Next Article in Journal
Promotion of Sweet Potato Growth and Yield by Decreasing Soil CO2 Concentrations with Forced Aeration
Previous Article in Journal
Moderate Drought Stress Enhances Grain Quality in Upland Rice by Optimizing Nitrogen Metabolism and Endosperm Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deconstructing Agrivoltaic Microclimates: A Critical Review of Inherent Complexity and a Minimum Viable Monitoring Framework
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Crop Multi-Stresses Under Mediterranean Climate: A Systematic Review

Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2026, 16(1), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010113 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 December 2025 / Revised: 24 December 2025 / Accepted: 26 December 2025 / Published: 1 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adaptations and Responses of Cropping Systems to Climate Change)

Abstract

Agricultural systems in Mediterranean-type climates are increasingly threatened by drought, salinity, extreme temperatures, heavy metal contamination, and pathogen pressure, all of which undermine crop productivity and agroecosystem stability. In this context, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), natural symbionts of most terrestrial plants, emerge as key biological agents capable of enhancing crop resilience. Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review synthesizes current knowledge on the role of AMF in mitigating abiotic and biotic stresses, highlighting their potential as a central component of sustainable Mediterranean agriculture. The available evidence demonstrates that AMF symbiosis significantly increases plant tolerance to multiple stressors across major crop families, including Poaceae, Fabaceae, Solanaceae, and Asteraceae. Under abiotic constraints, AMF improve water and nutrient uptake via extensive hyphal networks, modulate ion homeostasis under salinity, enhance tolerance to thermal extremes, and reduce heavy metal toxicity by immobilizing contaminants. Regarding biotic stresses, AMF induce systemic resistance to pathogens, stimulate secondary metabolite production that deters herbivores, and suppress parasitic nematode populations. Moreover, co-inoculation with other biostimulants, such as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, shows synergistic benefits, further improving crop productivity and resource-use efficiency. Overall, AMF represent an effective and multifunctional nature-based tool for improving the sustainability of Mediterranean agroecosystems. However, further research is required to evaluate AMF performance under simultaneous multiple stress factors, thereby reflecting real-world conditions and enabling a more integrated understanding of their agronomic potential.

1. Introduction

Over recent decades, the intensive reliance on chemical inputs in agriculture, together with the escalating impacts of climate change, has contributed substantially to ecosystem degradation [1]. Due to their intrinsic sensitivity to environmental fluctuations, plants are exposed to a wide spectrum of biotic and abiotic stressors—including drought, salinity, temperature extremes, heavy metal toxicity, nutrient imbalances, and pathogen infections [2,3,4]—which collectively contribute to yield reduction and impaired crop performance [5,6]. Among these, drought is particularly critical in the context of Mediterranean agriculture, where altered precipitation patterns and rising temperatures substantially constrain plant growth by impairing photosynthetic processes and disrupting nutrient homeostasis [1,7]. Within this context, the rhizosphere—the soil zone directly influenced by root activity—plays a central role, characterized by intense microbial interactions driven by root exudates that serve as key nutrient sources for microorganisms [8]. These exudates not only shape rhizosphere microbial communities but also modulate soil physical and chemical properties, thereby facilitating plant adaptation to environmental constraints [9,10]. Symbiotic interactions between plant roots, soil, and beneficial microorganisms enhance plant development by supporting nutrient acquisition, modulating signaling pathways, and contributing to soil health maintenance [11]. Rhizospheric microbial consortia promote nutrient cycling through nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and the release of phytohormones, organic acids, and enzymes [12,13], while simultaneously protecting plants from phytopathogens [8,14]. Among beneficial microbes, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have received particular attention due to their ability to establish symbiosis with the majority of terrestrial plants. AMF enhance soil structure and influence key biogeochemical processes. Their extensive extraradical hyphae significantly increase water and mineral uptake, particularly for low-mobility nutrients such as P, Zn, and Cu [13,15,16]. AMF also modulate root exudation, alter rhizosphere pH, and facilitate the mobilization of insoluble phosphorus, thereby improving plant phosphorus nutrition [10]. For instance, in rice, AMF can contribute up to 70% of total phosphorus uptake [17]. Beyond improving plant nutrition, AMF increase plant resilience to abiotic and biotic challenges. Under drought and salinity stress, they improve water and nutrient acquisition and promote the accumulation of osmoprotectants that support cellular homeostasis [18,19]. AMF also alleviate heavy metal toxicity through nutrient balancing and activation of plant tolerance mechanisms [20,21]. Mycorrhizal plants additionally display enhanced resistance to pathogens and improved tolerance to adverse environmental conditions [13,22]. The benefits of AMF are especially evident in low-input systems, such as organic agriculture, where improvements in photosynthesis and antioxidant capacity have been widely reported [16]. Given their multifunctional role, AMF are increasingly recognized as essential components of sustainable crop management practices [15]. They contribute to biotic stress reduction by priming plant defense pathways, particularly those regulated by jasmonic acid, and by enhancing secondary metabolite production [8,23]. Their synergistic interactions with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) further improve nutrient use efficiency and support the transition toward agroecological and low-input farming systems [16,24,25]. These strategies can be integrated with sustainable practices such as organic amendments, cover crops, and conservation tillage to enhance soil functionality and crop stability in Mediterranean environments [26,27].

Agricultural Systems Under Mediterranean-Type Climates

Mediterranean climates encompass extensive agricultural areas in Southern Europe and North Africa—including Spain, Italy, Morocco, and Tunisia—as well as regions of South Africa, California, central Chile, Australia, and Central Asia (Figure 1). These climates are defined by pronounced summer drought, irregular rainfall patterns, and elevated evapotranspiration rates. According to the Köppen Cs classification, a Mediterranean climate is characterized by the following: (i) strong seasonal rainfall concentration, with at least 65% of annual precipitation occurring during the cool season (November–April) [28]; (ii) mild winters, with temperatures below 0 °C for less than 3% of the year [28]; and (iii) hydrological conditions suitable for dryland agriculture but insufficient to sustain dense coniferous or mesophytic forests [28]. These characteristics generate seasonal imbalances in water availability that often coincide with critical crop developmental stages [27]. Furthermore, alternating drought periods and intense rainfall events enhance soil erosion and nutrient leaching, particularly in sloped terrains and soils with low organic matter content [2,29]. In addition to water scarcity, Mediterranean soils frequently suffer from salinity, aridity, and nutrient deficiencies—particularly, limited phosphorus availability—which collectively constrain productivity and soil fertility [8,26]. High evapotranspiration further limits soil moisture retention, thereby reducing plant water-use efficiency and exacerbating crop stress. Consequently, Mediterranean-type agroecosystems can be regarded as hotspots of abiotic constraints, where recurrent drought, heat waves, soil salinization, and land degradation interact to impair crop performance and threaten yield stability [6,7]. When these stressors coincide with sensitive phenological stages, they intensify oxidative damage and disrupt plant water and nutrient relations [30,31]. In addition, Mediterranean cropping systems are exposed to substantial pressure from biotic stressors—including soil-borne and foliar pathogens, insect pests, and parasitic nematodes—whose incidence and severity often increase when plants are already constrained by drought and thermal extremes [2,3,32,33]. Given these interrelated limitations, which are increasingly intensified by climate change, there is a pressing need for sustainable, biologically based strategies capable of enhancing agroecosystem resilience. AMF have emerged as a promising nature-based solution in this regard, owing to their capacity to modulate plant physiological and biochemical responses under stress [34] and to enhance plant defense against pathogens and pests under biotic stress conditions [35,36,37]. Their integration into crop management has been shown to improve nutrient uptake, forage biomass, legume productivity, and soil health in resource-limited Mediterranean systems [38]. For example, the combination of micropropagation and AMF inoculation has been demonstrated to enhance phenolic compound accumulation in globe artichoke [39]. Nonetheless, the adoption of AMF by farmers remains limited, partly due to the lack of comprehensive, accessible guidelines on their application and expected agronomic outcomes. Moreover, the successful use of AMF requires adaptation to the specific hydrological and thermal dynamics of Mediterranean agroecosystems [38]. This review therefore aims to provide a comprehensive, multi-stress synthesis of current evidence on the contributions of AMF to crop resilience under Mediterranean climate conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, resulting in the selection of 95 articles (Figure 2). The objective was to compile and critically synthesize research published over the last two decades concerning the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in mediating crop responses to abiotic and biotic stresses within Mediterranean agroecosystems. A comprehensive literature search was performed using the Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases. Peer-reviewed articles published up to July 2025 were considered. The search strategy relied on Boolean combinations of keywords related to the following:
(i) AMF (“arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”, “AMF species”, “root-associated mycorrhizae”, “mycorrhizal symbionts”);
(ii) Stress conditions (“abiotic stress”, “biotic stress”, “drought”, “salinity”, “temperature extremes”);
(iii) Agroecosystem context (“Mediterranean agriculture”, “sustainable crop management”, “Mediterranean climate”);
(iv) Mediterranean crops of agronomic interest.
The selection of keywords was guided by their established relevance in the literature addressing AMF–plant interactions under environmental constraints. Studies were included according to the following criteria:
  • Articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals;
  • Studies evaluating the effect of AMF on crops exposed to abiotic or biotic stress, with explicit focus on Mediterranean climates or comparable environments;
  • Research reporting quantitative or qualitative data on agronomic performance, physiological responses, nutritional parameters, or microbe–plant interactions associated with AMF.
Conversely, the following types of documents were excluded:
  • Conference abstracts, book chapters, editorials, and non-peer-reviewed material;
  • Studies not dealing with AMF in agricultural contexts;
  • Articles lacking sufficient methodological detail or presenting unquantified or inconclusive outcomes.
The selection process was carried out in two phases. First, all retrieved documents were imported into reference-management software and screened for duplicates. Titles and abstracts were then reviewed to identify studies meeting the inclusion criteria. In the second phase, full-text screening was performed to confirm eligibility. Out of 395 initially identified articles, 77 were duplicates and 193 were excluded during the abstract screening due to lack of relevance. Following full-text evaluation, 90 studies met all criteria and were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The complete workflow is illustrated in the PRISMA flowchart (Figure 2) [39].

3. Results

3.1. Abiotic Stress and Its Mitigation Through Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi exhibit broad ecological tolerance and are distributed across a wide range of ecosystems and soil types, although their performance varies considerably among species and strains [42,43]. In Mediterranean-type environments, drought, salinity, temperature extremes, and heavy metal toxicity represent major limiting factors for crop productivity, primarily due to their disruptive effects on water uptake, ionic homeostasis, photosynthetic activity, and cellular integrity. While these stressors are intrinsically detrimental, AMF have been widely documented to alleviate their impacts by enhancing plant adaptive strategies and strengthening physiological resilience (Table 1). AMF exert multifaceted effects under abiotic stress, including improved water and nutrient acquisition, enhanced osmotic adjustment, stabilization of cellular membranes, and activation of antioxidant systems. Their capacity to modulate ion transport and reduce the translocation of toxic ions further contributes to improved plant performance under Mediterranean conditions. A schematic representation of AMF-mediated responses to salinity stress is provided in Figure 3, highlighting the interplay between AMF colonization, stress-responsive genes, ion transporters, and antioxidant pathways [44].

3.1.1. Drought Stress

Drought remains one of the most severe constraints for agriculture in Mediterranean regions due to extended dry periods and irregular rainfall. AMF mitigate drought-induced damage by expanding the effective root-absorptive area through their extraradical hyphae, thereby improving water uptake and reducing osmotic stress [6,18]. Mycorrhizal plants often accumulate compatible solutes such as proline and trehalose, which help maintain cell turgor and protect macromolecular structures under dehydration [44]. Furthermore, AMF influence hormonal regulation—particularly abscisic acid—resulting in tighter stomatal control and improved water-use efficiency [29]. In Glycine max, AMF inoculation enhanced leaf photosynthetic rate under progressive drought, despite showing no significant changes in morphological traits under high-input agricultural systems [31]. Improvements in total polyphenols, sugars, and organic acids have also been recorded in mycorrhized plants [39,55], suggesting enhanced metabolic plasticity under water-limited conditions. In tomato, root colonization remained substantial (25% with Funneliformis mosseae and ~50% with Rhizophagus irregularis) even under drought stress [56], supporting the persistence of symbiosis despite unfavorable conditions. Globe artichoke (Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus) inoculated with AMF exhibited increased biomass production, improved yield stability, and enhanced accumulation of caffeoylquinic acids under drought [39]. Similarly, conservation agriculture practices have been shown to increase AMF colonization. In durum wheat, no-tillage increased root colonization by 54% compared with conventional tillage [46], while conservation tillage improved the efficacy of R. intraradices inoculation in triticale by increasing vesicle and arbuscule abundance by 6% and 5%, respectively [47]. In tomato, R. irregularis applied at transplanting increased plant height (+17%), leaf area (+15%), photosynthetic rate (+11%), chlorophyll content (+13%), stomatal conductance (+21%), yield (+24.8%), and tissue water content (+2.8%) relative to untreated controls. A consortium of G. mosseae and G. intraradices further increased plant height by 30.5% and chlorophyll content by 25% [57]. Collectively, these findings illustrate the strong potential of AMF to enhance drought tolerance across diverse Mediterranean crops.

3.1.2. Salinity Stress

Soil salinization is a widespread issue in semi-arid Mediterranean regions, leading to osmotic imbalance, ion toxicity, and oxidative stress [58]. AMF improve plant tolerance to salinity by modulating ion homeostasis, particularly through the reduction in Na+ accumulation and the enhancement of K+ and Ca2+ uptake—ions essential for enzymatic function and cellular stability [10,18]. Enhanced activities of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase further contribute to mitigating reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage (Figure 3) [44,58]. AMF may also indirectly reduce salinity effects by improving rhizosphere structure and decreasing salt accumulation around roots [18]. In tomato cultivars exposed to different salinity levels (1.4, 4.9, and 7.1 dS/m), inoculation with G. mosseae increased dry biomass by 22–31%, with even greater improvements observed in salt-sensitive varieties (up to 59%) under medium–high salinity [57]. In tomato plants inoculated with a mixture of R. irregularis, Claroideoglomus etunicatum, C. claroideum, F. mosseae, and F. geosporus, Ca and Mg uptake increased by 20% and 15%, respectively, while CO2 assimilation improved by 40% under combined heat and salt stress; Na accumulation decreased by 25% [51]. In olive, AMF treatment with R. irregularis reduced Na accumulation in leaves and increased relative water content and the K+/Na+ ratio—key indicators of salinity tolerance [59]. In chickpea, R. fasciculatus reduced relative stress injury under salinity from 12.7% to 7.5% and increased antioxidant enzyme activity, superoxide dismutase (+20–23%), catalase (+18%), and peroxidase (+30%), under 4 dS m−1 salinity [49]. Species-specific differences in AMF performance under salinity have also been reported. At 66 mM NaCl in maize, root colonization differed markedly among AMF species: 8.7% in R. intraradices, 62.7% in Septoglomus constrictum, and 65.3% in C. etunicatum. At 100 mM NaCl, colonization increased to 84.3%, 58.7%, and 77.3%, respectively, confirming species-dependent tolerance and efficiency [10].

3.1.3. Temperature Extremes

Temperature extremes—both heat waves and cold episodes—are increasingly frequent under Mediterranean climate change scenarios and represent major constraints for crop metabolism [6,7,60]. High temperatures promote oxidative stress, compromise photosynthesis, and disrupt membrane stability, while low temperatures impair enzymatic activity and reduce AMF development. AMF inoculation under combined heat and salinity stress has been shown to reduce flower drop, sustain CO2 assimilation, and improve fruit set and yield compared with non-mycorrhizal plants [51]. In maize, native AMF (R. irregularis, F. mosseae, and Glomus spp.) reduced heat-induced oxidative stress by 47% and enhanced chlorophyll content by 85% [45]. In strawberry, inoculation with F. mosseae improved fruit weight (+11%), yield (+6%), and photosynthetic performance (higher Fv/Fm), while reducing membrane damage under heat stress [53]. Cold stress studies have also shown positive effects: AMF-associated maize exhibited improved sugar metabolism and more stable membrane composition under low temperatures [31,32]. However, AMF performance declines under sustained cold. In carrot root organ cultures, hyphal growth and sporulation of G. intraradices, G. claroideum, and G. mosseae decreased by 60–70% at 15 °C compared to optimal temperatures (25–30 °C), although G. intraradices remained relatively more tolerant [30]. AMF-mediated thermotolerance has been linked to enhanced heat-shock protein production and increased antioxidant activity [60,61].

3.1.4. Heavy Metal Stress

Heavy metal contamination is an emerging concern in Mediterranean agricultural soils, where metals such as arsenic, cadmium, copper, and nickel significantly impair plant growth by inducing oxidative stress and interfering with nutrient uptake [11,20,62]. AMF contribute to both phytostabilization and phytoextraction by immobilizing metals in their hyphae and spores, thus reducing translocation to shoots and alleviating toxicity [20,37]. Additionally, AMF improve soil organic matter stabilization, thereby reducing the bioavailability of heavy metals such as As and Cd [11,63]. High colonization levels by Rhizoglomus spp. have been observed in heavily contaminated sites, indicating their potential ecological resilience and utility in phytoremediation [64]. In rice, R. irregularis combined with Si increased As accumulation by 38% in roots and 55% in shoots, suggesting a synergistic role of AMF in metal translocation [48]. In Jatropha multifida grown on metal- and metalloid-contaminated landfill soil, AMF inoculation enhanced biomass production and increased shoot and root accumulation of several elements, confirming its potential for phytoremediation in degraded sites [50]. In Vetiveria zizanioides, AMF inoculation under Cu stress increased plant height by 38% and biomass by 32%, while reducing Cu content in leaves and roots compared with non-inoculated plants [34]. The combination of AMF with phosphorus management has been proposed to reduce metal uptake while maintaining growth [20,62].

3.2. Biotic Stress and Its Mitigation Through Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi

Biotic stress encompasses plant damage caused by pathogenic fungi, bacteria, viruses, herbivorous insects, and parasitic nematodes, all of which contribute to significant yield losses by reducing plant vigor and increasing susceptibility to secondary infections [23,32,65,66]. AMF have emerged as promising biological tools to enhance plant resilience under these conditions [35,37,67]. Their protective effects are mediated through multiple pathways, including the priming of salicylic acid-dependent systemic acquired resistance (SAR), jasmonic acid-dependent induced resistance (IR), and long-term modulation of plant immune responses [36,68].
In addition to biochemical signaling, AMF influence plant resistance through competition for root colonization space, alteration of rhizosphere microbial communities, and improved host nutritional status [25,33]. These interactions lead to enhanced immune function, reduced pathogen incidence, and improved yield stability under biotic pressure (Table 2) [25,69,70,71]. A conceptual overview of AMF-mediated defense mechanisms against major biotic stressors is provided in Figure 4 [37].

3.2.1. Pathogen Resistance

AMF symbiosis is widely recognized for enhancing plant resistance to soilborne pathogens such as Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Phytophthora spp., which compromise root integrity and substantially reduce crop productivity [20,35,37]. Mycorrhizal colonization stimulates the production of defense-related phytoalexins and pathogenesis-related proteins and upregulates critical genes in host defense pathways [32,67], ultimately resulting in decreased disease incidence and severity [67,73]. AMF also reshape root exudation profiles, enriching the rhizosphere with microbial communities antagonistic to pathogens [8,13]. Beyond root pathogens, AMF reduce foliar disease susceptibility. Enhanced resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae in rice and to Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea in tomato has been documented in AMF-colonized plants [32,35]. In common bean, a mixed AMF inoculum (G. mosseae, G. intraradices, G. clarum, G. gigantea, and G. margarita) reduced R. solani incidence from 100% to 73.3% and disease severity from 100% to 66.3% after one week [72]. In globe artichoke, AMF mitigated infections caused by Verticillium dahliae, confirming their role as effective bioprotection agents in Mediterranean horticultural systems [71]. Although mostly beneficial, AMF-induced immune modulation can involve trade-offs: in certain cases, pathogens may exploit AMF-modified signaling states, potentially suppressing specific defenses [68]. Understanding these context-dependent outcomes is therefore essential for optimizing AMF-based disease management strategies.

3.2.2. Insect Herbivory Resistance

Herbivorous insects cause direct tissue damage, reduce photosynthetic area, and may facilitate subsequent pathogen infections. AMF enhance plant defense against herbivores primarily by stimulating the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites—such as flavonoids, terpenoids, and phenolic compounds—that function as deterrents or toxins [23,65]. AMF-induced resistance substantially affects herbivore feeding behavior. For example, larvae of Arctia caja consumed 77–82% less plant material from mycorrhizal Plantago lanceolata compared to non-mycorrhizal plants, depending on the AMF species involved [65,66]. In sorghum, AMF inoculation reduced the incidence of Spodoptera frugiperda attacks compared to controls [74]. Similarly, AMF enhanced plant resistance against Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus in rice [15,75]. However, herbivory responses are not uniformly positive. A comprehensive synthesis indicated that interactions with generalist chewing herbivores were neutral in 75% of cases and negative (reduced larval biomass) in 25%. For specialist herbivores, 83% of interactions were neutral and 17% positive. Notably, populations of Aulacorthum solani were tenfold higher on Glycine max plants inoculated with Gigaspora margarita [66]. These findings highlight the context-dependency of AMF–insect interactions and suggest that AMF may either reduce or, in some cases, inadvertently increase herbivore performance depending on the insect and AMF species involved.

3.2.3. Nematode Suppression

Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) and lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.) are among the most devastating pests in Mediterranean cropping systems, causing severe root dysfunction and yield losses. AMF mitigate nematode attacks through multiple mechanisms, including the following:
(i) Strengthening of physical barriers via increased lignin and callose deposition, which impede nematode penetration [73];
(ii) Modification of root exudates, reducing nematode attraction and host recognition [70,73];
(iii) Improved plant nutritional status, supporting enhanced tolerance and post-infection recovery [15,59].
In tomato and soybean, F. mosseae reduced Meloidogyne incognita infection by 60% and decreased egg hatchability by 27–32% in early infection stages [25,37]. In coffee, AMF reduced root-knot nematode infection by 38.3–52.5% across multiple studies [35]. For Pratylenchus penetrans, AMF colonization dramatically reduced nematode populations: G. mosseae lowered root nematode densities by 87%, egg production by 45%, and reproductive female numbers by 34%, resulting in a 51% reduction in second-stage juveniles [76]. In banana, colonization by G. intraradices reduced Radopholus similis populations by 72% and Pratylenchus coffeae by 84% [69]. A meta-analysis of 60 case studies showed that AMF reduced Pratylenchus densities in 36.6% of cases, had no effect in 46.6%, and increased populations in 16.6% of observations, highlighting species-dependent and colonization-level-dependent responses [70]. Overall, AMF demonstrate strong potential for nematode management in Mediterranean systems, although efficacy varies depending on both AMF species and nematode feeding strategies.

4. Co-Inoculation of AMF and Biostimulants

The integration of AMF into sustainable agricultural strategies represents a promising approach to mitigating abiotic and biotic stresses while reducing reliance on chemical inputs. Co-inoculation with other beneficial microorganisms—particularly plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and beneficial fungi such as Trichoderma spp.—is increasingly recognized for its capacity to amplify AMF-driven benefits and enhance overall plant resilience [24,25,77]. In cucumber, Bicer [54] demonstrated that combined AMF and PGPR inoculation (Bacillus megaterium, Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas fluorescens) significantly increased yield by 34% under severe water deficit (33% of field capacity). Co-inoculated plants also exhibited superior water-use efficiency, with the greatest improvements observed under reduced irrigation [54]. In globe artichoke, co-application of AMF (Glomus spp.) and PGPR (Bacillus spp., Azotobacter spp.) enhanced aboveground biomass by an average of 23% and increased fresh head yield by 54%, with cultivar-specific improvements ranging from 41% to 60% [27]. In olive, co-inoculation with G. intraradices and PGPR (B. megaterium, Burkholderia cedrus, and Streptomyces beta-vulgaris) induced significant shifts in the rhizosphere microbial community and increased the uptake of essential macro- and micronutrients, including N (+26%), P (+60%), Fe (+25%), Mn (+18%), Zn (+26%), B (+22%), and Cu (+14%), as well as the accumulation of phenolic compounds such as verbascoside [52]. Similarly, reducing mineral fertilization (NPK) by 50–70% combined with mixed AMF–PGPR inocula (G. mosseae, G. fasciculatum) improved growth and nutritional status in olive seedlings [78]. Overall, AMF–PGPR consortia strengthen agroecosystem resilience, reduce chemical input dependency, and promote long-term soil health, representing a key mechanism for advancing sustainable agriculture under Mediterranean climate conditions [79,80].

5. Limitations and Challenges

Despite extensive evidence of AMF benefits, their practical implementation in agriculture remains limited by biological, agronomic, and methodological constraints. AMF performance is highly context-dependent. Plant stress tolerance and pathogen resistance vary significantly depending on the specific combination of plant genotype and AMF species or isolate [25,73,81]. Certain AMF may even exacerbate pest pressures; for instance, Gigaspora spp. have been associated with increased Pratylenchus populations [73,81]. Low AMF colonization can also lead to increased nematode density [76], and in some host–herbivore systems, AMF have been reported to increase insect attractiveness [70,73]. Agricultural practices can severely influence AMF colonization. High phosphorus fertilization may reduce AMF colonization and functionality [1], and intensive tillage can negatively impact AMF abundance, diversity, and ecosystem functionality [47]. Fungicides may also impair the symbiosis and reduce AMF effectiveness [72]. Furthermore, exotic or commercial AMF strains often fail to outperform native communities, highlighting the importance of using locally adapted isolates [63,82]. In extreme environments such as metal-contaminated soils, AMF may grow exclusively intraradically to avoid direct exposure to toxic elements, limiting their functional interactions in the rhizosphere [34,64]. Methodological limitations also reduce reproducibility and translation to field conditions. Most studies rely on pot experiments that show limited ecological realism and do not necessarily reflect open-field multifactorial dynamics [73,81]. Furthermore, research is frequently based on outcome-only approaches, while mechanistic understanding remains insufficient, highlighting the need to adopt direct and molecular process-oriented methodologies [32,81]. Practical challenges also concern the quality of commercially available inocula, which may have low AMF viability, a risk of contamination, and occasionally induce negative microbial effects on crops [83]. In addition, currently adopted AMF quantification approaches, including microscopy-based assessments, are time-consuming and subjective [79,84]. Overall, despite the recognized beneficial potential of AMF, their agronomic implementation remains largely constrained by inconsistent symbiotic performance, context dependency, lack of inoculum standardization, and limited field validation. Future work must integrate ecological criteria for strain selection, rigorous evaluation under realistic stress combinations, and improved inoculum quality control to enable reliable, scalable adoption of AMF within sustainable agricultural systems, particularly under Mediterranean environments.

6. Future Technological Perspectives and Emerging Research Directions

Bridging the gap between laboratory findings and field performance is essential for the widespread adoption of AMF-based technologies [73,81]. Future research should prioritize mechanistic understanding of AMF–plant interactions, including signaling pathways governing Mycorrhiza-Induced Resistance (MIR), with particular attention to nematode defense mechanisms [22,32]. Large-scale, ecologically realistic trials are required to validate scalability under multifactorial stress conditions [63,85]. Optimizing inoculum dosage and timing [63] and selecting plant genotypes that show stable AMF responsiveness across environments [45] will be critical. Locally adapted isolates should be prioritized for improved performance under region-specific constraints, such as salinity [10,82]. Future research should also explore multi-component inoculants integrating AMF with native microbial communities, such as PGPR and endophytes, to enhance phytoremediation and biocontrol outcomes [24,63,78,79], and consider advanced delivery strategies including nanotechnology combined with RNA interference to achieve highly specific pest suppression [86]. In this sustainable framework, the co-addition of nanotechnologies and biofertilizers provides a strategy to significantly increase the net income of growers, especially under moderate drought stress conditions [27] (Table 3). The influence of microbial inoculation on the qualitative traits of agricultural products, including phenolic composition, warrants further attention, also in relation to AMF use under Mediterranean conditions [10,27,49]. The application of AMF in Mediterranean agroecosystems could provide significant economic benefits in both the short and long term by improving the cost efficiency of agricultural production systems [87,88]. Beyond reducing input costs, particularly those associated with mineral fertilizers, AMF application contributes to enhanced crop yield and quality, thereby directly increasing farm profitability, though their scalability is still limited by inoculum cost and availability [89].

7. Final Remarks

Mediterranean-type climates are characterized by pronounced seasonal water scarcity, elevated evapotranspiration rates, irregular precipitation patterns, thermal extremes, and progressive soil degradation. These interacting stressors continue to pose substantial challenges to crop productivity and agroecosystem stability. By synthesizing evidence across diverse host species, environmental stressors, AMF taxa, and systematically mapping the “native microbiome” to avoid the risks of competition with alien species and co-inoculation strategies, this review highlights the strategic importance of incorporating mycorrhizal technologies into sustainable crop management frameworks tailored to Mediterranean agro-climatic conditions and other semi-arid or arid regions with similar stressors. AMF have emerged as pivotal biological partners capable of supporting plants under both abiotic and biotic stress. The literature reviewed herein demonstrates that AMF contribute to enhanced drought tolerance, reduced ion toxicity under salinity, improved thermotolerance through photosynthetic stabilization, and modulation of plant immune pathways, resulting in strengthened resistance against pathogens, herbivores, and nematodes. Their synergistic interactions with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria further reinforce their value for resource-use efficiency and long-term soil health. However, most studies to date have explored AMF benefits in isolation, focusing on single stress factors under controlled conditions. Mediterranean agricultural systems, by contrast, are inherently exposed to multiple, simultaneous stressors. There remains an urgent need for integrative, ecologically realistic research that evaluates AMF performance under combined drought–salinity–heat–pathogen scenarios, as well as field-based investigations capable of capturing the complexity of Mediterranean environments. As climate extremes intensify and water resources become increasingly limited, the strategic use of AMF—alone or in combination with other beneficial microorganisms—offers a promising nature-based solution to enhance crop resilience, stabilize yields, and promote agroecosystem sustainability. Advancing this approach will require coordinated efforts to optimize inoculum selection, refine agronomic practices that support AMF functionality, and expand mechanistic understanding of AMF-mediated stress mitigation. Such evidence-based integration is essential for developing robust, climate-resilient Mediterranean cropping systems capable of sustaining food production under future environmental constraints.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M., G.P. and S.L.; methodology, S.L., G.P., C.F. and G.M.; data curation and statistical analysis, S.L., C.F. and G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, C.F.; writing—review and editing, S.L., G.M., G.P. and C.F.; supervision, S.L., G.P. and G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as part of the PhD course “Agricultural, Food and.Environmental Sciences” at the University of Catania, where Claudia Formenti is currentlycompleting a research project entitled “Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation as sustainable tool to improve yield and phytochemical value of Cynara cardunculus L.”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviated forms are used in this manuscript:
MicroorganismAbbreviated formReference
Claroideoglomus etunicatumC. etunicatum[10,51]
Claroideoglomus claroideumC. cloroideum[30,51,65]
Funnelliformis geosporusF. geosporus[51]
Funnelliformis mosseaeF. mosseae[31,34,37,39,45,51,53,72,73,90]
Glomus intraradicesG. intraradices[30,31,52,69,74]
Glomus mosseaeG. mosseae[31,32,65,72,74]
Gigaspora margaritaG. margarita[72]
Glomus giganteaG. gigantea[72]
Glomus viscosumG. viscosum[71]
Glomus aggregatumG. aggregatum[74]
Glomus monosporumG. monosporum[45]
Rhizophagus irregularisR. irregularis[35,37,39,45,48,51,59,67,90]
Rhizophagus intraradicesR. intraradices[10,47]
Rhizophagus fasciculatusR. fasciculatus[49]
Septoglomus constrictumS. consctictum[10]
Bacillus megateriumB. megaterium[52,54]
Pantoea agglomeransP. agglomerans[54]
Pseudomonas fluorescensP. fluorescens[54]
Burkholderia cedrusB. cedrus[52]
Streptomyces beta-vulgarisS. beta-vulgaris[52]
AcronymsExtended forms
AMFArbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi
CRU TS3.25Climatic Research Unit Time Series version 3.25
IRInduced resistance
MIRMycorrhiza-Induced Resistance
NPKNitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), and Potassium (K)
PGPRPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
ROSReactive oxygen species
SARSystemic acquired resistance

References

  1. Begum, N.; Qin, C.; Ahanger, M.A.; Raza, S.; Khan, M.I.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmed, N.; Zhang, L. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: Implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Albacete, A.; Ghanem, M.E.; Martínez-Andújar, C.; Acosta, M.; Sánchez-Bravo, J.; Martínez, V.; Lutts, S. Hormonal changes in relation to biomass partitioning and shoot growth impairment in salinized tomato plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 59, 4119–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, D.; Wu, W.; Abrams, S.R.; Cutler, A.J. Drought-related gene expression in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 59, 2991–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tardieu, F.; Tuberosa, R. Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Akula, R.; Ravishankar, G.A. Influence of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fahad, S.; Bajwa, A.A.; Nazir, U.; Anjum, S.A.; Farooq, A.; Zohaib, A.; Sadia, S.; Nasim, W.; Adkins, S.; Saud, S.; et al. Crop production under drought and heat stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 6, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahuja, I.; de Vos, R.C.H.; Bones, A.M.; Hall, R.D. Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nihorimbere, V.; Ongena, M.; Smargiassi, M.; Thonart, P. Beneficial plant–microbe interactions in the rhizosphere. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2011, 15, 327–337. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bais, H.P.; Weir, T.L.; Perry, L.G.; Gilroy, S.; Vivanco, J.M. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 233–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Estrada, B.; Aroca, R.; Barea, J.M.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi isolated from a saline habitat improved maize antioxidant systems and plant tolerance to salinity. Plant Sci. 2013, 201–202, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pinton, R.; Varanini, Z.; Nannipieri, P. The Rhizosphere as a Site of Heavy Metal Interactions between Soil, Microorganisms and Plants. In Soil Heavy Metals; Sherameti, I., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhattacharyya, P.N.; Jha, D.K. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1327–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Medina, A.; Azcón, R. Effectiveness of the application of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi and organic amendments to improve soil quality and plant performance under stress conditions. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2010, 10, 354–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Berg, G. Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hamel, C. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on N and P cycling in the root zone. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2004, 84, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lombardo, S.; Abbate, C.; Pandino, G.; Parisi, B.; Scavo, A.; Mauromicale, G. Potato grown under high-calcareous soils: Fertilization and mycorrhization. J. Agron. 2020, 10, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Smith, S.E.; Anderson, I.C.; Smith, F.A. Mycorrhizal associations and phosphorus acquisition: From cells to ecosystems. In Annual Plant Reviews: Phosphorus Metabolism in Plants; Plaxton, W.C., Lambers, H., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; Volume 48, pp. 409–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Evelin, H.; Kapoor, R.; Giri, B. AMF and salt stress alleviation: A review. Ann. Bot. 2009, 104, 1263–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Y.; Tang, M.; Sulpice, R.; Chen, H.; Tian, S.; Ban, Y. AMF alter fractal dimension characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia under drought. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 612–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hildebrandt, U.; Regvar, M.; Bothe, H. AMF and heavy metal tolerance. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhan, F.; Li, B.; Jiang, M.; Yue, X.; He, Y.; Xia, Y.; Wang, Y. AMF enhance antioxidant defense and heavy metal retention in maize roots. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 24338–24347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pozo, M.J.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Ocampo, J.A. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. In Induced Resistance for Plant Protection; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bennett, A.E.; Bever, J.D. Mycorrhizal fungi mediate plant interactions with herbivores and pathogens. Ecol. Lett. 2018, 21, 683–691. [Google Scholar]
  24. Adesemoye, A.O.; Torbert, H.A.; Kloepper, J.W. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 58, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Woo, S.L.; Pepe, O. Microbial consortia as plant biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nadeem, S.M.; Naveed, M.; Ahmad, M.; Zahir, Z.A. Rhizosphere bacteria for improving crop production under stress conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2013, 66, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pandino, G.; Abbate, C.; Scavo, A.; Di Benedetto, D.; Mauromicale, G.; Lombardo, S. Co-inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting bacteria improves plant growth and yield of globe artichoke (Cynara cardunculus scolymus). Sci. Hortic. 2023, 335, 113365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aschmann, H. Mediterranean-type climate: A defined entity, a specific causal mechanism, and a worldwide distribution. In Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems: Origin and Structure; Kruger, F.J., Mitchell, D.T., Jarvis, J.U.M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1984; pp. 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ruiz-Lozano, J.M.; Aroca, R.; Zamarreño, M.J.; Azcón, R. Drought and plant–microbe interactions: Roles of plant hormones and microbial signals. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 205, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gavito, M.E.; Olsson, P.A.; Rouhier, H.; Medina-Peñafiel, A.; Jakobsen, I.; Bago, A.; Azcón-Aguilar, C. Temperature constraints on the growth and functioning of root organ cultures with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2005, 168, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pavithra, D.; Yapa, P.N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation enhances drought tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L.). Mycorrhiza 2018, 28, 477–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jung, S.C.; Martinez-Medina, A.; Lopez-Raez, J.A.; Pozo, M.J. Mycorrhiza-induced resistance and priming. J. Chem. Ecol. 2012, 38, 651–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ujvári, G.; Turrini, A.; Avio, L.; Agnolucci, M. Possible role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated bacteria in the recruitment of endophytic bacterial communities by plant roots. Mycorrhiza 2021, 31, 527–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, G.; Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; Chen, H.; Chen, C.; Cheng, W. Metabonomics reveals mechanisms of stress resistance in Vetiveria zizanioides inoculated with AMF under copper stress. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 6005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dey, M.; Ghosh, S. AMF in plant immunity and pathogen control. Rhizosphere 2022, 22, 100524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pozo, M.J.; Azcón-Aguilar, C. Unraveling mycorrhiza-induced resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dowarah, B.; Gill, S.S.; Agarwala, N. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi confer tolerance to biotic stresses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 1429–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lionello, P.; Abrantes, F.; Congedi, L.; Dulac, F.; Gacic, M.; Gomis, D.; Goodess, G.; Hoff, H.; Kutiel, H.; Luterbacher, J.; et al. Introduction: Mediterranean Climate—Background Information. In The Climate of the Mediterranean Region: From the Past to the Future; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; p. xxxv-xc. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pandino, G.; Lombardo, S.; Lo Monaco, A.; Ruta, C.; Mauromicale, G. In vitro micropropagation and mycorrhizal treatment influence polyphenol profiles of globe artichoke under field conditions. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Seager, R.; Osborn, T.J.; Kushnir, Y.; Simpson, I.R.; Nakamura, J.; Liu, H. Climate Variability and Change of Mediterranean-Type Climates. J. Clim. 2019, 32, 2887–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kuila, D.; Ghosh, S. Challenges of AMF as biofertilizers. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2022, 3, 10010712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Academic Press: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, S.; Zhao, Q. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance plant tolerance to salinity stress through ion homeostasis, antioxidant regulation, and osmotic adjustment pathways. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1323881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mathur, S.; Agnihotri, R.; Sharma, M.P.; Reddy, V.R.; Jajoo, A. High temperature stress and AMF in maize. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sebbane, M.; Labidi, S.; Hafsi, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) under no-tillage and tillage practices in a semiarid region. Agric. Sci. Dig. 2023, 43, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Madejón, P.; Fernández-Boy, E.; Madejón, E.; Morales-Salmerón, L.; Domínguez, M.T. Tillage effects on triticale under water stress. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2025, 186, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qiu, L.-X.; Xu, K.-X.; Guan, D.-X.; Liu, Y.-W.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, X.-Y.; Teng, H.H.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Ma, L.Q. Contrasting effects of arsenic on mycorrhizal-mediated silicon and phosphorus uptake by rice. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 373, 124005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pooja, P.; Devi, S.; Tallapragada, S.; Ahlawat, Y.K.; Sharma, N.; Kasnia, P.; Lakra, N.; Porcel, R.; Mulet, J.M.; Elhindi, K.M. Impact of AM symbiosis on photosynthetic, antioxidant, and water flux parameters in salt-stressed chickpea. Agronomy 2023, 13, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hassan, A.; Azid, A.; Hamid, F.S.; Pariatamby, A.; Ossai, I.C. Inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improved phytoremediation ability of Jatropha multifida L. in metal/metalloid contaminated landfill soil. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 22, 12737–12762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sousa, B.; Soares, C.; Sousa, F.; Martins, M.; Mateus, P.; Rodrigues, F.; Azenha, M.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.; Lino-Neto, F. AMF and biochar enhance tomato tolerance to combined heat and salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2024, 224, 104986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mechri, B.; Tekaya, M.; Guesmi, A.; Ben Hamadi, N.; Khezami, L.; Soltani, T.; Attia, F.; Chehab, H. Enhancing olive tree (Olea europaea) rhizosphere dynamics: Co-inoculation effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth- promoting rhizobacteria in field experiments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2024, 202, 105596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shirdel, M.; Eshghi, S.; Shahsavandi, F.; Fallahi, E. AM inoculation mitigates heat-stress effects on strawberry yield and physiology. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2025, 221, 109629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bicer, S.; Erdinc, C.; Comlekcioglu, N. Co-inoculation of microbial biostimulants at different irrigation levels under field conditions affects cucumber growth. Gesunde Pflanz. 2023, 75, 1237–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Conversa, G.; Elia, A.; La Rotonda, P. Mycorrhizal inoculation and P fertilization effects on processing tomato. Acta Hortic. 2007, 758, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Leventis, G.; Tsiknia, M.; Feka, M.; Ladikou, E.; Papadakis, I.; Chatzipavlidis, I.; Papadopoulou, K.; Ehaliotis, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance growth of tomato under normal and drought conditions, via different water regulation mechanisms. Rhizosphere 2021, 19, 100394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Al-Karaki, G.N.; Hammad, R.; Rusan, M. Response of two tomato cultivars differing in salt tolerance to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 2001, 11, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kohler, J.; Hernández, J.A.; Caravaca, F.; Roldán, A. Antioxidant enzymes in PGPR vs. AMF under salinity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Porras-Soriano, A.; Soriano-Martín, M.L.; Porras-Piedra, A.; Azcón, R. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased growth, nutrient uptake and tolerance to salinity in olive trees under nursery conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1350–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wahid, A.; Gelani, S.; Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. De Oliveira, L.M.; Ma, L.Q.; Santos, J.A.G.; Guilherme, L.R.G.; Lessl, J.T.; Mello, J.W.V. Effects of arsenate, chromate, and sulfate on arsenic and chromium uptake and translocation by arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 184, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Higueras-Valdivia, M.; Silva-Castro, G.A.; Paniagua-López, M.; Romero-Freire, A.; García-Romera, I. Mitigation of heavy metal soil contamination: A novel strategy with mycorrhizal fungi and biotransformed olive residue. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2025, 17, 100570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Turrini, A.; Saran, M.; Giovannetti, M.; Oehl, F. Rhizoglomus venetianum, a new AMF species from a heavy metal-contaminated site. Mycol. Prog. 2018, 17, 1213–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hartley, S.E.; Gange, A.C. Impacts of plant symbiotic fungi on insect herbivores: A hidden world of interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009, 54, 323–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Heinen, R.; Biere, A.; Harvey, J.A.; Bezemer, T.M. Soil organisms influence aboveground plant–insect interactions. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 6, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cameron, D.D.; Neal, A.L.; van Wees, S.C.M.; Ton, J. Mycorrhiza-induced resistance: More than the sum of its parts? Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jacott, C.N.; Murray, J.D.; Ridout, C.J. Trade-offs in AMF symbiosis. Agronomy 2017, 7, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Elsen, A.; Gervacio, D.; Swennen, R.; De Waele, D. AMF-induced biocontrol against nematodes in Musa. Plant Soil 2008, 308, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gough, E.C.; Owen, K.J.; Zwart, R.S.; Thompson, J.P. AMF effects on root-lesion nematodes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Villani, A.; Tommasi, F.; Paciolla, C. The Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Glomus viscosum Improves the Tolerance to Verticillium Wilt in Artichoke by Modulating the Antioxidant Defense Systems. Cells 2021, 10, 1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Abdel-Fattah, G.M.; El-Haddad, S.A.; Hafez, E.E.; Rashad, Y.M. Induction of defense responses in common bean plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 166, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Schouteden, N.; de Waele, D.; Panis, B.; Vos, C.M. AMF for biocontrol of plant-parasitic nematodes: Mechanisms involved. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kaur, J.; Chavana, J.; Soti, P.; Racelis, A.; Kariyat, R. AMF influence growth and insect dynamics in sorghum–sudangrass. Arthropod–Plant Interact. 2020, 14, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ostadi, A.; Javanmard, A.; Machiani, M.A.; Sadeghpour, A.; Maggi, F.; Nouraein, M.; Morshedloo, M.R.; Hano, C.; Lorenzo, J.M. Co-Application of TiO2 Nanoparticles and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Improves Essential Oil Quantity and Quality of Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) in Drought Stress Conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Vos, C.M.; Tesfahun, A.N.; Panis, B.; De Waele, D.; Elsen, A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induce systemic resistance in tomato against Meloidogyne incognita and Pratylenchus penetrans. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2012, 61, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Adeleke, B.S.; Chaudhary, P.; Ayilara, M.S.; Ojo, F.M.; Erinoso, S.M.; Upadhayay, V.K.; Adeyemo, A.I.; Akinola, S.A. Rhizosphere microbiomes mediating abiotic stress mitigation for improved plant nutrition. Ecologies 2024, 5, 375–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bizos, G.; Papatheodorou, E.M.; Chatzistathis, T.; Ntalli, N.; Aschonitis, V.G.; Monokrousos, N. Microbial. The Role of Microbial Inoculants on Plant Protection, Growth Stimulation, and Crop Productivity of the Olive Tree (Olea europea L.). Plants 2020, 9, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Verma, N.; Chahal, K.; Gupta, V.; Chaurasia, A.; Rana, B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A potential tool for sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wahab, A.; Muhammad, M.; Munir, A.; Abdi, G.; Zaman, W.; Ayaz, A.; Khizar, C.; Reddy, S.P.P. Role of AMF in regulating growth, productivity, and ecosystems under stresses. Plants 2023, 12, 3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hol, W.H.G.; Cook, R. An overview of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi–nematode interactions. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2005, 6, 489–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Alguacil, M.M.; Torrecillas, E.; Hernández, G.; Roldán, A. Differences in the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in wild and cultivated Olea europaea L. under the influence of fertilization and tillage. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 149–155. [Google Scholar]
  83. Koziol, L.; Lubin, T.; Bever, J.D. An assessment of twenty-three mycorrhizal inoculants reveals limited viability of AM fungi, pathogen contamination, and negative microbial effect on crop growth for commercial products. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2024, 202, 105559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. McGonigle, T.P.; Miller, M.H.; Evans, D.G.; Fairchild, G.L.; Swan, J.A. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 1990, 115, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Marrassini, V.; Ercoli, L.; Aguilar Paredes, A.V.; Pellegrino, E. Positive response to inoculation with indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as modulated by barley genotype. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2025, 45, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Silva, G.M.; Campos, E.V.R.; de Oliveira, F.F.; Rodrigues, J.S.; de Freitas Proença, P.L.; Melo, A.A.; Fraceto, L.F. Harnessing nanotechnology and bio-based agents: Advanced strategies for sustainable soybean nematode management. Plant Nano Biol. 2025, 13, 100195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Singh, K.N.Y.; Kuca, K.; Dhalaria, R. Economic Analysis of Mycorrhizal Applications and Their Potential for Enhancing Farm Profitability and Livelihoods. In Sustainable Mycorrhizal Cultivation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Caruso, C.; Maucieri, C.; Berruti, A.; Borin, M.; Barbera, A.C. Responses of Panicum miliaceum genotypes to saline and water stress. Agronomy 2018, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Boyno, G.; Rezaee Danesh, Y.; Çevik, R.; Teniz, N.; Demir, S.; Demirer Durak, E.; Farda, B.; Mignini, A.; Djebaili, R.; Pellegrini, M.; et al. Synergistic benefits of AMF: Development of sustainable plant defense system. Front. Micro-Biol. 2025, 16, 1551956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Ghorui, M.; Chowdhury, S.; Burla, S. Recent advances in the commercial formulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants. Front. Ind. Microbiol. 2025, 3, 1553472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of Mediterranean-type climate regions (color). Burgundy color shows the hot summer type of Mediterranean climate (Csa in the Köppen classification) and orange shows the warm summer type of Mediterranean climate (Csb in the Köppen classification). Also shown as contours is the annual mean precipitation over land from CRU TS3.25 in mm month−1, with dotted contours indicating values less than 50 mm month−1. Area averages are taken over the Mediterranean climate areas shown by the colored areas within the red boxes from Seager et al. [40].
Figure 1. Location of Mediterranean-type climate regions (color). Burgundy color shows the hot summer type of Mediterranean climate (Csa in the Köppen classification) and orange shows the warm summer type of Mediterranean climate (Csb in the Köppen classification). Also shown as contours is the annual mean precipitation over land from CRU TS3.25 in mm month−1, with dotted contours indicating values less than 50 mm month−1. Area averages are taken over the Mediterranean climate areas shown by the colored areas within the red boxes from Seager et al. [40].
Agronomy 16 00113 g001
Figure 2. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram showing the identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and inclusion of studies in the systematic review on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and their role in mitigating abiotic and biotic stresses under Mediterranean climate conditions. Source: Page MJ, et al. BMJ 2021;372: n71 [41]. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. (* Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the total number across all databases/registers). ** If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools.)
Figure 2. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram showing the identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and inclusion of studies in the systematic review on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and their role in mitigating abiotic and biotic stresses under Mediterranean climate conditions. Source: Page MJ, et al. BMJ 2021;372: n71 [41]. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. (* Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the total number across all databases/registers). ** If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools.)
Agronomy 16 00113 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of AMF-mediated responses to salt stress. Adapted by the authors. ROS: reactive oxygen species; OsPRX: Peroxidase gene of Oryza sativa; OsHBP1b: HMG-box protein 1b; OsNCX: Sodium/Calcium Exchanger; SOS: Salt Overly Sensitive pathway; CgCLCs: Chloride Channel proteins; NHX: Na+/H+ Exchanger family; ZjAHA7: Plasma membrane H+-ATPase gene in Ziziphus jujuba; ZjHAK2: High-affinity K+ transporter 2, from Wang et al. [44].
Figure 3. Schematic representation of AMF-mediated responses to salt stress. Adapted by the authors. ROS: reactive oxygen species; OsPRX: Peroxidase gene of Oryza sativa; OsHBP1b: HMG-box protein 1b; OsNCX: Sodium/Calcium Exchanger; SOS: Salt Overly Sensitive pathway; CgCLCs: Chloride Channel proteins; NHX: Na+/H+ Exchanger family; ZjAHA7: Plasma membrane H+-ATPase gene in Ziziphus jujuba; ZjHAK2: High-affinity K+ transporter 2, from Wang et al. [44].
Agronomy 16 00113 g003
Figure 4. Overview of AMF-mediated plant defense responses against major biotic stressors. From Dowarah et al. [37].
Figure 4. Overview of AMF-mediated plant defense responses against major biotic stressors. From Dowarah et al. [37].
Agronomy 16 00113 g004
Table 1. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on abiotic stress in crops under Mediterranean climate.
Table 1. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on abiotic stress in crops under Mediterranean climate.
FamilySpeciesStress AgentAMFEffect DetailReference
PoaceaeZea maysHigh temperatures 42 °CRhizophagus irregularis,
Funneliformis mosseae,
Glomus spp.
• Reduction in oxidative stress (−47%);
• Improvement in chlorophyll pigmentation (+85%).
[45]
Zea maysSalinityR. intraradices,
S. constrictum,
Claroideoglomus
etunicatum
At 100 mM NaCl, root colonization was:
• 84.3% (R. intraradices);
• 77.3% (C. etunicatum).
indicating different responses depending on the AMF species
[10]
Triticum
durum
DroughtIndigenous 1AMF
consortia
54% increase in root colonization with no-tillage practices compared to conventional tillage.[46]
Triticale hexaploideDroughtIndigenous 1AMF
consortia
With conservation tillage, increasing in the following:
the abundance of vesicles (+6%) and
arbuscules (+5%).
[47]
Oryza sativaArsenicR. irregularisPhytoextraction: Increasing As accumulation in the following:
• roots (+38%);
• aerial parts (+55%).
[48]
Vetiveria
zizanioides
CopperF. mosseaeIncrease in the following:
• height (+38%);
• biomass (+32%).
Reduction in Cu content in leaves (up to −111.2%).
[34]
FabaceaeGlycine maxHigh-input systems + DroughtG. intraradices
G. mosseae
No effect on biometric parameters.
Increase in the following:
• photosynthetic rate;
• soil moisture content.
Reduction in proline accumulation.
[31]
Cicer arietinumSalinityR. fasciculatusIncreasing activity of antioxidant enzymes:
• Superoxide Dismutase (+20–23%);
• Catalase (+18%);
• Peroxidase (+30%).
[49]
Pongamia
pinnata
Nickel1AMF microbial consortiumPhytoremediation: High Ni removal efficiency (90–93%) from the substrate.[50]
SolanaceaeSolanum
lycopersicum
Salinity + High temperatures +42 °CR. irregularis, C. etunicatum, C. claroideum, F. mosseae, F. geosporusReduction in the following:
• flower drop;
• Na accumulation (−25%).
Increase in the following:
• fruit set (+71%);
• fresh weight (+30%);
• Ca uptake (+20%);
• Mg uptake (+15%).
Improvement in CO2 assimilation (+ 40%).
[51]
AsteraceaeC. cardunculus var. scolymusDroughtF. mosseae, R. irregulareIncrease in caffeoylquinic acids.
Root colonization maintained under stress: 25%.
[39]
C. cardunculus var. scolymusCo-inoculum 1AMF + 2PGPRGlomus spp + 2PGPR (Bacillus spp., Azotobacter spp.)Increase in the following:
• aerial biomass (+23%);
• fresh weight yield (+54%).
[27]
OleaceaeOlea europaeaSalinityR. irregularisReduction in Na in leaves
Increase in the following:
• relative water content;
• K+/Na+ ratio.
[48]
Olea europaeaCo-inoculum 1AMF + 2PGPRG. intraradices + 2PGPRImproved uptake of the following:
• N (+26%);
• P (+60%);
• Fe (+25%);
• other nutrients.
[52]
RosaceaeFragaria
ananassa
High temperatures 42 °CF. mosseaeIncrease in the following:
• fruit weight (+11%);
• yield (+6%);
• photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm);
Reduction in membrane damage.
[53]
ApiaceaeDaucus carotaLow temperatures 15 °CG. intraradices, G. claroideum, G. mosseaeReduction in hyphal growth
sporulation (60–70%), with G. intraradices being more tolerant to cold.
[30]
CucurbitaceaeCucumis
sativus
Drought Mix of 1AMF + 2PGPR (Bacillus, Pantoea, Pseudomonas)Increase in the following:
• yield (+34%);
• water use efficiency.
[54]
EuphorbiaceaeJatropha
curcas
Nickel1AMF microbial consortiumNi removal efficiency from 82% to 86%.[50]
1AMF: arbuscolar mycorrhiza fungi. 2PGPR: plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria.
Table 2. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on biotic stress in crops under Mediterranean climate.
Table 2. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on biotic stress in crops under Mediterranean climate.
FamilySpeciesStress AgentAMFEffect DetailReference
FabaceaePhaseolus vulgarisRhizoctonia solaniMix: Glomus mosseae, G. intraradices, G. clarum, G. gigantea, G. margaritaReduction in disease incidence (from 100% to 73.3%) and severity (from 100% to 66.3%).[72]
Glycine maxAulacorthum solaniGigaspora margaritaNegative: The aphid was 10 times more abundant on inoculated plants.[66]
Glycine maxherbivorous insects1AMF No effect: 75% of interactions are neutral;
Positive: 25% for interaction (reduced larval biomass).
[66]
Glycine maxMeloidogyne incognitaFunneliformis mosseaeThe following reductions:
• 60% infection;
• 27–32% egg hatching.
[32,73]
SolanaceaeSolanum
lycopersicum
Alternaria solani, Botrytis cinerea
Pratylenchus penetrans
Rhizophagus irregularis
G. mosseae
Increase in resistance to foliar pathogens.
Reduction of 87% in nematode population in root.
[67]
PoaceaeOryza sativaMagnaporthe oryzae, Lissorhoptrus oryzophilusR. irregularisIncrease in resistance to the pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae and the insect Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus.[35,37]
Sorghum vulgareSpodoptera frugiperdaG. intraradices, G. mosseae, G. aggregatum, G. monosporumSignificant reduction in insect incidence compared to the control.[74]
AsteraceaeCynara cardunculus var. scolymusVerticillium dahliaeG. viscosumMitigation of infections[71]
PlantaginaceaePlantago lanceolataArctia cajaG. intraradices, G. claroideum, G. mosseaeLarvae of Arctia caja consumed 77–82% less plant material from non-mycorrhizal plants.[65]
RubiaceaeCoffea arabicaMeloidogyneIndigenous 1AMF consortiaAverage reduction in infection severity of 38.3–52.5%.[35]
MusaceaeMusa paradisiacaR. similis and P. coffeaeG. intraradicesReduction in nematode population by 72% (R. similis) and 84% (P. coffeae).[69]
PoaceaeGrassesPratylenchusGlomerales, Glomus, FunneliformisMeta-analysis:
• decrease in 36.6% of cases;
• no effect in 46.6% of cases;
• increase in 16.6% of cases.
[70]
1AMF: arbuscolar mycorrhiza fungi.
Table 3. Emerging technological approaches integrating AMF in different crop species.
Table 3. Emerging technological approaches integrating AMF in different crop species.
SpeciesTechnology AppliedEffect DetailReference
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymusIn vitro micropropagation combined with 1AMF inoculationIncreased phenolic compound accumulation[39]
C. cardunculus var. scolymusCo-inoculation 1AMF + 2PGPRIncreased aerial biomass and head yield; improved functional quality traits[27]
Olea europaea1AMF inoculation combined with 2PGPR consortia (field trial)Increased macro- and micronutrient uptake and enhanced secondary metabolite accumulation (oleuropein; verbascoside)[52]
Triticum
aestivum
Native 1AMF isolates for phytoremediationImproved biomass and photosynthetic efficiency in heavy-metal contaminated soils[63]
Zea maysNative 1AMF isolated from saline Mediterranean soilsEnhanced antioxidant systems and higher salinity tolerance[10]
Glycine maxNanotechnology + RNA interference deliveryHighly specific suppression of plant-parasitic nematodes [17]
Salvia officinalisCo-application of TiO2 nanoparticles + 1AMFIncreased essential oil quantity and improved quality under drought stress[75]
1AMF: arbuscolar mycorrhiza fungi. 2PGPR: plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Formenti, C.; Mauromicale, G.; Pandino, G.; Lombardo, S. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Crop Multi-Stresses Under Mediterranean Climate: A Systematic Review. Agronomy 2026, 16, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010113

AMA Style

Formenti C, Mauromicale G, Pandino G, Lombardo S. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Crop Multi-Stresses Under Mediterranean Climate: A Systematic Review. Agronomy. 2026; 16(1):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010113

Chicago/Turabian Style

Formenti, Claudia, Giovanni Mauromicale, Gaetano Pandino, and Sara Lombardo. 2026. "Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Crop Multi-Stresses Under Mediterranean Climate: A Systematic Review" Agronomy 16, no. 1: 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010113

APA Style

Formenti, C., Mauromicale, G., Pandino, G., & Lombardo, S. (2026). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Crop Multi-Stresses Under Mediterranean Climate: A Systematic Review. Agronomy, 16(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010113

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop