Next Article in Journal
The Signaling Networks of TIM-3, TGF-β, and STING in Glioblastoma
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Pro-Osteogenic Regulatory Modulation in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from the Periosteum Under Simulated Microgravity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease and Mitochondria-Targeted Therapeutics

1
Obesity and Metabolic Health Laboratory, Department of Nutritional Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
2
Neurobiology of Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Nutritional Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cells 2026, 15(11), 990; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15110990
Submission received: 6 May 2026 / Revised: 25 May 2026 / Accepted: 26 May 2026 / Published: 28 May 2026

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • Mitochondrial dysfunction is an early and important contributor to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), influencing oxidative stress, impaired energy metabolism, synaptic dysfunction, and neuronal loss.
  • Mitochondria-targeted therapies, including antioxidants, mitophagy enhancers, and metabolic modulators, show promising neuroprotective and cognitive benefits in preclinical AD models.
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • Targeting mitochondrial dysfunction may provide a disease-modifying strategy for AD by addressing multiple pathogenic mechanisms simultaneously.
  • Future progress will depend on early intervention, improved biomarkers, and precision-based mitochondrial therapies to enhance clinical translation in AD.

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent form of dementia and is characterized by progressive cognitive decline due to the loss of neurons. The accumulation of extracellular senile plaques (Aβ) and intracellular tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) is a key pathological feature of AD. Mitochondrial dysfunction is implicated in all key AD pathologies, whether as a cause or a consequence of disease progression. Growing evidence indicates that mitochondrial impairment plays a central role in AD pathogenesis by disrupting cellular homeostasis, promoting oxidative stress, and contributing to progressive neuronal death. Therefore, targeting mitochondria may offer promising insights into the development of disease-modifying therapies. In this review, we summarize current evidence on the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathophysiology of AD and on its therapeutic potential.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), an age-related, progressive, neurodegenerative disease, is the most prevalent form of dementia in older adults. According to Alzheimer’s disease figures and facts 2025, currently, an estimated 7.2 million Americans aged 65 have AD. Without medical advances to prevent, slow, or cure AD, this number will surpass 13.8 million by 2060. The impact of AD can be profoundly distressing for individuals who are affected by this disease, as well as their families and caregivers [1]. AD is described as a result of memory loss and a range of cognitive deficits. Accumulation of amyloid beta Aβ and neurofibrillary tangles due to hyperphosphorylated tau is a central pathological feature of the AD brain [2,3]. The aggregation of these pathological markers leads to various consequences, including, but not limited to, mitochondrial impairments, oxidative stress, glial cell activation, neuroinflammation, and dysregulation of microRNAs, which are associated with the gradual deterioration of synaptic transmission and loss of neurons, which in turn influence the progression of cognitive deficits [4,5]. Although the exact cause and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of AD have yet to be fully determined, the accumulation or improper removal of toxic Aβ in the brain is believed to play a crucial role in advancing the disease progression [6,7].
Mitochondria have appeared as the main regulators of neuronal survival and function, playing vital roles in ATP production, reactive oxygen species (ROS), mtDNA (which encodes electron transport chain proteins, and its dysfunction leads to impaired energy production and oxidative stress), membrane dynamics, calcium homeostasis, redox signaling, and apoptotic regulation (Figure 1) [8]. Neurons are particularly susceptible to mitochondrial impairment due to their high metabolic demands, polarized morphology, and dependence on a defined mitochondrial distribution at synapses [9,10]. Several studies suggest that mitochondrial anomalies occur early in AD pathogenesis and may contribute to amyloid and tau pathology, positioning mitochondrial dysfunction as a potential initial phenomenon. Conversely, amyloid-beta and tau deposition exacerbate mitochondrial dysfunction, supporting a bidirectional relationship.
The mitochondrial cascade hypothesis of AD proposes that inherited and age-related mitochondrial alterations lead to impaired bioenergetics, excessive ROS production, altered mitochondrial dynamics, defective mitophagy, and loss of synaptic function, contributing to neuronal vulnerability and progressive cognitive decline [9,10]. These mitochondrial disparities correspond with classical AD pathologies by promoting the accumulation of Aβ, hyperphosphorylation of tau, and neuroinflammatory responses, thereby creating a self-propagating progression of cellular dysfunction [11,12].
Given the important role of mitochondria in integrating metabolic, oxidative, and synaptic pathways, mitochondrial dysfunction represents a promising therapeutic target for AD [10]. Developments in mitochondria-targeted antioxidants, metabolic modulators, mitophagy enhancers, gene-based therapies, and mitochondrial transplantation have opened new opportunities for disease-modifying interventions. This review critically examines the evidence supporting mitochondrial dysfunction as a potential contributor to AD pathogenesis. It provides an in-depth evaluation of emerging mitochondrial-targeted therapeutic approaches, highlighting their mechanistic basis and translational potential.

2. Evidence of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in AD

Swerdlow and Khan proposed the mitochondrial cascade hypothesis in 2004 and explained that mitochondrial dysfunction plays a significant role in AD [13,14]. Although this hypothesis has not been conclusively validated in all AD models or clinical settings, an extensive body of evidence suggests prevalent mitochondrial abnormalities in AD brains, supporting a critical role for mitochondrial impairment in AD progression and pathogenesis [15].
Numerous aspects of mitochondrial integrity and function are disrupted in AD, including altered mitochondrial morphology, reduced membrane potential, impaired oxidative phosphorylation, enhanced ROS production, defective calcium buffering, mtDNA impairment, dysfunctional mitochondrial biogenesis, abnormal axonal transport of mitochondria, and defective mitophagy. All these irregularities indicate a complete failure of mitochondrial quality control and bioenergetic homeostasis in AD rather than individual defects within a single pathway (Figure 2) [15,16].
Neurons are extremely susceptible to mitochondrial damage due to their high energy requirement, polarized morphology, and dependence on efficient mitochondrial trafficking to synaptic compartments. Consequently, even minor mitochondrial dysfunction can substantially influence synaptic transmission, plasticity, and neuronal resilience [17]. Mitochondrial abnormalities often occur before amyloid plaque deposition and NFT formation, according to mounting data from AD individuals, transgenic AD mouse models, and cell culture [18,19,20]. This finding suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction may act as an early event rather than a downstream consequence of AD pathology. These findings also support that mitochondrial dysfunction is a persistent and early feature of AD, affecting several interconnected mitochondrial pathways. This extensive impairment provides a mechanistic background that links metabolic failure, oxidative stress, synaptic dysfunction, and neuronal loss, thereby aligning mitochondria as a central player in AD pathogenesis and a rational target for therapeutic intervention.

2.1. Altered Energy Metabolism in AD

Normally, glucose is the primary energy source for brain cells. In a resting awake state, the brain uses 20% of the body’s oxygen, more than 25% of the body’s glucose, and weighs an average of 2% of the body’s total weight [10]. One of the earliest and most consistent metabolic abnormalities observed in AD is a pronounced cerebral hypometabolic state, characterized by impaired glucose uptake and consumption. Neurons depend extremely on glucose-driven mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to fulfill their intense high-energy demands [21,22]. In AD, altered glucose metabolism and impaired mitochondrial bioenergetics create a chronic energy shortage that compromises synaptic function and contributes to neurodegeneration. Mitochondrial dysfunction directly alters energy metabolism by reducing the efficiency of the electron transport chain (ETC), diminishing tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle activity, and affecting cellular bioenergetic pathways. Premature electron leakage at complexes I and III results in increased production of ROS, further damages mitochondrial components, and exacerbates bioenergetic failure [23,24]. This imbalance between energy production and oxidative stress leads to diminished cytochrome c oxidase activity and progressive decline of mitochondrial respiratory competence in AD brains [24].
Neuroimaging studies using positron emission tomography (PET) have consistently confirmed a 20–30% decline in cerebral glucose metabolism in individuals with AD compared to cognitively healthy individual controls [25]. Hypometabolism is evidently examined in brain regions critical for learning and memory, including the hippocampus, posterior cingulate cortex, and temporal and parietal lobes. Notably, these metabolic deficits are seen early, often preceding clinical symptoms and structural brain atrophy, and progressively spread to the frontal and occipital regions as cognitive impairment develops [26,27]. At the molecular level, impaired glucose transport and insulin signaling further contribute to cerebral energy shortage in AD [28]. Glucose uptake into the brain is mainly facilitated by glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) at the blood–brain barrier and astrocytes, while neuronal glucose uptake depends mainly on glucose transporter 3 (GLUT3) [29]. Aging and AD are associated with lowered expression of neuronal glucose transporters, particularly GLUT3 and glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4), and with reduced glucose availability to neurons even with preserved vascular delivery [30]. These deficits are exacerbated by brain insulin resistance, characterized by reduced insulin receptor expression and impaired downstream signaling pathways, further disrupting neuronal glucose utilization and mitochondrial function. Insulin modulates neuronal and glial cell activity, thereby altering mood, cognition, and behavior. Additionally, due to its role in promoting neuronal health, insulin may protect against AD. Brain insulin resistance also overlaps with amyloid pathology by impairing Aβ clearance and promoting its accumulation. Insulin competitively inhibits insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), reducing Aβ breakdown, while altered insulin signaling interferes with low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) trafficking, damaging Aβ clearance [31]. These processes strengthen a vicious cycle in which metabolic dysfunction, mitochondrial impairment, and amyloid pathology reciprocally exacerbate one another. These findings support the concept of AD as a state of chronic cerebral energy failure mediated by the combination of impaired glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, and mitochondrial dysfunction. This bioenergetic collapse leads to evident neurodegeneration.

2.2. Impaired Mitochondrial Dynamics in AD

Mitochondrial dynamics, governed by coordinated fusion and fission processes, are essential for maintaining mitochondrial integrity, distribution, and function in neurons. Through continuous remodeling, these processes allow mitochondria to adapt to metabolic demands, facilitate mitochondrial transport along axons and dendrites, and support synaptic activity. Given the polarized morphology and high energy requirements of neurons, precise regulation of mitochondrial dynamics is particularly critical for neuronal survival and plasticity [17]. Mitochondrial fusion promotes the combination of mitochondrial contents, including proteins, lipids, and mtDNA, thereby protecting the function of mitochondria and compensating for localized damage [32]. This process is facilitated by the dynamin-related GTPases mitofusin 1 (MFN1) and mitofusin 2 (MFN2), which regulate outer mitochondrial membrane fusion, and optic atrophy 1 (OPA1), which controls inner membrane fusion and cristae organization [33,34]. In contrast, mitochondrial fission facilitates mitochondrial replication, distribution, and quality control by isolating damaged mitochondria for removal via mitophagy. Fission is mainly facilitated by dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), which is recruited to the mitochondrial outer membrane where it constricts and divides mitochondria in a GTP-dependent manner [35].
In AD, this balance between fusion and fission is disrupted, resulting in extreme mitochondrial fission. Numerous studies in postmortem human AD brains, transgenic mouse models, and neuronal culture have demonstrated increased DRP1 activity, accompanied by reduced expression of fusion proteins such as MFN1, MFN2, and OPA1 [36,37]. This shift toward increased fission and diminished fusion represents an early and consistent feature of AD pathology, preceding significant neuronal loss and showing a strong relationship with synaptic dysfunction [37,38,39]. Excessive mitochondrial fission has profound functional consequences. Fragmented mitochondria demonstrate impaired bioenergetic capacity, reduced calcium buffering, and reduced efficiency in transport to synaptic terminals [10]. As synapses are highly energy-dependent structures, compromised mitochondrial trafficking and localization result in defective synaptic transmission, reduced plasticity, and increased vulnerability to excitotoxic and oxidative stress [17]. Moreover, fragmented mitochondria are more susceptible to oxidative damage and are less capable of maintaining normal cristae architecture, further exacerbating mitochondrial impairment in AD [40,41]. Abnormal mitochondrial dynamics are also combined with other pathogenic pathways in AD. Aβ and hyperphosphorylated tau have been shown to directly interact with mitochondrial fission and fusion proteins, particularly DRP1, promoting excessive fission and boosting mitochondrial fragmentation [42,43]. This interaction creates a feed-forward loop in which AD pathology accelerates mitochondrial dysfunction, which in turn amplifies synaptic failure and neuronal loss. These findings suggest impaired mitochondrial dynamics as a critical contributor to AD pathogenesis by disrupting mitochondrial morphology, transport, and function.

2.3. Impaired Mitochondrial Biogenesis in AD

Mitochondrial biogenesis is a strictly regulated process that maintains an adequate pool of functional mitochondria, particularly in energy-demanding cells such as neurons [44]. By regulating the synthesis of mitochondrial proteins, the replication of mtDNA, and the assembly of respiratory chain complexes, mitochondrial biogenesis promises sustained bioenergetic function and redox balance. In neurons, continuous mitochondrial renewal is required to compensate for mitochondrial damage and support synaptic activity. The transcriptional regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis is primarily mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α), a master regulator that integrates metabolic signals, oxidative stress responses, and mitochondrial function [45,46,47]. PGC-1α coactivates nuclear respiratory factors (NRF1 and NRF2), which, in turn, regulate the expression of mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM), a significant driver of mtDNA transcription and replication [48,49,50]. Through this signaling network, PGC-1α coordinates mitochondrial biogenesis with cellular energy demands and antioxidant defense processes [51]. Compelling evidence shows that mitochondrial biogenesis is markedly impaired in AD. Reduced PGC-1α expression has been consistently observed in postmortem AD brains, and experimental studies in transgenic mouse models support early suppression of PGC-1α signaling even before substantial Aβ deposition [52,53]. Reductions in PGC-1α, NRF1, NRF2, TFAM, and upstream regulatory factors such as cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) and protein kinase-A have been detected in young 3xTg-AD mice, suggesting that defects in mitochondrial biogenesis arise early in disease progression and lead to neuropathological changes [54]. Impaired mitochondrial biogenesis in AD occurs in parallel with defective Mitophagy, resulting in a net loss of functional mitochondria.
While damaged mitochondria accumulate due to inefficient clearance, the reduced capacity to produce new mitochondria further exacerbates bioenergetic failure. This imbalance between mitochondrial removal and replacement leads to reduced ATP production, increased oxidative stress, and enhanced neuronal vulnerability. Due to the limited regenerative capacity of neurons, prolonged inhibition of mitochondrial biogenesis has particularly detrimental consequences for synaptic maintenance and neuronal survival [55]. Significantly, PGC-1α signaling also crosses directly with classical AD pathologies. PGC-1α has been shown to reciprocally regulate Beta-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) in vitro and in vivo, acting together with Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1)-mediated deacetylation of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). These coordinated mechanisms are essential for controlling Aβ production in AD [56].
Additionally, PGC-1α plays a critical role in regulating mitochondrial antioxidant defenses, and its downregulation leads to increased ROS accumulation and oxidative damage in AD neurons [57,58]. Furthermore, these findings support impaired mitochondrial biogenesis as a significant early event in AD pathogenesis and, by limiting mitochondrial renewal under increasing metabolic stress, suppress PGC-1α-mediated biogenesis, amplifying mitochondrial dysfunction, and contributing to AD pathology.

2.4. Increased Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Defects in AD

Oxidative stress is a prominent and early pathological feature of AD and is closely linked with mitochondrial dysfunction [59,60]. It begins with an imbalance between ROS production and the function of cellular antioxidant defenses to neutralize them. The brain is exceptionally susceptible to oxidative damage due to its high oxygen consumption, abundant lipid contents, and comparatively limited antioxidant capacity, making neurons especially vulnerable to redox imbalance. Mitochondria are the primary source of intracellular ROS, with the majority generated as byproducts of oxidative phosphorylation due to electron leakage at complexes I and III of the ETC [61]. In AD, mitochondrial respiratory ineffectiveness exacerbates this process, leading to excessive ROS production. Notably, mitochondria are not only the primary generators of ROS but also their principal targets. ROS-mediated damage to mitochondrial DNA, proteins, and membrane lipids further impairs mitochondrial function, thereby perpetuating a self-reinforcing cycle of oxidative stress and bioenergetic failure [62,63,64].
Postmortem AD brains show elevated levels of oxidized lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids compared with age-matched healthy controls, indicating extensive oxidative damage [65,66]. Among mitochondrial defects, deficiency of cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) is one of the most consistently reported abnormalities in AD [67]. Reduced complex IV activity impairs ATP production, increases electron leakage, and further increases ROS generation and oxidative injury. These defects contribute directly to neuronal energy failure and synaptic dysfunction. Oxidative stress also plays a critical role in linking mitochondrial dysfunction to tau pathology in AD. Increased ROS levels inhibit protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), a major tau phosphatase, thereby increasing the activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β), a key kinase responsible for hyperphosphorylation of tau protein [68]. This shift in kinase–phosphatase balance promotes the formation of NFTs, thereby connecting mitochondrial oxidative stress to one of the central pathological hallmarks of AD [69]. Beyond tau pathology, oxidative damage disturbs synaptic integrity and neuronal signaling by modifying synaptic proteins, impairing calcium homeostasis, and activating apoptotic pathways. During aging, progressive mitochondrial dysfunction further impairs ROS production, while accumulated oxidative damage impairs mitochondrial turnover and quality control mechanisms, including mitophagy [70,71,72,73]. As a result, neurons accumulate dysfunctional mitochondria with diminished respiratory capacity, reinforcing oxidative stress and accelerating neurodegeneration. By acting both upstream and downstream of mitochondrial impairment, oxidative stress amplifies metabolic failure, promotes tau pathology, and reinforces the pathological cascade that drives the neurodegeneration in AD [64].

2.5. Impaired Mitophagy in AD

Mitophagy is a specialized form of autophagy that selectively removes damaged or dysfunctional mitochondria, thereby preserving mitochondrial quality and cellular homeostasis. In neurons, efficient Mitophagy is essential due to high metabolic demand, limited regenerative capacity, and reliance on long-lived mitochondria [74]. Disruption of this quality control mechanism has emerged as a critical contributor to mitochondrial impairment in AD. The best-characterized mitophagy pathway involves PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin [75]. Under physiological conditions, PINK1 is rapidly degraded in healthy mitochondria. However, mitochondrial damage and loss of membrane potential stabilize PINK1 on the outer mitochondrial membrane, causing Parkin recruitment and the ubiquitination of mitochondrial proteins [75]. This process signs damaged mitochondria for engulfment by autophagosomes and subsequent degradation through lysosomal fusion (Figure 3) [76].
In AD, multiple lines of evidence indicate that Mitophagy is initiated but fails to proceed efficiently to completion. Electron microscopy studies of postmortem AD brains and transgenic mouse models reveal an accumulation of structurally abnormal mitochondria, characterized by swelling and disrupted cristae [77,78]. Simultaneously, high levels of PINK1, Parkin, and ubiquitinated mitochondrial proteins have been identified in neurons, suggesting an activated yet suspended mitophagy response rather than a lack of mitophagy signaling [79,80,81]. Defective Mitophagy in AD is strongly linked to impaired autophagosome–lysosome fusion and lysosomal dysfunction. Mutations in presenilin 1 (PS1), a key component of the γ-secretase complex, interrupt lysosomal acidification and autophagic flux, leading to the buildup of autophagosomes and unfinished mitochondrial degradation [82,83]. As a result, damaged mitochondria stay within neurons, continuously generating reactive oxygen species and worsening oxidative stress and bioenergetic failure [64]. Impaired mitophagy with other mitochondrial abnormalities observed in AD [79,80,81]. Excessive mitochondrial fission yields fragmented mitochondria that are preferentially targeted for Mitophagy; however, failure of mitochondrial clearance leads to their pathological accumulation. This accumulation further impairs neuronal calcium buffering and metabolic homeostasis, exacerbating overall cellular dysfunction. Furthermore, persistent mitochondrial damage reinforces neuroinflammatory signaling and promotes neuronal vulnerability. Rather than showing insufficient detection of damaged mitochondria, mitophagy impairment in AD arises from disrupted downstream clearance processes. Among the molecular drivers of mitophagy impairment in AD, the Aβ precursor protein C- terminal fragment (APP-CTFβ, also known as C99) has emerged as a key contributor. APP-CTFβ is generated by β-secretase cleavage of APP and serves as the direct precursor to Aβ following further γ secretase processing. APP-CTFβ itself accumulates in AD brains and localizes to mitochondria-associated membranes, where it impairs mitochondrial function, disrupts autophagosomes-lysosome fusion, and inhibits mitophagic clearance of damaged mitochondria, thereby exacerbating mitochondrial dysfunction independently of Aβ pathology [84,85].

2.6. Shortage of Neuronal ATP in AD

A sustained decline in mitochondrial ATP production is a critical downstream consequence of mitochondrial dysfunction in AD and a key driver of neuronal and synaptic failure. Neurons depend on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to meet their continuous, high-energy demands, yet they lack substantial energy reserves, such as glycogen or lipid stores [86]. As a result, even modest impairments in mitochondrial ATP generation can have profound consequences for neuronal function and survival. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that ATP production is markedly reduced in the AD brain [64]. Defects in the ETC, reduced activity of cytochrome c oxidase and other respiratory complexes, compromise proton gradient formation and limit ATP synthesis [87]. Excessive ROS production further damages mitochondrial components, exacerbating bioenergetic inefficiency. All these alterations result in a persistent energy deficit that leads to neuronal loss and correlates strongly with cognitive decline. Structural and functional abnormalities of mitochondrial ATP synthase further contribute to ATP shortage in AD. Studies have shown oxidative and nitrative modifications of ATP synthase subunits, as well as altered regulation of the F1F0-ATP synthase complex, leading to reduced catalytic efficiency [88,89,90]. Oxidative damage to nuclear and mitochondrial DNA encoding ATP synthase components also reduces protein expression, further impairing ATP production [91,92]. These defects focus on ATP synthase dysfunction as a major contributor to neuronal energy failure in AD.
ATP reduction directly affects neuronal signaling and synaptic integrity because synaptic transmission, vesicle recycling, ion pump activity, and maintenance of membrane potential are all highly energy-dependent processes [93]. Reduced ATP availability disrupts calcium homeostasis, impairs axonal transport of organelles and synaptic vesicles, and reduces synaptic plasticity. As a result, synapses become functionally compromised long before neurons undergo irreversible degeneration.

2.7. Mitochondrial Calcium Dysregulation in AD

In mitochondria, calcium levels are strictly regulated. Calcium entry into mitochondria is primarily mediated by the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) on the outer mitochondrial membrane [94], followed by transport across the inner membrane via the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) [95]. VDAC1, the predominant isoform and the most abundant protein of the outer mitochondrial membrane, regulates metabolite, ATP/ADP, and ion exchange between the cytosol and mitochondria and has been proposed as a key component or regulator of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) [96]. In AD, VDAC1 levels are markedly elevated in postmortem tissues and AD transgenic mouse models, where VDAC1 interacts directly with Aβ and p-tau, promoting mitochondrial calcium overload, MPTP opening, cytochrome c release, and apoptotic signaling [97,98]. When calcium levels within mitochondria increase excessively, this leads to increased ROS production and triggers apoptosis, as observed in AD. Mitochondria help maintain calcium homeostasis by sequestering excess calcium during synaptic activity and releasing it when needed to support key functions, such as ATP production and signal transduction, in healthy neurons [99]. Imbalanced cellular calcium homeostasis is an early and widespread hallmark of the AD brain, and its connection to AD was established decades ago [100,101]. Early imbalance in calcium homeostasis is linked to alterations in calcium-dependent proteases, highlighting their involvement in the preclinical stages of the disease [102]. Additionally, increased basal cytosolic calcium levels and abnormal spontaneous calcium activity have been reported in neurons and astrocytes in AD mouse models [103,104]. The widespread view proposes that extensive calcium overload in neurons leads to neuronal death through several mechanisms, including excessive activation of calcium-dependent kinases and phosphatases, glutamate-induced excitotoxicity, stimulation of calcium-dependent proteases, and mitochondrial calcium deposits that trigger mPTP opening, release of cytochrome c, and activation of caspases and apoptosis [105,106,107]. (Figure 4) Calcium interferes with APP processing, promoting increased Aβ production and NFT formation [108,109]. In vitro studies have shown that mitochondrial calcium overload triggers the neurotoxicity induced by Aβ oligomers, and inhibition of mitochondrial calcium overload provides a novel mechanism of neuroprotection [110]. Another study showed that calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum depletes cellular GSH and increases ROS, leading to mitochondrial membrane depolarization, which suggests that early Aβ-induced disruptions in ER calcium homeostasis impair mitochondrial function and trigger apoptosis, contributing to neuronal death in AD [111]. In the mouse model of AD, elevated mitochondrial calcium levels contribute to neuronal death [105]. So, targeting reducing the mitochondrial calcium level may offer one of the treatment strategies for AD.

3. Therapeutic Interventions for Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Several therapeutic strategies targeting mitochondrial dysfunction have emerged as promising approaches for AD, ranging from mitochondria-targeted antioxidants and small molecules to gene therapy, mitochondrial transplantation, and mitophagy enhancers. The main compounds and their reported effects in AD are summarized in Table 1.

3.1. Mitochondria-Targeted Antioxidant Therapies

Given that mitochondria are both a prevalent source and a significant target of ROS, strategies that deliver antioxidants directly to mitochondria have gained substantial attention as potential disease-modifying interventions in AD. Unlike conventional antioxidants, which often show limited benefit due to poor mitochondrial penetration, mitochondria-targeted compounds are designed to accumulate within mitochondria, thereby improving local ROS buffering, preserving mitochondrial membrane integrity, and stabilizing bioenergetic function [112].

3.1.1. MitoQ

MitoQ is a mitochondria-targeted ubiquinone derivative that accumulates in mitochondria and has shown neuroprotective effects in AD animal models. In transgenic 3xTg-AD mice, chronic MitoQ administration improved cognitive behavior, reduced oxidative stress, inflammation, caspase activation, and Aβ42 levels, with behavioral outcomes approaching those of wild-type controls in spatial memory testing [113]. Additionally, in another study, MitoQ-treated 3xTg-AD mice preserved memory compared with untreated mice and reduced oxidative stress, synapse loss, astrogliosis, microglial cell proliferation, Aβ accumulation, caspase activation, and hyperphosphorylation of tau [114]. MitoQ has also been evaluated in clinical settings outside AD, including Parkinson’s disease, supporting its general translational feasibility, although robust clinical efficacy for neurodegeneration remains to be established [115,116,117].

3.1.2. SkQ1

Mitochondria-targeted plastoquinone derivatives such as SkQ1 have also demonstrated neuroprotective effects. In the AD rat model, SkQ1 treatment during the progressive stage improved mitochondrial structure and function in the hippocampus, reduced neurodegenerative alterations, prevented synaptic damage and neuronal loss, lowered Aβ burden and hyperphosphorylation of tau, and improved memory performance [118]. SkQ1 supports the therapeutic evidence that mitigating mitochondrial oxidative damage can slow downstream synaptic and neuropathological deterioration.
Despite encouraging preclinical findings, significant translational limitations remain. Many studies rely on transgenic or toxin-based models that do not fully recapitulate sporadic late-onset AD, and therapeutic efficacy may depend strongly on treatment timing (preclinical vs. symptomatic stages). Moreover, demonstrating antioxidant benefits in humans has historically been challenging, underscoring the need for improved biomarkers of mitochondrial oxidative stress, better patient stratification, and well-designed, robust trials aimed explicitly at testing disease-modifying outcomes.

3.2. Small Molecules

In addition to mitochondria-targeted antioxidants, several small molecules have been identified to modulate mitochondrial bioenergetics, dynamics, and signaling pathways implicated in AD. These compounds offer the advantage of favorable pharmacokinetics, blood–brain barrier penetration, and the ability to fine-tune mitochondrial function without the need for genetic manipulation.

3.2.1. CP2

CP2, a small-molecule modulator of mitochondrial complex I, has emerged as a promising therapeutic candidate in AD models. Unlike classical mitochondrial inhibitors, CP2 exerts partial, controlled inhibition of complex I, enhancing mitochondrial efficiency by reducing excessive electron leakage and ROS production. Chronic CP2 treatment in 3xTg-AD mice restored synaptic activity, improved cognitive performance, normalized glucose metabolism, and enhanced energy homeostasis [119]. These benefits were accompanied by a significant reduction in hyperphosphorylated tau levels, mediated through increased activity of PP2A and suppression of tau-associated kinases such as Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) and GSK3β [119]. Consistent findings have also been reported in APP/PS1 mice, where CP2 treatment ameliorated AD-related pathology and improved cognitive outcomes, particularly in female mice. Importantly, mild complex I modulation by CP2 restored synaptic structure and normalized mitochondrial distribution within the hippocampus, showing its ability to improve both metabolic and synaptic defects without inducing explicit mitochondrial toxicity [120].

3.2.2. Mdivi-1

Mdivi-1 is another class of small molecules that targets mitochondrial dynamics, particularly excessive fission mediated by dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1). Mdivi-1, a DRP1 inhibitor, suppresses mitochondrial fission by interfering with DRP1 GTPase activity, thereby reducing mitochondrial fragmentation [78]. In neurodegenerative disease models, Mdivi-1 has been shown to prevent cytochrome c release, improve mitochondrial morphology, and attenuate disease-related phenotypes [42,121]. However, some studies suggest that Mdivi-1 may exert off-target effects, underscoring the need for improved specificity and careful interpretation of its neuroprotective actions [122].

3.2.3. DDQ

Recent studies have identified diethyl (3,4-dihydroxyphenethylamino) (quinolin-4-yl) methylphosphonate (DDQ) as a novel mitochondrial modulator with multitarget activity. DDQ treatment improves the expression of mitochondrial and synaptic genes dysregulated in AD and enhances synaptic activity with reduced Aβ pathology [123,124]. DDQ also promotes a favorable shift in amyloid processing by reducing toxic Aβ 42 levels while increasing Aβ 40, a form linked with lower neurotoxicity [123].

3.2.4. Resveratrol

In addition to these mitochondria-localized agents, broader antioxidant and redox-modulating compounds such as resveratrol have been studied in AD models and reported to reduce oxidative stress markers and improve memory performance in Aβ-challenged animals [125]. However, because such compounds are not specifically engineered for mitochondrial targeting, their inclusion is best framed as complementary evidence supporting oxidative stress modulation, rather than as primary examples of mitochondria-targeted antioxidants.

3.3. Gene Therapy Targets Mitochondrial Pathways

Gene therapy has emerged as a powerful strategy for modulating mitochondrial pathways implicated in neurodegenerative diseases, offering the potential for sustained and targeted correction of cellular dysfunction. While AD is not caused by single-gene mutations, mitochondrial gene therapy approaches aim to enhance mitochondrial resilience, bioenergetic capacity, and antioxidant defenses rather than directly targeting amyloid or tau pathology. Current strategies focus on nuclear-encoded mitochondrial regulators, as direct manipulation of mtDNA poses significant technical challenges [126]. Advances in mitochondrial gene editing, including mitochondrially targeted zinc-finger nucleases (mtZFNs), have demonstrated proof-of-concept efficacy in selectively eliminating mutant mtDNA and promoting repopulation with healthy copies in inherited mitochondrial disorders [127]. Although these approaches remain experimental, they establish a conceptual framework for correcting mtDNA instability and improving mitochondrial function in disease contexts.

3.3.1. Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV)-Based Vectors

These vectors have become the preferred platform for mitochondrial gene delivery due to their favorable safety profile, long-term transgene expression, and neuronal targeting capabilities [128]. In AD models, AAV-mediated delivery of mitochondrial-protective genes has shown encouraging results. For instance, hippocampal delivery of AAV9-DJ-1 in APP/PS1 mice improved cognitive performance and activated key neuroprotective pathways, including NRF2 signaling, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation, and autophagy-related mechanisms [129]. These effects were accompanied by enhanced antioxidant capacity and reduced oxidative stress, underscoring DJ-1’s role in maintaining mitochondrial redox homeostasis [129].

3.3.2. PGC-1α

Another promising target is PGC-1α, a master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism. Lentiviral-mediated overexpression of PGC-1α in the hippocampus and cortex of APP23 mice resulted in improved spatial and recognition memory, reduced Aβ accumulation, and inhibition of β-secretase (BACE1) expression [130]. Additionally, PGC-1α gene delivery attenuated neuroinflammation, preserved pyramidal neurons in the CA3 region, and enhanced neurotrophic factor expression, showing its broad neuroprotective potential [130].
Despite these promising findings, several challenges limit the immediate clinical translation of mitochondrial gene therapy for AD. Efficient and widespread delivery across the blood–brain barrier, optimal timing of intervention, potential immune responses, and long-term safety remain key considerations. Moreover, given the heterogeneity of sporadic AD, gene therapy approaches are likely to be most effective when applied early in disease progression or combined with complementary therapies targeting metabolic and synaptic dysfunction.

3.4. Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore (mPTP) Inhibitors

Cyclophilin D (CypD): The mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) is a high-conductance channel whose pathological opening leads to mitochondrial membrane depolarization, collapse of ATP synthesis, and initiation of cell death pathways [131,132]. CypD, a mitochondrial matrix peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase, is a critical regulator of mPTP opening and sensitizes mitochondria to metabolic and oxidative stress. Increasing evidence implies dysregulated mPTP activity as a key contributor to mitochondrial impairment and neuronal vulnerability in AD. In AD, elevated CypD expression and increased formation of Aβ–CypD complexes have been detected in cortical and hippocampal mitochondria [133]. These interactions lower the threshold for mPTP opening, rendering mitochondria more susceptible to calcium overload and oxidative stress. Pathological mPTP opening results in loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, impaired oxidative phosphorylation, excessive ROS production, and release of pro-apoptotic factors, thereby linking mitochondrial stress directly to neuronal dysfunction and degeneration [134]. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of CypD has demonstrated neuroprotective effects in AD models. CypD-deficient transgenic mice exhibit improved mitochondrial function, preserved ATP production, reduced oxidative damage, and enhanced learning and memory performance during aging and in AD-like conditions [133]. These findings support the concept that suppressing pathological mPTP opening can interrupt the cascade of mitochondrial failure and neuronal loss in AD. Pharmacological inhibition of CypD using cyclosporine A has been shown to prevent mitochondrial depolarization, limit cytochrome c release, and reduce tau burden and synaptic dysfunction in experimental models [135]. However, the clinical applicability of cyclosporine A is limited by its immunosuppressive effects and poor central nervous system specificity, highlighting the need to develop more selective mPTP inhibitors that target CypD without systemic toxicity. Beyond its role in mPTP regulation, CypD has been implicated in broader mitochondrial signaling and gene regulatory processes that influence mitochondrial bioenergetics and stress responses. Dysregulation of these functions may further contribute to mitochondrial instability and neurodegeneration in AD, although their precise relevance in human disease requires further investigation. These findings identify CypD-mediated mPTP opening as a critical node linking mitochondrial stress to irreversible neuronal injury in AD. Targeting pathological mPTP activation represents a promising strategy to preserve mitochondrial integrity and neuronal survival, particularly when combined with interventions that enhance mitochondrial bioenergetics and quality control. However, translating mPTP inhibitors into clinical practice will require improved drug specificity, optimized delivery, and careful patient stratification.
Table 1. The compounds targeting mitochondrial dysfunction in AD.
Table 1. The compounds targeting mitochondrial dysfunction in AD.
CompoundEffects in ADReferences
mitoQImproved cognition, reduced oxidative stress and inflammation, and lowered Aβ levels.[113,115,116,117]
SS-31Stabilizes mitochondrial membrane, improves mitochondrial function, improves bioenergetics, and restores synaptic protein levels.[136]
SkQ1It improves mitochondrial function, memory, and prevents synaptic damage and neuronal loss.[118]
ResveratrolReduced oxidative stress marker, improved memory.[125]
CP2Controlled complex I inhibition and reduced ROS generation, restored synaptic activity, and improved cognition.[119,120]
mdivi-1DRP1 inhibitor suppresses mitochondrial fission and improves mitochondrial morphology.[42,78,121,122]
DDQReduces DRP1–Aβ interaction, enhances synaptic activity, and reduces Aβ levels.[123,124]
Gene therapyEnhances antioxidant pathways (NRF2, AMPK), improves cognition. Improve mitochondrial biogenesis, reduce Aβ accumulation, and improve memory.[126,127,128,129]
Cyclosporine APrevent mitochondrial depolarization, limit cytochrome c, and reduce tau cleavage and synaptic impairment.[135]
Mitochondria transplantReplaces damaged mitochondria, reduces Aβ levels, improves spatial learning and memory, and decreases neuronal loss and gliosis.[137,138]
NAD+ precursorsEnhance mitophagy, improve mitochondrial resistance to oxidative stress, and reduce Aβ and tau burden.[81,139,140]
Urolithin AInduces mitophagy and improves mitochondrial function.[141,142,143,144]
SpermidinePromotes autophagy and mitophagy and reduces the oxidative burden.[145,146,147,148,149]
MelatoninReduced oxidative stress increases the expression of antioxidant enzymes and stabilizes mitochondrial integrity.[150,151,152]
NACProtect against ROS by restoring glutathione (GSH), reduced Aβ, and phosphorylated tau levels.[153,154,155,156,157,158]
PhotobiomodulationReduces Aβ and tau pathology, and improves cognition[159,160]

3.5. Mitochondrial Transplantation

Mitochondrial transplantation, also known as mitotherapy, has emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy to restore mitochondrial function by directly providing healthy, functional mitochondria to cells with impaired bioenergetics. Unlike pharmacological or gene-based approaches that modulate specific pathways, mitotherapy offers a unique advantage by simultaneously targeting multiple aspects of mitochondrial dysfunction, including ATP production, calcium homeostasis, redox balance, and metabolic regulation [137]. In experimental models of AD, mitochondrial transplantation has shown promising neuroprotective effects [137]. Intravenous or intracerebral delivery of healthy mitochondria in AD rodent models improved spatial learning and memory, restored mitochondrial membrane potential, enhanced calcium buffering, and reduced oxidative stress [137]. These functional improvements were accompanied by decreased neuronal loss and gliosis in the hippocampus, as well as normalization of key mitochondrial enzyme activities, including citrate synthase and cytochrome c oxidase [138]. Notably, mitotherapy also reduces the accumulation of Aβ, suggesting that restoration of mitochondrial function may indirectly modulate classical AD pathology [138]. Importantly, mitotherapy addresses mitochondrial dysfunction at a systemic level rather than targeting individual molecular defects. By replenishing functional mitochondria, this approach bypasses impaired mitochondrial biogenesis, defective mitophagy, and dysregulated signaling pathways that limit the effectiveness of endogenous mitochondrial repair mechanisms in AD neurons. As such, mitotherapy may be particularly beneficial in advanced disease stages where intrinsic mitochondrial recovery processes are severely compromised. Despite its promise, several challenges currently limit the clinical translation of mitochondrial transplantation. These include optimizing mitochondrial isolation and preservation, ensuring efficient delivery across the blood–brain barrier, determining the longevity and functional integration of transplanted mitochondria, and addressing potential immunogenicity or off-target effects. Moreover, most evidence to date derives from small-animal models, and the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of mitotherapy in humans remain to be established.

3.6. Mitophagy-Enhancing Compounds

Given the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and impaired mitophagic flux in AD, pharmacological strategies that enhance mitochondrial quality control have gained increasing interest. Unlike mitochondria-targeted antioxidants that primarily mitigate oxidative damage, mitophagy-enhancing compounds aim to restore the selective clearance of dysfunctional or damaged mitochondria, thereby maintaining mitochondrial integrity, bioenergetic efficiency, and neuronal resilience.

3.6.1. NAD+

One of the most extensively studied approaches involves restoration of intracellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) levels. NAD+ is a critical metabolic cofactor that regulates mitochondrial function, redox homeostasis, and autophagy through NAD+-dependent enzymes such as sirtuins and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases. NAD+ levels decline with aging and are further reduced in AD models [81,139,140]. Supplementation with NAD+ precursors, including nicotinamide, nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN), and nicotinamide riboside (NR), has been shown to enhance mitophagy, improve mitochondrial resistance to oxidative stress, decrease accumulation of Aβ and phosphorylated tau proteins, and prevent cognitive decline in AD mouse models. These benefits are primarily mediated through activation of Sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) and CREB-dependent transcriptional programs that support mitochondrial turnover and bioenergetics [140,161]. Beyond mitophagy, NAD+ restoration also supports mitochondrial biogenesis through SERT1-mediated activation of PGC-1α and contributes to DNA repair via PARP-dependent mechanisms, underscoring their broad mitochondrial-protective potential.

3.6.2. Urolithin

It is a gut microbiota-derived metabolite of dietary ellagitannins, representing another promising mitophagy enhancer. Urolithin A has been shown to induce Mitophagy and improve mitochondrial function across multiple model systems [141]. In neurodegenerative disease contexts, urolithin A promotes mitochondrial turnover, improves ATP production, and reduces oxidative stress, thereby supporting neuronal survival [141,142]. Importantly, urolithin A has demonstrated promising safety and bioavailability profiles in humans, positioning it as a translationally attractive candidate for targeting mitochondrial dysfunction in aging-related disorders, including AD [143,144].

3.6.3. Spermidine

It is a naturally occurring polyamine that promotes autophagy and mitophagy through epigenetic and metabolic mechanisms, including inhibition of histone acetyltransferases and activation of autophagy-related genes. Spermidine administration has been shown to restore mitochondrial homeostasis, protect against age-associated memory impairment, and improve neuronal survival in an autophagy-dependent manner [145,146,147]. By facilitating the clearance of damaged mitochondria, spermidine reduces the oxidative burden. It supports synaptic function, highlighting its potential as a dietary or pharmacological intervention to mitigate mitochondrial dysfunction in AD [145,148,149].
Thoroughly, NAD+ precursors, urolithin A, and spermidine converge on mitophagy and mitochondrial quality control pathways, offering a complementary therapeutic strategy to antioxidant and bioenergetic interventions. By promoting the selective removal of impaired or damaged mitochondria, these compounds address a fundamental pathogenic mechanism in AD. Their most significant therapeutic potential may lie in the early or preventive phase, where enhancing mitochondrial turnover might delay synaptic dysfunction and slow neurodegenerative progression.

3.7. SS-31

A second class of mitochondria-directed agents includes peptides that stabilize mitochondrial membranes and improve mitochondrial performance under stress. SS-31 (elamipretide) has been reported to have protective effects in APP/PS1 mice when administered around the onset of symptoms, delaying behavioral decline and reducing mitochondrial and synaptic dysfunction. Mechanistically, SS-31 improved mitochondrial function, reduced oxidative stress, improved fission–fusion imbalance, and partially reduced amyloid pathology while restoring synaptic protein levels [136]. These findings support the concept that targeting mitochondrial membrane stability and bioenergetics can support functional benefits in AD models.

3.8. Melatonin

Melatonin is an endogenous indoleamine primarily known for regulating circadian rhythms and for exerting neuroprotective effects through dual mitochondrial mechanisms: direct antioxidant activity and inhibition of the mPTP. Melatonin readily crosses the blood–brain barrier and accumulates within mitochondria, where it directly scavenges ROS and nitrogen species and enhances the expression of antioxidant enzymes. In AD models, melatonin treatment has been shown to preserve mitochondrial membrane potential, inhibit opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, and suppress cytochrome c release, thereby protecting neurons from Aβ-induced apoptosis [150]. A study in transgenic AD mouse models demonstrates that chronic melatonin administration reduces oxidative stress, reduces neuroinflammation, lowers Aβ burden, and improves cognition [151]. Mechanistically, melatonin increases the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins, such as B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), while suppressing pro-apoptotic factors, including Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax), thereby stabilizing mitochondrial integrity and promoting neuronal survival [152]. These findings support melatonin’s role as a mitochondrial protectant rather than a direct disease-modifying agent.

3.9. N-Acetyl-Cysteine (NAC)

It acts primarily by replenishing intracellular glutathione (GSH), the most abundant endogenous antioxidant critical for mitochondrial redox homeostasis [158]. By restoring GSH levels, NAC enhances mitochondrial antioxidant capacity, inhibits oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA and proteins, and improves mitochondrial function. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that NAC reduces Aβ and phosphorylated tau levels, attenuates oxidative stress, and improves learning and memory performance in AD animal models [153,154,155]. NAC has also been evaluated in clinical settings. Long-term administration of NAC-containing nutraceutical formulations in individuals with mild cognitive impairment or early AD has been associated with improvements in cognitive and behavioral outcomes [156,157]. However, definitive disease-modifying effects remain to be established [156,157]. These findings highlight NAC’s translational potential as an adjunct therapy to mitigate mitochondrial oxidative stress.

3.10. Photobiomodulation (PBM)

PBM is an emerging non-invasive therapeutic approach that uses red and near-infrared (NIR) light (600–1100 nm) to enhance mitochondrial function, with cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV) as its primary biological target [162,163]. Since cytochrome c oxidase activity is reduced in AD brains, PBM directly addresses this bioenergetic deficit by promoting electron transfer, enhancing ATP production, and reducing oxidative stress [163,164]. In transgenic AD animal models, transcranial PBM has been shown to reduce Aβ plaque burden, attenuate tau hyperphosphorylation, restore mitochondrial membrane potential, and improve cognition [159,160,165]. Early pilot clinical studies in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild-to-moderate AD have reported improvements in cognition and cerebral blood flow, with a favorable safety profile [166]. Although variability in treatment parameters (wavelength, dose, and delivery method) and the limited number of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) currently restrict clinical translation, PBM represents a mechanistically rational mitochondria-targeted strategy that complements existing therapeutic approaches for AD.

4. Conclusions

Mitochondrial dysfunction has emerged as an important contributor to the pathogenesis of AD, linking metabolic failure, oxidative stress, synaptic dysfunction, and neuronal loss. Although AD is a multifactorial disorder involving several interconnected pathological pathways, including amyloid and tau accumulation, neuroinflammation, and vascular dysfunction, growing evidence supports the mitochondrial cascade hypothesis, suggesting that mitochondria may act not only as downstream targets of neurodegeneration but also as active participants in disease onset and progression. Importantly, mitochondrial dysfunction in AD is multifaceted rather than pathway-specific, suggesting that effective therapeutic strategies must address mitochondrial health at a systemic level. Despite compelling mechanistic and preclinical evidence, translation of mitochondrial-targeted therapies into clinical benefit remains limited.
Future progress will depend on refining preclinical models, identifying robust biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction, and adopting precision-medicine approaches to stratify patients based on mitochondrial and metabolic phenotypes. Early intervention, combination therapies targeting complementary mitochondrial pathways, and integration with lifestyle and metabolic interventions may be essential to achieving disease-modifying effects. Advances in mitochondrial imaging, omics-based profiling, and targeted delivery technologies are likely to further accelerate this field. Thus, targeting mitochondrial dysfunction represents a promising and biologically grounded strategy for addressing the complex pathology of AD.

Author Contributions

J.B., P.R., A.C.S. and V.H. have participated in writing and editing all parts of this review article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Institutes of Health, grant number R01 AG071560.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data was analyzed during this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rawat, P.; Sehar, U.; Bisht, J.; Reddy, A.P.; Reddy, P.H. Alzheimer’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease-related dementias in Hispanics: Identifying influential factors and supporting caregivers. Ageing Res. Rev. 2024, 93, 102178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sehar, U.; Rawat, P.; Reddy, A.P.; Kopel, J.; Reddy, P.H. Amyloid beta in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rawat, P.; Sehar, U.; Bisht, J.; Selman, A.; Culberson, J.; Reddy, P.H. Phosphorylated tau in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Reddy, P.H.; Yin, X.; Manczak, M.; Kumar, S.; Pradeepkiran, J.A.; Vijayan, M.; Reddy, A.P. Mutant APP and amyloid beta-induced defective autophagy, mitophagy, mitochondrial structural and functional changes and synaptic damage in hippocampal neurons from Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018, 27, 2502–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, H.-Y.; Zhao, Y.; Xie, Y.-Z. Immunosenescence of brain accelerates Alzheimer’s disease progression. Rev. Neurosci. 2023, 34, 85–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, H.; Kulas, J.A.; Wang, C.; Holtzman, D.M.; Ferris, H.A.; Hansen, S.B. Regulation of beta-amyloid production in neurons by astrocyte-derived cholesterol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2102191118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. John, A.; Reddy, P.H. Synaptic basis of Alzheimer’s disease: Focus on synaptic amyloid beta, P-tau and mitochondria. Ageing Res. Rev. 2021, 65, 101208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chan, D.C. Mitochondria: Dynamic organelles in disease, aging, and development. Cell 2006, 125, 1241–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ashleigh, T.; Swerdlow, R.H.; Beal, M.F. The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023, 19, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, W.; Zhao, F.; Ma, X.; Perry, G.; Zhu, X. Mitochondria dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: Recent advances. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pickett, E.K.; Rose, J.; McCrory, C.; McKenzie, C.-A.; King, D.; Smith, C.; Gillingwater, T.H.; Henstridge, C.M.; Spires-Jones, T.L. Region-specific depletion of synaptic mitochondria in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2018, 136, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kametani, F.; Hasegawa, M. Reconsideration of amyloid hypothesis and tau hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 328460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Swerdlow, R.H.; Khan, S.M. A “mitochondrial cascade hypothesis” for sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Med. Hypotheses 2004, 63, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Swerdlow, R.H. Mitochondria and mitochondrial cascades in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018, 62, 1403–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hauptmann, S.; Scherping, I.; Dröse, S.; Brandt, U.; Schulz, K.; Jendrach, M.; Leuner, K.; Eckert, A.; Müller, W. Mitochondrial dysfunction: An early event in Alzheimer pathology accumulates with age in AD transgenic mice. Neurobiol. Aging 2009, 30, 1574–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bhatti, J.S.; Kaur, S.; Mishra, J.; Dibbanti, H.; Singh, A.; Reddy, A.P.; Bhatti, G.K.; Reddy, P.H. Targeting dynamin-related protein-1 as a potential therapeutic approach for mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2023, 1869, 166798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. López-Doménech, G.; Kittler, J.T. Mitochondrial regulation of local supply of energy in neurons. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2023, 81, 102747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yao, J.; Irwin, R.W.; Zhao, L.; Nilsen, J.; Hamilton, R.T.; Brinton, R.D. Mitochondrial bioenergetic deficit precedes Alzheimer’s pathology in female mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14670–14675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Du, H.; Guo, L.; Yan, S.; Sosunov, A.A.; McKhann, G.M.; ShiDu Yan, S. Early deficits in synaptic mitochondria in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 18670–18675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Venkataraman, A.V.; Mansur, A.; Rizzo, G.; Bishop, C.; Lewis, Y.; Kocagoncu, E.; Lingford-Hughes, A.; Huiban, M.; Passchier, J.; Rowe, J.B. Widespread cell stress and mitochondrial dysfunction occur in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eabk1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dharshini, S.A.P.; Taguchi, Y.-H.; Gromiha, M.M. Investigating the energy crisis in Alzheimer disease using transcriptome study. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pinho, T.S.; Correia, S.C.; Perry, G.; Ambrosio, A.F.; Moreira, P.I. Diminished O-GlcNAcylation in Alzheimer’s disease is strongly correlated with mitochondrial anomalies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2019, 1865, 2048–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, R.-Z.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Z.-B. Mitochondrial electron transport chain, ROS generation and uncoupling. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019, 44, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Correia, S.C.; Santos, R.X.; Carvalho, C.; Cardoso, S.; Candeias, E.; Santos, M.S.; Oliveira, C.R.; Moreira, P.I. Insulin signaling, glucose metabolism and mitochondria: Major players in Alzheimer’s disease and diabetes interrelation. Brain Res. 2012, 1441, 64–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kapogiannis, D.; Mattson, M.P. Disrupted energy metabolism and neuronal circuit dysfunction in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mosconi, L.; Mistur, R.; Switalski, R.; Tsui, W.H.; Glodzik, L.; Li, Y.; Pirraglia, E.; De Santi, S.; Reisberg, B.; Wisniewski, T. FDG-PET changes in brain glucose metabolism from normal cognition to pathologically verified Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2009, 36, 811–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mosconi, L.; De Santi, S.; Li, J.; Tsui, W.H.; Li, Y.; Boppana, M.; Laska, E.; Rusinek, H.; de Leon, M.J. Hippocampal hypometabolism predicts cognitive decline from normal aging. Neurobiol. Aging 2008, 29, 676–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hölscher, C. Brain insulin resistance: Role in neurodegenerative disease and potential for targeting. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2020, 29, 333–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rummel, N.G.; Butterfield, D.A. Altered metabolism in Alzheimer disease brain: Role of oxidative stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2022, 36, 1289–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Jais, A.; Solas, M.; Backes, H.; Chaurasia, B.; Kleinridders, A.; Theurich, S.; Mauer, J.; Steculorum, S.M.; Hampel, B.; Goldau, J. Myeloid-cell-derived VEGF maintains brain glucose uptake and limits cognitive impairment in obesity. Cell 2016, 165, 882–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qiu, W.Q.; Walsh, D.M.; Ye, Z.; Vekrellis, K.; Zhang, J.; Podlisny, M.B.; Rosner, M.R.; Safavi, A.; Hersh, L.B.; Selkoe, D.J. Insulin-degrading enzyme regulates extracellular levels of amyloid β-protein by degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 32730–32738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Flannery, P.J.; Trushina, E. Mitochondrial dynamics and transport in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 98, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Olichon, A.; Baricault, L.; Gas, N.; Guillou, E.; Valette, A.; Belenguer, P.; Lenaers, G. Loss of OPA1 perturbates the mitochondrial inner membrane structure and integrity, leading to cytochrome c release and apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 7743–7746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, W.; Zhao, D.; Shah, S.Z.A.; Zhang, X.; Lai, M.; Yang, D.; Wu, X.; Guan, Z.; Li, J.; Zhao, H. OPA1 overexpression ameliorates mitochondrial cristae remodeling, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuronal apoptosis in prion diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kraus, F.; Ryan, M.T. The constriction and scission machineries involved in mitochondrial fission. J. Cell Sci. 2017, 130, 2953–2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xu, L.-L.; Shen, Y.; Wang, X.; Wei, L.-F.; Wang, P.; Yang, H.; Wang, C.-F.; Xie, Z.-H.; Bi, J.-Z. Mitochondrial dynamics changes with age in an APPsw/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport 2017, 28, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Misrani, A.; Tabassum, S.; Huo, Q.; Tabassum, S.; Jiang, J.; Ahmed, A.; Chen, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S. Mitochondrial deficits with neural and social damage in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease model mice. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 748388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ishihara, N.; Eura, Y.; Mihara, K. Mitofusin 1 and 2 play distinct roles in mitochondrial fusion reactions via GTPase activity. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 6535–6546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Züchner, S.; Mersiyanova, I.V.; Muglia, M.; Bissar-Tadmouri, N.; Rochelle, J.; Dadali, E.L.; Zappia, M.; Nelis, E.; Patitucci, A.; Senderek, J. Mutations in the mitochondrial GTPase mitofusin 2 cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy type 2A. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 449–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, H.; McCaffery, J.M.; Chan, D.C. Mitochondrial fusion protects against neurodegeneration in the cerebellum. Cell 2007, 130, 548–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Darshi, M.; Mendiola, V.L.; Mackey, M.R.; Murphy, A.N.; Koller, A.; Perkins, G.A.; Ellisman, M.H.; Taylor, S.S. ChChd3, an inner mitochondrial membrane protein, is essential for maintaining crista integrity and mitochondrial function. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 2918–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baek, S.H.; Park, S.J.; Jeong, J.I.; Kim, S.H.; Han, J.; Kyung, J.W.; Baik, S.-H.; Choi, Y.; Choi, B.Y.; Park, J.S. Inhibition of Drp1 ameliorates synaptic depression, Aβ deposition, and cognitive impairment in an Alzheimer’s disease model. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 5099–5110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Manczak, M.; Reddy, P.H. Abnormal interaction between the mitochondrial fission protein Drp1 and hyperphosphorylated tau in Alzheimer’s disease neurons: Implications for mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal damage. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012, 21, 2538–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Onyango, I.G.; Dennis, J.; Khan, S.M. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease and the rationale for bioenergetics based therapies. Aging Dis. 2016, 7, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fan, W.; Evans, R. PPARs and ERRs: Molecular mediators of mitochondrial metabolism. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2015, 33, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Eichner, L.J.; Giguère, V. Estrogen related receptors (ERRs): A new dawn in transcriptional control of mitochondrial gene networks. Mitochondrion 2011, 11, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Halling, J.F.; Pilegaard, H. PGC-1α-mediated regulation of mitochondrial function and physiological implications. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2020, 45, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Li, P.A.; Hou, X.; Hao, S. Mitochondrial biogenesis in neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. Res. 2017, 95, 2025–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fernandez-Marcos, P.J.; Auwerx, J. Regulation of PGC-1α, a nodal regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 884S–890S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ventura-Clapier, R.; Garnier, A.; Veksler, V. Transcriptional control of mitochondrial biogenesis: The central role of PGC-1α. Cardiovasc. Res. 2008, 79, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Choi, H.-I.; Kim, H.-J.; Park, J.-S.; Kim, I.-J.; Bae, E.H.; Ma, S.K.; Kim, S.W. PGC-1α attenuates hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptotic cell death by upregulating Nrf-2 via GSK3β inactivation mediated by activated p38 in HK-2 Cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Qin, W.; Haroutunian, V.; Katsel, P.; Cardozo, C.P.; Ho, L.; Buxbaum, J.D.; Pasinetti, G.M. PGC-1α expression decreases in the Alzheimer disease brain as a function of dementia. Arch. Neurol. 2009, 66, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, J.; Liu, W.-J.; Shi, H.-Z.; Zhai, H.-R.; Qian, J.-J.; Zhang, W.-N. A role for PGC-1a in the control of abnormal mitochondrial dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease. Cells 2022, 11, 2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Singulani, M.P.; Pereira, C.P.M.; Ferreira, A.F.F.; Garcia, P.C.; Ferrari, G.D.; Alberici, L.C.; Britto, L.R. Impairment of PGC-1α-mediated mitochondrial biogenesis precedes mitochondrial dysfunction and Alzheimer’s pathology in the 3xTg mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Exp. Gerontol. 2020, 133, 110882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sheng, B.; Wang, X.; Su, B.; Lee, H.g.; Casadesus, G.; Perry, G.; Zhu, X. Impaired mitochondrial biogenesis contributes to mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2012, 120, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, R.; Li, J.J.; Diao, S.; Kwak, Y.-D.; Liu, L.; Zhi, L.; Büeler, H.; Bhat, N.R.; Williams, R.W.; Park, E.A. Metabolic stress modulates Alzheimer’s β-secretase gene transcription via SIRT1-PPARγ-PGC-1 in neurons. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. St-Pierre, J.; Drori, S.; Uldry, M.; Silvaggi, J.M.; Rhee, J.; Jäger, S.; Handschin, C.; Zheng, K.; Lin, J.; Yang, W. Suppression of reactive oxygen species and neurodegeneration by the PGC-1 transcriptional coactivators. Cell 2006, 127, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Huang, W.; Huang, M.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Ye, Q. Beneficial effects of PGC-1α in the substantia nigra of a mouse model of MPTP-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity. Aging 2019, 11, 8937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Smith, M.A.; Rottkamp, C.A.; Nunomura, A.; Raina, A.K.; Perry, G. Oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2000, 1502, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Manczak, M.; Park, B.S.; Jung, Y.; Reddy, P.H. Differential expression of oxidative phosphorylation genes in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for early mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage. Neuromolecular Med. 2004, 5, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Balaban, R.S.; Nemoto, S.; Finkel, T. Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging. Cell 2005, 120, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hu, F.; Liu, F. Mitochondrial stress: A bridge between mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic diseases? Cell. Signal. 2011, 23, 1528–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Guo, C.; Sun, L.; Chen, X.; Zhang, D. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen. Res. 2013, 8, 2003–2014. [Google Scholar]
  64. Misrani, A.; Tabassum, S.; Yang, L. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Praticò, D.; Barry, O.P.; Lawson, J.A.; Adiyaman, M.; Hwang, S.-W.; Khanapure, S.P.; Iuliano, L.; Rokach, J.; FitzGerald, G.A. IPF2α-I: An index of lipid peroxidation in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 3449–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lyras, L.; Cairns, N.J.; Jenner, A.; Jenner, P.; Halliwell, B. An assessment of oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA in brain from patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 1997, 68, 2061–2069. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Rak, M.; Bénit, P.; Chrétien, D.; Bouchereau, J.; Schiff, M.; El-Khoury, R.; Tzagoloff, A.; Rustin, P. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase deficiency. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Elgenaidi, I.; Spiers, J. Regulation of the phosphoprotein phosphatase 2A system and its modulation during oxidative stress: A potential therapeutic target? Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 198, 68–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Toral-Rios, D.; Pichardo-Rojas, P.S.; Alonso-Vanegas, M.; Campos-Peña, V. GSK3β and tau protein in Alzheimer’s Disease and epilepsy. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 19. [Google Scholar]
  70. Tobore, T.O. On the central role of mitochondria dysfunction and oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol. Sci. 2019, 40, 1527–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, X.; Wang, W.; Li, L.; Perry, G.; Lee, H.-g.; Zhu, X. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2014, 1842, 1240–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Manczak, M.; Anekonda, T.S.; Henson, E.; Park, B.S.; Quinn, J.; Reddy, P.H. Mitochondria are a direct site of Aβ accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease neurons: Implications for free radical generation and oxidative damage in disease progression. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 15, 1437–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bhatti, J.S.; Bhatti, G.K.; Reddy, P.H. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in metabolic disorders—A step towards mitochondria based therapeutic strategies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 1066–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kerr, J.S.; Adriaanse, B.A.; Greig, N.H.; Mattson, M.P.; Cader, M.Z.; Bohr, V.A.; Fang, E.F. Mitophagy and Alzheimer’s disease: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. Trends Neurosci. 2017, 40, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nguyen, T.N.; Padman, B.S.; Lazarou, M. Deciphering the molecular signals of PINK1/Parkin mitophagy. Trends Cell Biol. 2016, 26, 733–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pickrell, A.M.; Youle, R.J. The roles of PINK1, parkin, and mitochondrial fidelity in Parkinson’s disease. Neuron 2015, 85, 257–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hirai, K.; Aliev, G.; Nunomura, A.; Fujioka, H.; Russell, R.L.; Atwood, C.S.; Johnson, A.B.; Kress, Y.; Vinters, H.V.; Tabaton, M. Mitochondrial abnormalities in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 3017–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, W.; Yin, J.; Ma, X.; Zhao, F.; Siedlak, S.L.; Wang, Z.; Torres, S.; Fujioka, H.; Xu, Y.; Perry, G. Inhibition of mitochondrial fragmentation protects against Alzheimer’s disease in rodent model. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 4118–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Martín-Maestro, P.; Gargini, R.; Perry, G.; Avila, J.; García-Escudero, V. PARK2 enhancement is able to compensate mitophagy alterations found in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016, 25, 792–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ye, X.; Sun, X.; Starovoytov, V.; Cai, Q. Parkin-mediated mitophagy in mutant hAPP neurons and Alzheimer’s disease patient brains. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 2938–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Fang, E.F.; Hou, Y.; Palikaras, K.; Adriaanse, B.A.; Kerr, J.S.; Yang, B.; Lautrup, S.; Hasan-Olive, M.M.; Caponio, D.; Dan, X. Mitophagy inhibits amyloid-β and tau pathology and reverses cognitive deficits in models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2019, 22, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Boland, B.; Kumar, A.; Lee, S.; Platt, F.M.; Wegiel, J.; Yu, W.H.; Nixon, R.A. Autophagy induction and autophagosome clearance in neurons: Relationship to autophagic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 6926–6937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lee, J.-H.; Yu, W.H.; Kumar, A.; Lee, S.; Mohan, P.S.; Peterhoff, C.M.; Wolfe, D.M.; Martinez-Vicente, M.; Massey, A.C.; Sovak, G. Lysosomal proteolysis and autophagy require presenilin 1 and are disrupted by Alzheimer-related PS1 mutations. Cell 2010, 141, 1146–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Vaillant-Beuchot, L.; Mary, A.; Pardossi-Piquard, R.; Bourgeois, A.; Lauritzen, I.; Eysert, F.; Kinoshita, P.F.; Cazareth, J.; Badot, C.; Fragaki, K. Accumulation of amyloid precursor protein C-terminal fragments triggers mitochondrial structure, function, and mitophagy defects in Alzheimer’s disease models and human brains. Acta Neuropathol. 2021, 141, 39–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bourgeois, A.; Lauritzen, I.; Lorivel, T.; Bauer, C.; Checler, F.; Pardossi-Piquard, R. Intraneuronal accumulation of C99 contributes to synaptic alterations, apathy-like behavior, and spatial learning deficits in 3× TgAD and 2× TgAD mice. Neurobiol. Aging 2018, 71, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Verschueren, K.H.; Blanchet, C.; Felix, J.; Dansercoer, A.; De Vos, D.; Bloch, Y.; Van Beeumen, J.; Svergun, D.; Gutsche, I.; Savvides, S.N. Structure of ATP citrate lyase and the origin of citrate synthase in the Krebs cycle. Nature 2019, 568, 571–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Khatri, N.; Man, H.-Y. Synaptic activity and bioenergy homeostasis: Implications in brain trauma and neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Neurol. 2013, 4, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Gauba, E.; Guo, L.; Du, H. Cyclophilin D promotes brain mitochondrial F1FO ATP synthase dysfunction in aging mice. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017, 55, 1351–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gauba, E.; Chen, H.; Guo, L.; Du, H. Cyclophilin D deficiency attenuates mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase dysfunction via OSCP in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019, 121, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Beck, S.J.; Guo, L.; Phensy, A.; Tian, J.; Wang, L.; Tandon, N.; Gauba, E.; Lu, L.; Pascual, J.M.; Kroener, S. Deregulation of mitochondrial F1FO-ATP synthase via OSCP in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lu, T.; Pan, Y.; Kao, S.-Y.; Li, C.; Kohane, I.; Chan, J.; Yankner, B.A. Gene regulation and DNA damage in the ageing human brain. Nature 2004, 429, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Reed, T.; Perluigi, M.; Sultana, R.; Pierce, W.M.; Klein, J.B.; Turner, D.M.; Coccia, R.; Markesbery, W.R.; Butterfield, D.A. Redox proteomic identification of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-modified brain proteins in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Insight into the role of lipid peroxidation in the progression and pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008, 30, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sultana, R.; Poon, H.F.; Cai, J.; Pierce, W.M.; Merchant, M.; Klein, J.B.; Markesbery, W.R.; Butterfield, D.A. Identification of nitrated proteins in Alzheimer’s disease brain using a redox proteomics approach. Neurobiol. Dis. 2006, 22, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gincel, D.; Zaid, H.; Shoshan-Barmatz, V. Calcium binding and translocation by the voltage-dependent anion channel: A possible regulatory mechanism in mitochondrial function. Biochem. J. 2001, 358, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Baughman, J.M.; Perocchi, F.; Girgis, H.S.; Plovanich, M.; Belcher-Timme, C.A.; Sancak, Y.; Bao, X.R.; Strittmatter, L.; Goldberger, O.; Bogorad, R.L. Integrative genomics identifies MCU as an essential component of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature 2011, 476, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rostovtseva, T.; Colombini, M. ATP flux is controlled by a voltage-gated channel from the mitochondrial outer membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 28006–28008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cuadrado-Tejedor, M.; Vilarino, M.; Cabodevilla, F.; Del Río, J.; Frechilla, D.; Pérez-Mediavilla, A. Enhanced expression of the voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice: An insight into the pathogenic effects of amyloid-β. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2011, 23, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Smilansky, A.; Dangoor, L.; Nakdimon, I.; Ben-Hail, D.; Mizrachi, D.; Shoshan-Barmatz, V. The voltage-dependent anion channel 1 mediates amyloid β toxicity and represents a potential target for Alzheimer disease therapy. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 30670–30683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sheng, Z.-H.; Cai, Q. Mitochondrial transport in neurons: Impact on synaptic homeostasis and neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Arnst, N.; Redolfi, N.; Lia, A.; Bedetta, M.; Greotti, E.; Pizzo, P. Mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling and bioenergetics in Alzheimer’s disease. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Callens, M.; Loncke, J.; Bultynck, G. Dysregulated Ca2+ homeostasis as a central theme in neurodegeneration: Lessons from Alzheimer’s disease and Wolfram syndrome. Cells 2022, 11, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Green, K.; Smith, I.; Laferla, F. Role of calcium in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and transgenic models. Calcium Signal. Dis. Mol. Pathol. Calcium 2007, 507–521. [Google Scholar]
  103. Kuchibhotla, K.V.; Goldman, S.T.; Lattarulo, C.R.; Wu, H.-Y.; Hyman, B.T.; Bacskai, B.J. Aβ plaques lead to aberrant regulation of calcium homeostasis in vivo resulting in structural and functional disruption of neuronal networks. Neuron 2008, 59, 214–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kuchibhotla, K.V.; Lattarulo, C.R.; Hyman, B.T.; Bacskai, B.J. Synchronous hyperactivity and intercellular calcium waves in astrocytes in Alzheimer mice. Science 2009, 323, 1211–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Calvo-Rodriguez, M.; Hou, S.S.; Snyder, A.C.; Kharitonova, E.K.; Russ, A.N.; Das, S.; Fan, Z.; Muzikansky, A.; Garcia-Alloza, M.; Serrano-Pozo, A. Increased mitochondrial calcium levels associated with neuronal death in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Cai, H.; Hou, F.; Wang, Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, Z.; Wu, M.; Wang, X.; Hölscher, C. Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter knockdown improves the viability of HT22 hippocampal neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2025, 991, 177347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Calvo-Rodriguez, M.; Bacskai, B.J. High mitochondrial calcium levels precede neuronal death in vivo in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Stress 2020, 4, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. LaFerla, F.M. Calcium dyshomeostasis and intracellular signalling in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3, 862–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Green, K.N.; LaFerla, F.M. Linking calcium to Aβ and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 2008, 59, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sanz-Blasco, S.; Valero, R.A.; Rodríguez-Crespo, I.; Villalobos, C.; Núñez, L. Mitochondrial Ca2+ overload underlies Aβ oligomers neurotoxicity providing an unexpected mechanism of neuroprotection by NSAIDs. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ferreiro, E.; Oliveira, C.R.; Pereira, C.M. The release of calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum induced by amyloid-beta and prion peptides activates the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008, 30, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pszczołowska, M.; Walczak, K.; Miśków, W.; Mroziak, M.; Chojdak-Łukasiewicz, J.; Leszek, J. Mitochondrial disorders leading to Alzheimer’s disease—Perspectives of diagnosis and treatment. Geroscience 2024, 46, 2977–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. McManus, M.J.; Murphy, M.P.; Franklin, J.L. The mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ prevents loss of spatial memory retention and early neuropathology in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 15703–15715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Young, M.L.; Franklin, J.L. The mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ inhibits memory loss, neuropathology, and extends lifespan in aged 3xTg-AD mice. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 101, 103409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rodriguez-Cuenca, S.; Cochemé, H.M.; Logan, A.; Abakumova, I.; Prime, T.A.; Rose, C.; Vidal-Puig, A.; Smith, A.C.; Rubinsztein, D.C.; Fearnley, I.M. Consequences of long-term oral administration of the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ to wild-type mice. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 48, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rossman, M.J.; Santos-Parker, J.R.; Steward, C.A.; Bispham, N.Z.; Cuevas, L.M.; Rosenberg, H.L.; Woodward, K.A.; Chonchol, M.; Gioscia-Ryan, R.A.; Murphy, M.P. Chronic supplementation with a mitochondrial antioxidant (MitoQ) improves vascular function in healthy older adults. Hypertension 2018, 71, 1056–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Snow, B.J.; Rolfe, F.L.; Lockhart, M.M.; Frampton, C.M.; O’Sullivan, J.D.; Fung, V.; Smith, R.A.; Murphy, M.P.; Taylor, K.M.; Group, P.S. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ as a disease-modifying therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2010, 25, 1670–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Stefanova, N.A.; Muraleva, N.A.; Maksimova, K.Y.; Rudnitskaya, E.A.; Kiseleva, E.; Telegina, D.V.; Kolosova, N. An antioxidant specifically targeting mitochondria delays progression of Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology. Aging 2016, 8, 2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Stojakovic, A.; Chang, S.-Y.; Nesbitt, J.; Pichurin, N.P.; Ostroot, M.A.; Aikawa, T.; Kanekiyo, T.; Trushina, E. Partial inhibition of mitochondrial complex I reduces tau pathology and improves energy homeostasis and synaptic function in 3xTg-AD mice. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2021, 79, 335–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Keller, N.; Christensen, T.A.; Wanberg, E.J.; Salisbury, J.L.; Trushina, E. Neuroprotective mitochondria targeted small molecule restores synapses and the distribution of synaptic mitochondria in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 6528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Chaplygina, A.; Zhdanova, D. Modulation of mitochondrial dynamics in primary hippocampal cultures of 5xFAD Mice by Mdivi-1, MFP, and Exogenous Zinc. Front. Biosci. -Landmark 2025, 30, 44648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bordt, E.A.; Zhang, N.; Waddell, J.; Polster, B.M. The non-specific Drp1 inhibitor Mdivi-1 has modest biochemical antioxidant activity. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kuruva, C.S.; Manczak, M.; Yin, X.; Ogunmokun, G.; Reddy, A.P.; Reddy, P.H. Aqua-soluble DDQ reduces the levels of Drp1 and A β and inhibits abnormal interactions between A β and Drp1 and protects Alzheimer’s disease neurons from A β-and Drp1-induced mitochondrial and synaptic toxicities. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 3375–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kshirsagar, S.; Alvir, R.V.; Pradeepkiran, J.A.; Reddy, A.P.; Reddy, P.H. Therapeutic potential of DDQ in enhancing mitochondrial health and cognitive function in Late-Onset Alzheimer’s disease. Mitochondrion 2025, 83, 102036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Huang, T.-C.; Lu, K.-T.; Wo, Y.-Y.P.; Wu, Y.-J.; Yang, Y.-L. Resveratrol protects rats from Aβ-induced neurotoxicity by the reduction of iNOS expression and lipid peroxidation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e29102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Keshavan, N.; Minczuk, M.; Viscomi, C.; Rahman, S. Gene therapy for mitochondrial disorders. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2024, 47, 145–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gammage, P.A.; Viscomi, C.; Simard, M.-L.; Costa, A.S.; Gaude, E.; Powell, C.A.; Van Haute, L.; McCann, B.J.; Rebelo-Guiomar, P.; Cerutti, R. Genome editing in mitochondria corrects a pathogenic mtDNA mutation in vivo. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1691–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Percy, K.C.M.; Liu, Z.; Qi, X. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: Guiding the path to targeted therapies. Neurotherapeutics 2025, 22, e00525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Peng, Y.Y.; Li, M.X.; Li, W.J.; Xue, Y.; Miao, Y.F.; Wang, Y.L.; Fan, X.C.; Tang, L.L.; Song, H.L.; Zhang, Q. DJ1 Ameliorates AD-like Pathology in the Hippocampus of APP/PS1 Mice. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2023, 36, 1028–1044. [Google Scholar]
  130. Katsouri, L.; Lim, Y.M.; Blondrath, K.; Eleftheriadou, I.; Lombardero, L.; Birch, A.M.; Mirzaei, N.; Irvine, E.E.; Mazarakis, N.D.; Sastre, M. PPARγ-coactivator-1α gene transfer reduces neuronal loss and amyloid-β generation by reducing β-secretase in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 12292–12297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Baines, C.P.; Kaiser, R.A.; Purcell, N.H.; Blair, N.S.; Osinska, H.; Hambleton, M.A.; Brunskill, E.W.; Sayen, M.R.; Gottlieb, R.A.; Dorn, G.W. Loss of cyclophilin D reveals a critical role for mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death. Nature 2005, 434, 658–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Schinzel, A.C.; Takeuchi, O.; Huang, Z.; Fisher, J.K.; Zhou, Z.; Rubens, J.; Hetz, C.; Danial, N.N.; Moskowitz, M.A.; Korsmeyer, S.J. Cyclophilin D is a component of mitochondrial permeability transition and mediates neuronal cell death after focal cerebral ischemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 12005–12010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Du, H.; Guo, L.; Zhang, W.; Rydzewska, M.; Yan, S. Cyclophilin D deficiency improves mitochondrial function and learning/memory in aging Alzheimer disease mouse model. Neurobiol. Aging 2011, 32, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Bernardi, P.; Gerle, C.; Halestrap, A.P.; Jonas, E.A.; Karch, J.; Mnatsakanyan, N.; Pavlov, E.; Sheu, S.-S.; Soukas, A.A. Identity, structure, and function of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore: Controversies, consensus, recent advances, and future directions. Cell Death Differ. 2023, 30, 1869–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Tapia-Monsalves, C.; Olesen, M.A.; Villavicencio-Tejo, F.; Quintanilla, R.A. Cyclosporine A (CsA) prevents synaptic impairment caused by truncated tau by caspase-3. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2023, 125, 103861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Jia, Y.-L.; Wang, W.; Han, N.; Sun, H.-L.; Dong, F.-M.; Song, Y.-X.; Feng, R.-F.; Wang, J.-H. The mitochondria-targeted small molecule SS31 delays progression of behavioral deficits by attenuating β-amyloid plaque formation and mitochondrial/synaptic deterioration in APP/PS1 mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2023, 658, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Gupta, T.; Rao, A.; Devi, V.; Kumari, L.; Negi, A.; Kumar, M.; Bharti, R.; Medhi, B. Mitotherapy Restores mitochondrial function and improves cognitive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Mitochondrion 2025, 85, 102077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Nitzan, K.; Benhamron, S.; Valitsky, M.; Kesner, E.E.; Lichtenstein, M.; Ben-Zvi, A.; Ella, E.; Segalstein, Y.; Saada, A.; Lorberboum-Galski, H. Mitochondrial transfer ameliorates cognitive deficits, neuronal loss, and gliosis in Alzheimer’s disease mice. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019, 72, 587–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Hou, Y.; Lautrup, S.; Cordonnier, S.; Wang, Y.; Croteau, D.L.; Zavala, E.; Zhang, Y.; Moritoh, K.; O’Connell, J.F.; Baptiste, B.A. NAD+ supplementation normalizes key Alzheimer’s features and DNA damage responses in a new AD mouse model with introduced DNA repair deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E1876–E1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gong, B.; Pan, Y.; Vempati, P.; Zhao, W.; Knable, L.; Ho, L.; Wang, J.; Sastre, M.; Ono, K.; Sauve, A.A. Nicotinamide riboside restores cognition through an upregulation of proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1α regulated β-secretase 1 degradation and mitochondrial gene expression in Alzheimer’s mouse models. Neurobiol. Aging 2013, 34, 1581–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jayatunga, D.P.W.; Hone, E.; Khaira, H.; Lunelli, T.; Singh, H.; Guillemin, G.J.; Fernando, B.; Garg, M.L.; Verdile, G.; Martins, R.N. Therapeutic potential of mitophagy-inducing microflora metabolite, urolithin A for Alzheimer’s disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Hou, Y.; Chu, X.; Park, J.H.; Zhu, Q.; Hussain, M.; Li, Z.; Madsen, H.B.; Yang, B.; Wei, Y.; Wang, Y. Urolithin A improves Alzheimer’s disease cognition and restores mitophagy and lysosomal functions. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2024, 20, 4212–4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Yuan, X.; Peng, X.; Hu, G. Urolithin A in Central Nervous System Disorders: Therapeutic Applications and Challenges. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mary, A.; Eysert, F.; Checler, F.; Chami, M. Mitophagy in Alzheimer’s disease: Molecular defects and therapeutic approaches. Mol. Psychiatry 2023, 28, 202–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Freitag, K.; Sterczyk, N.; Wendlinger, S.; Obermayer, B.; Schulz, J.; Farztdinov, V.; Mülleder, M.; Ralser, M.; Houtman, J.; Fleck, L. Spermidine reduces neuroinflammation and soluble amyloid beta in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. J. Neuroinflamm. 2022, 19, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Fairley, L.H.; Lejri, I.; Grimm, A.; Eckert, A. Spermidine rescues bioenergetic and mitophagy deficits induced by disease-associated tau protein. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Yang, X.; Zhang, M.; Dai, Y.; Sun, Y.; Aman, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yu, P.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhu, X. Spermidine inhibits neurodegeneration and delays aging via the PINK1-PDR1-dependent mitophagy pathway in C. elegans. Aging 2020, 12, 16852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Schroeder, S.; Hofer, S.J.; Zimmermann, A.; Pechlaner, R.; Dammbrueck, C.; Pendl, T.; Marcello, G.M.; Pogatschnigg, V.; Bergmann, M.; Müller, M. Dietary spermidine improves cognitive function. Cell Rep. 2021, 35, 108985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Borsky, P.; Holmannova, D.; Soukup, O.; Fiala, Z.; Maresova, T.; Hanzlova, M.; Philipp, T.; Borska, L. Distinct Roles of Urolithin A and Spermidine in Mitophagy and Autophagy: Implications for Dietary Supplementation. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2025, 39, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Olcese, J.M.; Cao, C.; Mori, T.; Mamcarz, M.B.; Maxwell, A.; Runfeldt, M.J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Lin, X.; Zhang, G. Protection against cognitive deficits and markers of neurodegeneration by long-term oral administration of melatonin in a transgenic model of Alzheimer disease. J. Pineal Res. 2009, 47, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ganie, S.A.; Dar, T.A.; Bhat, A.H.; Dar, K.B.; Anees, S.; Zargar, M.A.; Masood, A. Melatonin: A potential anti-oxidant therapeutic agent for mitochondrial dysfunctions and related disorders. Rejuvenation Res. 2016, 19, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Feng, Z.; Qin, C.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, J.-t. Early melatonin supplementation alleviates oxidative stress in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2006, 40, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Costa, M.; Bernardi, J.; Fiuza, T.; Costa, L.; Brandão, R.; Pereira, M.E. N-acetylcysteine protects memory decline induced by streptozotocin in mice. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2016, 253, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Huang, Q.; Aluise, C.D.; Joshi, G.; Sultana, R.; St. Clair, D.K.; Markesbery, W.R.; Butterfield, D.A. Potential in vivo amelioration by N-acetyl-L-cysteine of oxidative stress in brain in human double mutant APP/PS-1 knock-in mice: Toward therapeutic modulation of mild cognitive impairment. J. Neurosci. Res. 2010, 88, 2618–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Fu, A.-L.; Dong, Z.-H.; Sun, M.-J. Protective effect of N-acetyl-L-cysteine on amyloid β-peptide-induced learning and memory deficits in mice. Brain Res. 2006, 1109, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Remington, R.; Bechtel, C.; Larsen, D.; Samar, A.; Doshanjh, L.; Fishman, P.; Luo, Y.; Smyers, K.; Page, R.; Morrell, C. A phase II randomized clinical trial of a nutritional formulation for cognition and mood in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015, 45, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Remington, R.; Bechtel, C.; Larsen, D.; Samar, A.; Page, R.; Morrell, C.; Shea, T.B. Maintenance of cognitive performance and mood for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease following consumption of a nutraceutical formulation: A one-year, open-label study. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016, 51, 991–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Traber, J.; Suter, M.; Walter, P.; Richter, C. In vivo modulation of total and mitochondrial glutathione in rat liver: Depletion by phorone and rescue by N-acetylcysteine. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1992, 43, 961–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Purushothuman, S.; Johnstone, D.M.; Nandasena, C.; Mitrofanis, J.; Stone, J. Photobiomodulation with near infrared light mitigates Alzheimer’s disease-related pathology in cerebral cortex–evidence from two transgenic mouse models. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2014, 6, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Yang, L.; Wu, C.; Parker, E.; Li, Y.; Dong, Y.; Tucker, L.; Brann, D.W.; Lin, H.W.; Zhang, Q. Non-invasive photobiomodulation treatment in an Alzheimer Disease-like transgenic rat model. Theranostics 2022, 12, 2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Liu, D.; Pitta, M.; Jiang, H.; Lee, J.-H.; Zhang, G.; Chen, X.; Kawamoto, E.M.; Mattson, M.P. Nicotinamide forestalls pathology and cognitive decline in Alzheimer mice: Evidence for improved neuronal bioenergetics and autophagy procession. Neurobiol. Aging 2013, 34, 1564–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Karu, T.I. Multiple roles of cytochrome c oxidase in mammalian cells under action of red and IR-A radiation. IUBMB Life 2010, 62, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Hamblin, M.R. Photobiomodulation for Alzheimer’s disease: Has the light dawned? Photonics 2019, 6, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Wong-Riley, M.T.; Liang, H.L.; Eells, J.T.; Chance, B.; Henry, M.M.; Buchmann, E.; Kane, M.; Whelan, H.T. Photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins: Role of cytochrome c oxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 4761–4771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Chen, H.; Li, N.; Liu, N.; Zhu, H.; Ma, C.; Ye, Y.; Shi, X.; Luo, G.; Dong, X.; Tan, T. Correction: Photobiomodulation modulates mitochondrial energy metabolism and ameliorates neurological damage in an APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2026, 18, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Saltmarche, A.E.; Naeser, M.A.; Ho, K.F.; Hamblin, M.R.; Lim, L. Significant improvement in cognition in mild to moderately severe dementia cases treated with transcranial plus intranasal photobiomodulation: Case series report. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2017, 35, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the key functional domains of mitochondrial homeostasis, including bioenergetics, redox balance, mt DNA integrity, and fission–fusion quality control.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the key functional domains of mitochondrial homeostasis, including bioenergetics, redox balance, mt DNA integrity, and fission–fusion quality control.
Cells 15 00990 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of mitochondrial impairment in AD, including Aβ accumulation, tau pathology, inflammation, oxidative stress, and ETC complex alterations. These changes impair ATP production, mitochondrial membrane potential, calcium buffering, mitophagy, and the balance between fusion and fission, while increasing ROS generation and mPTP activation. Together, these disturbances contribute to oxidative damage, cellular dysfunction, and neuronal death.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of mitochondrial impairment in AD, including Aβ accumulation, tau pathology, inflammation, oxidative stress, and ETC complex alterations. These changes impair ATP production, mitochondrial membrane potential, calcium buffering, mitophagy, and the balance between fusion and fission, while increasing ROS generation and mPTP activation. Together, these disturbances contribute to oxidative damage, cellular dysfunction, and neuronal death.
Cells 15 00990 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of healthy autophagy and impaired mitophagy in AD, illustrating the role of APP C-terminal beta (APP-CTFβ) accumulation, lysosomal dysfunction, and impaired mitophagic clearance.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of healthy autophagy and impaired mitophagy in AD, illustrating the role of APP C-terminal beta (APP-CTFβ) accumulation, lysosomal dysfunction, and impaired mitophagic clearance.
Cells 15 00990 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of mitochondrial calcium overload leading to ROS generation, reduced membrane potential, and ATP depletion, disrupting mitochondrial homeostasis. VDAC, voltage-dependent anion channel; MPTP, mitochondrial permeability transition pore; BAX, Bcl-2-associated X protein; ROS, reactive oxygen species ΔΨm, mitochondrial membrane potential.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of mitochondrial calcium overload leading to ROS generation, reduced membrane potential, and ATP depletion, disrupting mitochondrial homeostasis. VDAC, voltage-dependent anion channel; MPTP, mitochondrial permeability transition pore; BAX, Bcl-2-associated X protein; ROS, reactive oxygen species ΔΨm, mitochondrial membrane potential.
Cells 15 00990 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bisht, J.; Rawat, P.; Shin, A.C.; Hegde, V. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease and Mitochondria-Targeted Therapeutics. Cells 2026, 15, 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15110990

AMA Style

Bisht J, Rawat P, Shin AC, Hegde V. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease and Mitochondria-Targeted Therapeutics. Cells. 2026; 15(11):990. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15110990

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bisht, Jasbir, Priyanka Rawat, Andrew C. Shin, and Vijay Hegde. 2026. "Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease and Mitochondria-Targeted Therapeutics" Cells 15, no. 11: 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15110990

APA Style

Bisht, J., Rawat, P., Shin, A. C., & Hegde, V. (2026). Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease and Mitochondria-Targeted Therapeutics. Cells, 15(11), 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15110990

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop