Next Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity Analysis and Core Germplasm Collection Construction of Camellia oleifera Based on Fruit Phenotype and SSR Data
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution and Expression Patterns of the Fructose 1,6-Bisphosptase Gene Family in a Miracle Tree (Neolamarckia cadamba)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Genomic Regions Associated with Agronomic and Disease Resistance Traits in a Large Set of Multiple DH Populations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/genes13122350
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Association Study Revealed SNP Alleles Associated with Seed Size Traits in African Yam Bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst ex. A. Rich.) Harms)

by
Oluwaseyi E. Olomitutu
1,2,
Rajneesh Paliwal
2,
Ayodeji Abe
1,
Olubusayo O. Oluwole
2,
Olaniyi A. Oyatomi
2 and
Michael T. Abberton
2,*
1
Department of Crop and Horticultural Sciences, University of Ibadan, Oduduwa Road, Ibadan 200132, Nigeria
2
Genetic Resources Center, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Oyo Road, Ibadan 200001, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(12), 2350; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122350
Submission received: 5 October 2022 / Revised: 26 November 2022 / Accepted: 9 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Tropical Food Crop Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Seed size is an important yield and quality-determining trait in higher plants and is also crucial to their evolutionary fitness. In African yam bean (AYB), seed size varies widely among different accessions. However, the genetic basis of such variation has not been adequately documented. A genome-wide marker-trait association study was conducted to identify genomic regions associated with four seed size traits (seed length, seed width, seed thickness, and 100-seed weight) in a panel of 195 AYB accessions. A total of 5416 SNP markers were generated from the diversity array technology sequence (DArTseq) genotype-by-sequencing (GBS)- approach, in which 2491 SNPs were retained after SNP quality control and used for marker-trait association analysis. Significant phenotypic variation was observed for the traits. Broad-sense heritability ranged from 50.0% (seed width) to 66.4% (seed length). The relationships among the traits were positive and significant. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) using the general linear model (GLM) and the mixed linear model (MLM) approaches identified 12 SNP markers significantly associated with seed size traits across the six test environments. The 12 makers explained 6.5–10.8% of the phenotypic variation. Two markers (29420334|F|0-52:C>G-52:C>G and 29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T) with pleiotropic effects associated with seed width and seed thickness were found. A candidate gene search identified five significant markers (100026424|F|0-37:C>T-37:C>T, 100041049|F|0-42:G>C-42:G>C, 100034480|F|0-31:C>A-31:C>A, 29420365|F|0-55:C>G-55:C>G, and 29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T) located close to 43 putative genes whose encoding protein products are known to regulate seed size traits. This study revealed significant makers not previously reported for seed size in AYB and could provide useful information for genomic-assisted breeding in AYB.

1. Introduction

Meeting global food and nutritional demands under limited growing space and changing climatic conditions is now the major target in crop breeding programs. Recently, the focus has shifted to relatively unknown indigenous legumes such as African yam bean (AYB) due to its dietary protein and mineral content and adaptive nature to wide climatic and soil conditions [1,2]. African yam bean is economically the most important species in the genus Sphenostylis and the most important tuberous legume of tropical Africa [3,4]. The utilization of its food substances (tubers and pulse) is a feature of cultural diversity in Africa [4,5]. The tuber contains, on average, 15.5% crude protein, 1.3% crude fat, and 68.3% carbohydrate [6]. The seed contains 22.5% protein, 53.7% carbohydrate, and 3.6% crude fat content [7]. Despite its numerous other benefits, low seed yield is one of the major constraints to its production [8,9] due to the absence of improved varieties and a lack of significant research attention.
Yield is a complex trait, difficult to improve directly. It is an expression of several component traits that are highly subject to environmental influences [10]. In crop breeding, the greatest yield improvements are associated with the selection and optimization of its component traits. Since the beginning of domestication in agriculture, increased seed size has been a major target as an important yield component trait [11]. Seed size is crucial to plant fitness in crops whose main mode of propagation is by seed and a key factor affecting eating quality and tolerance to abiotic stresses [12,13,14,15]. Compared with small seeds, large seeds accumulate sufficient nourishing substances for faster germination and stronger seedlings that can better compete for light and nutrition and have stronger tolerance to abiotic stresses [12,15,16]. Small seeds, on the other hand, are efficient at dispersal and colonization [17,18]. Seed size is the most commercially valued trait in dry grain legumes, and it varies widely among AYB accessions [4,19,20]. However, the genetic basis for variation in seed size in AYB is not yet known.
Recent advances in high-throughput genomic platforms have created the opportunity for the genome-wide-level understanding of the genetic basis of variation in complex traits at a finer resolution. Association mapping (AM), originally developed for use in mapping human disease genes [21], is now a popular method of maker-trait association studies in plants. Association mapping detects linkage disequilibrium between genetic markers and genes controlling the trait of interest by exploiting recombination events accumulating over many generations in natural populations [22]. It evaluates whether certain alleles within a population are found with specific phenotypes more frequently than expected [23]. Once genes and/or loci are identified and validated, they could be fixed to develop improved genotypes. Association mapping has several advantages over traditional linkage mapping. These include an increased resolution, a reduced research time (using existing populations rather than generating population via biparental crosses), and a higher allele number detection per locus as opposed to only two [24,25,26]. Association mapping also suffers some shortcomings, such as the detection of false positives in the population structure, which is a result of the linkage between causal and noncausal sites, more than one causal site, and epistasis. However, advancement in statistical methods has helped to reduce the rate of false positives [27]. Several GWAS reports have identified putative QTLs/genes in many leguminous crops [28,29,30,31,32,33] that played an important role in understanding the inheritance of quantitative traits [34,35] and trait deployment using a marker-assisted selection approach [36,37]. In legumes, several QTLs have been identified for seed size traits in cowpea [11], soybean [38], and common bean [39,40]. Unfortunately, very limited molecular research has been conducted in indigenous African legumes, including AYB. In AYB, the only available report of association mapping is the preliminary assessment for nutritional qualities by Oluwole et al. [41]. Here, a maker-traits association study was conducted to investigate the genetic basis of variation in seed size traits (seed length, seed width, seed thickness, and 100-seed weight) in AYB using diversity array technology sequence (DArTseq) genotype-by-sequencing (GBS)-based single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Germplasm

The germplasm consisted of 196 AYB accessions obtained from the existing collection of landraces at the Genetic Resource Center, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. The passport data of the accessions can be found in Olomitutu et al. [9].

2.2. Phenotyping

The accessions were phenotyped under optimal field conditions across three IITA research farms in Nigeria—Ibadan, Kano, and Ubiaja—during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons. The experimental design was a 14 × 14 α lattice with three replications. Each experimental unit consisted of 4 m single-row plots, with an inter-row spacing of 0.75 m and intrarow spacing of 0.5 m. Phosphorus fertilizer application in the form of triple superphosphate at a rate of 50 kg P/ha and staking were performed three weeks after planting. Manual weeding was carried out when necessary to keep the field clean. Details of the phenotyping methodology are described in Olomitutu et al. [9]. At harvest, data were recorded on 100-seed weight (g), seed length (mm), seed width (mm), and seed thickness (mm) on a plot basis using IITA descriptors for AYB [42].

2.3. Genotyping and Quality Control

Leaf samples were collected from three-week-old seedlings of each 196 AYB accession and stored at −80 °C. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted using the diversity array technology (DArT) DNA extraction protocol (https://ordering.seqart.net/files/DArT_DNA_isolation.pdf accessed on 20 January 2019). The isolated gDNA were qualified on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The high-quality DNA (100 ng/µL) samples were shipped to DArT Pty Ltd., Canberra, Australia, for genotyping using the whole genome profiling service of DArTseq technology [43]. Detailed methodology on complexity reduction, cloning, library construction, and cleaning was described by Egea et al. [44].
A raw dataset of 5416 DArTseq SNPs was generated. The DArTseq SNPs were filtered using call rate ≥ 70%, average reproducibility ≥ 95%, minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 0.01, and 20% missing SNP data to remove poor-quality SNPs. After SNP quality control, a total of 2491 SNPs from 195 accessions were retained and used for the genome-wide association study (GWAS). Accession TSs-442 was filtered out due to low-quality SNPs. In the absence of the AYB genome, trimmed sequences of filtered SNPs were aligned on the common bean reference genome v1.1 (available at https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov, (accessed on 20 January 2019)).

2.4. Phenotypic Data Analysis

Based on plot means across test locations, a combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using PROC GLM in SAS [45], with the RANDOM statement and TEST option. Location and year were considered fixed, while all other factors were regarded as random effects. Broad-sense heritability (H2) was estimated from the phenotypic (σ2p) and genotypic (σ2g) variances [46] and categorized as low (0–30%), moderate (30–60%), and high (>60%) according to [47]. Correlation analysis among the traits was performed using the corPlot function in R [48]. Distribution plots were also constructed for traits using the hist function in R. The plot means of the remaining 195 accessions (in each and combined locations) were used to calculate the best linear unbiased estimate (BLUE) using META-R version 6.04 [49]. The calculated BLUE value of each genotype was further used in the GWAS analysis.

2.5. Genome-Wide Association Study and Candidate Gene Identification

The 2491 filtered SNPs from 195 accessions were used for the assessment of population structure and GWAS using TASSEL 5 [50]. The population structure and relatedness analysis among genotypes in the AYB population were conducted using the genomic principal component analysis (PCA) matrix (P) and kinship matrix (K) [51,52]. Marker-trait associations were determined using two different models based on the estimated BLUEs for phenotypic traits (in each and combined locations) and filtered SNPs: the general linear model (GLM) with PCA as the fixed effect (GLM + PCA) and the mixed linear model (MLM) mixed linear model (MLM + PCA + K) [39]. Based on the distribution of p-values for traits, marker-trait associations were declared significant at p-values of ≥10−4 [53,54]. Manhattan and quantile–quantile (Q–Q) plots were constructed using CMplot package in R.
The SNP markers that were significantly associated with seed size traits through GWAS in the combined location analysis were annotated for candidate gene identification in the LIS-legume information systems (https://www.legumeinfo.org accessed on 4 April 2020). Since AYB currently lacks a reference genome, which is a limitation to candidate gene mapping, the genome of a related legume, the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), was used. A blast search was performed for trimmed nucleotide sequence (60–80 bps) of significant AYB SNPs on the Phaseolus vulgaris genome database (Phaseolus vulgaris G19833 genome v2.0) in the legume information system. Synteny of related legumes (Glycine max 2.0, Vigna angularis 3.0, and Cajanus cajan 1.0) was also included in the search. After marking the annotated position in the Phaseolus vulgaris genome database, the scroll was zoomed to 1 Mb (500 Kbp up and downstream from the annotated position of the AYB SNP tag in the Phaseolus vulgaris genome database) to check for the surrounding candidate genes and their encoding protein products and know if they regulate the traits of interest. Identified putative candidate genes in the Phaseolus vulgaris genome database were also subsequently further researched in the previous crop studies literature for verification.

3. Results

3.1. Phenotypic Evaluations

The ANOVA across the test locations revealed significant accession, location, location × year, accession × location, and accession × location × year effects for the four seed size traits. The accession × year interactions effect was significant only for 100-seed weight and seed length, while year effect was significant for seed length and seed width. High broad-sense heritability (66.4%) was obtained in seed length, while seed thickness (57.8%), 100-seed weight (51.6%), and seed width (50.0%) had moderate heritability estimates (Table 1).
The distribution of the seed size traits evaluated in the six environments and the correlation coefficients between the traits are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The relationships among the traits were positive and significant, and the distribution of traits was near-normal.

3.2. Genotyping and SNP Filtering

A diverse set of 196 AYB accessions were genotyped using a high-depth DArTseq SNP approach and generated a total of 5416 SNPs. After SNP quality control (call rate ≥ 0.70, marker reproducibility ≥ 0.95, MAF ≥ 0.01, and missing rate ≤ 0.20) (Supplementary Figures S1–S3), a total of 2491 SNPs were retained and used for GWAS analysis. The MAF ranged between 0.01 and 0.49, with an average of 0.16 (Supplementary Figure S4). The average heterozygosity of the population was 0.15, while TSs-137 accession (0.006) and TSs-10 (0.41) showed minimum and maximum heterozygosity in the AYB population (Supplementary Figures S5 and S6). The average proportion of missing data (based on genotypes) was 0.012 in the AYB population (Supplementary Figure S7). Out of 2491 AYB SNPs, only 422 showed genome-wide syntenic relationships with the common bean reference genome. In the common bean genome, most SNPs were aligned on chromosome 2 (58 SNPs), followed by chromosome 3 (51 SNPs), and the least on chromosome 10 (13 SNPs) (Supplementary Figure S8).

3.3. Association Analysis

Principal component analysis revealed that the first three principal components (PCs) respectively accounted for 5.9, 4.8, and 3.7% of the variation among the AYB accessions. No clear clustering (population structure) could be deduced among the accessions based on these two PCs (Figure 3). The coefficient of relatedness in the pairwise kinship matrix ranged between −0.33 and 2.52. The kinship heatmap plot was developed to visualize the relatedness within the population, which indicated low relatedness between accessions (Figure 3).
A total of 58 marker-trait associations were detected for the four seed size traits at a threshold of p-values of ≥10−4 in each and combined locations analyses (Table 2, Supplementary Table S1). The combined test environments analysis revealed that 12 significant SNP markers were associated with all four seed size traits, seven of which were codetected by the two statistical methods (GLM and MLM) used. The 12 SNPs explained 6.5–10.8% of the phenotypic variation. In the GLM, six SNPs were associated with 100-seed weight, four with seed thickness, three with seed width, and one with seed length. One SNP marker each was associated with 100-seed weight and seed length, three with seed width, and four with seed thickness in the MLM. Two markers (29420334|F|0-52:C>G-52:C>G and 29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T) with pleiotropic effects were both associated with seed width and seed thickness. Six out of the twelve markers were significant in at least one of the location and combined location analyses for the same traits (Table 2). Manhattan and Q–Q plots of the SNP-based associations mapping for the four traits based on GLM and MLM are presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. The observed p-values for all traits aligned with expected p-values, as shown by the Q-Q plots.
Evaluations in Ibadan over the 2 years revealed significant associations among 30 SNP markers with the four seed size traits (Supplementary Table S1). Seventeen of these SNPs were codetected by the two statistical methods. The markers explained 5.9 to 10.6% of the observed variance. Two markers with pleiotropic effects, 29421951|F|0-37:A>C-37:A>C (associated with 100-seed weight and seed width) and 100006540|F|0-20:T>G-20:T>G (associated with seed thickness and seed width), were found. In Kano, 14 markers displayed significant associations with all four seed size traits, 11 of which were codetected by both statistical methods. The variance explained by these markers ranged from 7.1 to 9.7%. Three markers, 29422320|F|0-37:T>C-37:T>C (associated with 100-seed weight and seed length), 29421428|F|0-9:C>A-9:C>A (associated with seed length and seed width) and 29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T (associated with seed thickness and seed width), were found to have pleiotropic effects. In Ubiaja, 12 markers, half of which were codetected by both statistical methods, were significantly associated with all traits. The contribution of all the markers to the phenotypic variation ranged from 5.0 and 10.5%. Evaluations in Ubiaja did not reveal any marker with a pleiotropic effect. Two marker overlaps were found: 29421549|F|0-25:A>C-25:A>C (for HSW in Kano and Ubiaja) and 29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T (for ST in Ibadan and Kano). Chromosome positions were not given because AYB is yet to have a reference genome (Supplementary Table S1).
Candidate gene analysis was performed by blasting trimmed nucleotide sequences (60–80 bps) of significant AYB SNPs in the combined location analysis on the Phaseolus vulgaris genome database (Phaseolus vulgaris G19833 genome v2.0) in the legume information system. Forty-three candidate genes were identified. These genes were located near (less than 500 kbp) five SNP markers (100026424|F|0-37:C>T-37:C>T, 100041049|F|0-42:G>C-42:G>C, 100034480|F|0-31:C>A-31:C>A, 29420365|F|0-55:C>G-55:C>G, and 29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T) associated with the four AYB seed traits (Figure 6, Table 3). The five SNP markers were located on chromosomes 1, 2, 6, and 7 of Phaseolus vulgaris. The 43 candidate genes have 34 encoding protein products, with some having similar encoding protein products (Table 3). The encoding gene products are known to regulate seed development (UDP-glycosyltransferase superfamily protein, RING-H2 finger protein 2B), seed/fruit size (cytochrome P450 superfamily protein, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily protein; ovate family protein 13), seed weight (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor family protein; ATP-binding ABC transporter), seed length (β-carotene isomerase D27), and grain shape (serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A) in field crops.

4. Discussion

The significant differences observed among the accessions for the seed size traits revealed the existence of adequate genetic variability among them. Seeds of AYB are known to harbor vast genetic variability in color, shape, and size [4,19,20,87]. Adewale et al. [4] had earlier suggested the use of six seed characters (seed length, width, and thickness and their ratios) as unique indices for discriminating among AYB accessions. The significant accession × location × year effects for all traits indicated the distinctiveness of the environments in discriminating among the accessions. Moderate to high heritability estimates observed for all traits implied increased power of SNP detection in the accession, hence, identification of true associations between a marker and putative gene [53]. The significant positive correlations between pairs of traits suggest the possibility of simultaneous improvements in the traits to enhance seed yield.
At the genetic level, differences in the extent of relatedness among individuals in a population used for association mapping can lead to the formation of a population structure that can cause spurious associations between genotypes and the traits of interest [88]. Principal component analysis is a widely used multivariate statistical approach proposed by Price et al. [89] that can calculate population relatedness and count groups in a population in order to reduce dimensional genotype data and control population structure (by selecting the first few PCs that present most of the total variation among individuals based on their SNP data). In this study, however, population structure analysis using the PCA approach showed barely noticeable differentiation among accessions. This result of subtle population structure was also confirmed by the multidimensional scaling (MDS) approach using Tassel software. The first three principal components of PCA had a high correlation with the first three principal components of MDS (data not shown). This might have resulted from the fact that most of the accessions, especially the large proportion whose origins are unknown (102 accessions), are possibly from Nigeria. Association analyses between specific phenotypes and genotypes within a genome are an important step toward the discovery of genes controlling the traits [53,90]. Of the 195 accessions used in this study, 137 have been previously utilized for conducting genome-wide association studies for nutritional traits, and several significant SNPs were found to be associated with the studied traits [41]. In this study, model fitness for the GWAS was confirmed by the Q–Q plots. The alignment of observed and expected p-values in the Q–Q plots for all the measured traits indicated that spurious associations as a result of population structure and familial relatedness were largely corrected. Using two alternative GWAS models, we found that the MLM model had a stricter decrease in the number of significant markers than the GLM model. This is because GLM is considered a naive model with a high rate of false positives because it does not take population structure into account [91], whereas MLM takes population structure into account and avoids spurious associations [92,93]. Though subtle population structure was found in this study, both models were reported because this was the first attempt at dissecting the genetic basis of seed size traits in AYB using GWAS. Significant QTLs associated with agronomic traits have also been reported in the absence of population structure using GLM and MLM models of GWAS in rice and faba bean crops [92,94]. The contribution of all the significant markers to the phenotypic variation, which ranged from 5.0 to 10.4%, suggested that the markers could be useful for marker-assisted selection in AYB improvement. However, due to the nonexistence of a reference genome for AYB, the exact locations of the markers on the chromosomes remain unknown. The Alliance for Accelerated Crop Improvement in Africa (ACACIA) is currently undertaking the whole genome sequencing of AYB [95]. Markers with pleiotropic effects could be useful in the simultaneous improvement of the correlated traits. The six significant markers that were consistent in the one location and the combined location analyses for the same traits in this study could be considered putative makers.
In this study, the common bean genome was used to align AYB SNPs, and 17% of the filtered 2491 SNPs aligned widely on common bean chr01 to chr11, including six SNPs on scaffolds. These suggest that the two crops have a syntenic relationship, which might be due to their close evolutionary relationship. Similar results have been reported for another African indigenous legume (Bambara groundnut) having syntenic relationships with other legumes (common bean, adzuki bean, and mung bean) [96,97]. The five significant markers found in Phaseolus vulgaris genome at a location close to genes whose encoding proteins had been reported in other crops to regulate the same traits as those with which they are associated in AYB can also be considered candidate makers. For example, markers (29420365|F|0-55:C>G-55:C>G and 29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T) associated with seed length, seed width, and seed thickness were found located close to genes (Phvul.001G153000 and Phvul.007G269900) having ovate family protein 13 as their encoding protein. Ovate family protein 13 is known to regulate fruit shape and seed size in tomato and rice, respectively [80]. Likewise, the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily protein, the encoding protein of genes (Phvul.006G047700, Phvul.006G047700, Phvul.002G024100, Phvul.001G153700, and Phvul.007G278500) located close to markers (100026424|F|0-37:C>T-37:C>T, 100041049|F|0-42:G>C-42:G>C, 100034480|F|0-31:C>A-31:C>A, 29420365|F|0-55:C>G-55:C>G, and 29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T) associated with the four seed size and shape traits of AYB is known to regulate seed physical traits by participating in RNA intron splicing during seed development [66]. Though significant marker-trait associations were detected in this study, the result serves as a foundation for the genetic understanding of putative makers underlying seed size traits in AYB. The identified significant makers could be targeted by plant breeders in marker-assisted selection to accelerate the genetic improvement of AYB.

5. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first attempt at dissecting the genetic basis of seed size traits in AYB using genome-wide association mapping. Several SNPs were significantly associated with seed size traits in AYB. The five significant SNP markers (100026424|F|0-37:C>T-37:C>T, 100041049|F|0-42:G>C-42:G>C, 100034480|F|0-31:C>A-31:C>A, 29420365|F|0-55:C>G-55:C>G, and 29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T) found on the Phaseolus vulgaris genome should be regarded as candidate markers. It is, therefore, recommended that efforts should be directed toward the validation of the identified significant makers using several mapping populations before they can be targeted for use in marker-assisted selection for seed size traits in AYB.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13122350/s1, Figure S1: call rate distribution in the AYB population, Figure S2: marker reproducibility distribution in the AYB population, Figure S3: proportion of missing data (SNP markers) distribution in the AYB population, Figure S4: minor allele frequency distribution in the AYB population, Figure S5: proportion of heterozygous (SNP markers) distribution in the AYB population, Figure S6: proportion of heterozygous (based on genotypes) distribution in the AYB population, Figure S7: proportion of missing data (based on genotypes) distribution in the AYB population, Figure S8: African yam bean SNPs aligned on different chromosomes of common bean genome, Table S1: DArTseq SNP markers having significant association with seed size traits of 195 accessions of African yam bean evaluated during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons in Ibadan, Kano, and Ubiaja.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.A., O.E.O. and R.P.; funding acquisition, M.T.A.; investigation, O.E.O.; methodology, O.E.O., A.A., R.P., O.O.O. and O.A.O.; data curation, O.E.O. and O.O.O.; formal analysis, O.E.O. and R.P.; project administration, M.T.A. and O.A.O.; supervision, M.T.A., A.A., O.A.O. and R.P.; writing—original draft, O.E.O.; writing—review and editing, A.A. and R.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is funded by the Crop Trust through the Genetic Resource Center, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratitude to members of staff of the seed bank of the Genetic Resource Center, IITA, Ibadan, the cassava breeding unit, IITA, Ubiaja, the cowpea breeding unit, IITA, Kano, and the Bioscience Center, IITA, Ibadan, for their field and laboratory assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grela, E.R.; Samolińska, W.; Kiczorowska, B.; Klebaniuk, R.; Kiczorowski, P. Content of minerals and fatty acids and their correlation with phytochemical compounds and antioxidant activity of leguminous seeds. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2017, 180, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Aremu, C.; Ige, S.A.; Ibirinde, D.; Raji, I.; Abolusoro, S.; Ajiboye, B.; Obaniyi, S.; Adekiya, A.; Asaleye, A. Assessing yield stability in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) performance using year effect. Open Agric. 2020, 5, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Potter, D. Economic botany of Sphenostylis (Leguminosae). Econ. Bot. 1992, 46, 262–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Adewale, B.D.; Kehinde, O.B.; Aremu, C.O.; Popoola, J.O.; Dumet, D.J. Seed metrics for genetic and shape determination in African yam bean. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 4, 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nnamani, C.V.; Ajayi, S.A.; Oselebe, H.O.; Atkinson, C.J.; Igboabuchi, A.N.; Ezigbo, E.C. Sphenostylis stenocarpa (ex. A. Rich.) Harms., a fading genetic resource in a changing climate: Crerequisite for conservation and sustainability. Plants 2017, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ojuederie, O.B.; Ajiboye, J.A.; Babalola, O.O. Biochemical and histopathological studies of key tissues in healthy male wistar rats fed on African yam bean seed and tuber Meals. J. Food Qual. 2020, 2020, 8892618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baiyeri, S.O.; Uguru, M.I.; Ogbonna, P.E.; Samuel-Baiyeri, C.C.A.; Okechukwu, R.; Kumaga, F.K.; Amoatey, C. Evaluation of the nutritional composition ofthe seeds of some selected African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa Hochst Ex. A. Rich (Harms)) accessions. Agro-Sci. 2018, 17, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Saka, J.O.; Ajibade, S.R.; Adeniyan, O.N.; Olowoyo, R.B.; Ogunbodede, B.A. Survey of underutilized grain legume production systems in the Southwest Agricultural zone of Nigeria. J. Agric. Food Inf. 2004, 6, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Olomitutu, O.E.; Abe, A.; Oyatomi, O.A.; Paliwal, R.; Abberton, M.T. Assessing intraspecific variability and diversity in African yam bean landraces using agronomic traits. Agronomy 2022, 12, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Edematie, V.E.; Fatokun, C.; Boukar, O.; Adetimirin, V.O.; Kumar, P. Inheritance of pod length and other yield components in two cowpea and tard-long bean crosses. Agronomy 2021, 11, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lo, S.; Muñoz-Amatriaín, M.; Hokin, S.A.; Cisse, N.; Roberts, P.A.; Farmer, A.D.; Xu, S.; Close, T.J. A genome-wide association and meta-analysis reveal regions associated with seed size in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 3079–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, N.; Li, Y. Maternal control of seed size in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 1087–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gu, Y.; Li, W.; Jiang, H.; Wang, Y.; Gao, H.; Liu, M.; Chen, Q.; Lai, Y.; He, C. Differential expression of a WRKY gene between wild and cultivated soybeans correlates to seed size. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2717–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Smitchger, J.; Weeden, N.F. The ideotype for seed size: A model examining the relationship between seed size and actual yield in pea. Int. J. Agron. 2018, 2018, 9658707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, Y.; Gao, M.; Liang, X.; Xu, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Gao, Y.; Qu, S.; et al. Quantitative trait loci for seed size variation in cucurbits—A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, N.L.; Gao, Y.M.; Zhang, Y.X. Effects of seed size and light intensity on seedling growth of watermelon. China Cucurbits Vegtables. 2006, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moles, A.T.; Ackerly, D.D.; Webb, C.O.; Tweddle, J.C.; Dickie, J.B.; Westoby, M. A brief history of seed size. Science 2005, 307, 576–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wu, G.; Du, G.; Shang, Z. Contribution of seed size and its fate to vegetation renewal: A review. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao = J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 17, 1969–1972. [Google Scholar]
  19. Oshodi, A.A.; Ipinmroti, K.O.; Adeyeye, E.I.; Hall, G.M. In vitro multienzyme digestibility of protein of six varieties of African yam bean flours. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1995, 69, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adewale, B.D.; Dumet, D.J.; Vroh-Bi, I.; Kehinde, O.B.; Ojo, D.K.; Adegbite, A.E.; Franco, J. Morphological diversity analysis of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Harms and prospects for utilization in germplasm conservation and breeding. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2012, 59, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Corder, E.H.; Saunders, A.M.; Risch, N.J.; Strittmatter, W.J.; Schmechel, D.E.; Gaskell, P.C.; Rimmler, J.B.; Locke, P.A.; Conneally, P.M.; Schmader, K.E.; et al. Protective effect of apolipoprotein-E type-2 allele for late-onset Alzheimer disease. Nat. Genet. 1994, 7, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ruggieri, V.; Francese, G.; Sacco, A.; D’Alessandro, A.; Rigano, M.M.; Parisi, M.; Milone, M.; Cardi, T.; Mennella, G.; Barone, A. An association mapping approach to identify favourable alleles for tomato fruit quality breeding. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Flint-Garcia, S.A.; Thuillet, A.-C.; Yu, J.; Pressoir, G.; Romero, S.M.; Mitchell, S.; Doebley, J.; Kresovich, S.; Goodman, M.; Buckler, E. Maize association population: A high-resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2005, 44, 1054–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, J.; Buckler, E.S. Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006, 17, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Semagn, K.; Bjørnstad, Å.; Xu, Y. The genetic dissection of quantitative traits in crops. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 13, 16–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zhao, K.; Tung, C.W.; Eizenga, G.C.; Wright, M.H.; Ali, M.L.; Price, A.H.; Norton, G.J.; Islam, M.R.; Reynolds, A.; Mezey, J.; et al. Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Larsson, S.J.; Lipka, A.E.; Buckler, E.S. Lessons from Dwarf8 on the strengths and weaknesses of structured association mapping. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Gali, K.K.; Sackville, A.; Tafesse, E.G.; Lachagari, V.B.; McPhee, K.; Hybl, M.; Mikić, A.; Smýkal, P.; McGee, R.; Burstin, J.; et al. Genome-wide association mapping for agronomic and seed quality traits of field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Raggi, L.; Caproni, L.; Carboni, A.; Negri, V. Genome-wide association study reveals candidate genes for flowering time variation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ahmed, S.M.; Alsamman, A.M.; Jighly, A.; Mubarak, M.H.; Al-Shamaa, K.; Istanbuli, T.; Momtaz, O.A.; El Allali, A.; Hamwieh, A. Genome-wide association analysis of chickpea germplasms differing for salinity tolerance based on DArTseq markers. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0260709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, Z.; Lancon-Verdier, V.; Le Signor, C.; She, Y.M.; Kang, Y.; Verdier, J. Genome-wide association study identified candidate genes for seed size and seed composition improvement in M. truncatula. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. de Almeida, C.P.; Santos, I.L.; de Carvalho Paulino, J.F.; Barbosa, C.C.F.; Pereira, C.C.A.; Carvalho, C.R.L.; Gonçalves, G.D.M.C.; Song, Q.; Carbonell, S.A.M.; Chiorato, A.F.; et al. Genome-wide association mapping reveals new loci associated with light-colored seed coat at harvest and slow darkening in carioca beans. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rajendran, K.; Coyne, C.J.; Zheng, P.; Saha, G.; Main, D.; Amin, N.; Ma, Y.; Kisha, T.; Bett, K.E.; McGee, R.J.; et al. Genetic diversity and GWAS of agronomic traits using an ICARDA lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Reference Plus collection. Plant Genet. Resour. 2021, 19, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Soller, M.; Beckmann, J.S. Molecular markers in varietal identification and genetic improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1983, 17, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Goddard, M.E.; Kemper, K.E.; MacLeod, I.M.; Chamberlain, A.J.; Hayes, B.J. Genetics of complex traits: Prediction of phenotype, identification of causal polymorphisms and genetic architecture. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 283, 20160569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Varshney, R.K.; Mohan, S.M.; Gaur, P.M.; Chamarthi, S.K.; Singh, V.K.; Srinivasan, S.; Swapna, N.; Sharma, M.; Pande, S.; Singh, S.; et al. Marker-assisted backcrossing to introgress resistance to Fusarium wilt race 1 and Ascochyta blight in C 214, an elite cultivar of chickpea. Plant Genome 2014, 7, plantgenome2013-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Uwera, A.; Rusagara, J.N.; Msolla, S.N.; Musoni, A.; Assefa, T. Molecular marker-assisted backcrossing of anthracnose resistance genes into common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, L.; Bu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, X.; Guo, N.; Qiu, L.; et al. Genome-wide association study of four yield-related traits at the R6 stage in soybean. BMC Genet. 2019, 20, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Mir, R.R.; Choudhary, N.; Bawa, V.; Jan, S.; Singh, B.; Bhat, M.A.; Paliwal, R.; Kumar, A.; Chitikineni, A.; Thudi, M.; et al. Allelic Diversity, structural analysis, and Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) for yield and related traits using unexplored common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm from western Himalayas. Front. Genet. 2021, 11, 609603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Giordani, W.; Gama, H.C.; Chiorato, A.F.; Garcia, A.A.F.; Vieira, M.L.C. Genome-wide association studies dissect the genetic architecture of seed shape and size in common bean. G3 2022, 12, jkac048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Oluwole, O.O.; Olomitutu, O.E.; Paliwal, R.; Oyatomi, O.A.; Abberton, M.T.; Obembe, O.O. Preliminary assessment of the association between DArT-SEQ SNP and some nutritional traits in African yam bean. Trop. J. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 4, 877–879. [Google Scholar]
  42. Adewale, D.B.; Dumet, D.J. Descriptors for African Yam Bean, Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst ex. A. Rich.) Harms; Genetic Resources Center, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA): Ibadan, Nigeria, 2011; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jaccoud, D.; Peng, K.M.; Feinstein, D.; Kilian, A. Diversity Arrays: A solid state technology for sequence information independent genotyping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Egea, L.A.; Mérida-García, R.; Kilian, A.; Hernandez, P.; Dorado, G. Assessment of genetic diversity and structure of large garlic (Allium sativum) germplasm bank, by diversity arrays technology “genotyping-by-sequencing” platform (DArTseq). Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. SAS Institute Inc. Base SAS® 9.4 Procedures Guide: Statistical Procedures; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hallauer, A.R.; Carena, M.J.; Miranda Filho, J.D. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
  47. Robinson, H.F.; Comstock, R.E.; Harvey, P.H. Estimates of heritability and the degree of dominance in corn 1. Agron. J. 1949, 41, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. R Core Team R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2015; Available online: https://www.R-project.org (accessed on 20 January 2019).
  49. Alvarado, G.; López, M.; Vargas, M.; Pacheco, Á.; Rodríguez, F.; Burgueño, J.; Crossa, J. META-R (Multi Environment Trail Analysis with R for Windows) Version 6.04. CIMMYT Research Data & Software Repository Network, V23. 2015. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11529/10201 (accessed on 20 January 2019).
  50. Bradbury, P.J.; Zhang, Z.; Kroon, D.E.; Casstevens, T.M.; Ramdoss, Y.; Buckler, E.S. TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2633–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, H.; Peng, Z.; Yang, X.; Wang, W.; Fu, J.; Wang, J.; Han, Y.; Chai, Y.; Guo, T.; Yang, N.; et al. Genome-wide association study dissects the genetic architecture of oil biosynthesis in maize kernels. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lipka, A.E.; Tian, F.; Wang, Q.; Peiffer, J.; Li, M.; Bradbury, P.J.; Gore, M.A.; Buckler, E.S.; Zhang, Z. GAPIT: Genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2397–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Adewale, S.A.; Badu-Apraku, B.; Akinwale, R.O.; Paterne, A.A.; Gedil, M.; Garcia-Oliveira, A.L. Genome-wide association study of Striga resistance in early maturing white tropical maize inbred lines. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mogga, M.; Sibiya, J.; Shimelis, H.; Lamo, J.; Yao, N. Diversity analysis and genome-wide association studies of grain shape and eating quality traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using DArT markers. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Yu, A.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, F.; Liu, A. Global gene expression of seed coat tissues reveals a potential mechanism of regulating seed size formation in castor bean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Li, N.; Li, Y. Ubiquitin-mediated control of seed size in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hina, A.; Cao, Y.; Song, S.; Li, S.; Sharmin, R.A.; Elattar, M.A.; Bhat, J.A.; Zhao, T. High-resolution mapping in two RIL populations refines major “QTL Hotspot” regions for seed size and shape in soybean (Glycine max L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Brinton, J.; Simmonds, J.; Uauy, C. Ubiquitin-related genes are differentially expressed in isogenic lines contrasting for pericarp cell size and grain weight in hexaploid wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ray, S.; Agarwal, P.; Arora, R.; Kapoor, S.; Tyagi, A.K. Expression analysis of calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family during reproductive development and abiotic stress conditions in rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Mol. Genet. Genom. 2007, 278, 493–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wei, S.; Hu, W.; Deng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Luo, Q.; Jin, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhou, S.; et al. A rice calcium-dependent protein kinase OsCPK9 positively regulates drought stress tolerance and spikelet fertility. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Moore, K.B.; Oishi, K.K. Characterization of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity during maize seed development, germination, and seedling emergence. Plant Physiol. 1993, 101, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Kang, Y.J.; Shim, K.C.; Lee, H.S.; Jeon, Y.A.; Kim, S.H.; Kang, J.W.; Yun, Y.T.; Park, I.K.; Ahn, S.N. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of the quantitative trait locus gw8. 1 associated with grain length in rice. Genes Genom. 2018, 40, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, W.; Sun, P.; He, Q.; Shu, F.; Wang, J.; Deng, H. Fine mapping of GS2, a dominant gene for big grain rice. Crop J. 2013, 1, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Watt, C.; Zhou, G.; Li, C. Harnessing transcription factors as potential tools to enhance grain size under stressful abiotic conditions in cereal crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, N.; Xu, R.; Li, Y. Molecular networks of seed size control in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019, 70, 435–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ma, J.; Wang, L.; Cao, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, H. Association mapping and transcriptome analysis reveal the genetic architecture of maize kernel size. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Radkova, M.; Revalska, M.; Kertikova, D.; Iantcheva, A. Zinc finger CCHC-type protein related with seed size in model legume species Medicago truncatula. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2019, 33, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Rehman, H.M.; Nawaz, M.A.; Bao, L.; Shah, Z.H.; Lee, J.M.; Ahmad, M.Q.; Chung, G.; Yang, S.H. Genome-wide analysis of Family-1 UDP-glycosyltransferases in soybean confirms their abundance and varied expression during seed development. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 206, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Basu, U.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Srivastava, R.; Daware, A.; Malik, N.; Sharma, A.; Bajaj, D.; Narnoliya, L.; Thakro, V.; Kujur, A.; et al. ABC transporter-mediated transport of glutathione conjugates enhances seed yield and quality in chickpea. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 253–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Qi, X.; Liu, C.; Song, L.; Li, Y.; Li, M. PaCYP78A9, a cytochrome P450, regulates fruit size in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Dong, N.Q.; Sun, Y.; Guo, T.; Shi, C.L.; Zhang, Y.M.; Kan, Y.; Xiang, Y.H.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.B.; Li, Y.C.; et al. UDP-glucosyltransferase regulates grain size and abiotic stress tolerance associated with metabolic flux redirection in rice. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Jiang, W.; Zhang, X.; Song, X.; Yang, J.; Pang, Y. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of APETALA2/Ethylene-Responsive element binding factor superfamily genes in soybean seed development. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sharma, P.; Singh, R.; Sehrawat, N. A critical review on: Significance of floral homeotic APETALA2 gene in plant system. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 10, 124–130. [Google Scholar]
  74. Liu, B.; Hua, C.; Song, G.; Wu, M.; Cui, R.; Zhang, A.; Liu, Y.; Huang, L.; Yan, A.; Ali, I.; et al. The SPATULA transcription factor regulates seed oil content by controlling seed specific genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 82, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ajadi, A.A.; Tong, X.; Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Tang, L.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Shu, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, S.; et al. Cyclin-Dependent kinase inhibitors KRP1 and KRP2 are involved in grain filling and seed germination in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Hu, Z.; He, H.; Zhang, S.; Sun, F.; Xin, X.; Wang, W.; Qian, X.; Yang, J.; Luo, X. A Kelch motif-containing serine/threonine protein phosphatase determines the large grain QTL trait in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54, 979–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ma, R.; Yuan, H.; An, J.; Hao, X.; Li, H. A Gossypium hirsutum GDSL lipase/hydrolase gene (GhGLIP) appears to be involved in promoting seed growth in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. He, S.L.; Ho, S.L. Functional characterization of a WD-Repeat protein gene (OsWD1) in rice. Am. J. Agric. For. 2018, 6, 18–27. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ma, Y.; Yang, C.; He, Y.; Tian, Z.; Li, J.; Sunkar, R. Rice OVATE family protein 6 regulates plant development and confers resistance to drought and cold stresses. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4885–4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. van der Knaap, E.; Østergaard, L. Shaping a fruit: Developmental pathways that impact growth patterns. In Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 79, pp. 27–36. [Google Scholar]
  81. Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Han, H.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yan, C.; Xu, W.; Qu, S. Construction of a high-density genetic map and analysis of seed-related traits using specific length amplified fragment sequencing for Cucurbita maxima. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.; Luo, W.; Li, W.; Chen, N.; Zhang, D.; Chong, K. The F-box protein OsFBK12 targets OsSAMS1 for degradation and affects pleiotropic phenotypes, including leaf senescence, in rice. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 1673–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Choi, B.S.; Kim, Y.J.; Markkandan, K.; Koo, Y.J.; Song, J.T.; Seo, H.S. GW2 functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase for rice expansin-like 1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Wang, Q.; Sun, G.; Ren, X.; Du, B.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Sun, D. Dissecting the genetic basis of grain size and weight in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by QTL and comparative genetic analyses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Zhong, J.; He, W.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, H.; Li, F.; Yao, J. A putative AGO protein, OsAGO17, positively regulates grain size and grain weight through OsmiR397b in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 916–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Xie, F.T.; Niu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Bu, S.H.; Zhang, H.Z.; Geng, Q.C.; Feng, J.Y.; Zhang, Y.M. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci for seed size traits in soybean. Mol. Breed. 2014, 34, 2165–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kay, D.E. Crop and Product Digest No. 2–Root Crops; Tropical Development and Research Institute: London, UK, 1987; pp. 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  88. Alqudah, A.M.; Sallam, A.; Baenziger, P.S.; Börner, A. GWAS: Fast-forwarding gene identification and characterization in temperate Cereals: Lessons from Barley—A review. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 22, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Price, A.L.; Patterson, N.J.; Plenge, R.M.; Weinblatt, M.E.; Shadick, N.A.; Reich, D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 904–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Mwadzingeni, L.; Shimelis, H.; Rees, D.J.G.; Tsilo, T.J. Genome-wide association analysis of agronomic traits in wheat under drought-stressed and non-stressed conditions. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Ezenwaka, L.; Del Carpio, D.P.; Jannink, J.L.; Rabbi, I.; Danquah, E.; Asante, I.; Danquah, A.; Blay, E.; Egesi, C. Genome-Wide Association study of resistance to cassava green mite pest and related traits in cassava. Crop Sci. 2018, 58, 1907–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Sallam, A.; Martsch, R. Association mapping for frost tolerance using multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) population in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Genetica 2015, 143, 501–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhang, Z.; Ersoz, E.; Lai, C.Q.; Todhunter, R.J.; Tiwari, H.K.; Gore, M.A.; Bradbury, P.J.; Yu, J.; Arnett, D.K.; Ordovas, J.M.; et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Bandillo, N.; Raghavan, C.; Muyco, P.A.; Sevilla, M.A.L.; Lobina, I.T.; Dilla-Ermita, C.J.; Tung, C.W.; McCouch, S.; Thomson, M.; Mauleon, R.; et al. Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: Progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice 2013, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Paliwal, R.; Abberton, M.; Faloye, B.; Olaniyi, O. Developing the role of legumes in West Africa under climate change. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2020, 56, 242–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ho, W.K.; Chai, H.H.; Kendabie, P.; Ahmad, N.S.; Jani, J.; Massawe, F.; Kilian, A.; Mayes, S. Integrating genetic maps in bambara groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.] and their syntenic relationships among closely related legumes. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Osundare, O.T.; Akinyele, B.O.; Odiyi, A.C.; Paliwal, R.; Oyatomi, O.A.; Abberton, M.T. Genetic diversity and population structure of some Nigerian accessions of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.,) using DArT SNP markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 13 02350 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution of seed size traits of 196 accessions of African yam bean evaluated during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons at three locations in Nigeria: (A) hundred seeds weight (g), (B) seed length (mm), (C) seed thickness (mm), and (D) seed width (mm).
Figure 1. Distribution of seed size traits of 196 accessions of African yam bean evaluated during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons at three locations in Nigeria: (A) hundred seeds weight (g), (B) seed length (mm), (C) seed thickness (mm), and (D) seed width (mm).
Genes 13 02350 g001
Genes 13 02350 g002 550
Figure 2. Phenotypic correlation coefficient of seed size traits of 196 accessions of African yam bean evaluated during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons at three locations in Nigeria: HSW, 100-seed weight; SL, seed length; SW, seed width; ST, seed thickness.
Figure 2. Phenotypic correlation coefficient of seed size traits of 196 accessions of African yam bean evaluated during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons at three locations in Nigeria: HSW, 100-seed weight; SL, seed length; SW, seed width; ST, seed thickness.
Genes 13 02350 g002
Genes 13 02350 g003 550
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (a–c) of AYB population and heatmap plot of kinship matrix (d) of 195 African yam bean accessions genotyped with the 2491 DArTseq SNPs.
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (a–c) of AYB population and heatmap plot of kinship matrix (d) of 195 African yam bean accessions genotyped with the 2491 DArTseq SNPs.
Genes 13 02350 g003
Genes 13 02350 g004 550
Figure 4. The Manhattan plots and Q–Q plots of the DArTSeq SNP-based associations mapping in the combined test environments analysis for: (A) hundred seeds weight (HSW), (B) seed length (SL), (C) seed thickness (ST), and (D) seed width (SW) using the GLM approach.
Figure 4. The Manhattan plots and Q–Q plots of the DArTSeq SNP-based associations mapping in the combined test environments analysis for: (A) hundred seeds weight (HSW), (B) seed length (SL), (C) seed thickness (ST), and (D) seed width (SW) using the GLM approach.
Genes 13 02350 g004
Genes 13 02350 g005 550
Figure 5. The Manhattan plots and Q–Q plots of the DArTSeq SNP-based associations mapping in the combined test environments analysis for: (A) hundred seeds weight (HSW), (B) seed length (SL), (C) seed thickness (ST), and (D) seed width (SW) using the MLM approach.
Figure 5. The Manhattan plots and Q–Q plots of the DArTSeq SNP-based associations mapping in the combined test environments analysis for: (A) hundred seeds weight (HSW), (B) seed length (SL), (C) seed thickness (ST), and (D) seed width (SW) using the MLM approach.
Genes 13 02350 g005
Genes 13 02350 g006 550
Figure 6. Cord diagram 43 of candidate genes (based on their encoded protein products) associated with five SNP markers associated with seed size traits in the AYB population.
Figure 6. Cord diagram 43 of candidate genes (based on their encoded protein products) associated with five SNP markers associated with seed size traits in the AYB population.
Genes 13 02350 g006
Table
Table 1. Mean squares from analysis of variance for four seed size traits of 196 accessions of African yam bean evaluated at three test locations in Nigeria.
Table 1. Mean squares from analysis of variance for four seed size traits of 196 accessions of African yam bean evaluated at three test locations in Nigeria.
SOVDFHSWSLSWST
Accession19552.18 **1.26 ***0.55 **0.88 ***
Location25863.2 ***117.51 ***126.96 ***148.95 ***
Year178.623.45 ***22.8 ***0.36
Location × Year2536.66 **19.46 ***4.32 **9.39 ***
Accession × Location39029.7 **0.49 ***0.32 **0.45 **
Accession × Year19528.1 **0.46 **0.250.31
Accession × Location × Year39020.74 ***0.33 ***0.23 ***0.33 ***
Replication (Location × Year)1266.67 ***0.54 **0.37 **0.52 **
Block (Replication × Location × Year)23417.14 *0.220.140.2
Error210714.10.220.140.21
Heritability 0.520.660.50.58
*, **, ***, significant at 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels of probability, respectively: HSW, 100-seed weight; SL, seed length; SW, seed width; ST, seed thickness.
Table
Table 2. DArTseq SNPs markers with significant associations with seed size traits of 195 accessions of African yam bean evaluated during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons at three locations in Nigeria (Ibadan, Kano, and Ubiaja).
Table 2. DArTseq SNPs markers with significant associations with seed size traits of 195 accessions of African yam bean evaluated during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons at three locations in Nigeria (Ibadan, Kano, and Ubiaja).
SNTraitMarkerPositionsGLMMLMSignificant in Individual Locations
p-ValueMarker R2p-ValueMarker R2
1HSW29421549|F|0-25:A>C-25:A>C11241.14 × 10−40.083628.76 × 10−40.0754KANO, UBIAJA
2HSW100026424|F|0-37:C>T-37:C>T1771.62 × 10−40.06499 UBIAJA
3HSW100008851|F|0-26:T>C-26:T>C1062.31 × 10−40.07655
4HSW100041049|F|0-42:G>C-42:G>C2497.12 × 10−40.06635
5HSW100026423|F|0-13:A>T-13:A>T22287.12 × 10−40.06635
6HSW29421658|F|0-5:G>A-5:G>A11568.34 × 10−40.06495
7SL29420365|F|0-55:C>G-55:C>G21524.35 × 10−40.072988.84 × 10−40.0769
8ST100034480|F|0-31:C>A-31:C>A2161.02 × 10−50.099253.42 × 10−50.1036UBIAJA
9ST29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T23644.59 × 10−50.086939.84 × 10−50.0925IBADAN, KANO
10ST29420680|F|0-49:T>G-49:T>G7294.41 × 10−40.068037.61 × 10−40.0712
11ST29420334|F|0-52:C>G-52:C>G5255.16 × 10−40.067027.09 × 10−40.0719
12SW29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>T23641.40 × 10−50.104053.63 × 10−50.1084KANO
13SW29421428|F|0-9:C>A-9:C>A10881.19 × 10−40.085052.08 × 10−40.0891KANO
14SW29420334|F|0-52:C>G-52:C>G5255.98 × 10−40.07087.94 × 10−40.0746
HSW, hundred seeds weight; SL, seed length; SW, seed width; ST, seed thickness.
Table
Table 3. Significant markers whose nucleotide sequences were found on the Phaseolus vulgaris genome and the encoding protein of genes found close to them.
Table 3. Significant markers whose nucleotide sequences were found on the Phaseolus vulgaris genome and the encoding protein of genes found close to them.
SNTraitMarker PositionGene IDCropChromosomeEncoding ProductRoleReferences
1HSW100026424|F|0-37:C>T-37:C>TPv06:15,126,920..15,126,980Phvul.006G04320P. vulgaris6Cinnamoyl-CoA reductaseLignin biosynthesis in seed coat[55]
Phvul.006G043600P. vulgaris6RING/U-box superfamily proteinRegulate seed size[56,57,58]
Phvul.006G043700P. vulgaris6Calcium-dependent protein kinase 33Seed development[59,60]
Phvul.006G044800P. vulgaris63-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase-like proteinSeed development[61]
Phvul.006G045000P. vulgaris6RING-H2 finger protein 2BSeed development[62]
Phvul.006G045300P. vulgaris6Myb transcription factorRegulate seed size[63,64]
Phvul.006G047700P. vulgaris6Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily proteinRegulate seed size[65]
Phvul.006G047300P. vulgaris6WRKY family transcription factorRegulate seed size [65]
2HSW100041049|F|0-42:G>C-42:G>CPv06:15,580,580..15,580,630Phvul.006G046700G. max6GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase 1-likeRegulate seed size[66]
Phvul.006G047300P. vulgaris6WRKY family transcription factorRegulate seed size[13,65]
Phvul.006G047700P. vulgaris6Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily proteinRegulate seed size[65]
Phvul.006G047900P. vulgaris6zinc finger CCCH-type with G patch domain proteinRegulate seed size[67]
Phvul.006G050000P. vulgaris6UDP-Glycosyltransferase superfamily proteinSeed development[68]
Phvul.006G051100P. vulgaris6Transmembrane protein, putativeRegulate seed size[63]
Phvul.006G053300P. vulgaris6WRKY family transcription factor family proteinRegulate seed size[13,65]
Phvul.006G053800P. vulgaris6ATP-binding ABC transporterRegulate seed size/weight[69]
Phvul.006G054100P. vulgaris6Cytochrome P450 superfamily proteinRegulate seed/fruit size[70]
3ST100034480|F|0-31:C>A-31:C>APv02:2,303,744..2,303,815Phvul.002G016300P. vulgaris2Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 3Regulate seed size[15,56]
Phvul.002G016400P. vulgaris2UDP-glucosyltransferase family proteinRegulate grain size[71]
Phvul.002G016900G. max2Ethylene-responsive transcription factor 3-likeMediates seed size and seed weight[72,73]
Phvul.002G017600G. max2Transcription factor SPATULA-likeRegulate grain size[74]
Phvul.002G019500P. vulgaris2Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor family proteinRegulate seed size/weight [75]
Phvul.002G021600G. max2Serine/threonine protein kinase TIO-likeRegulate seed size[76]
Phvul.002G024100P. vulgaris2Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily proteinRegulate grain size[65]
Phvul.002G022600P. vulgaris2GDSL-like Lipase/Acylhydrolase superfamily proteinSeed development[77]
Phvul.002G022800P. vulgaris2Cytochrome P450 superfamily proteinRegulate seed/fruit size[70]
Phvul.002G023100P. vulgaris2Transducin/WD40 repeat-like superfamily proteinRegulate grain size[78]
4SL29420365|F|0-55:C>G-55:C>GPv01:40,806,541..40,806,608Phvul.001G153000P. vulgaris1Ovate family protein 13Regulate seed/fruit size[79,80]
Phvul.001G152900P. vulgaris1RING/FYVE/PHD zinc finger superfamily proteinRegulate seed size[81]
Phvul.001G153400P. vulgaris1Kelch repeat F-box proteinRegulate seed size[82]
Phvul.001G153700P. vulgaris1Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily proteinRegulate seed size[65]
Phvul.001G155600G. max1β-carotene isomerase D27Regulate seed length[81]
Phvul.001G156500P. vulgaris1Auxin response factor 11Regulate seed size[12]
Phvul.001G157400P. vulgaris1E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DRIP2-likeRegulate seed size[56,83]
Phvul.001G157600G. max1Ethylene-responsive transcription factor 12-likeRegulate seed size[72]
Phvul.001G157900P. vulgaris1Cytochrome P450 superfamily proteinRegulate seed/fruit size[70]
5ST, SW29420736|F|0-57:G>T-57:G>TPv07:40,040,935..40,041,1Phvul.007G269900P. vulgaris7Ovate family protein 13Regulate seed/fruit size[79,80]
Phvul.007G270100P. vulgaris7Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 20Regulate seed size[15,56]
Phvul.007G272700P. vulgaris7RING-H2 finger protein 2BSeed development[62]
Phvul.007G273100P. vulgaris7Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2ARegulate grain shape[76,84]
Phvul.007G273400P. vulgaris7Myb transcription factorRegulate grain size[63,64]
Phvul.007G278500P. vulgaris7Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily proteinRegulate seed size[65]
Phvul.007G278600P. vulgaris7Argonaute family proteinRegulate seed size[85]
Phvul.007G279400P. vulgaris7ARM repeat superfamily proteinRegulate seed size[86]
Phvul.007G280200P. vulgaris7ATP-binding/protein serine/threonine kinaseRegulate seed size[76]
HSW, hundred seeds weight; SL, seed length; SW, seed width; ST, seed thickness.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olomitutu, O.E.; Paliwal, R.; Abe, A.; Oluwole, O.O.; Oyatomi, O.A.; Abberton, M.T. Genome-Wide Association Study Revealed SNP Alleles Associated with Seed Size Traits in African Yam Bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst ex. A. Rich.) Harms). Genes 2022, 13, 2350. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122350

AMA Style

Olomitutu OE, Paliwal R, Abe A, Oluwole OO, Oyatomi OA, Abberton MT. Genome-Wide Association Study Revealed SNP Alleles Associated with Seed Size Traits in African Yam Bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst ex. A. Rich.) Harms). Genes. 2022; 13(12):2350. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122350

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olomitutu, Oluwaseyi E., Rajneesh Paliwal, Ayodeji Abe, Olubusayo O. Oluwole, Olaniyi A. Oyatomi, and Michael T. Abberton. 2022. "Genome-Wide Association Study Revealed SNP Alleles Associated with Seed Size Traits in African Yam Bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst ex. A. Rich.) Harms)" Genes 13, no. 12: 2350. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122350

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop