Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analyses Reveal the Mechanism of Changes in the Sugar Constituents of Jujube Fruits under Saline–Alkali Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Industrial-Scale Composting of Rice Straw and Sewage Sludge
Previous Article in Journal
Agrobacterium rhizogenes-Mediated Genetic Transformation and Establishment of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome-Editing Technology in Limonium bicolor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy to Assess Compost Maturity Degree during Composting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Spectroscopy Techniques for Monitoring the Composting Process: A Review

by
Andrés Pérez-San Martín
1,2,3,
Frutos C. Marhuenda-Egea
4,
Maria Angeles Bustamante
5 and
Gustavo Curaqueo
2,3,*
1
Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Católica de Temuco, P.O. Box 15-D, Temuco 4813302, Chile
2
Grupo de Investigación en Sustentabilidad Agrícola, Universidad Católica de Temuco, P.O. Box 15-D, Temuco 4813302, Chile
3
Departamento de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Acuícolas & Núcleo de Investigación en Producción Alimentaria, Universidad Católica de Temuco, P.O. Box 15-D, Temuco 4813302, Chile
4
Department of Agrochemistry and Biochemistry, Multidisciplinary for Environmental Studies Ramón Margalef, 03690 Alicante, Spain
5
Centro de Investigación e Innovación Agroalimentaria y Agroambiental (CIAGRO-UMH), Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03312 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(9), 2245; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092245
Submission received: 20 July 2023 / Revised: 24 August 2023 / Accepted: 25 August 2023 / Published: 27 August 2023

Abstract

:
Composting is described as a sustainable alternative to organic waste reuse from the agricultural and household sectors. The organic matter degradation and stabilization product presents great variability due to the waste composition used. Thus, the use of techniques that allow the monitoring of the decomposition process is necessary to determine the quality of the final product. Therefore, this review critically analyzes and updates the chemical spectroscopy methods described for the evaluation of the organic matter transformation in the composting process to optimize and generate amendments for agricultural use. This review examines spectroscopic techniques such as ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis), infrared (IR), fluorescence, and 13C NMR reported for the evolution and maturation of carbonate structures in composting. In addition, they are used in the study of indicators for monitoring the degradation of complex structures, such as sugars and proteins, for the formation of precursors that are responsible for the formation of highly stabilized substances such as humic and fulvic compounds. Finally, these parameters may be used to elucidate organic matter degradation and its stabilization process, establish patterns that characterize each stage of composting along with its physicochemical characteristics, and monitor potential phytotoxicity levels.

1. Introduction

The worldwide population growth is estimated at around 26% by 2050 [1]. This would imply an increase in food production of almost 70% through agricultural systems [2]. This scenario represents a challenge regarding soil nutrition, the capacity to support the intensification level and ecosystem pressure, and the increased organic wastes generated by the industrial and/or household sector [3]. Therefore, an increase in agricultural production could impact soil degradation due to the application of agrochemicals and intensive management [4]. Thus, from the crop’s perspective, the nutrient uptake from the soil system can become a limiting factor [5]. Hence, sustainable alternatives are required that are capable of addressing the recycling of nutrients while minimizing the environmental impact [6].
In this sense, composting is an economic and controlled method for handling and converting organic matter from waste. This is defined as an aerobic biological control process of the decomposition of organic matter in a stable amendment with high fertilization value [7]. This occurs as a natural process that can be enhanced by adding different types of organic or biological substrates that optimize the development of microbial communities and favor the degradation of organic matter [8]. This generates a product high in bioavailable nutrients, free of pathogenic microorganisms and phytotoxicity with potential agronomic use [9], which is considered a natural alternative to chemical fertilizers, involving the concept of the circular economy [10].
Furthermore, due to the variability and characteristics of the residues used in the composting process, different parameters are analyzed to determine the stability, maturity, and quality of the composted product in each bio-oxidative and maturity stage [11]. This includes various analytical methodologies such as chromatography techniques, spectroscopy, or microbiological sequencing associated with the metabolic response, which allow the evaluation of their physical-chemical and biochemical process [12,13]. However, using a single method to investigate the decomposition process is insufficient. Integrating spectroscopic techniques to complement traditional methods is recommended as a better way to characterize the humification degree and organic matter stability [14]. Thus, spectroscopy methods have been incorporated due to their multiple advantages, such as short analysis time, minimal sample quantity, non-destructive sample, environmentally friendly, and experimental reproducibility [15].
These analyses include UV-Vis spectroscopy to evaluate the organic matter humification degree [16]. Infra-red (IR) spectroscopy for the monitoring of functional groups associated with the transformation of organic substances [17]. Fluorescence spectroscopy for the analysis of fluorescent compounds such as amino acids, proteins, and humic and fulvic substances [18]. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is associated with the study of carbon structures to analyze the transformation of aliphatic compounds and aromaticity degree [19]. Thus, spectroscopy methods are established as comparative and descriptive methods that allow the complementation of results for monitoring the composting process and its different residues [15].
In turn, compost quality standards are associated with the transformation and humification of organic matter; otherwise, they could generate serious levels of phytotoxicity due to the presence of non-stabilized substances and pathogens [20]. Furthermore, the formation of humic and fulvic compounds is an indicator of highly condensed structures rich in carboxylic, phenolic, hydroxylic, and quinonyl groups of potential benefit in soils and crops [21,22]. However, some studies suggest that traditional humic substance fractions may be assigned to intact and degrading microbial and plant biopolymers [23].
Therefore, this review is focused on a critical and updated analysis of the chemical spectroscopy methods described for the evaluation of the organic matter transformation in the composting process to optimize and generate amendments for agricultural use.

2. Composting Process

Composting has become an important alternative worldwide for the reduction and reuse of waste generated in the industrial and household sectors. Highlighted as a sustainable, economical, and controlled method for managing organic matter degradation [24] to increase eco-friendly practices and circular economy within productive processes [25]. It is defined as an aerobic biological process of organic matter decomposition to a stable form with a high content of humic and fulvic substances [21]. A transformation that occurs naturally and can be enhanced or accelerated by adding different organic waste types and inoculums that optimize microbial growth and favor substrate degradation [26,27].
On the other hand, the process effectiveness and product quality will be related to the development of each stage. First, the bio-oxidative stage consists of three phases (mesophilic, thermophilic, and cooling) differentiated by the temperature reached during the decomposition process of simple and complex organic matter [28]. Then, it ends with the maturity stage, where the reorganization and condensation of organic matter into stabilized compounds such as humic and fulvic substances is highlighted [29].
Thus, among the characteristics provided by mature compost to the soil matrix are its physical properties. It highlights that facilitating soil management, generating an adequate porosity that improves water retention and gas exchange, reduces the risks of erosion, improves the physicochemical characteristics of the soil, enriches the movement of nutrients, helps regulate soil temperature, and reduces water evaporation, which regulates soil moisture by maintaining a stable balance of microorganisms [7].
Furthermore, the benefits of composting on soil chemical characteristics have been reported [30]. This process contributes to improving the bioavailability of nutrients and optimizes their consumption through a more controlled release, avoiding over-fertilization of the crops [31]. It also improves the cation exchange capacity, increases soil fertility, and is a precursor of biostimulant substances for the reduction of the phytotoxic effects of residues caused by high concentrations of salinity, heavy metals, antibiotics, and/or pathogenic microorganisms [32,33].
Besides, compost is beneficial for biological and enzymatic activity, being a suitable medium for the development of microbial communities and as a contribution of microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi to the soil matrix, which also have suppressive properties capable of competing against plant pathogens [34].
Optimal development of these properties requires monitoring some key parameters associated with maturity and stability parameters in the composting process (Figure 1). Factors such as pH and temperature are the most important characteristics during composting [26]. These parameters define the metabolic processes and the succession of microbial communities at each stage [35]. Initially, vegetable or food waste is characterized by lowering the pH in the pile due to the release of organic acids in the early stages of degradation [36]. Also, incorrect storage of these wastes can cause the accumulation of acidic substances due to fermentation processes. Consequently, low pH levels in the early stages of composting can inhibit the degradation of organic matter [37] and decrease the temperature of the pile, delaying the transition to the thermophilic stage.
In turn, organic matter is a key factor to consider during the composting process, a parameter related to the C/N ratio that controls the evolution of the microbial community and humification processes [5]. Optimal initial C/N values range from 20 to 30, which avoids N mineralization and immobilization processes [38]. Consequently, the decrease in organic matter content, CO2 formation, N ammonification processes, and volatilization as NH3 form generate a variation in the C/N ratio during the composting process [29].
On the other hand, electrical conductivity reflects the waste mineralization process, and this is associated with salt formation due to the organic matter transformation into inorganic matter by the action of microorganisms [39]. Moreover, cation exchange capacity increases due to the content of polar functional groups such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, and methoxy by the action of raw material biological oxidation [40]. These parameters have a final effect on the germination rate, affecting the stability and maturity of the compost produced, decreasing the concentration of the phytotoxic compound, and favoring the formation of the humic substance [41].
Furthermore, Figure 2 summarizes the main products obtained by the degradation of microbial communities at each stage of the composting process. These results have been adapted from [21,42] in which different ways of formation of humic compounds are proposed considering the environmental variations. The synthesis of these substances is characterized by their particular resistance to degradation and their beneficial properties of agronomic interest in soil quality and against environmental phytotoxicity [21]. Its formation is an indicator parameter of compost stability and maturity, but it has not yet been completely elucidated due to the complexity of the associated biochemical processes [43]. For this reason, some theories have been described in this respect, such as the depolymerization and polymerization theories called lignin-protein theory and sugar-amine condensation theories (Maillard), respectively [44]. The polyphenol theory [21] has been widely accepted, leading to the combination of assumptions and the lignin/phenol-protein theory [45].

3. Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy (UV-Vis)

UV-Vis spectroscopy in composting allows for the detection of the variation in the absorption bands during the process. These bands are related to the degradation of organic matter. They are interpreted as the change of absorption at a given wavelength by the effect of the variation of the electronic structures of the compounds [46]. The UV-Vis spectra have different absorption regions: 280 nm indicates the beginning of the transformation of aliphatic compounds and lignins, 465 nm indicates the beginning of the humification process by depolymerization of complex organic molecules, and 665 nm indicates process humification with high oxygen content and aromatic groups [47,48]. In the UV absorption ranges, high absorbance at wavelengths less than 250 nm is characteristic of humic substances. It is attributed to the absorption of radiation by the double bonds present in aromatic C=C and ketone C=O [49]. For a wavelength of 280 nm, total aromaticity is detected due to the electron transition occurring in the 270–280 nm region for phenolic arenes, benzoic acids, aniline derivatives, polyenes, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with two or more rings [50,51]. Moreover, the absorption band at 365 nm is estimated to be related to the presence of fluorescent humic and fulvic compounds [28].
These parameters have also been interpreted as the relationship ratio between the regions described (Table 1). The first one indicates the ratio between the beginning of the organic matter transformation process and the humification degree. It is expected that the latter will increase at the end of the process, and the transformation process will decrease over time [52]. Thus, research reports the relationship E250/E203 as a measure to evaluate the substitution of aromatic rings and the presence of aliphatic groups. Therefore, polar functional groups are found at higher rates in aromatic rings, such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups [53,54]. In turn, the absorbance ratio of E250/E365 has been described as a way to characterize the aromaticity and the polycondensation degree of organic molecules [55]. The E280/E665 index has been reported to indicate the HA high molecular weight poly-condensed aromatic nucleus [43]. Thus, the E465/E665 index is related to the depolymerization process of organic matter and its transformation into stabilized compounds [52]. In this sense, its decrease is attributed to the absorption of C=C aromatic functional groups, and its increase suggests a low molecular weight and chromophores presence as carboxylic, ketonic, and aromatic groups process [56].
Moreover, E250/E365 and E465/E665 indexes are inversely related to the degree of aromaticity and molecular weight of soil humic substances, i.e., related to that low ratio values are characteristic of humic substances fraction and high humification degree [48]. Furthermore, E250/E436 values are associated with the presence of humic substances derived from organic matter of terrestrial (allochthonous) or microbially derived (autochthonous) origin [51]. Therefore, these indices are related to an increase in the polycondensed aromatic nucleus of humic acids, and high values may suggest the compost formation with high concentrations of phenolic groups, benzene-carboxyl, and methoxy in its structure [43,57].
Some authors [48,51] describe that the relations between E250/E365 and E465/E665 present an inverse tendency with aromaticity, acidity, molecular weight, and proportion in the content of oxygen, carbon, and carboxyl groups. Low values indicate a high condensation degree of aromatic humic components, high molecular weight, and low acidity, characteristic of the humic acid fraction. On the contrary, a high ratio indicates the presence of aliphatic compounds, low molecular weight, and high acidity, characteristic of the fulvic acid fraction.
In turn, another parameter has been described to evaluate organic matter transformation. Specific ultraviolet absorbance (SUVA) is defined as absorbance at a given wavelength normalized by dissolved organic carbon concentration (DOC) [58]. Aromaticity degree can be associated with ranges between 250–280 nm, and SUVA254 is directly related to the percentage of aromaticity of humic substances and molecular weight [59]. Furthermore, SUVA280 has been used to describe the number of aromatic compounds at each stage [60].
Table 1. Summary of the UV-Vis absorption regions described for the composting process.
Table 1. Summary of the UV-Vis absorption regions described for the composting process.
IndicatorDescriptionReferences
Absorption region (nm)
250Absorption of aromatic C=C and ketone groups (C=O).[49]
280Evaluate the beginning of the transformation of aliphatic compounds and lignin—absorption of aromatic groups.[51]
365Related to fluorescent humic-like and fulvic-like substances.[28]
465Indicates the beginning of the process of humification and depolymerization of complex molecules.[47,48]
665Indicates process humification, oxygen content, and aromatic groups.
SUVA254Related to the percentage of aromaticity of humic substances and their molecular weight.[59]
SUVA280Describes the amount of aromaticity present at the stages evaluated.[60]
Ratios
E250/E203Substitution measure of aromatic rings. The high degree indicates a greater presence of polar groups.[53,54]
E250/E365Evaluates the degree of aromaticity of organic molecules and inverse to the degree of humification.[55]
E250/E436Associated with terrestrial origin of humic substances (allochthonous or autochthonous).[51]
E280/E665Indicates the transformation process of humic substances, maintaining a decreasing trend over time.[43,52]
E465/E665Related to the degree of condensation and aromaticity of humic compounds.

4. Infrared Spectroscopy (IR)

IR spectroscopy is obtained from the molecular vibration generated by the different functional groups [61]. In the characterization of the composting process, peaks have been described that can contribute to monitoring the conversion stages of organic matter.
Table 2 describes the main functional groups attributed to these bands and their vibrations. The bands 2964 to 2930 cm−1 describe aliphatic carbon groups attributed to the presence of fatty acids [62]. The constant presence of this signal may be due to the concentration of biodegradable plant material composed of lignins, cutins, and suberins [63].
The signal between 1590 to 1504 cm−1 corresponds to the presence of amide II groups and the lignin and cellulose present in residues containing plant materials such as plants or wood, which are rich in this compound [64]. Another typical band of lignin is caused by the vibration of the aromatic (C=C) skeleton [65]. On the other hand, a band of protein origin can be found in nitrogen-rich composts associated with amide II groups [66]. Overall, the decrease of the 2964 and 1571 cm−1 bands may indicate rapid biodegradation of aliphatic and amide groups in the composting process, and the peak of 1408 cm−1 demonstrates the degradation of organic carbon belonging to carboxyl groups [67,68].
Table 2. Summary wavenumber described for the evaluation of the composting process.
Table 2. Summary wavenumber described for the evaluation of the composting process.
Wavenumber (cm−1)DescriptionReference
3437–3263This occurs due to stretching vibration produced by OH groups of alcohols, phenols, and organic acids.[28,52,53,57,66]
2964–2930Bands corresponding to C-H stretching and asymmetric vibrations in aliphatic structures.
1652–1642Bands produced by stretching vibrations of C=C bonds in aromatic structures by ketone groups such as quinones and amide groups (C-N).
1590–1500Obtained due to the deformation and vibration stretching of amide II groups (N-H) and (C-N) of secondary amides, respectively.
1408Intensity assigned to the vibration asymmetric stretching of carboxyl groups (C-O).
1387Described by the deformation of phenolic OH groups and aromatic alcohols, by the asymmetric stretching of carboxyl ions (COO) of disubstituted aromatic rings, and by the presence of inorganic nitrogen as nitrates.
1116–1003Characteristics of C-O bond stretching vibrations in structures such as polysaccharides, ethers, and secondary alcohols.
Besides, it is possible to generate a relationship between these bands using the relative intensities of each peak. Relationships between 1642/1111 and 1642/1003 ratios indicate the presence of (aromatic C/alcohol C) and (aromatic C/polysaccharide C), respectively. The increase in these values demonstrates that biodegradation of polysaccharides and groups such as alcohol and ether occurs [53]. The transformation of aliphatic carbons to their stabilized form as aromatic carbons due to the degradation process is related to the increase in the 1642/2964 (aromatic C/aliphatic C) ratio [57]. The increase in these ratios is associated with the degradation of organic matter as an energy source for microorganisms, generating an increase in aromatic products during the composting process [28].
The 1387/1544 (phenolic C/aromatic C-N) ratio suggests a direct evaluation of humification degree and the state of maturity due to the increase in aromatic carbon associated with OH groups (phenols), carboxylates (COO), quinones, amides, and nitrates [52]. Finally, the C/N ratio can be attributed to the change in the bands of the 1037/1384 ratio due to carbon source degradation and medium alkalization by the ammonia groups effect [66].

5. Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Fluorescence spectroscopy is a nondestructive method for characterizing organic matter in relation to its important fluorescent compounds, which include humic-like, fulvic-like, and proteinaceous substances [69]. This method is based on the signal interpretation by light emission effect in the process of electronic de-excitation of conjugated systems [70]. It is used to evaluate the humification degree of organic matter in the composting process. Fluorescence in organic matter is related to the condensed aromatic rings presence of unsaturated aliphatic carbon chains [71]. Fluorescence bands at long wavelengths have been described by high molecular weight and complex structural compounds with a high conjugation degree, and fluorescence bands at shorter wavelengths have been described for simple structures and small degrees of conjugated chromophores due to a low degree of aromatic polycondensation [72]. Therefore, the stability of organic matter and the increase in its condensation degree is associated with a chemically stable structure with greater residence in the environment, which contributes to enhancing the structure and fertility of the soil [73]. Thus, different parameters can be obtained from fluorescence spectroscopy associated with organic matter transformation in each stage of the composting process: Emission spectra, Excitation spectra, Synchronous-scan excitation spectra, and Excitation-Emission matrix (EEM).

5.1. Emission and Excitation Spectra

Emission spectra are generated due to the sample's exposure to a specific excitation wavelength and are represented by one or more emission bands. The excitation wavelength for obtaining emission spectra in the composting process analysis is 254 nm. The results reported a fluorescence peak at 340 nm in the initial phase, changing to 430 nm during the process, indicating an increase in the aromatic group condensation due to the maturation of the compost [55]. Thus, the relationship between emission spectra at 450 and 500 nm with an excitation wavelength of 370 nm (F450/F500) has been described. This index investigates the organic matter sources [74] and correlates with humic substances origin. A value less than 1.4 indicates terrestrially derived humic substances, and larger than 1.90 indicates microbially derived humic substances [75]. A high value of this ratio indicates weak aromatic humic substances with less benzene ring structure [76]. In this sense, monitoring of humic substances evaluation has been reported at an excitation wavelength of 360 and 470 nm and fulvic substances at an excitation wavelength of 360 and 468 nm [54,77].
Contrary to emission spectra, excitation spectra are determined using a fixed emission wavelength and the excitation scan at different wavelengths. Moreover, the results obtained can be assimilated to the UV-Vis absorption spectra, the information from which can be used to generate the emission spectra [78]. Studies [14] describe a composting of municipal solid waste, where they evaluate an excitation spectrum of 300 to 500 nm using an emission wavelength of 520 nm. The results reported four major peaks, of which only two were representative. One of these, around 436 nm, was attributed to aromatic rings bearing electron donor groups, and the second at 383 nm, possibly due to fluorophores originating from the polycondensation of carbonyl groups and lignin-derived phenolic structures [79]. These two peaks were associated through the fluorescence ratio determination (I436/I383) that showed an inverse correlation to the SUVA254 indicator and the emission at 351 nm, which are related to the abundance of aromatic carbons and the organic matter humification, respectively [80,81]. In addition to the evaluation of compost, excitation spectra for humic and fulvic acid fractions have also been described. Both describe an excitation range of 300–800 nm, differentiated by the emission wavelength at 590 and 530 nm, respectively [77]. Therefore, it is suggested that these parameters can be used to indicate the degree of stabilization of organic matter associated with its humification degree in the composting process.

5.2. Synchronous-Scan Spectra

Synchronous-scan spectra are generated from the simultaneous detection of excitation and emission scans at a predetermined wavelength difference, favoring signal amplification in trace compounds [82]. In turn, compared with other fluorescence analyses, it is possible to obtain a unique and clear spectrum associated with specific functional groups and chemical structures [83]. Synchronous fluorescence represents the spectra summation of different fluorophores in dissolved organic matter and exhibits better resolution than excitation and emission spectra [14]. This analysis reports the presence of characteristic peaks (Table 3) for the composting process associated with organic matter biodegradation and biosynthesis of humic-like substances [28]. First, a high-intensity Peak A has been reported in the range of 250–308 nm related to the presence of protein-like substances and mono-aromatic compounds, which tends to decrease in the process [28,72].
Furthermore, a Peak B was reported between 308–365 nm attributed to the presence of fulvic-like indicates the presence of polycyclic aromatics with three to four fused benzene rings and two to three conjugated systems in unsaturated aliphatic structures [84,85,86]. The identification of humic-like substances has been reported in Peak C 363–595 nm [14,28] related to the presence of polycyclic aromatic compounds with approximately 5–7 fused benzene rings tend to increase in intensity as the compost matures [85,87]. In turn, fluorescence techniques have been described for the characterization of humic substances in soil analysis due to their strong selectivity, high sensitivity, and no damage to the sample [88].
Table 3. Summary synchronous-scan excitation regions described in the composting process.
Table 3. Summary synchronous-scan excitation regions described in the composting process.
Region (nm)DescriptionReference
250–308Describes the presence of protein-like substances and mono-aromatic compounds, which tend to decrease during composting.[28,72]
308–365Attributed to the presence of fulvic-like acid and polycyclic aromatics with fused benzene rings and conjugated systems in unsaturated aliphatic structures.[84,86]
363–595This region is associated with polycyclic aromatic compounds with fused benzene rings, which increase in proportion to the maturation of the compost.[14,28]

5.3. Excitation-Emission Matrix

Excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectra are obtained by subsequently scanning the emission spectra range by increasing the excitation wavelength. Figure 3 compiles the Excitation-Emission matrix results reported by [89]. These results are represented in a graph divided into five regions. The dissolved organic matter of each region represents particular structures, in the case of the composting process, which can increase or decrease the intensity of fluorescence as it moves towards its maturity stage [68]. These peaks have been mainly associated with organic compounds such as humic and fulvic acid-like amino acids, proteins, or phenolic structures [90].
In this sense, Regions I and II are related to amino acids derived from simple aromatic proteins such as tyrosine and tryptophan with peaks at shorter excitation-emission wavelengths (<250 nm/<350 nm); Region III is described by peaks at shorter excitation wavelengths and longer emission wavelengths (<250 nm/>380 nm) are related to fulvic substances; Region IV is associated with microbial by-product-like material as a result of microbial protein degradation, reporting peaks at intermediate excitation, and shorter emission wavelengths (250~280 nm/<380 nm); Region V includes a longer excitation range and longer emission wavelengths (>280 nm/>380 nm) and is directly associated with humic substances and may even contain part of fulvic substances fluorescence, depending on the intensity of these [14,68,91,92].
In the first stage of composting, it is possible to observe a peak in wavelength pair 219/348 nm (Ex/Em) of greater intensity that extends to Region I, which disappears early in the process and does not report results in the maturation stage [93]. In Region III, a peak in an Ex/Em wavelength pair 220/429 nm can emerge in the early stages of composting and is a monitoring point for fulvic substance formation, reaching a maximum peak during the maturity stage [14]. Then, the quantity of fulvic acids could decrease due to their transformation into humic substances [94]. On the other hand, Region IV registers at the beginning of the composting process a weak signal corresponding to an Ex/Em wavelength pair 278/354 nm that progressively disappears until the maturation stage due to the effect of microbial activity on the organic matter degradation [95]. Finally, in Region V, a peak in Ex/Em wavelength pairs 313/406 nm can be observed, which increases significantly in the early stages of composting with an increase in intensity in the maturity stage, associated with a high degree of process humification [96]. Furthermore, it is possible to observe a peak at an Ex/Em wavelength pair 289/421 nm, indicating the maturation stage due to the organic matter stabilization, which does not occur in earlier stages [14,80,81].

6. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (13C NMR)

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is produced by the reorganization of nuclear spin due to the application of a magnetic field to the nuclei at the low-energy level, which will absorb electromagnetic energy and transit to the high-energy level. When the electromagnetic field disappears, the nucleus releases the absorbed energy, returning to its low-energy state in a process called relaxation. This energy is detected as radiofrequency detects the presence of carbon and its relationship with the functional groups [97].
During the composting process, chemical shifts have been described to monitor the organic matter decomposition and to evaluate structures stabilized over time. Figure 4 summarizes the main chemical shifts reported in the literature, corresponding to carbon monitoring as Alkyl-C (45-0 ppm), methoxyl C (60–45 ppm), aliphatic C substituted with O or N (110–60 ppm), aromatic C (110–145 ppm), phenolic C and aromatic ether substituted with O or N (160–145 ppm) and carbonyl C, carboxyl C, quinones, ester, and amides carbon (210–160 ppm) [19,52,98,99].
Studies performed by [19] describe an increase in polar carbonate structures, such as carboxyl, carbonyl, O-alkyl C, aromatic C, and phenolic C groups, corresponding to the formation of humic and fulvic substances. In contrast, Alkyl C shows a decreasing trend due to the degradation of carbonate structures in the preliminary stages, which can be ascribed to the aliphatic carbons of the methyl terminal groups, lipids, fatty acids groups, and other biopolymers [100]. Besides, O-alkyl C may correspond to carbohydrate carbons substituted with oxygen atoms and polysaccharide structures such as aliphatic alcohols or cellulose [101]. In the case of methoxyl groups and aromatic ethers, it has been reported that they may not present significant changes in the composting process because they are structures resistant to microbial degradation. However, they are structures that participate in the formation of the humic acid [102].
From these chemical shifts, it is possible to determine indicators such as the aromaticity index (Equation (1)), which is reported as the relationship between aromatic C groups and alkyl C groups with a tendency to increase in the final stages of composting [98,103].
Aromatic   index = ( Aromatic   C + Phenolic   C ) ( Alkyl   C + O   alkyl   C + N   alkyl   C + Aromatic   C + Phenolic   C ) × 100
In addition to this indicator, the lignin ratio (Equation (2)) is described as a relationship between methoxyl C and phenolic C to evaluate the degradation of complex carbon structures in the composting process, demonstrating a decrease over time due to the increase of phenolic C structures [99].
Lignin   ratio = Methoxyl   C Phenolic   C
Thus, among the most important aspects to evaluate the maturation degree of the compost is the germination rate, which is one of the most important parameters to determine the stability of the degradation of the organic matter [95]. In this sense, the Humification Index (HI = Fulvic acid carbon/Total organic carbon) and the degree of polymerization (DP = Humic acid carbon/Fulvic acid carbon) are directly related to the germination rate, while HI and DP are positively correlated with the chemical shift aromatic C, phenolic C and O-alkyl C and negatively with C/N ratio, the latter positively correlated with alkyl C [19]. Therefore, it is estimated that aromatic C, phenolic C, and O-alkyl C could be the most important functional groups for the evaluation of the humification degree, and a lower C/N ratio and alkyl C intensity must be obtained at the stage of maturation [103,104].

7. Future Perspectives

Monitoring the composting process evolution is a key factor in evaluating the degree of stability and maturation. These parameters change depending on the conditions of the process (oxygenation, humidity, temperature) and the characteristics of the material or residues used. For these reasons, the high variability that can present a product of another requires the standardization of these conditions to reach the quality points established in each compost. Thus, spectroscopy techniques (Table 4) are an alternative to monitoring the relationship between compost maturity state and synthesis of highly stabilized substances with potential agronomic interest.
Moreover, maintain monitoring residues with potential environmental risk effects such as sludge or sewage material. These substances may contain a high concentration of heavy metals, antibiotics, or the presence of microorganisms pathogenic to humans. Therefore, it requires monitoring to evaluate the reduction of factors that may subsequently affect crops and human consumption, integrating spectroscopy analysis in situations that make it difficult to determine these substances.
Finally, few studies have reported on the use of Raman spectroscopy in compost. Ref. [105] discusses this absence from the perspective of soil analysis. This technique allows a complimentary analysis of IR spectroscopy, identifying the transitions between the state of rotation energy and molecular vibration and being able to characterize functional groups in organic and inorganic samples. In turn, it focused on the determination of microplastics in agro-industrial wastes and their evolution during the composting process.
Among the advantages of this technique are highlighted: presents a low overlap of bands, allowing better detection and characterization of components; does not require prior sample preparation and has no interference from glass containers or aqueous solutions; also, it is possible to quantify the bands obtained and analyze in situ [106]. Thus, it is estimated that the integration of this technique in future analyses could significantly contribute to the characterization of the composting process and the compounds generated by the degradation of organic matter.

8. Conclusions

In conclusion, the composting process has been established as a sustainable alternative within the circular economy for the reduction and treatment of organic waste. Also, it is a useful method for generating soil amendments capable of recycling nutrients from organic waste generated by the agricultural and household sectors. The stabilization of organic matter and correct degradation of complex structures allows the generation of an optimal product, minimizing the probability of environmental impact due to the persistence of phytopathogenic agents or the presence of toxic substances in concentrations that affect soil quality. Spectroscopy techniques such as UV-Vis, IR, Fluorescence, and 13C NMR allow monitoring of the different stages of the composting, showing the stabilization and degradation of organic matter in highly condensed compounds. Each technique establishes a relationship concerning the functional groups and elucidates the part of the structures that are formed as a result of the action of microorganisms on organic waste. Therefore, it is considered that these methodologies establish reliable and complementary quantitative indicators to establish the necessary quality criteria required by a compost.
Finally, more information is needed on studies of Raman spectroscopy in the composting process, as well as a better elucidation of action mechanisms and metabolic pathways associated with each composting process for the formation of humic and fulvic substances. Also, to establish indices to evaluate potential risk substances that affect the germination or contamination of soils and prevent their use as an agronomic amendment.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, A.P.-S.M. and G.C.; review and editing, F.C.M.-E. and M.A.B.; investigation, A.P.-S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID)/Scholarship Program/Doctorado Nacional/2020—21201805 and VIPUCT 2020REGGC07 Project by Universidad Católica de Temuco.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Doctoral Program in Agricultural Sciences of the Universidad Católica de Temuco.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaza, S.; Yao, L.; Bhada-Tata, P.; Van Woerden, F. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; ISBN 9781464813290. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hunter, M.C.; Smith, R.G.; Schipanski, M.E.; Atwood, L.W.; Mortensen, D.A. Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating Targets for Sustainable Intensification. Bioscience 2017, 67, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pergola, M.; Persiani, A.; Palese, A.M.; Di Meo, V.; Pastore, V.; D’Adamo, C.; Celano, G. Composting: The Way for a Sustainable Agriculture. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 123, 744–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sharma, N.; Singhvi, R. Effects of Chemical Fertilizers and Pesticides on Human Health and Environment: A Review. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, R.; Yao, Z.; Lei, Y. Modeling of Soil Available Phosphorus Surplus in an Intensive Wheat–Maize Rotation Production Area of the North China Plain. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2019, 269, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wei, Y.; Li, J.; Shi, D.; Liu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Shimaoka, T. Environmental Challenges Impeding the Composting of Biodegradable Municipal Solid Waste: A Critical Review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 122, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sánchez, Ó.J.; Ospina, D.A.; Montoya, S. Compost Supplementation with Nutrients and Microorganisms in Composting Process. Waste Manag. 2017, 69, 136–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nakasaki, K.; Hirai, H.; Mimoto, H.; Quyen, T.N.M.; Koyama, M.; Takeda, K. Succession of Microbial Community during Vigorous Organic Matter Degradation in the Primary Fermentation Stage of Food Waste Composting. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 671, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sanasam, S.D.; Talukdar, N.C. Quality Compost Production from Municipality Biowaste in Mix with Rice Straw, Cow Dung, and Earthworm Eisenia Fetida. Compost Sci. Util. 2017, 25, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Curaqueo, G.; Riquelme, P.; Carmona, E.; Pérez-San Martín, A.; González, A. Composting with Industrial and Domiciliary Ashes in Temuco, Chile. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 503, 012026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Akratos, C.S.; Tekerlekopoulou, A.G.; Vasiliadou, I.A.; Vayenas, D.V. Cocomposting of Olive Mill Waste for the Production of Soil Amendments; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; ISBN 9780128053140. [Google Scholar]
  12. Torres-Climent, A.; Gomis, P.; Martín-Mata, J.; Bustamante, M.A.; Marhuenda-Egea, F.C.; Pérez-Murcia, M.D.; Pérez-Espinosa, A.; Paredes, C.; Moral, R. Chemical, Thermal and Spectroscopic Methods to Assess Biodegradation of Winery-Distillery Wastes during Composting. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, C.; Hu, B.; Wei, M.-B.; Zhao, J.-H.; Zhang, H.-Z. Influence of Matured Compost Inoculation on Sewage Sludge Composting: Enzyme Activity, Bacterial and Fungal Community Succession. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 294, 122165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, X.; Xi, B.; Wei, Z.; Guo, X.; Li, M.; An, D.; Liu, H. Spectroscopic Characterization of Water Extractable Organic Matter during Composting of Municipal Solid Waste. Chemosphere 2011, 82, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Biyada, S.; Merzouki, M.; Elkarrach, K.; Benlemlih, M. Spectroscopic Characterization of Organic Matter Transformation during Composting of Textile Solid Waste Using UV–Visible Spectroscopy, Infrared Spectroscopy and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD). Microchem. J. 2020, 159, 105314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, X.; Li, C.; Zhu, Q.; Huang, T.; Cai, Y.; Li, N.; Liu, J.; Tan, X. Characterization of Dissolved Organic Matter from Biogas Residue Composting Using Spectroscopic Techniques. Waste Manag. 2018, 78, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Aranganathan, L.; Rajasree, S.R.R.; Suman, T.Y.; Remya, R.R.; Gayathri, S.; Jayaseelan, C.; Karthih, M.G.; Gobalakrishnan, M. Comparison of Molecular Characteristics of Type A Humic Acids Derived from Fish Waste and Sugarcane Bagasse Co-Compost Influenced by Various Alkaline Extraction Protocols. Microchem. J. 2019, 149, 104038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, S.; Chen, Z.; Wen, Q.; Ma, J.; He, Z. Assessment of Maturity during Co-Composting of Penicillin Mycelial Dreg via Fluorescence Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectra: Characteristics of Chemical and Fluorescent Parameters of Water-Extractable Organic Matter. Chemosphere 2016, 155, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cao, Y.; Wang, J.; Huang, H.; Sun, E.; Butterly, C.; Xu, Y.; He, H.; Zhang, J.; Chang, Z. Spectroscopic Evidence for Hyperthermophilic Pretreatment Intensifying Humification during Pig Manure and Rice Straw Composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 294, 122131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jurado, M.M.; Suárez-Estrella, F.; López, M.J.; Vargas-García, M.C.; López-González, J.A.; Moreno, J. Enhanced Turnover of Organic Matter Fractions by Microbial Stimulation during Lignocellulosic Waste Composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 186, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, X.-X.; Liu, H.-T.; Wu, S.-B. Humic Substances Developed during Organic Waste Composting: Formation Mechanisms, Structural Properties, and Agronomic Functions. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 662, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khadra, A.; Pinelli, E.; Ezzariai, A.; Mohamed, O.; Merlina, G.; Lyamlouli, K.; Kouisni, L.; Hafidi, M. Assessment of the Genotoxicity of Antibiotics and Chromium in Primary Sludge and Compost Using Vicia Faba Micronucleus Test. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 185, 109693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kelleher, B.P.; Simpson, A.J. Humic Substances in Soils: Are They Really Chemically Distinct? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4605–4611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Idrovo-Novillo, J.; Gavilanes-Terán, I.; Bustamante, M.A.; Paredes, C. Composting as a Method to Recycle Renewable Plant Resources Back to the Ornamental Plant Industry: Agronomic and Economic Assessment of Composts. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 116, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chiarelotto, M.; Restrepo, J.C.P.S.; Lorin, H.E.F.; Damaceno, F.M. Composting Organic Waste from the Broiler Production Chain: A Perspective for the Circular Economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 329, 129717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cáceres, R.; Malińska, K.; Marfà, O. Nitrification within Composting: A Review. Waste Manag. 2018, 72, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, T.; Wu, X.; Shaheen, S.M.; Rinklebe, J.; Bolan, N.S.; Ali, E.F.; Li, G.; Tsang, D.C.W. Effects of Microorganism-Mediated Inoculants on Humification Processes and Phosphorus Dynamics during the Aerobic Composting of Swine Manure. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Song, C.; Li, M.; Xi, B.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Jia, X.; Qi, H.; Zhu, C. Characterisation of Dissolved Organic Matter Extracted from the Bio-Oxidative Phase of Co-Composting of Biogas Residues and Livestock Manure Using Spectroscopic Techniques. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 103, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, S.; Shen, Z.; Yang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Zeng, G.; Ai, S.; He, H. Effects of C/N Ratio and Bulking Agent on Speciation of Zn and Cu and Enzymatic Activity during Pig Manure Composting. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 119, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khaing, T.; Win, S.S.; Win, N.N. Physical and Chemical Properties of Compost Made from Agricultural Wastes. Int. J. Environ. Rural. Dev. 2019, 10, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soobhany, N. Insight into the Recovery of Nutrients from Organic Solid Waste through Biochemical Conversion Processes for Fertilizer Production: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ezzariai, A.; Hafidi, M.; Khadra, A.; Aemig, Q.; El Fels, L.; Barret, M.; Merlina, G.; Patureau, D.; Pinelli, E. Human and Veterinary Antibiotics during Composting of Sludge or Manure: Global Perspectives on Persistence, Degradation, and Resistance Genes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 359, 465–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, G.; Kong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, J.; Li, G. Evolution of Phytotoxicity during the Active Phase of Co-Composting of Chicken Manure, Tobacco Powder and Mushroom Substrate. Waste Manag. 2020, 114, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Milinković, M.; Lalević, B.; Jovičić-Petrović, J.; Golubović-Ćurguz, V.; Kljujev, I.; Raičević, V. Biopotential of Compost and Compost Products Derived from Horticultural Waste—Effect on Plant Growth and Plant Pathogens’ Suppression. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 121, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, X.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, F.; Tan, W.; Fan, Y.; Xi, B. How Do Fungal Communities and Their Interaction with Bacterial Communities Influence Dissolved Organic Matter on the Stability and Safety of Sludge Compost? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 4141–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cheung, H.N.B.; Huang, G.H.; Yu, H. Microbial-Growth Inhibition during Composting of Food Waste: Effects of Organic Acids. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 5925–5934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nakasaki, K.; Hirai, H. Temperature Control Strategy to Enhance the Activity of Yeast Inoculated into Compost Raw Material for Accelerated Composting. Waste Manag. 2017, 65, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Truong, T.H.H.; Marschner, P. Respiration, Available N and Microbial Biomass N in Soil Amended with Mixes of Organic Materials Differing in C/N Ratio and Decomposition Stage. Geoderma 2018, 319, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Awasthi, M.K.; Wong, J.W.C.; Kumar, S.; Awasthi, S.K.; Wang, Q.; Wang, M.; Ren, X.; Zhao, J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Z. Biodegradation of Food Waste Using Microbial Cultures Producing Thermostable A-Amylase and Cellulase under Different PH and Temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 248, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sharma, A.; Weindorf, D.C.; Wang, D.; Chakraborty, S. Characterizing Soils via Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer: 4. Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC). Geoderma 2015, 239, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Spaccini, R.; Cozzolino, V.; Di Meo, V.; Savy, D.; Drosos, M.; Piccolo, A. Bioactivity of Humic Substances and Water Extracts from Compost Made by Ligno-Cellulose Wastes from Biorefinery. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 792–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hart, K.M. Assessing the Role of Soil Chemoautotrophs in Carbon Cycling: An Investigation into Isotopically Labelled Soil Microorganisms. Ph.D. Thesis, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, S.; Yuan, L.; Li, W.; Lin, Z.; Li, Y.; Hu, S.; Zhao, B. Characterization of PH-Fractionated Humic Acids Derived from Chinese Weathered Coal. Chemosphere 2017, 166, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Qi, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Yang, T.; Dang, Q.; Wu, J.; Lv, P.; Wang, H.; Wei, Z. Effect of Manganese Dioxide on the Formation of Humin during Different Agricultural Organic Wastes Compostable Environments: It Is Meaningful Carbon Sequestration. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 299, 122596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, Z.; Li, X.; Li, M.; Zhu, Q.; Li, G.; Ma, C.; Li, Q.; Meng, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q. Impacts of Red Mud on Lignin Depolymerization and Humic Substance Formation Mediated by Laccase-Producing Bacterial Community during Composting. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 410, 124557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Passos, M.L.C.; Sarraguça, M.C.; Saraiva, M.L.M.F.S.; Rao, T.P.; Biju, V.M. Spectrophotometry|Organic Compounds. Encycl. Anal. Sci. 2018, 9, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sellami, F.; Hachicha, S.; Chtourou, M.; Medhioub, K.; Ammar, E. Maturity Assessment of Composted Olive Mill Wastes Using UV Spectra and Humification Parameters. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6900–6907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tahiri, A.; Richel, A.; Destain, J.; Druart, P.; Thonart, P.; Ongena, M. Comprehensive Comparison of the Chemical and Structural Characterization of Landfill Leachate and Leonardite Humic Fractions. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 1917–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Eshwar, M.; Srilatha, M.; Rekha, K.B.; Sharma, S.H.K. Characterization of Humic Substances by Functional Groups and Spectroscopic Methods. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 1768–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chin, Y.-P.; Aiken, G.; O’Loughlin, E. Molecular Weight, Polydispersity, and Spectroscopic Properties of Aquatic Humic Substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 1853–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rodríguez, F.J.; Schlenger, P.; García-Valverde, M. Monitoring Changes in the Structure and Properties of Humic Substances Following Ozonation Using UV-Vis, FTIR and 1H NMR Techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 541, 623–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zittel, R.; da Silva, C.P.; Domingues, C.E.; Seremeta, D.C.H.; Estrada, R.A.; de Campos, S.X. Composting of Smuggled Cigarettes Tobacco and Industrial Sewage Sludge in Reactors: Physicochemical, Phytotoxic and Spectroscopic Study. Waste Manag. 2018, 79, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. He, X.-S.; Xi, B.-D.; Jiang, Y.-H.; He, L.-S.; Li, D.; Pan, H.-W.; Bai, S.-G. Structural Transformation Study of Water-Extractable Organic Matter during the Industrial Composting of Cattle Manure. Microchem. J. 2013, 106, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Morán Vieyra, F.E.; Palazzi, V.I.; Sanchez de Pinto, M.I.; Borsarelli, C.D. Combined UV–Vis Absorbance and Fluorescence Properties of Extracted Humic Substances-like for Characterization of Composting Evolution of Domestic Solid Wastes. Geoderma 2009, 151, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, Q.; Awasthi, M.K.; Zhao, J.; Ren, X.; Wang, M.; Li, R.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Utilization of Medical Stone to Improve the Composition and Quality of Dissolved Organic Matter in Composted Pig Manure. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Uyguner, C.S.; Bekbolet, M. Implementation of Spectroscopic Parameters for Practical Monitoring of Natural Organic Matter. Desalination 2005, 176, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, S.; Li, D.; Li, J.; Li, G.; Zhang, B. Evaluation of Humic Substances during Co-Composting of Sewage Sludge and Corn Stalk under Different Aeration Rates. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 1299–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Abid, W.; Mahmoud, I.B.; Masmoudi, S.; Triki, M.A.; Mounier, S.; Ammar, E. Physico-Chemical and Spectroscopic Quality Assessment of Compost from Date Palm (Phoenix Dactylifera L.) Waste Valorization. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 264, 110492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Nguyen, H.V.-M.; Lee, H.-S.; Lee, S.-Y.; Hur, J.; Shin, H.-S. Changes in Structural Characteristics of Humic and Fulvic Acids under Chlorination and Their Association with Trihalomethanes and Haloacetic Acids Formation. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 790, 148142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ren, X.; Wang, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, R.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z. Elucidating the Optimum Added Dosage of Diatomite during Co-Composting of Pig Manure and Sawdust: Carbon Dynamics and Microbial Community. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 777, 146058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Soobhany, N.; Gunasee, S.; Rago, Y.P.; Joyram, H.; Raghoo, P.; Mohee, R.; Garg, V.K. Spectroscopic, Thermogravimetric and Structural Characterization Analyses for Comparing Municipal Solid Waste Composts and Vermicomposts Stability and Maturity. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 236, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fialho, L.L.; da Silva, W.T.L.; Milori, D.M.B.P.; Simões, M.L.; Martin-Neto, L. Characterization of Organic Matter from Composting of Different Residues by Physicochemical and Spectroscopic Methods. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1927–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Marhuenda-Egea, F.C.; Martínez-Sabater, E.; Jordá, J.; Sánchez-Sánchez, A.; Moral, R.; Bustamante, M.A.; Paredes, C.; Pérez-Murcia, M.D. Evaluation of the Aerobic Composting Process of Winery and Distillery Residues by Thermal Methods. Thermochim Acta 2007, 454, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Smidt, E.; Lechner, P.; Schwanninger, M.; Haberhauer, G.; Gerzabek, M.H. Characterization of Waste Organic Matter by FT-IR Spectroscopy: Application in Waste Science. Appl. Spectrosc. 2002, 56, 1170–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. El Fels, L.; Zamama, M.; Hafidi, M. Advantages and Limitations of Using FTIR Spectroscopy for Assessing the Maturity of Sewage Sludge and Olive Oil Waste Co-Composts. In Biodegradation and Bioremediation of Polluted Systems–New Advances and Technologies; InTech: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Grube, M.; Lin, J.G.; Lee, P.H.; Kokorevicha, S. Evaluation of Sewage Sludge-Based Compost by FT-IR Spectroscopy. Geoderma 2006, 130, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Carballo, T.; Gil, M.V.; Gómez, X.; González-Andrés, F.; Morán, A. Characterization of Different Compost Extracts Using Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Thermal Analysis. Biodegradation 2008, 19, 815–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wu, X.; Wang, J.; Shen, L.; Wu, X.; Amanze, C.; Zeng, W. Effect of Bamboo Sphere Amendment on the Organic Matter Decomposition and Humification of Food Waste Composting. Waste Manag. 2021, 133, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chang, Y.-T.; Lee, C.-H.; Hsieh, C.-Y.; Chen, T.-C.; Jien, S.-H. Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy to Assess Compost Maturity Degree during Composting. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chirayil, C.J.; Abraham, J.; Mishra, R.K.; George, S.C.; Thomas, S. Instrumental Techniques for the Characterization of Nanoparticles; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Volume 3, ISBN 9780323461450. [Google Scholar]
  71. Wei, Z.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, C.; Xi, B.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, X. Assessment of Humification Degree of Dissolved Organic Matter from Different Composts Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy Technology. Chemosphere 2014, 95, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. He, X.-S.; Xi, B.-D.; Jiang, Y.-H.; Li, M.-X.; Yu, H.-B.; An, D.; Yang, Y.; Liu, H.-L. Elemental and Spectroscopic Methods with Chemometric Analysis for Characterizing Composition and Transformation of Dissolved Organic Matter during Chicken Manure Composting. Environ. Technol. 2012, 33, 2033–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dos Santos, L.M.; Simões, M.L.; de Melo, W.J.; Martin-Neto, L.; Pereira-Filho, E.R. Application of Chemometric Methods in the Evaluation of Chemical and Spectroscopic Data on Organic Matter from Oxisols in Sewage Sludge Applications. Geoderma 2010, 155, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, D.; Yu, H.; Yang, F.; Liu, L.; Gao, H.; Cui, B. Characterizing Humic Substances from Native Halophyte Soils by Fluorescence Spectroscopy Combined with Parallel Factor Analysis and Canonical Correlation Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xie, Z.; Guan, W. Research on Fluorescence Spectroscopy Characteristics of Dissolved Organic Matter of Landfill Leachate in the Rear Part of Three Gorges Reservoir. J. Spectrosc. 2015, 2015, 9787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; An, T.; Wei, D.; Chi, F.; Zhou, B. Effects of Long-Term Fertilization on Soil Humic Acid Composition and Structure in Black Soil. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Řezáčová, V.; Gryndler, M. Fluorescence Spectroscopy: A Tool to Characterize Humic Substances in Soil Colonized by Microorganisms? Folia Microbiol. 2006, 51, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.; Hu, S.; Huang, Q.; Wei, C.; Zhang, W.; Kang, L.; Huang, Z.; Hao, A. Fluorescent Probes for “off–on” Sensitive and Selective Detection of Mercury Ions and l-Cysteine Based on Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheets. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 2093–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Provenzano, M.R.; D’Orazio, V.; Jerzykiewicz, M.; Senesi, N. Fluorescence Behaviour of Zn and Ni Complexes of Humic Acids from Different Sources. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Marhuenda-Egea, F.C.; Martínez-Sabater, E.; Jordá, J.; Moral, R.; Bustamante, M.A.; Paredes, C.; Pérez-Murcia, M.D. Dissolved Organic Matter Fractions Formed during Composting of Winery and Distillery Residues: Evaluation of the Process by Fluorescence Excitation-Emission Matrix. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shao, Z.-H.; He, P.-J.; Zhang, D.-Q.; Shao, L.-M. Characterization of Water-Extractable Organic Matter during the Biostabilization of Municipal Solid Waste. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1191–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sunuwar, S.; Manzanares, C.E. Excitation, Emission, and Synchronous Fluorescence for Astrochemical Applications: Experiments and Computer Simulations of Synchronous Spectra of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Their Mixtures. Icarus 2021, 370, 114689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lu, Z.; Lu, L.; Bi, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H. Study on Spectral Characteristics of Fulvic Acid in the Process of Mixed Composting of Bioleach Deep Dehydrated Sludge and Rice Straw. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 2021, 012094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Guo, X.; He, X.; Zhang, H.; Deng, Y.; Chen, L.; Jiang, J. Characterization of Dissolved Organic Matter Extracted from Fermentation Effluent of Swine Manure Slurry Using Spectroscopic Techniques and Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC). Microchem. J. 2012, 102, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Peuravuori, J.; Koivikko, R.; Pihlaja, K. Characterization, Differentiation and Classification of Aquatic Humic Matter Separated with Different Sorbents: Synchronous Scanning Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Water Res. 2002, 36, 4552–4562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yang, Y.; Du, W.; Cui, Z.; Zhao, T.; Wang, X.; Lv, J. Spectroscopic Characteristics of Dissolved Organic Matter during Pig Manure Composting with Bean Dregs and Biochar Amendments. Microchem. J. 2020, 158, 105226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Santín, C.; González-Pérez, M.; Otero, X.L.; Vidal-Torrado, P.; Macías, F.; Álvarez, M.Á. Characterization of Humic Substances in Salt Marsh Soils under Sea Rush (Juncus Maritimus). Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 2008, 79, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gao, J.; Dou, S.; Wang, Z. Structural Analysis of Humic Acid in Soil at Different Corn Straw Returning Modes through Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Infrared Spectroscopy. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2019, 2019, 1086324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chen, W.; Westerhoff, P.; Leenheer, J.A.; Booksh, K. Fluorescence Excitation−Emission Matrix Regional Integration to Quantify Spectra for Dissolved Organic Matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 5701–5710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Song, F.; Wu, F.; Feng, W.; Tang, Z.; Giesy, J.P.; Guo, F.; Shi, D.; Liu, X.; Qin, N.; Xing, B.; et al. Fluorescence Regional Integration and Differential Fluorescence Spectroscopy for Analysis of Structural Characteristics and Proton Binding Properties of Fulvic Acid Sub-Fractions. J. Environ. Sci. 2018, 74, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Huang, J.; Han, L.; Huang, G. Characterization of Digestate Composting Stability Using Fluorescence EEM Spectroscopy Combining with PARAFAC. Waste Manag. Res. J. A Sustain. Circ. Econ. 2019, 37, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Duan, H.; Ji, M.; Chen, A.; Zhang, B.; Shi, J.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Sun, J. Evaluating the Impact of Rice Husk on Successions of Bacterial and Fungal Communities during Cow Manure Composting. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24, 102084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Li, X.; Shi, Z.; Wang, J.; Jiang, R. The Quality of Dissolved Organic Matter Extracted at Different Times from Pig Compost and Its Copper Binding Capacity Based on EEM-PARAFAC. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 207, 111545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, D.; Hou, R.; Ma, X.; Liu, J.; Cao, Z.; Cheng, K.; Yan, G.; Zhang, C.; et al. Combined Addition of Biochar and Garbage Enzyme Improving the Humification and Succession of Fungal Community during Sewage Sludge Composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 346, 126344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Yu, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, W.; Liu, J.; Tang, J.; Liao, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, S. Hyperthermophilic Composting Accelerates the Humification Process of Sewage Sludge: Molecular Characterization of Dissolved Organic Matter Using EEM–PARAFAC and Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 274, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, H.-T.; Guo, H.-N.; Guo, X.-X.; Wu, S. Probing Changes in Humus Chemical Characteristics in Response to Biochar Addition and Varying Bulking Agents during Composting: A Holistic Multi-Evidence-Based Approach. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 300, 113736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Xu, L.; Li, Q.; Myers, M.; Chen, Q.; Li, X. Application of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology to Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage: A Review. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2019, 11, 892–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jindo, K.; Sonoki, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Canellas, L.; Roig, A.; Sanchez-Monedero, M.A. Influence of Biochar Addition on the Humic Substances of Composting Manures. Waste Manag. 2016, 49, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Piccolo, A.; Spaccini, R.; De Martino, A.; Scognamiglio, F.; di Meo, V. Soil Washing with Solutions of Humic Substances from Manure Compost Removes Heavy Metal Contaminants as a Function of Humic Molecular Composition. Chemosphere 2019, 225, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rodríguez, L.; Cerrillo, M.I.; García-Albiach, V.; Villaseñor, J. Domestic Sewage Sludge Composting in a Rotary Drum Reactor: Optimizing the Thermophilic Stage. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 112, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Spaccini, R.; Piccolo, A. Molecular Characteristics of Humic Acids Extracted from Compost at Increasing Maturity Stages. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 1164–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Amir, S.; Hafidi, M.; Merlina, G.; Hamdi, H.; Revel, J.-C. Elemental Analysis, FTIR and 13C-NMR of Humic Acids from Sewage Sludge Composting. Agronomie 2004, 24, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Albrecht, R.; Ziarelli, F.; Alarcón-Gutiérrez, E.; Le Petit, J.; Terrom, G.; Perissol, C. 13C Solid-State NMR Assessment of Decomposition Pattern during Co-Composting of Sewage Sludge and Green Wastes. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2008, 59, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wang, C.; Tu, Q.; Dong, D.; Strong, P.J.; Wang, H.; Sun, B.; Wu, W. Spectroscopic Evidence for Biochar Amendment Promoting Humic Acid Synthesis and Intensifying Humification during Composting. J. Hazard Mater. 2014, 280, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Xing, Z.; Du, C.; Zeng, Y.; Ma, F.; Zhou, J. Characterizing Typical Farmland Soils in China Using Raman Spectroscopy. Geoderma 2016, 268, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Parikh, S.J.; Goyne, K.W.; Margenot, A.J.; Mukome, F.N.D.; Calderón, F.J. Soil Chemical Insights Provided through Vibrational Spectroscopy; Elsevier:: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 126, ISBN 9780128001325. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. General scheme of physicochemical parameters associated with the composting process.
Figure 1. General scheme of physicochemical parameters associated with the composting process.
Agronomy 13 02245 g001
Figure 2. Transformation mechanism of organic matter in each stage of the composting process [21,42].
Figure 2. Transformation mechanism of organic matter in each stage of the composting process [21,42].
Agronomy 13 02245 g002
Figure 3. Location of structures for each region in an Excitation-Emission Matrix (EEM) of organic matter (adapted from [89]).
Figure 3. Location of structures for each region in an Excitation-Emission Matrix (EEM) of organic matter (adapted from [89]).
Agronomy 13 02245 g003
Figure 4. Signal distribution 13C NMR about the chemical shift described in the composting process [19,52].
Figure 4. Signal distribution 13C NMR about the chemical shift described in the composting process [19,52].
Agronomy 13 02245 g004
Table 4. Summary of the main characteristics of the spectroscopy techniques reviewed.
Table 4. Summary of the main characteristics of the spectroscopy techniques reviewed.
SpectroscopyDescriptionAdvantagesDisadvantage
UV-VisAn electronic transition effect occurs due to the absorption of energy by the electrons (transmittance).
-
Cost-effective
-
Easy method
-
Simple to interpret
-
Liquid sample only
-
Preliminary qualitative analysis
-
Absorption peaks superposition
IRThe energy absorbed by the functional groups produces different types of molecular vibrations (reflectance).
-
Determines liquid and solid samples
-
Conclusive results
-
Band overlap
-
Interpretation may be difficult
-
Solid sample recommended
FluorescenceBased on the signal interpretation by the effect of light emission in the process of electronic de-excitation of conjugated systems (emission).
-
Different analyses are available
-
Allows compounds tracking
-
It allows humic substance analysis
-
Previous knowledge is required
-
More complex interpretation results
-
Liquid sample recommended
NMRProduced by the reorganization of nuclear spin due to the application of a magnetic field to the nuclei (emission).
-
Non-Destructive
-
Minimum sample treatment
-
Complementary analysis
-
Expensive
-
Signals superposition
-
Solid sample
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martín, A.P.-S.; Marhuenda-Egea, F.C.; Bustamante, M.A.; Curaqueo, G. Spectroscopy Techniques for Monitoring the Composting Process: A Review. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2245. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092245

AMA Style

Martín AP-S, Marhuenda-Egea FC, Bustamante MA, Curaqueo G. Spectroscopy Techniques for Monitoring the Composting Process: A Review. Agronomy. 2023; 13(9):2245. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092245

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martín, Andrés Pérez-San, Frutos C. Marhuenda-Egea, Maria Angeles Bustamante, and Gustavo Curaqueo. 2023. "Spectroscopy Techniques for Monitoring the Composting Process: A Review" Agronomy 13, no. 9: 2245. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092245

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop