Next Article in Journal
Clinical Value and Molecular Function of Circulating MicroRNAs in Endometrial Cancer Regulation: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
HHcy Induces Pyroptosis and Atherosclerosis via the Lipid Raft-Mediated NOX-ROS-NLRP3 Inflammasome Pathway in apoE−/− Mice
Previous Article in Journal
A Microglial Function for the Nerve Growth Factor: Predictions of the Unpredictable
Previous Article in Special Issue
Poloxamer 407 Induces Hypertriglyceridemia but Decreases Atherosclerosis in Ldlr−/− Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/cells11111834
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cardiovascular Disease

by
Qianman Peng
1,†,
Dan Shan
1,†,
Kui Cui
1,
Kathryn Li
1,
Bo Zhu
1,
Hao Wu
1,
Beibei Wang
1,
Scott Wong
1,
Vikram Norton
1,
Yunzhou Dong
1,
Yao Wei Lu
1,
Changcheng Zhou
2 and
Hong Chen
1,*
1
Vascular Biology Program, Department of Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2
Division of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cells 2022, 11(11), 1834; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111834
Submission received: 24 April 2022 / Revised: 1 June 2022 / Accepted: 1 June 2022 / Published: 3 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) is the process of endothelial cells progressively losing endothelial-specific markers and gaining mesenchymal phenotypes. In the normal physiological condition, EndoMT plays a fundamental role in forming the cardiac valves of the developing heart. However, EndoMT contributes to the development of various cardiovascular diseases (CVD), such as atherosclerosis, valve diseases, fibrosis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Therefore, a deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying EndoMT in CVD should provide urgently needed insights into reversing this condition. This review summarizes a 30-year span of relevant literature, delineating the EndoMT process in particular, key signaling pathways, and the underlying regulatory networks involved in CVD.

1. Introduction

Endothelial cells (ECs) and mesenchymal cells are two distinct cell lineages that are both derived from the mesoderm. ECs are a heterogeneous cell population that exhibits tissue-specific properties [1,2]. Through adherens and tight junctions, ECs lining veins and arteries act as a barrier between the vessel wall and circulating blood, and the ECs lining the brain form the blood–brain barrier, whereas highly fenestrated pancreatic islet ECs allow for the release of molecules such as insulin from β cells into the bloodstream to modulate blood glucose levels [3,4,5,6]. ECs can be distinguished by the expression of cell–cell adhesion molecules, including platelet/EC adhesion molecule-1 (CD31/PECAM-1), vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin, von Willebrand factor (vWF), tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like and epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains 1 (TIE1), and TIE2 [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
In contrast to endothelial cells, mesenchymal cells lack adherents and tight junctions, instead possessing a spindle or stellate shape that allows cells to freely move across the extracellular matrix and form the connective tissue that plays an important role in organ functions [3,17]. Mesenchymal cells, commonly referred to as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), have been reported to have the ability to differentiate into chondrocytes, osteocytes, and adipocytes [18,19,20,21,22,23], which express mesenchyme-specific markers, such as N-cadherin, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), vimentin, fibroblast specific protein-1 (FSP-1, also known as S100A4), fibronectin, and smooth muscle protein 22α (SM22α) [7,8,24,25,26]. The contribution of mesenchymal cells to the pool of myofibroblasts or fibroblasts implicated in fibrotic disorders has been comprehensively documented in a variety of tissues [27,28,29,30,31].
The term “endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition” (EndoMT) is defined as the process through which endothelial cells differentiate into mesenchymal cells [23]. During heart development, endocardial ECs are the primary source of coronary vascular ECs, which, through EndoMT, produce mesenchymal cells featuring plastic and migratory properties [32]. In the normal physiological condition, this cell fate conversion is necessary to properly form the cardiac valves of the developing heart [33]. However, EndoMT recurs postnatally during the development of various cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), such as atherosclerosis, adult valve diseases, myocardial fibrosis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. In the EndoMT transitional process, endothelial cells progressively lose endothelial-specific markers and gain mesenchymal phenotypes [45]. The expression of cell–cell adhesion proteins is downregulated, but mesenchyme-specific factors are increased [46]. It is worth noting that multiple signaling pathways that modulate EndoMT, such as bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)–transforming growth factor (TGFβ), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), epidermal growth factor receptor, FGF, Notch, EGFR, PDGF [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55], Wnt/β-catenin signaling, calcineurin–NFAT, and transcription factor GATA4-mediated transcriptional regulation, are involved in cardiovascular diseases [51,56]. Thus, manipulating EndoMT or its reversed process, mesenchymal-to-endothelial transition, may provide hitherto unprecedented therapeutic potentials.
This review summarizes the main cell signaling transduction pathway in EndoMT and EndoMT-mediated pathogenesis. Most investigations have been limited to exploring endothelial and mesenchymal cell markers in response to inducers for EndoMT; however, the molecular mechanisms regulating pathological EndoMT remain elusive. Thus, we focus on the role of TGFβ, PDGF, Wnt/β-catenin, and FGF signaling pathways regulating EndoMT. We note that the precise transduction may differ between cell types as some features might be tissue- or organ-dependent. We also emphasize the therapeutic target and preclinical application of the EndoMT for cardiovascular disease treatment.

2. Signaling Pathways Involved in the Regulation of EndoMT

2.1. TGFβ (Transforming Growth Factor-β)

Currently, TGFβ signaling is the most well-investigated pathway recognized to induce EndoMT. Three mammalian isoforms of TGFβ (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3) have been characterized, since TGF-β1 was initially identified in the early 1980s [57,58]. All three mammalian isoforms of TGFβ can induce EndoMT, with TGF-β2 playing a prominent role in doing so; additionally, different isoform- and species-specific functions have been identified in this process [59]. TGFβ binds to the tetrameric complex on the plasma membrane, which consists of two TGFβRI and two TGFβRII [60,61]. Both kinases possess dual specificity. Activin receptor-like kinases 1 and 5 (ALK1 and ALK5 receptors) are the prominent type I receptors in endothelial cells. ALK1 is activated by BMP9/10 (bone morphogenetic protein 9/10) and commonly leads to endothelial quiescence, while TGFβ induces ALK5 [62]. Once type I receptors are activated, the signal is transmitted from the cell membrane to the nucleus through the phosphorylation of a class of intracellular transcriptional effector proteins called mothers against decapentaplegic, also commonly known as Smads and SMA homologs [63]. Smad proteins are categorized into three categories: common Smads (coSmads, also known as Smad4 in vertebrates), receptor-associated Smads (R-Smads, Smad1/2/3/5/8), and inhibitory Smads (I-Smads, Smad6/7) [54,64,65,66,67]. TGFβ family ligands activate particular R-Smads via distinct receptor complexes [64,68], which can translocate into the nucleus and modulate certain transcriptional genes’ responses [69]. TGF-family members can also transduce signals via non-Smad pathways, such as Rho-like GTPase, the extracellular signal-regulated kinase MAP kinase (MAPK), and phosphatidylinositol3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT [70,71]. The challenge moving forward is to illustrate the complex mechanisms of TGFβ signaling with cross-talk to the other various signaling pathways and discover effective therapeutic agents targeting the TGFβ pathway in CVDs. Figure 1 presents the signaling pathways thought to be involved in EndoMT signal transduction.

2.2. PDGF

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) signaling is important in cardiac development and has the ability to induce EndoMT. In mammals, a total of nine different genes encode four distinct PDGF chains (PDGF-A, PDGF-B, PDGF-C, and PDGF-D) [44,72,73], and all PDGFs are dimers of disulfide-linked polypeptide chains. PDGFs act via two receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) named PDGFR-α and PDGFR-β. Ligand binding induces the dimerization of the receptors, which is followed by activation through autophosphorylation [74]. The phosphorylated PDGF receptors cause the activation of downstream signaling pathways, Ras/mitogen-activating protein (MAP) kinase, including phospholipase C gamma (PLCγ) pathways and the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway, the proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase Src, members of the STAT family, and the tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 [44,75,76,77,78,79]. The expression of PDGF isoforms and PDGF receptors is enhanced during TGFβ-induced EndoMT. Exogenous PDGF-AA and PDGF-BB cooperate with the endogenous PDGF-A, or PDGF-B stimulated by TGF-β1, to synergistically induce EndoMT [73,80,81]. In addition, PDGF-AB selectively upregulates transcription factor Snail expression under hypoxia in human cardiac ECs [42].

2.3. Wnt/β-Catenin

Wnt/β-catenin signaling can act as a cofactor for TGFβ signaling. When the canonical Wnt pathway is inactive, β-catenin is maintained at low cytosolic levels by constitutive ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Additionally, β-catenin can interact with vascular endothelial cadherin at the cytoplasmic face of adherens junctions in non-Wnt–stimulated endothelial cells [82]. Wnt ligands interact with Frizzled receptors on the plasma membrane, altering intracellular catenin levels, the main effector of canonical Wnt signaling [83]. When the Wnt signaling pathway is activated, the phosphorylation of β-catenin is inhibited, and thus free β-catenin accumulates and translocates into the nucleus. In the nucleus, it enhances transcription of the lymphocyte enhancer factor/T-cell transcription factor (Lef/TCF) [84]. Wnt and TGF signaling may converge in the nucleus, where β-catenin interacts with Lef/TCF and Smad transcription factors to coordinate transcriptional control of shared target genes [84]. Wnt signaling is essential for the occurrence of EndoMT in endocardial cushions in the developing heart. Indeed, when there is a lack of β-catenin in cushion explants or endothelial cells, they fail to undergo EndoMT [85].

2.4. FGF

In mammals, the FGFR family is composed of four members (FGFR1–FGFR4). FGF ligand binding promotes FGFRs to dimerize and initiates trans-phosphorylate specific tyrosine residues in its cytoplasmic kinase domains, thereby causing FGFR activation. Subsequent phosphorylation takes place in the receptors’ cytoplasmic domains. Meanwhile, the constitutively docked fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 alpha (FRS2α), an adaptor protein, establishes docking sites for certain cytoplasmic proteins. This, in turn, leads to the activation of downstream signaling cascades, including phospholipase C gamma (PLCγ) pathways, the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway, and Ras/mitogen-activating protein (MAP) kinase [50,86]. In addition to activating the aforementioned pathways, endothelial phenotype and function are also modulated by FGF signaling that counters TGFβ-driven EndoMT. In 1990, it was proven that FGF2 (fibroblast growth factor-2, also known as basic FGF) [50,87], a growth factor known to play critical roles in endothelial proliferation and vascular integrity, suppresses TGFβ signaling in endothelial cells [86,88]. In addition, recent mechanistic studies have revealed that FGF activation via endothelial FGFR1 suppresses TGFβ signaling and EndoMT. It was shown that activated FGFR1 recruits FRS2α, which induces let-7 microRNA expression and suppresses the expression of TGFβRI [89,90]. However, inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IFN, and IL-1β, inhibit FGFR1 signaling and enhance EndoMT in some cultured endothelial cells [91].

3. EndoMT in In Vitro Studies

Extensive research has been conducted to elucidate the occurrence of EndoMT in in vitro studies. EndoMT is defined in these studies as cells that exhibit the following characteristics: (1) loss of endothelial properties, (2) coexpression of endothelial and mesenchymal markers, (3) increased migration, and (4) increased mesenchymal and myofibroblastic cells [23,91]. For example, Krenning et al. demonstrated that when human umbilical cord endothelial cells (HUVECs) were passaged and cultured with TGF-β1 and PDGF-BB, these cells lost their endothelial markers and developed spindly shapes while gaining the capacity to produce a variety of fibroblast-specific molecules. In one coagulation assay, HUVECs lost the function to prevent thrombin formation while acquiring a migratory capacity towards PDGF-BB signaling, gained contractile behavior similar to vascular smooth muscle cells, and produced smooth muscle protein 22α (SM22α) and α-SMA when cultured in mesenchymal differentiation medium. This research indicated that HUVECs could efficiently transdifferentiate into smooth muscle-like cells through endothelial-to-mesenchymal transdifferentiation [92]. Similar studies were conducted on cultured human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) and human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) with TGF-β1 treatment [31,93,94,95]. In addition, overexpression of miR-200a was shown to block EndoMT in HAECs by inhibiting α-SMA, FSP-1, CD31, and VE-cadherin expression, regardless of the presence of TGF-β1 in human aortic endothelial cells [95]. More recently, it was reported that losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, suppressed EndoMT in mitral valve endothelial cells by blocking the TGFβ-induced phosphorylation of the ERK pathway [96].

4. EndoMT in In Vivo Studies

EndoMT was initially described in transgenic mice models during experimentally induced cardiac fibrosis development via lineage tracing of endothelial and mesenchymal cells [97,98]. In one experimentally induced cardiac fibrosis study, it was underscored that TGFβ is crucial in mediating EndoMT. This EndoMT process is the main contributor to tissue fibrosis, acting as a profibrotic switch in cardiac fibrosis and other fibrotic diseases [31]. In other studies, macrophages were indicated to induce partial EndoMT. In turn, EndoMT regulates macrophage and endothelial cell phenotypes and lipid uptake, thereby affecting the surface structure and internal atherosclerotic plaque [99]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that miR-200c-3p/FERM2 is associated with EndoMT in human femoral arteries with atherosclerotic lesions [100]. Wnt2 protein has also been identified to express at a significantly high level in atherosclerotic lesions [101]. In 2001, Paranya et al. revealed the presence of transdifferentiation in vivo, with positive staining of mesenchymal cell marker α-SMA, and enhanced migration upon stimulation with PDGF-BB in a subpopulation of cells in frozen sections of aortic valves [102]. Recently, a study indicated that EndoMT is associated with alterations in the signaling of BMPR2, a gene that is mutated in 10% to 40% of cases of idiopathic PAH and in 70% of cases of familial PAH in rats [37,103]. In a recent study, Huang et al. generated an EC-specific PDGFR-β knockout transgenic mouse model and found a PDGF–NF-κB–HIF1-α–Snail axis that promotes VE-cadherin down-expression and activates mesenchymal-like transcriptional mechanisms and vessel abnormalities after myocardial infarction (MI) [104]. Table 1 summarizes the molecules involved, the functional changes seen related to EndoMT, the model system (in vitro/in vivo), and the cardiac disease studied.

5. Partial and Reversible EndoMT

ECs involve a progressive transition to mesenchymal via a fluid spectrum of intermediate cell states called partial EndoMT, which enables the temporary and reversible adoption of a hybrid endothelial-mesenchymal cell state [108]. This might may be triggered by signaling cross-talk regulatory mechanisms that limit complete progression through the EndoMT, preventing excessive mesenchymal transition. For example, FGF might antagonize TGFβ to restrict the complete EndoMT progression within the context of cardiovascular diseases [89]. However, the effects of the cross-talk and integrated signaling pathways should be evaluated at the level of the EndoMT master transcription factors. Snail and Slug inhibit the expression of one another, and both engage in distinct (as well as shared) signaling pathways that modulate partial and complete EndoMT [109]. Thus, activation of EndoMT counter pathways might limit the EndoMT at transcriptional levels and provide a novel strategy to reverse EndoMT-mediated CVDs. In addition, the time duration of chemical or physical stimuli may be another possible factor affecting the extent of EndoMT reversibility. In an experimental study, TGF-β1 pretreated ECs showed reversible EndoMT for culture times less than 10 days; however, ECs gained a stable mesenchymal phenotype and were irreversible when treated with TGF-β1 for 20 days [110].

6. EndoMT in Heart and Valve Development

During embryonic development, when endocardial cells differentiate into cardiomyocytes in the atrioventricular canal, they activate biosynthetic processes that contribute to the formation of the cardiac cushion mesenchyme and cardiac valves [36,111]. Initially, endocardial cells are delaminated from the endocardial sheet by transdifferentiating into mesenchymal cells and migrating into the cardiac jelly to form the cushion mesenchyme [112]. Then, the cushion progressively expands with accumulating mesenchymal cells primarily derived from endocardial cells and a portion of epicardial cells undergoing epicardial-to-mesenchymal transition [36]. The expansion of mesenchymal cells results in the elongation and remodeling of the valves, which lead to the formation of mature valve leaflets. In addition, lineage-tracing studies indicate that epicardial-derived mesenchymal descendants, which express PDGFRα or PDGFRβ, eventually give rise to pericytes and fibroblasts [36,113,114]. The EndoMT process has also been implicated in the embryonic development of multiple other vascular tissues, such as the formation of the abdominal aorta and the cardiac and semilunar valve [112]. Various stimuli, endothelin-1, angiotensin II, glucose, advanced glycation end-products, and inflammatory stimuli such as inflammatory mediators, growth factors, hypoxia, and proteases, can induce EndoMT via TGF-β signaling, which plays a vital role during the development of cardiovascular diseases [91,115,116,117,118,119,120].

7. EndoMT in Atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by the formation of plaques in the intima, and endothelium is an important source for atherosclerotic plaque-associated mesenchymal cells from EndoMT [97,101,121,122]. Indeed, EndoMT has been shown in Cre–loxP-mediated genetic lineage tracing studies to play a vital role in the formation of the plaque deposits and in facilitating plaque instability leading to plaque rupture, which triggers the release of atherosclerotic nodules into the circulation [97,123]. In addition, endothelial-specific deletion of fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 (FRS2) results in extensive EndoMT in the atherosclerotic plaque, which is accompanied by increased fibronectin deposition and neointima formation [105]. TGFβ signaling and transcription factor Snail were shown in response to shear stress, and the activated ECs initiated inflammatory responses via EndoMT in atherosclerosis [124]. Consistently, endothelial-specific TGFβRI/TGFβRII knockout in murine models of atherosclerosis has been shown to limit EndoMT, decrease inflammatory responses and plaque progression, and even enable plaque regression [31,85,125]. Moreover, patients with atherosclerosis have been significantly correlated with a high degree of endothelial TGFβ signaling and EndoMT activation [126,127,128]. These investigations provide mechanistic insights into the involvement of EndoMT in the progression of atherosclerosis, indicating that EndoMT acts as a link between inflammation and disturbed shear stress, with tissue remodeling promoting atherosclerotic plaque formation. All of this suggests that EndoMT could be a promising therapeutic target for preventing the development and progression of vulnerable plaques.
In recent years, single-cell RNA (scRNA) sequencing technology has facilitated the analysis of huge numbers of individual ECs in vascular tissue, revealing the complexity of atherosclerotic plaques in intricate detail. It is reported that transcriptional profiling of ECs from arterial tissue revealed cellular heterogeneity under disturbed flow [129,130]. For instance, mouse carotid arteries exposed to stable blood flow versus disturbed flow suggested that endothelial cells respond differently to stable versus disturbed flow at the genomic level with single-cell RNA sequencing analysis. Disturbed blood flow promoted the carotid arterial ECs into a wide variety of phenotypes from inflammatory to mesenchymal (i.e., EndoMT), immune cell-like, stem/progenitor-like, and hematopoietic phenotypes. Meanwhile, stable flow prevented, whereas the disturbed blood flow rapidly induced, robust atherosclerotic plaque development in the hypercholesterolemic mouse model [129]. This unbiased approach can characterize ECs in a complex arterial tissue without the prerequisite for sorting based on predefined markers.

8. EndoMT in Adult Valve Disease

Since EndoMT plays an essential role in the formation of heart valves, impairment of EndoMT can result in congenital valve disease. TGFβ is one of the four fundamental pathways (TGFβ, Notch, Wnt, and BMP) involved in valvulogenesis and also participates directly in impaired EndoMT in bicuspid and mitral prolapse valves, which are the most common congenital heart diseases [32,131,132]. Garside et al. identified that TGFβ signaling promotes EndoMT of endocardial cells and their invasion as mesenchymal cells into the cardiac cushions [53]. Also, Cre-mediated inactivation of TGFβRII in VE-cadherin-expressing ECs at E11.5 causes embryonic ventricular septal defect due to the failure of cushion fusion [31,85,133]. In addition, it has been reported that protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) suppressed EndoMT in HUVECs under TGF-β1 stimulation in cardiac valve development. In healthy adult valves, interstitial valve cells are dormant fibroblasts. However, during disease progression, interstitial valve cells evolve into activated cells similar to myofibroblasts that express mesenchymal markers α-SMA [32,131], and subsequently differentiate into chondrocyte and osteoblast-like cells, which are characteristic of calcific aortic valve disease [134,135].
In a recent study, Bischoff et al. identified an unanticipated expression of CD45, one protein tyrosine phosphatase, in mitral valve endothelial cells post-MI in response to the stimulation of TGF-β1. In in vitro studies, they showed that ovine mitral VECs expressed a low basal level of endogenous CD45, which was increased significantly after being stimulated by TGF-β1. There were also concomitant increases in mesenchyme-specific factor α-SMA, additional EndoMT markers, TGF-β1, TGF-β3, collagen 1, and collagen 3, all of which were suppressed by the inclusion of one CD45 selective PTPase inhibitor. In vivo, CD45 expressed in the MV leaflet endothelium, accompanied by increasing VE-cadherin positive endothelial cells that express α-SMA and CD45, is significantly higher in inferior MI compared to in sham animals (adult sheep). This research suggested that CD45 promotes a maladaptive, profibrotic form of EndoMT in the mitral valve endothelium. It perhaps goes by post-translational processes such as the dephosphorylation of EndoMT-related molecules, which are linked to other valve illnesses such as calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). This study, using clinically relevant large animal models, emphasized the complexity of the endothelium and indicated an unanticipated functional role for CD45 PTPase in EndoMT [136].

9. EndoMT in Myocardial Fibrosis

The critical role of EndoMT in the pathogenesis and progression of myocardial fibrosis has been described in recent years. For instance, endocardial cells can give rise to myofibroblasts through EndoMT after MI. These distinct changes accompany biochemical changes in cell morphology and polarity, featuring the decreased expression of endothelial markers, such as VE-cadherin, endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), CD31, and the acquisition of mesenchyme-specific factors, such as α-SMA, FSP-1, transgelin, and SM22a or calponin. Mechanistically, pSMAD2 and/or pSMAD3 were expressed in ECs in the injured heart, indicating that TGFβ signaling activation is involved in the embryonic EndoMT process. However, BMP7, a TGF-β1 antagonist, could significantly limit EndoMT-mediated EC transformation and the progression of cardiac fibrosis [137]. FGF activation causes a dramatic reduction in let-7 miRNA levels in tissue fibrosis that, in turn, upregulates the expression of TGFβ ligands and receptors, and activates TGFβ signaling in endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition [50,73,89,138]. Following myocardial infarction, partial EndoMT activation triggers robust new vessel generation [139]. Canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway has also been shown to mediate EndoMT [83]. Lineage tracing utilizing Tcf21–Cre, Tbx18–Cre, Wt1–Cre, and Gata5–Cre lines indicated that endothelial-derived mesenchymal descendants that express PDGFRα or PDGFRβ subsequently give rise to pericytes and fibroblasts [111]. Moreover, the expression levels of EndoMT-related genes, including Twist, Snail, and Slug, are also significantly upregulated within the left ventricular myocardial tissues of individuals with end-stage cardiac failure. In addition to these signaling transduction pathways, microRNAs including miR-21, miRNA-24, or miR-29 have been implicated in regulating fibrosis after MI [140,141,142].

10. EndoMT in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is characterized by excessive pulmonary remodeling and intimal thickenings in the pulmonary arterial wall. Arciniegas et al. first suggested the role of EndoMT in the pathophysiology of chronic PAH, and further studies suggest that EndoMT has been implicated in primary PAH and PAH secondary to SSc [42]. In addition, Ranchoux et al. applied transmission electron microscopy, providing evidence that EndoMT is a key contributor to α-SMA positive cells in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension [143]. The histological assessment shows that α-SMA+/vWF+ endothelial cells are present in up to 5% of pulmonary vessels in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary hypertension. The role of EndoMT in SSc-associated PAH pathology was investigated using a hypoxia/SU5416 mouse model. In addition, unambiguous expression of α-SMA indicated that EndoMT was involved in pulmonary arterial remodeling in intimal and plexiform lesions from PAH secondary to SSc lungs [144].
Moreover, proinflammatory mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10, also induce EndoMT implicated in pulmonary hypertension [103,107]. Furthermore, several signaling pathways, such as TGFβ, Wnt/β-catenin, and the transcription factors Snail, Slug, and Twist1, are related to pulmonary hypertension involved in EndoMT [42,145,146]. These novel findings offer solid evidence for the role of EndoMT in both primary PAH and PAH secondary to SSc, which might provide a promising therapeutic target to inhibit and even reverse pulmonary vascular excessive remodeling for PAH [42,144].

11. Perspective

There has been a diverse interest in studying the role of EndoMT in cardiovascular disease; in fields such as systems biology, biophysics, stem cell biology, and pathology, research on EndoMT has been expanding rapidly in recent decades [97]. However, one major challenge is the translation of the current knowledge of EndoMT heterogeneity and plasticity into clinical practice. Preclinical studies of inhibitors majorly focus on fibrosis complications through EndoMT. For example, hepatocyte growth factor, losartan, scutellarin, BMP-7, and relaxin have been demonstrated to repress EndoMT and attenuate cardiac fibrosis [96,124,147,148,149,150]. These inhibitors of EndoMT could be therapeutic candidates for treating other diseases where EndoMT occurs and contributes to the pathogenesis. It should be noted that many of the experimental techniques currently utilized in the field still suffer from significant limitations. Indeed, markers of endothelial cells for endothelial lineage identification, such as CD31, are also expressed by other cell types, and thus using a single marker can lead to false-positive results [151]. Moreover, due to the lack of unified and unambiguous EndoMT read-outs on the basis of endothelial and mesenchymal characteristics, cross-comparison between different research remains challenging. With many important aspects of EndoMT remaining unexplored, using multidisciplinary and novel approaches—such as scRNA-seq, ATAC-seq, computational models, live imaging, multi-omics, bioinformatics analysis, and mathematical modeling—will help us better understand the etiology of EndoMT and provide support for the treatment of a myriad of diseases associated with EndoMT [103,104,129,148,152,153,154].

12. Conclusions

Compelling evidence has demonstrated that EndoMT is implicated in cardiac development and cardiovascular disease, including atherosclerosis, adult valve diseases, myocardial fibrosis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Thus, EndoMT may be a promising target for therapeutic intervention. However, only a few drug candidates that target EndoMT have been investigated for preclinical use. Innovative approaches such as single-cell RNA (scRNA)-sequencing technology will allow for detailed profiling of EndoMT. Limiting EndoMT by suppressing its inducible pathways or by promoting its counter pathways provides a novel paradigm to combat EndoMT-mediated CVDs. Inhibitors that suppress TGFβ signaling-induced EndoMT would be an excellent starting point to guide producing potentially new class drugs that combat EndoMT-mediated cardiovascular diseases, the leading cause of patient death worldwide.

Author Contributions

Q.P., D.S. and H.C. drafted the manuscript; K.C., K.L., B.Z., H.W., B.W., S.W., V.N., Y.D., Y.W.L., C.Z. and H.C. performed the literature search and compiled and edited the manuscript; Q.P., D.S. and H.C. proofed the manuscript and figures. All authors contributed to manuscript draft and revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by NIH grants R01HL093242, R01HL130845, R01HL133216, R01HL137229, R01HL141858, R01HL1418583, R01HL156362, R01HL158097, and R01HL162367 to H.C. and NIH R01ES023470 and NIH R01HL131925 to C.Z.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dela Paz, N.G.; D’Amore, P.A. Arterial versus venous endothelial cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2009, 335, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ishii, Y.; Langberg, J.; Rosborough, K.; Mikawa, T. Endothelial cell lineages of the heart. Cell Tissue Res. 2009, 335, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kyuno, D.; Yamaguchi, H.; Ito, T.; Kono, T.; Kimura, Y.; Imamura, M.; Konno, T.; Hirata, K.; Sawada, N.; Kojima, T. Targeting tight junctions during epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human pancreatic cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 10813–10824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Deanfield, J.E.; Halcox, J.P.; Rabelink, T.J. Endothelial function and dysfunction: Testing and clinical relevance. Circulation 2007, 115, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Peiris, H.; Bonder, C.S.; Coates, P.T.; Keating, D.J.; Jessup, C.F. The β-cell/EC axis: How do islet cells talk to each other? Diabetes 2014, 63, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kadry, H.; Noorani, B.; Cucullo, L. A blood-brain barrier overview on structure, function, impairment, and biomarkers of integrity. Fluids Barriers CNS 2020, 17, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Navarro, P.; Ruco, L.; Dejana, E. Differential Localization of VE- and N-Cadherins in Human Endothelial Cells: VE-Cadherin Competes with N-Cadherin for Junctional Localization. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 140, 1475–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Loh, C.Y.; Chai, J.Y.; Tang, T.F.; Wong, W.F.; Sethi, G.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Chong, P.P.; Looi, C.Y. The E-Cadherin and N-Cadherin Switch in Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition: Signaling, Therapeutic Implications, and Challenges. Cells 2019, 8, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Coultas, L.; Chawengsaksophak, K.; Rossant, J. Endothelial cells and VEGF in vascular development. Nature 2005, 438, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Salva, K.A.; Haemel, A.K.; Pincus, L.B.; Liu, J.; Sundram, U.; Guitart, J.; Longley, B.J.; Wood, G.S. Expression of CD31/PECAM-1 (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1) by blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasms. JAMA Dermatol. 2014, 150, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Baldwin, H.S.; Shen, H.M.; Yan, H.C.; DeLisser, H.M.; Chung, A.; Mickanin, C.; Trask, T.; Kirschbaum, N.E.; Newman, P.J.; Albelda, S.M. Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1/CD31): Alternatively spliced, functionally distinct isoforms expressed during mammalian cardiovascular development. Development 1994, 120, 2539–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jakobsen, K.R.; Demuth, C.; Sorensen, B.S.; Nielsen, A.L. The role of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2016, 5, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Dmitrieva, N.I.; Burg, M.B. Secretion of von Willebrand factor by endothelial cells links sodium to hypercoagulability and thrombosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 6485–6490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Saharinen, P.; Jeltsch, M.; Santoyo, M.M.; Leppänen, V.-M.; Alitalo, K. The TIE Receptor Family. In Receptor Tyrosine Kinases: Family and Subfamilies; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 743–775. [Google Scholar]
  15. Garcia, J.; Sandi, M.J.; Cordelier, P.; Binetruy, B.; Pouyssegur, J.; Iovanna, J.L.; Tournaire, R. Tie1 deficiency induces endothelial-mesenchymal transition. EMBO Rep. 2012, 13, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Sadler, T.; Scarpa, M.; Rieder, F.; West, G.; Stylianou, E. Cytokine-induced chromatin modifications of the type I collagen alpha 2 gene during intestinal endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2013, 19, 1354–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Somoza, R.A.; Welter, J.F.; Correa, D.; Caplan, A.I. Chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells: Challenges and unfulfilled expectations. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2014, 20, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Munir, H.; Ward, L.S.C.; Sheriff, L.; Kemble, S.; Nayar, S.; Barone, F.; Nash, G.B.; McGettrick, H.M. Adipogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Alters Their Immunomodulatory Properties in a Tissue-Specific Manner. Stem Cells 2017, 35, 1636–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Mohamed-Ahmed, S.; Fristad, I.; Lie, S.A.; Suliman, S.; Mustafa, K.; Vindenes, H.; Idris, S.B. Adipose-derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: A donor-matched comparison. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Q.; Shou, P.; Zheng, C.; Jiang, M.; Cao, G.; Yang, Q.; Cao, J.; Xie, N.; Velletri, T.; Zhang, X.; et al. Fate decision of mesenchymal stem cells: Adipocytes or osteoblasts? Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 1128–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yu, Y.; Fuhr, J.; Boye, E.; Gyorffy, S.; Soker, S.; Atala, A.; Mulliken, J.B.; Bischoff, J. Mesenchymal stem cells and adipogenesis in hemangioma involution. Stem Cells 2006, 24, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mahmoud, M.M.; Serbanovic-Canic, J.; Feng, S.; Souilhol, C.; Xing, R.; Hsiao, S.; Mammoto, A.; Chen, J.; Ariaans, M.; Francis, S.E.; et al. Shear stress induces endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition via the transcription factor Snail. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Haynes, B.A.; Yang, L.F.; Huyck, R.W.; Lehrer, E.J.; Turner, J.M.; Barabutis, N.; Correll, V.L.; Mathiesen, A.; McPheat, W.; Semmes, O.J.; et al. Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Human Adipose Tissue Vasculature Alters the Particulate Secretome and Induces Endothelial Dysfunction. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 2168–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Talele, N.P.; Fradette, J.; Davies, J.E.; Kapus, A.; Hinz, B. Expression of α-Smooth Muscle Actin Determines the Fate of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2015, 4, 1016–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sun, L.; Sun, C.; Liang, Z.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Luo, H.; Zhang, H.; Ding, P.; Sun, X.; Qin, Z.; et al. FSP1+ fibroblast subpopulation is essential for the maintenance and regeneration of medullary thymic epithelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mendez, M.G.; Kojima, S.; Goldman, R.D. Vimentin induces changes in cell shape, motility, and adhesion during the epithelial to mesenchymal transition. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 1838–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kasten, A.; Naser, T.; Brullhoff, K.; Fiedler, J.; Muller, P.; Moller, M.; Rychly, J.; Groll, J.; Brenner, R.E. Guidance of mesenchymal stem cells on fibronectin structured hydrogel films. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Friedenstein, A. Stromal-Hematopoietic Interrelationships: Maximov’s Ideas and Modern Models; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1989; pp. 159–167. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fiocchi, C.; Ina, K.; Danese, S.; Leite, A.Z.; Vogel, J.D. Alterations of mesenchymal and endothelial cells in inflammatory bowel diseases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2006, 579, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abu El-Asrar, A.M.; De Hertogh, G.; van den Eynde, K.; Alam, K.; Van Raemdonck, K.; Opdenakker, G.; Van Damme, J.; Geboes, K.; Struyf, S. Myofibroblasts in proliferative diabetic retinopathy can originate from infiltrating fibrocytes and through endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT). Exp. Eye Res. 2015, 132, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zeisberg, E.M.; Tarnavski, O.; Zeisberg, M.; Dorfman, A.L.; McMullen, J.R.; Gustafsson, E.; Chandraker, A.; Yuan, X.; Pu, W.T.; Roberts, A.B.; et al. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 952–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bischoff, J. Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 1163–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baumann, K. Mechanotransduction: Kindlin’ the fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 278–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, J.; Ogbu, S.C.; Musich, P.R.; Thewke, D.P.; Yao, Z.; Jiang, Y. The Contribution of Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition to Atherosclerosis. Int. J. Transl. Med. 2021, 1, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rosa, I.; Romano, E.; Fioretto, B.S.; Manetti, M. The contribution of mesenchymal transitions to the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Eur. J. Rheumatol. 2020, 7, S157–S164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Von Gise, A.; Pu, W.T. Endocardial and epicardial epithelial to mesenchymal transitions in heart development and disease. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 1628–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Stenmark, K.R.; Frid, M.; Perros, F. Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition: An Evolving Paradigm and a Promising Therapeutic Target in PAH. Circulation 2016, 133, 1734–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cheng, W.; Li, X.; Liu, D.; Cui, C.; Wang, X. Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition: Role in Cardiac Fibrosis. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 26, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bruijn, L.E.; van den Akker, B.; van Rhijn, C.M.; Hamming, J.F.; Lindeman, J.H.N. Extreme Diversity of the Human Vascular Mesenchymal Cell Landscape. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e017094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ichim, T.E.; O’Heeron, P.; Kesari, S. Fibroblasts as a practical alternative to mesenchymal stem cells. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Islam, S.; Bostrom, K.I.; Di Carlo, D.; Simmons, C.A.; Tintut, Y.; Yao, Y.; Hsu, J.J. The Mechanobiology of Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cardiovascular Disease. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 734215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jimenez, S.A.; Piera-Velazquez, S. Endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) in the pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis-associated pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Myth or reality? Matrix Biol. 2016, 51, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Hashimoto, N.; Phan, S.H.; Imaizumi, K.; Matsuo, M.; Nakashima, H.; Kawabe, T.; Shimokata, K.; Hasegawa, Y. Endothelial-mesenchymal transition in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010, 43, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Song, S.; Zhang, M.; Yi, Z.; Zhang, H.; Shen, T.; Yu, X.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, X.; Yu, L.; Ma, C.; et al. The role of PDGF-B/TGF-β1/neprilysin network in regulating endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pulmonary artery remodeling. Cell. Signal. 2016, 28, 1489–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Greaves, D.; Calle, Y. Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and Associated Invasive Adhesions in Solid and Haematological Tumours. Cells 2022, 11, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Auersperg, N.; Pan, J.; Grove, B.D.; Peterson, T.; Fisher, J.; Maines-Bandiera, S.; Somasiri, A.; Roskelley, C.D. E-cadherin induces mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in human ovarian surface epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 6249–6254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Lamouille, S.; Xu, J.; Derynck, R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 178–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Shimizu, T.; Maruyama, K.; Kawamura, T.; Urade, Y.; Wada, Y. PERK participates in cardiac valve development via fatty acid oxidation and endocardial-mesenchymal transformation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wei, X.M.; Wumaier, G.; Zhu, N.; Dong, L.; Li, C.W.; Xia, J.W.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, X.J.; Zhang, Y.Y.; et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase L1 represses endothelial-mesenchymal transition by inhibiting IL-1β/NF-κB/Snail signaling. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2020, 41, 1102–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, J.G.; Kay, E.P. FGF-2-mediated signal transduction during endothelial mesenchymal transformation in corneal endothelial cells. Exp. Eye Res. 2006, 83, 1309–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tian, D.; Zeng, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Protective effect of rapamycin on endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in HUVECs through the Notch signaling pathway. Vascul. Pharmacol. 2019, 113, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, C.; Dong, F.; Jia, Y.; Du, H.; Dong, N.; Xu, Y.; Wang, S.; Wu, H.; Liu, Z.; Li, W. Notch signal regulates corneal endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 183, 786–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chang, A.C.; Fu, Y.; Garside, V.C.; Niessen, K.; Chang, L.; Fuller, M.; Setiadi, A.; Smrz, J.; Kyle, A.; Minchinton, A.; et al. Notch initiates the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in the atrioventricular canal through autocrine activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase. Dev. Cell 2011, 21, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Katsura, A.; Suzuki, H.I.; Ueno, T.; Mihira, H.; Yamazaki, T.; Yasuda, T.; Watabe, T.; Mano, H.; Yamada, Y.; Miyazono, K. MicroRNA-31 is a positive modulator of endothelial-mesenchymal transition and associated secretory phenotype induced by TGF-β. Genes Cells 2016, 21, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Liu, J.; Dong, F.; Jeong, J.; Masuda, T.; Lobe, C.G. Constitutively active Notch1 signaling promotes endothelialmesenchymal transition in a conditional transgenic mouse model. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 34, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Rossato, F.A.; Su, Y.; Mackey, A.; Ng, Y.S.E. Fibrotic Changes and Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition Promoted by VEGFR2 Antagonism Alter the Therapeutic Effects of VEGFA Pathway Blockage in a Mouse Model of Choroidal Neovascularization. Cells 2020, 9, 2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ma, J.; Sanchez-Duffhues, G.; Goumans, M.-J.; Ten Dijke, P. TGF-β-Induced Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Disease and Tissue Engineering. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sporn, M.B.; Todaro, G.J. Autocrine Secretion and Malignant Transformation of Cells. N. Engl. J. Med. 1980, 303, 878–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pinto, M.T.; Ferreira Melo, F.U.; Malta, T.M.; Rodrigues, E.S.; Plaça, J.R.; Silva, W.A., Jr.; Panepucci, R.A.; Covas, D.T.; de Oliveira Rodrigues, C.; Kashima, S. Endothelial cells from different anatomical origin have distinct responses during SNAIL/TGF-β2-mediated endothelial-mesenchymal transition. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2018, 10, 4065–4081. [Google Scholar]
  60. Diez, M.; Musri, M.M.; Ferrer, E.; Barbera, J.A.; Peinado, V.I. Endothelial progenitor cells undergo an endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition-like process mediated by TGFβRI. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010, 88, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Doerr, M.; Morrison, J.; Bergeron, L.; Coomber, B.L.; Viloria-Petit, A. Differential effect of hypoxia on early endothelial-mesenchymal transition response to transforming growth beta isoforms 1 and 2. Microvasc. Res. 2016, 108, 48–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shao, E.S.; Lin, L.; Yao, Y.; Bostrom, K.I. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor is coordinately regulated by the activin-like kinase receptors 1 and 5 in endothelial cells. Blood 2009, 114, 2197–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Xie, F.; Zhang, Z.; van Dam, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, F. Regulation of TGF-β Superfamily Signaling by SMAD Mono-Ubiquitination. Cells 2014, 3, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gwon, M.G.; An, H.J.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, W.H.; Gu, H.; Kim, H.J.; Leem, J.; Jung, H.J.; Park, K.K. Anti-fibrotic effects of synthetic TGF-β1 and Smad oligodeoxynucleotide on kidney fibrosis in vivo and in vitro through inhibition of both epithelial dedifferentiation and endothelial-mesenchymal transitions. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 333–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Wang, J.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xiang, D.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, F. Autophagy regulates Endothelial-Mesenchymal transition by decreasing the phosphorylation level of Smad3. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 487, 740–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Li, S.; Yu, L.; He, A.; Liu, Q. Klotho Inhibits Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction-Induced Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition via TGF-β1/Smad2/Snail1 Signaling in Mice. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Tecalco-Cruz, A.C.; Rios-Lopez, D.G.; Vazquez-Victorio, G.; Rosales-Alvarez, R.E.; Macias-Silva, M. Transcriptional cofactors Ski and SnoN are major regulators of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway in health and disease. Signal. Transduct. Target Ther. 2018, 3, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Miyazawa, K.; Miyazono, K. Regulation of TGF-β Family Signaling by Inhibitory Smads. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017, 9, a022095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Walton, K.L.; Johnson, K.E.; Harrison, C.A. Targeting TGF-β Mediated SMAD Signaling for the Prevention of Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Batlle, R.; Andres, E.; Gonzalez, L.; Llonch, E.; Igea, A.; Gutierrez-Prat, N.; Berenguer-Llergo, A.; Nebreda, A.R. Regulation of tumor angiogenesis and mesenchymal-endothelial transition by p38α through TGF-β and JNK signaling. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kumarswamy, R.; Volkmann, I.; Jazbutyte, V.; Dangwal, S.; Park, D.H.; Thum, T. Transforming growth factor-β-induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition is partly mediated by microRNA-21. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012, 32, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Liu, T.; Ma, W.; Xu, H.; Huang, M.; Zhang, D.; He, Z.; Zhang, L.; Brem, S.; O’Rourke, D.M.; Gong, Y.; et al. PDGF-mediated mesenchymal transformation renders endothelial resistance to anti-VEGF treatment in glioblastoma. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ng, F.; Boucher, S.; Koh, S.; Sastry, K.S.; Chase, L.; Lakshmipathy, U.; Choong, C.; Yang, Z.; Vemuri, M.C.; Rao, M.S.; et al. PDGF, TGF-β, and FGF signaling is important for differentiation and growth of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs): Transcriptional profiling can identify markers and signaling pathways important in differentiation of MSCs into adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic lineages. Blood 2008, 112, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chen, P.H.; Chen, X.; He, X. Platelet-derived growth factors and their receptors: Structural and functional perspectives. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1834, 2176–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Andrae, J.; Gallini, R.; Betsholtz, C. Role of platelet-derived growth factors in physiology and medicine. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 1276–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Morrison, D.K.; Kaplan, D.R.; Rhee, S.G.; Williams, L.T. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-dependent association of phospholipase C-gamma with the PDGF receptor signaling complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990, 10, 2359–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yokota, J.; Chosa, N.; Sawada, S.; Okubo, N.; Takahashi, N.; Hasegawa, T.; Kondo, H.; Ishisaki, A. PDGF-induced PI3K-mediated signaling enhances the TGF-β-induced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a TGF-β-activated MEK-dependent manner. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 33, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Nakata, S.; Fujita, N.; Kitagawa, Y.; Okamoto, R.; Ogita, H.; Takai, Y. Regulation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor activation by afadin through SHP-2: Implications for cellular morphology. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 37815–37825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Vignais, M.L.; Sadowski, H.B.; Watling, D.; Rogers, N.C.; Gilman, M. Platelet-derived growth factor induces phosphorylation of multiple JAK family kinases and STAT proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16, 1759–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Fischer, A.N.; Fuchs, E.; Mikula, M.; Huber, H.; Beug, H.; Mikulits, W. PDGF essentially links TGF-β signaling to nuclear β-catenin accumulation in hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Oncogene 2007, 26, 3395–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Abdel-Rahman, O. Targeting platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) signaling in gastrointestinal cancers: Preclinical and clinical considerations. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Shang, S.; Hua, F.; Hu, Z.-W. The regulation of β-catenin activity and function in cancer: Therapeutic opportunities. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 33972–33989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Aisagbonhi, O.; Rai, M.; Ryzhov, S.; Atria, N.; Feoktistov, I.; Hatzopoulos, A.K. Experimental myocardial infarction triggers canonical Wnt signaling and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Dis. Models Mech. 2011, 4, 469–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Cadigan, K.M.; Waterman, M.L. TCF/LEFs and Wnt signaling in the nucleus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4, a007906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Liebner, S.; Cattelino, A.; Gallini, R.; Rudini, N.; Iurlaro, M.; Piccolo, S.; Dejana, E. β-catenin is required for endothelial-mesenchymal transformation during heart cushion development in the mouse. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 166, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Lee, J.G.; Kay, E.P. Cross-talk among Rho GTPases acting downstream of PI 3-kinase induces mesenchymal transformation of corneal endothelial cells mediated by FGF-2. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006, 47, 2358–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Ko, M.K.; Kay, E.P. Regulatory role of FGF-2 on type I collagen expression during endothelial mesenchymal transformation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005, 46, 4495–4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Correia, A.C.; Moonen, J.R.; Brinker, M.G.; Krenning, G. FGF2 inhibits endothelial-mesenchymal transition through microRNA-20a-mediated repression of canonical TGF-β signaling. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Chen, P.Y.; Qin, L.; Barnes, C.; Charisse, K.; Yi, T.; Zhang, X.; Ali, R.; Medina, P.P.; Yu, J.; Slack, F.J.; et al. FGF regulates TGF-β signaling and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition via control of let-7 miRNA expression. Cell Rep. 2012, 2, 1684–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Terzuoli, E.; Nannelli, G.; Giachetti, A.; Morbidelli, L.; Ziche, M.; Donnini, S. Targeting endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition: The protective role of hydroxytyrosol sulfate metabolite. Eur. J. Nutr. 2020, 59, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yoshimatsu, Y.; Watabe, T. Emerging roles of inflammation-mediated endothelial-mesenchymal transition in health and disease. Inflamm. Regen. 2022, 42, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Krenning, G.; Moonen, J.A.J.; van Luyn, M.J.A.; Harmsen, M.C. Vascular smooth muscle cells for use in vascular tissue engineering obtained by endothelial-to-mesenchymal transdifferentiation (EnMT) on collagen matrices. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 3703–3711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Arkonac, B.M.; Foster, L.C.; Sibinga, N.E.; Patterson, C.; Lai, K.; Tsai, J.C.; Lee, M.E.; Perrella, M.A.; Haber, E. Vascular endothelial growth factor induces heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor in vascular endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 4400–4405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Noseda, M.; McLean, G.; Niessen, K.; Chang, L.; Pollet, I.; Montpetit, R.; Shahidi, R.; Dorovini-Zis, K.; Li, L.; Beckstead, B.; et al. Notch activation results in phenotypic and functional changes consistent with endothelial-to-mesenchymal transformation. Circ. Res. 2004, 94, 910–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Zhang, H.; Hu, J.; Liu, L. MiR-200a modulates TGF-β1-induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal shift via suppression of GRB2 in HAECs. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 95, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wu, M.; Peng, Z.; Zu, C.; Ma, J.; Lu, S.; Zhong, J.; Zhang, S. Losartan Attenuates Myocardial Endothelial-To-Mesenchymal Transition in Spontaneous Hypertensive Rats via Inhibiting TGF-β/Smad Signaling. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Li, Y.; Lui, K.O.; Zhou, B. Reassessing endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cardiovascular diseases. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018, 15, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Piera-Velazquez, S.; Li, Z.; Jimenez, S.A. Role of endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) in the pathogenesis of fibrotic disorders. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 179, 1074–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Helmke, A.; Casper, J.; Nordlohne, J.; David, S.; Haller, H.; Zeisberg, E.M.; von Vietinghoff, S. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition shapes the atherosclerotic plaque and modulates macrophage function. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 2278–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Chen, D.; Zhang, C.; Chen, J.; Yang, M.; Afzal, T.A.; An, W.; Maguire, E.M.; He, S.; Luo, J.; Wang, X.; et al. miRNA-200c-3p promotes endothelial to mesenchymal transition and neointimal hyperplasia in artery bypass grafts. J. Pathol. 2021, 253, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, J.; Rojas, S.; Singh, S.; Musich, P.R.; Gutierrez, M.; Yao, Z.; Thewke, D.; Jiang, Y. Wnt2 Contributes to the Development of Atherosclerosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 751720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yang, J.H.; Wylie-Sears, J.; Bischoff, J. Opposing actions of Notch1 and VEGF in post-natal cardiac valve endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 374, 512–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Ranchoux, B.; Antigny, F.; Rucker-Martin, C.; Hautefort, A.; Pechoux, C.; Bogaard, H.J.; Dorfmuller, P.; Remy, S.; Lecerf, F.; Plante, S.; et al. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 2015, 131, 1006–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Huang, M.; Yang, F.; Zhang, D.; Lin, M.; Duan, H.; El-Mayta, R.; Zhang, L.; Qin, L.; Shewale, S.V.; Pei, L.; et al. Endothelial plasticity drives aberrant vascularization and impedes cardiac repair after myocardial infarction. Nat. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022, 1, 372–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Chen, P.Y.; Qin, L.; Baeyens, N.; Li, G.; Afolabi, T.; Budatha, M.; Tellides, G.; Schwartz, M.A.; Simons, M. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition drives atherosclerosis progression. J. Clin. Invest. 2015, 125, 4514–4528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Violin, J.D.; DeWire, S.M.; Yamashita, D.; Rominger, D.H.; Nguyen, L.; Schiller, K.; Whalen, E.J.; Gowen, M.; Lark, M.W. Selectively engaging β-arrestins at the angiotensin II type 1 receptor reduces blood pressure and increases cardiac performance. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010, 335, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Gorelova, A.; Berman, M.; Al Ghouleh, I. Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2021, 34, 891–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Fang, J.S.; Hultgren, N.W.; Hughes, C.C.W. Regulation of Partial and Reversible Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Angiogenesis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 702021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Medici, D.; Hay, E.D.; Olsen, B.R. Snail and Slug Promote Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition through β-Catenin–T-Cell Factor-4-dependent Expression of Transforming Growth Factor-β3. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19, 4875–4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Viñals, F.; Pouysségur, J. Transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) promotes endothelial cell survival during in vitro angiogenesis via an autocrine mechanism implicating TGF-α signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 7218–7230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Quijada, P.; Trembley, M.A.; Small, E.M. The Role of the Epicardium During Heart Development and Repair. Circ. Res. 2020, 126, 377–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Piera-Velazquez, S.; Jimenez, S.A. Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition: Role in Physiology and in the Pathogenesis of Human Diseases. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1281–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bloomekatz, J.; Singh, R.; Prall, O.W.; Dunn, A.C.; Vaughan, M.; Loo, C.S.; Harvey, R.P.; Yelon, D. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) signaling directs cardiomyocyte movement toward the midline during heart tube assembly. eLife 2017, 6, e21172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Tallquist, M.D.; Soriano, P. Cell autonomous requirement for PDGFRα in populations of cranial and cardiac neural crest cells. Development 2003, 130, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Widyantoro, B.; Emoto, N.; Nakayama, K.; Anggrahini, D.W.; Adiarto, S.; Iwasa, N.; Yagi, K.; Miyagawa, K.; Rikitake, Y.; Suzuki, T.; et al. Endothelial cell-derived endothelin-1 promotes cardiac fibrosis in diabetic hearts through stimulation of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Circulation 2010, 121, 2407–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. You, S.; Qian, J.; Wu, G.; Qian, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chen, T.; Wang, J.; Huang, W.; Liang, G. Schizandrin B attenuates angiotensin II induced endothelial to mesenchymal transition in vascular endothelium by suppressing NF-κB activation. Phytomedicine 2019, 62, 152955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Yu, C.H.; Suriguga, G.M.; Liu, W.J.; Cui, N.X.; Wang, Y.; Du, X.; Yi, Z.C. High glucose induced endothelial to mesenchymal transition in human umbilical vein endothelial cell. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2017, 102, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Tsai, P.S.; Chiu, C.Y.; Sheu, M.L.; Yang, C.Y.; Lan, K.C.; Liu, S.H. Advanced glycation end products activated endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic islet endothelial cells and triggered islet fibrosis in diabetic mice. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2021, 345, 109562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhang, B.; Niu, W.; Dong, H.-Y.; Liu, M.-L.; Luo, Y.; Li, Z.-C. Hypoxia induces endothelial-mesenchymal transition in pulmonary vascular remodeling. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 42, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Yao, J.; Guihard, P.J.; Blazquez-Medela, A.M.; Guo, Y.; Moon, J.H.; Jumabay, M.; Bostrom, K.I.; Yao, Y. Serine Protease Activation Essential for Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Vascular Calcification. Circ. Res. 2015, 117, 758–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Souilhol, C.; Harmsen, M.C.; Evans, P.C.; Krenning, G. Endothelial-mesenchymal transition in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chen, P.Y.; Schwartz, M.A.; Simons, M. Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition, Vascular Inflammation, and Atherosclerosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mintet, E.; Lavigne, J.; Paget, V.; Tarlet, G.; Buard, V.; Guipaud, O.; Sabourin, J.C.; Iruela-Arispe, M.L.; Milliat, F.; Francois, A. Endothelial Hey2 deletion reduces endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition and mitigates radiation proctitis in mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Oh, N.A.; Hong, X.; Doulamis, I.P.; Meibalan, E.; Peiseler, T.; Melero-Martin, J.; Garcia-Cardena, G.; Del Nido, P.J.; Friehs, I. Abnormal Flow Conditions Promote Endocardial Fibroelastosis Via Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition, Which Is Responsive to Losartan Treatment. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2021, 6, 984–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Boyer, A.S.; Ayerinskas, I.I.; Vincent, E.B.; McKinney, L.A.; Weeks, D.L.; Runyan, R.B. TGFβ2 and TGFβ3 have separate and sequential activities during epithelial-mesenchymal cell transformation in the embryonic heart. Dev. Biol. 1999, 208, 530–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Goumans, M.J.; Ten Dijke, P. TGF-β Signaling in Control of Cardiovascular Function. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, a022210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Fan, C.S.; Chen, L.L.; Hsu, T.A.; Chen, C.C.; Chua, K.V.; Li, C.P.; Huang, T.S. Endothelial-mesenchymal transition harnesses HSP90α-secreting M2-macrophages to exacerbate pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Good, R.B.; Gilbane, A.J.; Trinder, S.L.; Denton, C.P.; Coghlan, G.; Abraham, D.J.; Holmes, A.M. Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition Contributes to Endothelial Dysfunction in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 1850–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Andueza, A.; Kumar, S.; Kim, J.; Kang, D.W.; Mumme, H.L.; Perez, J.I.; Villa-Roel, N.; Jo, H. Endothelial Reprogramming by Disturbed Flow Revealed by Single-Cell RNA and Chromatin Accessibility Study. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Li, F.; Yan, K.; Wu, L.; Zheng, Z.; Du, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, L.; Li, W.; Sheng, Y.; Ren, L.; et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals cellular heterogeneity of mouse carotid artery under disturbed flow. Cell Death Discov. 2021, 7, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Paranya, G.; Vineberg, S.; Dvorin, E.; Kaushal, S.; Roth, S.J.; Rabkin, E.; Schoen, F.J.; Bischoff, J. Aortic valve endothelial cells undergo transforming growth factor-β-mediated and non-transforming growth factor-β-mediated transdifferentiation in vitro. Am. J. Pathol. 2001, 159, 1335–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhang, H.; Lui, K.O.; Zhou, B. Endocardial Cell Plasticity in Cardiac Development, Diseases and Regeneration. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 774–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Nakajima, Y.; Yamagishi, T.; Hokari, S.; Nakamura, H. Mechanisms involved in valvuloseptal endocardial cushion formation in early cardiogenesis: Roles of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). Anat. Rec. 2000, 258, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Yutzey, K.E.; Demer, L.L.; Body, S.C.; Huggins, G.S.; Towler, D.A.; Giachelli, C.M.; Hofmann-Bowman, M.A.; Mortlock, D.P.; Rogers, M.B.; Sadeghi, M.M.; et al. Calcific aortic valve disease: A consensus summary from the Alliance of Investigators on Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014, 34, 2387–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Wirrig, E.E.; Yutzey, K.E. Conserved transcriptional regulatory mechanisms in aortic valve development and disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014, 34, 737–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Bischoff, J.; Casanovas, G.; Wylie-Sears, J.; Kim, D.H.; Bartko, P.E.; Guerrero, J.L.; Dal-Bianco, J.P.; Beaudoin, J.; Garcia, M.L.; Sullivan, S.M.; et al. CD45 Expression in Mitral Valve Endothelial Cells After Myocardial Infarction. Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 1215–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Pardali, E.; Sanchez-Duffhues, G.; Gomez-Puerto, M.C.; Ten Dijke, P. TGF-β-Induced Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Fibrotic Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Turkeli, A.; Yilmaz, O.; Karaman, M.; Kanik, E.T.; Firinci, F.; Inan, S.; Yuksel, H. Anti-VEGF treatment suppresses remodeling factors and restores epithelial barrier function through the E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling axis in experimental asthma models. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Welch-Reardon, K.M.; Wu, N.; Hughes, C.C. A role for partial endothelial-mesenchymal transitions in angiogenesis? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Yuan, J.; Chen, H.; Ge, D.; Xu, Y.; Xu, H.; Yang, Y.; Gu, M.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, J.; Ge, T.; et al. Mir-21 Promotes Cardiac Fibrosis after Myocardial Infarction via Targeting Smad7. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 42, 2207–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, J.; Huang, W.; Xu, R.; Nie, Y.; Cao, X.; Meng, J.; Xu, X.; Hu, S.; Zheng, Z. MicroRNA-24 regulates cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 2150–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Rooij, E.V.; Sutherland, L.B.; Thatcher, J.E.; DiMaio, J.M.; Naseem, R.H.; Marshall, W.S.; Hill, J.A.; Olson, E.N. Dysregulation of microRNAs after myocardial infarction reveals a role of miR-29 in cardiac fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 13027–13032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Xiong, J. To be EndMT or not to be, that is the question in pulmonary hypertension. Protein Cell 2015, 6, 547–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Di Benedetto, P.; Ruscitti, P.; Berardicurti, O.; Vomero, M.; Navarini, L.; Dolo, V.; Cipriani, P.; Giacomelli, R. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in systemic sclerosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2021, 205, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Woo, K.V.; Shen, I.Y.; Weinheimer, C.J.; Kovacs, A.; Nigro, J.; Lin, C.Y.; Chakinala, M.; Byers, D.E.; Ornitz, D.M. Endothelial FGF signaling is protective in hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. J. Clin. Invest. 2021, 131, e141467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Yun, E.; Kook, Y.; Yoo, K.H.; Kim, K.I.; Lee, M.S.; Kim, J.; Lee, A. Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Pulmonary Vascular Diseases. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Jin, Y.; Cheng, X.; Lu, J.; Li, X. Exogenous BMP-7 Facilitates the Recovery of Cardiac Function after Acute Myocardial Infarction through Counteracting TGF-β1 Signaling Pathway. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2018, 244, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Chen, H.; Xia, R.; Li, Z.; Zhang, L.; Xia, C.; Ai, H.; Yang, Z.; Guo, Y. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Combined with Hepatocyte Growth Factor Therapy for Attenuating Ischaemic Myocardial Fibrosis: Assessment using Multimodal Molecular Imaging. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Zhou, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, L.; Zhou, X.; Zheng, G.; Zhang, H.; Huang, W.; Cai, J. Anti-fibrosis effect of scutellarin via inhibition of endothelial-mesenchymal transition on isoprenaline-induced myocardial fibrosis in rats. Molecules 2014, 19, 15611–15623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wang, D.; Zhu, H.; Yang, Q.; Sun, Y. Effects of relaxin on cardiac fibrosis, apoptosis, and tachyarrhythmia in rats with myocardial infarction. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016, 84, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lai, B.; Li, Z.; He, M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Shyy, J.Y. Atheroprone flow enhances the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2018, 315, H1293–H1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Chowkwale, M.; Mahler, G.J.; Huang, P.; Murray, B.T. A multiscale in silico model of endothelial to mesenchymal transformation in a tumor microenvironment. J. Theor. Biol. 2019, 480, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Tripathi, S.; Xing, J.; Levine, H.; Jolly, M.K. Mathematical Modeling of Plasticity and Heterogeneity in EMT. In The Epithelial-to Mesenchymal Transition: Methods and Protocols; Campbell, K., Theveneau, E., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 385–413. [Google Scholar]
  154. Weinstein, N.; Mendoza, L.; Álvarez-Buylla, E.R. A Computational Model of the Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 11 01834 g001 550
Figure 1. Signaling pathways involved in the regulation of EndoMT.
Figure 1. Signaling pathways involved in the regulation of EndoMT.
Cells 11 01834 g001
Table
Table 1. EndoMT in in vitro and in vivo studies.
Table 1. EndoMT in in vitro and in vivo studies.
Molecules InvolvedFunctional Changes Seen Related to EndoMTModel System (In Vitro/In Vivo)Cardiac Disease StudiedReferences
TGFβCells lost endothelial markers; developed spindly shapes; gained the capacity to produce a variety of fibroblast-specific molecules.
Regulated cell phenotypes and lipid uptake and cell signaling, acted as a profibrotic switch in cardiac fibrosis diseases, thereby affecting the surface structure and internal atherosclerotic plaque.		In vitro: mitral valve endothelial cells; HUVECs; HCAECs; and HAECs.
In vivo: frozen sections of aortic valves from mature sheep; in atherosclerotic plaque in the mouse model.		Atherosclerosis;
adult valve disease;
cardiac fibrosis;
pulmonary arterial hypertension.		 [23,31,91,92,93,95,96,105]
miR-200a overexpression;
miR-200c-3p		miR-200a overexpression blocked EndoMT: inhibited α-SMA, FSP-1, CD31, and VE-cadherin expression.
miRNA-200c-3p promoted EndoMT.		In vitro: HAECs; HUVECs.
In vivo: In human femoral arteries with atherosclerotic lesions; in the mouse model.		Cardiac fibrosis;
atherosclerosis.		 [95,100]
ERK pathway↓Losartan suppressed EndoMT by blocking the TGFβ-induced phosphorylation of the ERK pathway.In vitro: mitral valve endothelial cells.Myocardial fibrosis [96,106]
TGFβ1 treatment:
PDGF-BB signaling↑;
SM22α ↑;
α-SMA↑		Unable to prevent thrombin formation; acquired and enhanced the migratory capacity.In vitro: HUVECs; HCAECs; HAECs.
In vivo: frozen sections of aortic valves from mature sheep.		Adult valve disease [92,93,95]
Wnt2↑Expressed significantly high in atherosclerotic lesions.In vivo: in atherosclerotic lesions in the mouse model.Atherosclerosis [101]
BMPR2BMPR2 mutated gene was related to idiopathic PAH.In vivo: familial PAH in rats.Pulmonary arterial hypertension [37,103,107]
PDGFR-β↑
VE-cadherin↓		The PDGF–NF-κB–HIF1-α–Snail axis promoted VE-cadherin down-expression.In vivo: in the mouse model.Myocardial infarction [104]
↑ indicates upregulation in affected group;↓ indicates down regulation in affected group.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, Q.; Shan, D.; Cui, K.; Li, K.; Zhu, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, B.; Wong, S.; Norton, V.; Dong, Y.; et al. The Role of Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cardiovascular Disease. Cells 2022, 11, 1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111834

AMA Style

Peng Q, Shan D, Cui K, Li K, Zhu B, Wu H, Wang B, Wong S, Norton V, Dong Y, et al. The Role of Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cardiovascular Disease. Cells. 2022; 11(11):1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111834

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Qianman, Dan Shan, Kui Cui, Kathryn Li, Bo Zhu, Hao Wu, Beibei Wang, Scott Wong, Vikram Norton, Yunzhou Dong, and et al. 2022. "The Role of Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cardiovascular Disease" Cells 11, no. 11: 1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111834

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop