You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Cells
  • Article
  • Open Access

16 April 2018

Cell Adhesion Molecules Are Mediated by Photobiomodulation at 660 nm in Diabetic Wounded Fibroblast Cells

,
and
Laser Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 17011, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell Adhesion Molecules

Abstract

Diabetes affects extracellular matrix (ECM) metabolism, contributing to delayed wound healing and lower limb amputation. Application of light (photobiomodulation, PBM) has been shown to improve wound healing. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of PBM on cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) in diabetic wound healing. Isolated human skin fibroblasts were grouped into a diabetic wounded model. A diode laser at 660 nm with a fluence of 5 J/cm2 was used for irradiation and cells were analysed 48 h post-irradiation. Controls consisted of sham-irradiated (0 J/cm2) cells. Real-time reverse transcription (RT) quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to determine the expression of CAM-related genes. Ten genes were up-regulated in diabetic wounded cells, while 25 genes were down-regulated. Genes were related to transmembrane molecules, cell–cell adhesion, and cell–matrix adhesion, and also included genes related to other CAM molecules. PBM at 660 nm modulated gene expression of various CAMs contributing to the increased healing seen in clinical practice. There is a need for new therapies to improve diabetic wound healing. The application of PBM alongside other clinical therapies may be very beneficial in treatment.

1. Introduction

1.1. Wound Healing and Diabetes

Wound healing is a physiological event critical to the continuity of life. It constitutes a complicated process whereby tissue injury results in a healing process involving various cell types including fibroblasts, cytokines, extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, and certain growth factors to bring about tissue repair and restore integrity. Wound healing is as a result of four highly coordinated phases, namely haemostasis, inflammation, cell proliferation and remodelling. Fibroblasts are vital components of the ECM. They produce collagen that maintains cellular integrity, as well as activate the production of growth factors and other secretions to enhance wound repair. In conditions such as diabetes mellitus (DM), wounds are often stuck in the inflammatory phase, and there is increased inflammation and ECM degradation at the wound site due to decreased collagen production and increased proteolytic activity. There is also decreased production of growth factors and cytokines, with cells becoming unresponsive to growth factors, as well as reduced cell proliferation, and changes in gene expression [1,2,3,4,5]. The pathogenesis of DM is not properly comprehended; however, previous studies have shown that the production of several ECM factors are altered by hyperglycaemia. Culture conditions modulated expression of ECM proteins including cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) in vitro [6,7,8]. These pathological changes contribute to the development of chronic wounds, one of the most common complications associated with the disease which affects around 15% of patients [9]. Chronic foot ulcers often necessitate amputation, resulting in a decrease in the quality of life, as well as creating a socio-economic burden on the country and patients. Various therapeutic interventions, including photobiomodulation (PBM), have been used to improve wound healing in cases of diabetes and other stressed conditions.

1.2. Cell Adhesion Molecules

CAMs are binding proteins located on the surface of the cell and bind to other cells or the ECM. CAMs constitutes four superfamilies, namely the immunoglobulin superfamily (IgCAMs), integrins, selectins and cadherins, and play a vital role during wound healing. It is fundamental to regulate CAMs during tissue repair to enable cell migration, protein production and proliferation [10,11,12]. Cadherins and integrins are primarily cell surface transmembrane receptors. Their main function is to stimulate cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion. They are also responsible for cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, survival and gene expression [13]. Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane proteins that play important roles during developmental and pathological processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, cell-cell attachment, adhesion and signal transduction between the cell and ECM [14]. Their adhesive nature allows them to bind to other ECM proteins such as vitronectin, fibronectin, laminin and collagen. Expressed integrins remain inactive and bind to their ligands only when activated. They mediate bi-directional signalling across the plasma membrane, inducing intracellular signals and are activated in three different states, low, basal and high, allowing them to change their expression in various receptors [15,16,17]. Various cell types express integrins, including fibroblasts [18].
Cadherins are calcium-independent adhesion molecules mainly involved in tissue and embryonic cell development. Their adhesive property is dependent on the ability of their intracellular domain to interact with cytoplasmic proteins. Cadherins are found at intercellular junctions that keep cells together, sense changes in mechanical tension and mechanotransducers and ensures adaptive support, and serve as a link between the ECM and the cytoskeleton to activate a large number of molecules and pathways [19,20]. Ig-CAMs express both heterophilic and homophylic binding of laminins, fibronectins, collagens and other cell surface proteins. They are particularly involved in cell-cell adhesion, embryogenesis and wound healing. Furthermore, they interact with integrin’s to enhance wound repair [21]. Selectins are up-regulated when stimulated. Fibroblasts are important in the secretion of soluble factors and synthesizing the ECM to regulate neovascularization [22,23]. Experiments on selectins have been shown to improve neovascularization, stromal cell derived factor (SDF)-α1 homing and wound healing [22]. E and P selectins also regulate inflammatory cell infiltration and improves wound healing.

1.3. Photobiomodulation (PBM)

The application of PBM is a non-invasive therapeutic process for wound healing involving low energy power lasers or light emitting diodes (LEDs). Through several chemical, cellular and biological processes, PBM is capable of relieving pain and inflammation [24,25], as well as enhancing wound healing. PBM has been known for its biostimulatory effect in wound healing through various wavelengths, typically in the visible and near-infrared (NIR), and at low energy densities (fluencies). However, its mechanism of action is not fully understood. Currently, what is known, and the most accepted theory is that photons are absorbed by mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase (Cox) which results in increased electron transfer, resulting in increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and increased production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Nitric oxide (NO) is also photodissociated from Cox, which when bound to it inhibits Cox activity [26]. This brings about changes in cellular redox potential and pH levels, potassium and calcium ions, and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels (derivative of ATP), which all play an important role in signal transduction, and induce several transcription factors [27]. These changes will bring about changes and stimulate cellular proliferation and migration, increased production and release of growth factors and cytokines, as well stimulation of ECM accumulation. Studies have shown that PBM modulates fibroblast cell proliferation and gene expression in wounded models at different wavelengths and fluences [28,29,30,31,32]. Investigations on diabetic wound healing involving humans, rats and other animal models has also shown positive effects [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Discovering and understanding the functions of CAMs in wound healing will allow for identification of mechanisms in medical conditions such as in chronic wounds [16]. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of PBM on CAMs in diabetic wound healing.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Isolation and Culure

Tissue was donated and collected from a consenting adult donor undergoing abdominoplasty (Linksfield, Sandringham, Johannesburg, South Africa). The isolation of cells from such tissue received ethical approval from the University of Johannesburg, Faculty Academic Ethics Committee (Clearance Reference Number: AEC05/01-2011). Briefly, adipose tissue was separated from the dermis with a sterile scalpel and the skin cut into 2–3 cm2 pieces. These smaller pieces of tissue were then incubated overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in 10 mL of 0.25% Trypsin-1 mM Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, ThermoFisher Scientific, Fairland, Johannesburg, South Africa, 25200-056). Trypsin was neutralised with an equal volume of media (Minimum Essential Medium, MEM, Sigma-Aldrich, Aston Manor, Johannesburg, South Africa, M7278) containing 10% Foetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich, F9665). The dermis was then pulled away from and separated from the epidermis using a forcep. The dermis was then digested with 15 mL of 10 mg/mL collagenase-1 in Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) with calcium (Ca2+) and magnesium (Mg2+) ions (Sigma-Aldrich, 55037C) and incubated for 40 min at 37 °C at 100 rpm (Labcon, Krugersdorp, Johannesburg, South Africa, shaker incubator, 3081u). Tissue was mechanically dissociated by pipetting several times (25 mL to 10 mL and then 5 mL disposable pipettes). Isolated cells were re-suspended in 20 mL complete MEM and cultured in T75 tissue culture flasks incubated overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The media was selective for the growth of fibroblasts.
Isolated cells were cultured according to standard culture methods [42]. Briefly, cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (ThermoFisher Scientific, Fairland, Johannesburg, South Africa, 11360-039), 2 mM l-glutamine (ThermoFisher Scientific, Gibco®, 25030-024), 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids (NEAA, ThermoFisher Scientific, Gibco®, 11140-035), 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (ThermoFisher Scientific, Gibco®, 15140-122) and 0.2% Amphotericin-B (ThermoFisher Scientific, Gibco®, 15290-020) in T75/T175 culture flasks. Cells were detached with 1 mL/25 cm2 TrypLE™ Express (ThermoFisher Scientific, Gibco®, 12604-021). Cells between passage numbers 7 and 12 were used in experiments. A diabetic wounded model was achieved by continuously growing cells under hyperglycemic conditions; cells were cultured in complete media (basal glucose concentration of 5.6 mMol/L) containing an additional 17 mMol/L d-glucose [43,44]. Mimicking a diabetic condition using high glucose concentrations of 20–40 mM/L is not uncommon in inducing cellular changes in different cell types in vitro [45,46,47,48]. For experiments, 6 × 105 cells in 3 mL complete media were seeded into 3.4 cm diameter tissue culture plates and cells allowed to adhere during overnight incubation. The following morning cells were rinsed with warm HBSS and 1 mL fresh media added to cultures. A wound was simulated in vitro via the scratch assay [49,50,51] under the same conditions, whereby a sterile 1 mL disposable pipette was used to scrape the confluent monolayer in a straight line, creating a cell-free zone in the center with cells either side of the ‘wound’ [44].

2.2. Laser Irradiation

Following the creation of a central scratch, cells were incubated for 30 min. A continuous wave diode laser emitting at a wavelength of 660 nm (Fremont, CA, USA, RGBlase, TECIRL-100G-650SMA) was used to irradiate cells (Table 1) in 3.4 cm diameter tissue culture dishes. This wavelength and laser parameters were chosen as they have previously shown stimulatory effects on WS1 cells [52,53]. Cells were irradiated via fibber optics in the dark from the top and at a distance that created the same spot size as the culture dish (7 cm). The temperature of the culture media was recorded every 2 min during irradiation to eliminate any effects produced by heat [28]. The duration of laser irradiation was determined by the output power (and hence output power density). Sham-irradiated (0 J/cm2) cells were used as controls.
Table 1. Laser parameters.

2.3. PCR Array

Forty-eight hours post-irradiation, cells were detached and total RNA isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Whitehead Scientific, Cape Town, South Africa, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany, 74104) and QIAshredder homogenisers performed on the QIAcube (Qiagen) as previously described [53]. RNA was quantified on the Qubit™ fluorometer (Invitrogen) using the Quant-iT™ RNA Assay kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Invitrogen, Q32852), and purity determined spectrophotometrically at A260 nm/A280 nm. cDNA was reverse transcribed from 1 μg total RNA by means of the Quanti-Tect Reverse Transcription Kit (Whitehead Scientific, Qiagen, 205311). Briefly, following treatment with DNase, sample was incubated at 42 °C for 5 min. RT master mix was added and samples incubated at 42 °C for 15 min followed by 3 min incubation at 95 °C. cDNA was stored at −20 °C until ready for qPCR.
The Human Extracellular Matrix and Adhesion Molecules RT2 Profiler™ PCR Array (Whitehead Scientific, SABiosciences, Frederick, MD, USA, PAHS-013Z) was used to profile the expression of 84 genes important for cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions as previously described [28]. Of these 84 genes, 64 were CAMs (Table 2). Briefly, 111 μL cDNA was added to the master mix (containing ROX as a reference dye and SYBR green) and 25 μL was added to each well. Real-time qPCR was performed on the Stratagene MX3000p (Diagnostech, Dainfern Valley, Johannesburg, South Africa, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) using the following cycles: 1 cycle at 95 °C for 10 min; 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. A dissociation curve was performed at the end of the program to ensure the amplification of a single product (single peak at temperatures greater than 80 °C had to be obtained). Results were normalised against an average of all five housekeeping/reference genes and analysed on an excel based spreadsheet (Available from the SABiosciences website, http://www.sabiosciences.com). Threshold cycle (Ct) values greater than 35 were considered negative. Normalised expression levels from irradiated cells were calculated relative to non-irradiated control cells according to the 2−ΔΔCt method and the genes were considered up- or down-regulated if the difference was >1 or <1, respectively.
Table 2. Functional CAM gene grouping.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Experiments were repeated three times (n = 3). Results were normalised against an average of all five housekeeping/reference genes. The student t-test was performed by the SABiosciences Excel-based Data Analysis Template and reported as significant if p <0.05.

3. Results

Forty-eight hours post-irradiation at a wavelength of 660 nm with 5 J/cm2, 64 genes related to CAMs was determined by real-time RT-qPCR in an in vitro diabetic wounded model (Table 3). Of the 64 genes, 25 were significantly down-regulated (Figure 1), while ten were significantly up-regulated (Figure 2). Eleven genes coding for transmembrane molecules were down-regulated (CD44, ITGA2, ITGA3, ITGA5, ITGA6, ITGAV, ITGB1, ITGB3, MMP14, MMP16, and SPG7), while five were up-regulated (CDH1, ITGA8, ITGAL, ITGB4, SELL, and VCAM1). Three genes coding for cell-cell adhesion molecules were down-regulated (CD44, COL6A2, and CTNND1), while five were up-regulated (CDH1, COL11A1, COL14A1, ITGA8 and VCAM1). Nine genes coding for cell-matrix molecules were down-regulated (CD44, ITGA2, ITGA3, ITGA5, ITGA6, ITGAV, ITGB1, ITGB3, and SSP1), and three were up-regulated (ITGA8, ITGAL, and ITGB4). Genes related to other CAMs were also regulated by PBM, and 11 genes were down-regulated (COL5A1, COL6A1, COL7A1, COL12A1, COL16A1, FN1, KAL1, LAMA1, LAMB3, LAMC1 and THBS1) and two were up-regulated (CNTN1 and LAMA3).
Table 3. Gene expression profile of CAMs in diabetic wounded human skin fibroblast cells irradiated at 660 nm with 5 J/cm2. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 1. Significant down-regulation (fold difference <1) of genes related to CAMs in diabetic wounded cells irradiated with 660 nm at 5 J/cm2.
Figure 2. Significant up-regulation (fold difference >1) of genes related to CAMs in diabetic wounded cells irradiated with 660 nm at 5 J/cm2.

4. Discussion

Wound healing is a carefully controlled and balanced process aimed at reversing the loss of structural integrity. CAMs play an important role during wound healing. Fibroblast cells play a major role in wound healing, and carry a variety of CAMs, and a deficiency in these CAMs may lead to delayed healing and ultimately chronic wounds [55]. Fibroblast cells produce many structural proteins important for wound healing, such as collagen. In addition, they also produce matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), proteolytic enzymes which breakdown collagen. MMPs are necessary during the early stages of wound healing as they facilitate the movement of fibroblasts to the wound site. Later on in the wound healing stages, fibroblasts decrease their proteolytic activity and start producing structural proteins. When phases during wound healing do not progress, chronic wounds develop.
The use of PBM both in vitro and in vivo has shown beneficial and simulative effects on wound healing [1,56,57,58,59,60]. Keshri et al. [56] studied the effect of PBM at 810 nm (22.6 J/cm2), using a pulsed (10 and 100 Hz, 50% duty cycle) diode laser, on full-thickness excision-type dermal wound healing in hydrocortisone-induced immunosuppressed rats. Their results showed accelerated healing through a decrease in inflammation (nuclear factor (NF)-kB, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α), and enhanced wound contraction (α-(SM) smooth muscle actin), cellular proliferation, ECM deposition, neovascularization (hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α, and vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF), and re-epithelialization. There was an up-regulation of the protein expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor-(FGFR)-1, fibronectin, heat shock protein (HSP)-90 and TGF-β2. Additionally, irradiation significantly increased cytochrome c oxidase (CCO, mitochondrial complex IV) activity and cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content. Ayuk et al. [1] illustrated that diabetic wounded fibroblast cells irradiated at 660 nm with 5 J/cm2 presented with a significant increase in cell migration, viability, proliferation, and collagen content. In a similar study, Jere et al. [57] demonstrated that the increase observed in proliferation and migration may be due to activation of the JAK/STAT pathway in response to the binding of epidermal growth factor (EGF) to its receptor (EGFR). Tatmatsu Rocha et al. [58] demonstrated the effects of PBM at 904 nm in a diabetic wounded mouse model. Irradiated diabetic wounded mice displayed intense deposition and a more organized collagen matrix, and decreased concentration of nitrite, a marker of oxidative stress, and thiobarbituric acid (TBARS), a marker of lipid peroxidation. They showed that PBM was able to reduce nitrosative/oxidative stress in diabetic mice, thus accelerating wound healing. Beckmann et al. [59] conducted a systematic review on PBM (also referred to as low level laser therapy, or LLLT). They analysed 22 references; 8 in vitro studies, 6 animal studies, and 8 clinical trials. In vitro and animal studies provided proof of enhanced cellular migration, viability, and proliferation, rapid re-epithelization and reformed connective tissue, improved microcirculation, and anti-inflammatory effects. The clinical studies showed a potential benefit of PBM in the healing of diabetic ulcers, and stressed that better designed research trials are necessary. Ruh et al. [60] investigated the gene expression of inflammatory or reparative factors (interleukin-6, IL6; TNF; VEGF; and TGF) in pressure ulcers from eight patients which were irradiated at 660 nm with 2 J/cm2. Analysis of the lesions post-irradiation showed a 50% improvement in the size of granulation tissue, with a decrease in the gene expression in TNF-α, and an increase in VEFG and TGF-β. They concluded that PBM may be a beneficial complementary treatment for pressure ulcers.
CAMs play a vital role in wound healing, and is important in cellular proliferation, migration and the production of proteins [16]. During the initial phases of wound healing, fibrinogen, fibronectin, and vitronectin are produced to establish the provisional wound matrix of the blood clot. Other ECM proteins such as osteopontin, thrombospondins, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), tenascins, and collagens are released, and are only briefly present [16]. This study found a down-regulation in fibronectin-1, thrombospondin-1 (no effect on thrombospondin-2 and -3), CD44 (a glycoprotein which interacts with osteopontin), and collagen types -V, -VI, -VII, -XII, and -XVI in diabetic wounded fibroblast cells exposed to PBM at 660 nm with 5 J/cm2 and left to incubate for 48 h. No effect on the expression of tenascin C and vitronectin was observed. Tenascin-C holds both adhesive and anti-adhesive properties, depending on the cellular context. Keshri et al. [56] found an increase in the expression of fibronectin when using an 810 nm pulsed laser in an immunosuppressed rat wounded model. In this study, there was a significant up-regulation in the expression of collagen type -XI and -XIV. Both these collagens are involved in fibrillogenesis. Fibril formation during wound healing is primarily carried out by collagen type I and III. Previous studies in the same cells have shown an increase in collagen type I secretion, as well as its up-regulation in response to irradiation at 660 nm with 5 J/cm2 [1,61]. Carvalho et al. [62] and Colombo et al. [63] both found increased collagen and improved healing in wounded rat models in response to PBM. In this study, there was a significant down-regulation in proteases MMP14 and MMP16, as well as SPG7, which codes for a mitochondrial metalloprotease and is necessary for intracellular motility and membrane trafficking. MMPs are secreted as inactive pro-proteins and require cleavage for activation. They are needed during tissue remodelling and maintaining the balance of the ECM. Often in the case of DM, MMP levels are elevated which contributes to the non-healing of chronic wounds [64]. Gharagozlian et al. [64] showed that PBM at 810 nm (1 or 3 J/cm2) reduced the gene expression of MMP3, MMP9, and MMP13 in Achilles tendons of rats. Casalechi et al. [65] showed that a wavelength of 780 nm (7.5 J/cm2) modulated gene expression of MMP1 and MMP13 in Wistar rats.
Integrins form a cell-surface receptor for collagen and laminin, and are the main mediators of cell attachment to the ECM [66]. This super-family consists of 24 varieties, all formed by one of 18 alpha subunits and one of 8 beta subunits. Extracellular ligand binding (such as fibronectin and laminin) promotes intracellular signalling. Integrins play a vital role in cell migration, and also allow cells to interact with the wound ECM. Several integrins are functionally stimulated or their expression is up-regulated in response to their contact with ECM molecules [16]. In this study, there was a significant down-regulation in a number of integrin alpha subunits: A2, which is expressed in the initial stages of wound healing and is involved in platelet adhesion; A3, which binds to members of the laminin family; A5, which associates with the beta 1 subunit to form a fibronectin receptor; A6, which associates with beta 1 or 4 subunits and interacts with members of the laminin family; and ITGAV which regulates angiogenesis. Integrin alpha 8 and integrin alpha L were both significantly up-regulated. The alpha 8 subunit regulates the recruitment of mesenchymal cells and mediates cell-cell interactions, while the alpha L chain associates with the beta 2 sub-chain (which was approaching significant up-regulation in this study) to form a receptor for lymphocytes. Members of the integrin beta subunits were also down-regulated: B1 and B3, both of which binds to alpha 5 subunit, which was also down-regulated. The gene coding for the integrin beta 4 subunit was up-regulated. This subunit acts as a receptor for the laminin family. In a study conducted by Giuliani and colleagues [67] the daily irradiation of mouse embryonic fibroblasts for 3 days to a wavelength of 670 nm (pulsed wave, 0.21 mW/cm2, 4.3 mJ/cm2) resulted in the up-regulation of ITGA5. This is in contract to our study, but may be due to the different irradiation protocols.
Laminins are important in the formation and functioning of the basement membrane, and are vital to cell adhesion, differentiation, migration and signalling. Forty-eight hours post-irradiation at 660 nm, diabetic wounded cells showed down-regulation in the genes coding for the alpha 1, beta 3 and gamma 1 subunits (LAMA1, LAMB3 and LAMC1, respectively). Genes coding for the alpha 3 (LAMA3) subunit was up-regulated. This gene is responsive to several growth factors, including keratinocyte growth factor, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF). In a similar study, diabetic wounded fibroblast cells irradiated at the same parameters as in this study (660 nm; 5 J/cm2) showed increased secretion of EGF, and subsequent activation of its receptor, EGFR [57]. Giuliani and colleagues [67] found no effect on the gene regulation of LAMA1 when they irradiated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (670 nm, 4.3 mJ/cm2). They also found no effect on cadherin 1. In contrast, this study found a significant up-regulation in CDH1, which codes for cadherin 1. Cadherins are involved in cell–cell adhesion and promotes a distinctive cytoskeletal structure which provides adhesive strength [68]. This study found a significant down-regulation in CTNND1, and up-regulation in CTNND2. These genes code for adhesive junction proteins of the catenin family. Catenin delta 2 protein is found to promote the disruption of E-cadherin adherens junctions which favors the spreading of cells [54]. This study also found an up-regulation in the gene which codes for contactin 1, CNTN1. This protein forms part of the immunoglobulin family, and functions as a cell-adhesion molecule. The gene encoding for another immunoglobulin family member, VCAM1, was also up-regulated. This gene codes for vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and is a transmembrane molecule. The gene for another transmembrane molecule, SELL, was also up-regulated. This gene codes for selectin L. The KAL1 (or ANOS1) gene was down-regulated in cells 48 h post-irradiation at 660 nm. The protein coded for by this gene, Kallmann syndrome 1 sequence, is believed to have anti-protease activity [54].

5. Conclusions

Normal wound healing processes are disrupted and hindered in DM, and the management of chronic diabetic ulcers remains a major global social and clinical challenge. Current therapies remain inadequate, with repeated failure and relapse. Several papers have shown the beneficial effects of PBM on diabetic wound healing, with favourable outcomes and no reported side-effects. This study revealed that laser irradiation at a wavelength of 660 nm and a fluence of 5 J/cm2 had an effect on a number of CAMs in a diabetic wounded fibroblast cell model. PBM influenced genes coding for proteins related to transmembrane molecules, cell-cell adhesion, cell-matrix adhesion, and a number of other CAMs. The difference seen in some of these studies may be due to different irradiation protocols and time post-irradiation, which would affect phase of healing, as well as cell types and models used. All of these need to be taken into consideration. Despite this, it cannot be denied that PBM has a profound effect on the ECM and CAMs, leading to increased healing.

Acknowledgments

This work is based on the research supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (Grant No. 98337), as well as grants received from the University of Johannesburg (URC), the African Laser Centre (ALC) (student scholarship), and Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)—National Laser Centre (NLC) Laser Rental Pool Program. All lasers were supplied and set up the NLC.

Author Contributions

N.N.H. conceived and designed the experiments and was involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for intellectual content, and is the postgraduate supervisor of second author; S.M.A. performed the experiments, analysed the data, and was involved in writing the manuscript; H.A. provided professional guidance and supplied editorial input and is a co-supervisor of the second author. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ayuk, S.M.; Houreld, N.N.; Abrahamse, H. Collagen production in diabetic wounded fibroblasts in response to low-intensity laser irradiation at 660 nm. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2012, 14, 1110–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Caley, M.P.; Martins, V.L.C.; O’Toole, E.A. Metalloproteinases and wound healing. Adv. Wound Care 2015, 4, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lan, C.-C.E.; Wu, C.-S.; Huang, S.-M.; Wu, I.H.; Chen, G.-S. High-glucose environment enhanced oxidative stress and increased interleukin-8 secretion from keratinocytes. Diabetes 2013, 62, 2530–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. McCarty, S.M.; Percival, S.L. Proteases and delayed wound healing. Adv. Wound Care 2013, 2, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, Y.; Wu, T.; Wu, J.; Zhao, L.; Li, Q.; Varghese, Z.; Moorhead, J.F.; Powis, S.H.; Chen, Y.; Ruan, X.Z. Chronic inflammation exacerbates glucose metabolism disorders in C57BL/6J mice fed with high-fat diet. J. Endocrinol. 2013, 219, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Köppel, H.; Riedl, E.; Braunagel, M.; Sauerhoefer, S.; Ehnert, S.; Godoy, P.; Sternik, P.; Dooley, S.; Yard, B.A. L-carnosine inhibits high-glucose-mediated matrix accumulation in human mesangial cells by interfering with TGF-β production and signalling. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2011, 26, 3852–3858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Huang, K.; Liu, W.; Lan, T.; Xie, X.; Peng, J.; Huang, J.; Wang, S.; Shen, X.; Liu, P.; Huang, H. Berberine reduces fibronectin expression by suppressing the S1P-S1P2 receptor pathway in experimental diabetic nephropathy models. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Taniguchi, K.; Xia, L.; Goldberg, H.J.; Lee, K.W.; Shah, A.; Stavar, L.; Masson, E.; Momen, A.; Shikatani, E.A.; John, R. Inhibition of Src kinase blocks high glucose–induced EGFR transactivation and collagen synthesis in mesangial cells and prevents diabetic nephropathy in mice. Diabetes 2013, 62, 3874–3886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. IDF, International Diabetes Federation in Diabetes Atlas, 2015. Available online: https://www.idf.org/diabetes atlas (accessed on 8 March 2018).
  10. Frantz, C.; Stewart, K.M.; Weaver, V.M. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123, 4195–4200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rozario, T.; DeSimone, D.W. The extracellular matrix in development and morphogenesis: A dynamic view. Dev. Biol. 2010, 341, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, N. Cell adhesion Molecules (CAMs). In Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences, 2nd ed.; Daroff, R., Aminoff, M.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 628–629. ISBN 9780123851574. [Google Scholar]
  13. Crawford, M.; Dagnino, L. Cadherins as Central Modulators of Wound Repair. In Wound Healing: Stem Cells Repair and Restorations, Basic and Clinical Aspects; Turksen, K., Ed.; Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; p. 15. ISBN 1119282497. [Google Scholar]
  14. Boettiger, D. Mechanical control of integrin-mediated adhesion and signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012, 24, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jakhu, H.; Gill, G.; Singh, A. Role of integrins in wound repair and its periodontal implications. J. Oral. Biol. Craniofac. Res. 2018, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koivisto, L.; Heino, J.; Lari Häkkinen, L.; Larjava, H. Integrins in Wound Healing. Adv. Wound Care 2014, 3, 762–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schnittert, J.; Bansal, R.; Storm, G.; Prakash, J. Integrins in wound healing, fibrosis and tumor stroma: High potential targets for therapeutics and drug delivery. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liu, S.; Shi-Wen, X.; Blumbach, K.; Eastwood, M.; Denton, C.P.; Eckes, B.; Krieg, T.; Abraham, D.J.; Leask, A. Expression of integrin β1 by fibroblasts is required for tissue repair in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123, 3674–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Leckband, D.; de Rooij, J. Cadherin adhesion and mechanotransduction. Annu Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 30, 291–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Padmanabhan, A.; Rao, M.V.; Wu, Y.; Zaidel-Bar, R. Jack of all trades: Functional modularity in the adherens junction. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2015, 36, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sanders, A.J.; Jiang, D.G.; Jiang, W.G.; Harding, K.G.; Patel, G.K. Activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule impacts on clinical wound healing and inhibits HaCaT migration. Int. Wound J. 2011, 8, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, Z.; Miner, J.J.; Yago, T.; Yao, L.; Lupu, F.; Xia, L.; McEver, R.P. Differential regulation of human and murine P-selectin expression and function in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 2975–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. McEver, R.P. Selectins: Initiators of leucocyte adhesion and signalling at the vascular wall. Cardiovasc. Res. 2015, 107, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Anders, J.J.; Lanzafame, R.J.; Arany, P.R. Low-level light/laser therapy versus photobiomodulation therapy. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2015, 33, 183–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ma, H.; Li, Y.-X.; Chen, H.; Kang, M.; Cheng-Yi, L.T. Effects of Low-Intensity Laser Irradiation on Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats. Int. J. Photoenergy 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Farivar, S.; Malekshahabi, T.; Shiari, R. Biological effects of low level laser therapy. Lasers Med. Sci. 2014, 2, 58–62. [Google Scholar]
  27. Guptaa, A.; Avcia, P.; Sadasivam, M.; Chandran, R.; Parizotto, N.; Vecchio, D.; de Melo, W.C.; Dai, T.; Chiang, L.Y.; Hamblin, M.R. Shining light on nanotechnology to help repair and regeneration. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 607–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ayuk, S.M.; Abrahamse, H.; Houreld, N.N. The role of photobiomodulation on gene expression of cell adhesion molecules in diabetic wounded fibroblasts in vitro. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2016, 161, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dawood, M.S.; Salman, S.D. Low level diode laser accelerates wound healing. Lasers Med. Sci. 2013, 28, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Masha, R.T.; Houreld, N.N.; Abrahamse, H. Low-intensity laser irradiation at 660 nm stimulates transcription of genes involved in the electron transport chain. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2013, 31, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rodrigues, N.C.; Brunelli, R.; de Araújo, H.S.S.; Parizotto, N.A.; Renno, A.C.M. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT)(660nm) alters gene expression during muscle healing in rats. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2013, 120, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tschon, M.; Incerti-Parenti, S.; Cepollaro, S.; Checchi, L.; Fini, M. Photobiomodulation with low-level diode laser promotes osteoblast migration in an in vitro micro wound model. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015, 20, 78002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chung, H.; Dai, T.; Sharma, S.K.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Carroll, J.D.; Hamblin, M.R. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 40, 516–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Peplow, P.V.; Chung, T.-Y.; Ryan, B.; Baxter, G.D. Laser photobiostimulation of wound healing: Reciprocity of irradiance and exposure time on energy density for splinted wounds in diabetic mice. Lasers Surg. Med. 2011, 43, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Primo, F.; De Paula, L.; de Siqueira-Moura, M.; Tedesco, A. Photobiostimulation on wound healing treatment by ClAlPc-nanoemulsion from a multiple-wavelength portable light source on a 3D-human stem cell dermal equivalent. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 5157–5163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Feitosa, M.C.P.; Carvalho, A.F.M.D.; Feitosa, V.C.; Coelho, I.M.; Oliveira, R.A.D.; Arisawa, E.Â.L. Effects of the low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the process of healing diabetic foot ulcers. Acta Cir. Bras. 2015, 30, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fekrazad, R.; Asefi, S.; Allahdadi, M.; Kalhori, K.A. Effect of Photobiomodulation on Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2016, 34, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lau, P.; Bidin, N.; Krishnan, G.; AnaybBaleg, S.M.; Sum, M.B.M.; Bakhtiar, H.; Nassir, Z.; Hamid, A. Photobiostimulation effect on diabetic wound at different power density of near infrared laser. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2015, 151, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Oton-Leite, A.F.; Silva, G.B.L.; Morais, M.O.; Silva, T.A.; Leles, C.R.; Valadares, M.C.; Pinezi, J.C.D.; Batista, A.C.; Mendonça, E.F. Effect of low-level laser therapy on chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis and salivary inflammatory mediators in head and neck cancer patients. Lasers Surg. Med. 2015, 47, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Peplow, P.V.; Baxter, G.D. Defining a therapeutic window for laser irradiation (810 nm) applied to the inguinal region to ameliorate diabetes in diabetic mice. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2014, 32, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Silva, V.D.U.E.; Paraguassu, G.M.; De Aquino Xavier, F.C.; Ramalho, M.J.P.; Rodrigues, T.T.; Dos Santos, J.N.; Ramalho, L.M.P. Effect of Laser Phototherapy on Wound Healing in Rats Exposed to a Hyperlipidic Diet. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2015, 120, e84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Houreld, N.; Abrahamse, H. In vitro exposure of wounded diabetic fibroblast cells to a helium-neon laser at 5 and 16 J/cm2. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2007, 25, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. McDermott, A.M.; Kern, T.S.; Murphy, C.J. The effect of elevated extracellular glucose on migration, adhesion and proliferation of SV40 transformed human corneal epithelial cells. Curr. Eye Res. 1998, 17, 924–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Houreld, N.; Abrahamse, H. Laser light influences cellular viability and proliferation in diabetic-wounded fibroblast cells in a dose- and wavelength-dependent manner. Lasers Med. Sci. 2008, 23, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Duan, X.; Ponomareva, L.; Veeranki, S.; Choubey, D. IFI16 induction by glucose restriction in human fibroblasts contributes to autophagy through activation of the ATM/AMPK/p53 pathway. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Esmaeelinejad, M.; Bayat, M.; Darbandi, H.; Bayat, M.; Mosaffa, N. The effects of low-level laser irradiation on cellular viability and proliferation of human skin fibroblasts cultured in high glucose mediums. Lasers Med. Sci. 2014, 29, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Góralczyk, K.; Szymanska, J.; Szot, K.; Fisz, J.; Rosc, D. Low-level laser irradiation effect on endothelial cells under conditions of hyperglycemia. Lasers Med. Sci. 2016, 31, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Li, M.F.; Zhang, R.; Li, T.T.; Chen, M.Y.; Li, L.X.; Lu, J.X.; Jia, W.P. High glucose increases the expression of inflammatory cytokine genes in macrophages through H3K9 methyltransferase mechanism. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2016, 36, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liang, C.-C.; Park, A.P.; Guan, J.-L. In vitro scratch assay: A convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 329–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cory, G. Scratch-wound assay. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 769, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chen, J.; Li, H.; Chen, J. Human epidermal growth factor coupled to different structural classes of cell penetrating peptides: A comparative study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 105, 336–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Houreld, N.N.; Masha, R.T.; Abrahamse, H. Low-intensity laser irradiation at 660 nm stimulates cytochrome c oxidase in stressed fibroblast cells. Lasers Surg. Med. 2012, 44, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Houreld, N.N.; Ayuk, S.M.; Abrahamse, H. Expression of genes in normal fibroblast cells (WS1) in response to irradiation at 660 nm. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2014, 120, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. National Centre for Biotechnology Information, Genes. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/ (accessed on 26 February 2018).
  55. LeBlanc, S.; Arabzadeh, A.; Benlolo, S.; Breton, V.; Turbide, C.; Beauchemin, N.; Nouvion, A.L. CEACAM1 deficiency delays important wound healing processes. Wound Repair. Regen. 2011, 19, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Keshri, G.K.; Gupta, A.; Yadav, A.; Sharma, S.K.; Singh, S.B. Photobiomodulation with Pulsed and Continuous Wave Near-Infrared Laser (810 nm, Al-Ga-As) Augments Dermal Wound Healing in Immunosuppressed Rats. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Jere, S.W.; Houreld, N.N.; Abrahamse, H. Photobiomodulation at 660 nm stimulates proliferation and migration of diabetic wounded cells via the expression of epidermal growth factor and the JAK/STAT pathway. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 179, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tatmatsu Rocha, J.C.; Ferraresi, C.; Hamblin, M.R.; Damasceno, F.M.; Falcão do Nascimento, N.R.; Driusso, P.; Parizotto, N.A. Low-Level Laser Therapy (904nm) Can increase collagen and reduce oxidative and nitrosative stress in diabetic wounded mouse skin. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2016, 164, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Beckmann, K.H.; Meyer-Hamme, G.; Schröder, S. Low Level Laser Therapy for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Critical Survey. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ruh, A.C.; Frigo, L.; Cavalcanti, M.F.X.B.; Svidnicki, P.; Vicari, V.N.; Lopes-Martins, R.A.B.; Pinto Leal, E.C.; De Isla, N.; Diomede, F.; Trubiani, O.; et al. Laser photobiomodulation in pressure ulcer healing of human diabetic patients: Gene expression analysis of inflammatory biochemical markers. Lasers Med. Sci. 2018, 33, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ayuk, S.M.; Abrahamse, H.; Houreld, N.N. Photobiomodulation alters matrix protein activity in stressed fibroblast cells in vitro. J. Biophotonics 2018, 11, e201700127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Carvalho, P.D.T.C.D.; Silva, I.S.D.; Reis, F.A.D.; Perreira, D.M.; Aydos, R.D. Influence of ingaalp laser (660 nm) on the healing of skin wounds in diabetic rats. Acta Cir. Bras. 2010, 25, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Colombo, F.; Neto, A.D.A.P.V.; Sousa, A.P.C.D.; Marchionni, A.M.T.; Pinheiro, A.L.B.; Reis, S.R.D.A. Effect of low-level laser therapy (660 nm) on angiogenesis in wound healing: A immunohistochemical study in a rodent model. Braz. Dent. J. 2013, 24, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gharagozlian, S.; Svennevig, K.; Bangstad, H.-J.; Winberg, J.-O.; Kolset, S.O. Matrix metalloproteinases in subjects with type 1 diabetes. BMC Clin. Pathol. 2009, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Casalechi, H.L.; Leal-Junior, E.C.P.; Xavier, M.; Silva, J.A., Jr.; de Carvalho Pde, T.; Aimbire, F.; Albertini, R. Low-level laser therapy in experimental model of collagenase-induced tendinitis in rats: Effects in acute and chronic inflammatory phases. Lasers Med. Sci. 2013, 28, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Barczyk, M.; Carracedo, S.; Gullberg, D. Integrins. Cell Tissue Res. 2010, 339, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Giuliani, A.; Lorenzini, L.; Alessandri, M.; Torricella, R.; Baldassarro, V.A.; Giardino, L.; Calzà, L. In vitro exposure to very low-level laser modifies expression level of extracellular matrix protein RNAs and mitochondria dynamics in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Shih, W.; Yamada, S. N-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion promotes cell migration in a three-dimensional matrix. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 3661–3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.