Next Article in Journal
Master–Slave Agricultural Machinery Cooperative Harvesting Control Based on VMD-Transformer-LSTM and Dual-Layer MPC
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Carbon Emissions and Ecosystem Service Value Caused by Land Use Change, and Its Coupling Characteristics in the Wensu Oasis, Northwest China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Linear and Non-Linear Models to Describe Temperature-Dependent Development of Scopula subpunctaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) and Its Stage Transition Models

1
School of Agricultural Sciences, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang 464000, China
2
School of Plant Protection and Environment, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China
3
School of Food Sciences and Engineering, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang 464000, China
4
College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
5
Department of Plant Medicals, Gyeongkuk National University, Andong 36729, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(10), 2306; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102306
Submission received: 4 September 2025 / Revised: 28 September 2025 / Accepted: 29 September 2025 / Published: 29 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Agroecology Innovation: Achieving System Resilience)

Abstract

Scopula subpunctaria (Herrich-Schaeffer), is a significant insect pest affecting tea plantations in China; however, its thermal developmental characteristics remain inadequately understood. This study examined the immature developmental stages of S. subpunctaria under eight constant temperature regimes (13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, and 33 °C) in controlled laboratory conditions. Results indicated an inverse relationship between temperature and the total duration of the immature stages (egg to pupa), with developmental time decreasing from 105.8 days at 13 °C to 29.3 days at 31 °C. Specifically, the developmental durations for eggs, larvae, and pupae ranged from 5.4 to 20.3 days, 15.4 to 52.3 days, and 8.1 to 33.3 days, respectively, in 13 °C to 31 °C temperature range. Using an ordinary linear model, the estimated lower developmental threshold temperatures were 8.61 °C for eggs, 8.40 °C for larvae, 9.39 °C for pupae, and 8.85 °C for the total immature stage, with corresponding thermal constants of 114.94, 302.11, 149.93, and 558.99 degree-days (DD), respectively. Comparative analysis of eleven nonlinear models revealed substantial variation in estimates of lower and upper temperature thresholds, while estimates of optimal temperatures showed minor differences. Based on statistical criteria and biological relevance, the Briere-2 model was selected to characterize egg development, the Lactin-1 model for larval development, and the Briere-1 model for pupal and total immature stages. Stage transition models for eggs, larvae, pupae, and the total immature period were constructed using a two-parameter Weibull function integrated with the respective nonlinear models. This study provides foundational insights into the thermal developmental characteristics of S. subpunctaria and offers predictive tools for forecasting stage-specific emergence in tea plantations.

1. Introduction

Scopula subpunctaria (Herrich-Schaeffer) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) is one of the prevalent insect pests affecting tea trees. It distributes across most tea-producing provinces in China, including Jilin, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, Hunan, and Hubei [1,2,3]. Its high leaf consumption capacity, rapid reproduction and wide distribution render significant pest potential. The larvae tend to perch on the leaf margins, gnawing semi-permeable reticular spots on the edges of young leaves. In the later stage, the larvae often chew the leaves into large, smooth “C”-shaped notches. During large-scale outbreaks, they frequently consume all the leaves of tea plants, leaving only the main veins, which significantly impacts tea production and quality [3].
Insects are poikilothermic organisms that have adapted to specific temperature ranges. Temperature is the most crucial abiotic factor affecting insect development [4,5,6,7,8], survival [9], reproduction [10,11], –growth parameter [12], and distribution [13], Species-specific thermal characteristics, such as lower and upper temperature thresholds or the optimum temperature, can define the boundaries of arthropod biological activities [14,15]. As the temperature rises from the lower temperature threshold to the upper temperature threshold, the developmental rate increases [15]. The relationship between temperature and developmental rate is non-linear near lower and upper temperature thresholds but approximately linear at moderate temperatures [16]. Numerous linear and non-linear developmental rate functions or models have been proposed to depict this relationship [8,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The simple linear function enables the estimation of two crucial parameters: the lower temperature threshold (LT) and thermal constant (K). Nonlinear models offer a more precise description of the developmental rate across a broader temperature range [16,18,19,22,23].
Stage transition (emergence) models of insects invariably integrate a temperature-dependent rate model with a distribution model to forecast stage-specific transitions [7,10,13,27,28]. As crucial components of population dynamic models, stage transition models play a vital role in predicting stage-specific emergence peak times, outbreaks, the invasive range of some species, which are instrumental in formulating effective management programs [4,7,13,14,27,28].
Several studies have addressed the partial biology of S. subpunctaria, such as outbreak reason and control methods [29], scanning electron microscopic observation on ultrastructure of mouthparts, antennae and sex glands [1,30], adult emergence and mating behaviors [2], the effects of nutrition supplementation on longevity and fecundity [31], the temperature-dependent oviposition model [3]. the antennal transcriptome and olfaction-related genes [32,33], predation of natural enemy [34]. The relationship between developmental rate and temperature for S. subpunctaria has not been reported in detail. A more accurate prediction of the developmental rate across a broader temperature range is needed. Moreover, the information on immature stage transition models of S. subpunctaria is lacking. Thus, the objectives of this study are as follows:
(1)
To determine the influence of temperature on the development of the immature stages of S. subpunctaria.
(2)
To compare two linear temperature-dependent model and estimate lower temperature threshold and thermal constant for each stage.
(3)
To evaluate eleven nonlinear models and select the most suitable one to depict the relationship between the developmental rate and temperature for each stage.
(4)
To establish stage transition models for the immature stages of S. subpunctaria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Rearing

A colony of S. subpunctaria was established in Insect Ecology laboratory at Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, which was originally collected from one tea plantations in Xiaomiao Village, Shisanliqiao County, Shihe District, Xinyang City, Henan Province, China (32°01′35″ N, 113°59′21″ E) in March 2019. About 30 pairs of S. subpunctaria adults were collected from tea plantations. These adults were then placed in a breeding cage (50 × 50 × 45 cm) and provided with cotton moistened with 10% sugar solution. The cotton moistened with the 10% sugar solution was replaced daily. Six to eight fresh tea Camellia sinensis (L.) shoots (about 20 cm long) were inserted into a conical flask (300 mL) filled with tap water, which were placed into the breeding cage to enable S. subpunctaria adults to lay eggs [2]. Every day, the freshly laid eggs on the tea shoots were collected and transferred to another breeding cage. Once the eggs hatched into larvae, fresh tea leaves were provided as food and replaced promptly until the larvae developed into pupae. The newly developed pupae (<24 h) were individually placed in 300 mL conical flasks, which were sealed with a piece of fabric mesh. After emerging from the pupae, the adults were reared using the same methods as described above to produce the next generation. The colony was kept in an insect rearing room maintained at a temperature of 25 ± 1 °C, 14:10 (L:D) h, and relative humidity of 65 ± 5%. The insect population was used for experiments after two generations.

2.2. Temperature-Dependent Development

Temperature-dependent development of eggs, larvae, and pupae were investigated at eight designated temperatures (13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, and 33 °C) in growth chambers (RTOP-310 Y, Zhejiang Top Cloud-agri Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China). The photoperiod in all chambers was set at 14:10 (L:D) h and the relative humidity was maintained as 75 ± 5%.
Newly laid eggs were collected from the breeding cage every 24 h These eggs were then placed in the designated temperature chambers to observe the development of each immature stage. A total of 300 eggs in each temperature chamber were monitored and examined daily. A binocular stereomicroscope (Olympus SZ51, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to check for their development into larvae and pupae. Each egg was placed individually into a Petri dish (9 cm in diameter and 2 cm in height). After hatching into larvae, fresh tea leaves were provided as food. The fresh tea leaves were replaced daily until pupation. Once pupation occurred at each temperature, the pupae were individually placed into a conical flask (300 mL), which was sealed with a piece of fabric mesh. The development of eggs, larvae, and pupae at each temperature was recorded daily until the emergence of adults or death. Due to the high mortality rate of eggs at 33 °C, no continuous development under this temperature was monitored.

2.3. Developmental Rate Model

2.3.1. Determining the Lower Temperature Threshold and Thermal Constant

The developmental rates (1/d) of immature stages of S. subpunctaria at the examined constant temperatures were employed to fit temperature-driven linear and nonlinear functions. In accordance with the law of “total effective temperatures” (Equation (1)), two linear models, namely the ordinary linear model (Equation (2)) and the Ikemoto linear model (Equation (3)) [35], were utilized to estimate the respective parameters:
D T     L T = K · (1)
1 / D = L T / K + T / K
D · T = K + L T · D
where D is the developmental duration (d), T is temperature (°C), LT is lower temperature threshold (°C), and K is thermal constant (DD).
The lower temperature threshold (°C) and thermal constant (DD) for immature stages of S. subpunctaria were estimated by ordinary and Ikemoto models. The data points within the intermediate temperature range (16–28 °C) were utilized for this estimation.

2.3.2. Evaluation of Nonlinear Model

Eleven nonlinear developmental rate models were chosen to depict the relationship between temperature and the developmental rates of the immature stages of S. subpunctaria. The equations and their parameters showed as follows
Logan-3 nonlinear model [21]:
r ( T ) = ψ T T b 2 T T b 2 + D 2 e T m a x ( T T b ) T
where r(T) is the mean developmental rate at temperature T (°C) (same in all nonlinear models); ψ is development rate at the base temperature (Tb), Tmax is lethal maximum temperature threshold, ΔT is width of high temperature boundary area, Tb is arbitrary base temperature (not a lower developmental threshold); D is empirical constant.
Logan-6 nonlinear model [14,18]:
r T =   ψ e ρ T       e ρ T m a x       T m a x     T T  
where ψ is the maximum developmental rate, ρ is a constant defining the rate at optimal temperature), Tmax is the lethal maximum temperature, and ΔT is the temperature range over which physiological breakdown becomes the overriding influence.
Logan-10 nonlinear model [14,18]:
r T = α 1 1 + k e     ρ · T e       T m a x       T T
where α and k are empirical constants, and ρ, Tmax, and ΔT are same as in Logan-6 model.
Lactin-1 nonlinear model [22]:
r T =   e ρ T       e ρ T m a x       T m a x     T T  
where ρ, Tmax, and ΔT are same as in Logan-6 model.
Lactin-2 nonlinear model [22]:
r T =   e ρ T       e ρ T m a x       T m a x     T T   +   λ
where ρ, Tmax, and ΔT are same as in Logan-6 model, and λ allows the curve to intersect the abscissa at suboptimal temperatures.
Briere-1 nonlinear model [23]:
r T = a T T     T m i n T m a x     T
where a is an empirical constant, Tmin is the low temperature developmental threshold, and Tmax is the lethal temperature threshold.
Briere-2 nonlinear model [23]:
r T = a T T     T m i n T m a x     T 1 / d
where a, Tmin, and Tmax are as in Birere-1, and d is an empirical constant.
3rd-order polynomial nonlinear model [20,36]:
r T = a T 3 + b T 2 + c T + d
where a, b, c, and d are empirical constants.
Simplified beta type nonlinear model [24]:
r T = ρ α     T 10 T 10 β
where ρ, α, and β are empirical constants.
Inverse second-order polynomial nonlinear model [25]:
r T = a 1 + b T + c T 2
where a, b, and c are empirical constants.
Biophysical nonlinear model [21]:
r T = R H O 25 * T 298.15 * e x p H A R 1 298.15     1 T 1 + e x p H L R 1 T L     1 T + e x p H H R 1 T H 1 T
where T is Kelvin temperature (°C + 273.15), R is the universal gas constant (1.987 cal deg−1 mol−1), RHO25 the development rate at 25 °C assuming no enzyme inactivation, HA the enthalpy of activation of the reaction that is catalyzed by a rate-controlling enzyme (cal mol−1), TL the Kelvin temperature at which the rate-controlling enzyme is half active and half low-temperature inactive, TH the Kelvin temperature at which the rate-controlling enzyme is half active and half high-temperature inactive, HL the change in enthalpy associated with low temperature inactivation of the enzyme, and HH the change in enthalpy associated with high-temperature inactivation of the enzyme.
To select the most suitable model for describing the temperature-dependent developmental rate of eggs, larvae, pupae, and the entire immature stage, the following comparison criteria were taken into account:
a: The model ought to depict the data precisely. The adjusted coefficient of determination (Adj. r2) and the residual sum of squares (RSS) offer complementary insights regarding the goodness of fit and the utility for predicting observations [14]. Additionally, the Akaike’s information criteria [37] and Bayesian-Schwarz information criteria [38] were employed to assess the goodness of fit of nonlinear models [39].
The Adj. r2, AIC, and BIC are defined as follows,
A d j .   r 2 = R S S / n θ + 1 S S / n 1
A I C = n l n R S S n 2 θ + 1 n l n n
B I C = n l n R S S + θ + 1 l n n n l n n
where RSS is the residual sum of squares, n is the number of observations, θ is the number of parameters, SS is the total sum of squares.
A higher Adj. r2 value implies a better explanatory power of the model. Lower AIC and BIC values signify the preferred model, which has the fewest parameters and a better fit. The nonlinear models were ranked according to the AIC values, while BIC values were utilized for confirmatory purposes.
b: Whether the estimated parameters of the models possess biological significance. For the process of development, the crucial biological parameters required are the low temperature threshold, optimal temperature, and high temperature threshold [8,23,27,36,40].

2.4. Stage Distribution Model

The variations in the developmental durations for eggs, larvae, pupae, and total immature stages were simulated using a two-parameter Weibull function [7,27,41].
f P x = 1 e x p ( ( P x / a ) b )
where f(Px) is the cumulative proportion of stage emergence at physiological age Px, a is the scale parameter, and b is the parameter of curve shape.
Prior to fitting the data to the Weibull function, cumulative frequency distributions of developmental durations were created by summing the frequencies across consecutive ages for each insect stage in days. These cumulative probability distributions were normalized to a maximum value of 1 by dividing the frequency at each age by the total frequency. Ultimately, standardized cumulative distribution curves were generated for various temperatures, and the age scale in days for each stage was converted into physiological age (Px) using the rate summation method [18,27]:
P x = 0 n r T i i = 0 n r T i
where Px is the physiological age at nth day, r(Ti) is the developmental rate at temperature T at time i (day). The cumulative probability distribution of developmental durations for each stage was modeled using physiological age as the independent variable. Parameter estimation for the two-parameter Weibull model was conducted utilizing software TableCurve 2D v4 [42].

2.5. Stage Transition Model

The stage transition model was integrated with both the nonlinear developmental rate model and the distribution model corresponding to each immature stage. The simulation of stage transitions was performed utilizing the computational techniques proposed by Choi and Kim [43]. Physiological ages were determined by aggregating developmental rates across varying temperature conditions, which subsequently served as inputs for the two-parameter Weibull distribution model. The cumulative proportion of the cohort transitioning between stages was estimated using the Weibull function for each stage at a specified physiological age. The proportion of the cohort transitioning within the physiological age interval between i and i + Δi was calculated by subtracting the cumulative proportion at physiological age i from that at physiological age i + Δi.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

The influence of temperature on the developmental durations of different immature stages was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and mean comparisons were conducted employing the Tukey test [44]. Parameter estimation for all functions was performed utilizing the Table Curve 2D v4 software [42].

3. Results

3.1. Temperature-Dependent Development

Notably, successful development from egg to adult occurred within the temperature range of 13 to 31 °C, whereas larval progression was inhibited at 33 °C (Table 1). Temperature exerted a significant influence on the developmental durations of all immature stages (ANOVA: Egg: F = 5176.97, df = 6, 1659, p < 0.0001; Larva: F = 3315.11, df = 6, 1192, p < 0.0001; Pupa: F = 1838.04, df = 6, 1005, p < 0.0001; Table 1). Total immature development durations decreased significantly as temperature increased, from 105.8 ± 0.32 d at 13 °C to 29.3 ± 0.21 d at 31 °C (F = 10941.0, df = 6, 1005, p < 0.0001; Table 1).

3.2. Lower Temperature Threshold and Thermal Constant

Both the ordinary linear and Ikemoto linear models demonstrated strong linear correlations between developmental rates and temperatures ranging from 16 °C to 28 °C (Figure 1; Table 2). While the ordinary linear model yielded lower estimates of developmental thresholds and higher thermal constants compared to the Ikemoto model, both models effectively described the temperature-dependent development of S. subpunctaria. The lower temperature thresholds for the egg, larva, pupa, and total immature stages of S. subpunctaria, as estimated using the ordinary linear model, were determined to be 8.61, 8.40, 9.39, and 8.85 °C, respectively. Corresponding thermal constants were calculated as 114.94, 302.11, 149.93, and 558.99 degree-days (DD), respectively (Table 2).

3.3. Evaluation of Nonlinear Model

Drawing upon previously published studies, eleven nonlinear models were selected to characterize the developmental rates across the various life stages of S. subpunctaria. According to established evaluation criteria, the Briere-2, Logan-3, Logan-6, Lactin-1, and Lactin-2 models were identified as most appropriate for describing egg development. For larvae, the 3rd-order polynomial, Logan-10, Lactin-1, Lactin-2, and Simplified beta type models were deemed most suitable. The pupal stage was best represented by the Simplified beta type, Briere-2, Briere-1, 3rd-order polynomial, and Lactin-1 models, while the total immature stage was optimally described by the 3rd-order polynomial, Simplified beta type, Briere-1, Biophysical, and Briere-2 models (Table 3).
These nonlinear models in Figure 1 yielded estimates of optimal temperatures (Topt) with minor variation. Specifically, for eggs, Topt varied from 27.95 °C (Inverse second-order polynomial) to 30.97 °C (Logan-3). For larvae, Topt ranged from 29.41 °C (Inverse second-order polynomial) to 31.00 °C (Briere-1). For pupae, Topt varied from 28.79 °C (Inverse second-order polynomial) to 30.51 °C (Logan-3). For total immature stage, Topt ranged from 29.33 °C (Inverse second-order polynomial) to 30.84 °C (Simplified beta type).
Parameter estimates and optimal temperatures derived from six selected models are presented in Table 4. Considering Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) rankings, the number and biological interpretability of parameters, the Briere-2 model was identified as the most suitable for describing temperature-dependent developmental rates of S. subpunctaria eggs. Lactin-1 was preferred for larvae, while Briere-1 was optimal for both pupae and total immature stages. Based on these selected models, the optimal temperatures for developmental rates were estimated as 30.88 °C for eggs, 29.64 °C for larvae, 29.79 °C for pupae, and 30.79 °C for the total immature stage (Table 4).

3.4. Stage Distribution Model

The relationship between the cumulative proportion of developmental completion and physiological age for eggs, larvae, pupae, and total immature stage was effectively modeled using a two-parameter Weibull function (Egg: F = 966.28; df = 1, 69; p < 0.0001; Larva: F = 3664.01; df = 1, 86; p < 0.0001; Pupa: F = 2652.01; df = 1, 83; p < 0.0001; Total immature: F = 3891.84; df = 1, 106; p < 0.0001; Figure 2; Table 5). The distribution patterns for all stages were similar (Figure 2). The parameter a, representing the expected physiological age at 50% developmental completion, was estimated as 0.9886, 1.0128, 1.0132, and 1.0088 for eggs, larvae, pupae, and the total immature stage, respectively (Table 5). Notably, the parameter b was lower in the pupal stage compared to the egg and larval stages, indicating greater variability in developmental durations during the pupal stage.
The two-parameter Weibull function f P x = 1 e x p ( ( P x / a ) b ) was applied.

3.5. Stage Transition Model

The emergence rate of individuals within a cohort, as a function of cohort age (days) and temperature (°C), was simulated by integrating a nonlinear developmental rate model with stage distribution model, constituting a stage transition model for each developmental stage (Figure 3). Overall, the emergence rate curves across all stages exhibited a similar pattern. At lower temperatures, emergence rates corresponded to prolonged developmental durations accompanied by greater variability. As temperature increased, the curves narrowed and variability decreased, until temperatures exceeded approximately 32.0 °C, beyond which the curves broadened again and displayed a delayed peak emergence time (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

This study investigated the temperature-dependent developmental durations of immature stages of S. subpunctaria under constant temperature conditions. Temperature exerted a significant influence on the developmental durations across all immature stages. Notably, S. subpunctaria demonstrated sensitivity to high temperatures, as survival through the immature stages was not observed at 33 °C.
The ordinary linear model, initially introduced by Ludwig [17], requires minimal data and is computationally straightforward. It provides approximate estimates of the lower temperature threshold (LT) and thermal constant (K) that are comparable to those derived from more complex models [16,36]. Consequently, this model has been widely employed to characterize insect developmental rates within mid-temperature ranges [7,8,14,15,25,26,35,36,43,45]. However, the ordinary linear model has limitations: it is applicable only within an intermediate temperature range (15–30 °C), which results in an overestimation of the LT due to extrapolation of the linear segment into a region where the relationship is inherently nonlinear [15]. Furthermore, this model does not estimate the optimal temperature or the upper temperature threshold. Ikemoto and Takai [35] proposed an alternative linear regression model to estimate LT and K, which tends to yield higher LT values and lower K values compared to the ordinary linear model.
To address the limitations of linear models, various nonlinear models have been developed to more accurately describe developmental rates across a broader temperature spectrum. Several of these models have been successfully applied to estimate both lower and upper temperature thresholds for development [8,15,18,19,23,26,27,40]. Model selection typically prioritizes statistical criteria such as goodness of fit; however, additional considerations include balancing model fit with structural complexity, the reliability of estimated temperature thresholds, and the biological interpretability of parameters [8,40].
In the present study, nonlinear models were selected based on the adjusted coefficient of determination (Adj. r2), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), all of which are independent of parameter count and provide robust measures of model fit [37,39]. Moreover, the capacity of a model to estimate critical temperature points (i.e., Tmin, Topt, and Tmax) and the biological relevance of its parameters were deemed essential criteria for model selection.
To evaluate the eleven nonlinear models, the top five models ranked by AIC were selected for further analysis, focusing on the biological interpretation of parameters and the estimation of critical temperature thresholds (i.e., Tmin, Topt, and Tmax). Among these top five nonlinear models, the Briere-2 model was identified as the most suitable for characterizing egg development due to its relatively low parameter count and superior AIC ranking. For larval development, although the 3rd-order polynomial model demonstrated a favorable ranking, it failed to estimate low and high temperature thresholds. In contrast, the Lactin-1 model, which possessed fewer parameters and a higher Adj. r2 value compared to the Logan-10 model, was ultimately chosen as the optimal nonlinear model for modeling larval stage transitions. Regarding pupal development, both the 3rd-order polynomial and Simplified Beta-type models were unable to estimate key temperature points. The Briere-1 model, exhibiting fewer parameters and a higher Adj. r2 value relative to the Lactin-1 and Briere-1 models, was therefore selected to describe pupal development. Applying a similar rationale, the Briere-1 model was also deemed the best nonlinear model for representing the developmental rate of the total immature stage. Consequently, the Briere-2, Lactin-1, and Briere-1 models were applied to their respective stage transition models.
In this study, the cumulative distributions of egg, larval, pupal, and total immature stages were effectively modeled using a two-parameter Weibull function, with physiological age serving as the independent variable. Notably, larval developmental periods were longer and exhibited greater variability compared to those of eggs and pupae. The Weibull function has been widely employed to describe the cumulative proportion of developmental completion in insects [7,13,27,43,46,47]. Integrating the distribution model with the nonlinear developmental rate models enables the prediction of stage-specific emergence rates under varying temperature conditions in the field. This investigation represents the first effort to develop stage transition models for S. subpunctaria, which are essential components for constructing a comprehensive population model for this species, analogous to models developed for other arthropods [46,47].

5. Conclusions

Overall, this study provides foundational insights into the thermal biology of S. subpunctaria across a range of constant temperatures, simulates developmental rates using both linear and nonlinear models, and establishes stage transition models. The findings are expected to facilitate accurate predictions of S. subpunctaria population development timing in tea plantations and support the formulation of integrated pest management strategies. Furthermore, the stage transition models developed herein constitute a critical component for constructing a comprehensive population model that will elucidate the seasonal fluctuations and population dynamics of S. subpunctaria in the field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G. and C.J.; methodology, S.G. and P.Z.; software, S.G. and C.J.; validation, X.L., P.Z. and C.J.; formal analysis, S.G. and H.H.; investigation, F.Z. and J.S.; resources, S.G.; data curation, S.G. and J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G. and J.S.; writing—review and editing, L.Q.; visualization, C.J.; supervision, X.L.; project administration, S.G. and C.J.; funding acquisition, S.G. and C.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32402364; Henan Province science and technology research project, grant number 242102110178; Key Scientific Research Projects of Universities in Henan Province, grant number 24B210012; Henan Dabieshan Laboratory Key Project, grant number DMLP006; National research foundation of Korea, 3P network research program, grant number nrf-2018R1A6A1A03024862.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author (L.Q.). The data are not publicly available due to they are part of an ongoing study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hu, W.J.; Chen, W.L.; Wei, W.; Xu, X.Q. Scanning electron microscopic observation of sensilla on the antenna of male adult Scopula subpunctaria. Chin. Bull. Entomol. 2010, 47, 938–940. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ma, T.; Shi, X.; Lin, N.; Wang, Z.; Xiao, Q.; Sun, Z.; Wen, X. Temporal pattern of adult emergence and sexual behavior of Scopula subpunctaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Phytoparasitica 2019, 47, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Geng, S.B.; Hou, H.L.; Wang, G.J.; Jung, C.; Yin, J.; Qiao, L. Temperature-dependent oviposition model of Scopula subpunctaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2021, 24, 948–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Malekera, M.J.; Acharya, R.; Mostafiz, M.M.; Hwang, H.S.; Bhusal, N.; Lee, K.Y. Temperature-Dependent Development Models Describing the Effects of Temperature on the Development of the Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects 2022, 13, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jafari, M.; Goldasteh, S.; Aghdam, H.R.; Zamani, A.A.; Soleyman-Nejadian, E.; Chausberger, P. Modeling Thermal Developmental Trajectories and Thermal Requirements of the Ladybird Stethorus gilvifrons. Insects 2023, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, G.; Li, L.; Guo, Y.; Kang, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. Temperature-dependent development of Nitidula rufipes (Linnaeus, 1767) (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) and its significance in estimating minimum postmortem interval. Insects 2023, 14, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jung, J.K.; Kim, S.B.; Seo, B.Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, D.S. Temperature-dependent development of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) at constant temperatures: Instar pathways and stage transition models with semifield validation. J. Econ. Entomol. 2023, 116, 1689–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sedaghat, M.; Kheradmand, K.; Sedaratian-Jahromi, A.; Yazdanpanah, S.; Fathipour, Y. Temperature-dependent development of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) at nine constant temperatures. Int. J. Acarol. 2025, 51, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Andreadis, S.S.; Spanoudis, C.G.; Zakka, G.; Aslanidou, B.; Noukari, S.; Savopoulou-Soultani, M. Effect of temperature on rate of development, survival and adult longevity of Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 2017, 114, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sampaio, F.; Batista, M.M.; Marchioro, C.A. Temperature-dependent reproduction of Spodoptera eridania: Developing an oviposition model for a novel invasive species. Pest Manag. Sci. 2024, 80, 1118–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yan, S.; Su, H.; Lyu, B.; Lu, H.; Tang, J.; Zhuo, Z.; Yang, F. Effects of temperature and supplementary food on the development and fecundity of the Eulophid parasitoid Tetrastichus howardi on Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int. J. Pest Manag. 2024, 70, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kopecká, A.; Kouřimská, L.; Škvorová, P.; Kurečka, M.; Kulma, M. Effect of temperature on the nutritional quality and growth parameters of yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.): A preliminary study. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, C.G.; Choi, B.R.; Cho, J.R.; Kim, J.H.; Ahn, J.J. Thermal effects on the development, fecundity and life table parameters of Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on barley. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2017, 20, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roy, M.; Brodeur, J.; Cloutier, C. Relationship between temperature and developmental rate of Stethorus punctillum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and its prey Tetranychus mcdanieli (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Environ. Entomol. 2002, 31, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Golizadeh, A.; Zalucki, M.P. Estimating temperature-dependent developmental rates of potato tuberworm, Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Insect Sci. 2012, 19, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wagner, T.L.; Wu, H.I.; Sharpe, P.J.; Schoolfield, R.M.; Coulson, R.N. Modeling insect development rates: A literature review and application of a biophysical model. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1984, 77, 208–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ludwig, D. The effects of temperature on the development of an insect (Popillia japonica Newman). Physiol. Zool. 1928, 1, 358–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Logan, J.A.; Wollkind, D.J.; Hoyt, S.C.; Tanigoshi, L.K. An analytic model for description of temperature dependent rate phenomena in arthropods. Environ. Entomol. 1976, 5, 1133–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharpe, P.J.; DeMichele, D.W. Reaction kinetics of poikilotherm development. J. Theor. Biol. 1977, 64, 649–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Harcourt, D.G.; Yee, J.M. Polynomial algorithm for predicting the duration of insect life stages. Environ. Entomol. 1982, 11, 581–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hilbert, D.W.; Logan, J.A. Empirical model of nymphal development for the migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Environ. Entomol. 1983, 12, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lactin, D.J.; Holliday, N.J.; Johnson, D.L.; Craigen, R. Improved rate model of temperature-dependent development by arthropods. Environ. Entomol. 1995, 24, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Briere, J.F.; Pracros, P.; Le Roux, A.Y.; Pierre, J.S. A novel rate model of temperature-dependent development for arthropods. Environ. Entomol. 1999, 28, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Damos, P.T.; Savopoulou-Soultani, M. Temperature-dependent bionomics and modeling of Anarsia lineatella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in the laboratory. J. Econ. Entomol. 2008, 101, 1557–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Damos, P.T.; Savopoulou-Soultani, M. Temperature-driven models for insect development and vital thermal requirements. Psyche 2012, 2012, 123405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Régnier, B.; Legrand, J.; Rebaudo, F. Modeling temperature-dependent development rate in insects and implications of experimental design. Environ. Entomol. 2022, 51, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Geng, S.; Jung, C. Temperature-dependent development of immature Phyllonorycter ringoniella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) and its stage transition models. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 1813–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, D.S.; Lee, J.H.; Yiem, M.S. Temperature-dependent development of Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae) and its stage emergence models. Environ. Entomol. 2001, 30, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, W.; Shen, L.; Jiang, F.; Li, G. Outburst reason and control of Scopula subpunctaria in 2009, Sichuan, China. Sichuan Agric. Sci. Technol. 2009, 8, 38–39. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, F.M.; Hong, F.; Pan, P.L.; Yin, J.; Zhao, Q.; Jin, Y.L. Ultramorphology of Sensilla on the Proboscis in Adults of Two Geometridae Moths. J. Henan Agric. Sci. 2019, 48, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  31. Geng, S.B.; Hou, H.H.; He, S.J.; Qiao, L.; Pan, P.L.; Yin, J.; Jin, Y.L. Effects of Nutrition Supplementation on Longevity and Fecundity of Scopula subpunctaria. J. Tea Sci. 2020, 40, 501–509. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yuan, T.T.; Luo, Z.J.; Luo, Z.X.; Cai, X.M.; Bian, L.; Xiu, C.L.; Fu, N.X.; Chen, Z.M.; Zhang, L.W.; Li, Z.Q. Olfactory gene families in Scopula subpunctaria and candidates for Type-II sex pheromone detection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, F.M.; You, W.C.; Guo, S.B.; Chen, J.H.; Shi, H.Z.; Geng, S.B.; Zhou, Z.; Qiao, L. Analysis of the antennal transcriptome and olfaction-related genes of Scopula subpunctaria (Herrich-Schaeffer). J. Environ. Entomol. 2025, 47, 504–514. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen, J.H.; Wen, X.R.; Wang, C.X.; Zhang, Q.Q.; Liu, H.M.; Ning, W.G.; Guo, S.B. Predation and Predilection of Eocanthecona furcellata to Larvae of Scopula subpunctaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). J. Tea Sci. 2025, 45, 87–98. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ikemoto, T.; Takai, K. A new linearized formula for the law of total effective temperature and the evaluation of line-fitting methods with both variables subject to error. Environ. Entomol. 2000, 29, 671–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kontodimas, D.C.; Eliopoulos, P.A.; Stathas, G.J.; Economou, L.P. Comparative temperature-dependent development of Nephus includens (Kirsch) and Nephus bisignatus (Boheman) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) preying on Planococcus citri (Risso) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae): Evaluation of a linear and various nonlinear models using specific criteria. Environ. Entomol. 2004, 33, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  37. Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schwarz, G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 1978, 6, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Damos, P.T.; Savopoulou-Soultani, M. Development and statistical evaluation of models in forecasting moth phenology of major lepidopterous peach pest complex for Integrated Pest Management programs. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 1190–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marchioro, C.A.; Krechemer, F.S.; Foerster, L.A. Estimating the development rate of the tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), using linear and non-linear models. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 1486–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Weibull, W.; Sweden, S. A statistical distribution of function of wide applicability. J. Appl. Mech. 1951, 103, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jandel Scientific. TableCurve 2D; Version 4.0; Automated Curve Fitting and Equation Discovery; Jandel Scientific: San Rafel, CA, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  43. Choi, K.S.; Kim, D.S. Temperature-dependent development of Ascotis selenaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) and its stage emergence models with field validation. Crop Prot. 2014, 66, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. SAS Institute. Statistics; Version 9.3; SAS/STAT User’s Guide; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  45. von Schmalensee, L.; Süess, P.; Roberts, K.T.; Gotthard, K.; Lehmann, P. A quantitative model of temperature-dependent diapause progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2407057121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, D.S.; Lee, J.H. A population model for the peach fruit moth, Carposina sasakii Matsumura (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae), in a Korean orchard system. Ecol. Modell. 2010, 221, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Seo, Y.D.; Kim, D.S. Temperature-driven models of Aculops pelekassi (Acari: Eriophyidae) based on its development and fecundity on detached citrus leaves in the laboratory. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2014, 17, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Observed developmental rate (dots) for immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria and 12 fitted linear and nonlinear models (lines).
Figure 1. Observed developmental rate (dots) for immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria and 12 fitted linear and nonlinear models (lines).
Agronomy 15 02306 g001
Figure 2. Cumulative developmental completion proportion of immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria in relation to physiological age. The two-parameter Weibull function p P x = 1 e x p ( ( P x / a ) b ) was used, the parameter estimates were provided in Table 5.
Figure 2. Cumulative developmental completion proportion of immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria in relation to physiological age. The two-parameter Weibull function p P x = 1 e x p ( ( P x / a ) b ) was used, the parameter estimates were provided in Table 5.
Agronomy 15 02306 g002
Figure 3. Estimated emergence rate curves of immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria in relation to temperature (°C) and cohort age (days).
Figure 3. Estimated emergence rate curves of immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria in relation to temperature (°C) and cohort age (days).
Agronomy 15 02306 g003
Table 1. Number of insects completing the developmental stages and developmental durations (days, mean ± SE) of each stage of Scopula subpunctaria at different constant temperatures.
Table 1. Number of insects completing the developmental stages and developmental durations (days, mean ± SE) of each stage of Scopula subpunctaria at different constant temperatures.
Temperature (°C)Number of Insects Completing
the Developmental Stages
Developmental Duration (Days, Mean ± SE)
EggLarvaPupaTotal ImmatureEggLarvaPupaTotal Immature
1325518516216220.3 ± 0.09a52.3 ± 0.28a33.3 ± 0.30a105.8 ± 0.32a
1620716615215218.2 ± 0.11b42.2 ± 0.31b24.9 ± 0.39b85.5 ± 0.44b
192602001821829.4 ± 0.07c28.2 ± 0.21c14.8 ± 0.17c52.3 ± 0.28c
222291721561568.6 ± 0.12d21.5 ± 0.17d11.4 ± 0.10d41.2 ± 0.20d
252792282102107.0 ± 0.04e17.9 ± 0.10e9.8 ± 0.07e34.6 ± 0.11e
282271391121126.0 ± 0.04f15.9 ± 0.14f8.1 ± 0.08f29.7 ± 0.20f
312095838385.4 ± 0.09g15.4 ± 0.16f8.5 ± 0.15f29.3 ± 0.21f
33135- *--9.6 ± 0.22---
Means in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (p < 0.05,). * No observed values.
Table 2. Two linear temperature-driven rate models of immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria at constant temperatures and estimations of lower temperature threshold (LT) and thermal constant (K).
Table 2. Two linear temperature-driven rate models of immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria at constant temperatures and estimations of lower temperature threshold (LT) and thermal constant (K).
StageMethodLinear RegressionLT (°C)K (DD)
Equationr2p
EggOrdinary1/D = − 0.0749 + 0.0087 T0.9550.00108.61114.94
IkemotoDT = 97.923 + 10.409 D0.9650.002810.4197.92
LarvaOrdinary1/D = − 0.0278 + 0.0033 T0.9910.00048.40302.11
IkemotoDT = 286.989 + 9.072 D0.9910.00049.07286.99
PupaOrdinary1/D = − 0.0627 + 0.0067 T0.9880.00069.39149.93
IkemotoDT = 139.231 + 10.233 D0.9890.000510.23139.23
Total immatureOrdinary1/D = − 0.0158 + 0.0018 T0.9890.00058.85558.99
IkemotoDT = 518.977 + 9.741 D0.9880.00069.74518.97
Table 3. Statistical evaluation of 11 nonlinear models describing the relationship between temperature and developmental rate of immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria.
Table 3. Statistical evaluation of 11 nonlinear models describing the relationship between temperature and developmental rate of immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria.
Modelθ *EggLarvaPupaTotal Immature
Adj. r2AICBICRankAdj. r2AICBICRankAdj. r2AICBICRankAdj. r2AICBICRank
Logan-350.922−75.98−67.5020.976−90.55−83.87100.959−77.29−70.6170.963−96.21−89.539
Logan-640.913−73.83−65.4330.985−91.09−84.3680.967−75.83−69.1090.975−96.17−89.4410
Logan-1050.790−68.02−59.5470.985−93.72−87.0520.943−74.97−68.29110.966−96.69−90.028
Lactin-130.896−72.11−63.7940.990−93.13−86.3430.978−77.84−71.0650.983−97.99−91.216
Lactin-240.853−69.63−61.2350.988−92.75−86.0240.974−77.51−70.7860.979−97.36−90.637
Briere-130.835−68.43−60.1160.988−91.78−85.0070.980−78.54−71.7530.985−98.64−91.853
Briere-240.945−77.51−69.1110.987−91.84−85.1160.978−78.67−71.9420.981−98.08−91.355
3rd-order polynomial40.755−65.57−57.17100.996−100.31−93.5810.976−78.27−71.5440.986−100.26−93.531
Simplified beta type30.805−67.07−58.7580.989−92.14−85.3650.982−79.22−72.4310.986−99.12−92.342
Inverse second-order
polynomial
30.766−65.64−57.3290.987−90.94−84.1590.967−75.09−68.31100.977−95.71−88.9311
Biophysical4 ** 0.920−84.14−77.41110.941−76.75−70.0280.964−98.37−91.644
Adj. r2: adjusted coefficient of determination, AIC: Akaike information criterion, BIC: Bayesian-Schwarz information criterion. * The number of parameters in the model. ** Wagner et al. (1984) [16] identified the four parameter-reduced model, as the most appropriate.
Table 4. Estimated parameter values of selected nonlinear models for immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria.
Table 4. Estimated parameter values of selected nonlinear models for immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria.
ModelParameterEggLarvaPupaTotal Immature
Logan-10α0.3695839120.182974540.282572440.12540107
k15012000232.52114988311.7746717170.983033
ρ0.5851558870.200002180.22215690.19952189
Tmax31.6111993621.524665322.387874312.5555097
ΔT2.01073287314.618063114.683776418.5193126
Topt29.2130.5229.5230.74
Lactin-1ρ0.1701624840.150972190.164396780.15169148
Tmax34.8480977636.264075235.240160936.3094117
ΔT5.8691397536.618743756.076557876.58979692
Topt28.9829.6429.1629.72
Lactin-2ρ0.1606036390.118318390.111186540.10218944
Tmax35.1125675238.533887338.483411640.1557488
ΔT6.2155851268.432634168.935822779.76431074
λ−0.00544366−0.0141233−0.0502311−0.0144183
Topt28.8930.0929.5230.38
Briere-1a0.0001205940.00002944930.00007050290.000016594
Tmin8.195496614.258132987.089510665.27901386
Tmax34.370070638.196828136.229419537.7622876
Topt28.4531.0029.7930.79
Briere-2a0.000164420.00005950.000137640.000033227
Tmin−1.5868291.027242644.243569672.41313463
Tmax33.012953133.158932332.185406132.9974716
d7.413647124.730235015.0204264.67706889
Topt30.8830.0429.4829.93
Simplified beta typeρ0.005789860.0027690.004538690.00138198
α3.631806414.307827153.934221994.20528039
β3.463665652.628699973.049264942.75205603
Topt28.1831.0029.6330.84
Table 5. Estimated parameter values (mean ± SE) of distribution models for immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria.
Table 5. Estimated parameter values (mean ± SE) of distribution models for immature stages of Scopula subpunctaria.
StageParameter (Mean ± SE)r2
ab
Egg0.9886 ± 0.007519.5506 ± 0.892020.934
Larva1.0128 ± 0.0023712.2890 ± 0.453250.977
Pupa1.0132 ± 0.004588.3567 ± 0.404810.970
Total immature1.0088 ± 0.0014321.3284 ± 0.821020.974
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Geng, S.; Song, J.; Hou, H.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, F.; Qiao, L.; Liu, X.; Jung, C. Evaluation of Linear and Non-Linear Models to Describe Temperature-Dependent Development of Scopula subpunctaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) and Its Stage Transition Models. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2306. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102306

AMA Style

Geng S, Song J, Hou H, Zhang P, Zhang F, Qiao L, Liu X, Jung C. Evaluation of Linear and Non-Linear Models to Describe Temperature-Dependent Development of Scopula subpunctaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) and Its Stage Transition Models. Agronomy. 2025; 15(10):2306. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102306

Chicago/Turabian Style

Geng, Shubao, Junchuan Song, Heli Hou, Pei Zhang, Fangmei Zhang, Li Qiao, Xiaoguang Liu, and Chuleui Jung. 2025. "Evaluation of Linear and Non-Linear Models to Describe Temperature-Dependent Development of Scopula subpunctaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) and Its Stage Transition Models" Agronomy 15, no. 10: 2306. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102306

APA Style

Geng, S., Song, J., Hou, H., Zhang, P., Zhang, F., Qiao, L., Liu, X., & Jung, C. (2025). Evaluation of Linear and Non-Linear Models to Describe Temperature-Dependent Development of Scopula subpunctaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) and Its Stage Transition Models. Agronomy, 15(10), 2306. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102306

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop