Evaluating Scald Reactions of Some Turkish Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties Using GGE Biplot Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Materials and Field Trials
2.2. Collection of Isolates and Single Spore Isolation
2.3. Inoculation, Incubation, and Disease Assessment
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zaffarano, P.L.; McDonald, B.A.; Linde, C.C. Two new species of Rhynchosporium. Mycologia 2011, 103, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davis, H.; Fitt, B.D. Effects of Temperature and Leaf Weness on the Latent Period of Rhynchosporium secalis (Leaf Blotch) on Leaves of Winter Barley. J. Phytopathol. 1994, 140, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avrova, A.; Knogge, W. Rhynchosporium commune: A persistent threat to barley cultivation. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 986–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cromey, M. Integrated management of scald in New Zealand crops. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Barley Leaf Blight Diseases, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, 7–11 April 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Turkington, T.; Clayton, G.; Harker, K.; Xi, K.; Tewari, J.; Tekauz, A.; Kutcher, H.; Bailey, K.; Hartman, M. Management of barley leaf diseases in Western Canada. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Barley Leaf Blights, Aleppo, Syria, 7–11 April 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Yahyaoui, A. Occurrence of barley leaf blight diseases in central western Asia and north Africa. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Barley Leaf Blights, Aleppo, Syria, 7–11 April 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Karakaya, A.; Mert, Z.; Çelik Oğuz, A.; Azamparsa, M.; Çelik, E.; Akan, K.; Çetin, L. Current status of scald and net blotch diseases of barley in Turkey. In Proceedings of the IWBLD–1st International Workshop on Barley Leaf Diseases, Terme, Italy, 3–6 June 2014; pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar]
- Shipton, W.; Boyd, W.; Ali, S. Scald of barley. Rev. Plant Pathol. 1974, 53, 839–861. [Google Scholar]
- Aktaş, H. Spread of leaf spots in barley growing areas in Turkey. In Proceedings of the 6th Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathological Union, Cairo, Egypt, 1–6 October 1984; pp. 338–341. [Google Scholar]
- Kavak, H. Şanlıurfa Yöresinde Ekimi Yapılan Bazı Arpa Çeşitlerinin Arpa Yaprak Lekesine (Rhynchoporicum secalis (Oud) Davis) Karşı Reaksiyonları ve Hastalık Şiddeti ile Verim Arasındaki Ilişkisinin Belirlenmesi. Ph.D. Thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Türkiye, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Zencirci, N.; Hayes, P. Effect of scald (Rhynchosporium secalis) on yield components of twelve winter barley genotypes. J. Turk. Phytopathol. 1990, 82, 798–803. [Google Scholar]
- Çelik, E.; Karakaya, A. Eskişehir ili arpa ekim alanlarında görülen fungal yaprak ve başak hastalıklarının görülme sıklıklarının ve yoğunluklarının belirlenmesi. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 2015, 55, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Özdemir, H.Y.; Karakaya, A.; Çelik Oğuz, A. Kırıkkale ilinde buğday ve arpa ekim alanlarında görülen fungal yaprak hastalıklarının belirlenmesi. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 2017, 57, 89–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ababa, G.; Kesho, A.; Tadesse, Y.; Amare, D. Reviews of taxonomy, epidemiology, and management practices of the barley scald (Rhynchosporium graminicola) disease. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abebe, W. Barley net blotch disease management: A review. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Res. 2021, 7, 69–81. [Google Scholar]
- Backes, A.; Guerriero, G.; Ait Barka, E.; Jacquard, C. Pyrenophora teres: Taxonomy, morphology, interaction with barley, and mode of control. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 614951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cope, J.E.; Norton, G.J.; George, T.S.; Newton, A.C. Identifying potential novel resistance to the foliar disease ‘Scald’(Rhynchosporium commune) in a population of Scottish Bere barley landrace (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2021, 128, 999–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Düşünceli, F.; Cetin, L.; Albustan, S.; Zafer, M.; Kadir, A.; Karakaya, A. Determination of the reactions of some barley cultivars and genotypes to scald under greenhouse and field conditions. J. Agric. Sci. 2008, 14, 46–50. [Google Scholar]
- Mert, Z.; Karakaya, A. Assessment of the seedling reactions of Turkish barley cultivars to scald. J. Phytopathol. 2004, 152, 190–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLean, M.S.; Hollaway, G.J. Suppression of scald and improvements in grain yield and quality of barley in response to fungicides and host-plant resistance. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2018, 47, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saari, E.; Prescott, J. A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases. Plant Dis. Report. 1975, 59, 377–380. [Google Scholar]
- Xue, G.; Burnett, P.; Helm, J. Severity of, and resistance of barley varieties to, scald and net blotch in central Alberta. Can. Plant Dis. Surv. 1994, 74, 13–17. [Google Scholar]
- Azamparsa, M.R. Türkiye’de Rhynchosporium commune’nin Patotiplerinin Belirlenmesi ve Bazı Yerel Arpa Çeşitlerine ve Yabani Arpa (Hordeum spontaneum) Populasyonlarına Karşı Tepkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Zadoks, J.C.; Chang, T.T.; Konzak, C.F. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 1974, 14, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xi, K.; Turkington, T.; Juskiw, P.; Nyachiro, J.; Capettini, F. Field screening is effective for identifying genetic resistance to scald of barley. Crop Sci. 2019, 59, 1479–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, W.; Kang, M.S.; Ma, B.; Woods, S.; Cornelius, P.L. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, W.; Kang, M.S. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Kaplan, M.; Kokten, K.; Akcura, M. Assessment of Genotype× Trait× Environment interactions of silage maize genotypes through GGE Biplot. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 77, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumble, S.; Bernal, E.; Villardon, P.G. GGEBiplots: GGE Biplots with ‘ggplot2′. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GGEBiplots/GGEBiplots.pdf (accessed on 3 September 2023).
- Roostaei, M.; Mohammadi, R.; Amri, A. Rank correlation among different statistical models in ranking of winter wheat genotypes. Crop J. 2014, 2, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milioli, A.S.; Zdziarski, A.D.; Woyann, L.G.; Santos, R.d.; Rosa, A.C.; Madureira, A.; Benin, G. Yield stability and relationships among stability parameters in soybean genotypes across years. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2018, 78, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silvar, C.; Casas, A.; Kopahnke, D.; Habekuß, A.; Schweizer, G.; Gracia, M.; Lasa, J.; Ciudad, F.; Molina-Cano, J.; Igartua, E. Screening the Spanish barley core collection for disease resistance. Plant Breed. 2010, 129, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azamparsa, M.R.; Karakaya, A.; Ergun, N.; Sayim, I.; Duran, R.M.; Özbek, K. Identification of barley landraces and wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) genotypes resistant to Rhynchosporium commune. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 25, 530–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albustan, S.; Çetin, L.; Düşünceli, F. Orta Anadolu için geliştirilen bazı arpa nörserilerinde arpa yaprak lekesi hastalığına (Rhynchosporıum secalis (Oudem.) JJ Davis) dayanıklı genotiplerin sera ve tarla koşullarında belirlenmesi. In Proceedings of the Türkiye VIII. Fitopatoloji Kongresi, Ankara, Türkiye, 21–25 September 1998; pp. 30–33. [Google Scholar]
- Akan, K.; Akcura, M. GGE biplot analysis of reactions of bread wheat pure lines selected from Central Anatolian landraces of Turkey to leaf rust disease (Puccinia triticina) in multiple location-years. Cereal Res. Commun. 2018, 46, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, A.; Ortiz-Ferrara, G.; Crossa, J.; Singh, G.; Alvarado, G.; Bhatta, M.; Duveiller, E.; Sharma, R.; Pandit, D.; Siddique, A. Associations of environments in South Asia based on spot blotch disease of wheat caused by Cochliobolus sativus. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 1071–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadariya, M.; Glover, K.; Mergoum, M.; Osborne, L. Biplot analysis of agronomic and Fusarium head blight resistance traits in spring wheat. J. Crop Improv. 2008, 22, 147–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lillemo, M.; Singh, R.P.; van Ginkel, M. Identification of stable resistance to powdery mildew in wheat based on parametric and nonparametric methods. Crop Sci. 2010, 50, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merrick, L.F.; Glover, K.D.; Yabwalo, D.; Byamukama, E. Use of Genotype by Yield* Trait (GYT) analysis to select hard red spring wheat with elevated performance for agronomic and disease resistance traits. Crop Breed. Genet. Genom. 2020, 2, e200009. [Google Scholar]
- Das, A.; Parihar, A.K.; Saxena, D.; Singh, D.; Singha, K.; Kushwaha, K.; Chand, R.; Bal, R.; Chandra, S.; Gupta, S. Deciphering genotype-by-environment interaction for targeting test environments and rust resistant genotypes in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohunakin, A.O.; Odiyi, A.; Akinyele, B. Genetic variance components and GGE interaction of tropical maize genotypes under Northern leaf blight disease infection. Cereal Res. Commun. 2021, 49, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sankar, S.M.; Singh, S.; Prakash, G.; Satyavathi, C.T.; Soumya, S.; Yadav, Y.; Sharma, L.; Rao, A.; Singh, N.; Srivastava, R.K. Deciphering genotype-by-environment interaction for target environmental delineation and identification of stable resistant sources against foliar blast disease of pearl millet. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 656158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
No | Variety | Row Type | Registration Holder | Registration Year |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tokak 157/37 | Two-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 1963 |
2 | Zafer 160 | Six-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 1964 |
3 | Yeşilköy 387 | Six-rowed | Trakya Agricultural Research Institute | 1967 |
4 | Cumhuriyet 50 | Two-rowed | Transitional Zone Agricultural Research Institute | 1973 |
5 | Yerçil-147 | Two-rowed | Transitional Zone Agricultural Research Institute | 1976 |
6 | Quantum | Two-rowed | Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University | 1983 |
7 | Obruk 86 | Two-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 1986 |
8 | Anadolu 86 | Two-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 1986 |
9 | Bülbül 89 | Two-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 1989 |
10 | Erginel 90 | Six-rowed | Transitional Zone Agricultural Research Institute | 1990 |
11 | Şahin-91 | Two-rowed | GAP International Agricultural Research Institute | 1991 |
12 | Tarm-92 | Two-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 1992 |
13 | Bornova 92 | Six-rowed | Aegean Agricultural Research Institute | 1992 |
14 | Efes-3 | Two-rowed | Anadolu Efes | 1992 |
15 | Yesevi 93 | Two-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 1993 |
16 | Orza 96 | Two-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 1996 |
17 | Balkan 96 (Igri) | Two-rowed | Trakya Agricultural Research Institute | 1996 |
18 | Karatay 94 | Two-rowed | Bahri Dağdaş International Agricultural Research Institute | 1996 |
19 | Kalaycı-97 | Two-rowed | Transitional Zone Agricultural Research Institute | 1997 |
20 | Kıral-97 | Six-rowed | Bahri Dağdaş International Agricultural Research Institute | 1997 |
21 | Beyşehir | Two-rowed | Bahri Dağdaş International Agricultural Research Institute | 1998 |
22 | Konevi | Two-rowed | Bahri Dağdaş International Agricultural Research Institute | 1998 |
23 | Sladoran | Two-rowed | Trakya Agricultural Research Institute | 1998 |
24 | Şerifehanım 98 | Two-rowed | Aegean Agricultural Research Institute | 1998 |
25 | Vamıkhoca 98 | Six-rowed | Aegean Agricultural Research Institute | 1998 |
26 | Akhisar 98 | Six-rowed | Aegean Agricultural Research Institute | 1998 |
27 | Anadolu 98 | Two-rowed | Anadolu Efes | 1998 |
28 | Efes 98 | Two-rowed | Anadolu Efes | 1998 |
29 | Angora | Two-rowed | Anadolu Efes | 1999 |
30 | Çetin 2000 | Six-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 2000 |
31 | Çumra 2001 | Two-rowed | Anadolu Efes | 2001 |
32 | Çatalhüyük 2001 | Two-rowed | Anadolu Efes | 2001 |
33 | Akar | Two-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 2012 |
34 | Avcı-2002 | Six-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 2002 |
35 | Çıldır 02 | Two-rowed | Transitional Zone Agricultural Research Institute | 2002 |
36 | Sur-93 | Two-rowed | GAP International Agricultural Research Institute | 2002 |
37 | Zeynel Ağa | Two-rowed | Central Research Institute for Field Crops | 2003 |
38 | Başgül | Two-rowed | Anadolu Efes | 2003 |
39 | İnce-04 | Two-rowed | Transitional Zone Agricultural Research Institute | 2004 |
40 | Fahrettinbey | Two-rowed | Black Sea Agricultural Research Institute | 2004 |
No | Varieties | Row Type | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tokak 157/37 | Two-rowed | 87 | 94 | 93 | 44 |
2 | Zafer 160 | Six-rowed | 21 | 11 | 12 | 19 |
3 | Yeşilköy 387 | Six-rowed | 11 | 18 | 10 | 15 |
4 | Cumhuriyet 50 | Two-rowed | 88 | 84 | 85 | 92 |
5 | Yerçil-147 | Two-rowed | 75 | 74 | 69 | 73 |
6 | Quantum | Two-rowed | 82 | 83 | 83 | 84 |
7 | Obruk 86 | Two-rowed | 57 | 93 | 84 | 82 |
8 | Anadolu 86 | Two-rowed | 83 | 75 | 91 | 91 |
9 | Bülbül 89 | Two-rowed | 92 | 83 | 91 | 83 |
10 | Erginel 90 | Six-rowed | 21 | 11 | 10 | 30 |
11 | Şahin-91 | Two-rowed | 86 | 79 | 82 | 72 |
12 | Tarm-92 | Two-rowed | 84 | 83 | 93 | 81 |
13 | Bornova 92 | Six-rowed | 84 | 73 | 84 | 77 |
14 | Efes-3 | Two-rowed | 94 | 73 | 93 | 82 |
15 | Yesevi 93 | Two-rowed | 92 | 83 | 92 | 83 |
16 | Orza 96 | Two-rowed | 94 | 83 | 85 | 74 |
17 | Balkan 96 (Igri) | Two-rowed | 71 | 64 | 65 | 62 |
18 | Karatay 94 | Two-rowed | 94 | 76 | 84 | 81 |
19 | Kalaycı-97 | Two-rowed | 92 | 82 | 93 | 83 |
20 | Kıral-97 | Six-rowed | 10 | 23 | 19 | 12 |
21 | Beyşehir | Two-rowed | 81 | 86 | 73 | 92 |
22 | Konevi | Two-rowed | 93 | 84 | 93 | 81 |
23 | Sladoran | Two-rowed | 74 | 61 | 72 | 55 |
24 | Şerifehanım 98 | Two-rowed | 84 | 75 | 92 | 82 |
25 | Vamıkhoca 98 | Six-rowed | 82 | 62 | 84 | 63 |
26 | Akhisar 98 | Six-rowed | 31 | 20 | 21 | 49 |
27 | Anadolu 98 | Two-rowed | 94 | 85 | 93 | 94 |
28 | Efes 98 | Two-rowed | 94 | 82 | 95 | 85 |
29 | Angora | Two-rowed | 84 | 71 | 83 | 73 |
30 | Çetin 2000 | Six-rowed | 11 | 29 | 10 | 8 |
31 | Çumra 2001 | Two-rowed | 93 | 83 | 92 | 82 |
32 | Çatalhüyük 2001 | Two-rowed | 94 | 83 | 93 | 75 |
33 | Akar | Two-rowed | 93 | 86 | 92 | 88 |
34 | Avcı-2002 | Six-rowed | 9 | 12 | 19 | 23 |
35 | Çıldır 02 | Two-rowed | 76 | 65 | 75 | 63 |
36 | Sur-93 | Two-rowed | 85 | 74 | 84 | 81 |
37 | Zeynel Ağa | Two-rowed | 93 | 82 | 92 | 83 |
38 | Başgül | Two-rowed | 94 | 82 | 85 | 84 |
39 | İnce-04 | Two-rowed | 93 | 84 | 92 | 85 |
40 | Fahrettinbey | Two-rowed | 74 | 63 | 75 | 64 |
Source | DF * | Sum of Squares | F Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
Genotype | 39 | 110,871.6 | 140.855 ** |
Environment | 3 | 2026.39 | 33.4671 ** |
Replication [Environment] | 8 | 1550.48 | 9.6027 ** |
G × E | 117 | 19,281.36 | 8.1652 ** |
Error | 312 | 6297.06 | |
Total | 479 | 140,026.89 | |
C.V. (%) | 7.87 | ||
R2 | 0.96 |
No | Varieties | MSR * | MSR Rank | SD | SD Rank | Scale Group | GGE Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | Yeşilköy 387 | 13.5 | 1 | 3.7 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
30 | Çetin 2000 | 14.5 | 2 | 9.75 | 31 | 2 | 3 |
2 | Zafer 160 | 15.75 | 3 | 4.99 | 11 | 2 | 1 |
34 | Avcı-2002 | 15.75 | 3 | 6.4 | 20 | 2 | 1 |
20 | Kıral-97 | 16 | 4 | 6.06 | 17 | 2 | 2 |
10 | Erginel 90 | 18 | 5 | 9.42 | 30 | 2 | 2 |
26 | Akhisar 98 | 30.25 | 6 | 13.45 | 34 | 2 | 4 |
17 | Balkan 96 (Igri) | 65.5 | 7 | 3.87 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
23 | Sladoran | 65.5 | 7 | 9.04 | 29 | 4 | 7 |
40 | Fahrettinbey | 69 | 8 | 6.38 | 19 | 4 | 7 |
35 | Çıldır 02 | 69.75 | 9 | 6.7 | 22 | 4 | 8 |
5 | Yerçil-147 | 72.75 | 10 | 2.63 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
25 | Vamıkhoca 98 | 72.75 | 10 | 11.87 | 33 | 4 | 8 |
29 | Angora | 77.75 | 10 | 6.7 | 22 | 5 | 9 |
7 | Obruk 86 | 79 | 11 | 15.43 | 35 | 5 | 9 |
13 | Bornova 92 | 79.5 | 12 | 5.45 | 14 | 5 | 9 |
1 | Tokak 157/37 | 79.5 | 12 | 23.87 | 36 | 5 | 10 |
11 | Şahin-91 | 79.75 | 13 | 5.91 | 16 | 5 | 9 |
36 | Sur-93 | 81 | 14 | 4.97 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
6 | Quantum | 83 | 15 | 0.82 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
21 | Beyşehir | 83 | 15 | 8.04 | 26 | 5 | 10 |
24 | Şerifehanım 98 | 83.25 | 16 | 6.99 | 23 | 5 | 9 |
18 | Karatay 94 | 83.75 | 17 | 7.59 | 24 | 5 | 9 |
16 | Orza 96 | 84 | 18 | 8.21 | 27 | 5 | 9 |
8 | Anadolu 86 | 85 | 19 | 7.66 | 25 | 5 | 10 |
12 | Tarm-92 | 85.25 | 20 | 5.32 | 13 | 5 | 10 |
14 | Efes-3 | 85.5 | 21 | 9.95 | 32 | 5 | 9 |
38 | Başgül | 86.25 | 22 | 5.32 | 13 | 5 | 10 |
32 | Çatalhüyük 2001 | 86.25 | 22 | 9 | 28 | 5 | 10 |
4 | Cumhuriyet 50 | 87.25 | 23 | 3.59 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
9 | Bülbül 89 | 87.25 | 23 | 4.92 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
15 | Yesevi 93 | 87.5 | 24 | 5.2 | 12 | 5 | 10 |
19 | Kalaycı-97 | 87.5 | 24 | 5.8 | 15 | 5 | 10 |
31 | Çumra 2001 | 87.5 | 24 | 5.8 | 15 | 5 | 10 |
37 | Zeynel Ağa | 87.5 | 24 | 5.8 | 15 | 5 | 10 |
22 | Konevi | 87.75 | 25 | 6.18 | 18 | 5 | 10 |
39 | İnce-04 | 88.5 | 26 | 4.65 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
28 | Efes 98 | 89 | 27 | 6.48 | 21 | 5 | 10 |
33 | Akar | 89.75 | 28 | 3.3 | 3 | 5 | 10 |
27 | Anadolu 98 | 91.5 | 29 | 4.36 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Akan, K.; Cat, A.; Hocaoglu, O.; Tekin, M. Evaluating Scald Reactions of Some Turkish Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties Using GGE Biplot Analysis. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13122975
Akan K, Cat A, Hocaoglu O, Tekin M. Evaluating Scald Reactions of Some Turkish Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties Using GGE Biplot Analysis. Agronomy. 2023; 13(12):2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13122975
Chicago/Turabian StyleAkan, Kadir, Ahmet Cat, Onur Hocaoglu, and Mehmet Tekin. 2023. "Evaluating Scald Reactions of Some Turkish Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties Using GGE Biplot Analysis" Agronomy 13, no. 12: 2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13122975