Next Article in Journal
Agronomic Potential of Compost from Unconventional Organic Waste Sources and the Effect of Trichoderma harzianum T-22 on Durum Wheat’s Early Development
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Study of Agricultural and Biochemical Traits in Radiation-Induced Colored Wheat
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

GIA-YOLO: A Target Detection Method for Nectarine Picking Robots in Facility Orchards

1
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
2
Shandong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Production Technology and Equipment for Facility Horticulture, Taian 271018, China
3
Institute of Urban Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610213, China
4
Shandong Academy of Agricultural Machinery Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
5
Huang Huai Hai Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Jinan 250100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(8), 1934; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081934
Submission received: 13 July 2025 / Revised: 8 August 2025 / Accepted: 9 August 2025 / Published: 11 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Precision and Digital Agriculture)

Abstract

The complex and variable environment of facility orchards poses significant challenges for intelligent robotic operations. To address issues such as nectarine fruit occlusion by branches and leaves, complex backgrounds, and the demand for high real-time detection performance, this study proposes a target detection model for nectarine fruit based on the YOLOv11 architecture—Ghost–iEMA–ADown You Only Look (GIA-YOLO). We introduce the GhostModule to reduce the model size and the floating-point operations, adopt the fusion attention mechanism iEMA to enhance the feature extraction capability, and further optimize the network structure through the ADown lightweight downsampling module. The test results show that GIA-YOLO achieves 93.9% precision, 88.9% recall, and 96.2% mAP, which are 2.2, 1.1, and 0.7 percentage points higher than YOLOv11, respectively; the size of the model is reduced to 5.0 MB and the floating-point operations is reduced to 5.2 G, which is 9.1% and 17.5% less compared to the original model, respectively. The model was deployed in the picking robot system and field tested in the nectarine facility orchard, the results show that GIA-YOLO maintains high detection precision and stability at different picking distances, with a comprehensive missed detection rate of 6.65%, a false detection rate of 8.7%, and supports real-time detection at 41.6 FPS. The results of the research provide an important reference and support for the optimization of the design and application of the nectarine detection model in the facility agriculture environment.
Keywords: deep learning; nectarine; target detection; facility orchard; picking robotics deep learning; nectarine; target detection; facility orchard; picking robotics

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, L.; Li, Y.; Du, Y.; Gao, A.; Ma, W.; Song, Y.; Han, X. GIA-YOLO: A Target Detection Method for Nectarine Picking Robots in Facility Orchards. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1934. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081934

AMA Style

Ren L, Li Y, Du Y, Gao A, Ma W, Song Y, Han X. GIA-YOLO: A Target Detection Method for Nectarine Picking Robots in Facility Orchards. Agronomy. 2025; 15(8):1934. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081934

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Longlong, Yuqiang Li, Yonghui Du, Ang Gao, Wei Ma, Yuepeng Song, and Xingchang Han. 2025. "GIA-YOLO: A Target Detection Method for Nectarine Picking Robots in Facility Orchards" Agronomy 15, no. 8: 1934. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081934

APA Style

Ren, L., Li, Y., Du, Y., Gao, A., Ma, W., Song, Y., & Han, X. (2025). GIA-YOLO: A Target Detection Method for Nectarine Picking Robots in Facility Orchards. Agronomy, 15(8), 1934. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081934

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop