Next Article in Journal
Organic Materials Promote Soil Phosphorus Cycling: Metagenomic Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Biological Pest Control in Agroecosystems
Previous Article in Journal
Pre-Symptomatic Detection of Nicosulfuron Phytotoxicity in Vegetable Soybeans via Hyperspectral Imaging and ResNet-18
Previous Article in Special Issue
Production of Bacillus thuringiensis in “On Farm” Biofactories Is So Efficient Like a Commercial Product to Control Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Performance of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Strains on Eggs from Different Populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

by
Alessandro Bandeira Dalbianco
1,*,
Diego Fernando Daniel
2,
Dirceu Pratissoli
3,
Daniel de Lima Alvarez
4,
Nadja Nara Pereira da Silva
4,
Daniel Mariano Santos
4,
Santino Seabra Júnior
1 and
Regiane Cristina de Oliveira
4
1
Department of Horticulture, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18600-950, SP, Brazil
2
Department of Agronomy, University of West Santa Catarina (UNOESC), Maravilha 89874-000, SC, Brazil
3
Department of Agronomy, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Alegre 29500-000, ES, Brazil
4
Department of Plant Protection, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18600-950, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(7), 1692; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071692
Submission received: 14 June 2025 / Revised: 5 July 2025 / Accepted: 10 July 2025 / Published: 13 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Pest Control in Agroecosystems—2nd Edition)

Abstract

Tomato is the most widely cultivated fruit–vegetable worldwide, and the tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta) is the primary pest of this crop. In this context, biological control using parasitoids belonging to the genus Trichogramma is crucial. This study aimed to evaluate the biological characteristics of T. pretiosum strains collected from different locations and exposed to eggs from various T. absoluta populations/generations, using parameters such as parasitism capacity, viability (percentage of emergence), sex ratio, and female longevity. The presence of endosymbionts in the T. absoluta populations was also assessed. The experiment followed a randomized design, with treatments consisting of eggs from T. absoluta populations collected in different years (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023) and different strains of T. pretiosum. We used 20 replicates, with one female per replicate in each treatment, organized in a 5 × 4 factorial scheme (five populations of T. absoluta × four strains of T. pretiosum). The S2 strain of T. pretiosum was found to be the most efficient in terms of biological characteristics for parasitism of T. absoluta eggs, especially in T. absoluta populations collected in recent years (2022 and 2023). These results suggest that S2 is the preferred strain for future studies aimed at using this parasitoid as a control agent to combat T. absoluta. The endosymbionts Arsenophonus and Serratia were identified in T. absoluta populations collected in 2019–2020 and 2020–2021, respectively. These findings highlight the presence of these microorganisms in pest populations in different years.

1. Introduction

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is the most widely consumed and cultivated fruit–vegetable worldwide [1]. Despite its high production, the crop is vulnerable to a variety of phytosanitary problems that require intensive management, from planting to harvest [2]. The main threat to this crop is the tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), which can result in significant losses, affecting up to 100% production. This pest causes substantial damage and represents a considerable challenge for control [3].
In Brazil, the control of T. absoluta is often carried out by multiple insecticide applications [3,4]. However, this approach is considered undesirable because of environmental and economic concerns. Repeated insecticide application can have adverse effects on the natural enemies of the pest, compromising the balance of the agroecosystem [5]. Moreover, the selection of insecticide-resistant T. absoluta populations is a significant risk, increasing the challenges in pest control [4].
The implementation of pest management techniques can provide significant benefits to production systems by reducing pesticide use by > 50%. Several tools are available for pest management in tomato cultivation, with biological control being promising [2]. Parasitoids belonging to the genus Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) play a crucial role and are extensively employed in biological control programs worldwide. Their application is particularly effective in the management of lepidopteran pests and has been adopted in more than 15 million hectares across more than 40 countries [2,6].
Trichogramma pretiosum Riley is one of the most common species found in several countries, especially in disturbed environments, such as agroecosystems [2,4,7,8]. Several studies have shown that the choice of species or strain is a determining factor in the success of the mass release of these parasitoids [2]. Therefore, studies aimed at selecting species/strains are of great importance, especially for Trichogramma species, which exhibit considerable variation in foraging behavior (habitat and host location), host preference, recognition and acceptance of crops, and responses to environmental conditions [2,9].
The collection of T. pretiosum strains from the areas where they are released aims to eliminate adaptive costs, thus enabling pest management without adaptation costs for the parasitoid. However, each species or strain may exhibit distinct characteristics, such as parasitism rate and viability (emergence) of its offspring. This serves to identify the strain that is best adapted to the host within a biological control program [2,10].
Quality assessments of these strains are conducted over successive generations in the laboratory, focusing on key biological characteristics, such as parasitism rate and viability, which are expected to be at least 76% and 72%, respectively. Additionally, the sex ratio should be above 0.5 [7]. The implementation of quality control is essential, as maintaining these characteristics is a fundamental step in insect-rearing programs in the laboratory, ensuring that they resemble wild-type [2,7,11,12].
Changes observed in insect populations that are maintained in the laboratory are often linked to genetic control, involving selection effects on existing genotypes and random loss of genotypes due to genetic drift. However, when collecting wild species of natural enemies and/or hosts for laboratory rearing, genetic changes can be expected, owing to the domestication process of these species [2,13].
Beyond the intrinsic characteristics of the T. pretiosum strains, an increasingly relevant aspect in biological control studies is the role of endosymbiotic microorganisms associated with host insects, such as T. absoluta. These microorganisms, commonly vertically transmitted and widely distributed among various insect orders, have been shown to directly or indirectly influence several key aspects of host biology. These effects include changes in fecundity, modulation of immune responses, increased tolerance to environmental stressors, and impacts on tritrophic interactions, particularly with natural enemies, such as parasitoids and predators [14,15].
The objective of this study was to evaluate the biological characteristics of T. pretiosum strains collected from different locations and subjected to eggs from different T. absoluta populations by assessing their parasitism capacity, viability (percentage of emergence), sex ratio, female longevity, and presence of endosymbionts in these T. absoluta populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Location

The assays were conducted in the laboratories of the Research Group on Integrated Pest Management in Agriculture (AGRIMIP), affiliated with the Department of Plant Protection of the School of Agricultural Sciences at São Paulo State University (UNESP), which is located on the Botucatu Campus, São Paulo, Brazil. The geographical coordinates of the site are 22°50′40.1″ S latitude and 48°26′02.5″ W longitude at an altitude of 804 m. The experiments were conducted in climate-controlled facilities, maintained at 25 ± 2 °C, a photoperiod of 12 h, and a relative humidity of 70 ± 10%.

2.2. Collection, Rearing, and Maintenance of T. absoluta in the Laboratory

Populations of T. absoluta were collected in the years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 at the “Taquara Branca” farm, located in Sumaré, in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, where hybrids of indeterminate-growth tomatoes are cultivated for fresh fruit consumption. Infested compound leaves containing larvae were collected, rather than just leaflets, to maintain the turgor of the leaflets attached to the petiole. During collection, the leaves were stored in cardboard boxes arranged in a manner that did not exert pressure on the larvae and allowed aeration between layers. These boxes were then transported to the AGRIMIP laboratory.
The populations of T. absoluta used in this study were collected in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 and were treated as distinct populations throughout the analyses. Each population was maintained under controlled laboratory conditions from its respective year of collection until the evaluations conducted in 2023, following the same rearing regime for all. The population collected in 2023 remained under laboratory conditions for a significantly shorter period and was, therefore, considered the most representative in terms of conserving the genetic characteristics of the original field population.
Populations of T. absoluta were maintained under controlled conditions inside rectangular cages measuring 0.4 m length × 0.4 m width (at the base) × 0.5 m height. Each population was housed in a separate cage to maintain its individual characteristics. These cages featured a lateral opening covered with a nylon mesh. Plastic pots with soil and tomato plants (30 days after transplanting and with six leaves) were placed inside the cages; no insecticides were applied to the plants. The egg-bearing plants were subsequently transferred to other cages of identical size to allow hatching. During the larval stage, plants damaged by the larvae were replaced every 3 days. When the larvae reached the pupal stage, they were maintained in cages with dried plants until adult emergence. Adults were fed a 10% honey solution (90% distilled water and 10% pure wild honey; 2 mL of the solution was soaked in cotton inside a Petri dish), while the larvae were fed tomato plants of the Santa Clara cultivar [16].

2.3. Collection, Rearing, and Maintenance of T. pretiosum Strains

The T. pretiosum strains used were collected from various host plants in different regions of the state of São Paulo, Brazil, and maintained in the AGRIMIP laboratory (Table 1). Four T. pretiosum strains were used in the present study.
To obtain the T. pretiosum strains S1, S2, and S4, eggs of Ephestia kuehniella were exposed in the field using sentinel traps. These traps consisted of egg cards fixed directly to host plants and protected with anti-aphid nets to prevent predation and external interference. For S3, natural ovipositions of Spodoptera spp. were used, collected opportunistically from the field. After collection, all T. pretiosum strains were reared and multiplied on E. kuehniella eggs (Table 1).
All T. pretiosum strains were reared and multiplied by eggs of E. kuehniella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). This alternative host was reared on a diet of whole wheat flour (97%) and brewer’s yeast (3%) [17,18]. Rearing was conducted in rectangular trays of 5 L (7 cm height × 29 cm width × 35 cm depth), each containing 1 kg of diet, into which 0.36 g of fresh E. kuehniella eggs were inoculated. The trays were then sealed with plastic adhesive tape and maintained in a climate-controlled room at 18 ± 2 °C and a photoperiod of 14 h for larval development. The trays remained in this room until the emergence of the first adults; thereafter, they were transferred to another room maintained at 25 ± 2 °C and a photoperiod of 14 h, where the adults were collected daily. For parasitoid rearing, the alternative host eggs were glued onto pieces of double-sided adhesive tape (8 cm length × 2 cm width, polyester, Dimencional®) and subsequently inactivated by exposure to ultraviolet light (45 min at 15 cm from the light source), thereby preventing cannibalism of parasitized eggs [18,19]. The eggs were then offered to the parasitoids over a 24 h period.
Adult parasitoids were kept in transparent plastic containers of 3.6 L (15 cm length × 15 cm width × 25.6 cm height), completely sealed with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic film. For feeding, pure honey was provided and applied as thin streaks on the inner sides of the containers. The containers holding adults of the different T. pretiosum strains were maintained in a climate-controlled room at 25 ± 1 °C, a relative humidity of 70 ± 10%, and a photoperiod of 14 h. Newly emerged parasitoids were used for experiments or to maintain colonies. To prevent cross-contamination between strains, the colonies were kept in separate rooms.

2.4. Selection of T. pretiosum Strains for the Control of T. absoluta

The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design, with treatments consisting of eggs from T. absoluta populations collected in different years (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023) and different T. pretiosum strains, using 20 replicates, with one female per replication, organized in a 5 × 4 factorial scheme (five T. absoluta populations × four T. pretiosum strains).
Females (24 h old) from each strain were isolated in transparent flat-bottom glass tubes (30 mm width × 100 mm length), sealed with PVC plastic film (Magipack®), and fed with a droplet of pure honey. Twenty T. absoluta eggs were offered per replicate in each collection year, with 24 h of embryonic development per female (Figure 1). The eggs were collected using a fine-tipped brush (No. 10, Acrilex®) previously moistened with distilled water. Subsequently, they were transferred to a strip of Vergé-type paper (20 mm width × 70 mm length) moistened with small droplets of distilled water to facilitate adhesion of the eggs to the paper.
The estimation of longevity was assessed in F0 females, that is, the females used for egg parasitism. After 24 h, the strips with eggs were removed, and the females were evaluated daily to validate the longevity data. The following parameters were assessed: parasitism (%) (Equation (1)), emergence (%) (viability) (Equation (2)), female longevity after parasitism (days), number of adults emerging per egg, and sex ratio (Equation (3)).
Parasitism   % = Number   of   parasitized   eggs   ( black   eggs )   Total   number   of   host   eggs   exposed ×   100
Viability   % = Total   number   of   parasitized   eggs   with   emergence   hole     Total   number   of   parasitized   eggs   ( black   eggs ) ×   100
Sex   ratio = Total   number   of   emerged   females Total   number   of   emerged   females + total   number   of   emerged   males
The number of individuals per egg was calculated by dividing the total number of adults by the total number of emergence holes observed in the 20 T. absoluta eggs in each tube. The sex of the parasitoids was determined using a stereomicroscope based on the sexual dimorphism exhibited by their antennae [20].
All T. pretiosum strains used in the experimental assays were derived from populations maintained under laboratory conditions for an average of 25 generations prior to testing.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The variables under study were subjected to residual normality analysis using the Lilliefors test, whereas the homogeneity of variances was assessed using Bartlett’s test. For data showing disparities, a square root transformation √(x + 0.5) was applied. Subsequently, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, and in cases of significant differences, Tukey’s multiple comparison test was applied at a 5% significance level (p ≤ 0.05). All analyses were conducted using the GENES statistical software version 1990.2023.45 [21].
In addition, Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed at a 5% significance level, along with multivariate analysis using the hierarchical clustering method based on standardized mean Euclidean distance (D) and Ward’s minimum variance method, as well as principal component analysis (PCA) through biplot graphical analysis, to assess the degree of dependence and obtain an integrated evaluation of the biological characteristics of the T. pretiosum strains evaluated in T. absoluta populations. Pearson’s correlation and multivariate analyses were performed using OriginPro® 2021 software [22].

2.6. Sampling, DNA Extraction, and Detection of Endosymbionts via Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in T. absoluta Populations

2.6.1. Genomic DNA Extraction

For each T. absoluta population (collected in the years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023), genomic DNA extraction was performed from 20 fourth-instar larvae. The individuals were macerated in a solution of 80 μL of 10% Chelex 100 resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and 8 μL of proteinase K (20 mg/mL) [23]. The samples were placed in a heat block at 95 °C for 20 min. Subsequently, the supernatant was collected for PCR.
The sample size of 20 larvae was defined based on established protocols in the literature for detecting endosymbionts in insects [24,25], which indicate that sampling between 15 and 30 individuals per biological group is sufficient to detect the presence and infection frequency of commonly occurring endosymbionts.

2.6.2. PCR Reaction

DNA amplification of the different endosymbionts of the genera Arsenophonus, Cardinium, Carsonella, Hamiltonella, Regiella, Rickettsia, Serratia, Sodalis, Spiroplasma, Wolbachia, and Pantoea, and for the microsporidium (Nosema sp.), was performed using specific primers for endosymbiotic bacteria and a universal primer for Nosema sp. PCR was carried out in an INFINIGEN thermocycler (model TC-96CG) under specific conditions for each set of primers targeting the endosymbionts and the microsporidium of interest (Table 2 and Table 3).
The PCR mix consisted of 150 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5, 40 mM (NH4)2SO4, 4.0 mM MgCl2, 0.2% Tween 20, 0.4 mM dNTPs, 0.2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Neobio), 7.5 μL of nuclease-free water (Promega), 1 μL of each primer (10 mM), and 25 ng of genomic DNA per sample, totaling 25 μL of solution per tube and reaction. For Nosema sp., the mix was composed of 150 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5, 40 mM (NH4)2SO4, 4.0 mM MgCl2, 0.2% Tween 20, 0.4 mM dNTPs, 0.2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Neobio), 5 μL of nuclease-free water (Promega), 1.25 μL of each primer (10 mM), and 25 ng of genomic DNA.
PCR reactions included negative controls (reactions without DNA template) to monitor contamination as well as internal positive controls (DNA previously confirmed for each endosymbiont group tested) to ensure primer efficiency and specificity. The inclusion of these controls was essential to validate amplification results and to exclude false positives or negatives caused by technical errors or compromised reagents.
To visualize the PCR products, a 100 bp molecular marker (Norgen) and 1% agarose gel with Gel Red DNA staining were used, following the manufacturer’s instructions (NeoBio). Agarose gels were visualized using an ultraviolet light transilluminator (Major Science). All DNA extraction procedures were performed at the Molecular Biology and Nematology Laboratory of the School of Agricultural Sciences at São Paulo State University (UNESP), in Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Performance and Comparative Analysis of Trichogramma pretiosum Strains Against Tuta absoluta Eggs

There were significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in the evaluated biological characteristics for the T. absoluta population factor (parasitism (P); longevity (L); number of adults per egg (NAE); and sex ratio (SR)), demonstrating that the treatments differed from each other, with no difference observed for viability. There were also significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in the evaluated biological characteristics for the T. pretiosum strain factor (parasitism (P); viability (V); longevity (L); and sex ratio (SR)), demonstrating that the treatments differed from each other, with no difference observed for the number of adults per egg. There was a significant interaction between T. pretiosum strains and different T. absoluta populations with respect to parasitism, number of adults per egg, and sex ratio, with no interaction between viability and longevity (Table 4).
These results highlight the influence of different T. pretiosum strains on the main biological parameters of eggs from various T. absoluta populations. This allowed the evaluation of the best T. pretiosum strain in terms of biological performance and parasitism against T. absoluta populations, as well as multivariate analyses of the relationships between these factors.
Parasitism differed among the studied T. pretiosum strains, with the highest parasitism rate observed for the S2 strain, which showed the greatest potential for use in T. absoluta control programs. It was also the only strain that achieved >80% parasitism of T. absoluta eggs from the population collected in 2023 (Table 5). Analysis of the effect of the populations on the strains revealed differences between strains S1, S2, and S4. The T. absoluta populations collected in 2023 (58.3%) and 2019 (32.2%) showed higher parasitism rates for S1, the 2021 population (58.3%) showed the lowest parasitism rate among the other populations for S2, and the 2022 (69.2%) and 2023 (56.6%) populations showed higher parasitism rates for S4 (Table 5).
Differences in parasitism potential among strains have been reported in several studies. For the selection of T. pretiosum species/strains on Chrysodeixis includens Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs, parasitism ranged from 25.6% to 81.6%, leading to the identification of the best strains [18]. Similarly, parasitism provided a good indication for selecting T. pretiosum and Trichogramma galloi Zucchi species/strains for the control of Duponchelia fovealis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) at different ages of the egg (24, 48, and 72 h) [38]. Additionally, strain selection trials have shown that five T. pretiosum strains tested on T. absoluta and Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) eggs exhibited the same parasitism potential [39]. In a study involving three T. pretiosum strains, it was observed that the “Goiânia” strain had a parasitism rate twice as high as the “Iguatu” strain on E. kuehniella eggs [40].
Viability is a crucial indicator for assessing whether a host is suitable for the complete development of the parasitoid. Regardless of the parasitism rate, low emergence rates can significantly compromise the effectiveness of biological control programs [18].
There was a significant exclusive effect of the T. pretiosum strain on viability (percentage emergence of parasitized eggs from T. absoluta populations). Strains S2 (98.9%), S3 (97.8%), and S4 (97.8%) showed higher mean viability than S1 (95.3%) (Table 5).
Viability varied among the tested strains but remained above 91% (Table 5). Similar results have been reported for T. pretiosum strains on Neoleucinodes elegantalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) eggs (ranging from 93.4% to 100%) [41] and E. kuehniella and Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs (ranging from 86% to 95.0%) [42]. However, these results were higher than the emergence percentages of Trichogramma species/strains on Gymnandrosoma aurantianum Lima (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) eggs, which ranged from 30.9% to 42.1%. This low parasitoid emergence rate is related to excessive moisture loss from G. aurantianum eggs [43].
High emergence percentages under laboratory conditions are favorable for the mass release of the parasitoid, especially when associated with high parasitism rates. In this study, there was no difference in the viability among the different host collection years. Conversely, in another study, the highest emergence percentage was found in the least accepted host (Sitotroga cerealella); this may be related to a selection process in which the surviving individuals are more capable of reaching the adult stage [44].
The viability of T. pretiosum strains obtained on different T. absoluta populations at 25 °C was similar to that reported by other researchers for this egg parasitoid species on different hosts [18,38,39,41,42]. For quality control of Trichogramma mass production, viability was considered satisfactory when the percentage of emerged adults exceeded 85% [2]; this was observed in all strains when exposed to T. absoluta eggs from different populations (Table 5).
Significance was observed independently for the factors “T. pretiosum strains” and “T. absoluta populations” in relation to the variable “longevity (days) of T. pretiosum females after parasitism.” Among the strains, S1 (14.7 days) had the highest mean longevity, while S2 (10.3 days) recorded the lowest mean longevity. Analyzing the effect of populations in relation to the strains, there was a difference between strains S1 and S3, with the populations from 2019 (15.1 days), 2020 (17.7 days), and 2021 (14.5 days) providing greater longevity for S1. The populations from 2019 (16.4 days), 2020 (16.7 days), and 2022 (14.0 days) exhibited the highest mean longevity for S3 (Table 5).
It was observed that the higher the percentage of parasitism, the lower the longevity of the females (Table 5). The effect of parasitism on the longevity of Trichogramma females can vary depending on several factors, including parasitism intensity, environmental conditions, and the intrinsic capacity of the species. Generally, intense parasitism has negative effects on female longevity, not only because of the physical wear caused by the act of parasitizing but also because of metabolic stress, host quality, intrinsic species variation, and environmental conditions [45,46].
The survival and persistence of the parasitoid in an area depend on several factors, such as the continuous presence of the host, mortality caused by rainfall, agrochemical applications, and other climatic adversities [2]. According to the literature, T. pretiosum has the potential to remain active in the field for approximately 12 days, with parasitism remaining constant during the first 4 days. Therefore, parasitoid release should not be performed at intervals longer than 4 days. However, it is crucial to remember that the ideal time for applying any control method should be determined by the pest infestation level, which must be equal to or greater than the action threshold, to ensure economic viability of the control method [18,47].
When evaluating the number of T. pretiosum adults that emerged per egg (NAE) among T. absoluta populations in isolation, a difference was observed only in S3, with the 2021 population (1.14 adults per egg) showing the highest mean among all populations. Evaluating the interaction of T. pretiosum strains within T. absoluta populations, a difference was observed only for the year 2021, when S3 (1.14 adults per egg) demonstrated the highest mean among all strains (Table 5).
These values of NAE are similar to those found in a study evaluating the NAE from different Trichogrammatidae species/strains on C. includens eggs, which ranged from 1.0 to 1.2; these are lower than the number determined for other lepidopteran pest species, such as G. aurantianum, which ranged from 1.4 to 1.8 [43]. The number of parasitoids per egg varied according to the volume and quality of the host egg. Host size not only influences the number of eggs laid by the female but also determines the adult size of Trichogramma. Adult size is directly related to the nutritional resources available for larval development [2]. Thus, there is an ideal number of parasitoids per egg depending on host size; for T. absoluta eggs, under the parasitism pressure studied, it ranged from 1.0 to 1.14 individuals per egg for the strains evaluated.
The sex ratio in T. pretiosum that emerged after parasitism differed among the studied T. absoluta populations. For S1, the highest mean values were observed in the 2020 (0.76), 2021 (0.77), and 2022 (0.70) populations. For S2, no differences were observed. S3 showed higher means for the 2020 (0.79), 2022 (0.75), and 2023 (0.71) populations. For S4, the lowest mean value was observed for the 2022 population (0.59). When evaluating the interactions of T. pretiosum strains within T. absoluta populations, differences were observed for all evaluated strains. For the 2019 population, S2 (0.76) and S4 (0.76) had the highest mean values. For 2020, S4 (0.65) had the lowest mean value. In 2021, S3 (0.53) showed the lowest mean. In 2022 and 2023, S4 (0.59) and S1 (0.52) had the lowest mean values, respectively (Table 5).
Sex ratio is an important biological characteristic in applied biological control programs, with a higher production of females being desirable because they are responsible for parasitism [2]. The sex ratio of the strains studied was lower than that recorded for T. pretiosum strains on N. elegantalis eggs (0.8 to 1.0) and T. absoluta (0.4 to 0.8) [39,41]. All four T. pretiosum strains achieved indices equal to or greater than 0.5 on all hosts, meeting the criteria established for the quality control of Trichogramma species in mass rearing. A high sex ratio can be beneficial in biological control programs because males, unlike females, do not contribute to pest reduction through parasitism [2,44].
Figure 2 shows Pearson’s linear correlations among the different T. pretiosum strains for the main biological parameters when exposed to eggs from various T. absoluta populations.
Linear correlation analysis was used to identify the nature and magnitude of the relationship between two variables, allowing the identification of indirect associations for traits of interest in the study subjects. The strength of correlations was classified as weak (correlations between 0 and 0.30), moderate (correlations between 0.30 and 0.60), strong (correlations between 0.60 and 0.90), and very strong (0.90 to 1.00). Correlations equal to 0 indicated no relationship, whereas correlations equal to 1 indicated a perfect correlation between the two variables [41].
Correlations with strong or very strong magnitudes were considered relevant for interpretation purposes. A strong correlation was found between parasitism and viability (r = 0.64) (Figure 2). T. pretiosum strains exposed to T. absoluta eggs that achieved high percentages of parasitism also exhibited high adult emergence percentages (viability).
A strong inverse correlation was noted between parasitism and longevity (−0.70) (Figure 2). In other words, T. pretiosum females exposed to T. absoluta eggs that achieved high percentages of parasitism also exhibited reduced longevity, a factor reported in several studies [45,46].
Hierarchical clustering analysis (cluster analysis) distinguished different T. pretiosum strains based on biological parameters when exposed to T. absoluta eggs, grouping them according to their degree of similarity. This technique allowed the formation of groups that shared similar characteristics while presenting significant differences in relation to other groups (Figure 3).
The analysis separated two distinct groups at a 30% distance. The first group (left) consisted of populations from 2019 (S1), 2021 (S1), 2019 (S3), 2021 (S4), 2020 (S3), 2019 (S4), 2023 (S3), 2021 (S3), 2022 (S3), 2020 (S1), 2020 (S4), and 2022 (S1). The second group (right) included populations from 2019 (S2), 2020 (S2), 2022 (S4), 2021 (S2), 2023 (S4), 2023 (S1), 2022 (S2), and 2023 (S2) (Figure 3). By reducing this distance to 15%, it was possible to form four distinct groups, with the fourth and last group consisting of strain S2 (collected from tomato crops in Mogi Mirim, SP) when exposed to eggs from populations collected in 2022 (S2) and 2023 (S2) (Figure 3). Thus, T. pretiosum S2 may be considered as the strain with the greatest potential for use as an agent for T. absoluta control, as it was the most distinct among those studied and exhibited more favorable biological characteristics, indicating its biological potential. Furthermore, T. absoluta populations from more recent collection years have shown greater susceptibility to parasitism by this strain.
PCA was applied to establish a descriptive model for grouping the analyzed variables based on the different T. pretiosum strains exposed to T. absoluta eggs (Figure 4).
Principal component (PC)1 and PC2 explained 71.99% of the data variance.
PC1 explained the largest percentage of data variability (44.38%), with viability and parasitism most influencing this component. High correlations in PC1 were observed for all populations exposed to strain S2, as well as for most of strain S2, indicating that this group exhibited the most favorable biological characteristics for these strains (Figure 4).
For PC2, longevity showed the highest correlation, with strong correlations observed in most populations exposed to strains S1 and S3. This indicates that this group exhibited this biological characteristic as unfavorable for these strains since the fewer eggs parasitized, the greater the female longevity after the process (Figure 4).
The PCA results were consistent with those of the hierarchical clustering analysis in terms of the number of groups formed. Thus, both analytical techniques provided similar information regarding the structures of similarity and dissimilarity among the strains and populations studied (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
For future studies aimed at the use of T. pretiosum as a control agent for T. absoluta, strain S2 is ideal because it presented the best biotic potential based on the analyzed parameters. This may also be attributed to it being collected from tomato crops, thereby making it more adaptable to parasitizing pests associated with this crop.
Although T. pretiosum is one of the most commonly used and widespread species worldwide for biological control, there is no standardization, and the strains are often described as cryptic species. Despite being morphologically identical, genomic-level differences may exist. Thus, biological differences may occur between species or strains, as predetermined by the genetic code [48,49].
The relationship between the number of host generations reared in the laboratory and the parasitism rate of Trichogramma may be influenced by several factors; in some cases, a reduction in parasitoid efficacy is observed over time. Factors that may contribute to this trend include host adaptation to laboratory conditions; that is, when host generations are reared in the laboratory for extended periods, specific adaptations to the controlled environment may occur. This can lead to genetic changes in the host, making it less susceptible to parasitism by Trichogramma [2,8,50,51].
Additionally, there is a loss of wild traits because hosts maintained in the laboratory for several generations may lose characteristics associated with their wild conditions. These changes can affect the natural interactions between the parasitoid and host. Controlled laboratory conditions may also affect these interactions since they may not completely reflect the natural conditions found in the field. This can lead to divergence in host–parasitoid interactions when compared to those that occur in nature [2,8,50,51].
Thus, the significant variability in the behavior of the four Trichogramma strains, through their biological characteristics, may be related to the habitat of origin, host acceptance, crop, and climatic conditions. These factors have been widely studied as quality traits in biological control programs [8,38,41,52,53].

3.2. Detection of Endosymbionts via PCR in T. absoluta Populations

Only two endosymbionts were detected in T. absoluta populations, bacteria belonging to the genera Arsenophonus (in the 2019 and 2020 populations) and Serratia (in the 2020 and 2021 populations), among the five populations studied (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023) (Table 6).
Endosymbionts play crucial roles in host reproduction, survival, detoxification, and nutrition. They enhance the ability of the host to survive on nutrient-poor diets and improve digestive efficiency by providing essential vitamins. Additionally, endosymbionts help prevent contamination by pathogenic bacteria, influence mating, and affect reproductive systems, among other aspects [15,54,55].
The relationship between insects and endosymbiotic bacteria can be either beneficial or harmful, particularly in cases involving pathogens. In beneficial relationships, endosymbionts perform functions, including nutrition—enhancing efficiency with poor diet, supporting fecundity, and protecting the host against infections. Although many of these relationships remain unknown, it is estimated that approximately 70% of insects live in symbiosis with intracellular microorganisms. The complexity of these interactions highlights the importance of endosymbionts in insect biology and ecology [14,24,56,57].
Some endosymbionts, such as Baumannia, Blochmannia, Buchnera, Carsonella, Nardonella, Portiera, Sulcia, Tremblaya, and Wigglesworthia, are obligate, requiring hosts to survive. In contrast, Arsenophonus, Cardinium, Fritschea, Hamiltonella, Regiella, Rickettsia, Serratia, Sodalis, Spiroplasma, and Wolbachia are facultative and exist freely [58,59,60].
The endosymbionts Serratia and Arsenophonus are reported to be present in T. absoluta populations. The presence of these microorganisms influences various aspects of host biology, such as pathogen resistance, digestion, and interactions with parasitoids, although the specific impact of these endosymbionts on T. absoluta remains an area of ongoing research [24,25].
The endosymbiont Serratia was identified in T. absoluta populations collected in 2020 and 2021. This microorganism acts as a secondary endosymbiont and plays a beneficial role in insects, providing increased tolerance to high temperatures and pathogen resistance. Additionally, Serratia plays a significant nutritional role in amino acid synthesis. Despite these benefits, the presence of Serratia has side effects on both the insect host and its natural enemies. For example, Serratia infection decreases the longevity of predators feeding on the infected insects. This highlights the complexity of the interactions between endosymbionts and their hosts, with varied impacts on insect biology and ecology [61,62].
The endosymbiont Arsenophonus was identified in T. absoluta populations collected in 2019 and 2020. This microorganism acts as a secondary endosymbiont and has a symbiotic relationship with various insects; however, its exact function may vary among specific host species, potentially assisting in the nutrition of insect hosts. They can also synthesize essential nutrients that are absent or present in limited quantities in the insect diet. In some cases, they play a role in protecting the host against pathogens by competing with harmful microorganisms or producing antimicrobial substances [60,63]. In the type B hybridization of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) with the native biotype, the frequency of Arsenophonus in 24 hybrid carriers was significantly lower than expected, indicating either a loss of this endosymbiont in viable hybrids or a reduction in the viability of hybrids carrying it [64].
The analysis of endosymbiont identification in this study revealed that the populations maintained in the laboratory for several generations (collected in 2019, 2020, and 2021) were those that exhibited the presence of endosymbionts. In general, these populations demonstrated greater resistance to parasitism by the T. pretiosum strains studied. This suggests a correlation between the presence of endosymbionts and resistance to parasitism by T. pretiosum strains (Table 5).
The relationship between the endosymbionts Serratia and Arsenophonus in T. absoluta and parasitism by T. pretiosum involves complex interactions between the host, its endosymbionts, and the parasitoid. The presence of endosymbionts, such as Serratia, can influence various aspects of T. absoluta biology, including its reproduction, survival, and response to environmental stresses. These factors may indirectly affect T. absoluta parasitism [24].
Endosymbionts may modulate the host immune system; Serratia and Arsenophonus may influence the immune response of T. absoluta, affecting Trichogramma parasitism. Additionally, endosymbionts may affect host behaviors, such as oviposition site searching and host selection. Some endosymbionts confer resistance to their hosts against parasitoids [63,65], affecting the ability of Trichogramma to parasitize T. absoluta eggs.
To date, there are no specific reports indicating the direct association of the endosymbionts Serratia and Arsenophonus with changes in oviposition-searching behavior and host selection in insects. These endosymbionts are known for their complex interactions with hosts, affecting aspects such as immunity and resistance to pathogens; however, there is no clear evidence of direct modification of these behaviors [24].
The relationship between endosymbionts and parasitism by Trichogramma may vary depending on the specific strains of Serratia and Arsenophonus and the environmental conditions and genetic characteristics of T. absoluta populations [65]. Endosymbionts often alter the chemical composition of their hosts, resulting in the production of volatile compounds or other chemical cues, as perceived by Trichogramma. The presence of Serratia and Arsenophonus may affect the quality of T. absoluta eggs as hosts, potentially affecting their susceptibility to parasitism by Trichogramma [66].
The relationship between endosymbionts, hosts, and parasitoids is highly contextual and dependent on various factors, including environmental conditions, specific strains of endosymbionts, and the genetic characteristics of populations. In several cases, symbiotic relationships with endosymbionts are maintained across insect generations because of the significant benefits these microorganisms confer to the host [67,68,69].
In the present study, the endosymbiont Wolbachia was not detected in any T. absoluta population. Notably, Wolbachia is one of the most frequently reported endosymbionts of T. absoluta [24,57,70]. Additionally, the endosymbiont Pantoea has been identified in some populations [24]. These findings highlight the diversity of endosymbionts coexisting in insect populations; the presence or absence of these microorganisms may vary among different studies and insect populations.
Endosymbionts can be transmitted from hosts to their parasitoids, and this transmission may occur during parasitoid development within the infected host. However, transmission effectiveness and the effects of endosymbionts on parasitoids may vary. Some endosymbionts may benefit the parasitoid, whereas others may have negative or no effects. Both horizontal transmission (from one organism to another) and vertical transmission (from one generation to the next) are possible but depend on specific interactions between the endosymbiont, host, and parasitoid [24,57,70].
Finally, high genetic homogeneity is present in the evaluated T. absoluta populations, which may be primarily related to genetic drift in this invasive species [24,71,72]. In reduced populations, genetic diversity can be lost due to strong genetic drift [73]. These genetic patterns underscore the importance of understanding the genetic structure of T. absoluta populations to implement more effective management strategies, particularly considering their invasive status and impact on agricultural crops.

4. Conclusions

Strain S2 of T. pretiosum had the most efficient biological characteristics for parasitizing T. absoluta eggs. This included high parasitism and good viability/emergence, particularly in T. absoluta populations collected in recent years (2022 and 2023). These results make S2 the preferred strain for future studies aimed at using biological control agents to combat T. absoluta. The endosymbionts Arsenophonus and Serratia were identified in T. absoluta populations collected in 2019–2020 and 2020–2021, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.D. and R.C.d.O.; methodology, A.B.D., D.M.S., R.C.d.O., D.d.L.A. and N.N.P.d.S.; software, A.B.D. and D.F.D.; validation, A.B.D., D.M.S., D.d.L.A., N.N.P.d.S., D.F.D., D.P., S.S.J. and R.C.d.O.; formal analysis, A.B.D., D.M.S., D.d.L.A., N.N.P.d.S., D.F.D., D.P., S.S.J. and R.C.d.O.; investigation, A.B.D. and R.C.d.O.; resources, A.B.D. and R.C.d.O.; data curation, A.B.D., D.M.S., D.d.L.A., N.N.P.d.S., D.F.D. and R.C.d.O.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.D. and R.C.d.O.; writing—review and editing, A.B.D., D.M.S., D.d.L.A., N.N.P.d.S., D.F.D., D.P., S.S.J. and R.C.d.O.; supervision, A.B.D. and R.C.d.O.; project administration, A.B.D. and R.C.d.O.; funding acquisition, A.B.D. and R.C.d.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001, the Research Support Foundation of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP, Brazil) (processes number 2018/02317-5, 2019/10736-0, and 2018/19782-2), and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil) (304126/2019-5). Regiane Cristina de Oliveira holds a CNPq fellowship.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES). The authors also thank the São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP), Faculty of Agronomic Sciences—Graduate Technical Section, for the infrastructure support for the development of the experiment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Souza, P.H.M.; Castillo, R. Comercialização de produtos hortigranjeiros. Cad. Geogr. 2023, 33, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pratissoli, D.; Bueno, R.C.O.F.; Carvalho, J.R. Trichogramma da Coleta à Pesquisa Aplicada; UNICOPY: Alegre, Brazil, 2019; 211p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bacci, L.; Silva, E.M.; Martins, J.C.; Silva, R.S.; Chediak, M.; Milagres, C.C.; Picanço, M.C. The seasonal dynamic of Tuta absoluta in Solanum lycopersicum cultivation: Contributions of climate, plant phenology, and insecticide spraying. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 3187–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Silva, J.E.; Silva, W.M.; Silva, T.B.M.; Campos, M.R.; Filho, A.B.E.; de Siqueira, H.Á.A. High resistance to insect growth disruptors and control failure likelihood in Brazilian populations of the tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta. Phytoparasitica 2021, 49, 689–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dominguez, A.; Puigmartı, M.; Bosch, M.P.; Rosell, G.; Crehuet, R.; Ortiz, A.; Quero, C.; Guerrero, A. Synthesis, Functional Assays, Electrophysiological Activity, and Field Tests of Pheromone Antagonists of the Tomato Leafminer, Tuta absoluta. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3523–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zang, L.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F.; Desneux, N. Biological Control with Trichogramma in China: History, Present Status and Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2021, 66, 463–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Parra, J.R.P.; Pinto, A.S.; Nava, D.E.; Oliveira, R.C.; Diniz, A.J.F. Controle biológico com parasitoides e predadores na agricultura brasileira. In Trichogramma spp. Um Caso de Sucesso de Controle Biológico Aplicado no Brasil; Parra, J.R.P., Coelho Junior, A., Eds.; FEALQ: Piracicaba, Brazil, 2021; pp. 203–234. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ghaemmaghami, E.; Fathipour, Y.; Bagheri, A.; Talebi, A.A.; Reddy, G.V.P. Changes in Functional and Numerical Responses of the Parasitoid Wasp Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Over 45 Generations of Rearing on Ephestia kuehniella. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2022, 115, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hassan, S.A. Selection of suitable Trichogramma strains to control the codling moth Cydia pomonella and the two summer fruit tortrix moths Adoxophyes orana, Pnademis heparana (Lep.: Tortricidae). Entomophaga 1989, 34, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pratissoli, D.; Parra, J.R.P. Desenvolvimento e exigências térmicas de Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, criados em duas traças do tomateiro. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2000, 35, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hassan, S.A. Strategies to select Trichogramma species for use in biological control. In Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids; Wajnberg, E., Hassan, S.A., Eds.; Oxford University: Wallingford, UK, 1994; pp. 55–71. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gonçalves, J.R.; Holtz, A.M.; Pratissoli, D.; Guedes, R.N.C. Avaliação da qualidade de Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) em ovos de Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Acta Sci. Agron. 2003, 25, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bartlett, A.C. Genetic changes during insect-domestication. In Advances and Challenges in Insect Rearing; King, E.C., Leppla, N.C., Eds.; USDA/ARS: New Orleans, LA, USA, 1985; pp. 2–8. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bi, S.; Wang, X.; Tang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Guo, J.; Yang, N.; Wan, F.; Lü, Z.; Liu, W. Bacterial communities of the internal reproductive and digestive tracts of virgin and mated Tuta absoluta. Insects 2023, 14, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Awori, R.M.; Hendre, P.; Amugune, N.O. The genome of a steinernematid-associated Pseudomonas piscis bacterium encodes the biosynthesis of insect toxins. Access Microbiol. 2023, 5, 000659-v3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bottega, D.B.; Boiça Junior, A.L.; Rodrigues, N.E.; Souza, B.H.S.; Forim, M.R.; Santos, T.F. Atratividade, consumo e mortalidade de Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) em tomateiro tratado com óleo de Melia azedarach. Rev. Cienc. Agrar. 2018, 41, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Parra, J.R.P.; Lopes, J.R.; Zucchi, R.A.; Neto, S.S. Metodologia de criação de Anagasta kuehniella (Zeller, 1879) para produção massal de Trichogramma spp. An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 1989, 18, 403–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bueno, R.C.; Parra, J.R.P.; Bueno, A.F.; Haddad, M.L. Performance of trichogrammatids as biocontrol agents of Pseudoplusia includens Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2009, 38, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stein, C.P.; Parra, J.R.P. Uso da radiação para inviabilizar ovos de Anagasta kuehniella (Zeller, 1879) visando estudos com Trichogramma spp. An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 1987, 16, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bowen, W.R.; Stern, V.M. Effect of the temperature on the production of males and sexual mosaics in a uniparenteral race of Trichogramma semifumatum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1966, 59, 823–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cruz, C.D. Genes: A software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Sci. Agron. 2013, 35, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. OriginPro® 2021 (Free Trial). Available online: https://www.originlab.com/ (accessed on 3 November 2023).
  23. Walsh, P.S.; Metzger, D.A.; Higuchi, R. Chelex-100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 2013, 54, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mehrkhou, F.; Güz, N.; Korkmaz, E.M.; Çağatay, N.S. Analysis of genetic variation in an important pest, Tuta absoluta, and its microbiota with a new bacterial endosymbiont. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2021, 45, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Banadkuki, S.Z.; Rahmani, S.; Bandani, A.R. Bacterial communities of two populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2024, 27, 102295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thao, M.L.; Baumann, P. Evolutionary relationships of primary prokaryotic endosymbionts of whiteflies and their hosts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 3401–3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zchori-Fein, E.; Perlman, S.J. Distribution of the bacterial symbiont Cardinium in arthropods. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 2009–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zchori-Fein, E.; Brown, J.K. Diversity of prokaryotes associated with Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2002, 95, 711–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Montenegro, H.V.N.; Solferini, V.N.; Klaczko, L.B.; Hurst, G.D.D. Malekilling Spiroplasma naturally infecting Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Mol. Biol. 2005, 14, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gottlieb, Y.M.; Ghanim, M.; Chiel, E.; Gerling, D.; Portnoy, V.; Steinberg, S.; Tzuri, G.; Horowitz, R.; Belausov, E.; Mozes-Daube, N.; et al. Identification and localization of a Rickettsia sp. in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 3646–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ribeiro, M.F. Parasitismo de Populações de Anaphes nitens (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) em Gonipterus platensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) e Endossimbiontes Associados. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. Heddi, A.A.M.; Grenier, A.M.; Khatchadourian, C.; Charles, H.; Nardon, P. Four intracellular genomes direct weevil biology: Nuclear, mitochondrial, principal endosymbiont, and Wolbachia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 6814–6819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nováková, E.; Hypsa, V.; Moran, N.A. Arsenophonus, an emerging clade of intracellular symbionts with a broad host distribution. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thao, M.L.; Moran, N.A.; Abbot, P.; Brennan, E.B.; Burckhardt, D.H.; Baumann, P. Cospeciation of psyllids and their primary prokaryotic endosymbionts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 2898–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guz, N.; Arshad, M.; Cagatay, N.; Dageri, A. High prevalence of Pantoea in Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae): Vector of citrus huanglongbing disease. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 1525–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sandström, J.P.; Russell, J.A.; White, J.P.; Moran, N.A. Independent origins and horizontal transfer of bacterial symbionts of aphids. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vossbrinck, C.R.; Baker, M.D.; Didier, E.S.; Debrunner-Vossbrinck, B.A.; Shadduck, J.A. Ribosomal DNA sequences of Encephalitozoon hellem and Encephalitozoon cuniculi: Species identification and phylogenetic construction. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 1993, 3, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Paes, J.P.P.; Lima, V.L.S.; Pratissoli, D.; Carvalho, J.R.; Bueno, R.C.O. Seleção de parasitóides do gênero Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) e parasitismo em diferentes idades de ovos de Duponchelia fovealis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 2018, 40, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pratissoli, D.; Parra, J.R. Seleção de linhagens de Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) para o controle das traças Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) e Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2001, 30, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bleicher, E.; Parra, J.R.P. Espécies de Trichogramma parasitóides de Alabama argillacea. II. Tabela de vida de fertilidade e parasitismo de três populações. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 1990, 25, 207–214. [Google Scholar]
  41. Carvalho, G.A.D.; Palma, P.L.B.; Silva, E.S.; Melhado, K.Y.; Souza, S.L.; Raices, S.R. Cádmio em hortaliças: Comparando agricultura orgânica e convencional. Alim. Cienc. Tecnol. Meio Amb. 2020, 1, 35–60. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sá, L.A.N.; Parra, J.R.P. Biology and parasitism of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hym.: Pyralidae) on Ephestia kuehniella (Zeller) and Heliothis zea (Boddie) (Lep.: Noctuidae) eggs. J. Appl. Entomol. 1994, 118, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Molina, R.M.S.; Parra, J.R.P. Seleção de linhagens de Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) e determinação do número de parasitóides a ser liberado para o controle de Gymnandrosoma aurantianum Lima (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2006, 50, 534–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dias, N.D.S.; Parra, J.R.P.; Lima, T.C.C. Seleção de hospedeiro alternativo para três espécies de tricogramatídeos neotropicais. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2008, 43, 1467–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Poorjavad, N.; Goldansaz, S.H.; Hosseininaveh, V.; Nozari, J.; Dehghaniy, H.; Enkegaard, A. Fertility life table parameters of different strains of Trichogramma spp. collected from eggs of the carob moth Ectomyelois ceratoniae. Entomol. Sci. 2011, 14, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pinto, J.R.L.; Fernandes, O.A. Parasitism capacity of Telenomus remus and Trichogramma pretiosum on eggs of moth pests of peanut. Bull. Insectol. 2020, 73, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pernambuco, J.C.A.; Gladenucci, J.; Favoreto, A.L.; Bueno, R.C. Tempo de permanência em campo do parasitoide Trichogramma pretiosum após a liberação. Ecossist 2014, 39, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  48. Santos, N.R.; Almeida, R.P.; Padilha, I.Q.M.; Araújo, D.A.; Creão-Duarte, A.J. Molecular identification of Trichogramma species from regions in Brazil using the sequencing of the ITS2 region of ribosomal DNA. Braz. J. Biol. 2015, 75, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wu, L.H.; He, Y.; Hoffmann, A.A.; Thomson, L.J. Potential impact of climate change on parasitism efficiency of egg parasitoids: A meta-analysis of Trichogramma under variable climate conditions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 231, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Valente, E.C.N.; Broglio, S.M.F.; Passos, E.M.; Lima, A.S.T. Desempenho de Trichogramma galloi (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) sobre ovos de Diatraea spp. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2016, 51, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ghaemmaghami, E.; Fathipour, Y.; Bagheri, A.; Talebi, A.A.; Reddy, G.V.P. Quality control of the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) over 45 generations of rearing on Sitotroga cerealella. Insect Sci. 2021, 28, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hassan, S.A. Seleção de espécies de Trichogramma para o uso em programas de controle biológico. In Trichogramma e o Controle Biológico Aplicado; Parra, J.R.P., Zucchi, R.A., Eds.; FEALQ: Piracicaba, Brazil, 1997; pp. 183–205. [Google Scholar]
  53. Venkatesan, T.; Jalali, S.K. Trichogrammatids: Adaptation to stresses. In Biological Control of Insect Pests Using Egg Parasitoids; Sithanantham, S., Ballal, C.R., Jalali, S.K., Bakthavatsalam, N., Eds.; SPRINGER: New Delhi, India, 2013; pp. 105–125. [Google Scholar]
  54. Twort, V.G.; Blande, D.; Duplouy, A. One’s trash is someone else’s treasure: Sequence read archives from Lepidoptera genomes provide material for genome reconstruction of their endosymbionts. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sun, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lu, Z.; Gui, F. Tracking adaptive pathways of invasive insects: Novel insight from genomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nedoluzhko, A.V.; Kadnikov, V.V.; Beletsky, A.V.; Sharko, F.S.; Tsygankova, S.V.; Mardanov, A.V.; Ravin, N.V.; Skryabin, K.G. Microorganisms associated with microscopic insects Megaphragma amalphitanum and Scydosella musawasensis. Microbiology 2017, 86, 533–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, H.; Xian, X.; Gu, Y.; Castañé, C.; Arnó, J.; Wu, S.; Wan, F.; Liu, W.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y. Similar bacterial communities among different populations of a newly emerging invasive species, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick). Insects 2022, 13, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kikuchi, Y. Endosymbiotic bacteria in insects: Their diversity and culturability. Microbes Environ. 2009, 24, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Whittle, M.; Barreaux, A.M.; Bonsall, M.B.; Ponton, F.; English, S. Insect-host control of obligate, intracellular symbiont density. Proc. R. Soc. B 2021, 288, 20211993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Siozios, S.; Jimenez, P.N.; Azagi, T.; Sprong, H.; Frost, C.; Parratt, S.R.; Taylor, G.; Brettell, L.; Liew, K.C.; Croft, L.; et al. Genome dynamics across the evolutionary transition to endosymbiosis. bioRxiv 2023, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Foray, V.; Grigorescu, A.S.; Sabri, A.; Haubruge, E.; Lognay, G.; Francis, F.; Fauconnier, M.L.; Hance, T.; Thonart, P. Whole-genome sequence of Serratia symbiotica strain cwbi-2.3T, a free-living symbiont of the black bean aphid Aphis fabae. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, e00767-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Perreau, J.; Patel, D.K.; Anderson, H.; Maeda, G.P.; Elston, K.M.; Barrick, J.; Moran, N.A. Vertical transmission at the pathogen–symbiont interface: Serratia symbiotica and aphids. mBio 2021, 12, e00359-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nadal-Jimenez, P.; Parrat, S.R.; Siozios, S.; Hurst, G.D. Isolation, culture and characterization of Arsenophonus symbionts from two insect species reveal loss of infectious transmission and extended host range. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1089143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Thierry, M.; Becker, N.; Reynaud, B.; Lett, J.M.; Delatte, H. Symbiont diversity and non-random hybridization among indigenous (Ms) and invasive (B) biotypes of Bemisia tabaci. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20, 2172–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wu, L.H.; Hoffmann, A.A.; Thomson, L.J. Taiwanese Trichogramma of Asian corn borer: Morphology, ITS-2 rDNA characterization, and natural Wolbachia infection. Insect Sci. J. 2016, 16, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Russell, J.E.; Nunney, L.; Saum, M.; Stouthamer, R. Host and symbiont genetic contributions to fitness in a Trichogramma–Wolbachia symbiosis. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. McCutcheon, J.P.; Boyd, B.M.; Dale, C. The life of an insect endosymbiont from the cradle to the grave. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, R485–R495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gupta, A.; Nair, S. Dynamics of insect–microbiome interaction influence host and microbial symbiont. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sabater-Muñoz, B.; Toft, C. Evolution from free-living bacteria to endosymbionts of insects: Genomic changes and the importance of the chaperonin GroEL. In Symbiosis: Cellular, Molecular, Medical and Evolutionary Aspects; SPRINGER: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 77–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Skaljac, M.; Zanic, K.; Kostanjsek, R. The presence of Wolbachia in Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) populations from coastal Croatia and Montenegro. Afr. Entomol. 2012, 20, 191–194. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC119288 (accessed on 25 November 2023). [CrossRef]
  71. Duman, M. DNA barcoding of sunn pest adult parasitoids using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2015, 59, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shashank, P.R.; Twinkle, S.; Chandrashekar, K.; Meshram, N.M.; Suroshe, S.S.; Bajracharya, A.S. Genetic homogeneity in South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta: A new invasive pest to oriental region. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hagenblad, J.; Hülskötter, J.; Acharya, K.P.; Brunet, J.; Chabrerie, O.; Cousins, S.A.O.; Dar, P.A.; Diekmann, M.; De Frenne, P.; Hermy, M.; et al. Low genetic diversity despite multiple introductions of the invasive plant species Impatiens glandulifera in Europe. BMC Genet. 2015, 16, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the tube used and arrangement of Tuta absoluta eggs offered to each Trichogramma pretiosum female.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the tube used and arrangement of Tuta absoluta eggs offered to each Trichogramma pretiosum female.
Agronomy 15 01692 g001
Figure 2. Pearson correlation matrix among the biological characteristics of four Trichogramma pretiosum strains (S1, S2, S3, and S4) exposed to eggs from different Tuta absoluta populations.
Figure 2. Pearson correlation matrix among the biological characteristics of four Trichogramma pretiosum strains (S1, S2, S3, and S4) exposed to eggs from different Tuta absoluta populations.
Agronomy 15 01692 g002
Figure 3. Dendrogram resulting from the clustering analysis based on biological parameters (parasitism, viability, female longevity, number of adults emerged per egg, and sex ratio) of four Trichogramma pretiosum strains (S1, S2, S3, and S4) exposed to eggs from different Tuta absoluta populations (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023).
Figure 3. Dendrogram resulting from the clustering analysis based on biological parameters (parasitism, viability, female longevity, number of adults emerged per egg, and sex ratio) of four Trichogramma pretiosum strains (S1, S2, S3, and S4) exposed to eggs from different Tuta absoluta populations (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023).
Agronomy 15 01692 g003
Figure 4. Bidimensional projection of the analyzed principal components (PC1 and PC2) based on biological parameters (parasitism, viability, female longevity, number of adults emerged per egg, and sex ratio) of four Trichogramma pretiosum strains (S1, S2, S3, and S4) exposed to eggs from different Tuta absoluta populations.
Figure 4. Bidimensional projection of the analyzed principal components (PC1 and PC2) based on biological parameters (parasitism, viability, female longevity, number of adults emerged per egg, and sex ratio) of four Trichogramma pretiosum strains (S1, S2, S3, and S4) exposed to eggs from different Tuta absoluta populations.
Agronomy 15 01692 g004
Table 1. Trichogramma pretiosum strains with their respective natural host plants and collection origins.
Table 1. Trichogramma pretiosum strains with their respective natural host plants and collection origins.
StrainHost Insect (Eggs)Host PlantsCollection Origin
S1Ephestia kuehniellaBrassicasPardinho, São Paulo, Brazil
S2Ephestia kuehniellaTomatoMogi Mirim, São Paulo, Brazil
S3Spodoptera frugiperdaMaizeBotucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
S4Ephestia kuehniellaAtemoyaPardinho, São Paulo, Brazil
S = strain.
Table 2. Primers used for the identification of endosymbionts in Tuta absoluta.
Table 2. Primers used for the identification of endosymbionts in Tuta absoluta.
Endosymbiont/
Microsporidium
Target GenePrimer Sequence 5′ > 3′Size (bp) *Reference
Arsenophonus16S rRNAF-CGTTTGATGAATTCATAGTCAAA
R-GTCCTCCAGTTAGTGTTACCCAAC
600[26]
Cardinium16S rRNAF-TACTGTAAGAATAAGCACCGGC
R-GTGGATCACTTAACGCTTTCG
900[27]
Hamiltonella16S rRNAF-TGAGTAAAGTCTGGAATCTGG
R-AGTTCAAGACCGCAACCTC
700[28]
Spiroplasma16S rRNAF-GCTTAACTCCAGTTCGCC
R-CCTGTCTCAATGTTAACCTC
800[29]
Rickettsia16S rRNAF-GCTCAGAACGAACGCTATC
R-GAAGGAAAGCATCTCTGC
900[30]
Serratia16S rRNAF-CGCAGGCGGTTTGTTAAGTC
R-CTTCAAGGGCACAACCTCCA
268[31]
Wolbachia16S rRNAF-CGGGGGAAAAATTTATTGCT
R-AGCTGTAATACAGAAAGTAAA
700[32]
Sodalis16S rRNAF-ACCGCATAACGTCGCAAGACCR-TAACCCAACATTTCTCAACACGAG1000[33]
Carsonela16S rRNAF-CACGTGCTACAATGAGTAAAACAA
R-GGTTCCCCTACAGCTACCTTG
279[34]
Pantoea16S rRNAF-ACGGAGGGTGCAAGCGTTAAT
R-AGGTAAGGTTCTTCGCGTTGCA
630[35]
Regiella16S rRNAF-ATCGGGGAGTAGCTTGTCAT
R-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT
1000[36]
Nosema16S rRNAF-CACCAGGTTGATTCTGCC
R-TTATAGTCCTGCTAATGGTTC
222[37]
* bp = base pairs.
Table 3. PCR cycles used for the identification of endosymbionts in Tuta absoluta.
Table 3. PCR cycles used for the identification of endosymbionts in Tuta absoluta.
EndosymbiontsPCR Cycle Conditions
Arsenophonus and
Hamiltonella
Initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.
Spiroplasma and
Regiella
Initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 52 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 2 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.
Rickettsia and
Cardinium
Initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 92 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.
SerratiaInitial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 62 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 1 min.
WolbachiaInitial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.
SodalisInitial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 62 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 2 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.
CarsonelaInitial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.
PantoeaInitial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 90 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.
NosemaInitial denaturation at 95 °C for 4 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 48 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 4 min.
Table 4. Summary of the analysis of variance for the biological characteristics evaluated in four Trichogramma pretiosum strains exposed to eggs from different Tuta absoluta populations.
Table 4. Summary of the analysis of variance for the biological characteristics evaluated in four Trichogramma pretiosum strains exposed to eggs from different Tuta absoluta populations.
Sources of VariationVariables
PVLNAESR
T. absoluta populations (A)8.72 *0.92 ns8.66 *3.09 *3.72 *
T. pretiosum strains (B)30.30 *6.44 *37.30 *2.56 ns5.94 *
A × B2.32 *1.47 ns2.01 ns4.30 *8.81 *
Overall mean47.3097.5012.401.010.68
CV (%)27.706.116.970.350.49
* Significant at the 5% probability level. ns: not significant at the 5% probability level according to Tukey’s test. CV = Coefficient of Variation; parasitism (P, in %); viability (V, in %); longevity (L, in days); number of adults per egg (NAE); sex ratio (SR).
Table 5. Mean values of the biological characteristics of four Trichogramma pretiosum strains exposed to eggs from different Tuta absoluta populations. Air temperature: 25 ± 2 °C, relative humidity: 70 ± 10%, and photoperiod: 12 h.
Table 5. Mean values of the biological characteristics of four Trichogramma pretiosum strains exposed to eggs from different Tuta absoluta populations. Air temperature: 25 ± 2 °C, relative humidity: 70 ± 10%, and photoperiod: 12 h.
Biological
Characteristics
T. absoluta Populations
Collected in Different Years
Trichogramma pretiosum Strains
S1 1,2S2 1,2S3 1,2S4 1,2
Parasitism (%)201932.2 ± 9.07 abB67.7 ± 4.59 abA30.0 ± 9.03 aB42.9 ± 6.84 bcB
202016.6 ± 2.98 bB66.3 ± 7.32 abA37.7 ± 8.23 aB22.0 ± 4.44 cB
202130.6 ± 8.23 bB58.3 ± 6.71 bA47.8 ± 8.92 aAB35.0 ± 6.23 bcAB
202226.0 ± 5.57 bB77.2 ± 5.35 abA44.3 ± 9.42 aB69.2 ± 4.08 aA
202358.3 ± 6.92 aB85.0 ± 3.51 aA41.2 ± 5.51 aB56.6 ± 7.45 abB
Viability (%)201996.8 ± 0.63 aB98.7 ± 0.62 aA96.8 ± 1.20 aA96.5 ± 2.58 aA
202095.1 ± 2.12 aB97.8 ± 1.14 aA97.1 ± 1.66 aA97.1 ± 1.31 aA
202195.6 ± 2.44 aB100 ± 0.00 aA98.9 ± 0.41 aA97.6 ± 1.27 aA
202291.6 ± 1.98 aB99.2 ± 0.45 aA99.6 ± 0.26 aA97.9 ± 0.75 aA
202397.5 ± 1.18 aB98.8 ± 0.69 aA96.8 ± 1.39 aA100 ± 0.00 aA
Longevity (days)201915.1 ± 0.90 abA10.7 ± 0.89 aB16.4 ± 0.52 aA10.8 ± 0.79 aB
202017.7 ± 0.72 aA10.9 ± 1.15 aB16.7 ± 0.88 aA11.5 ± 0.98 aB
202114.5 ± 0.79 abA9.65 ± 0.86 aC13.1 ± 1.00 bAB11.2 ± 0.89 aBC
202213.2 ± 0.92 bA9.75 ± 0.99 aB14.0 ± 0.96 abA9.15 ± 0.52 aB
202312.5 ± 0.78 bA10.6 ± 0.56 aA11.3 ± 0.67 bA10.6 ± 0.67 aA
Number of adults per egg (NAE)20191.01 ± 0.00 aA1.00 ± 0.00 aA1.01 ± 0.00 bA1.00 ± 0.00 aA
20201.02 ± 0.02 aA1.00 ± 0.00 aA1.00 ± 0.00 bA1.00 ± 0.00 aA
20211.00 ± 0.00 aB1.00 ± 0.00 aB1.14 ± 0.11 aA1.00 ± 0.01 aB
20221.02 ± 0.01 aA1.10 ± 0.03 aA1.00 ± 0.00 bA1.00 ± 0.00 aA
20231.00 ± 0.00 aA1.00 ± 0.01 aA1.00 ± 0.00 bA1.00 ± 0.00 aA
Sex Ratio20190.54 ± 0.04 bB0.76 ± 0.02 aA0.52 ± 0.06 bB0.76 ± 0.03 aA
20200.76 ± 0.04 aAB0.73 ± 0.03 aAB0.79 ± 0.02 aA0.65 ± 0.06 abB
20210.77 ± 0.03 aA0.78 ± 0.02 aA0.53 ± 0.05 bB0.69 ± 0.02 abA
20220.70 ± 0.02 aAB0.72 ± 0.02 aAB0.75 ± 0.04 aA0.59 ± 0.02 bB
20230.52 ± 0.03 bB0.71 ± 0.02 aA0.71 ± 0.03 aA0.72 ± 0.03 abA
1 Means (± standard error of the mean) followed by the same lowercase letter in the column and uppercase letter in the row do not differ statistically according to Tukey’s test at the 5% probability level (p ≤ 0.05). 2 Data transformed using √(x + 0.5).
Table 6. Endosymbionts identified in different Tuta absoluta populations.
Table 6. Endosymbionts identified in different Tuta absoluta populations.
EndosymbiontsTuta absoluta Populations (Collection Years)
20192020202120222023
Rickettsia-----
Hamiltonella-----
Wolbachia-----
Arsenophonus++---
Cardinium-----
Sodalis-----
Nosema-----
Carsonella-----
Spiroplasma-----
Serratia-++--
Pantoea-----
Regiella-----
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dalbianco, A.B.; Daniel, D.F.; Pratissoli, D.; Alvarez, D.d.L.; Silva, N.N.P.d.; Santos, D.M.; Seabra Júnior, S.; Oliveira, R.C.d. Performance of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Strains on Eggs from Different Populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Agronomy 2025, 15, 1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071692

AMA Style

Dalbianco AB, Daniel DF, Pratissoli D, Alvarez DdL, Silva NNPd, Santos DM, Seabra Júnior S, Oliveira RCd. Performance of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Strains on Eggs from Different Populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Agronomy. 2025; 15(7):1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071692

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dalbianco, Alessandro Bandeira, Diego Fernando Daniel, Dirceu Pratissoli, Daniel de Lima Alvarez, Nadja Nara Pereira da Silva, Daniel Mariano Santos, Santino Seabra Júnior, and Regiane Cristina de Oliveira. 2025. "Performance of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Strains on Eggs from Different Populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)" Agronomy 15, no. 7: 1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071692

APA Style

Dalbianco, A. B., Daniel, D. F., Pratissoli, D., Alvarez, D. d. L., Silva, N. N. P. d., Santos, D. M., Seabra Júnior, S., & Oliveira, R. C. d. (2025). Performance of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Strains on Eggs from Different Populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Agronomy, 15(7), 1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071692

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop