Methylobacterium-Mediated Phytohormone Regulation and Metabolic Priming in Plant Drought Resilience
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Drought Stress Impacts on Plants
3. Role of Phyllosphere Microbiota in Plant Drought Tolerance
4. Ecology and Distribution of Methylobacterium
5. Methylobacterium Mediated Phytohormonal and Metabolic Regulation Under Drought
5.1. Phytohormone Production and Coordination
5.1.1. Indole-Acetic Acid (IAA)
5.1.2. Cytokinins (CKs)
5.1.3. Gibberelins (GAs)
5.2. Abscisic Acid and Ethylene Cross-Talk
5.3. Antioxidant Regulation
5.4. Osmolyte Induction
5.5. Ethylene Biosynthesis and ACC Deaminase-Mediated Pathway
5.6. Methanol Utilization
5.7. Exopolysaccharide Production
6. Molecular Mechanisms of Hormone-Mediated Stress Perception and Signaling
7. Metabolic Priming and Adaptive Stress Memory
8. Formulation of Methylobacterium Bio-Inoculant for Drought Mitigation
9. Effect of Methylobacterium on Drought Stress in Various Crop Plants
10. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yang, H.; Huntingford, C.; Wiltshire, A.; Sitch, S.; Mercado, L. Compensatory climate effects link trends in global runoff to rising atmospheric CO2 concentration. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 124075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Gentine, P.; Zhou, S.; Sullivan, S.C.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, S. Large increase in global storm runoff extremes driven by climate and anthropogenic changes. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cohen, I.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Huck, C.; Fritschi, F.B.; Mittler, R. Meta-analysis of drought and heat stress combination impact on crop yield and yield components. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 171, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seleiman, M.F.; Al-Suhaibani, N.; Ali, N.; Akmal, M.; Alotaibi, M.; Refay, Y.; Dindaroglu, T.; Abdul-Wajid, H.H.; Battaglia, M.L. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants 2021, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, M.; Six, J. Soil structure and microbiome functions in agroecosystems. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teshome, D.T.; Zharare, G.E.; Naidoo, S. The threat of the combined effect of biotic and abiotic stress factors in forestry under a changing climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 601009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parray, J.A.; Li, W.-J. Microbiome-Assisted Bioremediation: Rehabilitating Agricultural Soils; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Allan, R.P.; Arias, P.A.; Berger, S.; Canadell, J.G.; Cassou, C.; Chen, D.; Cherchi, A.; Connors, S.L.; Coppola, E.; Cruz, F.A.; et al. Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2023; pp. 3–32. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H.; Calvin, K.; Dasgupta, D.; Krinner, G.; Mukherji, A.; Thorne, P.; Trisos, C.; Romero, J.; Aldunce, P.; Barret, K.; et al. IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Lee, H., Romero, J., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Habib-ur-Rahman, M.; Ahmad, A.; Raza, A.; Hasnain, M.U.; Alharby, H.F.; Alzahrani, Y.M.; Bamagoos, A.A.; Hakeem, K.R.; Ahmad, S.; Nasim, W. Impact of climate change on agricultural production; Issues, challenges, and opportunities in Asia. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 925548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Connell, E. Towards adaptation of water resource systems to climatic and socio-economic change. Water Resour. Manag. 2017, 31, 2965–2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehi-Lisar, S.Y.; Bakhshayeshan-Agdam, H. Agronomic crop responses and tolerance to drought stress. In Agronomic Crops: Volume 3: Stress Responses and Tolerance; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 63–91. [Google Scholar]
- Daryanto, S.; Wang, L.; Jacinthe, P.-A. Global synthesis of drought effects on cereal, legume, tuber and root crops production: A review. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 179, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diatta, A.A.; Fike, J.H.; Battaglia, M.L.; Galbraith, J.M.; Baig, M.B. Effects of biochar on soil fertility and crop productivity in arid regions: A review. Arab. J. Geosci. 2020, 13, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaffique, S.; Khan, M.A.; Imran, M.; Kang, S.-M.; Park, Y.-S.; Wani, S.H.; Lee, I.-J. Research progress in the field of microbial mitigation of drought stress in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 870626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaur, H.; Manna, M.; Thakur, T.; Gautam, V.; Salvi, P. Imperative role of sugar signaling and transport during drought stress responses in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 171, 833–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.B.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prakash, K. Characterization and Identification of Black Pepper Accessions (Piper nigrum L.) for Stress Tolerance and Quality. Doctoral Dissertation, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, India, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, M.; Kour, D.; Yadav, A.N.; Saxena, R.; Rai, P.K.; Jyoti, A.; Tomar, R.S. Biodiversity of methylotrophic microbial communities and their potential role in mitigation of abiotic stresses in plants. Biologia 2019, 74, 287–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhanbhro, N.; Wang, H.J.; Bakhsh, Q.; Basit, M.F.; Song, W.; Ullah, U.; Shi, S.; Gao, S.; Shalmani, A.; Zhang, R.X. TaSnRK2. 1-2D Contributes to Drought Tolerance by Modulating ROS Production in Wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 2025, 48, 6440–6443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahid, S.; Ali, Q.; Ali, S.; Al-Misned, F.A.; Maqbool, S. Water deficit stress tolerance potential of newly developed wheat genotypes for better yield based on agronomic traits and stress tolerance indices: Physio-biochemical responses, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative defense mechanism. Plants 2022, 11, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas-Barry, G.; Martin, C.S.; Ramsubhag, A.; Eudoxie, G.; Miller, J.R. Multi-trait efficiency and interactivity of bacterial consortia used to enhance plant performance under water stress conditions. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 281, 127610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vocciante, M.; Grifoni, M.; Fusini, D.; Petruzzelli, G.; Franchi, E. The role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in mitigating plant’s environmental stresses. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebadi, A.; Etesami, H. Monitoring changes in the rhizospheric microbiome under drought conditions: Approaches and challenges. Sustain. Agric. Under Drought Stress 2025, 265–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bechtold, E.K.; Ryan, S.; Moughan, S.E.; Ranjan, R.; Nüsslein, K. Phyllosphere community assembly and response to drought stress on common tropical and temperate forage grasses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e00895-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, S.; Sharma, A.; Dutta, A.K.; Kapoor, R.K.; Jha, D.K.; Kumar, D. An introduction to current and future aspect on growth promoting microbiome. In Plant-Microbe Interaction-Recent Advances in Molecular and Biochemical Approaches; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 87–110. [Google Scholar]
- Woodward, F.; Lomas, M. Vegetation dynamics–simulating responses to climatic change. Biol. Rev. 2004, 79, 643–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindow, S.E.; Brandl, M.T. Microbiology of the Phyllosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 1875–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vorholt, J.A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 828–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fürnkranz, M.; Wanek, W.; Richter, A.; Abell, G.; Rasche, F.; Sessitsch, A. Nitrogen fixation by phyllosphere bacteria associated with higher plants and their colonizing epiphytes of a tropical lowland rainforest of Costa Rica. ISME J. 2008, 2, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Innerebner, G.; Knief, C.; Vorholt, J.A. Protection of Arabidopsis thaliana against leaf-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae by Sphingomonas strains in a controlled model system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3202–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- El-Saadony, M.T.; Saad, A.M.; Mohammed, D.M.; Fahmy, M.A.; Elesawi, I.E.; Ahmed, A.E.; Algopishi, U.B.; Elrys, A.S.; Desoky, E.-S.M.; Mosa, W.F. Drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria alleviate drought stress and enhance soil health for sustainable agriculture: A comprehensive review. Plant Stress 2024, 14, 100632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grady, K.L.; Sorensen, J.W.; Stopnisek, N.; Guittar, J.; Shade, A. Assembly and seasonality of core phyllosphere microbiota on perennial biofuel crops. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laforest-Lapointe, I.; Whitaker, B.K. Decrypting the phyllosphere microbiota. Am. J. Bot. 2019, 106, 171–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandenkoornhuyse, P.; Quaiser, A.; Duhamel, M.; Le Van, A.; Dufresne, A. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 1196–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, S.D.; Castillo, J.A. Influence of Light on Plant–Phyllosphere Interaction. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridier, A.; Piard, J.-C.; Pandin, C.; Labarthe, S.; Dubois-Brissonnet, F.; Briandet, R. Spatial organization plasticity as an adaptive driver of surface microbial communities. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wagner, M.R.; Lundberg, D.S.; Del Rio, T.G.; Tringe, S.G.; Dangl, J.L.; Mitchell-Olds, T. Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kwak, M.-J.; Jeong, H.; Madhaiyan, M.; Lee, Y.; Sa, T.-M.; Oh, T.K.; Kim, J.F. Genome information of Methylobacterium oryzae, a plant-probiotic methylotroph in the phyllosphere. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sohrabi, R.; Paasch, B.C.; Liber, J.A.; He, S.Y. Phyllosphere microbiome. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2023, 74, 539–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bera, K.; Sadhukhan, S.; Gunjal, A.; Choudhury, A.; Dutta, P. Phytomicrobiome in modulating plant growth and stress resilience: An insight into the functions and emerging perspectives in agriculture. Microbiome Driv. Ecosyst. Funct. 2024, 31–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, C.R.; Denney, W.C. Annual and seasonal variation in the phyllosphere bacterial community associated with leaves of the southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora). Microb. Ecol. 2011, 61, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlström, C.I.; Field, C.M.; Bortfeld-Miller, M.; Müller, B.; Sunagawa, S.; Vorholt, J.A. Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 1445–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahan, R.; McDonald, I.R. Diversity of Methylobacterium species associated with New Zealand native plants. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2023, 370, fnad124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnamoorthy, R.; Anandham, R.; Senthilkumar, M.; Venkatramanan, V. Adaptation mechanism of methylotrophic bacteria to drought condition and its strategies in mitigating plant stress caused by climate change. In Exploring Synergies and Trade-Offs Between Climate Change and the Sustainable Development Goals; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 145–158. [Google Scholar]
- Delmotte, N.; Knief, C.; Chaffron, S.; Innerebner, G.; Roschitzki, B.; Schlapbach, R.; von Mering, C.; Vorholt, J.A. Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 16428–16433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holland, M.A. Methylobacterium and plants. Rec. Res. Dev. Plant Physiol. 1997, 1, 207–213. [Google Scholar]
- Corpe, W.; Rheem, S. Ecology of the methylotrophic bacteria on living leaf surfaces. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1989, 5, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sy, A.; Timmers, A.C.; Knief, C.; Vorholt, J.A. Methylotrophic metabolism is advantageous for Methylobacterium extorquens during colonization of Medicago truncatula under competitive conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 7245–7252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patt, T.; Cole, G.; Hanson, R. Methylobacterium, a new genus of facultatively methylotrophic bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1976, 26, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maeng, S.; Kim, D.-U.; Lim, S.; Lee, B.-H.; Lee, K.; Kim, M.; Srinivasan, S.; Bai, J. Methylobacterium radiodurans sp. nov., a novel radiation-resistant Methylobacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 3435–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alessa, O.; Ogura, Y.; Fujitani, Y.; Takami, H.; Hayashi, T.; Sahin, N.; Tani, A. Comprehensive Comparative Genomics and Phenotyping of Methylobacterium Species. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 740610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galbally, I.; Wv, K. The Production of Methanol by Flowering Plants and the Global Cycle of Methanol. J. Atmos. Chem. 2002, 43, 195–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Körner, E.; von Dahl, C.C.; Bonaventure, G.; Baldwin, I.T. Pectin methylesterase Na PME1 contributes to the emission of methanol during insect herbivory and to the elicitation of defence responses in Nicotiana attenuata. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2631–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salvi, P.; Manna, M.; Kaur, H.; Thakur, T.; Gandass, N.; Bhatt, D.; Muthamilarasan, M. Phytohormone signaling and crosstalk in regulating drought stress response in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1305–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swain, R.; Sahoo, S.; Behera, M.; Rout, G.R. Instigating prevalent abiotic stress resilience in crop by exogenous application of phytohormones and nutrient. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1104874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranjan, A.; Sinha, R.; Lal, S.K.; Bishi, S.K.; Singh, A.K. Phytohormone signalling and cross-talk to alleviate aluminium toxicity in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1331–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossi, C.E.; Tani, A.; Mori, I.C.; Matsuura, T.; Ulloa, R.M. Plant growth-promoting abilities of Methylobacterium sp. 2A involve auxin-mediated regulation of the root architecture. Plant Cell Environ. 2024, 47, 5343–5357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klikno, J.; Kutschera, U. Regulation of root development in Arabidopsis thaliana by phytohormone-secreting epiphytic methylobacteria. Protoplasma 2017, 254, 1867–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palberg, D.; Kisiała, A.; Jorge, G.L.; Emery, R.N. A survey of Methylobacterium species and strains reveals widespread production and varying profiles of cytokinin phytohormones. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jorge, G.L.; Kisiala, A.; Morrison, E.; Aoki, M.; Nogueira, A.P.O.; Emery, R.N. Endosymbiotic Methylobacterium oryzae mitigates the impact of limited water availability in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) by increasing plant cytokinin levels. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 162, 525–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossi, C.E.M.; Ulloa, R.M.; Sahin, N.; Tani, A. Methylobacterium as a Key Symbiont in Plant-Microbe Interactions: Its Ecological and Agricultural Significance. Plant Biotechnol. 2025, 42, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Valente, F.; Panozzo, A.; Bozzolin, F.; Barion, G.; Bolla, P.K.; Bertin, V.; Potestio, S.; Visioli, G.; Wang, Y.; Vamerali, T. Growth, photosynthesis and yield responses of common wheat to foliar application of methylobacterium symbioticum under decreasing chemical nitrogen fertilization. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yim, W.; Seshadri, S.; Kim, K.; Lee, G.; Sa, T. Ethylene emission and PR protein synthesis in ACC deaminase producing Methylobacterium spp. inoculated tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) challenged with Ralstonia solanacearum under greenhouse conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 67, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joe, M.; Saravanan, V.; Islam, M.; Sa, T. Development of alginate-based aggregate inoculants of Methylobacterium sp. and Azospirillum brasilense tested under in vitro conditions to promote plant growth. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 408–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Carvalho, M.R.; Bicalho, E.M.; Pereira, E.G.; Guilherme, L.R.G.; Marchiori, P.E.R. Drought tolerance: A perspective about leaf venation and the role of auxin. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2025, 37, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roychoudhry, S.; Kepinski, S. Auxin in root development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2022, 14, a039933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meena, K.K.; Bitla, U.M.; Sorty, A.M.; Singh, D.P.; Gupta, V.K.; Wakchaure, G.; Kumar, S. Mitigation of salinity stress in wheat seedlings due to the application of phytohormone-rich culture filtrate extract of methylotrophic actinobacterium Nocardioides sp. NIMMe6. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gomes, G.; Scortecci, K. Auxin and its role in plant development: Structure, signalling, regulation and response mechanisms. Plant Biol. 2021, 23, 894–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ashok, G.; Nambirajan, G.; Baskaran, K.; Viswanathan, C.; Alexander, X. Phylogenetic diversity of epiphytic pink-pigmented methylotrophic bacteria and role in alleviation of abiotic stress in plants. In Plant Microbiomes for Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 245–262. [Google Scholar]
- Ivanova, E.; Doronina, N.; Trotsenko, Y.A. Aerobic methylobacteria are capable of synthesizing auxins. Microbiology 2001, 70, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Herrera-Estrella, L.; Tran, L.-S.P. The Yin–Yang of cytokinin homeostasis and drought acclimation/adaptation. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 548–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ha, S.; Vankova, R.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K.; Tran, L.-S.P. Cytokinins: Metabolism and function in plant adaptation to environmental stresses. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakakibara, H. Cytokinins: Activity, biosynthesis, and translocation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 431–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kieber, J.J.; Schaller, G.E. Cytokinin signaling in plant development. Development 2018, 145, dev149344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibb, M.; Kisiala, A.B.; Morrison, E.N.; Emery, R.N. The origins and roles of methylthiolated cytokinins: Evidence from among life kingdoms. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 605672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koenig, R.L.; Morris, R.O.; Polacco, J.C. tRNA is the source of low-level trans-zeatin production in Methylobacterium spp. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 1832–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šmejkalová, H.; Erb, T.J.; Fuchs, G. Methanol assimilation in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1: Demonstration of all enzymes and their regulation. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meena, K.K.; Kumar, M.; Kalyuzhnaya, M.G.; Yandigeri, M.S.; Singh, D.P.; Saxena, A.K.; Arora, D.K. Epiphytic pink-pigmented methylotrophic bacteria enhance germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) by producing phytohormone. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012, 101, 777–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kutschera, U. Plant-associated methylobacteria as co-evolved phytosymbionts: A hypothesis. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, S.-M.; Hamayun, M.; Khan, M.A.; Iqbal, A.; Lee, I.-J. Bacillus subtilis JW1 enhances plant growth and nutrient uptake of Chinese cabbage through gibberellins secretion. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2019, 92, 172–178. [Google Scholar]
- Kassem, M.; Hauka, F.; Afify, A.H.; Nour El-Din, M.; Omara, A. Isolation and identification of some PPFMs bacterial isolates and their potentiality as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents to Rhizoctonia solani. J. Agric. Chem. Biotechnol. 2013, 4, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamlom, S.F.; Abdelghany, A.M.; Farouk, A.; Alwakel, E.S.; Makled, K.M.; Bukhari, N.A.; Hatamleh, A.A.; Ren, H.; El-Sorady, G.A.; Shehab, A. Biochemical and yield response of spring wheat to drought stress through gibberellic and abscisic acids. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalyaeva, M.; Ivanova, E.; Doronina, N.; Zakharchenko, N.; Trotsenko, Y.A.; Buryanov, Y.I. The effect of aerobic methylotrophic bacteria on the in vitro morphogenesis of soft wheat (Triticum aestivum). Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 50, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.; Shil, S.; Rime, J.; Alice, A.K.; Yumkhaibam, T.; Mounika, V.; Singh, A.P.; Kundu, M.; Lalhmangaihzuali, H.; Hazarika, T.K. Phytohormonal signaling in plant resilience: Advances and strategies for enhancing abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Growth Regul. 2025, 105, 329–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, N.; Jiang, C.; Chen, L.; Paul, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Shen, G. Achieving abiotic stress tolerance in plants through antioxidative defense mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1110622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Suzuki, N.; Miller, G.; Tognetti, V.B.; Vandepoele, K.; Gollery, M.; Shulaev, V.; Van Breusegem, F. ROS signaling: The new wave? Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaleel, C.A.; Manivannan, P.; Kishorekumar, A.; Sankar, B.; Gopi, R.; Somasundaram, R.; Panneerselvam, R. Alterations in osmoregulation, antioxidant enzymes and indole alkaloid levels in Catharanthus roseus exposed to water deficit. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2007, 59, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nysanth, N.; Anu Rajan, S.; Sivapriya, S.; Anith, K. Pink Pigmented Facultative Methylotrophs (PPFMs): Potential Bioinoculants for Sustainable Crop Production. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 17, 660–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chieb, M.; Gachomo, E.W. The role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant drought stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poorniammal, R.; Sundaram, S.P.; Kumutha, K. In Vitro Biocontrol Activity of Methylobacterium extorquens Against Fungal Pathogens. Int. J. Plant Prot. 2009, 2, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogati, K.; Walczak, M. The Impact of Drought Stress on Soil Microbial Community, Enzyme Activities and Plants. Agronomy 2022, 12, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Photolo, M.M.; Mavumengwana, V.; Sitole, L.; Tlou, M.G. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of a Bacterial Endophyte, Methylobacterium radiotolerans MAMP 4754, Isolated from Combretum erythrophyllum Seeds. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 2020, 9483670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, S.R.; Mahawar, H.; Bajpai, A.; Dubey, G.; Parmar, R.; Atoliya, N.; Devi, M.H.; Singh, A.B.; Jain, D.; Patra, A.; et al. Methylotroph bacteria and cellular metabolite carotenoid alleviate ultraviolet radiation-driven abiotic stress in plants. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 899268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araújo, W.; Santos, D.; Dini-Andreote, F.; Salgueiro-Londoño, J.; Camargo-Neves, A.A.; Andreote, F.; Dourado, M. Genes related to antioxidant metabolism are involved in Methylobacterium mesophilicum-soybean interaction. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2015, 108, 951–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramli, N.; Abas, F.; Ismail, I.S.; Rukayadi, Y.; Nor, S.M. Determination of Antioxidant Activity, Phenolic Compounds, and Toxicity of Methanolic and Ethanolic Extracts of Pink Pigmented Facultative Methylotrophs (PPFM) Bacteria Pigment. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2023, 46.(4), 1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ehinmitan, E.; Siamalube, B.; Losenge, T.; Mamati, E.; Juma, P.; Ngumi, V. Methylobacterium spp. in Sustainable Agriculture: Strategies for Plant Stress Management and Growth Promotion. Microbe 2025, 8, 100476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ehinmitan, E.; Siamalube, B.; Losenge, T.; Mamati, E.; Juma, P.; Ngumi, V. Methylobacterium spp. Isolated From Semiarid Soils Promote Growth and Drought Tolerance in Maize in Kenya. Int. J. Microbiol. 2025, 2025, 7442350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanacore, A.; Forgione, M.C.; Cavasso, D.; Nguyen, H.N.A.; Molinaro, A.; Saenz, J.P.; D’Errico, G.; Paduano, L.; Marchetti, R.; Silipo, A. Role of EPS in mitigation of plant abiotic stress: The case of Methylobacterium extorquens PA1. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 295, 119863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dourado, M.N.; Bogas, A.C.; Pomini, A.M.; Andreote, F.D.; Quecine, M.C.; Marsaioli, A.J.; Araújo, W.L. Methylobacterium-plant interaction genes regulated by plant exudate and quorum sensing molecules. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2013, 44, 1331–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dumanović, J.; Nepovimova, E.; Natić, M.; Kuča, K.; Jaćević, V. The significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense system in plants: A concise overview. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 552969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Birben, E.; Sahiner, U.M.; Sackesen, C.; Erzurum, S.; Kalayci, O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organ. J. 2012, 5, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sang, Y.L.; Cheng, Z.J.; Zhang, X.S. Plant stem cells and de novo organogenesis. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 1334–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.F.; Hoffman, N.E. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1984, 35, 155–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarembinski, T.I.; Theologis, A. Ethylene biosynthesis and action: A case of conservation. Plant Mol. Biol. 1994, 26, 1579–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, L.; Schenzle, A.; Odom, J.M.; Cheng, Q. Novel carotenoid oxidase involved in biosynthesis of 4, 4′-diapolycopene dialdehyde. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 3294–3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zulfiqar, F.; Ashraf, M. Proline alleviates abiotic stress induced oxidative stress in plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 4629–4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez-Leon, S.G.; Valenzuela-Soto, E.M. Glycine betaine is a phytohormone-like plant growth and development regulator under stress conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 5029–5040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamit, H.A.; Amaresan, N. Inoculation of methylotrophic bacteria ameliorate summer heat stress and enhance the black gram (Vigna mungo L.) growth, physiology and antioxidants properties. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, 43, 2077–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nysanth, N.; Meenakumari, K.; Syriac, E.K.; Beena, R. Screening of pink pigmented facultative methylotrophs for growth enhancement in paddy. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 18, 101055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivakumar, R.; Chandrasekaran, P.; Nithila, S. Effect of PPFM and PGRs on root characters, TDMP, yield and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under drought. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 2046–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, P.W.; Drew, M.C. Ethylene and plant responses to stress. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 100, 620–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilkinson, S.; Davies, W.J. Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: New insights from cell to plant to community. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 510–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, J.; Mertens, J.; Van de Poel, B.; Li, D.; Chen, K. The Yang cycle in plants: A journey of methionine recycling with fascinating metabolites and enzymes. Plant Horm. 2025, 1, e007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.L.-C.; Li, H.; Ecker, J.R. Ethylene Biosynthesis and Signaling Networks. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S131–S151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharp, R. Interaction with ethylene: Changing views on the role of abscisic acid in root and shoot growth responses to water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubois, M.; Van den Broeck, L.; Inzé, D. The Pivotal Role of Ethylene in Plant Growth. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glick, B.R. Modulating phytohormone levels. In Beneficial Plant-Bacterial Interactions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 139–180. [Google Scholar]
- Madhaiyan, M.; Reddy, B.; Anandham, R.; Senthilkumar, M.; Poonguzhali, S.; Sundaram, S. Plant growth–promoting methylobacterium induces defense responses in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) compared with rot pathogens. Curr. Microbiol. 2006, 53, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadeem, S.M.; Ahmad, M.; Tufail, M.A.; Asghar, H.N.; Nazli, F.; Zahir, Z.A. Appraising the potential of EPS-producing rhizobacteria with ACC-deaminase activity to improve growth and physiology of maize under drought stress. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, M.; Kumar Patel, M.; Kumar, N.; Bajpai, A.B.; Siddique, K.H. Metabolomics and molecular approaches reveal drought stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glick, B.R. Beneficial Plant-Bacterial Interactions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; Volume 243. [Google Scholar]
- Vurukonda, S.S.K.P.; Vardharajula, S.; Shrivastava, M.; SkZ, A. Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 184, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatma, M.; Asgher, M.; Iqbal, N.; Rasheed, F.; Sehar, Z.; Sofo, A.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene signaling under stressful environments: Analyzing collaborative knowledge. Plants 2022, 11, 2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nemecek-Marshall, M.; MacDonald, R.C.; Franzen, J.J.; Wojciechowski, C.L.; Fall, R. Methanol emission from leaves (enzymatic detection of gas-phase methanol and relation of methanol fluxes to stomatal conductance and leaf development). Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yurimoto, H. Phyllosphere C1-microorganisms: Their interaction with plants and contribution to the global carbon cycle. Plant Biotechnol. 2025, 42, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saito, S.; Uozumi, N. Guard cell membrane anion transport systems and their regulatory components: An elaborate mechanism controlling stress-induced stomatal closure. Plants 2019, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acharya, B.R.; Assmann, S.M. Hormone interactions in stomatal function. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 451–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wachendorf, M.; Küppers, M. The effect of initial stomatal opening on the dynamics of biochemical and overall photosynthetic induction. Trees 2017, 31, 981–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivakumar, R.; Nandhitha, G.; Chandrasekaran, P.; Boominathan, P.; Senthilkumar, M. Impact of pink pigmented facultative methylotroph and PGRs on water status, photosynthesis, proline and NR activity in tomato under drought. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 1640–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naseem, H.; Ahsan, M.; Shahid, M.A.; Khan, N. Exopolysaccharides producing rhizobacteria and their role in plant growth and drought tolerance. J. Basic Microbiol. 2018, 58, 1009–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, C.; Wang, M.-Y.; Khan, N.; Tan, L.-L.; Yang, S. Potentials, utilization, and bioengineering of plant growth-promoting Methylobacterium for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, P.N.; Ardley, J.K. Review of the genus Methylobacterium and closely related organisms: A proposal that some Methylobacterium species be reclassified into a new genus, Methylorubrum gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 2727–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ochsner, A.M.; Sonntag, F.; Buchhaupt, M.; Schrader, J.; Vorholt, J.A. Methylobacterium extorquens: Methylotrophy and biotechnological applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 517–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, X.-H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, T.-M.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C.; Xing, X.-H.; Yang, S. Establishment of CRISPR interference in Methylorubrum extorquens and application of rapidly mining a new phytoene desaturase involved in carotenoid biosynthesis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 4515–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaya, C. Microbial modulation of hormone signaling, proteomic dynamics, and metabolomics in plant drought adaptation. Food Energy Secur. 2024, 13, e513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Yao, L.; Zhang, M.-M.; Tian, D.-D.; Wu, J.; Hu, Y.-Z.; Bao, K.; Ma, Z.-X.; Tan, L.-L.; Yang, S. Improvement of plant growth and fruit quality by introducing a phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase mutation into Methylorubrum populi. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 136, lxaf013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crisp, P.A.; Ganguly, D.; Eichten, S.R.; Borevitz, J.O.; Pogson, B.J. Reconsidering plant memory: Intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1501340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, L.; Yang, L.; Ren, C.; Zhang, H.; Lu, J.; Wang, S.; Wu, Z.; Yang, Y. A review of aberrant DNA methylation and epigenetic agents targeting DNA methyltransferases in endometriosis. Curr. Drug Targets 2020, 21, 1047–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chistoserdova, L. Modularity of methylotrophy, revisited. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 2603–2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conrath, U.; Beckers, G.J.; Langenbach, C.J.; Jaskiewicz, M.R. Priming for enhanced defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2015, 53, 97–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilker, M.; Schwachtje, J.; Baier, M.; Balazadeh, S.; Bäurle, I.; Geiselhardt, S.; Hincha, D.K.; Kunze, R.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Rillig, M.C. Priming and memory of stress responses in organisms lacking a nervous system. Biol. Rev. 2016, 91, 1118–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walter, J.; Jentsch, A.; Beierkuhnlein, C.; Kreyling, J. Ecological stress memory and cross stress tolerance in plants in the face of climate extremes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 94, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedrich, T.; Faivre, L.; Bäurle, I.; Schubert, D. Chromatin-based mechanisms of temperature memory in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 762–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fleta-Soriano, E.; Munné-Bosch, S. Stress memory and the inevitable effects of drought: A physiological perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruce, T.J.; Matthes, M.C.; Napier, J.A.; Pickett, J.A. Stressful “memories” of plants: Evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Sci. 2007, 173, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, H.; Wen, X.; Wang, Z.; Yin, S. Microbial Memory of Drought Reshapes Root-Associated Communities to Enhance Plant Resilience. Plant Cell Environ. 2025, 49, 140–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poorniammal, R.; Prabhu, S.; Kannan, J.; Janaki, D. Liquid biofertilizer-A boon to sustainable agriculture. Biot. Res Today 2020, 2, 915–918. [Google Scholar]
- Allouzi, M.M.A.; Allouzi, S.M.A.; Keng, Z.X.; Supramaniam, C.V.; Singh, A.; Chong, S. Liquid biofertilizers as a sustainable solution for agriculture. Heliyon 2022, 8, e12609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanishka, S.; Gnanachitra, M.; Kumutha, K.; Poorniammal, R.; Thiyageshwaari, S. Formulation Breakthroughs: The Key to Tackling Biofertilizer Shelf Life and Quality Challenges. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 19, 2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arya, C.; Surendra Gopal, K.; Dicto, J.; Deepa, J.; Saeed, T. Drought tolerant Methylobacterium populi (Nel-c) enhanced growth and disease resistance in amaranth. Indian J. Hortic. 2025, 82, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres Vera, R.; Bernabé García, A.J.; Carmona Álvarez, F.J.; Martínez Ruiz, J.; Fernández Martín, F. Application and effectiveness of Methylobacterium symbioticum as a biological inoculant in maize and strawberry crops. Folia Microbiol. 2024, 69, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ehinmitan, E.; Siamalube, B.; Mamati, E.; Ngumi, V.; Juma, P.; Losenge, T. Evaluating growth-promotion and drought tolerance properties of endophytic Methylobacterium spp. from semi-arid Kenya Soil. Scope 2024, 14, 924–940. [Google Scholar]
- Tsoumanis, D.; Katsenios, N.; Monokrousos, N. Enhancing Peach Tree Fertilization: Investigating Methylobacterium symbioticum SB23 as Game-Changing Agent. Agronomy 2025, 15, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jasna Sherin, P.; Anu Rajan, S.; Anith, K.; Anuradha, T.; Soni, K.; Soumya, V.; Chitra, N. Functional Pink Pigmented Facultative Methylotrophs from Capsicum frutescens Phyllosphere as Bioinoculants for Growth Promotion and Drought Stress Alleviation in Chilli. J. Crop Health 2025, 77, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnamoorthy, R.; Kwon, S.-W.; Kumutha, K.; Senthilkumar, M.; Ahmed, S.; Sa, T.; Anandham, R. Diversity of culturable methylotrophic bacteria in different genotypes of groundnut and their potential for plant growth promotion. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Jesus Santos, A.F.; Da Cas Bundt, A. Foliar inoculation with Methylobacterium symbioticum SB23 enhances biological nitrogen fixation and maize yield under contrasting edaphoclimatic conditions. Braz. J. Agric. Sci. /Rev. Bras. Ciências Agrárias 2025, 20, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues, M.Â.; Correia, C.M.; Arrobas, M. The application of a foliar spray containing Methylobacterium symbioticum had a limited effect on crop yield and nitrogen recovery in field and pot-grown maize. Plants 2024, 13, 2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solanki, J.; Vyas, R.; Jhala, Y.; Patel, H. Development of Pink Pigmented Facultative Methylotrophs (PPFMs) consortium formulation and its efficacy on Chilli (Capsicum annuum). J. Adv. Microbiol. 2024, 24, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manjubhargavi, Y.; Rajan, S.; Chitra, N.; Soumya, V.; Beena, R.; Anith, K. Pink pigmented facultative Methylotrophs (PPFMs) improve rooting in black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) cuttings and mitigate drought stress. Plant Sci. 2024, 11, 4546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joel, G.V.V.; Latha, P.; Gopal, A.V.; Sreedevi, B. Isolation and characterization of pink pigmented facultative methylotrophic bacteria: An in-vitro evaluation of the isolates for plant growth promotion on rice. Biol. Forum Int. J. 2023, 15, 1167–1179. [Google Scholar]
- Poorniammal, R.; Senthilkumar, M.; Prabhu, S.; Anandhi, K. Effect of Methylobacterium on seed germination, growth and yield of Barnyard Millet (Echinochloa frumentacea Var. COKV 2) under Rainfed Condition. Phytopathology 2020, 9, 1675–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poorniammal, R.; Prabhu, S.; Senthilkumar, M.; Anandhi, K. Effect of phyllosphere application of Methylobacterium on growth and yield of barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentacea var. COKV 2). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2020, 9, 1860–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riyas, N. Screening of Pink Pigmented Facultative Methylotroph (PPFM) Isolates for Water Stress Tolerance and Yield in Paddy. Master’s Thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, India, 2019. [Google Scholar]







| Phytohormone | Methylobacterium Production | Mechanism | Plants | Role in Drought Tolerance | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) | Yes | Root elongation, lateral root formation | Arabidopsis thaliana | Enhanced water and nutrient uptake | [58] |
| Gibberellins (GA3, GA4) | Yes | Cell elongation | Arabidopsis thaliana | Maintenance of growth under drought | [59] |
| Cytokinins | Yes | Shoot–root balance, senescence delay | Lentil | Maintains photosynthetic activity and leaf turgor during drought stress | [60,61] |
| Abscisic acid (ABA)-like compounds | Indirect modulation | Stomatal regulation | Wheat | Improved water-use efficiency | [62,63] |
| Ethylene (via ACC deaminase activity) | Ethylene levels reduced | Lowers plant ethylene by degrading ACC | Tomato | Prevents ethylene-induced growth inhibition during drought stress | [64,65] |
| Jasmonic acid (JA) | Low/indirect | Regulates stress and defense responses | Arabidopsis thaliana | Contributes to osmotic adjustment and drought-induced defense mechanisms | [58] |
| Salicylic acid (SA) | Yes | Activates antioxidant defense and stress signaling pathways | Arabidopsis thaliana | Enhances drought tolerance by reducing oxidative damage and improving stress signaling | [58] |
| Antioxidants | Types | Nature | Primary Function | Role in Drought Stress Mitigation | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzymatic | Superoxide dismutase (SOD) | Metalloenzyme | Converts O2−• to H2O2 | Reduces superoxide toxicity and limits oxidative burst under drought | [90,91] |
| Catalase (CAT) | Heme enzyme | Decomposes H2O2 | Prevents hydrogen peroxide accumulation and membrane damage | [92] | |
| Peroxidases (POD) | Oxidoreductases | Detoxify peroxides | Protects proteins, lipids, and cell membranes during dehydration | [90] | |
| Glutathione reductase (GR) | Flavoenzyme | Maintains reduced glutathione (GSH) | Sustains cellular redox balance under water stress | [93] | |
| Non-enzymatic | Carotenoids | Lipophilic pigments | ROS quenching | Protect chloroplasts and photosynthetic machinery | [94] |
| Glutathione (GSH) | Thiol tripeptide | Redox buffering | Scavenges ROS and regenerates other antioxidants | [95] | |
| Phenolics | Secondary metabolites | Radical scavenging | Stabilize membranes and protect macromolecules | [96] | |
| Flavonoid-like compounds | Polyphenols | Metal chelation | Suppress ROS formation and oxidative damage | [97] | |
| Tocopherol-like compounds | Lipid-soluble antioxidants | Membrane protection | Prevent lipid peroxidation and electrolyte leakage | [98] | |
| Exopolysaccharides (EPS) | Extracellular polymers | Indirect antioxidant action | Improve water retention and buffer ROS diffusion | [99] | |
| Compatible solutes (trehalose, sugars) | Osmoprotectants | Cellular stabilization | Maintain hydration and reduce oxidative stress | [100] |
| Methylobacterium Strains | Application | Crop | Dosage and Time of Application | Stress Level | Mode of Action | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methylorubrum podarium, M. gregans, M. populi | Seed treatment and soil application | Chili | 1% PPFM | 30% Poly ethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 | Cell membrane integrity, relative water content, proline, activity of super oxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase also improved | [155] |
| M. populi, M. thiocyanatum | Seed treatment | Groundnut | 1% PPFM @ 45, 60 Days after sowing (DAS) | Natural condition | Reducing stress-related ethylene and proline accumulation | [45,156] |
| M. symbioticum | Foliar inoculation | Maize | 8–10 leaf stage 333 g ha−1 of wettable powder in 300 L ha−1 of water | Natural condition | Enhances biological nitrogen fixation and yield under contrasting edaphoclimatic conditions | [157] |
| Methylobacterium spp., M. komagatae | Seed treatment | Maize | - | - | Antioxidant enzyme catalase (CAT) and the osmoprotectant proline production | [153] |
| M. symbioticum | Foliar application | Maize | - | - | N fixation capacity and drought tolerance | [158] |
| M. radiotolerans, M. populi | Foliar application | Chili | 5 × 108 CFU/mL @ 30, 45 Days after transplanting (DATP) | Natural condition | Growth promotion and yield increases | [159] |
| M. brachiatum, M. thiocyanatum, M. populi | Seed treatment and foliar application | Mung bean | - | Reduced oxidative stress in plants by managing the production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide radicals (O2−). | [109] | |
| M. aerolatum, M. aminovorans, Methylorubrum zatmanii | Sett treatment and foliar spray | Black pepper | 1% PPFM @ 45, 75 and 90 Days after planting (DAP) | 5% PEG 6000 | Growth promotion and drought stress mitigation | [160] |
| M. aquaticum, M. phyllosphaerae, M. radiotolerans, M. fujisawaense | Seed treatment | Rice | 108 CFU/mL Overnight soaked seed | 0.73 MPa PEG 6000 | Yield increase and drought tolerance | [161] |
| Methylobacterium spp. | Seed treatment and Foliar application | Barnyard Millet | 1% 30, 45, 60 DAS | Natural condition | Yield increase and drought tolerance | [162,163] |
| Methylobacterium spp. | Seed treatment and Foliar application | Rice | 1% 30, 45 DATP | 1%, 2%, 3% mannitol | Plant cell membrane integrity under water stress conditions | [164] |
| Methylobacterium, Methylocapsa, Methylocella, Methyloferula, Methylohalomonas, Methylomonas, Methylophilus, Methylopila, Methylosinus, Methylotenera, Methylovirgula and Methylovorus | Seed treatment and Foliar application | All crops | - | - | Osmoprotectants such as sugars and alcohols which ultimately help to protect the plants from desiccation and excessive radiations | [19] |
| M. oryzae | Seed treatment | Lentil | 20mL/seed | PEG 6000 | Increasing plant cytokinin levels | [61] |
| Methylobacterium spp. | Foliar application | Tomato | 2% @ 25, 45 DAS | 50% Field capacity | Growth promotion and drought stress mitigation | [111] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Poorniammal, R.; Prabhu, S.; Dufossé, L.; Sharmi, K.R. Methylobacterium-Mediated Phytohormone Regulation and Metabolic Priming in Plant Drought Resilience. Agronomy 2026, 16, 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050494
Poorniammal R, Prabhu S, Dufossé L, Sharmi KR. Methylobacterium-Mediated Phytohormone Regulation and Metabolic Priming in Plant Drought Resilience. Agronomy. 2026; 16(5):494. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050494
Chicago/Turabian StylePoorniammal, Rajendran, Somasundaram Prabhu, Laurent Dufossé, and Krishnakumar Rithikha Sharmi. 2026. "Methylobacterium-Mediated Phytohormone Regulation and Metabolic Priming in Plant Drought Resilience" Agronomy 16, no. 5: 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050494
APA StylePoorniammal, R., Prabhu, S., Dufossé, L., & Sharmi, K. R. (2026). Methylobacterium-Mediated Phytohormone Regulation and Metabolic Priming in Plant Drought Resilience. Agronomy, 16(5), 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16050494

