You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Cells
  • Review
  • Open Access

14 January 2020

Crosstalk between PTEN/PI3K/Akt Signalling and DNA Damage in the Oocyte: Implications for Primordial Follicle Activation, Oocyte Quality and Ageing

,
and
1
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
2
Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, UK
3
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Double-Strand DNA Break Repair and Human Disease

Abstract

The preservation of genome integrity in the mammalian female germline from primordial follicle arrest to activation of growth to oocyte maturation is fundamental to ensure reproductive success. As oocytes are formed before birth and may remain dormant for many years, it is essential that defence mechanisms are monitored and well maintained. The phosphatase and tensin homolog of chromosome 10 (PTEN)/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (PKB, Akt) is a major signalling pathway governing primordial follicle recruitment and growth. This pathway also contributes to cell growth, survival and metabolism, and to the maintenance of genomic integrity. Accelerated primordial follicle activation through this pathway may result in a compromised DNA damage response (DDR). Additionally, the distinct DDR mechanisms in oocytes may become less efficient with ageing. This review considers DNA damage surveillance mechanisms and their links to the PTEN/PI3K/Akt signalling pathway, impacting on the DDR during growth activation of primordial follicles, and in ovarian ageing. Targeting DDR mechanisms within oocytes may be of value in developing techniques to protect ovaries against chemotherapy and in advancing clinical approaches to regulate primordial follicle activation.

1. Introduction

In mammalian females, oocytes are formed before birth and are surrounded by somatic cells (granulosa cells) to form structures known as follicles. Oocytes have entered meiosis and are arrested at the dictyate stage of prophase I with the most immature stage (primordial follicles) forming the store of female germ cells that will be utilised throughout reproductive life (reviewed in [1]). The pool of primordial follicles is progressively reduced with age leading to reproductive senescence [2,3,4]. Follicles are gradually lost from the pool either through death or by activation of the growth pathway. Therefore the rates of activation and degeneration determine the size of the pool and the time to onset of menopause [5]. Once follicles are recruited into the growing pool, pre-granulosa cells differentiate to form a single layer of cuboidal cells surrounding the oocyte. In parallel, the oocyte increases in size and undergoes further growth and maturation whilst still being maintained in meiotic arrest. These processes are referred to as primordial follicle activation [6]. Primordial follicles may be quiescent for many years and in humans for several decades, highlighting the importance of potential DNA damage accumulation [7] that may threaten genomic integrity. In this context, a robust surveillance mechanism is essential to ensure that oocytes with DNA damage have it repaired or are eliminated with prevention of further growth and development [8,9], thus maintaining the quality of oocyte and any resulting embryo throughout the reproductive lifespan [10].
The phosphatase and tensin homolog of chromosome 10 (PTEN)/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (PKB, Akt) pathway is one of the major non-gonadotropic insulin signalling pathways that coordinates the activation, growth and differentiation of follicles [6,11]. The pathway functions to control a myriad of cellular functions involving cell metabolism, proliferation and survival [12,13]. There is evidence to support the existence of crosstalk between the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway and the DNA damage response (DDR) in cells [14,15,16], indicating the importance of the consequences of interference with one of these pathways on the other. High PI3K/Akt activity is linked to a decline in the number of primordial follicles and ovarian ageing [17,18]. Ovarian ageing is associated with impaired DDR within oocytes [19,20,21,22] and this can also be induced following exposure to DNA damaging agents [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Nevertheless, taking advantage of PI3K/Akt signalling pathway effects on follicular recruitment, PTEN inhibition, as a central negative regulator of the pathway, has been widely used to activate primordial follicles in a range of species [18,29,30,31,32,33]. Most importantly, pregnancies have been achieved in women following transplantation of small fragments of ovarian cortex after exposure to pharmacological inhibitors of PTEN [34]. Recent studies suggest that activation of follicles by these methods may be damaging to subsequent growth and survival of follicles [35,36,37], indicating that further investigation is required to fully understand the impact and implications of follicle activation using pharmacological manipulation of this pathway.
A great deal of evidence, discussed below, suggests that the PI3K/PTEN/Akt pathway is essential in regulating cell-cycle checkpoint initiation and DNA repair and that the lack of PTEN in cells may cause genomic instability [38,39]. The ability to respond to such damage is crucial to ensure primordial follicle survival and to support the production of mature oocytes with a minimised risk of meiotic abnormalities against the adverse effects of age (reviewed in [40]) and ultimately to maintain reproductive lifespan. Surveillance mechanisms within oocytes to ameliorate DNA damage are essential as, during reproductive life, oocytes (and granulosa cells) can be subjected to DNA damage: this mainly occurs in the long-lived primordial follicles as a consequence of external and internal insults [21]. DNA double strand-breaks (DSBs) do not occur as frequently as other lesions, but persistent unrepaired DNA DSBs are the most severe type of damage and may lead to genomic instability [21,41,42,43].
In this review, we will limit the discussion to the DNA damage/DSBs repair pathway, and primarily focus on the mechanisms used by oocytes within primordial follicles to protect themselves against DNA damage throughout their lifespan. The DDR mechanism in granulosa cells will be discussed where relevant. Crosstalk between the PI3K/PTEN/Akt pathway and DDR has been linked to increased DNA damage and impaired DNA repair protein interactions in ovarian follicles activated in vitro [29]. Such findings will be important in elucidating the impact of pharmacological activation of primordial follicles by manipulation of the PI3K/PTEN/Akt pathway and its impact on DDR.

2. Methods

Published articles including original research, peer-reviewed and reviews were searched systematically in PubMed (Medline) database using specific terms such as ‘DNA damage’, ‘oocytes’, ‘primordial follicle activation’, ‘PI3K/Akt’, ‘ovarian ageing’ and ‘chemotherapy’. Abstracts and conferences proceeding were not included. The search yielded 757 relevant references of English language literature. Article selection was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [44]. The references in these articles were searched manually to retrieve additional articles, and an additional 19 articles were included. These were then screened for duplication, to ensure only articles related to DNA damage repair mechanism in primordial follicles were included. Only original research articles meeting the following eligibility criteria were included in the final search results: original research articles published from 1990 to 2019, full articles available, articles in English and not symposia proceeding. Manuscripts were selected concerning primordial follicle activation in association with PI3K signalling pathway, ovarian ageing and DDR in oocytes of immature follicles. A total of 52 published full-text articles were included after cross-referencing, and 40 articles were analysed qualitatively (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Flow chart following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to determine the study included into qualitative analysis.

3. DNA Damage Repair Pathway within Primordial Follicles

The DNA of a cell is continuously threatened by various types of damage that may cause a reduction in cellular function, cell cycle progression and DNA repair [45]. Exogenous sources of DNA damage include environmental agents such as ultraviolet, radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs [24]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also an endogenous source of damage within somatic cells [46] and oocytes [20,47]. DNA damage constitutes a significant issue in non-dividing or slowly dividing cells as a large amount of DNA damage may accumulate over time. Any damage that does not cause cell cycle arrest will tend to induce replication errors leading to mutations [20]. However, all cells are endowed with the capacity to ameliorate the threats to DNA, which occurs mainly at the G1/S and G2/M-phase transition. Cells with DNA damage respond in various ways to activate an appropriate DDR pathway. A mild injury may not result in serious consequences as it can be repaired directly without cell cycle arrest. While severe DNA damage may result in cell cycle arrest, allowing sufficient time to repair DNA damage. During this time, a sequence of DDR proteins is activated and the cell’s fate depends on its capacity to repair the damage [48].
DNA DSBs can be repaired by two main mechanisms: non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) [49], and homologous recombination (HR) [20,50]. NHEJ is error-prone since it mediates the direct re-ligation of the two ends of broken DNA and is not based on a complementary DNA template. Given its error-prone nature, NHEJ is commonly accompanied by deletion or insertion of base pairs [51,52]. NHEJ primarily occurs at the G0/G1 phase [53] and can be independent of the cell cycle [54]. NHEJ is the most common type of DNA damage repair in mitotic cells. In contrast, HR is largely error-free and is functionally dominant at S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle when sister chromatids are available as a template for accurate DNA repair [55]. In this context, HR is the primary mode of DNA DSBs repair in meiotic cells. Both pathways are evident and can be functionally active in mammalian oocytes [56,57], although HR predominates in oocytes at all stages of development [10,48,58,59,60,61,62]. Given that primordial follicles are arrested at G2/M and accurate repair is a prerequisite to conserve genetic information [63], HR appears to be the pathway of choice for oocytes within primordial (immature) follicles [10,48,58,59]. While NHEJ can occur in the late stage of oocyte development [49,60,64].
HR requires the recognition of the DNA DSBs by the meiotic recombination 11 (MRE11)-Rad50-nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 (NBS1) (MRN) complex. The binding of MRN complex to DSB free ends allows the NBS1 protein to interact with ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) dimers leading to autophosphorylation of ATM at a serine residue (367, 1893 and 1981) [65]. Detection of DNA damage attracts ATM kinase to the DNA DSB sites, through direct interaction between ATM and the C-terminal region of NBS1 [66]. It has been reported that ovaries from MRE11 mutant mice showed a marked increase in unrepaired DSBs, with primordial follicle loss and infertility although the number of mature follicles did not differ between wild type and mutant mice [67]. However, meiotic progression in mutant mice was delayed with only 5% of oocytes being able to complete synapsis [67], suggesting a key role of MRE11 in oocyte DDR.
ATM in turn phosphorylates a specific histone protein, H2AX, at the C-terminal serine 139 to generate γH2AX, which binds specifically to the DNA damage sites and controls the recruitment of DNA repair proteins. The critical role of ATM in DDR is demonstrated by a study using mouse ovaries in culture exposed to phosphoramide mustard (PM), a metabolite of cyclophosphamide (CP). Increased γH2AX in oocytes occurred 24 h after exposure and consequently induced substantial follicle loss. Interestingly, the administration of the ATM inhibitor KU55933, reduced the adverse impact of PM on follicle depletion, emphasising the importance of ATM in the DDR [68]. Phosphorylation of γH2AX initiates a downstream pathway resulting in DNA repair or cell cycle arrest (reviewed in [20]). γH2AX is extensively phosphorylated from minutes to hours following the detection of DNA breaks, quantitatively reflecting the severity of the damage [69,70,71]. Mediator DNA damage checkpoint protein (MDC1) is then activated and bound to γH2AX, mediated by breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1; Figure 2A). MDC1 forms foci that co-localise with γH2AX within minutes after the damage occurs and provides positive feedback, recruiting additional MRN complexes and thus leading to propagation of γH2AX at sites of DNA breaks [72].
Figure 2. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) response pathway. (A) Homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway to combat DNA DSBs. Detection and recognition of DNA DSBs by the meiotic recombination 11-Rad50-nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 (MRN) complex (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) triggers phosphorylation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM). Activation of ATM results in the phosphorylation of several DNA damage response (DDR) kinases such as histone protein, H2A variant, H2AX, at Serine 139 to generate γH2AX, checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) and p53 (TAp63α in primordial oocytes), mediating the effects of ATM on DNA damage repair, cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. p63 induces cell-cycle arrest by activating the transcription of p21, which may hinder cell cycle progression through inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2) and Cdk 4 activity. Mediator DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 (MDC1) binds to γH2AX via breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) and forms foci that co-localise with γH2AX. In oocytes, the DNA strand resection is activated and leads to homologous recombination (HR). Activation of HR generates single-strand DNA (ssDNA) at multiple steps and requires a specific factor, replication protein A (RPA). The ssDNA binding protein complex RPA in oocytes is replaced by Rad51 and meiotic cDNA1 (Dmc1). (B) Activated Chk2 promotes degradation of cell division cycle (Cdc25) and ultimately provokes cell cycle arrest through phosphorylation of Cdk2 and 4. Alternatively, in response to excessive or irreparable DNA damage, p63 may induce a cascade of apoptotic signalling pathway that requires transcriptional induction of p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) and NOXA [24,92]. Apoptosis is controlled by the balance between pro-apoptosis B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2) and anti-apoptosis B-cell lymphoma (Bcl)-associated X (BAX) activity. (C) An interplay of dimeric to the tetrameric formation of TAp63α. Phosphorylation of TAp63α ultimately transforms the inactive dimeric form of TAp63α to the active tetrameric form (figure adapted from [84,85,87]).
Phosphorylation of ATM is the first step in the initiation of G2 checkpoint activation in the DNA damage repair pathway [73]. Activation of ATM upregulates downstream pathways leading to effective DNA repair through HR/NHEJ (HR in oocytes of primordial follicle, Figure 2A), initiation of checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2, Figure 2A) or apoptosis (through activation of TAp63α, Figure 2B,C, and discussed in detail below) [20,74]. Activation of HR generates single-strand DNA (ssDNA) at multiple steps and requires a specific factor, replication protein A (RPA). In oocytes, the ssDNA binding protein complex RPA is replaced by Rad51 and meiotic cDNA1 (Dmc1). BRCA2 mediates the interaction between Rad51, Dmc1 and ssDNA to form the meiotic presynaptic nucleofilament, resulting in the initiation of HR (Figure 2A). Dmc1 deficiency in mouse oocytes leads to synapsis failure, which is HR-dependent and ultimately reduces follicle survival [75].
The role of Rad51 is of paramount importance in the final step of HR and in preventing oocyte death, as is evident from studies in mouse and bovine [48,62,76]. Inhibition of Rad51 prior to irradiation exposure increases damage to DNA, whereas enhancing Rad51 expression by injecting recombinant Rad51 is sufficient to prevent DNA damage [48,76].
In the presence of DSBs, Chk2 activation delays the cell cycle transiently to provide sufficient time for DNA repair [77]. DNA damage checkpoints are primarily expressed when oocytes are in meiotic arrest. Their expression persists at this stage leading to increased sensitivity of oocytes in primordial follicles to DNA damage-inducing agents [75]. Activation of Chk2 simultaneously inhibits cell division cycle (Cdc) phosphatases including Cdc25a, Cdc25b and Cdc25c. This in turn activates cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) and consequently blocks the cell cycle progressing from G1 to S and G2/M phase (reviewed in [50]). The activation of p53 family members is another downstream target of ATM and functions to maintain checkpoint activation at G1/S of the cell cycle [53,78]. Inhibition of ATM in mouse oocytes exposed to irradiation results in a failure to activate p63, which then blocks the apoptosis pathway and prevents oocyte death [79].

6. DNA Damage Associated with Ovarian Ageing, a Crosstalk between PI3K/Akt/PTEN Signalling, Ageing and DNA Damage Response

Ovarian ageing as a physiological process varies substantially among women depending on the number of primordial follicles and the rate of follicle loss [141,142]. It is also very closely associated with reduced oocyte quality [143]. A link between these is suggested by the increasing rate of primordial follicle activation with age [144] with PI3K/Akt signalling pathway being a key regulator of this growth activation [17,18]. Compromised DNA repair protein interactions as a consequence of ovarian ageing has been connected to increase PI3K/Akt activity [19,20,21,22].
There is increasing evidence of an association between DNA damage and repair capacity of oocytes and maternal age, with DNA repair becoming less efficient with ageing [19,20,21,58]. A study in non-human primates confirmed a lack of DNA repair efficiency with advancing age, with cytoplasmic sequestration of BRCA1 in oocytes [22]. Although DNA damage and repair mechanisms in granulosa cells are not the main focus of this review, it is worth mentioning that γH2AX expression in granulosa cells of growing follicles was not different between old and young mice [22]. This finding may suggest less effective DNA repair in oocytes within primordial follicles compared to surrounding somatic cells. Accordingly, mouse oocytes of all follicle types exhibit high expression of γH2AX with increasing age. At the same time, the oocyte appears to have an ineffective DNA repair mechanism as was shown by a profound drop in BRCA1, MRE11 and ATM but not BRCA2. Mutations in BRCA1 but not BRCA2 perturb ovarian stimulation leading to smaller litter size. Interestingly, DNA damage was not evident in pre-granulosa cells within primordial follicles [21]. In line with these findings, the mRNA level of BRCA1, Rad51 and H2AX were reduced in aged female rat and buffalo oocytes within primordial follicles [19,58].
Women with BRCA2 mutations do not show a reduced response to ovarian stimulation [145]. However, BRCA2 deficient mice are able to produce competent and fertilised oocytes but more abnormal embryos are observed [146], indicating an important role of BRCA2 in the oocyte. In women, complete loss of BRCA2 function leads to ovarian dysgenesis resulting in primary amenorrhea, with reduced Rad51 function in HR indicated by low Rad51 expression at the site of DNA damage [147]. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis also shows association between DNA damage repair and age at menopause [148], particularly highlighting links with BRCA1. Likewise, a diminished ovarian reserve mirrored by low AMH levels in women with BRCA1 but not BRCA2 mutations [149] supports findings from a transgenic mouse model [21]. In addition, primordial follicles with BRCA1 mutations are more susceptible to DNA damage accumulation, as shown by high γH2AX expression in primordial follicles [25].
As ageing is thus associated with a reduction in DNA repair capacity, oocytes from older women may be more susceptible to genotoxic insults with increased primordial follicle loss due to apoptosis [10]. It is evident that the degree of doxorubicin induced DNA damage is independent of age, but apoptotic events are more apparent in oocytes of old mice. This may be related to the finding that oocytes from young mice have a greater DNA repair capacity [48]. Qualitative analysis of recent findings of studies in DNA damage and ovarian ageing are summarised in Table 2.
Table 2. Summary of recent clinical and experimental studies providing evidence linking DNA damage response (DDR), ovarian ageing and ovarian reserve.
ROS accumulation in mitochondria can be an underlying factor in ageing, by increasing oxidative damage leading to a gradual decrease in follicle quality [150]. Increased ROS activity due to senescence parallels diminished activity of the oxidative defence system and may lead to increased lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress and damage to macromolecules including DNA with either single-strand breaks (SSBs) or DSBs [151]. High ROS expression in follicular fluid of patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) has been linked to reduced oocyte fertilisation and poor embryo quality [152]. Mitochondria have been hypothesised to be the first organelle affected by ROS since they are the source of oxygen radical production; ageing is also associated with increased mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions [153,154]. PTEN upregulation, through modulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway, decreases ROS production in cells (reviewed in [155,156]). Increased ROS concentration in mitochondria due to ageing may inhibit PTEN leading to accumulation of PIP3, which then increases Akt activation and further increases ROS production. This pathway suggests a positive feedback loop between PTEN, PIP3 and ROS [157]. The impact of ageing on the PI3k/Akt signalling pathway, DDR and resting pool depletion is summarised in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Molecular relationship between phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase (PTEN/Akt) activation, DNA damage and decreased ovarian reserve. Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) mutation may lead to compromised DNA repair pathway and eventually primordial follicle apoptosis leading to follicle loss and decreased ovarian reserve. In addition, mitochondria can be one of the major sources of DNA damage. Excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production may harm macromolecules in the cells including DNA leading to single-stand breaks (SSBs) or double-strand breaks (DSBs). High ROS expression in mitochondria may lead to PTEN inhibition and increase Akt activation. This may eventually further increase ROS production due to inactivation of forkhead box O3 (FOXO3).

7. Conclusions and Future Directions

It is clear that mammalian oocytes have distinct DNA damage surveillance mechanisms. There is evidence linking the regulation of primordial follicle growth activation through the PI3K pathway with increased DNA damage/reduced repair, and this provides a model for the development of new approaches to the investigation and potentially therapeutic intervention in both these key aspects of oocyte biology. Evidence from both genetic mouse models and the culture of mammalian ovarian cortical fragments supports the contention that imbalance in signalling events between oocytes and granulosa cells may contribute to impaired follicle function after aberrant primordial follicle growth activation.
Data reviewed here explore the links between the regulation of primordial follicle growth activation and DNA damage repair pathways. The primordial follicle and particularly the oocyte within it has unique physiological challenges, being required to maintain genomic integrity and quality from birth over several decades without cell growth or replication. Thus, the opportunity for repeated DNA surveillance during cell division is absent, and oocyte-specific pathways from DNA damage to apoptosis exist. There is increasing research activity linking follicle growth regulation with oocyte DNA damage and repair capacity in the context of potential prevention of ovarian damage against chemotherapy, radiation or environmental toxicants. The elucidation of the possibility to confer resistance against chemotherapy through identification of key factors in the oocyte apoptotic pathway may lead to clinical trials building on the differences in these pathways between the oocyte and somatic cells.
Rad51, a critical protein involved in oocyte resilience to apoptosis, is a feasible candidate to promote DNA repair capacity in oocytes and ultimately conserve fertility in women undergoing cancer treatment. Administration of recombinant Rad51 into mouse oocytes has been demonstrated to increase DDR, prevent apoptosis, improve the defective DNA repair capacity in oocyte and restore embryo development [48,76]. Future investigation into the safety and efficacy of modulating Rad51 as a clinical application to preserve functional germ cells may be beneficial to improve oocyte and embryo development following chemotherapy exposure and in ageing.
Targeting the PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR pathway, mTOR inhibition with rapamycin [133] and everolimus [136] have also been investigated as a means to protect ovaries during exposure to chemotherapy in mice. Melatonin and ghrelin have also been proposed to protect the ovaries against cisplatin and may also affect this pathway, though perhaps indirectly. Both ghrelin and melatonin suppress cisplatin-mediated PI3K/Akt pathway upregulation and inhibit FOXO3 nuclear shuttling, thus preserving the primordial follicle pool [167]. This is a promising avenue, though it will be essential to ensure that the effects of chemotherapy on cancer cells are not compromised [10].
It has been shown that either complete loss of PUMA or partial loss of TAp63 in mice oocytes could retain the primordial follicle pool following CP and cisplatin exposure. This is a promising approach to reduce the negative effects of chemotherapy on the ovaries [26,117] as the salvage process exclusively occurs within the oocyte without interfering with the cancer treatments [10].
An intriguing novel approach to the protection of ovaries against chemotherapy has been suggested by a recent study introducing microRNAs (miRNAs) [168]. It is reported that miRNAs are differentially expressed in mouse postnatal ovaries exposed to 4-hydroperoxy-cyclophosphamide (4-HC), some of which have been implicated in DDR and apoptosis and affect cellular susceptibility to DNA damaging agents [169]. MiRNAs can be effective techniques as their expression can be adjusted with their microenvironment during chemotherapy treatment, thus minimising off-target toxicity. Lethal 7 (let-7a) mimic is an example of a new miRNA based therapeutic to minimise follicle injury following chemotherapy treatment [170]. However, this work is at an early stage, with challenges including how to deliver miRNAs to a specific target organ with minimum side effects.
In vitro activation (IVA) methods have generated controversy regarding efficacy and safety with in vitro studies indicating that manipulating activation by pharmacological methods has an impact on subsequent quality of oocytes [35,36,37]. Pharmacological primordial activation utilising a PTEN inhibitor has been associated with increased DNA damage and impaired DNA repair capacity particularly in oocytes [29]. While an IVA protocol utilising both PI3K/Akt and Hippo signalling pathways prior to ovarian tissue transplantation may have major negative consequences on follicle health [119,171,172], the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway may also be a potential target to prevent follicle activation and loss following ovarian tissue transplantation, maximising the longevity of the transplanted tissue. A recent study showed that short exposure to a specific inhibitor of mTORC1 partially hindered follicular activation while improving follicle survival and steroidogenesis [37]. Since precocious follicular growth in vitro has been a major constraint in developing in vitro follicle growth systems, lowering the activation rate by using an mTORC inhibitor may have additional value as a promising strategy for the derivation of mature oocytes in vitro. Finally as the canonical PI3K/Akt signalling pathway is interconnected with many feedback loops that are essential for optimal cell function during ageing [157], future research investigating the potential of manipulation of PTEN and PI3K to reduce ROS accumulation and thus damage in ageing oocytes will be essential.

Funding

The work was supported by LPDP (Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education) as a part of Ph.D. scholarship to MM. Work conducted in this area in EET and RAA’s laboratories has been funded by MRC grants G0901839 and G1100357.

Acknowledgments

Figure 2 and Figure 5 were created by Biorender web-based illustration.

Conflicts of Interest

None to declare.

References

  1. Telfer, E.E.; Zelinski, M.B. Ovarian follicle culture: Advances and challenges for human and nonhuman primates. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 99, 1523–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Faddy, M.J.; Gosden, R.G. A mathematical model of follicle dynamics in the human ovary. Hum. Reprod. 1995, 10, 770–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hansen, K.R.; Knowlton, N.S.; Thyer, A.C.; Charleston, J.S.; Soules, M.R.; Klein, N.A. A new model of reproductive aging: The decline in ovarian non-growing follicle number from birth to menopause. Hum. Reprod. 2008, 23, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Broekmans, F.J.; Knauff, E.A.; te Velde, E.R.; Macklon, N.S.; Fauser, B.C. Female reproductive ageing: Current knowledge and future trends. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 18, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McGee, E.A.; Hsueh, A.J. Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles. Endocr. Rev. 2000, 21, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adhikari, D.; Liu, K. Molecular mechanisms underlying the activation of mammalian primordial follicles. Endocr. Rev. 2009, 30, 438–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Q.; Sun, Q.Y. Evaluation of oocyte quality: Morphological, cellular and molecular predictors. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2007, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ashwood-Smith, M.J.; Edwards, R.G. DNA repair by oocytes. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 1996, 2, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tilly, J.L. Commuting the death sentence: How oocytes strive to survive. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 838–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Winship, A.L.; Stringer, J.M.; Liew, S.H.; Hutt, K.J. The importance of DNA repair for maintaining oocyte quality in response to anti-cancer treatments, environmental toxins and maternal ageing. Hum. Reprod. Update 2018, 24, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dupont, J.; Scaramuzzi, R.J. Insulin signalling and glucose transport in the ovary and ovarian function during the ovarian cycle. Biochem. J. 2016, 473, 1483–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stokoe, D. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway and cancer. Expert. Rev. Mol. Med. 2005, 7, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Engelman, J.A.; Luo, J.; Cantley, L.C. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 606–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Karimian, A.; Mir, S.M.; Parsian, H.; Refieyan, S.; Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, M.; Yousefi, B.; Majidinia, M. Crosstalk between phosphoinositide 3-kinase/akt signaling pathway with DNA damage response and oxidative stress in cancer. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 10248–10272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Plo, I.; Laulier, C.; Gauthier, L.; Lebrun, F.; Calvo, F.; Lopez, B.S. Akt1 inhibits homologous recombination by inducing cytoplasmic retention of brca1 and rad51. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 9404–9412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Puc, J.; Keniry, M.; Li, H.S.; Pandita, T.K.; Choudhury, A.D.; Memeo, L.; Mansukhani, M.; Murty, V.V.; Gaciong, Z.; Meek, S.E.; et al. Lack of pten sequesters chk1 and initiates genetic instability. Cancer Cell. 2005, 7, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reddy, P.; Adhikari, D.; Zheng, W.; Liang, S.; Hamalainen, T.; Tohonen, V.; Ogawa, W.; Noda, T.; Volarevic, S.; Huhtaniemi, I.; et al. Pdk1 signaling in oocytes controls reproductive aging and lifespan by manipulating the survival of primordial follicles. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 2813–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reddy, P.; Liu, L.; Adhikari, D.; Jagarlamudi, K.; Rajareddy, S.; Shen, Y.; Du, C.; Tang, W.; Hamalainen, T.; Peng, S.L.; et al. Oocyte-specific deletion of pten causes premature activation of the primordial follicle pool. Science 2008, 319, 611–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Govindaraj, V.; Keralapura Basavaraju, R.; Rao, A.J. Changes in the expression of DNA double strand break repair genes in primordial follicles from immature and aged rats. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2015, 30, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oktay, K.; Turan, V.; Titus, S.; Stobezki, R.; Liu, L. Brca mutations, DNA repair deficiency, and ovarian aging. Biol. Reprod. 2015, 93, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Titus, S.; Li, F.; Stobezki, R.; Akula, K.; Unsal, E.; Jeong, K.; Dickler, M.; Robson, M.; Moy, F.; Goswami, S.; et al. Impairment of brca1-related DNA double-strand break repair leads to ovarian aging in mice and humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 172ra21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, D.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, M.; Yuan, J.; Liu, M.; Yin, Y.; Wu, X.; Keefe, D.L.; Liu, L. Increased DNA damage and repair deficiency in granulosa cells are associated with ovarian aging in rhesus monkey. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2015, 32, 1069–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chang, E.M.; Lim, E.; Yoon, S.; Jeong, K.; Bae, S.; Lee, D.R.; Yoon, T.K.; Choi, Y.; Lee, W.S. Cisplatin induces overactivation of the dormant primordial follicle through pten/akt/foxo3a pathway which leads to loss of ovarian reserve in mice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kerr, J.B.; Hutt, K.J.; Michalak, E.M.; Cook, M.; Vandenberg, C.J.; Liew, S.H.; Bouillet, P.; Mills, A.; Scott, C.L.; Findlay, J.K.; et al. DNA damage-induced primordial follicle oocyte apoptosis and loss of fertility require tap63-mediated induction of puma and noxa. Mol. Cell. 2012, 48, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, W.; Titus, S.; Moy, F.; Ginsburg, E.S.; Oktay, K. Ovarian aging in women with brca germline mutations. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 3839–3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nguyen, Q.N.; Zerafa, N.; Liew, S.H.; Morgan, F.H.; Strasser, A.; Scott, C.L.; Findlay, J.K.; Hickey, M.; Hutt, K.J. Loss of puma protects the ovarian reserve during DNA-damaging chemotherapy and preserves fertility. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rinaldi, V.D.; Hsieh, K.; Munroe, R.; Bolcun-Filas, E.; Schimenti, J.C. Pharmacological inhibition of the DNA damage checkpoint prevents radiation-induced oocyte death. Genetics 2017, 206, 1823–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Johnson, S.B.; Yuan, G.; Arriba, A.K.; Zubizarreta, M.E.; Chatterjee, S.; Nagarkatti, M.; Nagarkatti, P.; Xiao, S. Doxorubicin obliterates mouse ovarian reserve through both primordial follicle atresia and overactivation. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2019, 381, 114714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maidarti, M.; Clarkson, Y.L.; McLaughlin, M.; Anderson, R.A.; Telfer, E.E. Inhibition of pten activates bovine non-growing follicles in vitro but increases DNA damage and reduces DNA repair response. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jagarlamudi, K.; Liu, L.; Adhikari, D.; Reddy, P.; Idahl, A.; Ottander, U.; Lundin, E.; Liu, K. Oocyte-specific deletion of pten in mice reveals a stage-specific function of pten/pi3k signaling in oocytes in controlling follicular activation. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jagarlamudi, K.; Reddy, P.; Adhikari, D.; Liu, K. Genetically modified mouse models for premature ovarian failure (pof). Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 315, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Adhikari, D.; Gorre, N.; Risal, S.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Y.; Liu, K. The safe use of a pten inhibitor for the activation of dormant mouse primordial follicles and generation of fertilizable eggs. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Novella-Maestre, E.; Herraiz, S.; Rodriguez-Iglesias, B.; Diaz-Garcia, C.; Pellicer, A. Short-term pten inhibition improves in vitro activation of primordial follicles, preserves follicular viability, and restores amh levels in cryopreserved ovarian tissue from cancer patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Suzuki, N.; Yoshioka, N.; Takae, S.; Sugishita, Y.; Tamura, M.; Hashimoto, S.; Morimoto, Y.; Kawamura, K. Successful fertility preservation following ovarian tissue vitrification in patients with primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 30, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lerer-Serfaty, G.; Samara, N.; Fisch, B.; Shachar, M.; Kossover, O.; Seliktar, D.; Ben-Haroush, A.; Abir, R. Attempted application of bioengineered/biosynthetic supporting matrices with phosphatidylinositol-trisphosphate-enhancing substances to organ culture of human primordial follicles. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2013, 30, 1279–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. McLaughlin, M.; Kinnell, H.L.; Anderson, R.A.; Telfer, E.E. Inhibition of phosphatase and tensin homologue (pten) in human ovary in vitro results in increased activation of primordial follicles but compromises development of growing follicles. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 20, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Grosbois, J.; Demeestere, I. Dynamics of pi3k and hippo signaling pathways during in vitro human follicle activation. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 33, 1705–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brandmaier, A.; Hou, S.Q.; Shen, W.H. Cell cycle control by pten. J. Mol. Biol. 2017, 429, 2265–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yin, Y.; Shen, W.H. Pten: A new guardian of the genome. Oncogene 2008, 27, 5443–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adriaens, I.; Smitz, J.; Jacquet, P. The current knowledge on radiosensitivity of ovarian follicle development stages. Hum. Reprod. Update 2009, 15, 359–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jackson, S.P.; Bartek, J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009, 461, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khanna, K.K.; Jackson, S.P. DNA double-strand breaks: Signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Menezo, Y.; Dale, B.; Cohen, M. DNA damage and repair in human oocytes and embryos: A review. Zygote 2010, 18, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A.; Group, P.-P. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Branzei, D.; Foiani, M. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 9, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lindahl, T.; Barnes, D.E. Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2000, 65, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Oktay, K.; Moy, F.; Titus, S.; Stobezki, R.; Turan, V.; Dickler, M.; Goswami, S. Age-related decline in DNA repair function explains diminished ovarian reserve, earlier menopause, and possible oocyte vulnerability to chemotherapy in women with brca mutations. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 1093–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kujjo, L.L.; Laine, T.; Pereira, R.J.; Kagawa, W.; Kurumizaka, H.; Yokoyama, S.; Perez, G.I. Enhancing survival of mouse oocytes following chemotherapy or aging by targeting bax and rad51. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Martin, J.H.; Bromfield, E.G.; Aitken, R.J.; Lord, T.; Nixon, B. Double strand break DNA repair occurs via non-homologous end-joining in mouse mii oocytes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Collins, J.K.; Jones, K.T. DNA damage responses in mammalian oocytes. Reproduction 2016, 152, R15–R22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lieber, M.R. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79, 181–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rodgers, K.; McVey, M. Error-prone repair of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016, 231, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Heijink, A.M.; Krajewska, M.; van Vugt, M.A. The DNA damage response during mitosis. Mutat. Res. 2013, 750, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bekker-Jensen, S.; Mailand, N. Assembly and function of DNA double-strand break repair foci in mammalian cells. DNA Repair 2010, 9, 1219–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stringer, J.M.; Winship, A.; Liew, S.H.; Hutt, K. The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 2777–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Menezo, Y., Jr.; Russo, G.; Tosti, E.; El Mouatassim, S.; Benkhalifa, M. Expression profile of genes coding for DNA repair in human oocytes using pangenomic microarrays, with a special focus on ros linked decays. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2007, 24, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jaroudi, S.; Kakourou, G.; Cawood, S.; Doshi, A.; Ranieri, D.M.; Serhal, P.; Harper, J.C.; SenGupta, S.B. Expression profiling of DNA repair genes in human oocytes and blastocysts using microarrays. Hum. Reprod. 2009, 24, 2649–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Govindaraj, V.; Krishnagiri, H.; Chauhan, M.S.; Rao, A.J. Brca-1 gene expression and comparative proteomic profile of primordial follicles from young and adult buffalo (bubalus bubalis) ovaries. Anim. Biotechnol. 2017, 28, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Govindaraj, V.; Rao, A.J. Comparative proteomic analysis of primordial follicles from ovaries of immature and aged rats. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2015, 61, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fiorenza, M.T.; Bevilacqua, A.; Bevilacqua, S.; Mangia, F. Growing dictyate oocytes, but not early preimplantation embryos, of the mouse display high levels of DNA homologous recombination by single-strand annealing and lack DNA nonhomologous end joining. Dev. Biol. 2001, 233, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  61. Rimon-Dahari, N.; Yerushalmi-Heinemann, L.; Alyagor, L.; Dekel, N. Ovarian folliculogenesis. Results Probl. Cell. Differ. 2016, 58, 167–190. [Google Scholar]
  62. Perez, G.I.; Acton, B.M.; Jurisicova, A.; Perkins, G.A.; White, A.; Brown, J.; Trbovich, A.M.; Kim, M.R.; Fissore, R.; Xu, J.; et al. Genetic variance modifies apoptosis susceptibility in mature oocytes via alterations in DNA repair capacity and mitochondrial ultrastructure. Cell. Death Differ. 2007, 14, 524–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Turan, V.; Oktay, K. Brca-related atm-mediated DNA double-strand break repair and ovarian aging. Hum. Reprod. Update 2019, 26, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Goedecke, W.; Vielmetter, W.; Pfeiffer, P. Activation of a system for the joining of nonhomologous DNA ends during xenopus egg maturation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992, 12, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. So, S.; Davis, A.J.; Chen, D.J. Autophosphorylation at serine 1981 stabilizes atm at DNA damage sites. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187, 977–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. You, Z.; Chahwan, C.; Bailis, J.; Hunter, T.; Russell, P. Atm activation and its recruitment to damaged DNA require binding to the c terminus of nbs1. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25, 5363–5379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Inagaki, A.; Roset, R.; Petrini, J.H. Functions of the mre11 complex in the development and maintenance of oocytes. Chromosoma 2016, 125, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ganesan, S.; Keating, A.F. The ovarian DNA damage repair response is induced prior to phosphoramide mustard-induced follicle depletion, and ataxia telangiectasia mutated inhibition prevents pm-induced follicle depletion. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2016, 292, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rogakou, E.P.; Pilch, D.R.; Orr, A.H.; Ivanova, V.S.; Bonner, W.M. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone h2ax phosphorylation on serine 139. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 5858–5868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tomilin, N.V.; Solovjeva, L.V.; Svetlova, M.P.; Pleskach, N.M.; Zalenskaya, I.A.; Yau, P.M.; Bradbury, E.M. Visualization of focal nuclear sites of DNA repair synthesis induced by bleomycin in human cells. Radiat. Res. 2001, 156, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nazarov, I.B.; Smirnova, A.N.; Krutilina, R.I.; Svetlova, M.P.; Solovjeva, L.V.; Nikiforov, A.A.; Oei, S.L.; Zalenskaya, I.A.; Yau, P.M.; Bradbury, E.M.; et al. Dephosphorylation of histone gamma-h2ax during repair of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells and its inhibition by calyculin a. Radiat. Res. 2003, 160, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jungmichel, S.; Stucki, M. Mdc1: The art of keeping things in focus. Chromosoma 2010, 119, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Marangos, P.; Carroll, J. Oocytes progress beyond prophase in the presence of DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jazayeri, A.; Falck, J.; Lukas, C.; Bartek, J.; Smith, G.C.; Lukas, J.; Jackson, S.P. Atm- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of atr in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bolcun-Filas, E.; Rinaldi, V.D.; White, M.E.; Schimenti, J.C. Reversal of female infertility by chk2 ablation reveals the oocyte DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Science 2014, 343, 533–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kujjo, L.L.; Ronningen, R.; Ross, P.; Pereira, R.J.; Rodriguez, R.; Beyhan, Z.; Goissis, M.D.; Baumann, T.; Kagawa, W.; Camsari, C.; et al. Rad51 plays a crucial role in halting cell death program induced by ionizing radiation in bovine oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 2012, 86, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zannini, L.; Delia, D.; Buscemi, G. Chk2 kinase in the DNA damage response and beyond. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 6, 442–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Basu, A.; Haldar, S. The relationship between bci2, bax and p53: Consequences for cell cycle progression and cell death. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 1998, 4, 1099–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kim, D.A.; Suh, E.K. Defying DNA double-strand break-induced death during prophase i meiosis by temporal tap63alpha phosphorylation regulation in developing mouse oocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014, 34, 1460–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Suh, E.K.; Yang, A.; Kettenbach, A.; Bamberger, C.; Michaelis, A.H.; Zhu, Z.; Elvin, J.A.; Bronson, R.T.; Crum, C.P.; McKeon, F. P63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest. Nature 2006, 444, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Livera, G.; Petre-Lazar, B.; Guerquin, M.J.; Trautmann, E.; Coffigny, H.; Habert, R. P63 null mutation protects mouse oocytes from radio-induced apoptosis. Reproduction 2008, 135, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Amelio, I.; Grespi, F.; Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, M.; Melino, G. P63 the guardian of human reproduction. Cell Cycle 2012, 11, 4545–4551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Levine, A.J.; Tomasini, R.; McKeon, F.D.; Mak, T.W.; Melino, G. The p53 family: Guardians of maternal reproduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gebel, J.; Tuppi, M.; Krauskopf, K.; Coutandin, D.; Pitzius, S.; Kehrloesser, S.; Osterburg, C.; Dotsch, V. Control mechanisms in germ cells mediated by p53 family proteins. J. Cell Sci. 2017. [CrossRef]
  85. Deutsch, G.B.; Zielonka, E.M.; Coutandin, D.; Dotsch, V. Quality control in oocytes: Domain-domain interactions regulate the activity of p63. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 1884–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Straub, W.E.; Weber, T.A.; Schafer, B.; Candi, E.; Durst, F.; Ou, H.D.; Rajalingam, K.; Melino, G.; Dotsch, V. The c-terminus of p63 contains multiple regulatory elements with different functions. Cell Death Dis. 2010, 1, e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Deutsch, G.B.; Zielonka, E.M.; Coutandin, D.; Weber, T.A.; Schafer, B.; Hannewald, J.; Luh, L.M.; Durst, F.G.; Ibrahim, M.; Hoffmann, J.; et al. DNA damage in oocytes induces a switch of the quality control factor tap63alpha from dimer to tetramer. Cell 2011, 144, 566–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Coutandin, D.; Osterburg, C.; Srivastav, R.K.; Sumyk, M.; Kehrloesser, S.; Gebel, J.; Tuppi, M.; Hannewald, J.; Schafer, B.; Salah, E.; et al. Quality control in oocytes by p63 is based on a spring-loaded activation mechanism on the molecular and cellular level. Elife 2016, 5, e13909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tuppi, M.; Kehrloesser, S.; Coutandin, D.W.; Rossi, V.; Luh, L.M.; Strubel, A.; Hotte, K.; Hoffmeister, M.; Schafer, B.; De Oliveira, T.; et al. Oocyte DNA damage quality control requires consecutive interplay of chk2 and ck1 to activate p63. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018, 25, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nowsheen, S.; Yang, E. The intersection between DNA damage response and cell death pathways. Exp. Oncol. 2012, 34, 243–254. [Google Scholar]
  91. Guo, X.; Keyes, W.M.; Papazoglu, C.; Zuber, J.; Li, W.; Lowe, S.W.; Vogel, H.; Mills, A.A. Tap63 induces senescence and suppresses tumorigenesis in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 1451–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Tavana, O.; Benjamin, C.L.; Puebla-Osorio, N.; Sang, M.; Ullrich, S.E.; Ananthaswamy, H.N.; Zhu, C. Absence of p53-dependent apoptosis leads to uv radiation hypersensitivity, enhanced immunosuppression and cellular senescence. Cell Cycle 2010, 9, 3328–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Adhikari, D.; Flohr, G.; Gorre, N.; Shen, Y.; Yang, H.; Lundin, E.; Lan, Z.; Gambello, M.J.; Liu, K. Disruption of tsc2 in oocytes leads to overactivation of the entire pool of primordial follicles. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2009, 15, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dole, G.; Nilsson, E.E.; Skinner, M.K. Glial-derived neurotrophic factor promotes ovarian primordial follicle development and cell-cell interactions during folliculogenesis. Reproduction 2008, 135, 671–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nilsson, E.; Parrott, J.A.; Skinner, M.K. Basic fibroblast growth factor induces primordial follicle development and initiates folliculogenesis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2001, 175, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ojeda, S.R.; Romero, C.; Tapia, V.; Dissen, G.A. Neurotrophic and cell-cell dependent control of early follicular development. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2000, 163, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nilsson, E.E.; Skinner, M.K. Kit ligand and basic fibroblast growth factor interactions in the induction of ovarian primordial to primary follicle transition. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2004, 214, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nilsson, E.E.; Kezele, P.; Skinner, M.K. Leukemia inhibitory factor (lif) promotes the primordial to primary follicle transition in rat ovaries. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2002, 188, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. McLaughlin, E.A.; McIver, S.C. Awakening the oocyte: Controlling primordial follicle development. Reproduction 2009, 137, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Adhikari, D.; Zheng, W.; Shen, Y.; Gorre, N.; Hamalainen, T.; Cooney, A.J.; Huhtaniemi, I.; Lan, Z.J.; Liu, K. Tsc/mtorc1 signaling in oocytes governs the quiescence and activation of primordial follicles. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Adhikari, D.; Liu, K. Mtor signaling in the control of activation of primordial follicles. Cell Cycle 2010, 9, 1673–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Castrillon, D.H.; Miao, L.; Kollipara, R.; Horner, J.W.; DePinho, R.A. Suppression of ovarian follicle activation in mice by the transcription factor foxo3a. Science 2003, 301, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. John, G.B.; Shirley, L.J.; Gallardo, T.D.; Castrillon, D.H. Specificity of the requirement for foxo3 in primordial follicle activation. Reproduction 2007, 133, 855–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pelosi, E.; Omari, S.; Michel, M.; Ding, J.; Amano, T.; Forabosco, A.; Schlessinger, D.; Ottolenghi, C. Constitutively active foxo3 in oocytes preserves ovarian reserve in mice. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hunt, C.R.; Gupta, A.; Horikoshi, N.; Pandita, T.K. Does pten loss impair DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination? Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 920–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Liu, P.; Gan, W.; Guo, C.; Xie, A.; Gao, D.; Guo, J.; Zhang, J.; Willis, N.; Su, A.; Asara, J.M.; et al. Akt-mediated phosphorylation of xlf impairs non-homologous end-joining DNA repair. Mol. Cell. 2015, 57, 648–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Xu, N.; Hegarat, N.; Black, E.J.; Scott, M.T.; Hochegger, H.; Gillespie, D.A. Akt/pkb suppresses DNA damage processing and checkpoint activation in late g2. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pedram, A.; Razandi, M.; Evinger, A.J.; Lee, E.; Levin, E.R. Estrogen inhibits atr signaling to cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20, 3374–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Shen, W.H.; Balajee, A.S.; Wang, J.; Wu, H.; Eng, C.; Pandolfi, P.P.; Yin, Y. Essential role for nuclear pten in maintaining chromosomal integrity. Cell 2007, 128, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Thacker, J. The rad51 gene family, genetic instability and cancer. Cancer Lett. 2005, 219, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Brunet, A.; Bonni, A.; Zigmond, M.J.; Lin, M.Z.; Juo, P.; Hu, L.S.; Anderson, M.J.; Arden, K.C.; Blenis, J.; Greenberg, M.E. Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a forkhead transcription factor. Cell 1999, 96, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Astle, M.V.; Hannan, K.M.; Ng, P.Y.; Lee, R.S.; George, A.J.; Hsu, A.K.; Haupt, Y.; Hannan, R.D.; Pearson, R.B. Akt induces senescence in human cells via mtorc1 and p53 in the absence of DNA damage: Implications for targeting mtor during malignancy. Oncogene 2012, 31, 1949–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kawamura, K.; Cheng, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Deguchi, M.; Sato, Y.; Takae, S.; Ho, C.H.; Kawamura, N.; Tamura, M.; Hashimoto, S.; et al. Hippo signaling disruption and akt stimulation of ovarian follicles for infertility treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 17474–17479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kim, S.Y.; Ebbert, K.; Cordeiro, M.H.; Romero, M.; Zhu, J.; Serna, V.A.; Whelan, K.A.; Woodruff, T.K.; Kurita, T. Cell autonomous phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation in oocytes disrupts normal ovarian function through promoting survival and overgrowth of ovarian follicles. Endocrinology 2015, 156, 1464–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kim, S.Y.; Ebbert, K.; Cordeiro, M.H.; Romero, M.M.; Whelan, K.A.; Suarez, A.A.; Woodruff, T.K.; Kurita, T. Constitutive activation of pi3k in oocyte induces ovarian granulosa cell tumors. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 3851–3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Smitz, J.E.; Cortvrindt, R.G. The earliest stages of folliculogenesis in vitro. Reproduction 2002, 123, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Nguyen, Q.N.; Zerafa, N.; Liew, S.H.; Findlay, J.K.; Hickey, M.; Hutt, K.J.; Bezerra, M.E.S.; Gouveia, B.B.; Barberino, R.S.; Menezes, V.G.; et al. Cisplatin- and cyclophosphamide-induced primordial follicle depletion is caused by direct damage to oocytes resveratrol promotes in vitro activation of ovine primordial follicles by reducing DNA damage and enhancing granulosa cell proliferation via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 53, 1298–1305. [Google Scholar]
  118. Soleimani, R.; Heytens, E.; Darzynkiewicz, Z.; Oktay, K. Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced human ovarian aging: Double strand DNA breaks and microvascular compromise. Aging 2011, 3, 782–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Roness, H.; Gavish, Z.; Cohen, Y.; Meirow, D. Ovarian follicle burnout: A universal phenomenon? Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 3245–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kalich-Philosoph, L.; Roness, H.; Carmely, A.; Fishel-Bartal, M.; Ligumsky, H.; Paglin, S.; Wolf, I.; Kanety, H.; Sredni, B.; Meirow, D. Cyclophosphamide triggers follicle activation and “burnout”; as101 prevents follicle loss and preserves fertility. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 185ra62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Spears, N.; Lopes, F.; Stefansdottir, A.; Rossi, V.; De Felici, M.; Anderson, R.A.; Klinger, F.G. Ovarian damage from chemotherapy and current approaches to its protection. Hum. Reprod. Update 2019, 25, 673–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Govatati, S.; Kodati, V.L.; Deenadayal, M.; Chakravarty, B.; Shivaji, S.; Bhanoori, M.; Yin, X.; Pavone, M.E.; Lu, Z.; Wei, J.; et al. Mutations in the pten tumor gene and risk of endometriosis: A case-control study increased activation of the pi3k/akt pathway compromises decidualization of stromal cells from endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Madanes, D.; Bilotas, M.A.; Baston, J.I.; Singla, J.J.; Meresman, G.F.; Baranao, R.I.; Ricci, A.G.; Takeuchi, A.; Koga, K.; Satake, E.; et al. Pi3k/akt pathway is altered in the endometriosis patient’s endometrium and presents differences according to severity stage endometriosis triggers excessive activation of primordial follicles via pi3k-pten-akt-foxo3 pathway inhibition of pi3k/akt/mtor pathway for the treatment of endometriosis. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2019, 104, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  124. Makker, A.; Goel, M.M.; Das, V.; Agarwal, A. Pi3k-akt-mtor and mapk signaling pathways in polycystic ovarian syndrome, uterine leiomyomas and endometriosis: An update. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2012, 28, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Takeuchi, A.; Koga, K.; Satake, E.; Makabe, T.; Taguchi, A.; Miyashita, M.; Takamura, M.; Harada, M.; Hirata, T.; Hirota, Y.; et al. Endometriosis triggers excessive activation of primordial follicles via pi3k-pten-akt-foxo3 pathway inhibition of pi3k/akt/mtor pathway for the treatment of endometriosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 5547–5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Yin, X.; Pavone, M.E.; Lu, Z.; Wei, J.; Kim, J.J. Increased activation of the pi3k/akt pathway compromises decidualization of stromal cells from endometriosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E35–E43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Barra, F.; Ferro Desideri, L.; Ferrero, S. Inhibition of pi3k/akt/mtor pathway for the treatment of endometriosis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 175, 3626–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, H.; Zhao, X.; Liu, S.; Li, J.; Wen, Z.; Li, M. 17betae2 promotes cell proliferation in endometriosis by decreasing pten via nfkappab-dependent pathway. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 317, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Kitajima, M.; Dolmans, M.M.; Donnez, O.; Masuzaki, H.; Soares, M.; Donnez, J. Enhanced follicular recruitment and atresia in cortex derived from ovaries with endometriomas. Fertil. Steril. 2014, 101, 1031–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Choi, Y.S.; Park, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Yoon, J.K.; Yun, B.H.; Park, J.H.; Seo, S.K.; Sung, H.J.; Kim, H.S.; Cho, S.; et al. Association between impairment of DNA double strand break repair and decreased ovarian reserve in patients with endometriosis. Front Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kacan, T.; Yildiz, C.; Baloglu Kacan, S.; Seker, M.; Ozer, H.; Cetin, A. Everolimus as an mtor inhibitor suppresses endometriotic implants: An experimental rat study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017, 77, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Chen, R.; Peng, H.; Guo, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H. Mtor inhibition attenuates DNA damage and apoptosis through autophagy-mediated suppression of creb1. Autophagy 2013, 9, 2069–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhou, L.; Xie, Y.; Li, S.; Liang, Y.; Qiu, Q.; Lin, H.; Zhang, Q. Rapamycin prevents cyclophosphamide-induced over-activation of primordial follicle pool through pi3k/akt/mtor signaling pathway in vivo. J. Ovarian. Res. 2017, 10, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Adhikari, D.; Risal, S.; Liu, K.; Shen, Y. Pharmacological inhibition of mtorc1 prevents over-activation of the primordial follicle pool in response to elevated pi3k signaling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, X.M.; Li, L.; Xu, J.J.; Wang, N.; Liu, W.J.; Lin, X.H.; Fu, Y.C.; Luo, L.L. Rapamycin preserves the follicle pool reserve and prolongs the ovarian lifespan of female rats via modulating mtor activation and sirtuin expression. Gene 2013, 523, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Goldman, K.N.; Chenette, D.; Arju, R.; Duncan, F.E.; Keefe, D.L.; Grifo, J.A.; Schneider, R.J. Mtorc1/2 inhibition preserves ovarian function and fertility during genotoxic chemotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3186–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wang, W.; Luo, S.M.; Ma, J.Y.; Shen, W.; Yin, S. Cytotoxicity and DNA damage caused from diazinon exposure by inhibiting the pi3k-akt pathway in porcine ovarian granulosa cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ganesan, S.; Keating, A.F. Bisphenol a-induced ovotoxicity involves DNA damage induction to which the ovary mounts a protective response indicated by increased expression of proteins involved in DNA repair and xenobiotic biotransformation. Toxicol. Sci. 2016, 152, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  139. Sun, X.; Su, Y.; He, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, H.; Hou, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, J. New strategy for in vitro activation of primordial follicles with mtor and pi3k stimulators. Cell Cycle 2015, 14, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Li, J.; Kawamura, K.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, S.; Klein, C.; Liu, S.; Duan, E.K.; Hsueh, A.J. Activation of dormant ovarian follicles to generate mature eggs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 10280–10284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Faddy, M.J.; Gosden, R.G.; Gougeon, A.; Richardson, S.J.; Nelson, J.F. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: Implications for forecasting menopause. Hum. Reprod. 1992, 7, 1342–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. De Bruin, J.P.; Dorland, M.; Spek, E.R.; Posthuma, G.; van Haaften, M.; Looman, C.W.; te Velde, E.R. Age-related changes in the ultrastructure of the resting follicle pool in human ovaries. Biol. Reprod. 2004, 70, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Li, Q.; Geng, X.; Zheng, W.; Tang, J.; Xu, B.; Shi, Q. Current understanding of ovarian aging. Sci. China Life Sci. 2012, 55, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Gougeon, A. Dynamics of follicular growth in the human: A model from preliminary results. Hum. Reprod. 1986, 1, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Oktay, K.; Kim, J.Y.; Barad, D.; Babayev, S.N. Association of brca1 mutations with occult primary ovarian insufficiency: A possible explanation for the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Sharan, S.K.; Pyle, A.; Coppola, V.; Babus, J.; Swaminathan, S.; Benedict, J.; Swing, D.; Martin, B.K.; Tessarollo, L.; Evans, J.P.; et al. Brca2 deficiency in mice leads to meiotic impairment and infertility. Development 2004, 131, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Weinberg-Shukron, A.; Rachmiel, M.; Renbaum, P.; Gulsuner, S.; Walsh, T.; Lobel, O.; Dreifuss, A.; Ben-Moshe, A.; Zeligson, S.; Segel, R.; et al. Essential role of brca2 in ovarian development and function. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1042–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Day, F.R.; Ruth, K.S.; Thompson, D.J.; Lunetta, K.L.; Pervjakova, N.; Chasman, D.I.; Stolk, L.; Finucane, H.K.; Sulem, P.; Bulik-Sullivan, B.; et al. Large-scale genomic analyses link reproductive aging to hypothalamic signaling, breast cancer susceptibility and brca1-mediated DNA repair. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1294–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Phillips, K.A.; Collins, I.M.; Milne, R.L.; McLachlan, S.A.; Friedlander, M.; Hickey, M.; Stern, C.; Hopper, J.L.; Fisher, R.; Kannemeyer, G.; et al. Anti-mullerian hormone serum concentrations of women with germline brca1 or brca2 mutations. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 1126–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Shi, L.; Zhang, J.; Lai, Z.; Tian, Y.; Fang, L.; Wu, M.; Xiong, J.; Qin, X.; Luo, A.; Wang, S. Long-term moderate oxidative stress decreased ovarian reproductive function by reducing follicle quality and progesterone production. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Yang, B.; Oo, T.N.; Rizzo, V. Lipid rafts mediate h2o2 prosurvival effects in cultured endothelial cells. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 1501–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Das, S.; Chattopadhyay, R.; Ghosh, S.; Ghosh, S.; Goswami, S.K.; Chakravarty, B.N.; Chaudhury, K. Reactive oxygen species level in follicular fluid--embryo quality marker in ivf? Hum. Reprod. 2006, 21, 2403–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kitagawa, T.; Suganuma, N.; Nawa, A.; Kikkawa, F.; Tanaka, M.; Ozawa, T.; Tomoda, Y. Rapid accumulation of deleted mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid in postmenopausal ovaries. Biol. Reprod. 1993, 49, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Keefe, D.L.; Niven-Fairchild, T.; Powell, S.; Buradagunta, S. Mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid deletions in oocytes and reproductive aging in women. Fertil. Steril. 1995, 64, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Nogueira, V.; Hay, N. Molecular pathways: Reactive oxygen species homeostasis in cancer cells and implications for cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 4309–4314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kitagishi, Y.; Matsuda, S. Redox regulation of tumor suppressor pten in cancer and aging (review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2013, 31, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Tait, I.S.; Li, Y.; Lu, J. Pten, longevity and age-related diseases. Biomedicines 2013, 1, 17–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Grynberg, M.; Dagher Hayeck, B.; Papanikolaou, E.G.; Sifer, C.; Sermondade, N.; Sonigo, C. Brca1/2 gene mutations do not affect the capacity of oocytes from breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation to mature in vitro. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 374–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Gunnala, V.; Fields, J.; Irani, M.; D’Angelo, D.; Xu, K.; Schattman, G.; Rosenwaks, Z. Brca carriers have similar reproductive potential at baseline to noncarriers: Comparisons in cancer and cancer-free cohorts undergoing fertility preservation. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 111, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Derks-Smeets, I.A.P.; van Tilborg, T.C.; van Montfoort, A.; Smits, L.; Torrance, H.L.; Meijer-Hoogeveen, M.; Broekmans, F.; Dreesen, J.; Paulussen, A.D.C.; Tjan-Heijnen, V.C.G.; et al. Brca1 mutation carriers have a lower number of mature oocytes after ovarian stimulation for ivf/pgd. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2017, 34, 1475–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Johnson, L.; Sammel, M.D.; Domchek, S.; Schanne, A.; Prewitt, M.; Gracia, C. Antimullerian hormone levels are lower in brca2 mutation carriers. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 107, 1256–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Van Tilborg, T.C.; Derks-Smeets, I.A.; Bos, A.M.; Oosterwijk, J.C.; van Golde, R.J.; de Die-Smulders, C.E.; van der Kolk, L.E.; van Zelst-Stams, W.A.; Velthuizen, M.E.; Hoek, A.; et al. Serum amh levels in healthy women from brca1/2 mutated families: Are they reduced? Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 2651–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wang, E.T.; Pisarska, M.D.; Bresee, C.; Chen, Y.D.; Lester, J.; Afshar, Y.; Alexander, C.; Karlan, B.Y. Brca1 germline mutations may be associated with reduced ovarian reserve. Fertil. Steril. 2014, 102, 1723–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Finch, A.; Valentini, A.; Greenblatt, E.; Lynch, H.T.; Ghadirian, P.; Armel, S.; Neuhausen, S.L.; Kim-Sing, C.; Tung, N.; Karlan, B.; et al. Frequency of premature menopause in women who carry a brca1 or brca2 mutation. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 99, 1724–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Guglielmino, M.R.; Santonocito, M.; Vento, M.; Ragusa, M.; Barbagallo, D.; Borzi, P.; Casciano, I.; Banelli, B.; Barbieri, O.; Astigiano, S.; et al. Tap73 is downregulated in oocytes from women of advanced reproductive age. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 3253–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Pan, H.; Ma, P.; Zhu, W.; Schultz, R.M. Age-associated increase in aneuploidy and changes in gene expression in mouse eggs. Dev. Biol. 2008, 316, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Jang, H.; Na, Y.; Hong, K.; Lee, S.; Moon, S.; Cho, M.; Park, M.; Lee, O.H.; Chang, E.M.; Lee, D.R.; et al. Synergistic effect of melatonin and ghrelin in preventing cisplatin-induced ovarian damage via regulation of foxo3a phosphorylation and binding to the p27(kip1) promoter in primordial follicles. J. Pineal Res. 2017, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Alexandri, C.; Stratopoulou, C.A.; Demeestere, I. Answer to controversy: Mir-10a replacement approaches do not offer protection against chemotherapy-induced gonadotoxicity in mouse model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Wang, Y.; Taniguchi, T. Micrornas and DNA damage response: Implications for cancer therapy. Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Alexandri, C.; Stamatopoulos, B.; Rothe, F.; Bareche, Y.; Devos, M.; Demeestere, I. Microrna profiling and identification of let-7a as a target to prevent chemotherapy-induced primordial follicles apoptosis in mouse ovaries. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Dolmans, M.M.; Martinez-Madrid, B.; Gadisseux, E.; Guiot, Y.; Yuan, W.Y.; Torre, A.; Camboni, A.; Van Langendonckt, A.; Donnez, J. Short-term transplantation of isolated human ovarian follicles and cortical tissue into nude mice. Reproduction 2007, 134, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Gavish, Z.; Spector, I.; Peer, G.; Schlatt, S.; Wistuba, J.; Roness, H.; Meirow, D. Follicle activation is a significant and immediate cause of follicle loss after ovarian tissue transplantation. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2018, 35, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.