Next Article in Journal
Organic Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Production Has an Advantage over Conventional in Quantity as Well as in Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Medium-Term Influence of Organic Fertilization on the Quality and Yield of a Celery Crop
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Metabolism and Nitric Oxide (NO) Content in Roots and Shoots of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plants under Arsenic-Induced Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/agronomy10091419
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Silicon Alleviates Temperature Stresses in Poinsettia by Regulating Stomata, Photosynthesis, and Oxidative Damages

by
Jiangtao Hu
1,
Yali Li
1 and
Byoung Ryong Jeong
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Horticulture, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus Program), Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
2
Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
3
Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(9), 1419; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091419
Submission received: 21 August 2020 / Revised: 14 September 2020 / Accepted: 16 September 2020 / Published: 18 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Metabolism in Crops/Agronomy-Series Ⅱ)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The effects of silicon (Si) on temperature stresses were investigated in poinsettia. Well-rooted cuttings supplemented with and without Si were exposed to 40 °C, and plants treated with or without Si during cutting propagation and cultivation were subjected to 4 °C. The results showed that almost all the stomata of cuttings without Si supplementation were closed, while some of them were still open in cuttings supplemented with Si under a high temperature stress. However, Si was not able to alleviate stomatal closure of poinsettia under low temperature stress. The increased epicuticular wax might contribute to enhanced resistance of poinsettia to low temperature stresses. In addition, poinsettia maintained a higher photosynthetic rate and lower malonaldehyde and hydrogen sulfide concentrations when supplemented with Si under high and low temperature stresses, which might contribute to lower APX activities. Overall, temperature stresses had negative impacts on the physiological characteristics of poinsettia, while Si could alleviate some effects of temperature stresses.

1. Introduction

Silicon (Si) is a beneficial element that helps plants overcome temperature stresses. The mechanisms involved include stimulation of antioxidant systems [1,2], maintenance of photosynthetic proteins [3], retention of water content [4], fortification of cell wall [4], restoration of hormonal balances [5], and regulation of stress-related genes [6,7]. Although Si is largely present in soil, the plant-available form (monosilicic acid) is relatively limited, especially in Korea which has low available Si in soil (averaged 72 mg∙kg−1) [8,9]. Moreover, Si is not available in most of hydroponic systems when it is not supplemented since horticultural growing media usually do not contain any natural soil. Deficiency of Si usually leads to abnormal plant development such as reduced number of brown epidermal cells, yellow leaves, and malformed fruits [10,11], while excessive Si uptake has negative effects on growth of Phragmites australis [12].
Poinsettias (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd.) are propagated in summer and they bloom in winter, which therefore could be exposed to high and low temperature stresses, respectively. Temperature stresses lead to numerous changes in plants. The initial response should be stomatal closure [13,14]. The stomata regulate gas exchange, which contribute to physiological processes including photosynthesis and transpiration. Most importantly, their roles in transpiration help plants control leaf temperature. Results of studies on stomatal responses to temperature are somewhat contradictory. Some studies revealed that stomata closed with increasing temperature [15,16,17], whereas some found that stomata opened with increasing temperature [18,19]. On the other hand, studies have suggested that stomata close at temperatures lower than that at which plants are grown [20,21]. However, it depends on the sensitivity of plants. It was found that a sudden low temperature led to stomatal closure in cold-tolerant plants but not in cold-sensitive plants [22].
High temperatures not only cause photorespiration of plants, but also damage the photosynthetic apparatus [23,24]. It was reported that chlorophyll biosynthesis is one of the most affected plant functions damaged by high temperatures [25]. Numerous studies have also reported that low temperatures stresses have negative impacts on photosynthesis in maize [26,27], rice [28,29], bean [27,30], potato [31,32], barley [33,34], wheat [35], and tomato [36,37]. The light absorbed by plants is either used for production of carbohydrates, dissipated as heat, or reemitted as fluorescence [38]. Thus, chlorophyll fluorescence-based techniques, such as JIP test, have been frequently used as a tool for early diagnosis of temperature stresses [39,40,41].
Moreover, malonaldehyde (MDA) accumulation is often used as an indicator of lipid peroxidation or maker of oxidative disruption of lipids [42,43,44,45] which is caused by reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide, and hydroxyl radical [46,47]. Among these reactive oxygen species, H2O2 has relatively a long-life span and plays central roles in stress signal transduction pathways [48,49]. Plants generate enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems to remove the damage of excessive H2O2. In enzymatic antioxidant systems, antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) are involved. Studies revealed that their activities are elevated under high temperature stresses [50,51,52], providing a protective role for plants.
Therefore, in this study, stomata, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidant enzyme activities were determined, hoping to obtain a better understanding of how Si alleviates temperature stresses in poinsettia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Poinsettia cultivar ‘Flame’ was used in this study. Terminal cuttings were harvested and stuck in foam wedge substrate in trays (Smithers Oasis Korea, Seoul, Korea). Then, they were kept on a fogged (for 10 min at every 15-min interval) propagation bench for 4 weeks. The mean day/night air temperature during the whole propagation period is 30/25 °C and average relative humidity is 80%. The well-rooted cuttings were then transplanted to 15-cm pots and cultivated for 18 weeks.

2.2. Supplementary Si and Temperature Stress Treatments

The cuttings, in trays, were treated with either 0 (Si0) or 75 (Si75) mg·L−1 of Si from potassium silicate (K2SiO3) every 3 days for 4 weeks during propagation. The cuttings from each treatment were then separated into two groups and supplied with either 0 or 75 mg·L−1 of Si during cultivation. The treatments were designated as CP0→C0 (supply 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation), CP75→C0 (supply 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation), CP0→C75 (supply 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation), and CP75→C75 (supply 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation). The composition of nutrient solutions was described in our previous report [53]. The temperature stress responses in cuttings and plants were evaluated by treating them with high (40 °C) or low (4 °C) temperatures in plant growth chambers for 3 or 9 days, respectively. Each treatment consisted of 3 replicates, and each replicate contained 15 cuttings or 3 plants. Samples were collected at the end of treatments.

2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy

Leaf samples were excised and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 4 h. After 3 washes with a 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), samples were slowly dried at room temperature in a desiccator. The dried samples were coated with gold and then observed using a DS-130 ISI (Oxford, UK) scanning electron microscope.

2.4. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured every 24 h with a portable fluorometer (FluorPen FP110, Photon Systems Instruments, Drásov, Czech Republic).

2.5. H2O2 and MDA Concentrations

About 0.1 g of leaf material was homogenized in ice with 0.1% (w/v) TCA. The homogenate was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C and 0.5 mL of the supernatant was added to 0.5 mL of a potassium phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) and 1 mL of KI (1 M). The absorbance of the assay mixture was read at 390 nm and H2O2 concentration was calculated based on a standard curve of known concentrations of H2O2. For MDA concentration quantification, 0.1 g leaf samples were homogenized with 2 mL of a sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The homogenates were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm and 4 °C for 20 min. The supernatants were added into 2 mL of 20% trichloroacetic acid containing 0.5% thiobarbituric acid. The reaction solutions were boiled for 10 min, and then cooled to room temperature and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm, 532 nm, and 600 nm. The MDA concentration was calculated according to the following formula:
MDA (μmol·g−1 FW) = [6.452 × (A532 − A600) − 0.56 × A450] × VT/(V0 × W)
where FW indicates the fresh weight of leaf sample, VT indicates total volume of the extraction solution, V0 indicates the measured volume, and W indicates the weight of leaf sample.

2.6. Activities of Antioxidant Enzymes

The activities of antioxidant enzymes SOD, POD, CAT, and APX were determined by the method introduced by Manivannan et al. [54]. The specific enzyme activity was represented as unit·μg−1 protein. One unit of SOD activity was defined as the amount causing 50% inhibition of initial rate of NBT reduction. One unit of POD activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that caused an increase of 0.01 per minute at 470 nm. One unit of CAT activity was defined as the amount of enzyme needed to reduce 1 μM of H2O2 per minute. One unit of APX activity was defined as the enzyme activity catalyzing oxidation of 1 µM ascorbic acid per minute.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The SAS statistical software Release 8.2 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA) was used. The differences between the control and plants treated with supplementary Si were tested by Student’s t-test (p ≤ 0.05), while multiple comparisons were analyzed by Duncan’s test (p ≤ 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Silicon Affected Stomata and Epicuticular Wax of Poinsettia

With a high temperature stress, almost all the stomata of cuttings not supplemented with Si were closed, while some of them were still open in cuttings that were supplemented with Si (Figure 1). However, all the stomata of cuttings, with and without Si supplementation, were closed under a low temperature stress (Figure 2).
It was also found that leaves of Si-treated cuttings and plants had more epicuticular wax, compared to those of the control, especially on the guard cells (Figure 1 and Figure 2). To prove that the white spots were epicuticular wax, wax was removed with chloroform and leaves were observed (Figure S1).

3.2. Silicon Maintained Photosynthesis in Poinsettia

With a high temperature stress, fluorescence quantum yields and OJIP transient curves showed significant differences after 2 days of treatment (Figure 3A,B). The photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) derived from JIP test was higher in the Si-treated cuttings (Figure 4A).
With a low temperature stress, the fluorescence quantum yield and OJIP transient curves showed significant differences after 6 days of treatment (Figure 3C,D). The Fv/Fm (maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II) was higher in CP0→C75 and CP75→C75 than in CP0→C0 (Figure 4B).

3.3. Concentration of H2O2 and MDA Was Low in Silicon-Treated Cuttings

The H2O2 concentration was significantly lower in the Si75-treated seedlings under a high temperature stress and in the CP75→C75-treated seedlings under a low temperature stress (Figure 5A,C). Moreover, MDA concentration was lower in the Si75-treated seedlings under a high temperature stress and in the CP0→C75- and CP75→C75-treated seedlings under a low temperature stress (Figure 5B,D).

3.4. APX Activity Was Low in Silicon-Treated Seedlings

With a high temperature stress, the SOD and APX activities were lower in the Si75-treated seedlings, while POD and CAT activities showed no significant differences (Figure 6A). With a low temperature stress, APX activity was lower in the CP0→C75- and CP75→C75- treated seedlings, while the POD activity was higher in the CP0→C75-treated seedlings (Figure 6B). There were no significant differences in SOD and CAT activities.

4. Discussion

Silicon is abundant in tissues around the stomata such as guard cells, spongy mesophyll, and veins [55,56]. The presence of Si modulates ion fluxes, which contributes to stomatal movement [57]. Under drought stresses, Si reduced transpiration in maize through stomatal movements and improved water use efficiency as a result [58,59]. In this study, we found that Si maintained stomatal opening in poinsettia under a high temperature stress. Based on previous reports, stomatal opening is believed to be associated with an enhanced evaporative cooling of leaves, reducing the likelihood of thermal damage to tissues [60]. Poinsettia is a sub-tropical plant, which might be sensitive to low temperature stresses. All stomata were closed under a low temperature stress, and Si was not able to alleviate stomatal closure.
Epicuticular wax plays an important role in modifying stomatal conductance, reflecting irradiation, and reducing water loss [61]. It has been reported that Si supplementation can increase epicuticular wax deposition in banana [62] and strawberry [63]. Moreover, Si-induced epicuticular wax deposition on leaves of wheat improved its ability to alleviate drought stresses [64]. Thus, the increased wax load on leaves of poinsettia, especially on guard cells, might help poinsettia overcome temperature stresses.
The value of fluorescence quantum yield and shape of OJIP transient curve has been found to be very sensitive to environmental conditions and thus are used as early diagnoses of stresses [37,65]. Researchers may find that it is difficult to determine optimal timing for sampling during experiment, especially when the plant materials are very limited. Thus, the fluorescence quantum yield and OJIP transient curve can provide important information for researchers. In this study, chlorophyll fluorescence was measured at intervals of 1 and 3 days for high and low temperature stresses, respectively. Samples were collected at one interval after significant differences were found. At that time point, fluorescence quantum yield and OJIP transient curve showed no significant differences, which might result in no differences in chlorophyll contents among differently treated plants (data not shown). At the time when fluorescence quantum yields were significantly different, Fv/Fm was higher in Si-treated plants than in control plants. Studies have revealed that Si supply mitigates high temperature stresses by maintaining photosynthetic proteins [3], which is essential for photosynthesis in plants. These results indicated that Si maintained photosynthetic proteins and/or pigments in poinsettia under temperature stresses.
The accumulation of MDA reflects oxidative cellular and tissue damages [66]. The Si-treated poinsettia had a significantly lower MDA concentration than control plants did. The same trends were found with H2O2 concentration. These results suggested that Si alleviated temperature stresses of poinsettia evidenced by lower production of H2O2 and MDA.
The accumulation of H2O2 was reported to increase under temperature stresses [67]. Generally, a decrease in concentration of H2O2 was due to high activity of peroxide scavenging antioxidative enzymes [68]. However, we found that both H2O2 concentration and APX activity were lower in Si-treated poinsettia under temperature stresses. There is a possibility that low H2O2 concentration contributed to lower APX activity. On the other hand, a previous study reported that generation of H2O2 and activity of antioxidant enzymes increased to a certain degree and then decreased with the duration of stress exposure [69], which suggested that H2O2 concentration and antioxidant enzyme activities should be measured at more time points to observe the changes.

5. Conclusions

It can be concluded in this study that Si alleviated temperature stresses in poinsettia by maintaining photosynthetic rate, preventing lipid peroxidation, and producing less H2O2. Moreover, SOD and APX activities were lower in Si-treated poinsettia under a high temperature stress, and APX activity was lower in the Si-treated poinsettia under a low temperature stress. Further studies could focus on the regulation of epicuticular wax by Si.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/9/1419/s1, Figure S1: Observation of leaf surface of poinsettia after (A) and before (B) removal of epicuticular wax.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.R.J.; Methodology, B.R.J.; Formal Analysis, J.H., Y.L.; Resources, B.R.J.; Data Curation, J.H., Y.L.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.H.; Writing—Review and Editing, B.R.J.; Project Administration, B.R.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Jiangtao Hu and Yali Li were supported by BK21 Plus Program, Ministry of Education, Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Le, B.; Nadeem, M.; Yang, S.-H.; Shin, J.A.; Kang, M.G.; Chung, G.; Sun, S. Effect of silicon in Pyropia yezoensis under temperature and irradiance stresses through antioxidant gene expression. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 1297–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, Y.H.; Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; Lee, I.J. Silicon regulates antioxidant activities of crop plants under abiotic-induced oxidative stress: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Muneer, S.; Park, Y.G.; Kim, S.; Jeong, B.R. Foliar or subirrigation silicon supply mitigates high temperature stress in strawberry by maintaining photosynthetic and stress-responsive proteins. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 36, 836–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Malhotra, C.; Kapoor, R.T. Silicon: A sustainable tool in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. In Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 333–356. [Google Scholar]
  5. Moradtalab, N.; Weinmann, M.; Walker, F.; Hoglinger, B.; Ludewig, U.; Neumann, G. Silicon improves chilling tolerance during early growth of maize by effects on micronutrient homeostasis and hormonal balances. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gao, J.P.; Chao, D.Y.; Lin, H.X. Understanding abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms: Recent studies on stress response in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 742–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nakashima, K.; Takasaki, H.; Mizoi, J.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. NAC transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. BBA-Gene Regul. Mech. 2012, 1819, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, Y.; Nikolic, M.; Bélanger, R.; Gong, H.; Song, A. Silicon in Agriculture; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 978–994. [Google Scholar]
  9. Park, C.S. Past and future advances in silicon research in the Republic of Korea. In Studies in Plant Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 359–371. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dallagnol, L.J.; Rodrigues, F.A.; DaMatta, F.M.; Mielli, M.V.; Pereira, S.C. Deficiency in silicon uptake affects cytological, physiological, and biochemical events in the rice–Bipolaris oryzae interaction. Phytopathology 2011, 101, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Miyake, Y.; Takahashi, E. Silicon deficiency of tomato plant. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1978, 24, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schaller, J.; Brackhage, C.; Gessner, M.O.; Bäuker, E.; Gert Dudel, E. Silicon supply modifies C:N:P stoichiometry and growth of Phragmites australis. Plant Biol. 2012, 14, 392–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Haldimann, P.; Feller, U. Inhibition of photosynthesis by high temperature in oak (Quercus pubescens L.) leaves grown under natural conditions closely correlates with a reversible heat-dependent reduction of the activation state of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27, 1169–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reynolds-Henne, C.E.; Langenegger, A.; Mani, J.; Schenk, N.; Zumsteg, A.; Feller, U. Interactions between temperature, drought and stomatal opening in legumes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 68, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ranney, T.G.; Peet, M.M. Heat tolerance of five taxa of birch (Betula): Physiological responses to supraoptimal leaf temperatures. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1994, 119, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bassow, S.; McConnaughay, K.; Bazzaz, F. The response of temperate tree seedlings grown in elevated CO2 to extreme temperature events. Ecol. Appl. 1994, 4, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Samuelson, L.J.; Teskey, R.O. Net photosynthesis and leaf conductance of loblolly pine seedlings in 2 and 21% oxygen as influenced by irradiance, temperature and provenance. Tree Physiol. 1991, 8, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Al-Khatib, K.; Paulsen, G.M. Enhancement of thermal injury to photosynthesis in wheat plants and thylakoids by high light intensity. Plant Physiol. 1989, 90, 1041–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dufrene, E.; Saugier, B. Gas exchange of oil palm in relation to light, vapour pressure deficit, temperature and leaf age. Funct. Ecol. 1993, 7, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kozlowski, T.; Pallardy, S. Effects of low temperature on leaf diffusion resistance of Ulmus americana and Fraxinus pennsylvanica seedlings. Can. J. Bot. 1979, 57, 2466–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lösch, R. Responses of stomata to environmental factors-experiments with isolated epidermal strips of Polypodium vulgare. Oecologia 1977, 29, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wilkinson, S.; Clephan, A.L.; Davies, W.J. Rapid low temperature-induced stomatal closure occurs in cold-tolerant Commelina communis leaves but not in cold-sensitive tobacco leaves, via a mechanism that involves apoplastic calcium but not abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 1566–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wise, R.; Olson, A.; Schrader, S.; Sharkey, T. Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Havaux, M. Characterization of thermal damage to the photosynthetic electron transport system in potato leaves. Plant Sci. 1993, 94, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sinsawat, V.; Leipner, J.; Stamp, P.; Fracheboud, Y. Effect of heat stress on the photosynthetic apparatus in maize (Zea mays L.) grown at control or high temperature. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2004, 52, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fracheboud, Y.; Haldimann, P.; Leipner, J.; Stamp, P. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection tool for cold tolerance of photosynthesis in maize (Zea mays L.). J. Exp. Bot. 1999, 50, 1533–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kościelniak, J.; Biesaga-Kościelniak, J. Photosynthesis and non-photochemical excitation quenching components of chlorophyll excitation in maize and field bean during chilling at different photon flux density. Photosynthetica 2006, 44, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; He, J.; Qian, L.; Wu, L.; Wang, R. Characteristics of chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidative system in super-hybrid rice and its parental cultivars under chilling stress. Biol. Plant. 2010, 54, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, G.L.; Guo, Z.F. Effects of chilling stress on photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence parameter in seedlings of two rice cultivars differing in cold tolerance. Rice Sci. 2005, 12, 187–191. [Google Scholar]
  30. Melkonian, J.; Owens, T.G.; Wolfe, D.W. Gas exchange and co-regulation of photochemical and nonphotochemical quenching in bean during chilling at ambient and elevated carbon dioxide. Photosynth. Res. 2004, 79, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, K.; Hwang, W.; Lo, H. Chilling stress and chilling tolerance of sweet potato as sensed by chlorophyll fluorescence. Photosynthetica 2007, 45, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Islam, S.; Izekor, E.; Garner, J. Effect of chilling stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence, peroxidase activity and other physiological activities in Ipomoea batatas L. genotypes. Am. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 6, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Frolec, J.; Ilík, P.; Krchňák, P.; Sušila, P.; Nauš, J. Irreversible changes in barley leaf chlorophyll fluorescence detected by the fluorescence temperature curve in a linear heating/cooling regime. Photosynthetica 2008, 46, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Richards, G.; Hall, D. Photoinhibition at chilling temperatures in intact leaves and isolated chloroplasts of barley. In Progress in Photosynthesis Research; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1987; pp. 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dai, Y.L.; Xu, C.H.; Zhao, F.H. Comparative studies on effects of low temperature on chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics and photochemcal activities of cucumber and winter wheat. In Progress in Photosynthesis Research; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1987; pp. 99–102. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dong, Z.; Men, Y.; Li, Z.; Zou, Q.; Ji, J. Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging as a tool for analyzing the effects of chilling injury on tomato seedlings. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 246, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zushi, K.; Kajiwara, S.; Matsuzoe, N. Chlorophyll a fluorescence OJIP transient as a tool to characterize and evaluate response to heat and chilling stress in tomato leaf and fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 148, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brestic, M.; Zivcak, M. PSII fluorescence techniques for measurement of drought and high temperature stress signal in crop plants: Protocols and applications. In Molecular Stress Physiology of Plants; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2013; pp. 87–131. [Google Scholar]
  39. Janka, E.; Körner, O.; Rosenqvist, E.; Ottosen, C.-O. High temperature stress monitoring and detection using chlorophyll a fluorescence and infrared thermography in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora). Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2013, 67, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bussotti, F.; Desotgiu, R.; Pollastrini, M.; Cascio, C. The JIP test: A tool to screen the capacity of plant adaptation to climate change. Scand. J. Forest Res. 2010, 25, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kalaji, H.M.; Bosa, K.; Kościelniak, J.; Hossain, Z. Chlorophyll a fluorescence—A useful tool for the early detection of temperature stress in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Omics 2011, 15, 925–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Malenčić, D.; Vasić, D.; Popović, M.; Dević, D. Antioxidant systems in sunflower as affected by oxalic acid. Biol. Plant. 2004, 48, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gülen, H.; Çetinkaya, C.; Kadıoğlu, M.; Kesici, M.; Cansev, A.; Eriş, A. Peroxidase activity and lipid peroxidation in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) plants under low temperature. J. Biol. Environ. Sci. 2008, 2, 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  44. Latef, A.A.H.A.; He, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on growth, photosynthetic pigments, osmotic adjustment and oxidative stress in tomato plants subjected to low temperature stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 1217–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, H.; Qiang, S.; Qian, Y. Physiological response of different croftonweed (Eupatorium adenophorum) populations to low temperature. Weed Sci. 2008, 56, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Davey, M.; Stals, E.; Panis, B.; Keulemans, J.; Swennen, R. High-throughput determination of malondialdehyde in plant tissues. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 347, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yamauchi, Y.; Furutera, A.; Seki, K.; Toyoda, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Sugimoto, Y. Malondialdehyde generated from peroxidized linolenic acid causes protein modification in heat-stressed plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 46, 786–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. da-Silva, C.J.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Modolo, L.V. H2O2, NO, and H2S: Tailoring in suiting plants against abiotic stresses. In Reactive Oxygen, Nitrogen and Sulfur Species in Plants: Production, Metabolism, Signaling and Defense Mechanisms; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 841–856. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hossain, M.A.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Armin, S.M.; Qian, P.; Xin, W.; Li, H.Y.; Tran, L.S.P. Hydrogen peroxide priming modulates abiotic oxidative stress tolerance: Insights from ROS detoxification and scavenging. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Chaitanya, K.; Sundar, D.; Masilamani, S.; Reddy, A.R. Variation in heat stress-induced antioxidant enzyme activities among three mulberry cultivars. Plant Growth Regul. 2002, 36, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhou, J.; Wang, L.; Xin, Y.; Wang, W.N.; He, W.Y.; Wang, A.L.; Liu, Y. Effect of temperature on antioxidant enzyme gene expression and stress protein response in white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. J. Therm. Biol. 2010, 35, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Almeselmani, M.; Deshmukh, P.; Sairam, R.; Kushwaha, S.; Singh, T. Protective role of antioxidant enzymes under high temperature stress. Plant Sci. 2006, 171, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hu, J.; Cai, X.; Jeong, B.R. Silicon affects root development, tissue mineral content, and expression of silicon transporter genes in poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd.) cultivars. Plants 2019, 8, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Manivannan, A.; Soundararajan, P.; Halimah, N.; Ko, C.H.; Jeong, B.R. Blue led light enhances growth, phytochemical contents, and antioxidant enzyme activities of Rehmannia glutinosa cultured in vitro. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2015, 56, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Morikawa, C.; Saigusa, M. Mineral composition and accumulation of silicon in tissues of blueberry (Vaccinum corymbosus cv. Bluecrop) cuttings. Plant Soil 2004, 258, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Blanke, M.M.; Prung, R.J.; Baker, E.A. Structure and elemental compositon of grape berry stomata. J. Plant Physiol. 1999, 154, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Agarie, S.; Uchida, H.; Agata, W.; Kubota, F.; Kaufman, P.B. Effects of silicon on transpiration and leaf conductance in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod. Sci. 1998, 1, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gao, X.; Zou, C.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F. Silicon improves water use efficiency in maize plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 27, 1457–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gao, X.; Zou, C.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F. Silicon decreases transpiration rate and conductance from stomata of maize plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2006, 29, 1637–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Crawford, A.J.; McLachlan, D.H.; Hetherington, A.M.; Franklin, K.A. High temperature exposure increases plant cooling capacity. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, R396–R397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Huggins, T.; Mohammed, S.; Sengodon, P.; Ibrahim, A.; Tilley, M.; Hays, D. Changes in leaf epicuticular wax load and its effect on leaf temperature and physiological traits in wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) exposed to high temperatures during anthesis. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2018, 204, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Asmar, S.A.; Pasqual, M.; de Araujo, A.G.; Silva, R.A.L.; Rodrigues, F.A.; Pio, L.A.S. Morphophysiological characteristics of acclimatized ‘Grande Naine’ banana plants in response to in vitro use of silicon. Semin. Ciênc. Agrár. 2013, 34, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Braga, F.T.; Nunes, C.F.; Favero, A.C.; Pasqual, M.; de Carvalho, J.G.; de Castro, E.M. Anatomical characteristics of the strawberry seedlings micropropagated using different sources of silicon. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2009, 44, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ahmed, M.; Qadeer, U.; Ahmed, Z.I.; Hassan, F.-U. Improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum) drought tolerance by seed priming with silicon. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2016, 62, 299–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Strasser, R.J.; Tsimilli-Michael, M.; Srivastava, A. Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. In Chlorophyll a Fluorescence; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 321–362. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ortega-Villasante, C.; Rellan-Alvarez, R.; Del Campo, F.F.; Carpena-Ruiz, R.O.; Hernandez, L.E. Cellular damage induced by cadmium and mercury in Medicago sativa. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2239–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sun, W.H.; Duan, M.; Li, F.; Shu, D.F.; Yang, S.; Meng, Q.W. Overexpression of tomato tAPX gene in tobacco improves tolerance to high or low temperature stress. Biol. Plant. 2010, 54, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Park, M.R.; Kim, Y.J. Enhanced antioxidant enzymes are associated with reduced hydrogen peroxide in barley roots under saline stress. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 38, 218–224. [Google Scholar]
  69. Yong, Z.; Hao-Ru, T.; Ya, L. Variation in antioxidant enzyme activities of two strawberry cultivars with short-term low temperature stress. World J. Agric. Sci. 2008, 4, 458–462. [Google Scholar]
Agronomy 10 01419 g001 550
Figure 1. Leaf surface of cutting-propagated poinsettia subjected to a high temperature stress. Si0, 0 mg·L−1 Si; Si75, 75 mg·L−1 Si.
Figure 1. Leaf surface of cutting-propagated poinsettia subjected to a high temperature stress. Si0, 0 mg·L−1 Si; Si75, 75 mg·L−1 Si.
Agronomy 10 01419 g001
Agronomy 10 01419 g002 550
Figure 2. Leaf surface of potted poinsettia subjected to a low temperature stress. CP0→C0, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation; CP75→C0, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP0→C75, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP75→C75, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation.
Figure 2. Leaf surface of potted poinsettia subjected to a low temperature stress. CP0→C0, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation; CP75→C0, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP0→C75, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP75→C75, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation.
Agronomy 10 01419 g002
Agronomy 10 01419 g003 550
Figure 3. Fluorescence quantum yield and OJIP transient curves of poinsettia subjected to high (A,B) and low (C,D) temperature stresses. The asterisk and different letters besides error bars indicate significant differences according to Student’s t-test and Duncan’s test, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Si0, 0 mg·L−1 Si; Si75, 75 mg·L−1 Si; CP0→C0, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation; CP75→C0, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP0→C75, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP75→C75, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation.
Figure 3. Fluorescence quantum yield and OJIP transient curves of poinsettia subjected to high (A,B) and low (C,D) temperature stresses. The asterisk and different letters besides error bars indicate significant differences according to Student’s t-test and Duncan’s test, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Si0, 0 mg·L−1 Si; Si75, 75 mg·L−1 Si; CP0→C0, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation; CP75→C0, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP0→C75, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP75→C75, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation.
Agronomy 10 01419 g003
Agronomy 10 01419 g004 550
Figure 4. The Fv/Fm of poinsettia subjected to high (A) and low (B) temperature stresses. The asterisk and different letters besides error bars indicate significant differences according to Student’s t-test and Duncan’s test, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Si0, 0 mg·L−1 Si; Si75, 75 mg·L−1 Si; CP0→C0, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation; CP75→C0, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP0→C75, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP75→C75, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation.
Figure 4. The Fv/Fm of poinsettia subjected to high (A) and low (B) temperature stresses. The asterisk and different letters besides error bars indicate significant differences according to Student’s t-test and Duncan’s test, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Si0, 0 mg·L−1 Si; Si75, 75 mg·L−1 Si; CP0→C0, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation; CP75→C0, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP0→C75, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP75→C75, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation.
Agronomy 10 01419 g004
Agronomy 10 01419 g005 550
Figure 5. The MDA and H2O2 concentrations in leaves of poinsettia subjected to high (A,B) and low (C,D) temperature stresses. The asterisk and different letters besides error bars indicate significant differences according to Student’s t-test and Duncan’s test, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Si0, 0 mg·L−1 Si; Si75, 75 mg·L−1 Si; CP0→C0, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation; CP75→C0, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP0→C75, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP75→C75, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation.
Figure 5. The MDA and H2O2 concentrations in leaves of poinsettia subjected to high (A,B) and low (C,D) temperature stresses. The asterisk and different letters besides error bars indicate significant differences according to Student’s t-test and Duncan’s test, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Si0, 0 mg·L−1 Si; Si75, 75 mg·L−1 Si; CP0→C0, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation; CP75→C0, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP0→C75, grown with 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP75→C75, grown with 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation.
Agronomy 10 01419 g005
Agronomy 10 01419 g006 550
Figure 6. Antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves of poinsettia subjected to high (A) and low (B) temperature stresses. The asterisk and different letters besides error bars indicate significant differences according to Student’s t-test and Duncan’s test, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). NS, non-significant; Si0, 0 mg·L−1 Si; Si75, 75 mg·L−1 Si; CP0→C0, 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation; CP75→C0, 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP0→C75, 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP75→C75, 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; SOD, superoxide dismutase; POD, peroxidase; CAT, catalase; APX, ascorbate peroxidase.
Figure 6. Antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves of poinsettia subjected to high (A) and low (B) temperature stresses. The asterisk and different letters besides error bars indicate significant differences according to Student’s t-test and Duncan’s test, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). NS, non-significant; Si0, 0 mg·L−1 Si; Si75, 75 mg·L−1 Si; CP0→C0, 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and cultivation; CP75→C0, 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 0 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP0→C75, 0 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; CP75→C75, 75 mg·L−1 Si during cutting propagation and 75 mg·L−1 Si during cultivation; SOD, superoxide dismutase; POD, peroxidase; CAT, catalase; APX, ascorbate peroxidase.
Agronomy 10 01419 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, J.; Li, Y.; Jeong, B.R. Silicon Alleviates Temperature Stresses in Poinsettia by Regulating Stomata, Photosynthesis, and Oxidative Damages. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091419

AMA Style

Hu J, Li Y, Jeong BR. Silicon Alleviates Temperature Stresses in Poinsettia by Regulating Stomata, Photosynthesis, and Oxidative Damages. Agronomy. 2020; 10(9):1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Jiangtao, Yali Li, and Byoung Ryong Jeong. 2020. "Silicon Alleviates Temperature Stresses in Poinsettia by Regulating Stomata, Photosynthesis, and Oxidative Damages" Agronomy 10, no. 9: 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop