Next Article in Journal
An Approach for Systems-Level Understanding of Prostate Cancer from High-Throughput Data Integration to Pathway Modeling and Simulation
Previous Article in Journal
Easy and Affordable: A New Method for the Studying of Bacterial Biofilm Formation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Nuclear Pore Complex: Birth, Life, and Death of a Cellular Behemoth
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Nuclear Shape-Shifters: Lipid and Protein Dynamics at the Nuclear Envelope

1
Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
2
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(24), 4120; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244120
Submission received: 6 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lipid and Protein Dynamics at the Nuclear Envelope)
The nuclear envelope constitutes a selective barrier that segregates chromatin into the nucleus of eukaryotic cells. This property makes the nuclear envelope the defining morphological characteristic of the eukaryotic lineage. For many years, cell biology textbooks painted a rather inert view of the nuclear envelope as a smooth, centrally located, perinuclear circle, busy mediating the bidirectional trafficking of proteins and RNAs through nuclear pore complexes. Recent research in the field is now transforming our understanding of the nuclear envelope as a highly dynamic organelle that can undergo extensive local remodeling during physiological processes such as nuclear division or de novo nuclear pore biogenesis as well as repairing itself during cell migration or mechanical insults. The seven articles in this Special Issue tackle different aspects of how membrane lipid metabolism and the regulation of nuclear envelope protein components such as lamins and nuclear pore complexes safeguard the homeostasis of the nucleus.
Lamins are intermediate filament proteins that coat the inner nuclear membrane and not only provide crucial mechanical support to the nucleus but also help organize the chromatin [1]. Lamin mutations in humans result in a range of pathologies, including progeria, a disorder causing accelerated ageing. Sears and Roux examine the pathways of lamin recruitment in ruptured nuclei [2]. The authors show that A-type lamins target nuclear envelope ruptures within minutes, by interacting with BAF, another protein enriched at the nuclear envelope. The observation that progeria-associated mutations in the Lamin A or BAF genes inhibit the recruitment of Lamin A protein to the ruptured sites raises the possibility that this could be a contributing factor to the disease.
Changes in nuclear shape are associated with mutations in lamins, aging and many pathologies including cancer. In addition, drastic alterations in nuclear shape take place throughout the physiological life cycle of cells such as during their division or movement. Janssen et al. present an in-depth overview of image-based methods for the quantitation of nuclear morphology and nuclear envelope abnormalities [3]. Establishing these quantitative parameters is an essential tool for studies using nuclear morphology as a phenotypic read-out.
An exciting recent finding in the field has been the identification of lipid droplets in the nucleus in a variety of cell types, although their functional significance remain enigmatic [4]. Kumanski et al. report the presence of nuclear lipid droplets in cells experiencing DNA replication stress [5]. The authors hypothesize that stalled replication forks, which are known to relocate to the nuclear envelope, may deform the inner nuclear membrane and promote lipid droplet formation at this site.
SMPD4, a sphingomyelinase which converts sphingomyelin into ceramide and phosphocholine, has been linked to congenital microcephaly [6]. Differently to other sphingomyelinases, this lipid enzyme localizes at the endoplasmic reticulum and nuclear envelope, and it interacts with nuclear pore complex components [6,7]. Piet et al. now extend these observations by identifying additional nuclear pore complex components by BioID, most prominently Nup35, Nup155 and Aladin [8]. As Nup35 and Nup155 can deform membranes, crucial for nuclear pore complex formation, the authors speculate that SMPD4 supports this action by changing the local membrane curvature by its enzymatic action.
In a review, the same group expands on the idea that lipids and lipid metabolism at the nuclear envelope help shaping the nuclear pore membrane [9]. As some lipids have a cone or anti-cone-like shape, it is conceivable that if asymmetrically distributed along the membrane and between the lipid leaflets membranes, they shape into a concave or convex form. This could be especially important if lipid enzymes change the overall shape of lipids, such as in the case of a sphingomyelinase a cylindrical-shaped sphingomyelin, into a cone-like ceramide, and this might thus support dynamic membrane curvature changes, which could be especially relevant during nuclear pore complex formation.
In a comprehensive review, Dultz et al. provide a topical overview on the architecture of nuclear pore complexes and their life cycle [10]. The review summarizes the current knowledge of how these giant complexes are assembled into the two-membrane structure of the nuclear envelope and how these complexes are remodeled, repaired and degraded.
Finally, Mitic et al. [11] take a closer look at Dictyostelium nuclear pore complexes by labeling individual components and following their fate through the cell cycle. The study indicates that some nuclear pore complex proteins leave this huge complex at the beginning of mitosis. Such a partial disassembly of nuclear pore complexes has been described for fungi such as Aspergilllus [12], and it is therefore important to grant spindle components access to the nuclear interior during mitosis while the nuclear envelope remains largely intact.

Funding

W.A. acknowledges funding by the German Research Foundation [grant number DFG AN377/7-1] and S.S. by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [grant number BB/T005610/1].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Burke, B.; Stewart, C.L. The nuclear lamins: Flexibility in function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sears, R.M.; Roux, K.J. Mechanisms of A-Type Lamin Targeting to Nuclear Ruptures Are Disrupted in LMNA- and BANF1-Associated Progerias. Cells 2022, 11, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Janssen, A.F.J.; Breusegem, S.Y.; Larrieu, D. Current Methods and Pipelines for Image-Based Quantitation of Nuclear Shape and Nuclear Envelope Abnormalities. Cells 2022, 11, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fujimoto, T. Nuclear lipid droplets—how are they different from their cytoplasmic siblings? J. Cell Sci. 2022, 135, jcs259253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kumanski, S.; Forey, R.; Cazevieille, C.; Moriel-Carretero, M. Nuclear Lipid Droplet Birth during Replicative Stress. Cells 2022, 11, 1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Magini, P.; Smits, D.J.; Vandervore, L.; Schot, R.; Columbaro, M.; Kasteleijn, E.; van der Ent, M.; Palombo, F.; Lequin, M.H.; Dremmen, M.; et al. Loss of SMPD4 Causes a Developmental Disorder Characterized by Microcephaly and Congenital Arthrogryposis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019, 105, 689–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Cheng, L.C.; Baboo, S.; Lindsay, C.; Brusman, L.; Martinez-Bartolomé, S.; Tapia, O.; Zhang, X.; Yates, J.R., III; Gerace, L. Identification of new transmembrane proteins concentrated at the nuclear envelope using organellar proteomics of mesenchymal cells. Nucleus 2019, 10, 126–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Piët, A.C.A.; Post, M.; Dekkers, D.; Demmers, J.A.A.; Fornerod, M. Proximity Ligation Mapping of Microcephaly Associated SMPD4 Shows Association with Components of the Nuclear Pore Membrane. Cells 2022, 11, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Peeters, B.W.A.; Piët, A.C.A.; Fornerod, M. Generating Membrane Curvature at the Nuclear Pore: A Lipid Point of View. Cells 2022, 11, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dultz, E.; Wojtynek, M.; Medalia, O.; Onischenko, E. The Nuclear Pore Complex: Birth, Life, and Death of a Cellular Behemoth. Cells 2022, 11, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mitic, K.; Grafe, M.; Batsios, P.; Meyer, I. Partial Disassembly of the Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins during Semi-Closed Mitosis in Dictyostelium discoideum. Cells 2022, 11, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. De Souza, C.P.; Osmani, A.H.; Hashmi, S.B.; Osmani, S.A. Partial nuclear pore complex disassembly during closed mitosis in Aspergillus nidulans. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14, 1973–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Antonin, W.; Siniossoglou, S. Nuclear Shape-Shifters: Lipid and Protein Dynamics at the Nuclear Envelope. Cells 2022, 11, 4120. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244120

AMA Style

Antonin W, Siniossoglou S. Nuclear Shape-Shifters: Lipid and Protein Dynamics at the Nuclear Envelope. Cells. 2022; 11(24):4120. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antonin, Wolfram, and Symeon Siniossoglou. 2022. "Nuclear Shape-Shifters: Lipid and Protein Dynamics at the Nuclear Envelope" Cells 11, no. 24: 4120. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11244120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop