Next Article in Journal
A New Method for Single-Plant Selection of Wheat Genotypes for Tolerance and Resistance to the Root-Lesion Nematode Pratylenchus thornei by Low-Density Sowing
Next Article in Special Issue
Expression and Functional Analysis of the ABORTED MICROSPORES (AMS) Gene in Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Dissection of Hypocotyl Elongation Responses to Light Quality in Brassica napus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flowering and Morphology Responses of Greenhouse Ornamentals to End-of-Day Blue-Dominant Lighting with Different Phytochrome Photostationary States
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 15
Issue 9
10.3390/agronomy15092048
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of Petunia Hsp20 Gene Family and Functional Characterization of MYC2a-Regulated CIV Subfamily in Pollen Development

by
Xuecong Zhou
†,
Bingru Zhang
†,
Yilin Wang
,
Letian Wang
,
Jiajun Tang
,
Bingyan Zhao
,
Qian Cheng
,
Juntao Guo
,
Hang Zhang
and
Huirong Hu
*
National Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2025, 15(9), 2048; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092048
Submission received: 16 July 2025 / Revised: 21 August 2025 / Accepted: 24 August 2025 / Published: 26 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanism of Flower Growth in Ornamental Plants: From Floral Induction to Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Plant heat shock proteins (Hsps) are from a diverse and ancient protein family, with small Hsps of ~20 kDa molecular weight classified as Hsp20s. As a key transcription factor in the jasmonic acid (JA) pathway, myelocytomatosis protein 2 (MYC2) plays a vital role in stamen development. In this study, we identified six genes with significantly altered expression levels using previous RNA-Seq data from PhMYC2a-overexpressing and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-treated petunia. Interestingly, five of these are Hsp20 family members (PhHsp16.0A, PhHsp16.1, PhHsp16.8, PhHsp21.9, and PhHsp40.8). Yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) and dual-luciferase assays demonstrated that PhMYC2a directly binds their promoters, indicating a collective effect. Thus, a genome-wide analysis was conducted and a total of 38 genes encoding Hsp20s were identified in the reference genome of Petunia axillaris. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 38 members of Hsp20s were irregularly distributed on 34 chromosome scaffolds and separated into 13 subfamilies, with only PaHsp16.0A and 16.1, among the five selected Hsp20s, being in the same Cytosol IV (CIV) subfamily. Conserved motif analysis suggested that the PaHsp20 gene family members may have a high degree of conservation. The promoter sequence analysis suggested that the promoter regions of PaHsp20 genes contained multiple light- and hormone-related cis-regulatory elements. Subsequently, spatiotemporal expression patterns, analyzed by qRT-PCR, showed that PhHsp16.0A and PhHsp16.1 had relatively high expression levels in flowers, with similar expression patterns at various stages of flower bud and anther development. Furthermore, virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of PhHsp16.0A and PhHsp16.1 resulted in significantly reduced pollen fertility, indicating their regulation in the process of flower development and echoing the role of PhMYC2a. This study highlights the pivotal role of Hsp20s in MYC2a-mediated regulatory mechanisms during petunia pollen development.

1. Introduction

Stamen is the male reproductive organ of angiosperms, which participates in the reproductive process by producing pollen [1]. Meanwhile, defects in stamen development will lead to male sterility. Numerous studies have shown that hormones such as JA, gibberellin (GA), auxin (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and cytokinin (CTK) mainly regulate stamen growth through complex molecular regulatory networks [2]. In rice, OsTIE1 tightly regulates JA biosynthesis by inhibiting the TCP transcription factors OsTCP1/PCF5, affecting rice anther dehiscence and male fertility [3]. Similarly, AtHMGB15 acts as a positive regulator in the JA signaling pathway and cooperates with MYC2 to regulate the development of plant male organs [4]. In lily anthers, stable GA levels are critical for microspore-to-pollen transition; research found that silencing LoBLH6 perturbs this stability, causing abnormal pollen development [5]. OsFTIP7 promotes nuclear localization of the transcription factor OSH1, which directly represses the IAA biosynthesis gene OsYUCCA4 during late anther development, thereby regulating the timing of anther dehiscence at flowering and affecting stamen fertility in rice [6]. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of LOGL8, a CTK-activating enzyme gene, predominantly impairs pollen fertility in rice [7]. In tomato, overexpression of SlCIN2 leads to high glucose levels in anthers, which causes accumulation of ABA and reactive oxygen species (ROS). This disrupts the programmed cell death process in anthers, resulting in pollen abortion [8]. Moreover, the influence of hormones on anther development is not singular. GA affects almond anther development by regulating the expression levels of genes related to IAA, CTK, JA, salicylic acid (SA) and ABA hormones, as well as anther developmental genes [9].
Heat shock proteins, acting as molecular chaperones, are highly conserved proteins involved in plant growth and development. Their expression is significantly induced under environmental stress [10]. Functionally, Hsps maintain cellular homeostasis by aiding the correct folding, repair, and degradation of misfolded proteins, thereby alleviating stress-induced damage to organisms [11,12]. Phylogenetically, eukaryotic Hsps are categorized into five major classes based on molecular weight and homology: Hsp100, Hsp90, Hsp70, Hsp60, and the small heat shock protein family Hsp20 [13]. Among these, Hsp20 proteins typically range in size from 12 to 42 kDa [14].
The Hsp20 family has been extensively studied in several model plants and in a range of important agricultural and horticultural crops, such as Arabidopsis thaliana [15], Oryza sativa [16], Capsicum annuum [17], Solanum lycopersicum [18], Cucumis sativus [19], and Rhododendron delavayi [20]. Functional characterization has shown that Hsp20s are involved not only in stress response but also in the regulation of plant growth and development. For example, the A. thaliana Hsp20 gene affects early seed development [21]; meanwhile, the wheat chloroplast small heat stress protein sHsp26 is not only involved in seed maturation and germination but also contributes to seed heat tolerance. Additionally, overexpression of the OsHsp16.9 gene enhances salt and drought resistance in O. sativa [22]; the Vitis vinifera VvHsp20 gene is involved in fruit development [23]; the MdHsp18.2b gene in Malus domestica regulates resistance to salt stress and infestation by Bacillus speciosus, as well as anthocyanin accumulation in healing tissues [24]; and A. thaliana strains overexpressing the Prunus persica PpHsp20-32 gene exhibit significantly greater plant height than the wild type [25]. Members of the Hsp20 family regulate various biological processes in organisms. However, limited research has focused on Hsp20s in ornamental plants, particularly regarding their roles in growth and development.
Petunia hybrida, an herbaceous flower of the Solanaceae family, is widely used in flower beds due to its rich varieties, diverse flower types, and bright colors [26]. P. hybrida relies heavily on hybrid breeding for cultivar improvement, and the utilization of male-sterile lines can effectively shorten the breeding cycles and accelerate seed production. Male sterility also offers several advantages: it helps eliminate pollen allergens, avoids pollen-mediated genetic drift in transgenic plants, and prevents fruit contamination. Furthermore, photosynthetic products retained from blocked anther development promote the enlargement of other floral organs and prolong the flowering period, thereby enhancing the ornamental quality of flowers [27,28]. Therefore, unraveling the molecular network underlying anther development in petunia will lay a solid foundation for future molecular breeding efforts.
MYC2a, as a core transcription factor of the JA pathway, plays an important role in stamen development [29]. Previously, we performed transcriptome sequencing on anther extremely sterile petunia PhMYC2a-overexpressing T1 lines and MeJA-treatment plants (accession number: PRJNA1308536), and the PhHsp20 genes shared between these two groups attracted our attention. We thus hypothesize that Hsp20 genes may act as targets of the MYC2a transcription factor, participating in the MYC2a-centered regulatory network governing petunia stamen development. In this study, five Hsp20 genes were identified from six differentially expressed genes (DEGs) through RNA-Seq data mining, with Y1H and dual-luciferase assays validating their roles as downstream targets of the transcription factor PhMYC2a. Additionally, genome-wide characterization of the Hsp20 gene family was performed, covering evolutionary features, structural properties, regulatory elements, and expression patterns. Focusing on members with notable expression in floral tissues, we further investigated the functional relevance of two CIV subfamily genes (PhHsp16.0A and PhHsp16.1) in pollen development using VIGS. Together, these analyses aim to clarify the regulatory and functional landscape of Hsp20s in petunia reproductive development, providing insights into their roles beyond stress responses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

P. hybrida ‘W115’ (Mitchell), which was grown in the experimental base of Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan, China) at 22 °C under a 16 h light (100 µmol m−2 s−1) and 8 h dark photoperiod, was used for gene cloning, expression analyses, and VIGS assays. Young leaves were used to extract genomic DNA and cDNA (reverse-transcribed from RNA) for cloning of the promoter region and genes. Flower anthers (a) and buds (b) were sampled at developmental stages of 0.2a (b), 0.3a (b), 0.5a (b), 1.0a (b), 1.5a (b), 2.5a (b), and 3.5a (b). These stages correspond to bud lengths of 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 cm (with a deviation range of ±0.2 mm). In addition, young roots, young stems, young leaves, unopened flowers, and floral organs of opening flowers (consisting of four whorls: sepal, petal, anther, pistil) were separately collected from three individual plants. These samples were used to extract RNA for qRT-PCR analyses. Nicotiana benthamiana, which was planted in the same environment as petunia, was used for dual-luciferase assays. All primers used in this study are listed in Table S1.

2.2. Characterization of PaHsp20 Family Members in Petunia

Genomic and proteomic sequence data of P. axillaris (the closest relative of P. hybrida ‘W115’) were downloaded from the Sol Genomics Network (SGN, https://www.sgn.cornell.edu/, accessed on 28 February 2024). The Hidden Markov Model (PF00011) of the Hsp20 domain was downloaded from Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 28 February 2024), and an HMM search was performed against the P. axillaris genomic and proteomic sequences (from SGN) using the HMMER 3.0 software to select candidate proteins with E-value ≤ 1 × 10−5. Candidate protein sequences were submitted to the InterPro (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/search/, accessed on 5 March 2024) for screening and retention of those containing Hsp20 domains, with their domain positions recorded and sequences with molecular weights outside the 12–42 kDa range removed. ExPASy (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 8 March 2024) was then used to predict the physicochemical properties of the proteins: molecular mass (Mw), isoelectric point (pI), and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY).

2.3. Homologous Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis was performed using Hsp20 protein sequences derived from A. thaliana [15], O. sativa [16], and P. axillaris (Table S2). All Hsp20 protein sequences were aligned using MUSCLE for multiple sequence alignment, and the phylogenetic tree was then constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method in MEGA 11.0 software with bootstrap value set to 1000. The phylogenetic tree was visualized using ChiPlot (https://www.chiplot.online/circleTree.html, accessed on 20 March 2024) [30]. The protein sequences of PaHsp20s were submitted to Plant-mPLoc (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/, accessed on 25 March 2024) and WoLF PSORT (https://psort.hgc.jp/, accessed on 25 March 2024) for subcellular localization prediction, and consensus results were selected, which provided a reference for subsequent gene classification.

2.4. Conserved Motifs, Gene Structure, and Promoter Cis-Acting Element Analysis

Thirty-eight PaHsp20 protein sequences were submitted to MEME (https://meme-suite.org/meme/index.html, accessed on 2 April 2024) for conserved motif analysis, a total of ten conserved motifs were identified, and the CDS and UTR positions of the sequences were determined using TBtools v2.0 software. Using the above data, 1500 bp upstream of each CDS was selected as the promoter region. These regions were further analyzed using PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 10 April 2024) to identify promoter cis-elements, and the results were visualized [31]. Images of promoter cis-element counts were generated using ChiPlot (accessed on 14 April 2024).

2.5. Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from different samples of P. hybrida using an EASYspin Plant RNA Kit (Aidlab, Beijing, China). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using a HiScript® II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The qRT-PCR was performed using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) on ABI 7500/7500-Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to a previously described method. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate relative expression levels, which were normalized to the expression of the housekeeping gene EF-1α across different tissues.

2.6. Y1H Assays

The CDS region of PhMYC2a was integrated into the NdeI and XhoI sites of pGADT7 vector via homologous ligation. The pHIS2 vector was cleaved with EcoRI and SacI restriction enzymes, and the promoter sequences of PhHsps were cloned into it using the same ligation method. The Y1H assay was performed as the previous protocol [32]. Each recombinant pHIS2 construct (containing PhHsps promoters) was cotransformed with pGADT7-PhMYC2a into Y187 yeast cells. The pGADT7 vector was used as a negative control. The binding of PhMYC2a to each promoter fragment was assessed on SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His medium containing 20, 50, 60, or 70 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT), which was used to suppress background histidine leakage of the pHIS2 vector.

2.7. Dual-Luciferase Assays

For the effector plasmid, the coding sequence of PhMYC2a was cloned into the pGreenII 62-SK vector at the restriction sites SmaI and KpnI to obtain 35S:PhMYC2a as effector construct. The same restriction enzymes were used to cleave the pGreenII 0800-LUC vector, the promoter sequences of PhHsps were cloned into it to form proPhHsps:LUC reporters using a ClonExpress II one-step cloning kit. The effector and reporters were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 (pSoup-19) and then co-expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. The empty vector was used as a negative control. After 48 to 60 h of transformation, the luciferase activity was measured with a TransDetect® Dual-Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay kit (TransGen, Beijing, China). Three biological replicates were performed to quantify luciferase activity.

2.8. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing in P. hybrida

Specific cDNA fragments (200 bp for PhHsp16.0A and 190 bp for PhHsp16.1) were amplified and cloned into the pTRV2 vector using the EcoRI and BamHI sites. VIGS was performed as described [33]. A. tumefaciens GV3101 carrying the pTRV1 vector and either pTRV2 (control) or pTRV2-PhHsp16.0A/16.1 (OD600 = 2.0) cultures were mixed in a 1:1 ratio, and the mixture was infiltrated into petunia seedling leaves using a 1 mL sterile needleless syringe.

2.9. Pollen Fertility Test

Viability and in vitro germination assays were employed to verify the pollen fertility, following the method described by Huang et al. [34]. Pollen grains were observed using a bright-field inverted microscope (model TE-2000U, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) at 10× magnification. Each experiment included three fully bloomed flowers from different VIGS lines and the control group (CK), with three independent biological replicates.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism 9 software. Significant analysis of data for rosette area, silique length, and seed length was conducted using Student’s t-test, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Transcription Factor PhMYC2a Binds Directly to the Promoters of PhHsp20 Genes

To identify the potential downstream targets of PhMYC2a, we analyzed RNA-Seq data from petunia plants with PhMYC2a overexpression and those treated with MeJA. The transcriptomic samples and their conditions are summarized in Table S3. Using DESeq2 software version 1.30.1, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with the screening criteria of absolute fold change (|FoldChange|) ≥ 3 and false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.01. A Venn diagram (Figure 1) was constructed to visualize overlapping DEGs across these groups, revealing six DEGs shared between the PhMYC2a-overexpressing and MeJA-treated samples. Detailed functional annotations of these six DEGs are provided in Table 1. Notably, five of these DEGs encode Hsp20 proteins, suggesting that Hsp20s may act as key effectors in the regulatory network mediated by PhMYC2a.
To verify whether PhMYC2a binds directly to the promoters of these PhHsp20 genes, we performed a Y1H assay using the PhHsp20 gene promoters fused to the HIS3 reporter gene (Figure 2A). As a positive control, yeast cells co-expressing pGADT7-53 and p53HIS2 grew normally on -Leu/-Trp/-His media with any concentration of 3-aminotriazole (3-AT). For our test samples, yeast cells co-expressing PhMYC2a-pGADT7 and proPhHsp16.0A/16.1/16.8/21.9-pHIS2 grew normally on -Leu/-Trp/-His media with 60, 20, 50, and 20 mM of 3-AT, respectively. In contrast, yeast cells co-expressing an empty pGADT7 vector and the same proPhHsp-pHIS2 reporters failed to grow under these conditions (Figure 2B–E). These results indicate that PhMYC2a directly binds to the promoters of PhHsp16.0A, PhHsp16.1, PhHsp16.8, and PhHsp21.9. Notably, both yeast cells co-expressing pGADT7 and proPhHsp40.8-pHIS2, as well as those co-expressing PhMYC2a-pGADT7 and proPhHsp40.8-pHIS2, grew normally on -Leu/-Trp/-His media with 70 mM 3-AT, but the latter was shown to be significantly stronger (Figure 2F), suggesting that PhMYC2a may also bind to the promoter of PhHsp40.8.
Having shown PhMYC2a directly binds to the PhHsp20 promoters via Y1H assays, we further performed dual-luciferase reporter assays to confirm these bindings in a plant cellular context. The effector vector 35S:PhMYC2a was constructed by fusing PhMYC2a to the 35S promoter. Reporter vectors proPhHsps:LUC were generated by inserting PhHsp20 gene promoters upstream of LUC gene (Figure 3A). Dual-luciferase assays showed that the ratio of luciferase to Renilla luciferase (LUC/REN) activity was significantly higher in samples co-expressing 35S:PhMYC2a and proPhHsp16.0A/16.1/16.8/21.9/40.8: LUC compared to controls (empty effector + proPhHsps:LUC). Specifically, the LUC/REN ratios were 2.75-, 2.53-, 1.56-, 2.46-, and 1.83-fold higher (Figure 3B). These results confirm that PhMYC2a directly binds to the PhHsp20 promoters, consistent with the findings from Y1H assays.

3.2. Characterization of the PaHsp20 Gene Family in Petunia

To further explore the evolutionary relationships, structural characteristics, and potential roles of Hsp20s in flower development, we performed a genome-wide identification of Hsp20 genes using the P. axillaris genome database as a reference. A total of 38 Petunia Hsp20 family members with molecular weights between 12 kDa and 42 kDa were screened by HMM search and the verification of Hsp20 structural domains on the InterProScan website by excluding those that did not contain Hsp20 structural domains. The molecular weight, isoelectric point, and total average hydrophobicity coefficient of the PaHsp20 family proteins were analyzed, the proteins were named according to the molecular weight size of the proteins, and the proteins with the same molecular weight were named as A, B and C, from the smallest to the largest (Table S4). According to the data in Table 1, the length of coding amino acids ranged from 113 to 379 aa, and the molecular weight size ranged from 12.85 kDa to 41.64 kDa. The one with the highest number of amino acids (379) and the largest molecular weight (41.64 kDa) is PaHsp41.6, and the one with the lowest number of amino acids (113) and the smallest molecular weight (12.85 kDa) is PaHsp12.8. 24 of the members have a theoretical isoelectric point of less than 7, which makes the protein acidic, while 15 members have a theoretical isoelectric point of more than 7, which makes the protein basic. The total of 38 members had a total average hydrophobicity coefficient less than 0, and the protein was hydrophilic.

3.3. Chromosomal Localization and Phylogenetic Analysis

The 38 members of the PaHsp20 family of petunia are distributed on 34 chromosome scaffolds (Figure 4), the chromosomes are populated by gene density, with bluer colors representing fewer gene sequences and redder colors representing denser gene sequences. Meanwhile, it can be found that genes on the same chromosome, such as PaHsp18.0B, PaHsp18.0C, and PaHsp35.7; PaHsp31.8 and PaHsp16.4 are the closest to each other on the branches of the evolutionary tree and belong to the same subfamily, so we speculate that they may have similar functions. However, PaHsp16.1 and PaHsp20.1, which are also on the same chromosome, belong to subfamilies CIV and CIX, respectively.
A phylogenetic tree was constructed using Hsp20 protein sequences from O. sativa, A. thaliana, and the above 38 PaHsp20, totaling 79 protein sequences, for sequence alignment (Figure 5). According to the evolutionary branching, the resulting tree revealed that 29 PsHsp20 genes (76.3%) could be classified into 13 subfamilies based on evolutionary branching and established nomenclature from A. thaliana and O. sativa, except for the unclassified Hsp20. The largest subgroup, CI, contained eight genes, followed by subfamilies CII, CVIII, CIX, MII, and ER with three genes each. Two genes were assigned to both CIV and CVI, while single-gene representation was observed in CIII, CV, CVII, P, and Px. The remaining nine genes (23.7%) exhibited substantial sequence divergence and could not be assigned to known subfamilies. Among these unclassified members, seven (PaHsp14.4, PaHsp17.5, PaHsp24.2, PaHsp26.2, PaHsp28.8, PaHsp30.3, and PaHsp41.6) formed a distinct cluster designated unknown localization one, while two (PaHsp35.6 and PaHsp35.9) comprised unknown localization two.

3.4. Protein Conserved Motifs, Gene Structure, and Promoter Cis-Acting Element Analysis

Ten conserved motifs of PaHsp20 proteins were identified by the MEME website and listed in Table 2, and the lengths of these conserved motifs ranged from 15 to 50 amino acids (Figure 6A, Table 2).
According to the results of the conserved motifs in Figure 6, most PaHsp20 have multiple motifs among these 38 sequences, while PaHsp26.2 has only motif 2; PaHsp25.2 and PaHsp26.8 have only motifs 1 and 2; PaHsp21.3 has only motifs 2 and 5; and PaHsp14.4 and PaHsp17.5 have only motifs 1 and 5. Comparison revealed that the closer the kinship, the closer the number and position of motif distribution of the gene family members, suggesting that the PaHsp20 gene family members may have a high degree of conservatism.
The CDS and UTR fragments of the 38 sequences obtained from the analysis (Figure 6B), each of which has two or more CDS fragments. However, PaHsp16.8, PaHsp41.6, and PaHsp30.3 had 5′ UTR region; PaHsp18.6, PaHsp16.0A, PaHsp15.7, and PaHsp25.1 had 3′ UTR region; and PaHsp16.0B, PaHsp20.1, and PaHsp21.3 have UTR regions at both 3′ and 5′ ends. Although the UTR acts as an untranslated region and is not a protein coding region, the upstream readable frames within the 5′ UTR region can be translated into polypeptides with transcriptional regulation. A total of 10 (26.3%) PaHsp20 had no introns, 24 (63.2%) PaHsp20 had one intron, two (5.3%) PaHsp20 had two introns, PaHsp26.2 had four introns, and PaHsp31.8 had six introns.
In this study, the promoter sequences of 38 PaHsp20 gene family members were analyzed. The results of promoter cis-acting element analysis showed that the PaHsp20 family genes have basic core sequences such as TATA-box, CAAT-box, and five of these genes also contain the conserved sequence A-box. All genes except PaHsp18.0A have at least one light-responsive element, such as TCT-motif, GT1-motif, GATA-motif, G-box, etc. All genes except PaHsp30.3 had at least one phytohormone-related response element. For example, 26 genes (68.4%) were related to ABA, 19 genes (50%) were related to GA, 13 (34.2%) genes were related to SA, 23 genes (60.5%) were related to MeJA, and 16 genes (42.1%) were related to IAA. In addition, there were 27, 15, 13, 11, 9, 8, and 7 genes with anaerobic induction element ARE, MYB binding site involved in drought-inducibility MBS, cis-acting element involved in defense and stress responsiveness TC-rich repeats, low temperature response element LTR, cis-acting regulatory element related to meristem expression CAT-box, cis-acting regulatory element involved in circadian control circadian, and cis-acting regulatory element involved in zein metabolism regulation O2-site, respectively. In addition to the above cis-acting elements, the promoters of a small number of genes have regulatory elements related to seed-specific regulation, endosperm expression and specificity, cell cycle regulation, seed specificity, circadian rhythms, and fenestrated chloroplast differentiation (Figure 7).
Only PaHsp30.3 had the AACA-motif element associated with endosperm-specific expression. Only PaHsp17.6 had the cis-acting regulatory element associated with seed-specific regulation RY element. The cell cycle regulatory element MSA-like was present only in the PaHsp19.5 gene. The MYB binding site involved in the regulation of flavonoid biosynthetic genes, the MBSI element, was present only in PaHsp17.5 and it was speculated that these genes have unique regulatory capabilities.

3.5. The Expression Analysis of PhHsp20 Genes

We next confirmed the transcript level in specific tissues of the candidate PhHsp genes closely related to PhMYC2a using qRT-PCR analysis, which were obtained by RNA-Seq. The expression in petunia roots, stems, leaves, flowers, sepal, corolla, stamens, and pistils are shown in Figure 8. The expression of PhHsp was diverse but it was observed that certain Hsp genes exhibited relatively high expression levels in specific tissues. For instance, PhHsp16.1 had increased expression in flowers. PhHsp40.8 showed significantly elevated expression in roots. In particular, PhHsp21.9 and PhHsp16.0A demonstrated a prominent expression pattern. Additionally, PhHsp16.8 had a high expression in several tissues.
Developmental stage expression patterns of PhHsp genes during the growing processes of flower buds and anthers have been demonstrated represented by different length flower buds. The results of flower buds are shown in Figure 9A. PhHsp40.8, PhHsp16.1, and PhHsp16.0A genes had extremely high expression levels at periods of 0.2b, 2.5b, and 2.5b, respectively. However, they were relatively low at other periods, implying that these PhHsp genes might play important roles in such periods. On the contrary, PhHsp16.8 and PhHsp21.9 gene expression levels were relatively average in each period, suggesting that these genes might play a significant and continuous role during the bud development.
The expression of PhHsp genes in anthers fluctuated more compared to that in flower buds; all genes had exceptionally high expression levels in specific periods (Figure 9B). PhHsp16.8 and PhHsp40.8 genes had high expression levels at periods of 1.0a and 0.2a, respectively. Moreover, the remaining genes had high expression levels at several periods. For example, PhHsp21.9 had high expression levels at periods of 0.3a, 0.5a, and 3.5a; PhHsp16.1 (1.5a, 2.0a); PhHsp16.0A (0.5a, 1.0a, and 1.5a), indicating that it might play a crucial role in these periods.

3.6. Silencing of PhHsp16.0A and PhHsp16.1 Significantly Reduced the Stamen Fertility

According to the gene family identification results, among the five Hsp20s screened from the transcriptome, PhHsp16.1 and PhHsp16.0A both belong to the subfamily. Y1H and dual-luciferase assays confirmed their direct binding to PhMYC2a. Additionally, qRT-PCR analysis revealed significant expression of these two genes during pollen development, suggesting their potential roles in this process.
To investigate the roles of PhHsp16.0A and PhHsp16.1 in petunia flower development, we performed VIGS (Figure S1). qRT-PCR analysis of petunia seedlings one month post-injection revealed that the transcript levels of PhHsp16.0A and PhHsp16.1 were significantly lower in silenced plants compared to pTRV2 controls (CK; Figure 10A,B), confirming successful silencing of the target genes. For subsequent experiments, we selected transgenic lines 1, 9, and 13 for PhHsp16.1, and lines 6, 11, and 12 for PhHsp16.0A.
Following treatment with 1% aceto-carmine, wild-type pollen grains were mostly plump, spherical, and uniformly stained dark red (Figure 11A). In contrast, pollen grains from pTRV2-PhHsp16.1 lines exhibited a significantly lower staining rate (Figure 11B). Additionally, the initiation and growth of pollen tubes in pTRV2-PhHsp16.0A lines were significantly reduced compared to those in fully viable pollen grains. Meanwhile, the observation results of other floral organs showed no significant difference compared with CK (Figures S2 and S3). These evidences suggested that the Hsp20 gene played a critical role in stamen development.

4. Discussion

Heat stress severely affects plant growth, causing physiological damage, physiological disorders, and biochemical alterations in plants at different stages of growth [35]. In recent years, the small heat shock protein gene family has been identified in numerous species. It has been reported that 63, 57, and 36 Hsp20 family members were recently identified in M. domestica, Populus yunnanensis, and Lactuca sativa, respectively [24,36,37]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that small heat shock proteins are widespread in plants and play an important role in stress respond. Beyond stress conditions, Hsp20 expression also undergoes significant changes during plant growth and development, with selective accumulation-specific organs such as seeds and pollen [38,39].
In this study, we used bioinformatics methods to mine and identify the Hsp20 gene family of P. axillaris and obtained 38 PaHsp20 gene family members. Phylogenetic analysis showed that 55.3% of the PaHsp20 family genes were classified into the cytoplasmic C subclade, which was consistent with the taxonomic features of other species, like soybean [40], tomato [18], and apple [41], which all had the most cytoplasmic C subclade genes. Whereas differences in evolutionary analyses may be related to differences in the way of delineation. The CI subfamily of PaHsp20 represented the largest Hsp20 subfamily, consistent with findings in potato, Arabidopsis, and grape [15,23,42]. Comparative analysis of the Hsp20 gene family between P. axillaris and its relative tomato revealed that tomato Hsp20 genes are also classified into 13 subfamilies. Tomato, pepper, and petunia all lack the CVIII subfamily, while tomato and pepper both lack the CIV and MII subfamilies [17,18]. These findings suggest widespread occurrence of gene gain and loss events in plant evolution. Within the same plant family, certain subfamilies may be consistently absent across species, while others exhibit lineage-specific losses, reflecting divergent evolutionary trajectories.
Most of the proteins of this family are acidic proteins, which are the same as those of Hsp20 proteins of altospermum in the protologue community [43]. The PaHsp20 genes show dispersed genomic distribution, with 38 family members distributed across 34 scaffolds. Three CI-subfamily genes (PaHsp18.0A, PaHsp18.0C, PaHsp35.7) co-localized on one scaffold, while two CII-subfamily genes (PaHsp31.8, PaHsp16.4) shared another scaffold. Notably, PaHsp20.1 (CII) and PaHsp16.1 (CI) co-occurred despite belonging to different subfamilies. UTR regions were rare among PaHsp20 genes. Only six members contained 5′UTRs (PaHsp16.8, PaHsp41.6, PaHsp30.3, PaHsp16.0B, PaHsp20.1, PaHsp21.3), which may regulate developmental processes including cell growth and tissue differentiation. Also, our results further revealed that the majority of PaHsp20 genes (89.5%) contain no intron or only a single short intron. This structural feature aligns closely with observations in other plant species: 93.8% in grape, 97.14% in pepper, and 83.33% in tomato [17,18,23]. The consistency across these diverse species suggests that the fewer and shorter introns in Hsp20 genes may represent a conserved evolutionary trait. Such a structural characteristic could confer functional advantages, as genes with fewer or shorter introns often undergo more rapid transcription and translation, which is particularly critical for Hsp20s given their role in rapid stress responses.
Given the diverse cis-acting elements in their promoter regions, these PaHsp20 genes are likely involved in a wide range of biological processes and environmental responses. Most notably, the majority of PaHsp20 members contain at least one light-responsive element and one phytohormone-related response element. This finding is supported in multiple species such as pepper and chickpeas [17,43]. This conservation of cis-acting element profiles across species suggests that the integration of light and phytohormone signals may represent a core regulatory mechanism for Hsp20 genes in plants. In petunia, such elements could enable PaHsp20 genes to fine-tune their expression in response to fluctuating light conditions (e.g., during floral development) and hormonal cues (such as those governing pollen maturation), thereby contributing to the coordination of growth and developmental processes. Thus, these elements likely position PaHsp20 genes as key mediators of petunia growth and development, integrating both hormonal and environmental signals.
The previous research showed that Hsp70 genes are required for normal plant development, including chloroplast development [44] and gametogenesis [45]. Hsp70-16 dysfunction perturbs the proper development and function of floral organs, and loss of Hsp17-16 function was found to cause the interruption of the lateral sepal opening, which would impair the normal development of floral organs in the subsequent pollination process [46]. Although Hsp70 and Hsp90, members of the heat shock protein superfamily, have been well-documented as playing critical roles in secondary metabolism and developmental regulation, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the involvement of Hsp20 family proteins in these biological processes remain poorly characterized and require further elucidation.
While the Hsp20 gene family has been extensively characterized for its roles in environmental stress responses, with most functional studies focusing on this context, our findings shed light on an underappreciated aspect of their biological significance. For instance, AtHsp21 interacts with the pTAC5 protein and is important for chloroplast development in Arabidopsis under heat stress [47], and CaHsp25.9 enhances tolerance to heat, salt, and drought by modulating reactive oxygen species accumulatio, antioxidant enzyme activity, and stress-related gene expression [48]. However, research exploring Hsp functions under non-stress conditions remains limited. Our work addresses this gap by identifying the gene family of Hsp20 in petunia and establishing their direct regulation by the transcription factor PhMYC2a. This newly identified regulatory relationship extends the known functional repertoire of Hsp20 proteins, linking them to floral development in a non-stress context. By doing so, our study provides novel insights into the diverse roles of Hsp20s and offers a framework for investigating their understudied functions in plant developmental processes beyond stress responses.
Currently, the functional mechanisms of the MYC2 transcription factor in plants have been extensively characterized. As a key downstream effector in the JA pathway, MYC2 plays pivotal roles in regulating biotic and abiotic stress responses, plant growth and development, and the biosynthesis of specialized metabolites [49]. MYC2 exhibits diverse DNA-binding specificities, including recognition of G-box (5′-CACGTG-3′) and E-box (5′-CACNTG-3′) motifs, and functions as both a transcriptional activator and repressor in modulating various aspects of JA signaling [50]. Numerous regulatory pathways involving MYC2 have been identified, such as MYC2-PUB22 [51], MYC2-EPF2/EPFL4/EPFL9 [52], and MYC2-GGPPS [53]. In the present study, we identified five PhHsp20 genes as direct downstream targets of PhMYC2a through Y1H and dual-luciferase assays. This finding provides the first evidence for a direct regulatory link between MYC2 and the Hsp20 gene family in petunia, thereby laying a foundation for refining the molecular regulatory network underlying stamen development in petunia. Notably, we verified the functions of PhHsp16.0A and PhHsp16.1 in anther development using VIGS. However, due to the limitations of the VIGS technique, the target genes only exhibited reduced expression levels in the treated plants, resulting in a mere decrease in stamen fertility without the induction of complete male sterility. In future studies, constructing CRISPR/Cas9 vectors for PhHsp16.0A and PhHsp16.1 to achieve targeted knockout of these genes will help clarify their precise regulatory capacity on stamen fertility, which will further advance our understanding of the MYC2-Hsp20 module in petunia reproductive development.

5. Conclusions

This study firstly mined five Hsp20 genes downstream of PhMYC2a and validated their direct interaction using Y1H and dual-luciferase assays from the petunia transcriptome data. Secondly, we systematically classified and characterized the Hsp20 gene family in the polyploid model species P. axillaris. The classification of PaHsp20 was based on phylogenetic analysis, conserved domain analysis, and gene structure analysis. Furthermore, the detailed analyses, including cis-element prediction, protein–protein interaction prediction, and tissue-specific expression analysis, suggest that some PaHsp20s might be involved in the regulation of plant growth. Finally, we validated the function of PhHsp16.0A and PhHsp16.1 in reducing pollen fertility using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). This provides a possible direction for future studies on Hsp20 genes. This finding may offer a new avenue for future petunia breeding efforts.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy15092048/s1, Figure S1: The plants of VIGS assay (A) Representative images of wild-type (WT), control (CK), and VIGS-PhHsp16.0A transgenic petunia plants; (B) Representative images of WT, CK, and VIGS-PhHsp16.1 transgenic petunia plants; Figure S2: Phenotypic observation results of PhHsp16.1; Figure S3: Phenotypic observation results of PhHsp16.0A; Table S1: Primers used in this research; Table S2: Locus ID information of Hsp20 used as query sequences in BLASTP analysis; Table S3: Naming of RNA-Seq samples; Table S4: The identification of PaHsp20 gene family members.

Author Contributions

X.Z.: writing—original draft, conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis; B.Z. (Bingru Zhang): writing—original draft, visualization, software, methodology, formal analysis; Y.W.: methodology; L.W.: methodology; J.T.: methodology; B.Z. (Bingyan Zhao): methodology; Q.C.: methodology; J.G.: methodology; H.Z.: formal analysis; H.H.: writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31972988), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Program No. BC2024103), and Hubei Provincial Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for Undergraduate (No. S202410504120).

Data Availability Statement

The transcriptome data have been deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra accessed on 15 July 2025) with accession number PRJNA1308536.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Zhang, H.Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Ning, K.; Yan, X.L.; Wang, Q.J.; Huang, Z.X.; Zhu, Q.Q.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Ren, Y.; et al. Stamen and pollen development in Menispermaceae with contrasting androecium structure. Plant Syst. Evol. 2022, 308, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Song, S.S.; Qi, T.C.; Huang, H.; Xie, D.X. Regulation of Stamen Development by Coordinated Actions of Jasmonate, Auxin, and Gibberellin in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fang, Y.X.; Guo, D.S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, N.; Fang, X.W.; Zhang, Y.H.; Li, X.; Chen, L.T.; Yu, D.Q.; Zhang, B.L.; et al. Rice transcriptional repressor OsTIE1 controls anther dehiscence and male sterility by regulating JA biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 1697–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sachdev, S.; Biswas, R.; Roy, A.; Nandi, A.; Roy, V.; Basu, S.; Chaudhuri, S. The Arabidopsis ARID–HMG DNA-BINDING PROTEIN 15 modulates jasmonic acid signaling by regulating MYC2 during pollen development. Plant Physiol. 2024, 196, 996–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yu, J.P.; Wu, Z.; Liu, X.Y.; Fang, Q.Q.; Pan, X.; Xu, S.J.; He, M.; Lin, J.X.; Teng, N.J. LoBLH6 interacts with LoMYB65 to regulate anther development through feedback regulation of gibberellin synthesis in lily. Hortic. Res. 2025, 12, uhae339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Song, S.Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, L.; See, Y.H.B.; Mao, C.Z.; Gan, Y.B.; Yu, H. OsFTIP7 determines auxin-mediated anther dehiscence in rice. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, S.F.; Lou, S.L.; Zhao, X.C.; Zhang, S.J.; Chen, L.T.; Huang, P.; Li, G.D.; Li, Y.Y.; Liu, Y.G.; Chen, Y.L. Ectopic expression of a male fertility gene, LOGL8, represses LOG and hinders panicle and ovule development. Crop J. 2022, 10, 1665–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Q.Q.; Wang, X.; Zhao, T.Y.; Luo, J.F.; Liu, X.; Jiang, J. CYTOSOLIC INVERTASE2 regulates flowering and reactive oxygen species-triggered programmed cell death in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2024, 196, 1110–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, P.; Tian, J.; Guo, C.; Luo, S.; Li, J. Interaction of gibberellin and other hormones in almond anthers: Phenotypic and physiological changes and transcriptomic reprogramming. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. UI Haq, S.; Khan, A.; Ali, M.; Khattak, A.M.; Gai, W.X.; Zhang, H.X.; Wei, A.M.; Gong, Z.H. Heat shock proteins: Dynamic biomolecules to counter plant biotic and abiotic stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hartl, F.U.; Bracher, A.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 2011, 475, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Balchin, D.; Hayer-Hartl, M.; Hartl, F.U. In vivo aspects of protein folding and quality control. Science 2016, 353, acc4353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, W.; Vinocur, B.; Shoseyov, O.; Altman, A. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Waters, E.R. The evolution, function, structure, and expression of the plant sHSPs. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Siddique, M.; Gernhard, S.; von Koskull-Döring, P.; Vierling, E.; Scharf, K.-D. The plant sHSP superfamily: Five new members in Arabidopsis thaliana with unexpected properties. Cell Stress Chaperon. 2008, 13, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sarkar, N.K.; Kim, Y.K.; Grover, A. Rice sHsp genes: Genomic organization and expression profiling under stress and development. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, M.; Liu, J.H.; Lu, J.P.; Zhai, Y.F.; Wang, H.; Gong, Z.H.; Wang, S.B.; Lu, M.H. Genome-wide analysis of the CaHsp20 gene family in pepper: Comprehensive sequence and expression profile analysis under heat stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, J.H.; Cheng, Y.; Feng, K.; Ruan, M.Y.; Ye, Q.J.; Wang, R.Q.; Li, Z.M.; Zhou, G.Z.; Yao, Z.P.; Yang, Y.J.; et al. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of tomato Hsp20 gene family in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 17, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, J.J.; Hai, Z.X.; Wang, R.Y.; Yu, Y.Y.; Chen, X.; Liang, W.H.; Wang, H.H. Genome-wide analysis of HSP20 gene family and expression patterns under heat stress in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 968418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, C.; Wang, X.J.; Zhou, P.; Li, C.C. Genome-wide identification and characterization of RdHSP genes related to high temperature in Rhododendron delavayi. Plants 2024, 13, 1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dafny-Yelin, M.; Tzfira, T.; Vainstein, A.; Adam, Z. Non-redundant functions of sHSP-CIs in acquired thermotolerance and their role in early seed development in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chauhan, H.; Khurana, N.; Nijhavan, A.; Khurana, J.P.; Khurana, P. The wheat chloroplastic small heat shock protein (sHSP26) is involved in seed maturation and germination and imparts tolerance to heat stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 1912–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ji, X.R.; Yu, Y.H.; Ni, P.Y.; Zhang, G.H.; Guo, D.L. Genome-wide identification of small heat-shock protein (HSP20) gene family in grape and expression profile during berry development. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, F.J.; Li, Z.Y.; Zhang, D.E.; Ma, N.; Wang, Y.X.; Zhang, T.T.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, Z.; You, C.X.; Lu, X.Y. Identification of Hsp20 gene family in Malus domestica and functional characterization of Hsp20 class I gene MdHsp18.2b. Physiol. Plant. 2024, 176, e14288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lian, X.D.; Wang, Q.P.; Li, T.H.; Gao, H.Z.; Li, H.N.; Zheng, X.B.; Feng, J.C. Phylogenetic and transcriptional analyses of the HSP20 gene family in peach revealed that PpHSP20-32 is involved in plant height and heat tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vandenbussche, M.; Chambrier, P.; Rodrigues Bento, S.; Morel, P. Petunia, your next supermodel? Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Smith, A.G.; Gardner, N.; Zimmermann, E. Increased flower longevity in petunia with male sterility. Hortscience 2004, 39, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. García-Sogo, B.; Pineda, B.; Roque, E.; AntÓn, T.; Atarés, A.; Borja, M.; Beltrán, J.P.; Moreno, V.; Cañas, L.A. Production of engineered long-life and male sterile Pelargonium plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 156–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, S.R.; Hu, Y.; Yang, H.Q.; Tian, S.B.; Wei, D.Y.; Tang, Q.L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.M. The regulatory roles of MYC TFs in plant stamen development. Plant Sci. 2023, 333, 111734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, J.M.; Chen, Y.R.; Cai, G.J.; Cai, R.L.; Hu, Z.; Wang, H. Tree Visualization by One Table (tvBOT): A web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W587–W592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, T.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Tan, D.; Wei, Y.; Yuan, H.; Li, T.; Wang, A. Apple (Malus domestica) MdERF2 negatively affects ethylene biosynthesis during fruit ripening by suppressing MdACS1 transcription. Plant J. 2016, 88, 735–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yue, Y.Z.; Zhu, W.W.; Wang, J.H.; Wang, T.T.; Shi, L.S.; Thomas, H.R.; Hu, H.R.; Wang, L.G. Integration of DNA methylation, microRNAome, degradome and transcriptome provides insights into petunia anther development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2024, 66, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, X.; Yue, Y.Z.; Sun, J.; Peng, H.; Yang, Z.N.; Bao, M.Z.; Hu, H.R. Characterization of a fertility-related SANT/MYB gene (PhRL) from petunia. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 183, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hassan, M.U.; Chattha, M.U.; Khan, I.; Chattha, M.B.; Barbanti, L.; Aamer, M.; Iqbal, M.M.; Nawaz, M.; Mahmood, A.; Ali, A.; et al. Heat stress in cultivated plants: Nature, impact, mechanisms, and mitigation strategies—A review. Plant Biosyst. 2021, 155, 211–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shi, L.C.; Kang, Y.D.; Ding, L.; Xu, L.J.; Liu, X.J.; Yu, A.M.; Liu, A.Z.; Li, P. Comprehensive characterization of poplar HSP20 gene family: Genome-wide identification, stress-induced expression profiling, and protein interaction verifications. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Q.Q.; Dai, B.W.; Fan, M.; Yang, L.L.; Li, C.; Hou, G.G.; Wang, X.F.; Gao, H.B.; Li, J.R. Genome-wide profile analysis of the Hsp20 family in lettuce and identification of its response to drought stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1426719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ham, D.J.; Moon, J.C.; Hwang, S.G.; Jang, C.S. Molecular characterization of two small heat shock protein genes in rice: Their expression patterns, localizations, networks, and heterogeneous overexpressions. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 6709–6720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Roger, D.K.; Tamutenda, C.; Hannah, S.T.; Tea, M.; Robert, A.B.; Virginia, B.P. Chaperone function of two small heat shock proteins from maize. Plant Sci. 2014, 221–222, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lopes-Caitar, V.S.; de Carvalho, M.C.; Darben, L.M.; Kuwahara, M.K.; Nepomuceno, A.L.; Dias, W.P.; Abdelnoor, R.V.; Marcelino-Guimarães, F.C. Genome-wide analysis of the Hsp20 gene family in soybean: Comprehensive sequence, genomic organization and expression profile analysis under abiotic and biotic stresses. BMC Genom. 2013, 28, 577. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yao, F.W.; Song, C.H.; Wang, H.T.; Song, S.W.; Jiao, J.; Wang, M.M.; Zheng, X.B.; Bai, T.H. Genome-wide characterization of the HSP20 gene family identifies potential members involved in temperature stress response in apple. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 609184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Y.L.; Li, Z.M.; Dong, L.P.; Tang, M.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, C.H.; Cao, Z.Y.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, Y.C.; Wang, H.; et al. Histone H1 acetylation at lysine 85 regulates chromatin condensation and genome stability upon DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 7716–7730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, S.S.; Wu, Y.Z.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Z.B.; He, D.D.; Yan, J.G.; Zou, H.S.; Liu, Y.M. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of heat shock protein 20 (HSP20) gene family in response to high-temperature stress in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Agronomy 2024, 14, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Latijnhouwers, M.; Xu, X.M.; Møller, S.G. Arabidopsis stromal 70-kDa heat shock proteins are essential for chloroplast development. Planta 2010, 232, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Maruyama, D.; Sugiyama, T.; Endo, T.; Nishikawa, S. Multiple BiP genes of Arabidopsis thaliana are required for male gametogenesis and pollen competitiveness. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, X.; Shi, L.; Chen, Y.Q.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, D.S.; Xiao, S.; Aharoni, A.; Shi, J.X.; Xu, J. Arabidopsis HSP70-16 is required for flower opening under normal or mild heat stress temperatures. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 1190–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhong, L.L.; Zhou, W.; Wang, H.J.; Ding, S.H.; Lu, Q.T.; Wen, X.G.; Peng, L.W.; Zhang, L.X.; Lu, C.M. Chloroplast small heat shock protein HSP21 interacts with plastid nucleoid protein pTAC5 and is essential for chloroplast development in Arabidopsis under heat stress. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 2925–2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Feng, X.H.; Zhang, H.X.; Ali, M.; Gai, W.X.; Cheng, G.X.; Yu, Q.H.; Yang, S.B.; Li, X.X.; Gong, Z.H. A small heat shock protein CaHsp25.9 positively regulates heat, salt, and drought stress tolerance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 142, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Luo, L.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, L.; Han, X.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, L.; Man, M.; Li, F.; Ren, M.; Xing, Y. MYC2: A Master Switch for Plant Physiological Processes and Specialized Metabolite Synthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kazan, K.; Manners, J.M. MYC2: The Master in Action. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 686–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, S.F.; Hu, C.Y.; Zhu, C.G.; Fan, Y.F.; Zhou, J.; Xia, X.J.; Shi, K.; Zhou, Y.H.; Foyer, H.C.; Yu, J.Q. The MYC2–PUB22–JAZ4 module plays a crucial role in jasmonate signaling in tomato. Mol. Plant 2024, 17, 598–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Xia, Y.; Jiang, S.; Wu, W.; Du, K.; Kang, X. MYC2 regulates stomatal density and water use efficiency via targeting EPF2/EPFL4/EPFL9 in poplar. New Phytol. 2024, 241, 2506–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zheng, J.R.; Liao, Y.L.; Ye, J.B.; Xu, F.; Zhang, W.W.; Zhou, X.; Wang, L.N.; He, X.; Cao, Z.Y.; Yi, Y.W.; et al. The transcription factor MYC2 positively regulates terpene trilactone biosynthesis through activating GbGGPPS expression in Ginkgo biloba. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 15 02048 g001
Figure 1. Venn diagram of DEGs in eight different groups. Abbreviations: C (without MeJA treatment) and M (with MeJA treatment); W (non-transgenic plants) and T (transgenic plants); S (small flower size) and L (large flower size).
Figure 1. Venn diagram of DEGs in eight different groups. Abbreviations: C (without MeJA treatment) and M (with MeJA treatment); W (non-transgenic plants) and T (transgenic plants); S (small flower size) and L (large flower size).
Agronomy 15 02048 g001
Agronomy 15 02048 g002
Figure 2. The results of yeast one-hybrid assay. (A) Schematic of vectors used in Y1H assays; (B) PhMYC2a binds the promoter of PhHsp16.0A; (C) PhMYC2a binds the promoter of PhHsp16.1; (D) PhMYC2a binds the promoter of PhHsp16.8; (E) PhMYC2a binds the promoter of PhHsp21.9; (F) PhMYC2a may bind the promoter of PhHsp40.8.
Figure 2. The results of yeast one-hybrid assay. (A) Schematic of vectors used in Y1H assays; (B) PhMYC2a binds the promoter of PhHsp16.0A; (C) PhMYC2a binds the promoter of PhHsp16.1; (D) PhMYC2a binds the promoter of PhHsp16.8; (E) PhMYC2a binds the promoter of PhHsp21.9; (F) PhMYC2a may bind the promoter of PhHsp40.8.
Agronomy 15 02048 g002
Agronomy 15 02048 g003
Figure 3. The results of dual-luciferase reporter assays. (A) Schematic of the vectors used to perform dual-Luciferase reporter assay; (B) LUC/REN activity ratios of dual-luciferase assay, asterisks represent statistically significant differences (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01) as determined by Student’s t test.
Figure 3. The results of dual-luciferase reporter assays. (A) Schematic of the vectors used to perform dual-Luciferase reporter assay; (B) LUC/REN activity ratios of dual-luciferase assay, asterisks represent statistically significant differences (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01) as determined by Student’s t test.
Agronomy 15 02048 g003
Agronomy 15 02048 g004
Figure 4. Chromosomal localization of PaHsp20 gene. The color from blue to red represents a low to high density of genes on that chromosome scaffolding.
Figure 4. Chromosomal localization of PaHsp20 gene. The color from blue to red represents a low to high density of genes on that chromosome scaffolding.
Agronomy 15 02048 g004
Agronomy 15 02048 g005
Figure 5. Phylogenetic relationships of Hsp20 in O. sativa, A. thaliana, and P. axillaris. MEGA 11.0 was adopted for phylogenetic analysis by using the Neighbor Joining (NJ) method with 1000 replicates of bootstrapping to test the reliability. The 13 subfamilies were highlighted and differentiated by colors and the unclassified PaHsp20s are represented by the UN1/UN2. Cytosol (C) subfamilies (CI-CIX); mitochondria (M) subfamilies (MI and MII); endoplasmic reticulum (ER), chloroplast (P), and peroxisome (Px).
Figure 5. Phylogenetic relationships of Hsp20 in O. sativa, A. thaliana, and P. axillaris. MEGA 11.0 was adopted for phylogenetic analysis by using the Neighbor Joining (NJ) method with 1000 replicates of bootstrapping to test the reliability. The 13 subfamilies were highlighted and differentiated by colors and the unclassified PaHsp20s are represented by the UN1/UN2. Cytosol (C) subfamilies (CI-CIX); mitochondria (M) subfamilies (MI and MII); endoplasmic reticulum (ER), chloroplast (P), and peroxisome (Px).
Agronomy 15 02048 g005
Agronomy 15 02048 g006
Figure 6. The predicted motifs of PaHsp20 protein and analysis of gene structure of PaHsp20 family.
Figure 6. The predicted motifs of PaHsp20 protein and analysis of gene structure of PaHsp20 family.
Agronomy 15 02048 g006
Agronomy 15 02048 g007
Figure 7. Number of cis-acting elements in the promoter of the PaHsp20 gene family. The basic core sequences TATA-box and CAAT-box are not included in the figure; colors from white to red represent increasing numbers from 0 to 8.
Figure 7. Number of cis-acting elements in the promoter of the PaHsp20 gene family. The basic core sequences TATA-box and CAAT-box are not included in the figure; colors from white to red represent increasing numbers from 0 to 8.
Agronomy 15 02048 g007
Agronomy 15 02048 g008
Figure 8. The expression patterns of PhHsp20 genes in different petunia tissues. The RNA samples of roots, stems, leaves, flowers, sepal, corolla, stamens, and pistils were extracted from P. hybrida ‘Michelle’. The expression levels of PhHsp20 genes were detected by the 2−ΔΔCt method with petunia EF-1α gene as the internal control, and the expression in the root was defined as one. The data were calculated from three replications and presented as mean values ± standard error. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in Tukey multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).
Figure 8. The expression patterns of PhHsp20 genes in different petunia tissues. The RNA samples of roots, stems, leaves, flowers, sepal, corolla, stamens, and pistils were extracted from P. hybrida ‘Michelle’. The expression levels of PhHsp20 genes were detected by the 2−ΔΔCt method with petunia EF-1α gene as the internal control, and the expression in the root was defined as one. The data were calculated from three replications and presented as mean values ± standard error. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in Tukey multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 02048 g008
Agronomy 15 02048 g009
Figure 9. The expression analysis of PhHsp20 genes during the development of petunia flower buds (A) and anthers (B). The RNA samples isolated from flower buds and anthers at seven developmental stages in P. hybrida ‘Michelle’. The expression levels of PhHsp20 genes were detected by the 2−ΔΔCt method with petunia EF-1α gene as the internal control, and the expression in 0.2a stage was defined as one. The data were calculated from three replications and presented as mean values ± standard error. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in Tukey multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).
Figure 9. The expression analysis of PhHsp20 genes during the development of petunia flower buds (A) and anthers (B). The RNA samples isolated from flower buds and anthers at seven developmental stages in P. hybrida ‘Michelle’. The expression levels of PhHsp20 genes were detected by the 2−ΔΔCt method with petunia EF-1α gene as the internal control, and the expression in 0.2a stage was defined as one. The data were calculated from three replications and presented as mean values ± standard error. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in Tukey multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 15 02048 g009
Agronomy 15 02048 g010
Figure 10. The qRT-PCR results of VIGS assay. (A) Expression levels in CK and pTRV2-PhHsp16.0A transgenic petunia plants; (B) expression levels in CK and pTRV2-PhHsp16.1 transgenic petunia plants. The expression levels of PhHsp genes were detected by the 2−ΔΔCt method with petunia EF-1α gene as the internal control. Asterisks represent statistically significant differences (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01) as determined by Student’s t test.
Figure 10. The qRT-PCR results of VIGS assay. (A) Expression levels in CK and pTRV2-PhHsp16.0A transgenic petunia plants; (B) expression levels in CK and pTRV2-PhHsp16.1 transgenic petunia plants. The expression levels of PhHsp genes were detected by the 2−ΔΔCt method with petunia EF-1α gene as the internal control. Asterisks represent statistically significant differences (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01) as determined by Student’s t test.
Agronomy 15 02048 g010
Agronomy 15 02048 g011
Figure 11. The result of pollen fertility test assay. (A) Pollen examination conducted by germination test from CK and line 1, 9, 13 of pTRV2-PhHsp16.1 transgenic petunia plants; (B) Pollen examination conducted by staining test from CK and line 6, 11, 12 of pTRV2-PhHsp16.0A transgenic petunia plants; Asterisks represent statistically significant differences (** p < 0.01) as determined by Student’s t test.
Figure 11. The result of pollen fertility test assay. (A) Pollen examination conducted by germination test from CK and line 1, 9, 13 of pTRV2-PhHsp16.1 transgenic petunia plants; (B) Pollen examination conducted by staining test from CK and line 6, 11, 12 of pTRV2-PhHsp16.0A transgenic petunia plants; Asterisks represent statistically significant differences (** p < 0.01) as determined by Student’s t test.
Agronomy 15 02048 g011
Table 1. Functional annotations of the six shared DEGs.
Table 1. Functional annotations of the six shared DEGs.
NameGene IDFunctional Annotation
PhHsp21.9Peaxi162Scf00011g0020322.7 kDa class IV heat shock protein
PhGOLS10APeaxi162Scf00058g02212Galactinol synthase 1
PhHsp16.8Peaxi162Scf00128g00741Small heat shock protein, chloroplastic
PhHsp16.1Peaxi162Scf00132g0008717.6 kDa class I heat shock protein
PhHsp16.0APeaxi162Scf00420g0014118.1 kDa class I heat shock protein
PhHsp40.8Peaxi162Scf00565g0081217.6 kDa class II heat shock protein
Table 2. List of the putative motifs of PaHsp20 proteins.
Table 2. List of the putative motifs of PaHsp20 proteins.
NameAmino Acid SequenceSequence Length 1
Motif 1LPENAKLDKIKAKMENGVLTV21
Motif 2HIFRVDLPGLKKEEVKVZVEE21
Motif 3FFGGRRSNIFDPFSLDIFDPFEGFPFSGTVANIPSSARETSAFANARIDW50
Motif 4EKNDKWHRMERSSGKFVRRFR21
Motif 5GRVLKISGERKREZE15
Motif 6PKZEEKKPEVKAIDI15
Motif 7SAMAAARVDWKETPEA16
Motif 8LAAKLKMPRKVJNMTLVALLVLGIGLYVANVMKS34
Motif 9FYNNCVSPSCRNGNNKIKAMAVGERNNLDHLQRQKKHQSNQPRKRSVQMA50
Motif 10HGFGGGRGNNVFDPFSLDIWDPFEDFH27
1 the length of motif amino acid sequence. Note: A–alanine; C–cysteine; D–aspartic acid; E–glutamic acid; F–phenylalanine; G–glycine; H–histidine; I–isoleucine acid; K–lysine; L–leucine; M–methionine; N–aspartic acid; P–proline; Q–glutamine; R–arginine; S–serine; T–threon amino acid; V–valine; W–tryptophan; Y–tyrosine.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, X.; Zhang, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Tang, J.; Zhao, B.; Cheng, Q.; Guo, J.; Zhang, H.; Hu, H. Genome-Wide Identification of Petunia Hsp20 Gene Family and Functional Characterization of MYC2a-Regulated CIV Subfamily in Pollen Development. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092048

AMA Style

Zhou X, Zhang B, Wang Y, Wang L, Tang J, Zhao B, Cheng Q, Guo J, Zhang H, Hu H. Genome-Wide Identification of Petunia Hsp20 Gene Family and Functional Characterization of MYC2a-Regulated CIV Subfamily in Pollen Development. Agronomy. 2025; 15(9):2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Xuecong, Bingru Zhang, Yilin Wang, Letian Wang, Jiajun Tang, Bingyan Zhao, Qian Cheng, Juntao Guo, Hang Zhang, and Huirong Hu. 2025. "Genome-Wide Identification of Petunia Hsp20 Gene Family and Functional Characterization of MYC2a-Regulated CIV Subfamily in Pollen Development" Agronomy 15, no. 9: 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092048

APA Style

Zhou, X., Zhang, B., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Tang, J., Zhao, B., Cheng, Q., Guo, J., Zhang, H., & Hu, H. (2025). Genome-Wide Identification of Petunia Hsp20 Gene Family and Functional Characterization of MYC2a-Regulated CIV Subfamily in Pollen Development. Agronomy, 15(9), 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092048

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop