Next Article in Journal
UGT2B15 Acts as a Critical Detoxification Barrier Against Chemi-Cal-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Carcinogenesis via the Androgen Receptor Axis
Previous Article in Journal
Latrophilin-1-Mediated Gαq Signaling, Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry, and CaV2.1 Activation Control Spontaneous Exocytosis at the Mouse Neuromuscular Junction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Significance of Angiopoietin Valency in Vascular Health and Disease

1
Institute for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
2
Biochemistry Department, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
3
Comparative Medicine Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2026, 15(9), 820; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15090820
Submission received: 17 March 2026 / Revised: 19 April 2026 / Accepted: 27 April 2026 / Published: 30 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Cell Signaling)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • F-domain valency determines the activity of Ang 1 and Ang 2 in the Tie2 pathway;
  • Synthetically designed proteins precisely control Tie2 activity;
  • F-domain valency of four or fewer is Ang 2-like, whereas six or more demonstrates Ang 1-like activity.
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • Angiopoietins and Tie2 signaling play a critical role in regulating vascular health.
  • Well-defined ligand valency enables precise control of Tie2 signaling for treating vascular diseases.

Abstract

The Angiopoietin–Tie2 pathway is a key regulator of postnatal vascular maintenance and remodeling, regulating vascular barrier function and integrity. While the opposing roles of the ligands Angiopoietin-1 (Ang 1) and Angiopoietin-2 (Ang 2) have been recognized for decades, the structural mechanism governing their distinct signaling outputs has only recently been elucidated. As artificial intelligence and protein design continue to develop, emerging evidence suggests that ligand valency and receptor clustering are key determinants of Tie2 pathway activation and endothelial cell function; that is, “form follows function”. This review summarizes the latest discovery in the structural biology and signaling mechanism of the Tie2 pathway using protein design to decode the ligand–receptor interactions. Probing the underlying molecular basis of Tie2 offers new therapeutic opportunities for targeting diseases, featuring vascular dysfunctions such as sepsis, traumatic brain injury, acute respiratory diseases, chronic inflammation, and cancer. This also highlights the next generation of AI-designed protein therapeutics.

1. Introduction: The Angiopoietin–Tie Pathway in Vascular Development and Diseases

The angiopoietin–Tie signaling axis is governed by a complex interplay between two tyrosine kinase receptors, Tie1 and Tie2, and their ligands, Angiopoietin-1 (Ang 1), Angiopoietin-2 (Ang 2), and Angiopoietin-4 (Ang 4) [1,2]. Tie2 (TEK) serves as the primary signal transducer. The Angiopoietin–Tie2 (Ang-Tie2) pathway is vital for vascular homeostasis and remodeling in both normal and pathological conditions. In vivo studies underscore the criticality of this axis: homozygous knockout (KO) of Tie1, Tie2, or Ang 1 in mice results in early embryonic death on E13.5, E9.5–E10.5, or E12.5, respectively, along with varying degrees of microvascular hemorrhage, edema, ruptures, and endocardial defects [3,4,5]. Notably, Tie1 KO leads to smaller hearts, while Tie2/Ang 1 KO leads to reduced vascular branching, dilated vessels, rounded endothelial cells, and a lack of perivascular cells [1,4,5,6]. Mice with a homozygous knockout of Ang 2 were able to survive up to day 14 postnatal with major defects in lymphangiogenesis, causing lymphatic edema, ischemia-induced neovascularization, and abnormal outgrowth of retinal capillaries [6,7,8]. Ang 2 KO in C57BL/6 mice were reported to live up to adulthood but exhibited poor lymphatic maturation and defects in collecting vessel phenotypes—the connection point between lymphatic and blood vessel circulation [8]. These animal studies highlight the indispensable role of the Angiopoietin–Tie2 pathway in orchestrating both embryonic vascular development and postnatal angiogenesis.
Tie2 is highly expressed in vascular and lymphatic endothelial cells during early development, one of the key pathways that regulate endothelial cell fate and function [1]. Ang 1 is continuously secreted by pericytes or smooth muscle cells that bind Tie2 for vascular maturation, stability, and barrier integrity under homeostatic conditions or in newly formed blood vessels [9,10,11]. Ang 2 is expressed and stored in Weibel–Palade bodies in endothelial cells, and it is released in response to inflammation. Ang 2 binding to Tie2 triggers the increase in vascular permeability and the expression of ICAM and VCAM on the endothelium, facilitating leukocyte adhesion and infiltration [12]. Tie2 expression can also be found in non-vascular cell lines such as hematopoietic stem cells and macrophages (Tie2-expressing macrophages, TEMs), suggesting its potential role in regulating blood cell differentiation and inflammation [13,14,15,16]. Furthermore, the Drosophila homolog of Tie2, Tie, is expressed in both germline stem cells (GSC) and intestinal stem cells (ISC), and functions to protect these essential adult stem cells against apoptosis, a process activated by the secretion of a Tie2 ligand from dying daughter cells [17]. GSC protection is critical for regenerating the germ line after a harmful insult. Microglia in the central nervous system upregulate Tie2 in response to acute injury [18].
The Tie2 pathway serves as a regulator across vascular biology, immunology, and pathology. Given its diverse roles, there is a critical need to analyze and target Tie2 to develop effective therapies. Misregulation of Tie2 signaling is observed in both acute conditions—such as sepsis [19,20], traumatic brain injury (TBI) [18,21,22,23], and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [24,25,26,27]—and chronic diseases, including diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD [28,29,30,31,32]), and atherosclerosis [33,34,35,36]. Furthermore, Tie2 signaling impacts tumor angiogenesis and metastatic progression. Collectively, Tie2 signaling significantly affects disease manifestation and patient outcomes. This review explores the molecular criteria for Tie2 activation, focusing on how ligand valency influences signaling through designed proteins and their therapeutic utility in vascular disease management.

2. Angiopoietin–Tie2 Pathway: Structure and Signaling

Mechanistically, angiopoietins bind and cluster Tie2 receptors, triggering auto-phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the cytosolic kinase domains [37,38,39,40,41]. These phosphorylations trigger the activation of downstream effectors (pAKT, pERK1/2, pFAK, etc.), driving endothelial cell proliferation, migration, sprouting, and immune responses, modulating angiogenesis, vascular stability, and permeability [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Ang 1 activates Tie2 and downstream pAKT, pERK1/2, and pFAK, resulting in endothelial survival, tube formation, and vascular stability. Although Tie2 expression in sprouting endothelial cells is low [52], it is suggested that Ang 1 can induce endothelial cell sprouting via FAK phosphorylation [42,53]. Under a physiological environment, endothelial cell sprouting is driven primarily by VEGF signaling rather than Tie2.
However, the role of Ang 2 in vascular endothelial cells is variable; Ang 2 is an agonist in the absence of Ang 1. Interestingly, Ang 2 can also compete with Ang 1 and inhibits pTie2 and pAKT [54,55]. In lymphatic endothelial cells, Ang 2 is a strong agonist that activates the Tie2/pAKT axis and regulates lymphatic vessel development [56,57]. The dynamic activity of Ang 2 highlights the crucial role of Ang 2 in blood and lymphatic vessel development and function. There is no doubt that significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the precise structural mechanism of the “Ang 2 switch”—specifically, how the same binding interface can toggle between agonism and antagonism, a phenomenon increasingly attributed to differences in ligand valency rather than affinity [47]. The solution hinges on the idea that “form follows function”, guided by the Modernist axiom. To investigate how valency regulates ligand–receptor interaction, we must understand the structure of the ligands and Tie2 receptors.
The Tie2 receptor consists of four major domains: the ligand-binding domain (LBD), fibronectin-like (FN) domain, transmembrane domain, and tyrosine kinase domain. The LBD comprises three Ig-like domains (Ig1, Ig2, and Ig3) and three EGF-like domains [58] (Figure 1). Below the LBD are three FN-III-like domains, then a transmembrane domain, followed by two cytosolic tyrosine kinase domains. Upon clustering, Tie2 cross-phosphorylate leading to the downstream activation of second messengers and transcription factors. Thus, ligand valency plays a determining role in the size and geometry of Tie2 clustering, influencing the downstream phosphorylations and activity [1].
The angiopoietin ligands, Ang 1 and Ang 2, share significant structural homology but elicit opposing signaling and vascular outcomes. Structurally, Ang 1 and Ang 2 share 60% amino acid sequence homology and possess identical domain architectures: a super clustering domain (SCD), a coiled-coil domain (CCD), and a fibrinogen-like receptor-binding domain (F-domain) [47] (Figure 2). The F-domains of Ang 1 and Ang 2 exhibit nearly identical tertiary structures and comparable affinities for Tie2 binding (KD ~3 nM) [54] (Figure 2).
Structural analysis of the binding interface between Ang 1-Tie2 and Ang 2-Tie2 shows both ligand binding to the Tie2 receptor at the same interface on its Ligand-Binding Domain (LBD), indicating a similar binding mode (Figure 3) [47]. However, Ang 1 and Ang 2 differ significantly in their capacity for self-association. Both ligands form higher-order multimers via disulfide bonds between cysteine residues on the SCD and CCD, but Ang 1 shows a higher propensity for oligomerization [59]. In Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis, Ang 1 exhibits trimeric, tetrameric, and pentameric, as well as higher-order multimeric structures, whereas Ang 2 exists as trimeric, tetrameric, and pentameric structures, with rare cases of higher-order multimeric structures [59]. Thus, many speculate that Ang 1 tends to form higher-order oligomers than Ang 2, and this is likely attributable to an extra cysteine residue in the Ang 1 linker region; notably, introducing this cysteine into Ang 2 facilitates increased aggregation [59]. However, both ligands lack well-defined oligomeric states to fully distinguish the effect of Ang 1 vs. Ang 2 on Tie2, which leads to further investigation of Tie2 activation using synthetic proteins to control ligand valency.

3. Protein Design Can Precisely Control Ligand Valency and Signaling Outcome

Numerous efforts attempted to correlate the angiopoietin oligomeric states with Tie2 signaling outcomes using natural ligands (Ang 1/2), chimeric angiopoietins [60], modified angiopoietins [48,61,62] (CompAng 1 /2 and other variants), computationally designed protein scaffold conjugated to Ang 1 F-domain [21,63,64], Tie2 antibodies (MT100 [65], hTAAB [66]), or Ang 2 antibodies (ABTAA [45]). Firstly, engineered antibodies ABTAA against Ang 2 demonstrate that Ang 2 at high enough valency shows pTie2, pERK, and pAKT/FOXO activations, but the ligand valency is largely unknown [45]. Similarly, antibodies against Tie2 receptors (MT100 [65], hTAAB [66]) cluster and activate Tie2, but the oligomeric states of the receptor complexes remain ambiguous. The antibody approach cannot provide a precise correlation between the oligomeric state of the ligand valency or receptor clusters with downstream signaling output. Chimeric mouse angiopoietins generated by swapping the F-domains of Ang 1 and Ang 2 suggested the F-domain is the determinant for Tie2 activation, not the oligomeric state [47,60]. Nevertheless, a growing body of evidence indicates that the F-domain of Ang 1 or Ang 2 at the appropriate valency is sufficient for inducing Ang 1-like or Ang 2-like activity.
Table 1 summarizes the valency of modified angiopoietin constructs and their activity in the Tie2 pathway. Although many of them lack a well-defined valency status and exhibit conflicting results in valency–Tie2 activity correlation, they provide great insight into the role of ligand valency. The monomeric ligand (Ang 1 F-domain alone) does not activate Tie2. Most dimeric ligands do not activate Tie2, with one exception (CA1-3) that shows pTie2 and pAKT activation, but non-reducing electrophoresis shows that higher-order oligomers exist within the CA1-3. Trimeric and tetrameric ligands activate pTie2 and pAKT, with the same caveat of mixed oligomeric states. The pentameric Comp-Ang 1/2 constructs activate pTie2/pAKT. Comp-Ang 1/2 are widely used to investigate the Tie2 pathway and therapeutic applications for vascular diseases. The F-domain of Ang 1 or 2 was fused with the short coiled-coil domain of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) to generate Comp-Ang 1/2, respectively, expected to be pentamers, and both Comp-Ang displayed Ang 1-like agonism. However, biochemical analysis shows higher-order oligomers also exist in Comp-Ang, making it difficult to correlate Tie2 activation with ligand valency. In summary, all previous work contributed significant insight to support that ligand valency plays a critical role in determining Tie2 signaling outcomes.
The generation of ligands with well-defined valency status is needed to precisely dissect the molecular regulation of Tie2 signaling. The emergence of protein design technology enables a novel approach to precisely control the molecular interaction between receptors and ligands [67,68]. Protein design enables a rapid generation of protein scaffolds and binder libraries. The wide range of protein scaffolds can be modified to self-associate into higher-order multimers at well-defined oligomeric states. The F-domain scaffolds are a range of designed protein scaffolds conjugated with Ang 1 F-domain at a well-defined homogeneous oligomeric state [21,63,64]. Using the F-domain scaffolds, Ang 1-like vs. Ang 2-like activities were distinguishable based on defined oligomeric state (Figure 4). Low F-domain valency scaffolds—dimeric, trimeric, and tetrameric—behaved like Ang 2. Conversely, high-valency F-domain scaffolds—hexameric, octameric, tetrahedral, octahedral, and icosahedral—behaved like Ang 1 [21,63,64].
Similar to Ang 2, low-valency F-domain scaffolds (H3 and Tet1-A) were able to compete with Ang 1 and inhibit pAKT activation [21,54,55]. The F-domain scaffolds revealed the minimum molecular requirement for Ang 1-like vs. Ang 2-like Tie2 signaling output. However, current scientific understanding is still limited by the absence of a truly homogenous pentameric ligand. While COMP-based constructs and natural Angiopoietins (1 and 2) are capable of forming pentamers, they typically manifest as mixed oligomers, leading to a gap in knowledge regarding the specific signaling behavior—agonistic or antagonistic—of a pentameric valency. Leveraging artificial intelligence for protein design may provide the means to surpass existing technical hurdles in the development of a pentameric ligand.
Receptor geometry can also influence Tie2 cross-phosphorylations, co-receptor interactions, and adapter protein binding in Tie2’s cytosolic domain. F-domain scaffolds with the same valency but differing in geometry did not generate a significant difference in Tie2 activation [21]. Further investigation is needed to analyze the relationship between receptor geometry and signaling bias.
Previous studies have begun to explore the effects of ligand valency on Tie2–co-receptor interactions. Co-receptors, such as Tie1, ⍺5ꞵ1 integrin, and VE-PTP, regulate angiopoietins’ activity on Tie2. Upon Ang 1 or higher valency agonists binding, Tie2 is found to colocalize with ⍺5β1 and promote pFAK, pAkt, and pERK activation [21,51], whereas such an effect is not observed with lower-valency ligands [21]. Since Ang 1 F-domain has been shown to interact with integrin [51,69,70], F-domain likely binds to both Tie2 and integrin, forming a complex that is further stabilized and strengthened by higher valency. A de novo-designed Tie2 binder is also highly desirable as the native angiopoietins are thermally unstable, and the F-domain is also known to bind integrins [69,70] in addition to Tie2. This raises further questions regarding whether the F-domain or valency plays a more significant role in the association of Tie2 with its co-receptors.
Vascular endothelial protein tyrosine phosphatase (VE-PTP) is a Tie2 inhibitor. In vascular endothelial cells expressing vascular endothelial protein tyrosine phosphatase (VE-PTP), the role of Ang 2 is variable. Ang 2 acts as an agonist in the absence of Ang 1, but it also competes with Ang 1 and inhibits pTie2 and pAKT [54,55]. In contrast, in lymphatic endothelial cells that lack VE-PTP expression, Ang 2 acts as a consistent agonist, activating the Tie2/pAKT axis [56,57]. It is hypothesized that high-valency ligands, like Ang 1, may have induced large clusters of Tie2 that exclude VE-PTP from dephosphorylating Tie2. On the other hand, lower-valency ligands, like Ang 2, make smaller Tie2 clusters that are more susceptible to VE-PTP dephosphorylation, similar to the phase-separation process observed in T-cell receptor (TCR), in which the negative regulators are spatially excluded upon TCR activation [71,72].
Despite the structural similarity, Tie1 and Tie2 display very different signaling roles in angiogenesis. Tie1 is known as an orphan receptor that does not directly bind angiopoietins but is critical for modulating Tie2 surface presentation and signal transduction [73,74,75,76,77,78]. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), Ang 2 is shown to promote Tie1-Tie2 interaction, resulting in inhibitory effects in Tie2 signaling, whereas Ang 1 disrupts the Tie1-Tie2 interaction, leading to stable vessels [47,77]. These observations suggest that Ang 1 or high valency ligands are likely generating large clusters of Tie2 receptors, which excludes Tie1, whereas Ang 2 and low valency ligands make smaller Tie2 clusters, exposing more Tie2 for Tie1-Tie2 association. In contrast, other studies argue that Tie1-Tie2 heterodimer lowers the threshold for Tie2 activation, and is suggested to enable Ang 2 agonism by lowering the Tie2 activation threshold [74,76,78]. Since Ang 2 also forms higher oligomers, it is unclear whether Tie1 truly lowers Tie2 activation threshold or if it is driven by Ang 2 at higher valency. Interestingly, during inflammatory states, the Tie1 ectodomain is cleaved (shedding), an event that renders Tie2 susceptible to antagonism and contributes to vascular leakage [74,77]. It is apparent that more work is needed to delineate the regulation and function of the Tie1-Tie2 complex.
Artificial intelligence using RF diffusion has successfully generated fully synthetic de novo-designed binders [67,68]. These synthetic binders demonstrated superior affinity, specificity, and activity over the native growth factors such as fibronectin [79], FGF [80], TGF-β ligands [81], and insulin [82] (Table 2). Perhaps fully synthetic Tie1 and Tie2 binders with high specificity are needed to explore the true mode of action and function of the Tie1-Tie2 complex. Similarly, combining the Tie2 binder with the integrin binder (⍺5β1mb [79]) can also enable us to investigate the role of F-domain vs. valency in the Tie2–integrin complex. Protein design is a valuable tool that empowers biologists to not only dissect the relationship of ligand valency and Tie2 signaling output but also allows the precise manipulation of Tie2 signaling to control vascular dysfunctions in diseases.

4. Therapeutic Application of Design Proteins in Tie2-Mediated Vascular Dysfunction

The Angiopoietin–Tie2 signaling axis is central to both healthy and diseased blood vessels (Figure 5). Specifically, angiopoietins of varying valencies are involved in regulating diverse vascular functions and disease pathology. Herein, we review the role of this pathway in acute and chronic inflammation, as well as in cancer.

4.1. Acute Vascular Failure (Sepsis, ARDS, and TBI)

Acute vascular failure refers to a series of severe vascular complications, including sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and traumatic brain injury (TBI), characterized by leaky vasculature, inflammation, and hypoxia, which require immediate medical intervention to restore circulation and prevent permanent organ damage or death. These complications can be triggered by various conditions, including illnesses causing chronic or robust inflammation, and in response to infectious diseases.
Sepsis occurs when an overwhelming infection triggers systemic inflammation and widespread endothelial dysfunction. Experimental studies support a causal role for Angiopoietin/Tie2 signaling dysregulation in sepsis outcomes. Animal models of sepsis show that upregulating Tie2 signaling has a protective effect. For example, adenoviral overexpression of Ang 1 in mice with endotoxic-shock-preserved blood pressure, prevented capillary leakage, and dampened inflammation [24]. Furthermore, in animals with polymicrobiological abdominal sepsis in multiple organ dysfunction, the intravenous administration of recombinant Ang 1 improved the condition and survival time of the animals by preserving vascular barrier function [83] and reducing inflammation [84].
Conversely, reducing Tie2 activity or activating the antagonistic Ang 2 ligand worsens sepsis. Mice with even one Tie2 allele knocked out suffer greater vascular leakage and higher mortality under septic challenge [85]. Likewise, excess Ang 2 is harmful: both partial Ang 2 gene deletion [86] and lung-targeted RNAi against Ang 2 [87] have shown protective effects from vascular leak and death in septic mice. These and other studies have established hallmark Tie2 pathway signatures in sepsis in the clinical setting. The loss of Tie2 activity disrupts vascular stability, resulting in leaky capillaries, edema, leukocyte diapedesis, and microthromboses [88,89,90]. Clinically, studies have shown that an acute surge of circulating Ang 2, on the magnitude of 10–100 times over healthy individuals [91], is routinely observed early in sepsis and correlates with loss of vascular integrity and organ failure [20,92]. Correspondingly, the Ang 2/Ang 1 ratio in blood becomes markedly elevated, indicating severe Tie2 pathway impairment [19]. This Ang 2 elevation is such a consistent feature that Ang 2 has been proposed as a dynamic biomarker of sepsis severity. Interestingly, clustering Ang 2 into higher-order multimers using antibodies ABTAA produced Ang 1-like activity and ameliorated LPS-induced sepsis in mice [45].
There is some distinction between septic infection in the lungs and secondary complications from the widespread inflammation that may or may not be caused by septic infection. The latter is known as Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), a severe lung injury that occurs in response to severe respiratory inflammation caused by infections like pneumonia or SARS-CoV-2, or secondary to sepsis [26,93,94]. It is characterized by severe lung swelling that causes fluid to build up in the alveoli, impairing breathing and reducing oxygen availability in the blood. In animal models, therapeutically modulating Tie2 signaling activity defends the lungs against injury from various insults: pulmonary edema and inflammation caused by endotoxin [95], hyperoxia [96], and even chemical toxins [97,98]. Lung-specific studies in sepsis found that high Ang 2 levels make pulmonary microvessels leaky, causing protein-rich edema in airspaces and impaired gas exchange [92], but ARDS has also demonstrated connections with dysregulated Tie2 signaling, demonstrating the importance of the angiopoietin/Tie2 pathway in ARDS pathogenesis as in sepsis. Clinical studies in ARDS patients show that elevated Ang 2 in plasma or lung fluid correlates with worse oxygenation and more severe respiratory failure [99]. Notably, this Tie2 pathway disruption is not specific to infection. Even in what are known as sterile lung injuries, in which severe inflammation is triggered by surgery or other direct or indirect traumatic injury as opposed to bacterial or viral infection, studies have demonstrated a higher Ang 2:Ang 1 ratio [100,101,102], consistent with Ang 2 misregulation being the harbinger of critical illness as opposed to some specific pathogen. Tie2 misregulation has also been linked to ARDS through inherent genetic variations. Studies have shown that individuals with various polymorphisms in Ang 2 that lead to higher Ang 2 secretion are at increased risk for developing ARDS following pulmonary injury [25]. Similarly, a common variant in TEK (the Tie2 gene), which results in lower baseline Tie2 expression, was found to predispose individuals to ARDS [85].
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) damages the brain function via a cascade of events from primary mechanical injury, followed by a secondary injury phase characterized by blood–brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, cerebral edema, and neuroinflammation. This disruption allows for the extravasation of blood-borne factors (e.g., fibrinogen and albumin) and immune cells into the brain parenchyma, exacerbating neuronal death and functional impairment. The Ang-Tie2 signaling axis, a critical regulator of endothelial quiescence and vascular stability, has emerged as a central determinant of BBB integrity following TBI. The Tie2 pathway appears to drive age-related differences in TBI recovery. Juvenile mice exhibit faster restoration of BBB integrity compared to adults, a phenotype that is abolished by pharmacological inhibition of Tie2, suggesting that robust Tie2 signaling is the mechanism underlying the “plasticity” of the juvenile BBB [103]. Elevated Ang 2 levels in the serum of TBI patients have also been identified as a potential biomarker for the severity of BBB disruption [104]. Ang 1 is found to rapidly decrease upon BBB injury, while Ang 2 expression increases in the cortex, hippocampus, and microvessels [105]. Activating Tie2 using the F-domain scaffold agonist, Icos1, was able to accelerate neurovascular regeneration in mice after TBI through the activation of the Tie2-pAKT pathway [21].

4.2. Chronic Vascular Disorders and Inflammation

Inflammation is profoundly interrelated with the Angiopoietin–Tie2 axis. In fact, Tie2 can be seen as a regulatory switch between vascular homeostasis and inflammation [106]. In uninflamed conditions, Ang 1 from pericytes and platelets constantly activates Tie2 in the endothelium, thereby keeping blood vessels tight and non-adhesive to leukocytes. However, during inflammation, endothelial cells respond by releasing stored Ang 2, which floods the local environment and competitively inhibits Ang 1, upregulating vascular permeability. This process typically remains local and controlled, but in chronic inflammatory conditions, Ang 2 is upregulated in affected tissues, leading to abnormal angiogenesis and persistent leukocyte influx [107]. Chronic inflammation occurs as part of many diseases. Here, we discuss those most profoundly connected with the vascular system.
In chronic kidney disease (CKD), numerous studies report that Ang 2 levels are chronically elevated, both in plasma and within diseased kidneys [30,108,109]. Clinically, high circulating Ang 2 (and a high Ang 2/Ang 1 ratio) in CKD patients correlates with faster progression to end-stage renal failure [29,32]. In one cohort of 319 CKD patients, those with higher Ang 2 and Ang 2/Ang 1 ratio experienced significantly greater risk of kidney function decline, suggesting Ang 2 is not just a marker but a driver of renal injury [28]. Mechanistically, excess Ang 2 promotes glomerular and vascular injury in the kidney, whereas Ang 1–Tie2 signaling is protective. In experimental models of kidney disease (obstructive nephropathy or ischemia–reperfusion injury), overexpression of Ang 1 was shown to attenuate damage: Ang 1 preserved microvascular integrity, reduced endothelial cell apoptosis, and decreased inflammation and fibrosis in the injured kidney [110,111] by dampening the endothelial secretion of chemokine CCL2, thereby curbing monocyte/macrophage infiltration into the kidney [28]. It also directly protected the endothelium from apoptotic signals induced by Ang 2 and Wnt ligands present during injury. Blocking Ang 2 had beneficial effects: administering the Ang 2-neutralizing agent L1-10 to mice with progressive CKD significantly reduced peritubular capillary loss, macrophage accumulation, and kidney fibrosis. One study found that COMP-Ang 1 significantly reduced endotoxin-induced vascular leakage in the lung, heart, and kidney, but not in the liver or intestine, demonstrating the potential of utilizing Ang 1-like ligands for treating CKD [112].
Diabetes mellitus, especially when uncontrolled, leads to chronic vascular complications in multiple organs. A unifying feature of diabetic complications is endothelial dysfunction driven by hyperglycemia and resulting inflammation, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia [113]. Recent evidence implicates the Angiopoietin–Tie2 system as a mediator of this dysfunction. Chronic hyperglycemia itself causes an upregulation of Angiopoietin-2 in vascular cells [114]. Consequently, diabetic patients often have elevated Ang 2 levels in their circulation. For instance, Ang 2 is higher in the serum of type 2 diabetics with microvascular complications [115], and it correlates with markers of endothelial injury and inflammation. Vasculopathy refers to a secondary disease affecting blood vessels following a primary inflammation, and diabetes can cause widespread diabetic vasculopathy [116]. For example, in diabetic kidneys, hyperglycemia-induced Ang 2 elevation in glomerular endothelial cells leads to loss of the glomerular filtration barrier. High glomerular Ang 2 was found to cause pericyte-like mesangial cell dropout and endothelial fenestration, promoting albumin leakage into urine. In patients with diabetic nephropathy, plasma Ang 2 levels correlate with proteinuria severity and disease progression [28].
One of the most common diabetic vascular complications, diabetic retinopathy, exemplifies this process. In diabetes, retinal Ang 2 is markedly increased, while Ang 1 is unchanged [117]. This shift permits retinal capillaries to become permeable and prone to leakage, a key feature of diabetic macular edema. This same study found that Ang 2 also induces inflammation in the diabetic retina by promoting leukocyte adhesion and even triggering the apoptosis of astrocytes, a retinal supporting cell [117], causing their loss and thus weakening vascular support. These insights, combined with older studies showing synergistic effects of modulating both VEGFA and Ang 2 [118,119], showed reduced inflammation and better repair of existing vasculature, leading to improved vision outcomes. These have led to new, more effective therapies: notably, faricimab, a bispecific antibody that neutralizes both VEGF and Ang 2, was approved to treat diabetic macular edema [120,121]. In phase III trials, a broad population of patients who received anti-Ang 2 and VEGF treatment had improved retinal edema and vision outcomes compared to anti-VEGF alone [122]. COMP-Ang 1 protects against renal damage by preserving vascular integrity, reducing albuminuria, and decreasing glomerular hypertrophy and fibrosis [123]. In diabetic retinopathy, COMP-Ang 1 also demonstrated promising results in stabilizing vascular integrity under hyperglycemic environments in in vitro and in vivo mouse models [124,125].
Atherosclerosis is a chronic arterial disease that can occur independently of diabetes, though studies have shown that diabetes can both induce its development and accelerate deterioration [126]. A recent study definitively linked the Tie2 signaling axis to the control of the development of atherosclerosis. Their findings indicate that Tie2 signaling in the arterial endothelium is, in fact, atheroprotective: in healthy arteries, endothelial cells experience steady laminar blood flow, which maintains high Tie2 activity (via Ang 1 from supporting cells), helping to keep the endothelium anti-inflammatory. Moreover, their human genome-wide association study identified inactivating variants in the TIE2 (TEK) gene that were associated with increased risk for developing coronary artery disease. Further mechanistic work showed this variant lies in an intronic enhancer responsive to TNFα; the risk allele impairs Tie2 upregulation under inflammatory stress, potentially making arteries more vulnerable to inflammation. In conjunction with genetic risk factors associated with atherosclerosis, this and other recent studies have found that mechanical factors inherent to macrovascular complications can further exacerbate development and progression. Regions of disturbed flow (such as branch points predisposed to plaque) have reduced Tie2 signaling and higher Ang 2, contributing to local endothelial activation [34,35,127]. In experimental atherosclerosis models, endothelial-specific deletion of Tie2 accelerates plaque formation. Mice lacking Tie2 in arterial endothelial cells developed larger atherosclerotic lesions with increased endothelial NF-κB activation, upregulated adhesion molecules VCAM1 and ICAM1, and greater infiltration of monocytes and T cells into the artery wall [35]. Loss of Tie2 was associated with increased nuclear FOXO1 and a pro-inflammatory gene expression profile in both endothelial cells and even in neighboring fibroblasts, enhancing the inflammatory state. By contrast, mice with intact Tie2 signaling had relative resistance to atherosclerosis, even when challenged with a high-fat diet and other risk factors. Collectively, these findings highlight the Tie2 axis as a major target of novel therapeutics for chronic vascular diseases and inflammation.

4.3. Oncogenesis and the Tumor Microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment is composed of a diverse mix of typically non-malignant cell types that are leveraged together to facilitate tumor survival and progression, including endothelial cells that will enable the growth of new blood vessels for tumor growth [128]. Accordingly, numerous antiangiogenic therapeutics have been developed to be used in conjunction with other therapeutics to help reduce tumor growth while targeting other tumor cells [129]. However, these therapeutics, which typically target the VEGF, FGF, or PDGF pathway, have shown limitations in efficacy [130]. For instance, small-molecule or antibody inhibitors against the VEGF pathway have an average life expectancy of 4–5 months, along with serious side effects, drug resistance, and cancer relapse [129,130].
Unsurprisingly, the Angiopoietin–Tie2 axis has been identified as pivotal in cancer, particularly in tumor angiogenesis, tumor inflammation, and metastasis. High Ang 2 levels have been demonstrated in many cancers, including glioblastoma [131], colorectal [132], and breast cancer [133]. These elevated levels correlate with increased microvessel density and poor prognosis, linking Ang 2 to tumor vascularization and metastatic potential [36]. Studies have found that although Ang 2 is only mildly expressed in healthy endothelial cells, tumor-associated endothelial cells often overexpress Ang 2, leading to leaky vascular integrity, hypoxic tumor environment, and upregulation of VEGF overexpression to promote vascular sprouting, leading to aberrant pathological angiogenesis [12,134]. Early studies found that using anti-Ang 2 antibodies (ABTAA) and peptide body (AMG 386) inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth [135,136]. Accordingly, researchers have developed therapies that synergize the inhibition of VEGF and the Tie2 signaling axis, which have yielded more successful control of tumor angiogenesis in preclinical mouse models [135,137,138,139,140,141]. Elevated Ang1 levels are also associated with poor prognosis and increased tumor growth in certain types of cancers, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and gliomas [142,143].
Tie2 signaling also influences various cell types in the tumor microenvironment in addition to endothelial cells. In oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs), high Ang 1/Tie2 expression in cancer cells drives epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis [144]. Tie2-expressing macrophages (TEMs) are a subset of tumor-associated macrophages that express the Tie2 receptor and are highly pro-angiogenic [145]. Ang 1 can induce p38 and Erk1/2 phosphorylation in TEMs and drive macrophage differentiation toward a pro-inflammatory state (M1) [146]. M1 macrophages are activated to eradicate pathogens and cancerous cells [147]. In contrast, Ang 2 from tumor vessels can recruit and activate these TEMs, which will further stimulate tumor angiogenesis [148]. Several groups have hypothesized that these cells are responsible for repairing damaged tumor vasculature and facilitating tumor relapse [14,149,150,151], but knocking out Tie2 in these specific monocytes did not alter the relapse rate of solid tumors [152]. One recent study even found that TEMs promoted angiogenesis in chronically ischemic brain tissue [23], supporting the studies showing that these cells can be pro-angiogenic in cancer microenvironments, which are also inherently ischemic. One study found that Ang 2 blockade did not inhibit the recruitment of MRC1(+) TIE2-expressing macrophages but impeded their upregulation of Tie2, their association with blood vessels, and their ability to restore angiogenesis in tumors [153]. Another found that impairing the ability for TEMs and other tumor cells to communicate prevented metastasis in breast carcinomas [154]. Taken together, Tie2 plays a different role in cancer. Tie2 can exhibit pro-tumor or anti-tumor characteristics in different cancers. Thus, targeting Tie2 using agonists or antagonists should be tailored to the specific cancer type.

5. Conclusions

The complex signaling outcomes of the Angiopoietin–Tie2 axis are fundamentally governed by ligand valency and the resulting receptor clustering dynamics, rather than simple binding affinity. Historically, Ang 1 is known as the agonist while Ang 2 is the antagonist, but this claim is obscured by the “Ang 2 switch” mechanism, better known as the context-dependent agonist/antagonist. The technological advance in protein design enables us to dissect the Ang 1 vs. Ang 2 activity based on ligand valency. Studies utilizing Comp-Ang, antibodies, angioprotein surrogates, and modified angiopoetins provided pivotal insights about Tie2 signaling and vascular outcomes. The development of F-domain scaffolds provides additional clarification about how angiopoietin valency correlates with Tie2 signaling outcome by precisely controlling ligand valency and geometry. F-domain scaffolds have demonstrated that high-order multimers (valency of 6 or more) are required to drive Ang 1-like activity, whereas low-valency ligands (valency of four or lower) mimic Ang 2-like activity. This technological and mechanistic breakthrough translates directly into clinical potential for managing vascular dysfunction.
The ability to engineer synthetic Tie2 binders offers a powerful toolkit for a spectrum of devastating conditions. By enforcing receptor clustering at the right valency and geometry, Tie2 has the potential to control acute vascular integrity crises (sepsis, ARDS, and TBI) and chronic inflammatory states (diabetic retinopathy, atherosclerosis, and CKD) more precisely. In acute and chronic vascular injuries, where the Tie2 pathway is suppressed by elevated Ang 2, high-valency agonists, F-domain scaffold Icos1 and Comp-Ang 1, offer a strategy to rescue endothelial barrier function and prevent leakage. The Tie2 pathway plays a dynamic and critical role in pathogenic angiogenesis and Tie2-expressing macrophage (TEM) immune response in different cancers. In the tumor microenvironment, where Ang 2-mediated instability facilitates aberrant angiogenesis and metastasis, targeting this axis with precise Ang 1-like super agonists remain a critical therapeutic avenue. Ultimately, the ability to control Tie2 signaling outputs through precise valency engineering represents a paradigm shift from non-specific, broad-spectrum modulation of angiopoietins to targeted vascular management.
Artificial intelligence using RF diffusion sheds light on replacing native ligands with fully synthetic, de novo-designed binders [67,68]. Many of these de novo-designed protein binders have already demonstrated superior affinity, specificity, and activity over the native growth factors. Producing native proteins at scale is challenging due to their thermal instability and high cost. Furthermore, their non-specific binding to multiple targets complicates research and therapeutic development. A de novo-designed Tie2 binder is highly desirable as the native angiopoietins and F-domain-based constructs have the same limitations. The Ang 1 F-domain is also known to bind integrins in addition to Tie2 [69,70], which can generate off-target effects when used in clinical applications. Developing completely synthetic Tie2 agonists and antagonists with precisely defined valency and novel binder scaffolds is a critical area for future research. Ultimately, the integration of structural biology and artificial intelligence in protein design marks a new era in vascular medicine. Before adapting synthetic proteins for therapeutic application, it is important to evaluate and overcome translational challenges, such as in vivo pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity of non-native proteins, tissue-specific delivery, and toxicity. Future research must focus on elucidating the exact dynamics of Tie2 co-receptors and translating a de novo-designed, highly stable Tie2 binder at the appropriate valency into clinical trials. By mastering the valency and geometric requirements of Tie2 activation, we move closer to resolving the root causes of severe vascular dysfunctions.

Author Contributions

Y.T.Z. and D.D.E. prepared the original draft, H.R.-B. and J.M. reviewed, revised and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health DE033016, 1P01GM081619, R01GM097372, and R01GM083867; the NHLBI Progenitor Cell Biology Consortium (U01HL099997; UO1HL099993) SCGE COF220919; DOD PR203328 W81XWH-21-1-0006; and the Stem Cell Gift Funds for H.R-B.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Ruohola-Baker lab for stimulating discussions. Y.T.Z is a volunteer scholar in the Ruohola-Baker lab.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

FdAng 1 F-domain
Ang 1-Fc2 Ang 1 F-domains fused with the antibody Fc domain
CA1-3CMP-Ang variants, coiled-coil domain of Ang1 replaced with a short, trimeric coiled-coil domain of cartilage matrix protein
GCN4-Ang 1Ang 1 F-domain fused to coiled-coil domains of GCN4
GCN4-Ang2Ang 2 F-domain fused to coiled-coil domains of GCN4
CA1-1 and CA1-2CMP-Ang variants, coiled-coil domain of Ang1 replaced with a short, trimeric coiled-coil domain of cartilage matrix protein
C4Modified tpr1C4F to form tetramer and presents 4 Ang 1 F-domains
AkC4Tetramer formed by 4 ankyrin domain repeats presenting 4 Ang 1 F-domain
MAT-Ang 1 or MAT-Ang 2Matrilin-1 protein fused with Ang 1 or Ang 2 F-domain
Comp-Ang 1 or Com-Ang 2Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein with Fd of Ang 1 or Ang 2
H3, H6, or H8Helical bundles conjugated with 3, 6, or 8 Ang 1 F-domains
Tet1 & Tet2Tetrahedral nanocage 1 or 2 conjugated with 12 Ang 1 F-domains
Tet1ATrimeric subunit of Tet1 presenting 3 Ang 1 F-domains
O42.1Octahedral nanocage formed with Ang 1-Fc to present 24 Ang 1 F-domains
Icos1 & Icos2Icosahedral nanocage 1 or 2 conjugated with 60 Ang 1 F-domains
Icos1-ATrimeric subunit of Icos 1
Cap-FdDe novo-designed capsid cage conjugated with 60 Ang 1 F-domains
I52.6Icosahedral nanocage formed with Ang 1-Fc to present 50 Ang 1 F-domains

References

  1. Brindle, N.P.J.; Saharinen, P.; Alitalo, K. Signaling and Functions of Angiopoietin-1 in Vascular Protection. Circ. Res. 2006, 98, 1014–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, H.J.; Cho, C.-H.; Hwang, S.-J.; Choi, H.-H.; Kim, K.-T.; Ahn, S.Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Oh, J.-L.; Lee, G.M.; Koh, G.Y. Biological characterization of angiopoietin-3 and angiopoietin-4. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 1200–1208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Sato, T.N.; Tozawa, Y.; Deutsch, U.; Wolburg-Buchholz, K.; Fujiwara, Y.; Gendron-Maguire, M.; Gridley, T.; Wolburg, H.; Risau, W.; Qin, Y. Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation. Nature 1995, 376, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suri, C.; Jones, P.F.; Patan, S.; Bartunkova, S.; Maisonpierre, P.C.; Davis, S.; Sato, T.N.; Yancopoulos, G.D. Requisite Role of Angiopoietin-1, a Ligand for the TIE2 Receptor, during Embryonic Angiogenesis. Cell 1996, 87, 1171–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dumont, D.J.; Gradwohl, G.; Fong, G.H.; Puri, M.C.; Gertsenstein, M.; Auerbach, A.; Breitman, M.L. Dominant-negative and targeted null mutations in the endothelial receptor tyrosine kinase, tek, reveal a critical role in vasculogenesis of the embryo. Gene Dev. 1994, 8, 1897–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gale, N.W.; Thurston, G.; Hackett, S.F.; Renard, R.; Wang, Q.; McClain, J.; Martin, C.; Witte, C.; Witte, M.H.; Jackson, D.; et al. Angiopoietin-2 Is Required for Postnatal Angiogenesis and Lymphatic Patterning, and Only the Latter Role Is Rescued by Angiopoietin-1. Dev. Cell 2002, 3, 411–423. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hackett, S.F.; Wiegand, S.; Yancopoulos, G.; Campochiaro, P.A. Angiopoietin-2 plays an important role in retinal angiogenesis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2002, 192, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dellinger, M.; Hunter, R.; Bernas, M.; Gale, N.; Yancopoulos, G.; Erickson, R.; Witte, M. Defective remodeling and maturation of the lymphatic vasculature in Angiopoietin-2 deficient mice. Dev. Biol. 2008, 319, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stoeltzing, O.; Ahmad, S.A.; Liu, W.; McCarty, M.F.; Wey, J.S.; Parikh, A.A.; Fan, F.; Reinmuth, N.; Kawaguchi, M.; Bucana, C.D.; et al. Angiopoietin-1 inhibits vascular permeability, angiogenesis, and growth of hepatic colon cancer tumors. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 3370–3377. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fukuhara, S.; Sako, K.; Noda, K.; Zhang, J.; Minami, M.; Mochizuki, N. Angiopoietin-1/Tie2 receptor signaling in vascular quiescence and angiogenesis. Histol. Histopathol. 2010, 25, 387–396. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gamble, J.R.; Drew, J.; Trezise, L.; Underwood, A.; Parsons, M.; Kasminkas, L.; Rudge, J.; Yancopoulos, G.; Vadas, M.A. Angiopoietin-1 Is an Antipermeability and Anti-Inflammatory Agent In Vitro and Targets Cell Junctions. Circ. Res. 2000, 87, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hashizume, H.; Falcón, B.L.; Kuroda, T.; Baluk, P.; Coxon, A.; Yu, D.; Bready, J.V.; Oliner, J.D.; McDonald, D.M. Complementary Actions of Inhibitors of Angiopoietin-2 and VEGF on Tumor Angiogenesis and Growth. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 2213–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ali, E.A.M.; Altaie, A.M.; Talaat, I.M.; Hamoudi, R. Putative Role of Tie2-Expressing Monocytes/Macrophages in Colorectal Cancer Progression Through Enhancement of Angiogenesis and Metastasis. Cancers 2025, 17, 2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, L.; Li, J.; Wang, F.; Dai, C.; Wu, F.; Liu, X.; Li, T.; Glauben, R.; Zhang, Y.; Nie, G.; et al. Tie2 Expression on Macrophages Is Required for Blood Vessel Reconstruction and Tumor Relapse after Chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 6828–6838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Matsubara, T.; Kanto, T.; Kuroda, S.; Yoshio, S.; Higashitani, K.; Kakita, N.; Miyazaki, M.; Sakakibara, M.; Hiramatsu, N.; Kasahara, A.; et al. TIE2-expressing monocytes as a diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with angiogenesis. Hepatology 2013, 57, 1416–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Palma, M.D.; Naldini, L. Angiopoietin-2 TIEs Up Macrophages in Tumor Angiogenesis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 5226–5232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xing, Y.; Su, T.T.; Ruohola-Baker, H. Tie-mediated signal from apoptotic cells protects stem cells in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brodsky, J.; Tashi, Z.; Christopher, S.K.; Kruitoff, R.; Abbasi, M.; Cerna, G.; Gohsman, S.B.; Mana, M.D.; Bartelle, B.B. Microglia express Tie2 in a longitudinal imaging study of acute neural injury in mice. Mol. Biol. Cell 2025, 36, ar112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fiusa, M.M.L.; Costa-Lima, C.; de Souza, G.R.; Vigorito, A.C.; Aranha, F.J.P.; Lorand-Metze, I.; Annichino-Bizzacchi, J.M.; de Souza, C.A.; Paula, E.V.D. A high angiopoietin-2/angiopoietin-1 ratio is associated with a high risk of septic shock in patients with febrile neutropenia. Crit. Care 2013, 17, R169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Orfanos, S.E.; Kotanidou, A.; Glynos, C.; Athanasiou, C.; Tsigkos, S.; Dimopoulou, I.; Sotiropoulou, C.; Zakynthinos, S.; Armaganidis, A.; Papapetropoulos, A.; et al. Angiopoietin-2 is increased in severe sepsis: Correlation with inflammatory mediators. Crit. Care Med. 2007, 35, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhao, Y.T.; Fallas, J.A.; Saini, S.; Ueda, G.; Somasundaram, L.; Zhou, Z.; Raj, I.X.; Xu, C.; Carter, L.; Wrenn, S.; et al. F-domain valency determines outcome of signaling through the angiopoietin pathway. EMBO Rep. 2021, 22, e53471. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, E.; Hu, W.; Yang, A.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, J.; Luo, J.; Wang, Y.; Tang, T.; Cui, H. Thrombin promotes pericyte coverage by Tie2 activation in a rat model of intracerebral hemorrhage. Brain Res. 2019, 1708, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tai, C.; Ling, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Sun, J.; Mo, N.; Sun, T.; Huang, L.; Yao, C.; Wang, H.; et al. Tie2-expressing monocytes/macrophages promote angiogenesis in chronically ischaemic brain tissue. Cell Biosci. 2025, 15, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Parikh, S.M. Dysregulation of the angiopoietin–Tie-2 axis in sepsis and ARDS. Virulence 2013, 4, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Su, L.; Zhai, R.; Sheu, C.-C.; Gallagher, D.C.; Gong, M.N.; Tejera, P.; Thompson, B.T.; Christiani, D.C. Genetic variants in the angiopoietin-2 gene are associated with increased risk of ARDS. Intensiv. Care Med. 2009, 35, 1024–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  26. Kim, W.-Y.; Hong, S.-B. Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Recent Update. Tuberc. Respir. Dis. 2015, 79, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sack, K.D.; Kellum, J.A.; Parikh, S.M. The Angiopoietin-Tie2 Pathway in Critical Illness. Crit. Care Clin. 2020, 36, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chang, F.-C.; Liu, C.-H.; Luo, A.-J.; Huang, T.T.-M.; Tsai, M.-H.; Chen, Y.-J.; Lai, C.-F.; Chiang, C.-K.; Lin, T.-H.; Chiang, W.-C.; et al. Angiopoietin-2 inhibition attenuates kidney fibrosis by hindering chemokine C-C motif ligand 2 expression and apoptosis of endothelial cells. Kidney Int. 2022, 102, 780–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. David, S.; John, S.G.; Jefferies, H.J.; Sigrist, M.K.; Kümpers, P.; Kielstein, J.T.; Haller, H.; McIntyre, C.W. Angiopoietin-2 levels predict mortality in CKD patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2012, 27, 1867–1872. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Sayed, S.Z.; Mohamed, E.R.; Moustafa, M.T.; Ali, L.H.; Mahgoob, M.H. Assessing Vascular Biomarkers and Their Association with Hypertension in Paediatric Chronic Kidney Disease. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Méd. J. 2024, 25, 66–73. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jian, W.; Li, L.; Wei, X.-M.; Guan, J.-H.; Yang, G.-L.; Gui, C. Serum angiopoietin-2 concentrations of post-PCI are correlated with the parameters of renal function in patients with coronary artery disease. Medicine 2019, 98, e13960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. David, S.; Kümpers, P.; Lukasz, A.; Fliser, D.; Martens-Lobenhoffer, J.; Bode-Böger, S.M.; Kliem, V.; Haller, H.; Kielstein, J.T. Circulating angiopoietin-2 levels increase with progress of chronic kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010, 25, 2571–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Abumrad, N.A.; Cabodevilla, A.G.; Samovski, D.; Pietka, T.; Basu, D.; Goldberg, I.J. Endothelial Cell Receptors in Tissue Lipid Uptake and Metabolism. Circ. Res. 2021, 128, 433–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Endothelial tyrosine kinase Tie2 counteracts atherosclerosis development. Nat. Cardiovasc. Res. 2023, 2, 232–233. [CrossRef]
  35. Anisimov, A.; Fang, S.; Hemanthakumar, K.A.; Örd, T.; van Avondt, K.; Chevre, R.; Toropainen, A.; Singha, P.; Gilani, H.; Nguyen, S.D.; et al. The angiopoietin receptor Tie2 is atheroprotective in arterial endothelium. Nat. Cardiovasc. Res. 2023, 2, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Saharinen, P.; Eklund, L.; Alitalo, K. Therapeutic targeting of the angiopoietin–TIE pathway. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 635–661. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jones, N.; Chen, S.H.; Sturk, C.; Master, Z.; Tran, J.; Kerbel, R.S.; Dumont, D.J. A Unique Autophosphorylation Site on Tie2/Tek Mediates Dok-R Phosphotyrosine Binding Domain Binding and Function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 2658–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kontos, C.D.; Stauffer, T.P.; Yang, W.-P.; York, J.D.; Huang, L.; Blanar, M.A.; Meyer, T.; Peters, K.G. Tyrosine 1101 of Tie2 Is the Major Site of Association of p85 and Is Required for Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and Akt Downloaded from. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 4131–4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jones, N.; Dumont, D.J. The Tek/Tie2 receptor signals through a novel Dok-related docking protein, Dok-R. Oncogene 1998, 17, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Partanen, J.; Armstrong, E.; Mäkelä, T.P.; Korhonen, J.; Sandberg, M.; Renkonen, R.; Knuutila, S.; Huebner, K.; Alitalo, K. A novel endothelial cell surface receptor tyrosine kinase with extracellular epidermal growth factor homology domains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992, 12, 1698–1707. [Google Scholar]
  41. Puri, M.C.; Rossant, J.; Alitalo, K.; Bernstein, A.; Partanen, J. The receptor tyrosine kinase TIE is required for integrity and survival of vascular endothelial cells. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 5884–5891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, I.; Kim, H.G.; Moon, S.-O.; Chae, S.W.; So, J.-N.; Koh, K.N.; Ahn, B.C.; Koh, G.Y. Angiopoietin-1 Induces Endothelial Cell Sprouting Through the Activation of Focal Adhesion Kinase and Plasmin Secretion. Circ. Res. 2000, 86, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, I.; Kim, J.-H.; Moon, S.-O.; Kwak, H.J.; Kim, N.-G.; Koh, G.Y. Angiopoietin-2 at high concentration can enhance endothelial cell survival through the phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase/Akt signal transduction pathway. Oncogene 2000, 19, 4549–4552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kim, I.; Kim, H.G.; So, J.-N.; Kim, J.H.; Kwak, H.J.; Koh, G.Y. Angiopoietin-1 Regulates Endothelial Cell Survival Through the Phosphatidylinositol 3′-Kinase/Akt Signal Transduction Pathway. Circ. Res. 2000, 86, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Han, S.; Lee, S.-J.; Kim, K.E.; Lee, H.S.; Oh, N.; Park, I.; Ko, E.; Oh, S.J.; Lee, Y.-S.; Kim, D.; et al. Amelioration of sepsis by TIE2 activation–induced vascular protection. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 335ra55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Master, Z.; Jones, N.; Tran, J.; Jones, J.; Kerbel, R.S.; Dumont, D.J. Dok-R plays a pivotal role in angiopoietin-1-dependent cell migration through recruitment and activation of Pak. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 5919–5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yu, X.; Seegar, T.C.M.; Dalton, A.C.; Tzvetkova-Robev, D.; Goldgur, Y.; Rajashankar, K.R.; Nikolov, D.B.; Barton, W.A. Structural basis for angiopoietin-1–mediated signaling initiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7205–7210. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kim, H.-Z.; Jung, K.; Kim, H.M.; Cheng, Y.; Koh, G.Y. A designed angiopoietin-2 variant, pentameric COMP-Ang2, strongly activates Tie2 receptor and stimulates angiogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA-Mol. Cell Res. 2009, 1793, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  49. Parikh, S.M. The Angiopoietin-Tie2 Signaling Axis in Systemic Inflammation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 28, 1973–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Milam, K.E.; Parikh, S.M. The angiopoietin-Tie2 signaling axis in the vascular leakage of systemic inflammation. Tissue Barriers 2015, 3, e957508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dalton, A.C.; Shlamkovitch, T.; Papo, N.; Barton, W.A. Constitutive Association of Tie1 and Tie2 with Endothelial Integrins is Functionally Modulated by Angiopoietin-1 and Fibronectin. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163732, Erratum in PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179059.. [Google Scholar]
  52. Felcht, M.; Luck, R.; Schering, A.; Seidel, P.; Srivastava, K.; Hu, J.; Bartol, A.; Kienast, Y.; Vettel, C.; Loos, E.K.; et al. Angiopoietin-2 differentially regulates angiogenesis through TIE2 and integrin signaling. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 1991–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Koblizek, T.I.; Weiss, C.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Deutsch, U.; Risau, W. Angiopoietin-1 induces sprouting angiogenesis in vitro. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8, 529–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Maisonpierre, P.C.; Suri, C.; Jones, P.F.; Bartunkova, S.; Wiegand, S.J.; Radziejewski, C.; Compton, D.; McClain, J.; Aldrich, T.H.; Papadopoulos, N.; et al. Angiopoietin-2, a Natural Antagonist for Tie2 That Disrupts in vivo Angiogenesis. Science 1997, 277, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yuan, H.T.; Khankin, E.V.; Karumanchi, S.A.; Parikh, S.M. Angiopoietin 2 Is a Partial Agonist/Antagonist of Tie2 Signaling in the Endothelium. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 2011–2022. [Google Scholar]
  56. Souma, T.; Thomson, B.R.; Heinen, S.; Carota, I.A.; Yamaguchi, S.; Onay, T.; Liu, P.; Ghosh, A.K.; Li, C.; Eremina, V.; et al. Context-dependent functions of angiopoietin 2 are determined by the endothelial phosphatase VEPTP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 1298–1303. [Google Scholar]
  57. Carota, I.A.; Kenig-Kozlovsky, Y.; Onay, T.; Scott, R.; Thomson, B.R.; Souma, T.; Bartlett, C.S.; Li, Y.; Procissi, D.; Ramirez, V.; et al. Targeting VE-PTP phosphatase protects the kidney from diabetic injury. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 936–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Barton, W.A.; Tzvetkova-Robev, D.; Miranda, E.P.; Kolev, M.V.; Rajashankar, K.R.; Himanen, J.P.; Nikolov, D.B. Crystal structures of the Tie2 receptor ectodomain and the angiopoietin-2–Tie2 complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kim, K.-T.; Choi, H.-H.; Steinmetz, M.O.; Maco, B.; Kammerer, R.A.; Ahn, S.Y.; Kim, H.-Z.; Lee, G.M.; Koh, G.Y. Oligomerization and Multimerization Are Critical for Angiopoietin-1 to Bind and Phosphorylate Tie2. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 20126–20131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Procopio, W.N.; Pelavin, P.I.; Lee, W.M.F.; Yeilding, N.M. Angiopoietin-1 and -2 Coiled Coil Domains Mediate Distinct Homo-oligomerization Patterns, but Fibrinogen-like Domains Mediate Ligand Activity. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 30196–30201. [Google Scholar]
  61. Cho, C.-H.; Kammerer, R.A.; Lee, H.J.; Steinmetz, M.O.; Ryu, Y.S.; Lee, S.H.; Yasunaga, K.; Kim, K.-T.; Kim, I.; Choi, H.-H.; et al. COMP-Ang1: A designed angiopoietin-1 variant with nonleaky angiogenic activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 5547–5552. [Google Scholar]
  62. Oh, N.; Kim, K.; Kim, S.J.; Park, I.; Lee, J.-E.; Seo, Y.S.; An, H.J.; Kim, H.M.; Koh, G.Y. A Designed Angiopoietin-1 Variant, Dimeric CMP-Ang1 Activates Tie2 and Stimulates Angiogenesis and Vascular Stabilization in N-glycan Dependent Manner. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Divine, R.; Dang, H.V.; Ueda, G.; Fallas, J.A.; Vulovic, I.; Sheffler, W.; Saini, S.; Zhao, Y.T.; Raj, I.X.; Morawski, P.A.; et al. Designed proteins assemble antibodies into modular nanocages. Science 2021, 372, eabd9994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lutz, I.D.; Wang, S.; Norn, C.; Courbet, A.; Borst, A.J.; Zhao, Y.T.; Dosey, A.; Cao, L.; Xu, J.; Leaf, E.M.; et al. Top-down design of protein architectures with reinforcement learning. Science 2023, 380, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Liu, F.-Y.; Cho, Y.-L.; Fridayana, F.R.; Niloofar, L.; Vo, M.N.; Huang, Y.; Limanjaya, A.; Kwon, M.-H.; Ock, J.; Lee, S.-J.; et al. MT-100, a human Tie2-agonistic antibody, improves penile neurovasculature in diabetic mice via the novel target Srpx2. Exp. Mol. Med. 2025, 57, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jo, G.; Bae, J.; Hong, H.J.; Han, A.; Kim, D.-K.; Hong, S.P.; Kim, J.A.; Lee, S.; Koh, G.Y.; Kim, H.M. Structural insights into the clustering and activation of Tie2 receptor mediated by Tie2 agonistic antibody. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cao, L.; Coventry, B.; Goreshnik, I.; Huang, B.; Sheffler, W.; Park, J.S.; Jude, K.M.; Marković, I.; Kadam, R.U.; Verschueren, K.H.G.; et al. Design of protein-binding proteins from the target structure alone. Nature 2022, 605, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Watson, J.L.; Juergens, D.; Bennett, N.R.; Trippe, B.L.; Yim, J.; Eisenach, H.E.; Ahern, W.; Borst, A.J.; Ragotte, R.J.; Milles, L.F.; et al. De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion. Nature 2023, 620, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dallabrida, S.M.; Ismail, N.; Oberle, J.R.; Himes, B.E.; Rupnick, M.A. Angiopoietin-1 Promotes Cardiac and Skeletal Myocyte Survival Through Integrins. Circ. Res. 2005, 96, e8–e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dallabrida, S.M.; Ismail, N.S.; Pravda, E.A.; Parodi, E.M.; Dickie, R.; Durand, E.M.; Lai, J.; Cassiola, F.; Rogers, R.A.; Rupnick, M.A. Integrin binding angiopoietin-1 monomers reduce cardiac hypertrophy. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 3010–3023. [Google Scholar]
  71. Boeynaems, S.; Alberti, S.; Fawzi, N.L.; Mittag, T.; Polymenidou, M.; Rousseau, F.; Schymkowitz, J.; Shorter, J.; Wolozin, B.; Bosch, L.V.D.; et al. Protein Phase Separation: A New Phase in Cell Biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2018, 28, 420–435. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Su, X.; Ditlev, J.A.; Hui, E.; Xing, W.; Banjade, S.; Okrut, J.; King, D.S.; Taunton, J.; Rosen, M.K.; Vale, R.D. Phase separation of signaling molecules promotes T cell receptor signal transduction. Science 2016, 352, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. D’Amico, G.; Korhonen, E.A.; Waltari, M.; Saharinen, P.; Laakkonen, P.; Alitalo, K. Loss of Endothelial Tie1 Receptor Impairs Lymphatic Vessel Development. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 207–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Korhonen, E.A.; Lampinen, A.; Giri, H.; Anisimov, A.; Kim, M.; Allen, B.; Fang, S.; D’Amico, G.; Sipilä, T.J.; Lohela, M.; et al. Tie1 controls angiopoietin function in vascular remodeling and inflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 3495–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Song, S.-H.; Kim, K.L.; Lee, K.-A.; Suh, W. Tie1 regulates the Tie2 agonistic role of angiopoietin-2 in human lymphatic endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 419, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mueller, S.B.; Kontos, C.D. Tie1: An orphan receptor provides context for angiopoietin-2/Tie2 signaling. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 3188–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Seegar, T.C.M.; Eller, B.; Tzvetkova-Robev, D.; Kolev, M.V.; Henderson, S.C.; Nikolov, D.B.; Barton, W.A. Tie1-Tie2 Interactions Mediate Functional Differences between Angiopoietin Ligands. Mol. Cell 2010, 37, 643–655. [Google Scholar]
  78. Patan, S. TIE1 and TIE2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Inversely Regulate Embryonic Angiogenesis by the Mechanism of Intussusceptive Microvascular Growth. Microvasc. Res. 1998, 56, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, X.; Guillem-Marti, J.; Kumar, S.; Lee, D.S.; Cabrerizo-Aguado, D.; Werther, R.; Alamo, K.A.E.; Zhao, Y.T.; Nguyen, A.; Kopyeva, I.; et al. De Novo Design of Integrin α5β1 Modulating Proteins to Enhance Biomaterial Properties. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2500872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Edman, N.I.; Phal, A.; Redler, R.L.; Schlichthaerle, T.; Srivatsan, S.R.; Ehnes, D.D.; Etemadi, A.; An, S.J.; Favor, A.; Li, Z.; et al. Modulation of FGF Pathway Signaling and Vascular Differentiation Using Designed Oligomeric Assemblies. Cell 2024, 187, 3726–3740.e43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yang, W.; Hicks, D.R.; Ghosh, A.; Schwartze, T.A.; Conventry, B.; Goreshnik, I.; Allen, A.; Halabiya, S.F.; Kim, C.J.; Hinck, C.S.; et al. Design of High-Affinity Binders to Immune Modulating Receptors for Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, X.; Cardoso, S.; Cai, K.; Venkatesh, P.; Hung, A.; Ng, M.; Hall, C.; Coventry, B.; Lee, D.S.; Chowhan, R.; et al. Tuning Insulin Receptor Signaling Using de Novo-Designed Agonists. Mol. Cell 2025, 85, 4064–4081.e9. [Google Scholar]
  83. David, S.; Park, J.-K.; van Meurs, M.; Zijlstra, J.G.; Koenecke, C.; Schrimpf, C.; Shushakova, N.; Gueler, F.; Haller, H.; Kümpers, P. Acute Administration of Recombinant Angiopoietin-1 Ameliorates Multiple-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome and Improves Survival in Murine Sepsis. Cytokine 2011, 55, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, R.; Li, H.; Xie, Z.; Huang, M.; Xu, P.; Yuan, C.; Li, J.; Flaumenhaft, R.; Huang, M.; Jiang, L. Development of a Recombinant Ang1 Variant with Enhanced Tie2 Binding and Its Application to Attenuate Sepsis in Mice. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eads1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ghosh, C.C.; David, S.; Zhang, R.; Berghelli, A.; Milam, K.; Higgins, S.J.; Hunter, J.; Mukherjee, A.; Wei, Y.; Tran, M.; et al. Gene Control of Tyrosine Kinase TIE2 and Vascular Manifestations of Infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2016, 113, 2472–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. David, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Ghosh, C.C.; Yano, M.; Khankin, E.V.; Wenger, J.B.; Karumanchi, S.A.; Shapiro, N.I.; Parikh, S.M. Angiopoietin-2 may contribute to multiple organ dysfunction and death in sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 40, 3034–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Stiehl, T.; Thamm, K.; Kaufmann, J.; Schaeper, U.; Kirsch, T.; Haller, H.; Santel, A.; Ghosh, C.C.; Parikh, S.M.; David, S. Lung-Targeted RNA Interference Against Angiopoietin-2 Ameliorates Multiple Organ Dysfunction and Death in Sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2014, 42, e654–e662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Thomas, M.; Felcht, M.; Kruse, K.; Kretschmer, S.; Deppermann, C.; Biesdorf, A.; Rohr, K.; Benest, A.V.; Fiedler, U.; Augustin, H.G. Angiopoietin-2 Stimulation of Endothelial Cells Induces αvβ3 Integrin Internalization and Degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 23842–23849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Higgins, S.J.; Ceunynck, K.D.; Kellum, J.; Chen, X.; Gu, X.; Chaudhry, S.A.; Schulman, S.; Libermann, T.A.; Lu, S.; Shapiro, N.I.; et al. Tie2 protects the vasculature against thrombus formation in systemic inflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 1471–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Palud, A.; Parmentier-Decrucq, E.; Pastre, J.; Caires, N.D.F.; Lassalle, P.; Mathieu, D. Evaluation of endothelial biomarkers as predictors of organ failures in septic shock patients. Cytokine 2015, 73, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Duyen, L.T.T.; Manh, B.V.; Thao, T.T.P.; Khanh, L.V.; Trang, B.N.L.; Giang, N.T.; Quang, H.V.; Viet, N.T.; Hang, N.T.; Mao, C.V.; et al. Prognostic significance of the angiopoietin-2 for early prediction of septic shock in severe sepsis patients. Futur. Sci. OA 2022, 8, FSO825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Parikh, S.M.; Mammoto, T.; Schultz, A.; Yuan, H.-T.; Christiani, D.; Karumanchi, S.A.; Sukhatme, V.P. Excess Circulating Angiopoietin-2 May Contribute to Pulmonary Vascular Leak in Sepsis in Humans. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gibson, P.G.; Qin, L.; Puah, S.H. COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): Clinical features and differences from typical pre-COVID-19 ARDS. Méd. J. Aust. 2020, 213, 54–56.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bauer, T.T.; Ewig, S.; Rodloff, A.C.; Müller, E.E. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Pneumonia: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Data. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006, 43, 748–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. McCarter, S.D.; Mei, S.H.J.; Lai, P.F.H.; Zhang, Q.W.; Parker, C.H.; Suen, R.S.; Hood, R.D.; Zhao, Y.D.; Deng, Y.; Han, R.N.N.; et al. Cell-based Angiopoietin-1 Gene Therapy for Acute Lung Injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007, 175, 1014–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bhandari, V.; Choo-Wing, R.; Lee, C.G.; Zhu, Z.; Nedrelow, J.H.; Chupp, G.L.; Zhang, X.; Matthay, M.A.; Ware, L.B.; Homer, R.J.; et al. Hyperoxia causes angiopoietin 2–mediated acute lung injury and necrotic cell death. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 1286–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shao, Y.; Shen, J.; Zhou, F.; He, D. Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing Ang1 attenuates phosgene-induced acute lung injury in rats. Inhal. Toxicol. 2018, 30, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Shen, J.; Wang, J.; Shao, Y.-R.; He, D.-K.; Zhang, L.; Nadeem, L.; Xu, G. Adenovirus-delivered angiopoietin-1 treatment for phosgene-induced acute lung injury. Inhal. Toxicol. 2013, 25, 272–279. [Google Scholar]
  99. Lomas-Neira, J.L.; Heffernan, D.S.; Ayala, A.; Monaghan, S.F. Blockade of Endothelial Growth Factor, Angiopoietin-2, Reduces Indices of Ards and Mortality in Mice Resulting from the Dual-Insults of Hemorrhagic Shock and Sepsis. SHOCK 2016, 45, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Ganter, M.T.; Cohen, M.J.; Brohi, K.; Chesebro, B.B.; Staudenmayer, K.L.; Rahn, P.; Christiaans, S.C.; Bir, N.D.; Pittet, J.-F. Angiopoietin-2, Marker and Mediator of Endothelial Activation With Prognostic Significance Early After Trauma? Ann. Surg. 2008, 247, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fremont, R.D.; Koyama, T.; Calfee, C.S.; Wu, W.; Dossett, L.A.; Bossert, F.R.; Mitchell, D.; Wickersham, N.; Bernard, G.R.; Matthay, M.A.; et al. Acute Lung Injury in Patients With Traumatic Injuries: Utility of a Panel of Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Pathogenesis. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 2010, 68, 1121–1127. [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhou, M.-T.; Chen, C.-S.; Chen, B.-C.; Zhang, Q.-Y.; Andersson, R. Acute lung injury and ARDS in acute pancreatitis: Mechanisms and potential intervention. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 2094–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Brickler, T.R.; Hazy, A.; Correa, F.G.; Dai, R.; Kowalski, E.J.A.; Dickerson, R.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Morton, P.D.; Whittington, A.; et al. Angiopoietin/Tie2 Axis Regulates the Age-at-Injury Cerebrovascular Response to Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurosci. 2018, 38, 9618–9634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Nunez, A.; Thomas, R.; Brecker, K.; Demos, C.; Jain, S.; Sun, X.; Giacino, J.; McCrea, M.; Okonkwo, D.; Robertson, C.; et al. Angiopoietin2 (Ang2) Levels are Associated with Increased Severity and Unfavorable Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): A TRACK-TBI Study (S17.001). Neurology 2025, 104, 3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gu, H.; Fei, Z.-H.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Yang, J.-G.; Zhao, C.-H.; Cai, Y.; Zhong, X.-M. Angiopoietin-1 and Angiopoietin-2 Expression Imbalance Influence in Early Period After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Int. Neurourol. J. 2016, 20, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Fiedler, U.; Augustin, H.G. Angiopoietins: A link between angiogenesis and inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2006, 27, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wu, Q.; Xu, W.-D.; Huang, A.-F. Role of angiopoietin-2 in inflammatory autoimmune diseases: A comprehensive review. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 80, 106223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chu, C.; Chen, X.; Hasan, A.A.; Szakallova, A.; Krämer, B.K.; Tepel, M.; Hocher, B. Angiopoietin-2 predicts all-cause mortality in male but not female end-stage kidney disease patients on hemodialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2021, 37, 1348–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bontekoe, J.; Lee, J.; Bansal, V.; Syed, M.; Hoppensteadt, D.; Maia, P.; Walborn, A.; Liles, J.; Brailovsky, E.; Fareed, J. Biomarker Profiling in Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Identifies the Relationship between Angiopoietin-2 and Atrial Fibrillation. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2018, 24, 269S–276S. [Google Scholar]
  110. Singh, S.; Manson, S.R.; Lee, H.; Kim, Y.; Liu, T.; Guo, Q.; Geminiani, J.J.; Austin, P.F.; Chen, Y.M. Tubular Overexpression of Angiopoietin-1 Attenuates Renal Fibrosis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158908. [Google Scholar]
  111. Zhao, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, R.; Wei, J.; Li, G.; Zhao, H. Angiopoietin 1 counteracts vascular endothelial growth factor-induced blood–brain barrier permeability and alleviates ischemic injury in the early stages of transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Neurol. Res. 2010, 32, 748–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hwang, J.-A.; Lee, E.H.; Lee, S.D.; Park, J.B.; Jeon, B.H.; Cho, C.-H. COMP-Ang1 ameliorates leukocyte adhesion and reinforces endothelial tight junctions during endotoxemia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 381, 592–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rask-Madsen, C.; King, G.L. Vascular Complications of Diabetes: Mechanisms of Injury and Protective Factors. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yao, D.; Taguchi, T.; Matsumura, T.; Pestell, R.; Edelstein, D.; Giardino, I.; Suske, G.; Rabbani, N.; Thornalley, P.J.; Sarthy, V.P.; et al. High Glucose Increases Angiopoietin-2 Transcription in Microvascular Endothelial Cells through Methylglyoxal Modification of mSin3A. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 31038–31045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Li, L.; Qian, L.; Yu, Z.-Q. Serum angiopoietin-2 is associated with angiopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2015, 29, 568–571. [Google Scholar]
  116. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S.; Gao, M.; Wang, W.; Chen, K.; Huang, L.; Liu, Y. Diabetic vascular diseases: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Yun, J.-H.; Park, S.W.; Kim, J.H.; Park, Y.-J.; Cho, C.-H.; Kim, J.H. Angiopoietin 2 induces astrocyte apoptosis via αvβ5-integrin signaling in diabetic retinopathy. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2101. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  118. Rangasamy, S.; Srinivasan, R.; Maestas, J.; McGuire, P.G.; Das, A. A Potential Role for Angiopoietin 2 in the Regulation of the Blood–Retinal Barrier in Diabetic Retinopathy. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 3784. [Google Scholar]
  119. Canonica, J.; Foxton, R.; Garrido, M.G.; Lin, C.-M.; Uhles, S.; Shanmugam, S.; Antonetti, D.A.; Abcouwer, S.F.; Westenskow, P.D. Delineating effects of angiopoietin-2 inhibition on vascular permeability and inflammation in models of retinal neovascularization and ischemia/reperfusion. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1192464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Borrelli, E.; Boscia, F.; Lanzetta, P.; Lupidi, M.; Mastropasqua, R.; Nicolò, M.; Parravano, M.; Ricci, F.; Staurenghi, G.; Vadalà, M.; et al. Intravitreal faricimab for diabetic macular oedema and neovascular age-related macular degeneration: General considerations and practical recommendations by an expert panel of Italian retina specialists. Eye 2025, 39, 3005–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Iwagawa, T.; Inokuchi, Y.; Saita, K.; Soeda, T.; Usui-Ouchi, A.; Aihara, M.; Watanabe, S. Effects of VEGFA and ANGPT2 Antibodies on the Activation of Microglia in the Early Stages of Streptozotocin-Induced Pathogenesis of Diabetic Retinopathy. Genes Cells 2025, 30, e70036. [Google Scholar]
  122. Wykoff, C.C.; Abreu, F.; Adamis, A.P.; Basu, K.; Eichenbaum, D.A.; Haskova, Z.; Lin, H.; Loewenstein, A.; Mohan, S.; Pearce, I.A.; et al. Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab with extended dosing up to every 16 weeks in patients with diabetic macular oedema (YOSEMITE and RHINE): Two randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trials. Lancet 2022, 399, 741–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Lee, S.; Kim, W.; Moon, S.-O.; Sung, M.J.; Kim, D.H.; Kang, K.P.; Jang, K.Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Park, B.H.; Koh, G.Y.; et al. Renoprotective effect of COMP-angiopoietin-1 in db/db mice with type 2 diabetes. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2007, 22, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Cahoon, J.M.; Rai, R.R.; Carroll, L.S.; Uehara, H.; Zhang, X.; O’Neil, C.L.; Medina, R.J.; Das, S.K.; Muddana, S.K.; Olson, P.R.; et al. Intravitreal AAV2.COMP-Ang1 Prevents Neurovascular Degeneration in a Murine Model of Diabetic Retinopathy. Diabetes 2015, 64, 4247–4259. [Google Scholar]
  125. Rochfort, K.D.; Carroll, L.S.; Barabas, P.; Curtis, T.M.; Ambati, B.K.; Barron, N.; Cummins, P.M. COMP-Ang1 Stabilizes Hyperglycemic Disruption of Blood-Retinal Barrier Phenotype in Human Retinal Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 3547–3555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Poznyak, A.; Grechko, A.V.; Poggio, P.; Myasoedova, V.A.; Alfieri, V.; Orekhov, A.N. The Diabetes Mellitus–Atherosclerosis Connection: The Role of Lipid and Glucose Metabolism and Chronic Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Hauer, A.D.; Habets, K.L.L.; van Wanrooij, E.J.A.; de Vos, P.; Krueger, J.; Reisfeld, R.A.; van Berkel, T.J.C.; Kuiper, J. Vaccination against TIE2 reduces atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2009, 204, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Anderson, N.M.; Simon, M.C. The tumor microenvironment. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, R921–R925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Elebiyo, T.C.; Rotimi, D.; Evbuomwan, I.O.; Maimako, R.F.; Iyobhebhe, M.; Ojo, O.A.; Oluba, O.M.; Adeyemi, O.S. Reassessing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in anti-angiogenic cancer therapy. Cancer Treat. Res. Commun. 2022, 32, 100620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Liu, Z.-L.; Chen, H.-H.; Zheng, L.-L.; Sun, L.-P.; Shi, L. Angiogenic signaling pathways and anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Scholz, A.; Harter, P.N.; Cremer, S.; Yalcin, B.H.; Gurnik, S.; Yamaji, M.; Tacchio, M.D.; Sommer, K.; Baumgarten, P.; Bähr, O.; et al. Endothelial cell-derived angiopoietin-2 is a therapeutic target in treatment-naive and bevacizumab-resistant glioblastoma. EMBO Mol. Med. 2016, 8, 39–57. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  132. Munakata, S.; Ueyama, T.; Ishihara, H.; Komiyama, H.; Tsukamoto, R.; Kawai, M.; Takahashi, M.; Kojima, Y.; Tomiki, Y.; Sakamoto, K. Angiopoietin-2 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2021, 52, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Danza, K.; Pilato, B.; Lacalamita, R.; Addati, T.; Giotta, F.; Bruno, A.; Paradiso, A.; Tommasi, S. Angiogenetic axis angiopoietins/Tie2 and VEGF in familial breast cancer. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 21, 824–830. [Google Scholar]
  134. Rigamonti, N.; Kadioglu, E.; Keklikoglou, I.; Wyser Rmili, C.; Leow, C.C.; De Palma, M. Role of Angiopoietin-2 in Adaptive Tumor Resistance to VEGF Signaling Blockade. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 696–706. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  135. Park, J.-S.; Kim, I.K.; Han , S.; Park, I.; Kim, C.; Bae, J.; Oh, S.J.; Lee, S.; Kim, J.H.; Woo, D.C.; et al. Normalization of Tumor Vessels by Tie2 Activation and Ang2 Inhibition Enhances Drug Delivery and Produces a Favorable Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Cell 2016, 30, 953–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Coxon, A.; Bready, J.; Min, H.; Kaufman, S.; Leal, J.; Yu, D.; Lee, T.A.; Sun, J.-R.; Estrada, J.; Bolon, B.; et al. Context-Dependent Role of Angiopoietin-1 Inhibition in the Suppression of Angiogenesis and Tumor Growth: Implications for AMG 386, an Angiopoietin-1/2–Neutralizing Peptibody. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 2641–2651. [Google Scholar]
  137. Peterson, T.E.; Kirkpatrick, N.D.; Huang, Y.; Farrar, C.T.; Marijt, K.A.; Kloepper, J.; Datta, M.; Amoozgar, Z.; Seano, G.; Jung, K.; et al. Dual inhibition of Ang-2 and VEGF receptors normalizes tumor vasculature and prolongs survival in glioblastoma by altering macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 4470–4475. [Google Scholar]
  138. Coutelle, O.; Schiffmann, L.M.; Liwschitz, M.; Brunold, M.; Goede, V.; Hallek, M.; Kashkar, H.; Hacker, U.T. Dual targeting of Angiopoetin-2 and VEGF potentiates effective vascular normalisation without inducing empty basement membrane sleeves in xenograft tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 112, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Tourneau, C.L.; Becker, H.; Claus, R.; Elez, E.; Ricci, F.; Fritsch, R.; Silber, Y.; Hennequin, A.; Tabernero, J.; Jayadeva, G.; et al. Two phase I studies of BI 836880, a vascular endothelial growth factor/angiopoietin-2 inhibitor, administered once every 3 weeks or once weekly in patients with advanced solid tumors. ESMO Open 2022, 7, 100576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Helaine, C.; Ferré, A.E.; Leblond, M.M.; Pérès, E.A.; Bernaudin, M.; Valable, S.; Petit, E. Angiopoietin-2 Combined with Radiochemotherapy Impedes Glioblastoma Recurrence by Acting in an Autocrine and Paracrine Manner: A Preclinical Study. Cancers 2020, 12, 3585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lee, E.; Lee, E.-A.; Kong, E.; Chon, H.; Llaiqui-Condori, M.; Park, C.H.; Park, B.Y.; Kang, N.R.; Yoo, J.-S.; Lee, H.-S.; et al. An agonistic anti-Tie2 antibody suppresses the normal-to-tumor vascular transition in the glioblastoma invasion zone. Exp. Mol. Med. 2023, 55, 470–484. [Google Scholar]
  142. Machein, M.R.; Knedla, A.; Knoth, R.; Wagner, S.; Neuschl, E.; Plate, K.H. Angiopoietin-1 Promotes Tumor Angiogenesis in a Rat Glioma Model. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 165, 1557–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Liu, X.; Liang, H.; Fang, H.; Xiao, J.; Yang, C.; Zhou, Z.; Feng, J.; Chen, C. Angiopoietin-1 promotes triple-negative breast cancer cell proliferation by upregulating carboxypeptidase A4. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2023, 55, 1487–1495. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  144. Kitajima, D.; Kasamatsu, A.; Nakashima, D.; Miyamoto, I.; Kimura, Y.; Endo-Sakamoto, Y.; Shiiba, M.; Tanzawa, H.; Uzawa, K. Evidence for critical role of Tie2/Ang1 interaction in metastatic oral cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 7237–7242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Turrini, R.; Pabois, A.; Xenarios, I.; Coukos, G.; Delaloye, J.-F.; Doucey, M.-A. TIE-2 expressing monocytes in human cancers. OncoImmunology 2017, 6, e1303585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Seok, S.H.; Heo, J.-I.; Hwang, J.-H.; Na, Y.-R.; Yun, J.-H.; Lee, E.H.; Park, J.-W.; Cho, C.-H. Angiopoietin-1 elicits pro-inflammatory responses in monocytes and differentiating macrophages. Mol. Cells 2013, 35, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kovaleva, O.V.; Rashidova, M.A.; Sinyov, V.V.; Malashenko, O.S.; Gratchev, A. M1 macrophages—Unexpected contribution to tumor progression. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1638102. [Google Scholar]
  148. Coffelt, S.B.; Tal, A.O.; Scholz, A.; Palma, M.D.; Patel, S.; Urbich, C.; Biswas, S.K.; Murdoch, C.; Plate, K.H.; Reiss, Y.; et al. Angiopoietin-2 Regulates Gene Expression in TIE2-Expressing Monocytes and Augments Their Inherent Proangiogenic Functions. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 5270–5280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Du, S.; Qian, J.; Tan, S.; Li, W.; Liu, P.; Zhao, J.; Zeng, Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, Z.; Cai, J. Tumor cell-derived exosomes deliver TIE2 protein to macrophages to promote angiogenesis in cervical cancer. Cancer Lett. 2022, 529, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kim, O.-H.; Kang, G.-H.; Noh, H.; Cha, J.-Y.; Lee, H.-J.; Yoon, J.-H.; Mamura, M.; Nam, J.-S.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, Y.A.; et al. Proangiogenic TIE2+/CD31+ macrophages are the predominant population of tumor-associated macrophages infiltrating metastatic lymph nodes. Mol. Cells 2013, 36, 432–438. [Google Scholar]
  151. Wang, X.; Zhu, Q.; Lin, Y.; Wu, L.; Wu, X.; Wang, K.; He, Q.; Xu, C.; Wan, X.; Wang, X. Crosstalk between TEMs and endothelial cells modulates angiogenesis and metastasis via IGF1-IGF1R signalling in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 117, 1371–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Jakab, M.; Rostalski, T.; Lee, K.H.; Mogler, C.; Augustin, H.G. Tie2 Receptor in Tumor-Infiltrating Macrophages Is Dispensable for Tumor Angiogenesis and Tumor Relapse after ChemotherapyTEMs Do Not Express Tie2. Cancer Res. 2022, 82, 1353–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Mazzieri, R.; Pucci, F.; Moi, D.; Zonari, E.; Ranghetti, A.; Berti, A.; Politi, L.S.; Gentner, B.; Brown, J.L.; Naldini, L.; et al. Targeting the ANG2/TIE2 Axis Inhibits Tumor Growth and Metastasis by Impairing Angiogenesis and Disabling Rebounds of Proangiogenic Myeloid Cells. Cancer Cell 2011, 19, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Duran, C.L.; Surve, C.R.; Ye, X.; Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; Harney, A.S.; Wang, Y.; Sharma, V.P.; Stanley, E.R.; Cox, D.; et al. Targeting CSF-1 signaling between tumor cells and macrophages at TMEM doorways inhibits breast cancer dissemination. Oncogene 2025, 44, 3297–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic of Tie1 and Tie2 receptor structures generated by Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro model) with modifications. The two receptors shared similar major domains and structures.
Figure 1. Schematic of Tie1 and Tie2 receptor structures generated by Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro model) with modifications. The two receptors shared similar major domains and structures.
Cells 15 00820 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of angiopoietin 1 and 2 structures generated by Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro model), demonstrating the structural similarity between the two ligands. Box: Super-imposed crystal structure of Ang 1 F-domain (4K0V, Chain B) [47] and Ang 2 F-domain (2GY7, Chain A) [58]. Crystal structures are produced by PyMol.
Figure 2. Schematic of angiopoietin 1 and 2 structures generated by Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro model), demonstrating the structural similarity between the two ligands. Box: Super-imposed crystal structure of Ang 1 F-domain (4K0V, Chain B) [47] and Ang 2 F-domain (2GY7, Chain A) [58]. Crystal structures are produced by PyMol.
Cells 15 00820 g002
Figure 3. This image displays the crystal structures of Angiopoietin-1-Tie2 (Ang 1, PDB ID: 4K0V [47]) and Angiopoietin-2-Tie2 (Ang 2, PDB ID: 2GY7 [58]) superimposed at the Tie2 ectodomain. The image is produced by PyMol.
Figure 3. This image displays the crystal structures of Angiopoietin-1-Tie2 (Ang 1, PDB ID: 4K0V [47]) and Angiopoietin-2-Tie2 (Ang 2, PDB ID: 2GY7 [58]) superimposed at the Tie2 ectodomain. The image is produced by PyMol.
Cells 15 00820 g003
Figure 4. Based on the F-domain scaffolds, ligand valency determines the size of Tie2 receptor clusters, resulting in differential signaling and functional output. Ligands with valency of four or lower produce Ang 2-like activity, while ligands with valency of six or more produce Ang 1-like activity. Black solid arrows indication pathway activation. Dotted arrows indicate FOXO translation out of the nucleus. Schematic was generated using Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro model).
Figure 4. Based on the F-domain scaffolds, ligand valency determines the size of Tie2 receptor clusters, resulting in differential signaling and functional output. Ligands with valency of four or lower produce Ang 2-like activity, while ligands with valency of six or more produce Ang 1-like activity. Black solid arrows indication pathway activation. Dotted arrows indicate FOXO translation out of the nucleus. Schematic was generated using Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro model).
Cells 15 00820 g004
Figure 5. The dual roles of Tie2 signaling in healthy vascular maintenance and pathogenic vessel formation. Black arrow indicates the secretion of Ang 1 by pericytes. Pink dotted arrows indicate vascular leakage. The schematic is created with BioRender.com.
Figure 5. The dual roles of Tie2 signaling in healthy vascular maintenance and pathogenic vessel formation. Black arrow indicates the secretion of Ang 1 by pericytes. Pink dotted arrows indicate vascular leakage. The schematic is created with BioRender.com.
Cells 15 00820 g005
Table 1. Summary of ligand valency and signaling output. This stable summarizes constructs at different valencies, signaling outcome, and observed oligomeric states (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous). Refer to the List of Abbreviations for the constructs’ description.
Table 1. Summary of ligand valency and signaling output. This stable summarizes constructs at different valencies, signaling outcome, and observed oligomeric states (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous). Refer to the List of Abbreviations for the constructs’ description.
ValencyConstructsSignaling ActivityObserved
Oligomeric State
1F-domain (Fd)no Tie2 activity [21,64] Homogeneous
2Ang 1-Fcno Tie2 activity [63]Homogeneous
CA1-3pTie2 and pAKT [62]Heterogeneous
GCN4-Ang 1No Tie2 activity [61]Heterogeneous
Fc-A1no Tie2 activity [62]Heterogeneous
3GCN4-Ang2no Tie2 activity [48]Heterogeneous
CA1-1pTie2, pAKT [62]Heterogeneous
CA1-2no Tie2 activity [62]Heterogeneous
H3, Tet1A, Icos1-ApERK, pFAK [21] Homogeneous
4C4, AkC4pERK, pFAK [21] Homogeneous
MAT-Ang2pAKT [48]Heterogeneous
MAT-Ang 1pTie2, pAKT [61]Heterogeneous
5Comp-Ang 1pTie2, pAKT [61,62]Heterogeneous
Comp-Ang 2pTie2, pAKT [48]Heterogeneous
6H6pAKT, pERK, pFAK [21] Homogeneous
8H8pAKT, pERK, pFAK [21] Homogeneous
12Tet1 & Tet2pAKT, pERK, pFAK [21] Homogeneous
24O42.1pAKT, pERK [63]Homogeneous
60Icos1 & Icos2pAKT, pERK, pFAK [21] Homogeneous
Cap-FdpAKT [64]Homogeneous
I52.6pAKT, pERK [63]Homogeneous
VariableAng 1, Ang 2pAKT, pTie2, pFAK, pERK [21,42,43,44,48,51,54,55] Heterogeneous
Table 2. De novo-designed proteins demonstrated promising signaling modulation and cellular outcome.
Table 2. De novo-designed proteins demonstrated promising signaling modulation and cellular outcome.
De Novo BindersTarget ReceptorActivity
mb7FGFR1Inhibits FGFR1 as a monomer
Activates pFGFR1/pERK/calcium release when linked to a hexameric scaffold [80]
IR agonistsinsulinActivate pAKT/pERK and promote cell proliferation in C2C12-IR cells [82]
NeonectinIntegrin α5β1Inhibits integrin-mediated cell adhesion, angiogenesis, and cell migration [79]
5HCS binderTGFβRIInhibit SMAD signaling [81]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.T.; Ehnes, D.D.; Mathieu, J.; Ruohola-Baker, H. The Significance of Angiopoietin Valency in Vascular Health and Disease. Cells 2026, 15, 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15090820

AMA Style

Zhao YT, Ehnes DD, Mathieu J, Ruohola-Baker H. The Significance of Angiopoietin Valency in Vascular Health and Disease. Cells. 2026; 15(9):820. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15090820

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yan Ting, Devon D. Ehnes, Julie Mathieu, and Hannele Ruohola-Baker. 2026. "The Significance of Angiopoietin Valency in Vascular Health and Disease" Cells 15, no. 9: 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15090820

APA Style

Zhao, Y. T., Ehnes, D. D., Mathieu, J., & Ruohola-Baker, H. (2026). The Significance of Angiopoietin Valency in Vascular Health and Disease. Cells, 15(9), 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15090820

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop