Next Article in Journal
Structure and Development of the Legume-Rhizobial Symbiotic Interface in Infection Threads
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Biology of the WWOX Gene That Spans Chromosomal Fragile Site FRA16D
Previous Article in Journal
Hepatic Wnt1 Inducible Signaling Pathway Protein 1 (WISP-1/CCN4) Associates with Markers of Liver Fibrosis in Severe Obesity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neurological Disorders Associated with WWOX Germline Mutations—A Comprehensive Overview
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/cells10051051
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Functions of WWOX Potentially Involved in Cancer Development

by
Karim Taouis
,
Keltouma Driouch
,
Rosette Lidereau
and
François Lallemand
*
Pharmacogenomics Unit, Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(5), 1051; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051051
Submission received: 30 March 2021 / Revised: 23 April 2021 / Accepted: 25 April 2021 / Published: 29 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue WWOX: A Fragile Tumor Suppressor with Pleotropic Functions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The WW domain-containing oxidoreductase gene (WWOX) was cloned 21 years ago as a putative tumor suppressor gene mapping to chromosomal fragile site FRA16D. The localization of WWOX in a chromosomal region frequently altered in human cancers has initiated multiple current studies to establish its role in this disease. All of this work suggests that WWOX, due to its ability to interact with a large number of partners, exerts its tumor suppressive activity through a wide variety of molecular actions that are mostly cell specific.

1. Introduction

The WW domain-containing oxidoreductase gene (WWOX) was initially identified as a gene present in the chromosomal region 16q23.3-24.1 frequently affected by loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in various cancers [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Homozygous deletions of WWOX have also been detected in different cancer cells [7]. This gene, consisting of 1.1 million bases, is composed of 9 exons; its intron 8 contains the common fragile site FRA16D which would be the major cause of the instability of the 16q23.3-24.1 region [6]. The localization of WWOX in this unstable chromosomal region was the first argument suggesting that it is a tumor suppressor gene. As a result, many researchers have set out to study the possible association of WWOX with cancer.
WWOX encodes a protein of 414 amino acids composed of a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase central domain (SDR domain) that may be involved in sex-steroid metabolism and two NH2-terminus WW domains (WW1 and WW2) responsible for multiple protein-protein interactions [1,8,9,10]. So far, more than 570 interactors of WWOX have been identified [8,11] (https://thebiogrid.org/119707/summary/homo-sapiens/wwox.html, accessed date: 22 March 2021). Over time, numerous observations in the clinical setting and experimental results supporting the assumption that WWOX plays a critical role in cancer have accumulated.
First, in human tumors, WWOX expression has been shown to be decreased or absent in several types of cancer [12]. This low expression is associated with a poor prognosis in breast [13,14,15,16,17,18,19], ovarian [20], bladder [21], liver [22,23], and kidney cancers [24]. Immunohistochemistry studies have shown that WWOX protein levels can vary depending on tumor subtypes. In breast cancer, for instance, WWOX is more highly expressed in luminal tumors since WWOX is an estrogen-regulated gene. Loss of WWOX expression is associated with a poor prognosis in ER-negative breast tumors but not as much in ER-positive breast cancers [1,25,26]. Genomic losses appear to be the main mechanism leading to inhibition of WWOX expression. Thus, more than half of breast and ovarian cancers have heterozygous deletions within the WWOX gene [25]. WWOX expression is also inhibited by its hypermethylation in some cancer cells [26], and the tyrosine kinase Ack-1 phosphorylates WWOX on its tyrosine 287, which induces its polyubiquitination and thereby its degradation by the proteasome in prostate cancer [27]. However, WWOX mutations are rare events in cancers. It has been proposed that due to its localization in an unstable genomic region, WWOX suppressor activity is much more frequently inhibited by LOH and homozygous deletion than by point mutations [28]. Importantly, germline inactivation WWOX gene has been described in humans as leading to autosomal recessive disorders such as WOREE syndrome (WWOX-related epileptic encephalopathy). Even though homozygous deletions/mutations completely inactivating the WWOX gene are rare, neither the hundreds of patients reported worldwide nor the parents of these children, who by definition are WWOX haploinsufficient, developed neoplasia. Thus the role of WWOX in cancer is probably more prominent as a relevant gene in tumor progression rather than tumor initiation [29,30].
Secondly, the ability of WWOX to inhibit proliferation, support-dependent growth, migration, invasion, tumor growth, and metastasis of many different cell lines has been reported, which is consistent with tumor suppressive activity [15,17,26,31,32,33,34,35]. Moreover, different groups of researchers have defined WWOX as a proapoptotic protein, raising the possibility that WWOX may inhibit carcinogenesis by inducing cell death [3,14,32,36,37,38,39,40].
Thirdly, mouse models also shed light on the tumor suppressor activity of WWOX. Different models of mice carrying a targeted deletion of the Wwox gene have been generated. In a B6-129 mixed background, juvenile Wwox−/− mice exhibited more osteosarcomas than wild-type littermates, while more lung papillary carcinoma appeared in adult Wwox+/− mice in comparison with Wwox+/+ mice [41]. Heterozygous Wwox+/− mice also showed a higher incidence of ethyl nitrosourea-induced lung tumors and lymphomas than control mice. Interestingly, tumors from Wwox+/− mice expressed a low level of Wwox protein, suggesting that haploinsufficiency of WWOX could promote carcinogenesis. Consistent with this hypothesis, Abdeen et al. showed that the Wwox+/− tumor-susceptible C3H mice had a higher frequency of mammary tumors than control mice [42]. Ludes-Meyers et al. reported that a Wwox hypomorphic female mice had a higher incidence of spontaneous B-cell lymphomas [43]. However, it should be noted that other groups have also generated Wwox knockout mice showing no spontaneous neoplasia [44,45]. In particular, Chou et al. have recently shown that skin development is impaired in Wwox−/− mice but they have not described any tumor [46]. Moreover, Suzuki et al. did not report any tumors in the lde/lde rats which have spontaneous homozygous inactivation of the Wwox locus [47]. The reasons for these discrepancies remain to be determined. One possibility might be that the Wwox KO mice have extremely fragile bones. Frequent fractures can occur in newborn mice and the originally diagnosed periosteal osteosarcomas might be misdiagnoses. Since knockout mice led to early postnatal lethality, conditional Wwox deletion, by means of Cre recombinase approaches have been performed in different mice tissues. The study of these animal models has shown that the ablation of Wwox in the epithelium of the mammary glands of C3H mice or in the liver of C57BL6/j;129v mice treated with diethylnitrosamine, increases tumorigenesis [22,48]. However, Wwox ablation in the mammary gland, the bones (osteoblasts), or the liver in strains other than C3H mice has been shown to be non-carcinogenic. WWOX loss would therefore contribute to the progression of carcinogenesis rather than the initiation of the tumor [22,49,50,51].
Fourth, Chang et al. reported that different peptides of WWOX (WWOX286-299, WWOX7-21, and WWOX7-11) injected into the tail vein of mice inhibit the growth of melanoma B16F12 cells inoculated into the flanks, revealing their potential use in anticancer treatments [52,53]. Additionally, the WWOX7-21 peptide promotes ceritinib-mediated 4T1 breast-cancer stem cells apoptosis [53]. The authors assume that these peptides mimic the anticancer function of endogenous WWOX.
Fifth, the same group demonstrated that the WWOX-deficient metastatic cancer cells escape from WWOX-expressing cells by retrograde migration and by inducing apoptosis of the latter [54]. These results strongly suggest that the WWOX-deficient cells must suppress WWOX-expressing cells to metastasize.
The extensive study of the molecular functions of WWOX has provided many other arguments, leaving little doubt that WWOX plays an important role in cancer, which would therefore be associated with tumor progression. In this review, we discuss some molecular functions of WWOX, which may explain its anticarcinogenic activity. In particular, we described the main molecular partners of WWOX involved in these molecular functions (Table 1).

2. WWOX a Positive Regulator of Cell Death

Different groups of researchers have highlighted that WWOX induces cell death via multiple cell-specific molecular mechanisms. The inhibition of WWOX expression would therefore make cancer cells resistant to cell death, which is favorable to the development of cancer.
Chang et al. were the first to define WWOX as a proapoptotic protein raising the possibility that WWOX might inhibit carcinogenesis by inducing this type of cell death [3]. WWOX is crucial for various stress stimuli, such as TNF (tumor necrosis factor), UV (ultraviolet) light, and ectopic expression of the proapoptotic protein p53, to mediate cell death in different cell lines [37]. In response to stimuli such as UV light, WWOX is phosphorylated on its tyrosine 33 located in the WW1 domain (pY33-WWOX). This phosphorylation promotes the WWOX-p53 association and the translocation of the complex to the nucleus. WWOX increases the stabilization of p53. Mutant forms of WWOX, unable to translocate to the nucleus or to be phosphorylated on their tyrosine 33, are less effective at inducing apoptosis than wild-type WWOX [36]. Altogether, these observations indicate that WWOX is a proapoptotic protein acting by binding p53 in the nucleus. However, it has also been reported that WWOX induces apoptosis in p53-deficient human lung cancer NCI-H1299 cells, thus WWOX is also able to stimulate programmed cell death independently of p53 [3].
In agreement with this last observation, by using two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation analyses, the same group have highlighted the interactions of WWOX with TRADD (tumor necrosis factor receptor type 1) and TRAF2 (TNF receptor-associated factor 2), two components of the TNF signaling pathways, suggesting that WWOX may modulate TNF-dependent cell death by regulating the function of these two proteins in TNF signaling [55].
In addition, sciatic nerve transection in rat induces (1) expression of WWOX; (2) nuclear translocation of pY33-WWOX with several proteins involved in transcription: p-CREB (cyclic AMP responsive element binding protein 1), JNK (c-Jun amino-terminal kinase), c-Jun (AP-1 transcription factor subunit), NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1), and ATF3 (activating transcription factor 3); (3) the pY33-WWOX-p-CREB interaction; and then (4) apoptosis. Moreover, CREB enhances the apoptotic function of WWOX in human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells. These results suggest that WWOX induces apoptosis in neurons by interacting with CREB in the nucleus [56].
They have also determined that the cytokine TGF-β1 (transforming growth factor β1) binds to Hyal-2 (hyaluronidase 2) located on the cell surface. The binding of TGF-β1 to Hyal-2 induces the pY33-WWOX-Hyal-2 interaction and the translocation of the resulting complex to the nucleus. This complex then activates SMAD (mothers against decapentaplegic homolog)-dependent transcription and apoptosis in human colon HCT116 cells [57,58]. In addition, HA (hyaluronan), one of the main components of the extracellular matrix, induces the nuclear translocation of WWOX, Hyal-2 and SMAD4 (mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4) in several cell lines [57]. HA induces WWOX-Hyal-2-SMAD4 complex formation and bubbling cell death in human prostate cancer DU145 cells. By interacting with SMAD4 and Hyal-2, WWOX would therefore be able to induce different types of cell death [57].
In parallel, Aqeilan et al. reported that the WW1 domain of WWOX binds to the PPPY487 motif of the proapoptotic protein p73 (a p53 homolog) in human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells [38]. The phosphorylation of WWOX on its tyrosine 33 by the SRC kinase, enhances this interaction. WWOX sequesters p73 in the cytoplasm (in NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts and human breast MCF7 cells), and cytoplasmic p73 contributes to the proapoptotic activity of WWOX (in human osteosarcoma SAOS-2 cells). These results suggest that the WWOX-p73 cytoplasmic complex would induce apoptosis in specific cells.
Another group has shown that a dominant-negative form of WWOX or WWOX knockdown can inhibit apoptosis induced by PMA (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate) in human Jurkat T cells. PMA-induced apoptosis is associated with dissociation of the WWOX-MEK1 (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1) complex located in lysosomes, and translocation of WWOX into mitochondria. WWOX could therefore induce mitochondrial apoptosis in Jurkat T cells [59] (Figure 1).

3. WWOX Associates with Cancer-Linked Transcription Factors and Inhibits Their Transcriptional Activity

WWOW has been clearly shown to negatively modulate various oncogenic transcription factors. The inhibition of the expression of WWOX could therefore induce an over activity of the latter, thus enhancing carcinogenesis.
The AP-2 (transcription factor AP-2) family is composed of five transcription factors (AP-2α, AP-2β, AP-2γ, AP-2δ, and AP-2ε) [71]. AP-2γ exhibits the characteristics of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes depending on the type of cancerous tissue. It is overexpressed in invasive breast cancer and triple-negative breast tumor (absence of estrogen and progesterone receptor expressions, and overexpression of ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4)). This overexpression is associated with a poorer response to endocrine therapy and with reduced patient survival [16,72,73,74]. WWOX interacts with AP-2 γ and, to a lesser extent, AP-2α [62]. The WW1 domain of WWOX and the PPPYFPPPY64 motif of AP-2γ are involved in this interaction. Using NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts and human cervical cancer Hela cells as cell models, ectopic expression of WWOX has been shown to inhibit the transcriptional activity of AP-2γ by sequestrating it into the cytoplasmic compartment.
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR/ERBB1), ERBB2, ERBB3, and ERBB4 are members of the epidermal growth factor receptor subfamily of the receptor tyrosine kinases family [75]. Activation of ERBB4 leads to the stimulation of the Ras/mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-K)/Akt pathways, and to the release of its intracellular domain (CTF) in the cytoplasm. CTF then moves to the nucleus where it functions as a coactivator or a corepressor for different transcription factors such as yes-associated protein (YAP). The role of ERBB4 in cancer is still unclear. Series of experimental studies suggest that it has both oncogenic and tumor suppressive functions in this cancer. With the HEK293 and Hela cells as cell models, the WW1 domain of WWOX has been reported to bind to two PPxY motifs of ERBB4 (PPIY1037 and PPPY1285) [63]. WWOX competes with YAP for CTF and sequesters CTF in the cytoplasm, thereby inhibiting the transcriptional activity of the CTF-YAP complex.
AP-1 (Activator protein-1) designates a family of oncogenic transcription factors whose activity is modulated by numerous intracellular signaling pathways controlling differentiation, migration, proliferation, and apoptosis [76]. AP-1 functions as homo- or hetero-dimeric combinations of proteins of the JUN and FOS sub-families. Different observations suggest that C-JUN, a member of the JUN sub-family, plays an important role in various types of cancers. Indeed, this protein is overexpressed in several cancers including breast, colorectal, and lung cancers. Moreover, overexpression of C-JUN in the breast cell line MCF7 has been shown to stimulate a tumorigenic and invasive phenotype. WWOX, via its WW1 domain, binds the PPPY64 motif of C-JUN and sequesters it in the cytoplasm, thereby inhibiting its transcriptional activity [64].
RUNX2 (Runt-related transcription factor 2), belonging to the RUNX family, is an oncogenic transcription factor that interacts with multiple cell-specific co-regulators to modulate gene expression [77,78]. It plays an important role in breast, ovarian, prostate, and other cancers. In breast cancer, RUNX2 is crucial for invasion and bone metastasis [79,80]. WWOX interacts with RUNX2 via its WW1 domain and inhibits its transcriptional activity in various cell types [65]. WWOX binds to RUNX2 located on the osteocalcin promoter and inhibits its positive effect on the activity of this promoter in the mouse osteoblast MC3T3 cells. Therefore, WWOX does not inhibit the transcriptional activity of RUNX2 by sequestrating it in the cytoplasm but rather as a transcriptional corepressor. Ectopic expression of WWOX in different osteosarcoma cell lines inhibits metastasis, and the expression of RUNX2 and its target genes such as VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor gene) involved in angiogenesis and MMP13 (matrix metalloproteinase-13 gene) involved in invasion [81]. Zheng’s study strongly suggests that WWOX inhibits invasion of lung cancer cells by inhibiting RUNX2 expression [82].

4. WWOX Interacts and Affects the Function of Components of Oncogenic Pathways

Various studies have provided experimental arguments indicating that WWOX is a negative regulator of the oncogenic pathways: Wnt (Wingless)/β-catenin, TGFβ1/SMAD and JAK2 (Janus kinase 2)/STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) signaling pathways. The inhibition of the expression of WWOX would increase their activity to an aberrant level, thus promoting the development of many types of cancer.
The Wnt/β-catein pathway modulates proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, migration, invasion, and tissue homeostasis; its aberrant activation stimulates the development of cancers including colon and breast cancers [83,84,85]. This pathway regulates the transcriptional activity of Tcf (T-cell factor) and Lef (lymphoid enhancer factors) by modulating the stability of β-catenin [86]. In the absence of secreted Wnt ligand, GSK3β (glycogen synthase kinase3β) and CK1α (casein kinase 1α) integrated in the degradation complex of β-catenin, phosphorylate β-catenin, this induces its ubiquitination and therefore its degradation by the 26S proteasome. The association of the Wnt ligand with its receptors (Frizzled and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein) inhibits the phosphorylation of β-catenin by GSK3β and CK1α, which induces its accumulation in the nucleus. In the nuclear compartment, β-catenin associates with Tcf and Lef and stimulates their transcriptional activity thus activating the expression of target genes. BCL9-2 (B-cell CLL/lymphoma 9-like protein), a component of the BCL9 family of vertebrate, is a nuclear coactivator of β-catenin in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [87]. Dishevelled proteins1, 2 and 3 (Dvl-1, 2, and 3) are crucial for the Wnt/β-catein pathway to stabilize β-catenin and the β-catenin-Tcf interaction [88,89]. Nuclear translocation of Dvl proteins is required for their function in Wnt/β-catenin signaling [88]. WWOX has been defined as a novel inhibitor of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [60,61]. In HEK293 and the breast cell line MCF7 as cellular models, WWOX has been shown to interact with Dvl and BCL9-2 proteins [8,60,61,90]. The WW1 domain of WWOX, the PPPY568 motif of Dvl-2, and the PPPY561 motif of BCL9-2 play important roles in these interactions. It has been suggested that WWOX inhibits this pathway at least in part by (1) sequestrating Dvl-2 in the cytoplasm and (2) binding BCL9-2 in the nucleus and suppressing its transcriptional activity.
The cytokine TGFβ1 modulates multiple cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, and thus plays a crucial role in embryogenesis and homeostasis of adult tissues [91]. TGFβ1 acts by activating several intracellular signaling pathways, including Erk (extracellular signal-regulated kinase), JNK, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase), SMAD, and other pathways. Regarding the SMAD pathway, the binding of TGFβ1 to its receptors (TGFβ type I (TβRI) and TGFβ type II (TβRII)) induces the phosphorylation of SMAD3 (mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3) by TβRI. This phosphorylation induces the association of SMAD3 with SMAD4 and the translocation of the resulting complex to the nucleus where it modulates the transcription of targets genes. TGFβ1 plays an intricate role in cancer. It has tumor suppressive activity during the first stages of carcinogenesis but promotes cancer development in the later stages. Ferguson and collaborators have shown that WWOX inhibits the transcriptional activity of TGFβ1 in the breast cell line MCF10 [34]. WWOX, via its WW1 domain, binds SMAD3 and sequesters it to the cytoplasm. WWOX would therefore inhibit the TGFβ1/SMAD pathway at least in part by sequestrating SMAD3 in the cytoplasm.
The JAK2/STAT3 pathway consists of the intracellular protein tyrosine kinase JAK2 and the transcription factor STAT3 [92]. This pathway mediates the signaling of various cytokines, growth factors, and hormones. The association of JAK2 with the intracellular part of its receptor induces the phosphorylation of STAT3 by JAK2, leading to the translocation of STAT3 in the nucleus where it stimulates the transcription of target genes. The JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway is aberrantly activated in various tumors types, which is generally associated with poor prognosis [93]. Chang and collaborators showed that WWOX interacts with JAK2 and STAT3 via its WW1 domain. WWOX prevents phosphorylation of JAK2 and STAT3, and inhibits the transcriptional activity of STAT3 in different TNBC (triple-negative breast cancer) cell lines [15]. Expression of WWOX and phosphorylated STAT3 are negatively correlated in breast cancer cells. Ectopic expression of WWOX inhibits migration, tumor proliferation and metastasis of TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231. This ectopic expression also inhibits the migration and growth of cells induced by STAT3 in NIH3T3. These results strongly suggest that the loss of WWOX drives metastasis in TNBC by JAK2/STAT3 axis [15] (Figure 2).
Ezrin is an actin-binding protein belonging to the ERM (Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin) family of proteins that regulate cell polarity, adhesion, and invasion through the control of various signaling pathways [94]. Ezrin has been shown to promote cell migration and invasion in several types of cancer where high protein expression has been correlated with poor patient prognosis. The interaction of Ezrin and WWOX has been revealed in gastric parietal cells. PKA-mediated phosphorylation of Ezrin regulates Ezrin–WWOX interaction and WWOX targeting to apical membranes of cells. The Ezrin-WWOX complex may play a role in the remodeling of the apical membrane cytoskeleton and the recruitment of the pump of proton H,K-ATPase to apical membrane upon activation of the parietal cell [68]. The role of the WWOX-Ezrin complex in cancer has yet to be determined.

5. WWOX, the Hypoxia-Inducible Transcription Factor 1α (HIF1α) and the Warburg Effect

Most tumor cells need to synthesize their ATP mainly via anaerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect) to proliferate under hypoxic conditions and generate glycolytic intermediates involved in the biosynthesis of macromolecules and organelles essential for assembling new cells [95]. HIF1α, overexpressed in common human cancers, is essential to this cellular adaptation [96]. This transcription factor induces glycolysis by upregulating the expression of various genes of the glycolytic pathway (hexokinase 1 and 2, glucose transporters 1 and 3, lactate dehydrogenase-A), and restricts mitochondrial respiration by stimulating pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-1.
Inactivation of the WWOX gene in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (KO-MEFs) increases the glucose uptake, improves glycolysis, reduces mitochondrial respiration, stimulates expression of HIF1α target genes, and promotes tumorigenicity [97]. Inhibition of HIF1α expression prevents increased of glucose uptake and tumorigenicity in the KO-MEFs [97]. Using WWOX liver-specific knockout mice, it has also been reported that inhibition of HIF1α significantly delays hepatocellular carcinoma induced by loss of WWOX expression [22]. WWOX, via its WW1 domain, interacts with HIF1α and induces its degradation [97].
These results strongly suggest that the loss of expression of WWOX would induce the expression of HIF1α, thus promoting anaerobic glycolysis and therefore cancer (Figure 3).

6. WWOX, a Genome Stability Gatekeeper

The maintenance of genome stability is essential to cell survival and the elimination of DNA disorders that can cause cancer. To maintain their genome integrity, cells have developed many molecular mechanisms to repair their DNA damages [98,99,100].
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most dangerous forms of DNA damage [98]. Two major molecular mechanisms are involved in DSB repair: NHEJ (Non homologous end joining) and HR (homologous recombination) [101]. NHEJ, active throughout the cell cycle, joins broken ends by religation. HR, considered to be more faithful than NHEJ, induces recombination between sister chromatids during the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. The MRE11 (Meiotic recombinase 11)-RAD50-NBS1 (Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome 1) complex initiates repair of DSBs by recognizing and binding them. This complex then recruits and activates the ATM protein kinase. ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) induces NHEJ or HR, depending on the intracellular context and the location of the DSBs [102,103]. To induce HR, ATM phosphorylates many substrates such as BRCA1 (breast cancer type 1) and CtIP (DNA endonuclease RBBP8). These substrates promote the resection of the DNA ends on either side of the DNA break to generate single stranded ends that will be coated by RPA (replication protein A) then by RAD51(recombinase RAD51). The resulting nucleoprotein filaments invade the complementary strand of the sister chromatid, thus allowing DNA synthesis.
Recently, different groups of researchers have demonstrated that WWOX plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the genome. Indeed, WWOX knockout in MEFs exhibits chromosomal alterations and copy number variations [67]. Inhibition of WWOX expression increases the number of DSBs induced by the radiomimetic drug neocarzinostatin in the breast cell line MCF7 [66]. Abu-Odeh et al. showed that WWOX, via its WW1 domain, interacts with ATM (in MCF7 cells) and stimulates its protein kinase activity (in MEF and different breast cell lines) [66]. DSBs lead to the K63-linked polyubiquitination of the lysine 274 of WWOX by the E3 ligase ITCH (E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase itchy homologue), which induces the translocation of WWOX to the nucleus and its association with ATM. Ectopic expression of WWOX in the osteosarcoma U2OS cells induces HR. This research team has provided experimental arguments suggesting that WWOX also promotes repair of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) by enhancing the activity of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) through an ATM-dependent mechanism in different cell lines [104]. WWOX would therefore be a key player in preserving the integrity of the genome by being involved in HR and SSBs.
However, Schrock et al. have shown that WWOX inhibits HR, thus promoting DSB repair by NHEJ in MDA-MB-231 breast cell line [67]. WWOX also inhibits HR in human osteosarcoma U87 cells and Hela cells. Although it has been demonstrated that WWOX has to interact with BRCA1 to inhibit HR, the mechanism by which WWOX acts on this DNA repair mechanism remains largely unknown. The molecular mechanisms by which WWOX maintains the stability of the genome therefore depend on the type of cell. The determination of cells in which WWOX inhibits HR is crucial because it has been demonstrated that enhanced HR in WWOX-deficient cells results in resistance to radiation and cisplatin [67].
The loss of WWOX could therefore lead to genomic instability, which would promote cancer (Figure 3).

7. WWOX in the Regulation of Protein Trafficking to the Endosomes, Golgi, and Lysosomes

Interestingly, WWOX binds several proteins playing a role in protein trafficking and in targeting proteins to different subcellular compartments or to lysosomes for degradation [11,70]. Whether these molecular partners, such as SEC23IP (protein transport protein Sec23A-interacting protein), SCAMP3 (secretory carrier-associated membrane protein 3), or LITAF (lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha factor homologue), also known as SIMPLE (small membrane protein of the lysosome/late endosome), are involved in cancer progression has not been completely elucidated. However, recent findings may indicate that these proteins are cancer-related. For example, SCAMP3 protein was found to be an important regulator of EGFR trafficking and was suggested to play a critical role in EGFR-driven cancers [105]. In the same way, the LITAF protein has been proposed as a tumor suppressor frequently downregulated in several cancer types. The downregulation of LITAF induces cell growth, inhibits apoptosis, and induces cell migration in cancer cells [106]. In addition, the cancer-promoting proteins, TMEM207 (transmembrane protein 207) and VOPP1 (vesicular overexpressed in cancer pro-survival protein 1), found overexpressed in various cancers, bind to WWOX and inhibit its tumor-suppressor activity not by inhibiting its expression but its ability to associate with some protein partners [14,69,107]. It is therefore conceivable that a cell expressing VOPP1, TMEM207, or both, could be cancerous even though it expresses a high level of WWOX [108]. Thus, WWOX may act as an adapter protein with pleiotropic functions resulting from a network of interactions regulating the transcription, the localization, or the degradation of key cancer-related proteins.

8. The Function of WWOX in Cancer Development Is Regulated by Its Phosphorylation State

We have seen that the phosphorylation of WWOX on its tyrosine 33 is crucial for its apoptotic activity. Chang et al. recently demonstrated that the phosphorylation of WWOX on its serine 14 also plays a fundamental role in the anticancer function of WWOX. Indeed, melanoma B16F10 cells inoculated into mice metastasize to the lung. pS14-WWOX is expressed in the B16F10 cells infiltrated into this organ, and the injection of Zfra via tail veins prevents B16F10 cells from metastasizing and inhibits the phosphorylation of WWOX on its serine 14 [109,110]. Additionally, the injection of pS14-WWOX7-21 peptide promotes B16F10 cell growth [52,53]. The pS14-WWOX7-21 peptide blocks, while pS14-WWOX antiserum promotes, ceritinib-mediated 4T1 breast cancer stem cells apoptosis [53]. The authors hypothesize that this phosphorylated peptide recapitulates the functional properties of endogenous pS14-WWOX. Altogether, these results strongly suggest that pS14-WWOX promotes cancer cell growth, at least in part, by inhibiting apoptosis. However, the mechanism by which pS14-WWOX acts on cell death remains to be elucidated.

9. Conclusions

Numerous scientific studies provide evidence that inhibition or loss of WWOX expression can promote cancer in a variety of ways: by inducing cell death resistance, proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis formation, anaerobic glycolysis, or genome instability. WWOX’s broad spectrum of action is possible because of its ability to modulate many molecular mechanisms through the interaction with multiple protein partners. Most of these molecular mechanisms appear to be cell specific. The tumor suppressor activity of WWOX in a given cell type would therefore be dependent on the availability of one or more of its protein partners. The absence of this availability could explain the existence of cancerous cells expressing high levels of WWOX.
To fully understand the tumor suppressor activity of WWOX, much work needs to be done in order to define all WWOX’s molecular mechanisms and their cell type specificities. Additionally, it has been suggested that the phosphorylation of WWOX on its serine 14 facilitates cancer progression. The research into the presence of this phosphorylated form of WWOX in cancer cells, and the determination of the molecular mechanisms responsible of this phosphorylation, also need to be performed. This work is particularly indispensable for the potential use of WWOX expression as a marker of prognosis and a significant predictor of response to some cancer treatments, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Author Contributions

All authors (K.T., K.D., R.L. and F.L.) participated to the writing. They read it and accepted to the published version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Breast Cancer Research Foundation: BCRF-20-097.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bednarek, A.K.; Laflin, K.J.; Daniel, R.L.; Liao, Q.; Hawkins, K.A.; Aldaz, C.M. WWOX, a Novel WW Domain-Containing Protein Mapping to Human Chromosome 16q23.3-24.1, a Region Frequently Affected in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 2140–2145. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bièche, I.; Lidereau, R. Genetic Alterations in Breast Cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1995, 14, 227–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chang, N.S.; Pratt, N.; Heath, J.; Schultz, L.; Sleve, D.; Carey, G.B.; Zevotek, N. Hyaluronidase Induction of a WW Domain-Containing Oxidoreductase That Enhances Tumor Necrosis Factor Cytotoxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 3361–3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Chen, T.; Sahin, A.; Aldaz, C.M. Deletion Map of Chromosome 16q in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: Refining a Putative Tumor Suppressor Gene Region. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 5605–5609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Driouch, K.; Dorion-Bonnet, F.; Briffod, M.; Champéme, M.H.; Longy, M.; Lidereau, R. Loss of Heterozygosity on Chromosome Arm 16q in Breast Cancer Metastases. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997, 19, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ried, K.; Finnis, M.; Hobson, L.; Mangelsdorf, M.; Dayan, S.; Nancarrow, J.K.; Woollatt, E.; Kremmidiotis, G.; Gardner, A.; Venter, D.; et al. Common Chromosomal Fragile Site FRA16D Sequence: Identification of the FOR Gene Spanning FRA16D and Homozygous Deletions and Translocation Breakpoints in Cancer Cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9, 1651–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Paige, A.J.; Taylor, K.J.; Taylor, C.; Hillier, S.G.; Farrington, S.; Scott, D.; Porteous, D.J.; Smyth, J.F.; Gabra, H.; Watson, J.E. WWOX: A Candidate Tumor Suppressor Gene Involved in Multiple Tumor Types. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 11417–11422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Abu-Odeh, M.; Bar-Mag, T.; Huang, H.; Kim, T.; Salah, Z.; Abdeen, S.K.; Sudol, M.; Reichmann, D.; Sidhu, S.; Kim, P.M.; et al. Characterizing WW Domain Interactions of Tumor Suppressor WWOX Reveals Its Association with Multiprotein Networks. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 8865–8880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Aqeilan, R.I.; Hagan, J.P.; de Bruin, A.; Rawahneh, M.; Salah, Z.; Gaudio, E.; Siddiqui, H.; Volinia, S.; Alder, H.; Lian, J.B.; et al. Targeted Ablation of the WW Domain-Containing Oxidoreductase Tumor Suppressor Leads to Impaired Steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 1530–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sałuda-Gorgul, A.; Seta, K.; Nowakowska, M.; Bednarek, A.K. WWOX Oxidoreductase--Substrate and Enzymatic Characterization. Z. Naturforsch. C J. Biosci. 2011, 66, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hussain, T.; Lee, J.; Abba, M.C.; Chen, J.; Aldaz, C.M. Delineating WWOX Protein Interactome by Tandem Affinity Purification-Mass Spectrometry: Identification of Top Interactors and Key Metabolic Pathways Involved. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baryła, I.; Styczeń-Binkowska, E.; Bednarek, A.K. Alteration of WWOX in Human Cancer: A Clinical View. Exp. Biol. Med. 2015, 240, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Aqeilan, R.I.; Donati, V.; Gaudio, E.; Nicoloso, M.S.; Sundvall, M.; Korhonen, A.; Lundin, J.; Isola, J.; Sudol, M.; Joensuu, H.; et al. Association of Wwox with ErbB4 in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 9330–9336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bonin, F.; Taouis, K.; Azorin, P.; Petitalot, A.; Tariq, Z.; Nola, S.; Bouteille, N.; Tury, S.; Vacher, S.; Bièche, I.; et al. VOPP1 Promotes Breast Tumorigenesis by Interacting with the Tumor Suppressor WWOX. BMC Biol. 2018, 16, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chang, R.; Song, L.; Xu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Dai, C.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Hou, Y.; Li, W.; Zhan, X.; et al. Loss of Wwox Drives Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by JAK2/STAT3 Axis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guler, G.; Uner, A.; Guler, N.; Han, S.-Y.; Iliopoulos, D.; Hauck, W.W.; McCue, P.; Huebner, K. The Fragile Genes FHIT and WWOX Are Inactivated Coordinately in Invasive Breast Carcinoma. Cancer 2004, 100, 1605–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khawaled, S.; Suh, S.S.; Abdeen, S.K.; Monin, J.; Distefano, R.; Nigita, G.; Croce, C.M.; Aqeilan, R.I. WWOX Inhibits Metastasis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells via Modulation of MiRNAs. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 1784–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Nunez, M.I.; Ludes-Meyers, J.; Abba, M.C.; Kil, H.; Abbey, N.W.; Page, R.E.; Sahin, A.; Klein-Szanto, A.J.P.; Aldaz, C.M. Frequent Loss of WWOX Expression in Breast Cancer: Correlation with Estrogen Receptor Status. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2005, 89, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Płuciennik, E.; Kusińska, R.; Potemski, P.; Kubiak, R.; Kordek, R.; Bednarek, A.K. WWOX--the FRA16D Cancer Gene: Expression Correlation with Breast Cancer Progression and Prognosis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006, 32, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nunez, M.I.; Rosen, D.G.; Ludes-Meyers, J.H.; Abba, M.C.; Kil, H.; Page, R.; Klein-Szanto, A.J.P.; Godwin, A.K.; Liu, J.; Mills, G.B.; et al. WWOX Protein Expression Varies among Ovarian Carcinoma Histotypes and Correlates with Less Favorable Outcome. BMC Cancer 2005, 5, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ramos, D.; Abba, M.; López-Guerrero, J.A.; Rubio, J.; Solsona, E.; Almenar, S.; Llombart-Bosch, A.; Aldaz, C.M. Low Levels of WWOX Protein Immunoexpression Correlate with Tumour Grade and a Less Favourable Outcome in Patients with Urinary Bladder Tumours. Histopathology 2008, 52, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Abu-Remaileh, M.; Khalaileh, A.; Pikarsky, E.; Aqeilan, R.I. WWOX Controls Hepatic HIF1α to Suppress Hepatocyte Proliferation and Neoplasia. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lin, J.; Wang, B.; Huang, A.; Wang, X. The relationship between FHIT and WWOX expression and clinicopathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 2010, 18, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lin, J.-T.; Tzai, T.-S.; Liao, C.-Y.; Wang, J.-S.; Wu, T.T.; Wang, H.-Y.; Wu, C.-H.; Yu, C.-C.; Lu, P.-J. WWOX Protein Expression Varies among RCC Histotypes and Downregulation of WWOX Protein Correlates with Less-Favorable Prognosis in Clear RCC. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2013, 20, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aldaz, C.M.; Ferguson, B.W.; Abba, M.C. WWOX at the Crossroads of Cancer, Metabolic Syndrome Related Traits and CNS Pathologies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1846, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Del Mare, S.; Salah, Z.; Aqeilan, R.I. WWOX: Its Genomics, Partners, and Functions. J. Cell. Biochem. 2009, 108, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mahajan, N.P.; Whang, Y.E.; Mohler, J.L.; Earp, H.S. Activated Tyrosine Kinase Ack1 Promotes Prostate Tumorigenesis: Role of Ack1 in Polyubiquitination of Tumor Suppressor Wwox. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 10514–10523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Schrock, M.S.; Huebner, K. WWOX: A Fragile Tumor Suppressor. Exp. Biol. Med. 2015, 240, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aldaz, C.M.; Hussain, T. WWOX Loss of Function in Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Piard, J.; Hawkes, L.; Milh, M.; Villard, L.; Borgatti, R.; Romaniello, R.; Fradin, M.; Capri, Y.; Héron, D.; Nougues, M.-C.; et al. The Phenotypic Spectrum of WWOX-Related Disorders: 20 Additional Cases of WOREE Syndrome and Review of the Literature. Genet. Med. 2019, 21, 1308–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bednarek, A.K.; Keck-Waggoner, C.L.; Daniel, R.L.; Laflin, K.J.; Bergsagel, P.L.; Kiguchi, K.; Brenner, A.J.; Aldaz, C.M. WWOX, the FRA16D Gene, Behaves as a Suppressor of Tumor Growth. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 8068–8073. [Google Scholar]
  32. Aderca, I.; Moser, C.D.; Veerasamy, M.; Bani-Hani, A.H.; Bonilla-Guerrero, R.; Ahmed, K.; Shire, A.; Cazanave, S.C.; Montoya, D.P.; Mettler, T.A.; et al. The JNK Inhibitor SP600129 Enhances Apoptosis of HCC Cells Induced by the Tumor Suppressor WWOX. J. Hepatol. 2008, 49, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Gourley, C.; Paige, A.J.W.; Taylor, K.J.; Ward, C.; Kuske, B.; Zhang, J.; Sun, M.; Janczar, S.; Harrison, D.J.; Muir, M.; et al. WWOX Gene Expression Abolishes Ovarian Cancer Tumorigenicity In Vivo and Decreases Attachment to Fibronectin via Integrin A3. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 4835–4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ferguson, B.W.; Gao, X.; Zelazowski, M.J.; Lee, J.; Jeter, C.R.; Abba, M.C.; Aldaz, C.M. The Cancer Gene WWOX Behaves as an Inhibitor of SMAD3 Transcriptional Activity via Direct Binding. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Chen, S.; Wang, H.; Huang, Y.-F.; Li, M.-L.; Cheng, J.-H.; Hu, P.; Lu, C.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, N.; Tzeng, C.-M.; et al. WW Domain-Binding Protein 2: An Adaptor Protein Closely Linked to the Development of Breast Cancer. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Chang, N.-S.; Doherty, J.; Ensign, A. JNK1 Physically Interacts with WW Domain-Containing Oxidoreductase (WOX1) and Inhibits WOX1-Mediated Apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 9195–9202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Chang, N.-S.; Doherty, J.; Ensign, A.; Schultz, L.; Hsu, L.-J.; Hong, Q. WOX1 Is Essential for Tumor Necrosis Factor-, UV Light-, Staurosporine-, and P53-Mediated Cell Death, and Its Tyrosine 33-Phosphorylated Form Binds and Stabilizes Serine 46-Phosphorylated P53. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 43100–43108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Aqeilan, R.I.; Pekarsky, Y.; Herrero, J.J.; Palamarchuk, A.; Letofsky, J.; Druck, T.; Trapasso, F.; Han, S.-Y.; Melino, G.; Huebner, K.; et al. Functional Association between Wwox Tumor Suppressor Protein and P73, a P53 Homolog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 4401–4406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Huang, Q.; Zhu, K.; Liu, C.; Xie, F.; Xu, P.; Tang, Z. Expression of WW domain containing oxidoreductase gene in cholangiocarcinoma and its effect on the biological behavior of cancer cell line RBE. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2011, 49, 324–329. [Google Scholar]
  40. Chou, P.-Y.; Lin, S.-R.; Lee, M.-H.; Schultz, L.; Sze, C.-I.; Chang, N.-S. A P53/TIAF1/WWOX Triad Exerts Cancer Suppression but May Cause Brain Protein Aggregation Due to P53/WWOX Functional Antagonism. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019, 17, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Aqeilan, R.I.; Trapasso, F.; Hussain, S.; Costinean, S.; Marshall, D.; Pekarsky, Y.; Hagan, J.P.; Zanesi, N.; Kaou, M.; Stein, G.S.; et al. Targeted Deletion of Wwox Reveals a Tumor Suppressor Function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 3949–3954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Abdeen, S.K.; Salah, Z.; Maly, B.; Smith, Y.; Tufail, R.; Abu-Odeh, M.; Zanesi, N.; Croce, C.M.; Nawaz, Z.; Aqeilan, R.I. Wwox Inactivation Enhances Mammary Tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2011, 30, 3900–3906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ludes-Meyers, J.H.; Kil, H.; Nuñez, M.I.; Conti, C.J.; Parker-Thornburg, J.; Bedford, M.T.; Aldaz, C.M. WWOX Hypomorphic Mice Display a Higher Incidence of B-Cell Lymphomas and Develop Testicular Atrophy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2007, 46, 1129–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Cheng, Y.-Y.; Chou, Y.-T.; Lai, F.-J.; Jan, M.-S.; Chang, T.-H.; Jou, I.-M.; Chen, P.-S.; Lo, J.-Y.; Huang, S.-S.; Chang, N.-S.; et al. Wwox Deficiency Leads to Neurodevelopmental and Degenerative Neuropathies and Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β-Mediated Epileptic Seizure Activity in Mice. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2020, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ludes-Meyers, J.H.; Kil, H.; Parker-Thornburg, J.; Kusewitt, D.F.; Bedford, M.T.; Aldaz, C.M. Generation and Characterization of Mice Carrying a Conditional Allele of the Wwox Tumor Suppressor Gene. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chou, Y.-T.; Lai, F.-J.; Chang, N.-S.; Hsu, L.-J. Wwox Deficiency Causes Downregulation of Prosurvival ERK Signaling and Abnormal Homeostatic Responses in Mouse Skin. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 558432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Suzuki, H.; Katayama, K.; Takenaka, M.; Amakasu, K.; Saito, K.; Suzuki, K. A Spontaneous Mutation of the Wwox Gene and Audiogenic Seizures in Rats with Lethal Dwarfism and Epilepsy. Genes Brain Behav. 2009, 8, 650–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Abdeen, S.K.; Ben-David, U.; Shweiki, A.; Maly, B.; Aqeilan, R.I. Somatic Loss of WWOX Is Associated with TP53 Perturbation in Basal-like Breast Cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Ferguson, B.W.; Gao, X.; Kil, H.; Lee, J.; Benavides, F.; Abba, M.C.; Aldaz, C.M. Conditional Wwox Deletion in Mouse Mammary Gland by Means of Two Cre Recombinase Approaches. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Abdeen, S.K.; Salah, Z.; Khawaled, S.; Aqeilan, R.I. Characterization of WWOX Inactivation in Murine Mammary Gland Development. J. Cell. Physiol. 2013, 228, 1391–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Del Mare, S.; Husanie, H.; Iancu, O.; Abu-Odeh, M.; Evangelou, K.; Lovat, F.; Volinia, S.; Gordon, J.; Amir, G.; Stein, J.; et al. WWOX and P53 Dysregulation Synergize to Drive the Development of Osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 6107–6117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Su, W.-P.; Wang, W.-J.; Chang, J.-Y.; Ho, P.-C.; Liu, T.-Y.; Wen, K.-Y.; Kuo, H.-L.; Chen, Y.-J.; Huang, S.-S.; Subhan, D.; et al. Therapeutic Zfra4-10 or WWOX7-21 Peptide Induces Complex Formation of WWOX with Selective Protein Targets in Organs That Leads to Cancer Suppression and Spleen Cytotoxic Memory Z Cell Activation In Vivo. Cancers 2020, 12, 2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, W.-J.; Ho, P.-C.; Nagarajan, G.; Chen, Y.-A.; Kuo, H.-L.; Subhan, D.; Su, W.-P.; Chang, J.-Y.; Lu, C.-Y.; Chang, K.T.; et al. WWOX Possesses N-Terminal Cell Surface-Exposed Epitopes WWOX7-21 and WWOX7-11 for Signaling Cancer Growth Suppression and Prevention In Vivo. Cancers 2019, 11, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Chou, P.-Y.; Lai, F.-J.; Chen, Y.-A.; Sie, Y.-D.; Kuo, H.-L.; Su, W.-P.; Wu, C.-Y.; Liu, T.-Y.; Wen, K.-Y.; Hsu, L.-J.; et al. Strategies by Which WWOX-Deficient Metastatic Cancer Cells Utilize to Survive via Dodging, Compromising, and Causing Damage to WWOX-Positive Normal Microenvironment. Cell Death Discov. 2019, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chang, N.-S.; Doherty, J.; Ensign, A.; Lewis, J.; Heath, J.; Schultz, L.; Chen, S.-T.; Oppermann, U. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying WOX1 Activation during Apoptotic and Stress Responses. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003, 66, 1347–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, M.-Y.; Lai, F.-J.; Hsu, L.-J.; Lo, C.-P.; Cheng, C.-L.; Lin, S.-R.; Lee, M.-H.; Chang, J.-Y.; Subhan, D.; Tsai, M.-S.; et al. Dramatic Co-Activation of WWOX/WOX1 with CREB and NF-KappaB in Delayed Loss of Small Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons upon Sciatic Nerve Transection in Rats. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Hsu, L.-J.; Hong, Q.; Chen, S.-T.; Kuo, H.-L.; Schultz, L.; Heath, J.; Lin, S.-R.; Lee, M.-H.; Li, D.-Z.; Li, Z.-L.; et al. Hyaluronan Activates Hyal-2/WWOX/Smad4 Signaling and Causes Bubbling Cell Death When the Signaling Complex Is Overexpressed. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 19137–19155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hsu, L.-J.; Schultz, L.; Hong, Q.; Van Moer, K.; Heath, J.; Li, M.-Y.; Lai, F.-J.; Lin, S.-R.; Lee, M.-H.; Lo, C.-P.; et al. Transforming Growth Factor Beta1 Signaling via Interaction with Cell Surface Hyal-2 and Recruitment of WWOX/WOX1. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 16049–16059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lin, H.-P.; Chang, J.-Y.; Lin, S.-R.; Lee, M.-H.; Huang, S.-S.; Hsu, L.-J.; Chang, N.-S. Identification of an In Vivo MEK/WOX1 Complex as a Master Switch for Apoptosis in T Cell Leukemia. Genes Cancer 2011, 2, 550–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Bouteille, N.; Driouch, K.; Hage, P.E.; Sin, S.; Formstecher, E.; Camonis, J.; Lidereau, R.; Lallemand, F. Inhibition of the Wnt/Beta-Catenin Pathway by the WWOX Tumor Suppressor Protein. Oncogene 2009, 28, 2569–2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. El-Hage, P.; Petitalot, A.; Monsoro-Burq, A.-H.; Maczkowiak, F.; Driouch, K.; Formstecher, E.; Camonis, J.; Sabbah, M.; Bièche, I.; Lidereau, R.; et al. The Tumor-Suppressor WWOX and HDAC3 Inhibit the Transcriptional Activity of the β-Catenin Coactivator BCL9-2 in Breast Cancer Cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015, 13, 902–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Aqeilan, R.I.; Palamarchuk, A.; Weigel, R.J.; Herrero, J.J.; Pekarsky, Y.; Croce, C.M. Physical and Functional Interactions between the Wwox Tumor Suppressor Protein and the AP-2gamma Transcription Factor. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 8256–8261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Aqeilan, R.I.; Donati, V.; Palamarchuk, A.; Trapasso, F.; Kaou, M.; Pekarsky, Y.; Sudol, M.; Croce, C.M. WW Domain-Containing Proteins, WWOX and YAP, Compete for Interaction with ErbB-4 and Modulate Its Transcriptional Function. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 6764–6772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Gaudio, E.; Palamarchuk, A.; Palumbo, T.; Trapasso, F.; Pekarsky, Y.; Croce, C.M.; Aqeilan, R.I. Physical Association with WWOX Suppresses C-Jun Transcriptional Activity. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 11585–11589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Aqeilan, R.I.; Hassan, M.Q.; de Bruin, A.; Hagan, J.P.; Volinia, S.; Palumbo, T.; Hussain, S.; Lee, S.-H.; Gaur, T.; Stein, G.S.; et al. The WWOX Tumor Suppressor Is Essential for Postnatal Survival and Normal Bone Metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 21629–21639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Abu-Odeh, M.; Salah, Z.; Herbel, C.; Hofmann, T.G.; Aqeilan, R.I. WWOX, the Common Fragile Site FRA16D Gene Product, Regulates ATM Activation and the DNA Damage Response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E4716–E4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Schrock, M.S.; Batar, B.; Lee, J.; Druck, T.; Ferguson, B.; Cho, J.H.; Akakpo, K.; Hagrass, H.; Heerema, N.A.; Xia, F.; et al. Wwox-Brca1 Interaction: Role in DNA Repair Pathway Choice. Oncogene 2017, 36, 2215–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Jin, C.; Ge, L.; Ding, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, H.; Ward, T.; Wu, F.; Cao, X.; Wang, Q.; Yao, X. PKA-Mediated Protein Phosphorylation Regulates Ezrin–WWOX Interaction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 341, 784–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Takeuchi, T.; Adachi, Y.; Nagayama, T. A WWOX-Binding Molecule, Transmembrane Protein 207, Is Related to the Invasiveness of Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 2012, 33, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ludes-Meyers, J.H.; Kil, H.; Bednarek, A.K.; Drake, J.; Bedford, M.T.; Aldaz, C.M. WWOX Binds the Specific Proline-Rich Ligand PPXY: Identification of Candidate Interacting Proteins. Oncogene 2004, 23, 5049–5055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kołat, D.; Kałuzińska, Ż.; Bednarek, A.K.; Płuciennik, E. The Biological Characteristics of Transcription Factors AP-2α and AP-2γ and Their Importance in Various Types of Cancers. Biosci. Rep. 2019, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Gee, J.M.W.; Eloranta, J.J.; Ibbitt, J.C.; Robertson, J.F.R.; Ellis, I.O.; Williams, T.; Nicholson, R.I.; Hurst, H.C. Overexpression of TFAP2C in Invasive Breast Cancer Correlates with a Poorer Response to Anti-Hormone Therapy and Reduced Patient Survival. J. Pathol. 2009, 217, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Guler, G.; Himmetoglu, C.; Jimenez, R.E.; Geyer, S.M.; Wang, W.P.; Costinean, S.; Pilarski, R.T.; Morrison, C.; Suren, D.; Liu, J.; et al. Aberrant Expression of DNA Damage Response Proteins Is Associated with Breast Cancer Subtype and Clinical Features. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 129, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Guler, G.; Iliopoulos, D.; Guler, N.; Himmetoglu, C.; Hayran, M.; Huebner, K. Wwox and Ap2gamma Expression Levels Predict Tamoxifen Response. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 6115–6121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Sundvall, M.; Iljin, K.; Kilpinen, S.; Sara, H.; Kallioniemi, O.-P.; Elenius, K. Role of ErbB4 in Breast Cancer. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 2008, 13, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Brennan, A.; Leech, J.T.; Kad, N.M.; Mason, J.M. Selective Antagonism of CJun for Cancer Therapy. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Sun, S.-S.; Zhang, L.; Yang, J.; Zhou, X. Role of Runt-Related Transcription Factor 2 in Signal Network of Tumors as an Inter-Mediator. Cancer Lett. 2015, 361, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Komori, T. Runx2, an Inducer of Osteoblast and Chondrocyte Differentiation. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2018, 149, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Barnes, G.L.; Hebert, K.E.; Kamal, M.; Javed, A.; Einhorn, T.A.; Lian, J.B.; Stein, G.S.; Gerstenfeld, L.C. Fidelity of Runx2 Activity in Breast Cancer Cells Is Required for the Generation of Metastases-Associated Osteolytic Disease. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 4506–4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Javed, A.; Barnes, G.L.; Pratap, J.; Antkowiak, T.; Gerstenfeld, L.C.; van Wijnen, A.J.; Stein, J.L.; Lian, J.B.; Stein, G.S. Impaired Intranuclear Trafficking of Runx2 (AML3/CBFA1) Transcription Factors in Breast Cancer Cells Inhibits Osteolysis in Vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 1454–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Del Mare, S.; Aqeilan, R.I. Tumor Suppressor WWOX Inhibits Osteosarcoma Metastasis by Modulating RUNX2 Function. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Zheng, Q.-W.; Zhou, Y.-L.; You, Q.-J.; Shou, F.; Pang, Q.-F.; Chen, J.-L. WWOX Inhibits the Invasion of Lung Cancer Cells by Downregulating RUNX2. Cancer Gene Ther. 2016, 23, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Clevers, H. Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signaling in Development and Disease. Cell 2006, 127, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Dey, N.; Barwick, B.G.; Moreno, C.S.; Ordanic-Kodani, M.; Chen, Z.; Oprea-Ilies, G.; Tang, W.; Catzavelos, C.; Kerstann, K.F.; Sledge, G.W.; et al. Wnt Signaling in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Is Associated with Metastasis. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. Targeting the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway in Cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kikuchi, A.; Kishida, S.; Yamamoto, H. Regulation of Wnt Signaling by Protein-Protein Interaction and Post-Translational Modifications. Exp. Mol. Med. 2006, 38, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Brembeck, F.H.; Schwarz-Romond, T.; Bakkers, J.; Wilhelm, S.; Hammerschmidt, M.; Birchmeier, W. Essential Role of BCL9-2 in the Switch between Beta-Catenin’s Adhesive and Transcriptional Functions. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 2225–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Itoh, K.; Brott, B.K.; Bae, G.-U.; Ratcliffe, M.J.; Sokol, S.Y. Nuclear Localization Is Required for Dishevelled Function in Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signaling. J. Biol. 2005, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Gan, X.; Wang, J.; Xi, Y.; Wu, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, L. Nuclear Dvl, c-Jun, Beta-Catenin, and TCF Form a Complex Leading to Stabilization of Beta-Catenin-TCF Interaction. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 180, 1087–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Khawaled, S.; Nigita, G.; Distefano, R.; Oster, S.; Suh, S.-S.; Smith, Y.; Khalaileh, A.; Peng, Y.; Croce, C.M.; Geiger, T.; et al. Pleiotropic Tumor Suppressor Functions of WWOX Antagonize Metastasis. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Seoane, J.; Gomis, R.R. TGF-β Family Signaling in Tumor Suppression and Cancer Progression. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Alunno, A.; Padjen, I.; Fanouriakis, A.; Boumpas, D.T. Pathogenic and Therapeutic Relevance of JAK/STAT Signaling in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Integration of Distinct Inflammatory Pathways and the Prospect of Their Inhibition with an Oral Agent. Cells 2019, 8, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Thomas, S.J.; Snowden, J.A.; Zeidler, M.P.; Danson, S.J. The Role of JAK/STAT Signalling in the Pathogenesis, Prognosis and Treatment of Solid Tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 113, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Song, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, M.; Wang, G.; Ye, Y.; Xia, W. Ezrin Mediates Invasion and Metastasis in Tumorigenesis: A Review. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of Cancer: The next Generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Soni, S.; Padwad, Y.S. HIF-1 in Cancer Therapy: Two Decade Long Story of a Transcription Factor. Acta Oncol. 2017, 56, 503–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Abu-Remaileh, M.; Aqeilan, R.I. Tumor Suppressor WWOX Regulates Glucose Metabolism via HIF1α Modulation. Cell Death Differ. 2014, 21, 1805–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Van Gent, D.C.; Hoeijmakers, J.H.; Kanaar, R. Chromosomal Stability and the DNA Double-Stranded Break Connection. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. DNA Damage, Aging, and Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 1475–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Jackson, S.P.; Bartek, J. The DNA-Damage Response in Human Biology and Disease. Nature 2009, 461, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Chapman, J.R.; Taylor, M.R.G.; Boulton, S.J. Playing the End Game: DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Choice. Mol. Cell 2012, 47, 497–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Blackford, A.N.; Jackson, S.P. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response. Mol. Cell 2017, 66, 801–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Her, J.; Bunting, S.F. How Cells Ensure Correct Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 10502–10511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Abu-Odeh, M.; Hereema, N.A.; Aqeilan, R.I. WWOX Modulates the ATR-Mediated DNA Damage Checkpoint Response. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 4344–4355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Venugopalan, A.; Lynberg, M.; Cultraro, C.M.; Nguyen, K.D.P.; Zhang, X.; Waris, M.; Dayal, N.; Abebe, A.; Maity, T.K.; Guha, U. SCAMP3 Is a Mutant EGFR Phosphorylation Target and a Tumor Suppressor in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Oncogene 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhou, Y.; Huang, J.; Yu, X.; Jiang, X.; Shi, Y.; Weng, Y.; Kuai, Y.; Lei, L.; Ren, G.; Feng, X.; et al. LITAF Is a Potential Tumor Suppressor in Pancreatic Cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 9, 3131–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Bunai, K.; Okubo, H.; Hano, K.; Inoue, K.; Kito, Y.; Saigo, C.; Shibata, T.; Takeuchi, T. TMEM207 Hinders the Tumour Suppressor Function of WWOX in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 1026–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Saigo, C.; Kito, Y.; Takeuchi, T. Cancerous Protein Network That Inhibits the Tumor Suppressor Function of WW Domain-Containing Oxidoreductase (WWOX) by Aberrantly Expressed Molecules. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Huang, S.-S.; Chang, N.-S. Phosphorylation/de-Phosphorylation in Specific Sites of Tumor Suppressor WWOX and Control of Distinct Biological Events. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018, 243, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lee, M.-H.; Shih, Y.-H.; Lin, S.-R.; Chang, J.-Y.; Lin, Y.-H.; Sze, C.-I.; Kuo, Y.-M.; Chang, N.-S. Zfra Restores Memory Deficits in Alzheimer’s Disease Triple-Transgenic Mice by Blocking Aggregation of TRAPPC6AΔ, SH3GLB2, Tau, and Amyloid β, and Inflammatory NF-ΚB Activation. Alzheimer’s Dementia Transl. Res. Clin. Interv. 2017, 3, 189–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 10 01051 g001 550
Figure 1. Subcellular localization of WWOX and its partners involved in cell death.
Figure 1. Subcellular localization of WWOX and its partners involved in cell death.
Cells 10 01051 g001
Cells 10 01051 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Modulation of Wnt/β-catenin, (B) TGFβ1 and (C) JAK2/STAT3 pathways by WWOX.
Figure 2. (A) Modulation of Wnt/β-catenin, (B) TGFβ1 and (C) JAK2/STAT3 pathways by WWOX.
Cells 10 01051 g002
Cells 10 01051 g003 550
Figure 3. Main anticarcinogen molecular functions of WWOX.
Figure 3. Main anticarcinogen molecular functions of WWOX.
Cells 10 01051 g003
Table
Table 1. Main protein partners involved in the anticarcinogenic molecular functions of WWOX (nd: not defined, P: proline, Y: tyrosine, S: serine, L: leucine, A: alanine, X: any amino acid).
Table 1. Main protein partners involved in the anticarcinogenic molecular functions of WWOX (nd: not defined, P: proline, Y: tyrosine, S: serine, L: leucine, A: alanine, X: any amino acid).
Molecular PartnerWWOX Domain InvolvedPartner Domain
Involved		Complex LocalizationInvolved inReference
p53ndndnucleusapoptosis[37]
p73ndPPPY487cytoplasmapoptosis[38]
TRADDndndndTNF signaling[55]
TRAF2ndndnucleusTNF signaling[55]
CREBWWndnucleusapoptosis[56]
Hyal-2WW1ndMembrane, nucleus, cytoplasmcell death[57,58]
SMAD4WW1ndnucleuscell death[57,58]
MEK1WW and SDRndlysosomeapoptosis[59]
SMAD3WW1PPGY184cytoplasmTGFβ1 signaling[34]
Dvl-2WW1PPPY568cytoplasmWnt signaling[60]
BCL9-2WW1PPPY561nucleusWnt signaling[61]
JAK2WW1ndcytoplasmJAK2/STAT3 signaling[15]
STAT3WW1ndcytoplasmJAK2/STAT3 signaling[15]
AP-2γWW1PPPY64cytoplasmtranscription[62]
ERBB4WW1PPIY1037, PPPY1285cytoplasmtranscription[63]
C-JUNWW1PPPY64cytoplasmtranscription[64]
RUNX2WW1ndnucleustranscription[65]
ATMWW1ndndDNA repair response[66]
BRCA1WW1ndndDNA repair response[67]
ITCHWW1LPXY623 and LPXY839nucleusDNA repair response[8,66]
EZRINWW1PPPPPPPVY477Apical membraneSignal transduction[68]
VOPP1WW1PPPY165cytoplasmProtein trafficking/sorting[14]
TMEM207ndPPPY139cytoplasmProtein trafficking/sorting[69]
SEC23IPWW1PPSY167ndProtein trafficking/sorting[11]
SCAMP3WW1PPAY53 or LPSF141ndProtein trafficking/sorting[11]
LITAFWW1PPSY23Golgi apparatusProtein trafficking/sorting[70]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taouis, K.; Driouch, K.; Lidereau, R.; Lallemand, F. Molecular Functions of WWOX Potentially Involved in Cancer Development. Cells 2021, 10, 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051051

AMA Style

Taouis K, Driouch K, Lidereau R, Lallemand F. Molecular Functions of WWOX Potentially Involved in Cancer Development. Cells. 2021; 10(5):1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taouis, Karim, Keltouma Driouch, Rosette Lidereau, and François Lallemand. 2021. "Molecular Functions of WWOX Potentially Involved in Cancer Development" Cells 10, no. 5: 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051051

APA Style

Taouis, K., Driouch, K., Lidereau, R., & Lallemand, F. (2021). Molecular Functions of WWOX Potentially Involved in Cancer Development. Cells, 10(5), 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop