Next Article in Journal
From Smart Irrigation to Nature-Positive Water Management in Australian Sugarcane: Irrigation Technologies, Nature Frameworks, and Integration Pathways
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Summer Catch Cropping on Nitrogen Accumulation and Loss in Farmland with Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Concurrent Elevation of CO2 and Temperature Stimulates N2O Emissions from Rice Paddies in a Rice–Wheat Cropping System

Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2026, 16(17), 1722; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16171722
Submission received: 31 July 2026 / Revised: 26 August 2026 / Accepted: 29 August 2026 / Published: 4 September 2026

Abstract

Paddy fields are a major agricultural hotspot for nitrous oxide (N2O), contributing approximately 11% of global agricultural emissions. While elevated CO2 and warming individually regulate N2O emissions by modulating soil carbon, nitrogen (N) availability and microbial activity, the effects of concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature (ECT) and the underlying microbial mechanisms under field conditions remain poorly understood. Here, we used a free-air CO2 enrichment and temperature increase (T-FACE) system in a rice–wheat cropping system to investigate the impacts of ECT on N2O emissions from rice paddies and identify the underlying biogeochemical and microbial mechanisms. Results showed that ECT increased area-scaled and yield-scaled N2O emissions by 15.3% and 17.6%, respectively. Mechanistically, during the peak emission period, ECT significantly increased soil NH4+–N content by 40.2% and the denitrification gene ratio [(nirK + nirS)/nosZ] by 27.5%. Furthermore, ECT increased the diversity of nitrifying communities but decreased that of denitrifying communities, while reshaping the composition of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and denitrifiers, thereby altering nitrification and denitrification. Overall, our field-based evidence suggests that ECT can stimulate N2O emissions primarily by increasing soil N substrate availability and shifting denitrifier communities in ways that may favor N2O accumulation. These findings offer mechanistic insights into climate-driven N2O emissions.

1. Introduction

Rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations and temperatures, driven by human activities since the Industrial Revolution, represent defining hallmarks of contemporary climate change [1,2,3]. As CO2 acts as the primary substrate for plant photosynthesis and temperature fundamentally dictates the metabolic rates of plants and soil microorganisms, their concurrent elevation exerts profound challenges to the stability, biogeochemical functioning, and sustainability of global agroecosystems [4,5,6,7].
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) serves as the primary staple food for more than half of the global population, playing a central role in global food security [8,9]. However, flooded paddy soils are also a major agricultural hotspot for nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions—a potent, long-lived greenhouse gas with a global warming potential nearly 300 times that of CO2 and the primary agent of stratospheric ozone depletion [10,11]. Globally, rice paddies emit approximately 1.7 kg N ha−1 yr−1 of N2O, accumulating to a total annual flux of ~130 Gg yr−1 and accounting for ~11% of global agricultural N2O emissions [12,13]. Driven by intensive reactive nitrogen (N) inputs, atmospheric N2O concentrations are accelerating at a rate of 0.75–1.0 ppb yr−1 [14,15,16]. Given that agricultural soils contribute roughly half of global N2O emissions [15,17], deciphering how paddy N2O emissions respond to future climate scenarios is critical for accurately predicting climate–carbon/nitrogen feedbacks and mitigating agricultural greenhouse gas forcing.
Soil N2O emissions stem primarily from microbial nitrification and denitrification processes, both of which are highly sensitive to CO2 enrichment and elevated temperatures [18,19]. While a substantial body of research has documented the individual effects of elevated CO2 or warming on paddy N2O emissions [20,21,22], studies examining concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature (ECT) remain limited [23,24,25]. For instance, Pereira et al. (2013) [24] reported that ECT exerted a negligible effect on seasonal N2O emissions, whereas Bhattacharyya et al. (2013) [23] and Wang et al. (2018) [25] observed substantial emission surges under ECT scenarios. A recent global synthesis further highlighted that ECT increased N2O emissions by an average of 36% relative to ambient conditions [19]. Conceptually, these emission increases are likely attributed to enhanced photosynthate allocation to roots under elevated CO2, which elevates labile soil carbon availability and fuels denitrification [26], coupled with warming-induced acceleration of soil organic N mineralization [27,28], which boosts substrate supply for both nitrification and denitrification [29]. Nevertheless, these studies have predominantly focused on N2O emission dynamics, lacking direct empirical evidence that couples emission patterns with underlying biogeochemical and microbial pathways.
Existing literature indicates that ECT can reshape soil N transformations via dual biogeochemical pathways. On the one hand, ECT alters substrate availability by expanding total and labile N pools [30], reshaping microbial necromass accumulation and amino sugar dynamics [31], and stimulating root exudation through increased C allocation [23]. On the other hand, ECT restructures key functional microbial communities, selectively modulating root-associated C/N-metabolizing bacteria [32], shifting ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) community structures [33,34], and altering the balance between active AOB and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) [35]. Notwithstanding these isolated biogeochemical and microbiological insights, most studies have evaluated soil chemical properties or microbial taxonomic shifts independently, without synchronously tracking field-scale N2O flux trajectories. Crucially, how these ECT-induced microbial restructurings and substrate shifts interactively govern real-time paddy N2O emissions under realistic field conditions remains a major knowledge gap.
To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a field experiment using a free-air CO2 enrichment and temperature increase (T-FACE) system in a typical rice–wheat cropping system. The objectives of this study were to quantify the impacts of concurrent elevated CO2 and warming on in situ N2O emissions from rice paddies and to unravel the underlying substrate and microbial mechanisms driving these emission responses. We hypothesized that ECT would exert a synergistic positive effect on N2O emissions, driven by enhanced root C exudation and accelerated N mineralization, which collectively stimulate the abundance and metabolic activity of nitrifiers and denitrifiers. Findings from this study will provide a mechanistic foundation for refining global biogeochemical models and developing high-yield, low-emission rice management strategies under future climate scenarios.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

The field experiment was initiated in 2021 at the Danyang Experimental Station of Nanjing Agricultural University (31.9° N, 119.5° E), Baolin Village, Jiangsu Province, China. The site is characterized by a typical subtropical monsoon climate with four distinct seasons and has been managed under a winter wheat–rice cropping system for many years. The mean annual temperature and precipitation for 2021–2024 were 17.0 °C and 1281 mm, respectively. Prior to establishment of the experimental platform in 2021, the topsoil (0–20 cm) had the following baseline properties: soil organic carbon, 21.1 g kg−1; total nitrogen, 1.1 g kg−1; total phosphorus, 0.5 g kg−1; and total potassium, 12.6 g kg−1.
The field experiment comprised two treatments, namely an ambient control (CK; ambient CO2 concentration and temperature) and a concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature (ECT) treatment, with three replicates arranged in a randomized complete block design. Prior to the experiment, the soil within each block was thoroughly tilled and mixed to ensure within-block homogeneity. The study was conducted using a free-air CO2 enrichment and temperature increase (T-FACE) system, which integrates a Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) system with a Free-Air Temperature Increase (FATI) array (Figure S1). The FACE system consisted of six octagonal rings (8 m in diameter), with a minimum spacing of 25 m between rings to avoid gas cross-contamination. In the ECT treatment, atmospheric CO2 concentration was elevated by approximately 160 ppm above ambient, reaching about 550 ppm, consistent with the IPCC medium-emission scenario (SSP2-4.5) for the end of this century [36]. High-purity CO2 from a 20-m3 liquid storage tank was delivered through a main pipeline and injected into each ring via micro-porous perimeter tubes. Real-time control was managed by an automated central system (Yisheng Taihe, China). Each ring was equipped with eight evenly distributed CO2 sensors (VC2008T, SenseAir, Delsbo, Sweden), a temperature sensor, and an anemometer-wind vane. Gas release was dynamically regulated according to wind speed and direction, and injection was automatically suspended when wind speed exceeded 5 m s−1 to improve gas use efficiency. Fumigation was conducted during daytime hours (05:00–19:00). Injection tubes and sensor arrays were suspended 60–75 cm above the rice canopy and adjusted weekly as the crop grew. Control rings were fitted with identical non-fumigating dummy pipelines to account for potential microclimatic effects. During the 2024 rice-growing season, mean daytime CO2 concentrations were 542 ppm in ECT rings and 397 ppm in CK rings.
The FATI system consisted of an infrared heating array coupled with an automatic temperature-tracking platform. Each warming unit included an aluminum reflector plate (180 cm × 20 cm) fitted with an 800-W far-infrared electric heating element. The target warming level was set at 1.0–2.0 °C above ambient, which is within the range of projected warming under future climate scenarios [37]. Heating plates were suspended approximately 75 cm above the canopy to warm both the upper canopy and surface soil through downward infrared radiation. Unheated dummy plates were installed in CK plots at the same height to minimize shading and other microclimatic artifacts. Canopy temperature was monitored using infrared sensors directed at the uppermost fully expanded leaves, whereas soil temperature was continuously recorded at a 5-cm depth using vertically inserted probes connected to a multi-channel automatic logger at 10-min intervals. Plate height was adjusted weekly to maintain a constant distance from the canopy. During the 2024 rice-growing season, mean canopy temperature was 26.73 °C in CK and 27.63 °C in ECT; mean surface soil temperature was 25.27 °C in CK and 25.62 °C in ECT.

2.2. Crop Management

The local conventional japonica rice cultivar Wuyunjing 23 was used. Twenty-five-day-old seedlings were manually transplanted in late June and harvested in early November. Plants were spaced at 25 cm × 15 cm, with three seedlings per hill. Buffer rows with the same spacing were established around the experimental area to minimize edge effects. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied at 225 kg N ha−1 as urea (46% N) in three splits, i.e., 40% as basal fertilizer 1 d before transplanting, 30% at tillering (7 d after transplanting), and 30% at panicle initiation. Phosphorus was applied as superphosphate (120 kg P2O5 ha−1; 12% P2O5) entirely as a basal dressing. Potassium was applied as potassium chloride (160 kg K2O ha−1; 60% K2O), split equally between basal application and panicle initiation. A conventional alternate wetting and drying (AWD) regime was adopted, including shallow flooding during the early growth stage to promote tillering, mid-season drainage to suppress unproductive tillers, and AWD cycles thereafter until final drainage 7 d before harvest.
The octagonal rings and permanent PVC bases remained in place throughout the rice and wheat growing seasons and were designed to minimize interference with normal field operations. All agronomic practices inside the rings, including tillage, planting, fertilization, irrigation, and harvest, were performed manually and followed the same schedule and methods as the surrounding field. The permanent PVC bases remained flush with the soil surface and therefore did not obstruct planting, manual weeding, fertilizer application, or harvesting; planting density and crop management within the bases were identical to those in the surrounding ring area. Specifically, during the wheat season, the field was maintained under rainfed conditions with supplemental irrigation as needed. Between the rice and wheat seasons, crop residues were returned to the field, and the land was prepared by shallow manual tillage within the rings to simulate field-scale operations. All other management practices, including pest, disease, and weed control, followed local high-yield recommendations.

2.3. Sampling and Measurement Methods

2.3.1. N2O Emission Measurement

N2O fluxes were measured during the entire three-year experimental period (2022–2024) using the static closed-chamber technique [38]. Since the interannual patterns were highly similar, the 2024 dataset is presented herein as a representative case.
Each sampling system consisted of a permanent PVC base (50 cm × 50 cm × 15 cm), inserted 2–3 d before transplanting, and a removable PVC chamber (50 cm × 50 cm; 50 or 100 cm high depending on plant height). The chamber was externally wrapped with reflective insulation and sponge to minimize solar heating during sampling. To standardize diurnal variation, gas sampling was consistently performed between 09:00 and 11:00 a.m. on each sampling day. At the time of measurement, thermally insulated chambers were fitted into the water-filled grooves of the permanent PVC bases to establish an airtight seal. Gas samples were withdrawn at 10-min intervals over a 30-min closure period (i.e., at 0, 10, 20, and 30 min after chamber deployment) and transferred into pre-evacuated 500-mL aluminum foil gas bags for offline analysis. Samples were transported to the laboratory and analyzed for N2O concentrations within 24 h using a photoacoustic gas analyzer (INNOVA 1412, LumaSense, Ballerup, Denmark), which was calibrated with standard gases prior to each measurement to ensure analytical precision.
Gas sampling was performed weekly, with additional sampling after fertilization and 2–3 extra samplings during the mid-season drainage period. N2O flux (F, mg m−2 h−1) was calculated as:
F = ρ × 273 ( 273 + T ) × V S × Δ c Δ t
where ρ denotes the standard-state density of N2O (1.977 g L−1); T is the mean chamber air temperature (°C); V and S refer to headspace volume (m3) and base area (m2), respectively; and Δc/Δt is the linear rate of N2O concentration change (µL L−1 h−1). To ensure data reliability, only flux measurements with a coefficient of determination (R2) > 0.90 for the linear regression were retained for further analysis. To ensure representative gas sampling and data accuracy, two gas sampling points (i.e., chambers) were established within each octagonal ring as technical replicates (Figure S1), and the measurements from the two chambers were averaged to obtain a single value per biological replicate (ring). Seasonal cumulative area-scaled N2O emissions were calculated by trapezoidal integration of all fluxes over the rice-growing season, and yield-scaled emissions were expressed as kg N2O t−1 grain yield.

2.3.2. Aboveground Biomass and Plant N Accumulation

At maturity, three representative hills were selected from each plot (octagonal ring) according to the average number of productive tillers. Aboveground biomass was determined after oven-drying the samples to constant weight at 70 °C. The dried plant material was ground, and N concentration was measured by Dumas combustion using an elemental analyzer (vario EL cube, Langenselbold, Germany). Plant N accumulation was calculated as biomass multiplied by N concentration. Grain yield was determined by harvesting, threshing, and air-drying representative hills from the center of each plot. Final yield was adjusted to 14.5% moisture content according to the national standard for japonica rice.

2.3.3. Soil Characteristics

During the 2024 N2O emission peak, soil samples (0–15 cm depth) were collected by five-point sampling with a 5-cm-diameter corer and pooled per ring to obtain a representative composite sample. After homogenization and sieving, each sample was split into two portions. One was stored at 4 °C for analysis of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), NH4+-N, NO3-N [39,40] and soil N mineralization rate [41], and the other was stored at −80 °C for microbial functional gene abundance and high-throughput sequencing. DOC was extracted with deionized water (1:5 w/v) and quantified on a total organic carbon analyzer (Multi N/C 3100, Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). NH4+-N and NO3-N were extracted with 2 M KCl (1:5 w/v) and determined using a flow autoanalyzer (Auto Analyzer 3, BRAN LUEBBE, Norderstedt, Germany). Soil N mineralization rate was measured using an incubation method. In brief, duplicate fresh soil samples, each equivalent to 5 g of dry soil, were prepared. One subsample was immediately extracted for NH4+–N and NO3–N analysis, while the other was incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 28 days. During incubation, deionized water was added periodically to maintain constant soil moisture. At the end of the incubation, the second subsample was similarly extracted and analyzed. The N mineralization rate was calculated using the following equation [42]:
N m   =   ( N I     N S ) / D
where Nm is the soil N mineralization rate (mg kg−1 d−1), NI and NS are the total soil NH4+-N and NO3-N concentrations (mg kg−1) after and before incubation, respectively, and D is the incubation duration (d).

2.3.4. Microbial DNA Extraction and Functional Gene Quantification

Frozen soil samples were thawed and DNA was extracted from 0.25 g of soil using the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA concentration and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). Absolute quantitative PCR was performed on an ABI Q6 Flex Real-Time PCR system using ChamQ SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The primer pairs ArchamoAF-ArchamoAR [43], amoA1F-amoA2R [44], NirK1F-NirK5R [45], nirSF-NirSR [46], and nosZ1F-nosZ1R [47] were used to quantify the copy numbers of amoA-AOA, amoA-AOB, nirK, nirS, and nosZ genes, reflecting nitrifier and denitrifier abundances, respectively. Each 20-µL reaction consisted of 10 µL 2× ChamQ SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, China), 0.4 µL of each primer (10 µM), 0.4 µL 50× ROX Reference Dye 2, 1.5 µL DNA template, and nuclease-free water to volume. Thermal cycling followed the manufacturer’s recommendations with slight adjustments to the annealing temperature. All runs were executed on a QuantStudio™ 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

2.3.5. High-Throughput Sequencing and Analysis

Soil microbial DNA was extracted using the same protocol and analyzed by functional gene amplicon sequencing. The sequencing pipeline comprised PCR amplification, product purification, quantification and normalization, PE300 library preparation, and high-throughput sequencing. Before library construction, DNA integrity was assessed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Target genes were amplified with the same primers as in the qPCR assay, and the amplicons were visualized on 2% agarose, purified with the AxyPrep DNA Gel Recovery Kit (AXYGEN, Union City, CA, USA), and quantified on a Quantus™ Fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Purified products were then pooled proportionally to meet the sequencing depth required per sample. Libraries were constructed with the NEXTFLEX® Rapid DNA-Seq Kit and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform.
Raw reads were quality-filtered, and non-redundant sequences were retained after singleton removal. OTUs were delineated at 97% similarity using UPARSE [48], with chimeras discarded and representative sequences selected. An OTU table was generated by mapping quality-filtered reads to these representative sequences at ≥97% identity. Taxonomic classification was performed by aligning representative sequences against the SILVA 16S rRNA database (Release 138) with the RDP Classifier 2.2 at an 80% confidence threshold [49], and community composition was summarized at different taxonomic levels.
Subsequent analyses included alpha diversity, beta diversity and community composition. Alpha diversity was assessed via rarefaction analysis using Mothur v.1.21.1 [50], yielding observed species, Chao1, ACE, Shannon, Simpson, and Pielou_J indices; between-treatment differences for each index were tested using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Beta diversity was assessed by principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of Bray–Curtis distances, computed using the vegan package, and the PCoA was performed with the ape package. Community composition was analyzed at the genus level based on relative abundances, and treatment effects were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The independent-samples t-test was used to evaluate the effects of concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature on N2O emissions, rice biomass, plant N accumulation, soil properties, and the abundances of nitrifiers and denitrifiers. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20, and figures were prepared with GraphPad Prism 9. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. N2O Emissions

The temporal pattern of N2O fluxes was similar in CK and ECT, with fluxes remaining low under continuous flooding and increasing sharply after mid-season drainage and during the subsequent alternate wetting and drying cycles (Figure 1a). Relative to CK, ECT significantly increased seasonal cumulative area-scaled N2O emissions by 15.3% (Figure 1b). Yield-scaled N2O emissions were also higher under ECT, increasing by 17.6% compared with CK (Figure 1c).

3.2. Rice Biomass, Plant N Accumulation and Soil Properties

ECT did not significantly affect aboveground biomass or plant N accumulation at maturity (Figure 2a,b). At the peak stage of N2O emission, ECT significantly increased the soil N mineralization rate by 55.9% (Figure 2c). Soil DOC showed an increasing trend under ECT, with an 8.3% increase relative to CK (Figure 2d). In contrast, ECT increased soil NH4+–N content by 40.2% and decreased NO3–N content by 30.5% (Figure 2e,f).

3.3. Nitrifier and Denitrifier Abundances

ECT did not significantly affect the abundances of AOA, AOB, nirK-type denitrifiers, or nosZ-type denitrifiers (Figure 3a,b,e). The abundance of nirS-type denitrifiers showed an increasing trend under ECT, with a 22.1% increase relative to CK, although the difference was not significant (Figure 3d). In contrast, the (nirK + nirS)/nosZ ratio was significantly increased by 27.5% under ECT (Figure 3f).

3.4. Nitrifier and Denitrifier Communities

3.4.1. Community Alpha Diversity

Compared with CK, ECT significantly increased AOA richness, diversity, and evenness. Specifically, observed species, Chao1, and ACE increased by 20.1%, 13.7%, and 15.4%, respectively, while the Shannon index, Simpson index, and Pielou’s evenness increased by 20.9%, 8.5%, and 16.8%, respectively (Table 1). In contrast, AOB alpha diversity did not differ significantly between treatments (Table 1).
For the nirK-type denitrifier community, richness indices did not differ significantly between CK and ECT, but ECT significantly decreased the Shannon index by 12.7%, the Simpson index by 3.5%, and Pielou’s evenness by 12.4% (Table 1). Similarly, for the nirS-type community, richness was unaffected, whereas the Shannon index, Simpson index, and Pielou’s evenness were significantly reduced by 5.9%, 2.9%, and 5.3%, respectively (Table 1). For the nosZ-type community, ECT significantly decreased Pielou’s evenness by 1.6%, while the other alpha diversity indices remained unchanged (Table 1).

3.4.2. Community Beta Diversity

ECT markedly altered the beta diversity of soil nitrifier and denitrifier communities. The AOA and AOB communities under ECT were clearly separated from those under CK. The first two principal coordinates explained 84.1% and 6.4% of the variance for AOA, and 50.1% and 13.1% for AOB, respectively (Figure 4a,b).
Similarly, the nirK-, nirS- and nosZ-type denitrifier communities under ECT were clearly separated from CK. The first two principal coordinates explained 34.0% and 17.6% of the variance for nirK, 59.1% and 12.0% for nirS, and 31.2% and 15.7% for nosZ, respectively (Figure 4c–e).

3.4.3. Composition of Nitrifier and Denitrifier Communities

ECT changed the community composition of AOA and nirK-, nirS-, and nosZ-type denitrifiers at the genus level (Figure 5). Within the AOA community, ECT reduced the relative abundance of Nitrosopumilus by 29.5% and increased the relative abundance of Candidatus Nitrosotalea approximately sevenfold compared with CK (Figure 5a). The AOB community was overwhelmingly dominated by Nitrosospira in both CK and ECT (>99% relative abundance), and no genus showed a significant response to ECT (Figure 5b).
Among nirK-type denitrifiers, ECT increased the relative abundance of Rhodanobacter and Gemmatimonas by 38.6% and 127.0%, respectively (Figure 5c). For nirS-type denitrifiers, ECT significantly decreased Anaerolinea by 59.6% but increased Sideroxydans by 156.7% (Figure 5d). For the nosZ-type community, ECT did not significantly alter the relative abundance of the dominant genera (Figure 5e).

4. Discussion

Our field experiment showed that concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature significantly increased N2O emissions from rice paddies in a rice–wheat cropping system, consistent with earlier findings [23,25]. This stimulation may be attributed to several mechanisms. First, ECT may have increased labile carbon inputs to the paddy soil. Elevated CO2 often enhances photosynthesis and root carbon allocation, thereby increasing root exudation and the supply of labile C to the rhizosphere, which in turn can stimulate nitrification and denitrification and promote N2O production [26,51]. In our study, soil DOC content tended to be higher under ECT (Figure 2), implying a greater supply of labile C for nitrification and denitrification that likely enhanced N2O emissions [23,25,51].
Second, ECT likely enhanced N turnover in the soil, thereby increasing the supply of substrates for N2O production. Warming can accelerate soil organic N mineralization and increase the availability of mineral N, especially NH4+-N, which can support both nitrification and denitrification processes [20,29]. Consistent with this mechanism, ECT significantly increased the soil N mineralization rate and NH4+-N content in our study (Figure 2). The enrichment of available N under ECT likely provided more substrates for microbial N transformations, ultimately facilitating greater N2O emissions [16]. By contrast, plant N accumulation was not significantly increased, consistent with Pereira et al. (2013) [24], indicating that the additional mineral N generated under ECT was not fully retained by crop uptake and may instead have been more readily available for microbial processes.
Third, ECT altered the abundance and structure of nitrifying and denitrifying communities, thereby shifting the balance between N2O production and reduction. Nitrifiers and denitrifiers are the key microbial groups governing N2O emissions in rice paddies [18,19]. In our study, ECT significantly increased the functional denitrification gene ratio (nirK + nirS)/nosZ (Figure 3), indicating that denitrification was shifted toward N2O production rather than complete reduction to N2. However, ECT did not significantly affect the abundances of AOA and AOB, suggesting that the stimulatory effect of ECT on N2O emissions was more likely driven by changes in denitrifier function than by changes in nitrifier abundance. In addition, ECT increased nirS abundance more strongly than nirK, implying that nirS-type denitrifiers may have played a greater role in promoting incomplete denitrification and the resulting N2O accumulation.
At the community level, ECT reshaped both nitrifier and denitrifier assemblages (Table 1; Figure 5). ECT increased the alpha diversity of the AOA community (Table 1), accompanied by a decrease in the relative abundance of Nitrosopumilus and an increase in the relative abundance of Ca. Nitrosotalea (Figure 5). This pattern likely reflected the altered soil carbon and nitrogen status under ECT. Specifically, the increased NH4+-N concentration and the tendency toward higher DOC content (Figure 2) may have created more heterogeneous niches for different AOA groups, thereby promoting community diversification and compositional turnover [52]. This is consistent with a previous study showing that ECT can enhance nitrifier diversity [35].
However, ECT did not significantly affect denitrifier richness but reduced community diversity and evenness (Table 1), indicating a more uneven and selectively structured denitrifier community (Figure 5). These changes were likely driven by shifts in soil pH, C/N ratio, and O2 availability under ECT, which may have acted as environmental filters [23,30,53,54]. Among the changed taxa, the enrichment of Rhodanobacter is notable because this genus is often associated with acidic and low-redox environments and has been linked to N2O production [54,55,56,57]. In some Rhodanobacter strains, the absence of N2O reductase prevents the final reduction of N2O to N2, which may favor N2O accumulation [58]. The increase in the relative abundance of Gemmatimonas may have been supported by greater labile C input from elevated CO2 and enhanced N mineralization under warming [26,27,30,59].
In contrast, the decline in the relative abundance of Anaerolinea may have been associated with increased O2 release from roots under elevated CO2, which would be unfavorable for this obligate anaerobe [53,60,61]. The increase in Sideroxydans may further indicate strengthened Fe and N cycling under ECT, as this nitrate-dependent Fe(II)-oxidizing bacterium can couple Fe2+ oxidation to nitrate reduction [62,63]. Under ECT, warming may have accelerated microbial O2 consumption, lowered soil redox potential, and enhanced Fe3+ reduction, thereby increasing Fe2+ availability and creating more favorable conditions for Sideroxydans [23,64]. Taken together, these results suggest that ECT promoted N2O emissions mainly by altering the abundance and community structure of key nitrifying and denitrifying microbes, which likely shifted microbial N transformation toward greater N2O production.
Our results showed that ECT increased yield-scaled N2O emissions, underscoring a dual challenge for rice–wheat systems, i.e., maintaining yield while mitigating N2O release under future warmer and CO2-enriched conditions. Addressing this challenge will require integrated strategies that simultaneously improve productivity and reduce N2O emissions. For example, optimizing straw management by converting straw into biochar before soil incorporation may enhance carbon sequestration, improve soil fertility, and substantially reduce N2O emissions [65,66,67]. The use of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers, such as nitrification inhibitors, urease inhibitors, and controlled-release fertilizers, can also improve nitrogen use efficiency and mitigate N2O emissions in intensive paddy systems [65,68,69]. In addition, deep placement of nitrogen fertilizer has been shown to increase rice yield while reducing N2O emissions [66]. Finally, breeding climate-resilient rice varieties, particularly through hybrid breeding approaches, may help combine heat tolerance with low-emission traits and thereby reduce both yield losses and N2O release under future climate change scenarios [70,71]. Moving forward, increased efforts will be needed to adapt to and mitigate the negative effects of climate change, ensuring the sustainability of rice yields and minimizing N2O emissions from rice agriculture.
This study has some limitations. First, soil NH4+, NO3, and DOC were measured only once, during the peak N2O emission period. This timing was chosen to capture soil N and C availability under conditions most relevant to the observed fluxes while minimizing disturbance to the long-term non-destructive gas flux measurements. However, a single sampling event cannot capture the seasonal dynamics of soil N and C pools, so relationships with N2O emissions should be interpreted cautiously. Future studies should adopt a dynamic soil sampling scheme synchronized with N2O flux measurements to better resolve the temporal coupling between soil N/C availability and N2O emissions. Second, plant biomass was measured only at the ripening stage and thus represents cumulative growth over the entire season rather than stage-specific growth. The biomass–N2O relationship should therefore be interpreted at the seasonal scale, reflecting overall photosynthetic carbon allocation belowground rather than a direct phase-specific link. Root-derived carbon inputs, such as rhizodeposition and fine-root turnover, vary among growth stages and may contribute to temporal fluctuations in N2O emissions. However, phase-specific belowground carbon inputs were not quantified, which limits our ability to directly link biomass dynamics to N2O fluxes at particular developmental stages. Future studies should measure root biomass, root exudates, or belowground carbon allocation at multiple growth stages to better resolve the temporal coupling between plant carbon supply and N2O emissions.

5. Conclusions

Our results indicated that concurrent elevation of CO2 and temperature increased both area-scaled and yield-scaled N2O emissions by 15.3% and 17.6% from rice paddies in a rice–wheat cropping system. This stimulation was mainly associated with enhanced soil N availability, as ECT increased the soil N mineralization rate and NH4+–N content, together with shifts in nitrifying and denitrifying microbial communities. Specifically, ECT increased the (nirK + nirS)/nosZ ratio and altered the alpha diversity and composition of AOA and nirK-/nirS-type denitrifier communities, likely suggesting a greater potential for N2O production under future climate change. These findings emphasize the urgent need for agronomic practices that can sustain rice production and reduce N2O emissions from flooded rice agroecosystems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy16171722/s1, Figure S1: Schematic diagram and field installation of the T-FACE system [72].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L., H.Q., Y.D. and Y.J.; formal analysis, J.L., Q.Y., Y.S., H.Q. and Y.L.; data curation, J.L., Q.Y., Y.S., X.M., T.C. and Y.R.; writing—original draft, J.L.; writing—review & editing, H.Q., Y.L., Y.D. and Y.J.; funding acquisition, Y.L., Y.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271635, U24A20402, and 32301354) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (GZC20262209).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy reasons.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. IPCC. IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 35–115. [Google Scholar]
  2. Montzka, S.A. Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI)—NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory. Available online: https://gml.noaa.gov/aggi/aggi.html (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  3. WMO. State of the Global Climate 2024. Available online: https://library.wmo.int/records/item/69455-state-of-the-global-climate-2024?language_id=13&back=&offset= (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  4. Ainsworth, E.A.; Rogers, A. The Response of Photosynthesis and Stomatal Conductance to Rising [CO2]: Mechanisms and Environmental Interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. García-Palacios, P.; Crowther, T.W.; Dacal, M.; Hartley, I.P.; Reinsch, S.; Rinnan, R.; Rousk, J.; van den Hoogen, J.; Ye, J.-S.; Bradford, M.A. Evidence for Large Microbial-Mediated Losses of Soil Carbon under Anthropogenic Warming. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Li, C.; Camac, J.; Robinson, A.; Kompas, T. Predicting Changes in Agricultural Yields under Climate Change Scenarios and Their Implications for Global Food Security. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Smith, P.; Li, L.; Filley, T.R.; Cheng, K.; Shen, M.; He, Y.; Pan, G. Size and Variability of Crop Productivity Both Impacted by CO2 Enrichment and Warming—A Case Study of 4 Year Field Experiment in a Chinese Paddy. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 221, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: FAOSTAT. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed on 27 August 2025).
  9. Yuan, S.; Linquist, B.A.; Wilson, L.T.; Cassman, K.G.; Stuart, A.M.; Pede, V.; Miro, B.; Saito, K.; Agustiani, N.; Aristya, V.E.; et al. Sustainable Intensification for a Larger Global Rice Bowl. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. IPCC. IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013; p. 1535. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ravishankara, A.R.; Daniel, J.S.; Portmann, R.W. Nitrous Oxide (N2O): The Dominant Ozone-Depleting Substance Emitted in the 21st Century. Science 2009, 326, 123–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Cui, X.; Zhou, F.; Ciais, P.; Davidson, E.A.; Tubiello, F.N.; Niu, X.; Ju, X.; Canadell, J.G.; Bouwman, A.F.; Jackson, R.B.; et al. Global Mapping of Crop-Specific Emission Factors Highlights Hotspots of Nitrous Oxide Mitigation. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 886–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. EPA Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Data Tool | US EPA. Available online: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ghgdata/nonco2/ (accessed on 29 July 2026).
  14. Thompson, R.L.; Lassaletta, L.; Patra, P.K.; Wilson, C.; Wells, K.C.; Gressent, A.; Koffi, E.N.; Chipperfield, M.P.; Winiwarter, W.; Davidson, E.A.; et al. Acceleration of Global N2O Emissions Seen from Two Decades of Atmospheric Inversion. Nat. Clim. Change 2019, 9, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Tian, H.; Xu, R.; Canadell, J.G.; Thompson, R.L.; Winiwarter, W.; Suntharalingam, P.; Davidson, E.A.; Ciais, P.; Jackson, R.B.; Janssens-Maenhout, G.; et al. A Comprehensive Quantification of Global Nitrous Oxide Sources and Sinks. Nature 2020, 586, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Zhu, G.; Shi, H.; Zhong, L.; He, G.; Wang, B.; Shan, J.; Han, P.; Liu, T.; Wang, S.; Liu, C.; et al. Nitrous Oxide Sources, Mechanisms and Mitigation. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2025, 6, 574–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Cui, X.; Bo, Y.; Adalibieke, W.; Winiwarter, W.; Zhang, X.; Davidson, E.A.; Sun, Z.; Tian, H.; Smith, P.; Zhou, F. The Global Potential for Mitigating Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Croplands. One Earth 2024, 7, 401–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Kuypers, M.M.M.; Marchant, H.K.; Kartal, B. The Microbial Nitrogen-Cycling Network. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  19. Qian, H.; Zhu, X.; Huang, S.; Linquist, B.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Wassmann, R.; Minamikawa, K.; Martinez-Eixarch, M.; Yan, X.; Zhou, F.; et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation in Rice Agriculture. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 716–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Bao, T.; Zhang, N.; Mo, D.; Liu, Z.; Yang, T.; Zhang, B.; Wang, L.; Qian, H.; Ding, Y.; Jiang, Y. Higher N2O Emissions and Lower Rice Yield within Double-Cropped Rice Systems of South China under Warming. Field Crops Res. 2025, 322, 109709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Kumar, A.; Padhy, S.R.; Das, R.R.; Shahid, M.; Dash, P.K.; Senapati, A.; Panneerselvam, P.; Kumar, U.; Chatterjee, D.; Adak, T.; et al. Elucidating Relationship between Nitrous Oxide Emission and Functional Soil Microbes from Tropical Lowland Rice Soil Exposed to Elevated CO2: A Path Modelling Approach. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 308, 107268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Yao, Z.; Wang, R.; Zheng, X.; Mei, B.; Zhou, Z.; Xie, B.; Dong, H.; Liu, C.; Han, S.; Xu, Z.; et al. Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Reduces Yield-Scaled N2O Fluxes from Subtropical Rice Systems: Six Site-Years Field Experiments. Glob. Change Biol. 2021, 27, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Bhattacharyya, P.; Roy, K.S.; Neogi, S.; Dash, P.K.; Nayak, A.K.; Mohanty, S.; Baig, M.J.; Sarkar, R.K.; Rao, K.S. Impact of Elevated CO2 and Temperature on Soil C and N Dynamics in Relation to CH4 and N2O Emissions from Tropical Flooded Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 461–462, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Pereira, J.; Figueiredo, N.; Goufo, P.; Carneiro, J.; Morais, R.; Carranca, C.; Coutinho, J.; Trindade, H. Effects of Elevated Temperature and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentration on the Emissions of Methane and Nitrous Oxide from Portuguese Flooded Rice Fields. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 80, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Wang, B.; Li, J.; Wan, Y.; Li, Y.; Qin, X.; Gao, Q.; Waqas, M.A.; Wilkes, A.; Cai, W.; You, S.; et al. Responses of Yield, CH4 and N2O Emissions to Elevated Atmospheric Temperature and CO2 Concentration in a Double Rice Cropping System. Eur. J. Agron. 2018, 96, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Gineyts, R.; Niboyet, A. Nitrification, Denitrification, and Related Functional Genes under Elevated CO2: A Meta-Analysis in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 2023, 29, 1839–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Dai, Z.; Yu, M.; Chen, H.; Zhao, H.; Huang, Y.; Su, W.; Xia, F.; Chang, S.X.; Brookes, P.C.; Dahlgren, R.A.; et al. Elevated Temperature Shifts Soil N Cycling from Microbial Immobilization to Enhanced Mineralization, Nitrification and Denitrification across Global Terrestrial Ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 5267–5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, X.; Ni, C.; Fan, Z.; Wu, W.; Xu, C.; Feng, J.; Yin, R.; Schimel, J.P.; Torn, M.S.; Zhu, B. Terrestrial Ecosystem Nitrogen Cycling in Response to Field Warming: Global Patterns and Future Trends. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2026, 123, e2532868123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Li, L.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, W.; Biederman, J.A.; Xu, X.; Ran, Q.; Qian, R.; Xu, C.; Zhang, B.; Wang, F.; et al. Terrestrial N2O Emissions and Related Functional Genes under Climate Change: A Global Meta-Analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 931–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  30. Gao, K.; Mao, Z.; Meng, E.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, G.; Liu, Y. Effects of Elevated CO2 and Warming on the Root-associated Microbiota in an Agricultural Ecosystem. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 6252–6266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  31. Liu, Z.; Liu, X.; Wu, X.; Bian, R.; Liu, X.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, K.; Li, L.; Pan, G. Long-Term Elevated CO2 and Warming Enhance Microbial Necromass Carbon Accumulation in a Paddy Soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2021, 57, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Okubo, T.; Tokida, T.; Ikeda, S.; Bao, Z.; Tago, K.; Hayatsu, M.; Nakamura, H.; Sakai, H.; Usui, Y.; Hayashi, K.; et al. Effects of Elevated Carbon Dioxide, Elevated Temperature, and Rice Growth Stage on the Community Structure of Rice Root–Associated Bacteria. Microb. Environ. 2014, 29, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Zheng, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, J.; Pan, G.; Yu, X.; Wang, J. Short-Term Responses of Microbial Community and Functioning to Experimental CO2 Enrichment and Warming in a Chinese Paddy Field. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 77, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Waqas, M.A.; Li, Y.; Ashraf, M.N.; Ahmed, W.; Wang, B.; Sardar, M.F.; Ma, P.; Li, R.; Wan, Y.; Kuzyakov, Y. Long-Term Warming and Elevated CO2 Increase Ammonia-Oxidizing Microbial Communities and Accelerate Nitrification in Paddy Soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 166, 104063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Zhu, C.; Ling, N.; Li, L.; Liu, X.; Dippold, M.A.; Zhang, X.; Guo, S.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Shen, Q. Compositional Variations of Active Autotrophic Bacteria in Paddy Soils with Elevated CO2 and Temperature. Soil Ecol. Lett. 2020, 2, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. IPCC. IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2021; 2391p. [Google Scholar]
  37. UNFCCC. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Proposal by the President. Available online: https://unfccc.int/documents/9064 (accessed on 20 August 2025).
  38. Zou, J.; Liu, S.; Qin, Y.; Pan, G.; Zhu, D. Sewage Irrigation Increased Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Rice Paddies in Southeast China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 129, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Zhu, Q.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fei, J.; Rong, X.; Peng, J.; Wei, X.; Luo, G. Intercropping Regulates Plant- and Microbe-Derived Carbon Accumulation by Influencing Soil Physicochemical and Microbial Physiological Properties. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2024, 364, 108880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Jones, D.L.; Willett, V.B. Experimental Evaluation of Methods to Quantify Dissolved Organic Nitrogen (DON) and Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) in Soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Li, X.; Wang, A.; Huang, D.; Qian, H.; Luo, X.; Chen, W.; Huang, Q. Patterns and Drivers of Soil Net Nitrogen Mineralization and Its Temperature Sensitivity across Eastern China. Plant Soil 2023, 485, 475–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Risch, A.C.; Zimmermann, S.; Moser, B.; Schütz, M.; Hagedorn, F.; Firn, J.; Fay, P.A.; Adler, P.B.; Biederman, L.A.; Blair, J.M.; et al. Global Impacts of Fertilization and Herbivore Removal on Soil Net Nitrogen Mineralization Are Modulated by Local Climate and Soil Properties. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 7173–7185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Francis, C.A.; Roberts, K.J.; Beman, J.M.; Santoro, A.E.; Oakley, B.B. Ubiquity and Diversity of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea in Water Columns and Sediments of the Ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 14683–14688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Rotthauwe, J.H.; Witzel, K.P.; Liesack, W. The Ammonia Monooxygenase Structural Gene amoA as a Functional Marker: Molecular Fine-Scale Analysis of Natural Ammonia-Oxidizing Populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 4704–4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Braker, G.; Fesefeldt, A.; Witzel, K.-P. Development of PCR Primer Systems for Amplification of Nitrite Reductase Genes (nirK and nirS) To Detect Denitrifying Bacteria in Environmental Samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3769–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Kandeler, E.; Deiglmayr, K.; Tscherko, D.; Bru, D.; Philippot, L. Abundance of narG, nirS, nirK, and nosZ Genes of Denitrifying Bacteria during Primary Successions of a Glacier Foreland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 5957–5962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  47. Henry, S.; Bru, D.; Stres, B.; Hallet, S.; Philippot, L. Quantitative Detection of the nosZ Gene, Encoding Nitrous Oxide Reductase, and Comparison of the Abundances of 16S rRNA, narG, nirK, and nosZ Genes in Soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 5181–5189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  48. Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: Highly Accurate OTU Sequences from Microbial Amplicon Reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, Q.; Garrity, G.M.; Tiedje, J.M.; Cole, J.R. Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5261–5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. Schloss, P.D.; Westcott, S.L.; Ryabin, T.; Hall, J.R.; Hartmann, M.; Hollister, E.B.; Lesniewski, R.A.; Oakley, B.B.; Parks, D.H.; Robinson, C.J.; et al. Introducing Mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7537–7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  51. Carnol, M.; Hogenboom, L.; Jach, M.E.; Remacle, J.; Ceulemans, R. Elevated Atmospheric CO2 in Open Top Chambers Increases Net Nitrification and Potential Denitrification. Glob. Change Biol. 2002, 8, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Wessén, E.; Nyberg, K.; Jansson, J.K.; Hallin, S. Responses of Bacterial and Archaeal Ammonia Oxidizers to Soil Organic and Fertilizer Amendments under Long-Term Management. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2010, 45, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Xie, W.; Liu, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Pan, G. Elevated CO2 Increases Soil Redox Potential by Promoting Root Radial Oxygen Loss in Paddy Field. J. Environ. Sci. 2024, 136, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Cheng, K.; Li, L.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, J.; Pan, G. Short-Term Response of Nitrifier Communities and Potential Nitrification Activity to Elevated CO2 and Temperature Interaction in a Chinese Paddy Field. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 96, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Bano, S.; Wu, Q.; Yu, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X. Soil Properties Drive Nitrous Oxide Accumulation Patterns by Shaping Denitrifying Bacteriomes. Environ. Microbiome 2024, 19, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Van Den Heuvel, R.N.; Van Der Biezen, E.; Jetten, M.S.M.; Hefting, M.M.; Kartal, B. Denitrification at pH 4 by a Soil-Derived Rhodanobacter-Dominated Community. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 3264–3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  57. Xing, X.-Y.; Tang, Y.-F.; Xu, H.-F.; Qin, H.-L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.-Z.; Chen, A.-L.; Zhu, B.-L. Warming Shapes nirS- and nosZ -Type Denitrifier Communities and Stimulates N2O Emission in Acidic Paddy Soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e02965-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  58. Wu, Q.; Ji, M.; Yu, S.; Li, J.; Wu, X.; Ju, X.; Liu, B.; Zhang, X. Distinct Denitrifying Phenotypes of Predominant Bacteria Modulate Nitrous Oxide Metabolism in Two Typical Cropland Soils. Microb. Ecol. 2023, 86, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Li, F.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Yin, J.; Huang, S. Bacterial Community Structure after Long-Term Organic and Inorganic Fertilization Reveals Important Associations between Soil Nutrients and Specific Taxa Involved in Nutrient Transformations. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  60. Sekiguchi, Y.; Yamada, T.; Hanada, S.; Ohashi, A.; Harada, H.; Kamagata, Y. Anaerolinea thermophila Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. and Caldilinea aerophila Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Novel Filamentous Thermophiles That Represent a Previously Uncultured Lineage of the Domain Bacteria at the Subphylum Level. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 1843–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  61. Yamada, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Hanada, S.; Imachi, H.; Ohashi, A.; Harada, H.; Kamagata, Y. Anaerolinea thermolimosa Sp. Nov., Levilinea saccharolytica Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. and Leptolinea tardivitalis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Novel Filamentous Anaerobes, and Description of the New Classes Anaerolineae Classis Nov. and Caldilineae Classis Nov. in the Bacterial Phylum Chloroflexi. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 1331–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  62. Blöthe, M.; Roden, E.E. Composition and Activity of an Autotrophic Fe(II)-Oxidizing, Nitrate-Reducing Enrichment Culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6937–6940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. Wu, Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, J.; Lu, J.; You, H.; Zhang, X. Microbially Mediated Fe-N Coupled Cycling at Different Hydrological Regimes in Riparian Wetland. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 851, 158237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  64. Wood, T.E.; Tucker, C.; Alonso-Rodríguez, A.M.; Loza, M.I.; Grullón-Penkova, I.F.; Cavaleri, M.A.; O’Connell, C.S.; Reed, S.C. Warming Induces Unexpectedly High Soil Respiration in a Wet Tropical Forest. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 8222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  65. Liao, P.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; Zeng, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Huang, S. Identifying Agronomic Practices with Higher Yield and Lower Global Warming Potential in Rice Paddies: A Global Meta-Analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 322, 107663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Wang, C.; Luo, N.; Liu, J.; Fang, Y.; Qi, Z.; Li, S.; Gao, Z.; Feng, Y.; Chu, Q.; Dai, H. Data-Driven Strategies to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity While Sustaining Global Rice Production. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2026, 224, 108547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Xia, L.; Cao, L.; Yang, Y.; Ti, C.; Liu, Y.; Smith, P.; van Groenigen, K.J.; Lehmann, J.; Lal, R.; Butterbach-Bahl, K.; et al. Integrated Biochar Solutions Can Achieve Carbon-Neutral Staple Crop Production. Nat. Food 2023, 4, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  68. Fan, D.; He, W.; Smith, W.N.; Drury, C.F.; Jiang, R.; Grant, B.B.; Shi, Y.; Song, D.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Global Evaluation of Inhibitor Impacts on Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agricultural Soils: A Meta-Analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 2022, 28, 5121–5141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  69. Lam, S.K.; Wille, U.; Hu, H.-W.; Caruso, F.; Mumford, K.; Liang, X.; Pan, B.; Malcolm, B.; Roessner, U.; Suter, H.; et al. Next-Generation Enhanced-Efficiency Fertilizers for Sustained Food Security. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  70. Hosseiniyan Khatibi, S.M.; Adviento-Borbe, M.A.; Dimaano, N.G.; Radanielson, A.M.; Ali, J. Advanced Technologies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice Fields: Is Hybrid Rice the Game Changer? Plant Commun. 2025, 6, 101224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  71. Ying, H.; Yin, Y.; Zheng, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, Y.; Stefanovski, D.; Cui, Z.; Dou, Z. Newer and Select Maize, Wheat, and Rice Varieties Can Help Mitigate N Footprint While Producing More Grain. Glob. Change Biol. 2019, 25, 4273–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  72. Qian, H.; Chen, J.; Zhu, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Deng, A.; Song, Z.; Ding, Y.; Jiang, Y.; et al. Intermittent Flooding Lowers the Impact of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 on CH4 Emissions from Rice Paddies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 329, 107872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. N2O emissions as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature. (a) Temporal dynamics of N2O fluxes; (b) seasonal cumulative area-scaled N2O emissions; (c) yield-scaled N2O emissions. Error bars denote the standard errors (SE). CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Figure 1. N2O emissions as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature. (a) Temporal dynamics of N2O fluxes; (b) seasonal cumulative area-scaled N2O emissions; (c) yield-scaled N2O emissions. Error bars denote the standard errors (SE). CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Agronomy 16 01722 g001
Figure 2. Rice plant and soil properties as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature. (a) Aboveground biomass; (b) plant N accumulation; (c) soil N mineralization rate; (d) dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content; (e) NH4+–N content; (f) NO3–N content. Error bars represent the SE. CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Figure 2. Rice plant and soil properties as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature. (a) Aboveground biomass; (b) plant N accumulation; (c) soil N mineralization rate; (d) dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content; (e) NH4+–N content; (f) NO3–N content. Error bars represent the SE. CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Agronomy 16 01722 g002
Figure 3. Abundances of nitrifier and denitrifier functional genes as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature. (a) amoA-AOA; (b) amoA-AOB; (c) nirK; (d) nirS; (e) nosZ; and (f) the (nirK + nirS)/nosZ ratio. Error bars represent SE. CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Figure 3. Abundances of nitrifier and denitrifier functional genes as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature. (a) amoA-AOA; (b) amoA-AOB; (c) nirK; (d) nirS; (e) nosZ; and (f) the (nirK + nirS)/nosZ ratio. Error bars represent SE. CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Agronomy 16 01722 g003
Figure 4. Beta diversity of nitrifier and denitrifier communities as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature. (a) AOA; (b) AOB; (c) nirK-type denitrifiers; (d) nirS-type denitrifiers; and (e) nosZ-type denitrifiers. The values on the axes indicate the percentage of variance explained by each principal coordinate. CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Figure 4. Beta diversity of nitrifier and denitrifier communities as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature. (a) AOA; (b) AOB; (c) nirK-type denitrifiers; (d) nirS-type denitrifiers; and (e) nosZ-type denitrifiers. The values on the axes indicate the percentage of variance explained by each principal coordinate. CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Agronomy 16 01722 g004
Figure 5. Genus-level composition of nitrifier and denitrifier communities as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature. (a) AOA; (b) AOB; (c) nirK-type denitrifiers; (d) nirS-type denitrifiers; and (e) nosZ-type denitrifiers. CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Figure 5. Genus-level composition of nitrifier and denitrifier communities as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature. (a) AOA; (b) AOB; (c) nirK-type denitrifiers; (d) nirS-type denitrifiers; and (e) nosZ-type denitrifiers. CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Agronomy 16 01722 g005
Table 1. Alpha diversity of soil nitrifier and denitrifier communities as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Table 1. Alpha diversity of soil nitrifier and denitrifier communities as affected by concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Community RichnessCommunity DiversityPielou’s Evenness
Observed SpeciesChao 1ACEShannonSimpsonPielou_J
AOACK193 ± 7230 ± 12226 ± 92.41 ± 0.020.8260 ± 0.00450.4582 ± 0.0070
ECT232 ± 4 *261 ± 6 1261 ± 4 *2.91 ± 0.03 *0.8958 ± 0.0028 *0.5349 ± 0.0033 *
AOBCK868 ± 91058 ± 241053 ± 173.96 ± 0.030.9430 ± 0.00190.5850 ± 0.0037
ECT886 ± 61088 ± 191080 ± 84.02 ± 0.020.9454 ± 0.00140.5929 ± 0.0036
nirK-typeCK724 ± 29877 ± 24870 ± 224.94 ± 0.120.9762 ± 0.00360.7503 ± 0.0153
ECT718 ± 59882 ± 61860 ± 674.31 ± 0.10 *0.9421 ± 0.0042 *0.6570 ± 0.0090 *
nirS-typeCK1333 ± 321567 ± 531596 ± 605.23 ± 0.070.9794 ± 0.00120.7272 ± 0.0104
ECT1279 ± 441515 ± 661544 ± 694.92 ± 0.06 *0.9506 ± 0.0039 *0.6885 ± 0.0066 *
nosZ-typeCK1592 ± 301935 ± 371915 ± 335.88 ± 0.020.9917 ± 0.00040.7971 ± 0.0023
ECT1642 ± 251997 ± 291978 ± 285.81 ± 0.030.9907 ± 0.00060.7847 ± 0.0033 *
Notes. Values are presented as mean ± standard error. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05, whereas the absence of an asterisk denotes no significant difference between the CK and ECT treatments. 1 p = 0.05. CK, ambient CO2 and temperature; ECT, concurrent elevated CO2 and temperature.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Yi, Q.; Song, Y.; Min, X.; Chen, T.; Ren, Y.; Qian, H.; Liu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Jiang, Y. Concurrent Elevation of CO2 and Temperature Stimulates N2O Emissions from Rice Paddies in a Rice–Wheat Cropping System. Agronomy 2026, 16, 1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16171722

AMA Style

Liu J, Yi Q, Song Y, Min X, Chen T, Ren Y, Qian H, Liu Y, Ding Y, Jiang Y. Concurrent Elevation of CO2 and Temperature Stimulates N2O Emissions from Rice Paddies in a Rice–Wheat Cropping System. Agronomy. 2026; 16(17):1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16171722

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jiujie, Qin Yi, Yuchen Song, Xiumei Min, Taoyun Chen, Yuxin Ren, Haoyu Qian, Yunlong Liu, Yanfeng Ding, and Yu Jiang. 2026. "Concurrent Elevation of CO2 and Temperature Stimulates N2O Emissions from Rice Paddies in a Rice–Wheat Cropping System" Agronomy 16, no. 17: 1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16171722

APA Style

Liu, J., Yi, Q., Song, Y., Min, X., Chen, T., Ren, Y., Qian, H., Liu, Y., Ding, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2026). Concurrent Elevation of CO2 and Temperature Stimulates N2O Emissions from Rice Paddies in a Rice–Wheat Cropping System. Agronomy, 16(17), 1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16171722

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop