Next Article in Journal
Techno-Economic Assessment of an Office-Based Indoor Farming Unit
Next Article in Special Issue
Accurate Detection Algorithm of Citrus Psyllid Using the YOLOv5s-BC Model
Previous Article in Journal
Combined Application of Trichoderma harzianum and Paclobutrazol to Control Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani of Tomato Seedlings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Litchi Detection in a Complex Natural Environment Using the YOLOv5-Litchi Model
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Non-Destructive Quality-Detection Techniques for Cereal Grains: A Systematic Review

College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing 210095, China
China Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210095, China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production Co-Sponsored by Province and Ministry, Nanjing 210095, China
Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2022, 12(12), 3187;
Received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 11 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Operation Technology and Intelligent Equipment in Farmland)


Grain quality involves the appearance, nutritional, and safety attributes of grains. With the improvement of people’s living standards, problems pertaining to the quality of grains have received greater attention. Modern quality detection techniques feature unique advantages including rapidness, non-destructiveness, accuracy, and efficiency in detecting grain quality. This review summarizes research progress of these techniques in detection of quality indices of grains. Particularly, the review focuses on detection techniques based on physical properties including acoustic, optical, thermal, electrical, and mechanical properties, and those simulating sensory analysis such as electronic noses, electronic tongues, and electronic eyes. According to the current technological development and application, the challenges and prospects of these techniques are demonstrated.

1. Introduction

Grains, containing nutritional ingredients including carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals, are daily necessities of human life. However, impurities, unsound kernels, fungal toxins, pesticides, and heavy metal residues pose a risk to human health. With regular economic growth and social progress, consumers have begun to pay more attention to the quality and safety of grains and have increasingly larger demands for high-quality and highly safe grains. The quality attributes of grains acceptable to consumers mainly include appearance attributes (size, shape, and color), nutritional attributes (protein, starch, fat, and vitamin), and safety attributes (contaminants such as mildew, pesticide residues, and heavy metal residues). Detailed and specific requirements for quality indices of grains have been set in Chinese National Standards. For appearance attributes, appearance indices including the color and shape, impurity, and unsound kernels of wheat, maize, paddy, and soybean have been elucidated in detail in the Assistant Atlas of Grain Sensory Inspection [1,2,3,4]. As to nutritional attributes, the determination methods for nutrients including proteins [5], starches [6], fats [7], ashes [8], amino acids [9], dietary fibers [10], and trace elements [11] have been specified in the Chinese National Standards for Food Safety. In terms of safety attributes, the maximum residue limits for pesticides [12], maximum residue limits for fungal toxins [13], and maximum levels of contaminants [14] in grains have been listed in the Chinese National Standards for Food Safety. There are also detailed requirements pertaining to the appearance [15,16,17,18], nutritional attributes [19,20,21,22,23,24,25], and safety attributes [26,27,28,29] of grains in international standards.
Grain quality is an important index in the grain circulation process involving the production, storage, trading, and processing. Grain quality detection has always been one of the greatest challenges pertaining to the treatment, processing, classification, and safety guarantees needed in the food industry. Traditionally, grain quality detection is realized through sensory and chemical analyses. However, sensory analysis is time-consuming, inefficient, highly subjective, and susceptible to external interference (influences of physical conditions such as fatigue); chemical analysis is expensive, time-consuming, laborious, and destructive, and requires a laboratory. In recent years, to meet the requirements of modern quality inspection, detection techniques based on physical properties such as acoustic, optical, thermal, electrical, and mechanical properties and sensory features including visual, gustatory, and olfactory features have been developed apace. A bibliometric analysis was used in this paper. References on the state of the art in non-destructive quality-detection techniques for cereal grains were searched through the Web of Science search engine as well as the National Standards Full Text Open System and the websites of International Organization for Standardization to obtain relevant quality standards for cereal grains. The standards are to look up by keywords such as cereal, grain, wheat, rice, pulses, maize, toxin, pesticide, and residue on the system and website. The references of the state of the art were obtained within the last five years in the core collection database of the Web of Science search engine. We searched the references by combining the keywords cereal, grain, and quality with the technical words of physical properties such as near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), hyperspectral imaging (HSI), Raman spectroscopy (RS), optical, dielectric, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), X-ray, electromagnetic, acoustic, thermal, and mechanical, and sensory features such as electronic eye (E-eye), computer vision, electronic nose (E-nose), electronic tongue (E-tongue), and sensory, respectively. We classified all the references according to the quality as the first condition and the techniques as the second condition, and summarized and analyzed the research purposes, research contents, research methods and research results of each reference. The previous references have focused on the applications of a particular detection method to different objects, or some detection methods for selected objects. In this study, we analyzed and summarized the advantages and disadvantages of the methods of physical properties and sensory features in terms of appearance, nutritional and safety attributes of cereal grains, and explored the techniques that can detect various quality indicators in different application scenarios. Based on the latest technical references we have collected, we have mapped the latest research progress of research institutes [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52] (Figure 1) and commercial instruments [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86] (Figure 2).
Among detection techniques for grain quality based on physical properties, those based on optical features such as NIRS, HSI, and RS detect nutritional attributes (proteins, starches, and fats) and safety attributes (pesticide residues and fungal toxins) of grains [87]. The detection is based on the response to light in grains, including its absorption, reflection, transmission, and scattering. In addition, HSI can also be used to determine color and shape [88]; RS also can be adopted to assay heavy metal residues [89]. Detection techniques based on electromagnetic properties such as those based on dielectric properties, NMR, and X-ray realize detection according to response signals of grains in the electrical or magnetic fields. They can be utilized to determine the moisture content [90] and nutritional attributes such as starches and fats [91]. X-rays also can be used to determine trace elements and heavy metals in grains [92]. Detection techniques based on acoustic features were adopted to study nutrients including proteins and appearance attributes such as unsound kernels according to responses of grains to acoustic signals (reflection and transmission) [93]. Detection techniques based on thermal features were used to assess safety attributes involving fungi and appearance attributes including unsound kernels based on differences in thermal radiation of each part of grains [94]. Those based on mechanical properties were employed to study nutritional attributes including proteins and starches according to mechanical features of grains under all kinds of applied load [95]. Among detection techniques for grain quality based on sensory features, E-eyes were used to identify appearance attributes of grains including the color and shape, impurities, and unsound kernels according to features such as color and shape in images [96]. E-noses were employed to evaluate safety attributes involving pesticide residues and fungal toxins and appearance attributes including unsound kernels in accordance with gaseous response signals of volatile organic compounds in grains [97]. E-tongues are often used to detect nutritional attributes such as proteins and starches and safety attributes about heavy metals based on taste response signals in grain leachates [98]. The principles and objects of detection techniques for grain quality based on physical properties and sensory features are listed in Table 1.
The organizational structure of this paper is shown in Figure 3. The article consists of four parts as follows:
Introduction. The introduction of the classification and definition of grain quality (which can be classified as appearance, nutritional, and safety attributes), and the analysis of grain quality detection techniques based on physical properties and sensory features.
Research progress. The current status of the study is divided into three subsections: appearance, nutritional and safety attributes. ① Research progress on detection of appearance attributes of grains based on HSI, X-ray, NMR, thermal properties, acoustic properties, and E-eye. ② Research progress on detection of nutritional attributes of grains based on NIRS, HSI, RS, NMR, X-ray, acoustic properties, mechanical properties, and the E-tongue. ③ Research progress on detection of safety attributes of grains based on NIRS, HSI, RS, X-ray, and the E-nose.
Unsolved technical problems. The problems of high cost, environmental interference, detection principle, limit of detection (LOD), moisture detection, grading and classification of grains and practical application issues in detection applications.
Future research direction. The summary about future research direction, and the methods and attempts to solve the above problems found in some references.

2. Overseas and Domestic Research Status

2.1. Non-Destructive Quality Detection Methods for Appearance Attributes of Cereal Grains

According to descriptions in the Assistant Atlas of Grain Sensory Inspection, the appearance attributes of grains mainly include quality indices such as color and shape, impurities (screen underflows, inorganic impurities, and organic impurities), and unsound kernels (immature, injured, specked, broken, germinated, and moldy grains). Traditionally, appearance attributes are mainly inspected through an artificial sensory analysis, which is both time- and labor-consuming and greatly affected by subjective factors. Among modern detection methods of appearance attributes, the HSI, NMR, X-ray, those based on acoustic and thermal features, and E-eye all can detect indices of appearance attributes (Table 2).
HSI, which combines spectral and image information, can more accurately detect the quality information of grains. Li et al. [99] collected the hyperspectral images of wheat grains in four states (healthy, germinated, mildewed, and shriveled) across the range of wavelengths from 866.4 to 1701.0 nm. By using the data enhancement method based on the deep convolutional generative adversarial network, the spectral data are generated, and sample classes are expanded to improve the performance of the classifier. The classification accuracy of the CNN model is increased from 17.50% before expansion to 96.67%. Zhang et al. [100] obtained hyperspectral data from single wheat grains in the reverse and ventral sides at 866.4 to 1701.0 nm and used the principal component loading method to extract characteristic wavelengths. In this way, the SVM model is established for discriminating four types of wheat grains (healthy, germinated, mildewed, and shriveled), and the classification accuracies for the four types of wheat grains all exceed 96%. By collecting the spectra of healthy and Fusarium-infected wheat grains at 350 to 2500 nm, Zhang et al. [101] found that the classification accuracy of the spectral classification index method is 0.97.
In NMR detection, the NMR signals of grains and foreign matters therein show significant differences. Shao et al. [102] measured the NMR spectra of wheat grains, Sitophilus zeamais, and their mixture. By analyzing NMR spectra through a combination of biexponential analysis and a discrete method, a series of NMR parameters were obtained, which could be used as diagnostic indices for the number and stage of insect pests in wheat grains. The partial least squares (PLS) results based on NMR relaxation parameters (T21, T22, P21, P22, and A21/22) indicate that the measurement and prediction of insect pests exhibit good correlation (R > 0.960).
X-rays can penetrate deeply into a grain and therefore can be used to detect internal structural features thereof. Boniecki et al. [107] observed internal structural damage caused by the granary weevils through digital X-ray images of wheat seeds and developed an artificial neural network model with a three-layer perceptron capable of correctly detecting 100% of infected seeds and 98.4% of healthy seeds. Besançon et al. [48] differentiated between two wheat grain samples based on computerized tomography (CT) data with a resolution of 7 um according to endosperm porosity. They plotted the cumulative distribution curves of pore volume and pore size and analyzed different types of pores to describe endosperm structures. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and CT images with the resolution of 1 um can be employed to describe the microstructures of endosperm of durum wheat grains and quantitatively investigate proportions of vitreous endosperm and farinaceous endosperm. Jha and Tripathy [108] used a high-resolution X-ray micro-CT scanner to collect the images of paddy and wheat grains, and the pore sizes of paddy and wheat samples in the CT images are in the range of 0.01 to 0.8 mm3. Their analysis implies that hybrid solar drying causes compaction of paddy surfaces, cell disruption, and agglomeration of wheat endosperm. By using an X-ray micro-CT system to conduct lossless scanning of whole maize grains, Shao et al. [109] reconstructed the 3D model of the internal structure of maize grains via pseudo-color visualization. The results show that plump maize grains have fewer internal fissures than non-plump grains. Shi et al. [35] developed a fissure detection and measurement algorithm for rough rice kernels based on X-ray images. The algorithm segments individual rice kernels in the X-ray images using the gap-filling method and detects fissures in each rice kernel through adaptive thresholding and the use of a slew of filters. The deviation for the percentage of fissured kernels is less than 2%. Through X-ray scanning and reconstruction, Sun and Xiao [110] conducted visualized analysis on the internal structure of rice at micron resolution. They also determined the volume, shape, and location information of rice chalkiness through 3D reconstruction and volume-based quantification. Zhou et al. [111] scanned wheat grains through micron-resolution X-ray CT and discriminated wheat grains that are infected with mold or not by comparing their grey values in different states. The 3D visualized characterization of the internal structure and pores of the wheat grains was realized according to the difference in attenuation of X-rays, and parameters such as the wheat grain volume, pore volume, and porosity were calculated.
Unsound kernels show different reflection, scattering, projection, and absorption features for acoustic waves. Guo et al. [103] proposed an impact sound signal processing technology based on Gaussian modelling and improved extreme learning machine to detect injured wheat grains. The results indicate that the classification accuracies of the method for uninjured wheat grains and those injured by insect pests and sprouting are 92.0%, 96.0%, and 95.0%, respectively.
Grain and foreign matter therein including insect pests exhibit significant differences in the thermal radiation features. Based on thermal features, the appearance attributes of unsound kernels can be detected. Wang et al. [104] plotted temperature changes on the longitudinal and transverse profiles of bulk maize using cloud images. At different time moments, the areas of six sections and volumes of zones at a temperature above 25 °C were calculated. In addition, the relationship of the area and volume with the temperature difference was revealed. The results show that a large high-temperature zone is formed rapidly at the center of the maize under microbial action. The heat exchange distance in the longitudinal and transverse directions is a function of the temperature difference, and the two have a linear relationship during development of the high-temperature zone. The volume of the high-temperature zone is a cubic polynomial function.
E-eyes, as a non-conventional term, are an image analysis technique in computer vision. An E-eye comprises an image sensor and a pattern recognition system. The image sensor collects image data and the pattern recognition system recognizes and analyzes features such as color and shape in images [96,112,113]. Lingwal et al. [105] used a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify 15,000 images of 15 wheat varieties based on visual traits. A classification model for wheat varieties under adjustment of different hyper-parameters was established, which indicated a training accuracy and test accuracy of 94.88% and 97.53%, respectively. Basati et al. [81] extracted nine color features, ten shape features, and six statistical features relating to healthy and moth-eaten wheat grains with different moisture contents. Therein, 11 features were selected as the input to artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree, and discriminant analysis classifiers. The results show that the classification accuracy of the J.48 algorithm based on the decision tree is the highest (90.20%), followed by the ANN with an 11-19-2 topology and the discriminant analysis classifier, the classification accuracies of which are separately 87.46% and 81.81%. Based on a multi-class support vector machine (SVM) classifier, Vithu et al. [106] developed a recognition model for the documented type of paddy. The model considers five morphological features and nine color features in paddy images, based on which the overall classification accuracy reaches 90.3%. The average classification accuracies of the model for paddy, organic impurities, inorganic impurities, other paddy varieties, and black rice are 85%, 83.2%, 93%, 98%, and 93.6%, respectively. By analyzing features including the color and shape in grain images, E-eyes can realize the qualitative classification of grain varieties and detection of pests and diseases. Grain investigation methods based on E-eyes are easy and convenient to use and have been extensively applied in quality-detection on grain varieties.
HSI can realize high-accuracy detection of appearance indices by combining image and spectral information. NMR achieves high-accurate detection based on characteristic response signals of insect pests. X-ray technology is used to detect and estimate changes in internal structures of grains and analyze the formation of appearance attributes. The unsound kernels can be detected and discriminated based on differences of normal and unsound kernels in acoustic and thermal features. E-eyes can detect all appearance indices including color and shape, impurities, and unsound kernels of grains.

2.2. Non-Destructive Quality Detection Methods for Nutritional Attributes of Cereal Grains

The main nutritional indices of grains include proteins, starches, fats, ashes, amino acids, dietary fibers, and trace elements. Traditionally, nutritional attributes are determined using physical and chemical experimental analysis. The Kjeldahl method for nitrogen determination, hydrolysis, Randall extraction, incineration, amino-acid analyzers, enzymatic gravimetric method, and plasmas are generally adopted to determine protein [5], starch [6], fat [7], ash [8], amino acid [9], dietary fiber [10], and trace element [11] contents in grains. Traditional detection methods generally call for destructive sample preparation and are time-consuming and inefficient. In modern inspection methods for nutritional attributes, methods including NIRS, HSI, RS, NMR, X-ray, and those based on acoustic properties, mechanical properties, and E-tongues are mainly used (Table 3).
Grains show different spectral response characteristics in the near-infrared region when containing different contents of nutritional ingredients, so the nutritional attributes can be quantified based on spectral features. Shi et al. [114] collected NIR spectra of 48 wheat samples at 680 to 2500 nm and established the optimal NIR model between 1400 and 2500 nm using mean-centered partial least square regression (PLSR). The R2 of crude proteins is predicted to be 0.98. Amanah et al. [115] determined diffuse reflectance spectra of 310 soybean samples in the waveband ranging from 1000 to 2500 nm and studied characteristic absorption bands of different nutritional ingredients of soybeans. In addition, they also built the PLS multi-variate analysis model for isoflavones and oligosaccharides in soybeans, and the predicted R2 scores of the model for isoflavones and oligosaccharides are separately 0.80 and 0.72. Nutritional ingredients also differ in different varieties of grains in a same type, so the different varieties can be discriminated according to differences in nutritional attributes. Through principal component analysis (PCA), Wadood et al. [127] screened the spectral variables at 950 to 1650 nm and established a classification model for linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The model shows the highest classification accuracies of 100% and 73% separately for the origin and production year of wheat, and the highest classification accuracy of 98.2% for the genotypes of wheat grains. Fan et al. [128] coupled machine learning methodologies with a spectral dimensionality reduction algorithm to establish an assessment model for seed vigor, the accuracy of which exceeds 84.0%. Based on PCA, Basati et al. [129] classified healthy and unhealthy wheat kernels at the accuracy of 100%, and the two types of wheat kernels are more effectively discriminated at wavelengths of 839 nm, 918 nm, and 995 nm. Zhang et al. [130] eliminated interference wavelengths successively using the equidistant combination-partial least squares and wavelength step-by-step phase-out PLS. On this basis, the constructed novel purity analysis model of rice seeds shows a predicted correlation coefficient of 0.920. Schütz et al. [131] established a global classification model for the geographical origin of grain maize by adopting the SVM classification technique, which achieved an overall classification accuracy of 95%. Qiu et al. [132] differentiated viable and unviable maize seeds based on spectral data within the waveband ranging from 1000 to 2500 nm and the established partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) classification model shows the classification accuracy of 98.0%. By using the random forest algorithm, Wang et al. [133] screened spectra of soybeans in the range of 5793 to 12,489 cm−1 and selected important variables to establish the classification model, which achieved an 80% classification accuracy of soybeans. Kusumaningrum et al. [134] used the variable importance in projection method to screen 146 optimal wavelengths from 1000 to 2500 nm and built the soybean seed viability prediction model combining PLS-DA. The model shows the prediction accuracy approaching 100% for viable and unviable soybean seeds.
HSI acquires spectral information when collecting image information, so it can be used to detect the nutritional attributes of grains. HSI allows segmentation of hyperspectral data from single grain kernels and also can segment hyperspectral data of different parts of single grain kernels, so it exhibits unique advantages in quality analysis of single grain kernels. Caporaso et al. [31] collected hyperspectral images of individual wheat kernels from 980 to 2500 nm and the R2 scores for the calibration and validation sets of the established detection model for the protein content based on PLSR analysis are separately 0.82 and 0.79. Fu et al. [116] selected 23 characteristic wavelengths of oleic acids and 21 characteristic wavelengths of linoleic acids in hyperspectral images of soybean kernels in the range from 600 to 1000 nm. On this basis, they established the PLS-DA classification model of different oil contents, which shows the classification accuracies separately of 98.6% and 86.7% for the calibration and validation of oleic acids. Liu et al. [117] sampled hyperspectral images above and below the embryos of individual maize kernels in the range from 930 to 2500 nm and used the competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) method to select characteristic wavelengths. They established the PLSR and non-linear statistical data model using the ANN algorithm and its predicted R-value for maize starch content is 0.96. Weng et al. [135] collected hyperspectral images from 10 high-quality paddy varieties in China at 400 to 1000 nm. The classification model for paddy varieties based on PCA networks using spectral and morphological features exhibits classification accuracies separately of 98.66% and 98.57% in the training and prediction sets. Guo et al. [136] obtained hyperspectral images of the mixture of rice produced in Wuchang City and Jiangxi Province, China from 380 to 1000 nm and the established full-wavelength SG1-PLSR model shows a predicted R-value of 0.9909. The R-value of the simplified PLSR model established based on 15 important wavelengths selected according to the weighted regression coefficient is 0.9769. Miao et al. [137] imaged 800 maize kernels in eight varieties in the range from 386.7 to 1016.7 nm, and the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) model pre-processed via PCA exhibits the highest classification accuracy of 97.5%, which is far higher than other models (75% for PCA, 85% for kernel principal component analysis, and 76.25% for local linear embedding). Li et al. [54] collected 3600 hyperspectral images of soybeans in the range from 866.4 to 1701.0 nm and established the one-dimensional CNN model of soybeans. The classification accuracies of the model for four soybean varieties (Zhonghuang 13, 37, 39, and 57) exceeded 98%.
The molecular vibration and rotation information can be obtained based on Raman spectra of nutritional ingredients in grains at different frequencies of incident light, thus realizing the quantitative detection and qualitative analysis of the quality [138,139]. RS can be used for qualitative analysis such as the varietal classification of grains including wheat, paddy, and maize. Liu et al. [118] collected Raman spectra of eight wheat varieties with waxy proteins from 700 to 2000 cm−1, measured spectra in several specific regions, and established the discriminant analysis (DA) classification model. The accuracies of the model in the calibration and validation sets are 94.4% and 94.6%, respectively. Zhu et al. [119] acquired Raman spectra of 107 paddy varieties in China from 200 to 1500 cm−1, used PCA for preliminary evaluation, and established the soft independent modelling of class analogy model. The model can identify high-quality and poor-quality rice at an accuracy of between 80 and 100%. Liu et al. [140] collected Raman spectral data from 760 maize seeds from four different varieties from 400 to 1800 cm−1, selected characteristic wavelengths through CARS and established the MCARS-genetic algorithm-SVM model in 13 wavebands. The calibrated classification accuracy and prediction accuracy of the model are 99.29% and 100%, respectively. The grain quality can be quantitatively assessed based on characteristic peaks on Raman spectra of different nutritional ingredients in different grains. Pezzotti et al. [120] proposed and verified the quantitative algorithm for calculating the amylose and amylopectin components based on spectral differences across 830 to 895 cm−1. They also constructed the Raman equation for quantitatively determining the phenylalanine (PHE) and tryptophan components based on the significant features of PHE at 1003 cm−1 and the breathing vibration of indole rings of tryptophan at 768 cm−1. Singh et al. [121] collected transmitted Raman spectra of soybean flour from 400 to 1950 cm−1 and established the multi-variate linear regression classification model based on the spectral measure. The predicted R2 scores of proteins and fats in the soybean flour are separately 0.87 and 0.87. Yang et al. [122] studied Raman spectral characteristics of maize seeds from 380 to 180 cm−1 according to samples of standard chemical components of maize, including maize starch, protein, oil, and bran. They found that the characteristic peaks at 477, 1443, 1522, 1596, and 1654 cm−1 in their Raman spectra are separately correlated to the maize starch, oil-starch mixture, zeaxanthin, lignin, and oil.
Based on the NMR principle, a series of detectable inductive signals with attenuated intensity are generated when exciting atomic nuclei with fixed magnetic moments in samples using a specific impulse train. The intensity of the relaxation signals is in direct proportion to the number of nuclear spins in the detected samples (a quantitative basis) and the signal attenuation process is closely related to the constituent structure of the detected substances (a qualitative basis). The inverse analysis of signals using a mathematical method can yield information about various components and microstructures that fail to be obtained using other approaches, thus realizing the detection objective. Li et al. [123] identified the mass and oil content of individual maize kernels using an NMR sorting system. The mass of individual maize kernels is listed (in descending order) as haploid, diploid, and aborted kernels on the whole, with an extremely significant difference between diploid and aborted kernels and insignificant differences among other kernels; the oil contents are listed (in descending order) as diploid, haploid, and aborted kernels, and the oil contents are distributed in gradients in the three types of kernels.
In X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, various elements in samples release X-ray fluorescence with characteristic energy after being excited by irradiating these samples using X-rays. By measuring the wavelength and intensity of these X-rays, the elements present in the samples can be quantified. X-rays can be utilized to detect trace elements in grains. Lemmens et al. [124] adopted pearling, synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy mapping, and X-ray absorption near-edge structure imaging of wheat to reveal changes in mineral elements such as Zn, Fe, and S during germination of wheat. This provides an opportunity for improving the nutritional quality in the food processing process. Chen et al. [125] investigated wheat flour samples by using the energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and extracted characteristic variables using the CARS. They also identified 12 energy variables (corresponding to mineral elements) to characterize the geographical attributes of samples. Through PCA and quadratic discriminant analysis, they established a non-linear model, which has the identification accuracy of 84.25% for origins of wheat flour through five-fold cross validation. Nguli et al. [71] estimated concentrations of Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn in soybean kernels based on total reflection X-ray fluorescence, and their results show that soybean contains sufficient trace elements. Except for Fe which is present in high concentrations, concentrations of other elements are relatively low yet within the necessary range.
Detection based on acoustic features is used to evaluate grain quality according to the vibration responses of grains under certain excitation. The interactions between acoustic vibration and grains include reflection, scattering, transmission, and absorption. The propagation mode of acoustic vibration is determined by the vibro-acoustic characteristics of grains, which are related to the mechanical and structural properties of grains. Responses of grains to vibration are dependent on the elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio, density, mass, and shape of grains, and the mechanical and structural properties of grains change with the growth and metabolism of cells. Detection based on acoustic features is widely used to assess attributes that are related to the mechanical and structural properties [93]. Khorshidi et al. [141] detected wheat varieties through transmission of longitudinal ultrasonic waves at five frequencies and established the PCA and generalized linear model thereof. Their results imply that, compared with other frequencies, ultrasonic measurement at 10 MHz can better identify wheat varieties and the ultrasonic phase velocity and longitudinal storage modulus at 10 MHz are the optimal discrimination factors for wheat varieties. Khorshidi et al. [141] also verified the capacity of low-intensity ultrasound at 10 MHz in identifying wheat varieties using 23 red, hard, spring wheat varieties. They confirmed through PCA that the ultrasonic parameters are significantly correlated to the protein content, falling number, and grain ash content of wheat. An acoustic detection method can be applied to quality detection and variety classification of grains, while it is susceptible to external environmental interference and can only be applied to a limited number of scenarios.
Mechanical properties of grains refer to mechanical features thereof under all types of applied load. Determining the mechanical parameters (rupture force, rupture energy, etc.) of grains under load can reduce the loss of grains in the harvest, transportation, storage, and processing processes. Research into the organizational structures and mechanical properties of grains provides a certain physical basis for improving the nutritive value and taste of grain products. Mechanical properties of grains are also an important factor that determines their processing quality, and determining the type and calculating the value of load borne by grains in the processing process can provide a basis for precision-design of relevant agricultural machinery [95]. Feng et al. [63] designed an orthogonal rotation combination test scheme. By using a multi-parameter controllable thin layer drying test bench, they dried maize under different conditions (temperatures of 30 to 60 °C, relative humidity of 30% to 60%, air velocities of 0.46 to 0.94 m s−1, initial moisture contents of maize of 20% to 30% w.b., and tempering ratios of 0 to 3). Thereafter, they employed a texture analyzer to measure various mechanical properties of dried maize kernels, including the rupture force, rupture energy, elastic modulus, and brittleness. They then established the model for relationships of the rupture force, rupture energy, elastic modulus, and brittleness with the drying conditions. As the drying temperature is increased from 30 °C to 60 °C, the rupture energy, elastic modulus, and brittleness of maize kernels separately are increased by 19.11%, 11.76%, and 4.02%; when the relative humidity during drying is increased from 30% to 60%, the rupture force, rupture energy, elastic modulus, and brittleness separately are increased by 15.07%, 13.74%, 20.73%, and 3.31%. Delwiche et al. [50] explored the relationships of super-soft wheat with three compressive strength properties (maximum stress, Young’s modulus, and Poisson’s ratio), with the correlation coefficients separately being 0.76, 0.66, and 0.75. Grain quality based on mechanical properties was detected mainly on the basis that the quality distribution of grains influences organizational structures of grains, which are then shown as the difference in mechanical properties. At present, the correlation between nutritional ingredients and organizational structures of grains remains unclear, and the grain quality detection based on mechanical properties is still in the initial exploratory stage.
Lu et al. [126] measured the original voltametric signals of rice-flour slurry using a self-made E-tongue and built a CNN+BpNN model. The training and prediction accuracies of the model for physical and chemical indicators including the degree of chalkiness, amylose, protein, starch, and total metal content are separately between 84.3% and 92.0% and 81.9% and 89.5%. Zhao et al. [40] assayed rice filtrate by using an E-tongue (α-Astree, and Alpha MOS, France). Discrimination factors DF1 and DF2 separately account for 97.24% and 97.58% of the total variability of paddy in the storage period, and the DF1 value of storage devices shows an increase trend while the DF2 value first increases, then decreases. The results show that rice samples under different storage conditions can be distinguished. Guo et al. [142] acquired current response signals of wheat leachates during five different storage periods using a self-made large amplitude pulse voltammetry (MLAPV) based E-tongue system. They also built a detection model based on wavelet packet transform, improved artificial fish swarm algorithm, and extreme learning machine. The model achieved the training and testing accuracies separately of 96% and 92% for aged wheat stored for five different periods.
NIRS, HSI, and RS can all be used to detect multiple quality indices; NMR detection can detect oils; X-rays can be employed to detect trace elements. In comparison, acoustic and mechanical responses of grains are insignificantly correlated with the nutritional attributes of grains; because grain leachates need to be prepared when detecting grains using an E-tongue, application of E-tongues is, to some extent, limited.

2.3. Non-Destructive Inspection Methods for Safety Attributes of Cereal Grains

Regarding safety attributes, the maximum limits for pesticide residues, fungal toxins, and contaminants in grains have been listed in the Chinese National Standards for Food Safety. Traditionally, gas chromatography and liquid chromatography are commonly used for determining the maximum limits of pesticide residues and fungal toxins, and atomic absorption spectrometry (ABS) is utilized to measure heavy metal residues. Modern methods for detecting safety attributes mainly include NIRS, HSI, RS, X-ray, and E-noses (Table 4).
NIRS can be used to detect fungal toxins. Jiang et al. [143] collected spectra of wheat from 600 to 1600 nm and adopted the LDA and PLSR to construct a qualitative and quantitative analysis model for the degree of infection of wheat infected with harmful mold. The LDA model shows an overall identification rate above 90.0% for wheat samples with different degrees of mildew, and the determination coefficient of the PLSR model reaches 0.8592. Ong et al. [144] proposed a modified simulated annealing (MSA) algorithm to determine the concentration of aflatoxin B1 in rice. Compared with the full-spectrum regression model, the MSA algorithm provides more accurate detection (an improvement of more than 44% at the low concentration and one exceeding 62% at the high concentration).
HSI that combines spectral and image information can reach a higher detection accuracy. Zhou et al. [145] collected hyperspectral images of maize flour samples with different aflatoxin B concentrations from 430 to 2400 nm and proposed two algorithms with which to calculate the inter-class variance ratio and weighted inter-class variance ratio to extract the characteristic wavelengths. In this way, they established the SVM model, the average classification accuracy of which reaches 96.18%.
RS has been extensively used to detect safety attributes of grains [150,151,152,153]. Pesticide residues in grains produce clear characteristic peaks in the Raman spectra and changes in grain quality caused by mildew may induce variation of Raman spectra. According to response characteristics of Raman spectra of pesticides and mildew, the safety attributes of grains can be quantitatively detected. Qiu et al. [60] obtained Raman spectra of healthy wheat kernels, and wheat kernels with slight and severe gibberellic disease from 240 to 1736 cm−1. A classification model was established by using an inception-attention network, with classification accuracies of 97.13%, 91.49%, and 93.62% separately in the training, validation, and prediction sets. Long et al. [146] acquired Raman hyperspectral images from 732 to 1007 nm, from which 50 variables were screened by combining CARS with variance features. These variables are more applicable to determine the fungal spore count of individual maize kernels. In addition, they established an optimal detection model based on PLSR, with an R-value of 0.8619 in the validation test. Weng et al. [32] prepared efficient gold nanorods for detection based on surface enhanced RS and resolved Raman fitting using the density functional theory. When the residual concentrations of the wheat leachate and contaminated wheat are separately 0.2 and 0.25 mg/L, the Raman signals of pirimiphos-methyl can be detected. Jiang et al. [154] collected the surface enhanced Raman spectra of paddy samples with different Dursban concentrations. The R-values of calibration and prediction sets predicted using the CARS-PLS model are separately 0.9942 and 0.9881, and the LOD is 0.01 mg/mL.
X-rays are fluorescent and have been widely used to explore heavy metal residues in grains [92]. Sang et al. [147] developed an energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometric method to detect cadmium in rice, which resulted in an R-value of 0.9814 when compared with the measurement results of graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Zhou et al. [111] scanned wheat kernels through micron-resolution X-ray CT and determined whether wheat kernels are infected with mold or not by comparing grey values in different states.
E-noses, also known as artificial olfactory systems, are electronic systems that imitate biological noses. They mainly identify different types and components of materials according to odor. Mildew and pesticide residues of grains may produce volatile substances in the storage process, which can be qualitatively studied and quantitatively detected using an E-nose [97,155,156]. Zhou et al. [64] cultivated insect pests in a container containing 1 kg of rice at 15 °C and 30 °C for four weeks and detected the volatile substances in the rice with insect pests using an E-nose (Cyranose 320) every five days. In addition, the PCA was adopted to build the classification model. Results show that the E-nose can accurately identify clean rice and rice with insect pests at 30 °C, while it fails to discriminate among those stored for one, two, and three weeks. Mishra et al. [67] used an E-nose to evaluate changes in the quality of wheat artificially infected with Rhyzopertha dominica to different degrees in four storage periods. They also optimized the sensor array via hybrid neuro-fuzzy-assisted electronic nose analysis and detected the number of insect pests, uric acid content, and protein content, with R values of 0.999, 0.985, and 0.973 respectively. Ku et al. [148] inoculated Aspergillus candidus in fresh paddy, which was then loaded in a simulation grain bin and detected using an online detection system for mildew of grains. A model for the mold content was established by optimizing parameters using the particle swarm optimization. The R2 score for mold detection and the minimum LOD for mold content are 0.9839 and 1.5 × 10 cfu/g, respectively. Zhao et al. [149] collected the odor responses using an E-nose from wheat inoculated with mold after storage for 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days, and they established the relationship model with the degree of infection of mold. The PCA model can accurately differentiate wheat samples without mildew and with slight and severe mildew. The identification rate of the LDA model for the mildew degree of wheat infected with a single mold exceeds 90.0% and that for all wheat samples reaches 84.0%. The predicted R2 of the PLSR model for the total fungal count is 0.852.
NIRS and HSI can qualitatively identify and quantitatively detect fungal toxins. RS can detect fungal toxins and pesticide residues according to different Raman characteristic peaks. The mildew and heavy metal residues in grains can be detected based on X-rays due to their depth of penetration and fluorescent characteristics. E-noses can detect safety attributes of grains according to the volatile gases produced by fungal toxins and pesticide residues.

3. Unsolved Technical Problems

For different quality indices of grains, different types of detection methods can be used to realize high-accuracy detection. However, these methods still have room to improve in terms of grain-quality detection.
  • High cost. ① Optical detection methods including NIRS, HSI, and RS have developed to relative maturity, while the detection cost of full-spectrum devices is high. ② NMR instruments also face the problem of high cost.
  • Environmental interference. Grain quality detection based on acoustic and thermal features is greatly influenced by the environment (ambient noise and temperature).
  • Detection principle. ① The relationship between the mechanical features and quality indices of grains remains unclear. ② Water is an important factor that affects the dielectric property of grains, while the relationship between quality indices and dielectric properties of grains is also poorly understood. ③ Detection objects of E-tongues must be grain leachates, which limits the application thereof to the quality detection. ④ X-rays may contaminate grains.
  • LOD. E-nose detection is limited by the LOD of gas sensors and the method fails to identify problems including early mildew in grains.
  • Moisture detection. Water is an important factor that influences grain quality and must be detected in all stages including the harvest, storage, trading, transportation, and processing of grains.
  • Grading and classification of grains. Grains can be graded and classified according to differences in multiple quality indices of grains in accordance with the national or international standards. However, research on grain quality using a single detection technique can only determine one or several indices, which fails to meet the grading and classification demands imposed in practice.
  • Practical application issues. In different applications, grain quality inspection equipment faces different challenges; for example, the aerodynamic characteristics of the grain seeds during sowing, and the vibration of the machinery during harvesting can affect the quality inspection results.

4. Future Research Directions

  • ① Considering that screening of characteristic wavelengths of different quality indices of grains is still an important part in existing quality detection research, device development based on characteristic wavelengths can substantially reduce the cost of analysis. This is conducive to the popularization and application of optical detection devices. In recent years, NIRS spectrometers [157,158] have also been upgraded with the development of NIRS analysis and chemometrics methods [159,160,161,162]. Liu et al. [163] selected four characteristic wavelengths to develop the portable near-infrared quality detector, which can realize the real-time determination of proteins and moisture in wheat kernels. The development of multispectral imaging [164] based on characteristic wavelengths can overcome this problem. Sendin et al. [165] discriminated between high-quality and poor-quality maize using 19 characteristic wavelengths, with the classification accuracy in the range of 83% to 100%. ② NMR can be divided into high-field and low-field ones [166]. A high-field NMR spectrometer contains expensive superconducting magnets, so it has complex structures and its signals are difficult to process. A low-field NMR spectrometer uses low-cost permanent magnets, so it is preferred in grain-quality detection.
  • Acoustic features include audible sound and ultrasonic waves. Detection based on audible acoustic features is susceptible to the ambient noise, while acoustic detection based on ultrasonic waves can avoid environmental interference, and is an important method of applying acoustic methods to grain-quality detection [36]. Eliminating interference (including the effect of changes in ambient temperature) with detection based on thermal features is the top priority for improving the accuracy of detection of grain quality. Mangus et al. [62] performed environmental calibration using a temperature reference plate, which compensates for environmental influences including air temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, and camera temperature, thus maintaining the measurement temperature.
  • ① The difference in mechanical properties of cereal grains is determined by the tightness of bonding of main components including starches and proteins therein. By using an electronic universal testing machine, Cheng et al. [167] measured the shear resistance of wheat. In this way, they obtained that the shear resistance is significantly positively correlated with the protein content, positively correlated with wet and dry gluten, negatively (albeit insignificantly) correlated with the starch content, and positively (albeit insignificantly) correlated with the bulk weight and thousand-kernel weight. Existing research into the mechanical properties of cereal grains mainly focuses on grain quality evaluation [168], while the correlation of these properties with quality indices remains to be further studied. ② Moisture detection of grains based on dielectric properties has reached an extremely high accuracy, so developing detection devices applicable to different application scenarios is a potential direction for future development [169]. ③ Preparation of grain leachates is laborious and the detection electrodes of E-tongues need to be cleaned and polished in a complex process before the next detection [142]. Therefore, the development of preparation techniques of detection samples for E-tongues and the upgrading of detection electrode materials are the only way to realizing real-time efficient detection of quality indices of grains. ④ X-rays include hard and soft variants [170]; hard X-rays may damage grains, while soft ones have low penetrability and therefore, they are applicable to detection of quality indices of grains.
  • The multi-scale, systematic organization for imitating biological noses through bionics design is one of the methods to improve the LOD of E-noses. In addition, development of high-LOD gas-sensing materials is also an important approach to improving the performance of E-noses [171].
  • Research into moisture detection in grains has developed to relative maturity, and high-accuracy moisture detection can be realized based on dielectric properties and NMR [56,75,172,173,174,175]. Robust progress has been made in moisture detection devices based on dielectric properties [79,169,176], while those based on NMR have not developed to any substantial extent. Moisture detection devices for grains in different application scenarios should be a focus of future research.
  • The combination of multiple quality detection techniques of grains can detect multiple quality indices in the grading and classing requirements, thus realizing grain grading and classification. At present, some studies have combined multiple detection techniques to improve the detection accuracy [177,178,179,180,181]. Realizing the grading and classification of cereal grains by combining multiple quality detection techniques remains the focus of future research.
  • To guarantee the normal operation of grain quality detection equipment, the interference factors affecting grain quality detection equipment are studied for specific application scenarios. Gierz et al. [182] collected seed image data at the air velocity (15, 20, 25 m/s) of a pneumatic seeder pipeline conveying seeds based on the aerodynamic characteristics of grain seeds [183,184], and constructed a classification model based on multilayer-based perceptron network, which has a correct classification coefficient of 0.99 for contaminants in seeds at a sowing speed of 15 m/s. Studying the influencing factors in different application scenarios is necessary to promote the application of grain quality detection instruments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and J.N.; investigation, Y.L., J.Z., H.Y. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L., J.Z. and J.N.; visualization, Y.L., J.Z., H.Y. and M.S.; supervision, Y.Z., W.C., X.J. and J.N.; funding acquisition, Y.Z., W.C., X.J. and J.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2021YFD2000101), Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institution (grant number S202219), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31871524), Modern Agricultural Machinery Equipment & Technology Demonstration and Promotion of Jiangsu Province (grant number NJ2021-58), and the Primary Research & Development Plan of Jiangsu Province of China (grant number BE2019306, BE2021304).

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable. No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.


We would like to thank all the researchers in the Intelligent Equipment Research Group of the National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture and all the foundations for this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. GB/T 22504.1-2008; Inspection of Grain and Oils—Assistant Atlas of Grain Sensory Inspection—Part 1: Wheat. AQSIQ: Beijing, China; SAC: Beijing, China, 2008; p. 12.
  2. GB/T 22504.2-2018; Inspection of Grain and Oils—Assistant Atlas of Grain Sensory Inspection—Part 2: Maize. SAMR: Beijing, China; SAC: Beijing, China, 2018; p. 12.
  3. GB/T 22504.3-2018; Inspection of GRAIN and oils—Assistant Atlas of Grain Sensory Inspection—Part 3: Paddy. SAMR: Beijing, China; SAC: Beijing, China, 2018; p. 20.
  4. AQSIQ; SAC. Inspection of Grain and Oils—Assistant Atlas of Grain Sensory Inspection—Part 4: Oilseeds (Draft for comments). Available online: (accessed on 17 July 2022).
  5. GB 5009.5-2016; National Food Safety Standard—Determination of Protein in Food. NHFPC: Beijing, China; CFDA: Beijing, China, 2016; p. 10.
  6. GB 5009.9-2016; National Food Safety Standard—Determination of Starch in Food. NHFPC: Beijing, China; CFDA: Beijing, China, 2016; p. 12.
  7. GB 5009.6-2016; National Food Safety Standard—Determination of Fat in Food. NHFPC: Beijing, China; CFDA: Beijing, China, 2016; p. 14.
  8. GB 5009.4-2016; National Food Safety Standard—Determination of Ash in Food. NHFPC: Beijing, China, 2016; p. 9.
  9. GB 5009.124-2016; National Food Safety Standard—Determination of Amino Acids in Food. NHFPC: Beijing, China; CFDA: Beijing, China, 2016; p. 8.
  10. GB 5009.88-2014; National Food Safety Standard—Determination of Dietary Fiber in Food. NHFPC: Beijing, China, 2015; p. 9.
  11. GB 5009.268-2016; National Food Safety Standard—Determination of Multiple Elements in Food. NHFPC: Beijing, China; CFDA: Beijing, China, 2016; p. 17.
  12. GB 2763-2021; National Food Safety Standard—Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food. NHC: Beijing, China; MARA: Beijing, China; SAMR: Beijing, China, 2021; p. 422.
  13. GB 2761-2017; National Food Safety Standard—Limits for Mycotoxins in Food. NHFPC: Beijing, China; CFDA: Beijing, China, 2017; p. 10.
  14. GB 2762-2017; National Food Safety Standard—Limits for Contaminants in Food. NHFPC: Beijing, China; CFDA: Beijing, China, 2017; p. 22.
  15. ISO 19942:2018; Maize (Zea mays L.)—Specification. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018; p. 14.
  16. ISO 605:1991; Pulses—Determination of Impurities, Size, Foreign Odours, Insects, and Species and Variety—Test Methods. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1991; p. 5.
  17. ISO 7301:2011; Rice—Specification. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; p. 19.
  18. ISO 7970:2021; Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)—Specification. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; p. 22.
  19. ISO 13903:2005; Animal Feeding Stuffs—Determination of Amino Acids Content. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005; p. 17.
  20. ISO 7973:1992; Cereals and Milled Cereal Products—Determination of the Viscosity of Flour—Method Using an Amylograph. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1992; p. 8.
  21. ISO 20483:2013; Cereals and Pulses—Determination of the Nitrogen Content and Calculation of the Crude Protein Content—Kjeldahl Method. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013; p. 13.
  22. ISO 11085:2015; Cereals, Cereals-Based Products and Animal Feeding Stuffs—Determination of Crude Fat and Total Fat Content by the Randall Extraction Method. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; p. 16.
  23. ISO 2171:2007; Cereals, Pulses and By-Products—Determination of Ash Yield by Incineration. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007; p. 11.
  24. ISO 7305:2019; Milled Cereal Products—Determination of Fat Acidity. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; p. 8.
  25. ISO 6647-1:2020; Rice—Determination of Amylose Content—Part 1: Spectrophotometric Method with a Defatting Procedure by Methanol and with Calibration Solutions of Potato Amylose and Waxy Rice Amylopectin. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; p. 11.
  26. ISO 23637:2021; Cereals—Determination of Cadmium Content by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Diluted Nitric Acid Extraction. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; p. 10.
  27. ISO 16050:2003; Foodstuffs—Determination of Aflatoxin B1, and the Total Content of Aflatoxins B1, B2, G1 and G2 in Cereals, Nuts and Derived Products—High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; p. 12.
  28. CXS 193-1995; General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed. CCCF: Rome, Italy, 1995; p. 39.
  29. CAC/MRL 1-2009; Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for Pesticides. FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009.
  30. Peiris, K.H.S.; Dong, Y.; Davis, M.A.; Bockus, W.W.; Dowell, F.E. Estimation of the Deoxynivalenol and Moisture Contents of Bulk Wheat Grain Samples by FT-NIR Spectroscopy. Cereal Chem. J. 2017, 94, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Caporaso, N.; Whitworth, M.B.; Fisk, I.D. Protein content prediction in single wheat kernels using hyperspectral imaging. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Weng, S.; Yu, S.; Dong, R.; Zhao, J.; Liang, D. Detection of Pirimiphos-Methyl in Wheat Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and Chemometric Methods. Molecules 2019, 24, 1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  33. Lewis, M.A.; Trabelsi, S.; Nelson, S.O. Real-time Monitoring of Moisture within an Eighth-scale Grain Bin during Drying. In Proceedings of the 2018 ASABE Annual International Meeting, St. Joseph, MI, USA, 29 July–1 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
  34. van Duynhoven, J.; Rondeau-Mouro, C. Applications of magnetic resonance in food science. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2019, 57, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shi, H.; Siebenmorgen, T.J.; Luo, H.; Odek, Z. Fissure Detection and Measurement in Rough Rice Using X-ray Imaging. Trans. ASABE 2019, 62, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khorshidi, A.S.; Ames, N.; Cuthbert, R.; Sopiwnyk, E.; Thandapilly, S.J. Application of low-intensity ultrasound as a rapid, cost-effective tool to wheat screening: Discrimination of Canadian varieties at 10 MHz. J. Cereal Sci. 2019, 88, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Estrada-Pérez, L.V.; Pradana-López, S.; Pérez-Calabuig, A.M.; Mena, M.L.; Cancilla, J.C.; Torrecilla, J.S. Thermal imaging of rice grains and flours to design convolutional systems to ensure quality and safety. Food Control 2021, 121, 107572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sabanci, K.; Aslan, M.F.; Durdu, A. Bread and durum wheat classification using wavelet based image fusion. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 5577–5585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yin, Y.; Hao, Y.; Yu, H. Identification method for different moldy degrees of maize using electronic nose coupled with multi-features fusion. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2016, 32, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, Q.; Yousaf, L.; Xue, Y.; Shen, Q. Changes in flavor of fragrant rice during storage under different conditions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 3435–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Onmankhong, J.; Sirisomboon, P. Texture evaluation of cooked parboiled rice using nondestructive milled whole grain near infrared spectroscopy. J. Cereal Sci. 2021, 97, 103151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kahrıman, F.; Sütal, A.; Topçakıl, M.; Gezer, Ö. Prototype near-infrared (NIR) reflectance spectrometer for the analysis of maize flour. Instrum. Sci. Technol. 2021, 49, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Amanah, H.Z.; Joshi, R.; Masithoh, R.E.; Choung, M.-G.; Kim, K.-H.; Kim, G.; Cho, B.-K. Nondestructive measurement of anthocyanin in intact soybean seed using Fourier Transform Near-Infrared (FT-NIR) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2020, 111, 103477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Z.; Huang, W.; Tian, X.; Long, Y.; Li, L.; Fan, S. Rapid and Non-destructive Classification of New and Aged Maize Seeds Using Hyperspectral Image and Chemometric Methods. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 849495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tian, F.; Tan, F.; Zhu, P. Multi-classification identification of PLS in rice spectra with different pre-treatments and K/S optimisation. Vib. Spectrosc. 2020, 109, 103069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, J.; Duan, K.; Guo, W. Detection Method of Moisture Content of Wheat with Microwave Free-space Measurement. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2019, 50, 338–343+378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shewry, P.R.; Corol, D.I.; Jones, H.D.; Beale, M.H.; Ward, J.L. Defining genetic and chemical diversity in wheat grain by 1H-NMR spectroscopy of polar metabolites. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1600807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  48. Besançon, L.; Rondet, E.; Grabulos, J.; Lullien-Pellerin, V.; Lhomond, L.; Cuq, B. Study of the microstructure of durum wheat endosperm using X-ray micro-computed tomography. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 96, 103115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mankin, R.; Hagstrum, D.; Guo, M.; Eliopoulos, P.; Njoroge, A. Automated Applications of Acoustics for Stored Product Insect Detection, Monitoring, and Management. Insects 2021, 12, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Delwiche, S.R.; Morris, C.F.; Kiszonas, A.M. Compressive strength of Super Soft wheat endosperm. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 91, 102894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mancera-Rico, A.; García-de-los-Santos, G.; Zavaleta-Mancera, H.A.; Carrillo-Salazar, J.A.; González-Estrada, E.; Villaseñor-Perea, C.A. Moisture and Rupture Models for Corn (Zeamays) Seeds of Different Endosperm Types. Trans. ASABE 2019, 62, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vadivambal, R.; Jayas, D.S. Applications of Thermal Imaging in Agriculture and Food Industry-A Review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011, 4, 186–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, Z.; Yang, Q.; Shen, G.; Mei, J.; Huang, Y.; Han, L. Online Application of Soybean Meal NIRS Quantitative Analysis Model from Laboratory to Factory. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2019, 50, 358–363+371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Sun, H.; Rao, Z.; Ji, H. Identification of soybean varieties based on hyperspectral imaging technology and one-dimensional convolutional neural network. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, 13767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, X.; Zhao, C. Non-Destructive Quantitative Analysis of Azodicarbonamide Additives in Wheat Flour by High-Throughput Raman Imaging. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2021, 71, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Movahhed, S.; Ahmadi Chenarbon, H.; Darabi, F. Assessment of storage time on dielectric constant, physicochemical and rheological properties of two wheat cultivars (Pishtaz and Hamon). J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, C.; Jiang, S.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Zhao, F.; Pang, Z.; Liu, X.; Food, S.O.; Health, B.T.; et al. Effect of high temperature cooking on the quality of rice porridge. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2021, 14, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, Y.; Changcheng, W.; Weimin, D.; Yingwu, Y. Detection Method for Hybrid Crack-glume Rice Seeds Based on Acoustic Characteristics Analysis. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2016, 47, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fazeli Burestan, N.; Afkari Sayyah, A.H.; Taghinezhad, E. Prediction of some quality properties of rice and its flour by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) analysis. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 1099–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qiu, M.; Zheng, S.; Tang, L.; Hu, X.; Xu, Q.; Zheng, L.; Weng, S. Raman Spectroscopy and Improved Inception Network for Determination of FHB-Infected Wheat Kernels. Foods 2022, 11, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Odek, Z.; Siebenmorgen, T.J.; Atungulu, G.G. Validating the Glass Transition Hypothesis in Explaining Fissure Formation in Rough Rice Kernels during the Drying Process. Trans. ASABE 2021, 64, 1763–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mangus, D.L.; Sharda, A.; Zhang, N. Development and evaluation of thermal infrared imaging system for high spatial and temporal resolution crop water stress monitoring of corn within a greenhouse. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016, 121, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Feng, J.; Wu, Z.; Qi, D.; Jin, Y.; Wu, W. Accurate measurements and establishment of a model of the mechanical properties of dried corn kernels. Int. Agrophys. 2019, 33, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhou, M.L.; Khir, R.; Pan, Z.L.; Campbell, J.F.; Mutters, R.; Hu, Z.Y. Feasibility of detection of infested rice using an electronic nose. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2021, 92, 101805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kniese, J.; Race, A.M.; Schmidt, H. Classification of cereal flour species using Raman spectroscopy in combination with spectra quality control and multivariate statistical analysis. J. Cereal Sci. 2021, 101, 103299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kwon, H.; Yang, G.; Jeong, S.; Roh, J.; Lee, S. Establishment of machine learning hyperparameters for predicting the extensional properties of noodles from the thermo-mechanical properties of wheat flour. J. Food Eng. 2022, 321, 110940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mishra, G.; Srivastava, S.; Panda, B.K.; Mishra, H.N. Sensor array optimization and determination of Rhyzopertha dominica infestation in wheat using hybrid neuro-fuzzy-assisted electronic nose analysis. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 5687–5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yu, S.; Huang, X.; Wang, L.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y. Characterization of selected Chinese soybean paste based on flavor profiles using HS-SPME-GC/MS, E-nose and E-tongue combined with chemometrics. Food Chem. 2022, 375, 131840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yan, Y.; Ren, J.; Tschannerl, J.; Zhao, H.; Harrison, B.; Jack, F. Nondestructive Phenolic Compounds Measurement and Origin Discrimination of Peated Barley Malt Using Near-Infrared Hyperspectral Imagery and Machine Learning. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 3082274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Parenti, O.; Guerrini, L.; Carini, E.; Zanoni, B. The effect of gradual flour addition during kneading on whole wheat dough properties and bread quality. LWT 2021, 147, 111564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nguli, M.; Gatari, M.J.; Shepherd, K.; Njenga, L.; Boman, J. Assessment of essential micronutrient levels in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Kenya by total reflection X-ray fluorescence. X-ray Spectrom. 2022, 51, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhou, Y.; Hui, Y.-B.; Feng, L.-F.; Zhou, T.; Wang, Q. A method for reconstructing the internal morphological structure of wheat kernels upon Sitophilus zeamais infestation. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 88, 101676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cancilla, J.C.; Pradana-López, S.; Pérez-Calabuig, A.M.; López-Ortega, S.; Rodrigo, C.; Torrecilla, J.S. Distinct thermal patterns to detect and quantify trace levels of wheat flour mixed into ground chickpeas. Food Chem. 2022, 384, 132468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Xu, S.; Zhou, Z.; Lu, H.; Luo, X.; Lan, Y. Improved Algorithms for the Classification of Rough Rice Using a Bionic Electronic Nose Based on PCA and the Wilks Distribution. Sensors 2014, 14, 5486–5501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  75. Song, H.; Yan, Y.; Song, Z.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Li, F. Nondestructive testing model for maize grain moisture content established by screening dielectric parameters and variables. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2019, 35, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Linlin, J.; Xia, A. Rapid prediction of ricewater content and activity based on low field nuclear magnetic resonance technique. Food Mach. 2018, 34, 70–74+95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jamil, N.; Bejo, S.K. Husk Detection Using Thermal Imaging Technology. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2014, 2, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  78. Yu, L.; Witt, T.; Rincon Bonilla, M.; Turner, M.S.; Fitzgerald, M.; Stokes, J.R. New insights into cooked rice quality by measuring modulus, adhesion and cohesion at the level of an individual rice grain. J. Food Eng. 2019, 240, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, B.; Qian, Z.; Jiao, J.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, H.; Liu, C.; Feng, L. Rice moisture content detection method based on dielectric properties and SPA-SVR algorithm. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2019, 35, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Korohou, T.; Okinda, C.; Li, H.; Cao, Y.; Nyalala, I.; Huo, L.; Potcho, M.; Li, X.; Ding, Q. Wheat Grain Yield Estimation Based on Image Morphological Properties and Wheat Biomass. J. Sens. 2020, 2020, 1571936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Basati, Z.; Rasekh, M.; Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y. Using different classification models in wheat grading utilizing visual features. Int. Agrophys. 2018, 32, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kerhervé, S.O.; Guillermic, R.M.; Strybulevych, A.; Hatcher, D.W.; Scanlon, M.G.; Page, J.H. Online non-contact quality control of noodle dough using ultrasound. Food Control 2019, 104, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ravichandran, P.; Viswanathan, S.; Ravichandran, S.; Pan, Y.J.; Chang, Y.K. Estimation of grain quality parameters in rice for high-throughput screening with near-infrared spectroscopy and deep learning. Cereal Chem. 2022, 96, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, F.; Wang, C.; Song, S. Origin identification of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) by using green spectral imaging coupled with chemometrics. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2022, 123, 104179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sabanci, K.; Kayabasi, A.; Toktas, A. Computer vision-based method for classification of wheat grains using artificial neural network. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 2588–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Rubalya Valantina, S.; Arockia Jayalatha, K. Computational studies on physico-chemical properties in the quality analysis of corn and peanut oil. Grasas Y Aceites 2021, 72, e427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Grassi, S.; Alamprese, C. Advances in NIR spectroscopy applied to process analytical technology in food industries. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2018, 22, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, B.; Sun, J.; Xia, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, P.; Guo, Y.; Sun, X. The Applications of Hyperspectral Imaging Technology for Agricultural Products Quality Analysis: A Review. Food Rev. Int. 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, F.; Lu, A.; Wang, J. Application of Raman spectroscopy in grain detection. J. Food Saf. Qual. 2016, 7, 4408–4414. [Google Scholar]
  90. Jha, S.N.; Narsaiah, K.; Basediya, A.L.; Sharma, R.; Jaiswal, P.; Kumar, R.; Bhardwaj, R. Measurement techniques and application of electrical properties for nondestructive quality evaluation of foods—A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 48, 387–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  91. Ozel, B.; Oztop, M.H. A quick look to the use of time domain nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry and magnetic resonance imaging for food quality applications. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 41, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Du, Z.; Hu, Y.; Ali Buttar, N.; Mahmood, A. X-ray computed tomography for quality inspection of agricultural products: A review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 3146–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhang, W.; Lv, Z.; Xiong, S. Nondestructive quality evaluation of agro-products using acoustic vibration methods-A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2386–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. ElMasry, G.; ElGamal, R.; Mandour, N.; Gou, P.; Al-Rejaie, S.; Belin, E.; Rousseau, D. Emerging thermal imaging techniques for seed quality evaluation: Principles and applications. Food Res. Int. 2020, 131, 109025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhang, K.; Jia, J.; Wu, J. Research progress in the mechanical properties of cereal. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2014, 35, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Velesaca, H.O.; Suárez, P.L.; Mira, R.; Sappa, A.D. Computer vision based food grain classification: A comprehensive survey. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 187, 106287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mohd Ali, M.; Hashim, N.; Abd Aziz, S.; Lasekan, O. Principles and recent advances in electronic nose for quality inspection of agricultural and food products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wei, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Ren, Q. The measurement principles, working parameters and configurations of voltammetric electronic tongues and its applications for foodstuff analysis. J. Food Eng. 2018, 217, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Sun, H.; Rao, Z.; Ji, H. Discrimination of unsound wheat kernels based on deep convolutional generative adversarial network and near-infrared hyperspectral imaging technology. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 268, 120722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, L.; Ji, H. Identification of wheat grain in different states based on hyperspectral imaging technology. Spectrosc. Lett. 2019, 52, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, D.; Wang, Q.; Lin, F.; Weng, S.; Lei, Y.; Chen, G.; Gu, C.; Zheng, L. New Spectral Classification Index for Rapid Identification of Fusarium Infection in Wheat Kernel. Food Anal. Methods 2020, 13, 2165–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shao, X.; Xu, W.; Xu, S.; Xing, C.; Ding, C.; Liu, Q. Time-Domain NMR Applied toSitophilus zeamais Motschulsky/Wheat Detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 12565–12575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Guo, M.; Ma, Y.; Yang, X.; Mankin, R.W. Detection of damaged wheat kernels using an impact acoustic signal processing technique based on Gaussian modelling and an improved extreme learning machine algorithm. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 184, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wang, X.; Xie, Q.; Shi, J.; Zhou, X. Cloud image analysis of temperature changes during bulk corn microbiological heating. Int. J. Food Prop. 2021, 24, 1777–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Lingwal, S.; Bhatia, K.K.; Tomer, M.S. Image-based wheat grain classification using convolutional neural network. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021, 80, 35441–35465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Vithu, P.; Anitha, J.; Raimond, K.; Moses, J. Identification of dockage in paddy using multiclass SVM. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSPC), Coimbatore, India, 28–29 July 2017; pp. 389–393. [Google Scholar]
  107. Boniecki, P.; Piekarska-Boniecka, H.; Świerczyński, K.; Koszela, K.; Zaborowicz, M.; Przybył, J. Detection of the granary weevil based on X-ray images of damaged wheat kernels. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2014, 56, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jha, A.; Tripathy, P.P. Influence of solar drying and storage conditions on microstructure, crack propagation and nano-hardness of paddy and wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 95, 103054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Shao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Du, J.; Pan, X.; Ma, L.; Wang, J.; Böhmer, D.; Guo, X. Fast Analysis of Maize Kernel Plumpness Characteristics through Micro-CT Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  110. Su, Y.; Xiao, L.-T. 3D Visualization and Volume-Based Quantification of Rice Chalkiness In Vivo by Using High Resolution Micro-CT. Rice 2020, 13, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhou, Y.; Hui, Y.; Feng, L.; Yan, L.; Ma, X. Characterization of the Effect of Fungi Growth on the Structure of Whole Wheat Kernels Using X-ray Micro-Computed Tomography. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc. 2019, 34, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sood, S.; Singh, H. Computer Vision and Machine Learning based approaches for Food Security: A Review. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021, 80, 27973–27999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Gierz, Ł.; Markowski, P.; Chmielewski, B. Validation of an image-analysis-based method of measurement of the overall dimensions of seeds. J. Physics Conf. Ser. 2021, 1736, 12007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Shi, H.; Lei, Y.; Louzada Prates, L.; Yu, P. Evaluation of near-infrared (NIR) and Fourier transform mid-infrared (ATR-FT/MIR) spectroscopy techniques combined with chemometrics for the determination of crude protein and intestinal protein digestibility of wheat. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Amanah, H.Z.; Tunny, S.S.; Masithoh, R.E.; Choung, M.-G.; Kim, K.-H.; Kim, M.S.; Baek, I.; Lee, W.-H.; Cho, B.-K. Nondestructive Prediction of Isoflavones and Oligosaccharides in Intact Soybean Seed Using Fourier Transform Near-Infrared (FT-NIR) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopic Techniques. Foods 2022, 11, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Fu, D.; Zhou, J.; Scaboo, A.M.; Niu, X. Nondestructive phenotyping fatty acid trait of single soybean seeds using reflective hyperspectral imagery. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, 13759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, C.; Huang, W.; Yang, G.; Wang, Q.; Li, J.; Chen, L. Determination of starch content in single kernel using near-infrared hyperspectral images from two sides of corn seeds. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2020, 110, 103462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liu, D.; Wu, Y.; Gao, Z.; Yun, Y.-H. Comparative non-destructive classification of partial waxy wheats using near-infrared and Raman spectroscopy. Crop Pasture Sci. 2019, 70, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhu, L.; Sun, J.; Wu, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Qian, H.; Qi, X. Identification of rice varieties and determination of their geographical origin in China using Raman spectroscopy. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 82, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Pezzotti, G.; Zhu, W.; Hashimoto, Y.; Marin, E.; Masumura, T.; Sato, Y.-I.; Nakazaki, T. Raman Fingerprints of Rice Nutritional Quality: A Comparison between Japanese Koshihikari and Internationally Renowned Cultivars. Foods 2021, 10, 2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Singh, R.; Wrobel, T.P.; Mukherjee, P.; Gryka, M.; Kole, M.; Harrison, S.; Bhargava, R. Bulk Protein and Oil Prediction in Soybeans Using Transmission Raman Spectroscopy: A Comparison of Approaches to Optimize Accuracy. Appl. Spectrosc. 2019, 73, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yang, G.; Wang, Q.; Liu, C.; Wang, X.; Fan, S.; Huang, W. Rapid and visual detection of the main chemical compositions in maize seeds based on Raman hyperspectral imaging. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 200, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Li, H.; Yu, Y.; Pang, Y.; Shen, X. Study of Maize Haploid Identification Based on Oil Content Detection with Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 2018, 38, 1089–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lemmens, E.; De Brier, N.; Spiers, K.M.; Garrevoet, J.; Falkenberg, G.; Smolders, E.; Delcour, J.A. Steeping and germination of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). II. Changes in spatial distribution and speciation of iron and zinc elements using pearling, synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy mapping and X-ray absorption near-edge structure imaging. J. Cereal Sci. 2019, 90, 102843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chen, T.; Qi, X.P.; Si, Z.Y.; Cheng, Q.W.; Chen, H. An energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry approach for the identification of geographical origin of wheat flour. Int. J. Food Eng. 2021, 17, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Lu, L.; Hu, Z.; Hu, X.; Han, J.; Zhu, Z.; Tian, S.; Chen, Z. Quantitative approach of multidimensional interactive sensing for rice quality using electronic tongue sensor array based on information entropy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 329, 129254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wadood, S.A.; Guo, B.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y. Geographical origin discrimination of wheat kernel and white flour using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy fingerprinting coupled with chemometrics. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 2045–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Fan, Y.; Ma, S.; Wu, T. Individual wheat kernels vigor assessment based on NIR spectroscopy coupled with machine learning methodologies. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2020, 105, 103213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Basati, Z.; Jamshidi, B.; Rasekh, M.; Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y. Detection of sunn pest-damaged wheat samples using visible/near-infrared spectroscopy based on pattern recognition. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 203, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, J.; Li, M.; Pan, T.; Yao, L.; Chen, J. Purity analysis of multi-grain rice seeds with non-destructive visible and near-infrared spectroscopy. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 164, 104882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Schütz, D.; Riedl, J.; Achten, E.; Fischer, M. Fourier-transform near-infrared spectroscopy as a fast screening tool for the verification of the geographical origin of grain maize (Zea mays L.). Food Control 2022, 136, 108892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Qiu, G.; Lü, E.; Lu, H.; Xu, S.; Zeng, F.; Shui, Q. Single-Kernel FT-NIR Spectroscopy for Detecting Supersweet Corn (Zea mays L. Saccharata Sturt) Seed Viability with Multivariate Data Analysis. Sensors 2018, 18, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  133. Wang, L.; Huang, Z.; Wang, R. Discrimination of cracked soybean seeds by near-infrared spectroscopy and random forest variable selection. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2021, 115, 103731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kusumaningrum, D.; Lee, H.; Lohumi, S.; Mo, C.; Kim, M.S.; Cho, B.-K. Non-destructive technique for determining the viability of soybean (Glycine max) seeds using FT-NIR spectroscopy. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 1734–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Weng, S.; Tang, P.; Yuan, H.; Guo, B.; Yu, S.; Huang, L.; Xu, C. Hyperspectral imaging for accurate determination of rice variety using a deep learning network with multi-feature fusion. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 234, 118237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Guo, L.; Yu, Y.; Yu, H.; Tang, Y.; Li, J.; Yu, D.; Chu, Y.; Ma, S.; Ma, Y.; Zeng, X. Rapid quantitative analysis of adulterated rice with partial least squares regression using hyperspectral imaging system. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 5558–5564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Miao, A.; Zhuang, J.; Tang, Y.; He, Y.; Chu, X.; Luo, S. Hyperspectral Image-Based Variety Classification of Waxy Maize Seeds by the t-SNE Model and Procrustes Analysis. Sensors 2018, 18, 4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  138. Gillibert, R.; Huang, J.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, W.L.; Lamy De La Chapelle, M. Food quality control by Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 105, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, K.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Lin, H. Raman spectroscopic techniques for nondestructive analysis of agri-foods: A state-of-the-art review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 490–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Liu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Long, Y.; Zhang, C.; Fan, S.; Huang, W. Variety classification of coated maize seeds based on Raman hyperspectral imaging. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 270, 120772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Salimi Khorshidi, A.; Thandapilly, S.J.; Ames, N. Application of low-intensity ultrasound as a rapid, cost-effective tool to wheat screening: A systematic frequency selection. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 82, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Guo, T.; Yin, T.; Yang, Z.; Jing, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z. Detection and Analysis of Wheat Storage Year Using Electronic Tongue Based on WPT—IAF—ELM. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2019, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Jiang, X.; Zhao, T.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Shen, F.; Ju, X.; Liu, X.; Zhou, H. Study on Method for On-Line Identification of Wheat Mildew by Array Fiber Spectrometer. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 2018, 38, 3729–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ong, P.; Tung, I.-C.; Chiu, C.-F.; Tsai, I.-L.; Shih, H.-C.; Chen, S.; Chuang, Y.-K. Determination of aflatoxin B1 level in rice (Oryza sativa L.) through near-infrared spectroscopy and an improved simulated annealing variable selection method. Food Control 2022, 136, 108886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhou, Q.; Liang, D.; Fan, S.; Huang, W.; Pang, Q.; Tian, X. Application of hyperspectral characteristic wavelength selection based on weighted between-class to within-class variance ratio (WBWVR) in aflatoxin B concentration classification of maize flour. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2022, 122, 104095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Long, Y.; Huang, W.; Wang, Q.; Fan, S.; Tian, X. Integration of textural and spectral features of Raman hyperspectral imaging for quantitative determination of a single maize kernel mildew coupled with chemometrics. Food Chem. 2022, 372, 131246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Sang, X.; Ma, J.; Wen, D.; Huang, D. Detection of Cd in Rice Based on Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2020, 41, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ku, J.; Huang, H.; Jin, X.; Zhao, S.; Li, L.; Tong, K. Development of Online Detection System of Grain Mildew Based on E-nose. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc. 2019, 34, 118–124+129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhao, T.; Shen, F.; Zhou, R.; Liu, X.; Fang, Y.; Li, P.; Pei, F.; Xing, C. Preliminary Study on Rapid Detection of Fungal Infection in Wheat Based on Electronic Nose. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc. 2019, 34, 135–140+146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhou, H.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Liang, Y.; Jialading, A.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J. Application of SERS quantitative analysis method in food safety detection. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2021, 40, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, J.; Chen, Q.; Belwal, T.; Lin, X.; Luo, Z. Insights into chemometric algorithms for quality attributes and hazards detection in foodstuffs using Raman/surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 2476–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Jiang, L.; Hassan, M.M.; Ali, S.; Li, H.; Sheng, R.; Chen, Q. Evolving trends in SERS-based techniques for food quality and safety: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Lin, Z.; He, L. Recent advance in SERS techniques for food safety and quality analysis: A brief review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019, 28, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Jiang, L.; Mehedi Hassan, M.; Jiao, T.; Li, H.; Chen, Q. Rapid detection of chlorpyrifos residue in rice using surface-enhanced Raman scattering coupled with chemometric algorithm. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 261, 119996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Jia, W.; Liang, G.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, J. Advances in Electronic Nose Development for Application to Agricultural Products. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 2226–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Loutfi, A.; Coradeschi, S.; Mani, G.K.; Shankar, P.; Rayappan, J.B.B. Electronic noses for food quality: A review. J. Food Eng. 2015, 144, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Beć, K.B.; Grabska, J.; Huck, C.W. Miniaturized NIR Spectroscopy in Food Analysis and Quality Control: Promises, Challenges, and Perspectives. Foods 2022, 11, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Hong, F.W.; Chia, K.S. A review on recent near infrared spectroscopic measurement setups and their challenges. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2021, 171, 108732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Liang, N.; Sun, S.; Zhang, C.; He, Y.; Qiu, Z. Advances in infrared spectroscopy combined with artificial neural network for the authentication and traceability of food. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 2963–2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Zhang, X.; Yang, J.; Lin, T.; Ying, Y. Food and agro-product quality evaluation based on spectroscopy and deep learning: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Zareef, M.; Chen, Q.; Hassan, M.M.; Arslan, M.; Hashim, M.M.; Ahmad, W.; Kutsanedzie, F.Y.H.; Agyekum, A.A. An Overview on the Applications of Typical Non-linear Algorithms Coupled with NIR Spectroscopy in Food Analysis. Food Eng. Rev. 2020, 12, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Wang, D.; Wu, J.; Han, P.; Wang, K. Application of Spectral Key Variable Selection in Non-Destructive Detection of the Qualities of Agricultural Products and Food. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 2021, 41, 1593–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Li, H.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, W.; Ni, J. Design of a Phenotypic Sensor about Protein and Moisture in Wheat Grain. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 881560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. ElMasry, G.; Mandour, N.; Al-Rejaie, S.; Belin, E.; Rousseau, D. Recent Applications of Multispectral Imaging in Seed Phenotyping and Quality Monitoring—An Overview. Sensors 2019, 19, 1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  165. Sendin, K.; Manley, M.; Williams, P.J. Classification of white maize defects with multispectral imaging. Food Chem. 2018, 243, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Ezeanaka, M.C.; Nsor-Atindana, J.; Zhang, M. Online Low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (LF-NMR) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Food Quality Optimization in Food Processing. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2019, 12, 1435–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Cheng, Y.; Sun, X. Relationships between anti-shearing force and quality properties of wheat grain. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2009, 25, 314–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Su, Y.; Cui, T.; Zhang, D.; Xia, G.; Gao, X.; He, X.; Xu, Y. Effects of shape feature on compression characteristics and crack rules of maize kernel. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 44, 14307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhang, W.; Yang, G.; Lei, J.; Liu, C.; Tao, J.; Tan, C. Development of on-line detection device for grain moisture contentusing microwave reflection method. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2019, 35, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Mohd Ali, M.; Hashim, N.; Aziz, S.A.; Lasekan, O. Emerging non-destructive thermal imaging technique coupled with chemometrics on quality and safety inspection in food and agriculture. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Hurot, C.; Scaramozzino, N.; Buhot, A.; Hou, Y. Bio-Inspired Strategies for Improving the Selectivity and Sensitivity of Artificial Noses: A Review. Sensors 2020, 20, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  172. Jafari, M.; Chegini, G.; Rezaeealam, B.; Shaygani Akmal, A.A. Experimental determination of the dielectric constant of wheat grain and cluster straw in different moisture contents. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 8, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  173. Jiang, M.; Wu, P.; Xing, H.; Li, L.; Jia, C.; Chen, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, L. Water migration and diffusion mechanism in the wheat drying. Dry. Technol. 2021, 39, 738–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Shao, X.; Xu, W.; Wang, X.; Yang, X.; Shen, F.; Liu, Q. Fissure Development of Three Japonica Rice Grain during Water Desorption. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2022, 55, 390–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Song, P.; Peng, Y.; Wang, G.; Song, P.; Wang, K.; Yang, T. Detection of internal water flow in germinating corn seeds based on low field nuclear magnetic resonance. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2018, 34, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Wan, L.; Tang, H.; Ma, G.; Che, G.; Zou, D.; Sun, W. Optimization Design and Experiment on Finned Double Plates Rice Moisture Content Measuring Device. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2021, 52, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Shen, F.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Fang, Y.; Li, P.; Liu, Q.; Hu, Q.; Liu, X. On-line prediction of hazardous fungal contamination in stored maize by integrating Vis/NIR spectroscopy and computer vision. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 229, 118012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Medeiros, A.D.D.; Silva, L.J.D.; Ribeiro, J.P.O.; Ferreira, K.C.; Rosas, J.T.F.; Santos, A.A.; Silva, C.B.D. Machine Learning for Seed Quality Classification: An Advanced Approach Using Merger Data from FT-NIR Spectroscopy and X-ray Imaging. Sensors 2020, 20, 4319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Mahajan, S.; Mittal, S.K.; Das, A. Machine vision based alternative testing approach for physical purity, viability and vigour testing of soybean seeds (Glycine max). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3949–3959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Shao, X.; Xu, S.; Xu, W. Detection of Wheat Kernels Hidden Pest Sitophilus zeamais Based on Soft X-ray and Low-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc. 2019, 34, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Nagel Held, J.; Kaiser, L.; Longin, C.F.H.; Hitzmann, B. Prediction of wheat quality parameters combining Raman, fluorescence, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Cereal Chem. 2022, 99, 830–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Gierz, Ł.; Przybył, K.; Koszela, K.; Duda, A.; Ostrowicz, W. The Use of Image Analysis to Detect Seed Contamination—A Case Study of Triticale. Sensors 2021, 21, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Ahmadi Chenarbon, H.; Movahhed, S. Assessment of physical and aerodynamic properties of corn kernel (KSC 704). J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, 13858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Gierz, Ł.; Hwang, J.-N.; Jiang, X. The method and a stand for measuring aerodynamic forces in every plane on the basis of an image analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2019), Guangzhou, China, 10–13 May 2019; p. 111795. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The research progress of research institutions on grain quality detection techniques [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52].
Figure 1. The research progress of research institutions on grain quality detection techniques [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52].
Agronomy 12 03187 g001
Figure 2. Commercial instruments for grain quality detection [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86].
Figure 2. Commercial instruments for grain quality detection [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86].
Agronomy 12 03187 g002
Figure 3. Block diagram of the article organization.
Figure 3. Block diagram of the article organization.
Agronomy 12 03187 g003
Table 1. Modern inspection techniques for grain quality.
Table 1. Modern inspection techniques for grain quality.
Detection methodsPrinciplesObjectsLimitation
NIRSRealizing quantitative quality detection and qualitative analysis according to differences in the absorption band and intensity of hydric groups in organic components of grains in the near-infrared regionNutritional attributes including proteins, starches, and fats, and safety attributes pertaining to pesticide residues and fungal toxinsHigh precision instruments are expensive and the NIR spectra of different components overlap.
HSIRealizing accurate detection of grain quality based on hyperspectral and image dataNutritional attributes including proteins, safety attributes pertaining to pesticide residues and fungal toxins, and appearance attributes including color and shapeHSI is costly, the amount of hyperspectral data is extremely large, and it is difficult to store and analyze.
RSBased on scattering spectra of different components in grains at different light frequencies; achieving quality detection by analyzing molecular vibration and rotation of these components in grainsNutritional attributes including proteins, and safety attributes pertaining to fungal toxins, pesticide residues, and heavy metalsFluorescence phenomena on Fourier variation Raman spectral interference, optical systems affecting different vibrational peak overlaps, and Raman scattering intensity.
Electromagnetic propertiesDielectricAccording to the response characteristics of grains in the applied electric fieldMoisture content High correlation mainly with moisture.
NMRAtomic nuclei with fixed magnetic moments in grains produce a string of response signals with attenuated intensity in the specific impulse trains.Moisture content and nutritional attributes including starches and fatsMainly used for moisture state, migration process analysis, high price, complex signal analysis, and imperfect NMR spectrum database.
X-rayElements in grains release X-ray fluorescence of specific energy under X-ray irradiationNutritional attributes including trace elements, and safety attributes pertaining to heavy metalsX-ray control is complicated and dangerous.
Acoustic propertiesAccording to the reflection, scattering, projection, and absorption characteristics of acoustic waves in grainsNutritional attributes including proteins, and appearance attributes such as unsound kernelsHigh environmental noise interference.
Thermal propertiesAccording to differences in thermal radiation of various parts of grainsAppearance attributes such as fungal infection and unsound kernelsHigh ambient temperature disturbance.
Mechanical propertiesAccording to the mechanical features of grains under all types of mechanical loadNutritional attributes including proteins and starchesThe association between mechanical properties and quality is unclear.
E-eyeAccording to features including color and shape in imagesMultiple appearance attributesHigh requirements for clarity of acquired images, difficulty to identify early mold and pest images, and difficulty to segment multi-seed images.
E-noseAccording to gaseous response signals of volatile organic compounds in grainsSafety attributes pertaining to fungal toxins and pesticide residuesEarly mold or mild pesticide residues produce low gas concentrations that are difficult to detect and environmental gas interference.
E-tongueAccording to taste response signals of grain leachatesNutritional attributes including proteins and starches, and safety attributes pertaining to heavy metalsThe detection object is the leachate of seed samples
Table 2. Non-destructive quality detection methods for appearance attributes of cereal grains.
Table 2. Non-destructive quality detection methods for appearance attributes of cereal grains.
Detection MethodsObjectsDevicesReferences
HSIColor and shape, unsound kernels, and impuritiesZolix “GaiaSorter” hyperspectral imaging system[99,100,101]
NMRUnsound kernelsNMI20 bench top pulsed NMR analyzer[102]
X-rayUnsound kernelsSkyscan 1272 X-ray micro-CT scanner[48]
Acoustic propertiesUnsound kernelsSelf-made impulse signal acquisition device[103]
Thermal propertiesUnsound kernelsMLG-II temperature sensor[104]
E-eyeColor and shape, unsound kernels, and impuritiesCCD camera or smartphone[81,105,106]
Table 3. Non-destructive detection methods for nutritional attributes of cereal grains.
Table 3. Non-destructive detection methods for nutritional attributes of cereal grains.
Detection MethodsObjectsDevicesReferences
NIRSProteins, starches, and amino acidsUnity SpectraStar 2500XL-spectrometer[114,115]
HSIProteins, oleic acids, and starchesOCI-UAV-1000 hyper-spectrometer[31,116,117]
RSProteins, starches, amino acids, and oilsRenishaw Raman spectrometer[118,119,120,121,122]
NMROilsMinispec mq20 NMR spectrometer[123]
X-rayTrace elementsHard X-ray microprobe[71,124,125]
Acoustic propertiesProteins and ashesPhysical property analyzer[36]
Mechanical propertiesProteins and starchesCT3 physical property analyzer[50,63]
E-tonguesStarches and proteinsSelf-made three-electrode E-tongue[126]
Table 4. Non-destructive inspection methods for safety attributes of cereal grains.
Table 4. Non-destructive inspection methods for safety attributes of cereal grains.
Detection MethodsObjectsDevicesReferences
NIRSFungal toxinsZeiss fiber optical spectrometer[143,144]
HSIFungal toxinsANDOR EMCCD camera + Xenics LWNIR camera[145]
RSPesticide residues and fungal toxins1064-nm NanoRam Raman spectrometer[32,60,146]
X-rayHeavy metals and fungal toxinsY. CHEETAN micron-resolution X-ray CT scanner[111,147]
E-nosesPesticide residues and fungal toxinsFox3000 E-nose[148,149]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, H.; Song, M.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, W.; Jiang, X.; Ni, J. Non-Destructive Quality-Detection Techniques for Cereal Grains: A Systematic Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3187.

AMA Style

Liu Y, Zhang J, Yuan H, Song M, Zhu Y, Cao W, Jiang X, Ni J. Non-Destructive Quality-Detection Techniques for Cereal Grains: A Systematic Review. Agronomy. 2022; 12(12):3187.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yiming, Jingchao Zhang, Huali Yuan, Minghan Song, Yan Zhu, Weixing Cao, Xiaoping Jiang, and Jun Ni. 2022. "Non-Destructive Quality-Detection Techniques for Cereal Grains: A Systematic Review" Agronomy 12, no. 12: 3187.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop