Novel Low-Crystallinity Polyetheretherketone Copolymers for 3D Printing
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Synthesis of PEEK and Copolymers
2.3. Characterization and Methods
2.4. FDM Printing
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Study of the Structure of Copolymers by IR Spectroscopy
3.2. Thermal Properties
3.3. Mechanical Properties
3.4. Rheological Properties
3.5. Properties of 3D Printed Samples
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| DCDPS | 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone |
| DFBP | 2,6-difluorobenzophenone |
| DPS | Diphenylsulfone |
| DSC | Differential scanning calorimetry |
| PEEK | Polyetheretherketone |
| HQ | Hydroquinone |
| FDM | Fused Deposition Modeling |
References
- Oleksy, M.; Dynarowicz, K.; Aebisher, D. Rapid prototyping technologies: 3D printing applied in medicine. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ligon, S.C.; Liska, R.; Stampfl, J.; Gurr, M.; Mülhaupt, R. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 10212–10290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saroia, J.; Wang, Y.; Wei, Q.; Lei, M.; Li, X.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, K. A review on 3D printed matrix polymer composites: Its potential and future challenges. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 106, 1695–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karkun, M.S.; Dharmalingam, S. 3D printing technology in aerospace industry—A review. Int. J. Aviat. Aeronaut. Aerosp. 2022, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wawryniuk, Z.; Brancewicz-Steinmetz, E.; Sawicki, J. Revolutionizing transportation: An overview of 3D printing in aviation, automotive, and space industries. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 134, 3083–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arefin, A.M.; Khatri, N.R.; Kulkarni, N.; Egan, P.F. Polymer 3D printing review: Materials, process, and design strategies for medical applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turek, P.; Budzik, G.; Oleksy, M.; Bulanda, K. Polymer materials used in medicine processed by additive techniques. Polimery 2020, 65, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frunzaverde, D.; Cojocaru, V.; Ciubotariu, C.R.; Miclosina, C.O.; Ardeljan, D.D.; Ignat, E.F.; Marginean, G. The influence of the printing temperature and the filament color on the dimensional accuracy, tensile strength, and friction performance of FFF-printed PLA specimens. Polymers 2022, 14, 1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valerga, A.P.; Batista, M.; Puyana, R.; Sambruno, A.; Wendt, C.; Marcos, M. Preliminary study of PLA wire colour effects on geometric characteristics of parts manufactured by FDM. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 13, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selvam, A.; Mayilswamy, S.; Whenish, R.; Naresh, K.; Shanmugam, V.; Das, O. Multi-objective optimization and prediction of surface roughness and printing time in FFF printed ABS polymer. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 16887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Portoaca, A.; Nae, I.; Zisopol, D.G.; Ramadan, I. Studies on the influence of FFF parameters on the tensile properties of samples made of ABS. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1235, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vidakis, N.; Petousis, M.; Kechagias, J.D. A comprehensive investigation of the 3D printing parameters’ effects on the mechanical response of polycarbonate in fused filament fabrication. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 7, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domingo-Espin, M.; Borros, S.; Agullo, N.; Garcia-Granada, A.A.; Reyes, G. Influence of building parameters on the dynamic mechanical properties of polycarbonate fused deposition modeling parts. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2014, 1, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazurkiewicz, M.; Kluczyński, J.; Jasik, K.; Sarzyński, B.; Szachogłuchowicz, I.; Łuszczek, J.; Torzewski, J.; Śnieżek, L.; Grzelak, K.; Małek, M. Bending Strength of Polyamide-Based Composites Obtained during the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) Process. Materials 2022, 15, 5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shakeri, Z.; Benfriha, K.; Zirak, N.; Shirinbayan, M. Mechanical strength and shape accuracy optimization of polyamide FFF parts using grey relational analysis. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shekar, R.I.; Kotresh, T.M.; Rao, P.D.; Kumar, K. Properties of high modulus PEEK yarns for aerospace applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 2497–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dallal, S.; Eslami, B.; Tiari, S. Recent Advances in PEEK for Biomedical Applications: A Comprehensive Review of Material Properties, Processing, and Additive Manufacturing. Polymers 2025, 17, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haleem, A.; Javaid, M. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and its 3D printed implants applications in medical field: An overview. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2019, 7, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, X.; Jing, X.; Zhang, C.; Chen, S. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) properties and its application status. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 453, 012080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panayotov, I.V.; Orti, V.; Cuisinier, F.; Yachouh, J. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2016, 27, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Tian, X.; Li, D.; Cao, Y.; Zhao, F.; Shi, C. Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 248, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, A.; Wynn, M.; Quigley, L.; Salviato, M.; Zobeiry, N. Effect of temperature history during additive manufacturing on crystalline morphology of PEEK. Adv. Ind. Manuf. Eng. 2022, 4, 100085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanjanijam, A.R.; Major, I.; Lyons, J.G.; Lafont, U.; Devine, D.M. Fused filament fabrication of PEEK: A review of process-structure-property relationships. Polymers 2020, 12, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yi, N.; Davies, R.; Chaplin, A.; Ghita, O. Novel backbone modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) grades for powder bed fusion with enhanced elongation at break. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 55, 102857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fortney, A.; Fossum, E. Soluble, semi-crystalline PEEK analogs based on 3,5-difluorobenzophenone: Synthesis and characterization. Polymer 2012, 53, 2327–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Jiang, B.; Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiang, Z.; Yu, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, H. Slowing crystallization to enhance interlayer strength of 3D printed poly (ether ether ketone) parts by molecular design. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 59, 103104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishore, V.; Chen, X.; Ajinjeru, C.; Hassen, A.A.; Lindahl, J.; Failla, J.; Kunc, V.; Duty, C. Additive manufacturing of high performance semicrystalline thermoplastics and their composites. In Solid Freeform Fabrication 2016: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium—An Additive Manufacturing Conference; University of Texas at Austin: Austin, TX, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Bair, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Brouwer, L.; Schwarze, H.; Vergne, P.; Poll, G. Oscillatory and steady shear viscosity: The Cox–Merz rule, superposition, and application to EHL friction. Tribol. Int. 2014, 79, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Sample | DFBN:DCDPS * | MFI, g/10 min |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK | 1:0 | 16.9 |
| SPEEK-5 | 0.95:0.5 | 21.5 |
| SPEEK-10 | 0.90:0.10 | 29.4 |
| SPEEK-15 | 0.85:0.15 | 7.5 |
| SPEEK-20 | 0.80:0.20 | 8.4 |
| SPEEK-25 | 0.75:0.25 | 12.8 |
| SPEEK-50 | 0.50:0.50 | 0.3 |
| Sample | Tg, °C | Tm, °C | Tcr, °C | ꭓ, % | Tm, Onset, °C | Tm, End, °C | Tcr, Onset, °C | Tcr, End, °C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEEK | 149.9 | 339.1 | 290.1 | 27.9 | 323.7 | 345.1 | 297.4 | 281.5 |
| 5% | 153.51 | 337.5 | 287.9 | 18.6 | 315.8 | 337.5 | 294.1 | 281.5 |
| 10% | 154.8 | 325.1 | 267.1 | 20.5 | 311.7 | 333.1 | 276.9 | 258.9 |
| 15% | 158.1 | 318.4 | 264.4 | 16.3 | 303.6 | 325.4 | 272.1 | 255.5 |
| 20% | 161.4 | 310.1 | 243.4 | 15.6 | 289.5 | 319.1 | 268.6 | 243.4 |
| 25% | 159.2 | 300.8 | 218.1 | 13.1 | 281.7 | 317.6 | 235.9 | 196.5 |
| 50% | 176.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zhansitov, A.; Kurdanova, Z.; Shakhmurzova, K.; Slonov, A.; Khashirov, A.; Rzhevskaya, E.; Musov, K.; Tlupov, A.; Khashirova, S. Novel Low-Crystallinity Polyetheretherketone Copolymers for 3D Printing. Polymers 2026, 18, 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18050558
Zhansitov A, Kurdanova Z, Shakhmurzova K, Slonov A, Khashirov A, Rzhevskaya E, Musov K, Tlupov A, Khashirova S. Novel Low-Crystallinity Polyetheretherketone Copolymers for 3D Printing. Polymers. 2026; 18(5):558. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18050558
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhansitov, Azamat, Zhanna Kurdanova, Kamila Shakhmurzova, Azamat Slonov, Azamat Khashirov, Elena Rzhevskaya, Khasan Musov, Alanbek Tlupov, and Svetlana Khashirova. 2026. "Novel Low-Crystallinity Polyetheretherketone Copolymers for 3D Printing" Polymers 18, no. 5: 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18050558
APA StyleZhansitov, A., Kurdanova, Z., Shakhmurzova, K., Slonov, A., Khashirov, A., Rzhevskaya, E., Musov, K., Tlupov, A., & Khashirova, S. (2026). Novel Low-Crystallinity Polyetheretherketone Copolymers for 3D Printing. Polymers, 18(5), 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18050558

