Next Article in Journal
Phytotoxic Effects of Three Origanum Species Extracts and Essential Oil on Seed Germinations and Seedling Growths of Four Weed Species
Next Article in Special Issue
The Lobed-Leaf Phenotype in Brassica juncea Is Associated with the BjLMI1 Locus as Evidenced Using GradedPool-Seq
Previous Article in Journal
Rapid Diagnosis and Visual Detection of Potato Cyst Nematode (Globodera rostochiensis) Using Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Combination with Lateral Flow Assay Method (RPA-LFA)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modification of Gene Expression, DNA Methylation and Small RNAs Expression in Rice Plants under In Vitro Culture
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Comprehensive Assessment of Houttuynia cordata Thunb., an Important Medicinal Plant and Vegetable

Agronomy 2022, 12(10), 2582; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102582
by Qing Luo 1,2, Ping-Hong Meng 2, Da-Wei Jiang 3, Zhong-Ming Han 4, Zhen-Hui Wang 1, Guo-Fei Tan 1,2,* and Jian Zhang 1,5,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Agronomy 2022, 12(10), 2582; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102582
Submission received: 28 August 2022 / Revised: 16 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

please check the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for reviewing our manuscript entitled ‘Comprehensive Assessment of Houttuynia cordata Thunb., an Important Medicinal Plant and Vegetable’ (MANUSCRIPT ID: agronomy-1912110). Your effort and time spent on our manuscript are greatly appreciated by all of us. We are grateful to all suggestions and review comments made by you. Your suggestions have definitely improved the quality of our manuscript.

This manuscript has been extensively edited according to your and reviewers’ comments. The manuscript has been improved by a professional English language editing service (http://essaystar.com/User/reviewcertificate.html?id=P-202209270835had). The manuscript was also critical read by one professional colleague in Canada whose native language is English. Please find the revised manuscript in Agronomy’s manuscript center. The changes were made directly in the text with Trace or RED marked. The responses to the reviewers are highlighted below. Point to point response are attached in PDF file. 

Thank you again for your kind help and excellent suggestions for our manuscript. We hope these revisions will be satisfactory. We are looking forward to hearing from you soon.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Jian and All co-authors

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript “Comprehensive Assessment of Houttuynia cordata Thunb., an Important Medicinal Plant and Vegetable” aims to review the knowledge about the medical plant Houttuynia cordata Thunb. It should be accepted with minor revision. The authors should do extensive editing of English language and typing errors.  

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for reviewing our manuscript entitled ‘Comprehensive Assessment of Houttuynia cordata Thunb., an Important Medicinal Plant and Vegetable’ (MANUSCRIPT ID: agronomy-1912110). Your effort and time spent on our manuscript are greatly appreciated by all of us. We are grateful to all suggestions and review comments made by you. Your suggestions have definitely improved the quality of our manuscript.

This manuscript has been extensively edited according to your and reviewers’ comments. The manuscript has been improved by a professional English language editing service (http://essaystar.com/User/reviewcertificate.html?id=P-202209270835had). The manuscript was also critical read by one professional colleague in Canada whose native language is English. Please find the revised manuscript in Agronomy’s manuscript center. The changes were made directly in the text with Trace or RED marked. The responses to the reviewers are highlighted below. Point to point response are attached in PDF file. 

Thank you again for your kind help and excellent suggestions for our manuscript. We hope these revisions will be satisfactory. We are looking forward to hearing from you soon.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Jian and All co-authors

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript is generally very well structured, the studies reviewed are well described, and for the most part the manuscript is well written.

There are some minor spelling mistakes, so please proofread the manuscript again and correct mistakes, restructure some sentences where the information is a bit confusing and not very clear.

Other than that, I congratulate the authors for a very interesting and comprehensive review of Houttuynia cordata, and a well-written manuscript. I think the manuscript can be published in Agronomy.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for reviewing our manuscript entitled ‘Comprehensive Assessment of Houttuynia cordata Thunb., an Important Medicinal Plant and Vegetable’ (MANUSCRIPT ID: agronomy-1912110). Your effort and time spent on our manuscript are greatly appreciated by all of us. We are grateful to all suggestions and review comments made by you. Your suggestions have definitely improved the quality of our manuscript.

This manuscript has been extensively edited according to your and reviewers’ comments. The manuscript has been improved by a professional English language editing service (http://essaystar.com/User/reviewcertificate.html?id=P-202209270835had). The manuscript was also critical read by one professional colleague in Canada whose native language is English. Please find the revised manuscript in Agronomy’s manuscript center. The changes were made directly in the text with Trace or RED marked. The responses to the reviewers are highlighted below. Point to point response are attached in PDF file. 

Thank you again for your kind help and excellent suggestions for our manuscript. We hope these revisions will be satisfactory. We are looking forward to hearing from you soon.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Jian and All co-authors

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

After major changes, the manuscript sounds to be suitable for publication in the journal. However, authors are advised to check out again the subsections and merge those are close in view of their subject.  

Author Response

Comments from the editors and reviewers:

   After major changes, the manuscript sounds to be suitable for publication in the journal. However, authors are advised to check out again the subsections and merge those are close in view of their subject.

Response:

-- We thank the reviewer for this observation and suggestion.

-- We agree. We appreciate your comments, and checked out again the subsections and merge those are close in view of their subject. Please find the revised manuscript in Agronomy’s manuscript center. The changes were made directly in the text with Trace or RED marked.

Back to TopTop