Next Article in Journal
Dual Molecular Diagnoses of Recessive Disorders in a Child from Consanguineous Parents: Case Report and Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Kinesin Family in Barley (Hordeum vulgare)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Novel Genes Associated with Fish Skeletal Muscle Adaptation during Fasting and Refeeding Based on a Meta-Analysis

by
Érika Stefani Perez
1,
Sarah Santiloni Cury
1,
Bruna Tereza Thomazini Zanella
1,
Robson Francisco Carvalho
1,
Bruno Oliveira Silva Duran
2 and
Maeli Dal-Pai-Silva
1,*
1
Department of Structural and Functional Biology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-689, Brazil
2
Department of Histology, Embryology and Cell Biology, Federal University of Goias (UFG), Goiania 74690-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(12), 2378; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122378
Submission received: 8 November 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 16 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Genes & Environments)

Abstract

:
The regulation of the fish phenotype and muscle growth is influenced by fasting and refeeding periods, which occur in nature and are commonly applied in fish farming. However, the regulators associated with the muscle responses to these manipulations of food availability have not been fully characterized. We aimed to identify novel genes associated with fish skeletal muscle adaptation during fasting and refeeding based on a meta-analysis. Genes related to translational and proliferative machinery were investigated in pacus (Piaractus mesopotamicus) subjected to fasting (four and fifteen days) and refeeding (six hours, three and fifteen days). Our results showed that different fasting and refeeding periods modulate the expression of the genes mtor, rps27a, eef1a2, and cdkn1a. These alterations can indicate the possible protection of the muscle phenotype, in addition to adaptive responses that prioritize energy and substrate savings over cell division, a process regulated by ccnd1. Our study reveals the potential of meta-analysis for the identification of muscle growth regulators and provides new information on muscle responses to fasting and refeeding in fish that are of economic importance to aquaculture.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

1.1. Fish and Skeletal Muscle

Fish are the most diverse living vertebrates on the planet, with important ecological and economic roles in many nations [1]. Regarding the fishing industry in Brazil, Piaractus mesopotamicus, popularly known as the pacu, is one of the most widely cultivated native species, with production in nine Brazilian states [2]. The popularity of pacu is associated with certain characteristics of the species, such as its robustness, high carcass yield, and good adaptation to artificial feeding [3]. In addition, improvements in management techniques developed through studies seeking to understand how aspects of the cultivation environment affect the development of this species have contributed to the high level of pacu production [4]. Recently published in vivo and in vitro studies explored the genetic attributes that regulate the fast growth and impressive musculature of this species [5,6], with the pacu presenting an excellent model for studies of the skeletal muscle [7].
The skeletal muscle constitutes more than 60% of the teleost body mass [8]. In addition to being one of the most frequently consumed tissues by humans, the skeletal muscle acts as a support system for the body, generating strength and movements, and represents a large reserve of amino acids for fish [9]. When faced with environmental stimuli, the muscle proteins (myofibrillar components) are degraded or synthesized, enabling muscle plasticity. The predominance of anabolic pathways in the tissue promotes fish muscle growth by increasing the size of the existing muscle fibers (hypertrophy) or forming new muscle fibers (hyperplasia). However, muscle loss occurs when catabolism exceeds protein synthesis [10,11]. In this context, the availability of nutrients is a factor that stimulates the remodeling of the skeletal muscle, given that the availability of food in nature changes over time and space [12]. Fasting periods are common in nature and fish farming, where periods of food restriction followed by refeeding are used as a compensatory growth strategy [13].
Fasting and refeeding studies conducted in our lab showed changes in the classical pathways that regulate the muscle protein balance in the pacu skeletal muscle, which is well-characterized in the literature [14,15,16]. First, during fasting, there is an increase in the expression of catabolic genes (murf1 and mafbx) and a loss of muscle mass. Then, during refeeding periods, muscle mass recovery occurs through the stimulation of anabolic genes (igf-1 and mtor) [17]. These observations are similar to those of studies carried out on Hippoglossus hippoglossus [18], Salmo salar [19], Oncorhynchus mykiss [20], and Paralichthys adspersus [21], demonstrating the effectiveness of these experimental protocols in observing the mechanisms of changes in the muscle phenotype. However, the regulators of the muscle phenotype in fish have not yet been fully identified, especially under challenging conditions.

1.2. Meta-Analysis

In finfish aquaculture, the maintenance of the fish muscle mass underpins the sector’s profitability. Thus, understanding the muscle phenotype regulators is essential in order to improve the management techniques. In this context, mRNA profiles in public databases may favor the exploration of markers involved in maintaining the skeletal muscle phenotype and its growth. Among the available methodologies for the mining of the public data to be analyzed, meta-analysis has been used in several areas of science as a statistical method that compiles, compares, and evaluates data from pre-existing and independent studies [22,23]. This methodology has already been used to study fish skeletal muscle in analyses of the metabolic capacity associated with the reduction in nutrients [24], to evaluate the seasonal variations in mercury concentration [25], and to recognize pacu as a species of fish with a high muscular expression of myoglobin [26]. However, to our knowledge, no meta-analysis studies have yet focused on evaluating the possible muscle growth mediators or the mechanism maintaining the muscle phenotype in fish.
Therefore, this work aimed to identify, through meta-analysis, novel genes associated with the growth and maintenance of the muscle phenotype. We investigated the expression levels of these genes during fasting and refeeding conditions in the pacu fish, Piaractus mesopotamicus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. In Silico Analysis

2.1.1. Integrative Meta-Analysis

The integrative meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA, http://www.prisma-statement.org/, accessed on 2 February 2020) [27]. The keywords used to search for the studies were: “fish AND skeletal muscle”, “fish skeletal muscle AND transcriptome”, “fish muscle AND transcriptomic”, “fish skeletal muscle AND transcriptomics”, and “fish skeletal muscle AND mRNA profiling”. The meta-analysis involved studies carried out between 2012 and 2016. The inclusion criteria were (1) studies using raw data on mRNAs from the white and red muscles of fish and (2) samples derived from fish of the Osteichthyes class alone. The exclusion criteria were (1) studies using genetic manipulation, (2) studies that did not use fish as a model, (3) studies using models of chronic disease, (4) studies that did not assess the skeletal muscle, (5) single-cell data, (6) cell culture data, (7) studies that did not contain transcriptomic data, (8) aging models, (9) studies based on fish of the Chondrichthyes class, and (10) studies based on insufficient differentially expressed genes (DEGs) or less than ten genes (Table S5). The GEO database’s datasets (NCBI) were used to search for and download skeletal muscle mRNA data from the included studies (Figure 1).

2.1.2. Analysis of the Microarray Data and Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)

Studies involving microarray data and their respective serial numbers were obtained from the GEO datasets. Since microarray experiments can be designed on two different platforms, including one-color or two-color arrays, specific analyses were applied for data from each platform. The raw data of the GSE84288 and GSE58929 datasets and the DEGs of GSE36339 and GSE47141 were downloaded and analyzed. For the analysis of these data in the one-color system, the GEO2R tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/, accessed on 1 June 2020) was used, which applies the same script (R 3.2.3, Biobase 2.30.0, GEOquery 2.40.0, limma 3.26.8) to all the datasets. To select the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in this system, adjusted p-values (padj) of <0.05 and a |fold change (FC)| of >1.5 were considered (Tables S6 and S7). For the analysis of the data in the two-color system [28], the DEGs were obtained through a list provided by the authors. They applied the difference in the log2 ER (expression ratio: Cy5/Cy3 or Cy3/Cy5) of zero between the chips to obtain these DEGs from this list, and we considered p < 0.05 for our DEGs (Tables S8 and S9). Cy5 and Cy3 are cyanines that emit fluorescence when there is a hybridization between the cDNA of the sample and the probe contained in the microarray chip.

2.1.3. Ontologies and Network of Molecular Interactions

Based on the DEGs of each dataset, the enrichment of the pathways was performed using the Fish EnrichR tool (https://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/FishEnrichr/, accessed on 15 July 2020). In this analysis, the lists of up- and downregulated genes were combined using the tool due to the similarity of the biological processes in which these genes take part. The Biological Process, Molecular Function, WikiPathway, and KEGG libraries were considered for the selection of the terms, considering the significance value of p < 0.05 (Fisher’s test) (Tables S1–S4). Based on the ontology of each dataset, an initial and individual analysis was performed to identify the most common pathways among the datasets (Tables S10–S14 and Figures S1–S4). These common pathways, being present in at least two datasets (Table S15), had their genes selected for the construction of a molecular interaction network using the STRING version 11 tool (https://string-db.org/, accessed on 25 August 2020). The databases, text mining, experiments, co-expression, and co-occurrence were considered as active interaction sources. The minimum interaction score required was the most reliable (0.900), and the p-value of the PPI enrichment indicated the statistical significance provided by STRING (<1.0 × 10−16). For a better visualization, the nodes without connections were hidden, and the names of the proteins were retained. Based on this network and with the support of the literature, key genes were selected for the investigation of the muscle of pacus (Piaractus mesopotamicus) subjected to fasting and refeeding conditions through RT-qPCR.

2.2. In Vivo Analysis

2.2.1. Ethics Statement and Animals

The experiments were carried out on animals and their muscle tissue from previous studies [6,16] according to the ARRIVE [29] guidelines and those of the Brazilian National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA). The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (protocol numbers 705 and 1050) of the Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. Early juvenile pacus weighing 12.6 g ± 2.24 and late juvenile pacus weighing 28.5 g ± 8.8 were obtained from the University of West São Paulo (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil, and cultivated at the Agribusiness Technology Agency (APTA), Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil. The fish were reared at 28 °C under a natural photoperiod (12 h light:12 h dark) in different recirculation systems in 0.5 m3 tanks containing 30 pacus. All the fish underwent a 15-day adaptation period with ad libitum food two to three times a day, following the diet previously described in the publications of our research group [6,16], before the start of the experiments.
After this adaptation period, the youngest fish (12.6 g ± 2.24) were separated into the following groups: control (C, with ad libitum feeding), fasting (F4d, fasting for four days) and refeeding (R3d, refeeding for three days after fasting). Meanwhile, the older fish (28.5 g ± 8.8) were divided into the following groups: control (C, with ad libitum feeding), fasting (F15d, fasting for 15 days), and refeeding (R6h, refeeding for six hours after fasting; R15d, refeeding for 15 days after fasting). Fish of different weights were selected to ensure that the investigations would cover different growth periods. In this context, the lengths of the fasting and refeeding periods were selected based on the size of the fish, considering that these nutritional changes would modify the muscle transcriptional signature without triggering the death of the fish before their experimental evaluation. In addition to these aspects, our research group has already obtained significant results by evaluating the classical genes of the skeletal muscle in these periods of fasting and refeeding in pacus [6,16], suggesting that evaluations of novel genes in these experimental models can be of great value for the area. After the experiments, the pacus were euthanized with excess benzocaine (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a concentration up to and exceeding 250 mg/L, and the fast-twitch muscles were collected from each experimental group (5 fish/experimental group). Afterward, these muscles were stored in a freezer at −80 °C until the beginning of the molecular analysis.

2.2.2. mRNA Expression

To investigate the genes selected in the in silico analysis, we extracted the total RNA from pacu muscle samples previously used in other experiments [6,16] using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. To quantify and analyze the purity of the extracted RNA, a NanoVueTM Plus spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, UK) was used, which provides these parameters through absorbance at 260 nm (amount of RNA) and 280 nm (amount of protein). To assess the integrity of the extracted RNA, 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and capillary electrophoresis were used with the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used, which provided an RNA integrity number (RIN) based on 28S and 18S ribosomal RNAs. The samples with a 260/280 ratio of ≥1.8 and RIN of ≥7 were considered for further analysis. To prevent any genomic DNA from contaminating the samples, the extracted RNA was treated with RQ1 RNase-Free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). RNA reverse transcription was performed using a GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription System (Promega, USA), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.
The expression level of the mRNAs was evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using the QuantStudio™ 12K Flex Real-Time PCR platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), with two technical and five biological replicates. All the qPCR reactions were performed according to the Minimum Information Guidelines for Publishing Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) [30]. The cDNA samples were amplified using a GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix (Promega, USA), and the primers for the respective targets (Table 1) were synthesized using Exxtend (BRA). The primers for rps27a (ribosomal protein s27a), eef1a2 (eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 2), ccnd1 (Cyclin D1), mtor (the mammalian target of rapamycin), and cdkn1a (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A) were designed based on the Piaractus mesopotamicus transcriptome obtained by our research group [5]. The tools used to design the primers were Primer3 v.0.4.067,68 (https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/, accessed on 20 October 2021) and NetPrimer (Premier Biosoft, San Francisco, CA, USA) (Table 1). The reactions were performed at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and annealing at 60 °C for 1 min. For the specific genes, such as eef1a2 and cdkn1a, the annealing temperature was changed to 65 °C so as to improve the reaction. The relative quantification of the gene expression was performed by the comparative CT method, 2ΔΔCt [31] using DataAssistTM v3.01 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), in which the expression was normalized based on the ppia mRNA, the expression of which remained constant among all the samples.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

For the gene expression analysis, comparisons were performed between the experimental groups of late juveniles C, F15d, R6h, and R15d, respectively, and between the early juvenile groups C, F4d, and R3d. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test was performed for all the genes evaluated, and one-way ANOVA tests with Tukey’s post-test were applied to the data with a normal distribution. The Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn post-test were applied to the data that did not have a normal distribution. The data are presented as the mean ± SD, and for all the tests, the statistical significance was set at 5% (p < 0.05) (software: GraphPad v.6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com, accessed on 26 November 2021).

3. Results

3.1. In Silico Analyzes

Four datasets using microarrays to study the gene expression were selected based on our meta-analysis. These datasets have their respective serial numbers identified in the database as GSE58929, GSE84288, GSE36339, and GSE47141. Fish of the Danio rerio species subjected to exercise, Salmo salar that consumed glucosinolates, Sparus aurata that consumed lipopolysaccharides, and Oncorhynchus mykiss subjected to exercise and a high-carbohydrate diet were the models of these studies, respectively. In total, 1906 upregulated genes and 617 downregulated genes were identified. For the GSE58929 dataset, 1516 upregulated genes and 215 downregulated genes were obtained, with 195 upregulated and 158 downregulated genes for GSE84288, 43 upregulated and 38 downregulated genes for GSE36339, and, finally, 152 upregulated and 206 downregulated genes for GSE47141 (Table 2). For the enrichment analysis, lists containing both the up- and downregulated genes of each dataset were used. The cellular processes most enriched in each dataset were mainly associated with ribosomes and the cell cycle and represented by terms such as cytoplasmic translation (GO:0002181), cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins_WP324, ribosome, positive regulation of the cell cycle (GO:0045787), and cell cycle_WP1393 (Tables S1–S4). These enriched terms, which are associated with protein synthesis and proliferation and were present in at least two datasets, were identified (Figure 2). Thus, the genes were selected and plotted in a molecular interaction network (Figure 3). Consequently, the genes obtained from the GSE84288 dataset were not present in the composition of the network, as they enriched cellular processes that did not match the objectives of the study.
In the interaction network, we observed different clusters of genes associated with the cell cycle (upper region of the network) and ribosomes (lower region), demonstrating the interaction between these two processes. Furthermore, such genes were responsible for enriching the common cellular processes of proliferation and protein synthesis in the different species subjected to different treatments (Figure 2).
From this network, key genes were selected by considering their topology and the possible importance of these genes for fish skeletal muscles, according to the literature. This selection involved rps27a, which connects the two large clusters of the network, and based on their close interactions, the other targets selected were ccnd1, cdkn1a, and eef1a2. The selected key genes were investigated using the fasting and refeeding conditions, which involve proliferation and protein synthesis processes and have great relevance in aquaculture.

3.2. mRNA Expression

3.2.1. Early Juvenile Pacus Subjected to Four Days of Fasting (F4d) and Three Days of Refeeding (R3d)

Our evaluation of the shorter fasting and refeeding periods showed an increase in the mtor and eef1a2 expression in the skeletal muscle of the early juveniles in the F4d group compared to the C and R3d groups, while the expression of rps27a was reduced in the R3d group compared to the F4d group. Furthermore, considering the genes associated with the cell cycle, a reduction in the ccnd1 expression was observed in the R3d group compared to both the C and F4d groups. The expression of cdkn1a, meanwhile, was downregulated in the R3d group compared to F4d (Figure 4).

3.2.2. Late Juvenile Pacus Subjected to Fasting for 15 Days (F15d) and Then Refeeding for Six Hours (R6h) or 15 Days (R15d)

Considering the genes related to the translational machinery, at the end of the 15-day fasting period (F15d), the mtor expression remained unchanged in the skeletal muscle of the late juvenile pacus compared to the C group. On the contrary, the mtor expression was reduced in the prolonged refeeding group (R15d) compared to the R6h group. Regarding the rps27a ribosomal gene, there was a decrease in its expression in the R15d group compared to the F15d group. On the other hand, the expression of the eukaryotic elongation factor eef1a2 showed no change in its expression between the different groups. Regarding the cell cycle and replication regulators, the expression of the ccnd1 transcripts showed an increase in the F15d group and the R6h group compared to the C and R15d groups. Meanwhile, the expression of cdkn1a was downregulated in both the R6h and R15d groups compared to the C and F15d groups (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

The meta-analysis using the fish skeletal muscle microarrays allowed us to identify the critical connection between ribosomes and the cell cycle, as evidenced by the molecular interaction network. This relationship was also observed by a group of researchers who described the limiting role of the ribosomal machinery in cell proliferation. This association becomes more evident when considering the roles of many ribosomal proteins (RPs) in communicating the disturbance in ribosome biogenesis to the cell cycle [32]. Furthermore, the lack of nutrients and other factors promotes ribosomal/nucleolar stress, characterized by the destabilization of the nucleolus and interruption of the synthesis of new ribosomes, triggering changes in the cell physiology, such as the arrest of the division process [33]. In such a context, we investigated the effects of fasting and refeeding on the expression of the regulators and components of the translational and proliferative machinery obtained in the in silico analyses with implications for muscle growth in fish.
In addition to the other targets obtained and investigated in this work that are related to ribosomes, such as rps27a and eef1a2, mTOR (the mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase) plays an essential role in ribosomal biogenesis by regulating the translation of RPs and the transcription of rRNAs (ribosomal RNAs) [34]. Although this gene was not identified in the interaction network, based on its importance for the cellular process studied and to better understand the findings obtained in silico, the expression of the mtor transcript was also evaluated. Based on this analysis, the upregulation of mtor in the F4d compared to the C group may be involved in maintaining the translational capacity, defined as the number of ribosomes present in the tissue [35], during this initial period of fasting. This maintenance can be seen as a mechanism that supports the ribosomal population and basal protein synthesis and protects the muscle tissue during the initial stress triggered by the four-day fasting [15,36,37]. Thus, this transcriptional modulation may occur until the time of food restitution, as observed by the expression of mtor in the R3d group, the levels of which became similar to those of the control group. On the other hand, the lack of alteration in the expression of this gene in the F15d group compared to the control may be related to the more severe catabolic environment compared to the F4d condition. In this group, it is possible that the processes maintaining the survival of the organism, as a whole, overcome the protection of the muscle mass.
Interestingly, the expression of rps27a was similar when comparing F4d with R3d and F15d with R15d. In all cases, the expression of this gene increased during fasting. Similar to other RPs, RPS27A plays an important structural role in the ribosomes, and its participation in the crosstalk between ribosomal stress and the cell cycle has already been described [32]. According to these authors, who evaluated the expression of RPL11 (ribosomal protein L11) in vitro, its expression was unchanged despite the role that this RP plays in nutritional stress [38]. In addition to these findings, the authors noted that it was abundant even in cells that were not subjected to starvation [39]. Our data indicated that rps27a is also abundant in the muscle cells, demonstrating the role of the translation machinery in the tissue and the presence of multiple copies of rDNA in the skeletal muscle [40]. Furthermore, a reduction in rps27a expression was observed in the R3d and R15d groups compared to F4d and F15d, respectively. These results may be associated with the reduction in stress in the context of food availability in the refeeding groups, as was also observed in the refeeding of Gadus morhua after fasting periods, which promoted the resumption of ribosomal pro-biogenesis conditions in the muscle of this fish [41].
The expression of eef1a2 (eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 2), another component of the translational machinery transcript, was also evaluated in our study. In its canonical function, eef1a2 acts through the elongation of the polypeptide chains, ensuring that the tRNAs and their respective amino acids correctly couple on the ribosomes [42]. In this study, four-day fasting promoted an increase in eef1a2 expression, followed by a reduction in the expression of the R3d group. According to some authors, Eef1a2 participates in the maintenance of muscle mass in rats, and its absence triggers atrophy [43,44]. Similarly, in zebrafish embryos, the lack of this gene affects the development of nervous tissue and causes muscle weakness [45].
Furthermore, in mdx mice, eef1a2 overexpression improves Duchenne muscular dystrophy, highlighting the relevance of this gene to tissue maintenance, formation, and morphology [46]. Given the critical role of eef1a2 in the conservation of the muscle mass and morphology, the increase in its expression in the F4d group may indicate an attempt to maximize protein synthesis during food restriction. In contrast, the food availability in the R3d group reduced its expression to levels similar to those of the C group. These data, as well as the lack of alteration in eef1a2 in the more extended periods of fasting and refeeding, corroborate the transcriptional modulation of mtor. In the shorter periods of fasting and refeeding, it was still viable for cells to maintain the muscle mass through the utilization of amino acids from muscle catabolism during the short protocol [15,47], something that was unlikely to occur in the F15d group.
As in the case of the genes associated with the protein synthesis machinery, changes in the nutritional status of cells also modulate the expression of cell cycle regulators [48]. Ccnd1 (cyclin D1) is one of the genes that coordinate cell proliferation, connecting nutrient availability in the environment with cell division. The expression of this cyclin varies throughout the cell cycle, with high levels of ccnd1 found in the G1 phase. In the transition from the G1 to S phases, there is a reduction in cyclin expression, which allows for DNA synthesis. During the entire S phase, the ccnd1 levels remain low, thus increasing the cyclin expression in the transition from S to G2. At this point, the cyclin D1 levels only increase due to environmental signals, such as the presence of food [49]. In our study, a reduction in ccnd1 expression was observed in the R3d group compared to the F4d group, while high levels of ccnd1 were identified in the F15d and R6h groups compared to the C and R15d groups, respectively. The increased ccnd1 expression in the F15d group may represent an adaptive measure that saves energy and substrates in the skeletal muscle of fish under fasting conditions. In senile human cells, this was reported to occur due to high levels of cyclin D1, which prevent DNA synthesis and delay cell cycle progression during the G1 phase [50,51]. This blockage of the cell cycle through ccnd1 can compromise the proliferative processes required for the fish’s muscle growth. However, the progressive reduction in these cyclin levels resulting from refeeding, in both the short (R3d) and long (R15d) periods, may be associated with the nutritional restoration and continuity of the cell cycle, thus allowing muscle growth to resume. It should be noted that the lack of change in ccnd1 expression in the F4d group compared to the C group may be associated with this less severe period of fasting, in which proliferative processes may not be affected.
Regarding the final investigated target, a reduction in the cdkn1a (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A, herein termed p21) levels was observed in the R3d group compared to the F4d group and in the R6h and R15d groups compared to the C and F15d groups, respectively. In addition to regulating the cell cycle, Cdkn1a acts on cell survival, with the mRNA of this gene expressed in both the liver and skeletal muscle of rats fasting for 24 and 48 h [34]. According to these authors, Cdkn1a regulates energy expenditure by controlling the lipid deposits and positively regulating PPARα (peroxisome proliferator-activated alpha receptor) [34]. PPARα is a crucial transcription factor that orchestrates numerous aspects of the adaptation to fasting, including fatty acid oxidation and ketogenesis [52]. In this context, our research group described high levels of ppar in the red muscle of the pacus during fasting, a muscle compartment that is less affected than white muscle [16]. Though we did not identify differences between the control and fasting groups in the case of cdkn1a, the literature data partially corroborate our results, demonstrating the important reduction in the cdkn1a levels during refeeding [38]. In this way, the maintenance of high levels of cdkn1a in the F4d and F15d groups, similar to the levels in the C group, may be associated with muscle adaptation to food restriction, and after food is made available to the muscle fibers, the transcriptional expression of cdkn1a decreases to very low levels.
Microarray data provide unprecedented opportunities to explore new biological questions. Although our strategy has limitations associated with the low number of datasets available in the databases, the key genes selected in vitro were validated in pacus subjected to fasting and refeeding conditions, reinforcing the findings described here and the prospective power of the meta-analysis.

5. Conclusions

Our meta-analysis was an efficient strategy for the data mining and identification of non-classical genes associated with the maintenance of the skeletal muscle phenotype and growth in fish. Specifically, we demonstrated that ribosomal and cell cycle genes act in these processes in different species and under distinct experimental conditions. Furthermore, the investigation of the selected targets in the pacus demonstrated specific transcriptional modulations in short and extended fasting and refeeding periods, which can be associated with the maintenance of basal protein synthesis and tissue protection, together with energy saving. Together, our results help researchers to understand the adaptations of the skeletal muscle to the manipulation of food availability and are relevant for strategies that employ periods of fasting and refeeding in finfish farming and the natural environment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13122378/s1, Table S1: Ontological analysis based on the up- and downregulated genes of GSE84288. Molecular Function, Biological Process, KEGG, WikiPathway, and Interpro libraries. The first column has the terms, and the next columns have the statistical parameters. In addition, the genes responsible for the enrichment of each term are listed in the last column. Table S2: Ontological analysis based on the up- and downregulated genes of GSE36339. Here, were considered the Molecular Function, Biological Process, KEGG, WikiPathway, and Interpro libraries. The first column has the terms, and the next columns have the statistical parameters. In addition, the genes responsible for the enrichment of each term are listed in the last column. Table S3: Ontological analysis based on the up- and downregulated genes of GSE47141. Here, were considered the Molecular Function, Biological Process, KEGG, WikiPathway, and Interpro libraries. The first column has the terms, and the next columns have the statistical parameters. In addition, the genes responsible for the enrichment of each term are listed in the last column. Table S4: Ontological analysis based on the up- and downregulated genes in the GSE58929 dataset. Here, were considered the Molecular Function, Biological Process, KEGG, WikiPathway, and Interpro libraries. The first column has the terms, and the next columns have the statistical parameters. In addition, the genes responsible for the enrichment of each term are listed in the last column. Table S5: Total datasets obtained from the GEO datasets through meta-analysis. The studies were obtained using keywords and organized by serial number. The title, sequencing platform, and exclusion criteria for each dataset were also described. Datasets selected for analysis. The table contains the same essential information for the datasets selected for analysis and obtained through meta-analysis. Table S6: Total genes obtained from the GSE58929 dataset in a one-color system and analyzed using Geo2R. Between the columns provided by Geo2R, only the padj and fold change (FC) values were used to select the DEGs. The IDs (identification of probes) were used to identify the gene’s name. Up- and Downregulated genes obtained from the GSE58929 dataset. These DEGs were selected considering the fold change (FC) of >1.5 and <1.5 and padj of <0.05. Table S7: Total genes obtained from the GSE84288 dataset and analyzed using Geo2R. Between the columns provided by Geo2R, only the padj and fold change (FC) values were used to select the DEGs. The IDs (identification of probes) were used to identify the gene’s name. Up- and Downregulated genes obtained from the GSE58929 dataset. These DEGs were selected considering the fold change (FC) of >1.5 and <1.5 and padj of <0.05. Table S8: Total genes (no filtering) of the original study (GSE36339) obtained from a two-color microarray (gene list provided by the authors and available in the publication). These genes come from the 72 h evaluation of the treatment with lipopolysaccharide consumption by the red and white muscles of Sparus aurata. In the first column are the gene IDs (gene identification) and in the second and third columns are the log2 ER (expression ratio) and p-values, respectively. Up- and Downregulated genes obtained from the original study (GSE36339). These genes were selected considering p < 0.05 for 72h of treatment (lipopolysaccharide consumption) applied to the red and white muscles of Sparus aurata. Table: S8a: Total genes (no filtering) of the original study (GSE36339) obtained from a two-color microarray (gene list provided by the authors and available in the publication). These genes come from the 24 h evaluation of the treatment with lipopolysaccharide consumption by the red and white muscle of Sparus aurata. In the second column are the gene names and in the third and fourth columns are the log2 ER (expression ratio) and p-values, respectively. Up- and downregulated genes obtained from the original study (GSE36339). These genes were selected considering p < 0.05 for 24 h of treatment (lipopolysaccharide consumption) applied to the red and white muscles of Sparus aurata. Table S8b: Up- and downregulated genes obtained from the original study (GSE36339). These genes were selected considering p < 0.05 for 24 and 72 h of treatment (lipopolysaccharide consumption) by the red and white muscles of Sparus aurata. In the first column are the gene names, in the second are the gene abbreviations, and in the third and fourth columns are the log2 ER (expression ratio) and p-values, respectively. Table S9: Total genes (no filtering) of the original study (GSE47141) obtained from a two-color microarray (gene list provided by the authors and available in the publication). These genes were selected from the red and white muscles of Oncorhynchus mykiss subjected to exercise and a carbohydrate diet. In the second column are the gene names and in the third and fourth columns are the log2 ER (expression ratio) and p-values, respectively. Genes that were upregulated and downregulated were obtained from the original study (GSE47141) and selected considering p < 0.05 for the treatment (exercise and carbohydrate diet) applied to the red muscle of Oncorhynchus mykiss. Table S10: Combined score and p-value of enrichment considering the Biological Processes library for all the datasets (58929, 47141, 36339, and 84288). This sheet was used in conjunction with the p-value sheet to create a heatmap of the Biological Process. Table S11: Combined score and p-value of enrichment considering the Molecular Function library for all the datasets (58929, 47141, 36339, and 84288). This sheet was used in conjunction with the p-value sheet to create a heatmap of the Molecular Function. Table S12: Combined score and p-value of enrichment considering the WikiPathway library for all the datasets (58929, 47141, 36339, and 84288). This sheet was used in conjunction with the p-value sheet to create a heatmap of the WikiPathway. Table S13: Combined score and p-value of enrichment considering the KEGG library for all the datasets (58929, 47141, 36339, and 84288). This sheet was used in conjunction with the p-value sheet to create a heatmap of KEGG. Table S14: Combined score and p-value of enrichment considering the Interpro library for all the datasets (58929, 47141, 36339, and 84288). This sheet was used in conjunction with the p-value sheet to create a heatmap of the Biological Process. Table S15: Table containing the data for the heatmap of the cellular processes related to protein synthesis and cell division. These processes were selected based on heatmaps built with the Biological Process, Molecular Function, KEGG, and WikiPathway libraries from all the datasets (GSE58929, GSE36339, GSE47141, and GSE84288), in which the most enriched processes were associated with translational machinery and proliferation. In this table are the processes enriched in at least two datasets. Note that the GSE84288 dataset was excluded due to the heterogeneity of the enriched processes compared to the other datasets. In the first column are the enriched processes, and in the following are the respective combined scores/p-values for each dataset. Figure S1: Heatmap built with the Biological Process library from all the datasets (GSE58929, GSE36339, GSE47141, and GSE84288), in which the most enriched processes were associated with translational machinery and proliferation. Figure S2: Heatmap built with the Molecular Function library from all the datasets (GSE58929, GSE36339, GSE47141, and GSE84288), in which the most enriched processes were associated with translational machinery and proliferation. Figure S3: Heatmap built with the WikiPathway library from all the datasets (GSE58929, GSE36339, GSE47141, and GSE84288), in which the most enriched processes were associated with translational machinery and proliferation. Figure S4: Heatmap built with the KEGG library from all the datasets (GSE58929, GSE36339, GSE47141, and GSE84288), in which the most enriched processes were associated with translational machinery and proliferation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, É.S.P., B.O.S.D., R.F.C. and M.D.-P.-S.; methodology, É.S.P., S.S.C., B.T.T.Z., R.F.C. and M.D.-P.-S.; formal analysis, É.S.P., S.S.C. and B.T.T.Z.; investigation, É.S.P., S.S.C. and B.T.T.Z.; writing—original draft, É.S.P. and M.D.-P.-S.; review and editing, É.S.P., S.S.C., B.T.T.Z., R.F.C., B.O.S.D. and M.D.-P.-S.; project administration, R.F.C., B.O.S.D. and M.D.-P.-S.; funding acquisition, M.D.-P.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), grant number #306678/2021-7, by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—Brazil (CAPES)—Financing Code 001 and by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grant number #2018/26428-0.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA), according to the Brazilian legislation, and the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (protocol numbers 705 and 1050) of the Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), approved the experiments.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed in the current study are available in the GEO dataset (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds, accessed on 1 June 2020) repository. Each dataset has an access link: GSE58928 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE58929, accessed on 1 January 2020), GSE84288 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE84288, accessed on 1 January 2020), GSE36339 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE36339, accessed on 1 January 2020), and GSE47141 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE47141, accessed on 1 January 2020). Supplementary Tables provided by the authors and contained in the original published articles were used for the analysis of the last two datasets. These original articles can be accessed at PMID: 22825392 (GSE36339) and PMID: 23968867 (GSE47141). All the data generated by our study are available throughout the text and in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020 Sustainability in Action. FAO. 2020. Available online: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca9229en (accessed on 20 December 2020).
  2. Valenti, W.C.; Barros, H.P.; Valenti, P.M.; Bueno, G.W.; Cavalli, R.O. Aquaculture in Brazil: Past, present and future. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 19, 100611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dias, K.; Ribeiro, T.C.; Carneiro, D.J.; Urbinati, E.C. Tempo de trânsito gastrintestinal e esvaziamento gástrico do pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus) em diferentes temperaturas de cultivo. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 2005, 27, 414–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Aguilar, F.A.A.; Da Cruz, T.M.P.; Mourão, J.B.; Cyrino, J.E.P. Water temperature, body mass, and fasting heat production of pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). SciELO 2017, 89, 1305–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mareco, E.A.; Garcia de la Serrana, D.; Johnston, I.A.; Dal-Pai-Silva, M. Characterization of the transcriptome of fast and slow muscle myotomal fibres in the pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Duran, B.O.S.; de la Serrana, D.G.; Zanella, B.T.T.; Perez, E.S.; Mareco, E.A.; Santos, V.B.; Carvalho, R.F.; Dal-Pai-Silva, M. An insight on the impact of teleost whole genome duplication on the regulation of the molecular networks controlling skeletal muscle growth. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0255006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Duran, B.O.S.; de Góes, G.A.; Zanella, B.T.T.; Freire, P.P.; Valente, J.S.; Salomão, R.A.S.; Fernandes, A.; Mareco, E.A.; Carvalho, R.F.; Dal-Pai-Silva, M. Ascorbic acid stimulates the in vitro myoblast proliferation and migration of pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Johnston, I.A. Genetic and Environmental Determinants of Muscle Growth Patterns; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001; pp. 141–186. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sänger, A.M.; Stoiber, W. Muscle Fiber Diversity and Plasticity; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001; pp. 187–250. [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnston, I.A.; Bower, N.I.; Macqueen, D.J. Growth and the regulation of myotomal muscle mass in teleost fish. J. Exp. Biol. 2011, 214, 1617–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Biga, P.R.; Goetz, F.W. Zebrafish and giant danio as models for muscle growth: Determinate vs. indeterminate growth as determined by morphometric analysis. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2006, 291, 1327–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Rescan, P.-Y.; Montfort, J.; Rallière, C.; Le Cam, A.; Esquerré, D.; Hugot, K. Dynamic gene expression in fish muscle during recovery growth induced by a fasting-refeeding schedule. BMC Genom. 2007, 8, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Py, C.; Elizondo-González, R.; Peña-Rodríguez, A. Compensatory growth: Fitness cost in farmed fish and crustaceans. Rev. Aquac. 2022, 14, 1389–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kuniyoshi, M.L.G.; Da Silva-Gomes, R.N.; Vieira, J.C.S.; Hessel, M.C.; Mareco, E.A.; Dos Santos, V.B.; Carvalho, R.F.; Padilha, P.D.M.; Dal-Pai-Silva, M. Proteomic analysis of the fast-twitch muscle of pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus) after prolonged fasting and compensatory growth. PLoS ONE 2019, 30, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Paula, T.G.; Zanella, B.T.T.; Fantinatti, B.E.D.A.; de Moraes, L.N.; Duran, B.O.D.S.; de Oliveira, C.B.; Salomão, R.A.S.; da Silva, R.N.; Padovani, C.R.; dos Santos, V.B.; et al. Food restriction increase the expression of mTORC1 complex genes in the skeletal muscle of juvenile pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zanella, B.T.T.; Magiori, I.C.; Duran, B.O.S.; Pereira, G.G.; Vicente, I.S.T.; Carvalho, P.L.P.F.; Salomão, R.; Mareco, E.; Carvalho, R.; Paula, T.; et al. Ascorbic acid supplementation improves skeletal muscle growth in pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus) juveniles: In vivo and in vitro studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nebo, C.; Portella, M.C.; Carani, F.R.; de Almeida, F.L.A.; Padovani, C.R.; Carvalho, R.F.; Dal-Pai-Silva, M. Short periods of fasting followed by refeeding change the expression of muscle growth-related genes in juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 164, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Hagen, Ø.; Fernandes, J.M.O.; Solberg, C.; Johnston, I.A. Expression of growth-related genes in muscle during fasting and refeeding of juvenile Atlantic halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus L. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. 2008, 152, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tacchi, L.; Bickerdike, R.; Secombes, C.J.; Pooley, N.J.; Urquhart, K.L.; Collet, B.; Martin, S.A.M. Ubiquitin E3 ligase atrogin-1 (Fbox-32) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): Sequence analysis, genomic structure and modulation of expression. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. 2010, 157, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Seiliez, I.; Gabillard, J.C.; Cassy, S.S.; García-Serrana, D.; Gutiérrez, J.; Kaushik, S.; Panserat, S.; Tesseraud, S. An in vivo and in vitro assessment of TOR signaling cascade in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2008, 295, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Fuentes, E.; Björnsson, B.T.; Valdés, J.A.; Einarsdottir, I.E.; Lorca, B.; Alvarez, M.; Molina, A. IGF-I/PI3K/Akt and IGF-I/MAPK/ERK pathways in vivo in skeletal muscle are regulated by nutrition and contribute to somatic growth in the fine flounder. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2011, 300, 1532–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Møller, A.M.; Myles, P.S. What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis? Br. J. Anaesth. 2016, 117, 428–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Perez-Riverol, Y.; Zorin, A.; Dass, G.; Vu, M.-T.; Xu, P.; Glont, M.; Vizcaíno, J.A.; Jarnuczak, A.F.; Petryszak, R.; Ping, P.; et al. Quantifying the impact of public omics data. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Calduch-Giner, J.; Echasseriau, Y.; Crespo, D.; Baron, D.; Planas, J.V.; Prunet, P.; Pérez-Sánchez, J. Transcriptional assessment by microarray analysis and large-scale meta-analysis of the metabolic capacity of cardiac and skeletal muscle tissues to cope with reduced nutrient availability in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Mar. Biotechnol. 2014, 16, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mills, N.; Cashatt, D.; Weber, M.J.; Pierce, C.L. A case study and a meta-analysis of seasonal variation in fish mercury concentrations. Ecotoxicology 2018, 27, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Chen, R.-Y.; Hieu, B.N.; Audira, G.; Lou, B.; Lin, M.-D.; Hsiao, C.-D. Meta-Transcriptomic Analysis of RNAseq Data Reveals Pacu and Loach Fish with Unusually High Levels of Myoglobin Expression in Skeletal Muscles. Animals 2020, 10, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lapa, R.M.L.; Filho, M.B.; Marchi, F.A.; Domingues, M.A.C.; de Carvalho, G.B.; Drigo, S.A.; Kowalski, L.P.; Rogatto, S.R. Integrated miRNA and mRNA expression analysis uncovers drug targets in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Oral Oncol. 2019, 93, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kilkenny, C.; Browne, W.J.; Cuthill, I.C.; Emerson, M.; Altman, D.G. Improving bioscience research reporting: The arrive guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bustin, S.A.; Benes, V.; Garson, J.A.; Hellemans, J.; Huggett, J.; Kubista, M.; Mueller, R.; Nolan, T.; Pfaffl, M.W.; Shipley, G.L.; et al. The MIQE guidelines: Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem. 2009, 55, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real- time quantitative PCR and the 2∆∆Ct Method. Methods 2001, 1408, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xu, X.; Xiong, X.; Sun, Y. The role of ribosomal proteins in the regulation of cell proliferation, tumorigenesis, and genomic integrity. Sci. China Life Sci. 2016, 59, 656–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kusnadi, E.P.; Hannan, K.M.; Hicks, R.J.; Hannan, R.D.; Pearson, R.B.; Kang, J. Regulation of rDNA transcription in response to growth factors, nutrients and energy. Gene 2015, 556, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lopez-Guadamillas, E.; Fernandez-Marcos, P.J.; Pantoja, C.; Muñoz-Martin, M.; Martínez, D.; Gómez-López, G.; Campos-Olivas, R.; Valverde, A.M.; Serrano, M. p21Cip1 plays a critical role in the physiological adaptation to fasting through activation of PPARα. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Figueiredo, V.C.; McCarthy, J.J. Regulation of ribosome biogenesis in skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Physiology 2019, 34, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Von Walden, F. Ribosome biogenesis in skeletal muscle: Coordination of transcription and translation. J. Appl. Physiol. 2019, 127, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Von Walden, F.; Liu, C.; Aurigemma, N.; Nader, G.A. mTOR signaling regulates myotube hypertrophy by modulating protein synthesis, rDNA transcription, and chromatin remodeling. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2016, 311, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Bhat, K.P.; Itahana, K.; Jin, A.; Zhang, Y. Essential role of ribosomal protein L11 in mediating growth inhibition-induced p53 activation. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 2402–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Goldberg, A.L.; Etlinger, J.D.; Goldspink, D.F.; Jablecki, C. Mechanism of work-induced hypertrophy of skeletal muscle. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1975, 7, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lied, E.; Rosenlund, G.; Lund, B.; Von Der Decken, A. Effect of starvation and refeeding on in vitro protein synthesis in white trunk muscle of atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Comp. Biochem. 1983, 76, 777–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Z.; Qi, C.-F.; Shin, D.-M.; Zingone, A.; Newbery, H.J.; Kovalchuk, A.L.; Abbott, C.M.; Morse, H.C., III. Eef1a2 promotes cell growth, inhibits apoptosis and activates JAK/STAT and AKT signaling in mouse plasmacytomas. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Chambers, D.M.; Peters, J.; Abbot, C. The lethal mutation of the mouse wasted (wst) is a deletion that abolishes expression of a tissue-specific isoform of translation elongation factor 1a, encoded by the Eef1a2 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 4463–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Cao, S.; Smith, L.L.; Padilla-Lopez, S.R.; Guida, B.S.; Blume, E.; Shi, J.; Morton, S.U.; Brownstein, C.A.; Beggs, A.H.; Kruer, M.C.; et al. Homozygous EEF1A2 mutation causes dilated cardiomyopathy, failure to thrive, global developmental delay, epilepsy and early death. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 3545–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Idigo, N.J.; Soares, D.C.; Abbott, C.M. Translation elongation factor 1A2 is encoded by one of four closely related eef1a genes and is dispensable for survival in zebrafish. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20194191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Péladeau, C.; Adam, N.; Bronicki, L.M.; Coriati, A.; Thabet, M.; Al-Rewashdy, H.; Vanstone, J.; Mears, A.; Renaud, J.-M.; Holcik, M.; et al. Identification of therapeutics that target eEF1A2 and upregulate utrophin A translation in dystrophic muscles. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Miyazaki, M.; Shimozuru, M.; Tsubota, T. Skeletal muscles of hibernating black bears show minimal atrophy and phenotype shifting despite prolonged physical inactivity and starvation. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jiménez, J.; Truman, A.W.; Menoyo, S.; Kron, S.; Clotet, J. The yin and yang of cyclin control by nutrients. Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 865–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Yang, K.; Masahiro, H.; Stacey, D.W. Variations in Cyclin D1 levels through the cell cycle determine the proliferative fate of a cell. Cell Div. 2006, 1, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Pagano, M.; Theodoras, A.M.; Tam, S.W.; Draetta, G.F. Cyclin D1-mediated inhibition of repair and replicative DNA synthesis in human fibroblasts. Genes Dev. 1994, 8, 1627–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Pawlak, M.; Lefebvre, P.; Staels, B. Molecular mechanism of PPARα action and its impact on lipid metabolism, inflammation and fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2015, 62, 720–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wahli, W.; Michalik, L. PPARs at the crossroads of lipid signaling and inflammation. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 23, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kersten, S. Integrated physiology and systems biology of PPARα. Mol. Metab. 2014, 3, 354–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Literature search flowchart obtained from PRISMA in the meta-analysis.
Figure 1. Literature search flowchart obtained from PRISMA in the meta-analysis.
Genes 13 02378 g001
Figure 2. Biological processes and pathways associated with protein synthesis and proliferation were obtained from the enrichment of the pathways in each dataset, considering the Biological Process, WikiPathway, and KEGG libraries. The graph represents the selected processes that were present in at least two datasets. The GSE84288 dataset is absent from this graph due to the enrichment of the pathways that, unlike those of the other datasets, did not show predominant biological processes associated with protein synthesis and proliferation.
Figure 2. Biological processes and pathways associated with protein synthesis and proliferation were obtained from the enrichment of the pathways in each dataset, considering the Biological Process, WikiPathway, and KEGG libraries. The graph represents the selected processes that were present in at least two datasets. The GSE84288 dataset is absent from this graph due to the enrichment of the pathways that, unlike those of the other datasets, did not show predominant biological processes associated with protein synthesis and proliferation.
Genes 13 02378 g002
Figure 3. Molecular interaction network built on genes that enriched the cellular processes associated with proliferation and protein synthesis. The nodes represent the genes, and the edges represent the interactions between genes. The edge colors have different meanings: light blue: interactions from the curated databases; pink: interactions that were experimentally determined; green: neighborhood gene; red: gene fusions; dark blue: gene co-occurrence; lime: text mining; black: co-expression; and lilac: protein homology. In the upper region of the network are genes associated with the cell cycle, and in the lower portion are genes related to ribosomes. The dotted red circles highlight the genes selected for investigation: rps27a, ccnd1, cdkn1a, and eef1a2. The interaction score considered was 0.900.
Figure 3. Molecular interaction network built on genes that enriched the cellular processes associated with proliferation and protein synthesis. The nodes represent the genes, and the edges represent the interactions between genes. The edge colors have different meanings: light blue: interactions from the curated databases; pink: interactions that were experimentally determined; green: neighborhood gene; red: gene fusions; dark blue: gene co-occurrence; lime: text mining; black: co-expression; and lilac: protein homology. In the upper region of the network are genes associated with the cell cycle, and in the lower portion are genes related to ribosomes. The dotted red circles highlight the genes selected for investigation: rps27a, ccnd1, cdkn1a, and eef1a2. The interaction score considered was 0.900.
Genes 13 02378 g003
Figure 4. Relative mRNA expression of mtor (a), rps27a (b), eef1a2 (c), ccnd1 (d), and cdkn1a (e) in early juvenile pacu. The genes were evaluated in the control (C), four-day fasting (F4d), and three-day refeeding (R3d) groups. Data are expressed as the fold change of group C and presented as the mean ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05 in a one-way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for mtor, rps27a, ccnd1, and cdkn1a, or the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests for eef1a2, n = 5/group).
Figure 4. Relative mRNA expression of mtor (a), rps27a (b), eef1a2 (c), ccnd1 (d), and cdkn1a (e) in early juvenile pacu. The genes were evaluated in the control (C), four-day fasting (F4d), and three-day refeeding (R3d) groups. Data are expressed as the fold change of group C and presented as the mean ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05 in a one-way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for mtor, rps27a, ccnd1, and cdkn1a, or the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests for eef1a2, n = 5/group).
Genes 13 02378 g004
Figure 5. Relative mRNA expression of the mtor (a), rps27a (b), eef1a2 (c), ccnd1(d) and cdkn1a (e) in in late juvenile pacus. The genes were evaluated in the control (C), fifteen-day fasting (F15d), six-hours fasting (R6h), and fifteen-day refeeding (R15d) groups. Data are expressed as the fold change of group C and presented as the mean ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05 in a one-way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for mtor, rps27a, ccnd1, and cdkn1a or the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests for eef1a2, n = 5/group).
Figure 5. Relative mRNA expression of the mtor (a), rps27a (b), eef1a2 (c), ccnd1(d) and cdkn1a (e) in in late juvenile pacus. The genes were evaluated in the control (C), fifteen-day fasting (F15d), six-hours fasting (R6h), and fifteen-day refeeding (R15d) groups. Data are expressed as the fold change of group C and presented as the mean ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05 in a one-way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for mtor, rps27a, ccnd1, and cdkn1a or the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests for eef1a2, n = 5/group).
Genes 13 02378 g005
Table 1. Primers that were used for the amplification of rps27a, eef1a2, ccnd1, cdkn1a, mtor, and ppia mRNAs by RT-qPCR. F, forward; R, reverse. The genes are as follows: rps27a (ribosomal protein s27a), eef1a2 (eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 2), ccnd1 (cyclin D1), mtor (mammalian target of rapamycin), cdkn1a (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A), and ppia (peptidylprolyl isomerase A).
Table 1. Primers that were used for the amplification of rps27a, eef1a2, ccnd1, cdkn1a, mtor, and ppia mRNAs by RT-qPCR. F, forward; R, reverse. The genes are as follows: rps27a (ribosomal protein s27a), eef1a2 (eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 2), ccnd1 (cyclin D1), mtor (mammalian target of rapamycin), cdkn1a (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A), and ppia (peptidylprolyl isomerase A).
SymbolGene NamePrimer Sequence
rps27aRibosomal Protein S27aF:CTACACCACCCCCAAGAAGA
R:ATGAAAACACCAGCACCACA
eef1a2Eukaryotic Translation Elongation Factor 1 Alpha 2F:GAACAAATGCCACGGTTTCT
R:AGAGCCCAACTACAGCCAGA
ccnd1Cyclin D1F:CACGATGCTAACCTGCTCAA
R:TTTTGGGCACGATTTCTTTC
cdkn1aCyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 1AF: GTGGCGTTTCTCTGCTTAGG
R:GATTCGGACTGAATGGCACT
mtorMechanistic Target of Rapamycin KinaseF:TTGGGAGAGACGTACTGC
R:CACAGGACTGGTGTAGGAA
ppiaPeptidylprolyl Isomerase AF:ATTGTGGTTCGTGAAGTCGC
R:CCGCTGGGCAGAGTGATTAT
Table 2. Identification, characterization, and number of genes from each study included in the data analysis.
Table 2. Identification, characterization, and number of genes from each study included in the data analysis.
Serial NumberSpeciesTreatmentUpregulated GenesDownregulated Genes
GSE58929Danio rerioExercise1516215
GSE84288Salmo salarConsumption of glucosinolates195158
GSE36339Sparus aurataConsumption of lipopolysaccharides4338
GSE47141Oncorhynchus mykissExercise and a high-carbohydrate diet152206
Total genes 1906617
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Perez, É.S.; Cury, S.S.; Zanella, B.T.T.; Carvalho, R.F.; Duran, B.O.S.; Dal-Pai-Silva, M. Identification of Novel Genes Associated with Fish Skeletal Muscle Adaptation during Fasting and Refeeding Based on a Meta-Analysis. Genes 2022, 13, 2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122378

AMA Style

Perez ÉS, Cury SS, Zanella BTT, Carvalho RF, Duran BOS, Dal-Pai-Silva M. Identification of Novel Genes Associated with Fish Skeletal Muscle Adaptation during Fasting and Refeeding Based on a Meta-Analysis. Genes. 2022; 13(12):2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122378

Chicago/Turabian Style

Perez, Érika Stefani, Sarah Santiloni Cury, Bruna Tereza Thomazini Zanella, Robson Francisco Carvalho, Bruno Oliveira Silva Duran, and Maeli Dal-Pai-Silva. 2022. "Identification of Novel Genes Associated with Fish Skeletal Muscle Adaptation during Fasting and Refeeding Based on a Meta-Analysis" Genes 13, no. 12: 2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122378

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop