Food and Medicinal Uses of Ancestral Andean Grains in the Districts of Quinua and Acos Vinchos (Ayacucho-Peru)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Ethnobotanical Data Collection
2.3. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Arias, M.E.; Aguirre, M.G.; Luque, A.C. Caracterización Anatómica de Tallos de Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae). Aportes al Estudio de Restos Arqueológicos. Intersecc. Antropol. 2014, 15, 265–276. [Google Scholar]
- Aceituno-Mata, L. Estudio Etnobotánico y Agroecológico de La Sierra Norte de Madrid. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- FAO Dietary Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Nutrition; Report of an FAO Expert Consultation; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome: Auckland, New Zealand, 2013; ISBN 978-92-5-107417-6.
- Mujica, Á.; Moscoso, G.; Zavaleta, A.; Canahua, A.; Juarez, R.; Chambi, W.; Vignale, D. Usos Medicinales y Conocimientos Nutracéuticos Ancestrales de Granos Andinos: Quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), Kañihua (Chenopodium pallidicaule Aellen), Tubérculos Andinos: Izaño (Tropaeolum tuberosum R. y P), Olluco (Ullucus tuberosus Loz.), Oca (Oxalis tuberosa Mol.) y Parientes Silvestres En El Altiplano Peruano. Agro Enfoque. Ago 2015, 29, 10–16. [Google Scholar]
- Bvenura, C.; Kambizi, L. Chapter 5—Future Grain Crops. In Future Foods; Bhat, R., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 81–105. ISBN 978-0-323-91001-9. [Google Scholar]
- Olivera, L.; Best, I.; Paredes, P.; Perez, N.; Chong, L.; Marzano, A. Nutritional Value, Methods for Extraction and Bioactive Compounds of Quinoa; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022; ISBN 978-1-80355-181-4. [Google Scholar]
- Villacrés, E.; Quelal, M.; Galarza, S.; Iza, D.; Silva, E. Nutritional Value and Bioactive Compounds of Leaves and Grains from Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Plants 2022, 11, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, E.; Encina-Zelada, C.; Barros, L.; Gonzales-Barron, U.; Cadavez, V.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chemical and Nutritional Characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Willd (Quinoa) Grains: A Good Alternative to Nutritious Food. Food Chem. 2019, 280, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ponce de León Saavedra, P.; Valdez-Arana, J.d.C.; Ponce de León Saavedra, P.; Valdez-Arana, J.d.C. Evaluación Nutricional y Funcional de 17 Accesiones de Quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) Cultivadas En La Zona Andina Del Perú. Sci. Agropecuaria 2021, 12, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amit, S.; Irfan, A.M.; Gaurav, S.; Nalini, T.; Sarmad, M. A Review on Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Importance of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2021, 14, 1779–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathan, S.; Siddiqui, R.A. Nutritional Composition and Bioactive Components in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Greens: A Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León, J. Plantas Alimenticias Andinas; Instituto Ineteramericano de Ciencias Agrícolas Zona Andina: Lima, Peru, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- MINAGRI. Quinua Peruana—Situación Actual y Perspectivas en el Mercado Nacional e Internacional al 2015; Ministerio de Agricultura y Riego: Lima, Peru, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- MINAGRI. Encuesta Nacional de Intenciones de Siembra 2019 Campaña Agrícola Agosto 2019—Julio 2020; Dirección General de Seguimiento y Evaluación de Políticas; Dirección de Estadística Agraria: Lima, Perú, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Cárdenas, D.; Bermúdez, C.; Echeverri, S.; Pérez, A.; Puentes, M.; López, L.; Correia, M.I.T.; Ochoa, J.B.; Ferreira, A.M.; Texeira, M.A.; et al. Declaración de Cartagena. Declaración Internacional sobre el Derecho al Cuidado Nutricional y la Lucha contra la Malnutrición. Rev. Cuba. De Aliment. Y Nutr. 2020, 30, 10–22. [Google Scholar]
- Pulgar Vidal, J.P. Las ocho regiones naturales del Perú. Terra Brasilis (Nova Série). Revista da Rede Brasileira de História da Geografia e Geografia Histórica. Terra Bras. (New Ser.) 2014, 3, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tapia Núñez, M.E. Ecodesarrollo en los Andes Altos; Fundación Friedrich Ebert: Bonn, Germany, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- de Almeida, C.D.F.C.B.R.; Ramos, M.A.; Silva, R.R.V.; de Melo, J.G.; Medeiros, M.F.T.; Araújo, T.A.D.S.; de Almeida, A.L.S.; de Amorim, E.L.C.; Alves, R.R.D.N.; de Albuquerque, U.P. Intracultural Variation in the Knowledge of Medicinal Plants in an Urban-Rural Community in the Atlantic Forest from Northeastern Brazil. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2012, e679373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corroto, F.; Macía, M.J. What Is the Most Efficient Methodology for Gathering Ethnobotanical Data and for Participant Selection? Medicinal Plants as a Case Study in the Peruvian Andes. Econ. Bot. 2021, 75, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkes, F.; Colding, J.; Folke, C. Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10, 1251–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macía, M.J.; García, E.; Vidaurre, P.J. An Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants Commercialized in the Markets of La Paz and El Alto, Bolivia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 97, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martin, G.J. Ethnobotany, Conservation and Community Development. In Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual; Martin, G.J., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1995; pp. 223–251. ISBN 978-1-4615-2496-0. [Google Scholar]
- Alberti-Manzanares, P. Los Aportes de Las Mujeres Rurales al Conocimiento de Plantas Medicinales En México: Análisis de Género. Agric. Soc. Desarro. 2006, 3, 139–153. [Google Scholar]
- Alexiades, M.N. Collecting Ethnobotanical Data: An Introduction to Basic Concepts and Techniques. Adv. Econ. Bot. 1996, 10, 53–94. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team. European Environment Agency. 2020. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers/r-development-core-team-2006 (accessed on 10 December 2021).
- Tapia Núñez, M.E.; Fries, A.M.; Mazar, I.; Rosell, C. Guía de Campo de los Cultivos Andinos, 1st ed.; Asociación Nacional de Productores Ecológicos del Perú/Organización de Las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación: Lima, Roma, 2007; ISBN 978-92-5-305682-8. [Google Scholar]
- Tapia, M.E. Ecodesarrollo Agropecuario en la Sierra del Perú. Zonas Áridas 1990, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benavides, M.; Vásquez Caicedo, G.; Casafranca, J. La Pequeña Agroindustria En El Perú: Situación Actual y Perspectivas; IICA Biblioteca Venezuela: San José, Costa Rica, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Pinedo-Taco, R.; Gómez-Pando, L.; Julca-Otiniano, A.; Pinedo-Taco, R.; Gómez-Pando, L.; Julca-Otiniano, A. Sostenibilidad de sistemas de producción de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Ecosistemas Recur. Agropecu. 2018, 5, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz-Condori, J.G.; Florez-López, N.E. Evaluación Sensorial y Calidad Nutricional de Una Galleta a Base de Tarwi, Cañihua e Hígado de Pollo En Escolares de Una Institución Educativa de Cerro Colorado En El Año 2017. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, Arequipa, Perú, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Blanco, T.B. Alimentación y Nutrición; Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC): Lima, Perú, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez, J.P.; Rahman, H.; Thushar, S.; Singh, R.K. Healthy and Resilient Cereals and Pseudo-Cereals for Marginal Agriculture: Molecular Advances for Improving Nutrient Bioavailability. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guerrero, P.; Salazar, A.H.; Aguirre, N.C. Estudio Técnico y Económico de Cuatro Variedades de Quinua En La Región Andina Central Colombiana. Rev. Luna Azul (On Line) 2018, 46, 167–180. [Google Scholar]
- Laurente Blanco, L.F.; Mamani Huanacuni, A. Modelamiento de La Producción de Quinua Aplicando ARIMA En Puno-Perú. Fides Ratio-Rev. Difusión Cult. Científica Univ. Salle Boliv. 2020, 19, 205–230. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. La Quinua, Cultivo Milenario Para Contribuir a La Seguridad Alimentaria Mundial; Oficina Regional para América Latina y el Caribe: Lima, Perú, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobsen, S.-E.; Sherwood, S. Cultivo de Granos Andinos En Ecuador: Informe Sobre Los Rubros Quinua, Chocho y Amaranto; Ediciones Abya Yala: Quito, Ecuador, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Pinedo-Taco, R.E.; Gómez-Pando, L.R.; Anderson-Berens, D. Production sustainability index of organic quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) in the interandean valleys of Peru. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyst. 2022, 25, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Apaza Mamani, V.; Cáceres Sanizo, G.; Estrada Zuñiga, R.; Pinedo Taco, R.E. Catálogo de Variedades Comerciales de Quinua en el Perú; Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria: La Molina, Peru, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- MINAGRI Dirección General de Políticas Agrarias; MINAGRI: Lima, Perú, 2017; pp. 1–8.
- Soto, M.; Allende, R.A.; Romero, V.L. Estudio Comparativo En Rendimiento y Calidad de 12 Variedades de Quinua Orgánica En La Comunidad Campesina de San Antonio de Manallasac, Ayacucho. Rev. Campus 2020, 25, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apaza, V.; Delgado, P. Manejo y Mejoramiento de Quinua Orgánica; Serie Manual; Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Extensión: Puno, Perú, 2005; 150p. [Google Scholar]
- Restrepo, J. El ABC de la Agricultura Orgánica, Fosfitos y Panes de Piedra: Manual Práctico; Feriva: Cali, Colombia, 2007; ISBN 978-958-44-1261-4. [Google Scholar]
- Protocolo de Nagoya. Available online: https://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-es.pdf (accessed on 9 April 2022).
- Scruzzi, G.; Cebreiro, C.; Pou, S.; Rodríguez Junyent, C. Salud Escolar: Una Intervención Educativa en Nutrición desde un Enfoque Integral. Cuadernos. Info 2014, 35, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bermúdez, A.; Oliveira-Miranda, M.A.; Velázquez, D. La Investigación Etnobotánica Sobre Plantas Medicinales: Una Revisión de Sus Objetivos y Enfoques Actuales. Interciencia 2005, 30, 453–459. [Google Scholar]
- Weckmüller, H.; Barriocanal, C.; Maneja, R.; Boada, M. Factors Affecting Traditional Medicinal Plant Knowledge of the Waorani, Ecuador. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Luzuriaga-Quichimbo, C.X.; Hernández del Barco, M.; Blanco-Salas, J.; Cerón-Martínez, C.E.; Ruiz-Téllez, T. Plant Biodiversity Knowledge Varies by Gender in Sustainable Amazonian Agricultural Systems Called Chacras. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sanabria-Diago, O.L. La etnobotánica y su contribución a la conservación de los recursos naturales y el conocimiento tradicional. In Manual de Herramientas Etnobotánicas Relativas a la Conservación y el Uso Sostenible de los Recursos Vegetales Una Contribución de la Red Latinoamericana de Botánica a la Implementación de la Estrategia Global para la Conservación de Las Especies Vegetales Hacia el Logro de Las Metas 13 y 15; Red Latinoamericana de Botánica (RLB): Santiago, Chile, 2011; pp. 37–60. ISBN 978-956-9073-01-04. [Google Scholar]
- Bussmann, R.W.; Sharon, D. Traditional Medicinal Plant Use in Northern Peru: Tracking Two Thousand Years of Healing Culture. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2006, 2, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Repo-Carrasco-Valencia, R.; Hellström, J.K.; Pihlava, J.-M.; Mattila, P.H. Flavonoids and Other Phenolic Compounds in Andean Indigenous Grains: Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), Kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule) and Kiwicha (Amaranthus caudatus). Food Chem. 2010, 120, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortés-Rodríguez, E.A.; Venegas-Cardoso, F.R. Conocimiento Tradicional y la Conservación de la Flora Medicinal en la Comunidad Indígena de Santa Catarina, BC, México. Ra Ximhai Rev. Científica Sociedad Cultura Desarrollo Sostenible 2011, 7, 117–122. [Google Scholar]
Variable | Frequency (n = 42) | % |
---|---|---|
Age (min = 38, max = 65, mean = 52.93, SD = 6.74) | ||
<45 years | 5 | 11.9 |
45–60 years | 30 | 71.4 |
>60 years | 7 | 16.7 |
Gender | ||
Female | 17 | 40.5 |
Male | 25 | 59.5 |
Education level | ||
Higher Education | 1 | 2.4 |
Secondary school | 8 | 19.0 |
Basic education | 14 | 33.3 |
No schooling | 16 | 38.1 |
No answer | 3 | 7.1 |
Present occupation | ||
Merchant | 3 | 7.1 |
Farmer | 24 | 57.1 |
Housewife | 2 | 4.8 |
Civil servant and farmer | 1 | 2.4 |
Farmer and housewife | 9 | 21.4 |
No answer | 3 | 7.1 |
Birth place | ||
Lima | 1 | 2.4 |
Quinua | 41 | 97.6 |
Living region | ||
Quinua | 41 | 97.6 |
Quinua-Chihuanpampa | 1 | 2.4 |
Years of residence (min = 15, máx = 65, mean = 51.21, SD = 9.89) | ||
<45 years | 7 | 16.7 |
45–60 years | 28 | 66.7 |
>60 years | 7 | 16.7 |
Variable | Frequency (n = 54) | % |
---|---|---|
Age (min = 27, max = 75, mean = 53.49, SD = 9.25) | ||
<45 years | 6 | 11.1 |
45–60 years | 34 | 63.0 |
>60 years | 13 | 24.1 |
No answer | 1 | 1.9 |
Gender | ||
Female | 20 | 37.0 |
Male | 32 | 59.3 |
No answer | 2 | 3.7 |
Education level | ||
Secondary school | 3 | 5.6 |
Basic education | 21 | 38.9 |
No schooling | 28 | 51.9 |
No answer | 2 | 3.7 |
Present occupation | ||
Merchant | 1 | 1.9 |
Farmer | 33 | 61.1 |
Housewife | 4 | 7.4 |
Farmer and housewife | 12 | 22.2 |
Merchant and farmer | 3 | 5.6 |
No answer | 1 | 1.9 |
Birth place | ||
Acosvinchos | 49 | 90.7 |
Ayacucho | 1 | 1.9 |
Chaupirara | 1 | 1.9 |
Chaupirara-Acosvinchos | 1 | 1.9 |
Huinchupata | 1 | 1.9 |
Lima | 1 | 1.9 |
Living region | ||
Acosvinchos | 53 | 98.1 |
Huinchupata | 1 | 1.9 |
Years of residence (min = 47, max = 70.5, mean = 52.31, SD = 10.67) | ||
<45 years | 7 | 13.0 |
45–60 years | 32 | 59.3 |
>60 years | 10 | 18.5 |
No answer | 5 | 9.3 |
Quinua | Acos Vinchos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency | % | Frequency | % | ||
Types of ancient Andean grains used for food | Quinoa | 4 | 9.5 | 36 | 66.7 |
Quinoa y Achita | 38 | 90.5 | 18 | 33.3 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 | |
Parts of the plant used for food | Grain | 36 | 85.7 | 48 | 88.9 |
Grain and young leaves | 6 | 14.3 | 6 | 11.1 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 | |
Form of consumption | Do not know | 1 | 2.4 | 2 | 3.7 |
Breakfast, main course and soups | 41 | 97.6 | 52 | 96.3 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 | |
Production for consumption only | Yes | 28 | 66.7 | 36 | 66.7 |
No | 11 | 26.2 | 17 | 31.5 | |
Do not know | 3 | 7.1 | 1 | 1.9 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 | |
Production for trade | Yes | 11 | 26.2 | 19 | 35.2 |
No | 27 | 64.3 | 35 | 64.8 | |
Do not know | 4 | 9.5 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100 | |
They know which plants are the most nutritious | Yes | 34 | 81.0 | 29 | 53.7 |
No | 6 | 14.3 | 21 | 38.9 | |
Do not know | 2 | 4.8 | 4 | 7.4 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 |
Quinua | Acos Vinchos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency | % | Frequency | % | ||
Informants who crop quinoa | Sowed | 39 | 92.9 | 54 | 100.0 |
No answer | 3 | 7.1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100 | |
Informants who crop achita | Sowed | 8 | 19.0 | 15 | 27.8 |
Do not know | 34 | 81.0 | 39 | 72.2 | |
Total | 42 | 100 | 54 | 100 | |
Quinoa production | Good | 18 | 42.9 | 20 | 37.0 |
Fair | 20 | 47.6 | 34 | 63.0 | |
Do not know | 4 | 9.5 | 0 | 0.0 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 | |
Achita production | Good | 4 | 9.5 | 2 | 3.7 |
Fair | 5 | 11.9 | 13 | 24.1 | |
Do not know | 33 | 78.6 | 39 | 72.2 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 | |
Origin of seeds for cultivation | Do not know | 2 | 4.8 | 1 | 1.9 |
Purchased | 2 | 4.8 | 1 | 1.9 | |
Home-grown | 38 | 90.5 | 52 | 96.3 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 | |
Substances used to treat plant diseases | Chemicals | 37 | 88.1 | 45 | 83.3 |
Homemade products | 2 | 4.8 | 8 | 14.8 | |
Do not know | 3 | 7.1 | 1 | 1.9 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 |
Quinua | Acos Vinchos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency | % | Frequency | % | ||
Informants who use quinoa and achita as medicinal plants | Yes | 7 | 16.7 | 6 | 11.1 |
No | 35 | 83.3 | 48 | 88.9 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 | |
Ailments for which quinoa is used | Purgante | 7 | 100.0 | 3 | 50.0 |
Colics-purgante | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 50.0 | |
Total | 7 | 100 | 6 | 100.0 | |
Part of the quinoa plant used | Grain | 3 | 42.9 | 3 | 50.0 |
Leaves | 3 | 42.9 | 1 | 16.7 | |
Leaves and grains | 1 | 14.3 | 2 | 33.3 | |
Total | 7 | 100.0 | 6 | 100.0 | |
Forms of administration of quinoa | Infusion | 3 | 42.9 | 1 | 16.7 |
Infusion and wash | 1 | 14.3 | 2 | 33.3 | |
Wash | 3 | 42.9 | 2 | 33.3 | |
Do not know | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 16.7 | |
Total | 7 | 100.0 | 6 | 100.0 | |
Adverse effects of quinoa mixed with other plants | Yes | 5 | 71.4 | 6 | 100.0 |
No | 2 | 28.6 | 0 | 0.0 | |
Total | 7 | 100.0 | 6 | 100 | |
Quinoa toxicity in high doses | Yes | 6 | 85.7 | 5 | 83.3 |
No | 1 | 14.3 | 1 | 16.7 | |
Total | 7 | 100.0 | 6 | 100.0 | |
Frequency of medicinal use of quinoa | Common use | 1 | 14.3 | 1 | 16.7 |
Disappearing | 5 | 71.4 | 1 | 16.7 | |
Do not know | 1 | 14.3 | 4 | 66.7 | |
Total | 7 | 100.0 | 6 | 100.0 |
Quinua | Acos Vinchos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency | % | Frequency | % | ||
Places and practices carried out for health care | Health center | 5 | 11.9 | 5 | 9.3 |
Healer and use medicinal plants | 9 | 21.4 | 2 | 3.1 | |
Health centre, healer and use medicinal plants | 28 | 66.7 | 47 | 87.0 | |
Total | 42 | 100 | 54 | 100 | |
Places where medicinal plants are obtained | Purchased | 3 | 7.1 | 3 | 5.6 |
Collected from the field | 15 | 35.7 | 20 | 37.0 | |
Grown in the orchard | 11 | 26.2 | 8 | 14.8 | |
Collected from the field and orchard | 13 | 31.0 | 22 | 40.7 | |
Do not use | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.9 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 | |
The use of medicinal plants is common in the family | Yes | 39 | 92.9 | 49 | 90.7 |
Does not use | 3 | 7.1 | 5 | 9.3 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 | |
The use of medicinal plants is recommended | Yes | 39 | 92.9 | 54 | 100.0 |
Do not know | 3 | 7.1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100 | |
Informants who know healers in their community | Yes | 22 | 52.4 | 15 | 27.8 |
No | 17 | 40.5 | 39 | 72.2 | |
Do not know | 3 | 7.1 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 42 | 100.0 | 54 | 100.0 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Anaya, R.B.; De La Cruz, E.; Muñoz-Centeno, L.M.; Cóndor, R.; León, R.; Carhuaz, R. Food and Medicinal Uses of Ancestral Andean Grains in the Districts of Quinua and Acos Vinchos (Ayacucho-Peru). Agronomy 2022, 12, 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051014
Anaya RB, De La Cruz E, Muñoz-Centeno LM, Cóndor R, León R, Carhuaz R. Food and Medicinal Uses of Ancestral Andean Grains in the Districts of Quinua and Acos Vinchos (Ayacucho-Peru). Agronomy. 2022; 12(5):1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051014
Chicago/Turabian StyleAnaya, Roberta Brita, Eusebio De La Cruz, Luz María Muñoz-Centeno, Reynán Cóndor, Roxana León, and Roxana Carhuaz. 2022. "Food and Medicinal Uses of Ancestral Andean Grains in the Districts of Quinua and Acos Vinchos (Ayacucho-Peru)" Agronomy 12, no. 5: 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051014
APA StyleAnaya, R. B., De La Cruz, E., Muñoz-Centeno, L. M., Cóndor, R., León, R., & Carhuaz, R. (2022). Food and Medicinal Uses of Ancestral Andean Grains in the Districts of Quinua and Acos Vinchos (Ayacucho-Peru). Agronomy, 12(5), 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051014