Next Article in Journal
Systematic Characterization and Property Enhancement of Recycled PE Flexible Film Packaging
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Regeneration-Cycle Mechanism of Cu-BTC@MWS Composites Following Mercury Adsorption
Previous Article in Special Issue
Innovative Biobased Active Composites of Cellulose Acetate Propionate with Tween 80 and Cinnamic Acid for Blueberry Preservation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The State of the Art and Innovations in Active and Edible Coatings and Films for Functional Food Applications

by
Sandra Mariño-Cortegoso
1,2,*,
Antía Lestido-Cardama
1,2,
Raquel Sendón
1,2,
Ana Rodríguez Bernaldo de Quirós
1,2 and
Letricia Barbosa-Pereira
1,2,*
1
FoodChemPack Research Group, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
2
Instituto de Materiales (iMATUS), University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2025, 17(18), 2472; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17182472 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 August 2025 / Revised: 5 September 2025 / Accepted: 10 September 2025 / Published: 12 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Biopolymer-Based Composites in Food Technology)

Abstract

Edible coatings and films are gaining the attention of researchers, consumers, and the food industry as a sustainable alternative to conventional plastic packaging. This review provides an overview of recent advances in their development, with a particular focus on new natural sources of biomaterials (e.g., proteins and polysaccharides) and natural additives (antioxidants and antimicrobials). Special attention is given to high-technology preparation methods, including electrohydrodynamic atomization (EHDA), as well as controlled release systems for bioactive compounds designed to preserve foodstuffs and extended their shelf life. The application of edible coatings as carriers of nutrients (vitamins) and bioactives (probiotics and polyphenols) to improve the nutritional value and support the development of functional foods is also discussed. In addition, this review addresses safety considerations and regulatory aspects that are crucial for commercialization and consumer acceptance. Finally, key challenges are highlighted, including the improvement of mechanical and barrier properties, scalability of innovative technologies, consumer education, regulatory support, and the integration of circular economy principles, to encourage the adoption of these sustainable solutions.

1. Introduction

Biobased systems are emerging as effective alternatives to conventional plastic packaging [1]. Within this context, edible packaging arises as a promising option since it is recognized as safe, biodegradable, low-cost, and sustainable. Edible coatings and films are thin layers composed by food-grade ingredients applied in direct contact with the food. They can be consumed as part of the product while preserving its nutritional and sensory attributes [2]. Although both share similar biopolymeric matrices, their applications differ: films are preformed standalone layers that can be placed onto food surfaces, while coatings are generated directly on the product during application. This conceptual and functional difference is critical, as it determines their formulation, preparation methods, structural properties, and technological implications in food packaging. Edible coatings and films can be produced with biopolymers and active compounds extracted from agri-food residues. Such materials can improve food quality, extend shelf life, and reduce environmental waste [3,4]. The correct application of these biomaterials comprises the development of food contact materials with acceptable barrier and mechanical properties. In addition, the functional activity and nutritional value of edible coatings can be enhanced by incorporating additives, such as colours, flavours, antioxidants, antimicrobials, vitamins, and nutraceuticals, into their polymeric matrix [5]. To fulfil the desired function, an efficient encapsulation technique enables the compound of interest to be delivered to the target and express its functional activity after ingestion. Common production and encapsulation methods described in the literature include dipping, brushing, spraying, solvent casting, and extrusion [6].
Despite the benefits of using edible coatings and films to improve the quality, shelf life and safety, the commercial applications of many of these coatings are still rather limited [3]. Global regulations, industrial application, cost feasibility, consumer acceptance, and ensuring environmental sustainability are the biggest obstacles to the commercialization of these packaging systems. Consumer acceptance is mandatory for the successful development of food products and significantly influences the global food market. Increasing demand for healthy, safe, and sustainable foods has led to a greater acceptance of natural edible packaging. However, edible coatings and films sometimes provide undesirable flavours or potential toxicity to food products. Therefore, their acceptance relies not only on the functional properties, but also on other factors, such as film appearance, organoleptic properties, effective marketing, and the overall cost of the final food product [7]. While several reviews have summarized the fundamentals and general applications of edible coatings and films, important aspects remain underexplored. In particular, there is limited discussion on (i) the incorporation of new biopolymer sources and the exploitation of nanostructures and other advanced technologies to enhance mechanical and barrier properties; (ii) the design and verification of controlled release systems for bioactive compounds, which is still an emerging research area with high potential for food preservation; and (iii) the role of edible coatings as carriers of nutrients and bioactives to develop functional foods, an aspect that has not been sufficiently emphasized in earlier works.
This review addresses these gaps by providing an update perspective on recent materials and technologies, with special attention to controlled release strategies and their implications for food functionality. Furthermore, safety considerations, regulatory challenges, and their social and environmental impact are critically discussed to offer a comprehensive outlook on the opportunities and limitations of edible coatings and films.

2. Biopolymers for Edible Films and Coatings Development

The research development of active and edible coatings and films is currently focused on searching for suitable materials, such as polysaccharides and proteins, increasingly used as biopolymers [1]. As such, Table 1 displays current commercialised edible coatings and films. Additionally, fortification with bioactive compounds might enhance the capability to extend the shelf life of perishable food products, as well as to improve the physical limitations usually associated with these biopolymers [2]. Table 2 summarizes the state of the art in the development of biopolymer-based systems that incorporate bioactive or functional compounds through various technologies described in the following section. It outlines the types of biopolymers used, the nature of the active compounds, and the technologies employed for their integration. The table also details the specific food applications and highlights the resulting effects on both the material properties of the biopolymer system (such as mechanical strength, barrier properties, and biodegradability) and the preservation of food products (including antimicrobial activity, oxidation delay, and shelf life extension).

2.1. Proteins

A wide range of proteins from animal and plant sources can be employed as biopolymers. Gelatin is a denatured protein obtained from acid, alkali, or enzymatic collagen hydrolysis that shapes transparent, odourless, and tasteless films that demonstrated good gas barrier properties and high mechanical resistance and elasticity; although its high-water permeability limits its use in food packaging [8,9]. Gelatine is first dissolved in hot water to create a film-forming solution. The film is then produced using the casting technique, followed by drying. For instance, Moreno et al. (2020) [10] have developed an active, gelatine-based coating loaded with an ethanolic propolis extract that effectively extended raspberries’ shelf life by avoiding fungal growth.
Whey protein, constituted principally of β-lactoglobulins, α-lactalbumins, and bovine serum albumin, has gained relevance over recent years for being a by-product of cheese processing. It is tasteless, transparent, and has proved to be a controlled barrier against oxygen, but with high water permeability [11]. When the protein percentage is ∼90%, it is known as whey protein isolate, but when the content ranges 70–80% it is recognized as whey protein concentrate [12]. Whey-based films and coatings containing bioactive compounds have largely demonstrated its effect on shelf life extension by decreasing microbial growth and/or enhancing antioxidant properties. For example, Sajimon et al. (2023) [13] have observed a water resistance improvement on films loaded with oregano essential oil, while effectively extending the shelf life of grapes without affecting perceived sensorial quality (see Table 2).
However, it is important to use protein from plant-based resources for vegetarian diets and, if possible, agro-industrial by-products, aiming to reduce the environmental impacts that petroleum-based packaging and animal use lead to [14]. In this sense, soy protein has been used since the beginning of the century. It is derived from soybeans, which contain up to 44% protein, primarily classified as globulins, with β-conglycinin and glycinin being the major fractions [15,16,17]. Soy protein is water-soluble and commonly requires the addition of plasticizers or other biopolymers to enhance its mechanical and barrier properties in film-forming solutions [18]. For instance, Mostafa et al. (2023) [19] reported that the incorporation of cellulose nanocrystals into soy protein isolate films significantly improved their mechanical strength. Additionally, the introduction of date palm leaf extract conferred antioxidant properties. However, the liquid form of the extract reduced tensile strength, while the powder form preserved the mechanical performance of the original blend. In another study, Yousuf et al. (2020) [20] developed a coating solution comprising soy protein isolate and lemon extract, which was applied to fresh-cut melon. The coating effectively retained vitamin C, reduced microbial growth, and improved key physicochemical properties, thereby extending the shelf life of the fruit.
Zein protein, the main storage protein and a residue in corn starch production, has been investigated over the last few years. Zein is an amphiphilic protein, composed by more than 50% of hydrophobic amino acids, which depending on their structural setup, can be exploited to formulate a hydrophobic surface for food packaging applications. It is considered that the rate of solvent evaporation is a key step to control surface hydrophobicity. As such, electrohydrodynamic processing can lead to the formation of superhydrophobic surfaces due to high-speed solvent evaporation, while samples prepared by solvent casting induced self-assembly with resulting hydrophilicity behaviour due to conformational transitions from α-helix to β-sheet [21]. It has a good film-forming capacity, high tensile strength, and low water and oxygen permeability, and it can be used to encapsulate bioactive compounds, which can improve barrier properties through the formation of non-covalent bounds, mainly H-bonds and hydrophobic interactions [22,23]. Xia et al. (2023) [24] have developed a hydrophobic film based on peppermint oil–zein nanofibers further coated by sprayed methyltriethoxysilane. They studied the effect of solvents (aqueous acetic acid and ethanolic solutions) on a zein protein secondary structure. As result, they observed that β-chain was predominant in acetic acid solutions, while α-helix was the major structure found using an ethanolic solution. Furthermore, they observed that hydrophobic behaviour was further enhanced by peppermint oil loading, which increased antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, successfully prolonging the shelf life of coated pork.
Silk fibroin has gained significant attention in recent years as a promising material for edible coatings and films. It is the main structural protein of silk, typically accounting for 65–85% of its composition [25]. Due to its high β-sheet content, which can be further increased through water annealing treatments, silk fibroin exhibits excellent gas barrier properties. This was demonstrated by Marelli et al. (2016) [26] in the preservation of strawberries, where increasing the β-sheet content up to 58% significantly enhanced the fruit’s shelf-life. Building on this approach, Jaramillo-Quinceno and Restrepo-Osorio (2020) [27] improved the performance of silk fibroin coatings using the same annealing methodology. Notably, they successfully extracted silk fibroin from fibrous silk waste for the first time, and applied it to fruit coatings. Their study also included an analysis of metal contaminants, indicating a low-to-moderate risk for human consumption, thus supporting its potential for safe food applications. Reflecting the growing industrial interest, Mori® has already commercialized an edible silk fibroin-based coating in the USA, designed for various food types, primarily fruits and vegetables, to effectively extend their shelf life (see Table 1).

2.2. Lipids

2.2.1. Resins

Shellac is a resin produced by the Kerria lacca insect composed primarily of long-chain aliphatic hydroxy acids and sesquiterpenoid acid, which make it insoluble in water. Its unique physicochemical properties, including low vapour permeability, high gloss, and good adhesion, have led to its use across various fields, such as pharmaceuticals, food, or archeology [28,29,30,31]. In the food industry, shellac is approved as a food additive under the code E904 [32,33]. In food packaging applications, shellac is widely employed as a coating, particularly for fruits and confectionery, to enhance moisture resistance, appearance, and shelf life. Due to its versatility, it is also explored as a delivery system of bioactive compounds through the development of nanofibers, nanoparticles, microparticles, and microcapsules [34,35]. Its mechanical and functional properties can be further improved through polymer blending or chemical modification, expanding its potential in active packaging systems.

2.2.2. Waxes

Waxes are among the most historically used materials in edible coating applications [15]. Although they are not classified as biopolymers—due to the absence of a repeating monomeric structure—their functionality in food packaging is well recognized. They are often directly applied as coatings or as components in composite films with proteins or polysaccharides [36,37]. Chemically, waxes consist predominantly of long-chain aliphatic esters, fatty acids, and alcohols, which confer strong hydrophobicity. This property significantly enhances their barrier performance, particularly by reducing water vapour permeability [38]. As a result, wax-based coatings effectively limit moisture loss and reduce weight loss in coated food products [39]. Additionally, the incorporation of bioactive compounds—such as polyphenols or plant-derived extracts—further enhances their functional properties. These bioactive-enriched systems can impart antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, contributing to improved food quality and extended shelf life [40,41]. Commonly used waxes include beeswax, carnauba, and candelilla waxes. More recently, rice bran wax obtained from rice processing by-products was more recently employed, due to its circular economy approach. As such, Abhirami et al. (2020) [42] employed a 10% w/v rice bran wax emulsion to successfully extend tomato shelf life up to 27 days, compared to 18 days for the control.

2.3. Polysaccharides

On the other hand, polysaccharides attract attention in food packaging for their gelling properties. Chitosan results from the deacetylation of chitin, a biopolymer found in crustaceous exoskeletons. It has a relevant impact in the development of non-plastic alternatives in food packaging due to its biodegradability, non-toxicity, biocompatibility, antimicrobial properties, and film-forming ability, in addition to its demonstrated elasticity [43,44]. As such, Davoodi et al. (2020) [45] have employed chitosan as a functional additive to mucilage-based films to enhance biopolymer performance and provide antibacterial activity to extend the shelf life of cherries and apples. Moreover, many authors have developed active chitosan films or coatings with phenolic compounds, phenol-rich extracts, or essential oils to enhance antioxidant properties and extend food shelf life [46,47].
Nevertheless, as has occurred with protein biopolymers, research recently has been conducted on plant-based alternatives. In this sense, starch and cellulose from different sources have been widely employed for decades [48,49]. Starch is the most abundant polysaccharide, composed of amylose (20–30%) and amylopectin (70–80%) in different proportions depending on the origin. It is mainly obtained from potato, corn, wheat, rice, barley, cassava, etc. [50,51]. In starch-based films, additives are required to improve their inherently poor mechanical and barrier properties. To address the brittleness caused by starch’s crystalline structure, thermoplastic starch (TPS) is produced, typically through extrusion and by blending with plasticizers, such as glycerol. Kumar et al. (2024) [52] have developed starch-based active coatings incorporating clove essential oil and glycerol as a plasticizer. The authors observed wide differences between starch of various origins (mango kernels, corn, and litchi seed), with litchi seed starch films being the most effective at preserving mandarins.
Cellulose and its derivatives, such as carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), or nanocellulose, have been extensively investigated and used in blends and laminates. Cellulose is formed by the polymerization of D-glucose through a β-1,4 glycosidic bond. Both starch and cellulose blends are mostly employed in industrial applications. However, cellulose’s water insolubility and crystallinity make cellulose-based alternatives more suitable for packaging development [53]. CMC is a cost-effective anionic cellulose derivative produced through the incorporation of the –CH2COOH group into the cellulose chain. Its water solubility causes a superior film-forming capacity than that of cellulose. It provides good oxygen barrier properties, higher flexibility, and high-water-vapour permeability films and coatings [54]. HPMC is a non-ionic derivative formed by the inclusion of –OCH3 and –CH2CHOHCH3 groups, which has gained attention over the years because of its water solubility and improved mechanical properties compared to CMC, its gel-forming capacity, and its ability to encapsulate bioactive compounds [55,56]. As such, Iqbal et al. (2024) [57] have developed a nanoemulsion to be applied as an edible coating made of HPMC, beeswax, Tween 80 as a surfactant, glycerol as a plasticizer, and thyme, cinnamon, and peppermint oil as functional additives, effectively extending the shelf life of sweet cherries. On the other hand, nanocellulose, typically classified into cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and nanofibers (SNFs), has attracted growing interest regarding the development of composites and coatings, particularly for its ability to reinforce the mechanical and barrier properties of biopolymers [58,59,60]. Moreover, the formation of H-bonds and electrostatic interactions not only enhance matrix integrity but also promote the encapsulation and controlled release of bioactive compounds [61,62]. For instance, Wardak et al. (2024) [60] developed an edible coating that significantly increased the shelf life of tomatoes using various concentrations of CNFs to reinforce starch-based films, which improved their mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties. CNCs and CNFs are generally extracted from plant biomass through acid hydrolysis or alkaline treatments [63]. However, more environmentally friendly approaches, such as enzymatic hydrolysis and bacterial production, have recently gained attention [64,65]. Among these, bacterial cellulose (BC) stands out due to its high purity and uniform nanofibrillar structure. These characteristics have enabled BC to find a wide range of food industry applications, not only in packaging but also as a food additive or ingredient, where it serves as an emulsifier, stabilizer, and thickener [66]. In packaging, BC’s high crystallinity, mechanical strength, and barrier properties make it an excellent reinforcement agent. For example, Li et al. (2023) [67] used BC as a nanofiller in biopolymer films, significantly enhancing crystallinity, thermal stability, and barrier performance, while also improving the shelf life of fresh-cut apples through superior freshness retention properties.
Arabinoxylans are a type of hemicellulose found in the cell walls of various cereal grains, such as rice, wheat, or corn. They are composed of xylose units forming the backbone, with arabinose side chains. Due to their excellent film-forming ability, arabinoxylans can produce transparent and flexible films suitable for food packaging applications. Moreover, arabinoxylans exhibit natural antioxidant properties, attributed to phenolic compounds, such as ferulic acid, that remain bound to their structure during their extraction. Their biopolymer functional performance can be enhanced by incorporating bioactive compounds, nanocomposites, or blending with other polymers [68,69,70].
Gums are diverse group of polysaccharides. Depending on their origin, they include marine gums (e.g., alginate, carrageenan, and agar), plant gums (e.g., gum arabic and gum Tragacanth), seed gums or galactomannans (e.g., guar gum), mucilages (e.g., psyllium gum), and microbial gums (e.g., pullulan, kefiran, xanthan gum, and levan) [71,72].
Algae are a rich source of polysaccharides commonly used in food packaging development. Alginate, composed of guluronic acid and mannuronic acid units, is a water-soluble biopolymer that has displayed moderate oxygen and low water barrier properties. Its film fragility and mechanical properties can be improved with plasticizers. It has gained importance in the field of food packaging owing to its ability to prepare hydrogels and to retain water, thus controlling the moisture levels in the packaged food, and the encapsulation and controlled-release capacities of its bioactive compounds [73,74]. Thus, Das et al. (2020) [75] prepared an alginate-based nanoemulsion loaded with Citrus sinensis essential oil to provide antibacterial activity to coatings to extend the shelf life of tomatoes. Carrageenan is another polysaccharide derived from seaweed; specifically, it is obtained from the Rhodophyceae family. It is water-soluble and used for its film-forming capacity, barrier, and antibacterial properties. Blends with other polysaccharides improve its thermal stability and poor mechanical and barrier properties [76,77]. Agar is a polysaccharide derived from marine red algae that consists of D-galactopyranose and 3,6-anhydro-L-galactopyranose, and is soluble in hot water. Despite it being used for its good film-forming capacities, its poor water vapour barrier properties, thermal stability, mechanical properties, brittleness, and high hydrophilia limit its application in food packaging. To overcome these drawbacks, agar is used in food coatings or films with other polymers, nanomaterials, or plasticizers [78,79].
Some bacterial polysaccharides, such as xanthan gum, have been widely used in the food industry for decades. In contrast, others like kefiran and levan have more recently gained attention due to their bioactive properties and film-forming abilities, making them promising candidates for edible and active food packaging.
Kefiran is an exopolysaccharide composed of glucose and galactose units, predominantly by Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens, the principal bacteria in kefir grains [80]. Kefiran exhibits antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, and forms transparent films with good barrier properties, enhancing its potential for food packaging applications. As with many other polysaccharides, its inherent brittleness often needs the incorporation of plasticizers or other biopolymers to improve flexibility and mechanical performance [81,82]. Additionally, the integration of bioactive compounds can modify the structural and functional properties of kefiran-based films. For instance, Hasheminya and Dehghannya (2024) [83] developed active kefiran–gelatin films incorporating a Zhumeria majdae essential oil nanoemulsion. The films exhibited reduced water vapour permeability and tensile strength, while showing significant improvements in elongation at break and light-blocking capacity. The nanoemulsion also enhanced the antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antifungal properties of the film, which was effective in preserving sponge cake over 16 days of storage [83].
Levan, another bacterial exopolysaccharide, is produced by species such as Bacillus subtilis and Zymomonas mobilis. It consists of β-(2→6)-linked fructose units and shares similar functional properties with kefiran, including film-forming capacity and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [84]. However, like kefiran, levan-based films tend to be brittle, a limitation that can be addressed by blending with other biopolymers to enhance flexibility and functional performance. As such, Wang et al. (2022) [85] incorporated levan into chitosan-based films, improving their mechanical strength, UV light absorption, and surface hydrophobicity, while reducing swelling and water vapour permeability. The resulting films exhibited good thermal stability and were effective in preserving fresh pork, as indicated by a reduction in total volatile basic nitrogen [85]. Furthermore, levan-based systems can be functionalized by incorporating additional bioactive agents. In a study by Gan et al. (2022) [86], a levan–pullulan–chitosan composite coating enriched with ε-polylysine was applied to strawberries. The coating demonstrated significant improvements in microbial control, moisture retention, and oxidative stability, effectively extending the shelf life of the fruit.
On the other hand, fungal exopolysaccharides are also gaining interest as biopolymers. Among them, pullulan is the one that is most employed for food packaging applications. It is composed of maltotriose units bound through α-1,6 glycosidic bonds. It is a water-soluble biopolymer with poor water barrier properties but is an excellent barrier against oxygen. It displays moderate mechanical properties and thermal stability. The incorporation of bioactive compounds can improve the physical–chemical properties of pullulan-based coatings [87,88]. Therefore, An et al. (2023) [89] demonstrated that pullulan coatings enriched with Auricularia auricular extracts not only exhibited enhanced mechanical properties but also provided antioxidant and antimicrobial capacity. These improvements extended the shelf life of fresh-cut potato by reducing weight loss and limiting browning index, among other quality-preserving effects.
Scleroglucan, schizophyllan, and lentinan are other examples of fungus-derived exopolysaccharides. Sclerogucan is produced by Sclerotium rolfsii, schizophyllan by Schizophyllum commune, and lentinan by Lentinula edodes (shiitaki mushroom) [90,91,92]. While all three share a β-(1→3) backbone with β-(1→6) branching, they exhibit variations in their branching degree, solution behaviour, and biofunctional attributes.
These polysaccharides typically adopt a triple-helical conformation in aqueous environments, which contributes to their functional stability. Scleroglucan is valued for its excellent rheological properties, exhibiting shear-thinning behaviour, thermal resistance, and pH tolerance (maintaining viscosity up to pH 13 before decreasing) [93,94]. Schizophyllan also shows high thermal and salt stability and has demonstrated antioxidant activity, with primary applications in biomedicine [95]. For example, Hamedi et al. (2021) [96] developed a schizophyllan/bacterial cellulose-based hydrogel incorporating ZnO nanoparticles for wound healing purposes. However, no studies have yet reported its use in food packaging [96].
All three polysaccharides are currently utilized in cosmetics and biomedical formulations, but scientific research on their application in edible coatings or films remains scarce. In food systems, scleroglucan and schizophyllan are mainly used as stabilizers, thickeners, and gelling agents, particularly in Japan [97]. On the other hand, lentinan has demonstrated several beneficial effects, highlighting its antioxidant, antimicrobial, and lipid-lowering properties, as well as resistance to gastric digestion and high bioavailability, which makes it a promising candidate for edible coating applications [92,98,99]. A recent example is provided by Cui et al. (2023) [100] who developed a lentinan-based film for beef preservation. To overcome the brittleness of the polysaccharide matrix, the researchers incorporated soy protein nanoparticles loaded with Litsea cubeba essential oil. The resulting composite film demonstrated significantly improved mechanical properties, gas barrier performance, and thermal stability. Moreover, it exhibited strong antioxidant and antibacterial activities, effectively delaying lipid oxidation on the beef surface for up to seven days, thereby extending its shelf life [100].
Other known gums, such as xanthan gum, mucilage, gellan gum, dextran, or locust bean gum, are also currently being studied and their ability as biopolymers to incorporate bioactive compounds to extend food shelf life is being proven. Thus, Aayush et al. (2024) [101] have developed a nanoemulsion with xanthan gum, with Tween 80 as an emulsifier and betel leaf extract, to effectively extend the shelf life of tomatoes by 6 days by improving several physical–chemical properties.
Tamarind polysaccharide is an underexploited biopolymer for food packaging applications that has recently emerged as a biopolymer, considering tamarind seeds form a large proportion of the fruit and are already being exploited by the pharmaceutical industry for drug delivery purposes. It is mainly composed of xyloglucan, based on units of xylose, galactose, and glucose. Contrary to most of the previously described biopolymers, tamarind polysaccharide possesses good mechanical and moderate barrier properties [101,102,103,104].
Finally, among polysaccharides, pectin is being considered as a biopolymer due to being easily recuperated from industrial fruit by-products, mainly apples and citrus peels. Depending on its purification process, it can possess antioxidant capacity due to the covalently bound phenolic compounds, but can also be included to functionalize pectin-based films [105,106]. Its water retention capacity makes it a material of interest in moisture control to enhance the shelf life of food. Its combination with plasticizers improves its mechanical properties, especially regarding flexibility aspects [107].
The abridgments that all biomaterials have shown regarding mechanical and barrier properties can be improved by modifying the polymeric structure using plasticizers (e.g., glycerol, sorbitol, or polyethylene glycol) [108], crosslinking agents (e.g., citric acid or CaCl2) [109,110], nanomaterials, or grafting bioactive compounds [111,112]. Furthermore, the inclusion of bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols, functionalizes films and coatings by providing antioxidant, antifungal, or antimicrobial properties. This functionalization primarily involves the use of phenolic compounds (e.g., ferulic acid or resveratrol) [113], natural extracts (e.g., rosemary or lemon extracts) [114], essential oils (e.g., cinnamon or oregano essential oils) [115], aldehydes (e.g., linalool or citral) [116], or organic acids (e.g., acetic or sorbic acid) [117].

3. Technologies for Edible Coatings and Film Development and Applications in Food

The development of active packaging to extend food shelf life has driven significant advances in techniques for producing and applying films or coatings on food products. These technologies enable the incorporation of bioactive compounds, particularly natural extracts rich in phenolic compounds or isolated phenolics, which provide antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Recent years have seen a growing trend in optimizing these methods to enhance both the functional performance of the coatings and the preservation of food quality. Figure 1 illustrates the formulation of edible coatings and films using biopolymers, additives, and bioactive compounds such as antimicrobial agents, plasticizers, and essential oils. It also shows common production techniques used for their application or formation, including dipping, spraying, casting, and electrohydrodynamic atomization (EHDA). Coatings are typically applied directly onto the food surface, while films are formed separately and later applied. Each method involves a drying step to stabilize the coating or film. All the methodologies described, both for coating application and for film formation, are found in Table 2, which summarises the state of the art in the development of biopolymer-based systems that incorporate bioactive or functional compounds through the technologies described in the current section.

3.1. Films Fabrication Methods

Melt extrusion is a thermomechanical processing technique that involves melting a biopolymer/blend, which is subsequently passed through a die to form continuous films. The resulting films are then solidified by cooling down. It is a technique widely employed in industry for petroleum-based or biobased material processing due to its high production, versatility, and low-cost. Currently, it is also investigated for its application in edible biopolymers. As such, Cheng et al. (2022) employed blown extrusion to produce ε-polylysine hydrochloride-loaded starch/gelatin edible antimicrobial films [118]. Additionally, Huntrakul et al. (2020) have developed acetylated cassava starch and pea protein isolate films, successfully improving starch processability in blown extrusion and barrier properties [119].
Injection moulding is a manufacturing process broadly used in conventional plastics production. This method is emerging for employment in the production of edible and active films for food packaging applications. It involves a mould to obtain the desired shape of a directly injected molten material, which is then solidified. Recently, Plasencia et al. (2025) [120] have developed compostable and thermoplastic zein-based films, demonstrating the feasibility of injection moulding processing in producing films with valuable physicochemical properties.
Casting is a low-cost technique widely employed to develop active films, especially at a lab-scale level. It consists of solubilizing the materials for further solvent evaporation, incorporating directly the bioactive compounds and other additives into the polymeric matrix [121,122,123]. Alterations in the biopolymer structure to improve its biopolymer performance and enabling the controlled release of bioactive compounds are highly employed in the development of active coatings and films. In this sense, the addition of crosslinking agents, including molecules, such as CaCl2, citric acid, or cinnamaldehyde is a commonly used technique. Whitehead et al. [124] demonstrated that adding genipin as a crosslinking agent has led to an impact on morphological matrix characteristics and, consequently, on the delivery of ascorbic acid. Phenolic compounds can also act as crosslinking agents because of their binding affinity to the polymeric matrix, which directly depends on the number of hydroxyl groups [125,126]. Thus, phenolic compounds can improve mechanical and barrier properties, while performing antioxidant action.
In recent years, research into encapsulation technologies has significantly increased, focusing on protecting bioactive compounds from environmental degradation caused by factors such as humidity, UV light, and heat, while also enhancing their controlled release.
The use of nanoemulsions to ameliorate the solubility of bioactive compounds and entrap them into the biopolymers to provide a controlled release has increased in the last 10 years [127]. Nanoemulsions are more homogeneous and provide higher encapsulation efficiency compared to microemulsions. Their lower particle size (20–200 nm) is related to a large surface volume that allows slow diffusion rates [128]. The efficacy of an active coating loaded with a nanoemulsion was verified by Y. Xiong et al. [129] since the preservation and coating stability was enhanced by the inclusion of oregano essential oil and resveratrol in a nanoemulsion system. Different high-energy and low-energy methods are required to develop nanoemulsions, with the former highlighted for its extended use of high-pressure techniques and ultrasonication [130]. Due to the thermodynamic instability of these formulations, surfactants are employed to reduce the interfacial tension, avoid coalescence and flocculation phenomena, and to reach the desired small particle size [131].
Finally, electrohydrodynamic atomization (EHDA) has arisen as an encouraging technique in active packaging development due to its capacity to transform biopolymer solutions into nanostructures, generating films or coatings. This technique employs an electric field to produce electrospun nanofibers or electrosprayed nanoparticles, ranging in size from the micrometric to the nanometric. Both structures’ properties can be modulated by modifying parameters, such as the material concentration, needle opening, and distance-to-collector or voltage [132,133]. Electrospun nanofibers and electrosprayed nanoparticles have a high porosity and surface area-to-total volume ratio that allow the loading and controlled release of the encapsulated bioactive compounds, which aids in improving water and oxygen barrier properties [134]. Zein electrospun nanofibers developed by M.A. Moreno et al. [135] reached encapsulation efficacies of ~90% and increased the controlled release of phenol-rich extracts by applying glutaraldehyde as a crosslinker agent. One of the main advantages of EHDA is its versatile use since it can process a wide range of biopolymers, as is also the case with non-electrospinnable materials, using recent advances in its setups (e.g., coaxial or trilayer) [136].
Multilayer formulations have been shown to improve the physicochemical properties of films and coatings. Among the various techniques for producing multilayer films, the electrohydrodynamic atomization (EHDA) of multilayer films has proved to enhance the performance characteristics of the films, boosting mechanical strength and flexibility, while also improving their functionalization with bioactive compounds [137,138].

3.2. Coating Application Methods

Coating formulations unloaded or loaded with bioactive compounds can be applied as coatings using various methods, with dipping being the most common and cost-effective technique. In this process, the food product is immersed in the solution, followed by the evaporation of solvents, leaving a protective coating on the surface [139,140,141,142].
Spraying, another widely used coating technique, offers the advantage of precise control over key factors in the coating process, including system conditions, operational parameters, and the structural characteristics of the polymer. This method produces uniform layers with well-controlled thicknesses, ensuring the consistency and quality of the final coating [52,143]. Thus, Zhong et al. (2014) [144] have observed that spraying and electrostatic spraying led to thinner coating deposition on Mozzarella cheese among all biopolymers tested (alginate, chitosan, and soy protein).
Spreading or brushing techniques consist of the direct application of the coating with a brush. They are commonly used for small fruits and vegetables. However, the drawbacks of these techniques are related to the non-controlled coating thickness and the limitations in terms of large-scale applications [145,146]. Hence, Rajaei Lak et al. (2024) [147] found that, of the studied methods, brushing is the least effective, just below the dipping method [147].
Vacuum impregnation is a useful technique for applying coatings to porous fruits and vegetables, but is not suitable for delicate fruits. It is a non-thermal technique which removes the air and moisture from the food matrix, followed by coating infusion. It allows a thicker deposition, higher concentration, and controlled deposition compared to the dipping technique [148,149]. Vacuum impregnation can also be employed to enhance the colour, texture, flavour, and aroma of porous foods [150]. When combined with osmotic dehydration, vacuum impregnation can increase mass transfer efficiency while minimizing structural alterations and reducing process duration [151]. The technique is inherently complex and strongly influenced by multiple intrinsic and extrinsic variables, making process optimization essential for achieving optimal efficiency and consistent product quality. Senturk Parreidt et al. (2018) [152] evaluated the effect of dipping and vacuum impregnation on melon coated with an alginate-based formulation. The authors observed that vacuum impregnation was more effective in terms of firmness, weight, and colour preservation than the dipping method.
The panning method is well-established in the food industry and, in particular, the pharmaceutical industry, due to its efficiency in processing large food quantities. It involves placing food products in a large rotating pan while the coating solution is evenly sprayed onto their surfaces as the pan continuously spins. Thus, it is especially useful for spherical foodstuffs, such as nuts. It ensures a homogeneous distribution of coating whose thickness can be controlled by the pan’s rotation speed. After coating application, food is commonly subjected to a drying process [153,154,155].
The enrobing method is another methodology commonly employed in the food industry for applying coatings, particularly for confectionery products. This process involves dipping or passing food through a curtain or bed of coating material or formulation, such as molten chocolate, to achieve a uniform and continuous coating. As such, enrobing is commonly employed for products like chocolate-covered nuts [144,156]. Rajaei Lak et al. (2024) [147] evaluated the effect of applying a zein-based coating enriched with Heracleum persicum essential oil onto cheese using different methods. The results demonstrated that the enrobing method was the most effective in preserving the cheese’s physicochemical properties, notably by reducing microbial counts, minimizing pH fluctuations, and limiting moisture loss.
Fluidized-bed processing method consists of solid particles suspension in a stream of air or gas, enabling thin and uniform coating layer application on small and dry food products. It is followed by a drying process [157,158]. Moreover, fluidized-bed-processing is a useful method for encapsulation purposes, enhancing product functionality. It is a high-cost technique compared to those previously reported, although it is greatly employed by the food industry [159,160].
Cold plasma treatment is an innovative technique used in food packaging applications to enhance the properties of edible coatings. It involves generating plasma by applying an electric field to a neutral gas under atmospheric pressure, exposing materials to low-temperature plasma. Various approaches, including laser treatment, ozonation, UV radiation, or gamma rays can be employed to induce physicochemical changes on biopolymers. Plasma-based methods are utilized to improve the functional characteristics of biopolymers for the intended applications, such as adhesion or barrier properties [161,162]. For instance, Akhavan-Mahdavi et al. (2023) [163] successfully extended pistachio shelf life using a cold plasma and chitosan coating, thus reducing mould and yeast growth and aflatoxin concentration, without significantly altering the other physicochemical characteristics or sensory perception.
Ultrasonic spray coating is a next-generation spraying technique that enables multilayer coating through layer-by-layer deposition, promoting bond interactions between layers and addressing issues such as cross-contamination and time-consuming processes. Ultrasonic spray coating produces uniform droplets with a consistent size and distribution, ensuring a high-quality coating. The technique allows for the incorporation of various additives and materials, facilitating the encapsulation of bioactive compounds and the creation of multifunctional coatings [164,165]. Additionally, UA operates at low pressure, requiring less energy for atomization, making it an efficient and versatile method for advanced food coating applications [166]. Some studies have explored the advantages of its use for conventional polymers or its application as a technique for food products, ingredients, or bioactive compound processing, but it is currently an underexploited technology in terms of the development of edible and active films or coatings [167,168].
All the described techniques have shown encouraging potential in the production of edible and active coatings or films. However, more studies should be performed to overcome the drawbacks regarding scalability and cost-effectiveness for large-scale packaging applications.
Table 2. Biopolymer-based systems incorporating bioactive compounds, production technologies, food applications, and their effects on material properties and food preservation.
Table 2. Biopolymer-based systems incorporating bioactive compounds, production technologies, food applications, and their effects on material properties and food preservation.
BiopolymersBioactive/Functional CompoundsTechnologyApplicationEffectRef.
Proteins
GelatinGrape seed extractCoating dispersionTilapia fillets
(vacuum impregnation)
Protective effects against metabolic changes. ↓ changes contents the main metabolites. Inhibited the formation of harmful substances or undesirable compounds with off-odours. ↓ pH changes, ↓ TVB-N, and ↓ K-value variations[169]
GelatinPeppermint and chamomile EOsElectrospinningNA↑ WCA, ↑ antioxidant properties (>chamomile EO), ↑ antibacterial activity (>peppermint EO), and not cytotoxic[134]
Zein–gelatinTea polyphenolCasting
(multilayer stacking)
Kiwifruit, avocado and banana
(packaged)
Fruits: ↓ WL, ↓ ΔE, ↑ TPC, and ↓ microorganism growth[170]
Irradiated starch–gelatinLime juiceCastingChicken
(packaged)
Films: ↑ mechanical properties and ↓ microorganism growth
Chicken: ↓ lipid oxidation and ↑ SL (12 days)
[171]
GelatinPropolis extractCasting
(extract encapsulation in zein nanocapsules–antisolvent precipitation)
Raspberries
(dipping)
Films: ↑ flexibility, ↑ film colour, and ↑ antifungal activity
Raspberries: ↑ SL (11 days)
[10]
GelatinTomato by-product hydrolysateCastingPork loin
(dipping)
Pork: ↑ WL, ↑ ΔE, ≃ pH, ≃ water activity, ↓ lipid oxidation, and ↑ antioxidant activity[172]
GelatinCinnamaldehydeCasting
(Cinnamaldehyde-sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex)
Grass carp fillets
(dipping)
Films: ↑ flexibility, ↑ opacity, and ↓ microorganism growth
Carp fillets: ↓ protein degradation
[173]
Gelatin–chitosanCurcumin and cinnamon oilCasting
(pickering emulsion of cinnamon oil with oxidized CNF)
Pork meat
(covered)
Film: ↓ L*, ↑ ΔE, ↑ roughness, ↑ TS, ↓ EB, ↓ WCA at 0 min, ↑ WCA at 10 min, ↓WVP, ↑ antioxidant capacity, and ↑ antibacterial properties
Pork meat: ↓ TVB-N, ↑ SL, and freshness indicator (ΔE)
[174]
Gelatin–pectinLemongrass EOCastingChicken breast
(packaged)
Films: ↓ L*, ↓ WS, ↓ mechanical properties, ↑ thermal stability, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑ antioxidant activity
Chicken: ↓ WL and ≃ pH
[175]
WheyNatamycin or/and α-tocopherol nanoemulsion (o/w)CastingNAFilms: ↓ TS and elastic modulus, ↑ opacity, ↑ ΔE, ↑ WVP, ↓ microorganism growth (natamycin), and ↑ antioxidant activity (α-tocopherol)[176]
Sweet whey–starchChlorogenic acidCastingBananas
(dipping)
Films: ↑ UV barrier, ↑swelling, ↑ toughness, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑ antioxidant activity
Bananas: ↑ antioxidant activity and ↓ browning
[177]
WPIA511 bacteriophageCastingCheese
(dipping)
Films: ≃ phage viability (2 weeks) and ↓ microorganism growth
Cheese: ↑ colour, ↑ hardness, ↑ springiness, ≃ adhesiveness, ≃ cohesiveness, ≃ gumminess, and ≃ chewiness
[178]
Tomato seed mucilage–wheyShallot EOCastingFish fillet
(dipping)
Fish fillet: ↑ L*, ↓ WL, ↓ hardness, ↓ chewiness, ↓ springiness, ↓ cohesiveness, ↓ gumminess, ↓ pH, ↓ TBA, ↓ TVB-N, ↓ ΔE, and ↓ microorganism growth[179]
Nanochitosan–WPISummer savoury EOCastingRainbow trout fillets
(dipping and packaged in pouches)
Films and fish: ↓ microorganism growth[180]
Pectin–WPCLactobacillus helveticusCastingAcid-Curd Cheese
(dipping)
Cheese: ≃ colour, ≃ moisture, and ↓ microorganism growth[181]
WPITransglutaminase Casting
(microemulsion)
Fresh-cut apple
(dipping)
Films: ↑ mechanical properties and ↑ water resistance
Apple: ↓ WL, ↓ browning index, ↓ PPO activity, ↓ CAT activity, ↓ H2O2 production, and ↓ MDA accumulation
[182]
WPCGreen tea extractCastingFresh Cheese
(packaged)
↑ antioxidant activity
Cheese: ↓ lipid oxidation and ↑ ΔE cheese
[183]
WPNACoating dispersionPeanuts↓ lipid oxidation and ↑ SL (3 months)[155]
WPNACoating dispersionChocolates
(pan coating)
WPI–sucrose provided chocolates with the most gloss (even after 5 months). Sucrose crystallization contributed to coating gloss[154]
WPIBergamot oilCasting
(nanoemulsion with nanocellulose)
NA↑ mechanical properties, ↓ WVP, ↓ L*, ↑ opacity, ↑ homogeneous structure, and ↑ antioxidant activity[184]
WPCOregano EOCastingGrapes
(packaged)
Films: ↓ mechanical properties, ↓ microorganism growth, ↑ antioxidant activity, ↓ WS, and ↓ light transmittance
Grapes: ↓ ΔE grapes, ≃ weight, ≃ pH, ≃ acidity, ≃ Brix value
[13]
ZeinMethyl ferulateCoaxial electrospinningSea Bass
(wappred)
Films: ↑ TS, ↑ fibre membrane, ↓ crystallinity, ↑ thermal stability, ↓ WCA, ↓ microorganism growth, irregular network structure, smooth surface, ↑ membrane hydrophilicity, and sustained release
Sea bass: ≃ pH and ≃ TVB-N content
[185]
Zein–PVA–chitosanAnthocyanin extractLayer-by-layer castingShrimp
(covered)
Films: ↑ mechanical properties, ↑ flexibility, ↓ WVP, and UV protection
Shrimp: ↑ antioxidant activity and colorimetric response to TVB-N (↑ ΔE)
[186]
ZeinGarlic EOCasting
(nanoemulsion)
Vannamei prawn
(dipping)
Prawn: ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ TVB-N, ↓H2S production, ↓ microorganism growth, ↑ antioxidant activity, ↑ SL, and ↑ acceptability[187]
Zein-chitosanThymol; thyme, cinnamon and oregano EOsCasting
(micellar particles)
Strawberries
(dipping)
Micelles: ↓ particle size and ↓ ζ potential
Strawberries: ↓ moisture loss, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑ SL
[188]
ZeinHeracleum persicum EOCoating dispersionCheese
(Brushing, dipping, spraying, enrobing)
Cheese: Hardness preserved, ↓ microorganism growth, ↓ moisture loss, ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ pH increase, ↑ overall acceptability over storage, ↑ SL, and ≃ L*. Enrobing > spraying > brushing > dipping [147]
Zein–beeswaxNisinCoating dispersionNectarines and apples
(dipping)
Nectarines and apples: ↓ WL, ↑ firmness, ↑ antibacterial activity, and ≃ mould and yeast growth[189]
Zein2-hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrinCastingStrawberries
(dipping)
Films: ↓ zein aggregation, ↑ zein solubility, ↓ light transmission, ↑ hydrophilia, ↑ WVP, ↓ moisture content, ↑ UV-light blocking properties, ↑ TS, ↓ strain at break, ↓ YM, ↓ WVP, and ↓ antioxidant properties
Strawberries: ↓ WL, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑ SL
[139]
ZeinDill leaf extract and dill leaf EOCasting
(EO encapsulation in β-cyclodextrin)
Carp fillets
(wrapped)
Films: ↑ antibacterial properties, ↓ moisture content, ↑ thermal stability, ↑ L*, ↑ surface roughness, ↑ TS (with extract, EO free and encapsulated), ↓ TS (with extract and EO, free or encapsulated, combined), ↑ EB (with extract, EO free), and ≃ EB (with EO encapsulated; extract and EO, free or encapsulated, combined)
Fillets: ↓ microorganism growth, ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ pH increase, ↓ TVB-N, ↑ desirable aroma, ↑ overall acceptability over storage time, and ↑ SL
[190]
Starch–zeinSorghum bran extractCastingNA↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↓ moisture, ↓ WS, ↑ opacity, ↑ antioxidant activity, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑WVTR[191]
Zein-chitosanNAElectrospinning (zein)
Casting (zein and chitosan)
(bilayer films)
Apple slices
(wrapped)
Films: ↑ moisture permeability, ↑ EB and ↓ TS (with ↑ PEG), and ↑ antioxidant activity
Apples: ↑ anti-browning ability and ↑ WL
[192]
ZeinThyme EOElectrospinningStrawberries
(packed in a PET container with the active film attached to its lids)
Nanofibers: linear morphology, smooth surface and bead-free structure, and physical encapsulation process
Strawberries: ↓ microorganism growth, ↓ biochemical changes, ↑ SL, and ≃ antioxidant properties for 15 days
[193]
Zein–CNCCurcuminCore–shell microparticles
(2:1 zein-CNCs)
  • Solvent evaporation (curcumin loaded zein microparticles)
  • Antisolvent precipitation
NA↓ particle size and ↑ stability with ↑ curcumin, ↓ particle size at ↑ pH, ↓ bioaccessibility with ↑ CNCs, ↑ degradation under UV light, and CNCs ↑ thermal stability [194]
ZeinTiO2 nanotube arrays (TNTAs)Casting
(bilayer films, TNTAs-zein)
NA↑ mechanical strength, ≃ flexibility and ↑ water resistance (compared to zein), and ↑ antimicrobial activity[195]
Zein–chitosanEugenol or/and curcuminCastingBlueberries
(dipping)
Films: shear-thinning behaviour, ↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↓ WVP, ↓ oxygen and CO2 permeability, ↓ surface roughness, ↓ L*, and ↑ ΔE
Blueberries: ↑ UV and pH stability, ↓ microorganism growth, ↑ antioxidant properties, ↓ WL, and ↑ hardness
[196]
Zein–chitosan–dialdehyde CMCCinnamaldehydeCasting
(cinnamaldehyde–zein antisolvent precipitation)
Strawberries
(packed)
Films: ↑ mechanical strength, ↓ WVP, ↓ oxygen permeability, ↑ UV-light blocking properties, ↑ hydrophobicity, ↓ WS, ↓ moisture, ↓ L*, and ↓ ΔE
Strawberries: ↓ WL, ↓ microorganism growth, ↑ antioxidant properties, and ↑ SL
[197]
ZeinNAInjection mouldingNA↑ thermal stability, ↓ water uptake along weeks, ↑ EB, ↓ elongation (↑ urea), and ↓ toughness (↑ urea). Clearer colour and ↑ hydrophilic properties (↑ urea). Plasticizers ↓ glass transition temperature. 80% degradation after 6 weeks[120]
Sodium caseinateNABlown extrusion
(co-rotating twin-screw extruder)
NA↓ Young’s modulus (↑ glycerol % and ↓ relative humidity), ↑ EB (glycerol ≥ 25% and ↑ RH), and ↑ WVP (↑ glycerol)[198]
Pea protein isolateNAInjection mouldingNA↓ film transparency. ↑ TS, ↑ Young’s modulus, and ↓ EB (70% pea protein). ↑ water uptake. 30–40% glycerol needed for ↑ processability[199]
Polysaccharides
ChitosanNACoating dispersion (substitution of wheat flour by chitosan solution in frying batter)Fish sticks
(enrobing)
↑ L*, ↓ whiteness, ↓ Hue angle, ↓ fat uptake, ↓ TVB-N, ↓ PO value, ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ hardness, ↓ crispness, ↓ gumminess, ↓ Warner–Bratzler shear force, and ↓ toughness[200]
ChitosanKojic acid and clove EOCoating dispersionWhite shrimp
(dipping)
↓ microorganism growth, ↓ TVB-N, ↓ pH, ↓ ΔE, ↑ sensory scores, and ↓ WL[201]
Chitosan–gelatin–catechol-modified chitosanAgNPCasting
(catechol–chitosan synthesis)
NA↓ WS, ↑ surface roughness, ↑ TS, ↓ EB, ↓ WVP, and ↑ antibacterial properties[202]
ChitosanGallic acid Casting
(gallic acid encapsulation in ZnO NP)
NA↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↓ WVP, ↓ oxygen permeability, ↓ swelling, ↓ WS, ↑ UV-barrier properties, ↑ antibacterial properties, and ↑ antioxidant properties[203]
Salvia macrosiphon seed mucilage–chitosanNACastingCherries and apples
(dipping)
Films: ↑ thermal stability, ↑ TS, ↓ EB, ↓ WVP, ↓ WS, ↓ moisture content, ↑ UV-barrier properties, ↑ transparency, and ↑ roughness
Fruits: ↑ antibacterial properties and ↑ SL
[45]
Chitosan–hydrolysed orange peel (pectin-rich)NACastingNA
(overall migration assay in Tenax®)
↑ elastic modulus, ≃ TS, ↓ EB, ↑ oxygen barrier properties, ↓ WVP, ↑ thermal properties, ↓ moisture content, ↑ UV-barrier properties, ↑ WS, ↑ transparency, ↑ antioxidant capacity, ↑ antibacterial properties, and fast biodegradability (62.9% WL after 26 days)[204]
Collagen–chitosanGallic acid and ε-polylysineCasting
(grafting of gallic acid onto chitosan backbone)
Pork
(wrapped)
Films: ↑ UV-barrier properties, ↓ L*, ↑ ΔE, ↑ WS, ↑ WVP, ↓ TS, ↓ EB, ≃ thermal stability, ↑ antioxidant capacity, and ↑ antibacterial properties
Pork: ↓ TVB-N, ↓ lipid oxidation, and ↑ SL (5 days)
[47]
Chitosan–guar gumWatermelon rind extractCastingFresh-cut bananas
(packaged)
Films: ↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↓ WVP, ↓ oxygen permeability, ↑ thermal stability, ↓ L*, ↓ moisture content, ↓ WS, ↑ antioxidant capacity, ↑ antibacterial properties
Bananas: ↓ WL, ↑ firmness, ↓ TSS, ↑ sensory quality, and ↑ SL
[205]
Chitosan–chitinEggplant anthocyaninsCasting
(chitin nanofibers development)
Pork
(film fixed on the top of the box)
Nanofibers: ↓ NP ζ potential
Films: ↑ compactness, ↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↑ thermal stability, ↑ hydrophobicity, ↓ L*, ↑ ΔE, ↑ WVP, ↑ oxygen permeability, ↓ moisture content, ↓ WS, ↑ UV barrier properties, ↑ antioxidant capacity, ↑ antibacterial properties, pH sensitivity, ammonia sensitivity, acid sensitivity, and colour changes easily detected by the naked-eye
[206]
ChitosanLuteolinCasting
(luteolin encapsulation in o/w nanoemulsion)
NA
(specific migration assay in EtOH 95%)
Nanoemulsion: ↓ ζ potential, PDI ∼ 0.2
Films: ↑surface homogeneity, ↓ L*, ↑ ΔE, ↑ compactness, ↓ WVP, ↓ oxygen permeability ↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↑ antioxidant capacity, ↑ antibacterial properties, and slow controlled release rate
[207]
Carboxymethyl chitosanPomegranate peel extractCoating dispersionGrass carp fillets
(vacuum impregnation; packaged in sterile bags)
↓ drip loss, ↓ texture softening, ↑ sensory scores, ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ TVB-N, ↓ K-value, ↓ bioamine accumulation, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑ SL (3 days)[46]
ChitosanNACoating dispersionPumpkin
(dipping and vacuum impregnation)
Vacuum impregnation: ↑ thickness, ↑ incorporation, ↑ homogeneity, ↓ water content loss, ↑ pH variations, ↑ acidity changes, ↑ ΔE, and ↑ firmness[208]
ChitosanNACoating dispersionPistachio
(dipping and cold plasma treatment)
preserved hardness and colour indices, ↓ PO, ↓ microorganisms growth, ↓ aflatoxins, and ↑ overall acceptance
(1.5% chitosan coating and 120 s of cold plasma treatment, most effective)
[163]
ChitosanPomegranate extractHydrogel padNA↑ swelling ratio over time and ↑ pH, porous hydrogel (cross-linking), ↑ TPC, ↑ antioxidant capacity, ↑ antibacterial properties, and water absorption[209]
Cassava starch–pea proteinNABlown extrusionSoybean and olive oil
(sachets)
Pea protein: stabilized films during blown-extrusion, ↓ flexibility, ↓ non-homogeneity AS-PI blend matrices. ↑ TS, ↓ WS, ↓ light-transmission, ↑ crystallinity, ↑ WCA, ↓ WVP, ↓ OP, ↓ humidity-induced shrinkage, and ↑ thermal stability[119]
Cassava starch–chitosan–gelatinNACoating dispersionGuavas↓ WL, ↓ titratable acidity, ↓ vitamin C, ↑ soluble solids, ↓ ripening index, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑ SL (9 days)[210]
Starch–gelatinε-polylysineBlown extrusionBread
(wrapped)
Films: ↓ complex viscosity, ↓ storage modulus, ↑ gelatinization degree, ↑ WCA, ↓ WVP, ↑ WS, ↓ TS, ↑ EB, and ↑ antimicrobial effect
Bread: ↓ microorganism growth and ↑ SL
[118]
Potato starchCarvacrolCastingPaipa cheese
(brushing)
Films: ↓ WS, ↓ TS, ↓ YM, ≃ WVP, ≃ moisture content, ≃ transparency, ≃ swelling behaviour, and ↑ antioxidant properties
Cheese: ↑ brightness, ≃ water activity, ≃ moisture content, ≃ colour attributes, ↓ microorganism growth, ↑ hardness, ↑ gumminess, ↑ springiness, and ↑ chewiness
[146]
Sweet potato starchCumin EOCoating gelPears
(dipping)
↓ rot lesion on infected pear caused by Alternaria alternata, ↓ changes in fruit colour, ↓ firmness changes, ↓ chlorophyll degradation, suppressed the onset of climacteric rise in respiration, ↓WL, ≃ stomata densities, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑ sensory quality[140]
Jackfruit starchPomegranate peel extractCastingGrapes
(dipping)
Film: ↑ TPC, ↑ antioxidant properties, ↑ thermal stability, ≃ WS, ↑ TS (↓ concentrations), ↑ WVP, ↑ oxygen permeability
Grapes: ↓ WL, ↑ firmness, and ↑ L*
[211]
StarchNACoating dispersionStrawberries
(dipping, then packed in PET containers)
↓ ripening, ↓ firmness reduction, ↓ WL, ↓ total soluble solid reduction, ↓ ascorbic acid loss, ↓ microbial load, and ↓ redness reduction[142]
Mango kernel, corn, and litchi seed starchClove EOCasting
(Ultrasonication)
Khasi mandarins
(spraying)
Formulations: ↑ consistency (mango < litchi < corn starch), ≃ particle size, ↓ ζ potential (litchi < mango < corn starch), and ↓ PDI (corn < litchi < mango starch)
Films: ↑ TS, ↓ transparency, ↓ WS (litchi < corn starch), ↑ antioxidant capacity, and ↓ microorganism growth
Mandarin: ↓ firmness reduction, ↓ WL, ↑ TPC ↑ TFC, ↑ antioxidant activity, ↓ respiration rate, and ↓ TSS
Litchi seed starch–CEO—ultrasonication, the most effective
[52]
Buckwheat starch–xanthan gumLemongrass EOCasting
(Ultrasonication)
Plum
(dipping)
Films: ↓ moisture content, ↓ WS, ↑ L*, ↑ thermal properties (compared to commercial starch), ↑ TS, ↓ EB, ↓WVP, ↑ WCA, ↑ antioxidant capacity, and ↑ antimicrobial activity
Plum: ↓ ripening, ↓ WL, ↓ TSS, ↓ pH increase, and ↓ shrinkage
[212]
Potato starchSodium benzoateCoating emulsion“Fino” lemons
(dipping)
↓ WL, ↓ gas exchange, ≃ firmness, ≃ pH, ≃ Hue angle variation, ≃ titratable acidity, and ↓ disease severity and incidence (lemons were inoculated with Penicillum digitatum)[141]
Corn starchFumaric acidCoating dispersionSilver pomfret fish steaks
(dipping; individually packed in nylon-EVOH-PE pouches)
Bacteriostatic effect (↑ antibacterial activity), ↓ H2S production, ↓ pH increase, ↓ TVVB-N increase, ↓ lipid oxidation (↓ TBA, ↓ PV increase) ↑ overall acceptability reduction, and ↑ SL (9 days)[213]
Starch–CNFCitric acid (crosslinking agent)CastingTomatoes
(dipping)
Films: ↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↑ thermal stability, ↓ WVP, ↓ swelling degree, and ↓ transparency
Tomatoes: ↓ WL, ↓ firmness reduction, ↓ TSS loss, ↓ pH increase, and ≃ colour
[60]
CNFCarbon dotsCastingTangerine, strawberry
(dipping; migration assays in H2O, 10, 50 and 95% EtOH)
Films: ↑ UV blocking properties, ≃ transparency, ≃ mechanical properties, ↑ WVP, ↓ oxygen permeability, ↑ WCA, ↑ antioxidant properties, ↑ antimicrobial activity, negligible cytotoxicity, and ↑ CDs release in more hydrophilic simulants
Fruits: inhibited fungal growth and ↑ SL (>10 days for tangerine, >2 days for strawberries)
[214]
Alginate–CNCThyme and/or clove EOCasting
(pickering emulsion)
Guava
(dipping)
Films: ↓ viscosity, ↑ particle size, ↑ opacity, ↓ WS, ↓ WVP ↑ antioxidant properties, and ↑ antifungal activity
Guavas: ↓ WL, ↓ hue angle decrease, ↓ pH increase, ↑ vit C retention, ↓ firmness reduction, ↓ titratable acidity reduction, and ↓ TSS increase
[61]
HPMCRutinCasting
(liposomes)
NA↓ YI, ↑ ΔE, ↓ moisture, ↓ TS, ↑ EB, and ≃ WVP
(compared to edible coating with free rutin)
[215]
HPMC–beeswaxThyme, cinnamon and peppermint oilNA
Nanoemulsion
Sweet cherries
(dipping)
↓ total suspended solids, ↓ titratable acidity, ≃ colour, ↓ WL, ↓ respiration rate, ≃ firmness, ↓ TPC reduction, ↑ sensory quality, and ↑ antimicrobial activity[57]
HPMCNACoating dispersion“Golden Reinders” and “Granny Smith” apples
(dipping)
↓ firmness reduction, ≃ colour, ↓ superficial scald, ↓ antifungal growth, ↓ ACS activity, ↓ ethylene production, ≃ starch index, ≃ soluble solids content, ≃ total titratable acidity, ↓ VOCs (↓ terpenoids, ↓ esters, ↓ aldehydes) ↓ consumer acceptance, ↓ α-farnesene levels and its oxidation products, and ↑ ethanol accumulation
Most effective in “Golden Reinders” apples
[216]
HPMC–chitosan–alginateNisinCasting
(bilayer)
Chestnut
(dipping)
Films: ↑ WVP, ↑ oxygen permeability, ↑ WS, ↓ transparency, ↑ thermal stability, ↓ TS, and ↓ EB
Chestnut: ↓ respiratory intensity, ↓ WL, and ↓ decay rate
[217]
CMCPolysaccharide and phenolic compounds from spent coffee groundsCoating dispersionGoldenberries
(spraying)
↓ WL, ↓ gas permeability (O2, CO2 and C2H4), ↓ microbial growth, ≃ TSS, ↑ polysaccharides, ↑ antioxidant properties (just the coating with phenolics), ↓ Vit C reduction, and ≃ sensorial parameters[143]
CMC–bacterial celluloseOlive and ginger oilCastingOranges and tomatoes
(dipping)
Film: ≃ WS, ≃ moisture, ↓ TS, ↑ EB, non-toxic toward NIH-3T3 fibroblasts, and antimicrobial activity
Fruits: ↓ WL, ↑ overall acceptability along storage time, and ↑ SL
(films containing ginger oil were more effective)
[218]
Ethyl celluloseMedium chain triglyceride oleogelHot extrusion 3D food printerNA↑ oil binding capacity (↑ ethyl cellulose).
PEG addition: ↑ overall printability, ↑ plasticity, ↑ viscosity, ↑ storage modulus, ↑ gel strength, ↑ shear thinning behaviour, and ↓ G’ in melting point (45 °C)
[219]
Xanthan gum–CMCZnO-NPsCastingTomatoes
(dipping)
Films: ↑ opacity, ↑ thermal stability, ↓ WVP, ↑ TS, ↓ EB, and ↑ antimicrobial activity
Tomatoes: ↓ WL and ↑ SL
[220]
Chia seed mucilage–bacterial CNFNACoating dispersionStrawberries
(dipping)
↑ TPC, ↑ TFC, ≃ TAC, ↑ Vit C, ↑ antioxidant activity, ↓ PO activity, and ↓ peroxidase enzymes activity[221]
AlginateHydroxyapatite–quercetinNA
Solubilization
Chicken fillets
(dipping, layer by layer)
↓ release rate (compared to free quercetin), ↑ L* preservation, ≃ ΔE, ↓ WHC, ↑ antibacterial activity, ↓ harness increase, ↓ springiness reduction, ↓ gumminess and chewiness decrease, ↓ TVB-N, and ↑ overall acceptability throughout storage time[222]
Alginate, chitosan, and soy protein isolateNACoating dispersionMozzarella cheese
(dipping, enrobing, spraying, and electrostatic spraying)
↓ WL (> chitosan > alginate >soy protein), ≃ hardness, ↓ WL (dipping > enrobing > spray > electrospray), ↓ thickness (spray and electrostatic spray), ↑ homogeneity (dipping and enrobing), and ↑ spreadability (alginate)[144]
AlginateNACoating dispersionMelon
(dipping and vacuum impregnation)
↑ firmness (vacuum impregnation), ↑ weight gain (vacuum impregnation), and ↑ ΔE (vacuum impregnation)[152]
AlginateAloe vera and Frankincense oilCastingGreen capsicums
(wrapped)
Films: ↑ thermal stability, ↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↑ brightness, ↑ yellowness and greenness, ≃ transparency, ↑ UV-shielding, ↓ WVP, and ↓ microorganism growth
Green capsicums: ↓ senescence and ↓ WL
[223]
AlginateBrassica juncea extract and Raphanus sativus sprout extractCasting
(zein-chitosan microparticles containing the extracts)
Tomatoes
(dipping)
Films: ↑ thermal stability, ↑ hydrophobicity, ↓ water absorption, ↓ WCA, ↓ TS, ↑ EB, ↓ WVP, ↑ antibacterial activity, and ↑ antioxidant capacity
Tomatoes: ≃ appearance, ≃ texture, and ↑ SL (30 days)
[224]
AlginateMyrtle, rosemary extract, irradiationCoating dispersionBeef cattle meat
(dipping and packed PP trays)
↓ lipid oxidation, ↑ antioxidant properties, ↓ L*, ↑ redness, ↓ firmness, ≃ pH, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑ SL (6 days)
(most effective treatment: irradiation and coatings with myrtle extract)
[225]
AlginateCitrus sinensis EONanoemulsionTomatoes
(dipping)
↑ whiteness index, ↑ antibacterial activity, ↑ firmness, ↓ WL, ↓ pH increase, and ↑ overall acceptability[75]
Alginate–chitosanFucoidanCoating dispersionRainbow trout fillets
(dipping. Layer-by-layer)
↑ fish quality, ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ TVB-N, ↑ antibacterial activity, ↑ overall acceptability along storage time, and ↑ SL (10 days)[226]
Glucomannan–κ-carrageenanSalmonella enteritidis phage PBSE191Casting
(Hydrogel film)
Chicken meat
(wrapped)
Film: ↑ TS, ↓ EB, ↑ water swelling ratio, ↑ moisture content, ↓ WS, and ↓ WVP
Chicken meat: Salmonella-killing (↓ bacterial growth)
[227]
ι and κ-carrageenan—high and low methoxyl pectinTomato pasteCastingNAred colour films, ↑ WVP, ↓ moisture ↑ weight, ↑ opacity, ↑ strength, ↑ flexibility, ↑ stiffness, and ↑ antioxidant properties[228]
κ-carrageenanDill EO–oxygen absorberCoating dispersionChilled rainbow trout fillets
(dipping)
↓ pH increase, ↓ TVB-N, ↓ conjugated dienes, ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ protein carbonyls, ↓ electric conductivity, ↓ organoleptic deterioration, ↑ antioxidant properties, ↑ antibacterial properties, and ↑ SL (16 days)[229]
Konjac glucomannan–carrageenanCamellia oilCoating dispersionChicken meat
(dipping)
↓ WL, ↓ pH increase, ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ TVB-N, ↑ antibacterial properties, ↑ overall acceptability along storage time, and ↑ SL (10 days)[230]
Tragacanth gum–carrageenanClove EOCastingNA↓ TS, ↓ YM, ↑ EB, ↓ moisture content, ↑ WS, ↓ WVP, ↑ ΔE, ↑ antibacterial properties, and ↑ antioxidant capacity[231]
κ-carrageenanSpent coffee grounds oilCasting
(emulsion)
NA↓ TS, ↑ EB, ↑ WS, and ↑ antioxidant capacity[232]
PullulanAuricularia auricular extractsCastingPotato fresh cut
(dipping)
Films: ↓ transparency, ↑ compactness, ↑ thermal stability, ↑ WVP, ↑ WS, ↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↑ ΔE, ↑ antioxidant properties, and ↑ antimicrobial properties
Potato: ↓ browning index, ↓ microbial growth, ↑ TSS, ↓ WL, and ↑ SL
[89]
Pullulan–gelatinClove EOCasting
(nanoemulsion and pickering emulsion using WPI and inulin)
NA
(release assay in 95% EtOH)
↑ antibacterial properties, ↓ density (NE) and ↑ with emulsion, ↓ moisture content, ↓ WVP, ↓ TS, ↓ EB (NE) and ≃ with emulsion, ↓ ΔE (NE) and ↑ with emulsion, ↑ antioxidant properties, emulsion and ↓ release rate after 72 h[233]
Pullulan–chitosanGalangal EOCastingMango
(dipping)
Films: ↓ WVP, ↑ WS, ↑ TS, ↑ thermal stability
Mangoes: ↓ WL, ↓ firmness decrease, ↑ titratable acidity, and ↓ TSS
[234]
Agar–agarBacteriocin of Lactobacillus sakeiCastingCurd cheese
(covered)
Films: ↓ WVP, ↑ WS, ↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↓ thermal stability, and ↑ antibacterial activity
Cheese: ↓ bacterial growth
[235]
Agar–gelatinAloe vera EOCastingKashar cheese
(wrapped)
Films: ≃ WC, ↓ WS, ↑ antioxidant properties, and ↑ antimicrobial properties
Cheese: ≃ pH and ↓ colour variance
[236]
Levan–pullulan–chitosanε-polylysineCastingStrawberries
(dipping)
Films: ↓ WVP, ↓ oxygen permeability, ↑ WCA, ↓ TS and ↑ EB (↑ levan-pullulan ratio), ↑ opacity, ↑ ΔE, ↓ L*, ↑ moisture content, ↓ WS, and ↑ antimicrobial properties
Strawberries: ↓ WL, ↓ firmness decrease, and ↓ TSS
[86]
Pectin–pullulanGrape seed extractCastingPeanuts
(dipping)
Films: ↓ L*, ↑ ΔE, ↑ UV-blocking properties, ↑ TS, ↓ EB, ≃ WVP, ≃ WCA, ↑ antibacterial properties, ↑ antioxidant properties
Peanuts: ↓ peroxide value, ↓ lipid oxidation, ↑ SL
[237]
Xanthan gumBetel leaf extractCoating nanoemulsionTomatoes
(dipping)
NE: ↑ viscosity (with ↑ xanthan gum), ↑ antimicrobial activity
Tomatoes: ↓ WL, ↓ pH increase, ↓ TSS, ↓ firmness decrease, ↑ Vit C, ↑ TPC, ↑ antioxidant capacity, ↑ overall acceptance along storage time, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑ SL (6 days)
[101]
Persian gum–gelatinThyme EOCasting
(Pickering emulsion)
Barred mackerel fillet
(dipping)
Films: ↓ moisture content, ↓ WVP, ↓ TS, ↓ EB (4% of emulsion), and ↓ opacity (4% of emulsion)
Mackerel: ↓ pH increase, ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ microorganism growth, and ↑ sensory attributes perception
[238]
Guar gumButea menosperma flower extractCastingTomatoes
(dipping)
Films: ↓ TS, ↑ EB, ↓ L*, ↑ ΔE, ↑ thermal stability, and ↑ antioxidant properties
Tomatoes: ↓ firmness reduction, ↓ WL, ↓ TSS, ↓ decay, ↑ acceptability, and ↑ SL
[239]
Alginate–algaroba seed galactomannans/cashew gum–gelatinNACoating dispersionGrapes ‘Italia’
(dipping)
↓ WL, ↓ firmness reduction, ↓ TSS, ≃ L*, ≃ pH, ↑ TPC, and ↑ antioxidant properties
(2% alginate, 0.5% glucomannans, 0.5% cashew gum)
[240]
Kefiran–gelatinZhumeria majdae EOCasting
(nanoemulsion)
Sponge cakes
(packaged)
Films: ↓ WVP, ↓ TS, ↑ EB, ↓ L*, ↑ ΔE, ↑ YI, ↓ light transmission, ↑ opacity, ↑ thermal stability, ↑ antioxidant properties, and ↑ antimicrobial capacity[83]
Chia seed mucilage–bacterial CNFNACoating dispersionStrawberries
(dipping)
≃ TAC, ↑ vit C, ↑ TPC preservation, ↑ antioxidant properties, ↓ PO, ↓ PA, ↓ SOD, and ↓ ALP[221]
Plantago major seed mucilageCitrus limon EOCoating dispersionBuffalo meat
(dipping)
↓ PO (↓ lipid oxidation), ↓ microbial growth, ≃ pH, ↓ moisture reduction, ↓ hardness reduction, ↓ ΔE, and ↑ overall acceptance[241]
Fenugreek seed mucilage–CMCRosemary EOCastingApples
(dipping)
Films: ↓ moisture content, ↑ WVP, ↓ WS, ↓ L*, ↑ ΔE, ↓ light transmission, ↑ transparency, ↓ thermal stability, ↓ TS, ↓ EB, ↑ TPC, and ↑ antibacterial activity
Apples: ↓ ΔE and ↑ SL
[242]
MHEC–brewer’s spent grain arabinoxylansNACastingNA↓ TS, ↑ thermal stability, ↑ hydrophobicity (↑ WCA), ↓ moisture content, ↓ WS, ↑ WVTR, and ↑ antioxidant properties[243]
Brewer spent grain arabinoxylans–CNFFerulic acid or feruloylated arabinoxylo-oligosaccharidesCastingNA↑ UV-blocking properties, ↓ YM, ↓ TS, ≃ EB, ↑ thermal stability, ↑ antioxidant properties, and ↑ antimicrobial activity[244]
ArabinoxylanTea polyphenolCastingGrapes
(dipping)
Films: ↓ light-transmittance, ↑ TS, ↓ EB, ↓ WVTR, and ↑ antioxidant properties
Grapes: ↓ transpiration of water, ↓ WL, ↑ titratable acids, ↑ vit C, ↓ shrivelling rates, and ↓ spoilage
[245]
Water extractable arabinoxylans NACastingCherry and strawberry
(dipping)
Films: ↑ flexibility, ↑ WVP, ↑ thermal stability, ≃ TS, ≃ EB, and ≃ WVP
Fruits: ↓ WL, ↓ colour degradation, ↓ decay, ↓ TSS, ↓ TAC loss, ↓ softening process, ↓ vit C decline, ↓ malondialdehyde content, and ↑ SL
(more effective on cherries)
[246]
Carboxymethylated tamarind seed polysaccharideε-PolylysineCastingGreen Bell Pepper
(dipping)
Films: ↑ WVP, ↓ WCA, ↓ TS, ↓ EB, ↑ antioxidant properties, and ↑ antimicrobial activity
Pepper: ↓ WL, ↓ malondialdehyde content, ↓ hardness decrease, ↓ vit C loss, ↓ nutrients reduction, and ↑ SL
[247]
Tamarind xyloglucan/protein–chitosanNACastingNA↑ thermal stability, ↓ TS, ↑ EB, ↑ MC, ↓ WS, and ↓ swelling degree[248]
Glutenin–tamarind gumMelatonin-pummelo EOCasting
(microemulsion)
White mushroom
(covered)
Films: ↓ thermal stability, ↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↑ OP (just with EO), ↓ WVP, ↑ UV-blocking properties, and ↑ antioxidant properties
Mushroom: ↑ overall acceptability, ↓ respiration rate, ↓ malondialdehyde content, and ↑ SL
[249]
Tamarind xyloglucan–starchLignin nanoparticlesCastingBanana
(dipping)
Films: ↑ TS, ↑ EB, ↓ YM, ↑ WCA, ↓ WVP, ↑ TPC, and ↑ antioxidant properties
Banana: ↑ UV-blocking properties, ↓ WL, and ↓ colour change
[250]
ShellacTannic acidCoating dispersionMangoes
(dipping)
↓ WL, ↓ firmness reduction, ↓ respiration rate, ↓ browning index, ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ TSS, ↑ TPC, ↑ antioxidant properties, ↓ membrane permeability, ↓ enzymatic activity, ↓ vit C loss ↑ volatiles preservation, ↑ antifungal activity, ↑ overall quality, and ↑ SL (10 days) [251]
Shellac–soy protein-starchJuglone from walnut green husk extractCoating dispersionWichita pecans
(smeared)
↓ pure kernel loss, ↓ acid value increase, ↓ fat loss, ↑ PO, ↑ overall taste, ↑ interior brown colour, and ↑ antibacterial activity
(combination of shellac, soy protein, and starch with juglone)
[252]
Zein–shellacCurcuminCastingNA↓ WVP, ≃ WS, ↓ EB, ↑ TS (1, 3% curcumin), ↓ TS (5, 7% curcumin), ↑ WCA, ↓ L*, ↑ ΔE, ↑ YI, ↑ opacity, ↓ thermal stability. Controlled release, pH responsiveness, ↑ antioxidant properties, and ↑ antibacterial properties[253]
ShellacNAElectrospinning(coating on paper to package tomatoes)Coating: ↑ TS, ↓ WVTR, ↓ OP, ↓ oil permeability, ↑ moisture resistance, ↑ paper integrity (↓ roughness, ↑ homogeneity)
Tomatoes: ↓ WL, ↓ citric acid decrease, and ↓ pH increase
[254]
PectinIlex paraguariensis extractCastingNA≃ WVP, ↓ L*, ↑ ΔE, ↑ TPC, ↑ antioxidant properties, ↑ thermal resistance, and ↑ UV blocking properties
(10% extract, 15% sorbitol optimum, compared to control film)
[255]
Pectin–beeswaxSatureja montana, Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Commiphora myrrha EOs, eugenol, geraniol, vanillin, and propolis extractCoating dispersion“Valencia” oranges
(rubbing)
↓ fungal growth, ↓ WL (Commiphora myrrha most effective), ↑ SL, ≃ firmness, and ≃ titratable acidity
Antifungal properties: Vanillin > propolis extract > Satureja montana > Cinnamomum zeylanicum > eugenol > geraniol > Commiphora myrrha
[256]
Low-methoxyl pectinEpigallocatechin gallateLyophilization
(free radical grafting method)
Grapes
(dipping)
Coatings: ↓ thermal stability, ↑ antioxidant properties, and ↑ antibacterial properties
Grapes: ↓ WL, ↑ TPC, ↓ firmness reduction, ↓ polyphenol oxidase activity, ↓ malondialdehyde content, ↓ lipid oxidation ↓ microorganism growth, ↑ wetting, ↑ water adhesion, and ↓ water spreading
[257]
PectinCarvacrol/2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexCastingNAcyclodextrin ↑ carvacrol solubility and stability, ↓ viscosity, ↑ WCA, ↑ thermal stability, and ↑ antifungal activity[258]
Others
NAJaggeryNAApple snacks
(vacuum impregnation and osmotic dehydration; freeze-drying and hot air-drying)
↓ L*, ↑ ΔE ↑ antioxidant capacity, and ≃ TPC Freeze-drying: preserves the antioxidants
Convective hot air drying: ↑antioxidant properties
[151]
NAEnzymes
(polygalacturonase, pectin methylesterase and pectin lyase)
Coating dispersionPumpkin
(vacuum impregnation)
↓ stiffness values, no fracture point, homogeneous texture profile, ↑ antioxidant capacity, and ↓ total and
reducing sugars
[150]
NATurmeric extractNAJasmine white rice kernels
(Top-Spray Fluidized Bed Coating)
Recycling of 80% exhaust air ↓ fissured kernels (<11.8% moisture content) and saved the energy consumption (41.7–46.5%). Coating efficiency 75–86%. Head-wrapped yield 94–95%[259]
NARosemary extractEncapsulation with maltodextrin-gum arabic-WPCMicrocrystalline cellulose cores
(fluidized bed coating)
Coating efficiency: 64.3–79.2. Agglomerates 0.2–47.7. Layering > agglomeration as the main growth mechanism of MCC cores. Retention efficiencies ≃ 70% (except for caffeic acid, ≃ 60%)[159]
a Chitosan–graphene oxide nanofillerNANA
Coating dispersion
PBS
(ultrasonic spray coating, layer-by-layer)
↑ moisture resistance, ↑ mechanical and scratch resistance, ↓ OP, ↓ CO2 permeability, ↓ swelling, and ↓ light transmission[260]
Defatted soybean mealNACasting
(cold plasma treatment with O2-, N2-, air-, He-, and Ar-)
Smoked salmon
(packed)
Ar-treatment: ↑ EB, ↑ TS, ↓ WVP, ↑ L*, and ↑ ink adhesion
(15 min, 400 W)
Salmon: ↓ lipid oxidation, ↓ Hue angle reduction, and ↓ hardness reduction
[261]
a Not edible, but the only scientific paper found that has used ultrasonic spray coating in food packaging. WPC: whey protein concentrate; WPI: whey protein isolate; CMC: carboxymethyl cellulose; CNC: cellulose nanocrystals; CNF: cellulose nanofibers; PVA: polyvinyl alcohol; MHEC: methyl hydroxyethyl cellulose; NP: NP; EO: essential oil. VI: vacuum impregnation; TS: tensile strength; EB: elongation at break; YM: YM; L*: lightness; YI: yellowness index; SL: shelf life; TVB-N: total volatile basic nitrogen; WL: weight loss; TPC: total phenolic content; TFC: total flavonoid content; TAC: total anthocyanin content; WS: water solubility; WCA: water contact angle; WHC: water holding capacity; WVP: water vapour permeability; WVTR: water vapour transmission rate; ΔE: total colour difference; TSS: total soluble solids; PO: polyphenol oxidase; PA: peroxidase activity; SOD: superoxide dismutase activity; ALP: Ammonia-lyase phenylalanine activity.

4. Controlled Release in Active Edible Coatings and Films

Recently, active packaging has attracted great attention as a carrier for controlling the release of bioactive species, such as antimicrobial or antioxidant agents [262]. The controlled release of active agents through food packaging materials is a novel release technology in which the active compound is released in a controlled manner over time, ensuring the desired concentration on the surface of the food, thereby performing its function, maintaining the quality of the food product, and extending its shelf life [263,264]. Among controlled-release packaging types, edible coatings have gained widespread attention [264]. Coating represents a key method for producing controlled-release active packaging, where food products are coated with a thin layer of biopolymers with bioactive-loaded particles [265]. A variety of functionally bioactive compounds can be incorporated into the active films and coatings to be used as active packaging materials and vehicles to deliver key compounds [266], including phenolic compounds, probiotics, and prebiotics [6].
One of the principal factors in the development of controlled-release active packaging is determining the release mechanism [267]. Three types of release mechanisms have been proposed for active packaging systems incorporated directly into food (Figure 2):
  • Diffusion-induced release: volatile bioactive compounds diffuse from the packaging into the food through air or non-direct contact spaces. This mechanism is common in petroleum-based and water-resistant polymers.
  • Swelling-induced release: bioactive compounds are released when moisture-sensitive packaging material, such as polypeptides or polysaccharide-based films, swells, allowing the bioactive compounds to be released by direct contact.
  • Disintegration-induced release: applicable to biodegradable or reactive non-biodegradable polymers where the packaging material partially breaks down releasing the active compounds [263,264,267].
Figure 2. Controlled-release mechanisms of bioactive compounds from edible coatings: (A) illustration of diffusion; (B) swelling; and (C) disintegration processes.
Figure 2. Controlled-release mechanisms of bioactive compounds from edible coatings: (A) illustration of diffusion; (B) swelling; and (C) disintegration processes.
Polymers 17 02472 g002
The diffusion process is the main phenomenon in the release of bioactive compounds from active packaging, generally described by Fick’s second law [267]. The main challenge is to control the rate or kinetics of the release of the active compounds during the shelf life of the food: too slow a release may not provide sufficient bioactive agents at the beginning of storage, while too rapid a release may deplete active agents before the end of shelf life [263,264,265,267].
Mathematical modelling based on Fick’s law, together with the diffusion coefficient (D) and the partition coefficient (K), provides a useful framework to predict and optimize controlled release. These parameters describe how molecules migrate through the packaging material and how they distribute between the polymer matrix and the food or simulant [231]. Food simulants, established by Commission Regulation (EU) No. 10/2011 [268], are often employed to facilitate such studies [269].
However, mathematical models present limitations in real food applications since the release of active compounds is affected by certain conditions, including internal factors (bioactive agents, polymer matrix, and active layer) and external factors (storage and product characteristics) [262,264,267,270,271]. For example, larger bioactive agents have a slower release rate, while polymers with higher porosity or storage at elevated temperatures accelerate release [89,103]. Additionally, the pH of the medium can significantly alter release behaviour, as observed for rosemary essential oil and carvacrol [264,272].
Table 3 shows some examples of controlled release in active edible coatings and films. Pinheiro et al. (2012) [273] investigated and revealed how the spatial position of methylene blue within a κ-carrageenan/chitosan nanolayered coating, as well as the environmental conditions (pH and temperature), significantly affected the release profile, highlighting the importance of these factors in designing controlled-release systems. The study by Mastromatteo et al. (2009) [274] also showed that thymol release from a zein-based film decreased with increasing film thickness, while higher spelt bran content significantly accelerated its release. Arcan et al. (2014) [275] found that the use of fatty acids with different chain lengths in the production of zein blend films affected the release rate of lysozyme and catechin, while changing the number of double bonds in the fatty acids affected only the release rate of catechin.
Table 3. Application of bioactive compounds in controlled release systems using edible polymer matrices, with encapsulation methods, food product or food simulant applications, and observed food effects or controlled-release behaviour.
Table 3. Application of bioactive compounds in controlled release systems using edible polymer matrices, with encapsulation methods, food product or food simulant applications, and observed food effects or controlled-release behaviour.
Bioactive
Compound
Coating
Matrix/
Polymer
Encapsulation/
Controlled-Release Method
Food Product/Food SimulantObserved Effect/BenefitReference
ThymolZeinMono and multilayer filmsDistilled waterThymol release can be controlled by varying the thickness of the layers and the amount of biodegradable fibre[274]
Aroma compounds (methyl-ketones, ethyl-esters, alcohols)ι-carrageenanEmulsified film with lipid globulesNot applicableImproved retention of polar aroma compounds and gradual release over time[276]
Methylene blueΚ-carrageenan and chitosan on polyethylene terephthalateMultilayer nanocoating via layer-by-layer depositionPBS of a certain pH (2.0 or 7.0) and temperature (4 or 37 °C)Controlled and modulable release behaviour, adjustable according to pH, temperature, and incorporation layer[273]
Riboflavin and α-tocopherolWhey protein with gum arabic, low-methoxyl pectin or κ-carrageenanWater-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) microcapsulesHCl solution (pH 1.2); simulated gastric condition (pH 1.2) with 0.1% pepsin; phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4); and simulated intestinal condition (pH 7.4) with 1.0% pancreatinGum arabic showed better control of the liposoluble vitamin (α-tocopherol), while κ-carrageenan showed better control of the water-soluble vitamin (riboflavin).[277]
Lysozyme, catechin, and gallic acidZein–wax compositeAggregated hydrophobic wax particlesFresh Kashar cheeseAll lysozyme-containing films inhibited L. monocytogenes growth for 8 weeks, while films with catechin and gallic acid effectively prevented oxidative changes[278]
Lysozyme and (+)-catechinZein blended with oleic, linoleic, or lauric acids (with lecithin)Microsphere encapsulationWaterThe use of fatty acids with varying chain lengths affected the release rates of both compounds, whereas changes in the number of double bonds influenced only the release of catechin[275]
Rosemary oilMucilageLiposomesFresh-cut bananaThe liposomal oil combined with mucilage inhibited polyphenoloxidase, lipoxygenase activities, fruit softening and weight-loss, and retained higher firmness and soluble solids content[279]
β-caroteneXanthan gumNanocapsules and nanospheres; Korsmeyer–Peppas and Higuchi matrix-type modelsFresh-cut melon (Cucumis melo, var. cantaloupe)Improved β-carotene retention was achieved with minimal changes in whiteness and firmness helping to extend shelf life to 21 days at 4 °C[280]
Folic acidAlginate/chitosanNanolaminated films by the layer-by-layer technique and post-diffusionPhosphate-citrate buffer solutions at pH 3 or 7The release profiles were affected by pH conditions, showing a greater release in small intestine pH conditions where it is supposed to be adsorbed[281]
CurcuminCarboxymethylated filter paperNano metal–organic frameworksPitayasOn day 6, the rotten areas of the cut treated were below 5%, exhibiting a superlong-acting performance[282]
Spent black tea (SBT) extractPectin–sodium caseinate in a cassava starch matrixMicroencapsulationWater and 95% ethanolMicroencapsulation of SBT protected its antioxidants during film processing and significantly enhanced their migration into both simulants[283]
CurcuminChitosanHydrogen bonding interactionsLitchis, strawberries, mangos, and plumsThis coating enabled long-term release (up to 38 days) of natural preservatives on the surface of the fruit, maintaining freshness and appearance at least 9 days longer than uncoated samples[284]
Angelica archangelica essential oilChitosanNanoemulsionGrapes (Vitis vinifera L.)Inhibited the contamination of Botrytis cinerea; preserved weight, acidity, total soluble solids, phenolics, pH, enzymatic antioxidants; reduced respiration rate; and enhanced sensory quality over 30 d of storage[285]
Cinnamon essential oil (CEO)Chitosan/gelatinPickering emulsion50% ethanol and 95% ethanolImproved antimicrobial activity, enhanced thermal and mechanical stability, and exhibited better barrier properties and controlled release of CEO[286]
Thyme essential oilWhey proteinCo-precipitation in β-cyclodextrinWater and ethanol 95%Encapsulation improved volatile retention in the film and enabled gradual release, with slower rates in water compared to 95% ethanol[287]
Thyme essential oilChitosanPickering emulsionStrawberriesThe emulsion effectively prevented weight loss, reduced firmness decline, inhibited pH increase, decreased titratable acidity, and restricted microbial growth[288]
VanillinChitosan2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin; pH-dependent controlled releaseChickenIt extended shelf life and maintained sensory quality by delaying pH increases, preventing the proliferation of microorganisms, and inhibiting lipid oxidation[289]
Thyme essential oilChitosan and carboxymethyl celluloseWater-in-oil nanoemulsionsStrawberriesPotent antimicrobial effect, effectively controlling the growth of Botrytis cinerea and maintaining fruit quality (significantly reduced weight loss, preserved firmness) for 15 days at 4 °C[290]
Whey isolate protein fibre and glycyrrhizic acid (3:1)Sodium alginateTemperature-responsive emulsion systemGrapesMaintained pH, soluble solids, and vitamin C; reduced weight loss by 44.5% at 45 °C after 6 days[291]
ThymolAlginateNanoemulsion and nanostructured lipid carriersCarrotHigher peroxidase activity, total phenolic content, flavonoid content, DPPH radical scavenging activity, pH, and lower respiration rate, total soluble solids, weight loss, and decay, particularly with nanostructured lipid carriers[292]
When conducting experimental tests, it is very important to design them correctly and to consider that the release depends entirely on the compatibility of the bioactive compound and the selected food product or food simulant. However, it was found that most studies focus on the development and physicochemical characterization of active edible coatings and films by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis, zeta potential, particle size, etc., but only a few of them evaluate the release of the active compounds through testing with food simulants or in the foods themselves. For example, Rajapaksha and Shimizu (2021) showed a significantly higher release of antioxidant compounds from spent black tea microcapsule films in water than in 95% ethanol [283]. Fan et al. (2023) [286] evaluated the controlled release of cinnamon essential oil from gelatin/chitosan films stabilized with Pickering emulsion in 50 and 95% ethanol solutions, simulating semi-fatty and fatty foods, respectively. The release rates depended on the concentration of the essential oil in the matrix, showing that adjusting its content makes it possible to modulate the release. In the system with 50% ethanol, the higher amount of water caused swelling and the partial dissolution of the film, weakening the network structure and increasing the release [286]. Edible whey films incorporating thyme essential oil encapsulated in β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes demonstrated a gradual release of volatiles, with significantly higher release rates in 95% ethanol than in water, indicating controlled and matrix-dependent release behaviour relevant to food packaging applications [287]. Some studies have investigated controlled release in the gastrointestinal fluids themselves. Acevedo-Fani et al. (2018) [281] developed edible alginate/chitosan nanolaminates loaded with folic acid, designed for pH-dependent controlled release. Release was tested in simulated gastrointestinal conditions (phosphate–citrate buffers at pH 3 and 7, 37 °C for 7 h) and the nanolaminates exhibited minimal release at acidic pH values and a pronounced release at a neutral pH. These results suggest that the system enables targeted folic acid delivery, protecting it in the stomach and promoting its release in the small intestine, the primary site of absorption. Liu et al. (2013) [277] prepared a film-forming emulsion of polysaccharide and whey protein containing both liposoluble and water-soluble vitamins. Different polysaccharides such as gum arabic, low-methoxyl pectin, and κ-carrageenan showed distinct synergistic effects with whey protein, resulting in different results regarding the controlled-release properties of the vitamins in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Gum arabic showed better control of the liposoluble vitamin (α-tocopherol), while κ-carrageenan showed better control of the water-soluble vitamin (riboflavin).
Table 3 also shows several studies that conducted shelf life studies with real foods coated with active edible coatings or films. As can be seen in the table, most are applied to fresh fruits (such as banana, litchis, strawberry, mango, plum, pitaya, grape, and melon), but there are also studies on other foodstuffs like cheese, chicken, and vegetables. Various natural polysaccharides have been used as polymeric matrices, since they are renewable resources with excellent biocompatible, degradable, and antimicrobial properties [246], with chitosan being the most common. Conventional systems such as liposomes, nanoemulsions, and modified cyclodextrins have been used, as well as more advanced technologies such as Pickering emulsions, metal–organic frameworks, and lipid nanostructures. These techniques allow the release to be tailored to environmental factors such as pH, temperature, or the polarity of the medium. Kinetic models such as Korsmeyer–Peppas and Higuchi have been useful to describe the dynamics of β-carotene release through xanthan gum coatings combined with nanocapsules [280].
In some cases, edible coatings are intended to impart flavour by encapsulating and gradually releasing aromatic compounds, particularly the more polar volatiles that are typically evaluated by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [277]. For example, Marcuzzo et al. (2010) [276] developed edible films based on a ι-carrageenan emulsion that managed to retain volatile compounds during the film formation process and gradually release them over time.
Studies on the release of bioactive compounds from active and edible coatings are still scarce, so it is important to continue researching how the film matrix, the carrier particle, and the type of bioactivity affect this release, as well as to investigate the mechanisms involved and develop mathematical models that enable the description and prediction of the release profile [264].

5. Functional Food Applications

Edible coatings and films are a sustainable and effective method of preserving food and increasing its shelf life by acting as passive barriers that alleviate the need for chemicals, protecting products from moisture, oxidation, mechanical stress, and microbial infestation [293]. As shown in Table 4, numerous studies demonstrate the potential of edible coatings and films not only to extend the shelf life of foods—such as vegetables, fruits, fish, meat, cereals and their derivatives, and dairy products—but also to enrich their content in bioactive compounds, thus improving their functionality and health benefits (functional foods) including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cardioprotective effects; improving gut and immune health; aiding in disease prevention; and enhancing nutrient absorption, among other effects [6,294]. Edible coatings/films may include bioactive compounds transforming food products into “functional” foods, which can be defined as “foods that beneficially affect one or more specific functions of the body, beyond the proper nutritional effects, in a manner that is relevant to improved health and well-being and/or a reduction in disease risk” [294]. Among these compounds, polyphenols stand out due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial functions, which not only help protect food quality but may also confer health benefits after long-term storage. These natural plant-derived molecules can modulate oxidative stress and are associated with a reduced risk of chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis, neurodegenerative diseases, and cardiovascular disease. In addition to polyphenols, other compounds such as vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and prebiotics, among others, may also be incorporated depending on the functional goal of the coating (Table 4) [295,296]. However, due to their chemical and physical properties, many bioactive substances cannot be introduced into the food system in a simple free state [295]. Their inclusion in edible films and coatings is a way to increase their viability and survival during food production processes and to reach the gastrointestinal tract in sufficiently large quantities so that they can be effective [294]. For example, El-Sayed et al. (2021) [297] developed an ecological probiotic edible coating based on chitosan, sodium alginate, and carboxymethylcellulose with probiotic strains (Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lactobacillus casei) to improve the shelf life of ultrafine soft cheese for 45 days, thus achieving a functional product with antimicrobial properties. Semwal et al. (2022) [298] developed a sodium caseinate-based edible probiotic film for wheat buns with chia mucilage as a protectant to improve the viability of probiotic bacteria (Limosilactobacillus fermentum NKN51 and Lactobacillus brevis NKN52) for 3 weeks at 4 °C and 2 weeks at 25 °C.
However, sometimes, after intestinal simulation, the probiotic load decreases sharply due to the change in pH and the presence of different enzymes that can affect the integrity of the coating [294]. In these cases, prebiotics can also increase the viability of probiotics in films [299]. For example, Sáez-Orviz et al. (2020) [294] designed symbiotic bioactive coatings combining lactobionic acid as a prebiotic and Lactobacillus plantarum as a probiotic to produce a novel functional dairy product. The results showed that probiotic levels remained within acceptable ranges after simulated digestion, thanks to the protective effect of lactobionic acid. In another study, Alvarez et al. (2021) developed a new non-dairy probiotic food by adding an alginate-based solution enriched with prebiotics (inulin and oligofructose) and probiotic cultures (Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis), which resist simulated gastrointestinal digestion conditions, to fresh-cut apples [300].
In addition, it is essential to conduct studies that confirm the ability of active compounds to diffuse through coatings and reach the food matrix, as demonstrated by Tampucci et al. (2021) [301] in their research on tyrosol-enriched tomatoes. The authors evaluated a coating based on chitosan, and found that tyrosol, a hydrophilic molecule associated with health benefits, could pass through the tomato peel and infiltrate the pulp, maintaining constant levels for seven days of storage [301].
Edible coatings are also used in combination with osmotic dehydration to develop healthy and sustainable fruit and vegetable snacks with improved properties, as they allow the removal of water without significant nutrient losses, optimizing the texture and physicochemical properties [302].
Although studies on functional food applications are limited, there is considerable interest in the potential of nanocomposite systems as carriers of bioactive compounds to improve edible coatings, enhance the controlled release and dispersibility of bioactives within the food matrix, and increase the overall functionality of food systems [296]. Khatreja & Santhiya (2024) [303] developed an oral disintegrating film (ODF), a convenient and friendly alternative for patients with swallowing difficulties, composed of hyaluronic acid, okra mucilage, suspended vitamin C-loaded bioactive glass nanoparticles, and clove essential oil as a potential functional food. The developed ODF showed antibacterial, antioxidant, and hemocompatible properties. The incorporation of nanoparticles and essential oil improved the thermal and mechanical properties and porous nature of the films, making them useful for treating mouth ulcers, which also alleviates the pain due to the effect of the eugenol in clove oil [303].
Table 4. Recent advances in the use of functional compounds for the development of edible coatings and films materials with food applications, functional properties, and health benefits.
Table 4. Recent advances in the use of functional compounds for the development of edible coatings and films materials with food applications, functional properties, and health benefits.
Functional CompoundCoating/Film MaterialFunctional PropertyFood ProductHealth BenefitReference
Probiotic (Lactobacillus plantarum CIDCA 83114) and prebiotic (fructooligosaccharides)MethylcelluloseSymbiotic delivery increases the viability of probiotics after both 90 days of storage and contact with a simulated gastrointestinal environment, and maintain sensory propertiesApple snacksRegulation of the gastrointestinal tract and prevention of cardiovascular disease and different forms of cancer, among other effects[304]
Lactobacillus casei ShirotaInulin, gelatin and whey proteinProbiotic delivery, stability in low-moisture matrices, and increase in shelf lifeCracker cookiesPreventing various health problems[305]
Iron and ascorbic acidk-Carrageenan or tapioca starchImproves product stability by enhancing ascorbic acid retention and iron bioaccessibility under intestinal conditionsRefrigerated ready-to-eat pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne ex Poiret)Carrying micronutrients[306]
Lytic bacteriophageChitosanAntimicrobial deliveryTomatoesEnhanced microbial safety against Escherichia coli (minimizes foodborne pathogen risk through inactivation and growth inhibition)[307]
Garlic essential oilChitosanIncreases antioxidant properties (synergistic effect), especially as a radical scavengerBeef meatballAntioxidant (anti-diabetic, anti-cancer, and anti-atherosclerotic activities)[308]
Probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus CECT 8361) and prebiotic (inulin and oligofructose)AlginateSynbiotic delivery, improved probiotic viability, antimicrobial activity, antilisterial effectBlueberriesProbiotic carrier with antagonistic activity against fruit-borne pathogens and improvements regarding male fertility[309]
Probiotic (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12) and prebiotic (inulin)Whey protein isolate and alginateSynbiotic delivery and improved probiotic strain viability throughout storage and throughout in vitro gastrointestinal digestionCereal barsAntioxidant properties and supports gut health[310]
Probiotic (Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 9567) and prebiotic (lactobionic acid)Sodium alginateSynbiotic delivery and improved probiotic strain viability after the simulated digestionCottage cheeseImproved health and/or reduces the risk of certain diseases[257]
Prebiotics (oligofructose and inulin) and probiotic cultures (Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis)AlginateSynbiotic delivery; increases the viability of probiotics; antimicrobial activityFresh-cut appleAntioxidant activity; complementary strategy in the management of obesity[300]
Probiotic strains (Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lactobacillus casei)Chitosan, sodium alginate and carboxymethyl celluloseAntimicrobial preservation to extend shelf life and ensure stabilityUF soft cheeseDigestive regulation, stimulating the immune system, lowering cholesterol levels, lactose intolerance, cancer prevention, and cardiovascular diseases[297]
TyrosolChitosanExtends the shelf life and preserves the quality of fresh foodTomatoesAntioxidant, cardioprotective, antitumoral, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties[263]
Probiotic bacteria (Limosilactobacillus fermentum NKN51 and Lactobacillus brevis NKN52)Sodium caseinate and chia mucilageProbiotic delivery, improving their viability and stability on bakery productsWheat bunsGut health support and disease risk reduction[261]
Probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium FM11-2Mucilage of cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica)Probiotic delivery, improving the preservation and shelf life of the productFresh-cut apple slicesAntioxidant activity, potential gut health benefit from probiotic delivery[311]
Probiotic (L. acidophilus) and prebiotic (agave fructans)Sodium alginateSynbiotic delivery, increases the viability of probiotics, improves thermal resistance and increases shelf lifeCorn-based snack (churritos) almasaludReduction in the duration of diarrhea and reduction in body mass index in obese individuals[312]
Seaweed (Pelvetia canaliculate)Alginate and carrageenanReduces oil absorption, minimizes water loss, preserving fish succulence, and prevents fat oxidation during cookingMackerel (Scomber scombrus)Reduction in the intake of saturated and trans fatty acids, preventing cardiovascular diseases[313]
Encapsulated raspberry pomace powderAloe ferox gelIncreasing shelf life while minimizing weight loss and retaining firmnessReady-to-eat pomegranate arilsHigh antioxidant, anti-mutagenic, and antihypertensive properties[314]
In addition to the challenges of ensuring functionality under gastrointestinal conditions, consumer acceptance remains a critical factor. In this context, evaluating sensory attributes such as colour and appearance, odour, and taste is essential to determining the feasibility of incorporating functional ingredients into new food products. For instance, Alvarez et al. (2021) [300] reported that the addition of probiotic strains to a prebiotic–alginate coating negatively affected the product’s sensory quality at the end of storage. Apples containing L. rhamnosus showed browning, off-odours, and a deteriorated appearance after 8 days, with scores below the established acceptability limit. Furthermore, the complexity and variability of food matrices is another challenge to consider in these trials. For example, in the case of apple snacks [304], brushing dry and crunchy snacks with a liquid film-forming solution can soften them and impair their sensory properties. The problem of variability within batches, and even within individual fruits, is an accepted fact in these food matrices [309].

6. Overview on Social and Environmental Impact and Scalability

According to the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) outlined in the 2030 Agenda, edible packaging can contribute to achieving some of them. In particular, Goal 2 (Zero Hunger) and Goal 3 (Good Health and Well-being) may be supported through the use of active edible materials [315]. These materials can extend food shelf life, enhance nutritional profiles by delivering bioactive compounds, and reduce food industry waste by utilizing it as a source of high-value ingredients. This integrated approach supports both food security and public health, while promoting more sustainable production systems.
Nonetheless, edible films and coatings must face a scalability challenge, since they are usually developed at lab scales and their acquisition is limited, leading to high production costs. Additionally, these biopolymers exhibit wide variability in molecular weight, chain branching, and purity in each batch, depending on their origin and extraction protocol [316]. Consequently, this inconsistency affects their brittleness, thermal stability, and barrier or mechanical properties, complicating reproducible processing.
Casting is the methodology most employed in coating/film formulation, and it is not compatible, as are other lab-scale methods, with industrial processes [317]. Many biopolymers cannot tolerate the thermal and shear stress of extrusion, resulting in film thickness variations or adhesion issues. Alternative technologies like electrospraying or electrospinning show lab-scale promise for active coating production, but their low yields and lack of uniformity make industrial upscaling difficult [317]. Other techniques, such as microbial biopolymer production (pullulan or xanthan gum), require specific environmental conditions, which increases operational costs and is vulnerable to contamination. The absence of standardized production protocols and the difficulties of processability and scalability lead to high production costs, challenging the commercializing of innovative packaging [318].
Furthermore, the use of biopolymers is eco-friendly, since their production exhibits lower non-renewable energy use, CO2 emissions, and overall greenhouse gas emissions, compared to conventional plastics and biobased alternatives (PHA, PLA, PBAT, etc.). Nonetheless, environmental concerns are raised when considering their life cycle assessments (LCAs) [319]. Many studies have focused on the most currently employed biobased and biodegradable materials, with little research found on the biopolymers reviewed in the present study [120,204]. Hence, considering bioplastics end of life, recycling (thermomechanical, chemical, and biological) may reduce greenhouse gas emissions, since the potential to replace virgin materials is found to be >80% [320,321]. However, the number of recycling cycles remains inconclusive [322]. On the other hand, landfilling and composting are among the most common disposal or degradation pathways, although none of them are inherently more environmentally favourable than energy recovery, nor the most employed [320,323]. Despite the fact that bioplastics can be landfilled without prior separation or cleaning, this method involves uncontrolled methane emissions, whose energy recoveries do not exceed 20%. Industrial composting was found by some authors to be the pathway with highest negative impact, due to high CO2 and N2O production or soil acidification, which negatively impact seed germination [319,324]. Conversely, anaerobic digestion has been found to be the degradation pathway with the lowest footprint, due to the use of biogas for electricity production [319].
Consequently, bioplastics also lead to environmental impacts, including eutrophication due to biomass cultivation, acidification, or land use change. Therefore, the scalability of the production of active and biodegradable polymers should be assessed in a way that aims to incorporate investigations into their real-world use. Although the production of bioplastics leads to lower energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions, more research and a better understanding of the LCA and end of life of bioplastics must be achieved in order to reduce their environmental impact by achieving a circular economy.

7. Safety and Regulation of Active and Edible Coatings

Edible coatings are subject to regulations that apply to food as they are part of the edible portion of the food product. Thus, the substances used in the preparation of edible coatings must be of food grade. In Europe the components used in the manufacture of edible coatings are mainly constituted by additives which are regulated under the Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on food additives [325] and they are included in the union’s list of food additives published in Commission Regulation (EU) No 1129/2011 [326]. Moreover, they must meet specifications concerning purity as stated in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 [327] and this must be indicated on the label either with the chemical name or the E number.
In the United States the substances used in edible coatings must be classified as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provides an inventory of substances allowed in edible coatings, which fall into the categories “Food additives permitted for direct addition to food for human consumption” and “Secondary direct food additives permitted in food for human consumption”. In addition, other substances including copolymers (e.g., vinyl chloride–vinylidene chloride copolymer), dispersing adjuvants (e.g., polyethylene glycol), film formers (e.g., sodium lauryl sulphate), and adjuvants (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone) are also allowed [7,328,329,330].
Other important aspect that should be considered include the presence of ingredients that are potentially allergenic, which also should be declared in the label [7,328].
Active coatings which are not part of food and are not intended to be consumed together with the food are regulated by Commission Regulation (EC) No 450/2009 on active and intelligent materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. However, it is worth mentioning that active substances that are intentionally added with the purpose of being released into the food and are intended to have a technical effect on the food must meet the requirements of food additive legislation [331].
Regarding bioactive substances, currently plant extracts are being investigated to be incorporated into active coatings, due to, on the one hand, the better acceptance of natural compounds by the consumer and, on the other, the use of natural resources. However, a very limited number of plant extracts (e.g., extracts of rosemary) have been authorized as additives in the EU, which hinders the commercialization of these active systems. Therefore, the regulatory requirements remain a critical issue for their commercialization.

8. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Studies on edible films and coatings are a trending topic in sustainable packaging that enhances food functionality and extends shelf life. Biobased materials from food by-products have emerged as a sustainable alternative, reducing environmental impact while contributing to circular economy strategies. Despite their potential, several challenges remain before these materials can achieve large-scale commercialisation. Their mechanical and barrier properties are still inferior to those of conventional plastics, and thus the incorporation of additives and the use of advanced techniques, such as EHDA or spraying for nano- or micro-structured multilayered coatings, should be further explored. Additionally, the incorporation of bioactive compounds and natural extracts not only improves food safety and quality but also enables the development of nutrient-enriched and functionalized foods. However, regarding the controlled release of pre- and probiotics, nutrients, and bioactives, key parameters such as compatibility, stability during processing and storage, bioactivity, and functionality require deeper investigation. Edible coatings and films are recognized as a safe, renewable, low-cost, and sustainable. However, barriers remain, including consumer acceptance, scalability, and the high costs associated with industrial production (e.g., controlled release nanosystems). Bio-based materials and encapsulation technologies need to become cost-competitive with conventional alternatives. For regulatory approval, compliance with food safety standards, and allergenicity assessment, digestibility and toxicity testing remain critical requirements. Therefore, future efforts should not only focus on technical progress but also address consumer education, regulatory support, the integration of circular economy principles, and cost competitiveness to facilitate broader adoption.
Importantly, this review goes beyond summarizing the general fundamentals of edible coatings and films by focusing on underexplored aspects that can drive future innovation in the field. Particular emphasis is placed on the integration of new biopolymer sources and nanostructured materials to enhance mechanical and barrier properties, the development of controlled release systems for bioactive compounds as an emerging but often overlooked functionality, and the application of edible coatings as carriers of nutrients and bioactives to support the design of functional foods. By consolidating recent advances in these areas and highlighting the existing knowledge gaps, this review provides a roadmap for researchers, industry, and regulators to accelerate the transition of edible coatings and films from experimental development to commercial reality, ultimately contributing to more sustainable and health-oriented food systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.-C. and L.B.-P.; methodology, S.M.-C., L.B.-P. and A.L.-C.; validation, R.S., A.R.B.d.Q. and L.B.-P.; formal analysis, S.M.-C., A.L.-C., A.R.B.d.Q. and L.B.-P.; investigation, S.M.-C., A.L.-C., A.R.B.d.Q. and L.B.-P.; resources, L.B.-P.; data curation, S.M.-C., A.L.-C., A.R.B.d.Q. and L.B.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.-C., A.L.-C., A.R.B.d.Q. and L.B.-P.; writing—review and editing, S.M.-C., A.L.-C., R.S., A.R.B.d.Q. and L.B.-P.; supervision, R.S. and L.B.-P.; project administration, R.S. and L.B.-P.; funding acquisition, R.S. and L.B.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ValICET project that is supported by the PRIMA programme (Partnership for research and innovation in the Mediterranean area, Section 2 Funded Projects 2020, Agri-Food Value Chain) and funded in Spain by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the State Research Agency project PCI2021-121965 (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and by the European Union “NextGenerationEU”/PRTR).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

A.L.-C. is grateful for her Margarita Salas contract funded by the Program for Requalification, International Mobility, and Talent attraction in the Spanish University System (Ministry of Universities of Spain, grant UP2021-042).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dirpan, A.; Fadiah Ainani, A.; Djalal, M. A Review on Biopolymer-Based Biodegradable Film for Food Packaging: Trends over the Last Decade and Future Research. Polymers 2023, 15, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Galus, S.; Arik Kibar, E.A.; Gniewosz, M.; Kraśniewska, K. Novel materials in the preparation of edible films and coatings—A review. Coatings 2020, 10, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hamed, I.; Jakobsen, A.N.; Lerfall, J. Sustainable edible packaging systems based on active compounds from food processing byproducts: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 198–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Díaz-Montes, E.; Castro-Muñoz, R. Edible films and coatings as food-quality preservers: An overview. Foods 2021, 10, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jurić, M.; Bandić, L.M.; Carullo, D.; Jurić, S. Technological advancements in edible coatings: Emerging trends and applications in sustainable food preservation. Food Biosci. 2024, 58, 103835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khin, M.N.; Ahammed, S.; Kamal, M.M.; Saqib, M.N.; Liu, F.; Zhong, F. Investigating next-generation edible packaging: Protein-based films and coatings for delivering active compounds. Food Hydrocoll. Health 2024, 6, 100182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cloete, L.; Picot-Allain, C.; Ramasawmy, B.; Neetoo, H.; Ramful-Baboolall, D.; Emmambux, M.N. Drivers and barriers for commercial uptake of edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables industry-A review. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 3481–3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ahmad, T.; Ismail, A.; Ahmad, S.A.; Khalil, K.A.; Kumar, Y.; Adeyemi, K.D.; Sazili, A.Q. Recent advances on the role of process variables affecting gelatin yield and characteristics with special reference to enzymatic extraction: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 63, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Luo, Q.; Hossen, M.A.; Zeng, Y.; Dai, J.; Li, S.; Qin, W.; Liu, Y. Gelatin-based composite films and their application in food packaging: A review. J. Food Eng. 2022, 313, 110762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moreno, M.A.; Vallejo, A.M.; Ballester, A.R.; Zampini, C.; Isla, M.I.; López-Rubio, A.; Fabra, M.J. Antifungal edible coatings containing Argentinian propolis extract and their application in raspberries. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 107, 105973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kandasamy, S.; Yoo, J.; Yun, J.; Kang, H.-B.; Seol, K.-H.; Kim, H.-W.; Ham, J.-S. Application of Whey Protein-Based Edible Films and Coatings in Food Industries: An Updated Overview. Coatings 2021, 11, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ramos, Ó.L.; Reinas, I.; Silva, S.I.; Fernandes, J.C.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Pereira, R.N.; Vicente, A.A.; Poças, M.F.; Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X. Effect of whey protein purity and glycerol content upon physical properties of edible films manufactured therefrom. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 30, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sajimon, A.; Edakkadan, A.S.; Subhash, A.J.; Ramya, M. Incorporating oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) Essential oil onto whey protein concentrate based edible film towards sustainable active packaging. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 2408–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Maraveas, C. Production of Sustainable and Biodegradable Polymers from Agricultural Waste. Polymers 2020, 12, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dhall, R.K. Advances in edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 435–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lacroix, M.; Vu, K.D. Edible coating and film materials: Proteins. In Innovations in Food Packaging; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 277–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, L.; Ramezan, Y.; Pourramezan, H.; Najafi, A.; Kamkari, A.; Goksen, G.; Huang, A.; Zhang, W. Soy Protein Isolate (SPI)—Based Films/Coatings for Food Packaging: Research Progress on Properties and Applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2025, 24, e70181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, H.; Li, A.; Huang, G.; Jin, X.; Xiao, Y.; Gan, R.Y.; Gao, H. Development of apple pectin/soy protein isolate-based edible films containing punicalagin for strawberry preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 273, 133111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mostafa, H.; Airouyuwaa, J.O.; Hamed, F.; Wang, Y.; Maqsood, S. Structural, mechanical, antioxidant and antibacterial properties of soy protein isolate (SPI)-based edible food packaging films as influenced by nanocellulose (NC) and green extracted phenolic compounds from date palm leaves. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 38, 101124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yousuf, B.; Srivastava, A.K.; Ahmad, S. Application of natural fruit extract and hydrocolloid-based coating to retain quality of fresh-cut melon. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 3647–3658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, F.; Zhang, M.; Tang, W.W.; Wang, Y. Formation and mechanism of superhydrophobic/hydrophobic surfaces made from amphiphiles through droplet-mediated evaporation-induced self-assembly. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 5321–5327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Calva-Estrada, S.J.; Jiménez-Fernández, M.; Lugo-Cervantes, E. Protein-Based Films: Advances in the Development of Biomaterials Applicable to Food Packaging. Food Eng. Rev. 2019, 11, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, J.; Xie, J.; Paximada, E. Electrosprayed zein and quercetin particles: Formation and properties. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2025, 18, 2840–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xia, L.; Li, L.; Xiao, Y.; Xiao, F.; Ji, W.; Pang, M.; Wang, H. Hydrophobic electrospun membrane of peppermint oil loaded zein with coating of methyltriethoxysilane for active packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 144, 109031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, C.; Yao, L.; Zhang, L. Silk sericin-based biomaterials shine in food and pharmaceutical industries. Smart Mater. Med. 2023, 4, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marelli, B.; Brenckle, M.; Kaplan, D.; Omenetto, F.G. Silk Fibroin as Edible Coating for Perishable Food Preservation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jaramillo-Quiceno, N.; Restrepo-Osorio, A. Water—Annealing treatment for edible silk fibroin coatings from fibrous waste. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sharma, S.; Samrat; Goyal, P.; Dhingra, K.; Singh, A.; Sarkar, A.; Poddar, D. Shellac: Bridging the gap between chemistry and sustainability—A comprehensive review of its multifunctional coating applications for food, drug, and paper packaging. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 2024, 61, 691–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Xiao, J.; Fang, Z. Shellac-based films/coatings: Progress, applications and future trends in the field of food packaging. Food Chem. 2025, 467, 142326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Poddar, D.; Srivastava, R.K.; Pattanayek, S.K.; Goel, G. Structure-property relationships in shellac-coated paper: Impact of coating parameters on high-barrier bio-based packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 310, 143172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schniewind, A.P. Consolidation of dry archaeological wood by impregnation with thermoplastic resins. In Archaeological Wood: Properties, Chemistry and Preservation; Advances in Chemistry Series No., 225; Rowell, R.M., Barbour, R.J., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1960; pp. 362–371. [Google Scholar]
  32. Precision FDA. Available online: https://precision.fda.gov/ginas/app/ui/substances/46N107B71O (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  33. Food and Feed Information Portal Database. European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/food-feed-portal/screen/food-additives/search/details/POL-FAD-IMPORT-3276 (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  34. Yao, X.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, H.; Xiao, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhen, H.; Tan, C. Shellac-based delivery systems for food bioactive compounds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 271, 132623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yuan, Y.; He, N.; Xue, Q.; Guo, Q.; Dong, L.; Haruna, M.H.; Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Li, L. Shellac: A promising natural polymer in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Álvarez-Barreto, J.F.; Cevallos-Ureña, A.; Zurita, J.; Pérez, J.; León, M.; Ramírez-Cárdenas, L. Edible coatings of aloe vera gel and carnauba wax microparticles to increase strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) shelf life. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2023, 23, 181–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chalapud, M.C.; Baümler, E.R.; Carelli, A.A. Edible films based on aqueous emulsions of low—Methoxyl pectin with recovered and purified sunflower waxes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 2675–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cha, D.S.; Chinnan, M.S. Biopolymer-based antimicrobial packaging: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hosseini, S.F.; Mousavi, Z.; McClements, D.J. Beeswax: A review on the recent progress in the development of superhydrophobic films/coatings and their applications in fruits preservation. Food Chem. 2023, 424, 136404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. de Oliveira Filho, J.G.; Albiero, B.R.; Calisto, Í.H.; Bertolo, M.R.V.; Oldoni, F.C.A.; Egea, M.B.; Junior, S.B.; Azeredo, H.M.C.; Ferreira, M.D. Bio-nanocomposite edible coatings based on arrowroot starch/cellulose nanocrystals/carnauba wax nanoemulsion containing essential oils to preserve quality and improve shelf life of strawberry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 219, 812–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ruiz-Martínez, J.; Aguirre-Joya, J.A.; Rojas, R.; Vicente, A.; Aguilar-González, M.A.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Alvarez-Perez, O.B.; Torres-León, C.; Aguilar, C.N. Candelilla Wax Edible Coating with Flourensia cernua Bioactives to Prolong the Quality of Tomato Fruits. Foods 2020, 9, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Abhirami, P.; Modupalli, N.; Natarajan, V. Novel postharvest intervention using rice bran wax edible coating for shelf—Life enhancement of Solanum lycopersicum fruit. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kou, S.G.; Peters, L.M.; Mucalo, M.R. Chitosan: A review of sources and preparation methods. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 169, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Melro, E.; Antunes, F.E.; da Silva, G.J.; Cruz, I.; Ramos, P.E.; Carvalho, F.; Alves, L. Chitosan Films in Food Applications. Tuning Film Properties by Changing Acidic Dissolution Conditions. Polymers 2021, 13, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Davoodi, S.; Davachi, S.M.; Ghorbani Golkhajeh, A.; Shekarabi, A.S.; Abbaspourrad, A. Development and characterization of Salvia macrosiphon/Chitosan edible films. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 1487–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yu, D.; Zhao, W.; Dong, J.; Zang, J.; Regenstein, J.M.; Jiang, Q.; Xia, W. Multifunctional bioactive coatings based on water-soluble chitosan with pomegranate peel extract for fish flesh preservation. Food Chem. 2022, 374, 131619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zheng, T.; Tang, P.; Yang, C.; Ran, R.; Li, G. Development of active packaging films based on collagen/gallic acid-grafted chitosan incorporating with ε-polylysine for pork preservation. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 140, 108590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Othman, S.H.; Wane, B.M.; Nordin, N.; Noor Hasnan, N.Z.; Talib, R.A.; Karyadi, J.N.W. Physical, Mechanical, and Water Vapor Barrier Properties of Starch/Cellulose Nanofiber/Thymol Bionanocomposite Films. Polymer 2021, 13, 4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Abral, H.; Pratama, A.B.; Handayani, D.; Mahardika, M.; Aminah, I.; Sandrawati, N.; Sugiarti, E.; Muslimin, A.N.; Sapuan, S.M.; Ilyas, R.A. Antimicrobial Edible Film Prepared from Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibers/Starch/Chitosan for a Food Packaging Alternative. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 2021, 6641284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schirmer, M.; Höchstötter, A.; Jekle, M.; Arendt, E.; Becker, T. Physicochemical and morphological characterization of different starches with variable amylose/amylopectin ratio. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 32, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cano, A.; Jiménez, A.; Cháfer, M.; Gónzalez, C.; Chiralt, A. Effect of amylose: Amylopectin ratio and rice bran addition on starch films properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 111, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kumar, N.; Khan, A.A.; Pyngrope, D.; Alanazi, A.M.; Upadhyay, A.; Shukla, S. Development and characterization of novel starch (mango kernel and litchi seed) based active edible coatings and films using ultrasonication: Effects on postharvest shelf life of Khasi mandarins. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2024, 39, 101610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Heinze, T. Cellulose: Structure and properties. In Cellulose Chemistry and Properties: Fibers, Nanocelluloses and Advanced Materials; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 1–52. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yildirim-yalcin, M.; Tornuk, F.; Toker, O.S. Recent advances in the improvement of carboxymethyl cellulose-based edible films. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ghadermazi, R.; Hamdipour, S.; Sadeghi, K.; Ghadermazi, R.; Khosrowshahi Asl, A. Effect of various additives on the properties of the films and coatings derived from hydroxypropyl methylcellulose—A review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 3363–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Silva, P.M.; Prieto, C.; Lagarón, J.M.; Pastrana, L.M.; Coimbra, M.A.; Vicente, A.A.; Cerqueira, M.A. Food-grade hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based formulations for electrohydrodynamic processing: Part I—Role of solution parameters on fibre and particle production. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 118, 106761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Iqbal, S.Z.; Hussain, M.; Ali, H.; Haider, A.; Ali, S.; Hussain, A.; Javed, M.A.; Jawaid, M. Preparation and application of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose blended with beeswax and essential oil edible coating to enhance the shelf life of sweet cherries. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 272, 132532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mazhari Mousavi, S.M.; Afra, E.; Tajvidi, M.; Bousfield, D.W.; Dehghani-Firouzabadi, M. Cellulose nanofiber/carboxymethyl cellulose blends as an efficient coating to improve the structure and barrier properties of paperboard. Cellulose 2017, 24, 3001–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. He, Y.; Li, H.; Fei, X.; Peng, L. Carboxymethyl cellulose/cellulose nanocrystals immobilized silver nanoparticles as an effective coating to improve barrier and antibacterial properties of paper for food packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 252, 117156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wardak, M.H.; Nkede, F.N.; Van, T.T.; Meng, F.; Tanaka, F.; Tanaka, F. Development of edible films and partial coating, a novel coating technique for tomato fruits, using citric acid-crosslinked starch and cellulose nanofiber. Prog. Org. Coat. 2024, 187, 108127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mahapatra, A.; Dhakane-Lad, J.; Patil, S.; D’Souza, C.; Kumar, M.; Bharimalla, A.K.; Saxena, S. Amelioration of sodium alginate-CNC edible coating with thyme and/or clove essential oil for post-harvest quality of guava. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2024, 18, 5281–5296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Singkhonrat, J.; Ovatlarnporn, C.; Khan, K.U.R.; Basit, A.; Suksuwan, A.; Nalinbenjapun, S.; Sripetthong, S.; Korma, S.A.; Cacciotti, I. Fabrication of different nanocrystal (CNC)-based coatings for the enhancement of shelf life and quality of minimally processed fruits. Cellulose 2023, 30, 11521–11536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bigi, F.; Maurizzi, E.; Haghighi, H.; Siesler, H.W.; Licciardello, F.; Pulvirenti, A. Waste Orange Peels as a Source of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Their Use for the Development of Nanocomposite Films. Foods 2023, 12, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vazquez, A.; Foresti, M.L.; Moran, J.I.; Cyras, V.P. Extraction and production of cellulose nanofibers. In Handbook of Polymer Nanocomposites; Processing, Performance and Application: Volume C: Polymer Nanocomposites of Cellulose Nanoparticles; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 81–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lupașcu, R.E.; Ghica, M.V.; Dinu-Pîrvu, C.-E.; Popa, L.; Velescu, B.Ș.; Arsene, A.L. An Overview Regarding Microbial Aspects of Production and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose. Materials 2022, 15, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Choi, S.M.; Rao, K.M.; Zo, S.M.; Shin, E.J.; Han, S.S. Bacterial Cellulose and Its Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, N.; Zhang, R.; Yang, X.; Lin, D. Bacterial cellulose nanofibers used as nanofillers improved the fresh—Keeping performance of gelatin—Based edible coating for fresh—Cut apples. J. Food Sci. 2023, 88, 4131–4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Izydorczyk, M.S.; Biliaderis, C.G. Cereal arabinoxylans: Advances in structure and physicochemical properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 1995, 28, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. He, H.J.; Qiao, J.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Q.; Ou, X.; Wang, X. Isolation, structural, functional, and bioactive properties of cereal arabinoxylan—A critical review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 15437–15457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zannini, E.; Bravo Núñez, Á.; Sahin, A.W.; Arendt, E.K. Arabinoxylans as Functional Food Ingredients: A Review. Foods 2022, 11, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gao, X.; Pourramezan, H.; Ramezan, Y.; Roy, S.; Zhang, W.; Assadpour, E.; Zou, J.; Jafari, S.M. Application of gums as techno-functional hydrocolloids in meat processing and preservation: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 268, 131614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Eghbaljoo, H.; Sani, I.K.; Sani, M.A.; Rahati, S.; Mansouri, E.; Molaee-Aghaee, E.; Fatourehchi, N.; Kadi, A.; Arab, A.; Sarabandi, K.; et al. Advances in plant gum polysaccharides; Sources, techno-functional properties, and applications in the food industry-A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 2327–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pawar, S.N.; Edgar, K.J. Alginate derivatization: A review of chemistry, properties and applications. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 3279–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Marasinghe, W.N.; Jayathunge, K.G.L.R.; Dassanayake, R.S.; Liyanage, R.; Bandara, P.C.; Rajapaksha, S.M.; Gunathilake, C. Structure, Properties, and Recent Developments in Polysaccharide- and Aliphatic Polyester-Based Packaging—A Review. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Das, S.; Vishakha, K.; Banerjee, S.; Mondal, S.; Ganguli, A. Sodium alginate-based edible coating containing nanoemulsion of Citrus sinensis essential oil eradicates planktonic and sessile cells of food-borne pathogens and increased quality attributes of tomatoes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1770–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tavassoli-Kafrani, E.; Shekarchizadeh, H.; Masoudpour-Behabadi, M. Development of edible films and coatings from alginates and carrageenans. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 360–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, L.; Ni, R.; Shao, Y.; Mao, S. Carrageenan and its applications in drug delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 103, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Roy, S.; Chawla, R.; Santhosh, R.; Thakur, R.; Sarkar, P.; Zhang, W. Agar-based edible films and food packaging application: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 141, 104198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhao, J.; Liu, T.; Xia, K.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X. Preparation and application of edible agar-based composite films modified by cellulose nanocrystals. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 34, 100936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Moradi, Z.; Kalanpour, N. Kefiran, a branched polysaccharide: Preparation, properties and applications: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 223, 115100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ghasemlou, M.; Khodaiyan, F.; Oromiehie, A. Physical, mechanical, barrier, and thermal properties of polyol-plasticized biodegradable edible film made from kefiran. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Motedayen, A.A.; Khodaiyan, F.; Salehi, E.A. Development and characterisation of composite films made of kefiran and starch. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hasheminya, S.M.; Dehghannya, J. Development and characterization of kefiran-gelatin bio-nanocomposites containing Zhumeria majdae essential oil nanoemulsion to use as active food packaging in sponge cakes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Öner, E.T.; Hernández, L.; Combie, J. Review of Levan polysaccharide: From a century of past experiences to future prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 827–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Han, Y. Levan-chitosan blend films: Preparation, structural, physical properties and application in pork packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 217, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gan, L.; Jiang, G.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, S.; Li, X.; Tian, Y.; Peng, B. Development and characterization of levan/pullulan/chitosan edible films enriched with ε-polylysine for active food packaging. Food Chem. 2022, 388, 132989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ghosh, T.; Priyadarshi, R.; de Souza, C.K.; Angioletti, B.L.; Rhim, J.W. Advances in pullulan utilization for sustainable applications in food packaging and preservation: A mini-review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 125, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dewan, M.F.; Islam, M.N. Pullulan—Based Films: Unveiling Its Multifaceted Versatility for Sustainability. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2024, 2024, 2633384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. An, Z.; Yuan, M.; Xu, X.; Huang, Z.; Zhu, L.; Cai, Z.; Shen, Y. Active pullulan-based coatings incorporated with Auricularia auricular extracts for preserving potato fresh-cuts. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2024, 33, 1147–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Vaishnav, A.; Choudhary, D.K. Microbial Polymers: Applications and Ecological Perspectives, 1st ed.; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Debnath, A.; Das, B.; Devi, M.S.; Ram, R.M. Fungal exopolysaccharides: Types, production and application. In Microbial Polymers: Applications and Ecological Perspectives; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 45–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Morales, D.; Rutckeviski, R.; Villalva, M.; Abreu, H.; Soler-Rivas, C.; Santoyo, S.; Iacomini, M.; Smiderle, F.R. Isolation and comparison of α-and β-D-glucans from shiitake mushrooms (Lentinula edodes) with different biological activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Pu, W.; Shen, C.; Wei, B.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y. A comprehensive review of polysaccharide biopolymers for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) from flask to field. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 61, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fariña, J.I.; Sineriz, F.; Molina, O.E.; Perotti, N.I. Isolation and physicochemical characterization of soluble scleroglucan from Sclerotium rolfsii. Rheological properties, molecular weight and conformational characteristics. Carbohydr. Polym. 2001, 44, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Deng, Y.; Huang, Q.; Hu, L.; Liu, T.; Zheng, B.; Lu, D.; Zhou, L. Enhanced exopolysaccharide yield and antioxidant activities of Schizophyllum commune fermented products by the addition of Radix Puerariae. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 38219–38234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hamedi, S.; Shojaosadati, S.A. Preparation of antibacterial ZnO NP-containing schizophyllan/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite for wound dressing. Cellulose 2021, 28, 9269–9282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rahman, H.U.U.; Asghar, W.; Khalid, N. Scleroglucan and Schizophyllan; Polysaccharides of Microbial Origin; Oliveira, J.M., Radhouani, H., Reis, R.L., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mirończuk-Chodakowska, I.; Kujawowicz, K.; Witkowska, A.M. Beta-Glucans from Fungi: Biological and Health-Promoting Potential in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lu, X.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, P. Improved production and antioxidant activity of exopolysaccharides by submerged culture of Lentinula edodes by the addition of lignocellulose. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2022, 134, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cui, H.; Xu, R.; Hu, W.; Li, C.; Abdel-Samie, M.A.; Lin, L. Effect of soy protein isolate nanoparticles loaded with litsea cubeba essential oil on performance of lentinan edible films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Aayush, K.; Sharma, K.; Singh, G.P.; Chiu, I.; Chavan, P.; Shandilya, M.; Roy, S.; Ye, H.; Sharma, S.; Yang, T. Development and characterization of edible and active coating based on xanthan gum nanoemulsion incorporating betel leaf extract for fresh produce preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 270, 132220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Nagar, C.K.; Dash, S.K.; Rayaguru, K. Tamarind seed: Composition, applications, and value addition: A comprehensive review. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e16872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kochumalayil, J.; Sehaqui, H.; Zhou, Q.; Berglund, L.A. Tamarind seed xyloglucan–a thermostable high-performance biopolymer from non-food feedstock. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 4321–4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Raj, V.; Lee, S. State-of-the-art progress on tamarind seed polysaccharide (Tamarindus indica) and its diverse potential applications, a review with insight. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 331, 121847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, C.; Cai, W.D.; Yao, H.; Wu, L.X.; Li, L.; Zhun, J.; Yan, J.K. Conjugation of ferulic acid onto pectin affected the physicochemical, functional and antioxidant properties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 5352–5362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ramachandra Rao Sonale, S.; Pothuvan Kunnummal, S.; Sori, N.; Reddy, J.P.; Khan, M. Low methoxy feruloylated pectin from beetroot: Antioxidant and prebiotic properties. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e17240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Nastasi, J.R.; Kontogiorgos, V.; Daygon, V.D.; Fitzgerald, M.A. Pectin-based films and coatings with plant extracts as natural preservatives: A systematic review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 120, 193–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jaderi, Z.; Tabatabaee Yazdi, F.; Mortazavi, S.A.; Koocheki, A. Effects of glycerol and sorbitol on a novel biodegradable edible film based on Malva sylvestris flower gum. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Vieira, T.M.; Moldão-Martins, M.; Alves, V.D. Design of Chitosan and Alginate Emulsion-Based Formulations for the Production of Monolayer Crosslinked Edible Films and Coatings. Foods 2021, 10, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhou, H.; Yang, N.; Hou, J.; Yu, C.; Jin, Z.; Zeng, P.; Yang, L.; Fu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Guo, S. Effects of CaCl2, HCl, acetic acid or citric acid on dynamic mechanical performances and physicochemical properties of sodium alginate edible films. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 34, 100935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Xu, J.; Xia, R.; Zheng, L.; Yuan, T.; Sun, R. Plasticized hemicelluloses/chitosan-based edible films reinforced by cellulose nanofiber with enhanced mechanical properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 224, 115164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Zhang, M.; Huang, C.; Xie, J.; Shao, Z.; Li, X.; Bian, X.; Xue, B.; Gan, J.; Sun, T. Physical, Mechanical and Biological Properties of Phenolic Acid-Grafted Soluble Soybean Polysaccharide Films. Foods 2022, 11, 3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhang, Y.; Song, W.; Mao, S.; Qian, Y.; Gui, Q.; Du, J. An Antibacterial and Antioxidant Food Packaging Film Based on Amphiphilic Polypeptides-Resveratrol-Chitosan. Small 2024, 21, e2408767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Khalil, R.K.S.; Sharaby, M.R.; Abdelrahim, D.S. Novel active edible food packaging films based entirely on citrus peel wastes. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 134, 107961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Naqash, F.; Masoodi, F.A.; Ayob, O.; Parvez, S. Effect of active pectin edible coatings on the safety and quality of fresh-cut apple. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Prakash, A.; Baskaran, R.; Vadivel, V. Citral nanoemulsion incorporated edible coating to extend the shelf life of fresh cut pineapples. LWT 2020, 118, 108851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Oliveira, C.D.M.; Gomes, B.D.O.; Batista, A.F.P.; Mikcha, J.M.G.; Yamashita, F.; Scapim, M.R.S.; Bergamasco, R.C. Development of sorbic acid microcapsules and application in starch-poly (butylene adipate co-terephthalate) films. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cheng, Y.; Gao, S.; Wang, W.; Hou, H.; Lim, L.T. Low temperature extrusion blown ε-polylysine hydrochloride-loaded starch/gelatin edible antimicrobial films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 278, 118990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Huntrakul, K.; Yoksan, R.; Sane, A.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Effects of pea protein on properties of cassava starch edible films produced by blown-film extrusion for oil packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Plasencia, L.; Arrieta, M.P.; Lazaro-Hdez, C.; Gomez-Caturla, J.; Quiles-Carrillo, L. Innovative development and characterization of thermoplastic zein-based biopolymers for food packaging via injection molding. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 163, 111134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Fang, H.; Zhou, Q.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, S.; Wei, B.; Li, J.; Ji, S. Influence of Combined Edible Coating with Chitosan and Tea Polyphenol on the Quality Deterioration and Health-promoting Compounds in Harvested Broccoli. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2022, 15, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yang, C.; Lee, F.W.; Cheng, Y.J.; Chu, Y.Y.; Chen, C.N.; Kuan, Y.C. Chitosan coating formulated with citric acid and pomelo extract retards pericarp browning and fungal decay to extend shelf life of cold-stored lychee. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 310, 111735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kumar, N.; Neeraj; Pratibha; Trajkovska Petkoska, A. Improved Shelf Life and Quality of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) by Using Chitosan-Pullulan Composite Edible Coating Enriched with Pomegranate Peel Extract. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Whitehead, F.A.; Paramita, V.D.; Teimouri, S.; Young, S.; Kasapis, S. Controlled release of ascorbic acid from genipin-crosslinked gelatin matrices under moving boundary conditions. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 89, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Oliveira, M.A.; Gonzaga, M.L.; Bastos, M.S.; Magalhães, H.C.; Benevides, S.D.; Furtado, R.F.; Zambelli, R.A.; Garruti, D.S. Packaging with cashew gum/gelatin/essential oil for bread: Release potential of the citral. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 23, 100431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chen, N.; Gao, H.X.; He, Q.; Yu, Z.L.; Zeng, W.C. Influence of structure complexity of phenolic compounds on their binding with maize starch. Food Struct. 2022, 33, 100286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hasan, S.M.K.; Ferrentino, G.; Scampicchio, M. Nanoemulsion as advanced edible coatings to preserve the quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Palla, C.A.; Aguilera-Garrido, A.; Carrín, M.E.; Galisteo-González, F.; Gálvez-Ruiz, M.J. Preparation of highly stable oleogel-based nanoemulsions for encapsulation and controlled release of curcumin. Food Chem. 2022, 378, 132132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Xiong, Y.; Li, S.; Warner, R.D.; Fang, Z. Effect of oregano essential oil and resveratrol nanoemulsion loaded pectin edible coating on the preservation of pork loin in modified atmosphere packaging. Food Control 2020, 114, 107226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sneha, K.; Kumar, A. Nanoemulsions: Techniques for the preparation and the recent advances in their food applications. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 76, 102914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Espitia, P.J.P.; Fuenmayor, C.A.; Otoni, C.G. Nanoemulsions: Synthesis, Characterization, and Application in Bio-Based Active Food Packaging. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 264–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Silva, P.M.; Prieto, C.; Andrade, C.C.P.; Lagarón, J.M.; Pastrana, L.M.; Coimbra, M.A.; Vicente, A.A.; Cerqueira, M.A. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based micro- and nanostructures for encapsulation of melanoidins: Effect of electrohydrodynamic processing variables on morphological and physicochemical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 203, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Silva, P.M.; Torres-Giner, S.; Vicente, A.A.; Cerqueira, M.A. Electrohydrodynamic processing for the production of zein-based microstructures and nanostructures. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 56, 101504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Tang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Lan, X.; Huang, D.; Luo, T.; Ji, J.; Mafang, Z.; Miao, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, W. Electrospun Gelatin Nanofibers Encapsulated with Peppermint and Chamomile Essential Oils as Potential Edible Packaging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 2227–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Moreno, M.A.; Orqueda, M.E.; Gómez-Mascaraque, L.G.; Isla, M.I.; López-Rubio, A. Crosslinked electrospun zein-based food packaging coatings containing bioactive chilto fruit extracts. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 95, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Rathore, P.; Schiffman, J.D. Beyond the Single-Nozzle: Coaxial Electrospinning Enables Innovative Nanofiber Chemistries, Geometries, and Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 13, 48–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Rossi-Márquez, G.; Dávalos-Saucedo, C.A.; Mayek-Pérez, N.; Di Pierro, P. Multilayered Edible Coatings to Enhance Some Quality Attributes of Ready-to-Eat Cherimoya (Annona cherimola). Coatings 2023, 13, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Figueroa-Lopez, K.J.; Torres-Giner, S.; Angulo, I.; Pardo-Figuerez, M.; Escuin, J.M.; Bourbon, A.I.; Cabedo, L.; Nevo, Y.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Lagaron, J.M. Development of Active Barrier Multilayer Films Based on Electrospun Antimicrobial Hot-Tack Food Waste Derived Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and Cellulose Nanocrystal Interlayers. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Vitiello, A.; Catanzano, O.; Guida, M.; Scognamiglio, A.; Gallo, A.; Costabile, G.; Ungaro, F.; Miro, A.; Quaglia, F. Harnessing HP-β-CD in zein edible coatings for enhanced sensitive fruits preservation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 367, 123969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Oyom, W.; Xu, H.; Liu, Z.; Long, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Bi, Y.; Tahergorabi, R.; Prusky, D. Effects of modified sweet potato starch edible coating incorporated with cumin essential oil on storage quality of ‘early crisp’. LWT 2022, 53, 112475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Soto-Muñoz, L.; Martínez-Blay, V.; Pérez-Gago, M.B.; Fernández-Catalán, A.; Argente-Sanchis, M.; Palou, L. Starch—Based antifungal edible coatings to control sour rot caused by Geotrichum citri—Aurantii and maintain postharvest quality of ‘Fino’ lemon. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 794–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Gupta, V.; Thakur, R.; Barik, M.; Das, A.B. Effect of high amylose starch-natural deep eutectic solvent based edible coating on quality parameters of strawberry during storage. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 11, 100487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ballesteros, L.F.; Teixeira, J.A.; Cerqueira, M.A. Active Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Edible Coatings for the Extension of Fresh Goldenberries Shelf-Life. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zhong, Y.; Cavender, G.; Zhao, Y. Investigation of different coating application methods on the performance of edible coatings on Mozzarella cheese. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 56, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Shiekh, K.A.; Ngiwngam, K.; Tongdeesoontorn, W. Polysaccharide-Based Active Coatings Incorporated with Bioactive Compounds for Reducing Postharvest Losses of Fresh Fruits. Coatings 2022, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. López-Córdoba, A. Feasibility of Using Carvacrol/Starch Edible Coatings to Improve the Quality of Paipa Cheese. Polymers 2021, 13, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Rajaei Lak, H.; Bazargani-Gilani, B.; Karami, M. Different coating application methods: Zein—Based edible coating containing Heracleum persicum essential oil for Shelf—Life enhancement of Whey—Less cheese. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 5990–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Saleena, P.; Jayashree, E.; Anees, K. A comprehensive review on vacuum impregnation: Mechanism, applications and prospects. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2024, 17, 1434–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Panayampadan, A.S.; Alam, M.S.; Aslam, R.; Kaur, J. Vacuum impregnation process and its potential in modifying sensory, physicochemical and nutritive characteristics of food products. Food Eng. Rev. 2022, 14, 229–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Hernández, S.; Gallego, M.; Verdú, S.; Barat, J.M.; Talens, P.; Grau, R. Physicochemical characterization of texture-modified pumpkin by vacuum enzyme impregnation: Textural, chemical, and image analysis. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2023, 16, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Barrera, C.; Betoret, N.; Seguí, L. Potential of vacuum impregnation and osmotic dehydration techniques in producing jaggery-fortified apple snacks. Sustain. Food Technol. 2024, 2, 1041–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Senturk Parreidt, T.; Schmid, M.; Müller, K. Effect of dipping and vacuum impregnation coating techniques with alginate based coating on physical quality parameters of cantaloupe melon. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Aebi, M. Chocolate panning. In Industrial Chocolate Manufacture and Use; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 285–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Lee, S.Y.; Dangaran, K.L.; Krochta, J.M. Gloss stability of Whey—Protein/plasticizer coating formulations on chocolate surface. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1121–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Lee, S.Y.; Trezza, T.A.; Guinard, J.X.; Krochta, J.M. Whey—Protein—Coated peanuts assessed by sensory evaluation and static headspace gas chromatography. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1212–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Ertural, G.I.; Gunes, R.; Toker, O.S.; Palabiyik, I.; Konar, N.; Sagdic, O. Importance of rheological properties in enrobing efficiency of dark chocolate: Application in wafer products. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 58, 5938–5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Lipin, A.A.; Lipin, A.G. Prediction of coating uniformity in batch fluidized-bed coating process. Particuology 2022, 61, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Lin, S.Y.; Krochta, J.M. Fluidized—Bed system for whey protein film coating of peanuts. J. Food Process Eng. 2006, 29, 532–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Benelli, L.; Oliveira, W.P. Fluidized bed coating of inert cores with a lipid-based system loaded with a polyphenol-rich Rosmarinus officinalis extract. Food Bioprod. Process. 2019, 114, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Coronel-Aguilera, C.P.; San Martín-González, M.F. Encapsulation of spray dried β-carotene emulsion by fluidized bed coating technology. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 62, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Pankaj, S.K.; Bueno-Ferrer, C.; Misra, N.N.; Milosavljević, V.; O’donnell, C.P.; Bourke, P.; Keener, K.M.; Cullen, P.J. Applications of cold plasma technology in food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 35, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Sani, I.K.; Aminoleslami, L.; Mirtalebi, S.S.; Sani, M.A.; Mansouri, E.; Eghbaljoo, H.; Jalil, A.T.; Thanoon, R.D.; Khodei, S.M.; Mohammadi, F.; et al. Cold plasma technology: Applications in improving edible films and food packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 37, 101087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Akhavan-Mahdavi, S.; Mirzazadeh, M.; Alam, Z.; Solaimanimehr, S. The effect of chitosan coating combined with cold plasma on the quality and safety of pistachio during storage. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 4296–4307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Tatar Turan, F.; Kahyaoglu, T. The effect of an ultrasonic spray nozzle on carbohydrate and protein-based coating materials for blueberry extract microencapsulation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Abbas, M.; Buntinx, M.; Deferme, W.; Reddy, N.; Peeters, R. Oxygen Gas and UV Barrier Properties of Nano-ZnO-Coated PET and PHBHHx Materials Fabricated by Ultrasonic Spray-Coating Technique. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kustron, P.; Korzeniowski, M.; Sajbura, A.; Piwowarczyk, T.; Kaczynski, P.; Sokolowski, P. Development of High-Power Ultrasonic System Dedicated to Metal Powder Atomization. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 8984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Bose, S.; Keller, S.S.; Alstrøm, T.S.; Boisen, A.; Almdal, K. Process optimization of ultrasonic spray coating of polymer films. Langmuir 2013, 29, 6911–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Khaire, R.A.; Gogate, P.R. Novel approaches based on ultrasound for spray drying of food and bioactive compounds. Dry. Technol. 2021, 39, 1832–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhao, X.; Wu, J.; Chen, L.; Yang, H. Effect of vacuum impregnated fish gelatin and grape seed extract on metabolite profiles of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fillets during storage. Food Chem. 2019, 293, 418–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Xia, C.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Liu, H.; Xiao, J. Multilayer zein/gelatin films with tunable water barrier property and prolonged antioxidant activity. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 19, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Kanatt, S.R. Irradiation as a tool for modifying tapioca starch and development of an active food packaging film with irradiated starch. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2020, 173, 108873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Gallego, M.; Arnal, M.; Talens, P.; Toldrá, F.; Mora, L. Effect of Gelatin Coating Enriched with Antioxidant Tomato By-Products on the Quality of Pork Meat. Polymers 2020, 12, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Wu, J.; Song, G.; Huang, R.; Yan, Y.; Li, Q.; Guo, X.; Shi, X.; Tian, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, S. Fish gelatin films incorporated with cinnamaldehyde and its sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex and their application in fish preservation. Food Chem. 2023, 418, 135871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Liu, J.; Li, K.; Chen, Y.; Ding, H.; Wu, H.; Gao, Y.; Huang, S.; Wu, H.; Kong, D.; Yang, Z.; et al. Active and smart biomass film containing cinnamon oil and curcumin for meat preservation and freshness indicator. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 133, 107979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Azizah, F.; Nursakti, H.; Ningrum, A. Supriyadi Development of Edible Composite Film from Fish Gelatin–Pectin Incorporated with Lemongrass Essential Oil and Its Application in Chicken Meat. Polymers 2023, 15, 2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Agudelo-Cuartas, C.; Granda-Restrepo, D.; Sobral, P.J.; Hernandez, H.; Castro, W. Characterization of whey protein-based films incorporated with natamycin and nanoemulsion of α-tocopherol. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Dai, X.; Dong, F.; Dong, Z.; Bai, Z.; Mao, L. Enhanced antibacterial and antioxidant activities of chlorogenic acid loaded sweet whey/starch active films for edible food packaging. LWT 2024, 199, 116118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. García-Anaya, M.C.; Sepulveda, D.R.; Rios-Velasco, C.; Acosta-Muñiz, C.H. Incorporation of A511 bacteriophage in a whey protein isolate-based edible coating for the control of Listeria monocytogenes in Cheese. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 37, 101095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Izadi, H.; Zandi, M.; Rafeiee, G.; Bimakr, M. Tomato seed mucilage-whey protein isolate coating enriched with shallot essential oil: Effect on quality changes of the trout fish fillet during cold storage. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2024, 58, 103149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Elahi, R.; Jamshidi, A.; Fallah, A.A. Effect of active composite coating based on nanochitosan-whey protein isolate on the microbial safety of chilled rainbow trout fillets packed with oxygen absorber. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 133756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Vasiliauskaite, A.; Mileriene, J.; Songisepp, E.; Rud, I.; Muizniece-Brasava, S.; Ciprovica, I.; Axelsson, L.; Lutter, L.; Aleksandrovas, E.; Tammsaar, E.; et al. Application of Edible Coating Based on Liquid Acid Whey Protein Concentrate with Indigenous Lactobacillus helveticus for Acid-Curd Cheese Quality Improvement. Foods 2022, 11, 3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Xin, Y.; Yang, C.; Zhang, J.; Xiong, L. Application of Whey Protein-Based Emulsion Coating Treatment in Fresh-Cut Apple Preservation. Foods 2023, 12, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Robalo, J.; Lopes, M.; Cardoso, O.; Sanches Silva, A.; Ramos, F. Efficacy of Whey Protein Film Incorporated with Portuguese Green Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Extract for the Preservation of Latin-Style Fresh Cheese. Foods 2022, 11, 1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Sogut, E. Active whey protein isolate films including bergamot oil emulsion stabilized by nanocellulose. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 23, 100430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Li, T.; Shen, Y.; Chen, H.; Xu, Y.; Wang, D.; Cui, F.; Han, Y.; Li, J. Antibacterial Properties of Coaxial Spinning Membrane of Methyl ferulate/zein and Its Preservation Effect on Sea Bass. Foods 2021, 10, 2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Sun, R.; Li, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; Zhang, D.; Wu, Q. Development of Zein–PEG400/PVA–Chitosan Bilayer Films for Intelligent Packaging. Polymers 2025, 17, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Rahnama, M.; Anvar, S.A.; Ahari, H.; Kazempoor, R. Antibacterial effects of extracted corn zein with garlic Extract—Based nanoemulsion on the shelf life of Vannamei prawn (Litopenaeus vannamei) at refrigerated temperature. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 4969–4990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Pavlátková, L.; Sedlaříková, J.; Pleva, P.; Peer, P.; Uysal-Unalan, I.; Janalíková, M. Bioactive zein/chitosan systems loaded with essential oils for Food—Packaging applications. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 1097–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Mendes-Oliveira, G.; Gu, G.; Luo, Y.; Zografos, A.; Minas, I.; Nou, X. Edible and water-soluble corn zein coating impregnated with nisin for Listeria monocytogenes reduction on nectarines and apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 185, 111811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Zolfaghari, A.; Bazargani-Gilani, B.; Aghajani, N. Edible film based on corn zein containing dill extract and essential oil/β—Cyclodextrin inclusion complex: Shelf life enhancement of common carp fillet. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 4275–4288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Tyagi, V.; Wang, Y.; Bhattacharya, B. Development of ionic liquid plasticized High—Tensile Starch—Protein—Sorghum bran composite films with antimicrobial activity. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, e52442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Bharathi, S.K.V.; Leena, M.M.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Nanofibre-based bilayer biopolymer films: Enhancement of antioxidant activity and potential for food packaging application. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 1477–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Ansarifar, E.; Moradinezhad, F. Preservation of strawberry fruit quality via the use of active packaging with encapsulated thyme essential oil in zein nanofiber film. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 4239–4247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Wei, Y.; Guo, A.; Liu, Z.; Mao, L.; Yuan, F.; Gao, Y.; Mackie, A. Structural design of zein-cellulose nanocrystals core–shell microparticles for delivery of curcumin. Food Chem. 2021, 357, 129849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Cheng, K.; Du, J.; Xu, F.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Bai, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, J. Preparation and characterization of zein-based active packaging films integrated with TiO2 nanotube arrays. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2024, 45, 101348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Ren, M.; Cai, Z.; Chen, L.; Wahia, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhou, C. Preparation of zein/chitosan/eugenol/curcumin active films for blueberry preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 223, 1054–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Wang, K.; Li, W.; Wu, L.; Li, Y.; Li, H. Preparation and characterization of chitosan/dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose composite film loaded with cinnamaldehyde@ zein nanoparticles for active food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 261, 129586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Belyamani, I.; Prochazka, F.; Assezat, G. Production and characterization of sodium caseinate edible films made by blown-film extrusion. J. Food Eng. 2014, 121, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Perez, V.; Felix, M.; Romero, A.; Guerrero, A. Characterization of pea protein-based bioplastics processed by injection moulding. Food Bioprod. Process. 2016, 97, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Xavier, K.M.; Kannuchamy, N.; Balange, A.K.; Chouksey, M.K.; Gudipati, V. Functionality of chitosan in batter formulations for coating of fish sticks: Effect on physicochemical quality. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 169, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Gao, J.; Cui, S.W.; Xia, W. Coating white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) with edible fully deacetylated chitosan incorporated with clove essential oil and kojic acid improves preservation during cold storage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Cao, W.; Yan, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Gao, X.; Yan, H.; Niu, B.; Li, W. Preparation and characterization of catechol-grafted chitosan/gelatin/modified chitosan-AgNP blend films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 247, 116643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Yadav, S.; Mehrotra, G.K.; Dutta, P.K. Chitosan based ZnO nanoparticles loaded gallic-acid films for active food packaging. Food Chem. 2021, 334, 127605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Merino, D.; Bellassi, P.; Paul, U.C.; Morelli, L.; Athanassiou, A. Assessment of chitosan/pectin-rich vegetable waste composites for the active packaging of dry foods. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 139, 108580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Wang, F.; Xie, C.; Ye, R.; Tang, H.; Jiang, L.; Liu, Y. Development of active packaging with chitosan, guar gum and watermelon rind extract: Characterization, application and performance improvement mechanism. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 227, 711–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Wang, F.; Xie, C.; Tang, H.; Hao, W.; Wu, J.; Sun, Y.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, L. Development, characterization and application of intelligent/active packaging of chitosan/chitin nanofibers films containing eggplant anthocyanins. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 139, 108496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Bi, F.; Qin, Y.; Chen, D.; Kan, J.; Liu, J. Development of active packaging films based on chitosan and nano-encapsulated luteolin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 182, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Soares, A.D.S.; Ramos, A.M.; Vieira, É.N.R.; Vanzela, E.S.L.; de Oliveira, P.M.; Paula, D.D.A. Vacuum impregnation of chitosan-based edible coating in minimally processed pumpkin. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 53, 2229–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Farasati Far, B.; Jahanbakhshi, M.; Jameie, L.; Zolfigol, F.; Taromi, P.; Ertas, Y.N. Chitosan-graft-pomegranate extract hydrogel: A dual-functional pad for antibacterial and antioxidant enhancement for shelf life extension in food packaging. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2024, 6, 9545–9558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Silva, O.A.; Pellá, M.C.G.; Friedrich, J.C.; Pellá, M.G.; Beneton, A.G.; Faria, M.G.; Colauto, G.A.L.; Caetano, J.; Simões, M.R.; Dragunski, D.C. Effects of a native cassava starch, chitosan, and gelatin-based edible coating over guavas (Psidium guajava L.). ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Bodana, V.; Swer, T.L.; Kumar, N.; Singh, A.; Samtiya, M.; Sari, T.P.; Babar, O.A. Development and characterization of pomegranate peel extract-functionalized jackfruit seed starch-based edible films and coatings for prolonging the shelf life of white grapes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Bansal, H.; Singh, H.P.; Singh, S.; Sharma, A.; Singh, J.; Kaur, K.; Mehta, S.K. Preserving plum perfection: Buckwheat starch edible coating with xanthan gum and lemongrass essential oil. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 274, 133239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Remya, S.; Sivaraman, G.K.; Joseph, T.C.; Parmar, E.; Sreelakshmi, K.R.; Mohan, C.O.; Ravishankar, C.N. Influence of corn starch based bio-active edible coating containing fumaric acid on the lipid quality and microbial shelf life of silver pomfret fish steaks stored at 4 °C. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 59, 3387–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Ezati, P.; Rhim, J.W.; Molaei, R.; Priyadarshi, R.; Han, S. Cellulose nanofiber-based coating film integrated with nitrogen-functionalized carbon dots for active packaging applications of fresh fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 186, 111845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Lopez-Polo, J.; Soto, A.; Zamorano, M.; Silva-Weiss, A.; Oyarzun-Ampuero, F.A.; Brossard, N.; Fuentes, J.; Osorio, F.A. Effect of the incorporation of liposomes loaded with rutin on the transport properties of edible film produced with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: An in vitro release study. LWT 2024, 191, 115583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Fernández-Cancelo, P.; Giné-Bordonaba, J.; Pérez-Gago, M.B.; Palou, L.; Torres, R.; Echeverria, G.; Teixidó, N. A hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC)-based coating inhibits ethylene-dependent quality changes and reduces superficial scald incidence and blue mould severity during postharvest handling of two apple varieties. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2024, 207, 112610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Liu, M.; Zhang, P.; Wu, Y.; Ouyang, J. Chitosan-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and sodium alginate bilayer edible films for chestnut preservation. Food Chem. 2025, 466, 142254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Atta, O.M.; Manan, S.; Ul-Islam, M.; Ahmed, A.A.Q.; Ullah, M.W.; Yang, G. Development and characterization of plant oil-incorporated carboxymethyl cellulose/bacterial cellulose/glycerol-based antimicrobial edible films for food packaging applications. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5, 973–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Kavimughil, M.; Leena, M.M.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Effect of material composition and 3D printing temperature on hot-melt extrusion of ethyl cellulose based medium chain triglyceride oleogel. J. Food Eng. 2022, 329, 111055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Salama, H.E.; Khattab, M.A.; Sabaa, M.W.; Aziz, M.S.A. Xanthan/carboxymethyl cellulose-based edible coatings enriched with greenly synthesized ZnO-NPs for active packaging applications. Cellulose 2024, 31, 8189–8202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Mousavi, S.R.; Rahmati-Joneidabad, M.; Noshad, M. Effect of chia seed mucilage/bacterial cellulose edible coating on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of strawberries during cold storage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 190, 618–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Malvano, F.; Montone, A.M.I.; Capuano, F.; Colletti, C.; Roveri, N.; Albanese, D.; Capparelli, R. Effects of active alginate edible coating enriched with hydroxyapatite-quercetin complexes during the cold storage of fresh chicken fillets. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 32, 100847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Salama, H.E.; Aziz, M.S.A. Development of active edible coating of alginate and aloe vera enriched with frankincense oil for retarding the senescence of green capsicums. LWT 2021, 145, 111341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Moeini, A.; Salazar, S.A.; Gargiulo, L.; Kentsop, R.A.D.; Mattana, M.; Genga, A.; Jose, C.; Pedram, P.; Cabrera-Barjas, G.; Guerra, S.; et al. Development of alginate-based active edible coating with Brassica juncea and Raphanus sativus sprout extracts to extend tomato shelf-life. Food Hydrocoll. 2026, 170, 111693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Smeti, S.; Tibaoui, S.; Koubaier, H.B.H.; Lakoud, A.; Atti, N. Combined effects of alginate based active edible coatings and irradiation treatment on the quality characteristics of Beef Meat at 2 °C. Appl. Food Res. 2025, 5, 100743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Khorami, F.; Babaei, S.; Valizadeh, S.; Naseri, M.; Golmakani, M.T. Bilayer coatings for extension of the shelf life of fish fillets: Incorporating seaweed sulfated polysaccharides in Chitosan—Alginate LbL structures. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 2511–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Kim, S.; Kim, B.S.; Bai, J.; Chang, Y. Antibacterial κ-carrageenan/konjac glucomannan-based edible hydrogel film containing Salmonella phage PBSE191 and its application in chicken meat. LWT 2023, 180, 114707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Zioga, M.; Tsianaka, K.; Pappas, C.; Evageliou, V. Pection or/and carrageenan edible films in the presence of tomato paste. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 169, 111623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Karimzadeh, Z.; Fallah, A.A.; Dehkordi, S.H.; Shafiei, S.; Ghasemi, M. The active kappa-carrageenan coating and oxygen absorber packaging for the preservation of chilled rainbow trout fillets. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 283, 137572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Zhou, X.; Zong, X.; Zhang, M.; Ge, Q.; Qi, J.; Liang, J.; Xu, X.; Xiong, G. Effect of konjac glucomannan/carrageenan-based edible emulsion coatings with camellia oil on quality and shelf-life of chicken meat. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Tabassum; Babu, A.; Ahmed, H.S.; Naik, T.; Bhumika, K.P.; Jeevan, P.R.; Prabhakar, P.R.; Babu, C.S.V.; Varaprasad, K.; Keshava Murthy, P.S. Development of antibacterial edible films for food packaging using tragacanth gum, carrageenan, and clove essential oil. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2024, 141, e55495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Dordevic, D.; Gablo, N.; Zelenkova, L.; Dordevic, S.; Tremlova, B. Utilization of Spent Coffee Grounds as a Food By-Product to Produce Edible Films Based on κ-Carrageenan with Biodegradable and Active Properties. Foods 2024, 13, 1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Shen, Y.; Ni, Z.J.; Thakur, K.; Zhang, J.G.; Hu, F.; Wei, Z.J. Preparation and characterization of clove essential oil loaded nanoemulsion and pickering emulsion activated pullulan-gelatin based edible film. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 181, 528–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Zhou, W.; He, Y.; Liu, F.; Liao, L.; Huang, X.; Li, R.; Zou, Y.; Zhou, L.; Zou, L.; Liu, Y.; et al. Carboxymethyl chitosan-pullulan edible films enriched with galangal essential oil: Characterization and application in mango preservation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 256, 117579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Contessa, C.R.; de Souza, N.B.; Gonçalo, G.B.; de Moura, C.M.; da Rosa, G.S.; Moraes, C.C. Development of Active Packaging Based on Agar-Agar Incorporated with Bacteriocin of Lactobacillus sakei. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Isık, I.; Yenipazar, H.; Saygun, A.; Sahin Yesilcubuk, N.; Ozkan Zayim, E.; Catalgil Giz, H. Aloe vera oil-added agar gelatin edible films for Kashar cheese packaging. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 18516–18522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Priyadarshi, R.; Riahi, Z.; Rhim, J.W. Antioxidant pectin/pullulan edible coating incorporated with Vitis vinifera grape seed extract for extending the shelf life of peanuts. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 183, 111740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Sayadi, M.; Abedi, E.; Oliyaei, N. Effect of Persian gum-gelatin based-pickering emulsion film loaded with Thyme essential oil on the storage quality of Barred mackerel (Scomberomorus commerrson) fillet. LWT 2025, 215, 117241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Rashid, M.S.; Deshmukh, R.K.; Kumar, P.; Tripathi, S.; Esatbeyoglu, T.; Gaikwad, K.K. Development and characterization of edible films and coatings from Butea monosperma and guar gum for prolonging tomato freshness. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 311, 143958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. de Souza, W.F.C.; de Lucena, F.A.; da Silva, K.G.; Martins, L.P.; de Castro, R.J.S.; Sato, H.H. Influence of edible coatings composed of alginate, galactomannans, cashew gum, and gelatin on the shelf-life of grape cultivar ‘Italia’: Physicochemical and bioactive properties. LWT 2021, 152, 112315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Noshad, M.; Alizadeh Behbahani, B.; Jooyandeh, H.; Rahmati-Joneidabad, M.; Hemmati Kaykha, M.E.; Ghodsi Sheikhjan, M. Utilization of Plantago major seed mucilage containing Citrus limon essential oil as an edible coating to improve Shelf—Life of buffalo meat under refrigeration conditions. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 1625–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Lindi, A.M.; Gorgani, L.; Mohammadi, M.; Hamedi, S.; Darzi, G.N.; Cerruti, P.; Fattahi, E.; Moeini, A. Fenugreek seed mucilage-based active edible films for extending fresh fruit shelf life: Antimicrobial and physicochemical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 269, 132186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Rojas-Lema, S.; Mellinas, C.; Jiménez, A.; Garrigós, M.D.C.; Garcia-Garcia, D.; Balart, R. Enhanced properties of methyl hydroxyethyl cellulose films with arabinoxylans-rich extract from brewer’s spent grain. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2024, 8, 100624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Moreirinha, C.; Vilela, C.; Silva, N.H.; Pinto, R.J.; Almeida, A.; Rocha, M.A.M.; Coelho, E.; Coimbra, M.A.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Freire, C.S. Antioxidant and antimicrobial films based on brewers spent grain arabinoxylans, nanocellulose and feruloylated compounds for active packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 105836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Luo, R.; Peng, Z.; Wu, N.; Zhang, L.; Peng, B.; Shao, R.; Xu, W.; Yang, L. Development of antioxidant arabinoxylan-tea polyphenol composite films for enhanced preservation of fresh grapes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 281, 135867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Bai, Z.; Lan, H.; Li, J.; Geng, M.; Luo, D.; Feng, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Recycling of wheat gluten wastewater: Recovery of arabinoxylan and application of its film in cherry and strawberry preservation. Food Chem. X 2024, 22, 101415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Qiao, J.; Wang, Q.; Liu, K.; Chang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, S.; Yu, Y. Characterization and antioxidant and antibacterial activities of carboxymethylated tamarind seed polysaccharide composite films incorporated with ε-polylysine and their application in fresh-cut green bell pepper preservation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 8805–8816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Ning, R.; Cheng, X.; Lei, F.; Duan, J.; Wang, K.; Jiang, J. Antimicrobial multi-crosslinking tamarind xyloglucan/protein-chitosan coating packaging films with self-recovery and biocompatible properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 134949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Feng, L.; Jiang, X.; Han, J.; Li, L.; Kitazawa, H.; Wang, X.; Guo, Y.; Dong, X.; Liu, H. Properties of an active film based on glutenin/tamarind gum and loaded with binary microemulsion of melatonin/pummelo essential oil and its preservation for Agaricus bisporus. Food Chem. 2023, 429, 136901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Santhosh, R.; Thakur, R.; Sarkar, P.; Janaswamy, S. Active bio-nanocomposites from litchi seed starch, tamarind kernel xyloglucan, and lignin nanoparticles to improve the shelf-life of banana (Musa acuminata). Food Chem. 2025, 463, 141327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Ma, J.; Zhou, Z.; Li, K.; Li, K.; Liu, L.; Zhang, W.; Xu, H.; Tu, X.; Du, L.; Zhang, H. Novel edible coating based on shellac and tannic acid for prolonging postharvest shelf life and improving overall quality of mango. Food Chem. 2021, 354, 129510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Li, W.; Wang, C.; Ye, J. Decolorizing shellac incorporated with natural antibacterial juglone from walnut green husk extract for preserving the postharvest quality of Wichita pecans (Carya illinoinensis [Wangenh.] K. Koch) during storage. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 304, 111313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Han, T.; Chen, W.; Zhong, Q.; Chen, W.; Xu, Y.; Wu, J.; Chen, H. Development and Characterization of an Edible Zein/Shellac Composite Film Loaded with Curcumin. Foods 2023, 12, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Poddar, D.; Pandey, K.; Yoo, H.M. Streamlining electrospun shellac coatings on paper for high moisture strength and barrier food packaging film: Tailoring the processing parameters for accelerated coating. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 297, 139855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Amadeu, C.A.A.; Silva, F.B.; Souza, C.J.F.; Koschevic, M.T.; Schoeninger, V.; Falcão, E.A.; Garcia, V.A.D.S.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Martelli, S.M. Pectin Edible Films Filled with Ilex paraguariensis Concentrate Extract and Its Characterization. Polymers 2024, 16, 3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Alvarez, M.V.; Palou, L.; Taberner, V.; Fernández-Catalán, A.; Argente-Sanchis, M.; Pitta, E.; Pérez-Gago, M.B. Natural Pectin-Based Edible Composite Coatings with Antifungal Properties to Control Green Mold and Reduce Losses of ‘Valencia’ Oranges. Foods 2022, 11, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Huang, X.; Hong, M.; Wang, L.; Meng, Q.; Ke, Q.; Kou, X. Bioadhesive and antibacterial edible coating of EGCG-grafted pectin for improving the quality of grapes during storage. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 136, 108255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Sun, C.; Cao, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Chen, J.; Wu, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Sun, C. Preparation and characterization of pectin-based edible coating agent encapsulating carvacrol/HPβCD inclusion complex for inhibiting fungi. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 125, 107374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Palamanit, A.; Prachayawarakorn, S.; Tungtrakul, P.; Soponronnarit, S. Performance evaluation of top-spray fluidized bed coating for healthy coated rice production. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2016, 9, 1317–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Cabrini, A.; Esfahani, A.G.; Petraconi, A.; Lavorgna, M.; De Nardo, L.; Buonocore, G.G.; Andrade, R.J.E.; Cerruti, P. Ultrasonic spray deposition of PEGDE-crosslinked chitosan/graphene oxide coatings for enhancing gas barrier properties of polybutylene succinate films. Prog. Org. Coat. 2023, 183, 107760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Oh, Y.A.; Roh, S.H.; Min, S.C. Cold plasma treatments for improvement of the applicability of defatted soybean meal-based edible film in food packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 58, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Jafarzadeh, S.; Salehabadi, A.; Nafchi, A.M.; Oladzadabbasabadi, N.; Jafari, S.M. Cheese packaging by edible coatings and biodegradable nanocomposites; improvement in shelf life, physicochemical and sensory properties. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 218–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Almasi, H.; Oskouie, M.J.; Saleh, A. A review on techniques utilized for design of controlled release food active packaging. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 2601–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Xie, Q.; Liu, G.; Zhang, Y. Edible films/coatings containing bioactive ingredients with micro/nano encapsulation: A comprehensive review of their fabrications, formulas, multifunctionality and applications in food packaging. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 5341–5378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Bahrami, A.; Delshadi, R.; Assadpour, E.; Jafari, S.M.; Williams, L. Antimicrobial-loaded nanocarriers for food packaging applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 278, 102140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Zhang, W.; Jiang, H.; Rhim, J.W.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W. Effective strategies of sustained release and retention enhancement of essential oils in active food packaging films/coatings. Food Chem. 2022, 367, 130671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Malekjani, N.; Karimi, R.; Assadpour, E.; Jafari, S.M. Control of release in active packaging/coating for food products; approaches, mechanisms, profiles, and modeling. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 10789–10811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Commission Regulation (EU). No. 10/2011 of 14 January 2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. Off. J. Eur. Communities 2011, 12, 1–132. [Google Scholar]
  269. Chen, X.; Ma, W.; Hu, W.; Liu, Z.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, L. Progress in Release—Activated food packaging films. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2023, 36, 889–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Zhang, L.; Yu, D.; Regenstein, J.M.; Xia, W.; Dong, J. A comprehensive review on natural bioactive films with controlled release characteristics and their applications in foods and pharmaceuticals. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 690–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Wibowo, C.; Salsabila, S.; Muna, A.; Rusliman, D.; Wasisto, H.S. Advanced Biopolymer—Based edible coating technologies for food preservation and packaging. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, e13275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Peltzer, M.A.; Salvay, A.G.; Delgado, J.F.; Wagner, J.R. Use of edible films and coatings for functional foods developments: A review. In Functional Foods Sources, Health Effects and Future Perspectives; Nova Science Publishers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 1–26. ISBN 978-1-53610-477-6. [Google Scholar]
  273. Pinheiro, A.C.; Bourbon, A.I.; Quintas, M.A.; Coimbra, M.A.; Vicente, A.A. Κ-carrageenan/chitosan nanolayered coating for controlled release of a model bioactive compound. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2012, 16, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Mastromatteo, M.; Barbuzzi, G.; Conte, A.; Del Nobile, M.A. Controlled release of thymol from zein based film. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2009, 10, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Arcan, I.; Yemenicioglu, A. Controlled release properties of zein–fatty acid blend films for multiple bioactive compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 8238–8246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Marcuzzo, E.; Sensidoni, A.; Debeaufort, F.; Voilley, A. Encapsulation of aroma compounds in biopolymeric emulsion based edible films to control flavour release. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 80, 984–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Liu, F.; Jiang, Y.; Du, B.; Chai, Z.; Jiao, T.; Zhang, C.; Ren, F.; Leng, X. Design and characterization of controlled-release edible packaging films prepared with synergistic whey-protein polysaccharide complexes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 5824–5833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Ünalan, İ.U.; Arcan, I.; Korel, F.; Yemenicioğlu, A. Application of active zein-based films with controlled release properties to control Listeria monocytogenes growth and lipid oxidation in fresh Kashar cheese. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2013, 20, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Alikhani-Koupaei, M. Liposomal and edible coating as control release delivery systems for essential oils: Comparison of application on storage life of fresh-cut banana. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 2015, 7, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Zambrano-Zaragoza, M.L.; Quintanar-Guerrero, D.; Del Real, A.; Piñon-Segundo, E.; Zambrano-Zaragoza, J.F. The release kinetics of β-carotene nanocapsules/xanthan gum coating and quality changes in fresh-cut melon (cantaloupe). Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 1874–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Acevedo-Fani, A.; Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Martín-Belloso, O. Photo-protection and controlled release of folic acid using edible alginate/chitosan nanolaminates. J. Food Eng. 2018, 229, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Huang, G.; Yan, Y.; Xu, D.; Wu, J.; Xu, C.; Fu, L.; Lin, B. Curcumin-loaded nanoMOFs@ CMFP: A biological preserving paste with antibacterial properties and long-acting, controllable release. Food Chem. 2021, 337, 127987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Rajapaksha, S.W.; Shimizu, N. Development and characterization of functional starch-based films incorporating free or microencapsulated spent black tea extract. Molecules 2021, 26, 3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Huang, G.; Huang, L.; Geng, C.; Lan, T.; Huang, X.; Xu, S.; Shen, Y.; Bian, H. Green and multifunctional chitosan-based conformal coating as a controlled release platform for fruit preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 219, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Das, S.; Chaudhari, A.K.; Singh, V.K.; Dwivedy, A.K.; Dubey, N.K. Angelica archangelica essential oil loaded chitosan nanoemulsion as edible coating for preservation of table grape fruit against Botrytis cinerea contamination and storage quality deterioration. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2023, 205, 112482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Fan, S.; Wang, D.; Wen, X.; Li, X.; Fang, F.; Richel, A.; Xiao, N.; Fauconnier, M.L.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, D. Incorporation of cinnamon essential oil-loaded Pickering emulsion for improving antimicrobial properties and control release of chitosan/gelatin films. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 138, 108438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Lanciu Dorofte, A.; Dima, C.; Ceoromila, A.; Botezatu, A.; Dinica, R.; Bleoanca, I.; Borda, D. Controlled release of β-CD-encapsulated thyme essential oil from whey protein edible packaging. Coatings 2023, 13, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Li, H.; Liu, M.; Han, S.; Hua, S.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Xia, N.; Liu, Y.; Meng, D. Edible chitosan-based Pickering emulsion coatings: Preparation, characteristics, and application in strawberry preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 264, 130672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Chen, P.; Hua, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Lu, X.; Sun, C.; Sun, C.; Huang, L. Preparation and characterization of chitosan based edible coating containing vanillin/HPβCD inclusion complex and its application in chicken preservation. Food Control 2024, 166, 110683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Heidary, L.; Nourbakhsh, H.; Javanmardi, Z.; Saba, M.K. Biopolymer-enhanced nanoemulsions for controlled release of thyme: Impact on strawberry shelf life and quality. J. Agric. Food Res. 2025, 21, 101796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Shi, Y.; Li, B.; Yuan, J.; Qin, Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhong, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, C. Controlled release active films prepared from temperature responded emulsions and their application in grape preservation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2025, 709, 136190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Talesh, A.A.; Amiri, S.; Radi, M.; Hosseinifarahi, M. Effect of nanocomposite alginate-based edible coatings containing thymol-nanoemulsion and/or thymol-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers on the microbial and physicochemical properties of carrot. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 308, 129196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  293. Yaashikaa, P.R.; Kamalesh, R.; Kumar, P.S.; Saravanan, A.; Vijayasri, K.; Rangasamy, G. Recent advances in edible coatings and their application in food packaging. Food Res. Int. 2023, 173, 113366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Sáez-Orviz, S.; Rendueles, M.; Diaz, M. Impact of adding prebiotics and probiotics on the characteristics of edible films and coatings-a review. Food Res. Int. 2023, 164, 112381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Guan, T.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Cui, S.; McClements, D.J.; Wu, X.; Chen, L.; Long, J.; Jiao, A.; Qiu, C.; et al. Preparation, characteristics, and advantages of plant protein-based bioactive molecule delivery systems. Foods 2022, 11, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Pellegrino, M.; Elechi, J.O.G.; Plastina, P.; Loizzo, M.R. Application of Natural Edible Coating to Enhance the Shelf Life of Red Fruits and Their Bioactive Content. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. El-Sayed, H.S.; El-Sayed, S.M.; Mabrouk, A.M.; Nawwar, G.A.; Youssef, A.M. Development of eco-friendly probiotic edible coatings based on chitosan, alginate and carboxymethyl cellulose for improving the shelf life of UF soft cheese. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 1941–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Semwal, A.; Ambatipudi, K.; Navani, N.K. Development and characterization of sodium caseinate based probiotic edible film with chia mucilage as a protectant for the safe delivery of probiotics in functional bakery. Food Hydrocoll. Health 2022, 2, 100065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Paulo, A.F.S.; Baú, T.R.; Ida, E.I.; Shirai, M.A. Edible coatings and films with incorporation of prebiotics—A review. Food Res. Int. 2021, 148, 110629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Alvarez, M.V.; Bambace, M.F.; Quintana, G.; Gomez-Zavaglia, A.; del Rosario Moreira, M. Prebiotic-alginate edible coating on fresh-cut apple as a new carrier for probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. LWT 2021, 137, 110483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Tampucci, S.; Castagna, A.; Monti, D.; Manera, C.; Saccomanni, G.; Chetoni, P.; Zucchetti, E.; Barbagallo, M.; Fazio, L.; Santin, M.; et al. Tyrosol-enriched tomatoes by diffusion across the fruit peel from a chitosan coating: A proposal of functional food. Foods 2021, 10, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Kowalska, H.; Marzec, A.; Domian, E.; Kowalska, J.; Ciurzyńska, A.; Galus, S. Edible coatings as osmotic dehydration pretreatment in Nutrient—Enhanced fruit or vegetable snacks development: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 5641–5674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Khatreja, K.; Santhiya, D. Physicochemical characterization of novel okra mucilage/hyaluronic acid-based oral disintegrating films for functional food applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 134633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Tavera-Quiroz, M.J.; Romano, N.; Mobili, P.; Pinotti, A.; Gómez-Zavaglia, A.; Bertola, N. Green apple baked snacks functionalized with edible coatings of methylcellulose containing Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 16, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. García-Argueta, I.; Quintero-Salazar, B.; Dominguez-Lopez, A.; Gómez-Oliván, L.M.; Díaz-Bandera, D.; Dublán-García, O. Effect of edible coating based on whey, inulin and gelatine with Lactobacillus casei on the textural and sensorial properties of a cracker cookie. J. Prob. Health 2016, 4, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Genevois, C.E.; de Escalada Pla, M.F.; Flores, S.K. Application of edible coatings to improve global quality of fortified pumpkin. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 33, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Amarillas, L.; Lightbourn-Rojas, L.; Angulo-Gaxiola, A.K.; Basilio Heredia, J.; González-Robles, A.; León-Félix, J. The antibacterial effect of Chitosan—Based edible coating incorporated with a lytic bacteriophage against Escherichia coli O157,H7 on the surface of tomatoes. J. Food Saf. 2018, 38, e12571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Ariviani, S.; Kusumawati, M.; Atmaka, W. Chitosan-garlic essential oil incorporation on beef meatball edible coatings as antioxidant-based functional food. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 633, p. 012032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Bambace, M.F.; Alvarez, M.V.; del Rosario Moreira, M. Novel functional blueberries: Fructo-oligosaccharides and probiotic lactobacilli incorporated into alginate edible coatings. Food Res. Int. 2019, 122, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Pereira, J.O.; Soares, J.; Monteiro, M.J.; Amaro, A.; Gomes, A.; Pintado, M. Cereal bars functionalized through Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and inulin incorporated in edible coatings of whey protein isolate or alginate. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 6892–6902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Todhanakasem, T.; Boonchuai, P.; Itsarangkoon Na Ayutthaya, P.; Suwapanich, R.; Hararak, B.; Wu, B.; Young, B.M. Development of bioactive Opuntia ficus-indica edible films containing probiotics as a coating for fresh-cut fruit. Polymers 2022, 14, 5018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Castillo-Escandón, V.; Montfort, G.R.C.; Rubio, A.R.I.; Marszalek, J.E.; Subiría-Cueto, R.; Michel, S.F. Development of healthy synbiotic corn-based snack: Nutritional composition and effect of agave fructan-alginate coating on survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Cereal Sci. 2023, 114, 103777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Freire, C.D.; Antunes, M.; Silva, S.F.; Neves, M.; Tecelão, C. Seaweed Pelvetia canaliculata as a Source of Bioactive Compounds for Application in Fried Pre-Coated Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) Fillets: A Functional Food Approach. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Mbonambi, N.P.; Seke, F.; Mwelase, S.; Fawole, O.A. Improving Quality Management of ‘Ready-to-Eat’ Pomegranate Arils Using Aloe Ferox—Based Edible Coating Enriched With Encapsulated Raspberry Pomace. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025, 13, e70636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  315. United Nation. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  316. Reichert, C.L.; Bugnicourt, E.; Coltelli, M.-B.; Cinelli, P.; Lazzeri, A.; Canesi, I.; Braca, F.; Martínez, B.M.; Alonso, R.; Agostinis, L.; et al. Bio-Based Packaging: Materials, Modifications, Industrial Applications and Sustainability. Polymers 2020, 12, 1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Shah, Y.A.; Bhatia, S.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Khan, T.S. Advancements in the biopolymer films for food packaging applications: A short review. Biotechnol. Sustain. Mater. 2024, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Zhao, X.; Cornish, K.; Vodovotz, Y. Narrowing the gap for bioplastic use in food packaging: An update. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 4712–4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Hermann, B.G.; Debeer, L.; De Wilde, B.; Blok, K.; Patel, M.K. To compost or not to compost: Carbon and energy footprints of biodegradable materials’ waste treatment. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 1159–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Rossi, V.; Cleeve-Edwards, N.; Lundquist, L.; Schenker, U.; Dubois, C.; Humbert, S.; Jolliet, O. Life cycle assessment of end-of-life options for two biodegradable packaging materials: Sound application of the European waste hierarchy. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 86, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Lamberti, F.M.; Ingram, A.; Wood, J. Synergistic Dual Catalytic System and Kinetics for the Alcoholysis of Poly (Lactic Acid). Processes 2021, 9, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Barletta, M.; Aversa, C.; Puopolo, M. Recycling of PLA—Based bioplastics: The role of chain—Extenders in twin—Screw extrusion compounding and cast extrusion of sheets. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 49292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. EPA. United Environmental Protection Agency. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-01/documents/2018_ff_fact_sheet_dec_2020_fnl_508.pdf (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  324. Van Roijen, E.C.; Miller, S.A. A review of bioplastics at end-of-life: Linking experimental biodegradation studies and life cycle impact assessments. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 181, 106236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. European Parliament and of the Council. Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food additives. Off. J. Eur. Union 2008. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/1333/oj/eng (accessed on 9 September 2025).
  326. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1129/2011 of 11 November 2011 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a Union list of food additives. Off. J. Eur. Union 2011. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/1129/oj/eng (accessed on 9 September 2025).
  327. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 of 9 March 2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off. J. Eur. Union 2012. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/231/oj/eng (accessed on 9 September 2025).
  328. Raybaudi-Massilia, R.; Mosqueda-Melgar, J.; Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Martín-Belloso, O. Combinational edible antimicrobial films and coatings. In Antimicrobial Food Packaging; Barros-Velázquez, J., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA; Elsevier Inc: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2016; pp. 633–646. [Google Scholar]
  329. FDA (Food and Drug Administration). CFR Title 21: Foods and Drugs, CFR Part 172: Food Additives Permitted for Direct Addition to Food for Human Consumption CFR, Subpart C: Coatings, Films and Related Substances; National Geodetic Survey; NOAA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-172/subpart-C?toc=1 (accessed on 9 September 2025).
  330. FDA. CFR Title 21: Foods and Drugs, CFR Part 173: Secondary Direct Food Additives Permitted in Food for Human Consumption; National Geodetic Survey; NOAA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm (accessed on 9 September 2025).
  331. European Commission. Commission Regulation 450/2009 of 29 May 2009 on active and intelligent materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/450/oj/eng (accessed on 9 September 2025).
Figure 1. Formulation and application methods of edible biopolymer-based coatings and films for food applications.
Figure 1. Formulation and application methods of edible biopolymer-based coatings and films for food applications.
Polymers 17 02472 g001
Table 1. Examples of industrial commercially available edible coatings and films for food packaging applications from natural resources.
Table 1. Examples of industrial commercially available edible coatings and films for food packaging applications from natural resources.
ManufacturerCommercial Name–Patent NumberSpecificationsApplication
Bio2Coat SL/Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya
(Spain)
Website: https://bio2coat-group.com/ (accessed on 27 August 2025)
No trade nameCoating and film formulation: Mix of biopolymers, natural plasticizers, and bioburdens from food by-products and agrifood-sourced plant-based by-products (e.g., tomato concentrate for rice packaging; cocoa concentrate for packaged rice).
Currently filing patents
Effects: Maintains freshness and preserves firmness and humidity. Antimicrobial properties. Prolongs fruit shelf life by 40% by reducing fruit weight loss by 50%. Suitable for celiacs and allergen-free.
Fruits (spraying, nebulizing)
Poly-natural
(Chile)
Website: https://polynatural.com/ (accessed on 27 August 2025)
Shel-life®Coating formulation: Plant-based coating. Organic oils and extracts from vegetables (not specified).
Effects: Preserves firmness of cold-stored fruit. Reduces dehydration (20–30%). Maintains internal quality avoiding browning.
Fruits (spraying)
Notpla *
(UK)
Website: https://www.notpla.com/ (accessed on 27 August 2025)
Ooho
Patent N: US20200047927A1 (Method of encapsulating liquid products)
Formulation: Algae-based films. Products: containers, trays, bags, sachets, rigid cutlery, energy gel pods, etc.
High-performance barrier to fats and moisture (coating in containers).
Effects: Generally intended to provide edible packaging and substitute plastics and PFAS, depending on final application.
Food products: oil, water…
Other products: laundry, bath oil…
AgroSustain
(Switzerland)
Website: https://www.agrosustain.ch/ (accessed on 27 August 2025)
Afondo®
Patent N: WO 2024/110661 A1 (Edible coating for use as a plant biostimulant)
Coating formulation: o/w microemulsion made with diverse vegetable oils.
Effects: Extends shelf life of crops, replaces post-harvest treatments, waste reduction up to 50%, taste preservation, reduces water loss up to 70%, minimizes plastic packaging use.
Fruits, vegetables, and flowers (spraying, dipping)
LiquidSeal HoldingBV
(The Netherlands)
Website: https://www.liquidseal.nl/ (accessed on 27 August 2025)
Liquidseal®
Patent N: WO 2020/226495 A1 (Edible coating composition for coating fresh harvest products)
Coating formulation: aqueous emulsion.
Effects: Limits infections and cross-contamination. Improves taste and appearance, extends shelf life, maintains product quality, preserves firmness, and reduces weight loss.
Fruits: avocado, citrus, mango, and papaya. Vegetables: cucumbers. Flowers (spraying, dipping)
Mori
(USA)
Website: https://www.mori.com/ (accessed on 27 August 2025)
Mori®Coating formulation: silk protein
Effects: improves quality and extends freshness of food
Perishable food (wherever a food interacts with water) (dipping, spraying, glazing)
Margrey Industrial SA
(Mexico)
No trade name
Patent N: WO 2018/174699 A1 (Wax composition for coating fruit and vegetables)
Coating formulation: emulsion of carnauba wax, shellac, pine resin, etc.
Effects: gives high shine, does not alter organoleptic properties, decreases weight loss, permeable to gas exchange, antifungal activity, improves shelf life.
Fruits and vegetables (fluidization, dipping, spraying or roller impregnation)
Kerry Group Services International Ltd.
(Ireland)
Website: https://www.kerry.com/ (accessed on 27 August 2025)
No trade name
Patent N: US 2011/0014333 A1 (Oil-based coating for baked food products)
Coating formulation: emulsion of soybean salad oil, rosemary extract, oleoresin turmeric, paprika oleoresin, etc.
Effects: reduces rancidity and increases shelf life.
Baked food products (spraying, dipping)
Tomorrow Machine and Eckes Granini
(Sweeden)
Website: https://goneshells.com/ (accessed on 27 August 2025)
GoneShells®Formulation: Potato starch-based bottles.
Currently a prototype
Effects: water-resistant. Bio compostable. General packaging purposes.
Juices
Do eat
(Belgium)
Website: https://www.food.be/companies/do-eat (accessed on 27 August 2025)
No trade nameFormulation: Potato starch. Products: bags, vessels, etc.
Effects: Gluten free and suitable for vegetarians. Neutral flavour. General packaging purposes.
Bakeries, take-away food (chips, bagels.). Convenience food, prepared meals and dishes
Valdís Steinars
(Iceland)
Bioplastic SkinFormulation: gelatine meat by-products.
Effects: General packaging purposes. Transparency is pursued to assess freshness through visual indication.
Meat
Evoware *
(Indonesia)
Website: https://rethink-plastic.com/home/ (accessed on 27 August 2025)
No trade nameFormulation: seaweed, cassava starch, sugarcane bagasse, etc. Ingredients depend on the formulation. Products: bags, sachets, straws, food containers, cups, etc.
Effects: General packaging purposes.
Food and beverages
Caragum
(France)
Website: https://www.caragum.com/en/ (accessed on 27 August 2025)
Fibrecoat®Coating formulation: plant fibre and seaweed extract.
Effects: Reduction in fat absorption in fried breaded products (26.4% reduction in fat content), improves crunchiness, slightly improves the organoleptic properties of fried breaded products
Fried breaded products
(spraying)
* Not all the products developed by the company are edible.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mariño-Cortegoso, S.; Lestido-Cardama, A.; Sendón, R.; Rodríguez Bernaldo de Quirós, A.; Barbosa-Pereira, L. The State of the Art and Innovations in Active and Edible Coatings and Films for Functional Food Applications. Polymers 2025, 17, 2472. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17182472

AMA Style

Mariño-Cortegoso S, Lestido-Cardama A, Sendón R, Rodríguez Bernaldo de Quirós A, Barbosa-Pereira L. The State of the Art and Innovations in Active and Edible Coatings and Films for Functional Food Applications. Polymers. 2025; 17(18):2472. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17182472

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mariño-Cortegoso, Sandra, Antía Lestido-Cardama, Raquel Sendón, Ana Rodríguez Bernaldo de Quirós, and Letricia Barbosa-Pereira. 2025. "The State of the Art and Innovations in Active and Edible Coatings and Films for Functional Food Applications" Polymers 17, no. 18: 2472. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17182472

APA Style

Mariño-Cortegoso, S., Lestido-Cardama, A., Sendón, R., Rodríguez Bernaldo de Quirós, A., & Barbosa-Pereira, L. (2025). The State of the Art and Innovations in Active and Edible Coatings and Films for Functional Food Applications. Polymers, 17(18), 2472. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17182472

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop