Next Article in Journal
Sex Chromosome Turnover in Bent-Toed Geckos (Cyrtodactylus)
Next Article in Special Issue
The In Silico Identification of Potential Members of the Ded1/DDX3 Subfamily of DEAD-Box RNA Helicases from the Protozoan Parasite Leishmania infantum and Their Analyses in Yeast
Previous Article in Journal
Merging Genomics and Transcriptomics for Predicting Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metabolic Specialization and Codon Preference of Lignocellulolytic Genes in the White Rot Basidiomycete Ceriporiopsis subvermispora
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/genes12010115
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Whole Genome Analysis of Environmental Pseudomonas mendocina Strains: Virulence Mechanisms and Phylogeny

by
Lidia Ruiz-Roldán
1,†,
María de Toro
2,* and
Yolanda Sáenz
1,*
1
Área de Microbiología Molecular, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de La Rioja (CIBIR), C/Piqueras 98, 26006 Logroño, Spain
2
Plataforma de Genómica y Bioinformática, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de La Rioja (CIBIR), C/Piqueras 98, 26006 Logroño, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Joint Research Unit “Infection and Public Health” FISABIO-University of Valencia, Institute for Integrative Systems Biology I2SysBio (CSIC-UV), Av. de Catalunya, 21, 46020 Valencia, Spain.
Genes 2021, 12(1), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12010115
Submission received: 21 November 2020 / Revised: 10 January 2021 / Accepted: 16 January 2021 / Published: 19 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Genomics and Evolution)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pseudomonas mendocina is an environmental bacterium, rarely isolated in clinical specimens, although it has been described as producing endocarditis and sepsis. Little is known about its genome. Whole genome sequencing can be used to learn about the phylogeny, evolution, or pathogenicity of these isolates. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the resistome, virulome, and phylogenetic relationship of two P. mendocina strains, Ps542 and Ps799, isolated from a healthy Anas platyrhynchos fecal sample and a lettuce, respectively. Among all of the small number of P. mendocina genomes available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) repository, both strains were placed within one of two well-defined phylogenetic clusters. Both P. mendocina strains lacked antimicrobial resistance genes, but the Ps799 genome showed a MOBP3 family relaxase. Nevertheless, this study revealed that P. mendocina possesses an important number of virulence factors, including a leukotoxin, flagella, pili, and the Type 2 and Type 6 Secretion Systems, that could be responsible for their pathogenesis. More phenotypical and in vivo studies are needed to deepen the association with human infections and the potential P. mendocina pathogenicity.

1. Introduction

Pseudomonas is a non-fermenting Gram-negative bacterial genus that colonizes different ecological niches, thanks to their metabolic capacity and broad potential for adaptation to different conditions [1]. This genus includes a wide variety of species, mainly of environmental origin [2]. One of these species is P. mendocina, firstly isolated from soil and water samples in the province of Mendoza (Argentina) by Palleroni et al. in 1970 [3]. It is an environmental bacterium, rarely encountered in clinical specimens or reported as a human pathogen, although literature describes some cases of it producing endocarditis or sepsis [4,5].
Unlike the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the pathogenicity mechanisms of P. mendocina with respect to human infections have not yet been described. A large number of the species belonging to this genus are marked by their extensive resistance to antimicrobials and the presence of multiple virulence factors [1]. These include adhesins and secretion toxins, effector proteins, proteases, and elastases that facilitate adhesion, modulate host cell signal transduction cascades, and act against the extracellular matrix. Additionally, bacterial pathogens secrete proteins through cell membranes using different secretion systems, acting as toxic products in the host cell cytoplasm [6].
Over the years, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has evolved and incorporated innovations to tackle the complexities of genomes [7]. One of the outcomes of the bacterial post-genomic era was increased interest in the study and comparison of bacterial whole genome sequences in order to define their pan-genomes. A pan-genome is the full set of genes of a given bacterial species or clade [8]. It is constituted by the core genes, i.e., genes found in all strains of the same species, and by accessory genes, i.e., genes present only in some strains. These studies allowed for the characterization of the population structure, evolutionary trajectories, and pathogenicity of different bacterial species of ecological or medical interest, such as the opportunistic pathogen P. aeruginosa [9].
Little is known about the genomic characterization of P. mendocina species, and this is due to the low number of P. mendocina genomes available at the NCBI website at the time that this study was initiated (May 2019). As of December 2019, a total of 19 P. mendocina genomes (7 as complete genomes, 3 scaffold, and 9 contigs) were stored in the NCBI database, and all were from an environmental source, whereas 5044 P. aeruginosa genomes from different origins (219 complete genomes, 48 chromosome type, 1364 scaffold, and 3413 contigs) were annotated. For this reason, the aim of the present work was to analyze the genome of two P. mendocina strains isolated from animal and food samples, and to investigate their phylogenetic relationship with other P. mendocina obtained from the NCBI database.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacteria Dataset

P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 strains were isolated from a healthy mallard fecal sample and a lettuce, respectively. Both P. mendocina strains were selected from the Pseudomonas collection of the Molecular Microbiology group (CIBIR, Spain) by their susceptibility to all tested antipseudomonal agents and their capacity to produce biosurfactant compounds (secondary metabolites).
The mallard (A. platyrhynchos) fecal sample was collected in the Castilla-La Mancha region (Spain), and the lettuce (Lactuca sativa) from a little shop in the La Rioja region (Spain) in 2016. Both P. mendocina strains were identified by classical biochemical methods (Triple Sugar Iron and oxidase reactions), and confirmed by PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA fragment [10].

2.2. Genome Sequencing, Assembly, and Annotation

Genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantification of genomic DNA was measured by Qubit fluorimeter (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Genomic libraries were performed with the TruSeq DNA PCR-free Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol, and subsequent sequencing was carried out in an Illumina HiSeq 1500 RR 2 × 100 bp (Illumina).
FastQC version 0.11.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) was used to analyze the quality of raw reads, which were subsequently trimmed and filtered using Trim Galore version 0.4.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/). Quast (http://quast.sourceforge.net/quast.html) and BUSCO version 4.1.4 (https://gitlab.com/ezlab/busco) [11] analysis were performed in order to investigate the completeness of the sequenced genomes. PLACNETw tool was used to assemble bacterial whole genome and to reconstruct the plasmid content [12]. Genome annotation was subsequently performed using Rapid Prokaryotic Genome Annotation (Prokka version 1.12) [13].
The GenBank assembly numbers of P. mendocina available at the time of the study (Dec 2019) and considered as reference genomes in this work are described in Table S1. All of them were P. mendocina recovered from non-clinical samples. The reference genomes were annotated using Prokka [13] in order to unify them.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The pan-genome analysis was performed using Roary version 3.11.2 [14]. The phylogenetic tree based on strict core gene alignment was calculated using IQ-TREE [15] (version 1.6.10; bootstraps: 1000).
In order to visually compare the P. mendocina genomes, the CGView Comparison Tool [16] was used to map the sequences, using P. mendocina ymp as the reference genome, because the complete genome of this strain was the first to be obtained by whole-genome sequencing.
The pairwise average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis based on BLAST (ANIb), using both P. mendocina strains and the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes (Table S1), was conducted using JSpecies version 1.2.1 [17,18] with upper cut-off of more than 95%. The heatmap was performed using iTOL version 4 program [19]. The interspecies ANIb analysis was performed using the twenty-one P. mendocina genomes (19 reference genomes, Ps542 and Ps799 genomes) and four Pseudomonas spp. reference genomes: P. aeruginosa PAO1 (GenBank accession number NC_002516), P. putida KT2440 (NC_002947.4), P. fluorescens SBW25 (NC_012660), and P. protegens Pf-5 (NC_004129.6).
The phylogenetic distances (number of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) between the P. mendocina genomes, from the core genome alignment, were calculated using the ape function of Rstudio (version 3.5.2) [20].

2.4. COG Classification, Genomic Islands, and Bacteriophages Prediction

The proteins of each P. mendocina genome were classified into clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) functional using the EggNOG mapper web application (version 1.0.3-35-g63c274b) [21].
Genomic islands prediction was analyzed by the IslandViewer 4 [22] web tool, by default settings. DNA blocks of four contiguous open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted as genomic islands [23]. Bacteriophages prediction was realized by PHASTER [24,25] (database last update 20 December 2020, and BLASTp version 2.10.0+) and MetaPhinder [26] (database last update June 2016; minimum thresholds at 70% ID and 70% coverage, and additionally 50% ID and 50% coverage) plus ABRICATE version 0.9.8 (Seeman, T; https://github.com/tseemann/abricate).

2.5. Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Analysis

The presence of acquired resistance genes was analyzed in the P. mendocina genomes by ABRICATE version 1.0.0 (Seeman, T; https://github.com/tseemann/abricate), using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) version 3.0.8 (27 March 2020) [27]. The prediction of virulence genes was performed using BLAST+ (version 2.10.0+) [28] and a homemade virulence factor database. This database contained many of the virulence genes of P. mendocina ymp (GenBank accession number NC_009439) included in the Virulence Factor DataBase (VFDB) (26 April 2020) [29]. Additionally, the poorly annotated genes were curated using the VFAnalyzer software from the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) [29], comparing the genomes with the P. mendocina ymp reference genome (GenBank accession number CP000680.1) and by detecting orthologous genes between P. mendocina ymp and P. aeruginosa PAO1 (GenBank accession number NC_002516) using OrthoFinder [30].

3. Results

3.1. Genome Properties

The genome properties of P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 genomes, as well as the assembly parameters, are described in Table 1. After Illumina sequencing, PLACNETw was used to assemble these genomes. The Ps542 and Ps799 genomes were assembled into 64 and 33 contigs, respectively, including 22 and 15 contigs higher than 1 Kb in size, respectively. The longest contig for each of them measured 1,348,745 and 2,521,352, respectively. The N50 statistics were defined as 467,068 and 734,345 for Ps542 and Ps799, respectively.
Ps542 and Ps799 genomes were constituted by a circular chromosome of 5.2 Mb and 5.4 Mb, and their GC content percentage was 63.04% and 62.63%, respectively. For Ps542, among the 4658 predicted protein coding genes, a total of 3198 (68.6%) were associated with clear functions. For Ps799, 3329 genes from the 4955 predicted coding genes (67.2%) were associated with functions. Therefore, the P. mendocina Ps799 genome was larger than the Ps542 genome, including a high number of predicted genes and the presence of a MOBP family relaxase in its chromosome. This site-specific endonuclease belongs to a plasmid backbone and is required for its mobilization. In order to describe this relaxase, an alignment and subsequent tree construction from the first 300 amino acids of several MOBP relaxase models (Table S2), using the LG+I+G4 model, was made with IQ TREE [15,31,32,33]. The relaxase protein belongs to the MOBP family, included in the same cluster as MOBP3 relaxases from the reference plasmids, but is placed in its own subcluster (Figure S1). The Ps799 MOBP relaxase showed amino acid changes compared to the remaining MOBP3 relaxases, however, the main key residues that define the relaxase motifs were conserved. In addition, a replication initiation protein (RIP) was described also in Ps799. This protein belongs to the Rep3 superfamily protein group, found at 100% identity and 98.55% of coverage in the chromosome of several Pseudomonas sp., and one P. mendocina, according to a manual BLASTp search. However, despite the presence of this relaxase, no plasmids were detected in Ps542 nor Ps799 genomes.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

One of the objectives of this study was the comparison of these two P. mendocina genomes with the nineteen reference P. mendocina genomes, all of them obtained from the NCBI database (Table S1). The phylogenetic analysis of these P. mendocina genomes was carried out by studying their pan-genome. The P. mendocina pan-genome of our dataset consisted of 26,392 total genes: 728 belonging to the core genome (99–100% of strains), 362 from the soft core genome (95–98% of strains), and 25,302 genes corresponding to the accessory genome (Table S3).
Using their core-genome, from 741,976 nucleotides, a phylogenetic tree was created (Figure 1a). The phylogenetic tree showed the distribution of P. mendocina into two clusters, the first one comprised P. mendocina ZWU0006, MAE1-K, UBA1872, ymp, DLHK, and NSYSU genomes, and subclassified in two subclusters. The second cluster also comprised two subclusters. The first one only included P. mendocina Ps542 and NEB698 genomes, whereas the remaining genomes were included in the second subcluster. Both P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 genomes belonged to the same cluster. These similarities were also observed in Figure 2, where P. mendocina ymp, NSYSU, DLHK, UBA1872, and MAE1-K disclosed high BLAST hits (80–100%) among them.
A clonal relationship was observed between certain P. mendocina genomes from the second cluster, e.g., FFL24 and FFL34 (pulp mill wastewater origin, Chile), VN230 and VN231 (pulp mill wastewater, Chile), S5.2 and S13.2 (soil, France), and NBRC-14162 and NCTC10897 (soil, non-determined country) strains. To evaluate the clonality between strains, the phylogenetic distance (number of SNPs) was calculated (Table S4). No SNPs were observed betweenVN230 and VN231 core genomes, only one SNP was found between S5.2 and S13.2 and between NBRC-14162 and NCTC10897, and 5 SNPs were detected between FFL24 and FFL34 genomes (Figure 1b). Analyzing the biological data from the NCBI database, many of the related P. mendocina genomes were included in the same BioProject, except for NCTC10897 and NBRC-14162.
In comparison, our P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 genomes, isolated from a mallard and a lettuce, respectively, showed a high degree of difference between them, based on the high number of different SNPs detected between their core-genomes: 57,468 SNPs (from a total of 741,976 nucleotides).
Additionally, the ANIb values, calculated over the whole genome, were analyzed to determine the genetic identity of all P. mendocina genomes. Only a few P. mendocina strains showed ANIb values above 95% (Figure S2 and Table S5). Indeed, the differences between the two main clusters were confirmed. P. mendocina DLHSK, NSYSU, ymp, MAE1-K, and UBA1872 (first cluster) showed around 97% of ANIb, whereas genomes of the second cluster, P. mendocina VN230, VN231, NCTC10898, NCTC10899, NBRC-14162, NCTC10897, NK-01, S13.2, S5.2 (many of them isolated from soil or freshwater sources), and Ps799, showed percentages above 98%. Likewise, P. mendocina reference genomes S5.2 and S13.2, and NBRC 14,162 and NCTC10897, displayed ANIb values ranging from 99.9 to 100%, confirming the previously reported results (Figure 1a and Table S5). On the other hand, P. mendocina Ps542, NEB698, ZWU0006 EF27, FF124, and FF134 genomes showed identity percentages lower than 85%.
To describe the interspecies identity, an ANIb analysis was performed with four different reference genomes of Pseudomonas spp. as outgroups: P. aeruginosa PAO1 (GenBank accession number NC_002516), P. putida KT2440 (NC_002947.4), P. fluorescens SBW25 (NC_012660), and P. protegens Pf-5 (NC_004129.6) (Table S6). For these reference genomes, the ANIb values ranged from 74.76% (percentage identity between P. aeruginosa PAO1 and P. fluorescens SBW25) to 77.82% (percentage identity between P. aeruginosa PAO1 and P. mendocina MAE1-K). P. mendocina genomes showed percentages of identity ranging from 84% to 100% over their whole genome, and SNP values on their core-genome alignment from 0 to 61,985.

3.3. COG Classification, Genomic Islands, and Bacteriophages Prediction

The protein repertoire of P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 was compared with the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes. All P. mendocina genomes showed similar percentages of COG categories (Figure 3 and Table S7). The main difference was the presence of proteins belonging to “Extracellular structures” (W category) and “Cytoskeleton” (Z category), both detected in P. mendocina ZWU0006 reference genome (Table S7). Proteins included in the “Functional unknown” COG category (S category, 18–20%) made up the largest group. The majority of the proteins were distributed among “Amino acid transport and metabolism” (E category, 7–8%), “Transcription” (K category, 7–8%), and “Signal transduction mechanisms” (T category, 6–7%). The remaining categories showed percentages ranging from 1–5% (Table S7). On the other hand, the highest protein abundances in the P. mendocina Ps542 genome were observed in M category (5.3%), the “Cell motility” (N category) (4.0%) and T category (7.8%), whereas in the Ps799 genome, they were detected in “Carbohydrate transport and metabolism” (G category) (4.256%) and in “Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism” (Q category) (2.925%). No P. mendocina genomes showed proteins classified in either “General function prediction only” (R category) or “Nuclear structure” (Y category).
The genomic islands prediction was carried out to analyze part of the accessory genome of the P. mendocina genomes. Ps542 and Ps799 exhibited 16 and 18 genomic islands, respectively (Table S8). In the case of Ps542, the regions showed distances between 3871 and 44,758 bp, whereas Ps799 presented regions between 4181 and 49,621 bp. In both cases, non-relevant genes were described in their genomic islands.
On the other hand, no prophages sequences were obtained after using the MetaPhinder program. However, analyzing the data from the PHASTER program, four P. mendocina genomes exhibited prophages sequences, including the Ps542 and Ps799 strains (Table S9). Both genomes showed a transposase protein belonging to the Pseudomonas phage MD8 (GenBank accession number NC_031091), displaying a 91% of identity (101 of 130 aa). On the other hand, EF27 and MAE1-K presented prophage regions (Table S9), but only in EF27 were two regions with identity higher than 99% and coverage between 97–100% were described: an IS6-like element IS26 family transposase (Escherichia phage RCS47; NC_042128) and a Tn3-like element TnAs1 family transposase (Salmonella phage SJ46; NC_031129) (Table S9).

3.4. Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Analysis

According to previous phenotypic studies performed by our group, P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 strains were susceptible to all antipseudomonal antibiotics tested (piperacillin-tazobactam, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, netilmicin, tobramycin, gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin). To confirm the presence or absence of resistance genes, the CARD database was used to analyze their resistome (Table S10). No acquired resistance genes were observed in P. mendocina Ps542, whereas Ps799 exhibited a catB11 chloramphenicol resistance gene with one nucleotide deletion, resulting in a truncated protein. On the other hand, three of the nineteen P. mendocina genomes carried antimicrobial resistance genes. The EF27 genome harbored the blaCARB-16 and blaIMP-16 carbapenemases-encoding genes, the qnrVC1 quinolone resistance gene, the arr-4 rifampin ADP ribosyltransferase gene, the aph(6)-Id and aph(3”)-Ib aminoglycoside phosphotransferase genes, the ant(2”)-Ia adenylyltransferase, the dfrA6 dihydrofolate reductase gene, and the amino acidic substitution T831I in the GyrA DNA gyrase. The VN230 and VN231 carried the sul1 sulphonamide resistance gene and the aadA13 aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferase gene.
To study the virulome, their genomes were analyzed through a homemade virulence database and the VFDB database. The Ps542 and Ps799 genomes were compared with the P. mendocina ymp reference genome, as well as the remaining 18 P. mendocina genomes (Table S11). One hundred and sixty-five genes belonging to different virulence mechanisms were analyzed. One of the main groups of genes identified were those involved in flagella synthesis, responsible for swimming motility, which were present in all of the P. mendocina genomes, especially in Ps542 and Ps799. The genes responsible for the Type IV-pili biosynthesis and twitching motility were highly variable among the P. mendocina genomes. Unlike P. mendocina ymp, all genomes lacked the fimT and pilA genes, which are part of the type 4 fimbria biogenesis. On the other hand, the lack of genes responsible for phenazine biosynthesis (phzA1 to phzS) was consistent with the absence of a blue-green color in all of the P. mendocina strains studied (Table S11). Additionally, the genes responsible for the synthesis and regulation of alginate production were present in all P. mendocina genomes, except for the mucE gene, an activator of alginate biosynthesis. Regarding the pyoverdine biosynthesis genes, neither Ps542 nor Ps799 presented these clusters.
Interestingly, neither the most common phospholipases nor proteases were detected in the P. mendocina genomes. However, P. mendocina ymp showed an orthologous gene, called Pmen_0721 in The Pseudomonas Genome Database, related to the alkaline metalloprotease aprA from P. aeruginosa PAO1 (PA1249). This gene was annotated as an hemolysin-type calcium-binding protein. Surprisingly, P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 genomes exhibited the same orthologous gene, called Ps542_01013 and Ps799_01423, respectively, and in both cases it was annotated as a leukotoxin.
Regarding the type VI secretion system, the Hcp secretion island-1 system (H1-T6SS) was highlighted. Only the P. mendocina MAE1-K, DLHK, and NSYSU genomes carried the complete operon encoding this system, including the vgrG1 gene, which is absent in P. mendocina ymp (Table S11). Conversely, the NEB698 and Ps542 were unique in that they lacked all of the H1-T6SS operon. In the case of the Type 2 Secretion System (T2SS), all P. mendocina strains except EF27 carried the two clusters belonging to this general secretion pathway (Table S11).
Some of these virulence mechanisms are regulated by a quorum sensing (QS) system in P. aeruginosa, and are also dependent on the GacA/GacS two-component master regulatory system. No P. mendocina genome possessed the three QS systems, lasI/lasR, ahlI/ahlR, and rhlI/rhlR genes, whereas all of them harbored the gacA/gacS genes.

4. Discussion

The NGS is becoming one of the most widely used applications in whole genome sequencing. Using this technology, researchers can obtain the most comprehensive view of genomic information about many bacterial species in order to describe their phylogeny, evolution or pathogenic mechanisms [7]. Unlike genomic studies conducted on species such as P. aeruginosa [9,34,35] or P. putida [36,37], among others [38], little is known about the species P. mendocina. For this reason, this study was carried out to describe and understand the genomic structure of this species.
The two P. mendocina strains, Ps542 and Ps799, were isolated from animal and food samples, and their genomes were sequenced using Illumina technology. Once assembled, it was apparent that their genome sizes were bigger than that of the P. mendocina ymp reference strain, but similar to that of other P. mendocina. This bacterial species showed the smallest genome (5.19 Mb) compared to other Pseudomonas species, such as P. aeruginosa (6.61 Mb), P. putida (6.06 Mb), P. fluorescens (6.39 Mb), and P. syringae (6.11 Mb) (NCBI Genome, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome). Nevertheless, the GC content of the different species remained similar, from 58.8% for P. syringae to 66.6% for P. aeruginosa; the average GC content for P. mendocina was 62.5% (NCBI Genome, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome). One of the main reasons for the differences in genome size could be that the rest of the Pseudomonas species had larger accessory genomes including a great number of antimicrobial resistance genes, mobile genetic elements, and genes encoding virulence-related traits [37,39].
Studying the P. mendocina phylogeny, all of their genomes available in the NCBI database corresponded to environmental isolates [40,41,42], mainly originated from the Asian continent in the case of the first cluster; in contrast, the second cluster was isolated from Europe, North America, South America, and Asia, showing a wider geographical dispersion. On the other hand, as outlined in a few research articles, a pair of microorganisms can be classified in the same species if their ANI value is higher than 96% [17,43]. Surprisingly, after analyzing the ANIb values, genomes were joined into two specific groups (ANIb values between 97–99% from each one) and some genomes were excluded from both of them, the hypothesis of having P. mendocina subspecies in this study was taken into account. However, it is important to remark that all of the reference genomes used in this study were downloaded from the NCBI repository. It is important to well-annotate and increase the number of genomes of this species, including those from different origins, as clinical samples.
Regarding Ps542 and Ps799 genomes, it is important to highlight the presence of a putative MOBP3 family relaxase in the P. mendocina Ps799. Relaxase recognizes and covalently binds to the origin of transfer site (oriT) of the donor DNA sequence during the transfer process to a recipient cell [44]. This protein catalyzes the initial and final stages during the conjugation process. Additionally, it is the component of the conjugative machinery that is common in plasmid structures. In this case, the MOBP family comprises a cluster of actively evolving relaxases, including distinguishable clades, most of them isolated from soil or manure isolates [31,45]. The MOBP3 relaxase proteins have been found mainly in conjunction with the presence of IncX plasmids [31,46,47], but they have also been recently described as part of integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) or integrative mobilizable elements (IMEs), part of the bacterial genome [48]. These genomic but mobile elements are the most abundant conjugative ones in almost all prokaryotic clades [49].
Normally, IMEs, ICEs, and plasmids are responsible for the spread of antimicrobial resistance genes among bacterial species [50]. Despite the appearance of this relaxase, P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 were susceptible to all antibiotics tested. Consistent with this, in silico analysis confirmed the absence of antimicrobial resistance genes. However, 3 out of the 19 reference genomes showed antimicrobial resistance genes, EF27, VN230, and VN231. Again, this study confirmed the premise of extensive antimicrobial resistance even in clinical and some environmental P. mendocina isolates [51,52,53], with antimicrobial susceptibility more common among the environmental isolates [54,55]. However, although P. mendocina infections have to date been easily treated with antibiotics, antibiotic pressure and the spread of mobile genetic elements could reverse this in future [55].
In addition to the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms, bacteria can also produce a wide variety of virulence factors as a strategy to evade host immune defenses or colonize new niches [1]. Our P. mendocina genomes exhibited a relevant number of virulence genes implicated in flagella motility, type IV pili, and alginate production. Although motility and biofilm are also common in environmental non-pathogenic bacteria, they have been regarded as pathogenicity mechanisms because they are essential for many biological functions, such as the search for nutrients, survival in unfavorable conditions, sexual reproduction, but also for the spreading of diseases. The motility mechanisms are necessary to enable bacterial spread throughout the respiratory tract when establishing infections [56], as well as for dispersion of the bacteria during the last steps of biofilm formation [57]. Crucial to this process is fliG, which expresses a protein that locates to the basal body of the flagella and directs rotation [58], detected in all of the P. mendocina strains included. However, the missing genes responsible for the core minor pili subunits for Type IV pili (T4P) could avoid the attachment of these strains to host epithelial cells [58,59,60]. It is the same for the missing mucE gene, an activator of alginate biosynthesis, which could explain, joined to other mechanisms, the non-mucoid phenotype observed in the P. mendocina strains [61]. Regarding the secretion pathway H1-T6SS, whose complete structure was only present in four genomes, including the Ps799, it can act as an antibacterial weapon, giving the bacteria the capacity to inject different effectors to compete with other bacterial cells for the same ecological niche, even the environmental strains [62]. To appropriately coordinate all the virulence factors mentioned above, the GacA/GacS two-component master regulatory system could be enough to modulate the expression of the putative virulence factors in these strains.
In summary, a deep analysis of P. mendocina genomes was performed in this study (virulome, resistome, phylogeny) by comparing the genomes of two strains of animal and food origin, with the P. mendocina genomes published in the NCBI database. All P. mendocina genomes were classified into two phylogenetic clusters. However, the nomenclature of the reference genomes uploaded in an international repository must be reviewed to confirm the species name in this case. Most of the genomes did not harbor antimicrobial resistance genes, but it should be highlighted that all of them possessed putative virulence factors that could be responsible for the pathogenesis in many infections. More phenotypic and in vivo studies are needed in order to further understand the potential role of P. mendocina pathogenicity especially in clinical infections in humans.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/12/1/115/s1. Table S1. Genomic characteristics of the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes and their GenBank assembly numbers. Genes and protein data were obtained after Prokka annotation [13]. Table S2. Description of plasmids used in the phylogenetic tree of MOBP relaxases, including their GenBank ID. Table S3. Phylogenetic matrix about the presence/absence of genes in the P. mendocina genomes used in this study. Matrix was constructed with Roary (version 3.11.2) [14]. Table S4. Phylogenetic distances (number of SNPs) between the P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 and the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes, measured in their core genomes. The package ape from Rstudio (version 3.5.2) was used to analyze them. Table S5. Average nucleotide identity (ANIb) values, using BLAST, of the twenty-one P. mendocina genomes. Table S6. Average nucleotide identity based on BLAST (ANIb) values, comparing the P. mendocina genomes and four different Pseudomonas spp. reference genomes. Table S7. Percentages of clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) functional categories in the twenty-one P. mendocina genomes. Table S8. Genomic islands (GIs) prediction of the P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799. Islandviewer 4 [22] was used to predict the genomic islands. Table S9. Prophage sentences prediction of the P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799, including the 19 reference genomes downloaded from the NCBI repository. PHASTER [24,25] was used to predict bacteriophages regions. Percentage of identity (Identity (%)) follow the same reference values as Phaster web: Intact (>90%) and Questionable (70–90%). Identity values lower than 70% (Incomplete) were not added. Intact values are highlighted in green. Those phages that showed >90% ID in the Phaster analysis were subjected to a manual BLASTp analysis, indicated in the table with their query coverage. Table S10. Description of the antimicrobial resistance genes described in some P. mendocina genomes, using ABRICATE (version 1.0.0) (Seeman, T; https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) and the CARD database (version 3.0.8) [27]. Table S11. Virulence mechanisms of the twenty-one P. mendocina genomes obtained from the VFDB database (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/cgi-bin/VFs/genus.cgi?Genus=Pseudomonas) and a homemade BLAST database from the P. mendocina ymp genome. Each row corresponded to a virulence gene, each column corresponded to a different P. mendocina genome, where the contig number and the start-end of the gene are described. The symbol in parenthesis indicates the gene direction in the contig: +, forward; -, reverse. The ID number of the genes used in the homemade database are in the “ymp” column. Figure S1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of MOBP family relaxases, including the relaxase of the P. mendocina Ps799 genome, using IQ-TREE (version 1.6.10) [15]. The descriptions of the MOBP relaxases from different plasmids are included in Table S2. Color code: black on yellow = invariant amino acids; black on green = key residues that define the relaxase. The MOBF11 relaxase from the pDTG1 plasmid (GenBank accession number NC_004999) was used as an outgroup in order to root the tree. Figure S2. Phylogeny of the two P. mendocina genomes (Ps542 and Ps799) and the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes described in the NCBI database (Table S1): A. Core-genome phylogenetic tree based on the essential core genome, using Roary (version 3.11.2) [14]. Bootstrap values from 90% to 100% were marked as black circles. B. Heatmap of the average nucleotide identity based on BLAST (ANIb) for each pairwise comparison. Blue color key represents the percentage of differences between genomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.R.-R., M.d.T., and Y.S.; methodology, L.R.-R. and M.d.T.; formal analysis, L.R.-R. and M.d.T.; investigation, L.R.-R. and M.d.T.; data curation, M.d.T. and L.R.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, L.R.-R.; writing—review and editing, L.R.-R., M.d.T., and Y.S.; visualization, L.R.-R., M.d.T., and Y.S.; supervision, M.d.T. and Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III of Spain (ISCIII) (FIS project number PI12/01276) (Co-funded by European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) “A way to make Europe”). Lidia Ruiz-Roldán had a predoctoral fellowship from the Consejería de Industria, Innovación y Empleo, Gobierno de La Rioja, Spain.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets are available. The whole genome data for P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 were deposited at GenBank using BioProject number PRJNA525577. The raw sequencing data were deposited at NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession numbers SAMN11053884 and SAMN11053888, respectively.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank María Bea Escudero, from the Plataforma de Genómica y Bioinformática, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de La Rioja (CIBIR), for preparing the genomic DNA samples and genomic libraries. We want to thank Carlos Francés-Cuesta, from the Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO)—Universidad de Valencia, for his assistance in the bioinformatic analyses. We want to thank Maria Pilar Garcillán Barcia, from the Instituto de Biomedicina y Biotecnología de Cantabria (Universidad de Cantabria—CSIC), for her assistance in the analysis and review of the MOBP relaxase from the Ps799 genome.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Moradali, M.F.; Ghods, S.; Rehm, B.H.A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Peix, A.; Ramírez-Bahena, M.-H.; Velázquez, E. Historical evolution and current status of the taxonomy of genus Pseudomonas. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2009, 9, 1132–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Palleroni, N.J.; Doudoroff, M.; Stanier, R.Y.; Solánes, R.E.; Mandel, M. Taxonomy of the aerobic pseudomonads: The properties of the Pseudomonas stutzeri group. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1970, 60, 215–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Aragone, M.R.; Maurizi, D.M.; Clara, L.O.; Navarro Estrada, J.L.; Ascione, A. Pseudomonas mendocina, an environmental bacterium isolated from a patient with human infective endocarditis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992, 30, 1583–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nseir, W.; Taha, H.; Abid, A.; Khateeb, J. Pseudomonas mendocina sepsis in a healthy man. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2011, 13, 375–376. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Pena, R.T.; Blasco, L.; Ambroa, A.; González-Pedrajo, B.; Fernández-García, L.; López, M.; Bleriot, I.; Bou, G.; García-Contreras, R.; Wood, T.K.; et al. Relationship Between Quorum Sensing and Secretion Systems. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Goodwin, S.; McPherson, J.D.; McCombie, W.R. Coming of age: Ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016, 17, 333–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vernikos, G.; Medini, D.; Riley, D.R.; Tettelin, H. Ten years of pan-genome analyses. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2015, 23, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Freschi, L.; Vincent, A.T.; Jeukens, J.; Emond-Rheault, J.-G.; Kukavica-Ibrulj, I.; Dupont, M.-J.; Charette, S.J.; Boyle, B.; Levesque, R.C. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pan-Genome Provides New Insights on Its Population Structure, Horizontal Gene Transfer, and Pathogenicity. Genome Biol. Evol. 2019, 11, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Estepa, V.; Rojo-Bezares, B.; Torres, C.; Sáenz, Y. Faecal carriage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in healthy humans: Antimicrobial susceptibility and global genetic lineages. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2014, 89, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Seppey, M.; Manni, M.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing Genome Assembly and Annotation Completeness. In Gene Prediction; Humana: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 227–245. [Google Scholar]
  12. Vielva, L.; de Toro, M.; Lanza, V.F.; de la Cruz, F. PLACNETw: A web-based tool for plasmid reconstruction from bacterial genomes. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 3796–3798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Page, A.J.; Cummins, C.A.; Hunt, M.; Wong, V.K.; Reuter, S.; Holden, M.T.G.; Fookes, M.; Falush, D.; Keane, J.A.; Parkhill, J. Roary: Rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3691–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nguyen, L.-T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Grant, J.R.; Arantes, A.S.; Stothard, P. Comparing thousands of circular genomes using the CGView Comparison Tool. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Richter, M.; Rosselló-Móra, R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 19126–19131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Goris, J.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Klappenbach, J.A.; Coenye, T.; Vandamme, P.; Tiedje, J.M. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W256–W259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Team, R.C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Forslund, K.; Coelho, L.P.; Szklarczyk, D.; Jensen, L.J.; von Mering, C.; Bork, P. Fast Genome-Wide Functional Annotation through Orthology Assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bertelli, C.; Laird, M.R.; Williams, K.P.; Lau, B.Y.; Hoad, G.; Winsor, G.L.; Brinkman, F.S.L. IslandViewer 4: Expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W30–W35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mathee, K.; Narasimhan, G.; Valdes, C.; Qiu, X.; Matewish, J.M.; Koehrsen, M.; Rokas, A.; Yandava, C.N.; Engels, R.; Zeng, E.; et al. Dynamics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008, 105, 3100–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Arndt, D.; Grant, J.R.; Marcu, A.; Sajed, T.; Pon, A.; Liang, Y.; Wishart, D.S. PHASTER: A better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zhou, Y.; Liang, Y.; Lynch, K.H.; Dennis, J.J.; Wishart, D.S. PHAST: A Fast Phage Search Tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jurtz, V.I.; Villarroel, J.; Lund, O.; Larsen, M.V.; Nielsen, M. MetaPhinder—Identifying Bacteriophage Sequences in Metagenomic Data Sets. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jia, B.; Raphenya, A.R.; Alcock, B.; Waglechner, N.; Guo, P.; Tsang, K.K.; Lago, B.A.; Dave, B.M.; Pereira, S.; Sharma, A.N.; et al. CARD 2017: Expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D566–D573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Liu, B.; Zheng, D.; Jin, Q.; Chen, L.; Yang, J. VFDB 2019: A comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D687–D692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Alvarado, A.; Garcillán-Barcia, M.P.; de la Cruz, F. A degenerate primer MOB typing (DPMT) method to classify γ-proteobacterial plasmids in clinical and environmental settings. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q.; Vinh, L.S. UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Poulsen, B.E.; Yang, R.; Clatworthy, A.E.; White, T.; Osmulski, S.J.; Li, L.; Penaranda, C.; Lander, E.S.; Shoresh, N.; Hung, D.T. Defining the core essential genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019, 116, 10072–10080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Freschi, L.; Jeukens, J.; Kukavica-Ibrulj, I.; Boyle, B.; Dupont, M.-J.; Laroche, J.; Larose, S.; Maaroufi, H.; Fothergill, J.L.; Moore, M.; et al. Clinical utilization of genomics data produced by the international Pseudomonas aeruginosa consortium. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Nelson, K.E.; Weinel, C.; Paulsen, I.T.; Dodson, R.J.; Hilbert, H.; Martins dos Santos, V.A.P.; Fouts, D.E.; Gill, S.R.; Pop, M.; Holmes, M.; et al. Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the metabolically versatile Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 4, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Udaondo, Z.; Molina, L.; Segura, A.; Duque, E.; Ramos, J.L. Analysis of the core genome and pangenome of Pseudomonas putida. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 3268–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jun, S.-R.; Wassenaar, T.M.; Nookaew, I.; Hauser, L.; Wanchai, V.; Land, M.; Timm, C.M.; Lu, T.-Y.S.; Schadt, C.W.; Doktycz, M.J.; et al. Diversity of Pseudomonas Genomes, Including Populus-Associated Isolates, as Revealed by Comparative Genome Analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Freschi, L.; Bertelli, C.; Jeukens, J.; Moore, M.P.; Kukavica-Ibrulj, I.; Emond-Rheault, J.-G.; Hamel, J.; Fothergill, J.L.; Tucker, N.P.; McClean, S.; et al. Genomic characterisation of an international Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference panel indicates that the two major groups draw upon distinct mobile gene pools. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2018, 365, fny120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Guo, W.; Wang, Y.; Song, C.; Yang, C.; Li, Q.; Li, B.; Su, W.; Sun, X.; Song, D.; Yang, X.; et al. Complete genome of Pseudomonas mendocina NK-01, which synthesizes medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates and alginate oligosaccharides. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 3413–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Chong, T.M.; Yin, W.-F.; Mondy, S.; Grandclément, C.; Dessaux, Y.; Chan, K.-G. Heavy-metal resistance of a France vineyard soil bacterium, Pseudomonas mendocina strain S5.2, revealed by whole-genome sequencing. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 6366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wong, C.F.; Niu, H.; Jiang, J.; Li, J.; Chan, C.M.N.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Leung, F.C.C. Genome Sequence of Pseudomonas mendocina DLHK, Isolated from a Biotrickling Reactor. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 6326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Jain, C.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Phillippy, A.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Guzmán-Herrador, D.L.; Llosa, M. The secret life of conjugative relaxases. Plasmid 2019, 104, 102415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Garcillán-Barcia, M.P.; Francia, M.V.; de la Cruz, F. The diversity of conjugative relaxases and its application in plasmid classification. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 657–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lanza, V.F.; de Toro, M.; Garcillán-Barcia, M.P.; Mora, A.; Blanco, J.; Coque, T.M.; de la Cruz, F. Plasmid Flux in Escherichia coli ST131 Sublineages, Analyzed by Plasmid Constellation Network (PLACNET), a New Method for Plasmid Reconstruction from Whole Genome Sequences. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. de Toro, M.; Fernández, J.; García, V.; Mora, A.; Blanco, J.; de la Cruz, F.; Rodicio, M.R. Whole genome sequencing, molecular typing and in vivo virulence of OXA-48-producing Escherichia coli isolates including ST131 H30-Rx, H22 and H41 subclones. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Jiang, X.; Hall, A.B.; Xavier, R.J.; Alm, E.J. Comprehensive analysis of chromosomal mobile genetic elements in the gut microbiome reveals phylum-level niche-adaptive gene pools. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Guglielmini, J.; Quintais, L.; Garcillán-Barcia, M.P.; de la Cruz, F.; Rocha, E.P.C. The Repertoire of ICE in Prokaryotes Underscores the Unity, Diversity, and Ubiquity of Conjugation. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Partridge, S.R.; Kwong, S.M.; Firth, N.; Jensen, S.O. Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Rojo-Bezares, B.; Estepa, V.; Cebollada, R.; de Toro, M.; Somalo, S.; Seral, C.; Castillo, F.J.; Torres, C.; Sáenz, Y. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from a Spanish hospital: Characterization of metallo-β-lactamases, porin OprD and integrons. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 304, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Almuzara, M.; Montaña, S.; Carulla, M.; Sly, G.; Fernandez, J.; Hernandez, M.; Moriano, A.; Traglia, G.M.; Bakai, R.; Ramirez, M.S. Clinical cases of VIM-producing Pseudomonas mendocina from two burned patients. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 14, 273–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bellés, A.; Bueno, J.; Rojo-Bezares, B.; Torres, C.; Javier Castillo, F.; Sáenz, Y.; Seral, C. Characterisation of VIM-2-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from lower tract respiratory infections in a Spanish hospital. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 37, 1847–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Estepa, V.; Rojo-Bezares, B.; Torres, C.; Sáenz, Y. Genetic Lineages and Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas spp. Isolates Recovered from Food Samples. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2015, 12, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gani, M.; Rao, S.; Miller, M.; Scoular, S. Pseudomonas mendocina Bacteremia: A Case Study and Review of Literature. Am. J. Case Rep. 2019, 20, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Feldman, M.; Bryan, R.; Rajan, S.; Scheffler, L.; Brunnert, S.; Tang, H.; Prince, A. Role of flagella in pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pulmonary infection. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lee, K.; Yoon, S.S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm, a Programmed Bacterial Life for Fitness. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 1053–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Nolan, L.M.; Whitchurch, C.B.; Barquist, L.; Katrib, M.; Boinett, C.J.; Mayho, M.; Goulding, D.; Charles, I.G.; Filloux, A.; Parkhill, J.; et al. A global genomic approach uncovers novel components for twitching motility-mediated biofilm expansion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microb. Genom. 2018, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Giltner, C.L.; Nguyen, Y.; Burrows, L.L. Type IV pilin proteins: Versatile molecular modules. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2012, 76, 740–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Leighton, T.L.; Buensuceso, R.N.C.; Howell, P.L.; Burrows, L.L. Biogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type IV pili and regulation of their function. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 4148–4163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Valentine, M.E.; Kirby, B.D.; Withers, T.R.; Johnson, S.L.; Long, T.E.; Hao, Y.; Lam, J.S.; Niles, R.M.; Yu, H.D. Generation of a highly attenuated strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for commercial production of alginate. Microb. Biotechnol. 2020, 13, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Sana, T.G.; Berni, B.; Bleves, S. The T6SSs of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain PAO1 and Their Effectors: Beyond Bacterial-Cell Targeting. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Genes 12 00115 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogeny of the two P. mendocina genomes (Ps542 and Ps799) and the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes described in the NCBI database (Table S1): (a) Core-genome phylogenetic tree based on the essential core genome, using Roary pipeline [14]. Bootstrap values from 90 to 100% were marked as black circles; (b) Heatmap of the phylogenetic distances (number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) among the P. mendocina core-genomes, using the package ape from Rstudio (version 3.5.2) [20]. The color scale represents the percentage of differences between core-genomes.
Figure 1. Phylogeny of the two P. mendocina genomes (Ps542 and Ps799) and the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes described in the NCBI database (Table S1): (a) Core-genome phylogenetic tree based on the essential core genome, using Roary pipeline [14]. Bootstrap values from 90 to 100% were marked as black circles; (b) Heatmap of the phylogenetic distances (number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) among the P. mendocina core-genomes, using the package ape from Rstudio (version 3.5.2) [20]. The color scale represents the percentage of differences between core-genomes.
Genes 12 00115 g001
Genes 12 00115 g002 550
Figure 2. CCT map comparing Ps542 and Ps799 genomes and the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes. The CGView Comparison Tool [16] was used to map the P. mendocina sequences, using P. mendocina ymp as a reference genome. Prokka-generated GenBank files were used as an input and were converted into CGView XML files for generation of the circular genome comparison map. Starting from the outermost ring, the feature rings depict first the forward strand sequence features, then the reverse strand sequence features. The next 21 rings show regions of sequence similarity detected by BLAST comparisons conducted among CDS translations from all of the compared genomes of P. mendocina (ymp, NSYSU, DLHK, MAE1-K, UBA1872, NCTC10899, NK-01, Ps799, NCTC10898, NCTC10897, S13.2, S5.2, NBRC 14162, VN230, VN231, NEB698, FFL24, FFL34, Ps542, ZWU0006, and EF27).
Figure 2. CCT map comparing Ps542 and Ps799 genomes and the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes. The CGView Comparison Tool [16] was used to map the P. mendocina sequences, using P. mendocina ymp as a reference genome. Prokka-generated GenBank files were used as an input and were converted into CGView XML files for generation of the circular genome comparison map. Starting from the outermost ring, the feature rings depict first the forward strand sequence features, then the reverse strand sequence features. The next 21 rings show regions of sequence similarity detected by BLAST comparisons conducted among CDS translations from all of the compared genomes of P. mendocina (ymp, NSYSU, DLHK, MAE1-K, UBA1872, NCTC10899, NK-01, Ps799, NCTC10898, NCTC10897, S13.2, S5.2, NBRC 14162, VN230, VN231, NEB698, FFL24, FFL34, Ps542, ZWU0006, and EF27).
Genes 12 00115 g002
Genes 12 00115 g003 550
Figure 3. Clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) functional categories and their relative abundances in the P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 and the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes. Categories with COG < 0.042% (A, B, W, and Z categories) are not represented in the image. All of percentages are described in Table S7.
Figure 3. Clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) functional categories and their relative abundances in the P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 and the nineteen P. mendocina reference genomes. Categories with COG < 0.042% (A, B, W, and Z categories) are not represented in the image. All of percentages are described in Table S7.
Genes 12 00115 g003
Table
Table 1. Assembly parameters and general features of the P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 genomes, using PLACNETw (Velvet Optimiser assembly) [12] and Prokka pipeline [13].
Table 1. Assembly parameters and general features of the P. mendocina Ps542 and Ps799 genomes, using PLACNETw (Velvet Optimiser assembly) [12] and Prokka pipeline [13].
Ps542 GenomePs799 Genome
Assembly parameters
K-mer size (bp)101101
Number of contigs6433
Contig maximum length (bp)1,348,7452,521,352
N50 (bp)467,068734,345
Total bp assembly5,187,1285,446,182
Contigs >1 Kb2215
Average insert size (bp)514 ± 140529 ± 160
Genetic elements
Size (bp)5,178,7695,440,495
GC content (%)63.0462.63
Genes47255022
Protein coding genes46584955
Genes with predicted functions31983329
rRNA genes (5S, 16S, 23S)1, 1, 11, 1, 1
tRNA genes6666
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruiz-Roldán, L.; de Toro, M.; Sáenz, Y. Whole Genome Analysis of Environmental Pseudomonas mendocina Strains: Virulence Mechanisms and Phylogeny. Genes 2021, 12, 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12010115

AMA Style

Ruiz-Roldán L, de Toro M, Sáenz Y. Whole Genome Analysis of Environmental Pseudomonas mendocina Strains: Virulence Mechanisms and Phylogeny. Genes. 2021; 12(1):115. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12010115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruiz-Roldán, Lidia, María de Toro, and Yolanda Sáenz. 2021. "Whole Genome Analysis of Environmental Pseudomonas mendocina Strains: Virulence Mechanisms and Phylogeny" Genes 12, no. 1: 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12010115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop