Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of Bioinformatics Pipelines for Enrichment Illumina Next Generation Sequencing Systems in Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Virus Strains
Next Article in Special Issue
An EHPB1L1 Nonsense Mutation Associated with Congenital Dyserythropoietic Anemia and Polymyopathy in Labrador Retriever Littermates
Previous Article in Journal
CRISPR DNA Base Editing Strategies for Treating Retinitis Pigmentosa Caused by Mutations in Rhodopsin
Previous Article in Special Issue
SLC25A12 Missense Variant in Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retrievers Affected by Cerebellar Degeneration—Myositis Complex (CDMC)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Association Analysis for Chronic Superficial Keratitis in the Australian Racing Greyhound

1
Greyhound Racing Victoria, 46-50 Chetwynd Street, West Melbourne, VIC 3003, Australia
2
Greyhound Adoption Program, Greyhound Racing Victoria, 298 Goulburn Valley Hwy, Seymour, VIC 3660, Australia
3
Faculty of Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
4
Sydney Informatics Hub, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
5
Australian Greyhound Working and Sporting Dog Veterinarians, 1662 Dandenong Road, East Oakleigh, VIC 3166, Australia
6
Faculty of Science, Sydney School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(8), 1328; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081328
Submission received: 28 June 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 23 July 2022 / Published: 26 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Canine Genetics)

Abstract

:
Chronic superficial keratitis (CSK) is a progressive inflammatory condition of the eye (cornea) that can cause discomfort and blindness. Differential disease risk across dog breeds strongly suggests that CSK has a genetic basis. In addition to genetic risk, the occurrence of CSK is exacerbated by exposure to ultraviolet light. Genome-wide association analysis considered 109 greyhounds, 70 with CSK and the remainder with normal phenotype at an age over four years. Three co-located variants on CFA18 near the 5′ region of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene were associated with genome-wide significance after multiple-test correction (BICF2P579527, CFA18: 6,068,508, praw = 1.77 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.017; BICF2P1310662, CFA18: 6,077,388, praw = 4.09 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.040; BICF2P160719, CFA18: 6,087,347, praw = 4.09 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.040) (canFam4)). Of the top 10 associated markers, eight were co-located with the significantly associated markers on CFA18. The associated haplotype on CFA18 is protective for the CSK condition. EGFR is known to play a role in corneal healing, where it initiates differentiation and proliferation of epithelial cells that in turn signal the involvement of stromal keratocytes to commence apoptosis. Further validation of the putative functional variants is required prior to their use in genetic testing for breeding programs.

1. Introduction

Chronic superficial keratitis (CSK) is a progressive inflammatory condition of the eye and cornea that if left untreated can result in complete blindness. Alternative names for the condition in the canine include pannus and Uberreiter’s syndrome [1]. Certain dog breeds express a higher prevalence of the disorder. For example, of 463 cases of the disorder observed in the Rocky Mountain region of the USA, more than 80% occurred in German shepherd dogs [1]. In the same study, greyhounds were also observed to express the disorder (1.3% of cases observed) but at an earlier age. The disorder has been reported to be present in 4% of retired racing greyhounds in the USA [2] but was unobserved in 2715 greyhounds treated in United Kingdom primary practices [3]. Variation in disease risk across breeds and disproportionate representation in greyhounds strongly suggests that CSK has a genetic basis [4]. Previous work has suggested that CSK risk may have dominant inheritance in the Australian Racing Greyhound [5]. Potential dominant inheritance is also supported by the appearance of the disorder in crossbreeds of German shepherd, which is another disproportionately affected breed [6]. In the German shepherd dog breed, candidate region analysis considering the Major Histocompatibility Complex has identified modest association between the disorder risk and locus homozygosity [7,8].
Ocular changes associated with CSK typically arise as raised, pigmented, and vascularized lesions that commence as temporal/lateral lesions demonstrating development in the anterior corneal stroma (Figure 1A) and grow towards the center of the eye (Figure 1B). If untreated, granular tissue may eventually cover the cornea and the entire ocular surface (Figure 1C). It is suggested in the literature that younger affected dogs tend to express vascular lesions and severe manifestation of the disorder while dogs that are older on first diagnosis more often display pigmented lesions and milder disease [9]. The age of onset in dogs averages 4 years with most animals first diagnosed between 3 and 6 years [1]. Greyhounds as young as 1–2 years of age can show symptoms [10].
The corneal stroma is a transparent, viscoelastic tissue that resides posterior to a layer of non-keratinized, stratified epithelial cells (the corneal epithelium) that provides protection of the corneal stroma from superficial injury. The stroma is composed of multiple layers of collagen fibrils and glycosaminoglycan embedded with some keratocytes, originating from the neural crest [11]. The stroma lies in between the anterior cuboidal single layer of basement membrane (Bowman’s membrane) that controls interactions between the epithelial and stromal cells, and a monolayered endothelium to the posterior (Descemet’s membrane) that regulates corneal hydration. The keratocyte role is to maintain the fundamental integrity of the stroma as well as the regulation of stromal homeostasis of collagens and proteoglycans in the extra-cellular matrix (ECM) [11]. While most insults to the stroma are initiated by damage to the epithelium, this has not been observed to be the case in canine CSK [9]. The affected cells in CSK–stromal keratocytes arise from the neural crest [11].
During normal stromal wound healing, keratocytes first must undergo apoptosis. Some keratocytes also undergo necrosis, while keratocytes adjacent to epithelial injury are triggered to proliferate, migrate, and become activated to commence healing. In their activated state, the keratocytes are known as fibroblasts. The fibroblasts differentiate into myofibroblasts and together, these two cell types secrete a matrix scaffold that aids healing. Damaged epithelial and/or stromal cells produce chemokines that trigger an influx of inflammatory cells (an inflammatory response) to clear the necrotic and apoptotic debris. The inflammatory response in turn promotes the intrusion of blood vessels (neo-vascularization) into the stromal tissue to support the immune activation. Healing is slowly achieved by the resorption of abnormal ECM and the reverse differentiation or removal of the myofibroblast cells [12]. When this process fails transparency is not restored, resulting in corneal opacity. Decreased apoptosis of inflammatory cells can result in pathological neo-vascularization [12].
Canine CSK is regarded as incurable. However, the ocular defects in affected animals are non-infectious and typically respond to topical steroid-based treatments (e.g., prednisolone or dexamethasone), and therefore CSK is regarded as an autoimmune disorder. The autoimmune hypothesis has been supported by evidence of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) involvement in German shepherd CSK [7,8] and gene expression patterns of cell infiltrates at the leading edge of the lesions [6]. MHC class II expression in the diseased eye cannot be conclusively regarded as the primary pathogenic cause of CSK. However, some authors believe it likely that MHC class II expression prolongs the inflammatory process in affected corneas and might provide an environment that favors the development of autoimmune reactions to antigens normally present in the canine cornea [13].
Evidence suggests that CSK risk is exacerbated by age, as well as exposure to environmental irritants such as smoke, ultra-violet light, and high altitude [10]. It is possible that an external agent may precipitate the primary lesion, triggering an alteration in the ocular immune response to self [14]. In humans, ocular keratitis may be precipitated by viruses [15]. Regardless of the initiating cause, it is very likely that a pathological immune response is responsible for the opacity and neovascularization that together characterize the CSK disorder.

2. Materials and Methods

Blood or saliva samples from 109 Australian racing greyhounds, comprising 39 greyhounds over four years old with no observable ocular abnormality upon veterinary inspection (controls) and 70 individuals CSK affected in one or both eyes (cases), were collected in Australia under University of Sydney Animal Ethics Committee (Approval numbers: 2015/902; 2018/1442 and 2021/2005) (Table S1). Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA whole-blood samples using the PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quantity and quality was assessed using a NanoDrop2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA from blood spots applied to Whatman Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards was extracted by the genotyping provider (Neogen Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Performagene swab kit samples (DNAGenotek Inc., Kanata, ON, Canada) were purified with PG-L2P Performagene Purifier, and DNA was extracted following the protocol as described by the manufacturer.
DNA samples of 109 individuals were genotyped using the Illumina Canine 170K or 220K genotyping arrays (Neogen Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Three individuals were run on both 170K and 220K arrays to test for array calling concordance. Only the 220K arrays for the duplicated individuals were included in the main analyses. All duplicated individuals were CSK-affected. Genotyping markers (N = 1500) exhibiting the most disparate calls between the animals genotyped on both array types were excluded.
Illumina HiSeq whole-genome sequences were generated for three animals: one CSK affected (ID 1455); one control (ID 3181); and one with unknown CSK sequenced for a different study (ID 3343) using 100 base paired-end TruSeq libraries (Ramaciotti Centre for Functional Genomics, Kensington, NSW, Australia) at 30× coverage and with a 250 base pair insert size. Two of these individuals were included in the array-based genotyping. The restriction of the association analysis to animals phenotyped for CSK meant that ID 3343 was not included in the genome-wide association analysis.
Standard case–control genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) was conducted using Plink [16]. Data were quality filtered for marker call rate (--geno 0.1) and minor allele frequency (--maf 0.05). Individuals with more than 30% missing calls were excluded. This value allowed for animals with 170K array data (by default 23% missing calls relative to animals with 220K arrays) to remain in the analysis. Case–control analysis included only the animals with observed CSK phenotype (70 cases and 39 controls). Variants were regarded as genome-wide significant if they exhibited pgenome < 0.05. Multiple test correction was based on the Bonferroni statistic from applying the adjusted flag (--adjusted) in the PLINK association analysis.
Genotypes for individual chromosomes exhibiting genome-wide significance were extracted and analyzed separately using Haploview [17] to detect haplotype-based association. The same quality filtering was applied to the refined set of markers.
Fastq files prepared from paired-end sequencing reads of whole-genome sequenced animals were aligned with the UU_Cfam_GSD_1.0/canFam4 reference genome (canFam4) [18] using the Burrows Wheeler Aligner [19] and variants were called using standard pipelines using samtools, mpileup, and bcftools [20] as described previously [21].
Variant calls were captured for regions of association defined as 500Kb before and after genome-wide associated markers. Putative variant function for the linked variants was assessed after uploading variant call files (VCF) generated for chromosomal regions of interest from the whole-genome sequenced greyhounds as a custom track to the University of Santa Cruz genome browser (canFam4). The annotations used for comparison were the Uppsala University GSD1.0 gene annotations track (UU-GSD1) [18] and the “NCBI RefSeq genes, curated and predicted” available via the Variant Annotation Integrator (VAI) tool [22]. Analysis considered variants in transcribed portions of protein coding genes and exon splice sites.
Local alignments were assessed via the Integrated Genomics Viewer (IGV) to detect potential novel repeat element insertion and structural variants in associated regions [23]. Wider frequency of putative functional variants was assessed using two public canine genotyping resource archives [24,25]. To assess variant frequency in wider dog populations, the UCSC Genome browser “Liftover” tool was used to locate features between the canFam4 and canFam3.1 reference genomes.

3. Results

3.1. Genome-Wide Association Analysis

From the primary association analysis on unstratified, phenotyped greyhounds, 66 cases and 39 controls passed quality filtering. Four dogs were lost due to poor genotyping rate. The GWAS included 98,271 markers (54,422 were removed due to missing calls, 66,435 variants removed due to minor allele frequency, and 226 variants removed due to Hardy–Weinberg exact test). The median Chi-squared value was 1.14 (Figure 2A,B).
From the primary analysis, three co-located variants (BICF2P579527, CFA18: 6,068,508, praw = 1.77 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.017; BICF2P1310662, CFA18: 6,077,388, praw = 4.09 × 10−7, pgenome= 0.040; BICF2P160719, CFA18: 6,087,347, praw = 4.09 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.040 (canFam4)) exhibited genome-wide significance after multiple-test correction. The three variants with genome-wide significance were tightly clustered near the first exon of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene (Figure 2C). Of the top 10 associated markers, eight were co-located within five megabases (Mb) of the three most significantly associated markers. Other markers represented in the top 10 came from chromosomes CFX: 8,930,555 and CFA3:47,190,469 (Table S2).

3.2. Variant Analysis

3.2.1. CFA18

The defined region of association spanned CFA18:5,568,508–6,587,347 (canFam4). This region contains five annotated protein coding genes: Protein Transport Protein Sec61 Subunit γ (SEC61G), EGFR, LanC-Like Protein 2 (LANCL2), Vesicular, Overexpressed In Cancer, Prosurvival Protein 1 (VOPP1), and Biliverdin-IX α-Reductase (BLVRA). The primary association signal on CFA18 was located close to a plausible positional candidate gene: EGFR. From the array-based genotyping, our expectation was that the control animal ID 3181 would harbor the associated protective haplotype as a heterozygote in the region of association. By array genotypes, affected individual 1455 and the unknown individual 3343 would share the homozygosity for the risk haplotype.
The greyhound whole-genome sequence alignments failed in the region of the first coding exons of EGFR and VOPP1 identified using the canFam4 reference assembly and the UU-GSD1.0 gene annotations. The two phenotyped individuals demonstrated inferior alignment to the individual 3343 that was sequenced with a later technology. The sequencing/alignment failure was presumed to be caused by locally high genomic G-C content.
Variant calling from the three greyhounds with whole genome sequencing identified 2863 variants in the significant association region (Table S3). Potential functional variants are shown in Table S4. Variants potentially affecting protein coding in the known genes (SEC61G, EGFR, LANCL2, VOPP1, and BLVRA) are shown in Table 1. The VAI identified 35 unique potentially functional variants based on the filtering criteria: 8 3′UTR, 1 5′UTR, 1 missense, 20 non-coding-transcript exon variants, 1 splice-region variant, and 4 synonymous coding variants (Table S4). In addition, a further 79 potentially functional variants were added by considering the UU-GSD1 functional annotations (43 3′-UTR, 8 5′-UTR, 1 stop codon variant, 1 splice-acceptor site variant, 1 synonymous coding variant, and a further 25 variants coded in long non-coding RNA or putative protein coding transcripts) (Table S4). The three genome-wide significant array markers are included in Table 1 and Table S4 for reference. Significant array markers (red bars), exonic variants (pink bars), and splice variants (pink bars) are included in Figure 2C.
Special attention was paid to the region in the 5′ region of EGFR since this was located close to the association signal. A splice site mutation affecting intron 2 of EGFR, NM_201283, CFA18:5,961,614 rs851737129G > C was observed. At this variant, the affected individual is homozygous for the reference allele that retains the “GG” splice-acceptor while the control and un-phenotyped individuals are heterozygous for the alternate allele altering the splice acceptor site to “CG”. One non-synonymous variant CFA18:6,110,158G > A NM_201283p.255R > Q in EGFR (new), predicted to be neutral by PROVEAN [26], was present as a heterozygote only in control ID 3181 (Table 1). One variant potentially affecting the stop codon for human transcript NM_001346897.2 CFA18: 6,154,817 rs397512405T > C was shown upon closer inspection to be likely not functional in the dog (reference codon sequence TAT, new sequence TAC). A second splice-region variant in EGFR (CFA18:6,115,276) and the potential stop-codon variant were heterozygous in both the case and control sequenced animals. The protective haplotype identified in the GWAS is present only in ID3181 as a heterozygote. This haplotype likely affects EGFR activity, either through splicing, or in combination with other variants that such as the non-synonymous variant. The presence of multiple potential functional variants in the EGFR gene may contribute to the complexity of the inheritance.

3.2.2. CFX

While no markers on CFX attained genome-wide significance, the imperfect association with the CFA18 locus invited us to consider other signals from the analysis. The fifth most associated marker in the analysis was located on the X chromosome CFX: 8,930,555 (canFam4) (variant BICF2G630538106). The association interval was defined as CFX:8,430,655–9,430,555 (canFam4) by allowing 500 Kb of linkage-disequilibrium with the most associated marker. The CFX region VCF for three greyhounds with whole genome sequence is provided in Table S5. The region includes five protein coding genes: FERM And PDZ Domain Containing 4 (FRMPD4), Phosphoribosyl Pyrophosphate Synthetase 2 (PRPS2), Toll-like Receptor 7 (TLR7), Toll-like Receptor 8 (TLR8), and Thymosin β 4 X-Linked (TMSB4X), including at least two genes that plausibly may affect CSK risk: the toll-like receptor genes (TLR7 and TLR8). Both genes have been shown to affect autoimmunity in mouse and human models including ocular allergic and autoimmune diseases [27]. Variant annotation from the three sequenced greyhounds identified missense variants in TLR8 (three missense variants). This region accounted for eight variants among the 50 most associated array variants, including four in the defined region of association. Other potentially functional variants were observed in the association region (Table S6). Strong divergence in the TLR8 gene between the affected ID 1455 and unaffected ID 3181 sequenced dogs was observed. All three observed missense variants CFX:g. 9,365,039 C > A, XM_005641119:.p.104P > T (no existing variant identifier), rs24607342, CFX:g.9,366,054G > A, XM_005641119.3:p.442G > S, and BICF2G630537785, CFX:g.9,366,787G > A, XM_005641119.3:p.686R > H, demonstrated divergence between the case and control sequenced animals. All observed missense variants in TLR8 are individually predicted to be benign/tolerated [26], though inherited as a haplotype they may affect the gene efficacy or specificity.

3.2.3. CFA3

On CFA3, CFA3:47,190,469 (canFam4) (TIGRP2P43485_rs9072900) is intergenic, lying in-between and five-prime to two genes: multiple C2 and transmembrane domain-containing protein 2 (MCTP2) (CFA3:46,324,673–46,460,165) and repulsive guidance molecule A precursor (RGMA) (CFA3:47,534,393–47,578,334). The associated marker was alone at this locus among the top 50 markers in the analysis. Genes in the vicinity have not been connected with corneal function and so this locus was excluded from further consideration.

3.3. Haplotype Risk

Risk of clinical disease for haplotypes on CFA18 and the most associated marker on CFX are shown in Table 2. Perfect association with CSK was not observed at either locus. Animals homozygous for the risk haplotype on CFA18 had 76% risk of exhibiting CSK. On CFX, equal numbers of male and female cases were observed and animals exhibiting only the risk allele had 71% risk of CSK.

4. Discussion

While the literature suggests that younger affected dogs tend to express vascular lesions and severe manifestation of the CSK disorder, routine screening that resulted in the cases used in this study detected predominantly milder lesions indicative of early signs of the disease. During observed management, the lesions were responding well to initial treatments with reduced progression of lesions across the cornea.
Associated markers on CFA18 were located near a gene with potential to impact the observed phenotype. EGFR is known to play a role in corneal healing, where it initiates differentiation and proliferation of epithelial cells that in turn signal the involvement of stromal keratocytes to commence apoptosis [12]. The CSK phenotype is not commonly understood to involve epithelial injury, as fluorescein staining of CSK affected eyes does not typically indicate the involvement of the epithelial ulceration in the disorder [9]. Despite no obvious epithelial injury, CSK affected eyes demonstrate mild to severe hyperplasia of the corneal epithelium and thickening of the epithelial basement membrane [28,29].
Throughout the CFA18 region of association with the CSK trait, we observed a considerable amount of genetic diversity among the three sequenced greyhounds that made phasing of haplotypes challenging. Poor alignment in the vicinity of the EGFR first exon hampered genotyping and validation in this region, which was the site of the strongest association signal. Two variants demonstrating the greatest concordance among those assessed for function in the sequenced greyhounds, were a splicing mutation (rs851737129G > C) affecting exon 2 of EGFR affecting the splicing of K28 with K29 and V30 in the protein (NM_201283), and a missense mutation in EGFR: CFA18: 6,110,158G > A EGFRp.255R > Q (new). At the rs851737129G > C variant, the affected sequenced dog had the wild-type allele while the control dog 3181 was heterozygous for the splicing variant that is rare in the broader canine population. Dampening the effect of EGFR may reduce the proliferation of epithelial cells. If the CSK phenotype is a result of an overactive wound healing process, then restricting the activity of this process might result in a less severe disease course.
Markers on CFX did not reach genome-wide significance but showed a sustained regional association that was the second most associated in the study. However, the X-chromosome locus includes three observed coding mutations in TLR8 and strong divergence in the sequence of TLR8 between the control (ID 3181) and affected (ID 1455) sequenced greyhounds. Toll-like receptor (TLR) genes are important components of the innate immune system, and their disruption is known to trigger autoimmune responses in other species [30]. In certain specific cellular conditions, TLR genes may be inappropriately activated by self-components of the cell, and this activation may lead to sterile inflammation and autoimmunity. TLR genes occur in classes that respond to various pathogenic characteristics. TLR8 is a part of a group of TLR genes that responds to nucleic acids, and particularly single-stranded RNAs (for example, viruses). In addition to a non-specific connection with autoimmune responses, TLR genes have been specifically connected with ocular keratitis in humans [15].
Typically, recessive X-chromosome disease variants generate a sex imbalance in the affected individuals, such that males are over-represented in the disease cohort. In our analysis, the balance between male and females in the affected cohort was very even (34 male and 36 female). Dominant modes of inheritance for X-chromosome traits can occur and, in this situation, females and males may both be affected equally. The defining feature of X-linked dominant inheritance is that males cannot transmit the trait to their sons. If the TLR8 signal is affecting CSK autoimmunity, it is likely that dominant inheritance is affecting the trait. Breeding of affected individuals is not encouraged by the breed community, although if the breeding occurred before the disorder became apparent (since age of onset is typically greater than four years) it might be possible that some parental animals could be affected. The limited pedigree information that we have for this cohort does not offer further information to answer this question as we have no parental animals recorded as affected in the pedigrees accessed. Currently, while the connection with autoimmunity is enticing, the direct connection between variants in TLR8 and CSK is unproven.

5. Conclusions

Genome-wide analysis in the Australian racing greyhound has identified a region on CFA18 that is significantly associated with risk of CSK. The associated haplotype identified by the analysis appears to reduce the risk of disease. The identified haplotype does not perfectly explain the disease in the Australian dogs and this suggests that other loci likely affect the condition in this breed. The characteristics of the CSK phenotype show strong concordance with the corneal wound healing process that is plausibly affected by the gene EGFR. A second association signal in the analysis that failed to reach genome-wide significance identified a toll-like receptor locus on the X chromosome. Toll-like receptor genes have been shown to control autoimmunity in a range of species. While both of the main loci identified in this analysis might play a role in the CSK disease, we propose that at this time, the use of the CFA18 and CFX loci for genetic testing is premature. Genetic research on this phenotype is continuing.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13081328/s1. Table S1. Characteristics of greyhound samples used in the current analysis. Table S2. Ten most associated markers by genome-wide association analysis. Table S3. Variant call file for associated locus on CFA18 including genotypes from three Australian racing greyhounds (1455-Case; 3181-Control; 3343-Unphenotyped). Table S4. Characteristics of 117 putative functional variants and array markers on CFA18 showing genotypes in three Australian racing greyhounds. Table S5. Variant call file for associated locus on CFX including genotypes from three Australian racing greyhounds (1455-Case, 3181-Control, 3343-Unphenotyped). Table S6. Putative functional variants in region of most associated marker on CFX-CFX:8,430,655–9,430,555 (canFam4).

Author Contributions

Conceived the project: C.M.W.; designed the sampling strategy: S.K., R.G., R.F. and C.M.W.; analyzed the data N.B., H.M., C.E.W., G.S. and C.M.W.; wrote the paper: C.M.W. and S.K.; read and contributed to the final manuscript: S.K., R.G., N.B., H.M., R.F., C.E.W., G.S. and C.M.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Greyhounds Australasia, and the Australian Greyhound Working and Sporting Dog Veterinarians. Grant RG802.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY (Protocol approval numbers: 2015/902; 2018/1442 and 2021/2005).

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Whole genome sequencing data connected with this project are available via the European Nucleotide Archive https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB53922 (22 July 2022).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Sydney Informatics Hub, a Core Research Facility, of the University of Sydney for technical assistance and access to the High-Performance Computing cluster ‘Artemis’. The authors also acknowledge support through the Australian BioCommons which is enabled by NCRIS via Bioplatforms Australia, as well as the use of the National Computational Infrastructure (NCI) supported by the Australian Government and the Sydney Informatics Hub HPC Allocation Scheme, supported by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research), University of Sydney and the ARC LIEF, 2019: Smith, Muller, Thornber, et al., Sustaining and strengthening merit-based access to National Computational Infrastructure (LE190100021). Special thanks to Denise Wigney who was instrumental in assisting with this project. We are grateful to the students who have contributed to this work, including Rhiarn Hoban, Suvanna Cheng, Dale Horne, and Jessica Gold. Finally, we wish to thank the greyhound owners and their veterinarians who have provided sample materials to assist this work.

Conflicts of Interest

RG provides veterinary services at the Greyhound Adoption Program and receives fees for that activity. SK is an employee of Greyhound Racing Victoria. RF, RG and SK are members of the Australian Greyhound Working and Sporting Dog Veterinarians special interest group of the Australian Veterinary Association.

References

  1. Slatter, D.H.; Lavach, J.D.; Severin, G.A.; Young, S. Uberreiter’s syndrome (chronic superficial keratitis) in dogs in the Rocky Mountain area—A study of 463 cases. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1977, 18, 757–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lynch, G.L. Ophthalmic examination findings in a group of retired racing Greyhounds. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2007, 10, 363–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. O’Neill, D.G.; Rooney, N.J.; Brock, C.; Church, D.B.; Brodbelt, D.C.; Pegram, C. Greyhounds under general veterinary care in the UK during 2016: Demography and common disorders. Canine Genet. Epidemiol. 2019, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chavkin, M.J.; Roberts, S.M.; Salman, M.D.; Severin, G.A.; Scholten, N.J. Risk factors for development of chronic superficial keratitis in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1994, 204, 1630–1634. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng, S.; Wigney, D.; Haase, B.; Wade, C.M. Inheritance of chronic superficial keratitis in Australian Greyhounds. Anim. Genet. 2016, 47, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Williams, D.L. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of canine chronic superficial keratitis. Res. Vet. Sci. 1999, 67, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jokinen, P.; Rusanen, E.M.; Kennedy, L.J.; Lohi, H. MHC class II risk haplotype associated with canine chronic superficial keratitis in German Shepherd dogs. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2011, 140, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Barrientos, L.S.; Zapata, G.; Crespi, J.A.; Posik, D.M.; Diaz, S.; It, V.; Peral-Garcia, P.; Giovambattista, G. A study of the association between chronic superficial keratitis and polymorphisms in the upstream regulatory regions of DLA-DRB1, DLA-DQB1 and DLA-DQA1. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2013, 156, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Stanley, R.G. Superficial stromal keratitis in the dog. Aust. Vet. J. 1988, 65, 321–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gannon, J.R.; Craig, A.M.; Fegan, D.P. Care of the Racing and Retired Greyhound, 1st ed.; American Greyhound Council: Abilene, KS, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yam, G.H.F.; Riau, A.K.; Funderburgh, M.L.; Mehta, J.S.; Jhanji, V. Keratocyte biology. Exp. Eye Res. 2020, 196, 108062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kamil, S.; Mohan, R.R. Corneal stromal wound healing: Major regulators and therapeutic targets. Ocul. Surf. 2021, 19, 290–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Williams, D.L. Major histocompatibility class II expression in the normal canine cornea and in canine chronic superficial keratitis. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2005, 8, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Campbell, L.H.; Okuda, H.K.; Lipton, D.E.; Reed, C. Chronic superficial keratitis in dogs: Detection of cellular hypersensitivity. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1975, 36, 669–671. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaur, A.; Kumar, V.; Singh, S.; Singh, J.; Upadhyay, N.; Datta, S.; Singla, S.; Kumar, V. Toll-like receptor-associated keratitis and strategies for its management. 3 Biotech. 2015, 5, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chang, C.C.; Chow, C.C.; Tellier, L.C.; Vattikuti, S.; Purcell, S.M.; Lee, J.J. Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 2015, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Barrett, J.C. Haploview: Visualization and analysis of SNP genotype data. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, 2009, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, C.; Wallerman, O.; Arendt, M.L.; Sundstrom, E.; Karlsson, A.; Nordin, J.; Makelainen, S.; Pielberg, G.R.; Hanson, J.; Ohlsson, A.; et al. A novel canine reference genome resolves genomic architecture and uncovers transcript complexity. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R.; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chew, T.; Willet, C.E.; Haase, B.; Wade, C.M. Genomic Characterization of External Morphology Traits in Kelpies Does Not Support Common Ancestry with the Australian Dingo. Genes 2019, 10, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hinrichs, A.S.; Raney, B.J.; Speir, M.L.; Rhead, B.; Casper, J.; Karolchik, D.; Kuhn, R.M.; Rosenbloom, K.R.; Zweig, A.S.; Haussler, D.; et al. UCSC Data Integrator and Variant Annotation Integrator. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 1430–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Thorvaldsdottir, H.; Robinson, J.T.; Mesirov, J.P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): High-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 2013, 14, 178–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jagannathan, V.; Drogemuller, C.; Leeb, T.; Dog Biomedical Variant Database Consortium. A comprehensive biomedical variant catalogue based on whole genome sequences of 582 dogs and eight wolves. Anim. Genet. 2019, 50, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Plassais, J.; Kim, J.; Davis, B.W.; Karyadi, D.M.; Hogan, A.N.; Harris, A.C.; Decker, B.; Parker, H.G.; Ostrander, E.A. Whole genome sequencing of canids reveals genomic regions under selection and variants influencing morphology. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Choi, Y.; Chan, A.P. PROVEAN web server: A tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 2745–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lambiase, A.; Micera, A.; Sacchetti, M.; Mantelli, F.; Bonini, S. Toll-like receptors in ocular surface diseases: Overview and new findings. Clin. Sci. 2011, 120, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Andrew, S.E. Immune-mediated canine and feline keratitis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2008, 38, 269–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eichenbaum, J.D.; Lavach, J.D.; Gould, D.H.; Severin, G.A.; Paulsen, M.E.; Jones, R.L. Immunohistochemical staining patterns of canine eyes affected with chronic superficial keratitis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1986, 47, 1952–1955. [Google Scholar]
  30. Farrugia, M.; Baron, B. The Role of Toll-Like Receptors in Autoimmune Diseases through Failure of the Self-Recognition Mechanism. Int. J. Inflam. 2017, 2017, 8391230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ocular changes observed in Chronic Superficial Keratitis. (A) Early stages: raised, pigmented, and vascularized lesions commence development in the anterior corneal stroma. (B) Intermediate stage: vascularized regions advance with the disease progression. (C) Severe stage: granular tissue may eventually cover the cornea and the entire ocular surface.
Figure 1. Ocular changes observed in Chronic Superficial Keratitis. (A) Early stages: raised, pigmented, and vascularized lesions commence development in the anterior corneal stroma. (B) Intermediate stage: vascularized regions advance with the disease progression. (C) Severe stage: granular tissue may eventually cover the cornea and the entire ocular surface.
Genes 13 01328 g001
Figure 2. Genome-wide association analysis for Chronic Superficial Keratitis in Australian racing greyhounds (Cases 66, Controls 39). (A) Quantile-quantile plot. (B) Manhattan plot (Lamda = 1.14). (C) Genes in the association region showing the three genome-wide significant markers (BICF2P579527, CFA18: 6,068,508, praw = 1.77 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.017; BICF2P1310662, CFA18: 6,077,388, praw = 4.09 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.040; BICF2P160719, CFA18: 6,087,347, praw = 4.09 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.040)) as red bars. Putative functional variants in exons and splice-sites are shown as pink bars. All possible functional variants including variants in UTRs and non-coding RNAs shown as black bars. All positions refer to canFam4.
Figure 2. Genome-wide association analysis for Chronic Superficial Keratitis in Australian racing greyhounds (Cases 66, Controls 39). (A) Quantile-quantile plot. (B) Manhattan plot (Lamda = 1.14). (C) Genes in the association region showing the three genome-wide significant markers (BICF2P579527, CFA18: 6,068,508, praw = 1.77 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.017; BICF2P1310662, CFA18: 6,077,388, praw = 4.09 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.040; BICF2P160719, CFA18: 6,087,347, praw = 4.09 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.040)) as red bars. Putative functional variants in exons and splice-sites are shown as pink bars. All possible functional variants including variants in UTRs and non-coding RNAs shown as black bars. All positions refer to canFam4.
Genes 13 01328 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of putative protein-coding variants and array markers on CFA18.
Table 1. Characteristics of putative protein-coding variants and array markers on CFA18.
Position on CFA18 (bp)5,961,6146,068,5086,077,3886,087,3476,110,1586,115,2766,154,817
Variant identifierrs851737129rs22613273rs22642459rs22653533..rs397512405
LocationEGFRARRAYARRAYARRAYEGFREGFREGFR
Featuresplice_region_variantintronicintronicintronicmissense_variantsplice_region_variantpotential stop codon
Reference allele aGACTGAT
Alternate allele (s)CGTCATC
USCF1455 (case)G GG GT TC CG GT AC T
USCF3181 (control)C GA GC TT CA GT AC T
Source of annotationUU-GSD1 aARRAY cARRAYARRAYVAI bVAIUU-GSD1
MAF722 d0.5520.3970.4320.3830.00091580.0630.132
MAF590 e0.4910.4790.4860.476-0.0360.074
a University of Uppsala GSD1.0/canFam4. b VARIANT ANNOTATION INTEGRATOR (VAI) Hinricks et al. (2016). c Illumina Canine Genotyping Array (170K and 220K). d Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) Plassais et al. (2019). e MAF Jagannathan et al. (2019).
Table 2. Haplotype risk for the CFA18- and CFX-associated markers.
Table 2. Haplotype risk for the CFA18- and CFX-associated markers.
CaseControlPenetrance
CFA18 Haplotype aHomozygous GAG (Risk18)65210.76
Heterozygous3160.16
Homozygous AGA (Low-risk18)010.00
Uncalled22
CFX:BICF2G630538106 bG G (RiskX)(Female) G (Male)63260.71
A G (Female only)350.38
AA (Low-riskX) (Female) A (Male)280.20
Uncalled20
InteractionRisk18/RiskX61150.80
Risk18/Low-riskX240.33
Low-risk18/RiskX00-
Low-risk18/Low-riskX010.00
Other7190.27
a BICF2P579527, CFA18: 6,068,508, praw = 1.77 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.017; BICF2P1310662, CFA18: 6,077,388, praw = 4.09 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.040; BICF2P160719, CFA18: 6,087,347, praw = 4.09 × 10−7, pgenome = 0.040. b BICF2G630538106, CFAX:8,961,843, praw = 2.85 × 10−6, pgenome = 0.28.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karamatic, S.; Goode, R.; Bageswaran, N.; Willet, C.E.; Samaha, G.; Ferguson, R.; Mazrier, H.; Wade, C.M. Genome-Wide Association Analysis for Chronic Superficial Keratitis in the Australian Racing Greyhound. Genes 2022, 13, 1328. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081328

AMA Style

Karamatic S, Goode R, Bageswaran N, Willet CE, Samaha G, Ferguson R, Mazrier H, Wade CM. Genome-Wide Association Analysis for Chronic Superficial Keratitis in the Australian Racing Greyhound. Genes. 2022; 13(8):1328. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081328

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karamatic, Steven, Rebecca Goode, Niruba Bageswaran, Cali E. Willet, Georgina Samaha, Ray Ferguson, Hamutal Mazrier, and Claire M. Wade. 2022. "Genome-Wide Association Analysis for Chronic Superficial Keratitis in the Australian Racing Greyhound" Genes 13, no. 8: 1328. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081328

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop