Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato Response to Filter Cake and Macadamia Husk Compost in Two Agroecologies of KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Sites, Acquisition of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato, and Field Plans
2.2. Field Preparation and Experimental Set-Up
2.3. Plant Growth Data Collection
2.4. Preparation of Macadamia Husk Compost
2.5. Compost, Soil Sampling, and Analyses
2.6. Metrological Data Collection
2.7. Statistical Analyses
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Climate, and Meteorology of the Study Sites
3.2. Chemical Composition of the Initial Soil of the Study Sites, Filter Cake, and Macadamia Husk
3.3. Effects of Soil Amendments on the Physiology of the Test OFSP Cultivars
3.4. Effects of Soil Amendments on the Productivity of the Test OFSP Cultivars
3.5. Conclusion and Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ndlovu, M.S.; Demlie, M. Assessment of meteorological drought and wet conditions using two drought indices across KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, H.T.; Campbell, J.B.; Wynne, R.H.; Shao, Y.; Phan, S.V. Drought and human impacts on land use and land cover change in a Vietnamese coastal area. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Webb, R.; Buratini, J. Global challenges for the 21st century: The role and strategy of the agri-food sector. Anim. Reprod. (AR) 2018, 13, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kakar, R.; Sharma, J.C.; Mogta, A.; Guleria, A.; Thakur, J. Assessment of various nutrient management technologies for quality, fertilizer use efficiency, and economics of ginger production under subtropical to subtemperate conditions. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2020, 51, 2805–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, K.A.; Zhang, D. Effects of fertilizer broadcasting on the excessive use of inorganic fertilizers and environmental sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adiaha, M.S.; Agba, O.A. Influence of different methods of fertilizer application on the growth of maize (Zea mays L.). for increase production in south Nigeria. World Sci. News 2016, 54, 73–86. [Google Scholar]
- Kaza, S.; Yao, L.; Bhada-Tata, P.; Van Woerden, F. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ge, Y.; Abdulkreem AL-Huqail, A.; Zhou, Z.; Ali, E.F.; Ghoneim, A.M.; Eissa, M.; Ding, Z. Plant Growth Stimulating Bacteria and Filter Mud Cake Enhance Soil Quality and Productivity of Mango (Mangifera indica L.). J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ossom, E.M. Effects of filter cake fertilization on weed infestation, disease incidence, and tuber yield of cassava (Manihot esculenta) in Swaziland. Int J. Agric. Biol. 2010, 12, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
- Hammad, H.M.; Khaliq, A.; Abbas, F.; Farhad, W.; Fahad, S.; Aslam, M.; Ghulam, M.S.; Wajid, N.; Muhammad, M.; Bakhat, H.F. Comparative effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil organic carbon and wheat productivity under arid region. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2020, 51, 1406–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Case, S.D.C.; Oelofse, M.; Hou, Y.; Oenema, O.; Jensen, L.S. Farmer perceptions and use of organic waste products as fertilisers–A survey study of potential benefits and barriers. Agric. Syst. 2017, 151, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cox, J.; Van-Zwieten, L.; Ayres, M.; Morris, S. Macadamia husk compost improves soil health in sub-tropical horticulture. In Proceedings of the 3rd Australian New Zealand Soils Conference, Sydney, Australia, 5–9 December 2004; pp. 5–9. [Google Scholar]
- Baudoin, M.A.; Vogel, C.; Nortje, K.; Naik, M. Living with drought in South Africa: Lessons learnt from the recent El Niño drought period. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017, 23, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willis, K.S. Remote sensing change detection for ecological monitoring in United States protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 2015, 182, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, B.C. NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 1996, 58, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suchi, S.D.; Menon, A.; Malik, A.; Hu, J.; Gao, J. Crop Identification Based on Remote Sensing Data using Machine Learning Approaches for Fresno County, California. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService), Oxford, UK, 23–26 August 2021; pp. 115–124. [Google Scholar]
- Schinasi, L.H.; Benmarhnia, T.; De Roos, A.J. Modification of the association between high ambient temperature and health by urban microclimate indicators: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2018, 161, 168–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Javadnia, E.; Mobasheri, M.R.; Kamali, G.A. MODIS NDVI quality enhancement using ASTER images. JAST 2009, 11, 549–558. [Google Scholar]
- Masarirambi, M.T.; Nxumalo, K.A.; Kunene, E.N.; Dlamini, D.V.; Mpofu, M.; Manwa, L.; Earnshaw, D.M.; Bwembya, G.C. Traditional/indigenous vegetables of the kingdom of eswatini: Biodiversity and their importance: A review. J. Exp. Agric. Int. 2020, 42, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motsa, N.M.; Modi, A.T.; Mabhaudhi, T. Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) as a drought tolerant and food security crop. South Afr. J. Sci. 2015, 111, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Laurie, S.; Faber, M.; Adebola, P.; Belete, A. Biofortification of sweet potato for food and nutrition security in South Africa. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 962–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Li, G.; Sun, H.; Ma, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Gao, H.; Mei, L. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport chain in young apple tree leaves. Biol. Open 2018, 7, bio035279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fatokun, K.; Beckett, R.P.; Varghese, B.; Cloete, J.; Pammenter, N.W. Influence of cathodic water invigoration on the emergence and subsequent growth of controlled deteriorated pea and pumpkin seeds. Plants 2020, 9, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ossom, E.M.; Rhykerd, R.L. Response of Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. to soil fertilization with filter cake. Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci. 2007, 100, 197–208. [Google Scholar]
- Bittenbender, H.C.; Hue, N.V.; Fleming, K.; Brown, H. Sustainability of organic fertilization of macadamia with macadamia husk-manure compost. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1998, 29, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, E.R.; Johnson, G.V.; Unruh, L.G. Current approaches to soil testing methods: Problems and solutions. Soil Test. Prospect. Improv. Nutr. Recomm. 1994, 40, 203–220. [Google Scholar]
- Bremner, J.M. Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. J. Agric. Sci. 1960, 55, 11–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bates, R.G. Electronic pH Determinations; John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
- Matejovic, I. Determination of carbon and nitrogen in samples of various soils by the dry combustion. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1997, 28, 1499–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunter, A. Tentative ISFEI Soil Extraction Procedure. International Soil Fertility Evaluation and Improvement Project; NC State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Mbatha, N.; Xulu, S. Time series analysis of MODIS-Derived NDVI for the Hluhluwe-Imfolozi Park, South Africa: Impact of recent intense drought. Climate 2018, 6, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gajanayake, B.; Raja Reddy, K.; Shankle, M.W. Quantifying Growth and Developmental Responses of Sweetpotato to Mid-and Late-Season Temperature. Agron. J. 2015, 107, 1854–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, E.; Yu, Q.; Yin, H.; He, D.; Pan, X. Identifying key meteorological factors to yield variation of potato and the optimal planting date in the agro-pastoral ecotone in North China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 256, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adubasim, C.V.; Law-Ogbomo, K.E.; Obalum, S.E. Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) growth and tuber yield as influenced by plant spacing on sandy loam in humid tropical environment. Agro-Science 2017, 16, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weier, J.; Herring, D. Measuring Vegetation (NDVI & EVI); NASA Earth Observatory: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
- Jin, Z.; Chen, C.; Chen, X.; Jiang, F.; Hopkins, I.; Zhang, X.; Han, Z.; Billy, G.; Benavides, J. Soil acidity, available phosphorus content, and optimal biochar and nitrogen fertilizer application rates: A five-year field trial in upland red soil, China. Field Crops Res. 2019, 232, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, A.M.; Campos, L.G.; Senna, M.S.; da Silva, C.L.; Assunção, N.S. Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of sweet potato in response to cover crop and nitrogen management. Agron. J. 2018, 110, 2004–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, M.A.H. Effect of Potassium Fertilization on the Growth, Yield and Quality of some Sweet Potato Cultivars. Minufiya J. Agric. Res. 2015, 40, 519–528. [Google Scholar]
- Baghdadi, A.; Halim, R.A.; Ghasemzadeh, A.; Ramlan, M.F.; Sakimin, S.Z. Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the yield and quality of silage corn intercropped with soybean. PeerJ 2018, 6, e5280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Osmond, B.; Badger, M.; Maxwell, K.; Björkman, O.; Leegood, R. Too many photons: Photorespiration, photoinhibition and photooxidation. Trends Plant Sci. 1997, 2, 119–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morra, L.; Bilotto, M.; Baldantoni, D.; Alfani, A.; Baiano, S. A seven-year experiment in a vegetable crops sequence: Effects of replacing mineral fertilizers with Biowaste compost on crop productivity, soil organic carbon and nitrates concentrations. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 290, 110534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anisuzzaman, M.; Rafii, M.Y.; Jaafar, N.M.; Izan Ramlee, S.; Ikbal, M.F.; Haque, M.A. Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer on the Growth and Yield Components of Traditional and Improved Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes in Malaysia. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faloye, O.T.; Alatise, M.O.; Ajayi, A.E.; Ewulo, B.S. Effects of biochar and inorganic fertiliser applications on growth, yield and water use efficiency of maize under deficit irrigation. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 217, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Law-Ogbomo, K.; Ogedegbe, S.; Ewansiha, S. Agronomic Performance of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) Fertilized with Poultry Manure Enriched with Oil Palm Refuse Bunch Ash in a Low Fertile Soil. Not. Sci. Biol. 2019, 11, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weih, M.; Hamnér, K.; Pourazari, F. Analyzing plant nutrient uptake and utilization efficiencies: Comparison between crops and approaches. Plant Soil 2018, 430, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maselesele, D.; Ogola, J.B.; Murovhi, R.N. Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. Chinensis) Increased with Application of Macadamia Husk Compost. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crusciol, C.A.C.; McCray, J.M.; de Campos, M.; do Nascimento, C.A.C.; Rossato, O.B.; Adorna, J.C.; Mellis, E.V. Filter cake as a long-standing source of micronutrients for sugarcane. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 813–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moda, L.R.; de Mello Prado, R.; Caione, G.; Campos, C.N.S.; Colombo da Silva, E.; Alves Flores, R. Effect of sources and rates of phosphorus associated with filter cake on sugarcane nutrition and yield. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2015, 9, 477–485. [Google Scholar]
- Gonçalves, C.A.; de Camargo, R.; de Sousa, R.T.X.; Soares, N.S.; de Oliveira, R.C.; Stanger, M.C.; Lana, R.M.Q.; Lemes, E.M. Chemical and technological attributes of sugarcane as functions of organomineral fertilizer based on filter cake or sewage sludge as organic matter sources. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0236852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maselesele, D.; Ogola, J.B.; Murovhi, R.N. Macadamia Husk Compost Improved Physical and Chemical Properties of a Sandy Loam Soil. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues Torres, J.L.; Marques Mendonça Silva, A.C.; Silva Vallone, H.; da Silva Vieira, D.M.; Menezes de Souza, Z.; Miranda Lemes, E. Sugarcane filter cake application to coffee crop and soil physical attributes. Rev. Em Agronegócios E Meio Ambiente 2021, 14, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathobo, R.; Marais, D.; Steyn, J.M. The effect of drought stress on yield, leaf gaseous exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 180, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fatokun, K.; Zharare, G.E. Influence of diesel contamination in soil on growth and dry matter partitioning of Lactuca sativa and Ipomoea batatas. J. Environ. Biol. 2015, 36, 1205. [Google Scholar]
- Afzal, N.; Afionis, S.; Stringer, L.C.; Favretto, N.; Sakai, M.; Sakai, P. Benefits and trade-offs of smallholder sweet potato cultivation as a pathway toward achieving the sustainable development goals. Sustainability 2021, 13, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
MONTH | TEMPERATURE (°C) | TOTAL RAINFALL (mm) | UZ—HUMIDITY (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UZ | RV | AP | UZ | RV | AP | UZ | RV | AP | |
2019 | |||||||||
January | 24.4 | 24.5 | 24.9 | 103.4 | 70 | 106.6 | 80 | 79 | 76 |
February | 25.3 | 25.3 | 25.6 | 146.4 | 182.6 | 90 | 81 | 80 | 79 |
March | 25.6 | 25.3 | 25.9 | 58 | 109.6 | 131.4 | 80 | 81 | 78 |
April | 22.7 | 23 | 23 | 146.6 | 106.6 | 54.2 | 82 | 84 | 81 |
May | 21.4 | 21.7 | 21.8 | 7.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 78 | 80 | 78 |
June | 19.1 | 19.8 | 19.4 | 47.2 | 13.6 | 6.8 | 74 | 77 | 76 |
July | 19.1 | 20.1 | 19.1 | 21.6 | 1.2 | 0 | 66 | 67 | 68 |
August | 20.8 | 22.1 | 20.2 | 56 | 17.8 | 23.4 | 76 | 77 | 79 |
September | 20.8 | 22.3 | 20.1 | 95 | 26.2 | 32.4 | 74 | 74 | 76 |
October | 22.9 | 24 | 22.3 | 136.8 | 82.2 | 74.8 | 76 | 75 | 78 |
November | 23.9 | 24.4 | 23.3 | 128.4 | 73.8 | 184.4 | 80 | 79 | 81 |
December | 23.8 | 24.3 | 23.4 | 319.4 | 129.6 | 100.8 | 80 | 78 | 80 |
2021 | |||||||||
January | 26.1 | 26.4 | 25.6 | 241.2 | 168 | 198 | 79 | 77 | 80 |
February | 26.1 | 24.9 | 25 | 131.6 | 283.2 | 253.6 | 82 | 84 | 84 |
March | 25.6 | 24.4 | 24.4 | 59.4 | 88 | 83 | 78 | 82 | 81 |
April | 23.8 | 22.6 | 22.6 | 103.8 | 55.8 | 39.4 | 79 | 81 | 82 |
May | 20.7 | 19.9 | 19.9 | 120.8 | 34.2 | 9.4 | 79 | 80 | 80 |
June | 18.7 | 17.9 | 18.2 | 89 | 45 | 14 | 73 | 81 | 80 |
July | 17.4 | 16.9 | 17 | 50.2 | 12.2 | 13.4 | 65 | 74 | 75 |
August | 18.8 | 18.6 | 18.4 | 38 | 20.8 | 19.6 | 68 | 79 | 79 |
September | 21 | 20.1 | 20.1 | 103 | 75.4 | 65.6 | 76 | 78 | 78 |
October | 22.6 | 20.3 | 20.3 | 83.6 | 73 | 91.8 | 77 | 79 | 78 |
November | 24.1 | 22.8 | 22.3 | 95.4 | 32.2 | 15.6 | 77 | 76 | 78 |
December | 26.3 | 24.4 | 24.1 | 87.6 | 119 | 0 | 78 | 79 | 81 |
NUTRIENTS | SOIL COMPOSITION | SOIL AMENDMENTS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Ngwelezane | Mtubatuba | Dlangubo | FC | MHC | |
Nitrogen (N) | % | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 1.15 |
Phosphorus (P) | mg/Kg | 313.3 | 10.6 | 60 | 6500 | 3700 |
Potassium (K) | mg/Kg | 158.3 | 188 | 403 | 5800 | 11,100 |
Calcium (Ca) | mg/Kg | 1573 | 2750 | 1291 | 24,700 | 25,200 |
Magnesium (Mg) | mg/Kg | 296 | 619 | 418 | 4900 | 3200 |
Carbon (C) | % | 2.68 | 2.03 | 1.96 | 6.54 | 51.24 |
Zinc (Zn) | mg/Kg | 180.6 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 101.6 | 134.2 |
Copper (Cu) | mg/Kg | 28.3 | 2.3 | 5.7 | 61.5 | 32.2 |
Manganese (Mn) | mg/Kg | 18.7 | 19.6 | 44 | 1030.4 | 324.8 |
Sulphur (S) | % | * | * | * | 0.07 | 0.04 |
Sodium (Na) | mg/Kg | * | * | * | 798 | 1623 |
Iron (Fe) | mg/Kg | * | * | * | 22,145 | 14,263 |
Aluminium | mg/Kg | * | * | * | 16,919 | 14,671 |
Moisture | % | * | * | * | 40.1 | 55.8 |
Clay | % | 7.7 | 22.2 | 21.5 | * | * |
CN ratio | - | 11.4 | 11.0 | 16.3 | * | * |
Acidity | cmol/L | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | * | * |
Total cations | meq/100 g | 10.77 | 19.37 | 10.99 | * | * |
pH | KCl | 4.94 | 5.88 | 5.76 | * | * |
Density | mg/m−3 | 1 | 1.07 | 1 | * | * |
199062.1. | Beauregard | Impilo | W-119 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLANGUBO | ||||||||
ROOT-1 | ROOT-2 | ROOT-1 | ROOT-2 | ROOT-1 | ROOT-2 | ROOT-1 | ROOT-2 | |
CONT | 265.1 a | 244.8 a | 155.2 a | 138.5 a | 151.8 a | 151.6 a | 175.4 a | 154.3 a |
FC | 653.8 c | 587.0 c | 333.7 bc | 293.6 bc | 338.1 c | 297.5 c | 367.0 bc | 322.9 c |
FC + IF | 702.3 c | 624.9 c | 399.3 bc | 351.4 c | 311.3 bc | 273.9 bc | 409.9 c | 360.7 c |
IF | 617.8 c | 244.9 a* | 336.6 b | 272.7 bc* | 284.8 bc | 161.8 a* | 300.0 b | 229.8 ab* |
MHC | 347.9 ab | 327.4 b | 269.5 b | 237.1 ab | 202.8 a | 184.1 a | 200.7 a | 176.6 a |
MHC + IF | 399.2 b | 370.3 b* | 427.5 c | 376.2 c* | 233.6 ab | 205.5 ab | 328.9 bc | 289.4 bc* |
LSD0.05 | 72.9 | 51.3 | 73.6 | 73.6 | 54.55 | 49.15 | 59.21 | 52.73 |
MTUBATUBA | ||||||||
CONT | 223.1 a | 76.2 a* | 154.1 a | 52.7 a* | 147.8 a | 50.6 a* | 151.8 a | 51.9 a* |
FC | 451.2 c | 154.3 b* | 257.9 c | 71.9 bc* | 284.9 b | 97.4 b* | 325.7 c | 111.4 b* |
FC + IF | 470.9 c | 174.9 b* | 232.2 bc | 79.4 bc* | 274.9 b | 94.0 b* | 342.1 c | 117.0 c* |
IF | 431.5 c | 82.4 a* | 199.0 ab | 68.1 ab* | 210.2 ab | 71.9 ab* | 269.5 b | 56.7 a* |
MHC | 285.9 ab | 97.8 a* | 173.4 a | 59.3 a* | 170.5 a | 58.3 a* | 193.4 a | 66.1 b* |
MHC + IF | 319.9 b | 82.9 a* | 210.2 abc | 88.2 c* | 198.2 a | 67.8 a* | 268.3 b | 91.8 b* |
LSD0.05 | 60.26 | 27.40 | 39.32 | 13.45 | 50.29 | 97.43 | 35.19 | 13.47 |
NGWELEZANE | ||||||||
CONT | 230.6 a | 210.4 a | 63.8 a | 58.2 a | 156.2 a | 142.5 a | 202.4 a | 184.6 a |
FC | 523.6 b | 477.6 b | 133.5 bc | 121.8 bc | 290.2 c | 269.3 b | 441.5 c | 402.8 c |
FC + IF | 520.9 b | 475.1 b | 145.6 c | 132.8 c | 299.6 c | 273.3 b | 444.8 c | 405.8 c |
IF | 434.5 b | 264.2 a* | 105.6 b | 96.3 b | 223.0 b | 206.7 ab* | 384.6 bc | 350.9 bc* |
MHC | 259.3 a | 227.8 a | 115.9 bc | 105.7 bc | 177.6 ab | 160.7 a | 275.4 ab | 251.2 ab |
MHC + IF | 437.8 b | 266.3 a | 116.6 bc | 106.4 bc | 206.8 ab | 188.7 a | 343.2 bc | 313.1 bc |
LSD0.05 | 100.4 | 85.5 | 22.36 | 20.40 | 39.09 | 46.80 | 76.1 | 69.42 |
199062.1. | Beauregard | Impilo | W-119 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TREAT | DLANGUBO | |||||||
SHOOT-1 | SHOOT-2 | SHOOT-1 | SHOOT-2 | SHOOT-1 | SHOOT-2 | SHOOT-1 | SHOOT-2 | |
CONT | 343.3 a | 302.1 a | 97.3 a | 85.6 a | 69.8 a | 64.0 a | 247.1 a | 217.4 a |
FC | 1011.2 bc | 889.9 c | 285.2 d | 251.0 c | 148.7 bc | 136.8 b | 622.9 cd | 548.2 c |
FC + IF | 1098.8 c | 966.9 c | 277.5 cd | 215.2 c | 171.1 bc | 152.9 b | 674.2 d | 593.2 c |
IF | 837.9 b | 377.7 ab* | 229.0 c | 88.3 a* | 175.5 c | 117.1 ab* | 481.2 bc | 273.5 a* |
MHC | 465.0 a | 409.2 ab | 136.5 ab | 120.5 ab | 71.2 a | 72.6 a | 279.6 a | 246.0 a |
MHC + IF | 508.3 ac | 447.3 b* | 175.0 b | 154.0 b* | 118.0 ab | 71.7 a* | 460.8 b | 405.5 b* |
LSD0.05 | 145.3 | 92.2 | 32.82 | 27.06 | 36.62 | 40.6 | 103.7 | 86.5 |
MTUBATUBA | ||||||||
CONT | 334.7 a | 114.8 a* | 108.7 a | 37.3 a* | 92.6 ab | 31.6 ab* | 256.3 a | 87.9 a* |
FC | 639.5 cd | 219.4 b* | 183.3 b | 103.3 c* | 127.2 b | 45.1 b* | 538.9 bc | 184.8 cd* |
FC + IF | 686.6 d | 235.5 b* | 179.3 b | 61.5 b* | 133.4 b | 46.3 b* | 556.3 c | 190.8 d* |
IF | 564.9 bc | 132.9 a* | 152.8 ab | 52.4 ab* | 127.0 b | 25.2 ab* | 432.9 b | 148.5 bc* |
MHC | 340.0 a | 141.8 a* | 130.7 ab | 67.6 b* | 52.1 a | 17.9 a* | 315.3 a | 108.2 a* |
MHC + IF | 512.9 b | 145.2 a* | 171.4 ab | 58.8 ab* | 60.0 a | 20.6 a | 457.9 bc | 124.6 ab* |
LSD0.05 | 65.25 | 28.39 | 44.56 | 15.26 | 32.44 | 14.65 | 77.4 | 26.17 |
NGWELEZANE | ||||||||
CONTR | 400.4 a | 360.4 a | 94.2 a | 84.7 a | 58.0 a | 55.7 a | 230.2 a | 214.6 a |
FC | 930.4 b | 869.9 b | 197.5 bc | 177.7 bc | 127.5 bc | 111.1 ab | 574.6 b | 517.1 b |
FC + IF | 942.5 b | 856.2 b | 202.5 bc | 182.2 bc | 135.5 c | 121.9 b | 562.1 b | 505.9 b |
IF | 860.1 b | 366.9 a* | 172.5 bc | 85.6 bc* | 163.0 c | 146.6 b* | 480.8 b | 229.3 b* |
MHC | 387.1 a | 358.4 a | 147.5 ab | 133.7 ab | 68.0 ab | 61.2 a | 240.9 a | 216.2 a |
MHC + IF | 850.8 b | 376.2 b* | 215.8 c | 92.3 bc* | 97.8 abc | 90.7 ab | 556.7 b | 247 b |
LSD0.05 | 73.9 | 81.1 | 43.90 | 39.41 | 44.36 | 39.72 | 114.2 | 102.5 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fatokun, K.; Motsa, N.M.; Modi, A.T. Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato Response to Filter Cake and Macadamia Husk Compost in Two Agroecologies of KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123091
Fatokun K, Motsa NM, Modi AT. Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato Response to Filter Cake and Macadamia Husk Compost in Two Agroecologies of KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. Agronomy. 2022; 12(12):3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123091
Chicago/Turabian StyleFatokun, Kayode, Nozipho M. Motsa, and Albert T. Modi. 2022. "Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato Response to Filter Cake and Macadamia Husk Compost in Two Agroecologies of KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa" Agronomy 12, no. 12: 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123091