Next Article in Journal
Agronomic and Physiological Responses of Field-Grown Gladiolus (Gladiolus × hybridus L.) to Subsurface Drip and Pressurized Pulse Injection Irrigation
Previous Article in Journal
OccPepSeg-YOLO for Instance Segmentation of Occluded Peppers in Field Images
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seed Yield, Heritability of Pod Traits, and Antibacterial Potential of Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) Progenies in the Central Amazon

by
Rândrea Grazziella Verçosa Guimarães
1,
César Augusto Ticona-Benavente
2,* and
Luiz Antonio de Oliveira
1
1
Microbiology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus CEP 69067375, Brazil
2
Plant Breeding Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus CEP 69067375, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2026, 16(17), 1647; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16171647
Submission received: 6 July 2026 / Revised: 4 August 2026 / Accepted: 18 August 2026 / Published: 27 August 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Breeding and Genetics)

Abstract

Yam bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) is a promising, yet underutilized, leguminous crop with considerable potential for biopesticide development. However, baseline data on seed yield, the heritability of pod traits, and antibacterial effects against Ralstonia solanacearum (RS) are lacking, limiting informed selection for seed production and biopesticide use. This study evaluated the morpho-agronomic traits of nine Amazonian yam bean progenies and screened their seed extracts for in vitro antibacterial activity against RS. We conducted the experiment on a Spodosol, using a trellis system in a randomized complete block design with four replications and four plants per plot. Seed yield varied from 0.56 to 0.98 t ha−1, with progenies P14, P20, and P23 exhibiting the highest numerical yields. Broad-sense heritability (H2) was high for pod length (0.77), pod width (0.81), and 100-seed mass (0.85), suggesting considerable potential for genetic improvement of these traits. In vitro antibacterial assays revealed concentration-dependent biphasic activity: 0.5% (w/v) extracts initially stimulated bacterial growth at 6 and 12 h but suppressed multiplication by 88–90% at 24 h, whereas 5% (w/v) extracts promoted growth throughout the 24 h period. These findings establish baseline seed yield data for yam bean grown in Amazonian Spodosols and highlight the genetic variability available for breeding programs in the region. Progenies P14, P20, and P23 warrant further investigation as sources of natural compounds for sustainable plant protection, underscoring the need for optimized formulations and extended exposure periods.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, the global agricultural sector has faced increasing pressure to enhance food security while simultaneously reducing reliance on synthetic pesticides owing to environmental concerns, pest resistance, and the impact on human health [1]. This paradigm shift has spurred significant interest in sustainable agricultural practices and the exploration of plant-derived biopesticides as environmentally friendly alternatives [2]. Plant-based biopesticides offer a promising avenue for controlling various pests and pathogens, often with high specificity and rapid biodegradability, contributing to more resilient and sustainable agroecosystems [2,3].
Despite the growing recognition of biopesticides, their large-scale adoption is often hampered by challenges related to the consistent supply of raw materials and the lack of established agronomic practices for cultivating biopesticide-producing plants [4]. Therefore, identifying and developing neglected or underutilized crops with dual potential (food production and bioactive compound sources) is crucial for advancing sustainable agriculture, particularly in biodiversity-rich regions such as the Amazon.
Among these alternatives, plant-derived biopesticides have shown promise in controlling pests while maintaining the beneficial insect populations [5]. Given that crop losses induced by pathogens and pests can range from 8% to 40% globally [6], there is an urgent need for effective pest control strategies that are both environmentally benign and efficacious.
Despite the growing interest in the development of biopesticides, significant challenges remain in large-scale production and efficacy assessment against different phytopathogens. These challenges stem from costly production methods, variable efficacy, and a narrow spectrum of action, among other factors [7,8].
Yam bean (Pachyrhizus spp.), an herbaceous climbing vine legume of the Fabaceae family, is a promising candidate for large-scale biopesticide production. Pachyrhizus comprises five identified species: Pachyrhizus tuberosus (Lam.) Spreng, P. erosus (L.) Urb., P. ahipa (Wedd.) Parodi, P. ferrugineus (Piper) M.Sørensen, and P. panamensis R.T.Clausen [9]. These species are adapted to nutrient-poor soils in the Amazon and Andean regions [10]. They produce edible tuberous roots [11], with yields of up to 108 t ha−1 [10], and their seeds contain toxic compounds [12].
Yam bean seeds have demonstrated potential as biopesticides. They have proven effective against plant fungi, such as Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. (syn. Agroathelia rolfsii (Sacc.) Redhead & Mullineux) [13,14], Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz. & Sacc., Fusarium oxysporum Schltdl., and Rhizopus stolonifer (Ehrenb.) Vuill. [15], bacteria, such as Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Yabuuchi et al. [14], and various insect pests across multiple orders (Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, and Diptera), notably Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) [16], Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) [17], Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) [18], and Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) [19].
These toxic properties are attributed to diverse bioactive compounds, including rotenoids (rotenone, erosone, pachyrrhizone, dolineone, and pachyrrhizine), isoflavonoids (neotenone and dehydroneotenone), and other secondary metabolites [12,15,20,21,22], as well as defensins, such as SPE10 protein [23]. Among these, rotenone was used as a commercial pesticide until the 1940s, when dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) became dominant [24].
In recent decades, rotenone has regained importance in agriculture because of its rapid biodegradability [25] and low human toxicity. Its acute oral toxicity is characterized by LD50 values for rats ranging from 60 to 135 mg kg−1 [26], and a fatal case in humans involved an estimated dose of 40 mg kg−1 (“Rotenone [MAK Value Documentation, 2003]” 2012). The half-lives of rotenone in plants vary from 0.89 to 1.55 days in cabbage [27], 1.98 to 2.76 days in soil [27], or 5 to 8 days depending on the soil type [28].
Therefore, the Pachyrhizus breeding program at the National Institute for Amazonian Research (INPA, Brazil) was expanded to include a research line targeting seed toxicity and yield, in addition to the traditional focus on tuberous root yield improvement [14]. Of the 64 INPA progenies, nine showed high efficacy against Sclerotium rolfsii in vitro [13], but have not yet been evaluated for seed yield or screened against other economically important pathogens.
Ralstonia solanacearum (RS) is a critical soil-borne bacterial pathogen that causes bacterial wilt in numerous economically important Amazonian crops, including tomatoes, bananas, and hot peppers [29]. This pathogen is the primary constraint to tomato production in Amazonas State, Brazil, where efficient control methods are unavailable [14].
We hypothesized that some of the nine yam bean progenies selected by Lima et al. [13] would suppress RS multiplication and bear a high seed yield. Therefore, this study aimed to (i) evaluate the seed yield and key morpho-agronomic traits of nine selected Pachyrhizus progenies under trellis cultivation in the Central Amazon and (ii) conduct a preliminary in vitro screening of seed extracts from these progenies for antibacterial activity against the RS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Experiment

2.1.1. Location

The study was conducted at the Horticultural Research Station of INPA at Km 14 of Highway AM-010, Municipality of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. The soil was classified as Spodosol with a sandy texture. The climatic variables during the experimental period were obtained from INMET (2025) and are shown in Figure 1.

2.1.2. Material

Seeds from nine yam bean progenies (P1, P5, P14, P15, P20, P23, P46, P61, and P64), previously selected for toxicity against Sclerotium rolfsii [13], were obtained from the INPA Vegetable Germplasm Bank in Manaus, Brazil. Owing to within-progeny color variation, seeds were grouped by color: beige (P1, P5, P14, P15, P20, P23, and P64), brown (P46), and red (P61).

2.1.3. Soil Preparation

First, a composite soil sample was collected and analyzed at the Soil Laboratory of the Federal University of Amazonas. The soil exhibited the following characteristics: pH 4.8, P 168 mg dm−3, K 22 mg dm−3, Ca 2.8 cmolc dm−3, Mg 0.4 cmolc dm−3, Na 9.0 mg dm−3, H + Al 1.82 cmolc dm−3, CEC (pH 7) 5.12 cmolc dm−3, effective CEC 3.3 cmolc dm−3, and base saturation 64.5%. On the day of transplanting, soil preparation was conducted using a heavy tractor (Massey Ferguson 250X, AGCO Corporation, Jundiaí, Brazil) equipped with disc plows, making three passes. Immediately, furrows were created at 1-m intervals using a micro-tractor (Yanmar TC-14, Agritech Lavrale, Indaiatuba, Brazil), and mineral fertilization (N-P-K at 0-40-40 kg ha−1) [30] and dolomitic lime (2 t ha−1) were applied in the furrows and incorporated into the soil using the micro-tractor.

2.1.4. Seedling Preparation and Field Establishment

Seeds were pre-soaked in water for 24 h at ~25 °C and sown in April 2021 in 300 mL cups filled with a commercial substrate (Tropstrato HT Hortaliças, Vida Verde, Mogi Mirim, São Paulo, Brazil). Thirty-day-old seedlings were transplanted to the field in a randomized complete block design with nine treatments (progenies), four replications, and four plants per plot arranged in double rows (1 × 1 m spacing). This minimum plot size was adopted based on recommendations for climbing plants [31].

2.1.5. Cultivation

Plants were trained using 2.5-m gliricídia stakes (Gliricidia sepium (Jack.) Kunth) positioned adjacent to each plant. Stakes were secured with twine to galvanized wire (No. 12) that was stretched longitudinally along the planting rows and supported by bamboo poles at 2-m height. Manual weeding was conducted at 15-day intervals, and irrigation was restricted to the first month following field transplantation.

2.1.6. Harvest and Evaluation

Pods were harvested three times between October and November 2021, upon reaching full maturity and dryness. For each plot, the following agronomic traits were measured: plant stand, pod yield, seed yield (both in t ha−1), 100-seed mass (g), number of pods per plant, and pod dimensions. Pod length and width (cm) were determined using ten randomly selected pods per plot. Yield was calculated using the following formula: yield (t ha−1) = [average mass per plant (kg) × 10,000 plants ha−1] ÷ 1000. Broad-sense heritability (H2) was estimated using Formula (1).
H 2 = σ g 2 σ g 2 + σ e 2 r
where: σ g 2 = genetic variance, σ e 2 = error variance, and r = number of blocks = 4.

2.2. In Vitro Experiment

2.2.1. Material

Seeds from nine Pachyrhizus spp. progenies obtained from the field experiment were separated by color (beige, red, and brown) (Figure 2). Due to limited seed availability, P20 (red) and P64 (red) were excluded, resulting in 16 samples for the antibacterial assay.
The Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II isolate FIO104B was obtained from the INPA Phytopathogenic Microorganism Collection. This isolate was originally collected from tomatoes in Iranduba, Amazonas, Brazil. The bacterial culture was grown on yeast–peptone–glucose–agar (YPGA) medium in Petri dishes at 28 °C for 48 h.

2.2.2. Preparation of Aqueous Seed Extracts

Seeds from the field experiment were sterilized as follows: (i) immersion in 70% ethanol for five minutes; (ii) immersion in commercial bleach (sodium hypochlorite, 2–2.5% active chlorine) for five minutes; and (iii) ten washes with distilled water. Seeds were blotted dry with paper towels, stored in aluminum foil envelopes, and oven-dried at 50 °C for 48 h. The samples were then ground in a ball mill for five minutes at 15 Hz s−1. The resulting powder was stored in airtight plastic containers, treated with ultraviolet light for 20 min, placed in aluminum envelopes, and kept at −17 °C.
The extract was prepared by macerating the powder from each progeny with sterilized water (1:10, w/v) at 10 °C for 48 h. After maceration, the extract was purified using a 3.0 µm membrane filter, followed by centrifugation at 5500 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was filtered again through 0.45 µm and 0.22 µm mesh membranes. The purified extract was stored at a concentration of 10% in sterile Erlenmeyer flasks and frozen at −17 °C.
The extracts were then adjusted to 0.5% (w/v) and 5% (w/v) concentrations by mixing them with sterile yeast–peptone–glucose (YPG) medium. The controls consisted of an antibiotic control (tetracycline® mixed with YPG medium to obtain final concentrations of 200, 240, and 300 mg L−1), bacterial growth control (YPG + bacteria, no extract), and sterility control (YPG without bacteria and extract). All treatments were adjusted to a final volume of 20 mL.

2.2.3. In Vitro Antibacterial Assay

Bacterial inoculation was performed by adding 30 µL of the suspension (1 × 106 cells mL−1) to 20 mL of extract [32], resulting in a final concentration of 1.5 × 103 cells mL−1. The samples were incubated in a shaker at 150 rpm and 25 °C. Aliquots were collected at 6, 12, and 24 h and stored at −17 °C for subsequent cell counting using a Neubauer chamber.

2.2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). All analyses were conducted using the PROC GLM procedure of SAS 9.4 software.

3. Results

3.1. Agronomical Performance and Heritability

Seed yield among progenies ranged from 0.56 to 0.98 t ha−1, with no statistically significant differences (Table 1). Similarly, stand and pod yields showed no significant variations. However, three morphological traits exhibited significant differences (p < 0.05): mass of 100 seeds, pod length, and pod width (Table 1).
Progenies P14, P20, and P23 exhibited the highest numerical seed yields (0.83–0.98 t ha−1) and pod yields (1.84–2.21 t ha−1) (Table 1). Therefore, these progenies should be regarded as candidates for further testing.
The broad-sense heritability (H2) ranged from 0.77 to 0.85 for pod morphology and seed mass (pod length, pod width, and 100-seed mass) (Table 1). However, H2 for stand, pod yield, pods per plant, and seed yield was considered zero because the error mean square exceeded the progeny mean square, precluding estimation of the genetic variance component.

3.2. Effect of 0.5% Yam Bean Extracts

At 6 and 12 h of incubation, Duncan’s test (p < 0.05) showed that the yeast–peptone–glucose (YPG) medium with extracts had higher bacterial cell counts than the bacterial growth control (YPG + bacteria, no extracts) (Figure 3). In contrast, at 24 h, the bacterial growth control exhibited significantly higher cell numbers than those of the extract treatments (Figure 3). These results indicate that the extracts initially promoted bacterial multiplication for up to 12 h, but after 24 h, they exhibited toxic effects on RS. While the bacterial growth control increased exponentially from 7.06 to 10.10 log10 cells mL−1 between 6 and 24 h, the extract-treated samples showed limited growth from ~8.54 to ~9.30 log10 cells mL−1 on average, representing an approximately 6-fold reduction in bacterial multiplication.
Regarding the effect of tetracycline (200, 240, and 300 mg L−1), bacterial cell counts at 6 h were significantly lower than those in the bacterial growth control (Figure 3) and remained stable at approximately 6.60 log10 cells mL−1 at all time points (6, 12, and 24 h). These results indicate that tetracycline exerted rapid antibacterial activity, with inhibition occurring within the first 6 h of incubation and being maintained thereafter.
Among all progenies tested, P14 beige and P23 beige exhibited the highest antibacterial efficacy at 24 h, with cell counts of 9.11 and 9.09 log10 cells mL−1, respectively (p < 0.05). These extracts reduced RS multiplication by approximately 10-fold compared to that of the bacterial growth control. In contrast, P1 red (9.60 log10 cells mL−1) showed the lowest antibacterial activity, limiting bacterial growth by only 3-fold.

3.3. Effect of 5% Yam Bean Extracts

At 6, 12, and 24 h of incubation, Duncan’s test (p < 0.05) showed that the YPG culture medium with 5% extract had higher bacterial cell counts than the bacterial growth control (YPG + bacteria) (Figure 4). This indicates that the 5% extract promoted bacterial multiplication throughout the 24 h incubation period. Figure 4 also shows that the cell numbers in these extracts at 24 h reached 10.82 log10 cells mL−1 and bacterial growth control (10.10 log10 cells mL−1), indicating that the toxic effect on RS remained minimal at 24 h after inoculation.
At 24 h, the progenies differed significantly in cell concentration: P5 beige yielded the lowest values (10.54 log10 cells mL−1) and P1 red and P14 red the highest (10.82 and 10.81 log10 cells mL−1, respectively). This pattern may reflect differences in the extract composition that affect RS growth, including nutrient availability.
Despite their strong inhibition at 0.5% after 24 h, P14 beige and P23 beige only modestly multiplied at 5%, reaching 10.69 and 10.63 log10 cells mL−1, respectively. This suggests that these progenies may still exhibit comparatively greater antibacterial potential after 24 h, even at higher extract concentrations.

4. Discussion

4.1. Seed Yield and Agronomical Traits

Currently, the commercialization of botanical pesticides faces major challenges because it requires large quantities of plant material, standardization, methods for characterizing active substances and impurities, data on safe use and environmental impact, and compliance with very rigorous legislation [33,34]. For these reasons, producing sufficient plant material is essential, which is why this study focused on seed yield as a first step toward developing Pachyrhizus as a biopesticide crop.
Duncan’s test showed no significant differences in seed yield among the nine progenies, whose yields ranged from 0.56 to 0.98 t ha−1 under the evaluated conditions. However, the highest mean yield approached 1 t ha−1, which is greater than the seed yields reported for approximately 36% of other grain legume species [35]. The evaluated progenies had not been specifically bred for seed yield, and genetic variability was observed within progenies, for example, in flower (white and violet) and seed color. These findings indicate that the species has considerable potential for increasing seed yield if breeding methods appropriate for allogamous plants are applied, such as population improvement or the selection of pure lines and hybrids.
The present study also highlighted the advantages of growing Pachyrhizus using a trellis system. The mean pod yield reached 1.74 t ha−1 (Table 1), which was 164% higher than the 0.66 t ha−1 reported by Silva et al. [36] for 20 INPA progenies cultivated at the same site without staking. The use of stakes for vertical plant support was the main difference in management between the experiments. This substantial yield improvement suggests that trellis systems are essential for maximizing pod and seed production in Pachyrhizus spp.
Water availability critically influences seed productivity in Pachyrhizus spp. This study evaluated progenies on sandy Spodosol without supplemental irrigation (except for the first month post-transplanting) during a seven-month growing cycle (April–November) spanning the Central Amazon dry season (June–October). Zanklan et al. demonstrated seed yield reductions under water stress, with P. ahipa declining from 3.04 to 1.10 t ha−1 (64% reduction) and P. erosus from 5.66 to 4.69 t ha−1 (17% reduction). Cultivation on Latosols during the rainy season (beginning November–December) could enhance seed yields, as these soils offer better fertility and structure than sandy Spodosols, and natural precipitation would eliminate the need for supplemental irrigation.
In contrast, tuber yield at harvest was near zero in this study, consistent with a previous report showing that increasing tuber yield requires the removal of flowers [37]. Therefore, these progenies are recommended for seed production tests rather than for dual-purpose use (seed and tuber yield).

4.2. Heritability

Broad-sense heritability (H2) was high for pod length (H2 = 0.77), pod width (H2 = 0.81), and 100-seed mass (H2 = 0.85), suggesting that phenotypic selection for these traits should produce genetic gain.
In contrast, H2 for pod and seed yields was zero. This contrast between high and zero heritability values is central to the interpretation of the trial. Experimental design, local control and field management cannot explain the absence of detectable genetic variance for the yield traits, since these same factors applied equally to the dimensional traits, which showed coefficients of variation below 5%. The dichotomy instead points to the sampling unit itself: dimensional traits are averaged over a large number of pods and seeds within each plot, whereas yield traits are derived from only four plants.
Under the classical model for plot-based observations, the variance of a plot mean composed of n plants, V(n), may be decomposed into two additive components:
V n = V plant n + V env
where Vplant is the variance among individual plants within a plot, n is the number of plants per plot and Venv is the environmental variance associated with the plot as a physical position in the field. The essential property of this model is that only the first component is reduced by increasing the number of plants sampled, whereas Venv is invariant with respect to n. The response of residual variance to plot size therefore identifies which component dominates.
To estimate Vplant and Venv, the residuals eij of the complete block design were retained and all subsequent computations were performed on them, so that the estimated components describe exclusively the experimental error and are not contaminated by the treatment structure. Plots were then classified by the number of surviving plants. Two classes provided sufficient replication: n = 3 (k = 9 plots; 8 degrees of freedom) and n = 4 (k = 26 plots; 25 degrees of freedom). Within each class the residual variance for n plants per plot ( V ^ n ) was computed as:
V ^ n = e i j e ¯ k 2 k 1
where eij is the experimental error for each observation, and e ¯ k is the average of eij associated with the k plots. The estimates were V ^ 3 = 0.3945 and V ^ 4 = 0.1725 for pod yield and V ^ 3 = 0.0806 and V ^ 4 = 0.0424 for seed yield. The coefficient of variation can be estimated from these values. For pod yield the residual coefficient of variation fell from 36.11% in three-plant plots (k = 9) to 23.88% in four-plant plots (k = 26), and for seed yield from 37.72% to 27.36%, corresponding to reductions of 33.9% and 27.5%, respectively, achieved by adding a single plant to the observational unit.
Vplant was estimated by subtracting V ^ 3 V ^ 4 to eliminate Venv, and Venv was estimated by difference V ^ n V plant n . The estimates were Vplant = 2.6642 and Venv = −0.4935 for pod yield and 0.4580 and −0.0721 for seed yield. Assuming Venv = 0, the maximum V(3)/V(4) ratio is 1.3333, but the observed ratios of 2.29 (pod yield) and 1.90 (seed yield) both exceed this ceiling. Therefore, the environmental component is effectively zero, and the experimental error for pod and seed yield is almost entirely of within-plot sampling origin.
The optimum number of plants per plot can be estimated by the modified maximum curvature method of Meier and Lessman [38] applied to Smith’s variance law [39], CV(n) = A nb, where CV(n) is the coefficient of variation with n plants per plot, A is the coefficient of variation of the basic unit, and b is the heterogeneity index. The critical plot size was obtained by maximizing the curvature of Smith’s function, yielding Equation (4).
X c = A 2 b 2 2 b + 1 b + 2 1 2 ( b + 1 )
Considering A (n = 4) and b = 0.5, Xc was 11.6 plants for pod yield and 12.9 plants for seed yield; across the interval b = 0.4 to 0.6 the estimates ranged from 9.2 to 13.8 and from 10.3 to 15.3 plants, respectively. Therefore, seed yield consistently required the larger plot, as expected from its higher coefficient of variation. These estimates agree with empirical reports indicating that 14–30 plants per progeny are required to adequately capture the genetic diversity of half-sib families [40,41]. Therefore, to estimate seed yield and H2 of seed yield ≥14 plants per plot.

4.3. Effect of Pachyrhizus Extracts

Because the assay did not include colony-forming unit counts, determinations of minimum inhibitory or minimum bactericidal concentration, membrane-integrity assays, or recovery assays after extract removal, the observed responses were interpreted as changes in apparent bacterial multiplication rather than as proof of bactericidal activity.
Antibacterial assays revealed that 0.5% (w/v) yam bean extracts significantly inhibited RS multiplication by 3- to 10-fold at 24 h post-inoculation, whereas 5.0% (w/v) extracts stimulated bacterial growth throughout the evaluation period (6, 12, and 24 h).
After 6 and 12 h of incubation, 0.5% yam bean extract stimulated bacterial proliferation 10-fold and 25-fold, respectively, compared to the bacterial growth control (YPG medium + bacteria, no extract). However, at 24 h, the extracts reduced bacterial growth 10-fold relative to the control. These findings corroborate those of Silva et al. [14], who tested yam bean extracts at various concentrations (0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.5%) against RS and observed that 0.5% extracts provided effective bacterial control at 48 h, confirming the time-dependent antibacterial activity observed in the present study.
This biphasic pattern suggests that water-soluble nutrients in the extract (amino acids, simple sugars, and minerals) initially support bacterial metabolism and growth, while antimicrobial secondary metabolites exert delayed inhibitory effects, possibly due to time-dependent accumulation or metabolic activation.
One of these metabolites is rotenone, which demonstrates sustained cytotoxic activity lasting up to 7–8 days [27]. This extended activity profile suggests that the antibacterial effects may continue to intensify beyond 24 h. Therefore, while 24-h assessments provide valuable initial antibacterial data, extended monitoring at multiple timepoints (48–168 h) is warranted to determine the full spectrum of antimicrobial efficacy of the extract.
These findings indicate that Pachyrhizus extracts could be used to dip the roots of seedlings before transplanting to the field and to treat the plant collar during the first weeks after transplanting, thereby reducing bacterial multiplication.
It was also observed that tetracycline inhibited bacterial multiplication from 6 to 24 h with the same intensity and greater inhibitory capacity than the yam bean extracts. These results confirm the efficiency of tetracycline on RS at doses ranging from 240 to 700 mg L−1 [14,42]. Despite this efficacy, soil application is not recommended because tetracycline significantly disrupts soil microbial communities, with effects observed at concentrations as low as 5 mg kg−1 and increasing substantially at 25–500 mg kg−1 [43].
At 24 h and 0.5% concentration, progenies P23 beige, P14 beige, and P20 beige reduced the bacterial population by up to 90%, 89%, and 88%, respectively, relative to the bacterial growth controls. These findings indicate that these progenies may be promising candidates for the development of biocontrol strategies against RS.
The 5% extract promoted bacterial growth at 6, 12, and 24 h compared with the bacterial growth control (YPG + bacteria, no extract), suggesting that the nutritional effects outweighed the antimicrobial activity at this concentration. Therefore, extended incubation studies (48–192 h) are needed to determine whether antimicrobial effects emerge at later time points, given that rotenone persists for 7 or 8 days [27,28].

4.4. Limitations, Implications and Future Studies

This study has three limitations. (i) The failure to detect genetic variation in seed yield reflects insufficient sampling, as only four plants per experimental unit were evaluated. (ii) The antibacterial activity was assessed against a single RS isolate (phylotype II, FIO104B, from tomato in Iranduba, Amazonas, Brazil). Given the high genetic diversity and recombination within RS, particularly in virulence-related genes [44], these findings require validation against other phylotypes. (iii) The incubation period was limited to 24 h.
These findings indicate that progenies P14, P20, and P23 are promising candidates for breeding programs focused on dual purposes: seed production and biopesticide development. The high genetic variability within progenies suggests that breeding methods for allogamous (cross-pollinating) plants should be applied to Pachyrhizus spp. The 0.5% concentration was more effective than 5%, indicating that lower concentrations can be used in commercial formulations to reduce production costs. The biphasic activity (initial stimulation followed by inhibition) suggests that application timing is critical for maximizing antimicrobial effects.
Pachyrhizus extracts (0.1%) had no significant effect on soil mesofauna after 8 days [45], suggesting a low impact on soil mesofauna, which supports their use by smallholder farmers in the Amazon. However, further testing at other concentrations is needed.
Future studies should estimate the heritability of seed yield using larger plots (≥14 plants per plot) in different Amazonian soils. Further work should also determine the antibacterial efficacy of the extracts over extended periods (48–168 h) to assess the full duration of activity, and evaluate other concentrations with the candidate progenies to model concentration effects. Finally, studies should evaluate the effects of Pachyrhizus extracts applied to seedlings and under field conditions on RS, mesofauna, and plant growth, and quantify rotenoids and other compounds by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

5. Conclusions

Progenies P14, P20, and P23 are promising candidates for seed production and the development of biopesticides targeting Ralstonia solanacearum. These progenies should be evaluated in experimental designs with larger plot sizes (≥14 plants per plot) for seed yield, following breeding methods for half-sib families.
Broad-sense heritability for pod traits and seed size was high, suggesting that genetic gains can be achieved through selection for these traits.
The 0.5% (w/v) extracts exhibited time-dependent activity, stimulating bacterial multiplication at earlier time points but reducing R. solanacearum growth at 24 h after treatment. Conversely, the 5% (w/v) extracts promoted bacterial growth at 24 h, highlighting the need for assessments beyond 24 h to evaluate delayed inhibitory effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.T.-B.; methodology, C.A.T.-B. and L.A.d.O.; software, C.A.T.-B.; validation, R.G.V.G.; formal analysis, C.A.T.-B.; investigation, R.G.V.G.; resources, C.A.T.-B. and L.A.d.O.; data curation, R.G.V.G.; writing—original draft preparation, R.G.V.G.; writing—review and editing, R.G.V.G. and C.A.T.-B.; visualization, R.G.V.G. and C.A.T.-B.; supervision, C.A.T.-B.; project administration, C.A.T.-B. and L.A.d.O.; funding acquisition, C.A.T.-B. and L.A.d.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support for this publication was provided by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM) through the PROGRAMA DE APOIO À DISSEMINAÇÃO DO CONHECIMENTO CIENTÍFICO, TECNOLÓGICO E INOVADOR NO ÂMBITO DA PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO STRICTO SENSU—DIVULGA CT&I (Edital № 017/2024) and POSGRAD/FAPEAM.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are openly available at https://github.com/cesarticonabr/yam-bean-ralstonia-data.git (accessed on 17 August 2026).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Plant Breeding Laboratory team at INPA (Maria Oliveira, Leandro Silva, Katrine Castro, Leandra dos Santos, Guilbert Rodrigues, Natália Silva, Wuengredes Silva, Thiago Moraes, Álvaro Brasil, Camila de Sousa, Ronaldo Batista, Ariel Blind, José Rodrigues, and Alexandre Gato) for their logistical support, Luiz Alberto Guimarães de Assis for laboratory support, and Rogério Hanada for providing the R. solanacearum isolate.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
RSRalstonia solanacearum
YPGYeast–peptone–glucose
INPANational Institute for Amazonian Research
LD50Median lethal dose

References

  1. Ediagbonya, T.F.; Areo, I.O.; Mupenzi, C.; Mind’je, R.; Kamuhanda, J.K.; Kabano, S. Reduced Pesticide Dependency through Crop Management. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025, 7, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Gupta, I.; Singh, R.; Suganthi, M.; Sharma, M.; Grewal, K.; Singh, H.P.; Batish, D.R. Plant Essential Oils as Biopesticides: Applications, Mechanisms, Innovations, and Constraints. Plants 2023, 12, 2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Fenibo, E.O.; Matambo, T.S. Biopesticides for Sustainable Agriculture: Feasible Options for Adopting Cost-Effective Strategies. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2025, 9, 1657000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Haritha, D.; Ahmed, M.F.; Bala, S.; Choudhury, D. Eco-Friendly Plant Based on Botanical Pesticides. Plant Arch. 2021, 21, 2197–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Tembo, Y.; Mkindi, A.G.; Mkenda, P.A.; Mpumi, N.; Mwanauta, R.W.; Stevenson, P.C.; Ndakidemi, P.A.; Belmain, S.R. Pesticidal Plant Extracts Improve Yield and Reduce Insect Pests on Legume Crops Without Harming Beneficial Arthropods. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Savary, S.; Willocquet, L.; Pethybridge, S.J.; Esker, P.D.; McRoberts, N.; Nelson, A. The Global Burden of Pathogens and Pests on Major Food Crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Hamrouni, R.; Regus, F.; Farnet, A.; Orsière, T.; Boudenne, J.; Laffont-Schwob, I.; Christen, P.; Dupuy, N. Current Status and Future Trends of Microbial and Nematode-Based Biopesticides for Biocontrol of Crop Pathogens. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2024, 45, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  8. Poli, E.F.; Fontefrancesco, M.F. Trends in the Implementation of Biopesticides in the Euro-Mediterranean Region: A Narrative Literary Review. Sustain. Earth Rev. 2024, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Zanklan, A.S.; Becker, H.C.; Sørensen, M.; Pawelzik, E.; Grüneberg, W.J. Genetic Diversity in Cultivated Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) Evaluated through Multivariate Analysis of Morphological and Agronomic Traits. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2017, 65, 811–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Silva, E.S.; Filho, D.F.d.S.; Ticona-Benavente, C.A. Diversity of Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus spp. Fabaceae) Based on Morphoagronomic Traits in the Brazilian Amazon. Acta Amaz. 2016, 46, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Navarro, D.N.R.; Sørensen, M.; Leidi, E.O. Ahipa, Pachyrhizus ahipa: A Legume with Edible Tuberous Roots. Res. Portal Den. 2020, 19, 15–18. Available online: https://www.legumesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/legum_perspect_19.pdf (accessed on 17 August 2026).
  12. Leuner, O.; Havlík, J.; Buděšínský, M.; Vrkoslav, V.; Chu, J.; Bradshaw, T.D.; Hummelova, J.; Mikšátková, P.; Lapčík, O.; Valterová, I.; et al. Cytotoxic Constituents of Pachyrhizus tuberosus from Peruvian Amazon. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2013, 8, 1423–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Lima, R.G.d.; Ticona-Benavente, C.A.; Silva Filho, D.F.d.; Silva, L.S.e.; Guimarães, R.G.V.; Hanada, R.E. Pachyrhizus spp. Seed Extracts Control the Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Mycelial Growth. J. Med. Plants Res. 2021, 15, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Silva, T.M.e.; Guimaraes, R.G.V.; Martins, A.K.B.; Silva Filho, D.F.; Ticona-Benavente, C.A. Pachyrhizus Toxicity: Genetic Variability of Mature and Immature Seeds and Its Effects on Sclerotium rolfsii and Ralstonia solanacearum. J. Med. Plants Res. 2023, 17, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Barrera-Necha, L.L.; Bautista-Baños, S.; Bravo-Luna, L.; García-Suárez, F.J.; Alavez-Solano, D.; Reyes-Chilpa, R. Antifungal Activity of Seed Powders, Extracts, and Secondary Metabolites of Pachyrhizus erosus (L.) Urban (Fabaceae) against Three Postharvest Fungi. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 2004, 22, 356–361. [Google Scholar]
  16. Agustini, M.; Sartiami, D.; Dadang. Keefektifan Ekstrak Daun Sirsak, Biji Bengkuang, Dan Buah Cabai Jawa Terhadap Ulat Grayak Jagung (Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith)) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Entomol. Indones. 2024, 21, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Ravindranath, N.; Samanta, A.; Samanta, S.; Swaminathan, M.S. Dose-Dependent Toxicity and Field Efficacy of PEG-Emulsified Botanical Formulations against Chickpea Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera). J. Entomol. Res. 2025, 49, 632–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Kumar, R.; Singh, P. Efficacy of Certain Insecticides Against Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in Okra. Indian J. Entomol. 2022, 84, 348–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Basukriadi, A.; Wilkins, R.M. Oviposition Deterrent Activities of Pachyrhizus erosus Seed Extract and Other Natural Products on Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J. Insect Sci. 2014, 14, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  20. Catteau, L.; Lautié, E.; Koné, O.; Coppée, M.; Hell, K.; POMALEGNI, C.; Quetin-Leclercq, J. Degradation of Rotenone in Yam Bean Seeds (Pachyrhizus sp.) through Food Processing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 11173–11179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Lautié, E.; Rozet, E.; Hubert, P.; Leclercq, J.Q. Quantification of Rotenone in Seeds of Different Species of Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus sp.) by a SPE HPLC–UV Method. Food Chem. 2011, 131, 1531–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Lautié, E.; Rozet, E.; Hubert, P.; Vandelaer, N.; Billard, F.; Felde, T.z.; Grüneberg, W.J.; Quetin-Leclercq, J. Fast Method for the Simultaneous Quantification of Toxic Polyphenols Applied to the Selection of Genotypes of Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus sp.) Seeds. Talanta 2013, 117, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Song, X.; Wang, J.; Wu, F.; Li, X.; Teng, M.; Gong, W. cDNA Cloning, Functional Expression and Antifungal Activities of a Dimeric Plant Defensin SPE10 from Pachyrrhizus erosus Seeds. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 57, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Berry-Cabán, C.S. DDT and Silent Spring: Fifty Years After. J. Mil. Veterans’ Health 2011, 19, 19–24. Available online: http://jmvh.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/JMVH-Vol19-No4_Cristobal.pdf (accessed on 17 August 2026).
  25. Isman, M.B. Botanical Insecticides in the Twenty-First Century—Fulfilling Their Promise? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2019, 65, 233–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Radad, K.; Al-Shraim, M.; Al-Emam, A.; Wang, F.; Kranner, B.; Rausch, W.; Moldzio, R. Rotenone: From Modelling to Implication in Parkinson’s Disease. Folia Neuropathol. 2019, 57, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, N.; Wang, K.; Li, W.; Li, H.; Zhang, Z. Dissipation and Residue of Rotenone in Cabbage and Soil Under Field Conditions. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2013, 91, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Cavoski, I.; Caboni, P.; Sarais, G.; Miano, T. Degradation and Persistence of Rotenone in Soils and Influence of Temperature Variations. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 8066–8073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Netto, R.A.C.; Pereira, B.G.; Noda, H.; Boher, B. Murcha Bacteriana No Estado Do Amazonas, Brasil. Fitopatol. Bras. 2004, 29, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Stamford, N.P.; Santos, C.E.D.R.; Medeiros, R.; Freitas, A.D.S.D. Efeito Da Fertilização Com Fósforo, Potássio e Magnésio Em Jacatupé Infectado Com Rizóbio Em Um Latossolo Álico. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 1999, 34, 1831–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Storck, L.; Lúcio, A.D.; Krause, W.; Araújo, D.V.D.; Silva, C.A. Scaling the Number of Plants per Plot and Number of Plots per Genotype of Yellow Passion Fruit Plants. Acta Sci. Agron. 2014, 36, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Oliveira, L.A.D.; Vidor, C. Colonização, Sobrevivência e Competitividade de Estirpes de Rhizobium japonicum. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 1984, 8, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tamm, L.; Speiser, B.; Mercier, T. Proposals for Regulation of Botanicals. In Regulation of Biological Control Agents; Ehlers, R.-U., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2011; pp. 289–304. [Google Scholar]
  34. Soetopo, D.; Alouw, J.C. Biopesticide Development & Registration: Challenges & Strategies. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 1179, 012003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Cernay, C.; Pelzer, E.; Makowski, D. A Global Experimental Dataset for Assessing Grain Legume Production. Sci. Data 2016, 3, 160084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. Silva, E.S.; Atroch, A.L.; de Jesus, R.S.; Bitencourt, M.A.F.; Ticona-Benavente, C.A. Genotype x Year Interaction for Agronomical Traits and Proximate Composition in Yam Beans (Pachyrhizus Spp., Fabaceae) in the Brazilian Amazon. Genet. Mol. Res. 2022, 21, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Zanklan, A.S.; Ahouangonou, S.; Becker, H.C.; Pawelzik, E.; Grüneberg, W.J. Evaluation of the Storage Root-Forming Legume Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) under West African Conditions. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 1934–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Meier, V.D.; Lessman, K.J. Estimation of Optimum Field Plot Shape and Size for Testing Yield in Crambe abyssinica Hochst. Crop Sci. 1971, 11, 648–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Smith, H.F. An Empirical Law Describing Heterogeneity in the Yields of Agricultural Crops. J. Agric. Sci. 1938, 28, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Leipold, M.; Tausch, S.; Hirtreiter, M.; Poschlod, P.; Reisch, C. Sampling for Conservation Genetics: How Many Loci and Individuals Are Needed to Determine the Genetic Diversity of Plant Populations Using AFLP? Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2020, 12, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. McGlaughlin, M.E.; Riley, L.; Brandsrud, M.; Arcibal, E.; Helenurm, M.K.; Helenurm, K. How Much Is Enough? Minimum Sampling Intensity Required to Capture Extant Genetic Diversity in Ex Situ Seed Collections: Examples from the Endangered Plant Sibara filifolia (Brassicaceae). Conserv. Genet. 2015, 16, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Bawari, M.R.; Narendrappa, T. In-Vitro Evaluation of Bioagents and Antibiotics against Ralstonia solanacearum Causing Brinjal Wilt. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2019, 8, 2038–2041. [Google Scholar]
  43. Santás-Miguel, V.; Díaz-Raviña, M.; Martín, A.; García-Campos, E.; Barreiro, A.; Núñez-Delgado, A.; Álvarez-Rodríguez, E.; Arias-Estévez, M.; Fernández-Calviño, D. Soil Enzymatic Activities and Microbial Community Structure in Soils Polluted with Tetracycline Antibiotics. Agronomy 2021, 11, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Castillo, J.A.; Greenberg, J.T. Evolutionary Dynamics of Ralstonia solanacearum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1225–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Guimarães, R.G.V.; Silva, W.C.D.; Benavente, C.A.T.; Pinto, F.R.; Alencar, D.B.D. Effect of Cabrio® Top and Macuco Bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) Extracts on Soil Mesofauna. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 2019, 6, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. Climatic variables during Pachyrhizus spp. cultivation in Manaus, Brazil, in 2021. (A) Monthly air temperature and relative humidity. (B) Monthly precipitation and sunshine duration data.
Figure 1. Climatic variables during Pachyrhizus spp. cultivation in Manaus, Brazil, in 2021. (A) Monthly air temperature and relative humidity. (B) Monthly precipitation and sunshine duration data.
Agronomy 16 01647 g001
Figure 2. Seeds of nine Pachyrhizus spp. progenies were used for antibacterial assays against Ralstonia solanacearum. P20 (red) and P64 (red) were not included because of the few seeds.
Figure 2. Seeds of nine Pachyrhizus spp. progenies were used for antibacterial assays against Ralstonia solanacearum. P20 (red) and P64 (red) were not included because of the few seeds.
Agronomy 16 01647 g002
Figure 3. Mean number of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II cells from 6 to 24 h in yeast–peptone–glucose (YPG) liquid medium + Pachyrhizus spp. extracts at 0.5%, with antibiotic control (YPG + tetracycline), bacterial growth control (YPG + bacteria, no extracts), and sterility control (YPG without bacteria).
Figure 3. Mean number of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II cells from 6 to 24 h in yeast–peptone–glucose (YPG) liquid medium + Pachyrhizus spp. extracts at 0.5%, with antibiotic control (YPG + tetracycline), bacterial growth control (YPG + bacteria, no extracts), and sterility control (YPG without bacteria).
Agronomy 16 01647 g003
Figure 4. Mean number of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II cells from 6 to 24 h in YPG (yeast–peptone–glucose) liquid medium + Pachyrhizus spp. extracts at 5.0%, with antibiotic control (YPG + tetracycline), bacterial growth control (YPG + bacteria, no extracts), and sterility control (YPG without bacteria).
Figure 4. Mean number of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II cells from 6 to 24 h in YPG (yeast–peptone–glucose) liquid medium + Pachyrhizus spp. extracts at 5.0%, with antibiotic control (YPG + tetracycline), bacterial growth control (YPG + bacteria, no extracts), and sterility control (YPG without bacteria).
Agronomy 16 01647 g004
Table 1. Mean values of seven morpho-agronomic traits of nine yam bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) progenies grown on a Spodosol, Manaus, Brazil, 2021.
Table 1. Mean values of seven morpho-agronomic traits of nine yam bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) progenies grown on a Spodosol, Manaus, Brazil, 2021.
ProgenyStandPod Yield
(t ha−1)
Pod Length
(cm)
Pod Width
(cm)
Pods per Plant100-Seed Mass (g)Seed Yield
(t ha−1)
P13.50 1.88 11.15 a1.41 abc52.95 21.70 ab0.80
P53.501.4710.90 a1.46 a41.1223.20 a0.56
P144.001.8411.11 a1.37 bcd55.5619.63 cd0.83
P153.751.5010.70 a1.40 abc47.5020.93 bc0.66
P204.001.9810.90 a1.35 cd56.3120.90 bc0.86
P233.752.2111.30 a1.46 a59.7022.2 ab0.98
P463.501.4910.80 a1.40 abc44.8118.99 d0.61
P613.751.6910.91 a1.43 ab48.3322.64 a0.74
P643.501.5710.07 b1.32 d48.6020.52 bcd0.69
Mean3.701.7410.901.4050.5521.200.80
CV (%)14.2132.203.102.9030.835.0035.42
R20.310.360.610.650.350.740.34
H2000.770.8100.850
Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Means are not significantly different according to the F-test (p < 0.05). H2 = broad-sense heritability.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guimarães, R.G.V.; Ticona-Benavente, C.A.; Oliveira, L.A.d. Seed Yield, Heritability of Pod Traits, and Antibacterial Potential of Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) Progenies in the Central Amazon. Agronomy 2026, 16, 1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16171647

AMA Style

Guimarães RGV, Ticona-Benavente CA, Oliveira LAd. Seed Yield, Heritability of Pod Traits, and Antibacterial Potential of Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) Progenies in the Central Amazon. Agronomy. 2026; 16(17):1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16171647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guimarães, Rândrea Grazziella Verçosa, César Augusto Ticona-Benavente, and Luiz Antonio de Oliveira. 2026. "Seed Yield, Heritability of Pod Traits, and Antibacterial Potential of Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) Progenies in the Central Amazon" Agronomy 16, no. 17: 1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16171647

APA Style

Guimarães, R. G. V., Ticona-Benavente, C. A., & Oliveira, L. A. d. (2026). Seed Yield, Heritability of Pod Traits, and Antibacterial Potential of Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) Progenies in the Central Amazon. Agronomy, 16(17), 1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16171647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop