Next Article in Journal
Complex Gene Regulation Underlying Mineral Nutrient Homeostasis in Soybean Root Response to Acidity Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Genomic Survey, Characterization and Expression Analysis of the HECT Gene Family in Brassica rapa L. and Brassica oleracea L.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/genes10050401
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of Na+/H+ Antiporter (NHX) Genes in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and Their Regulated Expression under Salt Stress

by
Guo-Qiang Wu
*,
Jin-Long Wang
and
Shan-Jia Li
School of Life Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2019, 10(5), 401; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050401
Submission received: 12 April 2019 / Revised: 12 May 2019 / Accepted: 22 May 2019 / Published: 27 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Salinity is one of the major environment factors that limits the growth of plants and the productivity of crops worldwide. It has been shown that Na+ transporters play a central role in salt tolerance and development of plants. The objective of this study was to identify Na+/H+ antiporter (NHX) genes and investigate their expression patterns in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) subjected to various concentrations of NaCl. A total of five putative NHX genes were identified and distributed on four chromosomes in sugar beet. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these BvNHX genes are grouped into three major classes, viz Vac- (BvNHX1, -2 and -3), Endo- (BvNHX4), and PM-class NHX (BvNHX5/BvSOS1), and within each class the exon/intron structures are conserved. The amiloride-binding site is found in TM3 at N-terminus of Vac-class NHX proteins. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction suggested that only BvNHX5 putatively interacts with calcineurin B-like proteins (CBL) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPK), implying it might be the primary NHX involved in CBL-CIPK pathway under saline condition. It was also found that BvNHX5 contains one abscisic acid (ABA)-responsive element (ABRE), suggesting that BvNHX5 might be involved in ABA signal responsiveness. Additionally, the qRT-PCR analysis showed that all the BvNHX genes in both roots and leaves are significantly up-regulated by salt, and the transcription levels under high salinity are significantly higher than those under either low or moderate salinity. Taken together, this work gives a detailed overview of the BvNHX genes and their expression patterns under salt stress. Our findings also provide useful information for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of Na+ homeostasis and further functional identification of the BvNHX genes in sugar beet.

1. Introduction

Salinity is one of the major environment factors that limits crops productivity worldwide [1]. It is estimated that approximately 20% of cultivated land and one half of irrigated land worldwide suffers salinity damage [2]. Salt stress has a vital effect on the growth and development of plants [3]. High saline soils reduce the ability to uptake water and nutrients, resulting in osmotic or water-deficit stress [4]. To cope with salt stress, plants have evolved a series of smart and precise mechanisms, including regulation of growth and development, ion homeostasis, detoxification, and osmotic adjustment [5]. Of these, the maintenance of ion homeostasis is one of the most important strategies for plants adaptive to salt stress [6].
It is well-known that Na+/H+ antiporters (NHXs), which are located on plasma membranes and tonoplast, play a central role in the maintenance of Na+ homeostasis by transporting Na+ from the cytoplasm into either the extracellular spaces or vacuoles [7]. They are driven by the H+ electrochemical gradient generated by two different kinds of proton pumps, viz H+-ATPase and H+-PPase [8,9]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the NHX gene families have eight members that are divided into three major classes based on their subcellular localization [10]. AtNHX1, -2, -3, and -4 are located on vacuolar membranes and named Vac-class NHXs [11], AtNHX5 and AtNHX6 are located on the endosomal compartment and named Endo-class NHXs [12], while AtNHX7 (also named AtSOS1) and AtNHX8 are located on plasma membranes and named PM-class [13]. Most NHX proteins have been shown to contain 10–12 transmembrane helix domains (TMs), and the amiloride-binding site (FFIYLLPPI), a typical feature of Vac-class NHX proteins, is found in TM3 at N-terminus [14].
It is well documented that the NHX proteins are involved in cell expansion [15], pH regulation [16], salt stress response [17], K+ homeostasis [18,19], long-distance Na+ transport [20], and cellular vesicle trafficking [21]. Overexpression of Reaumuria trigyna RtNHX1 leads to accumulate more K+ and less Na+ in transgenic Arabidopsis compared to wild-type (WT) plants [22]. The ectopic expression of Zygophyllum xanthoxylum ZxNHX, together with ZxVP1-1, a H+-PPase gene in alfalfa (Medicago sativa), confers plant tolerances to both salt stress and water-deficit stress [23]. These results suggested that the NHX genes have important application values in the improvement of stress tolerance in crops.
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), which belongs to Chenopodiaceae family, is one of the most important sugar crops worldwide [24] and provides approximately 30% of the world’s annual sugar production [25]. In China, it is also the second largest sugar crop and cultivated mainly in the arid and semi-arid areas of Northern China, where irrigation is the most effective method to maintain a high yield of crops [26]. Sugar beet was used as an important source not only for animal feed but also for bioethanol production [27,28]. Previously, Wu et al. [26] compared salt tolerance among three sugar beet cultivars by combining physiological and agronomic criteria, and found that cultivar “Gantang7” is more tolerant to salt stress than the other two cultivars. Further studies showed that an additional 50 mM NaCl stimulates the growth of plants and enhances the tolerance to osmotic stress in sugar beet [29]. Sugar beet is thought to be a salt tolerant crop [26,29], compared to other species, such as Arabidopsis, wheat, and alfalfa. Recently, the genome sequence of sugar beet has been completed [30], and this makes it possible to identify the NHX genes at the whole genome level. Previous studies have shown that BvNHX1 might play a key role in sugar beet response to salt stress [31]. However, the comprehensive information and functional characterization of the NHX gene families of sugar beet still remain unknown.
Here, we proposed a hypothesis that the NHX genes might be involved in response to salt in sugar beet. To test this hypothesis, firstly, a total of five NHX genes were identified in the sugar beet genome, and their structures, phylogenetic relationship, chromosomal localizations, putative protein-interaction-protein (PPI) network, conserved motifs, and three-dimensional (3-D) structures were systematically analyzed; secondly, their regulated expression patterns under salt stress were investigated. Our findings shed light on the molecular properties and evolutionary relationship of the BvNHX family and provide useful theoretical support for future in-depth elucidation of biological functions of the NHX genes under salt stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification and Characterization of the NHX Genes in Sugar Beet

The sequences of 8 Arabidopsis AtNHXs were obtained from the TAIR database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/) [32] and then used search BvNHXs with the BLASTP tool using the NCBI sugar beet genome (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/?term=Beta+vulgaris) and genome database of sugar beet (http://bvseq.boku.ac.at/index.shtml) [30]. All homologous protein sequences of the NHX candidates are accepted if they are satisfied with the expectation value (E) < 10−40 [33].
The isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (MW) of BvNHXs were computed by ExPASy (https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/) [34]. The subcellular localization of BvNHX was predicted with the Plant-mPLoc server (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/) [35].
To further confirm the transmembrane helical domains (TMs) in NHXs, the candidate sequences were scanned with TMHMM server version 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/). Phosphorylation sites of BvNHX are predicted by NetPhos 3.1 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos/) [36].

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

To investigate the phylogenetic relationship between BvNHXs and other NHXs from various plants species, BvNHXs were aligned NHXs from Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Cucurbita maxima (Cm), Eutrema halophilum (Eh), Hordeum vulgare (Hv), Gossypium hirsutum (Gh), Oryza sativa (Os), Solanum lycopersicum (Sl), Solanum tuberosum (St), Sorghum bicolor (Sb), Spinacia oleracea (So), Triticum aestivum (Ta), and Vitis vinifera (Vv), by using Clustal W version 2.1 software. All the sequences and accession number of NHX genes are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA7.0 (https://www.megasoftware.net/history.php) using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method, with 1000 bootstrap replicates [37].

2.3. Chromosome Distributioof BvNHX Genes and Analysis of Ka/Ks Ratio

The physical positions of the BvNHX genes along each chromosome were identified from the sugar beet genome database and the distribution graph of BvNHX genes was drawn by MapInspect 1.0 software (https://mapinspect.software.informer.com/). Rate of synonymous (Ks) and non-synonymous (Ka) substitution were estimated using the PAL2NAL program (http://www.bork.embl.de/pal2nal/) [38].

2.4. Analysis of Conserved Motifs, Gene Structures, and cis-Acting Elements

The conserved motifs in the NHX proteins were identified with Multiple Expectation Maximization for Motif Elicitation program (MEME version 5.0.5, http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme) with the following parameter settings: The maximum number of motifs is 16, and the optimum width is set from 6–50.
To analyze gene structure, the exon/intron of the BvNHX genes were generated using Gene Structure Display Serve (GSDS, http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) [39] by aligning the CDS sequences with the corresponding genomic DNA sequences from the genome database of sugar beet (http://bvseq.boku.ac.at/index.shtml) [30].
To identify the various cis-acting regulatory elements in promoters of the BvNHX genes, 1500 bp upstream of the CDS was estimated using PlantCARE software (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) [40].

2.5. Three-Dimensional Structural Prediction of BvNHX Proteins

The three-dimensional (3-D) structure of BvNHX proteins were predicted using the I-TASSER program (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/) [41]. To identify the best structural template for BvNHX in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) database [42], the query sequences were subjected to multiple rounds of threading using LOMETS [43].

2.6. Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction of BvNHX Proteins

The protein-protein interaction (PPI) of BvNHX proteins was predicted by STRING database (http://string-db.org) [44].

2.7. Plant Material, Treatment, and qRT-PCR Analysis

Seeds of sugar beet (B. vulgaris L.) cultivar “Gantang7”, which is a salt-tolerant cultivar [26], were sterilized for 3 min with 75% ethanol (v/v) and rinsed three times with distilled water, soaked in distilled water overnight, and then germinated at 25 °C in the dark for three days. Uniform seedlings were transferred to a plugged hole in plastic containers (5 cm × 5 cm × 5 cm; 2 seedlings/container) filled with the distilled vermiculite and irrigated with modified Hoagland nutrient solution (2.5 mM KNO3, 1 mM NH4H2PO4, 0.5 mM MgSO4, 0.5 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.7 µM (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O, 60 µM Fe-Citrate, 92 µM H3BO3, 1.6 µM ZnSO4·7H2O, 18 µM MnCl2·4H2O, and 0.6 µM CuSO4·5H2O). The seedlings were grown in the same chamber with the temperature of 20/25 °C (night/day), the daily photoperiod of 8/16 h (night/day), the light flux density of 550–600 µmol·m−2·s−1, and the relative humidity of 65–75%. Solutions were renewed every three days.
Four-week-old seedlings were treated with modified Hoagland nutrient solution supplemented with 50, 100, 200, and 300 mM NaCl [45], and the plants were harvested at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after treatments of salt, respectively. The roots of plants were washed three times with distilled water to remove vermiculite and the leaves were rinsed in deionized water to remove surface salts. The whole leaves and roots were separated and harvested, in three biological replicates for RAN preparation. There are two plants in each replicate. All the harvested samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use.
Total RNA was isolated from each sample using a Trizol Total RNA Isolation Kit (Sangon, Shanghai, China). cDNA synthesis was carried out using a PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). All the sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR are shown in Table 1. BvACTIN was used as a constitute expression control in qRT-PCR experiments. qRT-PCR was performed using a MA-6000 Real-Time PCR System (Molarray, Suzhou, China) with a TB GreenTM Premix Ex TaqTM II Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). The conditions followed for the experiment are 95 °C for 30 s, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 60 s. Three biological repeats are used at least. The relative expression levels of the BvNHX genes are represented in the form of relative changes by the 2−ΔΔCt method [46].

3. Results

3.1. Identification of BvNHX Genes

To investigate the BvNHX gene families in sugar beet, the peptides of AtNHX of Arabidopsis were used as queries to screen the sugar beet genome in silico (Supplementary Table S1). The results showed that a total of five full-length genes coding putative Na+/H+ antiporter (NHX) was identified in the sugar beet genome and the sequences were downloaded from the sugar beet genome database (Supplementary Table Sl). All the NHX genes are assigned specific names (Table 2). The sequence analysis of these BvNHX genes showed that CDS ranges from 1560 bp (BvNHX2) to 3489 bp (BvNHX5) and the predicted protein varies from 519–1162 amino acids in length. Additionally, the molecular weights (MW) of the BvNHX proteins range from 58.2–128.5 and the isoelectric points (pI) range from 5.5–8.45 (Table 2). The number of transmembrane helical domains (TMs) in NHX proteins varies from 11–12 (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S1).
Subcellular localization analysis indicated that three genes, BvNHX1, -2, and -3, are localized on the vacuole (Vac), BvNHX4 is localized on the endosome (Endo), while BvNHX5, also named BvSOS1, is localized on the plasma membrane (PM). BvNHX phosphorylation sites vary in number, for serine 20 (BvNHX2) to 64 (BvNHX5), threonine 11 (BvNHX4) to 36 (BvNHX5), while tyrosine range from 2 (BvNHX2 and -4) to 8 (BvNHX5) (Supplementary Table S1), indicating serine is the most common site for phosphorylation with comparison to tyrosine and threonine. Additionally, BvNHX proteins have been found to be more phosphorylated with protein kinase A (PKA), protein kinase C (PKC), and cell division cycle protein 2 (CDC2), and less with ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) (Supplementary Table S1).

3.2. Phylogenetic Relationship of Sugar Beet and Other Plants in NHX Gene Families

To determine the evolutionary relationship of the NHX gene families in higher plants, BvNHXs with NHXs from other 12 species are compared. Of these, eight dicotyledonous angiosperms: A. thaliana (At), C. maxima (Cm), E. halophilum (Eh), G. hirsutum (Gh), S. oleracea (So), S. tuberosum (St), S. lycopersicum (Sl), and V. vinifera (Vv); four monocotyledonous angiosperms: H. vulgare (Hv), O. sativa (Os), S. bicolor (Sb) and T. aestivum (Ta) were analyzed. Then, a phylogenetic tree was built using 93 genes from 13 plant species using MEGA7.0 software. Protein sequence alignment showed that NHX genes are clustered into three subfamilies, designated Vac-class, Endo-class, and PM-class (Figure 1). With Vac-class NHXs the most abundant from all the investigated species.

3.3. Chromosomal Location, Ka/Ks Ratio Calculation and Gene Structure Analysis of BvNHX Genes

In order to examine the genome distribution of the BvNHX genes, chromosomal mapping was performed by MapInspect 1.0 software. As shown in Figure 2A, five BvNHX genes are mapped onto four of total 9 sugar beet chromosomes, indicating a diverse distribution. Two genes (BvNHX2 and -3) are located on chromosomal 4, while BvNHX1, -4, and -5 are found on chromosomal 1, 9, and 6, respectively.
To further identify the structural characteristics of the BvNHX genes, the exon/intron organizations of these genes were analyzed and compared (Figure 2B). BvNHX1–3 (Vac-class) have 13 introns, BvNHX4 (Endo-class) contains 18 introns, whilst BvNHX5 (PM-class) possesses 23 introns. The exon length, intron number, and intron phase are relatively conserved among members of Vac-class NHX. Additionally, the conservation of sequence among BvNHX genes was also confirmed by identities of amino acid sequences (Table 3). Two BvNHX paralogous pairs in Vac-class display higher identities of sequence in amino acid level (BvNHX1/BvNHX2 = 78.8% and BvNHX1/BvNHX3 = 79.6%), whilst the BvNHX genes in different subfamilies exhibit lower identities (8.6–10.1%). The sequences of BvNHX1/AtNHX1 and BvNHX5/AtNHX7 have higher identities (89.2% and 61.9%) (Table 3). Our data also showed that BvNHX1 and BvNHX2 display smaller divergence, while BvNHX1 and BvNHX5 have larger divergence (Table 3).
To investigate the selective pressure on BvNHX genes, the ratio of non-synonymous/synonymous (Ka/Ks) was calculated. A Ka/Ks ratio > 1 suggests positive selection, Ka/Ks ratio = 1 shows neutral selection, while ratio of Ka/Ks < 1 suggests purifying selection [47]. In the present study, Ka/Ks ratio between BvNHX3 and BvNHX5 has been found to be 0.1855 (Table 4), implying that the genes underwent a purifying selection or a positive Darwinian selection.

3.4. Analysis of the Conserved Motifs of BvNHX Proteins

To better understand the structural diversity of BvNHX proteins, the motif distributions in the proteins were investigated using the MEME program which identified a total of 16 putative motifs (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S2). The predicted motifs of BvNHX range from 6–50 amino acids in length. Motifs 3 and 6 are existed in all the members in BvNHX family and these motifs are located in N-terminus of BvNHX. Four motifs (motifs 1, 2, 8, and 9) are existed in both Vac- and Endo-class NHXs (BvNHX1, -2, -3 and -4), whilst other four motifs (motifs 4, 5, 7, and 14) are only detected in Vac-class NHXs (BvNHX1, -2 and -3). Motif 10 is existed in both BvNHX2 and -5. Motifs 12 and 13 are existed in BvNHX4 and -5 (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S2). Noticeably, amiloride-binding site (FFIYLLPPI), which is a typical feature of NHX proteins, is found in motif 2 of BvNHX1, -2 and -3, but absent in BvNHX4 and -5.

3.5. Analysis of cis-Acting Elements in BvNHX Promoters

To further explore the regulatory role of the BvNHX genes, the cis-acting elements of upstream region in BvNHX genes were predicted using the PlantCARE tool. As shown in Table 5, amounts of hormone-related (e.g., ABA, ethylene, salicylic acid (SA), and auxin), stress-related (e.g., anaerobic, drought, low temperature, wound, and salt) and development-related (e.g., zein metabolism regulation and light response) were identified in the BvNHX promoters. Among hormone-related cis-acting regulatory elements, ABRE (abscisic acid-responsive element) is found in BvNHX5 promoter, while ERE (ethylene-responsive element) are found in the promoters of BvNHX1, -3, and -4. Among stress-related cis-acting elements, DRE (drought-responsive element) and MYB are found in the BvNHX1 promoter, while LTR (low temperature-responsive element) and W box (salt-responsive element) are predicted in the BvNHX4 promoter. These results implied that BvNHXs might have potential roles in hormone signal responsiveness and stress adaptation.

3.6. Analysis of BvNHX Proteins Structures

To understand the putatively functional mechanism of NHX proteins in sugar beet, all the BvNHX proteins are modeled by I-TASSER software. The 3-D structures were construed according to the similar structural templates and crystal structures obtained from PDB (Protein Data Bank) (Figure 4). C-score was used to estimate the confidence of the constructed protein model for each BvNHX protein [33]. C-score typically ranges from −5 to 2, a higher value represents a model with a higher confidence and vice versa. In the present study, all the predicted BvNHX models have a C-score range from −1.83 to −0.61 (Table 6), suggesting the structures of BvNHXs are constructed with high accuracy.

3.7. Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction of BvNHXs

To further explore the potential function of BvNHXs during the possible interaction with other proteins, the PPI network is constructed by STRING database (Figure 5). No immediately interacted relationship is predicted among BvNHX proteins. However, BvNHX1, -2, -3, and -4 share the same putatively interacted protein, NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase 1 (CYR1, XP_010688037.1). BvNHX5 is predicted to interact with some proteins, including CBL10 (XP_010667136.1), CIPK8 (X_010671024.1), CIPK24 (XP_010687974.1), HKT1 (XP_010690257.1), HKT8 (XP_010690256.1), and RCD1 (XP_010669586.1) (Figure 5). Additionally, individual BvNHX protein is also hypothesized to interact with other putative proteins, such as calmodulin (XP_010671757.1), CML18 (XP_010671108.1), H+-PPase (XP_010668498.1), V-H+-ATPase (XP_010693105.1), CLC (XP_010684687.1), and KEA3 (XP_010691482.1) (Supplementary Figure S4).

3.8. Expression Patterns of BvNHX under Various Concentrations of NaCl

To further understand the possible functions of the BvNHX genes in response to salt stress, their expressional levels were investigated under different concentrations of NaCl over a 48-h period. The results showed that all the BvNHX genes are significantly induced by salt treatments (Figure 6). Interestingly, at low salt condition (50 mM NaCl), the expression of both BvNHX1 and BvNHX2 in leaf gradually increased over time until peak expression at 48 h and 24 h, respectively, which are 2.8- and 12.7-fold higher than those under control condition (0 h), while transcript of BvNHX3, BvNHX4, and BvNHX5 are sharply up-regulated at short time (3 h) and then gradually increased. When exposed to moderate salt stress (100 mM NaCl), BvNHX2 in leaf and root rapidly increased the expression level at 3 h, which was 31.2- and 14.1-fold higher than under control condition, respectively, and maintained a lower level from 6–48 h, while other BvNHX genes significantly increased their transcript abundances in either leaf or root over a 48-h period (except for BvNHX3 at 3 h after treatment). Additionally, under high salt stresses (200 and 300 mM NaCl), it is worth noting that the mRNA levels of BvNHX3, BvNHX4, and BvNHX5 in leaves are always significantly higher than those in roots at all treatment times.

4. Discussion

It is well-known that the plant NHX gene families encodes Na+/H+ antiporters which are crucial for ion homeostasis, cellular pH regulation, plant development, vesicle trafficking and salt tolerance [7,12,21]. In this study, the NHX genes were first identified from the sugar beet genome analysis and were further described by phylogenetic relationship, chromosomal localization, conserved motifs, 3-D structures, protein-protein interaction, and expression patterns under salt stress.

4.1. Identification and Structure Analysis of BvNHX Genes

In the present study, a total of five BvNHX genes have been identified in the genome of sugar beet (Table 1), like in other species such as tomato (S. lycopersicum) and potato (S. tuberosum), which also contain five NHX genes in all [18]. However, there are 10 NHX genes in soybean (Glycine max) [48], nine in maize (Zea mays) [18], eight in Arabidopsis [10] and poplar (Populus trichocarpa) [33], seven in S. bicolor [49] and rice (O. sativa) and [6], and six in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [18]. These differences in the number of NHX genes in plants could be attributed to gene duplication and loss specific to different subfamilies of NHX over the course of evolution.
Bioinformatics analysis showed that NHX members in sugar beet can be divided into three classes according to their vacuolar (BvNHX1, BvNHX2, and BvNHX3), endosomal (BvNHX4), and plasma membrane (BvNHX5/BvSOS1) localizations. It has been found that two endomembrane (NHX5 and NHX6) and two plasma membrane antiporters (NHX7 and NHX8) in Arabidopsis [10], only one is identified under these categories in sugar beet in this study (Figure 1). The exon/intron structural diversity, an important part in the evolution of gene families, provides additional evidence supporting phylogenetic groupings. In sugar beet, BvNHX1, -2, and -3 have fewer exons (14–15) than BvNHX4 (26) and BvNHX5 (23) class members (Table 1 and Figure 2B). However, in poplar, Vac-class NHXs (PtNHX1-5) contain 14 exons, the Endo-class NHX (PtNHX6) has 22 exons, while the PM-class NHXs (PtNHX7 and PtNHX8) display 23 exons [33]. Similarly, for NHX genes in soybean, seven members of GmNHX contain 14–15 exons, whereas other three members have 20 exons [48]. These results implied that there is structural diversification among the NHX genes families in plant species.
It has been shown that the putative amiloride-binding site and membrane-spanning pore are highly conserved in the NHX gene families [6,10,18], which consists of amino acid sequence “FFIYLLPPI” [18]. This domain serves to inhibit the cation/H+ exchange in the presence of drug amiloride and/or its derivatives [50]. In the present study, amiloride-binding site is located in TM3 of N-terminus, and it is found in BvNHX1, -2, and -3, but not in BvNHX4 and -5. Similar results are observed in AtNHX1-4 from Arabidopsis [11], IbNHX2 from sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) [50], and ZxNHX1 from Z. xanthoxylum [50]. Additionally, TM5 and -6 of BvNHX1, -3, and -4 are also highly conserved among NHX isoforms identified to date, which are considered critical for transport activity of antiporters [14]. Interestingly, these two regions do not appear to span the tonoplast membrane but yet appeared to be membrane-associated (Supplementary Figure S1). Similar domains are observed in AtNHX1 and ZxNHX1, which did not appear to be transmembrane segments [14,51].

4.2. Phylogenetic, Conserved Motif, and Promoter Analysis of BvNHX Genes

Previous studies demonstrated that NHXs in soybean, poplar, and S. bicolor were clustered in three groups [33,48,49]. Interestingly, members of BvNHX family were evolutionarily closer to those of SoNHX genes from spinach (S. oleracea), one member of Chenopodiaceae family, compared to NHX genes from other species (Figure 1). Additionally, conserved motif analysis showed that all the members of BvNHX contain motifs 3 and 6, whilst each subfamily of BvNHX shares the same conserved motifs (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S2). Similar results are found in PtNHXs [33] and SbNHXs [49]. These results indicated the NHX family genes are relatively conserved during the course of evolution.
Cis-acting regulatory elements serve as key molecular switches involved in transcriptional regulation of the gene activities controlling various biological processes such as hormone response, abiotic stress response and development processes [52,53]. In plant, hormones, such as ABA, ethylene, SA, and IAA, play critical roles in a number of developmental stages and stress response [54,55,56,57]. In this study, cis-acting regulatory elements related to hormones are identified in the promoters of BvNHX genes (Table 5). BvNHX5 has been found to contain one ABA responsive element (ABRE). Similar results were observed in poplar, where PtNHX1–7 had one or two ABREs [33]. These results suggested that the NHX genes might be involved in ABA signal pathway. Furthermore, several stress responsive regulatory elements were identified namely ARE (involved in anaerobic induction, one in BvNHX1 and two in BvNHX4), DRE (drought responsive cis-acting element, one in BvNHX1), LTR (low-temperature responsive element, one in BvNHX4), WUN-motif (wound-responsive element, one in BvNHX3), MYB (involved in drought response, one in BvNHX1), and STRE (involved in stress response, one in BvNHX5) (Table 5). Similar elements are found in PeNHXs from poplar and SbNHXs from S. bicolor [49]. Surprisingly, W-box, a DNA cis-acting regulatory element has also been detected in BvNHX3. W-box is recognized by the family of WRKY transcription factors which is involved in development processes and salt response in Arabidopsis [58]. Overall, the identified regulatory elements in the present study help in understanding their roles in the various abiotic and biotic stress related mechanisms.

4.3. Expression Analysis of BvNHX Genes under Salt Stress

Sequestering Na+ into vacuoles is one of important strategies for plants to alleviate Na+ toxicity in cytoplasm under salinity stress [59]. The tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporters play crucial roles in sequestering Na+ into vacuoles to maintain Na+ homeostasis and, thus, to improve plant salinity tolerance [22]. In this study, the expression levels of both BvNHX1 and BvNHX3 are significantly up-regulated by various concentrations of NaCl over a 48-h period, and their expression levels under high-salt stress are relatively higher than those under either mild- or moderate-salt stress. In R. trigyna, the expression levels of RtNHX1 in leaves showed an increase and reached a high level at 3 h, and then reduced after 6 h when exposed to high salt stress (200 mM NaCl) [22]. A similar expression pattern was found in sweet potato, where IbNHX2 was significantly up-regulated at 4 h after treatment of 200 mM NaCl [51]. Lu et al. [60] found that the transcription level of TaNHX3 in both leaves and roots sharply increased at 24 h and then gradually decreased after 48 h over a 96-h period in different wheat cultivars subjected to salt stress. Interestingly, more TaNHX3 was detected in salt-tolerant cultivar “Ji7369” compared with salt-sensitive cultivars “Shimai12” and “Ji-Shi-3” [59]. Additionally, in Porteresia coarctata, the mRNA levels of PcNHX1 in roots increased gradually up to 24 h and subsequently reduced to half of the initial level from 36 to 48 h after salt treatment and also upon salt withdrawal [61]. These results further confirmed that Vac-class NHXs play critical roles in the salt tolerance of plants. In this study, the expression levels of Vac-class NHX genes in leaves are significantly higher than those in roots under salt stress, implying that BvNHX1–3 can sequester Na+ in leaves during salinity stress. It was possible that, under mild-salt stress, Na+ accumulated in leaves of plants might be below vacuole capacity for compartmentalization Na+ [62], thus, in the present study the expression of BvNHX1 and -3 was relatively lower (Figure 6). Under high-salt stress, however, excessive Na+ was accumulated in leaves [59], here, BvNHX1 and BvNHX3 exhibited higher expression levels so that more Na+ could be compartmentalized in the vacuoles of leaves as soon as possible.
The plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporters (PM-class NHX or SOS1) play important roles in extruding Na+ to the growth medium and/or controlling long-distance Na+ transport in plants [20,63,64,65]. In this study, BvNHX5/BvSOS1 is significantly increased by salt stress. It is noticeable that its expression level is significantly higher in leaves than in roots under salt conditions, especially high-salt stress. In Salicornia brachiate, SbSOS1 exhibited a greater level of constitutive expression in roots than in shoots and was further increased by salt stress [66]. Similar results were observed in Puccinellia tenuiflora [62] and Z. xanthoxylum [63]. These results proposed that BvSOS1 might be involved in response to salt stress. However, the precise mechanism of BvSOS1 in long-distance transport of Na+ needs to be addressed in future research.

4.4. The Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis Prediction

In this study, PPI analysis showed that NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase 1 (CYR1, XP_010688037.1) is hypothesized interact with BvNHX1, -2, -3, and -4 (Figure 5). In all eukaryotes, CYR1 provides electrons, via cytochrome b5, for a range of biochemical reactions in cellular metabolism, including for fatty acid desaturation in the endoplasmic reticulum [67]. It is well documented that CYR1 has a crucial role in increasing the level of unsaturated fatty acids, which activates PM-H+-ATPase and, thus, reduces rhizosphere pH [68]. The results obtained from this study suggested that this protein might be involved in response to adversely environmental conditions.
Vac-class NHXs have been shown to be driven by electrochemical gradient of protons across tonoplasts generated by two vacuolar H+-pumps, H+-APTase and H+-PPase (VP) [9,10,69]. In this study, H+-PPase is hypothesized to interact with both BvNHX1 and -2, while H+-ATPase is hypothesized interact with BvNHX3 (Supplementary Figure S4). Co-expression of ZxNHX and ZxVP1 genes significantly can significantly improve salt tolerance in transgenic plant species including Lotus corniculatus [70], alfalfa [23], and sugar beet [71], by increasing cation accumulation. These results implied that Vac-class NHXs might be cooperated with H+-PPase and H+-ATPase to transport Na+ across tonoplasts when plants were subjected to salt stress.
It is well-known that the calcineurin B-like (CBL) can interact and modulate the CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPK), which, in turn, mediate Ca2+ signal transduction [33,72]. NHX7 (SOS1) is regulated by CBL and CIPK mediates the Ca2+ signaling pathway during salinity response [73]. In this pathway, a protein kinase complex consisting of CBL4 (SOS3) and CIPK24 (SOS2) was activated by a salt-stress elicited Ca2+ signal, and then the complex of CBL4-CIPK24 phosphorylated and activated the SOS1 protein to extrude Na+ out of cell in Arabidopsis under salt stress [74]. Overexpression of the SOS1 gene also increased salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco by maintaining a higher K+/Na+ ratio [75]. In the current study, two CIPKs (CIPK8 and -24), and two CBLs are hypothesized to interact with BvNHX5 (Figure 5). Similarly, NHX7 (SOS1) interaction with CBLs and CIPKs were predicted in poplar [33] and S. bicolor [48]. Unlike BvNHX5, BvNHX1 is bound to the members of CIPK, but not to CBL (Supplementary Figure S4). These results suggested that BvNHX5 putatively interact with CBL and CIPK proteins different with other BvNHX proteins. However, these proteins interactions need to be further validated by yeast two hybrid in the future research.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we identified five putative NHX genes in the sugar beet genome. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these NHX genes are grouped into three major classes, viz Vac-(BvNHX1, -2 and -3), Endo- (BvNHX4), and PM-class NHX (BvNHX5/BvSOS1), and within each class the exon/intron structures are conserved. Amiloride-binding site (FFIYLLPPI) is found in TM3 at the N-terminus of BvNHX1, -2, and -3. BvNHX5 contains one ABA responsive element, implying it might be involved in the ABA signal pathway. PPI network analysis revealed that only BvNHX5 putatively interacts with CBLs and CIPKs, suggesting this protein might be the primary NHX involved in CBL-CIPK pathway during salt stress response. Furthermore, qRT-PCR analysis indicated that all the BvNHX genes in leaves and roots are significantly up-regulated by salt, and their transcription levels under high-salt stress are relatively higher than those under low- and moderate-salt stress. These results suggested that the BvNHX genes play a vital role in sugar beet response to salt.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/10/5/401/s1, Table S1. The genomic DNA sequences, mRNA sequences, CDS, protein sequences, phosphorylation sites, and phylogeny sequences. Figure S1. Transmembrane domains for BvNHX proteins. Figure S2. Details of motifs in BvNHX proteins identified by MEME. Figure S3. Details of secondary structure of BvNHX proteins. Figure S4. String analysis for individual BvNHX protein.

Author Contributions

Investigation: J.-L.W.; project administration: G.-Q.W.; software: J.-L.W.; writing—original draft: G.-Q.W.; writing—review and editing: G.-Q.W. and S.-J.L. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded jointly by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31860404 and 31460101) and the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China (18JR3RA152).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Abbreviations

ABAAbscisic acid
ABREABA-responsive element
AREAnaerobic-responsive element
ATMAtaxia telangiectasia mutated
CBLCalcineurin B-like proteins
CDC2Cell division cycle protein 2
CDSCoding sequences
CIPKCBL-interacting protein kinases
CMPCalcium-binding protein
CYB5R1NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase 1
DERDrought-responsive element
EREEthylene-responsive element
GSDSGene structure display serve
GSK3Glycogen synthase kinase 3
HKTHigh-affinity K+ transporter
IAAAuxin
KEAK+ efflux antiporter
LTRLow-temperature responsiveness
ORFOpen reading frame
PDBProtein data bank
pIIsoelectric point
PKAProtein kinase A
PKCProtein kinase C
PMPlasma membrane
PPIProtein-protein interaction
SASalicylic acid
SOS1Salt overly sensitive 1
SEREStress response element
3-DThree-dimension
TMTransmembrane helical domain
VPVacuolar H+-PPase
MEMEMultiple expectation maximization for motif elicitation
MWMolecular weight
NHXNa+/H+ antiporter

References

  1. Deinlein, U.; Stephan, A.B.; Horie, T.; Luo, W.; Xu, G.; Schroeder, J.I. Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhao, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wang, T.; Chen, S.X.; Dai, S.J. Proteomics-based investigation of salt-responsive mechanisms in plant roots. J. Proteom. 2013, 82, 230–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jha, U.C.; Bohra, A.; Jha, R.; Parida, S.K. Salinity stress response and ‘omics’ approaches for improving salinity stress tolerance in major grain legumes. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 255–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hanin, M.; Ebel, C.; Ngom, M.; Laplaze, L.; Masmoudi, K. New insights on plant salt tolerance mechanisms and their potential use for breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liang, W.; Ma, X.; Peng, W.; Liu, L. Plant salt-tolerance mechanism: A review. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 495, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rodríguez-Rosales, M.P.; Gálvez, F.J.; Huertas, R.; Aranda, M.N.; Baghour, M.; Cagnac, O.; Venema, K. Plant NHX cation/proton antiporters. Plant Signal Behav. 2009, 4, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pehlivan, N.; Sun, L.; Jarrett, P.; Yang, X.; Mishra, N.; Chen, L.; Kadioglu, A.; Shen, G.; Zhang, H. Co-overexpressing a plasma membrane and a vacuolar membrane sodium/proton antiporter significantly improves salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 1069–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gaxiola, R.A.; Palmgren, M.G.; Schumacher, K. Plant proton pumps. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2204–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Bao, A.K.; Wang, S.M.; Wu, G.Q.; Xi, J.J.; Zhang, J.L.; Wang, C.M. Overexpression of the Arabidopsis H+-PPase enhanced resistance to salt and drought stress in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Sci. 2009, 176, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brett, C.L.; Donowitz, M.; Rao, R. Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic sodium/proton exchangers. Am. J. Physiol. 2005, 288, C223–C239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Aharon, G.S.; Apse, M.P.; Duan, S.; Hua, X.; Blumwald, E. Characterization of a family of vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporters Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Soil 2003, 253, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bassil, E.; Tajima, H.; Liang, Y.C.; Onto, M.A.; Ushijima, K.; Nakano, R.; Esumi, T.; Coku, A.; Belmonte, M.; Blumwald, E. The Arabidopsis Na+/H+ antiporters NHX1 and NHX2 control vacuolar pH and K+ homeostasis to regulate growth, flower development, and reproduction. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3482–3497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shi, H.Z.; Ishitani, M.; Kim, C.; Zhu, J.K. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 6896–6901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yamaguchi, T.; Apse, M.P.; Shi, H.; Blumwald, E. Topological analysis of a plant vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter reveals a luminal C terminus that regulates antiporter cation selectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 12510–12515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Apse, M.P.; Sottosanto, J.B.; Blumwald, E. Vacuolar cation/H+ exchange, ion homeostasis, and leaf development are altered in a T-DNA insertional mutant of AtNHX1, the Arabidopsis vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter. Plant J. 2003, 36, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ohnishi, M.; Fukada-Tanaka, S.; Hoshino, A.; Takada, J.; Inagaki, Y.; Iida, S. Characterization of a novel Na+/H+ antiporter gene InNHX2 and comparison of InNHX2 with InNHX1, which is responsible for blue flower coloration by increasing the vacuolar pH in the Japanese morning glory. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jiang, X.; Leidi, E.O.; Pardo, J.M. How do vacuolar NHX exchangers function in plant salt tolerance? Plant Signal Behav. 2010, 5, 792–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Bassil, E.; Coku, A.; Blumwald, E. Cellular ion homeostasis: Emerging roles of intracellular NHX Na+/H+ antiporters in plant growth and development. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 5727–5740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huertas, R.; Rubio, L.; Cagnac, O.; García-Sánchez, M.J.; Alché Jde, D.; Venema, K.; Fernández, J.A. Rodríguez-Rosales, M.P. The K+/H+ antiporter LeNHX2 increases salt tolerance by improving K+ homeostasis in transgenic tomato. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 2135–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Shi, H.; Quintero, F.J.; Pardo, J.M.; Zhu, J.K. The putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na+ transport in plants. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 465–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qiu, Q.S. Plant and yeast NHX antiporters: Roles in membrane trafficking. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, N.; Wang, X.; Ma, B.; Du, C.; Zheng, L.; Wang, Y. Expression of a Na+/H+ antiporter RtNHX1 from recretohalophyte Reaumuria trigyna improved salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 218, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bao, A.K.; Du, B.Q.; Touil, L.; Kang, P.; Wang, Q.L.; Wang, S.M. Co-expression of tonoplast Cation/H+ antiporter and H+-pyrophosphatase from xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum improves alfalfa plant growth under salinity, drought and field conditions. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015, 14, 964–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Porcel, R.; Bustamante, A.; Ros, R.; Serrano, R.; Mulet Salort, J.M. BvCOLD1: A novel aquaporin from sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) involved in boron homeostasis and abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 2844–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kong, W.; Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Bendahmane, M.; Fu, X. Genome-wide identification and characterization of aquaporin gene family in Beta vulgaris. Peer J. 2017, 5, e3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, G.Q.; Feng, R.J.; Zhang, J.J. Evaluation of salinity tolerance in seedlings of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars using proline, soluble sugars and cation accumulation criteria. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 2665–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bârsan, S.C.; Ivan, A.M.; Luca, L.C.; Luca, E. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yields and potential for bioethanol production under irrigation regime. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2015, 43, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Haankuku, C.; Epplin, F.M.; Kakani, V.G. Industrial sugar beets to biofuel: Field to fuel production system and cost estimates. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 80, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wu, G.Q.; Feng, R.J.; Liang, N.; Yuan, H.J.; Sun, W.B. Sodium chloride stimulates growth and alleviates sorbitol-induced osmotic stress in sugar beet seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 75, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dohm, J.C.; Minoche, A.E.; Holtgräwe, D.; Capellagutiérrez, S.; Zakrzewski, F.; Tafer, H.; Rupp, O.; Sörensen, T.R.; Stracke, R.; Reinhardt, R. The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Nature 2014, 505, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adler, G.; Blumwald, E.; Bar-Zvi, D. The sugar beet gene encoding the sodium/proton exchanger 1 (BvNHX1) is regulated by a MYB transcription factor. Planta 2010, 232, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lamesch, P.; Berardini, T.Z.; Li, D.; Swarbreck, D.; Wilks, C.; Sasidharan, R.; Muller, R.; Dreher, K.; Alexander, D.L.; Garcia-Hernandez, M.; et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 2012, 40, D1202–D1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tian, F.; Chang, E.; Li, Y.; Sun, P.; Hu, J.; Zhang, J. Expression and integrated network analyses revealed functional divergence of NHX-type Na+/H+ exchanger genes in poplar. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bjellqvist, B.; Hughes, G.J.; Pasquali, C.; Paquet, N.; Ravier, F.; Sanchez, J.C.; Frutiger, S.; Hochstrasser, D.F. The focusing positions of polypeptides in immobilized pH gradients can be predicted from their amino acid sequences. Electrophoresis 1993, 14, 1023–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chou, K.C.; Shen, H.B. Plant-mPLoc: A top-down strategy to augment the power for predicting plant protein subcellular localization. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Blom, N.; Sicheritz-Ponten, T.; Gupta, R.; Gammeltoft, S.; Brunak, S. Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Proteomics 2004, 4, 1633–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Goldman, N.; Yang, Z. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1994, 11, 725–736. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucl. Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, J.; Yan, R.; Roy, A.; Xu, D.; Poisson, J.; Zhang, Y. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 7–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Berman, H.M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T.N.; Weissig, H.; Shindvalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E. The protein data bank. Nucl. Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, S.; Zhang, Y. LOMETS: A local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucl. Acids Res. 2007, 35, 3375–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Lyon, D.; Junge, A.; Wyder, S.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Simonovic, M.; Doncheva, N.T.; Morris, J.H.; Bork, P.; et al. STRING v11: Protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucl. Acids Res. 2019, 47, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, G.Q.; Lin, L.Y.; Jiao, Q.; Li, S.J. Tetraploid exhibits more tolerant to salinity than diploid in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Acta Physiol. Plant. 2019, 41, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Anton, N.; Makova, K.D.; Li, W.H. The Ka/Ks ratio test for assessing the protein-coding potential of genomic regions: An empirical and simulation study. Genome Res. 2002, 12, 198–202. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chen, H.; Chen, X.; Wu, B.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, H.; Cui, X.; Liu, X. Whole-genome identification and expression analysis of K+ efflux antiporter (KEA) and Na+/H+ antiporter (NHX) families under abiotic stress in soybean. J. Integr. Agr. 2015, 14, 1171–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kumari, P.H.; Kumar, S.N.; Ramesh, K.; Reddy, P.S.; Nagaraju, M.; Prakash, A.B.; Shah, T.; Hederson, A.; Srivsastava, R.K.; Rajasheker, G.; et al. Genome-Wide Identification and analysis of Arabidopsis sodium proton antiporter (NHX) and human sodium proton exchanger (NHX) homologs in Sorghum bicolor. Genes 2018, 9, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, G.Q.; Wang, Q.; Bao, A.K.; Wang, S.M. Amiloride reduces sodium transport and accumulation in the succulent xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum under salt conditions. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 139, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, B.; Zhai, H.; He, S.; Zhang, H.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, D.A. Vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene, IbNHX2, enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic sweetpotato. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 201, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ding, X.; Li, J.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ni, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the UGlcAE gene family in tomato. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Verma, D.; Lakhanpal, N.; Singh, K. Genome-wide identification and characterization of abiotic-stress responsive SOD (superoxide dismutase) gene family in Brassica juncea and B. rapa. 2019, 20, 227. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mishra, S.; Shukla, A.; Upadhyay, S.; Sanchita; Sharma, P.; Singh, S.; Phukan, U.J.; Meena, A.; Khan, F.; Tripathi, V.; et al. Identification, occurrence, and validation of DRE and ABRE cis-regulatory motifs in the promoter regions of genes of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 56, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, J.; Huang, R. Modulation of ethylene and ascorbic acid on reactive oxygen species scavenging in plant salt response. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Salicylic acid: Biosynthesis, perception, and contributions to plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 50, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, K.; Liu, Z.; Xing, L.; Wei, Y.; Mao, J.; Meng, Y.; Bao, L.; Han, M.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, D. miRNAs associated with auxin signaling, stress response, and cellular activities mediate adventitious root formation in apple rootstocks. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 139, 66–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, Z.; Raza, Q.; Xu, L.; He, X.; Huang, Y.; Yi, J.; Zhang, D.; Shao, H.B.; Ma, H.; Ali, Z. GmWRKY49, a salt-responsive nuclear protein, improved root length and governed better salinity tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wu, H. Plant salt tolerance and Na+ sensing and transport. Crop J. 2018, 6, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lu, W.; Guo, C.; Li, X.; Duan, W.; Ma, C.; Zhao, M.; Gu, J.; Du, X.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, K. Overexpression of TaNHX3, a vacuolar Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter gene in wheat, enhances salt stress tolerance in tobacco by improving related physiological processes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 76, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jegadeeson, V.; Kumari, K.; Pulipati, S.; Parida, A.; Venkataraman, G. Expression of wild rice Porteresia coarctata PcNHX1 antiporter gene (PcNHX1) in tobacco controlled by PcNHX1 promoter (PcNHX1p) confers Na+ specific hypocotyl elongation and stem-specific Na+ accumulation in transgenic tobacco. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 139, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, W.D.; Wang, P.; Bao, Z.; Ma, Q.; Duan, L.J.; Bao, A.K.; Zhang, J.L.; Wang, S.M. SOS1, HKT1;5, and NHX1 synergistically modulate Na+ homeostasis in the halophytic grass Puccinellia tenuiflora. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ma, Q.; Li, Y.X.; Yuan, H.J.; Hu, J.; Wei, L.; Bao, A.K.; Zhang, J.L.; Wang, S.M. ZxSOS1 is essential for long-distance transport and spatial distribution of Na+ and K+ in the xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum. Plant Soil 2014, 374, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gao, J.; Sun, J.; Cao, P.; Ren, L.; Liu, C.; Chen, S.; Chen, F.; Jiang, J. Variation in tissue Na+ content and the activity of SOS1 genes among two species and two related genera of Chrysanthemum. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Almeida, D.M.; Oliveira, M.M.; Saibo, N.J.M. Regulation of Na+ and K+ homeostasis in plants: Towards improved salt stress tolerance in crop plants. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2017, 40, 326–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yadav, N.S.; Shukla, P.S.; Jha, A.; Agarwal, P.K.; Jha, B. The SbSOS1 gene from the extreme halophyte Salicornia brachiata enhances Na+ loading in xylem and confers salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wayne, L.L.; Wallis, J.G.; Kumar, R.; Markham, J.E.; Browse, J. Cytochrome b5 reductase encoded by CBR1 is essential for a functional male gametophyte in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3052–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Oh, Y.J.; Kim, H.; Seo, S.H.; Hwang, B.G.; Chang, Y.S.; Lee, J.; Lee, D.W.; Sohn, E.J.; Lee, S.J.; Lee, Y.; et al. Cytochrome b5 reductase 1 triggers serial reactions that lead to iron uptake in plants. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wu, G.Q.; Xi, J.J.; Wang, Q.; Ma, Q.; Bao, A.K.; Zhang, J.L.; Wang, S.M. The ZxNHX gene encoding tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter in the xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum plays important roles in response to salt and drought. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 758–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bao, A.K.; Wang, Y.W.; Xi, J.J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, J.L.; Wang, S.M. Co-expression of xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Lotus corniculatus by increasing cations accumulation. Funct. Plant Biol. 2014, 41, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, G.Q.; Feng, R.J.; Wang, S.M.; Wang, C.M.; Bao, A.K.; Wei, L.; Yuan, H.J. Co-expression of xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum ZxNHX and ZxVP1-1 confers enhanced salinity tolerance in chimeric sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yu, Q.; An, L.; Li, W. The CBL-CIPK network mediates different signaling pathways in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Miranda, R.S.; Alvarez-Pizarro, J.C.; Costa, J.H.; Paula, S.O.; Prisco, J.T.; Gomes-Filho, E. Putative role of glutamine in the activation of CBL/CIPK signaling pathways during salt stress in sorghum. Plant Signal Behav. 2017, 12, e1361075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Quintero, F.J.; Martinez-Atienza, J.; Villalta, I.; Jiang, X.Y.; Kim, W.Y.; Ali, Z.; Fujii, H.; Mendoza, I.; Yun, D.J.; Zhu, J.K.; et al. Activation of the plasma membrane Na/H antiporter Salt-Overly-Sensitive 1 (SOS1) by phosphorylation of an auto-inhibitory C-terminal domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2611–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Yue, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.; Duan, L.; Li, Z. SOS1 gene overexpression increased salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco by maintaining a higher K+/Na+ ratio. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 10 00401 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of the NHX genes from Beta vulgaris (Bv), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Cucurbita maxima (Cm), Eutrema halophilum (Eh), Hordeum vulgare (Hv), Gossypium hirsutum (Gh), O. sativa (Os), Solanum lycopersicum (Sl), Sorghum bicolor (Sb), Spinacia oleracea (So), Solanum tuberosum (St), Triticum aestivum (Ta) and Vitis vinifera (Vv). The tree was determined by the Neighbor-Joining method (NJ) with 1000 bootstrap replicates using MEGA7.0. According to the clustering of the NHX proteins, we divided proteins into three different classes, viz Vac-, Endo-, and PM-class. Proteins from sugar beet and Arabidopsis are denoted by blue and red diamonds, respectively. Details of NHXs from 13 species are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of the NHX genes from Beta vulgaris (Bv), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Cucurbita maxima (Cm), Eutrema halophilum (Eh), Hordeum vulgare (Hv), Gossypium hirsutum (Gh), O. sativa (Os), Solanum lycopersicum (Sl), Sorghum bicolor (Sb), Spinacia oleracea (So), Solanum tuberosum (St), Triticum aestivum (Ta) and Vitis vinifera (Vv). The tree was determined by the Neighbor-Joining method (NJ) with 1000 bootstrap replicates using MEGA7.0. According to the clustering of the NHX proteins, we divided proteins into three different classes, viz Vac-, Endo-, and PM-class. Proteins from sugar beet and Arabidopsis are denoted by blue and red diamonds, respectively. Details of NHXs from 13 species are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Genes 10 00401 g001
Genes 10 00401 g002 550
Figure 2. Physical mapping and structure analysis of the BvNHX gene. (A) The distribution of the BvNHX genes of sugar beet on 9 chromosomes. The number of chromosomes is shown at the top of each chromosome. The numbers of BvNHX genes are indicated on the left of each chromosome. The scale of the genome size is given on the left. (B) Gene structures of the BvNHX genes. Exons are indicated by yellow boxes. Introns are indicated by black lines. Upstream and downstream are indicated by blue boxes. The scale of genes length is given at the bottom. CDS: Coding sequence; Mb: million bases; kb: kilo bases.
Figure 2. Physical mapping and structure analysis of the BvNHX gene. (A) The distribution of the BvNHX genes of sugar beet on 9 chromosomes. The number of chromosomes is shown at the top of each chromosome. The numbers of BvNHX genes are indicated on the left of each chromosome. The scale of the genome size is given on the left. (B) Gene structures of the BvNHX genes. Exons are indicated by yellow boxes. Introns are indicated by black lines. Upstream and downstream are indicated by blue boxes. The scale of genes length is given at the bottom. CDS: Coding sequence; Mb: million bases; kb: kilo bases.
Genes 10 00401 g002
Genes 10 00401 g003 550
Figure 3. Motif analysis of the BvNHX proteins. Distribution of conserved motifs in BvNHXs was analyzed by the online tool MEME. Details of different motifs indicated by different colors are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The scale of proteins length was given at the bottom. aa: amino acid.
Figure 3. Motif analysis of the BvNHX proteins. Distribution of conserved motifs in BvNHXs was analyzed by the online tool MEME. Details of different motifs indicated by different colors are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The scale of proteins length was given at the bottom. aa: amino acid.
Genes 10 00401 g003
Genes 10 00401 g004 550
Figure 4. Structural analysis of five BvNHX modeled proteins. The best PDB structural analog for each transporter is shown in Table 6. Details of secondary structure of BvNHX proteins are shown in Supplementary Figure S3.
Figure 4. Structural analysis of five BvNHX modeled proteins. The best PDB structural analog for each transporter is shown in Table 6. Details of secondary structure of BvNHX proteins are shown in Supplementary Figure S3.
Genes 10 00401 g004
Genes 10 00401 g005 550
Figure 5. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of BvNHXs. Line thickness indicates the strength of data support. Network is clustered to 3 clusters, which are represented with red, green, and blue nodes, respectively. Details of string analysis for individual BvNHX protein are shown in Supplementary Figure S4.
Figure 5. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of BvNHXs. Line thickness indicates the strength of data support. Network is clustered to 3 clusters, which are represented with red, green, and blue nodes, respectively. Details of string analysis for individual BvNHX protein are shown in Supplementary Figure S4.
Genes 10 00401 g005
Genes 10 00401 g006 550
Figure 6. Relative expression levels of BvNHX genes in leaf and root of sugar beet seedlings subjected to 50, 100, 200, and 300 mM NaCl for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Expression of the BvNHX genes normalized to those of BvACTIN and shown relative to the expression at 0 h. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the expression levels of BvNHX genes at different time. Experiments were repeated at least 3 times. Values are means ± SE and bars indicate SE (n = 3). Columns with different letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 level (Duncan’s test).
Figure 6. Relative expression levels of BvNHX genes in leaf and root of sugar beet seedlings subjected to 50, 100, 200, and 300 mM NaCl for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Expression of the BvNHX genes normalized to those of BvACTIN and shown relative to the expression at 0 h. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the expression levels of BvNHX genes at different time. Experiments were repeated at least 3 times. Values are means ± SE and bars indicate SE (n = 3). Columns with different letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 level (Duncan’s test).
Genes 10 00401 g006
Table
Table 1. The sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR.
Table 1. The sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR.
No.Gene Name Forward Primer Sequence (5’-3’)Reverse Primer Sequence (5’-3’)
1BvACTINACTGGTATTGTGCTTGACTCATGAGATAATCAGTGAGATC
2BvNHX1TCGATGATTCTTTCATGAGGGCCAACTGCCTCATACTCTG
3BvNHX2GTGTTAGATTTGGGTGTGCAAATAGCGCAGTGATGGATTCATTGACCCAACG
4BvNHX3GTTTGGTGTACCAAATATAGTGCATGTGATAGATTCATTAGCCCAACGATTC
5BvNHX4TCCTACAAATGATCCGCTGATATCTCTGACGACGTAAAACATGACCAAGTAC
6BvNHX5GCCAGCTATGGCAGCTTATCATCCAAGGCCAATGCCGATG
Table
Table 2. Identification of sugar beet BvNHX family genes.
Table 2. Identification of sugar beet BvNHX family genes.
Gene NameGene IDGene CodeChrExons CountCDS (bp)ORF (aa)pIMW (kDa)TMPlant-mPLoc
BvNHX1XkmwBv1g006450_xkmw.t111516595526.3161.312Vac
BvNHX2ZfceBv4g089680_zfce.t141415605198.4558.211Vac
BvNHX3JkjiBv4g083400_jkji.t141416175386.3359.312Vac
BvNHX4PswrBv9g203100_pswr.t192615845275.558.212Endo
BvNHX5SjdhBv6g131830_sjdh.t1623348911626.34128.512PM
Chr: chromosomal location; CDS: coding sequences; Endo: endosome; MW: molecular weight; ORF: open reading frame; PM: plasma membrane; pI: isoelectric point; TM: transmembrane domain; Vac: vacuole.
Table
Table 3. Pairwise sequence similarity and divergence among BvNHX and AtNHX proteins.
Table 3. Pairwise sequence similarity and divergence among BvNHX and AtNHX proteins.
Similarity (%)
Protein namesBvNHX1BvNHX2BvNHX3BvNHX4BvNHX5AtNHX1AtNHX2AtNHX3AtNHX4AtNHX6AtHNX7AtNHX8
DivergenceBvNHX1 78.8 79.6 64.4 8.6 89.2 89.5 78.5 84.0 65.0 10.1 43.1
BvNHX257.7 77.8 65.5 9.1 79.5 79.5 86.5 79.1 65.8 11.1 43.3
BvNHX361.3 68.9 65.0 9.4 79.9 79.5 79.1 78.2 64.9 11.1 43.0
BvNHX4183.2 166.1 184.7 10.1 65.2 64.4 64.9 64.7 86.8 12.0 43.6
BvNHX5299.0 257.0 265.0 237.0 9.4 9.1 9.5 8.9 9.8 61.9 43.8
AtNHX125.2 57.5 62.6 177.6 265.0 94.2 79.5 83.7 65.4 10.6 43.3
AtNHX225.3 56.5 63.5 186.7 281.0 12.3 79.4 84.1 65.5 10.6 43.2
AtNHX362.4 35.2 62.9 178.0 252.0 59.3 60.3 78.7 65.6 11.1 43.8
AtNHX435.4 59.9 61.9 170.1 264.0 37.6 36.5 62.5 66.4 10.3 42.7
AtNHX6175.9 175.9 191.7 30.9 244.0 174.1 172.2 177.3 168.4 11.8 43.3
AtHNX7274.0 229.0 243.0 221.0 50.8 252.0 255.0 236.0 248.0 226.0 51.0
AtNHX8267.0 245.0 273.0 254.0 46.8 254.0 261.0 241.0 255.0 261.0 31.1
Similarity in upper triangle; divergence in lower triangle. Pair distance was calculated by Clustal W 2.0. Values marked with blue and grey colors represent divergence and similarity, respectively. The deeper background means the greater value. NHX: Na+/H+ antiporter.
Table
Table 4. Ks and Ka substitution rates in BvNHX paralog genes.
Table 4. Ks and Ka substitution rates in BvNHX paralog genes.
Gene 1Gene 2KsKaKa/Ks
BvNHX1BvNHX50.112211.104099.0000
BvNHX2BvNHX53.73737.99492.1392
BvNHX3BvNHX518.80763.48940.1855
BvNHX4BvNHX52.99005.50131.8399
Ks: synonymous substitution; Ka: non-synonymous substitution. NHX: Na+/H+ antiporter.
Table
Table 5. Kinds and amounts of hormone-, stress-, and development-related cis-acting element in the promoters of BvNHX predicted by the PlantCARE tool.
Table 5. Kinds and amounts of hormone-, stress-, and development-related cis-acting element in the promoters of BvNHX predicted by the PlantCARE tool.
Functional ClassElementsFunctionSequenceGenes
BvNHX1BvNHX2BvNHX3BvNHX4BvNHX5
HormoneABREAbscisic acid-responsive elementACGTG00001
EREEthylene-responsive elementATTTCATA10110
TCA-elementInvolved in salicylic acid responsivenessCCATCTTTTT20001
TGA-elementAuxin-responsive elementAACGAC00101
StressAREAnaerobic-responsive elementAAACCA10020
DREDrought-responsive elementGCCGAC10000
LTRLow-temperature responsivenessCCGAAA00010
WUN-motifWound-responsive elementAAATTACTA00100
MYBDrought-responsive elementCAACCA10000
W boxSalt-responsive elementTTGACC00010
STREStress response elementAGGGG00001
OthersBox 4Involved in light responsivenessATTAAT10100
GT1-motifInvolved in light responsivenessGGTTAAT10000
TCT-motifInvolved in light responsivenessTCTTAC10011
Gap-boxInvolved in light responsivenessCAAATGAA00100
AE-boxModul for light responseAGAAACTT00010
O2-siteZein metabolism regulationGATGACATGA00012
G-boxInvolved in light responsivenessTACGTG00001
ABRE: Abscisic acid responsive element; ERE: Ethylene-responsive element; ARE: Anaerobic-responsive element; DRE: Drought-responsive element; MYB: Drought-responsive element; LTR: Low-temperature responsiveness; STRE: Stress response element.
Table
Table 6. Structural dependent modeling parameters for the BvNHX proteins.
Table 6. Structural dependent modeling parameters for the BvNHX proteins.
ProteinC-ScoreTM-ScoreRMSD (Å)Best Identified Structural Analogs in PDB
PDB HitTM-Score aRMSD aIDEN aCov
BvNHX1−1.030.58 ± 0.149.9 ± 4.64cz9A0.7011.080.2210.712
BvNHX2−1.830.49 ± 0.1511.8 ± 4.54cz9A0.7391.190.210.753
BvNHX3−1.640.51 ± 0.1511.4 ± 4.54cz8A0.7111.440.2020.729
BvNHX4−0.610.52 ± 0.1511.3 ± 4.64cz9A0.7241.280.1950.74
BvNHX5−1.260.56 ± 0.1512.4 ± 4.35ijoJ0.9021.590.0870.915
C-score [−5, 2] is the confidence of each model, a higher value indicates a model with a higher confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are determined based on the C-score value and the protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. TM-score a indicates a measure of global similarity between query structure and known structure in PDB. RMSD a represents the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align. IDEN a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region. Cov is the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, G.-Q.; Wang, J.-L.; Li, S.-J. Genome-Wide Identification of Na+/H+ Antiporter (NHX) Genes in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and Their Regulated Expression under Salt Stress. Genes 2019, 10, 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050401

AMA Style

Wu G-Q, Wang J-L, Li S-J. Genome-Wide Identification of Na+/H+ Antiporter (NHX) Genes in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and Their Regulated Expression under Salt Stress. Genes. 2019; 10(5):401. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Guo-Qiang, Jin-Long Wang, and Shan-Jia Li. 2019. "Genome-Wide Identification of Na+/H+ Antiporter (NHX) Genes in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and Their Regulated Expression under Salt Stress" Genes 10, no. 5: 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050401

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop