Next Article in Journal
Effect of Plant Extracts and Metam Sodium on the Soilborne Fungal Pathogens, Meloidogyne spp., and Soil Microbial Community
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Wound-Healing Management on Potato Post-Harvest Storability
Open AccessEditor’s ChoiceArticle

Impact and Control of Powdery Mildew on Irrigated Soybean Varieties Grown in Southeast Australia

by Mathew W Dunn 1,* and Luke G Gaynor 2,3
1
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Australian Cotton Research Institute, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia
2
Grains Research and Development Corporation, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
3
Formerly New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(4), 514; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040514
Received: 5 March 2020 / Revised: 1 April 2020 / Accepted: 1 April 2020 / Published: 3 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Pest and Disease Management)
Powdery mildew—caused by the fungus Erisyphe diffusa (syn. Microsphaera diffusa)—was first observed in commercial soybean crops in southern New South Wales (NSW), Australia, in 2011. Its detection raised concerns that soybean production might be constrained if the severity of the disease reached the levels observed in northern Australia. Field experiments were conducted over four consecutive seasons to examine the response of three soybean cultivars—Djakal, SnowyA and the breeding line N005A-80—to two fungicides and two fungicide application regimes. The cultivar Djakal was identified as having a high level of resistance to powdery mildew. The severity of infection symptoms varied between seasons. The most severe symptoms were observed during the 2014–2015 season which resulted in the largest grain yield reduction of 20% for the cultivar SnowyA. All fungicide treatments provided a significant reduction in the severity of symptoms, with the split application of tebuconazole and both the single and split applications of tebuconazole + prothioconazole providing the most effective control of the disease. Few other grain yield effects were found, even when strong disease control was achieved. This was a suspected result of the consistent late-in-the-season onset of the disease. Few differences were observed among the treatments in terms of lodging severity, date of physiological maturity, or grain oil and protein concentrations. It was concluded that both fungicides provided effective control of powdery mildew. However, when disease pressure is low, application might not be warranted in southern NSW. View Full-Text
Keywords: soybean; powdery mildew; fungicide soybean; powdery mildew; fungicide
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Dunn, M.W.; Gaynor, L.G. Impact and Control of Powdery Mildew on Irrigated Soybean Varieties Grown in Southeast Australia. Agronomy 2020, 10, 514.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop