Closing Editorial: Immunopathogenesis of Bacterial Infection
1. Summary of the Special Issue
2. What has Changed Since?
- (1)
- Immunometabolism as a driver (not a passenger) of pathogenesis. A growing body of research has revealed the bidirectional interplay between host metabolism and antibacterial immunity. In the gut–liver axis, for example, enteric infection was shown to remodel bile metabolites (including itaconate) in ways that tune innate defenses and microbial ecology [1]. Macrophage activation programs are now being mechanistically linked to microbial metabolites and cellular energy flux, reframing our understanding of “nutrient” signals as integral regulators of host defense during infection [2].
- (2)
- Tissue education and trained immunity beyond macrophages. The concept of trained innate immunity has broadened beyond monocytes/macrophages to encompass additional cell types and tissue compartments. A recent elegant study reveals that a localized Staphylococcus aureus skin infection can imprint an eosinophil-based “innate immune memory,” exerting systemic effects on subsequent allergic inflammation—a striking demonstration of organ-level crosstalk that reshapes later immune responses to unrelated stimuli [3]. Complementary reviews suggest that, when properly directed, trained immunity could reduce susceptibility to diverse bacterial infections while minimizing the risk of chronic inflammatory sequelae [4].
- (3)
- Antibiotic action and resistance as immunological phenomena. Antibiotic resistance remains a constantly shifting target: recent studies demonstrate that ESKAPE pathogens can acquire resistance to even “next-generation” antibiotics within weeks in vitro, with corresponding mutations already detectable in clinical isolates and environmental microbiomes [5]. This sobering observation highlights that stewardship alone is insufficient to curb resistance. Rather, effective strategies must incorporate host immunobiology. In parallel, antibiotic therapy itself can elicit unintended immune consequences. For example, bactericidal antibiotics have been shown to trigger exaggerated and damaging cytokine responses through TLR9 sensing of bacterial DNA, underscoring the need to tailor antibiotic class or combination choices for patients at heightened risk of immunopathology and tissue injury [6].
- (4)
- Immunomodulator to the rescue. In recent years, researchers have increasingly focused on immunomodulatory strategies that enhance or redirect host responses. In surgical and implant-associated infections, administration of immunomodulators, such as N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) has been shown to stimulate neutrophil recruitment and reduce infection burden as effectively as a powerful systemic antibiotic against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus [7,8]. Similarly, immunomodulators that restore neutrophil function in diabetic hosts or reprogram macrophage polarization toward a bactericidal phenotype have been effective against infection and improved healing [9,10]. Collectively, these studies represent a shift from pathogen-centric to host-centric intervention strategies.
3. From Mechanisms to Levers
4. Priorities, Platforms, and Patient Impact
5. Methodological Platforms Enabling New and Clinically Relevant Insights
6. Where We Go Next
- Exploit organ–organ immune circuits. The gut–liver axis is not merely collateral damage during enteric infection; it is a programmable circuit. Mapping metabolite flows (e.g., itaconate and related dicarboxylates) and their cellular targets can reveal levers to enhance mucosal defense without provoking collateral inflammation [1].
- Design regimens around tolerance, not just resistance. If host ROS/RNS in macrophages potentiate antibiotic tolerance, then rational combinations might pair an antibiotic with a host-directed adjuvant that tempers those signals—precisely the KL1 logic emerging from recent work. Prospective clinical studies should track tolerance biomarkers (metabolic and transcriptional) alongside MICs [11].
- Choose antibiotics with the immune system in mind. For patients at high risk of immunopathology, bacteriostatic or DNA-sparing regimens—or the addition of targeted anti-inflammatory co-therapies—could reduce TLR9-driven cytokine storms observed with some bactericidal regimens, without sacrificing clearance. Translational trials should incorporate immune readouts as endpoints [6].
- Leverage microbial competition. Harnessing contact-dependent inhibition and other antagonistic interactions may offer microbiota-level strategies that suppress pathogens while stabilizing host-beneficial communities, decreasing the inflammatory “tone” that predisposes to pathology [12].
- Anticipate evolution—clinically. Routine sequencing of persistent infections (including biofilm-associated disease) and adaptive dosing guided by evolutionary risk landscapes can discourage resistance trajectories documented across ESKAPE organisms. Collaboration between evolutionary microbiologists and clinicians is no longer optional [5].
7. Gratitude and Community
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhang, T.; Hasegawa, Y.; Waldor, M.K. Enteric bacterial infection stimulates remodelling of bile metabolites to promote intestinal homeostasis. Nat. Microbiol. 2024, 9, 3376–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Oliveira Formiga, R.; Li, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Ribeiro, M.A.C.; Guarino-Vignon, P.; Fatouh, R.; Dubois, L.; Creusot, L.; Puchois, V.; Amouyal, S.; et al. Immunometabolic reprogramming of macrophages by gut microbiota-derived cadaverine controls colon inflammation. Cell Host Microbe 2025, 33, 1855–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Radhouani, M.; Farhat, A.; Hakobyan, A.; Zahalka, S.; Pimenov, L.; Fokina, A.; Hladik, A.; Lakovits, K.; Brösamlen, J.; Dvorak, V.; et al. Eosinophil innate immune memory after bacterial skin infection promotes allergic lung inflammation. Sci. Immunol. 2025, 10, eadp6231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schlüter, T.; van Elsas, Y.; Priem, B.; Ziogas, A.; Netea, M.G. Trained immunity: Induction of an inflammatory memory in disease. Cell Res. 2025, 35, 792–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daruka, L.; Czikkely, M.S.; Szili, P.; Farkas, Z.; Balogh, D.; Grézal, G.; Maharramov, E.; Vu, T.-H.; Sipos, L.; Juhász, S.; et al. ESKAPE pathogens rapidly develop resistance against antibiotics in development in vitro. Nat. Microbiol. 2025, 10, 313–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gross, J.L.; Basu, R.; Bradfield, C.J.; Sun, J.; John, S.P.; Das, S.; Dekker, J.P.; Weiss, D.S.; Fraser, I.D.C. Bactericidal antibiotic treatment induces damaging inflammation via TLR9 sensing of bacterial DNA. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 10359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahmud, F.; Roy, R.; Mohamed, M.F.; Aboonabi, A.; Moric, M.; Ghoreishi, K.; Bayat, M.; Kuzel, T.M.; Reiser, J.; Shafikhani, S.H. Therapeutic evaluation of immunomodulators in reducing surgical wound infection. FASEB J. 2022, 36, e22090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hamilton, J.L.; Mohamed, M.; Witt, B.; Wimmer, M.; Shafikhani, S. Therapeutic assessment of N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) in reducing periprosthetic joint infection. Eur. Cell Mater. 2021, 41, 122–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roy, R.; Zayas, J.; Singh, S.K.; Delgado, K.; Wood, S.J.; Mohamed, M.F.; Frausto, D.M.; Albalawi, Y.A.; Price, T.P.; Estupinian, R.; et al. Overriding impaired FPR chemotaxis signaling in diabetic neutrophil stimulates infection control in murine diabetic wound. eLife 2022, 11, e72071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roy, R.; Mahmud, F.; Zayas, J.; Kuzel, T.M.; Reiser, J.; Shafikhani, S.H. Reduced Bioactive Microbial Products (Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns) Contribute to Dysregulated Immune Responses and Impaired Healing in Infected Wounds in Mice with Diabetes. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2024, 144, 387–397.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, K.-Y.; Yang, X.; Eldridge, M.J.G.; Sun, R.; Giorgio, R.T.; Morris, B.I.; Wagner, N.J.; Hardy, B.; Axtman, M.; Rowe, S.E.; et al. A host-directed adjuvant sensitizes intracellular bacterial persisters to antibiotics. Nat. Microbiol. 2025, 10, 3013–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lim, B.; Xu, J.; Wierzbicki, I.H.; Gonzalez, C.G.; Chen, Z.; Gonzalez, D.J.; Gao, X.; Goodman, A.L. A human gut bacterium antagonizes neighboring bacteria by altering their protein-folding ability. Cell Host Microbe 2025, 33, 200–217.e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rostøl, J.T.; Quiles-Puchalt, N.; Iturbe-Sanz, P.; Lasa, Í.; Penadés, J.R. Bacteriophages avoid autoimmunity from cognate immune systems as an intrinsic part of their life cycles. Nat. Microbiol. 2024, 9, 1312–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List 2024: Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance, to Guide Research, Development, and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Mohamed, M.F.; Gupta, K.; Goldufsky, J.W.; Roy, R.; Callaghan, L.T.; Wetzel, D.M.; Kuzel, T.M.; Reiser, J.; Shafikhani, S.H. CrkII/Abl phosphorylation cascade is critical for NLRC4 inflammasome activity and is blocked by Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoT. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, K.; Cao, Y.; Han, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Luu, L.D.W.; Chen, L.; Yan, P.; Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Liang, Y.; et al. A pan-immune panorama of bacterial pneumonia revealed by a large-scale single-cell transcriptome atlas. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2025, 10, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Savin, C.; Lê-Bury, P.; Guglielmini, J.; Douché, T.; Fiol, G.M.; Buzelé, R.; Le Brun, C.; Bastides, F.; François, M.; Birmelé, B.; et al. In-host evolution of Yersinia enterocolitica during a chronic human infection. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 5637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shafikhani, S. Closing Editorial: Immunopathogenesis of Bacterial Infection. Cells 2025, 14, 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14231894
Shafikhani S. Closing Editorial: Immunopathogenesis of Bacterial Infection. Cells. 2025; 14(23):1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14231894
Chicago/Turabian StyleShafikhani, Sasha. 2025. "Closing Editorial: Immunopathogenesis of Bacterial Infection" Cells 14, no. 23: 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14231894
APA StyleShafikhani, S. (2025). Closing Editorial: Immunopathogenesis of Bacterial Infection. Cells, 14(23), 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14231894
