Next Article in Journal
Identification and Expression Profiling of the Cytokinin Synthesis Gene Family IPT in Maize
Previous Article in Journal
circ2LO: Identification of CircRNA Based on the LucaOne Large Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fossil or Non-Fossil: A Case Study in the Archaeological Wheat Triticum parvicoccum (Poaceae: Triticeae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Variations and Haplotype Diversity of the Wheat FRIZZY PANICLE (WFZP) Gene in 98 Aegilops tauschii Accessions

1
Laboratory for Research and Utilization of Qinghai Tibet Plateau Germplasm Resources, Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences of Qinghai University (Qinghai Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences), Xining 810016, China
2
Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
3
Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China
4
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2025, 16(4), 414; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16040414
Submission received: 4 March 2025 / Revised: 28 March 2025 / Accepted: 28 March 2025 / Published: 31 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Gene Mining and Breeding of Wheat)

Abstract

:
Background: The wheat FRIZZY PANICLE (WFZP) gene is a regulatory hub that controls spikelet formation in bread wheat, WFZP-D, as a favorable gene for wheat yield improvement. The sequences of WFZP-D in bread wheat accessions are known to be highly conserved. Methods: In this study, re-sequencing of WFZP homoeologous genes from 98 widely distributed Aegilops tauschii (the donor of the wheat D genome) germplasms was carried out to identify natural variations at both the nucleotide and polypeptide levels. Conclusions: WFZP homeolog exhibited high conservation with no functional variants in the key AP2/ERF domain. Haplotype characterization identified five haplotypes (Hap-D1 to Hap-D5) based on nine single-nucleotide polymorphisms, five of which induced single amino acid residue substitutions downstream of the AP2/ERF domain. Hap-D1 (identical to Triticum aestivum WFZP-D) and Hap-D2 are two most common. Hap-D1 is concentrated in Iran and Azerbaijan, primarily associated with ssp. strangulata, while Hap-D2 displays broad distribution across the range and primarily belongs to ssp. tauschii. The remaining haplotypes (Hap-D3/4/5) are identified in ssp. tauschii accessions. These findings suggest that strategic integration of ssp. tauschii into wheat-breeding programs could enhance genetic diversity. The identified natural variations provide potential haplotype resources for improving wheat yield potential.

1. Introduction

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L., AABBDD, 2n = 6x = 42) is a crucial cereal crop and provides about 40% of calories for the human population (http://faostat.fao.org, accessed on 5 May 2022). Enhancing wheat yield potential and stability is a priority for global food security. Grain yield is mainly determined by the number of grains produced in each inflorescence [1] and is a multi-factorial trait determined by multiple quantitative trait loci (QTLs). The number of fertile spikelets per spike is a determinant of the final grain number per spike at harvest and is determined early during reproductive development; it is also less affected by later environmental conditions [2] and has the highest heritability. Several key genes have been identified as regulators of spikelet number, such as the major genes of the flowering pathway [3], including Photoperiod-1 (Ppd-1) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), LEAFY (LFY) [4], WHEAT ORTHOLOG OF APO1 (WAPO1) [4], and Compositum2 (COM2) genes [5,6]. Among them, Ppd-1 is a key regulator of inflorescence architecture and paired spikelet development in wheat by regulating the expression of the FT to increase spikelet number [6]. Insensitivity allele Ppd-1a decreases the number of spikelets per spike by shortening the pre-anthesis period [7,8,9]. FT mutations contribute to increased spikelet number but delay the heading date [10,11]. While Specific combinations of LFY and WAPO1 natural alleles increase spikelet number per spike in wheat, loss-of-function mutations in LFY or its interacting protein WAPO1 significantly reduce the rate of formation of spikelet meristems [4]. The Compositum2 (COM2) gene encodes the APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF TF), which was identified in compositum (com) barley mutants with branched spikes and plays a crucial role in the determination of spikelet meristem fates and shoot meristem identity [5,6].
Recently, numerous major and stably expressed QTLs for supernumerary spikelets were also detected in the short arms of 2D chromosomes, especially those close to the wheat COM2 orthologue (WFZP) genomic region [12,13,14]. WFZP, as a COM2 orthologue in wheat-encoding class II AP2/ERF TF, has been characterized by the analysis of wheat multirow spikes (mrs1 mutants) [15]. WFZP is a homoallelic series of loci in the short arms of the 2A, 2B, and 2D chromosomes of bread wheat: WFZP-A, WFZP-B, and WFZP-D, respectively. Simultaneous mutations in the coding regions of WFZP-A and WFZP-D, coupled with transposable element (TE) insertions in the WFZP-B promoter region, lead to a severe multirow spike [15]. Recently, it was confirmed that in the endemic Tibetan wheat variety Zang734, which exhibits typical multirow spikes with three spikelets per rachis node (defined as triple spikelets), the null mutation in WFZP-A and complete deletion of WFZP-D trigger triple spikelets [16]. Moreover, in wfzp-d single mutants, the spikelet/grain numbers per spike also significantly increased, but the spike architecture was completely normal. Furthermore, natural sequence variations were screened in 228 hexaploid wheat cultivars, and the WFZP-D locus exhibited no sequence variations in any of the wheat accessions, indicating an extremely low variation rate in wheat WFZP-D [16]. The transfer and harnessing of potential WFZP-D natural variations from donor species in wheat may be useful for genetic manipulations by increasing spikelets.
Aegilops tauschii (DD, 2n = 2x = 14) is the donor of the bread wheat D genome [17,18,19,20], as well as a pivotal genome in several Aegilops tetraploid and hexaploid species [21]. This species is adapted to a wide range of environments, and its distribution range stretches from West Turkey to East China [20,22]. The use of diverse accessions from different geographical origins as donors is important in identifying as many alleles or haplotypes as possible [23,24]. Synthetic hexaploid wheat (SHW) was produced by crossing T. turgidum with Ae. tauschii, and these plants exhibit many valuable agronomic characteristics, such as high grain weight and spikelet number or large kernels and spikes [25,26,27]. SHW is known to be an effective genetic resource for the utilization of natural variations from donor species to bread wheat [26,27]. Here, we describe the identification of the natural variation in donor species Ae. tauschii germplasms for the WFZP homeolog gene across diverse geographical distributions and to provide genetic resources for effective introduction and utilization in wheat yield improvement.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The plant materials comprised randomly chosen 98 Ae. tauschii accessions that collectively encompassed a wide geographic distribution (Table S1). The materials were grown in the field at the Wenjiang Experimental Station of Sichuan Agricultural University in Chengdu, China. A distribution map of accessions was created based on the origin or geographic coordinates of the accessions, using the map_data package and the ggplot2 package for R (ver. 3.4) [28].

2.2. Primer Design, Plant DNA Amplification and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from freshly harvested leaves using a plant genomic DNA kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Relevant PCR primers were designed based on the WFZP homeolog (AET2Gv20232900) in Ae. tauschii from the EnsemblPlants database (http://plants.ensembl.org/index.html (accessed on 27 March 2025)) by utilizing DNAMAN v6.0 (Lynnon Biosoft, Vaudreuil, QC, Canada) software. The WFZP-D sequence of Ae. tauschii was amplified using the primers WFZP-8F (5′-CTCCATAGTGAGCACTACC-3′) and WFZP-8R (5′-GCCTCTCGAGTACTCTCG-3′) (1478-bp amplicon). The amplicons were performed using a Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler (ABI, Waltham, MA, USA). Amplification of the DNA was carried out in 20 µL reactions containing 1 µL (10 µmol/L) of each primer, 1 µL (100 ng/µL) of template DNA, 10 µL of 2 × Taq Master Mix (Dye Plus) (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), and 7 µL double-distilled (dd) H2O. Each reaction was exposed to a denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 39 cycles of 95 °C/40 s, 61 °C/45 s, 72 °C/100 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplicons were electrophoresed on a 1.0% agarose gel in 1 × TAE buffer (0.04 mol/L Tris base, 0.02 mol/L acetic acid, and 1.0 mmol/L EDTA) and were visualized under UV light with ethidium bromide. The PCR products (1478 bp) were purified and sequenced directly using Sanger ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems) by Qingke (Chengdu, China).

2.3. Protein 3D Modeling Prediction

To predict the protein 3D structure, we used AlphaFold v2.1, an open-source code [29]. We input the amino acid sequence into AlphaFold v2.1 and obtained five unrelaxed models, five relaxed models, and five ranked models in pdb format. Among these output models, the ranked_1.pdb model had the highest confidence, as indicated by the best Local Distance Difference Test (lDDT) score, and was therefore utilized. The structural graphics and the positions of amino acid substitutions were visualized using PyMOL (v. 2.6.0a0).

2.4. Sequence Alignments and Phylogenetic Study

Multiple sequence alignments at both the nucleotide and predicted polypeptide levels were conducted by DNAMAN v6.0 software (Lynnon Biosoft, Vaudreuil, QC, Canada). The FZP homologous sequences obtained from the National Center Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), including WFZP-A of T. aestivum (MH544619), T. turgidum (MH544637), T. dicoccoides (XM037625360), T. urartu (XM048704520) and T. monococcum (MH544636), WFZP-B of T. aestivum (MH544628) and T. dicoccoides (XM037626174), Hordeum vulgare FZP (XM045113517), Lolium rigidum FZP (XM047207198), Brachypodium distachyon FZP (XM003559789), Oryza sativa FZP (MN387799), Sorghum bicolor FZP (XM002463317), Zea mays FZP (XM008672421), Arabidopsis thaliana FZP (NM120840), and haplotypes of WFZP-D (including T. aestivum) were used to construct the phylogenetic trees. The neighbor-joining method in MEGA v11 software was used to construct the Phylogenetic trees [30], with bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates.

3. Results

3.1. Ae. tauschii WFZP-D: Nucleotide Sequence Polymorphism

The highly conserved WFZP homoeologous sequences from 98 Ae. tauschii accessions were deposited in GenBank as accession PP907061 to PP907065 (Table S1). All homeologs had one exon according to the annotation of T. aestivum WFZP-D (MH544629) and the sequence of the coding region was 942 bp without variations. Nine single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci were detected, all of which were located outside of the AP2/ERF domain. Only five of these nine SNPs resulted in an altered peptide sequence (Figure 1). The 9 SNPs were used to divide the 98 homeologs into five haplotypes (Table S1, Figure 1 and Figure 2). Hap-D2, as the most common haplotype, was present in 49 accessions, the majority of which belonged to ssp. tauschii, except for five accessions. Hap-D2 was widely distributed among accessions from other countries, namely Afghanistan (13 accessions), Pakistan (8 accessions), Turkey (4 accessions), Iran (4 accessions), Armenia (3 accessions), Azerbaijan (3 accessions), and Uzbekistan (2 accessions). Hap-D1 was the same as the T. aestivum WFZP-D haplotype and existed in 44 accessions, the majority of which belonged to ssp. strangulata and were mainly distributed in Iran and Azerbaijan. Hap-D3 was present in three accessions and mainly located in Iran, while both Hap-D4 and Hap-D5 were present in only one accession. Hap-D3, Hap-D4, and Hap-D5 belonged to ssp. tauschii.

3.2. Ae. tauschii WFZP-D: Peptide Sequences

At the polypeptide sequence level, the five haplotypes from Ae. tauschii were classified into four distinct polypeptides. Polypeptide alignment of WFZP homeolog proteins is shown in Figure 3. The predicted proteins from the nucleotide sequences of Hap-D1 and Hap-D4 had the same polypeptide and were termed the Hap-1 polypeptide haplotype, while the predicted proteins of the nucleotide sequences of Hap-D2, Hap-D3, and Hap-D5 were named Hap-2, Hap-3, and Hap-4, respectively. The predicted protein of WFZP-D (MH544629) in bread wheat was indistinguishable from that of Hap-1. The E to K mutation (wfzp-D.1) and premature termination codon mutation (wfzp-D.2) in the AP2/ERF domain (Figure 3) caused supernumerary spikelet and multirow spike phenotypes in wheat, respectively [15]. All WFZP homeologs shared conserved key features of AP2/ERF proteins (boxed in Figure 3). Five altered amino acids were found downstream of the AP2/ERF domain. One altered amino acid was different from that of bread wheat (Hap-1) in Hap-3, an N to T change occurred at position 126. Three altered amino acids were from A to T at position 123, from A to V at position 144, and from A to S at position 184 in Hap-2 and Hap-4. The remaining one altered amino acids was from D to N at position 238 in Hap-4 (Figure 3).
To predict the 3D structure of WFZP-D, a detailed analysis revealed that mutations were observed in specific regions of the AP2/ERF domain (Figure 4). Specifically, in WFZP-D.1, a mutation occurred in the β-sheet region, while in WFZP-D.2, the mutation was found in the α-helix region. These mutations within the key structural domains of the protein suggest potential alterations in its functional properties. Additionally, mutations were identified in the Hap-1, Hap-2, Hap-3, and Hap-4 regions at distinct positions within the protein sequence; however, these mutations did not significantly affect the overall conformation of the protein.

3.3. Phylogeny of the WFZP Homoeologs

Phylogeny based on nucleotide sequences of wheat WFZP homeolog genes (Figure 5) revealed that each of the three homeologs from Triticum, Ae. tauschii, and barley were divided into three clades. The groups from the A and B genome were more closely related to each another than to the D genome and barley group. Among the homeologs from the D genome group, two subgroups were recognizable: one clustered the sequences Hap-D1 (including T. aestivum), Hap-D3, and Hap-D4, and the other clustered the sequences of Ae. tauschii Hap-D2 and Hap-D5. The homologous sequence of cereal, including Ae. tauschii, Triticum, Hordeum, Lolium, Brachypodium, Oryza, Sorghum, and Zea, clustered into one large clade and showed that they were phylogenetically closely related to one another. The FZP homologous sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana (NM120840) was used as the outgroup.

4. Discussion

Increasing spikelet number could be an effective strategy for increasing wheat yield [31,32,33]. To date, several crucial genes that regulate the spikelet number in wheat have been reported. For example, Ppd-1 is a member of the pseudoresponse regulator (PRR) gene family that controls photoperiod sensing and heading date in wheat. It acts as a key regulator of inflorescence architecture and spikelet formation by modulating the expression of FT and other inflorescence determination genes [3]. Mutations in the insensitivity allele (Ppd-1a) are associated with a photoperiod-insensitive phenotype [34,35]. Ppd-1a decreases the number of spikelets per spike [7,9,35,36,37,38,39,40] by shortening the floret initiation phase [8,41,42]. Furthermore, Ppd-1a in common wheat enables it to adapt to different environmental changes [37], corresponding to variations in photoperiod response adapted to different environments [43]. Although the photoperiod-sensitive phenotype ppd is a potential means to increase wheat yield potential, it is difficult to utilize this phenotype for effective breeding. While FT mutations have been shown to contribute to increased spikelet number, they also delay the heading date [10,11]. The allele combination of LFY and WAPO1 can be used in wheat breeding, but specific combinations need to be identified and then assembled [4]. As a regulative hub for controlling spikelet formation in bread wheat, WFZP is a favorable gene for yield improvement [15,16]. WFZP represses the expression of the spikelet-formation gene TaBA1 by acting on its promoter [16]. It has been confirmed that the null mutation in WFZP-A and complete deletion of WFZP-D triggered triple spikelets in the endemic Tibetan wheat variety Zang734, which exhibits triple spikelet per rachis node [16]. Surprisingly, wfzp-d single mutants exhibited increased spikelet/grain numbers per spike and completely normal spike architecture [16]. Moreover, no sequence variations were detected in wheat WFZP-D in 228 hexaploid wheat cultivars [16]. This finding suggests that exploring natural variations in WFZP-D is a potential means for achieving high yield by increasing spikelets.
The Ae. tauschii population harbors rich haplotypic diversity. Structural analysis revealed that WFZP homoeologous sequences from Ae. tauschii accessions contain a single exon, with sequence variations predominantly localized outside the AP2/ERF domain (Figure 1). We identified five haplotypes based on nine SNPs, four of which induced single amino acid substitutions (Figure 1, Figure 3 and Figure 4). Notably, mutations within conserved AP2/ERF domains (e.g., maize bd1 and rice FZP) are known to trigger premature stop codons or nonfunctional proteins, altering inflorescence architecture [44,45]. A 4-bp deletion in the 5′-regulatory region of FZP decreased its transcriptional activity and significantly increased the number of secondary branches and grain yield in rice [46]. Furthermore, WFZP exhibits dual roles to promote nitrogen utilization, through modulating root systems and the expressions of N-related genes [47]. Therefore, the potential value of a newly discovered altered peptide sequence from Ae. tauschii is worth evaluating in the future.
Previous studies have revealed that WFZP-A/WFZP-D double mutants display compromised agronomic performance compared to single mutations (WFZP-A or WFZP-D), indicating a gene dosage-dependent regulatory mechanism of WFZP in maintaining optimal developmental traits [16]. Building on these findings, we propose a future research strategy involving the knockout of WFZP-A coupled with the overexpression of WFZP-D to evaluate whether this genetic manipulation further enhances agronomic traits. This dual approach offers significant potential for elucidating the role of WFZP in regulating spike development and related traits in wheat. Consistent with prior evidence linking Ae. tauschii ssp. strangulata to the D-genome origin of bread wheat [48,49,50,51], our analysis revealed complete congruence between Hap-D1 and the T. aestivum WFZP-D haplotype. This congruence was observed in 44 accessions predominantly classified as ssp. strangulata (Figure 2 and Table S1). Notably, newly identified haplotypes including Hap-D2 have not been found in common wheat varieties, the vast majority of which belonged to ssp. tauschii, except for five accessions. Hap-D3, Hap-D4, and Hap-D5 also belonged to ssp. tauschii. Furthermore, geographic analysis of 90 accessions with verified origin data (Figure 2 and Table S1) demonstrated exclusive distribution of Hap-D1 in Iran and Azerbaijan. To elucidate the tripartite relationship between WFZP-D gene variants, Ae. tauschii subspecies, and their biogeography, future investigations should prioritize expanded sampling with precise geographic metadata.

5. Conclusions

The wheat FRIZZY PANICLE (WFZP) gene serves as a regulatory hub controlling spikelet formation in bread wheat. More importantly, WFZP-D has been identified as a favorable gene for wheat yield improvement. Analysis of WFZP-D was conducted across 98 widely distributed accessions of Ae. tauschii, donor of the wheat D genome. This analysis revealed the presence of five haplotypes, distinguished by nine single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), with four of these SNPs resulting in single amino acid substitutions outside the AP2/ERF domain. Notably, WFZP homeolog in Ae. tauschii are highly conserved. The distribution of these haplotypes is noteworthy: Most accessions carrying Hap-D1 (which shares the same sequence as T. aestivum WFZP-D) are concentrated in a specific region, whereas the majority of accessions with Hap-D2 are widely distributed from Turkey to Kyrgyzstan. These Hap-D2 accessions primarily belong to ssp. tauschii, with only five exceptions. Furthermore, Hap-D2, the most prevalent haplotype, contains five single-nucleotides variations. The effective utilization of the genetic resources present in ssp. tauschii, which exhibit high sequence variation, are very important for transferring these genes to widely cultivated wheat species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes16040414/s1, Table S1: Source of germplasm utilized.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N. and S.L.; methodology, S.N. and R.T.; software, S.N. and R.T.; formal analysis, S.N. and S.L.; investigation, R.T., J.L. and F.Y.; resources, J.L., S.Y., J.S., Q.C., X.W. and D.S.; data curation, R.T., S.N. and S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.N. and R.T.; writing—review and editing, S.N., R.T. and W.C.; supervision, W.C. and S.N.; funding acquisition, W.C. and S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Open Project of Laboratory for Research and Utilization of Qinghai Tibet Plateau Germplasm Resources (2023-SYS-03), Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding (2023-1-1-003), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2023NSFSC0218), the Project of Qinghai Science and Technology Department (2024-ZJ-705) and the Qinghai Provincial Association for Science and Technology Young Talents Lifting Project (2022QHSKXRCTJ32).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are openly available in NCBI GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under accession numbers PP907061 to PP907065.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yaxi Liu (Sichuan Agricultural University) for providing the Ae. tauschii accessions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sakuma, S.; Schnurbusch, T. Of foral fortune: Tinkering with the grain yield potential of cereal crops. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1873–1882. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, J.; Gizaw, S.; Bossolini, E.; Hegarty, J.; Howell, T.; Carter, A.; Akhunov, E.; Dubcovsky, J. Identification and validation of QTL for grain yield and plant water status under contrasting water treatments in fall-sown spring wheats. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 1741–1759. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boden, S.A.; Cavanagh, C.; Cullis, B.R.; Ramm, K.; Greenwood, J.; Finnegan, E.J.; Trevaskis, B.; Swain, S.M. Ppd-1 is a key regulator of inflorescence architecture and paired spikelet development in wheat. Nat. Plants 2015, 1, 14016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, J.; Burguener, G.F.; Paraiso, F.; Dubcovsky, J. Natural alleles of LEAFY and WAPO1 interact to regulate spikelet number per spike in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2024, 137, 257. [Google Scholar]
  5. Poursarebani, N.; Seidensticker, T.; Koppolu, R.; Trautewig, C.; Gawroński, P.; Bini, F.; Govind, G.; Rutten, T.; Sakuma, S.; Tagiri, A.; et al. The genetic basis of composite spike form in barley and ‘Miracle-wheat’. Genetics 2015, 201, 155–165. [Google Scholar]
  6. Poursarebani, N.; Trautewig, C.; Melzer, M.; Nussbaumer, T.; Lundqvist, U.; Rutten, T.; Schmutzer, T.; Brandt, R.; Himmelbach, A.; Altschmied, L.; et al. COMPOSITUM 1 contributes to the architectural simplification of barley inflorescence via meristem identity signals. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. González, F.G.; Slafer, G.A.; Miralles, D.J. Pre-anthesis development and number of fertile florets in wheat as affected by photoperiod sensitivity genes Ppd-D1 and Ppd-B1. Euphytica 2005, 146, 253–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ochagavía, H.; Prieto, P.; Savin, R.; Griffiths, S.; Slafer, G.A. Dynamics of leaf and spikelet primordia initiation in wheat as affected by Ppd-1a alleles under field conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 2621–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ning, S.; Zhao, L.; Li, S.; Li, S.; Zang, T.; Liu, Y.E.; Yang, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Yi, Y.; et al. Delays in heading and improvements in both spikelet number and spike length are associated with the Aegilops tausschii photoperiod-sensitive ppd-D1b allele. Cereal Res. Commun. 2023, 51, 593–601. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Z.; Ke, W.; He, F.; Chai, L.; Cheng, X.; Xu, H.; Wang, X.; Du, D.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, X.; et al. A single nucleotide deletion in the third exon of FT-D1 increases the spikelet number and delays heading date in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 920–933. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, Y.; Xiong, H.; Guo, H.; Xie, Y.; Zhao, L.; Gu, J.; Li, H.; Zhao, S.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, C.; et al. A gain-of-function mutation at the C-terminus of FT-D1 promotes heading by interacting with 14-3-3A and FDL6 in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2025, 23, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Deng, M.; Wu, F.; Zhou, W.; Li, J.; Shi, H.; Wang, Z.; Lin, Y.; Yang, X.; Wei, Y.; Zheng, Y.; et al. Mapping of QTL for total spikelet number per spike on chromosome 2D in wheat using a high-density genetic map. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2019, 42, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ma, J.; Ding, P.; Liu, J.; Li, T.; Zou, Y.; Habib, A.; Mu, Y.; Tang, H.; Jiang, Q.; Liu, Y.; et al. Identification and validation of a major and stably expressed QTL for spikelet number per spike in bread wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 3155–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, Z.; Li, H.; Zhou, X.; Mou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, L.; Chen, X.; Wu, F.; Zhou, H.; Lin, Y.; et al. Identification, validation and candidate gene analysis of major QTL for Supernumerary spikelets in wheat. BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dobrovolskaya, O.; Pont, C.; Sibout, R.; Martinek, P.; Badaeva, E.; Murat, F.; Chosson, A.; Watanabe, N.; Prat, E.; Gautier, N.; et al. FRIZZY PANICLE drives supernumerary spikelets in bread wheat. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Du, D.; Zhang, D.; Yuan, J.; Feng, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Ke, W.; Li, R.; et al. FRIZZY PANICLE defines a regulatory hub for simultaneously controlling spikelet formation and awn elongation in bread wheat. New Phytol. 2021, 231, 814–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kihara, H. Discovery of the DD-analyser, one of the ancestors of Triticum vulgare. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 1944, 19, 889–890. [Google Scholar]
  18. McFadden, E.S.; Sears, E.R. The artificial synthesis of Triticum spelta. Rec. Genet. Soc. Am. 1944, 13, 26–27. [Google Scholar]
  19. McFadden, E.S.; Sears, E.R. The origin of Triticum spelta and its free-threshing hexaploid relatives. J. Hered. 1946, 37, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yen, C.; Yang, J.; Yuan, Z.; Ning, S.; Zhang, L.; Hao, M.; Liu, D. Biosystematics of Triticeae: Volume I. Triticum-Aegilops Complex; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kimber, G.; Yen, Y. Analysis of pivotal-differential evolutionary patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 9106–9108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van Slageren, M.W. Wild Wheats: A Monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub. & Spach) Eig (Poaceae); International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas, Agricultural University, Wageningen: Aleppo, Syria, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, F.; Shi, Y.; Ali, J.; Xu, J.; Li, Z. Breeding by selective introgression: Theory, practices, and lessons learned from rice. Crop J. 2021, 9, 646–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, D. Towards cultivar-oriented gene discovery for better crops. Crop J. 2024, 12, 670–675. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pritchard, D.J.; Hollington, P.A.; Davies, W.P.; Gorham, J.; de Diaz Leon, J.L.; Mujeeb-Kazi, A. K+/Na+ discrimination in synthetic hexaploid wheat lines: Transfer of the trait for K+/Na+ discrimination from Aegilops tauschii into a Triticum turgidum background. Cereal Res. Commun. 2002, 30, 261–267. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang, W.; Liu, D.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wei, H.; Hu, X.; Zheng, Y.; He, Z.; Zou, Y. Synthetic hexaploid wheat and its utilization for wheat genetic improvement in China. J. Genet. Genom. 2009, 36, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hao, M.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, L.; Dai, S.; Li, A.; Yang, W.; Xie, D.; Li, Q.; Ning, S.; Yan, Z.; et al. A breeding strategy targeting the secondary gene pool of bread wheat: Introgression from a synthetic hexaploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 2285–2294. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar]
  31. Brancourt-Hulmel, M.; Doussinault, G.; Lecomte, C.; Bérard, P.; Le Buanec, B.; Trottet, M. Genetic improvement of agronomic traits of winter wheat cultivars released in France from 1946 to 1992. Crop Sci. 2003, 43, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sreenivasulu, N.; Schnurbusch, T. A genetic playground for enhancing grain number in cereals. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Finnegan, E.J.; Ford, B.; Wallace, X.; Pettolino, F.; Griffin, P.T.; Schmitz, R.J.; Zhang, P.; Barrero, J.M.; Hayden, M.J.; Boden, S.A.; et al. Zebularine treatment is associated with deletion of FT-B1 leading to an increase in spikelet number in bread wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1346–1360. [Google Scholar]
  34. Shaw, L.M.; Turner, A.S.; Laurie, D.A. The impact of photoperiod insensitive Ppd-1a mutations on the photoperiod pathway across the three genomes of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant J. 2012, 71, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Bentley, A.R.; Horsnell, R.; Werner, C.P.; Turner, A.S.; Rose, G.A.; Bedard, C.; Howell, P.; Wilhelm, E.P.; Mackay, I.J.; Howells, R.M.; et al. Short, natural, and extended photoperiod response in BC2F4 lines of bread wheat with different photoperiod-1 (Ppd-1) alleles. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1783–1793. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Scarth, R.; Kirby, E.J.M.; Law, C.N. Effects of the photoperiod genes Ppd1 and Ppd2 on growth and development of the shoot apex in wheat. Ann. Bot. 1985, 55, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Worland, A.J.; Börner, A.; Korzun, V.; Li, W.M.; Petrovíc, S.; Sayers, E.J. The influence of photoperiod genes on the adaptability of European winter wheats. Euphytica 1998, 100, 385–394. [Google Scholar]
  38. Snape, J.W.; Butterworth, K.; Whitechurch, E.; Worland, A.J. Waiting for fine times: Genetics of flowering time in wheat. Euphytica 2001, 119, 185–190. [Google Scholar]
  39. Díaz, A.; Zikhali, M.; Turner, A.S.; Isaac, P.; Laurie, D.A. Copy number variation affecting the photoperiod-B1 and vernalization-A1 genes is associated with altered flowering time in wheat (Triticum aestivum). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Royo, C.; Dreisigacker, S.; Alfaro, C.; Ammar, K.; Villegas, D. Effect of Ppd-1 genes on durum wheat flowering time and grain filling duration in a wide range of latitudes. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 154, 612–631. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pérez-Gianmarco, T.I.; Slafer, G.A.; González, F.G. Wheat pre-anthesis development as affected by photoperiod sensitivity genes (Ppd-1) under contrasting photoperiods. Funct. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 645–657. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pérez-Gianmarco, T.I.; Slafer, G.A.; González, F.G. Photoperiod-sensitivity genes shape floret development in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1339–1348. [Google Scholar]
  43. Guo, Z.; Song, Y.; Zhou, R.; Ren, Z.; Jia, J. Discovery, evaluation and distribution of haplotypes of the wheat Ppd-D1 gene. New Phytol. 2010, 185, 841–851. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chuck, G.; Muszynski, M.; Kellogg, E.; Hake, S.; Schmidt, R.J. The control of spikelet meristem identity by the branched silkless1 gene in maize. Science 2002, 298, 1238–1241. [Google Scholar]
  45. Komatsu, M.; Chujo, A.; Nagato, Y.; Shimamoto, K.; Kyozuka, J. FRIZZY PANICLE is required to prevent the formation of axillary meristems and to establish floral meristem identity in rice spikelets. Development 2003, 130, 3841–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Huang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Fu, Y.; Sun, H.; Ma, X.; Tan, L.; Liu, F.; Sun, X.; Sun, H.; Gu, P.; et al. Variation in the regulatory region of FZP causes increases in secondary inflorescence branching and grain yield in rice domestication. Crop J. 2018, 96, 716–733. [Google Scholar]
  47. Du, D.; Li, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, H.; Tian, L.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; He, F.; et al. The Transcription Factor WFZP Interacts with the Chromatin Remodeler TaSYD to Regulate Root Architecture and Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency in Wheat. Adv. Sci. 2025; early view. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lagudah, E.S.; Appels, R.; Brown, A.D.H. The molecular-genetic analysis of Triticum tauschii, the D genome donor to hexaploid wheat. Genome 1991, 36, 913–918. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lubbers, E.L.; Gill, K.S.; Cox, T.S.; Gill, B.S. Variation of molecular markers among geographically diverse accessions of Triticum tauschii. Genome 1991, 34, 354–361. [Google Scholar]
  50. Dvorak, J.; Luo, M.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, H. The structure of Aegilops tauschii genepool and the evolution of hexaploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1998, 97, 657–670. [Google Scholar]
  51. Dvorak, J.; Deal, K.; Luo, M.; You, F.; Borstel, K.; Dehghani, H. The origin of spelt and free-threshing hexaploid wheat. J. Hered. 2012, 103, 426–441. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Haplotype variations in WFZP-D homeolog of D genome in the 98 accessions of Ae. tauschii. The grey box indicates the AP2/ERF domain. Exonic polymorphisms generating a changed peptide indicated in bold.
Figure 1. Haplotype variations in WFZP-D homeolog of D genome in the 98 accessions of Ae. tauschii. The grey box indicates the AP2/ERF domain. Exonic polymorphisms generating a changed peptide indicated in bold.
Genes 16 00414 g001
Figure 2. The distribution of the Ae. tauschii accessions used in the study and their allocation.
Figure 2. The distribution of the Ae. tauschii accessions used in the study and their allocation.
Genes 16 00414 g002
Figure 3. Alignment of the polypeptide sequences of WFZP-D homeolog. Polymorphisms generating a changed peptide compared with Hap-1 (T. aestivum WFZP-D haplotype) are indicated in red. The key feature of the AP2/ERF domain is shown in boxes. D.1 (MH544630) and D.2 (MH576978) are the sequences of the wfzp-D.1 (multirow spike) and wfzp-D.2 (supernumerary spikelet) mutations, respectively.
Figure 3. Alignment of the polypeptide sequences of WFZP-D homeolog. Polymorphisms generating a changed peptide compared with Hap-1 (T. aestivum WFZP-D haplotype) are indicated in red. The key feature of the AP2/ERF domain is shown in boxes. D.1 (MH544630) and D.2 (MH576978) are the sequences of the wfzp-D.1 (multirow spike) and wfzp-D.2 (supernumerary spikelet) mutations, respectively.
Genes 16 00414 g003
Figure 4. Protein structure prediction. Polymorphisms resulting in a changed peptide compared with Hap-1 are marked in green. The wfzp-D.1 (multirow spike) and wfzp-D.2 (supernumerary spikelet) mutations are marked in red; AP2/ERF domain is marked in golden yellow.
Figure 4. Protein structure prediction. Polymorphisms resulting in a changed peptide compared with Hap-1 are marked in green. The wfzp-D.1 (multirow spike) and wfzp-D.2 (supernumerary spikelet) mutations are marked in red; AP2/ERF domain is marked in golden yellow.
Genes 16 00414 g004
Figure 5. Phylogeny based on the full-length genomic sequence of A. thaliana, B. distachyon, L. rigidum, S. bicolor, O. sativa, Z. mays, H. vulgare, bread wheat, tetraploid wheat, diploid wheat, and Ae. tauschii WFZP homeologs using the neighbor-joining method. The FZP homologous sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana (NM120840) was used as the outgroup. Only bootstrap values (%) >50% are shown.
Figure 5. Phylogeny based on the full-length genomic sequence of A. thaliana, B. distachyon, L. rigidum, S. bicolor, O. sativa, Z. mays, H. vulgare, bread wheat, tetraploid wheat, diploid wheat, and Ae. tauschii WFZP homeologs using the neighbor-joining method. The FZP homologous sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana (NM120840) was used as the outgroup. Only bootstrap values (%) >50% are shown.
Genes 16 00414 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tao, R.; Li, S.; Liao, J.; Ye, F.; Yin, S.; Shen, J.; Cui, Q.; Wang, X.; Song, D.; Chen, W.; et al. Genetic Variations and Haplotype Diversity of the Wheat FRIZZY PANICLE (WFZP) Gene in 98 Aegilops tauschii Accessions. Genes 2025, 16, 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16040414

AMA Style

Tao R, Li S, Liao J, Ye F, Yin S, Shen J, Cui Q, Wang X, Song D, Chen W, et al. Genetic Variations and Haplotype Diversity of the Wheat FRIZZY PANICLE (WFZP) Gene in 98 Aegilops tauschii Accessions. Genes. 2025; 16(4):414. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16040414

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tao, Ruilong, Shengke Li, Jia Liao, Fahui Ye, Shuxiang Yin, Jicheng Shen, Qingshan Cui, Xinfeng Wang, Deguo Song, Wenjie Chen, and et al. 2025. "Genetic Variations and Haplotype Diversity of the Wheat FRIZZY PANICLE (WFZP) Gene in 98 Aegilops tauschii Accessions" Genes 16, no. 4: 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16040414

APA Style

Tao, R., Li, S., Liao, J., Ye, F., Yin, S., Shen, J., Cui, Q., Wang, X., Song, D., Chen, W., & Ning, S. (2025). Genetic Variations and Haplotype Diversity of the Wheat FRIZZY PANICLE (WFZP) Gene in 98 Aegilops tauschii Accessions. Genes, 16(4), 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16040414

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop