Next Article in Journal
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry Toxins in Lepidopteran Pests: An Updated Research Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the GRF and GIF Gene Families in Prunus avium
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Salicylic Acid Seed Priming: A Key Frontier in Conferring Salt Stress Tolerance in Barley Seed Germination and Seedling Growth

by
Rim Ben Youssef
1,2,†,
Nahida Jelali
1,†,
Jose Ramón Acosta Motos
3,
Chedly Abdelly
1 and
Alfonso Albacete
4,*
1
Laboratory of Extremophile Plants, Biotechnology Center of Borj-Cédria, P.O. Box 901, Hammam-Lif 2050, Tunisia
2
Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis 1060, Tunisia
3
Plant Biotechnology for Food and Agriculture Group (BioVegA2), Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Avenida de los Jerónimos 135, Guadalupe, 30107 Murcia, Spain
4
Institute for Agroenvironmental Research and Development of Murcia (IMIDA), c/Mayor s/n, La Alberca, 30150 Murcia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2025, 15(1), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010154
Submission received: 19 September 2024 / Revised: 2 January 2025 / Accepted: 6 January 2025 / Published: 10 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant-Crop Biology and Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
The goal of the current study was to investigate the effects of seed priming with salicylic acid (SA) on seed germination parameters, seedling growth traits, nutritional element mobilization, and oxidative stress status in two barley species that were subjected to various salt treatments. The findings demonstrated that salinity reduced a number of germination parameters in unprimed seeds and impacted seedling growth by impeding both species’ necessary nutrient mobilization. Under this abiotic stress, a noticeable rise in malondialdehyde and electrolyte leakage was also noted. Interestingly, pretreating seeds with SA improved seed germination and seedling growth performance under either 100 mM or 200 mM NaCl treatments. In fact, SA improved the length and dry weight of stressed seedlings of both barley species in addition to increasing the germination rate and mean daily germination. Additionally, SA increased the content of calcium, iron, magnesium, and potassium while lowering the concentrations of sodium and malondialdehyde and electrolyte leakage. It is significant to note that, in comparison to Hordeum maritimum, the positive effects of this hormone were more noticeable in stressed Hordeum vulgare species.

1. Introduction

Global food security, threatened by climate change and the increasing population, is one of the most important challenges in the 21st century and must be addressed while coping with an already stressed environment. Salinity is one of many environmental constraints threatening the germination process, which is the crucial step of crop establishment. During the plant life cycle, changes in morphology and physiology activate the embryo during the seed germination and establishment stages. In fact, a variety of physiological and biochemical processes, including seed germination, photosynthesis, respiration, mineral nutrition, and antioxidative enzyme activity, are altered by this abiotic stress [1]. There are two stages to these dangerous effects. The first phase is dominated by the osmotic impact, which causes water stress because the concentration of salt in the soil is higher. It appears that during this time, variations in water relations are the primary cause of the decline in seedling growth [2,3,4]. Growth is controlled during the second phase of stress by toxic effects and nutritional imbalances that cause sodium and chloride to be substituted for other crucially important beneficial ions such as potassium and calcium.
In fact, water uptake is reduced during imbibition with rising external osmotic potential. In addition, seed germination could be affected by the toxic impacts of sodium and chloride ions on embryo viability [5]. These impacts lead to a reduction or delay in germination and even to the death of seeds before germination. In this regard, it was confirmed that increasing salt concentration not only prevents seed germination but also extends germination time by delaying the dormancy period [6]. Overcoming this environmental problem and optimizing the use of salt-contaminated water and soil resources has been a scientific goal but has had little success, since only a few significant genetic characteristics related to salt efficiency have been determined [7]. The use of current technology to recover these soils is one option; it presents challenges in its application because of certain limitations, including a low supply of irrigation water and high reclamation and drainage costs. Biological exploitation of these soils via the cultivation of salt-tolerant plant species is the other option. Indeed, halophytes, such as Salicornia and Suaeda species, demonstrate remarkable adaptability to salinity and drought, yet data on their responses under extreme conditions remain limited. Expanding this discussion can highlight the unique survival strategies of halophytes and their potential in saline agriculture. Recent research focuses on seed germination patterns in halophytes, linking their success to seed dormancy mechanisms and hormonal balance under stress conditions. Studies underline the importance of osmolytes (e.g., proline and glycine betaine) and antioxidant enzymes in mitigating oxidative damage during germination under high salinity [8].
Improving salt tolerance in barley genotypes faces challenges, such as low selection efficiency, the complexity of various biological parameters, and inadequate evaluation methods for screening genotypes in breeding programs, despite a more manageable strategy being available [9,10]. Barley is resilient to harsh environments, making it essential to select genotypes that can thrive in saline soils and produce substantial yields [11]. Research shows that salt stress affects barley’s antioxidant enzyme activity, with salt-tolerant genotypes exhibiting a higher antioxidant capacity than salt-sensitive ones. Enhancing antioxidant levels can improve barley’s salt tolerance, as indicated by a high germination rate under hypersaline conditions and the ability to germinate again after salinity is removed [12]. High salinity hinders seed germination, while low salt concentrations promote it. For example, halophytes show increased germination at low salt levels [13,14,15,16]. Conversely, the annual halophyte Cakile maritima faced significant delays in germination and displayed reduced seedling lengths at 200 mmol/L NaCl [17]. With careful observation and extensive experimentation over many years and continents, it was discovered that there are a number of ways to improve the vigor of seedlings as they emerge from the seed, which results in a consistent crop stand. Ultimately, using straightforward techniques leads to a significant increase in yield. Out of a few of these methods, seed priming is a special technique that allows one to either adopt hydro-priming or osmo-priming, among other methods, to stimulate the germination of seedlings. There is plenty of evidence to support the use of particular chemicals or organics and soaking the seeds in various treatments. Hence, this adapted tool was involved to optimize the use of salt-contaminated water and enhance salt tolerance crops without deteriorating soil quality. This technique helps to enhance seed germination under both optimal and stressful conditions [18]. Nevertheless, its advantageous effects may be prominent under unfavorable circumstances [19]. Furthermore, this technique allows salinity problems to be overcome in agricultural lands, as well as glycophyte species to be adapted to this abiotic stress [20]. Many efficient compounds are used to broaden the application of this technique, such as salicylic acid (SA). SA is a plant hormone more commonly known for its role in human medicine than in the field of plant physiology [21]. However, SA has been recently considered an imperative phenolic signaling molecule regulating the growth of plants growing under both biotic and abiotic stresses [22]. Indeed, this potential endogenous hormone plays a key role in seed germination and plant growth and it is well-known that SA is a key signaling molecule involved in systemic acquired resistance (SAR) [23,24,25]. Recent works reported a key role for SA in response to salt stress [26] and iron deficiency [27] by inducing and modulating different physiological and metabolic processes including seed germination [28]. Additionally, this phenolic phytohormone plays an imperative role in stimulating catalase, peroxidase, and glutathione reductase activities against different stresses in response to reactive oxygen species (ROS) [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. In contrast, exogenous application of SA does not always have a positive effect on the improvement of oxidative stress under restrictive conditions. Its stimulating effect depends on the applied stress and the species studied [36].
In order to cope with environmental constraints, recent advancements emphasize environmentally friendly materials and techniques to boost seed performance. Seed coating and pelleting are advanced methods that have been used to improve seed performance, facilitate sowing, and enhance crop establishment and seed quality during the past ten years. Additionally, modern seed coating technology involves applying active ingredients such as nutrients, biostimulants, or plant protectants to seeds, improving their resistance to environmental stress. Pelleting increases seed size and weight, making them easier to handle and ensuring even sowing. When combined, seed coating technology has long been utilized as a more cost-effective choice in both developed and developing nations. In this context, the benefits of seed coating and pelleting, such as improved nutrient absorption and stress tolerance, were reported. The use of biodegradable polymers and bio-based materials for sustainable agriculture has been discussed [37]. Furthermore, another study focused on optimizing the pelleting process for small seeds such as red clover, emphasizing critical parameters such as coating thickness and material uniformity for better germination rates [38].
The use of exogenous plant growth regulators to increase plants’ tolerance to abiotic stressors has gained a lot of attention in recent years. Furthermore, there is currently a dearth of research examining the effects of pretreatment with SA on wild plants, as the majority of studies to date have concentrated on the impact of pretreatment with SA on cultivated plants. In light of this, the current study was carried out to examine the effect of SA seed priming on wild (Hordeum maritimum) and cultivated (Hordeum vulgare) barley seeds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, were used throughout the experiment. H. maritimum seeds were collected from Sebkha of Sidi Khlif-Kairouan (arid stage); however, H. vulgare seeds were provided by the National Institute of Agronomy of Tunis (INAT) (L. Manel). The germination experiment was conducted in the Extremophile Plants Laboratory (LPE) of the Biotechnology Centre of BorjCédria (CBBC), Tunisia. Barley seeds were disinfected for 8 min with sodium hypochlorite (2%, v/v) and then rinsed three times with distilled water. Then, seeds were soaked in distilled water (unprimed seeds) or in 1250 µM of SA solution for 20 h according to a previous preliminary test [7]. Finally, they were placed in Petri dishes moistened with a double layer of filtered paper (twenty-five seeds in each one). The Petri dishes were irrigated with three different treatments, one treatment consisting of distilled water without salt (0) and two different saline concentrations consisting of 100 and 200 mM NaCl. Then, they were placed in a germinator at 20 °C, in the dark, for seven days. The experiment was a factorial design with two factors, which were salinity at 3 levels (0, 100, and 200 mM) and seed priming with 2 levels (control and SA priming). From the beginning of the experiment, the number of seeds germinated was recorded daily up to the last day of the germination period.

2.2. Final Germination Percentage

The final germination percentage (FG%) represents the physiological seed germination limit measured on the seventh day and it is expressed according to the following equation [39]:
FG % = Germinated   seeds Total   seeds × 100

2.3. Mean Daily Germination Determination

The mean daily germination was calculated according to the following equation [40]:
MDG = FG % X th   test   day
where the Xth test day is the day when the number of seeds germinated reached its maximum for each repetition.

2.4. Seedling Growth

The seedlings were harvested and thoroughly rinsed in five baths of distilled water following seven days of germination under either ideal or stressful conditions. To ascertain the growth parameters, the samples were separated into coleoptiles and radicles after the seed coat was removed, and each sample’s length was measured separately. After samples were dried for 48 h at 80 °C, the dry weight (DW) was measured using a precision balance (Mettler type AE100 at 1/100 of mg, Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland).

2.5. Nutrient Extraction and Analysis

Twenty mg of vegetal dried material were ground and digested with 10 mL of sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 1N) for 1 h at 80 °C and then left overnight at room temperature. This allowed the total extraction of the target elements of samples. The different cations (Fe2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+) were analyzed using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Analyst 300, Rodgau, Germany). However, K+ and Na+ ions were determined using a flame spectrophotometer (BWB Technologies XP, France). Results were expressed in μg.g−1 MS for Fe2+ and in mg.g−1 MS for Mg2+, Ca2+, K+, and Na+ [41].

2.6. Measurement of Membrane Stability Index

Using a digital conductivity meter (type Metrohom, BANTE instruments 950, China), the membrane stability index (MSI) was measured in order to estimate the integrity of the membrane. A tube containing 0.2 g of fresh material and 10 mL of distilled water was first heated to 32 °C for 30 min before the electrical conductivity was measured (EC1). After the samples were placed at 100 °C for two hours, the conductivity (EC2) was also measured. The MSI was calculated using the following formula [42]
MSI = EC 1 EC 2 × 100
EC1: initial electrical conductivity measured.
EC2: final electrical conductivity measured.

2.7. Measurement of Malondialdehyde

Malondialdehyde (MDA), which can react with β-thiobarbituric acid, was measured to estimate lipid peroxidation [43]. MDA-(TBA), a colored derivative that can be measured spectrophotometrically at 532 nm, is produced when MDA and thiobarbituric acid undergo a condensation reaction. About 1 g of plant material was ground in 10 mL of trichloroacetic acid (0.1%; p/v) to carry out the extraction. For five minutes, the resulting homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 g. Four milliliters of thiobarbituric acid (0.5%; p/v) made in trichloroacetic acid (20%; p/v) were mixed with 1 mL of supernatant. After 30 min of incubation at 95 °C, the homogenate was cooled in ice to halt the reaction. After that, the samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 g. The absorbance of the supernatant obtained following centrifugation was measured at 532 nm. The non-specific absorbance at 600 nm was then subtracted to adjust the optical density. The following formula was used to determine the concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) using a molar extinction coefficient of (ε at 532 = 155 mM−1cm−1).
MDA ( nm gFW ) = ( ( OD + O 532 OD 600 ) × VS 0.155 ) × gFW
VS: volume of the supernatant; FW: Fresh weight; OD600: absorbance at 600 nm; OD532: absorbance at 532 nm

2.8. Statistical Analysis

One-way ANOVA was used for the comparison of means. Significant differences were further analyzed using Duncan’s test to identify differences between treatments for both barley species. All these tests used an alpha of 0.05 and were carried out with XLSTAT software version 2014 (Addinsoft, Paris, France). For all the growth parameters analyzed, ten replicates (n = 10) were performed. For MDA and ion analyses, three replicates (n = 3) for each treatment and species were performed. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted using XLSTAT software, considering variables centered on their means and normalized with a standard deviation of 1.

3. Results

3.1. Final Germination Rate

The results presented in Figure 1 show that salinity caused a significant decrease in the final germination rate in both barley species. This effect was dependent on the applied saline concentration. It is crucial to remember that H. vulgare seeds germinated on the medium supplemented with 200 mM NaCl showed the highest reduction percentage. When compared to seeds that germinated under the control medium, this decrease reached 51%. In contrast to seeds that were not pretreated, stressed seeds that were pretreated with SA had a higher germination rate. The species and concentration of salt were the primary determinants of this improvement. It should be noted that H. vulgare seeds exhibited a stronger positive impact from SA. In fact, when comparing seedlings from SA-primed seeds exposed to 200 mM NaCl to seedlings from unprimed seeds, the improvement rate was approximately 70% (Figure 1).

3.2. Mean Daily Germination

According to the results, salinity significantly reduced the daily average germination of both barley species when compared to ideal conditions (Figure 2). The species and the amount of saline that was applied both affected this decline. Pretreating seeds with SA, however, raised this parameter’s values in both species. Specifically, this effect was more pronounced in H. vulgare.

3.3. Growth Parameters

3.3.1. Tissue Length

Figure 3 illustrates how salt stress reduced the length of radicles and coleoptiles from non-pretreated seeds in comparison to control seeds when the pretreatment was not applied. The species and the concentration of applied salt both affected this decline. Indeed, when compared to the control medium, H. vulgare seedlings germinated on the medium supplemented with 200 mM NaCl showed the largest reduction percentage in radicle length (65%) and coleoptile length (67%), as shown in Figure 3. In contrast to seedlings from non-pretreated seeds, SA enhanced this parameter in the two species’ seedlings under limiting circumstances. The findings demonstrated that, in comparison to their non-pretreated counterparts, H. vulgare seedlings exposed to 200 mM NaCl exhibited the greatest increase, with radicles and coleoptiles increasing by 106% and 133%, respectively (Figure 3).

3.3.2. Tissue Dry Biomass

Salinity decreased the dry biomass of the roots and coleoptiles in seedlings of both species when the pretreatment was not applied. In seedlings exposed to 200 mM NaCl, this decrease was more noticeable (Figure 4). In fact, compared to the control salinity treatment, H. vulgare and H. maritimum showed reductions in radicle biomass of 60% and 37%, respectively, and reductions in coleoptile biomass of 62% and 33%. In line with the length parameter results, seedlings produced from SA-pretreated seeds produced more biomass. The negative effects of salt on the two species’ seedling growth were lessened by this phytohormone. Significant evidence of its positive effects was found in H. vulgare. In fact, compared to seedlings from non-pretreated seeds, the highest rate of increase in dry biomass production under stress conditions was observed at the radicle level in seedlings exposed to 200 mM NaCl (107%), and at the coleoptile level in those exposed to either 100 or 200 mM NaCl (210%) (Figure 4).

3.4. Mineral Nutrition

3.4.1. Iron

The iron content of both species’ seedlings from untreated seeds was considerably reduced by salinity. In fact, seedlings exposed to 200 mM NaCl showed a more notable rate of reduction in this nutrient (Table 1). In comparison to the controls, the reductions were approximately 56% and 35% in radicles and 72% and 39% in coleoptiles in H. vulgare and H. maritimum, respectively. Notably, seedlings of H. maritimum and H. vulgare from SA-pretreated seeds germinated under stress conditions had higher iron content than seedlings from non-pretreated seeds (Table 1).

3.4.2. Calcium

The calcium content of the two species’ seedlings dropped in response to salinity. The seedlings from seeds that germinated on the medium supplemented with 200 mM NaCl showed the biggest decline. Indeed, in H. vulgare and H. maritimum, the percentage decrease in calcium content was 52% and 39% in radicles and 67% and 47% in coleoptiles, respectively, when compared to the control (Table 1). However, pretreatment with SA increased this nutrient’s content, especially in seedlings derived from H. vulgare seeds. The applied salt concentration determined this increase. Comparing seedlings derived from non-pretreated seeds to those germinated under 200 mM NaCl, it was found that the radicle and coleoptile sizes of the former were approximately 157% and 102% larger, respectively (Table 1).

3.4.3. Magnesium

Compared to non-salinized conditions, salinity reduced the magnesium content in the two barley species’ seedlings (Table 1). In comparison to ideal conditions, this decline was observed in H. vulgare and H. maritimum seedlings exposed to 200 mM NaCl (by 54% and 48% in radicles and by 53% and 49% in coleoptiles, respectively) (Table 1). Nonetheless, SA seed pretreatment markedly raised the magnesium content of the coleoptiles and radicles of seedlings of both species under stressful conditions (Table 1). In comparison to seedlings originating from non-pretreated seeds, this induction was notably observed in H. vulgare seedlings germinated on the medium supplemented with 200 mM NaCl, which was approximately 88% and 96% greater in radicles and coleoptiles, respectively (Table 1).

3.4.4. Sodium

Salinity significantly raised the sodium content in the radicles and coleoptiles of seedlings grown from untreated seeds of both barley species, as Table 2 demonstrates. The seedlings produced from seeds that germinated on the medium supplemented with 200 mM NaCl showed the most notable accumulation. However, it should be noted that, in comparison to seedlings derived from non-pretreated seeds, those derived from seeds pretreated with SA had significantly lower sodium contents. The species and the salt treatment used determined this reduction (Table 2).

3.4.5. Potassium

The potassium content of both species’ seedlings decreased in response to salinity. With increasing saline concentrations, this decrease became more noticeable (Table 2), increasing by 81% and 25% in H. vulgare and H. maritimum radicles and 49% and 33% in coleoptiles when exposed to 200 mM NaCl, respectively. On the other hand, pretreating seeds with SA considerably raised the potassium content in both species exposed to salinity, particularly in H. vulgare seedlings exposed to 200 mM NaCl. When compared to seedlings grown from untreated seeds, the potassium content of these seedlings was 83% higher in the radicles and 54% higher in the coleoptiles (Table 2).

3.4.6. Sodium/Potassium Ratio

In seedlings grown from untreated seeds, salt stress markedly raised the Na/K ratio. When H. vulgare seedlings were exposed to 200 mM NaCl, this increase was more pronounced. SA treatment led to a decrease in the Na/K ratio in the seedlings of both species because of its critical function in lowering sodium and increasing potassium contents. In comparison to seedlings originating from non-pretreated seeds, this effect was most noticeable in H. vulgare seedlings exposed to 200 mM NaCl (Table 2), which decreased the Na/K ratio by 71% in radicles and 62% in coleoptiles, respectively.

3.4.7. Calcium/Sodium Ratio

The Ca/Na ratio in seedlings grown from untreated seeds was considerably reduced by salt stress. Compared to seedlings germinated under ideal conditions, this decrease was more noticeable in H. vulgare seedlings exposed to 200 mM NaCl, with radicles and coleoptiles being 96% and 98% smaller, respectively (Table 2). In contrast to seedlings originating from non-pretreated seeds, SA increased the Ca/Na ratio in seedlings of both barley species under restrictive conditions, particularly in H. vulgare seedlings exposed to 200 mM NaCl. The values in radicles and coleoptiles, respectively, increased by 319% to 328% (Table 2).

3.5. Membrane Stability Index

In both barley species, salinity dramatically increased electrolyte leakage, as seen in Figure 5. This increase was influenced by the concentration of salt that was applied; H. vulgare exposed to 200 mM NaCl showed higher leakage in both radicles (110%) and coleoptiles (73%) in comparison to seedlings that germinated under ideal conditions. Remarkably, SA pretreatment considerably decreased electrolyte leakage in both barley species’ seedlings. When comparing seedlings of H. vulgare derived from primed seeds and exposed to 200 mM NaCl to seedlings derived from non-pretreated seeds, a significant reduction was observed (Figure 5), with radicles and coleoptiles being reduced by 45% and 55%, respectively.

3.6. Malondialdehyde Content

In both species, salinity markedly raised MDA levels. However, in seedlings that germinated on the medium supplemented with 200 mM NaCl, this increase was more noticeable. Comparing H. vulgare and H. maritimum to controls, the stimulation rates were approximately 143% and 100% in coleoptiles and 175% and 60% in radicles, respectively (Figure 6). On the other hand, SA reduced the rise in MDA levels caused by salinity in the seedlings of the two species under investigation. When compared to their counterparts from non-pretreated seeds, the coleoptiles of H. vulgare seedlings from pretreated seeds that germinated on the medium supplemented with 200 mM NaCl had the lowest MDA content. The effects of SA on radicles were comparable in seedlings of the two species that germinated at both salt concentrations (Figure 6).

3.7. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

To study the set of variables that explained the greatest variability in the experiment, as well as how the different treatments were separated, a principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out. Principal component analysis (PCA) is a statistical method that consists of describing the variation produced by the observation of p random variables in terms of a set of new variables that are uncorrelated with each other (called principal components), each of which is a linear combination of the original variables. These new variables are obtained in order of importance, so that the first principal component (PC1) incorporates the greatest possible amount of variation due to the original variables; the second principal component (PC2) is chosen so that it explains the greatest possible amount of variation that remains unexplained by PC1, subject to the condition of being uncorrelated with PC1, and so on. With this in mind, two PCAs for coleoptile and radicle data, followed by a partial least squares discriminant analysis, were conducted to assign the PCs displaying eigenvalues greater than or equal to 1.0, which led to the identification of three PCs (PC1, PC2, and PC3) in coleoptiles, explaining 93.04% of the variation, and two PCs (PC1 and PC2) in radicles that explained 86.50% of the variation within the dataset (at the end of the experiment, after 7 days of germination under optimal or stressful conditions).
The purpose of this analysis was to first obtain a small number of linear combinations of the 12 variables studied (DW, MSI, MDA, Ca, Mg, Fe, K, Na, Na/K, Ca/Na, length, and FG%) that explain the greatest variability in the data. In the case of coleoptiles, three components were extracted, since these three components had eigenvalues greater than or equal to 1.0. These components were principal component 1 (PC1), which explained 48.82% of the variability of the experiment, principal component 2 (PC2), which explained 35.65% of the variability of the experiment, and principal component 3 (PC3), which explained 8.57% of the variability of the experiment. Together, they explained 93.04% of the variability in the original data (Table S1 and Figure S1). Then, for the first two extracted components, the variables that had more weight or were the most important (variables with a higher absolute value) were identified. In PC1, the variables with the most weight, ranked from highest to lowest, were: Na > Fe > MDA > Lenght > DW > Na/K. Therefore, PC1 included all variables related to the absorption of sodium and its effect on the iron accumulated in leaves, then on growth and membrane damage. PC1 was the best, with a value of F = 1025.11***, which allowed us to classify the treatments into seven clusters (Table S2, Figure 7, biographic; Figure S2, Tables S3a and S3b). The first cluster is shaped by the H. vulgare seedlings grown under optimal conditions (0 mM NaCl) and H. vulgare seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatments; the second cluster only includes the H. vulgare seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 200 mM NaCl treatment; the third cluster is composed of the H. maritimum seedlings grown under optimal conditions (0 mM NaCl) and H. maritimum seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatment; the fourth cluster is formed by the H. vulgare seedlings subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatment and H. maritimum seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 200 mM NaCl treatment; the fifth cluster only includes the H. maritimum seedlings subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatment; the sixth cluster only includes the H. maritimum seedlings grown under 200 mM NaCl treatment; and the seventh cluster only includes the H. vulgare seedlings subjected to 200 mM NaCl (Table S3c). Regarding PC2, the treatments were also very well-separated, with a value of F = 723.09***, which allowed us to once more classify the treatments into seven clusters (Table S3d): the first cluster only consisted of the H. vulgare seedlings subjected to 200 mM NaCl treatment; the second cluster included the H. vulgare seedlings subjected to 100 mM NaCl and H. vulgare seedlings grown under optimal conditions (0 mM NaCl); the third cluster is formed by the H. vulgare seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 200 mM NaCl and H. vulgare seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatment; the fourth cluster only includes H. maritimum seedlings subjected to 200 mM NaCl treatment; the fifth cluster only includes H. maritimum seedlings subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatment; the sixth cluster only includes the H. maritimum seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 200 mM NaCl treatment; and the seventh cluster is formed by H. maritimum seedlings grown under 0 mM NaCl and H. maritimum primed with SA and subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatment. These scores reconfirm the results described in the previous paragraph, which indicated that, in PC1, separation was observed in relation to the species. Meanwhile, in PC2, a separation of the treatments was observed in relation to the effect of salinity intensity in the presence or absence of seed priming (Table S3e).
In the case of radicles, two components were extracted since these two components had eigenvalues greater than or equal to 1.0. These components are principal component 1 (PC1), which explains 49.12% of the variability of the experiment, and principal component 2 (PC2), which explains 37.38% of the variability of the experiment. Together, they explained 86.50% of the variability in the original data (Table S4 and Figure S3). Then, for each extracted component, the variables with greater weights were identified. In PC1, the variables with the highest weights, from highest to lowest, were Fe > DW > Ca > Mg > Length > Ca/Na > Na. Therefore, PC1 included all variables related to mineral nutrition status. Indeed, salt leads to an imbalance generated by the absorption of an excessive amount of sodium. Following the same criteria, in PC2, the variables with the highest weights, from highest to lowest, were MSI > Na/K > MDA > FG%> K. This indicates that PC2 included all variables related to the effect of salinity on membrane damage and competition between sodium and potassium (Table S5).
We again aimed to locate the treatments in a scatter diagram (Figure 8) or biographic (Figure S4). These figures were obtained from the principal component table, where the scores obtained for each component are represented for each treatment (five items of data per 10 treatments, for a total of 50 items of data). In addition, the average score for each of the ten treatments was added (Table S6a). The scatter plot shows that the treatments were well-separated within the two PCs, but PC1 was the best, with a value of F = 1159.63***, which allowed us to classify the treatments into seven clusters (Table S6b). The first cluster is only formed by H. maritimum seedlings grown under the 200 mM NaCl treatment; the second cluster is shaped by H. maritimum seedlings grown under 100 mM NaCl, H. maritimum seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 200 mM NaCl, and H. maritimum seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatment; the third cluster is composed of H. vulgare seedlings grown under 200 mM NaCl and H. maritimum seedlings grown under 0 mM NaCl treatment; the fourth cluster only contained H. vulgare seedlings grown under the 100 NaCl treatment; the fifth cluster only contained H. vulgare seedlings primed with SA and subjected to the 200 mM NaCl treatment; the sixth cluster is only formed by H. vulgare seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatment; and the seventh cluster only contained H. vulgare seedlings grown under 0 mM NaCl (Table S6c). Regarding PC2, the treatments were well-separated, with a value of F = 716.80***, which allowed us to classify treatments into eight clusters (Table S6d). The first cluster is only formed by H. vulgare seedlings grown under 200 mM NaCl treatment; the second cluster is only formed by H. vulgare seedlings grown under 100 mM NaCl treatment; the third cluster is composed of H. vulgare seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 200 mM NaCl and H. maritimum seedlings grown under 200 mM NaCl; the fourth cluster only contained H. vulgare seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatment; the fifth cluster only contained the H. maritimum_100 NaCl treatment; the sixth cluster is shaped by the H. vulgare_0 mM NaCl treatment and H. maritimum seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 200 NaCl; the seventh cluster is formed by H. maritimum seedlings primed with SA and subjected to 200 mM NaCl and H. maritimum primed with SA and subjected to 100 mM NaCl treatment; and the eighth cluster consists of H. maritimum primed with SA and subjected to 100 mM NaCl and H. maritimum seedlings grown under 0 mM NaCl treatments. These scores reconfirm the results described in the previous paragraph (Table S6e).

4. Discussion

One of the most damaging environmental stresses is soil salinity, which reduces the amount of land under cultivation and limits agricultural productivity and quality worldwide [44]. Salt stress affects over 20% of irrigated arable land, or roughly 45 million hectares [45]. According to climate modeling, by 2050, over 50% of arable land will be salinized [46]. The combined effects of xerothermic factors, such as heat and drought, will exacerbate this environmental issue. During the seven days of treatment, seedlings of both barley species germinated in salinity conditions displayed the typical effects of salt stress. Indeed, this environmental restriction reduced both mean daily germination and the final germination rate. Additionally, it reduced the growth characteristics of seedlings in comparison to those grown from seeds germinated under optimal conditions. Regardless of the species and slat concentration, the control and NaCl-treated barley seedlings showed notable differences. Compared to H. maritimum, the detrimental effects of salt were more noticeable in H. vulgare. Toxic ions may have limited the mobilization of nutritional reserves, which are essential for the embryo’s survival and the initiation of the germination process. These findings supported earlier research showing that most plants are more affected by salinity during the germination stage and seedling development [47]. This study showed that by lowering the germination rate, salinity has a negative impact on seed germination and seedling growth. The concentration of salt determines this decline [48]. In the same context, it was demonstrated that all stages of development, but especially the early growth stages, make wheat plants extremely salt-sensitive [49]. Furthermore, salinity stress prevents seed germination through an osmotic effect, which is reflected in the embryo’s inability to absorb enough water for tissue hydration and metabolic process activation [50]. Indeed, water scarcity brought on by salinity affects crop stand establishment and germination, which is crucial and the main factor limiting crop production in saline regimes [51]. Excess soluble salts in soils decrease osmotic potential and postpone the onset of seedling germination by blocking the seeds’ water uptake or exosmosis and dispersing the processes involved in germination, including the best possible activity of enzymes needed for metabolic activity and the use of seed reserves [52,53].
However, salt stress increased the ratio of Na to K by increasing the absorption of Na content while decreasing the mobilization of K content. Since K transport to coleoptiles has been shown to be proportionate to water transport [54], this behavior could be explained by a decrease in transpiration rate, a reduction in absorption system performance, which would limit K transport [55], or competition for the uptake of K and Na ions [56,57]. Furthermore, antagonism between ions during their uptake under relatively high concentrations of Na+ and Cl causes an essential mineral imbalance that prevents the absorption of available water and essential nutrients such as K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+. The substitution of Na+ for Ca2+ is also caused by altered mineral distribution, increased ion toxicity, and membrane permeability. Salt stress causes cellular-level osmotic and ionic imbalances that disrupt the entire physiology of plants. For instance, by affecting the root membrane’s selectivity mechanism, salinity deprives plants of K+ [58]. As mentioned, these adverse circumstances may cause metabolic disruptions that result in an excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and may lead to oxidative damage to a variety of biomolecules, including proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids [59]. Our study’s data demonstrate that salt stress impacted the integrity of the membrane by increasing electrolyte leakage and causing MDA to accumulate, both of which result in oxidative stress. The species of H. vulgare showed a notable increase. Salinity, like all other environmental constraints, disrupts the redox system and can cause oxidative stress inside plant cells given that oxidative stress is a platform for any kind of environmental constraint [60]. However, it is well-known that plants also use ROS as signaling molecules during stressful conditions [61]. In fact, salinity-induced oxidative stress throws the pro-oxidant and antioxidant systems out of balance, favoring the former [62]. Generally speaking, these pro-oxidants or ROS are harmful to cells [63]. It is well-known that ROS cause cellular homeostasis to become unbalanced, membranes, proteins, and biomolecules to deteriorate, and that they have mutagenic and post-accumulation effects in the cytoplasm [64]. However, compared to untreated plants, H. maritimum plants exposed to various NaCl treatments had lower MDA levels. Pea (Pisum sativum) roots subjected to cadmium stress showed comparable outcomes [65]. Interestingly, the substantial increase in the reduced ascorbate (ASC) pool, which is known to be crucial in minimizing membrane damage during environmental stressors, may account for the slight decrease in MDA content in the tissues of H. maritimum plants [66]. Similar studies showed that salinity increased ROS production and caused cellular toxicity in a variety of crop plants [67]. Compared to salt-tolerant cultivars, wheat was a sensitive cultivar and exhibited higher levels of lipid peroxidation [68]. For example, salt stress (100 mM NaCl) increased the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) in wheat seedlings by up to 35% or 68% after 5 or 10 days of exposure, respectively [69]. Overall, Hordeum maritimum (wild barley) often exhibits superior salinity tolerance due to its evolutionary adaptations, such as efficient ion compartmentalization and osmotic adjustment mechanisms, whereas Hordeum vulgare (cultivated barley) may prioritize growth under favorable conditions. Indeed, many studies highlight the genetic differences between wild and cultivated barley, emphasizing ion transport systems and root morphology as critical factors in salinity response. Authors discuss how Hordeum maritimum maintains better growth under salinity stress compared to Hordeum vulgare, due to a higher capacity for sodium exclusion and maintenance of cellular homeostasis [8,70].
As previously stated, the negative effects of salinity on plant growth and development were lessened and mitigated when SA priming was applied to barley seeds subjected to salt stress. Indeed, SA has been shown to improve the germination of many species under salinity by increasing their tolerance. In our current study, we observed a significant boost in germination and seedling growth in barley seeds due to SA treatment under salt stress conditions. In fact, SA has stimulated Chinese mustard, violet, and wheat seed germination, as well as root and aerial growth in a dose-dependent manner [71]. In this regard, it was verified that active mitotic activity was responsible for the improvement in root growth observed in wheat seedlings cultivated from seeds primed with SA under salinity conditions [72]. Our study’s findings were in line with those of other studies conducted in this field. Indeed, a comparison of means revealed that salicylic acid priming improved various germination indices and lessened the detrimental effects of salinity stress on germination traits. For six hours, 0.5 mM was the ideal concentration for salicylic acid priming. Overall, the findings demonstrated that seed priming with salicylic acid can be used to lessen the detrimental effects of salinity stress on triticale seedling growth and seed germination under salinity stress conditions [73].
Similar results showed that SA’s beneficial effects result in a significant increase in total biomass when wheat seeds are pretreated with SA [74]. Crucially, SA pretreatment has been shown to increase the length of wheat seedlings cultivated under drought and salt stress conditions, thereby assisting wheat in surviving and competing in stressful environments [75]. These findings corroborated earlier studies that demonstrated the significant positive impact of SA pre-sowing treatment on all assessed growth factors and sweet pepper germination rates [76]. Furthermore, higher levels of cell division in seedlings and roots may be linked to increased germination in stressed seeds, which would boost the growth of wheat seedlings cultivated from SA-primed seeds and minimize membrane damage [77]. Additionally, lettuce’s resistance to cadmium toxicity increased when SA seed priming was applied [78]. Regarding this, plants exposed to 5 mM cadmium that were cultivated from seeds primed with SA showed an increase in germination rate and biomass. As was already mentioned, presoaking seeds with SA caused vital nutrients to be transported into the tissues of the seedlings, increasing the amounts of Fe, Mg, Ca, and K. Therefore, the increased H+-ATPase activity may be the cause of the stimulation of nutrient mobilization in barley seedlings that germinated from primed seeds. Similarly, it was observed that SA markedly enhanced the activity of H+-ATPase in the roots of peanut plants [79]. Furthermore, SA has been shown to improve cellular ion homeostasis by reducing excess Na+ influx and promoting K+ influx in aerial plant parts by bending the affinity of non-specific cation channels towards K+ [80]. Some authors demonstrated that SA reduced the oxidative stress caused by NaCl, as evidenced by decreased lipid peroxidation levels. On the other hand, it has been acknowledged that seed priming with SA contributes to the improvement of plant resistance and is crucial for boosting antioxidant defense and preventing the buildup of sodium [81]. Baby corn cultivated from SA-primed and salt-treated seeds showed a similar pattern. The higher ionic content was thought to be responsible for this advantageous effect, which raised the K/Na ratio and reduced Na accumulation [82]. Moreover, it has been noted in Hordeum vulgare and Iris pseudacorus that SA pretreatment strengthened defense systems and lessened the adverse effects of salt stress [83,84]. SA could also be related to plant acclimation to saline conditions. In this context, NaCl-adapted tomato cells contain a lower concentration of SA than unadapted cells. The adaptation process to NaCl was also related to a higher antioxidative capacity [85].

5. Conclusions

One of the main abiotic factors impeding sustainable agriculture is salinity stress, which prevents barley seedlings from germinating and growing early. Salt did, in fact, lower the rate of seed germination, the average daily germination rate, and the growth of seedlings. Additionally, it caused oxidative stress, marked by elevated MDA and electrolyte leakage, and restricted the absorption of vital mineral elements. The impact of SA pretreatment under salinity stress was examined in this study. The growth of barley seedlings under various salt treatments was significantly enhanced by this plant hormone. Indeed, compared to unprimed seeds, stressed seedlings from SA-primed seeds demonstrated a higher tolerance to NaCl. By raising the content of Fe, Ca, Mg, and K and preventing the buildup of Na, SA provides resistance to salt stress.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy15010154/s1, Table S1. Principal Component Analysis. Table S2. Table of Component Weights. Table S3a. This table shows the scores of the principal components in both barley species: Hordeum vulgare and Hordeum maritimum. Table S3b. ANOVA table for the component 1 scores according to the treatments. Table S3c. Multiple comparisons test for the component 1 scores by treatments using Tukey HSD method for both barley species Hordeum vulgare and Hordeum maritimum. Table S3d. ANOVA table for the component 2 scores according to the treatments. Table S3e. Multiple comparisons test for the component 2 scores by treatments using Tukey HSD method for both barley species H. vulgare and H. maritimum. Table S4. Principal Component Analysis. Table S5. Table of Component Weights. Table S6a. This table shows the scores of the principal components. Table S6b. ANOVA table for the component 1 scores according to the treatments. Table S6c. Multiple comparisons test for the component 1 scores by treatments using Tukey HSD method. Table S6d. ANOVA table for the component 2 scores according to the treatments. Table S6e. Multiple comparisons test for the component 2 scores by treatments using Tukey HSD method. Figure S1. Sedimentation graph. Figure S2. Graphical representation of the principal components marking with lines for each variable and wit points for each score. Figure S3. Sedimentation graph. Figure S4. Graphical representation of the principal components marking with lines for each variable and wit points for each score.

Author Contributions

R.B.Y.: Investigation, writing original draft, writing, review and editing. N.J.: writing original draft and conceptualization. J.R.A.M.: writing, review and editing. C.A.: Supervision. A.A.: writing, review and editing, validation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was conducted in the Laboratory of Extremophile Plants (LPE: Laboratoire des Plantes Extrémophiles, Tunisia) of the Centre of Biotechnology of Borj-Cedria (CBBC: Centre de Biotechnologie de Borj-Cedria, Tunisia), and supported by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (LR15CBBC02).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted in the Laboratory of Extremophile Plants (LPE: Laboratoire des Plantes Extremophiles, Tunisia) of the Centre of Biotechnology of Borj-Cedria (CBBC: Centre de Biotechnologie de Borj- Cedria, Tunisia). We thank the staff of the Centre of Biotechnology of Borj-Cedria (CBBC) for their technical and administrative support. We thank also the staff of Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura, Spanish National Research Council (CEBAS-CSIC), for its contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Ortuño, M.F.; Bernal-Vicente, A.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Sanchez-Blanco, M.J.; Hernandez, J.A. Plant Responses to Salt Stress: Adaptive Mechanisms. Agronomy 2017, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, H.; Guo, X.; Li, Q.; Lu, Y.; Huang, W.; Zhang, F.; Chen, L.; Liu, R.H.; Yan, S. Integrated Transcriptomic and Metabolic Framework for Carbon Metabolism and Plant Hormones Regulation in Vigna Radiata during Post-Germination Seedling Growth. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Shi, Q.; Yang, F.; Wei, M. Mixed Red and Blue Light Promotes Tomato Seedlings Growth by Influencing Leaf Anatomy, Photosynthesis, CO2 Assimilation and Endogenous Hormones. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 290, 110500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mohamed, I.A.A.; Shalby, N.; El-Badri, A.M.; Batool, M.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z.; Salah, A.; Rady, M.M.; Jie, K.; Wang, B.; et al. RNA-Seq Analysis Revealed Key Genes Associated with Salt Tolerance in Rapeseed Germination through Carbohydrate Metabolism, Hormone, and MAPK Signaling Pathways. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 176, 114262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Daszkowska-Golec, A. Arabidopsis Seed Germination Under Abiotic Stress as a Concert of Action of Phytohormones. OMICS A J. Integr. Biol. 2011, 15, 763–774. Available online: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/omi.2011.0082 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  6. Kaveh, H.; Nemati, H.; Farsi, M.; Jartoodeh, S.V. How Salinity Affect Germination and Emergence of Tomato Lines. J. Biol. Environ. Sci. 2011, 5, 159–163. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ben Youssef, R.; Jelali, N.; Boukari, N.; Albacete, A.; Martinez, C.; Alfocea, F.P.; Abdelly, C. The Efficiency of Different Priming Agents for Improving Germination and Early Seedling Growth of Local Tunisian Barley under Salinity Stress. Plants 2021, 10, 2264. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/10/11/2264 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Alsamadany, H.; Abdulbaki, A.S.; Alzahrani, Y. Unravelling drought and salinity stress responses in barley genotypes: Physiological, biochemical, and molecular insights. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1417021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vineeth, T.V.; Ravikiran, K.T.; Sreekumar, P.M.; Ajay, L.G.; Rathod, K.K. Engineering Salt Tolerance in Crops by CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing Technology: Target Traits, Present Perspective and Future Challenges. In Halophytes vis-à-vis Saline Agriculture: Perspectives and Opportunities for Food Security; Dagar, J.C., Gupta, S.R., Kumar, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 263–284. ISBN 978-981-9731-57-2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pongprayoon, W.; Tisarum, R.; Theerawittaya, C.; Chaum, S. Evaluation and Clustering on Salt-Tolerant Ability in Rice Genotypes (Oryza sativa L. Subsp. Indica) Using Multivariate Physiological Indices. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants. [CrossRef]
  11. Mansour, E.; Moustafa, E.S.A.; Abdul-Hamid, M.I.E.; Ash-shormillesy, S.M.A.I.; Merwad, A.-R.M.A.; Wafa, H.A.; Igartua, E. Field Responses of Barley Genotypes across a Salinity Gradient in an Arid Mediterranean Environment. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 258, 107206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ben Azaiez, F.E.; Ayadi, S.; Capasso, G.; Landi, S.; Paradisone, V.; Jallouli, S.; Esposito, S. Salt Stress Induces Differentiated Nitrogen Uptake and Antioxidant Responses in Two Contrasting Barley Landraces from MENA Region. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1426. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/9/1426 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  13. Guja, L.; Wuhrer, R.; Moran, K.; Dixon, K.W.; Wardell-Johnson, G.; Merritt, D.J. Full Spectrum X-Ray Mapping Reveals Differential Localization of Salt in Germinating Seeds of Differing Salt Tolerance. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2013, 173, 129–142. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/botlinnean/article/173/1/129/2416262 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  14. Zhumabekova, Z.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, C.; Kurmangozhinov, A.; Sarsekova, D. Effects of Sodium Chloride and Sodium Sulfate on Haloxylon ammodendron Seed Germination. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4927. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4927 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  15. Assareh, M.H.; Rasouli, B.; Amiri, B. Effects of NaCl and Na2SO4 on Germination and Initial Growth Phase of HalostachysCaspica. Desert 2010, 15, 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  16. Radić, S.; Štefanić, P.P.; Lepeduš, H.; Roje, V.; Pevalek-Kozlina, B. Salt Tolerance of Centaurea ragusina L. is Associated with Efficient Osmotic Adjustment and Increased Antioxidative Capacity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 87, 39–48. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098847212002092 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  17. Debez, A.; Belghith, I.; Pich, A.; Taamalli, W.; Abdelly, C.; Braun, H.P. High Salinity Impacts Germination of the Halophyte Cakile Maritima but Primes Seeds for Rapid Germination upon Stress Release. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 164, 134–144. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ppl.12679 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  18. Adetunji, A.E.; Adetunji, T.L.; Varghese, B.; Sershen; Pammenter, N.W. Oxidative Stress, Ageing and Methods of Seed Invigoration: An Overview and Perspectives. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2369. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/12/2369 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, S.; Cui, X.; Chen, Y.; Gu, C.; Miao, H.; Gao, H.; Chen, F.; Liu, Z.; Guan, Z.; Fang, W. CgDREBa Transgenic Chrysanthemum Confers Drought and Salinity Tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 74, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gholami, M.; Mokhtarian, F.; Baninasab, B. Seed Halopriming Improves the Germination Performance of Black Seed (Nigella Sativa) under Salinity Stress Conditions. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 18, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hara, M.; Furukawa, J.; Sato, A.; Mizoguchi, T.; Miura, K. Abiotic Stress and Role of Salicylic Acid in Plants. In Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants: Metabolism, Productivity and Sustainability; Ahmad, P., Prasad, M.N.V., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 235–251. ISBN 978-1-4614-0634-1. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hernández, J.A.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Barba-Espín, G. Where Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses Converge: Common Patterns in Response to Salinity and Plum Pox Virus Infection in Pea and Peach Plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2021, 178, 281–292. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/aab.12667 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, K.; Yang, W.; Zhao, B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, P.; Ouyang, Y.; Chang, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; et al. The Kelch-F-Box Protein SMALL AND GLOSSY LEAVES 1 (SAGL1) Negatively Influences Salicylic Acid Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis Thaliana by Promoting the Turn-over of Transcription Factor SYSTEMIC ACQUIRED RESISTANCE DEFICIENT 1 (SARD1). New Phytol. 2022, 235, 885–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saleem, M.; Fariduddin, Q.; Castroverde, C.D.M. Salicylic Acid: A Key Regulator of Redox Signalling and Plant Immunity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 168, 381–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kachroo, A.; Liu, H.; Yuan, X.; Kurokawa, T.; Kachroo, P. Systemic Acquired Resistance-Associated Transport and Metabolic Regulation of Salicylic Acid and Glycerol-3-Phosphate. Essays Biochem. 2022, 66, 673–681. Available online: https://portlandpress.com/essaysbiochem/article-abstract/66/5/673/231618/Systemic-acquired-resistance-associated-transport (accessed on 11 November 2024). [PubMed]
  26. Rady, M.M.; Mohamed, G.F. Modulation of Salt Stress Effects on the Growth, Physio-Chemical Attributes and Yields of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plants by the Combined Application of Salicylic Acid and Moringa Oleifera Leaf Extract. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 193, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jelali, N.; Ben Youssef, R.; Boukari, N.; Zorrig, W.; Dhifi, W.; Abdelly, C. Salicylic Acid and H2O2 Seed Priming Alleviates Fe Deficiency through the Modulation of Growth, Root Acidification Capacity and Photosynthetic Performance in Sulla Carnosa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 159, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, J.; Sun, M.; Purcell, J.E.; Chai, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, A. Effect of Salinity and Light Intensity on Somatic Growth and Podocyst Production in Polyps of the Giant Jellyfish NemopilemaNomurai (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae). Hydrobiologia 2015, 754, 75–83. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10750-014-2087-y (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, J.; Qiu, G.; Liu, C.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Fu, Q.; Guo, B. Salicylic Acid, a Multifaceted Hormone, Combats Abiotic Stresses in Plants. Life 2022, 12, 886. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/6/886 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  30. Myers, R.J., Jr.; Fichman, Y.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Mittler, R. Jasmonic Acid and Salicylic Acid Modulate Systemic Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling during Stress Responses. Plant Physiol. 2023, 191, 862–873. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/plphys/article/191/2/862/6730771 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Shaukat, K.; Zahra, N.; Hafeez, M.B.; Naseer, R.; Batool, A.; Batool, H.; Raza, A.; Wahid, A. Chapter 2—Role of Salicylic Acid–Induced Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Underlying Mechanisms in Plants. In Emerging Plant Growth Regulators in Agriculture; Aftab, T., Naeem, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 73–98. ISBN 978-0-323-91005-7. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lukan, T.; Coll, A. Intertwined Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species and Salicylic Acid Signaling Are Crucial for the Plant Response to Biotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5568. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/10/5568 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Khan, M.; Iqbal, R.; Poor, P.; Janda, T. Salicylic Acid: A Versatile Signaling Molecule in Plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 1887–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kaur, H.; Hussain, S.J.; Kaur, G.; Poor, P.; Alamri, S.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Khan MI, R. Salicylic Acid Improves Nitrogen Fixation, Growth, Yield and Antioxidant Defence Mechanisms in Chickpea Genotypes Under Salt Stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 2034–2047. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00344-022-10592-7 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  35. Tariq, R.M.S.; Ahmad, T.; Ayub, M.A.; Dogar, W.A.; Ahmad, Z.; Aslam, M.M. Management of Abiotic Stress Conditions by Salicylic Acid. In Plant Abiotic Stress Physiology; Apple Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; ISBN 978-1-00-318057-9. [Google Scholar]
  36. Barba-Espín, G.; Clemente-Moreno, M.J.; Alvarez, S.; García-Legaz, M.F.; Hernández, J.A.; Díaz-Vivancos, P. Salicylic Acid Negatively Affects the Response to Salt Stress in Pea Plants. Plant Biol. 2011, 13, 909–917. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00461.x (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Afzal, I.; Javed, T.; Amirkhani, M.; Taylor, A.G. Modern Seed Technology: Seed Coating Delivery Systems for Enhancing Seed and CropPerformance. Agriculture 2020, 10, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xue, J.; Ma, X.; Hou, Z.; Guo, M.; Zhang, X. Experimental Study on the Pelleting and Coating Performance of Red Clover Seeds. Coatings 2024, 14, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nasri, N.; Kaddour, R.; Mahmoudi, H.; Baatour, O.; Bouraoui, N.; Lachaâl, M. The Effect of Osmopriming on Germination, Seedling Growth and Phosphatase Activities of Lettuce under Saline Condition. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 14366–14372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Osborne, J.M.; Fox, J.E.D.; Mercer, S. Germination Response under Elevated Salinities of Six Semi-Arid Bluebush Species (Western Australia). SpringerLink. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-011-1858-3_35 (accessed on 11 November 2024).
  41. Farhat, N.; Sassi, H.; Zorrig, W.; Abdelly, C.; Barhoumi, Z.; Smaoui, A.; Rabhi, M. Is Excessive Ca the Main Factor Responsible for Mg Deficiency in Sulla Carnosa on Calcareous Soils? J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 1483–1490. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11368-015-1101-y (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  42. Dionisio-Sese, M.L.; Tobita, S. Effects of Salinity on Sodium Content and Photosynthetic Responses of Rice Seedlings Differing in Salt Tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 2000, 157, 54–58. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0176161700801352 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  43. Buege, J.A.; Aust, S.D. [30] Microsomal Lipid Peroxidation. In Methods in Enzymology; Fleischer, S., Packer, L., Eds.; Biomembranes—Part C: Biological Oxidations; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1978; Volume 52, pp. 302–310. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mahboob, W.; Shirazi, M.; Khan, A. Characterization of Salt Tolerant Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes on the Basis of Physiological Attributes. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2017, 19, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gupta, B.; Huang, B. Mechanism of Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Characterization. Int. J. Genom. 2014, 2014, 701596. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/2014/701596 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jamil, A.; Riaz, S.; Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Gene Expression Profiling of Plants under Salt Stress. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 30, 435–458. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07352689.2011.605739 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, D.; Li, W.; Xin, C.; Tang, W.; Eneji, A.E.; Dong, H. Lint Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Field-Grown Cotton Vary with Soil Salinity and Nitrogen Application Rate. Field Crops Res. 2012, 138, 63–70. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429012002997 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  48. Easton, L.C.; Kleindorfer, S. Effects of Salinity Levels and Seed Mass on Germination in Australian Species of Frankenia L. (Frankeniaceae). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 65, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Saha, N.R.; Farabi, S.; Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Yasmin, S.; Haque, M.S. Screening of Salt-Tolerant Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through Morphological and Molecular Markers. Cereal Res. Commun. 2023, 51, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Karmous, A.; Berbezier, I.; Ronda, A.; Hull, R.; Graham, J. Ordering of Ge Nanocrystals Using FIB Nanolithography. Surf. Sci. 2007, 601, 2769–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zafar, S.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Niaz, M.; Kausar, A.; Hussain, J. Evaluation of wheat genotypes for salinity tolerance using physiological indices as screening tool. Pak. J. Bot 2015, 47, 397–405. [Google Scholar]
  52. EL Sabagh, A.; Islam, M.S.; Skalicky, M.; Ali Raza, M.; Singh, K.; Anwar Hossain, M.; Hossain, A.; Mahboob, W.; Iqbal, M.A.; Ratnasekera, D.; et al. Salinity Stress in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Changing Climate: Adaptation and Management Strategies. Front. Agron. 2021, 3, 661932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Seleiman, M.; Aslam, M.T.; Alhammad, B.; Hassan, M.; Chattha, M.; Khan, I.; Gitari, H.; Uslu, Ö.; Roy, R.; Battaglia, M. Salinity Stress in Wheat: Effects, Mechanisms and Management Strategies. Phyton-Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 91, 667–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hajji, M.; Grignon, C. The Control of Transpiration by NaCl and Its Effects on K Super (+) in Rose-Laurel Leaves. ACTA Oecoloecol. Plant 1987, 8, 245–256. [Google Scholar]
  55. Soltani, A.; Hajji, M.; Grignon, C. Recherche de facteurs limitant la nutrition en milieu sale. Agronomie 1990, 10, 857–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jiang, W.; Jin, R.; Wang, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Liu, M.; Tang, Z. A Novel High-Affinity Potassium Transporter IbHKT-like Gene Enhances Low-Potassium Tolerance in Transgenic Roots of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). Plants 2022, 11, 1389. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/11/1389 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  57. Dave, A.; Agarwal, P.; Agarwal, P.K. Mechanism of High Affinity Potassium Transporter (HKT) towards Improved Crop Productivity in Saline Agricultural Lands. 3 Biotech 2022, 12, 51. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13205-021-03092-0 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ahanger, M.A.; Aziz, U.; Alsahli, A.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Influence of Exogenous Salicylic Acid and Nitric Oxide on Growth, Photosynthesis, and Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle in Salt Stressed Vigna Angularis. Biomolecules 2019, 10, 42. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/1/42 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kanazawa, K.; Sakakibara, H. High Content of Dopamine, a Strong Antioxidant, in Cavendish Banana. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 48, 844–848. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf9909860 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hernandez, J.R.; Amado, M.; Perez-Gonzalez, F. DCT-Domain Watermarking Techniques for Still Images: Detector Performance Analysis and a New Structure. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000, 9, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Miller, G.A.D.; Suzuki, N.; Ciftci-Yilmaz SU LT, A.N.; Mittler RO, N. Reactive Oxygen Species Homeostasis and Signalling during Drought and Salinity Stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 453–467. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bonnefont-Rousselot, D.; Raji, B.; Walrand, S.; Gardès-Albert, M.; Jore, D.; Legrand, A.; Peynet, J.; Vasson, M.P. An Intracellular Modulation of Free Radical Production Could Contribute to the Beneficial Effects of Metformin towards Oxidative Stress. Metabolism 2003, 52, 586–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ranieri, A.; Castagna, A.; Pacini, J.; Baldan, B.; Mensuali Sodi, A.; Soldatini, G.F. Early Production and Scavenging of Hydrogen Peroxide in the Apoplast of Sunflower Plants Exposed to Ozone. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 2529–2540, Oxford Academic. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/54/392/2529/621941 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Amdouni, T.; Ben, A.; Chebbi, M.; Merck, F.; Msilini, N. Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activities of the Medicinal Plant Ruta Chalepensis L. Grown under Saline Conditions. Agrochimica 2016, 60, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rodríguez-Serrano, M.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Zabalza, A.; Corpas, F.J.; Gomez, M.; Del Rio, L.A.; Sandalio, L.M. Cadmium Effect on Oxidative Metabolism of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Roots. Imaging of Reactive Oxygen Species and Nitric Oxide Accumulation in Vivo. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1532–1544. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01531.x (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  66. Moradi, F.; Ismail, A.M. Responses of Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll Fluorescence and ROS-Scavenging Systems to Salt Stress During Seedling and Reproductive Stages in RiceMoradi and Ismail—Responses of Rice to SalinityMoradi and Ismail—Responses of Rice to Salinity. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99, 1161–1173. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/aob/article/99/6/1161/2769280 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  67. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M.; Ahmad, P.; Chandna, R.; Prasad MN, V.; Ozturk, M. Enhancing Plant Productivity Under Salt Stress: Relevance of Poly-Omics. Salt Stress Plants Signal. Omics Adapt. 2013, pp. 113–156. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4614-6108-1_6 (accessed on 11 November 2024).
  68. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Hossain, M.A.; Fujita, M. Nitric Oxide Modulates Antioxidant Defense and the Methylglyoxal Detoxification System and Reduces Salinity-Induced Damage of Wheat Seedlings. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2011, 5, 353–365. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11816-011-0189-9 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  69. Zou, P.; Li, K.; Liu, S.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Xing, R.; Li, P. Effect of Sulfated Chitooligosaccharides on Wheat Seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) under Salt Stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 2815–2821. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05624 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Abdelrady, W.A.; Ma, Z.; Elshawy, E.E.; Wang, L.; Askri SM, H.; Ibrahim, Z.; Shamsi, I.H. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of salt tolerance in barley under salinity stress. Plant Stress 2024, 11, 100403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Martín-Mex, R.; Nexticapan-Garcéz, Á.; Villanueva-Couoh, E.; Uicab-Quijano, V.; Vergara-Yoisura, S.; Larqué-Saavedra, A. Salicylic Acid Stimulates Flowering in Micropopagated Gloxinia Plants. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 2015, 38, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shakirova, F.M.; Sakhabutdinova, A.R.; Bezrukova, M.V.; Fatkhutdinova, R.A.; Fatkhutdinova, D.R. Changes in the Hormonal Status of Wheat Seedlings Induced by Salicylic Acid and Salinity. Plant Sci. 2003, 164, 317–322. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168945202004156 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  73. Haghighi, A.; Siadat, S.; Moshatati, A.; Mousavi, S. The Effect of Salicylic Acid Priming on Germination Indices and Seed Vigor of Triticale under Salt Stress. J. Seed Res. 2023, 12, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hamid, M.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Arashad, M. Influence of Salicylic Acid Seed Priming on Growth and Some Biochemical Attributes in Wheat Grown under Saline Conditions. Pak. J. Bot. Pak. 2008, 40, 361–367. [Google Scholar]
  75. Rizwan, M.; Ali, Q.; Malik, D. Effects of Drought and Salt Stress on Wheat Seedling Growth Related Traits under Salicylic Acid Seed Priming. Int. J. Bot. Stud. 2020, 5, 130–136. [Google Scholar]
  76. Ibrahim, A.; Abdel-Razzak, H.; Wahb-Allah, M.; Alenazi, M.; Alsadon, A.; Dewir, Y.H. Improvement in Growth, Yield, and Fruit Quality of Three Red Sweet Pepper Cultivars by Foliar Application of Humic and Salicylic Acids. HortTechnology 2019, 29, 170–178. Available online: https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/29/2/article-p170.xml (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  77. (PDF) Salicylic Acid Seed Priming Modulates Some Biochemical Parametrs to Improve Germination and Seedling Growth of Salt Stressed Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328534999_Salicylic_acid_seed_priming_modulates_some_biochemical_parametrs_to_improve_germination_and_seedling_growth_of_salt_stressed_wheat_Triticum_aestivum_L (accessed on 11 November 2024).
  78. Šabanović, M.; Parić, A.; Briga, M.; Karalija, E. Effect of Salicylic Acid Seed Priming on Lettuce Resistance to High Levels of Cadmium (Lactuca sativa L.). Genet. Appl. 2018, 2, 67–72. Available online: https://genapp.ba/editions/index.php/journal/article/view/112 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  79. Dong, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, F.; Wan, Y. Effects of Exogenous Salicylic Acid and Nitric Oxide on Peanut Seedlings Growth under Iron Deficiency. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2016, 47, 2490–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jayakannan, M.; Bose, J.; Babourina, O.; Rengel, Z.; Shabala, S. Salicylic Acid in Plant Salinity Stress Signalling and Tolerance. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 76, 25–40. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10725-015-0028-z (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  81. Guo, B.; Liang, Y.; Zhu, Y. Does Salicylic Acid Regulate Antioxidant Defense System, Cell Death, Cadmium Uptake and Partitioning to Acquire Cadmium Tolerance in Rice? J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 20–31. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176161708000175 (accessed on 11 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  82. Islam, A.T.M.T.; Ullah, H.; Himanshu, S.K.; Tisarum, R.; Chaum, S.; Datta, A. Effect of Salicylic Acid Seed Priming on Morpho-Physiological Responses and Yield of Baby Corn under Salt Stress. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 304, 111304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Torun, H.; Novák, O.; Mikulík, J.; Pěnčík, A.; Strnad, M.; Ayaz, F.A. Timing-dependent effects of salicylic acid treatment on phytohormonal changes, ROS regulation, and antioxidant defense in salinized barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Liu, T.; Li, T.; Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Liu, S.; Yang, S.; Zou, N. Exogenous salicylic acid alleviates the accumulation of pesticides and miti gates pesticide-induced oxidative stress in cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Molina, A.; Bueno, P.; Marín, M.C.; Rodriguez-Rosales, M.P.; Belver, A.; Venema, K.; Donaire, J.P. Involvement of endogenous salicylic acid content, lipoxygenase and antioxidant enzyme activ ities in the response of tomato cell suspension cultures to NaCl. New Phytol. 2002, 156, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on the final germination rate (%) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum (A) and Hordeum vulgare (B), grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 1. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on the final germination rate (%) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum (A) and Hordeum vulgare (B), grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Agronomy 15 00154 g001
Figure 2. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on the Mean Daily Germination of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum (A) and Hordeum vulgare (B), grown under salinity stress. Values are means of three replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 2. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on the Mean Daily Germination of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum (A) and Hordeum vulgare (B), grown under salinity stress. Values are means of three replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Agronomy 15 00154 g002aAgronomy 15 00154 g002b
Figure 3. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on the length of radicles (A,B) and coleoptiles (C,D) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five replicates from three independent experiments ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 3. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on the length of radicles (A,B) and coleoptiles (C,D) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five replicates from three independent experiments ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Agronomy 15 00154 g003
Figure 4. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on dry weight in radicles (A,B) and coleoptiles (C,D) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 4. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on dry weight in radicles (A,B) and coleoptiles (C,D) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Agronomy 15 00154 g004
Figure 5. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on the Membrane Stability Index in radicles (A,B) and coleoptiles (C,D) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 5. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on the Membrane Stability Index in radicles (A,B) and coleoptiles (C,D) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Agronomy 15 00154 g005
Figure 6. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on Malondialdehyde content in radicles (A,B) and coleoptiles (C,D) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 6. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on Malondialdehyde content in radicles (A,B) and coleoptiles (C,D) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Agronomy 15 00154 g006
Figure 7. A principal component analysis of coleoptiles for the different treatments (HV_0 mM NaCl, HV_100 mM NaCl, HV_200 mM NaCl, HV_SA_100 mM NaCl, HV_SA_200 mM NaCl, HM_0 mM NaCl, HM_100 mM NaCl, HM_200 mM NaCl, HM_SA_100 mM NaCl, and HM_SA 200 mM NaCl). Two principal components (PC1 and PC2) resulted in a model that explained 84.47% of the total variance.
Figure 7. A principal component analysis of coleoptiles for the different treatments (HV_0 mM NaCl, HV_100 mM NaCl, HV_200 mM NaCl, HV_SA_100 mM NaCl, HV_SA_200 mM NaCl, HM_0 mM NaCl, HM_100 mM NaCl, HM_200 mM NaCl, HM_SA_100 mM NaCl, and HM_SA 200 mM NaCl). Two principal components (PC1 and PC2) resulted in a model that explained 84.47% of the total variance.
Agronomy 15 00154 g007
Figure 8. A principal component analysis of radicles for the different treatments (HV_0 mM NaCl, HV_100 mM NaCl, HV_200 mM NaCl, HV_SA_100 mM NaCl, HV_SA_200 mM NaCl, HM_0 mM NaCl, HM_100 mM NaCl, HM_200 mM NaCl, HM_SA_100 mM NaCl, and HM_SA 200 mM NaCl). Two principal components (PC1 and PC2) resulted in a model that explained 84.47% of the total variance.
Figure 8. A principal component analysis of radicles for the different treatments (HV_0 mM NaCl, HV_100 mM NaCl, HV_200 mM NaCl, HV_SA_100 mM NaCl, HV_SA_200 mM NaCl, HM_0 mM NaCl, HM_100 mM NaCl, HM_200 mM NaCl, HM_SA_100 mM NaCl, and HM_SA 200 mM NaCl). Two principal components (PC1 and PC2) resulted in a model that explained 84.47% of the total variance.
Agronomy 15 00154 g008
Table 1. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on total Fe, Ca, and Mg content in radicles and coleoptiles of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Table 1. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on total Fe, Ca, and Mg content in radicles and coleoptiles of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Hordeum maritimumHordeum vulgare
TreatmentsFe (µg/g DW)Ca (mg/g DW)Mg (mg/g DW)Fe (µg/g DW)Ca (mg/g DW)Mg (mg/g DW)
ControlColeoptile4994 ± 29 a18.25 ± 1.2 a22.73 ± 1.5 ab1178 ± 34 a0.887 ± 0.049 a0.228 ± 0.026 a
Radicle2920 ± 45 b13.32 ± 1.26 c25.15 ± 1.33 ab992 ± 24 b0.791 ± 0.023 a0.217 ± 0.024 ab
C+100 mM NaClColeoptile2639 ± 141 d11.68 ± 0.59 c16.19 ± 1.11 c851 ± 26 d0.579 ± 0.057 b0.187 ± 0.017 b
Radicle1919 ± 161 d8.84 ± 1.14 d17.58 ± 0.74 c921 ± 43 c0.314 ± 0.03 c0.166 ± 0.009 c
C+200 mM NaClColeoptile1414 ± 213 e7.60 ± 0.59 d10.65 ± 1.11 d725 ± 19 e0.473 ± 0.057 e0.115 ± 0.017 c
Radicle1276 ± 90 e5.66 ± 1.14 e11.62 ± 0.74 d646 ± 33.92 d0.481 ± 0.03 b0.113 ± 0.009 d
SA+100 mM NaClColeoptile3842 ± 251 b17.94 ± 0.59 a24.21 ± 1.83 a1078 ± 50 b0.750 ± 0.066 a0.212 ± 0.022 a
Radicle3171 ± 102 a15.39 ± 0.65 b26.81 ± 1.63 a1080 ± 27 b0.401 ± 0.024 b0.230 ± 0.011 a
SA+200 mM NaClColeoptile3021 ± 253 c15.63 ± 0.39 b20.83 ± 1.37 b1013 ± 39 c0.598 ± 0.059 b0.228 ± 0.024 a
Radicle2563 ± 121 c14.53 ± 1.73 bc21.82 ± 3.79 b925 ± 31 c0.222 ± 0.013 d0.197 ± 0.018 b
Table 2. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on Na and K content and Na/K and Ca/Na ratios in radicles and coleoptiles of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Table 2. Effect of SA seed priming and no pretreatment (Control: C) on Na and K content and Na/K and Ca/Na ratios in radicles and coleoptiles of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare, grown under salinity stress. Values are means of five independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Hordeum maritimumHordeum vulgare
TreatmentsFe (µg/g DW)Ca (mg/g DW)Mg (mg/g DW)Fe (µg/g DW)Ca (mg/g DW)Mg (mg/g DW)Fe (µg/g DW)Ca (mg/g DW)
ControlColeoptile0.066 ± 0.005 e0.900 ± 0.036 a0.073 ± 0.007 e276 ± 17 a0.114 ± 0.015 e1.296 ± 0.056 a0.088 ± 0.013 d160 ± 14 a
Radicle0.085 ± 0.011 e0.778 ± 0.048 a0.054 ± 0.044 e156 ± 9 a0.134 ± 0.011 e0.963 ± 0.033 a0.139 ± 0.010 d99 ± 6 a
C+100 mM NaClColeoptile0.879 ± 0.049 b0.655 ± 0.024 d1.346 ± 0.116 c13 ± 2 d1.397 ± 0.100 b1.191 ± 0.030 b1.173 ± 0.081 b8 ± 1.6 d
Radicle0.539 ± 0.023 c0.365 ± 0.021 c1.464 ± 0.157 c16 ± 2 d0.942 ± 0.058 b0.897 ± 0.034 b1.050 ± 0.070 b9 ± 1.2 d
Coleoptile1.631 ± 0.042 a0.459 ± 0.13 e3.550 ± 0.058 a4 ± 0.7 e1.963 ± 0.059 a0.871 ± 0.067 d2.265 ± 0.169 a3 ± 0.6 e
C+200 mM NaClRadicle1.01 ± 0.023 a0.151 ± 0.014 e6.739 ± 0.587 a5 ± 0.9 e1.134 ± 0.058 a0.720 ± 0.040 d1.579 ± 0.091 a4 ± 0.5 e
SA+100 mM NaClColeoptile0.506 ± 0.054 d0.812 ± 0.035 b0.623 ± 0.069 d35 ± 3 b0.792 ± 0.073 d1.262 ± 0.062 ab0.631 ± 0.082 c22 ± 1.5 b
Radicle0.293 ± 0.015 d0.485 ± 0.018 b0.606 ± 0.044 d52 ± 8 b0.762 ± 0.040 d0.914 ± 0.039 ab0.836 ± 0.070 c20 ± 1.8 b
SA+200 mM NaClColeoptile0.785 ± 0.053 c0.705 ± 0.035 c1.334 ± 0.099 b19 ± 3 c1.181 ± 0.055 c1.023 ± 0.062 c1.158 ± 0.090 b13 ± 0.8 c
Radicle0.619 ± 0.027 b0.276 ± 0.018 d1.960 ± 0.195 b23 ± 2 c0.846 ± 0.034 c0.780 ± 0.039 c1.088 ± 0.088 b17 ± 1.3 c
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ben Youssef, R.; Jelali, N.; Acosta Motos, J.R.; Abdelly, C.; Albacete, A. Salicylic Acid Seed Priming: A Key Frontier in Conferring Salt Stress Tolerance in Barley Seed Germination and Seedling Growth. Agronomy 2025, 15, 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010154

AMA Style

Ben Youssef R, Jelali N, Acosta Motos JR, Abdelly C, Albacete A. Salicylic Acid Seed Priming: A Key Frontier in Conferring Salt Stress Tolerance in Barley Seed Germination and Seedling Growth. Agronomy. 2025; 15(1):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ben Youssef, Rim, Nahida Jelali, Jose Ramón Acosta Motos, Chedly Abdelly, and Alfonso Albacete. 2025. "Salicylic Acid Seed Priming: A Key Frontier in Conferring Salt Stress Tolerance in Barley Seed Germination and Seedling Growth" Agronomy 15, no. 1: 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010154

APA Style

Ben Youssef, R., Jelali, N., Acosta Motos, J. R., Abdelly, C., & Albacete, A. (2025). Salicylic Acid Seed Priming: A Key Frontier in Conferring Salt Stress Tolerance in Barley Seed Germination and Seedling Growth. Agronomy, 15(1), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop