Next Article in Journal
SMC5/6: Multifunctional Player in Replication
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetical Genomics of Tonic Immobility in the Chicken
Previous Article in Journal
Evidence for Strong Kinship Influence on the Extent of Linkage Disequilibrium in Cultivated Common Beans
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/genes10010006
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Daily Regulation of Phototransduction, Circadian Clock, DNA Repair, and Immune Gene Expression by Heme Oxygenase in the Retina of Drosophila

by
Milena Damulewicz
1,
Michał Świątek
2,
Agnieszka Łoboda
3,
Józef Dulak
3,
Bernadetta Bilska
1,
Ryszard Przewłocki
4 and
Elżbieta Pyza
1,*
1
Department of Cell Biology and Imaging, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Biophysics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-530 Krakow, Poland
3
Department of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
4
Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-343 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2019, 10(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10010006
Submission received: 18 October 2018 / Revised: 3 December 2018 / Accepted: 17 December 2018 / Published: 21 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Genetics and Genomics of Animal Behaviour and Behavioural Plasticity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The daily expression of genes and the changes in gene expression after silencing the heme oxygenase (ho) gene were examined in the retina of Drosophila using microarray and SybrGreen qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) methods. The HO decrease in the morning upregulated 83 genes and downregulated 57 genes. At night, 80 genes were upregulated and 22 were downregulated. The top 20 genes downregulated after ho silencing in the morning modulate phototransduction, immune responses, autophagy, phagocytosis, apoptosis, the carbon monoxide (CO) response, the oxidative stress/UV response, and translation. In turn, the genes that upregulated at night were involved in translation—the response to oxidative stress, DNA damage, and phototransduction. Among the top 20 genes downregulated at night were genes involved in phototransduction, immune responses, and autophagy. For some genes, a low level of HO had an opposite effect in the morning compared to those at night. Silencing ho also changed the expression of circadian clock genes, while the HO decrease during the night enhanced the expression of immune system genes. The results showed that the cyclic expression of HO is important for controlling several processes in the retina, including neuroprotection and those involved in the innate immune system.

1. Introduction

The retina receives and transduces photic and visual stimuli. During these processes, the retina is exposed to extreme changes in light intensity and the wavelength spectrum throughout the day. During phototransduction, activated rhodopsin (metarhodopsin) is inactivated immediately after signal transduction since the accumulation of metarhodopsin-arrestin2 complexes is toxic to photoreceptors [1,2,3]. In addition, UV light and blue light exposure produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) in photoreceptors. These processes damage cells and may induce light-dependent retina degeneration [4]. However, there are mechanisms of protection against harmful short wavelength light, such as horizontal and vertical migrations of screening and photo pigments at specific times of the day [5,6]. These processes seem to be regulated by the circadian clock, which also controls other cyclic processes in the retina, such as oscillations in the amplitude of the electroretinogram (ERG) [5] and changes in the synaptic protein level [7].
Circadian clocks are self-sustaining generators of endogenous oscillations with a period of about a day in almost all processes in the body. The molecular mechanism of the clock in Drosophila is based on the circadian expression of two main clock genes, period (per) and timeless (tim). The transcripts of these genes accumulate at the end of the day and at the beginning of the night. During the night, PER and TIM proteins are synthesized. These proteins form heterodimers and enter the nucleus to repress the activity of the transcription factors clock (CLK) and cycle (CYC) [8]. CLK and CYC activate the expression of per and tim, as well as other clock genes including vrille (vri), Par domain protein 1ℇ (Pdp1ℇ), and clock-controlled genes (CCGs). When PER/TIM inhibit CLK/CYC activity, they repress their own transcription. This mechanism of the molecular clock is called the negative feedback loop. In the morning, light activates the clock photoreceptor cryptochrome (CRY) [9], and its binding to TIM targets this protein for degradation in proteasomes [10,11]. Because monomeric PER is unstable, it is also degraded. At the same time, CLK and CYC form heterodimers and bind to the E-box sequences of clock genes, activating their expression. Under light/dark (LD) conditions, the circadian clock is synchronized by light, mainly by CRY, and the period of the rhythm becomes equal to 24 h. In constant darkness (DD), the period is longer or shorter than 24 h. In addition to the central clock or pacemaker located in the brain, there are also clocks called peripheral clocks or oscillators that are distributed throughout the body. Some of these clock cells are in the retina, and they seem to be independent from the pacemaker in the brain [12], but other processes still depend on the central clock [13]. The retina circadian oscillators exhibit the circadian expression of clock genes [13,14,15,16]; however, per messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) peaks later during the day than it does in the pacemaker cells, and the PER protein is degraded sooner after the beginning of the day [16].
Heme oxygenase (ho) is one of the genes that shows circadian cycling in the retina. HO degrades heme into carbon monoxide (CO), ferrous ions, and biliverdin. In mammals, HO isoforms (HO-1 and HO-2) act as cytoprotective and anti-apoptotic agents by scavenging ROS (reviewed in [17]). In Drosophila melanogaster, only one form of HO, which plays a role in development [18] and in controlling the signaling pathway of DNA damage [19,20], is present. This form is also important for the protection of the retina against UV light and blue light exposure [19,21,22]. The level of ho mRNA peaks at the beginning of the day and during the night, and the peak in the morning decreases the light-dependent DNA damage to photoreceptors [19,21]. In arrhythmic per01 mutants, exposure to UV light increases the mortality of the flies, while ho over-expression decreases DNA breaks in the retina photoreceptors. Although it is clear that the morning peak in HO protects the visual system against degeneration, the role of the second peak of HO in the middle of the night is still unknown.
To understand the cellular processes regulated in the retina by ho in the morning (during the morning peak of motor activity) and, possibly, a new role of HO in the middle of the night during sleep, we carried out microarray analyses of isolated retinas. The changes in the expression of many genes observed after ho silencing indicate the importance of HO in various processes, including phototransduction, immune response, and autophagy.

2. Materials and Methods

Animals and Procedures

We used the following strains of D. melanogaster: GMR-Gal4 (a strain that expresses GAL4 under the control of the Glass Multiple Reporter (GMR) enhancer-promoter, predominantly in the retina), UAS-hoRNAi (a strain that expresses dsRNA for the ho gene under the control of the UAS sequence) [18], and UAS-Valium10 (a control for hoRNAi flies) [23]. After crossing GMR-Gal4 with UAS-hoRNAi or with UAS-Valium10, the offspring of GMR>hoRNAi, with ho expression silenced in the retina, were used as experimental flies. Those of GMR>Valium10 with an empty Valium10 vector expressed in the retina were used as controls. Flies were maintained under 12 h light and 12 h dark (LD12:12) conditions at a constant temperature of 24 °C. The UAS-hoRNAi system was used because the total knock-out of ho is lethal [18]. Partial ho silencing in the eye is sufficient to see the effect of HO on processes in the visual system [21]. Although ho silencing in the eye is more effective at higher temperatures, this condition causes severe retina degeneration [18].
Males, 5–7 days old, were sacrificed at the beginning of the day at ZT1 (one hour after lights-on) and in the middle of the night at ZT16 (four hours after lights-off). In total, 30 males were used for a single sample. The heads were kept in cold acetone at −80 °C for 7 days to lyophilize the tissues, and then the retinas were isolated manually. The total RNA was isolated using the Macherey Nagel XS kit (Macherey Nagel, Germany). The experiment was repeated four times. The RNA quality was controlled using an Agilent Bioanalyzer System, and the samples were sent to the OakLabs company (Berlin, Germany) for microarray data analysis on 8x60K ArrayXS Drosophila.
The expression of selected genes at ZT1 and ZT16 was also examined using a quantitative PCR (qPCR) technique. The total RNA was isolated using a Macherey Nagel XS kit, and the RNA quality was assessed by Nanodrop (samples used for the experiment showed A260/A280 ≥ 2.0 and A260/A230 ≥ 1.8). Of the total RNA, 1 μg was reverse-transcribed with the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cape Town, South Africa) and random primers. cDNA diluted 1:10 was used for SybrGreen qPCR (KapaBiosystems, Vilnius, Lithuania). The specific primers (the specificity was controlled with Primer BLAST and gel electrophoresis) used for the reaction are listed in Table 1. A standard curve was used to calculate gene expression level. The rpl32 gene served as a reference for gene expression. Statistical analyses were initially performed using the non-parametric ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Tukey’s test. Statistica 7.0 software and GraphPad software were used for the analyses.

3. Data Analysis

We compared the data from the control flies GMR>Valium10 collected at ZT1 and ZT16 to investigate the daily changes of gene expression in the retina. Those from GMR>hoRNAi with a decreased level of HO were also collected at ZT1 and ZT16 to investigate the role of HO in the regulation of genes involved in various processes in the retina in the morning and in the middle of the night.
The gene signal intensity values in each data sample have been derived from microarray studies (ArrayXS Drosophila Oak Labs experimentally validated the microarray based on Agilent technology). The Bioanalyzer kit “Eukaryote Total RNA Pico” was used for quality control of the total RNA prior to sample processing. The control probe signals were removed from the raw data, and the means of signals from replicate probes and signals from the same target probes were calculated. The data were then normalized according to the quantile normalization scheme and subsequently log-transformed. A two-sample t-test with unequal variances (Welch’s t-test) was used to statistically identify significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Changes in gene expression values were tested using the following criteria: data from control flies vs. flies with a decreased HO level, both collected at ZT1; data from control flies vs. flies with a decreased HO level, both collected at ZT16; data from control flies collected at ZT1 vs. data from control flies collected at ZT16; and data from flies with a decreased HO level collected at ZT1 vs. data from flies with a decreased HO level collected at ZT16. Four lists of DEGs corresponding to the aforementioned criteria have been created. The lists contain 348, 304, 519, and 228 elements, respectively [for p-values < 0.005; 19, 20, 77, and 55 after applying a Benjamini-Hochberg’s False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction]. To ensure list robustness, ANOVA (with time and treatment as factors) was also performed on the data set. The results were partially aligned with the Welch’s t-test results for the statistical significance of DEGs.
The log-transformed quantile-normalized data were used to create plots showing up- and downregulated genes, which were selected according to their involvement in the biological processes of interest.
Heatmaps showing DEGs between the control and treatment samples at ZT1 and ZT16 have also been created to provide an overall picture.
The lists of DEGs were submitted to the online system PANTHER10 (http://www.pantherdb.org/) to perform a statistical overrepresentation test based on the Gene Ontology (GO) classification [24]. The method includes calculating the ratio of all genes in a given GO term to all genes in the background pool (the genome of D. melanogaster in this instance). The ratio can be used together with the binomial distribution for the null hypothesis to calculate a p-value parameter that describes the chance of genes appearing randomly in the results. A lower p-value means a lesser chance of random appearance, which means that the most significant results are those with the lowest p-values. The Bonferroni correction was applied to the p-values. Additionally, we compared our results with those presented in a set of papers by other authors [25,26,27] to confirm that our control samples showed consistent patterns of expression relative to previously published results as references for circadian expression and to determine the influence of hoRNAi-related modifications on the expression of particular genes.

4. Results

4.1. Day-Night Differences in Gene Expression in the Retina of Drosophila

Microarray data analysis showed that approximately 435 genes were differentially expressed between ZT1 and ZT16 in the control flies (GMR>Valium10) in the retina (p-value < 0.05; 112 for p-value < 0.005; 77 after applying Benjamini-Hochberg’s FDR correction). From these genes, we identified clock genes [per, clock (clk), tim, vri, Pdp1], known clock-controlled genes (ebony, trpl) [25,27] (Table S1) and genes regulating other processes that may also be regulated by light or that may be clock-controlled (Table S2). The highest differences in expression levels between ZT1 and ZT16 (top 20) were observed for the phototransduction genes [trp, retinal degeneration A (rdgA), norpA], DNA damage protection genes [eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A (eIF4a), Heat shock protein 83 (Hsp83), Calmodulin (Cam)] and immune system-related genes [Neuropeptide-like precursor 2 (Nplp2), Phosphoreceptor dehydrogenase (Pdh)] (Table S3). Analyses using PANTHER10 showed that the most important changes in GO categories were in the nucleosome assembly, the phototransduction pathway, and the G protein signaling (Table S4).

4.2. Effects of Ho Silencing on Gene Expression in the Retina of Drosophila

We analyzed differences in gene expression between the control GMR > Valium10 flies and flies with silenced ho expression in the retina at two different time points (ZT1 and ZT16). The microarray analysis did not show significant downregulation of the ho mRNA level. However, using the qPCR method, we observed a 52% decrease in ho expression in the GMR>hoRNAi strain compared to that in the control (data not shown). In this analysis, 83 genes were identified as upregulated and 57 genes as downregulated at ZT1 (Table 2).
According to the GO categories, the most affected genes are involved in the processes of light perception, locomotion, responses to external stimuli, and geotaxis (Table 3). Moreover, among the top 20 genes upregulated in GMR>hoRNAi flies in the morning, we detected five genes that modulate translation, two genes that regulate transcription, four genes connected to immune responses and DNA damage, and one gene related to phototransduction (Table 3). Among the top 20 genes downregulated after ho silencing at ZT1 were genes responsible for phototransduction, immune responses, autophagy, phagocytosis, apoptosis, the CO response, the oxidative stress/UV response, and translation (Table 4).
In the retina of hoRNAi flies at ZT16, the expression of 80 genes was upregulated and 22 genes were downregulated in comparison with Valium10 flies (Table 2). PANTHER analysis showed that the most affected processes were immune responses and oxido-reduction processes (Table 5). Most of the upregulated genes during the night in GMR>hoRNAi flies were involved in translation, response to oxidative stress, DNA damage, and phototransduction (Table 6). Among the top 20 genes downregulated at ZT16 were genes involved in phototransduction, immune responses, and autophagy (Table 6). Interestingly, we found that HO had opposite effects on the same gene expression at different times of the day. For example, retinophilin (rtp), transient receptor potential (trp), and Turandot A (TotA) were strongly upregulated at ZT16 and downregulated at ZT1 (Table 4 vs. Table 6).

4.3. Confirmation of Microarray Data with the Real-Time PCR Method

In the next step of this study, we further explored the expression of genes involved in the phototransduction pathway. Microarray analyses showed that HO affects the expression of the following genes: white (w), Crystallin (Cry), Rhodopsin 5 (Rh5), Rhodopsin 6 (Rh6), no receptor potential A (norpA), neither inactivation nor afterpotential C (ninaC), and trp (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Most of these genes in GMR>hoRNAi flies were upregulated at ZT1 but showed no significant changes at ZT16.
Another process highly affected by ho silencing is the circadian clock. Microarray data showed that HO decreases the expression of Early gene at 23 (E23), cry, and Pdp1 in the morning and enhances tim, per, vri, and clockwork orange (cwo) during the night. We could see the opposite expression pattern in hoRNAi flies in the retina (Figure 2 and Figure 3). HO also strongly affects the humoral immune response, especially during the night, when the decrease in ho expression enhances the expression level of many genes of the innate immune system [Cecropin A1 (CecA1), Cecropin C (CecC), Cecropin B (CecB), Diptericin (Dpt), Attacin A (AttA), Attacin B (AttB), Attacin C (AttC), and Drosomycin (Dro)] (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
When we compared the DEGs between the control samples and samples with the silenced ho gene, we found that 180 transcripts were downregulated while 168 were upregulated, which indicates that the silencing of the ho gene significantly affects the activity of the retina cells at the beginning of the day (Figure 6A). In turn, among the 304 transcripts analyzed in the samples from the middle of the night (ZT16), 77 transcripts were downregulated while 227 were upregulated after ho gene silencing. The analysis showed that the silencing of the ho gene also caused a change in the retina cell activity in the absence of light during the night. Moreover, the majority of genes responding to ho gene silencing at ZT1 were not affected at ZT16 (and vice versa) (Figure 6B).
In the case of the transcripts that were upregulated in the control samples at the beginning of the day, most were downregulated in the middle of the night across the relevant samples, which suggests light-dependence and/or circadian control (Figure 6). However, in part of the group of transcripts downregulated in the control samples at the beginning of the day, the expression values in the middle of the night were upregulated across all relevant samples. This suggests that these genes are normally active during the night, while, for another part of this group, the regulation patterns were similar between the beginning of the day and the middle of the night. The changes in expression caused by ho silencing seem to be prevalent, regardless of daylight presence or the time of day.

5. Discussion

In the present study, we address the role of HO in the retina of Drosophila at two different time points: at the beginning of the day (ZT1, high motor activity) and in the middle of the night (ZT16, sleep), when two peaks of ho expression were observed in our earlier study [21]. We also examined the differences among all retina gene expression levels between ZT1 and ZT16. The obtained results showed that many transcripts were upregulated or downregulated at the selected time points, and this seemed to be correlated with the high activity of the flies (ZT1) or sleep (ZT16), in addition to direct light effects at ZT1 and regulation by the circadian clock.
It has been shown that in the whole head, more than a hundred genes oscillate in a circadian manner [25,26,27,28,29,30]. However, the whole-head homogenates that were examined included brains with optic lobes, fat body, and other head tissues. In our previous study, we found that various tissues—even different parts of the visual system such as the retina and lamina—have different and specific gene expression patterns [13]. In the present study, we found that 436 genes were differentially expressed at ZT1 compared to those at ZT16 in the fly retina. Among these, 50 genes have been listed as cyclically expressed genes in whole-head homogenates [25,26,27]. These include clock genes (per, tim, clk) and some previously described clock-controlled genes (for example, ebony) [25,27]. Moreover, some of the genes that oscillate in the whole head (like CG18386) do not cycle in clock neurons [31], but they show daily expression changes in the retina. It is possible that other genes identified in the retina may also exhibit daily changes in mRNA levels that are light or clock-dependent, but more detailed studies are needed to examine their expression during the day.
The differences among the retinas collected at two times, ZT1 and ZT16, were highest in the genes involved in the phototransduction pathway and circadian clock. The retina photoreceptors possess self-sustained peripheral circadian oscillators [12,14] that are independent from the pacemaker located in the brain. However, some clock-controlled genes in the retina are regulated by pacemaker cells [13]. In our previous study, using a qPCR technique, we detected the cyclic expression of clock genes in the retina [13], and this is consistent with the results obtained in the present microarray data. In the case of the phototransduction pathway, it has been reported that Rh1, Arr1, and Arr2 transcripts do not cycle [32], while trpl, which encodes the Ca2+ channel, has a rhythmic expression with a maximum at ZT11 [25]. We confirmed in the present study that trp mRNA oscillates during the day. TRP is a light-activated ion channel protein [33], and opening this channel produces light-sensitive conductance in photoreceptors. Higher trp and trpl expression during the night may increase the retina sensitivity to light. Among the phototransduction genes, Rh5 and Rh6 show changes in expression during the day. Claridge-Chang et al. [25] found that Rh4 also cycles in terms of expression, but this effect was not confirmed in our study. Interestingly, the highest expression levels of Rh5 and Rh6 were observed at the end of the night, when the retina is most sensitive to light and when the amplitude of the ERG [5] and optomotor responses [34] are intensified. The phototransduction pathway proteins seem to be important for circadian clock entrainment since trp/trpl double mutants are not only blind but also have abnormal TIM degradation in response to light [35], which affects synchronization of the clock by light.
Studies performed on vertebrate cells clearly indicate that HO-1 can not only localize in cytoplasm but also be cleaved and translocated to the nucleus, where it mediates the upregulation of genes involved in the antioxidant response and cytoprotection (reviewed in [36]). This may suggest that HO-1 can act as a transcription factor, but the structure of HO-1 does not reveal traditional DNA binding motifs, which are characteristic for most transcription factors. However, interactions with other proteins in the nucleus were shown. The nuclear form of HO-1 might be a transcription factor activator or repressor, as it influences several transcription factors, thus upregulating the activity of AP-1, AP-2, STATs, and Nrf2 and downregulating NFκB or SP1 [37].
In our previous study, we found that ho expression and HO activity affect the molecular mechanism of the circadian clock by changing clk and per expression levels [21]. In this study, we detected that many other genes are modulated by ho silencing in the retina photoreceptors. Moreover, this effect is time-dependent, and the expression of the same gene changes throughout the day, as in the case of Arr1, TotA, and rtp. It was previously shown that Arr1 is involved in metarhodopsin inactivation, and that changes in its location from the cytoplasm to the rhabdomere occur in a light-dependent manner [38]. TotA is a humoral factor secreted from the fat body under different stress factors, such as bacterial infection, high temperatures, mechanical pressure, dehydration, UV irradiation, and oxidative agents [39]. In turn, RTP is involved in organizing rhabdomeric components to suppress the random activation of the phototransduction cascade. The RTP function is also light-dependent [40].
In the morning, during the first peak of HO in the retina, the most important changes after ho silencing were observed in genes connected to the response to light. The primary role of HO at this time seems to be the protection of DNA against light-induced damage [19,20,21]. Since the phototransduction cascade enhances oxidative stress in photoreceptors [4], the observed HO-dependent decrease in phototransduction protein levels in the morning might be an additional mechanism of protection against ROS.
The phototransduction pathway is regulated by circadian inputs and HO levels. However, not all genes encoding phototransduction proteins oscillate in expression. Hartman et al. [32] reported that the most common gene in the compound eye, rhodopsin Rh1, is not rhythmically expressed [32], which is consistent with our data. In contrast, Rh5 and Rh6 expression levels are high during the night, and their mRNA levels depend on HO. Rhodopsin 5 is sensitive to blue light and UV-A, while Rh6 is sensitive to green light. Both are located in R8 photoreceptors, which terminate in the medulla. When HO in the retina is low, the Rh5 and Rh6 protein levels are higher than normal at the end of the night and at the beginning of the day. Because Rh5 is sensitive to blue light, which is intense during the dawn and may cause retina degeneration, a high level of HO protects the eyes against ROS and DNA damage by diminishing sensitivity to blue light before dawn. At the beginning of the day (ZT1), however, HO increases the Rh5 level and decreases the Rh6 level. A higher Rh5 level during the day probably allows the detection of a lower level of blue light in the environment than in the morning. At night (ZT16), ho silencing causes strong upregulation of the expression of chaperons (Hsc70-4), genes involved in the response to UV (TotA) or white light [the exit protein of rhodopsin and TRP A (Xport)], and DNA repair genes (eIF-4a, Cam) [41]. These genes seem to be involved in the repairing mechanisms of light-induced cell damage after dusk that are regulated by HO.
During the night, HO seems to also play a role in the regulation of the immune system and redox processes, which are involved in detoxification. It has been reported that in the whole organism, antimicrobial defense is rhythmic and occurs mainly during resting time [28,42]. In turn, infections disrupt sleep efficiency and affect the circadian clock [43]. In the present study, we observed that interactions between the circadian clock and immune system also exist in the retina, and HO plays an important role in the regulation of immune response intensity. After ho silencing, the expression of many genes encoding antimicrobial proteins was upregulated during the night. A similar effect has been described in mammals, in which HO has an anti-inflammatory effect [17,22]. Low HO levels in the retina of our experimental flies probably increased the ROS level, and, in effect, it over-activated the immune response. A relationship between ROS and immune responses has already been detected in the gut [44]. This process in the retina is clock-dependent, and high levels of HO during the night under normal physiological conditions may also protect retina cells against overactivity of the immune system.
In summary, our data indicate that HO is an important enzyme with multiple functions in the retina that change during the day. In the morning, HO is involved in protection against UV and high ROS levels. During the night, it regulates DNA repair processes and controls the immune response intensity, playing an anti-inflammatory role in the visual system.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/10/1/6/s1. Figure S1. Genes with different expression levels between ZT1 and ZT16 in the retina (according to our microarray data), which were described as circadian genes in the whole head of Drosophila by other authors. Figure S2. Genes with different expression levels between ZT1 and ZT16 in the retina (in our microarray data) but not in the whole head reported by other authors. Figure S3. Top 20 genes up- and downregulated at ZT16 in control flies. Figure S4. Top 10 genes of the most changed GO (gene ontology) between ZT1 and ZT16 in control flies. Figure S5. The differentially expressed genes across all samples (p-value < 0.05, FC > 1 or FC < −1). (A) a heatmap showing log2 expression values of 348 transcripts from Figure 6A with the addition of ZT16 samples. In the case of a group of transcripts that were upregulated in the control samples at the beginning of the day, most of them were downregulated in the middle of the night across relevant samples. This suggests that silencing of the ho gene results in decreased sensitivity to the daylight. However, in part of a group of transcripts downregulated in the control samples at the beginning of the day, the expression in the middle of the night was upregulated across all relevant samples, which suggests that these genes can be active in the absence of daylight. Whereas, for another part of this group, the regulation pattern was similar when gene expression levels were compared between the beginning of the day and the middle of the night. Changes in expression caused by the ho gene silencing seem to be prevalent, regardless of the daylight presence; (B) a heatmap showing log2 expression values of 304 transcripts from Figure 6B with the addition of ZT1 samples. The group of transcripts upregulated at ZT16 in the control GMR>Valium10 samples could be either connected to processes which occur during the night, since they are not upregulated at ZT1, or engaged in long term processes of protection against short wavelength light. The group of transcripts downregulated at ZT16 in GMR>Valium10 samples seems to have three distinctive patterns of expression. From the top, the first and largest pattern at ZT1 suggests that the difference in expression of these transcripts is driven only by silencing of the ho gene and is not connected to day/night cycle, even if the difference at ZT1 is not as clear as at ZT16. However, the ho gene expression is clock-dependent. The second pattern shows that there are some genes that are upregulated during the day in all samples, but are downregulated during the night only when the ho gene is not silenced. It suggests that HO is not only responsible for active defense against short wavelength light, but also involved in other functions, for example in the regulation of immune responses and DNA repair. The third pattern is related to transcripts whose expressions are reversed when gene expression is compared between two time points of both types of samples. This result indicates a possibility that ho silencing disturbs the daily rhythms in gene expression; (C) a heatmap showing log2 expression values of 519 transcripts differentially expressed between ZT1 and ZT16 of the GMR>Valium10 (control) samples with the addition of GMR>hoRNAi samples. Aside from a relatively small group of transcripts near the middle of the heatmap, the prevalent expression pattern suggests that the difference between ZT1 and ZT16 in control samples is nullified by silencing of the ho gene, in agreement with our expectations of ho silencing effect; (D) a heatmap showing log2 expression values of the 228 transcripts differentially expressed between ZT1 and ZT16 of the GMR>hoRNAi samples with the addition of control samples. There are four distinctive patterns in the added control samples. From the top, the first pattern includes transcripts whose expression levels seem to be not affected by ho silencing. The second pattern includes transcripts whose expression levels in the added control samples were uniformly raised in comparing with their levels in ZT1 samples with the silenced ho gene, but similar to the levels of expression in ZT16 samples with silenced ho. This suggests that the decreased ho expression causes these genes to be suppressed only during the day and/or in the presence of light during the day. The third pattern, similar to the first one, follows what was established in the GMR>hoRNAi samples, which means that these genes are most likely not connected to the ho gene functions. The fourth pattern pertains to a small group of transcripts whose expression levels seem to be switched and, as a result, transcripts that were upregulated at ZT1 of GMR>hoRNAi samples were downregulated at ZT1 of the control samples (and vice versa). This phenomenon raises a possibility that ho gene silencing disturbs light-dependent processes and the circadian clock; (E) a Venn diagram in which the numbers of common elements between each heatmap A, B, C, and D are shown. It suggests that lists of these heatmap genes are largely independent from each other. The Venn diagram takes into consideration only transcripts which were successfully annotated (298 out of 348 in case of A, 263 out of 304 in case of B, 445 out of 519 in case of C, and 209 out of 228 in case of D). The details of all the heatmap preparations and presentations are the same as in Figure 6. Figure S6: List of genes from the heatmap A (Figure 6) with their fold change, Welch’s t-test p-values, and ANOVA p-values adjusted for FDR. Figure S7: List of genes from the heatmap B (Figure 6) with their fold change, Welch’s t-test p-values, and ANOVA p-values adjusted for FDR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.P.; Data curation, M.D.; Formal analysis, M.Ś.; Funding acquisition, E.P.; Investigation, M.D., A.Ł. and B.B.; Methodology, M.D.; Project administration, E.P.; Resources, E.P.; Software, M.Ś.; Supervision, E.P.; Validation, M.D., M.Ś. and E.P.; Visualization, M.D.; Writing—original draft, E.P.; Writing—review & editing, J.D. and R.P.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Centre in Poland grant No 2012/07/B/NZ3/02908 to EP.

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Byk, T.; Bar-Yaacov, M.; Doza, Y.N.; Minke, B.; Selinger, Z. Regulatory arrestin cycle secures the fidelity and maintenance of the fly photoreceptor cell. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 1907–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sengupta, S.; Barber, T.R.; Xia, H.; Ready, D.F.; Hardie, R.C. Depletion of PtdIns(4,5)P2 underlies retinal degeneration in Drosophila trp mutants. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126, 1247–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shieh, B.H. Molecular genetics of retinal degeneration a Drosophila perspective. Fly 2011, 5, 356–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Organisciak, D.T.; Vaughan, D.K. Retinal light damage: Mechanisms and protection. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2010, 29, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, D.M.; Christianson, J.S.; Sapp, R.J.; Stark, W.S. Visual receptor cycle in normal and period mutant Drosophila: Microspectrophotometry, electrophysiology, and ultrastructural morphometry. Vis. Neurosci. 1992, 9, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pyza, E.; Meinertzhagen, I.A. Circadian rhythms in screening pigment and invaginating organelles in photoreceptor terminals of the housefly’s first optic neuropile. J. Neurobiol. 1997, 32, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Górska-Andrzejak, J.; Makuch, R.; Stefan, J.; Görlich, A.; Semik, D.; Pyza, E. Circadian expression of the presynaptic active zone protein bruchpilot in the lamina of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Neurobiol. 2013, 73, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, C.; Bae, K.; Edery, I. PER and TIM inhibit the DNA binding activity of a Drosophila CLOCK-CYC/dBMAL1 heterodimer without disrupting formation of the heterodimer: A basis for circadian transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 5316–5325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ozturk, N.; Selby, C.P.; Annayev, Y.; Zhong, D.; Sancar, A. Reaction mechanism of Drosophila cryptochrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ceriani, M.F.; Darlington, T.K.; Staknis, D.; Más, P.; Petti, A.A.; Weitz, C.J.; Kay, S.A. Light-dependent sequestration of TIMELESS by CRYPTOCHROME. Science 1999, 285, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Naidoo, N.; Song, W.; Hunter-Ensor, M.; Sehgal, A. A role for the proteasome in the light response of the timeless clock protein. Science 1999, 285, 1737–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cheng, Y.; Hardin, P.E. Drosophila photoreceptors contain an autonomous circadian oscillator that can function without period mRNA cycling. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Damulewicz, M.; Loboda, A.; Bukowska-Strakova, K.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J.; Pyza, E. Clock and clock-controlled genes are differently expressed in the retina, lamina and in selected cells of the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Siwicki, K.K.; Eastman, C.; Petersen, G.; Rosbash, M.; Hall, J.C. Antibodies to the period gene product of Drosophila reveal diverse tissue distribution and rhythmic changes in the visual system. Neuron 1988, 1, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yoshii, T.; Todo, T.; Wülbeck, C.; Stanewsky, R.; Helfrich-Förster, C. Cryptochrome is present in the compound eyes and a subset of Drosophila’s clock neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 2008, 508, 952–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zerr, D.M.; Hall, J.C.; Rosbash, M.; Siwicki, K.K. Circadian fluctuations of period protein immunoreactivity in the CNS and the visual system of Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 1990, 10, 2749–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Loboda, A.; Jazwa, A.; Grochot-Przeczek, A.; Rutkowski, A.J.; Cisowski, J.; Agarwal, A.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J. Heme oxygenase-1 and the vascular bed: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2008, 10, 1767–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cui, L.; Yoshioka, Y.; Suyari, O.; Kohno, Y.; Zhang, X.; Adachi, Y.; Ikehara, S.; Yoshida, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Taketani, S. Relevant expression of Drosophila heme oxygenase is necessary for the normal development of insect tissues. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 377, 1156–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Damulewicz, M.; Loboda, A.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J.; Pyza, E. Haeme oxygenase protects against UV light DNA damages in the retina in clock-dependent manner. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ida, H.; Suyari, O.; Shimamura, M.; Tien Tai, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Taketani, S. Genetic link between heme oxygenase and the signaling pathway of DNA damage in Drosophila melanogaster. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2013, 231, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Damulewicz, M.; Loboda, A.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J.; Pyza, E. Interactions between the circadian clock and heme oxygenase in the retina of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 4953–4962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Loboda, A.; Damulewicz, M.; Pyza, E.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J. Role of Nrf2/HO-1 system in development, oxidative stress response and diseases: An evolutionarily conserved mechanism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 3221–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ni, J.Q.; Liu, L.P.; Binari, R.; Hardy, R.; Shim, H.S.; Cavallaro, A.; Booker, M.; Pfeiffer, B.D.; Markstein, M.; Wang, H.; et al. A Drosophila resource of transgenic RNAi lines for neurogenetics. Genetics 2009, 182, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mi, H.; Poudel, S.; Muruganujan, A.; Casagrande, J.T.; Thomas, P.D. PANTHER version 10: Expanded protein families and functions, and analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D336–D342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Claridge-Chang, A.; Wijnen, H.; Naef, F.; Boothroyd, C.; Rajewsky, N.; Young, M.W. Circadian regulation of gene expression systems in the Drosophila head. Neuron 2001, 32, 657–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McDonald, M.J.; Rosbash, M. Microarray analysis and organization of circadian gene expression in Drosophila. Cell 2001, 107, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ueda, H.R.; Matsumoto, A.; Kawamura, M.; Iino, M.; Tanimura, T.; Hashimoto, S. Genome-wide transcriptional orchestration of circadian rhythms in Drosophila. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 14048–14052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ceriani, M.F.; Hogenesch, J.B.; Yanovsky, M.; Panda, S.; Straume, M.; Kay, S.A. Genome-wide expression analysis in Drosophila reveals genes controlling circadian behavior. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 9305–9319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, Y.; Han, M.; Shimada, B.; Wang, L.; Gibler, T.M.; Amarakone, A.; Awad, T.A.; Stormo, G.D.; Van Gelder, R.N.; Taghert, P.H. Influence of the period-dependent circadian clock on diurnal, circadian, and aperiodic gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9562–9567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wijnen, H.; Naef, F.; Boothroyd, C.; Claridge-Chang, A.; Young, M.W. Control of daily transcript oscillations in Drosophila by light and the circadian clock. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2, 326–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kula-Eversole, E.; Nagoshi, E.; Shang, Y.; Rodriguez, J.; Allada, R.; Rosbash, M. Surprising gene expression patterns within and between PDF-containing circadian neurons in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 13497–13502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hartman, S.J.; Menon, I.; Haug-Collet, K.; Colley, N.J. Expression of rhodopsin and arrestin during the light-dark cycle in Drosophila. Mol. Vis. 2001, 7, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Hardie, R.C.; Raghu, P. Visual transduction in Drosophila. Nature 2001, 413, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mazzotta, G.; Rossi, A.; Leonardi, E.; Mason, M.; Bertolucci, C.; Caccin, L.; Spolaore, B.; Martin, A.J.M.; Schlichting, M.; Grebler, R.; et al. Fly cryptochrome and the visual system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 6163–6168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yang, Z.; Emerson, M.; Su, H.S.; Sehgal, A. Response of the timeless protein to light correlates with behavioral entrainment and suggests a nonvisual pathway for circadian photoreception. Neuron 1998, 21, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Loboda, A.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J. HO-1/CO system in tumor growth, angiogenesis and metabolism—Targeting HO-1 as an anti-tumor therapy. Vascul. Pharmacol. 2015, 74, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lin, Q.; Weis, S.; Yang, G.; Weng, Y.H.; Helston, R.; Rish, K.; Smith, A.; Bordner, J.; Polte, T.; Gaunitz, F.; et al. Heme oxygenase-1 protein localizes to the nucleus and activates transcription factors important in oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 20621–20633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shieh, B.H.; Kristaponyte, I.; Hong, Y. Distinct roles of arrestin 1 protein in photoreceptors during Drosophila development. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 18526–18534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ekengren, S.; Hultmark, D. A family of Turandot-related genes in the humoral stress response of Drosophila. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 284, 998–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mecklenburg, K.L.; Takemori, N.; Komori, N.; Chu, B.; Hardie, R.C.; Matsumoto, H.; O’Tousa, J.E. Retinophilin is a light-regulated phosphoprotein required to suppress photoreceptor dark noise in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 1238–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ravi, D.; Wiles, A.M.; Bhavani, S.; Ruan, J.; Leder, P.; Bishop, A.J.R. A network of conserved damage survival pathways revealed by a genomic RNAi screen. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, J.E.; Edery, I. Circadian regulation in the ability of Drosophila to combat pathogenic infections. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shirasu-Hiza, M.M.; Dionne, M.S.; Pham, L.N.; Ayres, J.S.; Schneider, D.S. Interactions between circadian rhythm and immunity in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17, 353–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wu, S.C.; Liao, C.W.; Pan, R.L.; Juang, J.L. Infection-induced intestinal oxidative stress triggers organ-to-organ immunological communication in Drosophila. Cell Host Microbe 2012, 11, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 10 00006 g001 550
Figure 1. Microarray data of the phototransduction pathway genes. Differences in the selected gene expression levels are shown between GMR>hoRNAi and GMR>Valium10 (control) at ZT1 and ZT16. The following genes were examined: Act42A, ninaC, trp, Gαq, PLC21C, trpl, norpA, w, Crystalline (Cry), Rh5, and Rh6. Statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks, * p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1. Microarray data of the phototransduction pathway genes. Differences in the selected gene expression levels are shown between GMR>hoRNAi and GMR>Valium10 (control) at ZT1 and ZT16. The following genes were examined: Act42A, ninaC, trp, Gαq, PLC21C, trpl, norpA, w, Crystalline (Cry), Rh5, and Rh6. Statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks, * p ≤ 0.05.
Genes 10 00006 g001
Genes 10 00006 g002 550
Figure 2. The comparison of microarray and qPCR data in control flies (GMR>Valium10) between ZT1 and ZT16. (A) qPCR data normalized to ZT1 as 1, statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks: * p ≤ 0.05, **** p ≤ 0.0001; (B) in microarray, fold change is relative to ZT1. Statistically significant changes are marked with asterisks: * 0.005 < p-values < 0.05, *** p-values < 0.0005. The pattern of gene expression, which was examined using two different techniques, is similar for the following genes: per, tim, clk, norpA, trp, and trpl.
Figure 2. The comparison of microarray and qPCR data in control flies (GMR>Valium10) between ZT1 and ZT16. (A) qPCR data normalized to ZT1 as 1, statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks: * p ≤ 0.05, **** p ≤ 0.0001; (B) in microarray, fold change is relative to ZT1. Statistically significant changes are marked with asterisks: * 0.005 < p-values < 0.05, *** p-values < 0.0005. The pattern of gene expression, which was examined using two different techniques, is similar for the following genes: per, tim, clk, norpA, trp, and trpl.
Genes 10 00006 g002
Genes 10 00006 g003 550
Figure 3. Microarray data of the circadian clock gene expression. Differences in the selected gene expression levels are shown between GMR>hoRNAi and GMR>Valium10 (control) at ZT1 and ZT16. The following genes were examined: clk, cry, tim, per, Pdp1, vri, cwo, and E23. Fold change is relative to the control. Statistically significant difference are marked with asterisks: * 0.005 < p-values < 0.05.
Figure 3. Microarray data of the circadian clock gene expression. Differences in the selected gene expression levels are shown between GMR>hoRNAi and GMR>Valium10 (control) at ZT1 and ZT16. The following genes were examined: clk, cry, tim, per, Pdp1, vri, cwo, and E23. Fold change is relative to the control. Statistically significant difference are marked with asterisks: * 0.005 < p-values < 0.05.
Genes 10 00006 g003
Genes 10 00006 g004 550
Figure 4. Microarray data of the humoral immune response genes. Differences in the selected gene expression levels are shown between GMR>hoRNAi and GMR>Valium10 (control) at ZT1 and ZT16. Fold change is relative to the control. Statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks: * 0.005 < p-values < 0.05, ** 0.0005 < p-values < 0.005. The following genes were examined: CecA1, CecC, CecB, Dpt, AttaA, lola, AttB, AttC, Dro, and Thor.
Figure 4. Microarray data of the humoral immune response genes. Differences in the selected gene expression levels are shown between GMR>hoRNAi and GMR>Valium10 (control) at ZT1 and ZT16. Fold change is relative to the control. Statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks: * 0.005 < p-values < 0.05, ** 0.0005 < p-values < 0.005. The following genes were examined: CecA1, CecC, CecB, Dpt, AttaA, lola, AttB, AttC, Dro, and Thor.
Genes 10 00006 g004
Genes 10 00006 g005 550
Figure 5. The comparison of microarray and qPCR data between GMR>hoRNAi and GMR>Valium10 flies of humoral immune response gene expression levels. (A) qPCR data are shown as a relative quantitation normalized to the control (GMR>Valium10) as value 1. Statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.005; (B) in microarray, fold change is relative to the control. Statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks: * 0.005 < p-values < 0.05, ** 0.0005 < p-values < 0.005. The following genes were examined: dro, CecA1, DptB, CecB, and CecC.
Figure 5. The comparison of microarray and qPCR data between GMR>hoRNAi and GMR>Valium10 flies of humoral immune response gene expression levels. (A) qPCR data are shown as a relative quantitation normalized to the control (GMR>Valium10) as value 1. Statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.005; (B) in microarray, fold change is relative to the control. Statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks: * 0.005 < p-values < 0.05, ** 0.0005 < p-values < 0.005. The following genes were examined: dro, CecA1, DptB, CecB, and CecC.
Genes 10 00006 g005
Genes 10 00006 g006 550
Figure 6. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between GMR>Valium10 control samples and GMR>hoRNAi samples with the silenced ho gene (p-value < 0.05, fold change (FC) > 1 or FC < −1). (A) a heatmap showing log2 expression values of the 348 transcripts at the beginning of the day (ZT1). Each row represents one gene transcript. Values within a row were normalized and a row mean equals 0. Rows were hierarchically clustered. The 180 transcripts were downregulated while the 168 transcripts were upregulated. This allows the conclusion that the silencing of the ho gene leads to differences in the activity of the retina cells in the presence of light during the day; (B) a heatmap showing log2 expression values of the 304 transcripts in the middle of the night (ZT16). The details of the data preparation and presentation are the same as in (A). The 77 transcripts were downregulated while the 227 transcripts were upregulated. The analysis showed that silencing of the ho gene also caused changes in the retina cell activity in the absence of light during the night. The Venn diagram (C), which visualizes the numbers of common members of both group transcripts, clearly shows that the majority of genes responding to the ho gene silencing at ZT1 were not receptive at ZT16 (and vice versa). The Venn diagram takes into consideration only transcripts, which were successfully annotated (298 out of 348 in case of A and 263 out of 304 in case of B).
Figure 6. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between GMR>Valium10 control samples and GMR>hoRNAi samples with the silenced ho gene (p-value < 0.05, fold change (FC) > 1 or FC < −1). (A) a heatmap showing log2 expression values of the 348 transcripts at the beginning of the day (ZT1). Each row represents one gene transcript. Values within a row were normalized and a row mean equals 0. Rows were hierarchically clustered. The 180 transcripts were downregulated while the 168 transcripts were upregulated. This allows the conclusion that the silencing of the ho gene leads to differences in the activity of the retina cells in the presence of light during the day; (B) a heatmap showing log2 expression values of the 304 transcripts in the middle of the night (ZT16). The details of the data preparation and presentation are the same as in (A). The 77 transcripts were downregulated while the 227 transcripts were upregulated. The analysis showed that silencing of the ho gene also caused changes in the retina cell activity in the absence of light during the night. The Venn diagram (C), which visualizes the numbers of common members of both group transcripts, clearly shows that the majority of genes responding to the ho gene silencing at ZT1 were not receptive at ZT16 (and vice versa). The Venn diagram takes into consideration only transcripts, which were successfully annotated (298 out of 348 in case of A and 263 out of 304 in case of B).
Genes 10 00006 g006
Table
Table 1. Primer sequences used for quantitative PCR (qPCR) reaction.
Table 1. Primer sequences used for quantitative PCR (qPCR) reaction.
cecB_ForCTTCGTCTTTGTGGCACTCATC
cecB_RevCTGACCAATGCGTTCGATTTT
dptB_ForTCCTGATCCCCGAGAGATTG
dptB_RevCAGATCGAATCCTTGCTTTGG
cecA1_ForGACCTCACTGCAATATCAATATCTTT
cecA1_RevGGTGATGGCCAGAATGAGAG
dro_ForATTTGTCCACCACTCCAAGC
dro_RevGATGACTTCTCCGCGGTATG
cecC_ForCATCAGTCGCTCAGTTTCCA
cecC_RevTTCCCAGTCCTTGAATGGTT
trp_ForGCCCACCGAAATAACTACGA
trp_RevTATGCGTTGATCCTCGACTG
trpl_ForCCAAGAAACGAAAGGAGCAG
trpl_RevGAAACATCCATTCCGCTGTT
per_ForAAGAGCACCTTCTGCGTGAT
per_RevAGAATCTCGTCGGGAACCTT
norpA_ForCCACAACATGTCCTCGTTTG
norpA_RevTGGTTGAGTTGCATGGGTAA
rpl32_ForAGAAGCGCAAGGAGATTGTC
rpl32_RevATGGTGCTGCTATCCCAATC
Table
Table 2. List of genes up—and downregulated after heme oxygenase (ho) RNAi expression under the Glass Multiple Reporter (GMR) enhancer-promoter.
Table 2. List of genes up—and downregulated after heme oxygenase (ho) RNAi expression under the Glass Multiple Reporter (GMR) enhancer-promoter.
Biological ProcessZT1ZT16
UpregulationDownregulationUpregulationDown-Regulation
Sensory PerceptionGr94a
Ir92a
CG12645
Lush
Gr5a
Obp69a		 Obp83b
Obp84a
Obp28a
Or49b
Obp69a
Gk
TransportPorin2
ppk31
CG7458
Ndae1
CG30354
CG30345
Ykt6
CG5780		CG1208
CG42260
spir
Mppe		CG6125
CG15096
CG8051
Mdr50
inaF-C
ppk22
UbiquitinationRoc1b
DefenseDrs
Rel
CG10764		GbAttD
Dpt
CecC
Thor
AttB
AttA
AttC
CecA1
TranslationCG6094
CG10881
TranscriptionHb
Ubx
CG9727
Vsx2
Sug
H15		CG18599
Samuel		lin-28
sug
Crg-1
Metabolic ProcessesCG17544
Oys		CG6432
CG11453		CG11391
Pepck
Oxido-reductionCG10639
CG15864
CG9150		Fbp2
CG6852
Cyp305a1
CG5653		Prx2540-2
Cyp4e3
CG9629
CG10131
Sardh
Cyp6a14
CG10512		CG9747
Fmo-2
CG7724
Wound Healing Cht5 Cht5
Ca2+ BindingCG30378
TpnC47D		CG4495
CytoskeletonPpcsSls
Mwh
Unc-115a		CG5023
Lipase CG1986
CG10116		 CG10116
DNA Damage CorpPdk1
mus308
ProteolysisCG30287CG17571
CG5255
CG4914		 CG5849
CG4914
CuticleMetabolismCG42494
Cpr67B		Cpr92F
CG15754
Cpr5C
Endopeptidase Inhibitor CG42464
Response to Stress CG11498
Cell CycleCycB3
ana2		 ana2
Spc25
dgt3
Incenp
Signal Transduction5-HT2B
Graf
dlg1
hbs
RhoGAP100F		Tsp26ATyrRII
LKR
CCAP		Oamb
Proc-R
Metal Ion Binding CG42249CG18446
MtnD
Amy-p
Phosphatase Aph-4CG11425Aph-4
Hydrolase CG7997
Tobi		Jhe
ATPaseCG9492CG11069
KinaseCkIIalpha-i3
CG15547
TransferaseCG3038
Nucleic Acid BindingCG3165CG11563
CG7556
Adat		cid
CG45050
qkr58E-1
Lipid BindingCheB42b
PhagocytosisPrx3
NimA		 Prx3
Zinc BindingCG31053
RAF2		CAH1
App
PhototransductionRh5
GeotaxisCG34353
Clock Cry
Response to ER Stress CG42678
Septate Junction Tsp2A
UnknownCG13742
CG43894
CG43391
scpr-C
abd-A
CG3611
CG43816
CG17564
CG15186
CG15140
CG32413
CG34279
CG13337
CG12688
CG44437
CG13449
CG4998
CG12321
CG44158
CG42869
CG11905		CG10051
CG32548
CG45060
G6P
CG44163
CG31415
CG13058
Osi24
CG13332
CG12034
CG43117
CG15728
pyd3
Sfp77F
pre-mod(mdg4)-B
CG17777
CG42272
scpr-B
CG45603
CG11380
CG17378		Os-C
α5
CG17572
CG12239
CG11674
OS9
Tsp42Er
CG4962
CG30271
a10
CG10332
Lsp1beta
CG45061
pre-mod(mdg4)-T
CG11585
MESR3
CG18170
CG13042
CG14075
Lsp1alpha
CG43236		CG13840
CG44434
CG11889
CG45307
Sfp77F
CG17777
scpr-B
CG17104
CG13931
CG8568
Table
Table 3. List of the most changed Gene Ontology (GO) categories after ho silencing in the retina at ZT1.
Table 3. List of the most changed Gene Ontology (GO) categories after ho silencing in the retina at ZT1.
GO Category
ZT1 vs. ZT1
GMR>hoRNAi		Gene Countp-ValueGenes
Locomotion (GO:0040011)271.46 E-01NetA, RhoGAP100F, CG34353, Ppcs, Trpm, fra, oys, ey, Nmda1, hb, Roc1b, CG3857, Tsp26A, how, Cry, cry, abd-A, w, Galphaq, trp, Ced-12, dlg1, sls, stum, Unc-115a, CG9317, klar, E(Pc)
Sensory Perception of Light (GO:0050953)53.37 E-01Rh5, cry, Cry, trp, CG9317
Response to External Stimuli (GO:0009605)343.86 E-01NetA, RhoGAP100F, NimC1, Atg6, CG34353, Trpm, fra, Su(var)2-10, CG2051, Rh5, Nmda1, Drsl5, rdgB, CG3857, mthl8, trp, Cry, cry, CG13890, Drs, sug, w, Galphaq, Gr5a, dlg1, Diedel, gb, Sik2, Fuca, stum, Unc-115a, CG9317, E9Pc, Rel, srpk79D
Geotaxis (GO:0042332)
Response to Gravity (GO:0009629)		55.79 E-01CG34353, CG3857, Cry, cry, w, dlg1
Table
Table 4. Top 20 genes up- and downregulated after ho silencing in photoreceptor cells at ZT1.
Table 4. Top 20 genes up- and downregulated after ho silencing in photoreceptor cells at ZT1.
Genes Upregulated at ZT1
in GMR>hoRNAi Strain		Function
Arr1Phototransduction
CG17108Unknown
MntAMetal homeostasis
eIF-4aResponse to DNA damage
Mt:Cyt-bElectron transport
RpL13Translation
RpS25Translation
RplP2Translation
CG3457Unknown
IM2Defense response
RpL4Translation
CG4374Metal binding
ToCircadian clock
RpS27ATranslation
CG9821Unknown
Trf4-1DNA polymerase
AwdKinase
Spt20Histone acetylation
IM4Defense response
Ip259Phagocytosis
Genes Downregulated at ZT1in GMR>hoRNAi StrainFunction
Obp99bSensory perception
Nplp3Signaling pathway
Arr2Phototransduction
ninaEPhototransduction
PdhPhototransduction
Mt:ATPase6ATPase
Ggamma30APhototransduction
mt:ColUnknown
CG2233Unknown
TrpPhototransduction
Obp44aSensory perception
RpL27ATranslation
Mt:ColIIUnknown
Nplp2Defense response
GstE12Detoxification
RtpUnknown
RpS28bTranslation
TotAResponse to UV, oxidative stress, bacterium
CG4842Oxido-reduction
SeaPrevents chromosomal breaks
Table
Table 5. Top 10 of the most changed GO categories after ho silencing in photoreceptors at ZT16.
Table 5. Top 10 of the most changed GO categories after ho silencing in photoreceptors at ZT16.
GO CategoryGene Countp-ValueGenes
Antibacterial Humoral Response (GO:0019731)108.00 E-08CecA1, CecC, AttA, Thor, Dpt, CecB, AttB, AttC, CecA1, Dro
Antimicrobial Humoral Response (GO:0019730)
Humoral Immune Response (GO: 0006959)		111.67 E-05
4.25 E-04		CecA1, CecC, AttA, Thor, Dpt, CecB, AttB, AttC, CecA1, Dro, lola
Defense Response to Gram-Positive Bacterium (GO:0050830)92.29 E-04AttD, CecA1, CecC, AttA, CecB, AttB, AttC, CecA1, Dro
Oxidation-Reduction Process (GO:0055114)262.18 E-02CG33099, CG9747, CG9629, Sardh, Cyp4e3, Lkr, CG18003, Cyp309a1, Prx3, CG10131, MtnD, Acox57D-d, Cyp6a14, CG10512, Cyp9h1, CG11236, CG18170, CG3397, CG14688, Prx2540-2, CG7724, Cyp4p2, CG14630, Sodh-2, Fmo-2, GILT3
Cellular Macromolecule Metabolic Process (GO:0044260)175.03 E-02CG13085, Su(var)2-10, CG43143, Lkr, mus308, fng, qrk58E-1, MED23, S6k, Sse, Fak, RpS21, btl, p38c, Pdk1, Incenp, CG18853
Single-Organism Metabolic Process (GO:0044710)461.40 E-01CG33099, CG9747, CG10184, CG9629, Sardh, Cyp4e3, Vkor, Lkr, CG18003, CG5379, Cyp309a2, Prx3, CG10131, Thor, CG10116, MtnD, Crz, Acox57D-d, Pepck, Cyp6a14, fng, CG10512, CG7059, CG6465, AcCoAS, dob, Cyp9h1, CG11236, CG18170, S6k, CG11425, CG3397, Jhe, CG6415, CG14688, Gnmt, Prx2540-2, CG7724, Sk1, ade3, Cyp4p2, CG14630, Sodh-2, Fmo-2, Lsd-1, GILT3
Defense Response to Other Organism (GO:0098542)142.28 E-01AttD, Drsl6, CecA1, Su(var)2-10, CecC, AttA, Thor, Dpt, CecB, GNBP-like3, AttB, AttC, CecA1, Dro
Immune Response (GO:0006955)122.83 E-01CecA1, CecC, AttA,Thor, Dpt, CecB, AttB, AttC, PGRP-SC2, lola, Dro
Response to Bacterium (GO:0009617)133.05 E-01AttD, CecA1, Su(var)2-10, CecC, AttA, Thor, Dpt, CecB, AttB, AttC, CecA1, p38c, Dro
Response to External Biotic Stimulus (GO:0043207)163.07 E-01AttD, Drsl6, CecA1, Su(var)2-10, CecC, AttA, Thor, Dpt, CecB, GNBP-like3, AttB, AttC, CecA1, lola, p38c, Dro
Table
Table 6. Top 20 genes up- and downregulated after ho silencing in photoreceptor cells at ZT16.
Table 6. Top 20 genes up- and downregulated after ho silencing in photoreceptor cells at ZT16.
Genes Upregulated at ZT16 in GMR>hoRNAi StrainFunction
Rh6Phototransduction
TotAResponse to UV, oxidative stress, bacterium
TrpPhototransduction
RpS13Translation
XportPhototransduction
eIF-4aDNA damage
RpL37ATranslation
CG4962Unknown
RtpUnknown
Ggamma30APhototransduction
CamDNA damage
RpS7Translation
RpS26Translation
CG4000Unknown
Hsc70-4Chaperon
RpL8Translation
RpS28bTranslation
CG1561Unknown
CG2016Unknown
RpLP1Translation
Genes Downregulated at ZT16 in GMR>hoRNAi StrainFunction
Obp99bSensory perception
Arr1Phototransduction
Arr2Phototransduction
CG17108Unknown
CG6503Unknown
Tsf1Defense response
Lsp2Defense response
mt:ATPase6ATPase
Nplp2Signaling pathway
Nplp3Signaling pathway
mt:Cyt-bOxido-reduction
CG2233Unknown
AdhrOxido-reduction
mt:ColUnknown
PepckGlucose metabolism
RpLP2Translation
CG34166Unknown
mt:ND4Oxido-reduction
NoeUnknown
CG30197Peptidase inhibitor

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Damulewicz, M.; Świątek, M.; Łoboda, A.; Dulak, J.; Bilska, B.; Przewłocki, R.; Pyza, E. Daily Regulation of Phototransduction, Circadian Clock, DNA Repair, and Immune Gene Expression by Heme Oxygenase in the Retina of Drosophila. Genes 2019, 10, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10010006

AMA Style

Damulewicz M, Świątek M, Łoboda A, Dulak J, Bilska B, Przewłocki R, Pyza E. Daily Regulation of Phototransduction, Circadian Clock, DNA Repair, and Immune Gene Expression by Heme Oxygenase in the Retina of Drosophila. Genes. 2019; 10(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Damulewicz, Milena, Michał Świątek, Agnieszka Łoboda, Józef Dulak, Bernadetta Bilska, Ryszard Przewłocki, and Elżbieta Pyza. 2019. "Daily Regulation of Phototransduction, Circadian Clock, DNA Repair, and Immune Gene Expression by Heme Oxygenase in the Retina of Drosophila" Genes 10, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10010006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop