Foliar Spray Application of an Extract from Klebsormidium sp. K39 Retrieved by Phycoremediation Process: Biochemical Response to Drought Stress on Tomato Plants
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Microalgae Cultivation and Extract Preparation
2.2. Spectroscopic Characterization
2.3. Experimental Conditions and Plant Material
2.4. Measurements of Yield and Quality of Fruits
2.5. Lycopene and Polyphenol Determination in Tomato Fruits
2.6. Total Protein Extraction from Tomato Leaves and Fruits
2.7. Enzyme Activities in Tomato Tissues
2.8. Determination of Proline and Malondialdehyde
2.9. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fernandes, Â.; Chaski, C.; Pereira, C.; Kostić, M.; Rouphael, Y.; Soković, M.; Barros, L.; Petropoulos, S.A. Water stress alleviation effects of biostimulants. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabello, G.G.C.; Rodríguez, A.R.; Gondal, A.H.; Areche, F.O.; Corilla Flores, D.D.; Astete, J.A.Q.; Camayo-Lapa, B.F.; Yapias, R.J.M.; Jabbar, A.; Saldarriaga, J.Y.; et al. Plant adaptability to climate change and drought stress for crop growth and production. CAB Rev. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopecká, R.; Kameniarová, M.; Černý, M.; Brzobohatý, B.; Novák, J. Abiotic stress in crop production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borzì, I. Assessing impacts of climate crisis on water distribution systems through service inefficiency indicator. J. Water Clim. Change 2025, 16, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavalcante, L.; Walker, D.W.; Kchouk, S.; Neto, G.R.; Carvalho, T.M.N.; de Brito, M.M.; Pot, W.; Dewulf, A.; van Oel, P.R. From insufficient rainfall to livelihoods: Understanding the cascade of drought impacts and policy implications. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2025, 25, 1993–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hura, T.; Hura, K.; Ostrowska, A. Drought-stress induced physiological changes in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansoor, S.; Wani, O.A.; Lone, J.K.; Manhas, S.; Kour, N.; Alam, P.; Ahmad, A.; Ahmad, P. Reactive oxygen species in plants: From source to sink. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusvuran, S. Microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck) alleviates drought stress of broccoli plants by improving nutrient uptake, secondary metabolites, and antioxidative defense system. Plant J. 2021, 7, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Liang, Y.; Miao, Q.; Ji, X.; Duan, P.; Quan, D. The influence of microalgae fertilizer on soil water conservation and soil improvement: Yield and quality of potted tomatoes. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medda, S.; Dessena, L.; Mulas, M. Monitoring of the PAL enzymatic activity and polyphenolic compounds in leaves and fruits of two myrtle cultivars during maturation. Agriculture 2020, 10, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nephali, L.; Piater, L.A.; Dubery, I.A.; Patterson, V.; Huyser, J.; Burgess, K.; Tugizimana, F. Biostimulants for plant growth and mitigation of abiotic stresses: A metabolomics perspective. Metabolites 2020, 10, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wozniak, E.; Blaszczak, A.; Wiatrak, P.; Canady, M. Biostimulant mode of action. In The Chemical Biology of Plant Biostimulants; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafa, M.M.; Hammad, D.M.; Reda, M.M.; El-Sayed, A.E.B. Water extracts of Spirulina platensis and Chlorella vulgaris enhance tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) tolerance against saline water irrigation. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023, 14, 21181–21191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Bella, E.; Baglieri, A.; Fragalà, F.; Saccone, R.; Salvagno, E.; Terrazzino, S.; Puglisi, I. Influence of microalgae biomasses retrieved from phycoremediation of wastewaters on yield of lettuce, soil health, and nitrogen environmental fate. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2024, 24, 4880–4897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bello, A.S.; Saadaoui, I.; Ben-Hamadou, R. Beyond the source of bioenergy: Microalgae in modern agriculture as a biostimulant, biofertilizer and anti-abiotic stress. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Bella, E.; Baglieri, A.; Fragalà, F.; Puglisi, I. Multipurpose agricultural reuse of microalgae biomasses employed for the treatment of urban wastewater. Agronomy 2022, 12, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, A.L. The use of microalgae and cyanobacteria in the improvement of agricultural practices: A review on their biofertilising, biostimulating and biopesticide roles. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Samarakoon, U.; Altland, J.; Ling, P. Photosynthesis, biomass production, nutritional quality, and flavor-related phytochemical properties of hydroponic-grown arugula (Eruca sativa Mill.) ‘standard’ under different electrical conductivities of nutrient solution. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puglisi, I.; La Bella, E.; Rovetto, E.I.; Stevanato, P.; Fascella, G.; Baglieri, A. Morpho-biometric and biochemical responses in lettuce seedlings treated by different application methods of Chlorella vulgaris extract: Foliar spray or root drench? J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rachidi, F.; Benhima, R.; Sbabou, L.; El Arroussi, H. Microalgae polysaccharides bio-stimulating effect on tomato plants: Growth and metabolic distribution. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 25, e00426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barsanti, L.; Coltelli, P.; Gualtieri, P. Paramylon treatment improves quality profile and drought resistance in Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Micro-Tom. Agronomy 2019, 9, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutale-Joan, C.; Rachidi, F.; Mohamed, H.A.; El Mernissi, N.; Aasfar, A.; Barakate, M.; Mohammed, D.; Sbabou, L.; El Arroussi, H.E. Microalgae-cyanobacteria–based biostimulant effect on salinity tolerance mechanisms, nutrient uptake and tomato plant growth under salt stress. J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 3779–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerszberg, A.; Hnatuszko-Konka, K. Tomato tolerance to abiotic stress: A review of most often engineered target sequences. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 83, 175–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Distefano, M.; Mauro, R.P.; Page, D.; Meneguzzo, F.; Bertin, N.; Leonardi, C. Aroma Volatiles in Tomato Fruits: The Role of Genetic, Preharvest and Postharvest Factors. Agronomy 2022, 12, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seleiman, M.F.; Al-Suhaibani, N.; Ali, N.; Alotaibi, M.; Refay, Y.; Dindaroglu, T.; Abdul-Wajid, H.H.; Battaglia, M.L. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants 2021, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Puglisi, I.; Barone, V.; Sidella, S.; Coppa, M.; Broccanello, C.; Gennari, M.; Baglieri, A. Biostimulant activity of humic-like substances from agro-industrial waste on Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus quadricauda. Eur. J. Phycol. 2018, 53, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Bella, E.; Baglieri, A.; Rovetto, E.I.; Stevanato, P.; Puglisi, I. Foliar spray application of Chlorella vulgaris extract: Effect on the growth of lettuce seedlings. Agronomy 2021, 11, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barone, V.; Baglieri, A.; Stevanato, P.; Broccanello, C.; Bertoldo, G.; Bertaggia, M.; Cagnin, M.; Pizzeghello, D.; Moliterni, V.M.; Mandolino, G.; et al. Root morphological and molecular responses induced by microalgae extracts in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 1061–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Bella, E.; Occhipinti, P.S.; Puglisi, I.; Fragalà, F.; Saccone, R.; Russo, N.; Randazzo, C.L.; Caggia, C.; Baglieri, A. Comparative phycoremediation performance of three microalgae species in two different magnitude of pollutants in wastewater from farmhouse. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baglieri, A.; Cadili, V.; Monterumici, C.M.; Gennari, M.; Tabasso, T.; Montoneri, E.; Nardi, S.; Negre, M. Fertilization of bean plants with tomato plants hydrolysates. Effect on biomass production, chlorophyll content and N assimilation. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 176, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puglisi, I.; Nicolosi, E.; Vanella, D.; Piero, A.R.L.; Stagno, F.; Saitta, D.; Roccuzzo, G.; Consoli, S.; Baglieri, A. Physiological and biochemical responses of orange trees to different deficit irrigation regimes. Plants 2019, 8, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cetin, Ö.; Uygan, D.; Boyaci, H. Tomato irrigation scheduling improved by using percent canopy cover and crop developmental stage. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2008, 59, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hale, G.; Yuan, N.; Mendu, L.; Ritchie, G.; Mendu, V. Canopeo app as image-based phenotyping tool in controlled environment utilizing Arabidopsis mutants. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0300667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, G.C.; Deng, S.; Liu, N.; Wang, M.H.; She, D.L. Fruit quality and yield of tomato as influences by rain shelters and deficit irrigation. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2015, 17, 691–704. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, S.W. Standard Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 1984; p. 121. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, S.K.; Le Maguer, M. Kinetics of lycopene degradation in tomato pulp solids under different processing and storage conditions. Food Res. Int. 1996, 29, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Analysis of total phenols by Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puglisi, I.; La Bella, E.; Rovetto, E.I.; Lo Piero, A.R.; Baglieri, A. Biostimulant effect and biochemical response in lettuce seedlings treated with a scenedesmus quadricauda extract. Plants 2020, 9, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein-utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aebi, M. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984, 105, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Flohé, L.; Ötting, F. Superoxide dismutase assay. Methods Enzymol. 1984, 105, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mori, T.; Sakurai, M.; Sakuta, M. Effects of conditioned medium on activities of PAL, CHS, DAHP synthase (DS-Co and DS-Mn) and anthocyanin production in suspension cultures of Fragaria ananassa. Plant Sci. 2001, 160, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assis, J.S.; Maldonado, R.; Muñoz, T.; Escribano, M.I.; Merodio, C. Effect of high carbon dioxide concentration on PAL activity and phenolic contents in ripening cherimoya fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2001, 23, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khedr, A.H.; Abbas, M.A.; Wahid, A.A.; Quick, W.P.; Abogadallah, G.M. Proline induces expression of salt stress responsive proteins and may improve the adaptation of Pancratium maritimum L. to salt-stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 2553–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, L.Y.; Hu, S.L.; Wu, J.; Li, Y.H.; Zheng, J.L.; Wei, Z.J.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.L.; Liu, Y.S.; Zhang, H. Hydrogen sulfide prolongs postharvest shelf life of strawberry and plays an antioxidative role in fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 8684–8693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akram, S.; Saleem, Y.; Khan, A.R.; Wadood, A.; Hameed, A.; Sajjad, S. Identification of drought-tolerant tomato genotypes using multi-trait index at early growth stage. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2024, 24, 2456–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machado, J.; Vasconcelos, M.W.; Soares, C.; Fidalgo, F.; Heuvelink, E.; Carvalho, S.M.P. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant responses of young tomato plants (cv. micro-tom) to single and combined mild nitrogen and water deficit: Not the sum of the parts. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Zheng, Y.; Li, M.; Zeng, L.; Sang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Lin, H.; Fan, Z. Quantitative analyses of major enzyme activities in postharvest fruit. Future Postharvest Food 2024, 1, 219–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanojia, A.; Lyall, R.; Sujeeth, N.; Alseekh, S.; Martínez-Rivas, F.J.; Fernie, A.R.; Gechev, T.S.; Petrov, V. Physiological and molecular insights into the effect of a seaweed biostimulant on enhancing fruit yield and drought tolerance in tomato. Plant Stress 2024, 14, 100692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farid, R.; Mutale-Joan, C.; Redouane, B.; Mernissi Najib, E.L.; Abderahime, A.; Laila, S.; Arroussi Hicham, E.L. Effect of microalgae polysaccharides on biochemical and metabolomics pathways related to plant defense in Solanum lycopersicum. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 188, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhary, P.; Sharma, A.; Singh, B.; Nagpal, A.K. Bioactivities of phytochemicals present in tomato. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 2833–2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marques, H.M.C.; Mógor, A.F.; Amatussi, J.O.; Bocchetti de Lara, G.; Mógor, G.; Sant’Anna-Santos, B.F. Use of microalga Asterarcys quadricellularis in common bean. J. Appl. Phycol. 2023, 35, 2891–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhaskar, R.; Xavier, L.S.E.; Udayakumaran, G.; Kumar, D.S.; Venkatesh, R.; Nagella, P. Biotic elicitors: A boon for the in-vitro production of plant secondary metabolites. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022, 149, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, D.P.; Prabha, R.; Yandigeri, M.S.; Arora, D.K. Chyanobacteria-mediated phenylpropanoids and phytohormones in rice (Oryza sativa) enhance plant growth and stress tolerance. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2011, 100, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silva, S.; Teixeira, C.; Dias, M.C.; Pereira, R.B.; Gomes, P.; Silva, A.M. Bioprospecting a natural antioxidant peptide for tomato biostimulation under water limitations: Physiological approach. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, 44, 2569–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rady, M.M.; Boriek, S.H.K.; Abd El-Mageed, T.A.; Seif, E.l.; Yazal, M.A.; Ali, E.F.; Hassan, F.A.S.; Abdelkhalik, A. Exogenoues gibberellic acid or diluite bee honey boosts drought stress tolerance in Vicia faba by rebalancing osmoprotectants, antioxidants, nutrients, and phytohormones. Plants 2021, 10, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dere, S.; Kusvuran, S.; Dasgan, H.Y. Does drought increase the antioxidant nutrient capacity of tomatoes? Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, N.; Jiang, C.; Chen, L.; Paul, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Shen, G. Achieving abiotic stress tolerance in plants through antioxidative defense mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 110622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rao, M.J.; Duan, M.; Zhou, C.; Jiao, J.; Cheng, P.; Yang, L.; Wei, W.; Shen, Q.; Ji, P.; Yang, Y.; et al. Antioxidant defense system in plants: Reactive oxygen species production, signaling, and scavenging during abiotic stress-induced oxidative damage. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saed-Moucheshi, A.; Sohrabi, F.; Fasihfar, E.; Baniasadi, F.; Riasat, M.; Akbar Mozafari, A. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) as a selection criterion for triticale grain yield under drought stress: A comprehensive study on genomics and expression profiling, bioinformatics, heritability, and phenotypic variability. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patanè, C.; Cosentino, S.L.; Romano, D.; Toscano, S. Relative water content, proline, and antioxidant enzymes in leaves of long shelf-life tomatoes under drought stress and rewatering. Plants 2022, 11, 3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Alam, M.M.; Roychowdhury, R.; Fujita, M. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 9643–9684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, P.; Jha, A.B.; Dubey, R.S.; Pessarakli, M. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 217037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.B.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jalalian, S.; Ebrahimzadeh, A.; Zahedi, S.M.; Becker, S.J.; Hayati, F.; Hassanpouraghdam, M.B.; Rasouli, F. Chlamydomonas sp. extract meliorates the growth and physiological responses of ‘Camarosa’ strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch) under salinity stress. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, Y.J.; Park, J.E.; Truong, T.Q.; Koo, S.Y.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, S.M. Effect of Chlorella vulgaris on the growth and phytochemical contents of “red russian” kale (Brassica napus var. Pabularia). Agronomy 2022, 12, 2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, M.; Lian, L.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, H.; Wang, J. Roles of ROS metabolism and phenylpropanoid pathway in quality maintenance of postharvest Pleutorus eryngii under hyperoxia stress. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2024, 207, 112617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S. Novel insight into functions of ascorbate peroxidase in higher plants: More than a simple antioxidant enzyme. Redox Biol. 2023, 64, 102789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meena, M.; Divyanshu, K.; Kumar, S.; Swapnil, P.; Zehra, A.; Shukla, V.; Yadav, M.; Upadhyay, R.S. Regulation of L-proline biosynthesis, signal transduction, transport, accumulation and its vital role in plants during variable environmental conditions. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wadood, A.; Hameed, A.; Akram, S.; Ghaffar, M. Unraveling the impact of water deficit stress on nutritional quality and defense response of tomato genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1403895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azuma, R.; Ito, N.; Nakayama, N.; Suwa, R.; Nguyen, N.T.; Larrinaga-Mayoral, J.A.; Esaka, M.; Fujiyama, H.; Saneoka, H. Fruits are more sensitive to salinity than leaves and stems in pepper plants (Capsicum annum L.). Sci. Hortic. 2010, 125, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulcin, İ. Antioxidants: A comprehensive review. Arch. Toxicol. 2025, 99, 1893–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Batista-Silva, W.; Nascimento, V.L.; Medeiros, D.B.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Ribeiro, D.M.; Zsögön, A.; Araújo, W.L. Modifications in organic acid profiles during fruit development and ripening: Correlation or causation? Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Alkyl | N- and O-Alkyl | Aromatic | Carboxyl | HB/HI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–45 ppm | 45–95 ppm | 95–160 ppm | 160–195 ppm | ||
| Kleb biomass | 28.49 | 50.63 | 8.28 | 12.60 | 0.6 |
| Kleb extract | 61.82 | 20.77 | 11.14 | 6.27 | 2.7 |
| CTRL | Kleb | WS CTRL | WS Kleb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canopy cover (%) | 15.64 ± 1.03 | 15 ± 0.33 | 16 ± 1.46 | 15.6 ± 0.41 |
| Plant vigor | 9 a ± 0.08 | 9.18 a ± 0.26 | 6.90 b ± 0.21 | 6.98 b ± 0.17 |
| N-test | 754.50 ± 146.8 | 696 ± 158.90 | 652.5 ± 131.25 | 673.25 ± 126.79 |
| Root surface (%) | 44.63 ± 1.34 | 50.25 ± 3.74 | 40.82 ± 2.69 | 41.22 ± 3.37 |
| Samples | CTRL | Kleb | WS CTRL | WS Kleb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA (% Citric Acid) | 0.43 ± 0.06 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.07 |
| TSS (°Brix) | 7.07 ± 1.85 | 7.62 ± 0.81 | 7.36 ± 0.53 | 7.05 ± 0.13 |
| RI (TSS/TA) | 16.34 | 19.81 | 18.89 | 17.21 |
| Firmness (kg cm2) | 2.78 ± 0.17 | 2.73 ± 0.46 | 2.88 ± 0.86 | 2.67 ± 0.50 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Saccone, R.; La Bella, E.; Fragalà, F.; Bonfante, G.; Salvagno, E.; Baglieri, A.; Puglisi, I. Foliar Spray Application of an Extract from Klebsormidium sp. K39 Retrieved by Phycoremediation Process: Biochemical Response to Drought Stress on Tomato Plants. Agronomy 2026, 16, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010036
Saccone R, La Bella E, Fragalà F, Bonfante G, Salvagno E, Baglieri A, Puglisi I. Foliar Spray Application of an Extract from Klebsormidium sp. K39 Retrieved by Phycoremediation Process: Biochemical Response to Drought Stress on Tomato Plants. Agronomy. 2026; 16(1):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010036
Chicago/Turabian StyleSaccone, Rossella, Emanuele La Bella, Ferdinando Fragalà, Giuseppe Bonfante, Erika Salvagno, Andrea Baglieri, and Ivana Puglisi. 2026. "Foliar Spray Application of an Extract from Klebsormidium sp. K39 Retrieved by Phycoremediation Process: Biochemical Response to Drought Stress on Tomato Plants" Agronomy 16, no. 1: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010036
APA StyleSaccone, R., La Bella, E., Fragalà, F., Bonfante, G., Salvagno, E., Baglieri, A., & Puglisi, I. (2026). Foliar Spray Application of an Extract from Klebsormidium sp. K39 Retrieved by Phycoremediation Process: Biochemical Response to Drought Stress on Tomato Plants. Agronomy, 16(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010036

