Next Article in Journal
Targeted Brain Tumor Therapy by Inhibiting the MDM2 Oncogene: In Vitro and In Vivo Antitumor Activity and Mechanism of Action
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Muscle Myosin 2A (NM2A): Structure, Regulation and Function
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/cells9071591
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

All-Trans Retinoic Acid Enhances both the Signaling for Priming and the Glycolysis for Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Human Macrophage

by
Ahmad Alatshan
1,2,
Gergő E. Kovács
1,2,
Azzam Aladdin
3,4,
Zsolt Czimmerer
5,
Krisztina Tar
3 and
Szilvia Benkő
1,2,*
1
Departments of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4012 Debrecen, Hungary
2
Doctoral School of Molecular Cellular and Immune Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4012 Debrecen, Hungary
3
Department of Medical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
4
Doctoral School of Molecular Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
5
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(7), 1591; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071591
Submission received: 11 June 2020 / Revised: 19 June 2020 / Accepted: 26 June 2020 / Published: 1 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Cellular Immunology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is a derivative of vitamin A that has many important biological functions, including the modulation of immune responses. ATRA actions are mediated through the retinoic acid receptor that functions as a nuclear receptor, either regulating gene transcription in the nucleus or modulating signal transduction in the cytoplasm. NLRP3 inflammasome is a multiprotein complex that is activated by a huge variety of stimuli, including pathogen- or danger-related molecules. Activation of the inflammasome is required for the production of IL-1β, which drives the inflammatory responses of infectious or non-infectious sterile inflammation. Here, we showed that ATRA prolongs the expression of IL-6 and IL-1β following a 2-, 6-, 12-, and 24-h LPS (100ng/mL) activation in human monocyte-derived macrophages. We describe for the first time that ATRA modulates both priming and activation signals required for NLRP3 inflammasome function. ATRA alone induces NLRP3 expression, and enhances LPS-induced expression of NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β via the regulation of signal transduction pathways, like NF-κB, p38, and ERK. We show that ATRA alleviates the negative feedback loop effect of IL-10 anti-inflammatory cytokine on NLRP3 inflammasome function by inhibiting the Akt-mTOR-STAT3 signaling axis. We also provide evidence that ATRA enhances hexokinase 2 expression, and shifts the metabolism of LPS-activated macrophages toward glycolysis, leading to the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

IL-1β is a master cytokine that plays an important role in many immunological and physiological processes [1]. As a conductor cytokine, it regulates the activation of cells and modulates cytokine production. Additionally, it has an important role in T helper (Th) cell polarization, connecting innate and adaptive immune responses. The production of IL-1β is tightly regulated by multiprotein complexes called inflammasomes. The NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is a well-characterized inflammasome, and unlike other inflammasome complexes, it can be activated by a wide range of stimuli. Importantly, NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1β is required to drive an effective inflammatory response in infectious diseases triggered by pathogenic microorganisms. Additionally, NLRP3 inflammasome-derived IL-1β is also the major driver of chronic low-grade sterile inflammation that accompanies conditions, such as metabolic syndromes and aging, endometriosis, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, eventually leading to tissue damage [2,3,4,5]. For this reason, the pharmacological manipulation of NLRP3 inflammasome has become the focus of intensive studies and medical trials [6,7,8].
For safety reasons, in order to avoid unwanted activation, NLRP3-mediated IL-1β secretion requires two signals. The first priming signal is initiated by extracellular stimuli mediated by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) or cytokine receptors [9]. These stimuli activate a variety of signal transduction pathways, including NF-κB, p38, and ERK, which are required for the transcription of the inflammasome response-related genes, mainly NLRP3 and IL-1β. Furthermore, the priming signal is also needed for the expression and licensing of NLRP3 through post-translational modification [10,11]. A second signal, which may derive from a variety of PAMPs or DAMPs, is required for NLRP3 inflammasome oligomerization as part of activation. Subsequently, licensed NLRP3 protein interacts with ASC, which recruits pro-caspase-1, and the activation of the enzyme leads to the maturation of IL-1β cytokine [12].
Nuclear receptors (NRs) are transcription factors that are activated by lipid-soluble endogenous or exogenous ligands, and, among many functions, they are important modulators of inflammatory responses [13,14,15]. One of their family members is the retinoic acid receptor (RAR), which forms heterodimer with retinoic X receptor (RXR), and mediates the effect of retinoic acid [14,16]. Retinoic acid (RA) is an active form of vitamin A derivative, and can be generated in multiple forms; however, all-trans RA (ATRA) is the most abundant and active isomer in the human body [17]. Upon activation, cytosolic RAR translocates to the nucleus and binds to conserved RA-responsive elements (RAREs), regulating the transcription of several target genes [17,18]. Besides the nuclear function, ligand-bound RAR also has non-genomic activity in the cytosol, as it binds and regulates the proteins of signal transduction cascades, such as Akt, ERK, or p38 [19,20,21].
ATRA is known to play a crucial role in many biological processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, tumorigenesis, as well as inflammation [22,23]. While the role of ATRA in maintaining the proper mucosal homeostasis and immunological tolerance of mucosal immune cells has been extensively studied [17,24], less is known about its effect on non-mucosal immune cells, such as monocyte-derived macrophages (MΦs). It has been shown that vitamin A deficiency is characterized by increased susceptibility to infectious diseases, and supplementation with vitamin A and related retinoids improved immune responses in many ways, including the activation of myeloid cells and changes in cytokine production [17,25,26,27]. Though the nature and detailed mechanisms of the ATRA effect are still not clear—and due to the various model systems, it may be controversial—studies have provided solid evidence on the modulatory role of ATRA on inflammatory cytokine production. Importantly, it was reported that ATRA enhanced IL-1β secretion in cells, such as mast cells of the skin [28]; alveolar macrophages infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis [29]; human PBMCs [30]; an LPS-induced THP-1 monocytic cell line [31]; or in PMA-stimulated human monocytes [32]. However, while NLRP3 inflammasome has a central regulatory role in IL-1β production in myeloid cells, and the importance of NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated inflammatory responses has been shown in many infectious diseases [33], the possible effects of ATRA on the NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1β production and the related regulatory mechanisms are yet to be characterized.
In our study, we aimed to investigate the potential modulatory effect of ATRA on monocyte-derived MΦs, a well-characterized macrophage subtype that is a commonly used model for NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1β production. Here, we show for the first time that ATRA treatment significantly modulates both the priming and the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome of LPS-activated cells. We show enhanced expression of NLPR3 and pro-IL-1β expression. Additionally, we show that ATRA shifts the metabolism toward glycolysis, and provide evidence for the potential mechanisms that, in part, augments NLRP3 inflammasome activity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

MCC950 (NLRP3-selective inflammasome inhibitor) and Ultrapure LPS from Escherichia coli were obtained from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA, USA). All-trans retinoic acid, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and 3-bromopyruvate (3BP) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Recombinant human IL-10 was obtained from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA).

2.2. Ethics Statement, and Monocyte Isolation and Differentiation

Leukocyte-enriched buffy coats were obtained from healthy donors. The donors provided written informed consent. The procedure was documentary approved by the Director of the National Blood Transfusion Service. The study and all experimental protocols were in accordance with, and documentary approved by the Regional and Institutional Ethics Committee of the University of Debrecen (Debrecen, Hungary).

2.3. Monocyte Isolation and Macrophage Differentiation

Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from leukocyte-enriched buffy coats. Briefly, the blood samples were diluted two-fold in physiological saline solution (PSS). The diluted blood was submitted to density-gradient centrifugation (1500 rpm, 10 min, at 18 ℃) using Ficoll Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). The PBMC layer was collected and washed twice with PSS and one time with MACS buffer (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 2mM EDTA). Monocytes were purified from PBMCs using immunomagnetic positive selection with anti-CD14-conjugated microbeads according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). After isolation, the cell density was determined and the freshly isolated monocytes were suspended in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% heat-inactivated FCS, and 500 U/mL of penicillin-streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Finally, the suspended monocytes were cultured in 24-well plates at a density of 1.5 × 106 cells/mL in 50 ng/mL M-CSF (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) containing media and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After 48 h, half of the culture media was carefully removed and replaced with fresh media containing the same amounts of M-CSF. On day 5, the cells were used for the experiments.

2.4. Macrophage Treatment

After 5 days, the macrophages were treated with ATRA (1 µM) alone or pretreated with ATRA for 4 h and stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for different time points. For IL-1β induction, macrophages were treated with ATP (5 mM) for 45 min. Where indicated, cultures were pretreated with an inhibitor for 1 h, and then LPS was applied. The control (mock) was treated with 0.1% DMSO/ethanol.

2.5. RNA Preparation, RT-PCR, and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

The otal RNA content was extracted using TriReagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA concentration and quality were determined by a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop ND1000; Promega Biosciences, Madison, WI, USA). The isolated RNA was treated with DNase and RNase inhibitor (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). cDNA synthesis was done using random hexamers and the SuperScript II First-strand Reverse Transcriptase system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

For quantitative RT-PCR, Taqman Gene Expression Assays were used with the Taqman™ Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The amplification was performed using a QuantStudio12K Flex qPCR instrument (ABI). Human Taqman gene expression assays were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), NLRP3 (Hs00918082_m1), and IL-1β (Hs01555410_m1). The amplification program was, 10 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C, and 1 min at 60 °C. The relative expression values for each transcript of interest were calculated by the comparative Ct method, and human cyclophilin (Ppia) was used for normalization.

2.7. Western Blot Analysis

After harvesting, the cells were washed with PBS; directly lysed in 2X Laemmli sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), containing 25% glycerol, 2% SDS, 1% b-mercaptoethanol, and 1% bromophenol blue); and boiled for 10 min. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk diluted in TBS-Tween buffer (50 mM Tris, 0.5 M NaCl and 0.05% Tween-20, pH 7.6). The membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies in 1:1000 dilution. ASC (sc-30153) Abs were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), NLRP3 (Cat. No. 15101), caspase-1 (Cat. No. 3866), IL-1β (Cat. No. 12703), cleaved caspase-1 (Cat. No. 4199), cleaved-IL-1β (Cat. No. 83186), p-Akt/(S473) (Cat. No. 9271), p-mTOR (Ser2448) (Cat. No. 2971), p-p70S6 Kinase (Thr389) (Cat. No. 9234), p70S6 Kinase (Cat. No. 2708), p-Stat3 (Tyr705) (Cat. No. 9145), p-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) (Cat. No. 9211), p-SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) (Cat. No. 9251), p-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) (Cat. No. 9101), and p-IκBα (Ser32) (Cat. No. 2859) were obtained from Cell Signaling technology (Danvers, MA, USA). After the washing step, the membrane was incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary Abs in 1:5000 dilution (goat anti-rabbit IgG, No. 170-6515) from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA, USA). Membrane-bound peroxidase proteins were detected on X-ray films using the ECL system (SuperSignal West Pico/Femto chemiluminescent substrate; (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). β-Actin (8457) (Cell Signaling technology, Danvers, MA, USA) was used as the internal control.

2.8. Metabolic Assays and Extracellular Flux Analysis

Real-time changes in the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of macrophages were performed using a Seahorse XF 96 Analyzer (Seahorse Biosciences, North Billerica, MA, USA). Briefly, isolated monocytes (50,000 cell/well) were plated and differentiated in Seahorse XF96 cell culture microplates (Seahorse Biosciences, North Billerica, MA, USA). Then, macrophages were treated as described above and subjected to the metabolic assays. For the mitochondrial stress test, cells were washed and incubated in XF assay medium (Seahorse Bioscience, North Billerica, MA, USA) supplemented with 10 mM glucose and 2 mM L-glutamine and incubated for one hour at 37 °C in a CO2-free incubator. The bassline OCR was recorded, and the cells were then subjected to the following compounds: Oligomycin (Oligo), an ATP synthetase inhibitor (1 μM); carbonyl cyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (FCCP), an uncoupling agent (1 μM); and rotenone and antimycin A (R + A) as mitochondrial complex I and III inhibitors (1:1 μM), respectively. Real-time changes in the OCR were recorded every 6 min (1 min mixing, 5 min measurement) for five loops.
For the glycolytic stress test, the RPMI media was replaced by XF media supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in CO2-free conditions. After equilibration, the real-time changes in the ECAR were recorded every 9 min (1 min mixing, 8 min measure) for 5 loops, during sequential treatment of the following compounds: 10 mM glucose (Glu), 1 µM oligomycin (Oligo), and 50 mM 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG). The background control was determined by the testing media. The test was run for 90 min following the manufacturer’s protocol and the injection time for each compound is indicated in the graphs. The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford protein assay. The obtained values were normalized to the corresponding total protein content. Wave 2.3 Agilent Seahorse Desktop software was used for the data analysis.

2.9. Cytokine Measurements

To determine the concentration of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α in the cell culture supernatants, commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The minimum detection limits of the kits were 0.8 pg/mL for IL-1β, 2.2 pg/mL for IL-6, and 2pg/mL for IL-10 and TNF-α. Quantifications were performed by a FlexStation 3 Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Experimental results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey–Kramer test. Differences between groups were considered significant at p values of <0.05.

3. Results

3.1. ATRA Modifies LPS-Induced Proinflammatory Cytokine Secretion in Human Macrophages

To determine whether ATRA affects proinflammatory cytokine secretion of activated human monocyte-derived macrophages (MΦs), cells were treated with LPS in the absence or presence of ATRA for various time intervals, and cytokine production was measured using the ELISA method. We found that ATRA treatment had no effect on the TNFα secretion of resting and LPS-activated MΦs (Figure 1A); however, it significantly elevated the IL-6 secretion of LPS-treated cells.
As we reported previously, LPS treatment results in rapid IL-1β secretion that reaches a peak at 2 h and then gradually decreases over time [34]. ATRA alone did not have an effect on IL-1β secretion; however, LPS-induced IL-1β secretion was significantly enhanced and prolonged by ATRA (Figure 1B). Furthermore, IL-1β secretion showed a positive correlation with the concentration of applied ATRA (Figure 1C). Treatment of the cells with the NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950 abolished IL-1β secretion (Figure 1D), indicating that the effect of ATRA on IL-1β production is mediated through an NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent pathway.

3.2. ATRA Prolongs LPS-Induced IL-1β Cytokine Secretion in Part by Augmenting LPS-Induced NLRP3 and Pro-IL-1β Expression

NLRP3-mediated IL-1β secretion by human monocyte-derived MΦs requires two distinct signals. The first priming signal involves the upregulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome components and that of the pro-IL-1β. The second signal promotes the assembly of the complex, the activation of caspase-1 enzyme, and subsequently, the processing of IL-1β [35]. To delineate whether the LPS-induced priming signal is affected by ATRA, we determined the protein expression of the inflammasome components. Using the Western blot method, we did not find changes in the expression of the adaptor ASC and the pro-form of caspase-1 enzyme (Figure 2A). Nevertheless, the expression of the NLRP3 sensor and pro-IL-1β substrate was significantly enhanced in the ATRA+LPS-treated samples compared to the LPS-primed ones. Furthermore, we detected a stronger band intensity of cleaved caspase-1 and IL-1β in those samples that were pre-treated with ATRA, indicating that ATRA may also enhance the activity of caspase-1 (Figure 2A).
To find out if ATRA modulates LPS-induced NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β expression at the transcription level, we isolated RNA from the cells at different time points following treatments. Using the quantitative RT-PCR method, we obtained similar results to that of the protein expression, as we detected enhanced mRNA expression of NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β in the ATRA+LPS cells compared to the LPS-treated ones (Figure 2B). These results altogether show that ATRA prolongs LPS-induced IL-1β secretion in part by potentiating LPS-induced NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β expression.

3.3. ATRA Alone Enhances NLRP3 but Not Pro-IL-1β Expression

Next, we aimed to see whether ATRA alone may serve as a priming signal for NLRP3 inflammasome. Using in silico analysis of a public data base of microarray results [27], we found elevated expression of both NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β in ATRA-stimulated human monocytes, compared to non-stimulated cells (Supplementary Figure S1A). However, using human monocytes, we could not validate these results in an in vitro experiment, as we detected elevated expression of NLRP3, while the expression of pro-IL-1β did not change following ATRA treatment (Supplementary Figure S1B). To elucidate whether ATRA alone has an effect on the expression of NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β in MΦs, we stimulated the cells solely with ATRA, and studied their expressions using Q-RT-PCR and Western blot methods. Similar to our findings in monocytes, we did not observe changes in the expression of pro-IL-1β (Figure 3A); however, the expression of NLRP3 was significantly, and time-dependently upregulated both at the mRNA (Figure 3B) and protein levels (Figure 3C). These results indicate that although ATRA alone is able to enhance the expression of the NLRP3 sensor component of the inflammasome, this stimulus is not enough to trigger the expression of the inflammasome substrate pro-IL-1β.

3.4. ATRA Modifies Signal Transduction Pathways Required for Inflammasome Priming

ATRA exerts its effect through RAR nuclear receptors [14]. Besides direct regulation of gene expression, RAR can be located in the lipid rafts of cell membranes, and the ligation of the receptor induces the rapid activation of signaling cascades, like p38 and ERK [19,20,21,36]. To study whether ATRA modifies signaling pathways required for NLRP3 inflammasome priming, MΦs were treated with ATRA alone or in combination with LPS, and cell lysates were used for Western blot analysis of signal transduction pathways. Interestingly, while we did not detect changes in IkB-α and SAPK/JNK pathways, phosphorylation of Erk was significantly enhanced and that of the p38 was attenuated following ATRA treatment (Figure 4A). Thereafter, we explored whether ATRA modifies signaling pathways activated by LPS, and we found that it slightly augmented the LPS-induced phosphorylation of IkB-α, and significantly prolonged LPS-induced Erk and SAPK/JNK phosphorylation, while having a moderate but significant inhibitory effect on p38 phosphorylation (Figure 4B). These results show that ATRA modifies cytoplasmic signaling pathways that reportedly play an important role in NLRP3 priming.

3.5. ATRA Inhibits the LPS-Induced AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway

Toll-like receptor (TLR)-induced signaling and cytokine secretion is also affected by the Akt/mTOR signaling pathways [37]. Furthermore, mTOR was shown to regulate inflammasome function by inhibiting caspase-1 processing [38]. For this reason, we sought to determine whether ATRA has any modulatory effect on the LPS-activated mTOR pathway. We found that LPS stimulation of MΦs induced Akt phosphorylation and activated mTOR as well as its downstream target p70S6K (Figure 5). Surprisingly, however, ATRA pre-treatment almost completely abolished LPS-induced phosphorylation of Akt; furthermore, the subsequent downstream signaling pathways, including mTOR and p70S6K, were also attenuated.

3.6. ATRA Attenuates Secretion of LPS-Induced IL-10

STAT3 is a potential downstream target of mTORC1 signaling in MΦs [39]; additionally, it is one of the most efficient regulators of IL-10, a master anti-inflammatory cytokine [37,40]. For this reason, next we aimed to study whether inhibition of the Akt/mTOR pathways by ATRA has any effect on STAT3 signaling, and eventually on IL-10 secretion in the LPS-activated cells. Challenge with LPS highly induced the phosphorylation of STAT3, while ATRA significantly downregulated this activation (Figure 6A). Importantly, we also observed a significant attenuation in the LPS-induced IL-10 secretion at each time-point in the presence of ATRA (Figure 6B). As IL-10 mediates inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine secretion [41], we aimed to see whether IL-10 can reverse the augmenting effect of ATRA on IL-1β secretion. Application of recombinant human IL-10 to the ATRA+LPS-treated cells significantly decreased IL-1β secretion. These results suggest that the enhanced IL-1β secretion of LPS-activated cells following ATRA treatment is mediated, in part, by the attenuated STAT3/IL-10 signaling axis. These results also suggest that in LPS-activated MΦs, ATRA predominates the proinflammatory characteristics over of the anti-inflammatory ones.

3.7. ATRA Mediates a Metabolic Shift Towards Glycolysis in LPS-Stimulated MΦs

mTOR has a central regulatory role in several vital cellular functions, such as cell growth and energy metabolism [42]. In order to elucidate if ATRA could affect mitochondrial functions under LPS challenge, MΦs were subjected to LPS stimulation (for 6 h) in the absence or presence of ATRA. Cells were then analyzed for changes in the mitochondrial rate of oxygen consumption (OCR) and the rate of extracellular acidification (ECAR), as a measure of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and glycolysis, respectively. Interestingly, we found that ATRA treatment alone significantly enhanced the studied mitochondrial functions; however, ATRA pre-treatment was not able to recover the LPS-induced downregulation of basal respiration and ATP production (Figure 7A). Importantly, nevertheless, ATRA pre-treatment significantly enhanced the LPS-attenuated OCRs of maximal respiration and spare respiratory capacity (SRC), parameters that indicate the fitness of mitochondria, suggesting that ATRA has a protective role in the mitochondria (Figure 7A).
Regarding glycolysis, interestingly, we found that both ATRA and LPS individually significantly enhanced ECARs in the MΦs. Nevertheless, importantly, we detected a significantly higher glycolysis and glycolytic capacity in the ATRA+LPS-treated cells compared to the LPS- or ATRA-treated ones, showing an additive effect (Figure 7B). Consistent with these results, ATRA pre-treatment of LPS-activated MΦs induced a significant upregulation of the expression of hexokinase 2 (HK2), the rate-limiting enzyme and an indicator of the glycolytic pathway [43] (Figure 7C). To determine whether HK2 activity indeed affects IL-1β secretion, we treated MΦs with 3-bromopyruvate (3BP), a specific inhibitor of HK2. Using IL-1β ELISA, we found that 3BP significantly attenuated the secreted level of IL-1β cytokine (Figure 7D). Altogether, these results indicate that in LPS-activated human MΦs, ATRA triggers a rapid metabolic shift towards glycolysis, which, in part, drives the secretion of an elevated amount of IL-1β.

4. Discussion

Retinoic acid is a metabolite of vitamin A, and a major regulator of homeostasis and immune responses of epithelial tissues and the mucosa [44]. Vitamin A is obtained from the diet and following metabolism it is stored in the liver as retinol [45]. When it is released into the bloodstream, it is absorbed by target tissues and cells, and thereafter metabolized to different forms of retinoic acid (RA), of which, physiologically, all-trans RA (ATRA) is the most abundant [46]. The effects of ATRA on myeloid cells are mainly studied in intestinal mucosal DCs and MΦs. It was shown that at steady-state conditions, ATRA is produced by epithelial cells and stromal cells, and instructs mucosal DCs and resident MΦs to develop inflammatory tolerance [47]. During infection, mucosal DCs produce proinflammatory cytokines and drive the differentiation of T effector cells, while mucosal MΦs develop inflammatory anergy in spite of their phagocytic activity [47], thereby maintaining proper mucosal homeostasis [17].
Additionally, ATRA is also produced by murine bone marrow-derived MΦs or human monocyte-derived MΦs following activation [48]; also, it can be absorbed from the circulation, thus ATRA regulates local inflammatory responses in non-mucosal tissues where infiltrating monocytes differentiate in situ into MΦs during inflammation. Importantly, it was shown that in contrast to mucosal MΦs, ATRA suppressed nitric oxide synthesis, IL-12, and TNFα cytokine secretion, while enhancing IL-10 production in LPS-activated murine peritoneal MΦs and cord blood mononuclear cells [49,50,51]. Furthermore, it was also reported that ATRA enhanced LPS-induced IL-1β expression in human alveolar MΦs and THP-1 cells [31,32].
Using LPS-activated human monocyte-derived MΦs, we found that while the secretion of TNFα was not affected, IL-6 and IL-1β secretion was significantly augmented by ATRA. IL-1β is a conductor proinflammatory cytokine with a versatile function and has coordinating roles in both innate and adaptive immune responses [52]. As a safeguard mechanism, in human monocyte-derived MΦs, the production of IL-1β following LPS activation is highly regulated and requires both priming and activating stimuli of NLRP3 inflammasome [35]. Our results show for the first time that ATRA prolongs LPS-induced IL-1β secretion by enhancing both the priming and activation of NLRP3 inflammasome (Figure 8).
We found that ATRA treatment significantly enhanced the LPS-induced NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β expression; moreover, we showed that ATRA alone is also capable of inducing the expression of the NLRP3 sensor. ATRA exerts its effect through RAR nuclear receptors that regulate the expression of their target gene by binding to the RAR response element (RARE) [53]. Our results may suggest that ATRA, in part, induces a direct RAR-driven transcription of NLRP3. Although, in an in silico analysis, we indeed found putative consensus sequences for RAR binding in the NLRP3 gene (data not shown). This should be interpreted with caution, and the verification would require further elaborate and complex genomic studies. In the past decade, several studies have proved that the sole presence of a transcription factor binding site is not satisfactory evidence for its activity [54], as other criteria, such as neighboring DNA sequences, trans-acting elements, transcription co-factors’ availability, cell lineage-determining factors, or the cross-talk of transcription factors during a given cell activation, should all be considered [55,56]. Nevertheless, though the expression of NLRP3 is usually mediated through specific signal transduction pathways triggered by cell membrane-located receptors like TLRs or cytokine receptors [57], RAR would not be the first nuclear receptor announced as a regulator of NLRP3 transcription. Response elements for VDR, PPARγ, and RORγ have also been found at the promoter region of NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β genes, and ligation of these receptors resulted in either an enhanced or attenuated expression [58,59,60].
However, the function of ATRA is not restricted to genomic effects. Importantly, an extranuclear function of RAR has also been reported, as it was shown that ligated RAR modulates the activation of signaling pathways in the cytoplasm by interacting with Akt, p38, and ERK [19,20,21]. Here, we showed that ATRA alone significantly downregulated p38 signaling, while it upregulated ERK signaling. Moreover, ATRA also attenuated the LPS-induced p38 pathway, while augmenting the NF-kB, ERK, and JNK pathways. Our group along with other laboratories have previously reported that these pathways are important regulators of NLRP3 and pro-IL-1b expression [34,57]. Even though further studies are required to describe the details of the regulatory mechanisms, we propose that ATRA regulates priming of NLRP3 inflammasome via multiple pathways.
Besides priming, the assembly and activation of NLRP3 inflammasome is also triggered by a wide range of intracellular or extracellular stimuli [61]. Our results show that the LPS-activated Akt/mTOR signaling is significantly downregulated by ATRA. mTOR inhibitors have shown promising results in advanced clinical trials against certain malignancies [62], as Akt/mTOR may limit proinflammatory, and induce anti-inflammatory responses [63]. Importantly, mTOR signaling is a pivotal negative regulator of NF-kB signaling and caspase-1 activation but is also a positive regulator of IL-10 secretion via the STAT3 pathway, providing a feedback loop to limit excessive inflammation, including IL-1β secretion in myeloid cells [37,38,64]. Our results show that STAT3 phosphorylation is significantly attenuated following ATRA treatment; furthermore, we observed a dramatic inhibition in the secretion of IL-10 anti-inflammatory cytokine of the primed MΦs. Using recombinant IL-10, the ATRA-enhanced IL-1β secretion was indeed significantly decreased in the LPS-activated cells. Based on our results, we suggest that ATRA treatment of primed MΦs leads to reduced secretion of IL-10 via attenuated Akt/mTOR/STAT3 signaling, thus alleviating the inhibitory feedback loop on IL-1β, resulting in prolonged IL-1β secretion.
mTOR is also a sensor and a key regulator of energy metabolism, and changes in the metabolic pathways are a hallmark of activation and polarization of MΦs [65]. In general, enhanced glycolysis is observed during inflammatory responses, while mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is more characteristic of anti-inflammatory responses [66]. While it is clear that metabolic changes, including glycolysis, significantly modulate and regulate inflammasome activation, reported mechanisms are contradictory, and do not provide detailed evidence. Some studies suggest that undisturbed glycolysis is required for the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome [67,68,69,70], whereas others demonstrated that inhibition of glycolytic enzymes results in robust NLRP3 inflammasome activation [71,72]. In this current study, we showed that ATRA shifts the metabolic pathways towards glycolysis and increases HK2 expression in LPS-primed MΦs. Furthermore, inhibition of HK2 resulted in the attenuation of IL-1β secretion. Many glycolytic enzymes have already been shown to control the NLRP3 activation status [67,71,73]. Hexokinase (HK), the first enzyme in glycolysis, is assumed to be an important regulator of NLRP3 inflammasome activation [67]. HK2 is a constitutively active enzyme that is recruited to, and bound to the mitochondrial outer membrane to drive glycolysis [74]. In the case of excess glucose, HK2 activity leads to glycolytic overload, resulting in the accumulation of glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) [75]. G6P is an activator of the sugar sensor Mondo A/Mlx transcription factors that preferentially drive TXNIP expression [76], an activator of NLRP3 inflammasome [77]. Importantly, ATRA was reported to enhance glucose transporter (GLUT) expression and glucose uptake [78,79], while IL-10 was shown to limit glucose uptake and glycolytic flux to sustain OXPHOS [80]. Based on our results and the available reports in the field, we hypothesize that ATRA enhances glucose uptake to drive enhanced glycolysis, eventually resulting in augmented NLRP3 activation in LPS-primed MΦs.

5. Conclusions

Our data demonstrate a novel mechanistic role for ATRA in the NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated innate immune response. We showed that ATRA enhances and prolongs IL-1β secretion of LPS-activated human monocyte-derived MΦs by augmenting both the priming and the activating signals (Figure 8). Epidemiological studies have proved the association between vitamin A and adequate immune response in bacterial infections [81]. Vitamin A deficiency may result in increased susceptibility to various bacterial and viral infections, such as tuberculosis and malaria [82,83,84,85]. Importantly, it was also reported that supplementation with vitamin A or retinoids reduced infectious complications, and improved immune responses, in part, by the activation of myeloid cells and changing their cytokine production [29,86]. Additionally, it was also speculated that enhanced IL-1 β levels could contribute to the anticancer effects of vitamin A by potentiating macrophage-dependent tumor defense mechanisms [87].
Based on our results, we suggest that in infectious conditions, ATRA boosts IL-1β, a conductor proinflammatory cytokine, production via the NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated pathway in monocyte-derived macrophages. This observation may partly explain the improved inflammatory responses observed following retinoid supplementation. Although the in vivo relevancy of our findings requires further investigation, our results may provide potential therapeutic tools for conditions where inflammatory responses should be further potentiated, such as in infectious diseases and in antitumor therapies.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/9/7/1591/s1, Figure S1: Induction of NLRP3 expression by ATRA on monocytes. (A) In silico analysis results for human monocytes treated with ATRA obtained from gene expression omnibus (GEO) database, accession number: GSE46268. (B) Relative gene expression of IL-1β and NLRP3 were measured by quantitative-RT-PCR. Isolated human monocytes were plated for 2 h then treated with ATRA or left untreated for 24 h. Data were obtained from at least three healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SD. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. (Ahmad Alatshan) and S.B.; methodology, A.A. (Ahmad Alatshan), G.E.K., A.A. (Azzam Aladdin), Z.C., K.T., S.B.; validation, A.A. (Ahmad Alatshan), K.T., S.B.; formal analysis, A.A. (Ahmad Alatshan), G.E.K., A.A. (Azzam Aladdin), S.B.; investigation, A.A. (Ahmad Alatshan), G.E.K., A.A. (Azzam Aladdin), Z.C., K.T., S.B.; resources, S.B.; data curation, S.B. and A.A. (Ahmad Alatshan); writing—original draft preparation, A.A. (Ahmad Alatshan) and S.B.; writing—review and editing, A.A. (Ahmad Alatshan), Z.C., K.T., S.B; visualization, A.A. (Ahmad Alatshan); supervision, S.B.; project administration, S.B.; funding acquisition, S.B. preparing revised version, A.A. (Ahmad Alatshan) and S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Hungarian National Scientific Research Fund (NKFIH-OTKA Grant No. K131844 to S.B.), the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Debrecen (1G3DBKD0TUDF 247 to S.B., 1Q4D BKX5STIP320, 1G3DBKJ0BFTK 247 to K.T.). Z.C. is supported by the Premium Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Hungarian Scientific Research Found (OTKA FK132185). Ah.A. and Az.A. hold a Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship from the Government of Hungary.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaneko, N.; Kurata, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Morikawa, S.; Masumoto, J. The role of interleukin-1 in general pathology. Inflamm. Regen. 2019, 39, 12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Szekanecz, Z.; Szamosi, S.; Kovács, G.E.; Kocsis, E.; Benkő, S. The NLRP3 inflammasome-interleukin 1 pathway as a therapeutic target in gout. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 670, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shao, B.-Z.; Xu, Z.-Q.; Han, B.-Z.; Su, D.-F.; Liu, C. NLRP3 inflammasome and its inhibitors: A review. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fusco, R.; D’amico, R.; Cordaro, M.; Gugliandolo, E.; Siracusa, R.; Peritore, A.F.; Crupi, R.; Impellizzeri, D.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Di Paola, R. Absence of formyl peptide receptor 1 causes endometriotic lesion regression in a mouse model of surgically-induced endometriosis. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 31355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  5. Di Paola, R.; Fusco, R.; Gugliandolo, E.; D’Amico, R.; Cordaro, M.; Impellizzeri, D.; Perretti, M.; Cuzzocrea, S. Formyl peptide receptor 1 signalling promotes experimental colitis in mice. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 141, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pellegrini, C.; Fornai, M.; Antonioli, L.; Blandizzi, C.; Calderone, V. Phytochemicals as Novel Therapeutic Strategies for NLRP3 Inflammasome-Related Neurological, Metabolic, and Inflammatory Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zahid, A.; Li, B.; Kombe, J.K.; Jin, T.; Tao, J. Pharmacological Inhibitors of the NLRP3 Inflammasome. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. D’Amico, R.; Fusco, R.; Cordaro, M.; Siracusa, R.; Peritore, A.F.; Gugliandolo, E.; Crupi, R.; Scuto, M.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Di Paola, R. Modulation of NLRP3 Inflammasome through Formyl Peptide Receptor 1 (Fpr-1) Pathway as a New Therapeutic Target in Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kawana, N.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kino, Y.; Satoh, J.-I. Molecular Network of NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation-Responsive Genes in a Human Monocyte Cell Line. Austin J. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 1, 1017. [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo, H.; Callaway, J.B.; Ting, J.P. Inflammasomes: Mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tschopp, J.; Schroder, K. NLRP3 inflammasome activation: The convergence of multiple signalling pathways on ROS production? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rheinheimer, J.; de Souza, B.M.; Cardoso, N.S.; Bauer, A.C.; Crispim, D. Current role of the NLRP3 inflammasome on obesity and insulin resistance: A systematic review. Metabolism 2017, 74, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wager, C.M.L.; Arnett, E.; Schlesinger, L.S. Macrophage nuclear receptors: Emerging key players in infectious diseases. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15. [Google Scholar]
  14. Benko, S.; Love, J.D.; Beládi, M.; Schwabe, J.W.; Nagy, L. Molecular determinants of the balance between co-repressor and co-activator recruitment to the retinoic acid receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 43797–43806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, W.; Glass, C.K. Nuclear receptors and inflammation control: Molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological relevance. Atertio. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 1542–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Le Maire, A.; Teyssier, C.; Balaguer, P.; Bourguet, W.; Germain, P. Regulation of RXR-RAR Heterodimers by RXR-and RAR-Specific Ligands and Their Combinations. Cells 2019, 8, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oliveira, L.d.M.; Teixeira, F.M.E.; Sato, M.N. Impact of Retinoic Acid on Immune Cells and Inflammatory Diseases. Mediators Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 3067126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, L.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, T.; Ding, W.; Zhao, Y. Cellular metabolism and macrophage functional polarization. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 34, 82–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Masiá, S.; Alvarez, S.; de Lera, A.R.; Barettino, D. Rapid, nongenomic actions of retinoic acid on phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase signaling pathway mediated by the retinoic acid receptor. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007, 21, 2391–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.; Bai, J.; Chen, G.; Li, L.; Li, M. All-trans retinoic acid-induced deficiency of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway enhances hepatic carcinoma stem cell differentiation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. García-Regalado, A.; Vargas, M.; García-Carrancá, A.; Aréchaga-Ocampo, E.; González-De la Rosa, C.H. Activation of Akt pathway by transcription-independent mechanisms of retinoic acid promotes survival and invasion in lung cancer cells. Mol. Cancer 2013, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, X.J.; Hayes, J.D.; Henderson, C.J.; Wolf, C.R. Identification of retinoic acid as an inhibitor of transcription factor Nrf2 through activation of retinoic acid receptor alpha. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19589–19594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kwok, S.-K.; Park, M.-K.; Cho, M.-L.; Oh, H.-J.; Park, E.-M.; Lee, D.-G.; Lee, J.; Kim, H.-Y.; Park, S.-H. Retinoic acid attenuates rheumatoid inflammation in mice. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Czarnewski, P.; Das, S.; Parigi, S.M.; Villablanca, E. Retinoic acid and its role in modulating intestinal innate immunity. Nutrients 2017, 9, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Semba, R.D. Vitamin A and immunity to viral, bacterial and protozoan infections. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1999, 58, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Larange, A.; Cheroutre, H. Retinoic acid and retinoic acid receptors as pleiotropic modulators of the immune system. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 34, 369–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wheelwright, M.; Kim, E.W.; Inkeles, M.S.; De Leon, A.; Pellegrini, M.; Krutzik, S.R.; Liu, P.T. All-trans retinoic acid–triggered antimicrobial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Is Dependent on NPC2. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 2280–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Babina, M.; Guhl, S.; Motakis, E.; Artuc, M.; Hazzan, T.; Worm, M.; Forrest, A.R.; Zuberbier, T. Retinoic acid potentiates inflammatory cytokines in human mast cells: Identification of mast cells as prominent constituents of the skin retinoid network. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 406, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yamada, H.; Mizuno, S.; Ross, A.C.; Sugawara, I. Retinoic acid therapy attenuates the severity of tuberculosis while altering lymphocyte and macrophage numbers and cytokine expression in rats infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Nut. 2007, 137, 2696–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Trechsel, U.; Evêquoz, V.; Fleisch, H. Stimulation of interleukin 1 and 3 production by retinoic acid in vitro. Biochem. J. 1985, 230, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Matikainen, S.; Serkkola, E.; Hurme, M. Retinoic acid enhances IL-1 beta expression in myeloid leukemia cells and in human monocytes. J. Immunol. 1991, 147, 162–167. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hayashi, S.; Hashimoto, S.; Kitamura, N.; Hanazawa, S.; Horie, T. Retinoic acid regulates differentially the expression of IL-1β and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) in PMA-activated human monocytes. Biochm. Bophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 224, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Anand, P.K.; Malireddi, R.; Kanneganti, T.-D. Role of the nlrp3 inflammasome in microbial infection. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Budai, M.M.; Tőzsér, J.; Benkő, S. Different dynamics of NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1β production in GM-CSF–and M-CSF–differentiated human macrophages. J. Leukocyte Biol. 2017, 101, 1335–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kelley, N.; Jeltema, D.; Duan, Y.; He, Y. The NLRP3 inflammasome: An overview of mechanisms of activation and regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Piskunov, A.; Rochette-Egly, C. A retinoic acid receptor RARα pool present in membrane lipid rafts forms complexes with G protein αQ to activate p38MAPK. Oncogene 2012, 31, 3333–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Weichhart, T.; Säemann, M.D. The multiple facets of mTOR in immunity. Trends Immunol. 2009, 30, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schmitz, F.; Heit, A.; Dreher, S.; Eisenächer, K.; Mages, J.; Haas, T.; Krug, A.; Janssen, K.P.; Kirschning, C.J.; Wagner, H. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) orchestrates the defense program of innate immune cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 38, 2981–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jones, R.G.; Pearce, E.J. MenTORing immunity: mTOR signaling in the development and function of tissue-resident immune cells. Immunity 2017, 46, 730–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Weichhart, T.; Costantino, G.; Poglitsch, M.; Rosner, M.; Zeyda, M.; Stuhlmeier, K.M.; Kolbe, T.; Stulnig, T.M.; Hörl, W.H.; Hengstschläger, M. The TSC-mTOR signaling pathway regulates the innate inflammatory response. Immunity 2008, 29, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Iyer, S.S.; Cheng, G. Role of interleukin 10 transcriptional regulation in inflammation and autoimmune disease. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 32. [Google Scholar]
  42. Papadopoli, D.; Boulay, K.; Kazak, L.; Pollak, M.; Mallette, F.; Topisirovic, I.; Hulea, L. mTOR as a central regulator of lifespan and aging. F1000Res. 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, X.b.; Gu, J.d.; Zhou, Q.h. Review of aerobic glycolysis and its key enzymes–new targets for lung cancer therapy. Thoracic Cancer 2015, 6, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cassani, B.; Villablanca, E.J.; De Calisto, J.; Wang, S.; Mora, J.R. Vitamin A and immune regulation: Role of retinoic acid in gut-associated dendritic cell education, immune protection and tolerance. Mol. Asp. Med. 2012, 33, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mora, J.R.; Iwata, M.; Von Andrian, U.H. Vitamin effects on the immune system: Vitamins A and D take centre stage. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 685–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arnold, S.L.; Amory, J.K.; Walsh, T.J.; Isoherranen, N. A sensitive and specific method for measurement of multiple retinoids in human serum with UHPLC-MS/MS. J. Lipid Res. 2012, 53, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Smythies, L.E.; Sellers, M.; Clements, R.H.; Mosteller-Barnum, M.; Meng, G.; Benjamin, W.H.; Orenstein, J.M.; Smith, P. Human intestinal macrophages display profound inflammatory anergy despite avid phagocytic and bacteriocidal activity. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Coleman, M.M.; Basdeo, S.A.; Coleman, A.M.; Cheallaigh, C.N.; Peral de Castro, C.; McLaughlin, A.M.; Dunne, P.J.; Harris, J.; Keane, J. All-trans retinoic acid augments autophagy during intracellular bacterial infection. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2018, 59, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Na, S.-Y.; Kang, B.Y.; Chung, S.W.; Han, S.-J.; Ma, X.; Trinchieri, G.; Im, S.-Y.; Lee, J.W.; Kim, T.S. Retinoids inhibit interleukin-12 production in macrophages through physical associations of retinoid X receptor and NFκB. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 7674–7680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kang, B.; Chung, S.; Kim, S.; Kang, S.; Choe, Y.; Kim, T.S. Retinoid-mediated inhibition of interleukin-12 production in mouse macrophages suppresses Th1 cytokine profile in CD4+ T cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 130, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  51. Wang, X.; Allen, C.; Ballow, M. Retinoic acid enhances the production of IL-10 while reducing the synthesis of IL-12 and TNF-α from LPS-stimulated monocytes/macrophages. J. Clin. Immunol. 2007, 27, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ren, K.; Torres, R. Role of interleukin-1β during pain and inflammation. Brain Res. Rev. 2009, 60, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Balmer, J.E.; Blomhoff, R. Gene expression regulation by retinoic acid. J. Lipid Res. 2002, 43, 1773–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Siggers, T.; Gordaˆn, R. Protein–DNA binding: Complexities and multi-protein codes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 2099–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, J.; Zhuang, J.; Iyer, S.; Lin, X.; Whitfield, T.W.; Greven, M.C.; Pierce, B.G.; Dong, X.; Kundaje, A.; Cheng, Y. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 1798–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nagy, G.; Daniel, B.; Cuaranta-Monroy, I.; Nagy, L. Unraveling the hierarchy of cis and trans factors that determine the DNA binding by PPARγ. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2020, 40, e00547-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Song, N.; Li, T. Regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome by phosphorylation. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, Y.; Yao, J.; Zou, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Ma, G.; Jiang, P.; Zhang, W. Asiatic acid protects against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury by inactivation of Kupffer cells via PPARγ/NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 86339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tulk, S.E.; Liao, K.C.; Muruve, D.A.; Li, Y.; Beck, P.L.; MacDonald, J.A. Vitamin D3 Metabolites Enhance the NLRP3-Dependent Secretion of IL-1β From Human THP-1 Monocytic Cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2015, 116, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Billon, C.; Murray, M.H.; Avdagic, A.; Burris, T. RORγ regulates the NLRP3 inflammasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. He, Y.; Hara, H.; Núñez, G. Mechanism and regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016, 41, 1012–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Faivre, S.; Kroemer, G.; Raymond, E. Current development of mTOR inhibitors as anticancer agents. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 671–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Vergadi, E.; Ieronymaki, E.; Lyroni, K.; Vaporidi, K.; Tsatsanis, C. Akt signaling pathway in macrophage activation and M1/M2 polarization. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 1006–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tekedereli, I.; Akar, U.; Alpay, S.N.; Lopez-Berestein, G.; Ozpolat, B. Autophagy is Required to Regulate Mitochondria Renewal, Cell Attachment, and All-trans–Retinoic Acid–Induced Differentiation in NB4 Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Cells. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 2019, 38, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Byles, V.; Covarrubias, A.J.; Ben-Sahra, I.; Lamming, D.W.; Sabatini, D.M.; Manning, B.D.; Horng, T. The TSC-mTOR pathway regulates macrophage polarization. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. O’Neill, L.A.; Pearce, E.J. Immunometabolism governs dendritic cell and macrophage function. J. Exp. Med. 2016, 213, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Moon, J.-S.; Hisata, S.; Park, M.-A.; DeNicola, G.M.; Ryter, S.W.; Nakahira, K.; Choi, A.M. mTORC1-induced HK1-dependent glycolysis regulates NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Cell Rep. 2015, 12, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Masters, S.L.; Dunne, A.; Subramanian, S.L.; Hull, R.L.; Tannahill, G.M.; Sharp, F.A.; Becker, C.; Franchi, L.; Yoshihara, E.; Chen, Z. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by islet amyloid polypeptide provides a mechanism for enhanced IL-1β in type 2 diabetes. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tannahill, G.; Curtis, A.; Adamik, J.; Palsson-McDermott, E.; McGettrick, A.; Goel, G.; Frezza, C.; Bernard, N.; Kelly, B.; Foley, N. Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1β through HIF-1α. Nature 2013, 496, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xie, M.; Yu, Y.; Kang, R.; Zhu, S.; Yang, L.; Zeng, L.; Sun, X.; Yang, M.; Billiar, T.R.; Wang, H. PKM2-dependent glycolysis promotes NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasome activation. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wolf, A.J.; Reyes, C.N.; Liang, W.; Becker, C.; Shimada, K.; Wheeler, M.L.; Cho, H.C.; Popescu, N.I.; Coggeshall, K.M.; Arditi, M. Hexokinase is an innate immune receptor for the detection of bacterial peptidoglycan. Cell 2016, 166, 624–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sanman, L.E.; Qian, Y.; Eisele, N.A.; Ng, T.M.; van der Linden, W.A.; Monack, D.M.; Weerapana, E.; Bogyo, M. Disruption of glycolytic flux is a signal for inflammasome signaling and pyroptotic cell death. Elife 2016, 5, e13663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hughes, M.M.; O’Neill, L.A. Metabolic regulation of NLRP 3. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 281, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Majewski, N.; Nogueira, V.; Bhaskar, P.; Coy, P.E.; Skeen, J.E.; Gottlob, K.; Chandel, N.S.; Thompson, C.B.; Robey, R.B.; Hay, N. Hexokinase-mitochondria interaction mediated by Akt is required to inhibit apoptosis in the presence or absence of Bax and Bak. Mol. Cell 2004, 16, 819–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rabbani, N.; Thornalley, P.J. Hexokinase-2 Glycolytic Overload in Diabetes and Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 30, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Stoltzman, C.A.; Kaadige, M.R.; Peterson, C.W.; Ayer, D.E. MondoA senses non-glucose sugars regulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) and the hexose transport curb. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 38027–38034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhou, R.; Tardivel, A.; Thorens, B.; Choi, I.; Tschopp, J. Thioredoxin-interacting protein links oxidative stress to inflammasome activation. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rhee, E.-J.; Plutzky, J. Retinoid metabolism and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. J. 2012, 36, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lee, Y.M.; Lee, J.O.; Jung, J.-H.; Kim, J.H.; Park, S.-H.; Park, J.M.; Kim, E.-K.; Suh, P.-G.; Kim, H.S. Retinoic acid leads to cytoskeletal rearrangement through AMPK-Rac1 and stimulates glucose uptake through AMPK-p38 MAPK in skeletal muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 33969–33974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ip, W.E.; Hoshi, N.; Shouval, D.S.; Snapper, S.; Medzhitov, R. Anti-inflammatory effect of IL-10 mediated by metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Science 2017, 356, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Huang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Qi, G.; Brand, D.; Zheng, S.G. Role of vitamin A in the immune system. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Aibana, O.; Franke, M.F.; Huang, C.-C.; Galea, J.T.; Calderon, R.; Zhang, Z.; Becerra, M.C.; Smith, E.R.; Ronnenberg, A.G.; Contreras, C. Impact of vitamin A and carotenoids on the risk of tuberculosis progression. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 65, 900–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Barclay, A.; Foster, A.; Sommer, A. Vitamin A supplements and mortality related to measles: A randomised clinical trial. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 1987, 294, 294–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hussey, G.D.; Klein, M. A randomized, controlled trial of vitamin A in children with severe measles. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990, 323, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Friis, H.; Mwaniki, D.; Omondi, B.; Muniu, E.; Magnussen, P.; Geissler, W.; Thiong’o, F.; Michaelsen, K.F. Serum retinol concentrations and Schistosoma mansoni, intestinal helminths, and malarial parasitemia: A cross-sectional study in Kenyan preschool and primary school children. Am. J. Clin.Nutr. 1997, 66, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  86. Dreno, B.; Gollnick, H.; Kang, S.; Thiboutot, D.; Bettoli, V.; Torres, V.; Leyden, J.; Acne, G.A.T.I.O.I. Understanding innate immunity and inflammation in acne: Implications for management. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2015, 29, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Moriguchi, S.; Werner, L.; Watson, R.R. High dietary vitamin A (retinyl palmitate) and cellular immune functions in mice. Immunology 1985, 56, 169. [Google Scholar]
Cells 09 01591 g001
Figure 1. ATRA differentially modulates proinflammatory cytokine secretion of LPS-activated MΦs. MΦs were pre-incubated with ATRA (1 µM) where indicated, and then stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated time. Cell culture supernatants were collected, and the secretion of (A) TNFα and IL-6 were measured by ELISA. (B) For IL-1β induction, cells were subsequently incubated with ATP (5 mM) for 45 min. (C) Cells were pre-treated with increasing concentrations of ATRA as indicated, and IL-β secretion was measured 6 h following treatment. (D) Cells were pretreated with MCC950 (1 µM) 1 h before ATP treatment. C, control (6 h mock-treated cells). Data were obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Figure 1. ATRA differentially modulates proinflammatory cytokine secretion of LPS-activated MΦs. MΦs were pre-incubated with ATRA (1 µM) where indicated, and then stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated time. Cell culture supernatants were collected, and the secretion of (A) TNFα and IL-6 were measured by ELISA. (B) For IL-1β induction, cells were subsequently incubated with ATP (5 mM) for 45 min. (C) Cells were pre-treated with increasing concentrations of ATRA as indicated, and IL-β secretion was measured 6 h following treatment. (D) Cells were pretreated with MCC950 (1 µM) 1 h before ATP treatment. C, control (6 h mock-treated cells). Data were obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Cells 09 01591 g001
Cells 09 01591 g002aCells 09 01591 g002b
Figure 2. ATRA enhances LPS-induced pro-IL-1β and NLRP3 expression in human MΦs. MΦs were pre-incubated with ATRA (1 µM) where indicated prior to stimulation with LPS (100 ng/mL), then 5 mM ATP was applied for 45 min. (A) Representative immunoblot of NLRP3, pro-caspase-1, pro-IL-1β, and ASC from the cell lysates; and released caspase-1 and IL-1β in supernatant. Bar graphs represent the relative protein expression of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3 determined by densitometry. β-actin was used as the internal control. (B) The relative gene expression of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3 was measured by qPCR. The expression was normalized to the reference gene (human cyclophilin; Cyclo) expression. Data were obtained from at least four healthy donors. C, control (6 h mock-treated cells). All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Figure 2. ATRA enhances LPS-induced pro-IL-1β and NLRP3 expression in human MΦs. MΦs were pre-incubated with ATRA (1 µM) where indicated prior to stimulation with LPS (100 ng/mL), then 5 mM ATP was applied for 45 min. (A) Representative immunoblot of NLRP3, pro-caspase-1, pro-IL-1β, and ASC from the cell lysates; and released caspase-1 and IL-1β in supernatant. Bar graphs represent the relative protein expression of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3 determined by densitometry. β-actin was used as the internal control. (B) The relative gene expression of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3 was measured by qPCR. The expression was normalized to the reference gene (human cyclophilin; Cyclo) expression. Data were obtained from at least four healthy donors. C, control (6 h mock-treated cells). All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Cells 09 01591 g002aCells 09 01591 g002b
Cells 09 01591 g003
Figure 3. Induction of NLRP3 by ATRA. Relative gene expression of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3 were measured by quantitative RT-PCR. (A, B) MΦs were treated with ATRA for different time intervals. Here, 6-h LPS-primed cells served as a positive control. (C) Representative immunoblot of NLRP3 protein expression of ATRA-treated MΦs as indicated. β-actin was used as the internal control. C, control (6 h mock-treated cells). The data was obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p< 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Figure 3. Induction of NLRP3 by ATRA. Relative gene expression of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3 were measured by quantitative RT-PCR. (A, B) MΦs were treated with ATRA for different time intervals. Here, 6-h LPS-primed cells served as a positive control. (C) Representative immunoblot of NLRP3 protein expression of ATRA-treated MΦs as indicated. β-actin was used as the internal control. C, control (6 h mock-treated cells). The data was obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p< 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Cells 09 01591 g003
Cells 09 01591 g004
Figure 4. ATRA mediates signal transduction changes in MΦs. (A) Representative immunoblots of phosphorylated IkBα, Erk, SAPK/JNK, and p38 from whole-cell lysates after ATRA treatment for the indicated time points. Here, 60-min LPS-primed cells served as a positive control. (B) MΦs were pre-incubated with ATRA (1 µM) prior to LPS priming for the indicated time, and phosphorylated IkBα, Erk, SAPK/JNK, and p38. β-actin was used as the internal control. C, control (mock-treated cells). The data were obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Figure 4. ATRA mediates signal transduction changes in MΦs. (A) Representative immunoblots of phosphorylated IkBα, Erk, SAPK/JNK, and p38 from whole-cell lysates after ATRA treatment for the indicated time points. Here, 60-min LPS-primed cells served as a positive control. (B) MΦs were pre-incubated with ATRA (1 µM) prior to LPS priming for the indicated time, and phosphorylated IkBα, Erk, SAPK/JNK, and p38. β-actin was used as the internal control. C, control (mock-treated cells). The data were obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Cells 09 01591 g004
Cells 09 01591 g005
Figure 5. ATRA mediates signal transduction changes in MΦs. Representative immunoblots of phosphorylated Akt, mTOR, P70S6K, and total P70S6K from whole-cell lysates. MΦs were pre-incubated with ATRA (1 µM) prior to LPS priming for the indicated time; then, whole-cell lysates were used for Western blot. β-actin was used as the internal control. C, control (mock-treated cells). The data was obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Figure 5. ATRA mediates signal transduction changes in MΦs. Representative immunoblots of phosphorylated Akt, mTOR, P70S6K, and total P70S6K from whole-cell lysates. MΦs were pre-incubated with ATRA (1 µM) prior to LPS priming for the indicated time; then, whole-cell lysates were used for Western blot. β-actin was used as the internal control. C, control (mock-treated cells). The data was obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Cells 09 01591 g005
Cells 09 01591 g006
Figure 6. ATRA modulates LPS-induced IL-10 secretion and STAT3 activation in MΦs. MΦs were pre-incubated with ATRA (1 µM) prior to stimulation with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated time. (A) Representative immunoblots of phosphorylated STAT3 from whole-cell lysates. β-actin was used as the internal control. (B) The secretion of IL-10 was assessed by ELISA from cell culture supernatants. (C) The cells were pre-treated with recombinant human IL-10 (rhIL-10) (100 ng/mL) 1 h before LPS priming and subsequently incubated with ATP (5 mM) for 45 min. Then, the cell culture supernatants were collected, and the secretion of IL-1β was assessed by ELISA. C, control (mock-treated cells). The data were obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p< 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.001). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Figure 6. ATRA modulates LPS-induced IL-10 secretion and STAT3 activation in MΦs. MΦs were pre-incubated with ATRA (1 µM) prior to stimulation with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated time. (A) Representative immunoblots of phosphorylated STAT3 from whole-cell lysates. β-actin was used as the internal control. (B) The secretion of IL-10 was assessed by ELISA from cell culture supernatants. (C) The cells were pre-treated with recombinant human IL-10 (rhIL-10) (100 ng/mL) 1 h before LPS priming and subsequently incubated with ATP (5 mM) for 45 min. Then, the cell culture supernatants were collected, and the secretion of IL-1β was assessed by ELISA. C, control (mock-treated cells). The data were obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p< 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.001). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Cells 09 01591 g006
Cells 09 01591 g007aCells 09 01591 g007b
Figure 7. ATRA mediates metabolic changes in LPS-primed MΦs. The cells were pre-treated with or without ATRA, then primed with LPS for 6 h, and subsequently subjected to the mitochondria stress test using a Seahorse XF96 Analyzer. (A) Real-time kinetics measurement of the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) during sequential treatment with oligomycin (Oligo), carbonylcyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (FCCP), and antimycin A + rotenone (A+R). Representative results are shown. Bar graphs represent the calculated basal and maximal OCR, and ATP-coupled respiration and spare respiratory capacity. (B) Real-time kinetics measurement of the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) after sequential treatment of glucose (Glu), oligomycin (Oligo), and 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG). Representative results are shown. Bar graphs represent calculated ECAR and glycolytic capacity obtained from the glycolytic stress test. Wave Desktop software was used for data analysis. (C) Relative gene expression of HK2 was measured by qPCR. The expression was normalized to the reference gene (human cyclophilin) expression. (D) MΦs were pretreated with 3-bromopyruvate (3BP) (80 µM) 1 h before LPS priming and subsequently incubated with ATP (5 mM) for 45 min., and then the cell culture supernatants were collected, and the secretion of IL-1β was assessed by ELISA. C, control (mock-treated cells). The data was obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Figure 7. ATRA mediates metabolic changes in LPS-primed MΦs. The cells were pre-treated with or without ATRA, then primed with LPS for 6 h, and subsequently subjected to the mitochondria stress test using a Seahorse XF96 Analyzer. (A) Real-time kinetics measurement of the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) during sequential treatment with oligomycin (Oligo), carbonylcyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (FCCP), and antimycin A + rotenone (A+R). Representative results are shown. Bar graphs represent the calculated basal and maximal OCR, and ATP-coupled respiration and spare respiratory capacity. (B) Real-time kinetics measurement of the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) after sequential treatment of glucose (Glu), oligomycin (Oligo), and 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG). Representative results are shown. Bar graphs represent calculated ECAR and glycolytic capacity obtained from the glycolytic stress test. Wave Desktop software was used for data analysis. (C) Relative gene expression of HK2 was measured by qPCR. The expression was normalized to the reference gene (human cyclophilin) expression. (D) MΦs were pretreated with 3-bromopyruvate (3BP) (80 µM) 1 h before LPS priming and subsequently incubated with ATP (5 mM) for 45 min., and then the cell culture supernatants were collected, and the secretion of IL-1β was assessed by ELISA. C, control (mock-treated cells). The data was obtained from at least four healthy donors. All results are shown as means ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). +, −, presence or absence of indicated substance, respectively
Cells 09 01591 g007aCells 09 01591 g007b
Cells 09 01591 g008
Figure 8. Proposed model for the effects of ATRA.
Figure 8. Proposed model for the effects of ATRA.
Cells 09 01591 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alatshan, A.; Kovács, G.E.; Aladdin, A.; Czimmerer, Z.; Tar, K.; Benkő, S. All-Trans Retinoic Acid Enhances both the Signaling for Priming and the Glycolysis for Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Human Macrophage. Cells 2020, 9, 1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071591

AMA Style

Alatshan A, Kovács GE, Aladdin A, Czimmerer Z, Tar K, Benkő S. All-Trans Retinoic Acid Enhances both the Signaling for Priming and the Glycolysis for Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Human Macrophage. Cells. 2020; 9(7):1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071591

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alatshan, Ahmad, Gergő E. Kovács, Azzam Aladdin, Zsolt Czimmerer, Krisztina Tar, and Szilvia Benkő. 2020. "All-Trans Retinoic Acid Enhances both the Signaling for Priming and the Glycolysis for Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Human Macrophage" Cells 9, no. 7: 1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071591

APA Style

Alatshan, A., Kovács, G. E., Aladdin, A., Czimmerer, Z., Tar, K., & Benkő, S. (2020). All-Trans Retinoic Acid Enhances both the Signaling for Priming and the Glycolysis for Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Human Macrophage. Cells, 9(7), 1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071591

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop