Next Article in Journal
Physiological and Molecular Responses of the Flag Leaf Under L-Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase Inhibition
Previous Article in Journal
Botulinum Toxin Type A Inhibits Submandibular Secretion via the ERK/miR-124-3p/Specificity Protein 1/Claudin-1 Axis
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A Comprehensive Overview of the Mechanistic Insights from Human Studies to Animal Models

Cells 2025, 14(17), 1367; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14171367
by Matthew William Yacoub 1,2,3, Sophia Rose Smith 4,†, Badra Abbas 1,2,3,4,†, Fahad Iqbal 1,2,3,†, Cham Maher Othman Jazieh 5, Nada Saed Homod Al Shaer 5, Collin Chill-Fone Luk 6 and Naweed Imam Syed 1,2,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Cells 2025, 14(17), 1367; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14171367
Submission received: 7 August 2025 / Revised: 28 August 2025 / Accepted: 31 August 2025 / Published: 2 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Cells of the Nervous System)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper entitled "Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A Comprehensive Overview of the Mechanistic Insights from Human Studies to Animal Models" is well-written and has the potential to be published in the Cells journal. In this review, the authors define ADHD as a complex neurodevelopmental disorder with distinct trajectories across the lifespan. While progress has been made in identifying behavioral features and treatment strategies, significant gaps remain in the understanding of developmental mechanisms underlying the condition. Clarifying these mechanisms is critical for improving diagnostic accuracy in adults, assessing the safety of long-term pharmacological interventions, and evaluating the potential impact of prenatal exposure to ADHD medications on the developing brain. I have major criticisms of this work.

Major comments: 1) This review is missing important information on the genes involved in ADHD development. The authors should include this information in a table format for the reader’s convenience.

2)The authors are encouraged to present the animal models used in ADHD research in a table format for greater clarity and ease of reference.

Minor: Figure 1 is not appropriate for a scientific paper. The authors should improve it to make it look more professional, or alternatively, present this information in a table format.

Author Response

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a comprehensive, well-written and stimulating review of Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD). Given the prevalence of this "disorder", the concerns about over-medication of school age children simply to provide quieter classrooms, medication side effects and potential toxic effects of ADHD medications upon fetal and childhood brain development, this review could not be more timely. Overall, the authors do an excellent job of avoiding biases and present ADHD in both children and adults as neurodevelopmental syndrome that is heterogenous both in symptoms and responses to medications. 

In site of its length, I enjoyed reading this review. There are >300 references, most are from 21st century work and many are from the last 5 years. Thus, this review is contemporary. The English is fine, and the only suggestion I have is for the authors to increase font size in many of the otherwise excellent figures. There is also a paucity of discussion of recent molecular genetic and some important brain functional imaging studies of ADHD subjects. 

As the authors appreciate (and discuss), ADHD today is still mostly a behavioral syndrome diagnosis that can overlap with other (potentially over-diagnosed) behavioral syndromes such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). In spite of the authors' presentation of contemporary concepts about ADHD neurobiology/neuropharmacology, there are as of yet no "biomarkers" that are helpful in either diagnosis or evaluating responses to medications. That will have to wait for future research, and the authors discuss many areas where research is needed. Perhaps functional brain imaging will help in this area, and the authors provide clues (particularly in Section 3) that this is the case.

I felt that the Figures were educational and appropriate. Again, my only major concern is that the font sizes are too small.

Author Response

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I recommend accepting this paper in its present form.

Back to TopTop