Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Spatiotemporal Variations in the Water Quality of the Han River Basin, South Korea, Using Multivariate Statistical and APCS-MLR Modeling Techniques
Next Article in Special Issue
Early Effects of Fertilizer and Herbicide Reduction on Root-Associated Biota in Oil Palm Plantations
Previous Article in Journal
Repeated Manure Application for Eleven Years Stimulates Enzymatic Activities and Improves Soil Attributes in a Typic Hapludalf
Previous Article in Special Issue
Growth Promotion of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and Blackleg Disease (Leptosphaeria maculans) Suppression Mediated by Endophytic Bacteria
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Changes in Soil-Borne Communities of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi during Natural Regrowth of Abandoned Cattle Pastures Are Indicative of Ecosystem Restoration

Agronomy 2021, 11(12), 2468; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122468
by Carlos H. Rodríguez-León 1,2, Clara P. Peña-Venegas 3,*, Armando Sterling 2, Herminton Muñoz-Ramirez 2 and Yeny R. Virguez-Díaz 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agronomy 2021, 11(12), 2468; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122468
Submission received: 27 September 2021 / Revised: 18 November 2021 / Accepted: 22 November 2021 / Published: 3 December 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled ‘Changes in soil-borne communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during natural regrowth of abandoned cattle pastures are indicative of ecosystem restoration’ fits within the general scope of Agronomy MDPI. The article evaluated the soil microbial changes in soils of a natural regrowth succession of degraded pastures that were left for natural restoration. The authors, focused the attention on the changes in the composition, abundance and richness of AM fungal communities.

The manuscript is high originality and the work was well conducted. In the current experiment a high quality analytical methods were used and the experimental design and statistical analysis sounds; the manuscript is of high significance to the field and high interest to general audience, and the quality of writing is acceptable.

I have minor suggestions and comments on the paper .

  • The article has some formatting issues. Please check it;
  • In order to reduce the length of the manuscript, please move some Figure 1 in the supplementary file;
  • Line 378: please rewrite the follow sentence using other words: “In recent years, there has been a boom…”

Based on the above considerations, the paper is well written, the analytical methods are of high quality and the paper could be considered in Agronomy after minor revisions.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

L22: “Molecular techniques”. Which techniques? Please specify.

L25: “More AMF”. Does this means more AMF species? Please clarify.

L139: “y”?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop