Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Inactivation of the Proteasome Augments Alveolar Macrophage Secretion of Vesicular SOCS3
Next Article in Special Issue
The Quest for the Best: How TCR Affinity, Avidity, and Functional Avidity Affect TCR-Engineered T-Cell Antitumor Responses
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of cAMP Signaling Regulation in Osteogenic Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
MHC Class I-Restricted TCR-Transgenic CD4+ T Cells Against STEAP1 Mediate Local Tumor Control of Ewing Sarcoma In Vivo
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/cells9071588
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

T-Cell Gene Therapy in Cancer Immunotherapy: Why It Is No Longer Just CARs on The Road

by
Michael D. Crowther
1,*,
Inge Marie Svane
1 and
Özcan Met
1,2,*
1
Department of Oncology, National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
2
Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(7), 1588; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071588
Submission received: 22 May 2020 / Revised: 24 June 2020 / Accepted: 26 June 2020 / Published: 30 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue TCR Gene Therapy: Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
T-cells have a natural ability to fight cancer cells in the tumour microenvironment. Due to thymic selection and tissue-driven immunomodulation, these cancer-fighting T-cells are generally low in number and exhausted. One way to overcome these issues is to genetically alter T-cells to improve their effectiveness. This process can involve introducing a receptor that has high affinity for a tumour antigen, with two promising candidates known as chimeric-antigen receptors (CARs), or T-cell receptors (TCRs) with high tumour specificity. This review focuses on the editing of immune cells to introduce such novel receptors to improve immune responses to cancer. These new receptors redirect T-cells innate killing abilities to the appropriate target on cancer cells. CARs are modified receptors that recognise whole proteins on the surface of cancer cells. They have been shown to be very effective in haematological malignancies but have limited documented efficacy in solid cancers. TCRs recognise internal antigens and therefore enable targeting of a much wider range of antigens. TCRs require major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction but novel TCRs may have broader antigen recognition. Moreover, there are multiple cell types which can be used as targets to improve the “off-the-shelf” capabilities of these genetic engineering methods.

1. Introduction

T-cells are an important immune cell capable of recognising cancers over healthy cells. The number of cancer specific T-cells in the body however is low, due to thymic selection. Furthermore, cancer specific T-cells can be turned off due to tumour-expressed immunomodulatory proteins such as PD-L1, or through dampening of the immune response due to regulatory cells [1,2,3,4]. It is possible to overcome these issues using immune checkpoint inhibitors, ex vivo expansion and adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or genetically altering T-cells to improve their effectiveness [5,6,7] as reviewed in [8]. While isolation and expansion of TILs from melanomas is relatively straight forward, it is more difficult to obtain clinical efficacy in other solid cancers. Furthermore, while TILs are enriched for tumour-specific T-cells, they still can be extremely low in number, and adoptive transfer of TILs may result in the transfer of non-tumour reactive TILs due to lack of in vitro enrichment. A common method to improve the response to cancer is by introducing a receptor that has high affinity for a tumour antigen; namely chimeric-antigen receptors (CARs) and T-cell receptors (TCRs) (forming CAR-T cells and TCR-T cells, respectively) with high tumour specificity (Figure 1). The introduction of such receptors redirects the T-cells innate killing abilities to the right target, in this case, the cancer cells.

2. When CARs Become TRUCKs

The first CARs began as a single protein chain, where the extracellular component is formed of an antibody able to target CD19, joined to an intracellular domain derived from the CD3ζ signalling chain to facilitate signalling in a TCR-like manner (Figure 2) [9]. Additional engineering steps led to second generation CARs which included a costimulatory signalling domain from CD28, or the addition of the 4-1BB (CD137) signalling domain, resulting in a stronger signal cascade to lead to more effective CAR-T-cells that are now the focus of clinical trials (Figure 2) [10]. Current third generation CARs have combined these co-stimulatory signal domains (Figure 2) to further enhance efficacy. It is also possible to design CARs to instead include a TCR construct fused to a CAR signalling domain, which is advantageous as it allows intracellular targeting of antigens through the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), while maintaining the potent downstream signalling of conventional CAR constructs [11]. The main disadvantage of this type of construct is the requirement of patient-specific MHC allele matching.
The latest iteration of CAR-T cells are known as “armoured CARs”, carrying a transgenic payload giving them the name “T-cells Redirected for Universal Cytokine Killing” (TRUCKs) [12]. These genetic constructs lead to the production of cytokines directly at the targeted tissue, in addition to their direct cancer recognition (Figure 2). The pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL)-12, IL-2 and IL-5, aim to attract a second wave of immune cells like natural killer (NK) cells, to clear cancer cells that may invisible to the CAR-T [12]. Importantly, cytokines such as IL-12 have very potent pleotropic effects, and as such cannot be given in therapeutic doses systemically due to toxicity [13]. Therefore, targeted accumulation at the site of disease provides a very attractive alternative.
CAR-T cells have so far been shown to be most effective in CD19 positive haematological malignancies. Initial trials in patients showed remarkable anti-tumour reactivity in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) [14], acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL) [15] and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) [16], using CAR-T cells targeting CD19. Indeed, patients have shown complete remission rates of 70–93% [17]. Furthermore, Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) is now approved to treat relapsed ALL [18], while axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) is approved to treat relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [19].
Presently, there are 775 CAR-related clinical trials in the clinical trials database, with 66 completed and 495 active or recruiting [20], targeting 64 different antigens [21]. The remaining 214 are not yet recruiting, suspended, terminated, withdrawn, or unknown status. While currently only approved for use in haematological malignancies, 33 of the 64 targets are exclusively targeting solid cancers, with an additional 8 targeting both haematological and solid cancers. However, efficacy against solid cancers is still unknown, so the results of these clinical trials will be invaluable. There is evidence in some solid cancers of CAR immune infiltrations at tumour sites including a phase I/II trial with HER2-targeting CARs in sarcoma [22], a preclinical study of WT4-targeting CARs in renal cell carcinoma [23] and a xenogeneic model targeting glypican-1 in multiple solid tumours [24], a potential sign that CARs may be beneficial even in some solid cancers. Indeed, the development of TRUCKs (Figure 2) is one method to improve solid tumour efficacy, by site-directed release of cytokine in order to improve survival of CAR TILs by changing the tumour microenvironment [25]. Solid tumour CARs may also be improved by altering the co-stimulatory domain (Figure 2) to induce longer-lived T-cells in vivo—as with T-cells utilising the 4-1BB domain [26]. Combination therapy of CAR-T cells with immune checkpoint inhibitors is also being explored through various clinical trials, as reviewed in [27].

3. Loss of CAR Antigen

While CARs have been proven to be very effective in multiple B-cell malignancies, there have been cases of resistance and relapse in patients. Mechanisms of resistance include mutations in the antigenic target resulting in loss of recognition by the CAR-T cell, mostly due to the truncation of the protein and therefore loss of surface expression of the antigen [28]. One unique case of remission occurred when a single malignant B-cell was accidently transduced with the CAR, enabling cis binding of the expressed CAR to the CD19 antigen, masking the CD19 epitope to CAR-T cells and therefore resistance to the CAR therapy [29]. To overcome mechanisms of resistance, it is possible to target a secondary molecule, such as CD22 or CD20 which are also often expressed on B-cell malignancies [30,31,32]. This can be done concurrently with anti-CD19 CARs, or as a secondary treatment post-relapse [33]. Indeed, one 8-year old patient received sequential treatments of anti-CD19 CAR, followed by anti-CD22 CAR resulting in partial response, subsequently followed by anti-CD20 CAR which cleared the cancer to complete remission [34]. Rather than giving each of these treatments sequentially, a recent CAR construct was designed to transduce donor T-cells with CD19, CD20 and CD22 targeting CARs in the same cell [35], thus cells that lose expression of one of the lineage markers would still be cleared by the adoptively transferred CARs.
It is also possible to introduce a CAR specific to a Fcγ-receptor (FcγR), enabling restriction of CARs to an FcγR tagged tumour-targeting antibody [36,37]. This is advantageous over conventional CAR-T cells as the specificity of the CAR can be changed simply by changing the antibody. Furthermore, multiple tumour-targeting antibodies can be used at the same time, enabling the CAR-T cell to target multiple tumour antigens. FcγR CAR-T-cells can also have their toxicities managed through removal of the tumour targeting antibody, mitigating the effects of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). A similar methodology can be employed with an affinity-enhanced monomeric streptavidin 2 (mSA2) biotin-binding domain able to bind to biotin-tagged antibodies, enabling modular targeting of cancers that bind the antibody [38].

4. TCR-T, the Place to Be?

While CARs target surface tumour antigens with an antibody-like moiety, major histocompatibility complex restricted antigens offer a source of antigens that are both intracellular and secreted. This greatly increases the potential range of targets that can be recognised by genetically altered T-cells. One method being explored targets MHC-presented peptides using a CAR, for example recognition of α-fetoprotein peptide bound to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A0201 [39]. α-fetoprotein is a known cancer-associated protein but is only expressed intracellularly or secreted making it undruggable from the perspective of conventional CARs. Therefore, using the feature of MHC presentation, this has become a viable line of research. Furthermore, as TCRs are natural receptors for peptide-MHC, these remain ready to be exploited in the form of the introduction of a cancer-specific TCR into the peripheral T-cell pool analogous to CARs. Regarding antigens for these TCRs to target, there are generally two types of peptides: Those arising from mutations that differ from wild type antigens (that are not recognised by the immune system through self-tolerance mechanisms) known as neo-antigens, and those that result from over-expression or aberrantly expressed genes—known as tumour-associated antigens (TAA). Regarding the former, many avenues of research are now focusing on such a personalised treatment, due to the requirement of matching the TCR to the correct HLA, in addition to identification of cancer-specific mutations.
There are multiple ways to identify neo-antigens, and the TCRs that recognise them. One common way is through sequencing of a patient’s cancer cells to identify cancer-specific mutations that can be targeted, which are processed through an MHC-binding prediction to enrich the antigens for those that are more likely to be presented to T-cells [40], test these using HLA-tetramers [41], finally identifying TCRs that target these antigens through clonal T-cell analyses or single cell sequencing [42,43,44]. TCR-T cells can then be synthesised and adoptively transferred to the patient. This of course greatly increases the lead time therapy; however, it is potentially advantageous in that the TCR-T have confirmed reactivity to the tumour and will be 100% matched to the patient HLA. Neoantigens-reactive T-cells are also appealing as they are specific to cancer mutations and, therefore, less likely to react to non-cancerous somatic cells.
On the other hand, it is possible to target shared antigens across cancer and patients, which is advantageous over neoantigen reactive TCRs as TAA are often shared between individuals and between different cancers. As TAA often arise from proteins that are not usually expressed somatically in adults, they remain viable targets for TCR-T therapy. To use one case as an example, TCR-T cells engineered to target the common melanoma TAA NY-ESO-1 have been produced [45]. The responses to this TCR-T have been encouraging, with clinical benefit seen in 80% of patients.
A further opportunity to develop broad, population wide TCR-T cells is to use HLA-agnostic TCRs. This overcomes the issue of patient-specific unique MHC alleles that restrict their tumour antigens. Indeed, an exciting new avenue of research is to use the recently discovered MR1-restricted TCR known as MC.7.G5 [46]. This TCR recognises cancer regardless of tissue origin, and as MR1 is monomorphic in the population, this TCR has potential to be used as an “off-the-shelf” TCR that can be used in many patients without the caveat of MHC-restriction, analogous to CAR-T-cells. Importantly, while this TCR showed the killing of both autologous and non-autologous cancer cells when the TCR was transferred to the T-cells of a cancer patient, it remained inert to healthy cells, demonstrating its potential in cancer treatment. Other non-MHC-restricted TCRs also exist, such as anti-cancer γδ TCRs, which when transduced to donor T-cells have been shown to redirect non-cancer specific T-cells to kill cancer cells through recognition of metabolites of the mevalonate pathway that is upregulated in cancers [47]. There are also additional αβ TCRs that are not restricted by MHC but other invariant molecules, such as CD1c [48], offering further opportunities to explore TCR-T cells using these unconventional T-cells.
A potential source of neoantigen, TAA and HLA-agnostic reactive TCRs are in the tumour microenvironment itself; it has been well documented that tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes are enriched for tumour-reactive T-cells [44,49,50,51], as evidenced by the success of TIL-based cancer immunotherapy. As TILs are often exhausted and may have limited in vivo proliferative ability once transferred back into the patient [52,53], genetically engineering T-cells with a more naïve phenotype could increase the activatory potential, compared to unedited TILs. Furthermore, use of TCR-T cells over CAR-T cells has the advantage of the potential for epitope spreading, where T-cells with different antigen specificities to the adoptively transferred targeted antigen are also activated [54].

5. Examples of TCR-T

TCR-T cell therapies have been slower to reach clinical approval states for treatment of cancers. However, there have been studies that show the effectiveness of such treatments, leading to over 70 clinical trials involving TCR-T therapy (Table 1) [20]. These numbers indicate a real interest in moving forward with TCR-T as a viable therapy. One promising TCR-T target is the NY-ESO-1c125 TCR targeting a NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a derived peptide presented on HLA-A2, in patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma [55]. Anti-tumour responses were seen in 50% of patients, which is commendable considering metastatic synovial sarcoma is a solid cancer that is incurable with standard therapy. Furthermore, NY-ESO-1c125 T-cells persisted for at least 6 months in responders and showed effector memory phenotypes. NY-ESO-1 targeting TCR-T cells have also been shown to be effective in both melanoma and synovial sarcoma, with 3-year survival rates of 33% and 38%, respectively [56].
T-cells have also been engineered to express a TCR targeting the melanoma associated antigen gp100, together with a CAR targeting CSPG4 antigen, which has shown in vitro cytokine release and cytotoxicity [57]. These multi-target TCR-T cells have yet to be tested in animal models or humans, however. Interestingly, using multiple targets on the same cell could be exploited in the use of “logic gates”—whereby signalling domains are split across two or even three receptors, so only cells that possess both receptor targets activate the T-cell [58].

6. TCR-T Limitations

A confounding factor of TCR-based genetic engineering is the issue of TCR chain cross pairing. This is due to the fact TCRs exist as heterodimers and introduced TCR-α chains can pair with the endogenous TCR-β and vice versa. This is potentially hazardous as these mis-paired TCRs could harbour harmful neoreactivities [59]. There are however multiple methods to overcome mispairing issues. TCRs can be generated into a single chain CAR-like construct to prevent cross pairing, however such a construct can result in 10–100× less sensitivity for their cognate antigen [60]. However another study found the use of only the variable region of the beta chain which resulted in no loss of TCR sensitivity [61]. It is also possible to introduce a novel TCR while simultaneously knocking out the endogenous TCR. This can be achieved in two ways; either through co-transfer of a CRISPR lentivirus targeting the endogenous TCR-β chain [47] or through targeting the TCR gene insertion at both the TCR-α and TCR-β locus resulting in direct TCR gene replacement, allowing physiological expression of the engineered TCR [62]. The latter is achieved through non-viral delivery of DNA and therefore, arguably, reduces the time and expense associated with viral-based delivery of genes. The added benefit of knocking out the endogenous TCR is reduced competition for TCR co-receptors such as CD3 [63]. In a recent clinical trial, T-cells engineered with an NY-ESO-1 targeting TCR in addition to CRISPR knockout of both the endogenous TCR and PD-1, with edited T-cell detectable nine months post-transfusion, indicating viability of CRISPR edited, tumour-specific engineered TCR-T cells [64].

7. Target Cells

An exciting avenue of research is to introduce cancer-reactive TCRs using αβ-TCRs into γδ T-cells; as γδ T-cells express a different TCR isoform they cannot mis-pair introduced TCRs with endogenous. This is further advantageous in that γδ T-cells have been shown to have some natural anticancer reactivity [43,65,66,67] in addition to a range of other features not known to conventional αβ T-cells, such as antigen presentation [68].
Another potential target cell line for both CAR- and TCR-constructs is NK cells; as they do not possess an endogenous TCR there is no possibility of cross pairing of TCR chains. Furthermore, NK cells are able to both directly kill cells and secrete cytokines. There are some concerns that NK cells are poor at homing to cancer sites, but this may be overcome by using more advanced TRUCKs. As an example, one group has shown editing NK cells to express CD19-reactive CARs along with the IL-15 gene and a suicide gene could effectively clear xenograft B-cell leukaemia or lymphoma in mice models [69]. Indeed, NK-CARs have also shown efficacy in humans, with 7 out of 11 patients achieving complete remission with no development of severe adverse events such as CRS [70]. These NK-CARs expanded and persisted for at least 12 months, however other NK cell-based ACT studies have often failed to detect the presence of infused NK cells no more than a couple of weeks after infusion [71,72,73]. Macrophages have also recently been used to generate CAR-Ms, demonstrating antigen-specific phagocytosis and tumour clearance in vitro, with the added benefit of direct antigen presentation and cytokine secretion [74]. CAR-Ms persisted for at least 62 days in this immune deficient NSG mouse model, however it is difficult to assess the persistence in human cancer patients.

8. When to Turn Engineered Cells On and Off

Both CAR-T and TCR-T show promise but can also have side effects; notably cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Currently, these are treated with steroids or anti-IL-6 therapy [75], however this could diminish the overall immune response.
An additional caveat with engineered T-cells is on-target off-tumour specific toxicity. This occurs when a cancer target is expressed on tissues other than the cancer. An example showing this is in the case of CD133-directed CAR-T cells, as while CD133 is expressed on some leukaemia cells, it is also expressed on haemopoietic stem and progenitor cells, potentially causing severe toxicity [76]. Off-target, off-tumour toxicities can also occur, as evidenced with the MAGE-A3 TCR-T that resulted in severe cardiotoxicity and death of two patients due to TCR cross-reactivity to an antigen from Titin—which is only expressed on beating cardiomyocytes [39,40]. This study was important to show how potent TCR-T cells can be in vivo, but also highlight the importance of rigorous pre-clinical testing.
There are efforts to mitigate these side-effects from the genetic construct. One method is to introduce suicide switches into the edited cells—where an administered drug at a designated interval induces cell death of only the edited cells. This can be achieved through inclusion of druggable targets such as inducible caspase-9 which leads to CAR-T cell apoptosis upon administration of a small molecule [69]. Such suicide genes prevent some of the toxicities associated with over-stimulation of CAR-T-cells [75]. It is also possible to include the aforementioned logic gates [21,31].

9. Concluding Remarks

Cancer immunotherapy is now a vital part of the therapy regimen for cancer treatment. With CAR-T-cells showing outstanding results in B-cell malignancies, there is scope to expand the number of targets and nuances of the therapy to improve outcomes further. Particularly, design of novel CARs to target multiple antigens concurrently represents a promising line of research, such as larger CAR constructs so individual cells can target multiple antigens, or in the case of separate CAR-T cells adoptively transferred simultaneously. The introduction of CARs to include payloads such as cytokine secretion may also provide more potent efficacy. A major caveat with CAR therapy is cytokine release syndrome due to the high affinity antigen targeting—this can be mitigated through addition of cellular switches [21], logic gates [31] or through decoupling of direct antigen targeting through the use of FcγR CARs alongside infusion of tumour-targeting antibodies [38]. This enables removal of antigen target, or dose escalation in a much more controlled manner than in direct CAR-target recognition.
Unfortunately, the evidence of effective CAR-T-cell therapy in solid tumours remains limited. While some studies have shown effects in some solid tumours, there is still more research to be done. Indeed, there is difficulty in finding solid tumour antigens due to the lack of lineage specific markers as in the case of CD19/20/22 targeting CARs. As TCRs offer targeting of tumour specific neoantigens, use of TCR-T cell could be utilised for more specific solid tumour targets. The main caveat associated with TCR-T therapy is the requirement of MHC restriction, requiring identification of patient specific antigen receptors in contrast to the broad targets of CARs. However, there are example cases of TCRs targeting common HLA alleles such NY-ESO-1 mutated antigens on HLA-A0201 [77], or TCR targeting ubiquitous molecules such as tumour-associated MR1 [46].
Changing the recognition target of T-cells is not the only mechanism of gene editing in T-cells. As TILs are already a viable treatment option in solid cancers, particularly melanoma, it is feasible to try to improve responses in treatment resistant patient. It is possible, for example, to use CRISPR to knockout T-cell exhaustion markers that may be regulating the activity of adoptively transferred T-cells; examples of which include PD-1 knockout [78,79], DGK) knockout to increase TCR activation [80], or pooled gene knock-ins to improve in vivo T-cell fitness [81]. Finally, there is recent evidence of the development of universal CAR-T-cells, where CD52 was knocked out in CAR-T cells, to prevent graft-versus-host disease by preventing CAR-T-cell loss upon anti-CD52 mediated depletion of immune cells during therapy [82]. Such, off-the-shelf treatments greatly reduce cost and lead-time to treatment, paving the way for adoption of treatment as standard of care.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, M.D.C.; writing—review and editing, Ö.M. and I.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Danish Cancer Society (Kræftens Bekæmpelse), grant number R167-A10971-17-S2 and Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation (Børnecancerfonden), grant number 2018-8.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

  1. Baitsch, L.; Legat, A.; Barba, L.; Marraco, S.A.F.; Rivals, J.-P.; Baumgaertner, P.; Christiansen-Jucht, C.; Bouzourene, H.; Rimoldi, D.; Pircher, H.; et al. Extended Co-Expression of Inhibitory Receptors by Human CD8 T-Cells Depending on Differentiation, Antigen-Specificity and Anatomical Localization. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sawada, M.; Goto, K.; Morimoto-Okazawa, A.; Haruna, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Nakagawa, S.; Hiramatsu, K.; Matsuzaki, S.; Kobayashi, E.; et al. PD-1+ Tim3+ Tumor-Infiltrating CD8 T Cells Sustain The Potential for IFN-γ Production, but Lose Cytotoxic Activity in Ovarian Cancer. Int. Immunol. 2020, 32, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Blackburn, S.D.; Shin, H.; Haining, W.N.; Zou, T.; Workman, C.J.; Polley, A.; Betts, M.R.; Freeman, G.J.; Vignali, D.A.A.; Wherry, E.J. Coregulation of CD8+ T cell exhaustion by multiple inhibitory receptors during chronic viral infection. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 10, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sauce, D.; De Almeida, J.R.; Larsen, M.; Haro, L.; Autran, B.; Freeman, G.J.; Appay, V. PD-1 expression on human CD8 T cells depends on both state of differentiation and activation status. AIDS 2007, 21, 2005–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Guedan, S.; Ruella, M.; June, C.H. Emerging Cellular Therapies for Cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 37, 145–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pardoll, D.M. The Blockade of Immune Checkpoints in Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rosenberg, S.A.; Yang, J.C.; Sherry, R.M.; Kammula, U.S.; Hughes, M.S.; Phan, G.Q.; Citrin, D.E.; Restifo, N.P.; Robbins, P.F.; Wunderlich, J.R.; et al. Durable Complete Responses in Heavily Pretreated Patients with metastatic melanoma using T-cell transfer immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 4550–4557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Özcan, M.; Jensen, K.M.; Chamberlain, C.; Donia, M.; Svane, I.M. Principles of adoptive T cell therapy in cancer. Semin. Immunopathol. 2018, 41, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuwana, Y.; Asakura, Y.; Utsunomiya, N.; Nakanishi, M.; Arata, Y.; Itoh, S.; Nagase, F.; Kurosawa, Y. Expression of chimeric receptor composed of immunoglobulin-derived V resions and T-cell receptor-derived C regions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1987, 149, 960–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kalos, M.; Levine, B.L.; Porter, D.L.; Katz, S.I.; Grupp, S.A.; Bagg, A.; June, C.H. T Cells with Chimeric Antigen Receptors Have Potent Antitumor Effects and Can Establish Memory in Patients with Advanced Leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011, 3, 95ra73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Walseng, E.; Köksal, H.; Sektioglu, I.M.; Fåne, A.; Skorstad, G.; Kvalheim, G.; Gaudernack, G.; Inderberg, E.M.; Wälchli, S. A TCR-based Chimeric Antigen Receptor. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chmielewski, M.; Abken, H. TRUCKs: The fourth generation of CARs. Expert Opin. Boil. Ther. 2015, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Luo, H.; Wu, X.; Sun, R.; Su, J.; Wang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Shi, B.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, H.; Li, Z. Target-Dependent Expression of IL12 by synNotch Receptor-Engineered NK92 Cells Increases the Antitumor Activities of CAR-T Cells. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mancikova, V.; Peschelova, H.; Kozlova, V.; Ledererova, A.; Ladungova, A.; Verner, J.; Loja, T.; Folber, F.; Mayer, J.; Pospisilova, S.; et al. Performance of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in genetically defined classes of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J. Immunother. Cancer 2020, 8, e000471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pehlivan, K.C.; Duncan, B.B.; Lee, D.W. CAR-T Cell Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Transforming the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Disease. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2018, 13, 396–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Roberts, Z.J.; Better, M.; Bot, A.; Roberts, M.R.; Ribas, A. Axicabtagene ciloleucel, a first-in-class CAR T cell therapy for aggressive NHL. Leuk. Lymphoma 2017, 59, 1785–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ko, R.H.; Ji, L.; Barnette, P.; Bostrom, B.; Hutchinson, R.; Raetz, E.; Seibel, N.L.; Twist, C.J.; Eckroth, E.; Sposto, R.; et al. Outcome of Patients Treated for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 648–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Mueller, K.T.; Maude, S.L.; Porter, D.L.; Frey, N.; Wood, P.; Han, X.; Waldron, E.; Chakraborty, A.; Awasthi, R.; Levine, B.L.; et al. Cellular kinetics of CTL019 in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2017, 130, 2317–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Locke, F.; Ghobadi, A.; A Jacobson, C.; Miklos, D.B.; Lekakis, L.J.; O Oluwole, O.; Lin, Y.; Braunschweig, I.; Hill, B.T.; Timmerman, J.M.; et al. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): A Single-Arm, Multicentre, Phase 1–2 Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. U.S National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 25 March 2020).
  21. Mackay, M.; Afshinnekoo, E.; Rub, J.; Hassan, C.; Khunte, M.; Baskaran, N.; Owens, B.; Liu, L.; Roboz, G.J.; Guzman, M.L.; et al. The therapeutic landscape for cells engineered with chimeric antigen receptors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ahmed, N.; Brawley, V.S.; Hegde, M.; Robertson, C.; Ghazi, A.; Gerken, C.; Liu, E.; Dakhova, O.; Ashoori, A.; Corder, A.; et al. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) –Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor–Modified T Cells for the Immunotherapy of HER2-Positive Sarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 1688–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, Y.; Morales, A.J.; Cargill, M.J.; Towlerton, A.M.H.; Coffey, D.G.; Warren, E.H.; Tykodi, S.S. Preclinical development of T-cell receptor-engineered T-cell therapy targeting the 5T4 tumor antigen on renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2019, 68, 1979–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kato, D.; Yaguchi, T.; Iwata, T.; Katoh, Y.; Morii, K.; Tsubota, K.; Takise, Y.; Tamiya, M.; Kamada, H.; Akiba, H.; et al. GPC1 specific CAR-T cells eradicate established solid tumor without adverse effects and synergize with anti-PD-1 Ab. eLife 2020, 9, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chinnasamy, D.; Yu, Z.; Kerkar, S.P.; Zhang, L.; Morgan, R.A.; Restifo, N.P.; Rosenberg, S.A. Local delivery of interleukin-12 using T cells targeting VEGF receptor-2 eradicates multiple vascularized tumors in mice. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 1672–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ying, Z.; He, T.; Wang, X.; Zheng, W.; Lin, N.; Tu, M.; Xie, Y.; Ping, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, W.; et al. Parallel Comparison of 4-1BB or CD28 Co-stimulated CD19-Targeted CAR-T Cells for B Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2019, 15, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Grosser, R.; Cherkassky, L.; Chintala, N.; Adusumilli, P. Combination Immunotherapy with CAR T Cells and Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Solid Tumors. Cancer Cell 2019, 36, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Orlando, E.J.; Han, X.; Tribouley, C.; Wood, P.A.; Leary, R.J.; Riester, M.; Levine, J.E.; Qayed, M.; Grupp, S.A.; Boyer, M.; et al. Genetic mechanisms of target antigen loss in CAR19 therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1504–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ruella, M.; Xu, J.; Barrett, D.M.; Fraietta, J.A.; Reich, T.; Ambrose, D.E.; Klichinsky, M.; Shestova, O.; Patel, P.R.; Kulikovskaya, I.; et al. Induction of resistance to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy by transduction of a single leukemic B cell. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1499–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qin, H.; Dong, Z.; Wang, X.; Cheng, W.A.; Wen, F.; Xue, W.; Sun, H.; Walter, M.; Wei, G.; Smith, D.L.; et al. CAR T cells targeting BAFF-R can overcome CD19 antigen loss in B cell malignancies. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaaw9414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cho, J.H.; Collins, J.J.; Wong, W.W. Universal Chimeric Antigen Receptors for Multiplexed and Logical Control of T Cell Responses. Cell 2018, 173, 1426–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zugmaier, G.; Gökbuget, N.; Klinger, M.; Viardot, A.; Stelljes, M.; Neumann, S.; Horst, H.-A.; Marks, R.; Faul, C.; Diedrich, H.; et al. Long-term survival and T-cell kinetics in relapsed/refractory ALL patients who achieved MRD response after blinatumomab treatment. Blood 2015, 126, 2578–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Majzner, R.G.; Mackall, C.L. Tumor Antigen Escape from CAR T-cell Therapy. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 1219–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Du, J.; Zhang, Y. Sequential anti-CD19, 22, and 20 autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatments of a child with relapsed refractory Burkitt lymphoma: A case report and literature review. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 146, 1575–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fousek, K.; Watanabe, J.; Joseph, S.K.; George, A.; An, X.; Byrd, T.T.; Morris, J.S.; Luong, A.; Martínez-Paniagua, M.A.; Sanber, K.; et al. CAR T-cells that target acute B-lineage leukemia irrespective of CD19 expression. Leukemia 2020, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kudo, K.; Imai, C.; Lorenzini, P.; Kamiya, T.; Kono, K.; Davidoff, A.M.; Chng, W.J.; Campana, D. T Lymphocytes Expressing a CD16 Signaling Receptor Exert Antibody-Dependent Cancer Cell Killing. Cancer Res. 2013, 74, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ochi, F.; Fujiwara, H.; Tanimoto, K.; Asai, H.; Miyazaki, Y.; Okamoto, S.; Mineno, J.; Kuzushima, K.; Shiku, H.; Barrett, J.; et al. Gene-Modified Human α/β-T Cells Expressing a Chimeric CD16-CD3 Receptor as Adoptively Transferable Effector Cells for Anticancer Monoclonal Antibody Therapy. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2014, 2, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Lohmueller, J.J.; Ham, J.D.; Kvorjak, M.; Finn, O.J. mSA2 affinity-enhanced biotin-binding CAR T cells for universal tumor targeting. OncoImmunology 2017, 7, e1368604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, H.; Xu, Y.; Xiang, J.; Long, L.; Green, S.; Yang, Z.; Zimdahl, B.; Lu, J.; Cheng, N.; Horan, L.; et al. Targeting Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP)–MHC Complex with CAR T-Cell Therapy for Liver Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 23, 478–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Jurtz, V.; Paul, S.; Andreatta, M.; Marcatili, P.; Peters, B.; Nielsen, M. NetMHCpan-4.0: Improved Peptide-MHC Class I Interaction Predictions Integrating Eluted Ligand and Peptide Binding Affinity Data. J. Immunol. 2017, 199, 3360–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bentzen, A.K.; Marquard, A.; Lyngaa, R.; Saini, S.K.; Ramskov, S.; Donia, M.; Such, L.; Furness, A.J.S.; McGranahan, N.; Rosenthal, R.; et al. Large-scale detection of antigen-specific T cells using peptide-MHC-I multimers labeled with DNA barcodes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 1037–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shitaoka, K.; Hamana, H.; Kishi, H.; Hayakawa, Y.; Kobayashi, E.; Sukegawa, K.; Piao, X.; Lyu, F.; Nagata, T.; Sugiyama, D.; et al. Identification of Tumoricidal TCRs from Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes by Single-Cell Analysis. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2018, 6, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Janssen, A.; Hidalgo, J.V.; Beringer, D.X.; Van Dooremalen, S.; Fernando, F.; Van Diest, E.; Terrizzi, A.R.; Bronsert, P.; Kock, S.; Schmitt-Graeff, A.; et al. γδ T-cell Receptors Derived from Breast Cancer–Infiltrating T Lymphocytes Mediate Antitumor Reactivity. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2020, 8, 530–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Parkhurst, M.R.; Gros, A.; Pasetto, A.; Prickett, T.; Crystal, J.S.; Robbins, P.; Rosenberg, S.A. Isolation of T-Cell Receptors Specifically Reactive with Mutated Tumor-Associated Antigens from Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Based on CD137 Expression. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 23, 2491–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Rapoport, A.P.; Stadtmauer, E.A.; Binder-Scholl, G.K.; Goloubeva, O.; Vogl, D.T.; Lacey, S.F.; Badros, A.Z.; Garfall, A.; Weiss, B.; Finklestein, J.; et al. NY-ESO-1–specific TCR–engineered T cells mediate sustained antigen-specific antitumor effects in myeloma. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 914–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Crowther, M.D.; Dolton, G.; Legut, M.; Caillaud, M.E.; Lloyd, A.; Attaf, M.; Galloway, S.A.E.; Rius, C.; Farrell, C.P.; Szomolay, B.; et al. Genome-wide CRISPR–Cas9 screening reveals ubiquitous T cell cancer targeting via the monomorphic MHC class I-related protein MR1. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Legut, M.; Dolton, G.; Mian, A.A.; Ottmann, O.G.; Sewell, A.K. CRISPR-mediated TCR replacement generates superior anticancer transgenic T cells. Blood 2018, 131, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Lepore, M.; De Lalla, C.; Gundimeda, S.R.; Gsellinger, H.; Consonni, M.; Garavaglia, C.; Sansano, S.; Piccolo, F.; Scelfo, A.; Häussinger, D.; et al. A novel self-lipid antigen targets human T cells against CD1c+ leukemias. J. Exp. Med. 2014, 211, 1363–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Westergaard, M.; Andersen, R.; Chong, C.; Kjeldsen, J.W.; Pedersen, M.; Friese, C.; Hasselager, T.; Lajer, H.; Coukos, G.; Bassani-Sternberg, M.; et al. Tumour-reactive T cell subsets in the microenvironment of ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lu, Y.; Yao, X.; Crystal, J.S.; Li, Y.F.; El-Gamil, M.; Gross, C.; Davis, L.; Dudley, M.E.; Yang, J.C.; Samuels, Y.; et al. Efficient identification of mutated cancer antigens recognized by T cells associated with durable tumor regressions. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 3401–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Prieto, P.A.; Durflinger, K.H.; Wunderlich, J.R.; Rosenberg, S.A.; Dudley, M.E. Enrichment of CD8+ Cells From Melanoma Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocyte Cultures Reveals Tumor Reactivity for Use in Adoptive Cell Therapy. J. Immunother. 2010, 33, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Giraldo, N.; Becht, E.; Vano, Y.; Petitprez, F.; Lacroix, L.; Validire, P.; Sanchez-Salas, R.; Ingels, A.; Oudard, S.; Moatti, A.; et al. Tumor-Infiltrating and Peripheral Blood T-cell Immunophenotypes Predict Early Relapse in Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 4416–4428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kuball, J.; Hauptrock, B.; Malina, V.; Antunes, E.; Voss, R.-H.; Wolfl, M.; Strong, R.; Theobald, M.; Greenberg, P.D. Increasing functional avidity of TCR-redirected T cells by removing defined N-glycosylation sites in the TCR constant domain. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Hunder, N.N.; Wallen, H.; Cao, J.; Hendricks, D.W.; Reilly, J.Z.; Rodmyre, R.; Jungbluth, A.; Gnjatic, S.; Thompson, J.A.; Yee, C. Treatment of metastatic melanoma with autologous CD4+ T cells against NY-ESO-1. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 2698–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. D’Angelo, S.P.; Melchiori, L.; Merchant, M.S.; Bernstein, D.B.; Glod, J.; Kaplan, R.N.; Grupp, S.A.; Tap, W.D.; Chagin, K.; Binder, G.K.; et al. Antitumor Activity Associated with Prolonged Persistence of Adoptively Transferred NY-ESO-1 c259T Cells in Synovial Sarcoma. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 944–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Robbins, P.F.; Kassim, S.H.; Tran, T.L.N.; Crystal, J.S.; Morgan, R.A.; Feldman, S.A.; Yang, J.C.; Dudley, M.E.; Wunderlich, J.R.; Sherry, R.M.; et al. A Pilot Trial Using Lymphocytes Genetically Engineered with an NY-ESO-1-Reactive T-cell Receptor: Long-term Follow-up and Correlates with Response. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 21, 1019–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Simon, B.; Harrer, D.C.; Schuler-Thurner, B.; Schuler, G.; Uslu, U. Arming T Cells with a gp100-Specific TCR and a CSPG4-Specific CAR Using Combined DNA- and RNA-Based Receptor Transfer. Cancers 2019, 11, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Sukumaran, S.; Watanabe, N.; Bajgain, P.; Raja, K.; Mohammed, S.; Fisher, W.E.; Brenner, M.K.; Leen, A.M.; Vera, J.F. Enhancing the Potency and Specificity of Engineered T Cells for Cancer Treatment. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 972–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Van Loenen, M.M.; De Boer, R.; Amir, A.L.; Hagedoorn, R.S.; Volbeda, G.L.; Willemze, R.; Van Rood, J.J.; Falkenburg, J.H.F.; Heemskerk, M.H.M. Mixed T cell receptor dimers harbor potentially harmful neoreactivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 10972–10977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Harris, D.T.; Hager, M.V.; Smith, S.; Cai, Q.; Stone, J.; Kruger, P.; Lever, M.; Dushek, O.; Schmitt, T.M.; Greenberg, P.D.; et al. Comparison of T Cell Activities Mediated by Human TCRs and CARs That Use the Same Recognition Domains. J. Immunol. 2017, 200, 1088–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Oh, J.; Warshaviak, D.T.; Mkrtichyan, M.; Munguia, M.L.; Lin, A.; Chai, F.; Pigott, C.; Kang, J.; Gallo, M.; Kamb, A. Single variable domains from the T cell receptor β chain function as mono- and bifunctional CARs and TCRs. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Schober, K.; Müller, T.R.; Gökmen, F.; Grassmann, S.; Effenberger, M.; Poltorak, M.; Stemberger, C.; Schumann, K.; Roth, T.L.; Marson, A.; et al. Orthotopic replacement of T-cell receptor α- and β-chains with preservation of near-physiological T-cell function. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2019, 3, 974–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ahmadi, M.; King, J.W.; Xue, S.-A.; Voisine, C.; Holler, A.; Wright, G.; Waxman, J.; Morris, E.; Stauss, H.J. CD3 limits the efficacy of TCR gene therapy in vivo. Blood 2011, 118, 3528–3537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Stadtmauer, E.A.; Fraietta, J.A.; Davis, M.M.; Cohen, A.D.; Weber, K.L.; Lancaster, E.; Mangan, P.A.; Kulikovskaya, I.; Gupta, M.; Chen, F.; et al. CRISPR-engineered T cells in patients with refractory cancer. Science 2020, 367, eaba7365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Garber, K. γδ T cells bring unconventional cancer-targeting to the clinic—Again. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 389–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Willcox, C.R.; Pitard, V.; Netzer, S.; Couzi, L.; Salim, M.; Silberzahn, T.; Moreau, J.-F.; Hayday, A.; Willcox, B.E.; Déchanet-Merville, J. Cytomegalovirus and tumor stress surveillance by binding of a human γδ T cell antigen receptor to endothelial protein C receptor. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13, 872–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Godfrey, D.I.; Le Nours, J.; Andrews, D.; Uldrich, A.P.; Rossjohn, J. Unconventional T Cell Targets for Cancer Immunotherapy. Immunity 2018, 48, 453–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Brandes, M.; Willimann, K.; Bioley, G.; Lévy, N.; Eberl, M.; Luo, M.; Tampé, R.; Lévy, F.; Romero, P.; Moser, B. Cross-presenting human T cells induce robust CD8+ T cell responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 2307–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Liu, E.; Tong, Y.; Dotti, G.; Shaim, H.; Savoldo, B.; Mukherjee, M.; Orange, J.; Wan, X.; Lu, X.; Reynolds, A.; et al. Cord blood NK cells engineered to express IL-15 and a CD19-targeted CAR show long-term persistence and potent antitumor activity. Leukemia 2017, 32, 520–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, E.; Marin, D.; Banerjee, P.; Macapinlac, H.A.; Thompson, P.; Basar, R.; Kerbauy, L.N.; Overman, B.; Thall, P.; Kaplan, M.; et al. Use of CAR-Transduced Natural Killer Cells in CD19-Positive Lymphoid Tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bachanova, V.; Cooley, S.; DeFor, T.E.; Verneris, M.R.; Zhang, B.; McKenna, D.H.; Curtsinger, J.; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A.; Lewis, D.; Hippen, K.; et al. Clearance of acute myeloid leukemia by haploidentical natural killer cells is improved using IL-2 diphtheria toxin fusion protein. Blood 2014, 123, 3855–3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Romee, R.; Rosario, M.; Berrien-Elliott, M.M.; Wagner, J.A.; Jewell, B.A.; Schappe, T.; Leong, J.W.; Abdel-Latif, S.; Schneider, S.E.; Willey, S.; et al. Cytokine-induced memory-like natural killer cells exhibit enhanced responses against myeloid leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 357ra123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Miller, J.S.; Soignier, Y.; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A.; McNearney, S.A.; Yun, G.H.; Fautsch, S.K.; McKenna, D.; Le, C.; DeFor, T.; Burns, L.J.; et al. Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer. Blood 2005, 105, 3051–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Klichinsky, M.; Ruella, M.; Shestova, O.; Lu, X.M.; Best, A.; Zeeman, M.; Schmierer, M.; Gabrusiewicz, K.; Anderson, N.R.; Petty, N.E.; et al. Human chimeric antigen receptor macrophages for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Neelapu, S.S.; Tummala, S.; Kebriaei, P.; Wierda, W.; Gutierrez, C.; Locke, F.; Komanduri, K.V.; Lin, Y.; Jain, N.; Daver, N.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy—Assessment and management of toxicities. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 15, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bueno, C.; Velasco-Hernández, T.; Gutiérrez-Agüera, F.; Zanetti, S.R.; Baroni, M.L.; Sanchez, D.; Molina, O.; Closa, A.; Agraz-Doblás, A.; Marín, P.; et al. CD133-directed CAR T-cells for MLL leukemia: On-target, off-tumor myeloablative toxicity. Leukemia 2019, 33, 2090–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhang, J.; Wang, L. The Emerging World of TCR-T Cell Trials Against Cancer: A Systematic Review. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 18, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Marotte, L.; Simon, S.; Vignard, V.; Dupre, E.; Gantier, M.; Cruard, J.; Alberge, J.-B.; Hussong, M.; Deleine, C.; Heslan, J.-M.; et al. Increased antitumor efficacy of PD-1-deficient melanoma-specific human lymphocytes. J. Immunother. Cancer 2020, 8, e000311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Nakazawa, T.; Natsume, A.; Nishimura, F.; Morimoto, T.; Matsuda, R.; Nakamura, M.; Yamada, S.; Nakagawa, I.; Motoyama, Y.; Park, Y.-S.; et al. Effect of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated PD-1-Disrupted Primary Human Third-Generation CAR-T Cells Targeting EGFRvIII on In Vitro Human Glioblastoma Cell Growth. Cells 2020, 9, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jung, I.-Y.; Kim, Y.-Y.; Yu, H.-S.; Lee, M.; Kim, S.; Lee, J. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knockout of DGK Improves Antitumor Activities of Human T Cells. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 4692–4703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Roth, T.L.; Li, P.J.; Blaeschke, F.; Nies, J.F.; Apathy, R.; Mowery, C.; Yu, R.; Nguyen, M.L.; Lee, Y.; Truong, A.; et al. Pooled Knockin Targeting for Genome Engineering of Cellular Immunotherapies. Cell 2020, 181, 728–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Qasim, W.; Zhan, H.; Samarasinghe, S.; Adams, S.; Amrolia, P.; Stafford, S.; Butler, K.; Rivat, C.; Wright, G.; Somana, K.; et al. Molecular remission of infant B-ALL after infusion of universal TALEN gene-edited CAR T cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaaj2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 09 01588 g001 550
Figure 1. Production of chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR)/T-cell receptor (TCR) T-cells. T-cells are isolated from the blood of a cancer patient. A CAR or TCR is then introduced into the isolated T-cells through viral or non-viral delivery. CAR/TCR positive T-cells are then selected and expanded into large numbers before being transfused back into the original cancer patient.
Figure 1. Production of chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR)/T-cell receptor (TCR) T-cells. T-cells are isolated from the blood of a cancer patient. A CAR or TCR is then introduced into the isolated T-cells through viral or non-viral delivery. CAR/TCR positive T-cells are then selected and expanded into large numbers before being transfused back into the original cancer patient.
Cells 09 01588 g001
Cells 09 01588 g002 550
Figure 2. Generational development of chimeric antigen receptors. Chimeric antigen receptors were first developed as extracellular single-chain variable fragments (fused light and heavy chain from immunoglobulins) fused to the intracellular CD3ζ signalling domain. Then, 2nd generation CARs included the CD28 or 4-1BB co-stimulatory domains, while 3rd generation CARs included both co-stimulatory domains. The “T-cells Redirected for Universal Cytokine Killing” (TRUCKs) 4th generation also includes a cytokine payload such as IL-12. Conventional T-cell receptors on the other hand have signalling domains split across multiple proteins.
Figure 2. Generational development of chimeric antigen receptors. Chimeric antigen receptors were first developed as extracellular single-chain variable fragments (fused light and heavy chain from immunoglobulins) fused to the intracellular CD3ζ signalling domain. Then, 2nd generation CARs included the CD28 or 4-1BB co-stimulatory domains, while 3rd generation CARs included both co-stimulatory domains. The “T-cells Redirected for Universal Cytokine Killing” (TRUCKs) 4th generation also includes a cytokine payload such as IL-12. Conventional T-cell receptors on the other hand have signalling domains split across multiple proteins.
Cells 09 01588 g002
Table
Table 1. Clinical trials involving TCR-T therapy.
Table 1. Clinical trials involving TCR-T therapy.
Cancer TypeTargetMHCClinical trial NumberStatusYearNotes
Cervical IntraepithelialHPV E7HLA-A*02:01NCT04411134Phase I - Not yet recruiting2020
Soft Tissue SarcomaNY-ESO-1HLA-A*02:01NCT04318964Phase I - Recruiting2020Affinity enhanced TCR
Unresectable Hepatocellular CarcinomaAFPHLA-A 02:01NCT04368182Phase I - Recruiting2020
Solid tumourTumour antigensN/ANCT03891706Phase I - Recruiting2019Screen for tumour reactivity and clone TCRs
Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomaHPV E7HLA-A*02:01NCT04044950Phase II - Not yet recruiting2019
Oesophagus, Hepatoma, Glioma, GastricNY-ESO-1, Mesothelin, EGFRvIII and DR5HLAA*0201NCT03941626Phase I/II - Recruiting2019CAR-T/TCR-T cells include four different tumour-specific antibodies
HPV-Associated OropharyngealHPV E7 HLA-A 02:01NCT04015336Phase II - Recruiting2019
Solid TumourAutologous tumour antigenN/ANCT03970382Phase I - Recruiting20192 arms - with and without anti-PD-1 antibody
Vulvar High-Grade Squamous IntraepithelialHPV E7HLA-A*0201NCT03937791Phase II - Recruiting2019
Head and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaHPV-16 E6-NCT04139057Phase I/II - Recruiting2019anti-PD1 auto-secreted element
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16+ Relapsed/RefractoryHPV E7HLA-A*02:01NCT03912831Phase I - Recruiting2019
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma LMP2HLA-A2, HLA-A11 or HLA-A24NCT03925896Phase I - Recruiting2019
Glioma, glioblastoma--NCT03392545Phase I - Recruiting2019
High Grade Squamous IntraepithelialHPV E6HLA-A*02:01NCT03197025Phase I - Completed2019A single patient, no response
PancreaticKRAS G12V MutantHLA-C*08:02NCT04146298Phase I/II - Recruiting2019Anti-PD1 adjuvant if required
BreastAutologous tumour antigen-NCT04194190Individual Patient Expanded Access2019Single patient individual access
ProstateTP53-NCT04135092Individual Patient Expanded Access2019Single Patient Expanded Access
Hepatocellular CarcinomaAFPHLA-A 02:01NCT03971747Phase I - Recruiting2019
Non-small cell lungTumour antigensN/ANCT03778814Phase I - Recruiting2018Screen for tumour reactivity and clone TCRs
Cervical Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaHPV-E6Not providedNCT03578406Phase I - Recruiting2018TCR-T secretion of anti-PD1
Wide range of solid and liquid cancersCD19, CD22, CD33, CD38, BCMA, NY-ESO-1, c-met, Mesothelin, CEGFRvIII and DR5HLA-A*0201NCT03638206Phase I/II - Recruiting2018
ColorectalTGFβRII frameshift antigenHLA-A*0201NCT03431311Phase I/II - Terminated2018Only 1 patient enrolled, no results given
Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Ovarian carcinoma, peritoneal carcinomaNY-ESO-1HLA- A*02.1 and HLA-DP*04NCT03691376Phase I - Recruiting2018Melphalan pre-conditioning and TCR+ HSC transfer in addition to CD8+ TCR+ cells
Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaLMP1, LMP2 and EBNA1HLA-A*0201/2402/1101NCT03648697Phase II - Not yet recruiting2018
Bone Sarcoma, Soft Tissue SarcomaNY-ESO-1HLA-A*02:01NCT03462316Phase I - Recruiting2018
Solid cancersPatient-specific mutationsN/ANCT03412877Phase II - Recruiting2018
Gastrointestinal, Pancreatic, Gastric, Colon, RectalG12D Variant of Mutated RASHLA-A*11:01NCT03745326Phase I/II - Recruiting2018Murine TCR.
Myeloid and Lymphoid NeoplasmsPreferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME)HLA-A*0201NCT03503968Phase I/II - Recruiting2018
BroadNY-ESO-1/ LAGE-1aHLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*02:05, and/or HLA-A*02:06NCT03709706Phase II - Recruiting2018Includes a pembrolizumab combination treatment arm
Merkel Cell CancerMerkel cell polyomavirusHLA-A*02:01NCT03747484Phase I/II - Recruiting2018Inclusion requires previous anti-PD1 treatment
Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell, RecurrentNY-ESO-1HLA-A*0201NCT03029273Phase I - Recruiting2017Affinity enhanced TCR
Acute LeukaemiaHA-1HLA-A*0201+NCT03326921Phase I - Recruiting2017Relapsed or refractory patients after stem cell transplant
Vaginal, Cervical, Anal, Penile, OropharyngealHPV-16 E6HLA-A*02:01NCT02280811Phase I/II - Completed2017Partial response in 2/12 treated patients
Clear Cell Renal Cell CarcinomaHERV-EHLA-A*11:01NCT03354390Phase I - Recruiting2017HERV-E is an endogenous retrovirus
Solid tumourMAGE-A3/A6HLA-DPB1*04:01NCT03139370Phase I - Recruiting2017
Gastrointestinal, Pancreatic, Gastric, Colon, RectalG12V Variant of Mutated RASHLA-A*11:01NCT03190941Phase I/II - Recruiting2017Murine TCR.
Synovial SarcomaNY-ESO-1(HLA)-A*02:01 or HLA-A*02:06NCT03250325Phase I/II - Active, not recruiting2017
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Carcinoma in Situ, VulvarHPV E7HLA-A*02:01NCT02858310Phase I/II - Recruiting2016
Recurrent Hepatocellular CarcinomaHepatitis BNot givenNCT02719782Phase I - Recruiting2016
Hepatocellular CarcinomaHepatitis BNot givenNCT02686372Phase I - Recruiting2016
HaematologicalCytomegalovirus (CMV)HLA-A*0201NCT02988258Phase I - Suspended2016Suspended (Protocol being re-written to allow inclusion of more patients)
MultipleNY-ESO-1HLA-A*0201NCT02775292Phase I - Completed2016Also included NY-ESO-1 pulsed Dendritic cells adoptively transferred
MultipleNY-ESO-1HLA-A*0201NCT02774291Phase I - Recruiting2016Uses murine TCR
MelanomaMART-1HLA-A*0201NCT02654821Phase I/II - Active, not recruiting2016
MultipleNY-ESO-1HLA-A*0201NCT02650986Phase I/II - Recruiting2016Also included TGFbDNRII gene. Two treatment arms, one included chemotherapy drug decitabine
MetastaticNY-ESO-1HLA-A*0201NCT02062359Phase II - Terminated2016Study was closed due to poor accrual. TCR transduced into CD62L+ cells.
MelanomatyrosinaseHLA-A2NCT02870244Phase I - Recruiting2016
Acute Myeloid LeukaemiaWilms tumour [WT]1HLA-A*0201NCT02770820Phase I/II - Active, not recruiting2016
Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)WT1HLA-A*02:01NCT02550535Phase I/II - Completed2015No results posted
MultipleNY ESO-1HLA-A*02:01NCT02457650Phase I - Unknown2015Verified August 2016 by Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital. Recruitment status was: Recruiting
Thyroid CancerThyroglobulinHLA-A*0201NCT02390739Phase I/II - Withdrawn2015No results posted
SolidNY-ESO-1HLA-A*0201NCT02366546Phase I - Active, not recruiting2015
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or MesotheliomaWT1HLA-A*0201NCT02408016Phase I/II - Active, not recruiting2015
SolidMAGE-A4HLA-A*24:02NCT02096614Phase I - Unknown2014Verified November 2017 by Shinichi Kageyama, Mie University. Recruitment status was: Recruiting
Breast, Cervical, Renal, Melanoma, BladderMAGE-A3HLA-A 01 NCT02153905Phase I/II - Terminated2014Terminated due to slow, insufficient accrual. 1/3 Patients had PR
Unidentified solid tumourNY-ESO-1HLA-A*0201NCT02070406Phase I - Terminated2014Including DC vaccine and ipilumab treatment. Terminated due to low accrual.
Melanoma, Meningioma, Breast, Non-Small Cell Lung, HepatocellularNY-ESO-1HLA-A*0201NCT01967823Phase II - Completed2013No results posted
MetastaticMAGE-A3/12HLA-A*0201NCT01273181Phase I/II - Terminated20134/9 Patients had CR or PR
AML and CMLWT1HLA-A*0201NCT01621724Phase I/II - Completed2012Completed, no results posted
MultipleNY-ESO-1HLA-A*0201NCT01697527Phase II - Active, not recruiting2012
OvarianNYESO-1c259HLA A*0201, HLA-A*0205, and/or HLA-A*0206NCT01567891Phase I/II - Completed20120/6 responses
MelanomatyrosinaseHLA-A2NCT01586403Phase I - Active, not recruiting2012
Melanomagp 100:154, MART-1 F5HLA-A*0201NCT00923195Phase II - Completed2012Also, peptide vaccines. Progressive disease in 4/4 patients.
LeukaemiaWT1HLA-A*0201NCT01640301Phase I/II - Active, not recruiting2012After allogeneic HCT
MelanomaNY-ESO-1ᶜ2⁵⁹HLA-A*0201NCT01350401Phase I/II - Terminated2011Terminated due to lack of enrolment.
MelanomaTP53HLA-A*0201NCT00393029Phase II - Completed20111/9 Patients had tumour regression
Multiple MyelomaNY-ESO-1c259HLA-A*0201NCT01352286Phase II - Completed2011OS of 35.1.
Renal, KidneyTNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL)HLA-DR4NCT00923390Phase I/II - Terminated2009Terminated after 10 years, no results posted
Kidney, Melanoma, Unspecified Adult Solid TumourTP53HLA-A*0201NCT00704938Phase II - Terminated2008Includes adenovirus p53 dendritic cell (DC) vaccine. Terminated due to withdrawal of support from collaborator. No CR or PR.
MelanomaMART-1 F5HLA-A*0201NCT00706992Phase II - Terminated2008<11 subjects were enrolled to each Arm. No immune responses observed.
Information sourced from 20.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Crowther, M.D.; Svane, I.M.; Met, Ö. T-Cell Gene Therapy in Cancer Immunotherapy: Why It Is No Longer Just CARs on The Road. Cells 2020, 9, 1588. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071588

AMA Style

Crowther MD, Svane IM, Met Ö. T-Cell Gene Therapy in Cancer Immunotherapy: Why It Is No Longer Just CARs on The Road. Cells. 2020; 9(7):1588. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071588

Chicago/Turabian Style

Crowther, Michael D., Inge Marie Svane, and Özcan Met. 2020. "T-Cell Gene Therapy in Cancer Immunotherapy: Why It Is No Longer Just CARs on The Road" Cells 9, no. 7: 1588. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071588

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop