Next Article in Journal
Agronomic Experiments and Analysis of Garlic Mechanization-Friendly Cultivation Patterns in China
Previous Article in Journal
Impedance-Driven Decoupling Water–Nitrogen Stress in Wheat: A Parallel Machine Learning Framework Leveraging Leaf Electrophysiology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Utilizing Environmentally Friendly Techniques for the Sustainable Control of Plant Pathogens: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Severely Symptomatic Cucurbits in Croatia Dominantly Harbor a Complex of Potyviruses Including the Emerging Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus

1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Center for Plant Protection, Croatian Agency for Agriculture and Food, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Branch Office Virovitica, Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Croatia, 33000 Virovitica, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2025, 15(7), 1613; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071613
Submission received: 24 May 2025 / Revised: 16 June 2025 / Accepted: 28 June 2025 / Published: 1 July 2025

Abstract

Potyviruses (family Potyviridae, genus Potyvirus), including emerging ones, pose a growing threat to cucurbit production. This study presents the first virome analysis of severely symptomatic cucurbits in continental Croatia, combining high-throughput sequencing (HTS) and RT-PCR diagnostics. Zucchini, cucumber, and butternut squash plants with severe virus-like symptoms sampled in 2021–2022 were found to consistently host a complex of potyviruses, including watermelon mosaic virus (WMV), zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), and Moroccan watermelon mosaic virus (MWMV)—the latter being newly reported in Croatia and representing likely its northernmost detection in Europe. Phylogenetic analysis classified WMV isolates as emerging strains of subgroup EM3 and ZYMV as subgroup A1, consistent with European lineages. Croatian MWMV isolates formed a distinct subclade within the Mediterranean group, raising questions about its diversification trajectory. The findings highlight the expanding range of MWMV and underscore the value of HTS for early detection of emerging threats. These results have critical implications for cucurbit disease management, indicating the need to re-evaluate resistance claims in commercial cultivars and implement stricter phytosanitary surveillance in Croatia. The potential role of climate change in facilitating virus spread via aphid vectors is discussed, warranting further risk assessment and international monitoring efforts.
Keywords:
HTS; Illumina; MWMV; ONT; RT-PCR; WMV; ZYMV

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cucurbits (family Cucurbitaceae) are amongst the most important vegetable crops worldwide. Their global production in 2023 was estimated to be 233,257,475 t from the cultivation area of 8,157,592 ha [1]. In Croatian agriculture, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), melon (Cucumis melo L.) and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.) production was estimated at 40,159 t in 2023 and 41,886 t in 2024 [2]. In addition, zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.) is also grown in Croatia for fresh consumption, while different pumpkin species (Cucurbita sp.) are mainly used for seed oil production. The latter is of great traditional and economic importance in Međimurje, the northernmost part of Croatia, and watermelon production has the same status in the river Neretva Valley, agriculturally the most important part of the southernmost Dubrovnik-Neretva county [3]. One of the greatest challenges in profitable production of cucurbit crops is diseases, of which viruses play an increasingly important role [4], also endangering sustainability and food security [5]. The importance of viral diseases in food production is also highlighted by the fact that many of them are included in the list of quarantine or regulated non-quarantine pests of the European Union [6]. To date, more than 90 viruses are identified in cucurbits [7]. The causal agents of cucurbit viral diseases are classified into genera Begomovirus, Crinivirus, Cucumovirus, Polerovirus, Orthotospovirus, Ipomovirus, Tobamovirus and Potyvirus [8,9,10,11]. Some of them are quarantine viruses or regulated non-quarantine viruses, but not in cucurbits [6]. The only regulated quarantine virus in cucurbits is tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (ToLCNDV), an emerging begomovirus [6].
Thanks to the application of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) in recent times, cucurbits were confirmed as suitable hosts for viruses known in other hosts and new viruses were discovered for the first time in cucurbits [12,13,14]. Despite the efforts, HTS based on short reads (e.g., on Illumina platforms) is still not routinely used in plant virus screening, probably due to the complexity of the procedures for obtaining and processing data and still higher costs. Apparently more accessible metagenomic analysis with longer read outputs are possible using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform nanopore sequencing, which probably makes it more suitable for plant virus diagnostics [15,16]. Regardless of the HTS platform, this methodology provides unbiased virus detection and identification. An international framework and guidelines have been established for efficient and safe HTS usage [17,18] and it has been gaining traction in plant virus diagnostics. There is an increasing number of studies in cucurbitaceous host viruses investigated by ONT [19,20,21,22].
In the cucurbit plants of the Mediterranean growing regions, at least 28 different viruses have been detected so far, of which potyviruses (family Potyviridae, genus Potyvirus) are considered to be amongst the most damaging and some of those most frequently occurring in single or multiple infections [10,11]. Potyviruses are monopartite linear positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) viruses with genome sizes of 9.7–11 kb enclosed in 680–900 nm long and 11–13 nm wide filamentous particles [23]. They are mechanically transmissible pathogens of at least 59 plant families [24] and non-persistently transmissible by different aphids in nature. Amongst 214 viruses classified into the genus Potyvirus to date, at least 35 have been detected in cucurbits globally [23,25].
Insects serve as major vectors of plant pathogens, encompassing phytoplasmas, other bacteria, and viruses, including potyviruses. Aphids represent the most prolific group of virus vectors collectively responsible for the transmission of over 275 plant virus species [26]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that climate change, particularly rising temperatures, significantly affects aphid biology and population dynamics [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Increases in aphid populations are strongly associated with an elevated risk of epidemics caused by aphid-transmitted viruses.
Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV, Potyvirus citrulli) infects at least 170 plant species from 27 families, including economically important crops and ornamental plants such as pea, carrot, cotton, coriander, orchids (Vanilla fragrans, Habenaria radiata), crape myrtle and cucurbits [33,34,35,36,37]. It was first described in 1963 in Israel [38]; nonetheless, WMV has a worldwide distribution and occurs frequently in most European countries [11], including Croatia [39,40]. Its symptoms can be expressed differently in cucurbit plants depending on the plant host species, environmental factors and WMV strain [41]. Classical (CL) groups G1, G2 and emerging (EM) group G3 of WMV isolates are recognized based on the phylogenetic analyses of its coat protein (CP) gene [42] or nuclear inclusion b (NIb)/CP region [43,44,45]. Since the discovery of WMV EM isolates in France in 2000, severe symptoms of mosaic and mottling in cucurbits have been associated with this group of proposed Asian origin and the virus has become perceived as an important adverse factor in European cucurbit cultivation [11,46,47]. Besides in France, different EM isolates have been found as yet in Poland [48], Turkey [49], Italy [43] and Spain [11]. Outside of Europe, EM isolates were also found in squash in Argentina, as well as in different cucurbits and Palmer amaranth in the USA [45,50].
Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV, Potyvirus cucurbitaflavitesselati) is often found in cucurbits in a mixed infection with WMV and even their synergistic relationship was suggested [51]. Unlike WMV, ZYMV has a more restricted host range limited to the plants of the family Cucurbitaceae as main hosts. Nonetheless, it has been found in cultivated plants of the families Solanaceae and Fabaceae, as well as in some ornamental plants and weeds belonging to different families [52,53]. First identified in 1973 and described in 1981 in Italy [54], ZYMV is still considered to be one of the most dangerous cucurbit viruses, causing great losses in production worldwide [55]. In addition to mechanical and aphid transmission, the proven possibility of seed transmission probably contributes to its global occurrence and distribution [56]. ZYMV has been reported so far from Croatia [39,40], as well as from 18 other Mediterranean countries [8]. Similarly to WMV, several ZYMV phylogenetic groups can be delineated and emerging isolates originating from Asia were identified and characterized. They are members of the phylogenetic group A, subgroups A4 and A5 [44]. In Europe, emerging ZYMV isolates have been recorded in France and Poland [57,58]. In addition, Asian isolates from ZYMV group C have been found in Poland. They cause even more severe symptoms in cucurbits than the emerging group A isolates, including stunting [58]. Despite the fact that Asian ZYMV isolates have not yet been reported from other Mediterranean countries [8], their possible spread across Europe is a real concern due to the symptom severity.
Moroccan watermelon mosaic virus (MWMV, Potyvirus citrullimoroccense) is considered as an emerging virus for cucurbit crops in Southern Europe [59,60]; however, its status still has not been regulated officially [53]. Based on the biological and serological characteristics analyzed for the first time in Morocco in 1974, the virus was initially described as a strain of WMV and tentatively named WMV-2, causing severe deformations, blistering and chlorosis of cucurbits fruits and leaves [61]. Subsequent serological and peptide profile analyses confirmed MWMV as a distinct species [62,63], while phylogenetic studies classified it as a member of the papaya ringspot (PRSV) potyvirus subgroup [64,65]. MWMV has a narrow host range with cucurbits as main hosts, but it was also reported in papaya (Carica papaya L., Caricaceae) from the Democratic Republic of Congo [66] and Kenya [67]. Three MWMV phylogenetic groups correlating with the geographical distribution have been recognized so far: Western and Central African (includes isolates from Niger, Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of Congo), Southern African (isolates from Swaziland and South Africa) and the Mediterranean group. The latter comprises isolates from Morocco, Tunisia, Greece, Italy, Spain and France [68]. Additionally, MWMV was detected in Eastern Sudan [59], Portugal, Zimbabwe, Canary Island [64], Tanzania [69], Nigeria [70], Iran [71], Kenya [67,72], Turkey [73], Burkina Faso [72], Benin [74] and Brazil [75].
In Croatia, besides aphid-transmitted cucumber mosaic virus (CMV, Cucumovirus cucumerae), two different potyviruses (WMV and ZYMV) have been found to infect zucchini and pumpkin plants so far by using serological methods [39,40]. In this study, we employed different metagenomic analyses of viromes present in several severely symptomatic cucurbits. In zucchini, cucumbers and pumpkin plants, the virus identification was also performed by RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing. Phylogenetic analyses were performed for ZYMV, WMV, and MWMV and nearly full genomes were reconstructed for WMV, as well as for several MWMV isolates as main cucurbit virome constituents. MWMV was detected for the first time in cucurbits from Croatia in single or mixed infections with WMV and ZYMV.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

From the surroundings of the town of Pitomača (Supplementary Figure S1) in the Virovitica-Podravina County of Croatia, fruits and/or leaves with virus-like symptoms were collected during two consecutive vegetative seasons (2021 and 2022) from different cucurbit plants (Table 1). Virus-like symptoms comprised mosaic, deformations and lumpiness of zucchini fruits, curling, deformations, mosaic, yellowing and necrosis of cucumber leaves, deformations, streaking and necrosis of cucumber fruits, as well as mosaic and vein yellowing of butternut squash leaves (Figure 1). In the first year, six field grown zucchini plants (C. pepo ‘Naxos F1’) were collected (samples labeled T1-T6) from different growers and localities in the area. Even though the exact coordinates were not taken during that sampling, Stari Gradac, a village near the town of Pitomača (45°54′23.7″ N, 17°11′52.0″ E), was recorded as one of the localities (45°55′29.33″ N, 17°17′31.9″ E) for at least one zucchini sample (T4). In the second year, six cucumber plants (C. sativus ‘Salatar’) grown under greenhouse conditions from one grower at the locality Sedlarica (45°54′23.0″ N, 17°12′0.5″ E) were selected for analyses (samples labelled: 74SEC22S, 96SEC22S, 97SEC22S, 101SEC22S, 102SEC22S, 150SEC22S and 152SEC22S). In addition to cucumbers, one field-grown butternut squash (125SEZ22S) was sampled in the same year in Sedlarica (Table 1). Collected plant material was stored at −20 °C until use for analyses.

2.2. Virus Pre-Screening by Immunostrips

Due to the limitations of this study, the pre-screening of a smaller symptomatic plant subset was performed, choosing plants representative of the symptom severity and type. Fresh tissue was pre-screened on the day of the sampling, or the following day, in the laboratory by immunostrips according to the manufacturers’ instructions except for samples T1-T4. They were received to the laboratory as frozen fruit tissue strips and only T4 was pre-screened. Hence, a combination of tests for CMV, impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV), tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and tomato spotted wilt orthotospovirus (TSWV) were performed by ImmunoComb for CMV, INSV, TMV, and TSWV (Agdia, Elkhart, IN, USA) for samples T4, 74SEC22S, 102SEC22S, and 125SEZ22S. Individual immunostrips were used additionally for testing the potyvirus group pathogens, as well as for emerging viruses: pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) from Tobamovirus genus (ImmunoStrip for Poty group and PMMoV, respectively, Agdia, Elkhart, IN, USA) and regulated tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (ToLCNDV) belonging to Begomovirus genus (AgriStrip for ToLCNDV, Bioreba, Reinach, Switzerland).

2.3. Nucleic Acid Extraction

Two different types of nucleic acid extraction from cucurbit samples were performed. Total nucleic acids (TNA) were extracted from 500 mg of fruit skin or leaf tissue using a CTAB-based method with a buffer containing 2% PVP and the omission of 2-mercaptoethanol [76]. For the confirmation of HTS results by RT-PCR, RNA extraction was additionally performed from 200 mg of frozen tissue by using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Purity and concentration of extracted nucleic acids were measured by using Nanodrop 2000c Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.4. High-Througput Sequencing

2.4.1. ONT Sequencing Preparation and Data Analyses

One representative zucchini sample (T3) was pooled with five unrelated samples for Nanopore sequencing (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). After rRNA depletion (RiboMinus Plant Kit for RNA-Seq; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and polyA tailing, libraries were prepared for Nanopore sequencing by using cDNA-PCR kit (SQK-PCS109 version PCS_9085_v109_revK_14Aug2019, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) and sequencing was performed in MinION flow cells (FLO-Min106 R9.4 version; Oxford Nanopore Technologies) and a MinION MK-1C device.
The ONT generated fast5 files were basecalled using a super accuracy model with Guppy basecaller (v.2.2.3), available to Oxford Nanopore Technology customers via the ONT community site. The ONT MinION read quality was assessed using the FastQC tool [77] (v.0.12.1). The Nanofilt tool [78] (v.2.8.0) was used to remove adapters and filter reads, while Canu [79] (v.2.2) was used to assemble the genomes from the obtained reads. Reads were subsequently aligned to reference viral genomes using Minimap2 (v.2.17) against the Kraken2 viral genome sequence database (v2.1.2). Candidate viral contigs were later confirmed by homology search using BLASTn and BLASTp against the standard NCBI nucleotide (nt) database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed 14 January 2023).

2.4.2. Illumina Sample Preparation and Data Analysis

Illumina standard RNA-Seq using Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (2 × 150 base pairs (bp) configuration) was performed by a service provider (Genewiz, Leipzig, Germany) along with library preparation (Illumina kit) and rRNA depletion (QIAseq FastSelect-rRNA Plant Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). One symptomatic zucchini (T5) and one cucumber sample (102SEC22) representative of the type and severity of symptoms observed in the field in the seasons 2021 and 2022, respectively, were sequenced this way.
Illumina-generated reads were quality checked using FastQC and trimmed by Cutadapt [80] (v.1.18). Paired-end reads were then merged using FLASh (v.1.2.11). Reads were subsequently aligned to a reference viral genome using BWA-MEM [81], and variant calling and consensus sequence generation were performed using SAMtools and BCFtools [82,83]. Illumina-generated reads were also mapped against the Kraken2 database and BLASTn and BLASTp confirmed as ONT reads described above.

2.4.3. HTS Result Confirmation and Detection by RT-PCR

Confirmation of HTS results and the detection of individual viruses were performed by RT-PCR using OneStep RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following manufacturer’s instructions. Previously known primers for WMV, ZYMV and MWMV were used, covering the CP or NIb/CP regions (Table 2). Reactions were carried out in ProFlex PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), using conditions as follows: reverse transcription at 50 °C for 30 min, denaturation of reverse transcriptase and hot-start polymerase activation at 95 °C for 15 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing (at 64 °C for WMV), 63 °C for ZYMV or 54 °C for (MWMV) 30 s and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min. Final extension step was performed at 72 °C for 10 min. Five microliters of each PCR product were analyzed by horizontal electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel, with the addition of StainIN™ GREEN Nucleic Acid Stain (HighQu GmbH, Kraichtal, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and visualized in Amersham™ ImageQuant 800 (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA).

2.5. Phylogenetic Analyses

After PCR, products were bidirectionally Sanger sequenced at Macrogen Europe (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Sequences were examined and edited by using Bioedit 7.7.1. [86] and consensus sequences were obtained using MEGA11 [87]. In addition, obtained sequences were compared with all sequences in the NCBI GenBank database (accessed during October 2023) via BLASTx, to provide virus identification. Newly obtained sequences of Croatian viral isolates (Supplementary Table S1), together with worldwide isolates retrieved from GenBank (Supplementary Tables S2–S4), were used to build phylogenetic trees. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) statistical method [88], 1000 bootstrap repeats and nucleotide substitution model based on the lowest score of Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used. Identity scores between isolates were obtained based on nucleotide sequences using p-distance model in MEGA11, while distance matrices of nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (aa) comparison were created via Sequence Demarcation Tool ver. 1.2 [89].

2.6. Recombination Analysis

In order to detect any potential recombination event and patterns in sequence alignments used for the construction of phylogenetic trees, we utilized Recombination Detection program version Beta 5.67 (RDP5) [90]. The analysis was performed by seven different detection algorithms included in RDP5: RDP, GENECONV, BootScan, MaxChi, Chimaera, SiScan, and 3Seq. Recombination events predicted by four or more methods at a probability value (p-value) threshold of 0.05 were considered a proof of a putative recombination event. Recombination events that were marked as potential false positives, by the program itself while exporting the data, were discarded.

3. Results

3.1. Pre-Screened Viruses

ImmunoComb for CMV, INSV, TMV, and TSWV (Agdia, Elkhart, IN, USA) revealed the presence of TMV and TSWV in cucumber 102SEC22S and TMV in pumpkin 125SEZ22S, whilst individual ImmunoStrip (Agdia) or AgriStrip (Bioreba) testing revealed the presence of potyviruses in both of these samples, plus in the sample T4 of zucchini and another cucumber sample (74SEC22S). The emerging ToLCNDV was not recorded in this preliminary screening, whilst the cucumber sample 102SEC22S harbored PMMoV; however, the latter was not confirmed by RT-PCR, indicating possible cross-reactivity with TMV in immunostrips or cross-contamination in pre-screening.

3.2. Metagenomic Results

Sample T3, sequenced using the ONT platform, yielded a total of 80,200 reads, out of which 238 were successfully assembled. The average mapped read length was 760.333 bp. The mean sequencing depth was relatively low at 0.988×, resulting in only 2.94% coverage of the viral genome. In contrast, sample T5 and 102SEC22 generated a substantially higher total of 10,559,780 and 9,354,755 reads, respectively, with 2,049,672 and 1,964,634 reads assembled.
The mean length of mapped reads was 134.974 bp for T5 and 98.765 bp for 102SEC22, characteristic of Illumina short-read sequencing. The data for sample T3 produced a high sequencing depth of 27,981.3×, which allowed for 15.45% coverage of the reference viral genome. For the 102SEC22 sample, 17,115.5× sequencing depth allowed for 4.22% coverage of the reference viral genome.

3.3. HTS and RT-PCR Identification of Cucurbit Virome Constituents

HTS revealed a mixed infection with WMV and MWMV in the zucchini plant T3, while T5 harbored a triple potyvirus complex including WMV, ZYMV and MWMV. Metagenomic analysis also indicated the presence of cucurbit aphid-borne yellows virus (CAYV, genus Polerovirus) in T5. However, we could not reconstruct its complete genome possibly due to a low viral load in this metagenomic sample. Therefore, this virus, known to be a constituent of the cucurbit viromes without affecting fruit quality [10], was excluded from further analysis of this zucchini with severely symptomatic fruits.
In both zucchini samples potyvirus was the most abundant genus, covering about 50% (T5) or 44% (T3) of the virome (Figure 2). Cucumber plant 102SEC22S, with symptoms similar to those in 96SEC22S (Figure 1B,C), sampled in the following year at about 10 km distance from the zucchini fields also harbored a triple virus complex, including potyviruses MWMV and PVY, as well as an orthotospovirus (TSWV). Based on the sequencing data, we managed to partially assemble the MWMV genome from the T3 sample, with total coverage of 2141 bp (OQ729739). From samples T5 and 102SEC22, nearly complete MWMV genomes, with the exception of poly A tail, were assembled (OQ729737 and OQ729736, respectively) and they shared 99% nt identity. Also, from sample 102SEC22, nearly complete genomes of PVY (OQ534355) and TSWV (OQ534346-OQ534348 for S, M and L segments, respectively) were assembled. PVY from this cucumber sample shared the highest nt identity of 99.89% in nBLAST with other Croatian PVY isolates: 86DOW22S (acc. no. OQ534354) from Amaranthus blitum weed growing next to a tomato greenhouse sampled about 100 km northwest in Domašinec [91] and from a tomato PVY-NTN isolate 61SET21S (acc. no. ON505008, 99.23% nt identity) grown in a neighboring greenhouse of the same Sedlarica locality [92]. The TSWV isolate identified from cucumber 102SEC22 in this study had the highest nt identities per genome segments, 99.76 (S), 99.98 (M) and 99.99% (L), with the same A. blitum weed and tomato (105DOT22S, acc. nos. OQ507121-OQ507123) TSWV accessions from the above-mentioned remote locality of Domašinec. The weed and tomato samples from Domašinec, on the other hand, did not harbor any of the potyviruses recorded in cucurbits from this study [91]. All sequences obtained by HTS in this study were deposited in the NCBI GenBank and SRA (PRJNA946736). Their NCBI GenBank accession numbers are available in Supplementary Table S1.
In the RT-PCR experiments from samples collected in 2021, the symptomatic zucchini samples T3, T4 and T6 were confirmed to be infected with two potyviruses WMV and MWMV, while T1, T2 and T5 zucchini confirmation results included amplicons resulting from all three potyviruses (WMV, MWMV and ZYMV), as evidenced from the virome study (Supplementary Table S5). From the 2022 collection year, three cucumber samples (96SEC22S, 97SEC22S, 101SEC22S) tested positive only for MWMV, while the other three samples (74SEC22S, 102SEC22S, 150SEC22S) tested negative for the potyviruses investigated. Potyvirus complex WMV + MWMV was again found in the butternut squash (125SEZ22S) and one cucumber (152SEC22S) sample (Supplementary Table S5). Overall, RT-PCR performed for targeted detection of WMV, ZYMV and MWMV in individual samples of cucurbits (three subjected plus those not subjected to HTS) allowed for the detection of WMV in 6 out of 6 zucchini plants collected in 2021 (100.0%), in 1/7 (14.3%) cucumbers from 2022, as well as in the sole butternut squash sample. In contrast, ZYMV was confirmed only in 50.0% of the zucchini plants (3/6), but not in cucumber and butternut squash samples. Similar to WMV, MWMV was confirmed in all zucchini and the sole butternut plant sample while a higher infection rate was revealed for cucumbers (4 out of 7 tested, or 57.1%). As for mixed infections, all six zucchini plants were infected with at least WMV and MWMV, while in three of them the presence of ZYMV was also confirmed (Supplementary Table S5). In cucumbers, three tested plants were singly infected with MWMV, while one plant was co-infected with WMV and MWMV, as well as the butternut squash (Supplementary Table S5). Newly discovered MWMV isolates in this Croatian study further expand the geographical distribution of the virus in Europe and globally (Figure 3).
Regardless of their virome status, all cucumbers and zucchini plants analyzed here showed similar symptoms, especially in fruits (Figure 1). In three out of seven cucumber plants showing similar severe symptoms as plants wherein viral presence was confirmed (74SEC22S, 102SEC22S, 150SEC22S), we could not confirm the three potyviruses by RT-PCR; however, two out of those samples (74SEC22S and 102SEC22S) were pre-screened by immunostrips and turned positive in generic potyvirus testing.

3.4. Phylogenetic Analyses Results

3.4.1. WMV

Phylogenetic analyses of the WMV CP region [84], based on the nucleotide (nt) sequences of eight WMV isolates from this study and globally distributed isolates chosen from NCBI GenBank database (Supplementary Table S2), revealed three main phylogenetic groups, as previously reported [44]. All Croatian isolates were grouped together with a high bootstrap value into subgroup EM3 of group 3 (Figure 4). This group also comprises French, Polish and Asian isolates (Chinese, Korean) representing emerging isolates (EM) [44].
The distance matrix of the 714 nt sequences analyzed here [84] showed identity rates in the range from 97.3% to 100% for Croatian WMV isolates (Supplementary Figure S2), while their highest percentage of nt identity (96.9–99.3%) was with the South Korean isolate from melon (AB369278) belonging to the same subgroup. The lowest nt identities (91.2–92.9%) were observed in comparison with the isolate CHI87-620 (EU660580) from Chile, belonging to group 2. The second most divergent isolate in comparison to those from this study was isolate A08-170 (JF273466) originating from French zucchini, with nt identity range of 91.3–93.3% (Supplementary Figure S2). This French accession, considered as an emerging isolate from subgroup EM2 (Figure 4), is actually an EM1/EM2 recombinant [93].

3.4.2. ZYMV

Phylogenetic analyses for the NIb/CP sequence of ZYMV [85] isolate from zucchini T5 (T5_Z, OQ405090, Figure 5) from this study and worldwide distributed isolates chosen from GenBank (Supplementary Table S3) revealed previously delineated [44] phylogenetic groups A, B and C (Figure 5). The Croatian isolate was grouped in subgroup A1 under group A, with most of the other European isolates representing non-emerging strains from geographically near countries.
The most similar ZYMV isolates to the newly characterized Croatian isolate T5_Z (OQ405090) from A1 subgroup were isolates H (KF976712) from the Czech Republic, SE04T (KF976713) from Slovakia and Austria 2 (AJ420012), sharing 99.9% or 1081 out of 1082 nucleotides analyzed. Despite this high similarity in the NIb/CP region, the Czech isolate was previously determined as a severe strain and the Slovak isolate as a mild strain in their natural squash (C. pepo) host based on the symptom expression and divergence in the aa position 917 in P3 protein [94]. In contrast, the most divergent isolate in this comparison was ZYMV C-16 (DQ645729) from a melon in Spain, with 93.3% nucleotides shared, while the overall nt identity range for the A1 subgroup was estimated to be 93.3–99.9%. Outside of subgroup A1, T5_Z was the most similar to isolate BR2 (MH042025) from South Korea (95.1%) belonging to the A4 subgroup, representing an emerging strain. The most divergent to isolate T5_Z was ZYMV-VN/Cs1 (DQ925449) from Vietnam (82.2%), belonging to group B (Figure 5, Supplementary Figure S3).

3.4.3. MWMV

Regardless of the type of analysis (NIb/CP region or nearly complete genome), MWMV isolates studied here are clustered into three previously recognized phylogenetic groups [65]. They were clustered into the Mediterranean group together with other isolates originating from the Mediterranean countries (Figure 6 and Figure 7), as well as a recently discovered BR isolate (LC775353) from Brazil. Interestingly, in the NIb/CP genome region, Croatian isolates form a separate branch of the Mediterranean group, supported by a high bootstrap (99%) value (Figure 6).
Distance matrix analyses of the 476 nt sequences (Supplementary Table S4) in the NIb/CP region [60] showed nt identity rates of 98.7–100% among Croatian isolates (Supplementary Figure S4). Identities amongst isolates in the Mediterranean group were in the range of 93.5–100%, with the greatest difference between Croatian isolates T3 (acc. no OR146192) and T6 (acc. no. OR146195) and isolate Yoz2.ESS (MW362136) from Turkey. Croatian isolates are the most similar to isolates from Spain (96.2–96.6%), Morocco (96.2–96.4%), Italy (96.2–96.4%), and the most divergent from isolate Su-94-54 (AF307778) from Sudan (65.0–65.2%). This Sudanese isolate is considered as a strain of MWMV, but possibly also as an evolutionary intermediate between MWMV and PRSV [59]. With nt identity scores of 86.3–89.1%, isolates from the Mediterranean group are more similar to isolates from the Southern African group than to isolates from Western and Central African groups, whose identity score range is 77.7–85.7% (Supplementary Figure S4). Obtained results of nt identity rates were equivalent to results of identities obtained using distance matrix based on 158 aa sequences (Supplementary Figure S5).

3.5. Recombination Analysis Outcome

RDP5 analysis performed on the aligned sequences used for the construction of phylogenetic trees for each virus did not reveal any putative recombination events in sequences obtained in this study. However, it did reveal several putative recombination events in sequences obtained from the GenBank database used in the construction of phylogenetic trees for ZYMV, WMV and MWMV with complete genomic sequences (Supplementary Table S6).

4. Discussion

Potyviruses represent the biggest and one of the most important genera of plant viruses [24]. At least 15 different potyviruses have been recognized so far as pathogens adversely affecting cucurbits. In the Mediterranean region, some of them represent emerging viruses associated with severe symptoms [8,10]. Chemical plant protection products are ineffective in preventing or controlling viral diseases. Consequently, the cultivation of resistant, less susceptible, or tolerant cultivars remains the cornerstone of integrated virus disease management in cucurbits [95]. In Croatia, the presence of CMV, ZYMV and WMV was confirmed previously in field conditions in several zucchini cultivars marketed as tolerant, such as Naxos F1, Brilliante F1, Galatea F1, Tendor F1, and Sofia F1 [40]. This observation, together with the MWMV consistently detected in this study in severely affected zucchini Naxos F1, and cucumbers, with completely unmarketable fruits, prompts critical questions regarding the validity of declared resistance levels, at least in zucchini cultivars. It also raises the question of possible shifts in vector biology and activity, frequently reported in global studies, that may be contributing factors to the observed susceptibility. Supporting these projections in a comprehensive review, Skendžić and coworkers emphasized that global warming is likely to intensify aphid outbreaks and trigger earlier seasonal migrations [96]. These shifts could allow aphid populations to reach damaging densities earlier in the growing season, thereby extending the period during which virus transmission to crops occurs.
So far, (re)emerging MWMV has been reported from seven Mediterranean Basin countries: Morocco, Tunis, Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Greece and Turkey. Notably, this MWMV report from continental Croatia reinforces its emerging character and potential adverse impact for vegetable production outside the Mediterranean climatic zone (Figure 3). The observation of unusual and severe symptoms in the field, such as severe mosaic, dark-green fruit blistering, deformations and necrosis, preceded its detection and reporting [60,61,97]. Such symptoms in field cucurbits, recorded in other European and African countries, were observed in our study as well (Figure 1). There was no visible difference in the type and severity of symptoms between three zucchini plants infected with the potyvirus complex of WMV + ZYMV + MWMV and three plants co-infected with WMV + MWMV. Similarly, cucumbers singly infected with MWMV displayed similar symptoms as those co-infected with MWMV + WMV, or with MWMV in complex with PVY and TSWV (Figure 1, Supplementary Tables S1 and S5). It is thus tempting to assume that the expression of symptoms in cucurbits from this study may mostly be influenced by MWMV. However, further biological tests would be needed to unequivocally demonstrate this, similar to those performed in France [61] and Greece [97]. There were several severely symptomatic cucumber samples in this study (74SEC22S, 102SEC22S, 150SEC22S) wherein RT-PCR did not confirm the presence of the three investigated potyviruses in repeated experiments. Nonetheless, in two of them (74SEC22S, 102SEC22S) pre-screening with generic potyvirus group immunostrips was positive, suggesting the presence of at least one potyvirus, and in one of them (102SEC22S), the metagenomic analyses were able to identify the presence of MWMV, PVY and TSWV (Supplementary Table S1). The remaining symptomatic cucumber sample 150SEC22S unfortunately could not be subjected to HTS within a limited budget. With unconfirmed viral presence by pre-screening and RT-PCR in this sample, the etiology of its severe symptoms remains a matter of speculation. It could have harbored yet untested virus(es), or masked the presence of the virus, known to happen during hot periods [98], because the sampling was performed late in the season (24 August 2022) at the end of a very hot summer.
The two zucchini (T3 and T5) and one cucumber (102SEC22S) samples representative of the symptom type and severity subjected to HTS revealed complex viromes and enabled the assembly of nearly complete viral genomes, mostly from Illumina reads (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S1). Besides the expected abundance of phage contigs, potyviral dominated in the T3 and T5 overall datasets, and particularly in plant virus-related datasets. Even though the MWMV genome was only partially assembled from T3 reads (acc. no. OQ729739), it contained the NIb/CP region, enabling its nBLAST comparison with the corresponding T3 Sanger sequence (acc. no. OR146192) and confirming it was 97% identical. However, WMV found by RT-PCR in this sample could not be identified in HTS. On the other hand, the HTS data from T5 zucchini provided a nearly complete MWMV genome (acc. no. OQ 729737) but not the genomes of the other WMV and ZYMV identified by RT-PCR (Supplementary Tables S1 and S5). Additionally, the severely symptomatic zucchini fruit T5 dataset revealed a big portion of polerovirus reads. Those were not assembled but could potentially belong to CAYV, a cucurbit virus known not to affect the fruit quality [10] and thus not investigated further here. Nevertheless, more extensive research is needed to fully comprehend the diversity of viruses infecting zucchini, and other cucurbits, in Croatia. The testament to that is the cucumber sample 102SEC22S that, besides MWMV, had only several percents of potyviral Illumina reads, from which a PVY isolate nearly complete genome was assembled (acc. no. OQ534355). It was very similar to PVY-NTN isolates from tomatoes in Sedlarica [92] as well as from weed and tomato hosts in the locality of Domašinec about 100 km away [91]. Moreover, orthotospovirus reads were more abundant from this cucumber and revealed a nearly complete TSWV genome (acc. nos. OQ534346-OQ534348) very similar to isolates from the same remote tomato greenhouse agroecosystem [91]. Given the fact that both PVY and TSWV were detected by immunostrips in pre-screening procedures, and cucumber being amongst hosts of both viruses [53,99], we believe that these viruses may have played a role in the cucumber yield loss in the locality Sedlarica in 2022 and that the epidemiological link between cucumber and tomato agroecosystems should be a focus of future studies.
Cucurbit-infecting potyviruses are generally considered as pathogens of warmer climates, such as the Mediterranean Basin, with aphids as their main vectors, preferring a Mediterranean or even tropical climate [8]. Since climate changes favor the movement of aphids to northern areas, farther from their previously reported niche, this could allow easier and faster spread of viruses. This is especially dangerous in the case of emerging viruses or emerging strains of otherwise widespread viruses [10]. WMV, ZYMV and PRSV are long-known potyviruses of cucurbits, hitherto referred to as the most harmful [70,100]. Although widespread in the Mediterranean Basin and neighboring countries [8,101], WMV and ZYMV were reported only recently from Croatia [39,40]. Extensive ELISA study confirmed high incidence of CMV, WMV and ZYMV among zucchini and pumpkin samples collected across Croatia, including coastal (Istria, and Dubrovnik-Neretva) and continental (Međimurje, Varaždin, Sisak-Moslavina and Virovitica-Podravina) counties. The occurrence of WMV was reported in 31.8% (7/22) of samples from the coastal regions and in 1.7% (1/60) of continental region samples, with the detection in only one sample out of seventeen tested (5.9%) from Virovitica-Podravina County where we performed this study. In contrast, ZYMV was not detected in Croatian Mediterranean regions, while in the continental ones it was found to be present in 73.3% (44/60) of samples tested [39,40]. Much higher overall incidence of 57.1% was demonstrated for WMV throughout the two years in Virovitica-Podravina County in this study (Supplementary Table S5) than in the previous ones [39,40], suggesting that it has spread significantly in the last 4–5 years. It is also reasonable to assume that WMV occurs more frequently in the other Croatian continental counties with cucurbit vegetable production.
Croatian WMV isolates obtained in this study were characterized as emerging (EM) isolates of phylogenetic group 3, which is particularly worrying (Figure 4). More severe symptoms caused by emerging isolates of WMV in cucurbits, in comparison to classical (CL) isolates, which only had been present for the previous 30 years in Europe, were first noticed in 1999 in France [42,46]. Only later were the four phylogenetic subgroups recognized among French EM isolates (EM1, EM2, EM3 and EM4) as they became the most prevalent isolates in France over time [46]. As for France, most of the WMV isolates discovered in Spain in recent time were described as EM isolates [11]. In addition to this trend, all eight WMV isolates discovered in this study from Croatia were characterized as EM3 isolates. Lecoq et al. concluded that co-infections with WMV EM-CL isolates occur very commonly in fields and that some EM transmission characteristics favored their better distribution versus CL isolates [47]. EM isolates supposedly have better transmissibility by vectors from mixed CL-EM infections than CL isolates. Also, CL isolates were transmitted with significantly lower frequency from double CL-EM than from single infections. Despite these described European epidemiological scenarios, only WMV EM isolates were found among Croatian isolates in this study, without coinfection with CL isolates. Considering this, but also phylogenetic analyses which confirmed the greatest similarities of Croatian isolates with EM3 isolates from Asia (Figure 4) and no indication of potential recombinants (Supplementary Table S6), it is tempting to assume that Croatian EM3 isolates could have originated from a new Asian introduction rather than from local spread, as already suggested for EM2 and EM3 isolates discovered in France [46]. Nonetheless, this study is performed on a limited number of samples from a small area, possibly introducing bias in the analyses. Only wider studies examining the spread and diversity of WMV could shed light on this epidemiological question.
In contrast to the probable Asian origin of Croatian WMV isolates, phylogenetic analysis of ZYMV in the NIb/CP genome region showed that newly discovered Croatian isolate T5_Z (OQ405090) belongs to the A1 subgroup (Figure 5). According to the literature, A1 strains are the most common among isolates identified in the European and Mediterranean countries, which probably had a common ancestor [44,102]. Hasiów-Jaroszewska and coworkers demonstrated that Polish isolates from the A1 subgroup cause much milder symptoms in mechanically inoculated test plants in comparison to emerging isolates from group A and group C originating from Asia [58]. As we found and characterized a single non-recombinant ZYMV isolate in butternut squash in this study (Figure 5, Supplementary Table S6), the same limitations and possible bias apply as discussed above for WMV.
MWMV was identified in the majority (11 out of 14) of cucurbitaceous plant samples studied here. This is the first report of MWMV in Croatia and the ninth report of this emerging virus from the Mediterranean region countries (Figure 3), and as such, it deserved more scrutiny. Vercelli province in Italy [103] has been so far the northernmost MWMV reported latitude. Unfortunately, the report did not contain the exact geographical coordinates of the infected plants, nor could they be found afterwards [104]. Hence, the coordinates of the city of Vercelli (N 45°19′32.038″, E 8°25′24.459″) as the province center could be used as an orientation point. The type of agro-ecological factors influencing zucchini cultivation in the north of Italy are quite similar to northeastern Croatia and localities encompassed by this study. The triangle Pitomača–Sedlarica–Stari Gradac (45°54′–45°55′ N) is situated more north than Vercelli and thus may represent the northernmost finding of MWMV in the world. In Italy, Roggero et al. assumed the rapid local spread because it had been initially detected in the Latin Province of central Italy (around 41° N) in 1997 and in Vercelli province in the north (45° N) only a year after [103]. The Croatian MWMV isolates share the highest nucleotide identities (around 96%, Supplementary Figure S4) in the NIb/CP region, containing determinants for vector transmission in the CP region [105], with isolates from Italy, Spain and Morocco (Figure 6 and Figure 7) where a natural way of virus dispersal through a vector transmission was suggested.
One key consequence of warmer winters characteristic of global warming is enhanced aphid vector overwintering success in temperate climates, due to shorter cold periods and reduced frequency of frost events. Such conditions allow aphids to extend their annual period of activity and expand their geographical distribution [29]. Harrington et al. reported that for Myzus persicae (green peach aphid transmitting potyviruses and many others), a 1 °C increase in mean winter temperatures (January–February) could advance spring migration by approximately two weeks [27]. Similarly, it was projected that a 2 °C rise in temperature could result in up to five additional aphid generations annually in temperate zones. Consequently, outbreaks of aphid-borne viral diseases are expected to become more frequent and severe under future climate scenarios.
As a large number of aphid species confirmed as virus vectors [106] are known to occur in Croatia [53], similarly as in Italy, it may be expected that the emerging MWMV will spread further north, repeating the Italian scenario [103]. During this process the virus could diversify, probably through host-specific interactions, as already suggested for phylogenetically distant MWMV isolates (Figure 6 and Figure 7) discovered in papaya [72]. During our study, MWMV was confirmed in three different cucurbit species from two consecutive years and within two different growing systems (field-growing and greenhouse) in the same area of northeastern Croatia (Supplementary Tables S1 and S5). This MWMV population contained no potential recombinants (Supplementary Table S6) and formed a distinct subclade in the Mediterranean group. It was homogeneous across different hosts, time and growing conditions (Figure 6), suggesting it diversified as a separate subgroup with a specific timeline and dispersal pattern that could potentially be revealed by further phylodynamics studies. This diversification could have happened via infected plant material from a common pool, and the local virus establishment via aphid transmission. Although considered, seed transmission has not been proven yet as a means of MWMV transmission [103].
Given that MWMV is a relatively new and apparently emerging virus, it is advisable to conduct further research to determine its distribution and harmfulness in Croatia. Based on the obtained results, in cooperation with the Croatian NPPO (National Plant Protection Organisation), a Pest Risk Analysis is planned, with the possibility of proposing to the EPPO Secretariat to consider including MWMV on the Alert List. (https://www.eppo.int/ACTIVITIES/plant_quarantine/alert_list_intro, accessed on 30 April 2025).

5. Conclusions

This study combines mostly RT-PCR, Sanger sequencing of the amplicons and HTS techniques to identify and characterize the most prevalent viruses in the unmarketable fruits of zucchini in one vegetative season, and other cucurbits, but mostly cucumbers, in the consecutive one. It is somewhat limited in terms of sample number and geography. Even so, it gave us valuable insight into the diversity of cucurbit viruses of crops grown in an important vegetable cultivation zone of northeastern Croatia. Potyviruses seem to play an important part in the viromes linked to the most severe disease symptoms, as they were consistently identified across different host species, seasons and localities. The presence of emerging MWMV and emerging strains of WMV warrant additional research and improvement of cucurbit crop disease management practices.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information are available online at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy15071613/s1, Figure S1: The geographical position of the Croatian town of Pitomača from the surroundings of which cucurbit samples with virus-like symptoms were collected for virus analyses, Figure S2: Distance matrix of the pairwise evolutionary divergence between 31 WMV isolates available in GenBank and eight Croatian isolates obtained in this study, based on 714 nucleotide sequences in the CP genome region, Figure S3: Distance matrix of the pairwise evolutionary divergence between 42 ZYMV isolates available in GenBank and zucchini isolate (T5_Z) obtained in this study, based on 1083 nucleotide sequences in the NIb/CP genome region, Figure S4: Distance matrix of the pairwise evolutionary divergence between 47 MWMV isolates available in GenBank and 11 Croatian isolates obtained in this study, based on 476 nucleotide sequences in the NIb/CP genome region, Figure S5: Distance matrix of the pairwise evolutionary divergence between 47 available MWMV isolates in GenBank and 11 Croatian isolates obtained in this study, based on 158 amino acid sequences in the NIb/CP genome region, Table S1: List of WMV, ZYMV and MWMV isolates obtained in this study, deposited in the NCBI GenBank database with corresponding accession numbers and used in phylogenetic studies, Table S2: List of WMV isolates retrieved from GenBank and used for phylogenetic analyses based on CP coding region, Table S3: List of ZYMV isolates retrieved from GenBank and used for phylogenetic analyses based on the NIb/CP coding region, Table S4: List of all MWMV isolates retrieved from GenBank and used for phylogenetic analyses based on the NIb/CP coding region, Table S5: RT-PCR detection results for WMV, ZYMV and MWMV in tested cucurbits; Table S6: Recombination putative events identified by Recombination Detection Program (RDP5) software in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Š.; methodology, M.J., D.G., M.M. and D.Š.; validation, M.J., D.G., M.M. and D.Š.; formal analysis, M.J., D.G., M.M. and D.Š.; investigation, M.J., D.G., M.M., A.N. and D.Š.; resources, D.Š., A.N. and A.M.Č.; data curation, M.J., D.G. and D.Š.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J. and D.G.; writing—review and editing, M.J., D.G., M.M., A.N., A.M.Č. and D.Š.; visualization, M.J. and D.G.; supervision, D.Š.; project administration, D.Š.; funding acquisition, D.Š., A.N. and A.M.Č. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Croatian Science Foundation (HRZZ) project NanoPhyto (grant no. IPS-2020-01-2960), University of Zagreb support grant (2023, 2024) to D.Š. and Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Croatia Pest Survey Programme to A.N. and A.M.Č.

Data Availability Statement

The sequencing datasets generated in this study were deposited in the NCBI GenBank under the accession numbers listed in the text and Supplementary Materials and are freely available to the public.

Acknowledgments

Martin Jagunić and Dorotea Grbin equally contributed to this work. A part of this research was carried out as the diploma thesis of Marko Marohnić under the supervision of Dijana Škorić. We fully acknowledge support given by the vegetable producers of the Pitomača region for access to their field and greenhouse growing facilities and providing samples of symptomatic cucurbitaceous plants. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT 4.1 for the purposes of cited reference preparation/formatting and abstract shortening. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT. Crops and Livestock Products. 2025. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCLDatabase (accessed on 1 May 2025).
  2. Croatian Bureau of Statistics. Production of Vegetables, Fruits and Grapes in 2024—Provisional Data. 2025. Available online: https://podaci.dzs.hr/2024/hr/77192 (accessed on 20 April 2025).
  3. Mustapić, L.; Ivić, D.; Novak, A.; Milanović, J. Neretva valley—Reservoir of economic cucurbit viruses. Glasilo Biljne Zaštite 2021, 21, 570. Available online: https://hrcak.srce.hr/267588 (accessed on 26 January 2023).
  4. Tuttle McGrath, M. Diseases of Cucurbits and Their Management. In Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; Volume 1, pp. 455–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tatineni, S.; Hein, G.L. Plant Viruses of Agricultural Importance: Current and Future Perspectives of Virus Disease Management Strategies. Phytopathology 2023, 113, 117–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 (Annex II, Part B). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 of 28 November 2019 establishing uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and the Council, as Regards Protective Measures Against Pests of Plants, and Repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 690/2008 and Amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019. Off. J. Eur. Union 2019, 319, 1–279. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2019/2072/oj (accessed on 1 May 2025).
  7. Acharya, N.; Kumar, M.; Bag, S.; Riley, D.G.; Diaz-Perez, J.C.; Simmons, A.M.; Coolong, T.; McAvoy, T. Prevalence of Aphid-Transmitted Potyviruses in Pumpkin and Winter Squash in Georgia, USA. Viruses 2025, 17, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lecoq, H.; Desbiez, C. Viruses of Cucurbit Crops in the Mediterranean Region. In Viruses and Virus Diseases of Vegetables in the Mediterranean Basin; Loebenstein, G., Lecoq, H., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; Volume 84, pp. 67–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mofunanya, A.A.J.; Edu, E.A. Physiological and Biochemical Changes in Cucurbita moschata Duch. Ex. Poir Inoculated with a Nigerian Strain of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus (MWMV): Lagenaria breviflora Isolate. Int. J. Plant. Pathol. 2015, 6, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Radouane, N.; Ezrari, S.; Belabess, Z.; Tahiri, A.; Tahzima, R.; Massart, S.; Jijakli, H.; Benjelloun, M.; Lahlali, R. Viruses of Cucurbit Crops: Current Status in the Mediterranean Region. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2021, 60, 493–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Moya-Ruiz, C.; Rabadán, P.; Juárez, M.; Gómez, P. Assessment of the Current Status of Potyviruses in Watermelon and Pumpkin Crops in Spain: Epidemiological Impact of Cultivated Plants and Mixed Infections. Plants 2021, 10, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ibaba, J.D.; Laing, M.D.; Gubba, A. Pepo Aphid-Borne Yellows Virus: A New Species in the Genus Polerovirus. Virus Genes 2017, 53, 134–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ibaba, J.D.; Laing, M.D.; Gubba, A. Incidence and Phylogeny of Viruses Infecting Cucurbit Crops in KwaZulu-Natal, Republic of South Africa. Crop Prot. 2015, 75, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, C.; Zheng, M.; Du, X.; Cao, Z.; Wu, J.; Zhu, J.; Nie, C. Construction of a Full-Length Infectious CDNA Clone of Zucchini Tigre Mosaic Virus Infecting Snake Gourd and Genetic Diversity Analysis Based on Complete Genome Sequences of ZTMV Isolates. Arch. Virol. 2024, 169, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, K.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Yin, C.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Q.; Mao, L.; Shentu, X.; Yu, X. Nanopore Sequencing Technology and Its Application in Plant Virus Diagnostics. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 939666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pecman, A.; Adams, I.; Gutiérrez-Aguirre, I.; Fox, A.; Boonham, N.; Ravnikar, M.; Kutnjak, D. Systematic Comparison of Nanopore and Illumina Sequencing for the Detection of Plant Viruses and Viroids Using Total RNA Sequencing Approach. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 883921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Massart, S.; Adams, I.; Al Rwahnih, M.; Baeyen, S.; Bilodeau, G.J.; Blouin, A.G.; Boonham, N.; Candresse, T.; Chandellier, A.; De Jonghe, K.; et al. Guidelines for the Reliable Use of High Throughput Sequencing Technologies to Detect Plant Pathogens and Pests. Peer Community J. 2022, 2, e62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vazquez-Iglesias, I.; Santala, J.; Vossenberg, B.; Gaafar, Y.; Massart, S. PM 7/151 (1) Considerations for the Use of High Throughput Sequencing in Plant Health Diagnostics 1. EPPO Bull. 2022, 52, 619–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Carivali, M.F.B.; Luciani, C.E.; Celli, M.G.; Olmos, S.E.; Obregon, V.G.; Silva, M.I.; Fernandez, F.D.; Mederos, D.C.; Perotto, M.C. Identification, Sequencing and Genetic Diversity of Zucchini Tigre Mosaic Virus Infecting Cucurbita Species in Argentina. Plant Pathol. 2025, 74, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, B.; Shen, C.-C.; Xia, S.-W.; Song, S.-S.; Su, L.-H.; Li, Y.; Hao, Q.; Liu, Y.-J.; Guan, D.-L.; Wang, N.; et al. A Nanopore-Based Cucumber Genome Assembly Reveals Structural Variations at Two QTLs Controlling Hypocotyl Elongation. Plant Physiol. 2024, 195, 970–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, Z.-X.; Lin, C.-C.; Chen, Y.-K.; Chou, C.-C.; Chen, T.-C. Identification of an Emerging Cucumber Virus in Taiwan Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology. Plant Methods 2022, 18, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mackie, J.; Kinoti, W.M.; Chahal, S.I.; Lovelock, D.A.; Campbell, P.R.; Tran-Nguyen, L.T.T.; Rodoni, B.C.; Constable, F.E. Targeted Whole Genome Sequencing (TWG-Seq) of Cucumber Green Mottle Mosaic Virus Using Tiled Amplicon Multiplex PCR and Nanopore Sequencing. Plants 2022, 11, 2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. ICTV International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Family: Potyviridae. Genus: Potyvirus. 2025. Available online: https://ictv.global/report/chapter/potyviridae/potyviridae/potyvirus (accessed on 30 April 2025).
  24. Sharma, P.; Sahu, A.K.; Verma, R.K.; Mishra, R.; Choudhary, D.K.; Gaur, R.K. Current Status of Potyvirus in India. Arch. Phytopathol. Pflanzenschutz 2014, 47, 906–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mulholland, S.; Wildman, O.; Daly, A.; Tesoriero, L.; Chapman, T.A. Distribution and Diversity of Viruses Affecting Cucurbit Production in New South Wales, Australia. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2023, 52, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Canto, T.; Aranda, M.A.; Fereres, A. Climate Change Effects on Physiology and Population Processes of Hosts and Vectors That Influence the Spread of Hemipteran-borne Plant Viruses. Glob. Change Biol. 2009, 15, 1884–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Harrington, R.; Bale, J.S.; Tatchell, G.M. Aphids in a changing environment. In Insects in a Changing Environment; Harringon, R., Stork, N.E., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1995; pp. 125–155. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hou, Y.M.; Liu, S.Y.; Zhou, J.H.; Hu, Z.D.; Hu, M.R.; Zhao, Y.X. Researches on population dynamics of green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae) on different host plants. Agric. Res. Arid Areas 1999, 17, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  29. Norse, D.; Gommes, R. Climate change and agriculture: Physical and human dimensions. In World Agriculture Towards 2015/2030: An FAO Perspective; Bruinsma, J., Ed.; Earthscan Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2003; pp. 357–372. [Google Scholar]
  30. Harrington, R.; Clark, S.J.; Welham, S.J.; Verrier, P.J.; Denholm, C.H.; Hulle, M.; Maurice, D.; Rounsevell, M.D.; Cocu, N. Environmental Change and the Phenology of European Aphids. Glob. Change Biol. 2007, 13, 1550–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hullé, M.; Cœur d’Acier, A.; Bankhead-Dronnet, S.; Harrington, R. Aphids in the Face of Global Changes. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2010, 333, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, H.; Qiao, G.; Huang, X. Investigating the Impact of Climate Warming on Phenology of Aphid Pests in China Using Long-Term Historical Data. Insects 2020, 11, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ali, A.; Natsuaki, T. Watermelon mosaic virus. Plant Viruses 2007, 1, 80–84. [Google Scholar]
  34. Leiwakabessy, M. Characterization of A Divergent Strain of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus (MWMV) from Tanzania Supports the Existence of Two Major Lineages. Master’s Thesis, University of California, Davis, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang, X.; Du, M.; Li, S.; Zhou, X. Coinfection of Cotton Plants with Watermelon Mosaic Virus and a Novel Polerovirus in China. Viruses 2021, 13, 2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cespedes, M.K.; Melgarejo, T.A.; Henry, P.M.; Al Rwahnih, M.; Gilbertson, R.L. First Report of Watermelon Mosaic Virus Naturally Infecting Coriander (Coriandrum sativum) and Causing a Leaf Mottling Disease in California. Plant Dis. 2023, 107, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hang, C.; Huang, C.-R.; Zhu, F. First Report of Mosaic Disease of Crape Myrtle Caused by Watermelon Mosaic Virus in Jiangsu Province in China. Plant Health Prog. 2023, 24, 380–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cohen, S.; Nitzany, F.E. Identity of viruses affecting Cucurbits in Israel. Phytopathology 1963, 53, 193–196. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mihaljevski Boltek, L. Detekcija Ekonomski Značajnih Virusa Tikvenjača u Hrvatskoj. Master’s Thesis, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ivić, D.; Milanović, J.; Mihaljevski Boltek, L.; Novak, A.; Vončina, D. Zastupljenost i raširenost gospodarski važnih virusa tikvica (Cucurbita pepo L.) i tikvi (Cucurbita sp.) u Hrvatskoj. Agron. Glas. 2021, 83, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moya-Ruiz, C.D.; Gómez, P.; Juárez, M. Occurrence, Distribution, and Management of Aphid-Transmitted Viruses in Cucurbits in Spain. Pathogens 2023, 12, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Desbiez, C.; Costa, C.; Wipf-Scheibel, C.; Girard, M.; Lecoq, H. Serological and Molecular Variability of Watermelon Mosaic Virus (Genus Potyvirus). Arch. Virol. 2007, 152, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bertin, S.; Manglli, A.; McLeish, M.; Tomassoli, L. Genetic Variability of Watermelon Mosaic Virus Isolates Infecting Cucurbit Crops in Italy. Arch. Virol. 2020, 165, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Desbiez, C.; Verdin, E.; Moury, B.; Lecoq, H.; Millot, P.; Wipf-Scheibel, C.; Mirzayeva, S.; Sultanova, N.; Balakishiyeva, G.; Mammadov, A.; et al. Prevalence and Molecular Diversity of the Main Viruses Infecting Cucurbit and Solanaceous Crops in Azerbaijan. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 153, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Perotto, M.C.; Celli, M.G.; Pozzi, E.A.; Luciani, C.E.; Conci, V.C. Occurrence and Characterization of a Severe Isolate of Watermelon Mosaic Virus from Argentina. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 146, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Desbiez, C.; Joannon, B.; Wipf-Scheibel, C.; Chandeysson, C.; Lecoq, H. Emergence of New Strains of Watermelon Mosaic Virus in South-Eastern France: Evidence for Limited Spread but Rapid Local Population Shift. Virus Res. 2009, 141, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lecoq, H.; Fabre, F.; Joannon, B.; Wipf-Scheibel, C.; Chandeysson, C.; Schoeny, A.; Desbiez, C. Search for Factors Involved in the Rapid Shift in Watermelon Mosaic Virus (WMV) Populations in South-Eastern France. Virus Res. 2011, 159, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Borodynko, N.; Hasiów-Jaroszewska, B.; Rymelska, N.; Pospieszny, H. Watermelon Mosaic Virus Reported for the First Time in Poland. Plant Pathol. 2009, 58, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kamberoglu, M.A.; Desbiez, C.; Caliskan, A.F. Characterization of an emerging ısolate of watermelon mosaic virus in Turkey. Agric. Biol. 2015, 17, 211–215. [Google Scholar]
  50. Abdalla, O.A.; Ali, A. Genetic Variability and Evidence of a New Subgroup in Watermelon Mosaic Virus Isolates. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Salvaudon, L.; De Moraes, C.M.; Mescher, M.C. Outcomes of Co-Infection by Two Potyviruses: Implications for the Evolution of Manipulative Strategies. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 280, 20122959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. CABI. PlantwisePlus Knowledge Bank. 2023. Available online: https://plantwiseplusknowledgebank.org/doi/10.1079/pwkb.species.57657 (accessed on 11 October 2023).
  53. EPPO. European Plant Protection Organisation. EPPO Global Database. 2025. Available online: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/ (accessed on 20 April 2025).
  54. Lisa, V.; Boccardo, G.; D’Agostino, G.; Dellavalle, G.; D’Aquilio, M. Characterization of a potyvirus that causes zucchini yellow mosaic. Phytopathology 1981, 71, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kaldis, A.; Berbati, M.; Melita, O.; Reppa, C.; Holeva, M.; Otten, P.; Voloudakis, A. Exogenously Applied DsRNA Molecules Deriving from the Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus (ZYMV) Genome Move Systemically and Protect Cucurbits against ZYMV. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 883–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Simmons, H.E.; Holmes, E.C.; Gildow, F.E.; Bothe-Goralczyk, M.A.; Stephenson, A.G. Experimental Verification of Seed Transmission of Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus. Plant Dis. 2011, 95, 751–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lecoq, H.; Wipf-Scheibel, C.; Chandeysson, C.; Lê Van, A.; Fabre, F.; Desbiez, C. Molecular Epidemiology of Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus in France: An Historical Overview. Virus Res. 2009, 141, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hasiów-Jaroszewska, B.; Rymelska, N.; Borodynko, N.; Pospieszny, H. Biological and molecular characterization of the Polish Zucchini yellow mosaic virus isolates. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2013, 12, 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lecoq, H.; Dafalla, G.; Desbiez, C.; Wipf-Scheibel, C.; Delécolle, B.; Lanina, T.; Ullah, Z.; Grumet, R. Biological and Molecular Characterization of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus and a Potyvirus Isolate from Eastern Sudan. Plant Dis. 2001, 85, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lecoq, H.; Justafré, I.; Wipf-Scheibel, C.; Desbiez, C. Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus Newly Reported on Zucchini Squash in France. Plant Pathol. 2008, 57, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fischer, H.U.; Lockhart, B.E.L. Serious losses in cucurbits caused by watermelon mosaic virus in Morocco. Plant Dis. Rep. 1974, 58, 143–146. [Google Scholar]
  62. Purcifull, D.E.; Hiebert, E. Serological distinction of watermelon mosaic virus isolates. Phytopathology 1979, 69, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. McKern, N.M.; Strike, P.M.; Barnett, O.W.; Ward, C.W.; Shukla, D.D. Watermelon Mosaic Virus-Morocco Is a Distinct Potyvirus. Arch. Virol. 1993, 131, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yakoubi, S.; Desbiez, C.; Fakhfakh, H.; Wipf-Scheibel, C.; Marrakchi, M.; Lecoq, H. Biological Characterization and Complete Nucleotide Sequence of a Tunisian Isolate of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus. Arch. Virol. 2008, 153, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ibaba, J.D.; Laing, M.D.; Gubba, A. First Report of a Novel Potyvirus from the Papaya Ringspot Virus Cluster Infecting Zucchini (Cucurbita pepo) in KwaZulu-Natal, Republic of South Africa. Plant Dis. 2015, 99, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Arocha, Y.; Vigheri, N.; Nkoy-Florent, B.; Bakwanamaha, K.; Bolomphety, B.; Kasongo, M.; Betts, P.; Monger, W.A.; Harju, V.; Mumford, R.A.; et al. First Report of the Identification of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus in Papaya in Democratic Republic of Congo. Plant Pathol. 2008, 57, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Read, D.A.; Muoma, J.; Thompson, G.D. Metaviromic Analysis Reveals Coinfection of Papaya in Western Kenya with a Unique Strain of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus and a Novel Member of the Family Alphaflexiviridae. Arch. Virol. 2020, 165, 1231–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ibaba, J.D.; Laing, M.D.; Gubba, A. Genome Sequence Analysis of Two South African Isolates of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus Infecting Cucurbits. Virus Genes 2016, 52, 896–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Menzel, W.; Abang, M.M.; Winter, S. Characterization of Cucumber Vein-Clearing Virus, a Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci G.)-Transmitted Carlavirus. Arch. Virol. 2011, 156, 2309–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Owolabi, A.T.; Rabenstein, F.; Ehrig, F.; Edgar, M.M.; Vetten, H.J. Strains of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus Isolated from Lagenaria breviflorus and Coccinia barteri in Calabar, Southeastern Nigeria. Int. J. Virol. 2012, 8, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bananej, K.; Orfanidou, C.G.; Maliogka, V.I.; Katis, N.I. First Report of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus in Zucchini in Iran. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mumo, N.N.; Ateka, E.M.; Mamati, E.G.; Rimberia, F.K.; Asudi, G.O.; Machuka, E.; Njuguna, J.N.; Stomeo, F.; Pelle, R. Occurrence of a Novel Strain of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus Infecting Pumpkins in Kenya. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Yeşil, S. First Report of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus on Edible Seed Squash in Turkey. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 103, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kone, D.; (West African Science Service Center on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use (WASCAL), Acrra, Ghana); Sorho, F.; (Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Cocody, Abidjan, Ivory Coast); Affouda, L.; (the World Bank, Niamey, Niger); Desbiez, C.; (French National Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE), Montfavet, France); Lecoq, H.; (French National Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE), Montfavet, France). Moroccan watermelon mosaic virus newly reported on zucchini squash in Benin. Unpublished Work. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  75. Silva, B.A.; Kauffmann, C.M.; Mota, H.B.S.; Queiroz, P.S.; Batista, A.M.V.; Cardenas, S.B.S.; Freitas, D.M.S.; Nagata, T. First Report of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus in Pumpkin Plants in Brazil. Plant Dis. 2024, 108, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Šeruga, M.; Škorić, D.; Botti, S.; Paltrinieri, S.; Juretić, N.; Bertaccini, A.F. Molecular Characterization of a Phytoplasma from the Aster Yellows (16SrI) Group Naturally Infecting Populus nigra L. ‘Italica’ Trees in Croatia. For. Pathol. 2003, 33, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. 2010. Available online: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  78. De Coster, W.; D’Hert, S.; Schultz, D.T.; Cruts, M.; Van Broeckhoven, C. NanoPack: Visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 2666–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Koren, S.; Walenz, B.P.; Berlin, K.; Miller, J.R.; Bergman, N.H.; Phillippy, A.M. Canu: Scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017, 27, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2987–2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Elbeshehy, E.K.F.; Metwali, E.M.R.; Almaghrabi, O.A. Antiviral Activity of Thuja Orientalis Extracts against Watermelon Mosaic Virus (WMV) on Citrullus Lanatus. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Thomson, K.G.; Dietzgen, R.G.; Gibbs, A.J.; Tang, Y.C.; Liesack, W.; Teakle, D.S.; Stackebrandt, E. Identification of Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Potyvirus by RT-PCR and Analysis of Sequence Variability. J. Virol. Methods 1995, 55, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  87. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The Neighbor-Joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Muhire, B.M.; Varsani, A.; Martin, D.P. SDT: A Virus Classification Tool Based on Pairwise Sequence Alignment and Identity Calculation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Martin, D.P.; Varsani, A.; Roumagnac, P.; Botha, G.; Maslamoney, S.; Schwab, T.; Kelz, Z.; Kumar, V.; Murrell, B. RDP5: A Computer Program for Analyzing Recombination in, and Removing Signals of Recombination from, Nucleotide Sequence Datasets. Virus Evol. 2021, 7, veaa087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Škorić, D.; Zindović, J.; Grbin, D.; Pul, P.; Božović, V.; Margaria, P.; Mehle, N.; Pecman, A.; Kogej Zwitter, Z.; Kutnjak, D.; et al. Tomato spotted wilt virus in tomato from Croatia, Montenegro and Slovenia: Genetic diversity and evolution. Front. Microbiol. 2025, submitted.
  92. Grbin, D.; Pecman, A.; Musić, M.Š.; Kutnjak, D.; Škorić, D. First Report of Potato Virus S and Potato Virus Y in Tomatoes from Croatia. Plant Dis. 2023, 107, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Desbiez, C.; Joannon, B.; Wipf-Scheibel, C.; Chandeysson, C.; Lecoq, H. Recombination in Natural Populations of Watermelon Mosaic Virus: New Agronomic Threat or Damp Squib? J. Gen. Virol. 2011, 92, 1939–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Novakova, S.; Svoboda, J.; Glasa, M. Analysis of the Complete Sequences of Two Biologically Distinct Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus Isolates Further Evidences the Involvement of a Single Amino Acid in the Virus Pathogenicity. Acta Virol. 2014, 58, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Novak, A.; Ivić, D. Viral diseases of cucurbits. Glas. Biljn. Zaštite 2019, 19, 369–377. [Google Scholar]
  96. Skendžić, S.; Zovko, M.; Živković, I.P.; Lešić, V.; Lemić, D. The Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Insect Pests. Insects 2021, 12, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Malandraki, I.; Vassilakos, N.; Xanthis, C.; Kontosfiris, G.; Katis, N.I.; Varveri, C. First Report of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus in Zucchini Crops in Greece. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Khan, L.U.; Cao, X.; Zhao, R.; Tan, H.; Xing, Z.; Huang, X. Effect of Temperature on Yellow Leaf Disease Symptoms and Its Associated Areca Palm Velarivirus 1 Titer in Areca Palm (Areca catechu L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1023386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Moury, B.; Desbiez, C. Host Range Evolution of Potyviruses: A Global Phylogenetic Analysis. Viruses 2020, 12, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kabelka, E.; Grumet, R. Inheritance of Resistance to the Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus in the Cucumber Line TMG-1 and Cosegregation with Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance. Euphytica 1997, 95, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vučurović, A.; Bulajić, A.; Stanković, I.; Ristić, D.; Berenji, J.; Jović, J.; Krstić, B. Non-Persistently Aphid-Borne Viruses Infecting Pumpkin and Squash in Serbia and Partial Characterization of Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus Isolates. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 133, 935–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Glasa, M.; Svoboda, J.; Nováková, S. Analysis of the Molecular and Biological Variability of Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus Isolates from Slovakia and Czech Republic. Virus Genes 2007, 35, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Roggero, P.; Gotta, P.; Stravato, V.M.; Dellavalle, G.; Ciuffo, M. Further spread of Moroccan watermelon mosaic potyvirus in Italy in 1998. Plant Pathol. 1999, 81, 149. [Google Scholar]
  104. Ciuffo, M.; (CNR-IPSP, Turin, Italy). Personal communication, 2024.
  105. Ng, J.C.K.; Falk, B.W. Virus-Vector Interactions Mediating Nonpersistent and Semipersistent Transmission of Plant Viruses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006, 44, 183–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chatzivassiliou, E.K.; Papapanagiotou, A.P.; Mpenardis, P.D.; Perdikis, D.C.; Menexes, G. Transmission of Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus (MWMV) by Aphids in Greece. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Virus-like symptoms in cucurbit plants sampled for virome analyses: mosaic, deformations and lumpiness of zucchini fruits (A); curling, deformations, mosaic, yellowing and necrosis of cucumber leaves (B) and fruits (C); deformations, mosaic and vein yellowing of butternut squash leaves (D).
Figure 1. Virus-like symptoms in cucurbit plants sampled for virome analyses: mosaic, deformations and lumpiness of zucchini fruits (A); curling, deformations, mosaic, yellowing and necrosis of cucumber leaves (B) and fruits (C); deformations, mosaic and vein yellowing of butternut squash leaves (D).
Agronomy 15 01613 g001
Figure 2. Most abundant genera in the viromic data of severely symptomatic zucchini samples T5 (A) and T3 (B), as well as the cucumber sample 120SEC22 (C). Bacteriophage genera are grouped and shown separately due to their distinct origin, as well as the insect viruses that are included in the category “Others”. Unclassified virus genera are presented as a separate group labeled “Unclassified genera”.
Figure 2. Most abundant genera in the viromic data of severely symptomatic zucchini samples T5 (A) and T3 (B), as well as the cucumber sample 120SEC22 (C). Bacteriophage genera are grouped and shown separately due to their distinct origin, as well as the insect viruses that are included in the category “Others”. Unclassified virus genera are presented as a separate group labeled “Unclassified genera”.
Agronomy 15 01613 g002
Figure 3. Current global MWMV distribution map with colored outlines of the countries where it has been recorded, including Croatia (this study).
Figure 3. Current global MWMV distribution map with colored outlines of the countries where it has been recorded, including Croatia (this study).
Agronomy 15 01613 g003
Figure 4. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree, built of nucleotide sequences in the WMV CP region processed with Tamura 3 + gamma distribution parameter model (T3 + G). WMV isolates obtained in this study (marked in red) and isolates from the NCBI GenBank database are named by the corresponding GenBank accession number and the country of origin. Phylogenetic groups and subgroups are named according to [44]. An isolate of soybean mosaic virus (SMV; NC_002634) is used as an outgroup. Only branches supported by bootstraps (1000 repetitions) above 60% are shown. The scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.050.
Figure 4. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree, built of nucleotide sequences in the WMV CP region processed with Tamura 3 + gamma distribution parameter model (T3 + G). WMV isolates obtained in this study (marked in red) and isolates from the NCBI GenBank database are named by the corresponding GenBank accession number and the country of origin. Phylogenetic groups and subgroups are named according to [44]. An isolate of soybean mosaic virus (SMV; NC_002634) is used as an outgroup. Only branches supported by bootstraps (1000 repetitions) above 60% are shown. The scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.050.
Agronomy 15 01613 g004
Figure 5. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree constructed on the basis of ZYMV NIb/CP region processed with Tamura 3 + gamma distribution parameter model (T3 + G). ZYMV isolate T5_Z was obtained in this study (in red) and isolates from GenBank are denoted by a corresponding accession number and a country of origin. Phylogenetic groups and subgroups were named according to [44]. An isolate of the common mosaic virus (BCMV, MH628437) was used as an outgroup. Branches supported by bootstraps (1000 repetitions) above 60% are shown. The scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.050.
Figure 5. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree constructed on the basis of ZYMV NIb/CP region processed with Tamura 3 + gamma distribution parameter model (T3 + G). ZYMV isolate T5_Z was obtained in this study (in red) and isolates from GenBank are denoted by a corresponding accession number and a country of origin. Phylogenetic groups and subgroups were named according to [44]. An isolate of the common mosaic virus (BCMV, MH628437) was used as an outgroup. Branches supported by bootstraps (1000 repetitions) above 60% are shown. The scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.050.
Agronomy 15 01613 g005
Figure 6. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree, built from nucleotide sequences in NIb/CP MWMV region processed with Tamura-Nei + gamma distribution parameter model (TN + G). MWMV isolates obtained in this study (in red) and isolates from GenBank are denominated by the corresponding accession number and the country of origin. Phylogenetic groups and subgroups were named according to [65]. An isolate of zucchini tiger mosaic virus (ZTMV; KC345608) was used as an outgroup. Only the branches with bootstrap (1000 replicates) support above 60% are shown. The scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.10.
Figure 6. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree, built from nucleotide sequences in NIb/CP MWMV region processed with Tamura-Nei + gamma distribution parameter model (TN + G). MWMV isolates obtained in this study (in red) and isolates from GenBank are denominated by the corresponding accession number and the country of origin. Phylogenetic groups and subgroups were named according to [65]. An isolate of zucchini tiger mosaic virus (ZTMV; KC345608) was used as an outgroup. Only the branches with bootstrap (1000 replicates) support above 60% are shown. The scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.10.
Agronomy 15 01613 g006
Figure 7. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree constructed with complete MWMV genome sequences by using Tamura 3 + gamma distribution parameter model (T3 + G). MWMV isolate T5_Z obtained in this study (marked in red) and selected isolates from GenBank are denoted by the corresponding accession number and the country of origin. Phylogenetic groups and subgroups were named according to [65]. An isolate of zucchini tiger mosaic virus (ZTMV; KC345608) was used as an outgroup. Branches with bootstrap (1000 replicates) support above 60% are shown. The scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.10.
Figure 7. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree constructed with complete MWMV genome sequences by using Tamura 3 + gamma distribution parameter model (T3 + G). MWMV isolate T5_Z obtained in this study (marked in red) and selected isolates from GenBank are denoted by the corresponding accession number and the country of origin. Phylogenetic groups and subgroups were named according to [65]. An isolate of zucchini tiger mosaic virus (ZTMV; KC345608) was used as an outgroup. Branches with bootstrap (1000 replicates) support above 60% are shown. The scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.10.
Agronomy 15 01613 g007
Table 1. Cucurbit samples collected in Croatia and used in viral genome studies.
Table 1. Cucurbit samples collected in Croatia and used in viral genome studies.
Year of CollectionSampling Location, CroatiaSample NameCucurbit SpeciesPlant Material
2021PitomačaT1Cucurbita pepo ‘Naxos F1’fruit skin
PitomačaT2Cucurbita pepo ‘Naxos F1’fruit skin
PitomačaT3Cucurbita pepo ‘Naxos F1’fruit skin
Stari GradacT4Cucurbita pepo ‘Naxos F1’fruit skin
PitomačaT5Cucurbita pepo ‘Naxos F1’fruit skin
PitomačaT6Cucurbita pepo ‘Naxos F1’fruit skin
2022Sedlarica74SECu22SCucumis sativus ‘Salatar’leaves
Sedlarica96SECu22SCucumis sativus ‘Salatar’leaves
Sedlarica97SECu22SCucumis sativus ‘Salatar’leaves
Sedlarica101SECu22SCucumis sativus ‘Salatar’leaves
Sedlarica102SECu22SCucumis sativus ‘Salatar’leaves
Sedlarica125SEZ22SCucurbita moschataleaves
Sedlarica150SECu22SCucumis sativus ‘Salatar’leaves
Sedlarica152SECu22SCucumis sativus ‘Salatar’leaves
Table 2. List of primers used for RT-PCR detection of WMV, ZYMV and MWMV in cucurbits.
Table 2. List of primers used for RT-PCR detection of WMV, ZYMV and MWMV in cucurbits.
VirusPrimer NameOrientationSequence 5′-3′RegionProduct Size (bp)Reference
WMVWMV-ForforwardGAATCAGTGTCTCTGCAATCAGGCP825[84]
WMV-RevreverseATTCACGTCCCTTGCAGTGTG
ZYMVZY-2forwardGCTCCATACATAGCTGAGACAGCNIb and CP1200[85]
ZY-3reverseTAGGCTTGCAAACGGAGTCTAATC
MWMVMWMV-5forwardAGCAAGCGCCATACTCTGANIb and CP627[60]
MWMV-3reverseCAAACTCCATTAACATTCGG
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jagunić, M.; Grbin, D.; Marohnić, M.; Novak, A.; Čajkulić, A.M.; Škorić, D. Severely Symptomatic Cucurbits in Croatia Dominantly Harbor a Complex of Potyviruses Including the Emerging Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071613

AMA Style

Jagunić M, Grbin D, Marohnić M, Novak A, Čajkulić AM, Škorić D. Severely Symptomatic Cucurbits in Croatia Dominantly Harbor a Complex of Potyviruses Including the Emerging Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus. Agronomy. 2025; 15(7):1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071613

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jagunić, Martin, Dorotea Grbin, Marko Marohnić, Adrijana Novak, Ana Marija Čajkulić, and Dijana Škorić. 2025. "Severely Symptomatic Cucurbits in Croatia Dominantly Harbor a Complex of Potyviruses Including the Emerging Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus" Agronomy 15, no. 7: 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071613

APA Style

Jagunić, M., Grbin, D., Marohnić, M., Novak, A., Čajkulić, A. M., & Škorić, D. (2025). Severely Symptomatic Cucurbits in Croatia Dominantly Harbor a Complex of Potyviruses Including the Emerging Moroccan Watermelon Mosaic Virus. Agronomy, 15(7), 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071613

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop