Next Article in Journal
HPLC-DAD Polyphenolic Profiling and Antioxidant Activities of Sorghum bicolor during Germination
Next Article in Special Issue
Fractional Harvest of Fodder Galega for Improved Herbage Nutritive Value
Previous Article in Journal
Extraction and Analysis of Natural Product in Plant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mycobiome Composition and Diversity under the Long-Term Application of Spent Mushroom Substrate and Chicken Manure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Water Needs of Grapevines in Central Poland

1
Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Agrometeorology, Plant Irrigation and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland
3
Department of Remote Sensing and Environmental Research, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warszawa, Poland
4
Department of Land Improvement, Environmental Development and Spatial Management, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-649 Poznań, Poland
5
Institute of Technology and Life Sciences, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Research Centre, 85-174 Bydgoszcz, Poland
6
Institute of Plant Science, Szent István University, H-7400 Kaposvár, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(3), 416; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030416
Submission received: 15 January 2021 / Revised: 18 February 2021 / Accepted: 19 February 2021 / Published: 25 February 2021

Abstract

:
Climate warming increases the water needs of plants. The aim of this study was to estimate the water needs of grapevines in central Poland. Water needs were calculated using the crop coefficients method. Reference evapotranspiration was assessed by the Blaney–Criddle’s equation, modified for climate conditions in Poland. Crop coefficients were assumed according to the Doorenbos and Pruitt method. Water needs were calculated using the data from four meteorological stations. Rainfall deficit with the probability occurrence of normal years, medium dry years, and very dry years was determined by the Ostromęcki’s method. Water needs of grapevines during the average growing season were estimated at 438 mm. Upward time trend in the water needs both in the period of May–October and June–August was estimated. Temporal variability in the water needs was significant for all of the provinces. These changes were mainly impacted by a significant increasing tendency in mean air temperature and less by precipitation totals that did not show a clear changing tendency. Due to climate change, vineyards will require irrigation in the near future. The use of resource-efficient irrigation requires a precise estimate of the grapevines’ water needs. The study identified the water requirements for grapevines in central Poland.

1. Introduction

Despite the unfavorable climatic conditions, the tradition of viticulture in Poland dates back to the Middle Ages. Nowadays, the largest number of vineyards in Poland is located in the south-eastern, south-western, and southern provinces of the country, where the most favorable climatic conditions for viticulture are [1,2,3,4]. However, many new vineyards are also planted in eastern and central Poland, despite the fact that there are much less satisfactory climatic environments for viticulture [4,5]. The development of new vineyards in Poland is the effect of improving economic conditions and changes in consumer preferences, as well as the increase of ecological agro-tourism, including oeno-tourism activities. A large increase in interest in viticulture in Poland is also the result of great progress in breeding programs that aim to obtain new cultivars with low susceptibility to fungal diseases and frost damage and the gradual warming of the climate in Poland [2,3,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
Orchard plantations in central Poland are exposed to the largest deficit of precipitation during the growing season [14,15]. According to Rzekanowski [15], in the case of fruit plants, the highest water deficits occur in the great valleys area, i.e., central Poland, while more favorable water conditions are in the southern and northern region of the country. The most important factors that limit the development of vineyards in central Poland are minimum winter temperature (−30 °C occurring at least once in 10 years), as well as spring and autumn frosts [16]. The sum of active temperatures (SAT) above 10 °C is considered to be the most important climatic criterion, which is particularly useful for assessing the conditions of viticulture [16,17,18]. In the last few decades, climate change that is favorable for viticulture has been observed in Poland. As reported by Lisek [16], in central Poland in the years 1981–2000, the average SAT was almost 2500 °C, while in 2003 the SAT was over 2700 °C, and in 2006 the SAT was up to 2900 °C. For comparison, the SAT in northeastern Poland is about 2200 °C, 2600 °C in the highlands of central Poland, and 2700 °C in the south-west and west part of the country [17,18].
According to Lisek [16], as the result of climate change, especially due to the increase in temperature in the period from 1 May to 30 September, nowadays viticulture in central Poland is much more effective than twenty years ago. Due to climate warming, the subsequent phenological stages of plant development occur earlier, which increases the quality of fruit of the grapevines grown in central Poland. An increase in the average summer (May–September) temperature of 1 °C raises the water needs of grapevines by 50 mm of annual precipitation, assuming that at least 50% of annual precipitation occurs during the growing season [19,20].
The purpose of the present study was to estimate the water needs of grapevine plants grown in central Poland. The results of the research will help to develop a program of resource-efficient irrigation of vineyards in the central provinces of the country.

2. Materials and Methods

In the present study, crop evapotranspiration was applied as a measure of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) water needs [21]. Consequently, the water requirements of grapevines were determined by the crop coefficients method. The reference evapotranspiration was calculated by the Blaney–Criddle equation, which is based on air temperature and was modified for Polish environmental conditions [22,23,24]. The crop coefficients for grapevine plants (adjusted to the reference evapotranspiration that was considered by the Blaney–Criddle method) were assumed according to Doorenbos and Pruitt [25]. It was presumed that the soil in the middle of the growing season is covered with plants at a level of 40–50%. It was also assumed that the grapevines are grown in regions with a cold winter and with spring and autumn frosts; the first leaves appear in early May, while the harvest begins in mid-September.
The water needs of the grapevine plants were calculated on the basis of measurement data collected from four meteorological stations located in Bydgoszcz, Warszawa, Poznań, and Łódź, which were representative of the considered provinces situated in central Poland: Kuyavian–Pomeranian province (K–P), Masovian province (M), Greater Poland province (G–P), and Lodz province (L), respectively (Table 1, Figure 1). Due to the long data series, these stations were considered as representative of the studied regions. In the entire examined area and period, the long-term average sum of active temperatures (SAT) exceeded 2500 °C, which is assumed as suitable for moderately early and late ripening of grapevines [3,26]. The calculations were carried out for the vegetation period of grapevines in Poland, considered from 1 May to 31 October in the years 1981–2020.
The statistical methods used in the study were trend analysis at different significance levels (p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.05) and descriptive characteristics (minimum, maximum, median, standard deviation, and variability coefficient) [27]. All calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel 2013 software.
The amounts of precipitation deficit (N) with the occurrence probability of the normal years (N50%), medium dry years (N25%) and very dry years (N10%) were determined for the six-month period of intensive development of grapevine plants (from 1 May to 31 October) by the Ostromęcki method [28,29].

3. Results

Within the analyzed forty years in all studied provinces, there was the tendency of increased mean air temperature, both during the entire grapevine growing season and during the period of intense plant development (June–August). The significant (at p ≤ 0.01) trend in increased mean air temperature was observed in all examined provinces (Table 2).
Among the studied provinces in central Poland, in each month of the growing season, the lowest standard deviation of the grapevines’ water needs, which is a measure of the diversity of monthly sums of the water requirements, was estimated to occur in the Masovian province (Table 3). During the growing period, the highest standard deviation of the grapevine water needs was noted in July and ranged from 6.4 mm to 7.5 mm, depending on the province. The lowest standard deviation of the water needs ranged from 3.1 mm to 3.5 mm, depending on the province, was assessed in May.
The variability coefficient, as a measure of the relative diversity of monthly sums of the grapevines’ water needs in the period from May to August ranged from 5.1% to 7.4% (Table 3). In September, its values increased to the range between 7.3% and 10.3%. The highest variability coefficient of grapevine water requirements (from 12.6% to 14.2%) was noted in October. Among the studied provinces, during the entire growing season the highest diversity in the grapevines’ water needs was estimated to occur in the Greater Poland province.
The average water needs of grapevines during the growing season, considered from 1 May to 31 October in the years 1981–2020 in central Poland were estimated to be 438 mm (Figure 2a). The highest daily water requirements of grapevines (equal 3.7 mm) were calculated in July (Figure 2b). A little lower values of daily grapevines’ water needs (3.4 mm) were estimated to occur in August, as well in June (2.9 mm). The lowest water requirements of grapevines were assessed to occur in May (1.5 mm) and in October (0.9 mm).
The highest water needs of grapevines cultivated in central Poland in 1981–2020, both in the growing season (from 1 May to 31 October) and during the period of increased water needs by plants (from 1 June to 31 August), occurred in the Kuyavian–Pomeranian and Masovian provinces (Figure 3a,b). In the abovementioned provinces, the average value of crop evapotranspiration was 444 mm (K–P) and 445 mm (M) in the growing season, and 309 mm (K–P) and 308 mm (M) in the period of increased crop water needs. The lowest water needs of grapevines, 427 mm in the period of May–October and 296 mm in the period of June–August, were noted in the Lodz province. In both analyzed periods and in all of the provinces, grapevine water demands were higher than precipitation totals (Figure 3a,b), which indicates the necessity of supplementary irrigation.
In the studied forty-year period in each considered province of central Poland, there was a visible tendency of the increased water needs of grapevines— both in the growing season (May–October) (Figure 4a–d) and during the period of increased crop water needs (June–August) (Figure 5a–d), as well as in July, the month with the highest water requirements (Figure 6a–d).
There was also tendency of increased precipitation totals, especially during the entire grapevine vegetation period (May–October) (Figure 4a–d). In general, the trend of changes was not significant due to high variability in precipitation from year to year. An exception was Masovian province, where a significant increasing trend was recorded (Table 4). In the period of increased water demands for grapevines (June–August) a slight decreased tendency was recorded in Lodz province (Figure 5a–d and Figure 6a–d).
In the entire studied area of Poland, a significant temporal variability in grapevines’ water needs was noted (Table 5). This indicates that in the growing season (May–October) and during the years 1981–2020, the grapevine water requirements increased in each decade from 11.5 mm in Greater Poland province to 5.8 mm in Kuyavian–Pomeranian province (Figure 4a–d, Table 5). In the months June–August, during the period of increasing water needs by plants, the crop evapotranspiration rose in each following decade from 8.4 mm in Greater Poland province to 4.6 mm in Kuyavian–Pomeranian province (Figure 5a–d, Table 5). In July, the month when the water needs of the grapevines are the highest, the crop evapotranspiration increased in the range from 2.5 mm in Greater Poland province to 1.1 mm in Kuyavian–Pomeranian province (Figure 6a–d, Table 5).
The highest rainfall deficit in the studied six-month period of the grapevine development (from 1 May to 31 October) with the occurrence probability of the normal years (N50%) and medium dry years (N25%) was noted in the Kuyavian–Pomeranian province and amounted to 133 mm and 254 mm, respectively (Table 6). The highest rainfall deficit with the occurrence probability of the very dry years (N10%) was found in the Masovian province (363 mm). In the three-month period (June–August), during the increased water needs by plants, the highest rainfall deficit in the normal years (N50%) and medium dry years (N25%) was observed in the Kuyavian–Pomeranian province (117 mm and 200 mm, respectively) and the highest rainfall deficit in the very dry years (N10%) was noted in the Masovian province (303 mm). In July, the rainfall deficits N50%, N25%, and N10% were evenly balanced. Generally, with the exception of the very dry years (N10%), the lowest rainfall deficit in the normal years (N50%) and medium dry years (N25%) was found in the Lodz province.

4. Discussion

In Poland, atmospheric precipitations are the primary source of water for viticulture [3]. In areas suitable for the grapevine cultivation, the annual precipitation totals ranged between 500 mm and 800 mm [3,4]. Rzekanowski [15], studying the water deficit during the growing season in Poland on the basis of data from 27 meteorological stations, stated that the highest water deficits in the fruit plants’ cultivation occurs in central Poland (in the great valleys area). More favorable water conditions were noted in the southern and northern region of the country [15]. The highest need for irrigation supplementing precipitation was observed just in central Poland [30,31,32,33,34,35]. A clearly negative effect of drought periods on the yield of grapevine plants grown in Poland was published by Treder and Pacholak [36]. The water deficit occurring during the drought period contributed to the weak growth of shoots and fruits, drying shoots growing from the buds in the corners of leafstalks, and yellowing leaves [3]. Consequently, the vineyards located in central Poland should be irrigated, especially during periods of drought. Drip irrigation of the grapevine plantings in Poland was recommended [3,36].
Generally, in many European countries and around the world, irrigation is a common cultivation treatment in vineyards [37]. Several scientists report the beneficial effects of micro-irrigation, including deficit irrigation, on the development and yield of grapevine plants [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. In studies carried out in Spain, comparing to the rain-fed treatment, all applied irrigation methods increased the yield of grapevine fruit, even by 58% [45].
The effects of climate change on grapevine physiology and wine characteristics are already visible and will very likely continue in the coming decades in all the grape growing regions of the world. The first observed and forecasted effect of climate change was an advance in development stages, with a ripening occurring under warmer meteorological conditions. This can significantly modify the quality of berries, which will likely contain less anthocyanin, fewer acids, more sugars, and presumably fewer aroma compounds. The effects of climate change on grapevine yield potential are more difficult to predict [48].
The results of studies in Germany depicted an increasing spring frost risk for potential viticulture areas in eastern Germany as well as in the southernmost areas of viticulture. This effect in northern and eastern Germany is due to earlier bud burst and stronger continental air masses’ influence, but for the southern and western regions of Germany, it is mainly due to the even earlier bud burst. This could modify the regionally nuanced character of German wines [49].
Climate change studies for Italy [50,51], France [52], Germany [49,53], and Luxembourg [54], among others, hint at an increase in the growing season mean temperature.
The expected further climate changes may cause an increase in water needs of the plants, also including grapevines [13,24,55,56,57]. Therefore, some adaptation measures should already be taken today to protect plant crops against the effects of rising air temperature. These adaptation activities include irrigation treatments, particularly the resource-efficient drip irrigation systems. The results of the research presented in this paper will allow for precise programming of irrigation treatments for vineyards located in central Poland. It was found that the water needs of grapevines during the growing season in the study area amounted to 438 mm, and this value was not covered by rainfall.
In the present research, the observations of the temporal variability analyzed on the basis of the forty-year period showed a significant gradual increase in grapevine water needs in all of the studied provinces in central Poland. The importance of the irrigation treatments in Poland will gradually increase along with the intensification of adverse climate changes [7,8,35,58,59,60,61,62] and the foreseen rising temperature in the range of 2 °C to 4 °C [7,8]. It should be noted that individual scenarios for temperature and precipitation changes, developed for Poland in the actual decade of the 1920s and following (2050 and 2080) years, differ significantly, especially in the summer months (from June to August). In fact, all scenarios assumed an increase in air temperature. It is expected that the average monthly air temperature in July and August may exceed even 25 °C. Some scenarios predict an increase in precipitation, while the others assume a decrease in precipitation. This research has shown that in vineyards located in central Poland, there is already a significant deficit in precipitation.
Grapevines are considered to be drought tolerant plants [63], but most current cultivation areas are located in the regions with decreasing water availability and a potential risk of high drought stress during the growing season [64]. In future scenarios, the current winemaking regions in southern Europe may undergo a decline in their viticulture suitability, mainly due to severe dryness [65]. These regions may indeed become too dry for high-quality winemaking [66] and, in some of the most extreme cases, will require intensive irrigation [65].

5. Conclusions

Based on the estimates carried out in present study, it was found that during the growing season, i.e., from 1 May to 31 October, the average value of water needs of grapevines cultivated in vineyards in central Poland is estimated to be 438 mm and it is not covered by rainfall. Both in the growing season and during the period of increased water needs by plants, i.e., from 1 June to 31 August, an upward time trend in the water needs of grapevines was noted. A significant temporal variability in water needs was found for each province. Regardless of the occurrence probability of the normal, medium, or dry years, the rainfall deficit in the growing season in grapevine cultivation was recorded in the entire studied area of central Poland. These changes are mainly impacted by a significant increasing tendency in mean air temperature and less by precipitation totals, which do not show a clear changing tendency. The presented research results may constitute the basis for designing resource-efficient irrigation programs necessary for agricultural and horticultural crops in the light of the observed global climate change.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.J., S.R., P.S. and R.R.; methodology, S.R., P.S. and R.R.; software, B.J., W.P., A.Ł. and H.A.S.; validation, S.R., P.S. and R.R.; formal analysis, S.R.; investigation, S.R.; resources, B.J., S.R., P.S. and D.L.; data curation, S.R., W.K.-W. and W.P.; writing—original draft preparation, B.J., S.R., R.R., F.P.-F. and D.L.; writing—review and editing, B.J., S.R., W.P., R.R., F.P.-F., W.K-W. and D.L.; visualization, B.J., S.R., A.Ł., W.K.-W., H.A.S., R.R. and D.L.; supervision, S.R.; project administration, S.R.; funding acquisition, P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bokwa, A.; Klimek, M. Warunki klimatyczne Pogórza Wielickiego dla potrzeb uprawy winorośli [Climate conditions of the Wieliczka Foothills for the purposes of viticulture]. In Człowiek i Rolnictwo [Man and Agriculture]; Zborowski, A., Górka, Z., Eds.; IGiGP UJ: Kraków, Poland, 2009; pp. 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kopeć, B. Uwarunkowania termiczne wegetacji winorośli na obszarze południowo-wschodniej Polski [Thermal conditions of grape’s vegetation in south-eastern Poland]. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2009, 4, 251–262. [Google Scholar]
  3. Myśliwiec, R. Uprawa Winorośli [Viticulture]; PWRiL: Warszawa, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Adamczewska-Sowińska, K.; Bąbelewski, P.; Chohura, P.; Czaplicka-Pędzich, M.; Gudarowska, E.; Krężel, J.; Mazurek, J.; Sosna, I.; Szewczuk, A. Agrotechniczne Aspekty Uprawy Winorośli [Agrotechnical Aspects of Viticulture]; Druk-24h: Wrocław, Poland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Koźmiński, C.; Michalska, B. Atlas Klimatycznego Ryzyka Uprawy Roślin w Polsce [Atlas of Climatic Risk to Crop Cultivation in Poland]; USz: Szczecin, Poland, 2001; pp. 17–18. [Google Scholar]
  6. Szymanowski, M.; Smaza, M. Zmiana zasobów klimatycznych a możliwości uprawy winorośli na Dolnym Śląsku [Change of climatic resources and possibilities of viticulture in Lower Silesia]. In Proceedings of the XXXII National Congress of Agrometeorologists and Climatologists, Kołobrzeg, Poland, 13–15 September 2007; pp. 69–70. [Google Scholar]
  7. Łabędzki, L. Foreseen climate changes and irrigation development in Poland. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2009, 3, 7–18. [Google Scholar]
  8. Łabędzki, L. Expected development of irrigation in Poland in the context of climate change. J. Water Land Dev. 2009, 13, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lisek, J. Winorośl w Uprawie Przydomowej i Towarowej [Vines in Home and Commercial Cultivation]; Hortpress: Warszawa, Poland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kapłan, M. Możliwości uprawy winorośli w Polsce [Possibilities of viticulture in Poland]. Nauk. Przyr. 2013, 2, 4–12. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bąk, B.; Łabędzki, L. Thermal conditions in Bydgoszcz region in growing seasons 2011–2050 in view of expected climate change. J. Water Land Dev. 2014, 23, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pink, M. Polska jako kraj winiarski? Od tradycji do rodzących się możliwości [Poland as a wine country? From tradition to emerging possibilities]. Probl. Drob. Gospod. Rol. 2015, 2, 37–56. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rolbiecki, S.; Piszczek, P. Effect of the forecast climate change on the grapevine water requirements in the Bydgoszcz region. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2016, 4, 1847–1856. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rojek, M. Potrzeby nawadniania w Polsce [Irrigation needs in Poland]. In Nawadnianie Roślin [Plant Irrigation]; Karczmarczyk, S., Nowak, L., Eds.; PWRiL: Poznań, Poland, 2006; pp. 91–108. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rzekanowski, C. Kształtowanie się potrzeb nawodnieniowych roślin sadowniczych w Polsce [Shaping of irrigation needs for fruit plants in Poland]. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Aeas 2009, 3, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lisek, J. Climatic factors affecting development and yielding of grapevine in Central Poland. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 2008, 16, 286–293. [Google Scholar]
  17. Myśliwiec, R. Winorośl i Wina [Vines and Wines]; PWRiL: Warszawa, Poland, 2006; p. 22. [Google Scholar]
  18. Grabowski, J.; Kopytowski, J. Czas aktywnego wzrostu roślin w Polsce północno-wschodniej, a warunki uprawy winorośli [The time of active plant growth in north-eastern Poland and the conditions of viticulture]. Zesz. Probl. Postep. Nauk Roln. 2009, 536, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  19. Słowik, K. Deszczowanie Roślin Sadowniczych [Sprinkling of Fruit Plants]; PWRiL: Warszawa, Poland, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dzieżyc, J. Rolnictwo w Warunkach Nawadniania [Irrigationin Agriculture]; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  21. Łabędzki, L.; Szajda, J.; Szuniewicz, J. Ewapotranspiracja upraw rolniczych—Terminologia, definicje, metody obliczania. Przegląd stanu wiedzy [Evapotranspiration of agricultural crops—Terminology, definitions, calculation methods. Review]. IMUZ Falenty 1996, 33, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  22. Żakowicz, S. Podstawy Technologii Nawadniania Rekultywowanych Składowisk Odpadów Komunalnych [Fundamentals of Irrigation Technology for Reclaimed Municipal Waste Dumas]; SGGW: Warszawa, Poland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rolbiecki, S. O szacowaniu potrzeb wodnych drzew owocowych w Polsce na podstawie temperatury powietrza [Comparison of sour cherry-tree water requirements in the regions of Bydgoszcz and Wrocław]. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2018, II, 393–406. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jagosz, B.; Rolbiecki, S.; Stachowski, P.; Ptach, W.; Łangowski, A.; Kasperska-Wołowicz, W.; Sadan, H.A.; Rolbiecki, R.; Prus, P.; Kazula, M.J. Assessment of water needs of grapevines in western Poland from the perspective of climate change. Agriculture 2020, 10, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Doorenbos, J.; Pruitt, W.O. Guidelines for Predicting Crop Water Requirements; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kryza, M.; Szymanowski, M.; Błaś, M.; Migała, K.; Werner, M.; Sobik, M. Observed changes in SAT and GDD and the climatological suitability of the Poland-Germany-Czech Republic transboundary region for wine grapes cultivation. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2015, 122, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Platt, C. Problemy Rachunku Prawdopodobieństwa i Statystyki Matematycznej [Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics]; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  28. Żakowicz, S.; Hewelke, P. Wybrane Materiały Meteorologiczne [Selected Meteorological Materials]; SGGW: Warszawa, Poland, 1995; p. 356. [Google Scholar]
  29. Żakowicz, S.; Hewelke, P.; Gnatowski, T. Podstawy Infrastruktury Technicznej w Przestrzeni Produkcyjnej [Basics of Technical Infrastructure in Production Space]; SGGW: Warszawa, Poland, 2009; p. 192. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rolbiecki, S.; Rzekanowski, C. Influence of sprinkler and drip irrigation on the growth and yield of strawberries grown on sandy soils. Acta Hortic. 1997, 439, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rzekanowski, C.; Rolbiecki, S. The influence of drip irrigation on yields of some cultivars of apple trees in central Poland under different rainfall conditions during the vegetation season. Acta Hortic. 2000, 537, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rzekanowski, C.; Rolbiecki, S. The influence of drip irrigation on yields of some cultivars of stone fruit-bearing trees in central Poland under different rainfall conditions during the vegetation season. Acta Hortic. 2000, 537, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rolbiecki, S.; Rolbiecki, R.; Rzekanowski, C. Response of black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) cv. ‘Titania’ to micro-irrigation under loose sandy soil conditions. Acta Hortic. 2002, 585, 649–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rolbiecki, S.; Rolbiecki, R.; Rzekanowski, C. Effect of micro-irrigation on the growth and yield of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) cv. ‘Polana’ grown in very light soil. Acta Hortic. 2002, 585, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stachowski, P.; Markiewicz, J. The need of irrigation in central Poland on the example of Kutno county. Annu. Set Environ. Prot. 2011, 13, 1453–1472. [Google Scholar]
  36. Treder, W.; Pacholak, E. Nawadnianie roślin sadowniczych [Irrigation of fruit plants]. In Nawadnianie Roślin [Plant Irrigation]; Karczmarczyk, S., Nowak, L., Eds.; PWRiL: Poznań, Poland, 2006; pp. 333–365. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ruiz-Sanchez, M.C.; Domingo, R.; Castel, J.R. Deficit irrigation in fruit trees and vines in Spain. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 8, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yunusa, I.A.M.; Walker, R.R.; Loveys, B.R.; Blackmore, D.H. Determination of transpiration in irrigated grapevines: Comparison of the heat-pulse technique with gravimetric and micrometeorological methods. Irrig. Sci. 2000, 20, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cifre, J.; Bota, J.; Escalona, J.M.; Medrano, H.; Flexas, J. Phyisological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): An open gate to improve water-use efficiency? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 106, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chaves, M.M.; Santos, T.P.; Souza, C.R.; Ortuño, M.F.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Lopes, C.M.; Maroco, J.P.; Pereira, J.S. Deficit irrigation in grapevine improves water-use efficiency while controlling vigour and production quality. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2007, 150, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burg, P. The influence of drip irrigation on the quality of vine grapes. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel Brun. 2008, 56, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Intrigliolo, D.S.; Castel, J.R. Effects of irrigation on the performance of grapevine cv. Tempranillo in Requena, Spain. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 2008, 59, 30–38. [Google Scholar]
  43. Acevedo-Opazoa, C.; Ortega-Fariasa, S.; Fuentes, S. Effects of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) water status on water consumption, vegetative growth and grape quality: An irrigation scheduling application to achieve regulated deficit irrigation. Agric. Water Manag. 2010, 97, 956–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chaves, M.M.; Zarrouk, O.; Francisco, R.; Costa, J.M.; Santos, T.; Regalado, A.P.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Lopes, C.M. Grapevine under deficit irrigation: Hints from physiological and molecular data. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Intrigliolo, D.S.; Pérez, D.; Risco, D.; Yeves, A.; Castel, J.R. Yield components and grape composition responses to seasonal water deficits in Tempranillo grapevines. Irrigation Sci. 2012, 30, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nolz, R.; Loiskandl, W.; Kammerer, G.; Himmelbauer, M.L. Survey of soil water distribution in a vineyard and implications for subsurface drip irrigation control. Soil Water Res. 2016, 11, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Nolz, R.; Loiskandl, W. Evaluating soil water content data monitored at different locations in a vineyard with regard to irrigation control. Soil Water Res. 2017, 12, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Duchêne, É.; Pieri, F.H.P. Grapevine and climate change: What adaptations of plant material and training systems should we anticipate? Spéc. Laccave J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 2014, 3, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kartschall, T.; Wodinski, M.; von Bloh, W.; Oesterle, H.; Rachimow, C.; Hoppmann, D. Changes in phenology and frost risks in Vitis vinifera (cv Riesling) between 1901 and 2100. Meteorol. Z. 2015, 24, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Eccel, E.; Zollo, A.L.; Mercogliano, P.; Zorer, R. Simulations of quantitative shift in bio-climatic indices in the viticultural areas of Trentino (Italian Alps) by an open source R package. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016, 127, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bonfante, A.; Monaco, E.; Langella, G.; Mercogliano, P.; Bucchignani, E.; Manna, P.; Terribile, F. A dynamic viticultural zoning to explore the resilience of terroir concept under climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 624, 294–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Duchene, E.; Schneider, C. Grapevine and climatic changes: A glance at the situation in Alsace. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2005, 25, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Neumann, P.A.; Matzarakis, A. Viticulture in southwest Germany under climate change conditions. Clim. Res. 2011, 47, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Goergen, K.; Beersma, L.; Hoffmann, L.; Junk, J. ENSEMBLES-based assessment of regional climate effects in Luxembourg and their impact on vegetation. Clim. Chang. 2013, 119, 761–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rolbiecki, S.; Piszczek, P.; Chmura, K. Attempt at comparison of the grapevine water requirements in the regions of Bydgoszcz and Wrocław. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2017, III, 1157–1166. [Google Scholar]
  56. Irimia, L.M.; Patriche, C.V.; Rosca, B. Climate change impact on suitability for wine production in Romania. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2018, 133, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Piña-Rey, A.; González-Fernández, E.; Fernández-González, M.; Lorenzo, M.N.; Rodríguez-Rajo, F.J. Climate change impacts assessment on wine-growing bioclimatic transition areas. Agriculture 2020, 10, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Łabędzki, L.; Bąk, B.; Liszewska, M. Wpływ przewidywanej zmiany klimatu na zapotrzebowanie ziemniaka późnego na wodę [Impact of climate change on water demand of late potato]. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2013, 2, 155–165. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kuchar, L.; Iwański, S. Rainfall simulation for the prediction of crop irrigation in future climate. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2011, 5, 7–18. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kuchar, L.; Iwański, S. Rainfall evaluation for crop production until 2050-2060 and selected climate change scenarios for North Central Poland. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2013, 2, 187–200. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kuchar, L.; Iwański, S.; Diakowska, E.; Gąsiorek, E. Simulation of hydrothermal conditions for crop production purpose until 2050–2060 and selected climate change scenarios for North Central Poland. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2015, II, 319–334. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kuchar, L.; Iwański, S.; Diakowska, E.; Gąsiorek, E. Assessment of meteorological drought in 2015 for North Central part of Poland using hydrothermal coefficient (HTC) in the context of climate change. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2017, I, 257–273. [Google Scholar]
  63. Serra, I.; Strever, A.; Myburgh, P.; Deloire, A. Review: The interaction between rootstocks and cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) to enhance drought tolerance in grapevine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2014, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Costa, J.M.; Ortuño, M.F.; Chaves, M.M. Deficit irrigation as a strategy to save water: Physiology and potential application to horticulture. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 1421–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fraga, H.; García de Cortázar Atauri, I.; Santos, J.A. Viticultural irrigation demands under climate change scenarios in Portugal. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 196, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kenny, G.J.; Harrison, P.A. The effects of climate variability and change on grape suitability in Europe. J. Wine Res. 1992, 3, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of analysed provinces of central Poland: geographical location of Poland (a), location of meteorological stations (b) and isolines of SAT—long-term average sum of active temperatures (c).
Figure 1. Location of analysed provinces of central Poland: geographical location of Poland (a), location of meteorological stations (b) and isolines of SAT—long-term average sum of active temperatures (c).
Agronomy 11 00416 g001
Figure 2. Average water needs of grapevines in central Poland during the period of May–October (V–X) in the years 1981–2020, presented as the cumulated sum curve (a) and daily values in the particular months (b).
Figure 2. Average water needs of grapevines in central Poland during the period of May–October (V–X) in the years 1981–2020, presented as the cumulated sum curve (a) and daily values in the particular months (b).
Agronomy 11 00416 g002
Figure 3. Average water needs of grapevines and the average precipitation in the growing season (a) and in the period of increased crop water needs (b) in the considered provinces in central Poland (K–P = Kuyavian–Pomeranian, M = Masovian, G–P = Greater Poland, and L = Lodz).
Figure 3. Average water needs of grapevines and the average precipitation in the growing season (a) and in the period of increased crop water needs (b) in the considered provinces in central Poland (K–P = Kuyavian–Pomeranian, M = Masovian, G–P = Greater Poland, and L = Lodz).
Agronomy 11 00416 g003
Figure 4. Time trend of precipitation totals and grapevine water needs in the period of May–October in the considered provinces in central Poland: Kuyavian–Pomeranian (a), Masovian (b), Greater Poland (c) and Lodz (d).
Figure 4. Time trend of precipitation totals and grapevine water needs in the period of May–October in the considered provinces in central Poland: Kuyavian–Pomeranian (a), Masovian (b), Greater Poland (c) and Lodz (d).
Agronomy 11 00416 g004
Figure 5. Time trend of precipitation totals and grapevine water needs in the period of June–August in the considered provinces in central Poland: Kuyavian–Pomeranian (a), Masovian (b), Greater Poland (c) and Lodz (d).
Figure 5. Time trend of precipitation totals and grapevine water needs in the period of June–August in the considered provinces in central Poland: Kuyavian–Pomeranian (a), Masovian (b), Greater Poland (c) and Lodz (d).
Agronomy 11 00416 g005
Figure 6. Time trend of precipitation totals and grapevine water needs in July in the considered provinces in central Poland: Kuyavian–Pomeranian (a), Masovian (b), Greater Poland (c) and Lodz (d).
Figure 6. Time trend of precipitation totals and grapevine water needs in July in the considered provinces in central Poland: Kuyavian–Pomeranian (a), Masovian (b), Greater Poland (c) and Lodz (d).
Agronomy 11 00416 g006
Table 1. Geographical position of the meteorological stations.
Table 1. Geographical position of the meteorological stations.
ProvinceStationAltitude aLongitudeLatitude
Kuyavian–PomeranianBydgoszcz4618°01′53°08′
MasovianWarszawa10620°59′52°09′
Greater PolandPoznań8616°50′52°25′
LodzŁódź18419°24′51°44′
a Meters above mean sea level.
Table 2. Equations of mean air temperature trend in the grapevine vegetation period in 1981–2020 in central Poland.
Table 2. Equations of mean air temperature trend in the grapevine vegetation period in 1981–2020 in central Poland.
PeriodTrend EquationR2Tendency (°C·Decade−1)
Kuyavian–Pomeranian Province
May–Octobery = 0.0272x + 15.070R² = 0.2007 ***0.3
June–Augusty = 0.0406x + 17.874R² = 0.1952 ***0.4
Julyy = 0.0262x + 19.006R² = 0.0339 n.s.0.3
Masovian Province
May–Octobery = 0.0396x + 14.987R² = 0.3887 ***0.4
June–Augusty = 0.0577x + 17.720R² = 0.3848 ***0.6
Julyy = 0.0477x + 18.813R² = 0.1277 **0.5
Greater Poland Province
May–Octobery = 0.055x + 14.310R² = 0.4967 ***0.6
June–Augusty = 0.0739x + 16.813R² = 0.448 ***0.7
Julyy = 0.0607x + 17.906R² = 0.1516 **0.6
Lodz Province
May–Octobery = 0.0351x + 14.312R² = 0.3518 ***0.3
June–Augusty = 0.0572x + 16.821R² = 0.3726 ***0.6
Julyy = 0.0490x + 17.794R² = 0.1123 **0.5
n.s.—not significant; **—significant at p ≤ 0.05; ***—significant at p ≤ 0.01.
Table 3. Statistical characteristics of grapevine water requirements (mm) in 1981–2020 in central Poland.
Table 3. Statistical characteristics of grapevine water requirements (mm) in 1981–2020 in central Poland.
CharacteristicProvinceMonths of the Growing Season
MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
Minimum
(mm)
K–P a3980103915119
M4179101925221
G–P377698905020
L377596884819
Maximum
(mm)
K–P571091331197034
M551061321216834
G–P541061331218635
L521031271186735
Median
(mm)
K–P48891161046027
M48881151056128
G–P47851141036028
L45841101025827
Standard deviation
(mm)
K–P3.55.36.95.64.43.7
M3.15.26.45.44.43.5
G–P3.45.87.56.26.33.7
L3.25.27.05.44.63.6
Variability coefficient
(%)
K–P7.46.06.05.47.414.2
M6.55.95.65.17.312.6
G–P7.46.86.76.010.313.1
L7.06.26.35.37.813.5
a K–P = Kuyavian–Pomeranian province; M = Masovian province; G–P = Greater Poland province; L = Lodz province.
Table 4. Time trend equations of the rainfall in the years 1981–2020 in central Poland.
Table 4. Time trend equations of the rainfall in the years 1981–2020 in central Poland.
PeriodProvinces
Kuyavian–PomeranianMasovianGreater PolandLodz
Linear Correlation Coefficient (r)
May–October0.191 n.s.0.450 ***0.194 n.s.0.196 n.s.
June–August0.080 n.s.0.261 n.s.0.028 n.s.0.068 n.s.
July0.117 n.s.0.185 n.s.0.127 n.s.0.030 n.s.
Tendency of Rainfall (mm decade−1)
May–October15.538.314.915.2
June–August5.116.51.7–3.9
July4.18.75.5–1.2
n.s.—not significant; ***—significant at p ≤ 0.01.
Table 5. Time trend equations of the grapevine water needs in the years 1981–2020 in central Poland.
Table 5. Time trend equations of the grapevine water needs in the years 1981–2020 in central Poland.
PeriodProvinces
Kuyavian–PomeranianMasovianGreater PolandLodz
Linear Correlation Coefficient (r)
May–October0.456 ***0.644 ***0.701 ***0.610 ***
June–August0.429 ***0.614 ***0.660 ***0.598 ***
July0.184 n.s.0.357 **0.389 **0.335 **
Tendency of Water Needs (mm decade−1)
May–October5.88.411.57.6
June–August4.66.68.46.5
July1.12.02.52.0
n.s.—not significant; **—significant at p ≤ 0.05; ***—significant at p ≤ 0.01.
Table 6. Rainfall deficit (mm) in grapevines cultivation in 1981–2020 in central Poland. N—amounts of precipitation deficit.
Table 6. Rainfall deficit (mm) in grapevines cultivation in 1981–2020 in central Poland. N—amounts of precipitation deficit.
Probability of Rainfall Deficit OccurrenceProvinces
Kuyavian–PomeranianMasovianGreater PolandLodz
May–October
N50% = normal years133100126103
N25% = medium dry years254251262232
N10% = very dry years330363296300
June–August
N50% = normal years1179210695
N25% = medium dry years200194194175
N10% = very dry years260303225242
July
N50% = normal years37353130
N25% = medium dry years95878188
N10% = very dry years12912299132
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jagosz, B.; Rolbiecki, S.; Rolbiecki, R.; Łangowski, A.; Sadan, H.A.; Ptach, W.; Stachowski, P.; Kasperska-Wołowicz, W.; Pal-Fam, F.; Liberacki, D. The Water Needs of Grapevines in Central Poland. Agronomy 2021, 11, 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030416

AMA Style

Jagosz B, Rolbiecki S, Rolbiecki R, Łangowski A, Sadan HA, Ptach W, Stachowski P, Kasperska-Wołowicz W, Pal-Fam F, Liberacki D. The Water Needs of Grapevines in Central Poland. Agronomy. 2021; 11(3):416. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jagosz, Barbara, Stanisław Rolbiecki, Roman Rolbiecki, Ariel Łangowski, Hicran A. Sadan, Wiesław Ptach, Piotr Stachowski, Wiesława Kasperska-Wołowicz, Ferenc Pal-Fam, and Daniel Liberacki. 2021. "The Water Needs of Grapevines in Central Poland" Agronomy 11, no. 3: 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop