Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Genetic Indices
3.2. Population Structure
3.3. Genetic Indices of Subpopulations
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lucchini, V.; Meijaard, E.; Diong, C.H.; Groves, C.P.; Randi, E. New phylogenetic perspectives among species of South-east Asian pig (Sus sp.) based on mtDNA sequences and morphometric data. J. Zool. 2005, 266, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scandura, M.; Iacolina, L.; Crestanello, B.; Pecchioli, E.; Di Benedetto, M.F.; Russo, V.; Davoli, R.; Apollonio, M.; Bertorelle, G. Ancient vs. recent processes as factors shaping the genetic variation of the Europen wild boar: Are the effect of the last glaciation still detectable? Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17, 1745–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velickovic, N.; Ferreira, E.; Djan, M.; Ernst, M.; Vidakovic, D.O.; Monaco, A.; Fonseca, C. Demographic history, current expansion and future management challenges of wild boar populations in the Balkans and Europe. Heredity 2016, 117, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hewitt, G.M. Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 2004, 359, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sommer, R.S.; Zachos, F.E. Fossil evidence and phylogeography of temperate species: ‘glacial refugia’ and post-glacial recolonization. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36, 2013–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, T.; Varga, Z. Extra-Mediterranean refugia: The rule and not the exception? Front. Zool. 2012, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Csányi, S.; Márton, M.; Köteles, P.; Lakatos, E.; Schally, G. Vadgazdálkodási Adattár—2018/2019. vadászati év. Orsz. Vadgazdálk. Adtár. Gödöllő 2019, 66. Available online: http://vmi.szie.hu/adattar/vg_stat/VA-2018-2019.pdf (accessed on 14 October 2020).
- Lowe, S.; Browne, M.; Boudjelas, S.; De Poorter, M. 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species. In A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2004; p. 12. [Google Scholar]
- Bieber, C.; Ruf, T. Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa: Ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers. J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 42, 1203–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massei, G.; Kindberg, J.; Licoppe, A.; Gacic, D.; Sprem, N.; Kamler, J.; Baubet, E.; Hohmann, U.; Monaco, A.; Ozolins, J.; et al. Wild boar populations up, number of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 26, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groves, C.P.; Grubb, P. The Eurasian Suids: Sus and Babyrousa. In Peccaries and Hippos Pigs; Oliver, W.L.R., Ed.; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 1993; pp. 107–121. [Google Scholar]
- Oliver, W.; Leus, K. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Wild Boar; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2008; 21p. [Google Scholar]
- Randi, E. Conservation genetics of the genus Sus. IBEX J. Mt. Ecol. 1995, 3, 6–12. [Google Scholar]
- Giuffra, E.; Kijas, J.M.H.; Amarger, V.; Carlborg, Ö.; Jeon, J.T.; Andersson, L. The origin of domestic pig: Independent domestication and subsequent introgression. Genetics 2000, 154, 1785–1791. [Google Scholar]
- Alves, P.C.; Pinheiro, I.; Godinho, R.; Vicente, J.; Gortázar, C.; Scandura, M. Genetic diversity of wild boar populations and domestic pig breeds (Sus scrofa) in South-western Europe. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2010, 101, 797–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scandura, M.; Iacolina, L.; Apollonio, M. Genetic diversity in the European wild boar Sus scrofa: Phylogeography, population structure and wild x domestic hybridization. Mamm. Rev. 2011, 41, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexandri, P.; Triantafyllidis, A.; Papakostas, S.; Chatzinikos, E.; Platis, P.; Papageorgiou, M.; Larson, G.; Abatzopoulos, J.T.; Triantaphyllidis, C. The Balkans and the colonization of Europe: The post-glacial range expansion of the wild boar, Sus scrofa. J. Biogeogr. 2012, 39, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusza, S.; Podgórski, T.; Scandura, M.; Borowik, T.; Jávor, A.; Sidorovich, V.E.; Bunevich, A.N.; Kolesnikov, M.; Jedrzejewska, B. Contemporary genetic structure, phylogeorgraphy and past demographic processes of wild boar Sus scrofa population in central and eastern Europe. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Arif, I.A.; Khan, H.A.; Bahkali, A.H.; Al Homaidan, A.A.; Al Fahran, A.H.; Al Sadoon, M.; Shobrak, M. DNA marker technology for wildlife conservation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 18, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hoshino, A.A.; Bravo, J.P.; Nobile, P.M.; Morelli, K.A. Microsatellites as tools for genetic diversity analysis. In Genetic Diversity in Microorganisms; Caliskan, M., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 149–170. [Google Scholar]
- Barrios-Garcia, M.N.; Ballari, S.A. Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: A review. Biol. Invasions 2012, 14, 2283–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iacolina, L.; Scandura, M.; Goedbloed, D.J.; Alexandri, P.; Crooijmans, R.P.M.A.; Larson, G.; Archibald, A.; Apollonio, M.; Schook, L.B.; Groenen, M.A.M.; et al. Genomic diversity and differentiation of a managed island wild boar population. Heredity 2016, 116, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, Y.C.; Hsieh, H.M.; Lee, J.C.; Hsiao, C.T.; Lin, D.Y.; Linacre, A.; Tsai, L.C. Estabilishing a DNA identification system for pigs (Sus scrofa) using a multiplex STR amplification. For. Sci. Int. Genet. 2014, 9, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guillot, G.; Renaud, S.; Ledevin, R.; Michaux, J.; Claude, J. A unifying model for the analysis of phenotypic, genetic and geographic data. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 897–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Manni, F.; Guerard, E.; Heyer, E. Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: How barriers can be detected by “Monmonier”s algorithm. Hum. Biol. 2004, 76, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frantz, A.C.; Bertouille, S.; Eloy, M.C.; Licoppe, A.; Chaumont, F.; Flamand, M.C. Comparative landscape genetic analyses show a Belgian motorway to be a gene flow barrier for red deer (Cervus elaphus), but not wild boars (Sus scrofa). Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21, 3445–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vernesi, C.; Crestanello, B.; Pecchioli, E.; Tartari, D.; Caramelli, D.; Hauffe, H.; Bertorelle, G. The genetic impact of demographic decline and reintroduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa): A microsatellite analysis. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, V.; Pérez-González, J.; Santos, P.; Fernández-Llario, P.; Carranza, J.; Zsolnai, A.; Anton, I.; Buzgó, J.; Varga, G.; Monteiro, N.; et al. Microsatellite markers for identification and parentage analysis in the European wild boar (Sus scrofa). BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nikolov, I.S.; Gum, B.; Markov, G.; Kuehn, R. Population genetic structure of wild boar Sus scrofa in Bulgaria as revealed by microsatellite analysis. Acta Theriol. 2009, 54, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sprem, N.; Safner, T.; Treer, T.; Florijancic, T.; Juric, J.; Cubric-Curik, V.; Frantz, A.C.; Curik, I. Are the dinaric mountains a boundary between continental and Mediterranean wild boar population in Croatia? Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2016, 62, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, E.; Souto, L.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Fonseca, C. Genetic structure of the wild boar population in Portugal: Evidence of a recent bottleneck. Mamm. Biol. 2009, 74, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Choi, S.K.; Lee, J.-E.; Kim, Y.-J.; Min, M.-S.; Volishina, I.; Myslenkov, A.; Oh, J.G.; Kim, T.-H.; Markov, N.; Seryodkin, I.; et al. Genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations from east Asia based on microsatellite loci analysis. BMC Genet. 2014, 15, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mihalik, B.; Stéger, V.; Frank, K.; Szendrei, L.; Kusza, S. Barrier effect of the M3 highway in Hungary on the genetic diversity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population. Res. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 13, 32–38. [Google Scholar]
- Rosell, C.; Navas, F.; Pou, M.F.; Carol, J. Wild boar vehicle collisions. Spatial and temporal patterns and measures for the mitigation of the conflict. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposiumon Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and Sub-Order Suiformes, Sopron, Hungary, 27–31 August 2008; pp. 91–93. [Google Scholar]
- D’Amico, M.; Périquet, S.; Román, J.; Revilla, E. Road avoidance responses determine the impact of heterogeneous road networks at a regional scale. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016, 53, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
Locus | N | Na | Ne | Ho | He | HWE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PigSTR14B | 482 | 7 | 1.162 | 0.145 | 0.140 | * |
PigSTR7B | 485 | 8 | 3.179 | 0.367 | 0.685 | *** |
PigSTR4B | 462 | 5 | 1.929 | 0.459 | 0.482 | ns |
PigSTR4C | 485 | 6 | 1.891 | 0.404 | 0.471 | *** |
PigSTR17A | 485 | 6 | 1.450 | 0.353 | 0.311 | ns |
PigSTR11A | 485 | 5 | 1.766 | 0.427 | 0.434 | ns |
PigSTR14A | 477 | 4 | 1.640 | 0.375 | 0.390 | ns |
PigSTR11B | 415 | 14 | 2.640 | 0.342 | 0.621 | *** |
PigSTR1B | 386 | 9 | 1.192 | 0.036 | 0.161 | *** |
PigSTR15A | 479 | 14 | 5.095 | 0.758 | 0.804 | *** |
PigSTR5C | 484 | 8 | 2.871 | 0.610 | 0.652 | *** |
PigSTR13E | 409 | 8 | 3.689 | 0.465 | 0.729 | *** |
PigSTR1A | 485 | 5 | 1.284 | 0.206 | 0.221 | *** |
Locus | Group 1 (n = 147) | Group 2 (n = 339) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Na | Ne | Ho | He | HWE | Na | Ne | Ho | He | HWE | |
PigSTR14B | 4 | 1.11 | 0.10 | 0.10 | ns | 6 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.16 | * |
PigSTR7B | 7 | 3.30 | 0.50 | 0.70 | *** | 8 | 3.09 | 0.31 | 0.68 | *** |
PigSTR4B | 3 | 1.90 | 0.42 | 0.47 | ns | 5 | 1.94 | 0.48 | 0.48 | ns |
PigSTR4C | 5 | 2.26 | 0.56 | 0.56 | ns | 6 | 1.75 | 0.34 | 0.43 | *** |
PigSTR17A | 6 | 1.66 | 0.49 | 0.40 | ns | 5 | 1.37 | 0.29 | 0.27 | ns |
PigSTR11A | 4 | 2.08 | 0.61 | 0.52 | * | 4 | 1.58 | 0.35 | 0.37 | ns |
PigSTR14A | 3 | 1.60 | 0.40 | 0.37 | ns | 3 | 1.66 | 0.37 | 0.40 | ns |
PigSTR11B | 7 | 1.51 | 0.31 | 0.34 | ns | 13 | 3.08 | 0.35 | 0.68 | *** |
PigSTR1B | 5 | 1.10 | 0.04 | 0.09 | *** | 6 | 1.23 | 0.03 | 0.19 | *** |
PigSTR15A | 12 | 4.84 | 0.75 | 0.79 | ns | 13 | 5.15 | 0.76 | 0.81 | *** |
PigSTR5C | 5 | 2.89 | 0.58 | 0.65 | *** | 6 | 2.85 | 0.62 | 0.65 | *** |
PigSTR13E | 8 | 3.87 | 0.49 | 0.74 | *** | 7 | 3.11 | 0.45 | 0.68 | *** |
PigSTR1A | 4 | 1.26 | 0.19 | 0.21 | ns | 3 | 1.29 | 0.21 | 0.23 | *** |
Sampling Site | No. of Individuals | No. of Markers | Range of Alleles | Avg. No. of Alleles | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
East Asia | 238 | 16 | - | 3.4–9.6 | [33] |
Hungary | 49 | 14 | 3–14 | 6.21 | [29] |
Germany | 63 | 10 | 3–17 | 7.5 | [30] |
Hungary | 486 | 13 | 4–14 | 7.62 | Recent study |
Belgium | 325 | 14 | 5–25 | 8.8 | [27] |
Hungary | 29 | 9 | 6–12 | 8.8 | [28] |
Croatia | 264 | 14 | 4–19 | 8.92 | [31] |
Portugal | 110 | 6 | 3–15 | 10.17 | [32] |
Bulgaria | 289 | 10 | 5–31 | 12 | [30] |
Europe | 723 | 11 | 9–29 | 19 | [3] |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mihalik, B.; Frank, K.; Astuti, P.K.; Szemethy, D.; Szendrei, L.; Szemethy, L.; Kusza, S.; Stéger, V. Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin. Genes 2020, 11, 1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101194
Mihalik B, Frank K, Astuti PK, Szemethy D, Szendrei L, Szemethy L, Kusza S, Stéger V. Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin. Genes. 2020; 11(10):1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101194
Chicago/Turabian StyleMihalik, Bendegúz, Krisztián Frank, Putri Kusuma Astuti, Dániel Szemethy, László Szendrei, László Szemethy, Szilvia Kusza, and Viktor Stéger. 2020. "Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin" Genes 11, no. 10: 1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101194
APA StyleMihalik, B., Frank, K., Astuti, P. K., Szemethy, D., Szendrei, L., Szemethy, L., Kusza, S., & Stéger, V. (2020). Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin. Genes, 11(10), 1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101194