Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization and Expression of SPP1, LAP3 and LCORL and Their Association with Growth Traits in Sheep
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Analysis of Porcine Granulosa Cells Overexpressing Retinol Binding Protein 4
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rodent Models Assessing Mammary Tumor Prevention by Soy or Soy Isoflavones
Open AccessReview

A Critical Review of Animal Models Used in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Pathophysiology

1
Department of Experimental Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
2
Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
4
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
H.S. and B.J. contributed equally to this study.
H.E.H and M.E.S contributed equally to this study.
Genes 2019, 10(8), 614; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10080614
Received: 5 July 2019 / Revised: 30 July 2019 / Accepted: 1 August 2019 / Published: 13 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Modeling in Cancer)
  |  
PDF [560 KB, uploaded 16 August 2019]

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one of the most frequent, complex, and heterogeneous hematological malignancies. AML prognosis largely depends on acquired cytogenetic, epigenetic, and molecular abnormalities. Despite the improvement in understanding the biology of AML, survival rates remain quite low. Animal models offer a valuable tool to recapitulate different AML subtypes, and to assess the potential role of novel and known mutations in disease progression. This review provides a comprehensive and critical overview of select available AML animal models. These include the non-mammalian Zebrafish and Drosophila models as well as the mammalian rodent systems, comprising rats and mice. The suitability of each animal model, its contribution to the advancement of knowledge in AML pathophysiology and treatment, as well as its advantages and limitations are discussed. Despite some limitations, animal models represent a powerful approach to assess toxicity, and permit the design of new therapeutic strategies. View Full-Text
Keywords: Zebrafish; Drosophila; rats; mice; NPM-1; FLT3 ITD; ETO-1; IDH1/2 Zebrafish; Drosophila; rats; mice; NPM-1; FLT3 ITD; ETO-1; IDH1/2
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Skayneh, H.; Jishi, B.; Hleihel, R.; Hamieh, M.; Darwiche, N.; Bazarbachi, A.; El Sabban, M.; El Hajj, H. A Critical Review of Animal Models Used in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Pathophysiology. Genes 2019, 10, 614.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Genes EISSN 2073-4425 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top