Next Article in Journal
Profile of Semiquinone Radicals, Phytohormones and Sugars in Pistacia vera L. cv. Kirmizi Development
Previous Article in Journal
Pathogenic Variability of the Jackfruit-Bronzing Bacterium Pantoea stewartii Subspecies stewartii Infection to Jackfruit Varieties and Its Pivotal Plant Hosts in Malaysia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen Mineralization, Soil Microbial Biomass and Extracellular Enzyme Activities Regulated by Long-Term N Fertilizer Inputs: A Comparison Study from Upland and Paddy Soils in a Red Soil Region of China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in Bacterial Soil Biota under Cultivation of Crops near a Municipal Landfill Site

by
Dariusz Roman Ropek
* and
Krzysztof Frączek
Department of Microbiology and Biomonitoring, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(11), 2114; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112114
Submission received: 25 August 2021 / Revised: 26 September 2021 / Accepted: 20 October 2021 / Published: 21 October 2021

Abstract

:
The study aimed to evaluate the changes in the quantitative composition of a soil bacterial community near a municipal waste landfill, and attempted to use a bacteriological coefficient to assess the degree of soil degradation. The research was carried out near a landfill site located in southern Poland. Soil samples were collected from plots on which spring wheat, field bean and potato were cultivated. Microbiological analyses included the determination of the total number of bacteria in active and dormant (sporulating) stages. The highest ratio of sporulating bacteria in relation to vegetative bacteria was found in the reclaimed sector of the landfill site. The proposed bacteriological indicator of soil quality (i.e., the ratio of the number of sporulating bacteria to the number of vegetative forms) seems to be a good index for the assessment of soil quality near the landfill site.

1. Introduction

Municipal waste deposited in landfills and related habitats are still one of the most serious problems of modern civilization. They are almost always treated as a significant threat to all living organisms, including humans. Municipal waste is a potentially infectious material, which is a serious source of environmental pollution after deposition in landfills [1,2,3]. Municipal landfill sites cause changes in the use of neighbouring lands and reduce the aesthetic value of the landscape, mainly due to the possibility of contamination of the surrounding soils with inorganic compounds (e.g., heavy metals and sulfur compounds, dust) and biological aspects (e.g., microorganisms and their toxins) leading, among others, to the deterioration of the growing conditions for cultivated plants [4,5,6,7,8]. The exceedance of trace element concentrations tolerated by living organisms may lead to the extinction of more-sensitive species [9]. Soil microbiota is an important component of biocenosis, and it is susceptible to changes in environmental parameters. This sensitivity is related to the diversity of microbial biochemical functions and their high physiological activity. There are also distinct correlations between the soil characteristics, microorganisms and plants [10,11]. Soil microorganisms are the factor that, together with plant cover, determines both the direction and nature of biochemical processes as well as all physicochemical changes related to biological activities in arable soils. The result of their activity is not only the mineralization and humification of various organic compounds (including the synthesis of humus), but also the activation of many mineral compounds that are fundamental for soil plants and animals [10,12].
Since bacteria are the most numerous group of soil microorganisms near the municipal waste landfills, and because they take part in the circulation of elements in nature, as well as being subject to constant environmental, economic and agricultural pressures, they are selected as research microorganisms. In unfavourable conditions, microorganisms may switch to a dormant stage [13]. Dormancy is essential for microorganisms to cope with environmental stress such as a lack of nutrients and too low or high temperature for their growth [14]. When environmental conditions change, they switch from the dormant form to the vegetative form.
The study aimed to evaluate the changes in the quantitative composition of soil bacterial biota near a municipal waste landfill, and attempted to use a bacteriological coefficient to assess the degree of soil degradation. We hypothesised that the degree of soil degradation can be evaluated by the ratio of bacterial count in the sporulating to vegetative stage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Studied Area Characteristics

The field experiment was carried out on the municipal landfill area and in its immediate vicinity. The landfill site is located in southern Poland in an uninhabited area. Annual weather averages include temperatures of 8.4 °C, precipitation of 728.4 mm, relative air humidity of 79% and mean insolation of 1565.1 h. The area around the landfill is surrounded by agricultural land or wasteland. The research was carried out on nine fields located on the landfill site and in its buffer zone. The experimental plots were established in all geographic directions around the active sector, in two zones, at a distance of 50–250 m from its area, that is zone I (NI, EI, SI, WI) and between 250–500 m, that is zone II (NII, EII, SII, WII). Within the landfill site area, an additional plot was located in the reclaimed sector near the active one. Each field was divided into 12 plots of 25 m2—four plots for each crop. Plots were separated with ground strips of 1m width. In the plots, the Nadwislanski variety of the field bean (Vicia faba L.), the Żura variety of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and the Kulik variety of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) were cultivated following generally accepted principles of correct agricultural technology.
Based on the analysis of the granulometric composition of the soils, they were classified as sandy–slightly loamy, light and strong loam (plots: W II, EI, E II, SI, S II) and light loams (plots: WI, NI, N II, Z) [15] (Table 1).
The examined soils showed a clear differentiation, both in terms of the content of organic C and total N. The lowest content of these components was found in the soil from a plot established on the surface of the reclaimed sector (Z), and the highest concentration was ascertained for a plot located on the southern side of the landfill (SI), in the zone located 50–250 m from its area. The calculated C/N ratio was low, not exceeding a value of 10 (except for the soil from plot S II). For the tested soils from individual plots (except for the S I plot), the total contents of phosphorus were similar. The soil from the S I plot, as compared to the others, contained almost twice as much of this component, and the determined content of available phosphorus constituted as much as 34.5% of its total content. In the remaining soils, the share of this form of phosphorus in its total content was much lower, ranging from 5.0% to 14.4%. On the other hand, the examined soils showed much greater differentiation in terms of the total potassium content, in which the available form of this element was from 7.2% to 13.2%.
For the studied soils, the total concentrations of heavy metals did not exceed the limits given by Kabata-Pendias et al. [16] for non-polluted soils with their natural content (grade 0). Only for Cd (all plots), Zn (plot: W II, E I, E II, S I, S II) and Pb (plot Z) were the contents increased (grade I).

2.2. Microbiological Analysis

For microbiological analysis, the soil samples were taken from the arable layer (0–20 cm) using a steel corer (diameter 2 cm) of each plot. The soil sampling was conducted during crop vegetation. Four subsamples per plot were homogenized before microbiological analysis. The analysis was conducted using the soil serial dilution method [17]. These included the determination of the total heterotrophic bacteria numbers in the vegetative and dormant (sporulating) stages, using Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA, Difco). Spore-forming bacteria were enumerated after the pasteurization of samples before cultivation [18]. The bacterial cfu numbers were determined by the cultural method, converting the results to one gram of dry soil weight (cfu g−1 dry soil).

2.3. Data Processing and Statistical Analyses

The Statistica 13 program (TIBCO Software Inc. 2017. Statistica data analysis software system, version 13. https://www.tibco.com/tibco-data-science-overview, accessed on 1 October 2021) was used for the statistical analysis of the data. A one-way analysis of covariance ANCOVA was performed to assess the effect of the sampling site (plot location to the landfill) on the bacterial numbers in the soil. The significance of differences between the means was tested using the Newman–Keuls multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05). The effect of chemical parameters (the content of elements in the soil) on the survival of bacteria in the soil was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient “r”, assuming statistically significant values at p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

It should be emphasized that the basic microbiological parameters used in the assessment of the ecological condition of soils include the total number of bacteria [19]. According to Novak et al. [20], soil is the environment where the biodiversity of bacteria is high. They play an important role as soil quality indicators due to their involvement in the processes occurring in agroecosystems [21]. However, even the most uniform soil is not a homogeneous environment for bacteria.

3.1. Vegetative Forms

The bacterial numbers in the vegetative state ranged from 13.2 to 578.2 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil (Figure 1). Their highest value was found in plot WII for the cultivation of potatoes, and the lowest number in plot Z for the cultivation of horse beans. In the case of plots located outside the landfill site, the numbers of bacterial vegetative forms were in the range of 27.1–492.2 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil for the cultivation of wheat, 13.6–416.0 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil for the cultivation of horse beans and from 29.6 190 to 578.2 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil for potato cultivation. The bacterial abundance in the soil of the experimental plot located in the landfill area was in the range of 18.2–80.3 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil for wheat cultivation, 13.2–179.2 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil for the cultivation of horse bean and 51.3–186.1 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil for potato cultivation. Comparing the median numbers of vegetative bacteria, the highest differences were observed between the plot in the field of horse bean cultivation located in the reclaimed sector (median: 31.8 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil) and the plot in the cultivation of wheat, located at a distance of 250 to 500 m from the landfill area (median: 192.3 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil) (Table 2).
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess the impact of the location of the plot in relation to the landfill site on the bacterial numbers in the vegetative and sporulating stage for the cultivation of agricultural plants near the municipal waste landfill. The ANOVA results together with the Newman–Keuls test (p < 0.05) showed a significant effect of the cultivated plot (indirectly of municipal waste landfill) on the bacterial numbers in vegetative forms (p < 0.05). It was found that their average abundance in soil for the cultivation of all crops (wheat, field beans, potato) in plot Z, located in the landfill area, was significantly lower than the average numbers recorded for plots located 250–500 m from the landfill site (Newman–Keuls test: p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the plots located outside the landfill area, in two zones, both located at a distance of 50–250 m from its area (zone I) and 250–500 m (zone II) (Newman–Keuls test: p > 0.05) (Figure 1). The results of the comparisons showed that the mean values of the bacterial vegetative forms for the studied soil differed the most when the mean value of the Z plot was compared with that of the WII, SII and NI plots (Newman–Keuls test: p < 0.05). A statistically significant predominance of the average numbers of vegetative bacteria in the NI plot was also observed over the Z, EI, EII, WI, Si and NII plots. However, there were no significant differences for the means between the EI, WI and SI, NII, EII plots (Newman–Keuls test: p > 0.05). The analysis clearly showed that there were statistically significant differences in the vegetative bacterial numbers in the soil depending on the distance of the plot from the landfill site (Newman–Keuls test: p < 0.05). For the wheat cultivation, significant differences for the means were observed between plot Z and plot EII (Newman–Keuls test: p < 0.05); regarding the potatoes, there were significant differences for means between plots EI and Z and NI and WII (Newman–Keuls test: p < 0.05).
Regardless of the plot’s location, the grain size composition of the soils did not have a significant effect on the recorded numbers of vegetative bacteria (p > 0.05). The means that individual soil types did not differ significantly (Newman–Keuls test: p > 0.05). The highest average was recorded for the heavy clay sand, and it was not significantly higher than the lowest average for the light clay.
The impact of the element contents in the soil on the numbers of bacteria in vegetative forms observed in the plots was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. For most cases, there was no significant correlation between the presence of elements in the soil and the number of vegetative bacteria in the soil. The numbers of vegetative bacteria were only weakly negatively correlated (p < 0.05) with the presence of calcium (R = −0.39 p < 0.05) and chlorine: (R = −0.40 p < 0.05), and weakly positively correlated with the pH values (r = 0.37 p < 0.05) and heavy metals cadmium (r = 0.35 p < 0.05) and lead (r = 0.38 p < 0.05).
It is also worth noting that the statistical analysis showed that the total numbers of bacterial vegetative forms differed insignificantly (p > 0.05) depending on the type of cultivated plant. In this case, their highest mean values were recorded in the plots of wheat cultivation, but it was non-significantly higher than the lowest mean value recorded for the horse beans (Newman–Keuls test: p > 0.05). The conducted analyses showed that the type of the plant cultivated in the plots did not have a significant effect on the number of bacterial vegetative forms present in the soil (p > 0.05). These results were confirmed by Wielgosz et al. [22], who indicated that plants only slightly stimulated the growth of the number of bacteria in the soil. However, the authors draw attention to the fact that the survival and activity of soil microorganisms are closely related to the growing plants [23,24].
The simultaneous effect of the sampling site (first factor) and the month of the year (second factor) on the occurrence of vegetative forms of bacteria in the soil was investigated by performing a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results of the analysis showed that the impact of the site (plot) on the number of bacterial vegetative forms was stronger than that of the month. In general, the vegetative bacteria were more numerous in the summer months than in spring or early autumn (p < 0.05). In this case, the means of vegetative bacteria for May and July were the highest—significantly higher compared to the months when these microorganisms were least frequent (March and September, respectively) (Newman–Keuls test: p < 0.05). Wielgosz and Szember [24] have claimed that there are two periods of increased microbial growth during the year: The first with the occurrence of higher temperatures, and the second with the supply of organic matter to the soil. Similarly, Kulig [4] has indicated that significant differences in the intensity and range of the impact of municipal facilities are caused by meteorological conditions.

3.2. Sporulating Forms

In the analysed soils, the numbers of bacteria in the sporulating stage ranged from 3.8 to 196.8 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil (Figure 2). Their highest counts were recorded in the SII plot for the cultivation of wheat, and the lowest numbers were found for the NII plot under the cultivation of horse beans. For the plots located outside the landfill, the numbers of these bacterial forms were in the range of 5.3–196.8 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil, 3.8 to 134.8 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil and from 4.9 to 167.6 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil under the cultivation of wheat, horse beans and potatoes, respectively. The data allowed us to conclude that the ranges of their numbers in the plot located in the reclaimed sector were from 19.2 to 174.6 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil, from 17.8 to 83.8 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil and from 33.6 to 127.0 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil under wheat, horse beans and potato cultivation, respectively. When comparing the median number of surviving bacteria, the highest differences were observed between the plots in the field of horse bean cultivation located within 250 m from the landfill site (median: 25.5 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil) (Table 3), and the plot located in the landfill under the wheat cultivation (median: 89.6 × 104 cfu g−1 dry soil).
The one-way ANOVA showed, as in the case of vegetative bacteria, a significant effect of the position of the plot to the landfill on the numbers of sporulating bacteria in the soil (p < 0.05). In this case, the greatest differences in average values were observed between the plot located in the landfill area in the reclaimed sector, compared to the plot located a considerable distance from the landfill (250–500 m) outside its area, on the eastern side. The highest mean for plot Z was significantly higher than the recorded mean of the lowest for plot EII (Newman–Keuls test: p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the plots located near the landfill, that is WI, NII, WII, SI and NI (Newman–Keuls test: p > 0.05) (Figure 2). Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in the abundance of sporulating bacteria in the soil depending on the distance between the plots and the landfill area (Newman–Keuls test: p > 0.05).
It should be emphasized that the numbers of surviving soil bacteria in the plots, also due to the type of soil present there, did not differ significantly in their levels from each other (p > 0.05). As the analyses showed, the differences in the mean values between the different soil types found in the experimental plots were not statistically significant (Newman–Keuls test: p > 0.05). The highest average was recorded for the light clayey sand, but it was not significantly higher than that of the lowest average for heavy clay sand. Apart from determining the granulometric composition of the tested soils, tests of their chemical properties (pH, elemental composition) were also carried out in each selected plot. These are factors that, depending on local conditions, may have a significant impact on the number of microorganisms present in the soil. The impact of the measured chemical factors of the studied soils on the presence of sporulating bacteria was assessed based on the correlation coefficient. As the analyses showed, only the presence of copper Cu (r = 0.32 p < 0.05) and nickel Ni (r = 0.35 p < 0.05) in the soil was of significant importance in this respect. In other cases, there was no significant correlation between the presence of elements in the soil and the presence of sporulating bacteria. It should be emphasized that microorganisms can both contribute to increasing the content of metals in the environment and reduce their mobility or toxicity [25].
The results of the statistical analysis did not reveal a significant effect of the cultivated plant on the numbers of sporulating bacteria in the plot experiment, as the means for individual plants differed non-significantly (p > 0.05). In this case, the highest average was recorded in the soil under the wheat cultivation and did not differ significantly from the lowest average recorded under the cultivation of field beans. For the wheat cultivation, the highest average was recorded for plot Z; it was non-significantly higher than that of the lowest plot for EII (Newman–Keuls test: p > 0.05). Additionally, a high average was recorded for the SI and SII plots (slightly lower than the highest average). For the plots under the horse bean cultivation, the highest mean was recorded for the NI plot compared to that of the lowest average for the WI plot, while in the cultivation of potatoes, the greatest differences were recorded between the mean for the plot Z and the lowest mean recorded for the plot EI. The recorded means were not significantly different (Newman–Keuls test: p > 0.05). The plant is one of the elements in the entire biocenotic system and all physiological changes that occur during the growing season are reflected in the features of the soil microbial community [22,23].
The simultaneous impact of the sampling place and the month of the year on the occurrence of sporulating soil bacteria in the plots was investigated by performing a two-way ANOVA. Overall, it was shown that the effect of the site on the numbers of sporulating bacteria was stronger than that of the month of the year. The comparison of ANOVA results using the Newman–Keuls test (p < 0.05) indicated that the means for the individual months of the year did not differ significantly. The highest average numbers of these bacteria were recorded in the summer months (May, July). These values were not significantly higher than the lowest means recorded in spring, e.g., in March (p > 0.05).

3.3. Bacteriological Indicator

If the highest average number of bacteria of vegetative forms in the soil under the cultivation of wheat in the E II plot is taken as 100%, the calculated percentage of bacteria in the remaining plots located at different distances from the landfill was as follows: At the experimental sites located up to 250 m from the landfill (WI, NI, E, I and SI plots), it ranged from 39.6 to 86.2, and at the plots located in zone II, i.e., at a distance of 250 to 500 m, that is In II, N II and S II, it remained at the level of 64.9–80.9%. For the soil of the plot located in the reclaimed sector (plot number Z), this ratio was 18.4%. For the horse bean cultivation, the highest average number of bacterial vegetative forms was recorded in the S II plot and was assumed as 100%; the calculated percentage of bacteria in the studied sites located in zone I was 30.9 to 93.6, while for the experimental plots located in zone II, it remained at the level of 46.6–90.6%. In the soil in the plot located within the landfill site, this ratio was 23.7%. For the potato cultivation, the highest average number of bacterial vegetative forms was recorded for the NI plot, and the calculated percentage of bacteria in the soil under potato cultivation in the plots located in zone I was from 31.3 to 45.7%, and the research sites located in zone II (plots W II, N II, E II) remained at the level of 37.6–91.0%. For the soil of the plot located in the reclaimed sector, the value was 35.8%.
Based on the research results, the highest average number of sporulating bacteria under the cultivation of wheat was found in the Z plot located in the reclaimed sector and it was taken as 100%. Considering this assumption, it was calculated that in the soils of the plots located within 250 m from the landfill (plots: WI, NI, E, I and SI), there were 34.1% to 90.1% of these bacteria, and in plots located in zone II (plots: W II, N II, E II), 30.0% to 90.6%. For the horse bean cultivation, the highest average number of sporulating bacteria was recorded to the north of the landfill in the N I plot and was assumed to be 100%. Based on this assumption, it was calculated that for the plots located in zone I, bacteria ranged from 43.3% to 67.2%, whereas for the plots of the second zone, they ranged from 42.8% to 95.6%. For the plot located in the reclaimed sector, this ratio was 66.5%. On the other hand, under potato cultivation, the highest average number of sporulating bacteria was recorded in plot Z, i.e., located in the landfill, and it was assumed to be 100%. Considering this, it was calculated that in the soils of plots located at a distance of 250 m around the dump, bacteria ranged from 30.6% to 89.1%, and in the plots located at a distance of 250 to 500 m, the range was from 30.8% to 84.6%.
Analysing the results, the ratio of the number of sporulating bacteria to the number of vegetative bacteria was calculated, assuming it as a bacteriological index for the assessment of soil quality near the landfill (Table 4). Considering the results, the highest ratio of sporulating versus vegetative bacteria was found in the soil of the experimental plot located in the reclaimed sector. This indicates that the deposited waste in this sector may have affected the bacteriological conditions of the soil in the plot under study.
The statistical analysis showed the significant effect of deposited municipal waste (landfills) on the ratio of the sporulating to vegetative bacteria in the studied soil (p < 0.05). It was found that the value of the bacteriological index in the soil under the cultivation of all crops in the landfill area was significantly higher than those recorded values outside the landfill area, both at a distance of 50–250 m from the landfill area (zone I) and between 250 and 500 m (zone II) (Newman–Keuls test: p < 0.05) (Table 5). However, no significant differences were observed between the ratio of the sporulating to vegetative bacteria in the soil outside the landfill area (Newman–Keuls test: p > 0.05).
Plot (Z) is located in the area of the landfill site, which is characterized by a relatively short time since it was recultivated (10 years) and a relatively shallow soil layer (c.a. 100 cm). The other plots were established on arable land, which was under cultivation for at least several dozen years and has never been transformed to such an extent by humans (waste disposal and later recultivation). Despite the fact that in terms of physicochemical properties, it does not differ significantly from the other studied sites (arable land), the degradation of soil expressed by the harm of its ecological function was clearly visible.
The obtained results indicate that a wide range of environmental research should be carried out around municipal waste dumps, allowing for the selection of agricultural plants that positively affect the soil microorganisms, which may contribute to the improvement of biological activity of soils surrounding municipal facilities.

4. Conclusions

The analysis of the obtained results allows us to conclude that the location of the plot to the landfill has a significant impact on the observed quantitative composition of the soil bacterial community. The greatest differences were observed between the plot located in the reclaimed sector of the landfill and the plot located at a distance of 250 to 500 m from this sector. The analysis also shows that bacteria are more numerous in the summer months than in spring or early autumn. The proposed bacteriological indicator of the soil quality (i.e., the ratio of the sporulating to vegetative bacterial numbers—own proposal) seems to be a good index for the assessment of soil quality near the landfill site.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.F.; methodology, K.F.; software, D.R.R.; validation, D.R.R. and K.F.; formal analysis, D.R.R. and K.F.; investigation, D.R.R. and K.F.; resources, K.F.; writing—original draft preparation, K.F.; writing—review and editing, D.R.R.; visualization, D.R.R. and K.F.; supervision, D.R.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Flores-Tena, F.J.; Guerrero-Barrera, A.L.; Avelar-González, F.J.; Ramírez-López, E.M.; Martínez-Saldaña, M.C. Pathogenic and opportunistic Gram-negative bacteria in soil, leachate and air in San Nicolás landfill at Aguascalientes, Mexico. Rev. Latinoam. Microbiol. 2007, 49, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  2. Heo, Y.; Park, J.; Lim, S.I.; Hur, H.G.; Kim, D.; Park, K. Size-resolved culturable airborne bacteria sampled in rice field, sanitary landfill and waste incineration sites. J. Environ. Monit. 2010, 12, 1619–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Okpoitari, S.P.; Binaebi, A. Effect of municipal solid waste on bacteria population in soil. Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud. 2013, 2, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kulig, A. Metody pomiarowo-obliczeniowe w ocenach oddziaływania na środowisko obiektów gospodarki komunalnej. Politech. Warszawskiej. Inżynieria Sr. 2003, 44, 3–202. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, S.; Yin, M.; Ye, H.; Hou, H.; Dong, H.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, J.; et al. Assessing pollutions of soil and plant by municipal waste dump. Environ. Geol. 2007, 52, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abul, S. Environmental and health impact of solid waste disposal at Mangwaneni dumpsite in Manzini: Swaziland. J. Sustain. Dev. Afr. 2010, 12, 64–78. [Google Scholar]
  7. Przybulewska, K.; Nowak, A.; Głąbowska, D. Zmiany w mikroflorze gleby wokół składowiska odpadów komunalnych w Łęczycy k. Stargardu Szczecińskiego. Woda Środow. Obsz. Wiej. 2010, 10, 159–166. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pakuła, K. Zawartość wybranych pierwiastków w glebach wokół składowiska odpadów komunalnych. Ochr. Sr. I Zasobów Nat. 2011, 48, 240–249. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosik-Dulewska, C. Podstawy Gospodarki Odpadami; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2015; pp. 1–378. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kucharski, J. Relacje między aktywnośćią enzymów a żyznością gleby. W: Drobnoustroje w środowisku. Występowanie, aktywność i znaczenie. Pr. zbior. Red. W. Barabasz. Kraków. 1997, AR, 327–347. [Google Scholar]
  11. Libudzisz, Z.; Kowal, K. Mikrobiologia Techniczna, T.I.; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej: Łódź, Poland, 2000; pp. 1–354. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gleboznawcze, P.T. Systematyka gleb Polski. Rocz. Gleb. 1989, 40, 132–133. [Google Scholar]
  13. Blagodatskaya, E.; Kuzyakov, Y. Active microorganisms in soil: Critical review of estimation criteria and approaches. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 67, 192–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Joergensena, R.G.; Wichernb, F. Alive and kicking: Why dormant soil microorganisms matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 116, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barabasz, W.; Filipek–Mazur, B.; Mazur, K.; Chmiel, M.J.; Grzyb, J.; Frączek, K. Aktywność mikrobiologiczna gleby w 30—tym roku statystycznego doświadczenia nawozowego w Czarnym Potoku koło Krynicy. Zesz. Probl. Postępów Nauk. Rol. 1999, 465, 647–655. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kabata-Pendias, A.; Motowicka-Terelak, T.; Piotrowska, M.; Terelak, H.; Witek, T. Ocena stopnia zanieczyszczenia gleb i roślin metalami ciężkimi i siarką. In Ramowe Wytyczne dla Rolnictwa; IUNG: Puławy, Poland, 1993; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pepper, I.L.; Gerba, C.P.; Brendecke, J.W. Environmental Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vieira, F.C.S.; Nahas, E. Comparison of microbial numbers in soils by using various culture media and temperatures. Microbiol. Res. 2005, 160, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Frąc, M.; Lipiec, J.; Rutkowska, A.; Oszust, K.; Półtorak, M. Właściwości mikrobiologiczne gleby pod uprawą pszenicy ozimej w systemach ekologicznym i konwencjonalnym. Acta Agrophys. 2011, 18, 245–254. [Google Scholar]
  20. Novák, J.; Stankovičowá, K.; Chlapík, J.; Labuda, R.; Jaworekowá, S. Characteristic of eutrophic soils in Slovak National Parks. Ekológia Trávnehoporastu VII Medzinárodná Redecká Konf. 2007, 2007, 72–77. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jezierska-Tys, S.; Frąc, M. Microbiological indices of soil quality fertilized with dairy sewage sludge. Int. Agrophys. 2008, 22, 215–219. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wielgosz, E.; Szember, A.; Tokarzewska, D. Wpływ wybranych roślin na liczebność niektórych zespołów drobnoustrojów glebowych oraz aktywność różnych grup morfologicznych bakterii amonifikujących. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sect. E. Agric. 2002, 57, 121–137. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wielgosz, E.; Szember, A. Wpływ wybranych roślin na liczebność i aktywność drobnoustrojów glebowych. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sect. E Agric. 2006, 61, 107–119. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wielgosz, E.; Szember, A.; Pryciak, I. Wpływ wybranych roślin na występowanie zespołów drobnoustrojów glebowych. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sect. E Agric. 2004, 59, 1679–1688. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mocek-Płóciniak, A. Wpływ metali ciężkich na mikroorganizmy oraz aktywność enzymatyczną gleby. Rocz. Gleb. 2011, 4, 211–220. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The total numbers of bacteria in vegetative stage (cfu g−1 dry soil) for the soil near the municipal landfill site (columns—mean values, whiskers—mean concentration ± standard deviation). For description of sampling sites see Table 1.
Figure 1. The total numbers of bacteria in vegetative stage (cfu g−1 dry soil) for the soil near the municipal landfill site (columns—mean values, whiskers—mean concentration ± standard deviation). For description of sampling sites see Table 1.
Agronomy 11 02114 g001
Figure 2. The total numbers of bacterial sporulating forms (cfu g−1 dry soil) in the soil near the municipal landfill site (columns—mean values, whiskers—mean concentration ± standard deviation). For description of sampling sites see Table 1.
Figure 2. The total numbers of bacterial sporulating forms (cfu g−1 dry soil) in the soil near the municipal landfill site (columns—mean values, whiskers—mean concentration ± standard deviation). For description of sampling sites see Table 1.
Agronomy 11 02114 g002
Table 1. Characteristic of soil at the plots near the municipal landfill site.
Table 1. Characteristic of soil at the plots near the municipal landfill site.
Location of Experimental Fields in Relation to the Landfill SiteClassification of Soil 1Heavy Metals Concentration above Natural Level 2pH
DirectionZone
WIWestIlight loamCd5.1
WIIWestIIstrong loamy sandCd, Zn5.1
NINorthIlight loamCd5.6
NIINorthIIlight loamCd4.8
EIEastIweakly loamy sandCd, Zn4.8
EIIEastIIstrong loamy sandCd, Zn4.9
SISouthIlight loamy sandCd, Zn7.5
SIISouthIIweakly loamy sandCd, Zn4.7
ZLandfill site area0light loamCd, Pb4.7
1 Classification of soil according to Systematics of Polish soils [15], 2 Concentration above natural level according to Kabata-Pendias et al. [16].
Table 2. The number of bacteria in the vegetative stage in the soil under the cultivation of crops in the area around the municipal landfill site [×104 cfu∙g−1 dry soil].
Table 2. The number of bacteria in the vegetative stage in the soil under the cultivation of crops in the area around the municipal landfill site [×104 cfu∙g−1 dry soil].
Location of Experimental FieldsWheatField BeanPotato
RangeMedianaRangeMedianaRangeMediana
Distance from the landfill site area [m]50–250 m34.0–438.4131.324.4–355.587.729.6–503.7122.4
250–500 m27.1–492.2192.313.6–416.0159.046.1–578.2116.9
Landfill site area18.2–80.338.113.2–179.231.851.3–186.184.2
Table 3. The numbers of bacterial sporulating forms in the soil under the cultivation of agricultural plants in the area surrounding the municipal landfill site [×104 cfu∙g−1 dry soil].
Table 3. The numbers of bacterial sporulating forms in the soil under the cultivation of agricultural plants in the area surrounding the municipal landfill site [×104 cfu∙g−1 dry soil].
Location of Experimental FieldsWheatField BeanPotato
RangeMedianaRangeMedianaRangeMediana
Distance from the landfill site area [m]50–250 m7.8–167.238.65.6–95.525.54.9–138.127.2
250–500 m5.3–196.834.13.8–134.831.08.8–167.628.1
Landfill site area19.2–174.689.617.8–83.831.033.6–127.054.1
Table 4. Bacteriological indicator of soil quality near the municipal landfill site (the ratio of the number of sporulating bacteria to the number of vegetative forms—own proposal).
Table 4. Bacteriological indicator of soil quality near the municipal landfill site (the ratio of the number of sporulating bacteria to the number of vegetative forms—own proposal).
Localization of Experimental FieldsBacteriological Indicator—DB/VB
WheatField BeanPotato
W I *0.430.300.19
W II0.160.270.18
N I0.220.280.20
N II0.200.260.27
E I0.290.490.21
E II0.100.240.22
S I0.340.280.42
S II0.450.250.24
Z1.800.750.60
Explanation: DB sporulating bacteria; VB—vegetative bacteria; * For description of sampling sites see Table 1.
Table 5. Bacteriological indicator of soil quality depending on distance to the municipal landfill site (the ratio of the number of sporulating bacteria to the number of vegetative forms—own proposal).
Table 5. Bacteriological indicator of soil quality depending on distance to the municipal landfill site (the ratio of the number of sporulating bacteria to the number of vegetative forms—own proposal).
Localization of Experimental FieldsWheatField BeanPotatoAll Plants
Bacteriological Indicator—DB/VB
Distance from the landfill site area [m]Zone I—50–2500.310.320.230.28
Zone II—250–5000.210.250.270.25
Landfill site area1.800.750.600.92
Explanation: DB sporulating bacteria; VB—vegetative bacteria.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ropek, D.R.; Frączek, K. Changes in Bacterial Soil Biota under Cultivation of Crops near a Municipal Landfill Site. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112114

AMA Style

Ropek DR, Frączek K. Changes in Bacterial Soil Biota under Cultivation of Crops near a Municipal Landfill Site. Agronomy. 2021; 11(11):2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ropek, Dariusz Roman, and Krzysztof Frączek. 2021. "Changes in Bacterial Soil Biota under Cultivation of Crops near a Municipal Landfill Site" Agronomy 11, no. 11: 2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112114

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop