Next Article in Journal
Theoretical DFT Analysis of a Polyacrylamide/Amylose Copolymer for the Removal of Cd(II), Hg(II), and Pb(II) from Aqueous Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Superabsorbent Polymer Size on Strength and Shrinkage in Concrete Mixtures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flame Retardance and Antistatic Polybutylene Succinate/Polybutylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate/Magnesium Composite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Modeling of Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 19 Piastow Ave., 70-310 Szczecin, Poland
Polymers 2025, 17(14), 1944; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141944
Submission received: 9 July 2025 / Accepted: 15 July 2025 / Published: 16 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling of Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites)

1. Introduction

The importance of polymer composites (PCs) and nanocomposites (PNs) has increased significantly in recent years due to their enhanced material performance, sustainability and versatile applications [1,2,3,4,5]. These composites are constructed by combining a polymer matrix, reinforcement (e.g., fibers) and filler, most commonly either by introducing a monomer into the system and polymerizing it, or by directly introducing the polymer into the system [6,7]. Natural polymers are also used as a matrix for composites [8]. In addition, natural fibers are applied as reinforcements in PCs as an alternative to synthetic fibers, particularly in terms of improving the mechanical properties of the matrix [9,10,11]. Furthermore, natural fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) show exceptional economic efficiency and are environmentally friendly, making them highly suitable for a wide range of applications [12,13,14].
Recent advancements in the field of PCs and PNs have focused on a number of aspects, including processing techniques, product innovations, surface and color treatments and the investigation of critical properties [15,16,17]. Moreover, research is being carried out on layered hybrid composites with bio-based raw materials in order to provide sustainable alternatives in structural applications with an emphasis on diversifying the sourcing of raw materials [18,19]. To optimize functional characteristics, specific additives are introduced into the composite formulation, which play a key role in enhancing interfacial adhesion, mechanical strength, dimensional stability and resistance to environmental degradation, thus increasing the overall durability and functionality of the material [20,21,22,23,24].
Composite products find a wide range of applications in the automotive, transport, sports, shipbuilding, packaging, medical and engineering industries, among others [25,26]. Advances in polymer composite technology continue to lead to improvements in mechanical performance, biodegradability and recyclability [27,28]. Nanotechnology and fiber modification techniques are being explored to further enhance the strength, thermal stability and fire resistance of composites. All this underlines how important PCs and PNs are today and that their modeling and further extensive research on them is needed. Some of this research is presented in the Special Issue of Polymers entitled “Modeling of Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites”, the introduction to which is this Editorial.

2. Overview of Papers Published in the Special Issue

Umer et al. (Contribution No. 1) documented the feasibility of converting clean and renewable energy sources into electricity through the use of piezoelectric materials. They used a micromechanical study of the effect of adding silica nanoparticles to a polyimide matrix on the piezoelectric–elastic response of piezoelectric fiber-reinforced nanocomposites [29]. It was found that the addition of silica nanoparticles to the polymer improves the elastic and piezoelectric properties of the piezoelectric fiber nanocomposites. At the fiber volume fraction of 60%, the nanocomposite with polyimide filled with 3% silica exhibits a 39% improvement in the transverse Young’s modulus, which is almost a 32% improvement in transverse shear modulus and 37% improvement in the piezoelectric coefficient compared to the composite without nanoparticles. It was also shown that the piezoelectric–elastic properties, described by the above-mentioned piezoelectric constants, can be enhanced with a reduction in the diameter of the nanoparticles.
The second paper by Umer et al. (Contribution No. 2) deals with multifunctional PCs containing micro/nano hybrid reinforcements, which are currently attracting intense attention in the field of materials science and engineering. In the paper, a multi-phase analytical model was developed to study the effective electrical conductivity [30] of PCs with silicon carbide microcarriers and carbon nanoparticles. Before the percolation threshold, it was observed that the addition of nanoparticles with uniform dispersion can improve the electrical conductivity of the PCs tested. It was also shown that the electrical conductivity increases more by reducing the size of the nanoparticles.
Issues related to carbon fiber-reinforced polymer concrete beams for safety design are addressed in the paper by Maidi et al. (Contribution No. 3). It presents the structural response of such beams integrated with rigid frames during seismic events. Multi-scale simulations and parametric analyses were performed to optimize the residual state and global performance. The main parameters considered were tensile and compressive reinforcement, concrete strength, height-to-width ratio, cross-sectional coverage and confinement level, all of which are important for understanding their impact on seismic performance [31]. The results of the parametric analysis highlight the increased ductility and higher load carrying capacity of the tested reinforced beams compared to reinforced concrete beams [32]. This indicates that it is possible to design carbon fiber-reinforced polymer concrete components that could enhance ductile frames with increased energy dissipation and be suitable for use in non-corrosive seismic-resistant buildings.
Marashdeh and Madkhali (Contribution No. 4) considered heavy metal doping as a means of enhancing the radiation protection efficiency of Nigella sativa eumelanin polymers. The herbal polymer was doped with iron (Fe), copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) and it was examined how this doping affects the gamma ray shielding properties of the polymer. The doping of eumelanin polymers with the aforementioned components has been shown to be particularly effective in enhancing gamma ray protection at low energies, with Cu providing the most significant overall improvement, making these composites suitable for applications requiring enhanced radiation protection at lower gamma ray energies [33,34].
To improve the thermal and electrical properties of organic electronics, one potential research area is the study of composite layers that combine semiconducting organic polymers with inorganic nanoparticles, namely gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). One such promising composite system is based on two semiconducting polymers, PDPP4T and PCPDTBT, which are known for their small optical band gaps and high charge carrier mobility, making them ideal candidates for organic solar cells [35]. The inclusion of AuNPs in the blends of these polymers offers a unique opportunity to explore how nanoparticles affect the thermal transformations in these materials, ultimately affecting material properties and device performance. With this in mind, Jarka et al. (Contribution No. 5) used variable temperature ellipsometry [36] to examine thermal transitions in PDPP4T/PCPDTBT/AuNPs composite layers. They made their conclusions based on the developed phase diagram [37] for the PDPP4T/PCPDTBT blend using variable temperature spectroscopic ellipsometry with differential scanning calorimetry serving as a reference technique. The incorporation of AuNPs was evaluated to significantly affect the thermal stability and crystallization of the material, which is essential for organic field-effect transistor applications.
Understanding the structural dynamics of semiflexible polymers in an implicit solvent under different conditions provides valuable insights into their behavior in diverse environments. For this reason, Williams and Gray (Contribution No. 6) investigated the effect of the angular width of the bending potential on structural state behavior and conformational variation using microcanonical analysis [38]. A range of angular widths was considered, with the widest value corresponding directly to the classical semiflexible polymer model [39]. It was shown that as angular width decreases, structural variability within states decreases, structural state overlap decreases and conformations become more stable, leading to an expansion of the parameter space dominated by individual structures.
It is well known that adding carbon and glass fibers to polymer matrices improves their properties such as strength, stiffness and impact resistance. However, most of the existing research on the effects of these additives mostly concerns the study of single factors—such as fiber orientation, filling pattern or interlayer adhesion—without fully considering the interaction of these parameters in practical load-bearing applications. Furthermore, the intrinsic anisotropy of parts produced by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) [40], compounded by inconsistencies in layer bonding and fiber deposition, increases the complexity of predicting their mechanical properties. To address these challenges, Nemes et al. (Contribution No. 7) conducted a comprehensive, full-field deformation and damage analysis of carbon and glass fiber-reinforced 3D printing filaments based on Polylactic Acid (PLA) and Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol (PETG) [41]. The effects of printing parameters—including infill pattern, density and structure orientation—were investigated under both bending and compressive loading. The study found that although carbon and glass composites provide a more stable structure, their mechanical properties are generally inferior to PLA and PETG. These materials are less sensitive to changes in fill pattern and fill factor, so their strength is more uniform across different printing settings. Tests showed that the carbon and glass fiber PLA filaments behaved similarly, but in terms of both tolerable force and achievable deformation, the carbon fiber PLA filament performed slightly better. If bending is the expected stress for the structure, it is better to use a basic PLA material, which showed better results than fiber-reinforced filaments. Carbon fiber PLA and glass fiber PLA filaments have also been shown to perform better with mesh infill patterns and lower infill densities. This can be of practical importance when a low infill density has to be chosen (to optimize weight) [42] and when bending stresses are expected. According to tests, the optimum infill value for these materials is between 20 and 30%, so it was suggested that for load-bearing components there is no reason to use a higher infill.
The growing demand for fully recyclable composites has spurred extensive research into thermoplastics, valued for their recyclability and excellent mechanical properties. Recently, thermoplastic polymer blends have gained attention for their enhanced recyclability and sustainability, as well as their ability to improve thermal stability, viscosity and manufacturability. However, limited data are available on the mechanical characterization of composites that incorporate these blends, particularly for thermoplastic recycling. To expand on this knowledge, Hao et al. (Contribution No. 8) investigated the stress–strain behavior of the following three polymer blends relevant to structural applications: PES/PEEK, PPS/PEEK and HDPE/PP. They then performed numerical analysis to predict the mechanical properties of unidirectional FRCs using each of these blends as a matrix. Representative Volume Element-based simulations [43,44] were used for this purpose. Finally, the suitability of the blends tested to produce fully matrix-recycled composites was critically evaluated. This has provided valuable preliminary insight into the mechanical viability and sustainability benefits of using recycled thermoplastic blends as matrices for unidirectional FRCs.
The effect of resin composition on the photopolymerization of zirconia ceramics produced by digital light processing [45] using additive manufacturing (AM) was studied by Kuang et al. (Contribution No. 9). An oligomer was considered as an additive to the photosensitive resin. The dependence of the content of this additive on the viscosity and curing properties of ceramic suspensions was investigated. The results demonstrated that the introduction of oligomers is conducive to enhancing the cross-linking density and reducing defects. Furthermore, zirconia ceramics fabricated by photopolymerization with oligomer photosensitive resin have been shown to exhibit excellent mechanical properties, greatly expanding the potential applications of high-performance zirconia ceramic components using AM.
Rachtanapun et al. (Contribution No. 10) successfully developed antistatic and anti-flammable biodegradable PCs by melt-blending polybutylene succinate with epoxy resin, polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate and MgO particles. The addition of MgO improved the thermal decomposition behavior and water resistance of the blends, which could be attributed to the high thermal stability and hydrophobicity of the metal particles. The produced PCs showed an improvement in the V-1 rating [46] of flame retardancy, indicating an enhancement in the flame retardancy of biodegradable composite films. MgO served as a flame retardant, increasing the strength of the residual charcoal from the cross-linked matrix. The antistatic properties of the composites were improved using both plasma technology and the sparking process [47]. The antistatic effect of the plasma sputtering process was found to be better than that of the sparking process, as the sputtering method increased the uniform dispersion of metal nanoparticles on the composite surface. The resulting antistatic and anti-flammable biodegradable PCs with improved properties have potential for use in packaging, electronics and automotive applications.

3. Conclusions

The collective contributions to this Special Issue reflect a comprehensive and future-oriented exploration of sustainable practices and innovative technologies in the field of polymer composite and nanocomposite materials and products. The following conclusions can be drawn from the content presented in the papers covered in this Special Issue:
  • The introduction of suitable nanoparticles or dopants into polymer composites leads to improved piezoelectric properties and increased electrical conductivity efficiency, but also, for example, to effectively increase protection against gamma radiation at low energies.
  • The application of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer concrete offers hope for the possibility of designing ductile frames with enhanced energy dissipation, suitable for use in non-corrosive seismic-resistant buildings.
  • Adding carbon and glass fibers to polymer matrices used in 3D printing can improve their properties such as strength, stiffness and impact resistance.
  • Thermoplastic polymer blends are gaining attention for their increased recyclability and sustainability, as well as their ability to improve thermal stability or even flame retardancy and broad manufacturing capabilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this paper:
AMAdditive manufacturing
AuNPsGold nanoparticles
FDMFused Deposition Modeling
FRCsFiber-reinforced composites
PCsPolymer composites
PETGPolyethylene Terephthalate Glycol
PLAPolylactic Acid
PNsPolymer nanocomposites

List of Contributions

  • Umer, U.; Abidi, M.H.; Mian, S.H.; Alasim, F.; Aboudaif, M.K. Effects of silica nanoparticles on the piezoelectro-elastic response of PZT-7A–polyimide nanocomposites: Micromechanics modeling technique. Polymers 2024, 16, 2860. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16202860.
  • Umer, U.; Abidi, M.H.; Almutairi, Z.; Aboudaif, M.K. A multi-phase analytical model for effective electrical conductivity of polymer matrix composites containing micro-SiC whiskers and nano-carbon black hybrids. Polymers 2025, 17, 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17020128.
  • Maidi, M.; Sherzer, G.L.; Gal, E. Multiscale numerical study of enhanced ductility ratios and capacity in carbon fiber-reinforced polymer concrete beams for safety design. Polymers 2025, 17, 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17020234.
  • Marashdeh, M.; Madkhali, N. Enhancing radiation shielding efficiency of Nigella sativa eumelanin polymer through heavy metals doping. Polymers 2025, 17, 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17050609.
  • Jarka, P.; Hajduk, B.; Kumari, P.; Janeczek, H.; Godzierz, M.; Tsekpo, Y.M.; Tański, T. Investigations on thermal transitions in PDPP4T/PCPDTBT/AuNPs composite films using variable temperature ellipsometry. Polymers 2025, 17, 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17050704.
  • Williams, M.J.; Gray, M.C. Microcanonical analysis of semiflexible homopolymers with variable-width bending potential. Polymers 2025, 17, 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070906.
  • Nemes, V.; Szalai, S.; Szívós, B.F.; Sysyn, M.; Kurhan, D.; Fischer, S. Deformation characterization of glass fiber and carbon fiber-reinforced 3D printing filaments using digital image correlation. Polymers 2025, 17, 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070934.
  • Hao, P.; Tang, N.; Tiscar, J.M.; Gilabert, F.A. Untapped potential of recycled thermoplastic blends in UD composites via finite element analysis. Polymers 2025, 17, 1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17091168.
  • Kuang, N.; Qi, H.; Zhao, W.; Wu, J. Influence of resin composition on photopolymerization of zirconia ceramics fabricated by digital light processing additive manufacturing. Polymers 2025, 17, 1354. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17101354.
  • Rachtanapun, P.; Suhr, J.; Oh, E.; Thajai, N.; Kanthiya, T.; Kiattipornpithak, K.; Kaewapai, K.; Photphroet, S.; Worajittiphon, P.; Tanadchangsaeng, N.; Wattanachai, P.; Jantanasakulwong, K.; Sawangrat, C. Flame retardance and antistatic polybutylene succinate/polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate/magnesium composite. Polymers 2025, 17, 1675. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17121675.

References

  1. Gopinath, K.P.; Rajagopal, M.; Krishnan, A.; Sreerama, S.K. A review on recent trends in nanomaterials and nanocomposites for environmental applications. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2021, 17, 202–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Toboła, W.; Papis, M.; Jastrzębski, D.; Perz, R. Experimental research of energy absorbing structures within helmet samples made with the additive manufacturing method—Preliminary study. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 2023, 25, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Balakrishnan, T.S.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Shahar, F.S.; Basri, A.A.; Shah, A.U.M.; Sebaey, T.A.; Łukaszewicz, A.; Józwik, J.; Grzejda, R. Fatigue and impact properties of kenaf/glass-reinforced hybrid pultruded composites for structural applications. Materials 2024, 17, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Puchała, K.; Moneta, G.; Lichoń, D.; Grzejda, R.; Bednarz, A.; Mielniczek, W.; Łopatka, M.; Szymczyk, E.; Ignatovych, S.; Mykhailyshyn, R. Aerial medical platform for soldiers and civils evacuation—Concept, implementation plan and assessment of adaptation possibility of existing technologies. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2025, 19, 28–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nowakowski, M.; Kosiuczenko, K.; Viliš, J. Unmanned vehicle mobility improvement against ballistic threats during special missions: A simulation study. Transp. Probl. 2025, 20, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wysmulski, P.; Teter, A.; Debski, H. Effect of load eccentricity on the buckling of thin-walled laminated C-columns. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 1922, 080008. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wysmulski, P.; Debski, H. The analysis of sensitivity to eccentric load of compressed thin-walled laminate columns. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2078, 020006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Madkhali, N.; Algessair, S. Exploring the optical properties of metal-modified melanin following ultraviolet irradiation: An experimental and theoretical study using density functional theory. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Magibalan, S.; Naveen, N.; Pradeep, N.; Vijayakumar, G.; Nithish Kumar, R. Experimental Investigations on Mechanical Properties of Sisal and Coir Fiber Reinforced Hybrid Bio Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ibrahim, N.I.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Łukaszewicz, A.; Shah, A.U.M.; Shahar, F.S.; Józwik, J.; Najeeb, M.I.; Grzejda, R. Characterization and isolation method of Gigantochloa scortechinii (Buluh Semantan) cellulose nanocrystals. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 272, 132847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, Y.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Shahar, F.S.; Grzejda, R.; Łukaszewicz, A. Hybrid fiber-reinforced biocomposites for marine applications: A review. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bakhori, S.N.M.; Hassan, M.Z.; Bakhori, N.M.; Jamaludin, K.R.; Ramlie, F.; Daud, M.Y.M.; Aziz, S.A. Physical, mechanical and perforation resistance of natural-synthetic fiber interply laminate hybrid composites. Polymers 2022, 14, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shahar, F.S.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Grzejda, R.; Łukaszewicz, A.; Oksiuta, Z.; Krishnamoorthy, R.R. Harnessing the potential of natural composites in biomedical 3D printing. Materials 2024, 17, 6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, Y.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Shahar, F.S.; Łukaszewicz, A.; Oksiuta, Z.; Grzejda, R. Kenaf fiber-reinforced biocomposites for marine applications: A review. Materials 2025, 18, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Roy, N.; Sengupta, R.; Bhowmick, A.K. Modifications of carbon for polymer composites and nanocomposites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 781–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sharma, S.; Sudhakara, P.; Omran, A.A.B.; Singh, J.; Ilyas, R.A. Recent trends and developments in conducting polymer nanocomposites for multifunctional applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Azlin, M.N.M.; Ilyas, R.A.; Zuhri, M.Y.M.; Sapuan, S.M.; Harussani, M.M.; Sharma, S.; Nordin, A.H.; Nurazzi, N.M.; Afiqah, A.N. 3D printing and shaping polymers, composites, and nanocomposites: A review. Polymers 2022, 14, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gumowska, A.; Robles, E.; Bikoro, A.; Wronka, A.; Kowaluk, G. Selected properties of bio-based layered hybrid composites with biopolymer blends for structural applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Paszkiewicz, S.; Walkowiak, K.; Barczewski, M. Biobased polymer nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization: Comparison between carbon and mineral nanofillers. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 13805–13823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mohan, N.; Senthil, P.; Vinodh, S.; Jayanth, N. A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2017, 12, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. de Campos, A.; Corrêa, A.C.; Claro, I.C.; de Morais Teixeira, E.; Marconcini, J.M. Processing, characterization and application of micro and nanocellulose based environmentally friendly polymer composites. In Sustainable Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites; Inamuddin, Thomas, S., Mishra, R.K., Asiri, A.M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  22. Agwuncha, S.C.; Anusionwu, C.G.; Owonubi, S.J.; Sadiku, E.R.; Busuguma, W.A.; Ibrahim, I.D. Extraction of cellulose nanofibers and their eco/friendly polymer composites. In Sustainable Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites; Inamuddin, Thomas, S., Mishra, R.K., Asiri, A.M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 37–64. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yuan, S.; Shen, F.; Chua, C.K.; Zhou, K. Polymeric composites for powder-based additive manufacturing: Materials and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 91, 141–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Paszkiewicz, S.; Pypeć, K.; Irska, I.; Piesowicz, E. Functional polymer hybrid nanocomposites based on polyolefins: A review. Processes 2020, 8, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Georgios, K.; Silva, A.; Furtado, S. Applications of Green Composite Materials. In Biodegradable Green Composites; Kalia, S., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 312–337. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bhong, M.; Khan, T.K.H.; Devade, K.; Krishna, B.V.; Sura, S.; Eftikhaar, H.K.; Thethi, H.P.; Gupta, N. Review of Composite Materials and Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Diakun, J. Recycling Product Model and its application for quantitative assessment of product recycling properties. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Diakun, J.; Grzejda, R. Product design analysis with regard to recycling and selected mechanical properties. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Keramati, Y.; Ansari, R.; Hassanzadeh-Aghdam, M.K.; Umer, U. Micromechanical simulation of thermal expansion, elastic stiffness and piezoelectric constants of graphene/unidirectional BaTiO3 fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid nanocomposites. Acta Mech. 2023, 234, 6251–6270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abidi, M.H.; Al-Ahmari, A.M.; Umer, U.; Rasheed, M.S. Multi-objective optimization of micro-electrical discharge machining of nickel-titanium-based shape memory alloy using MOGA-II. Measurement 2018, 125, 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maidi, M.; Shufrin, I. Evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings for seismic retrofit through external stiffening: Limit displacement method. Buildings 2024, 14, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maidi, M.; Sherzer, G.L.; Gal, E. Enhancing ductility in carbon fiber reinforced polymer concrete sections: A multi-scale investigation. Comput. Concr. 2024, 33, 385–398. [Google Scholar]
  33. Marashdeh, M.; Al-Hamarneh, I.F. Evaluation of gamma radiation properties of four types of surgical stainless steel in the energy range of 17.50–25.29 keV. Materials 2021, 14, 6873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Akhdar, H.; Mahmoud, K.A.; Madkhali, N.; Marashdeh, M.; Abu El-Soad, A.M.; Tharwat, M. Engineering multifunctional polypropylene nanocomposites: Tailoring structural, thermal, and gamma-ray shielding properties with Ni0.9Zn0.1Fe2O4 doping. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2024, 177, 105478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hajduk, B.; Jarka, P.; Tański, T.; Bednarski, H.; Janeczek, H.; Gnida, P.; Fijalkowski, M. An investigation of the thermal transitions and physical properties of semiconducting PDPP4T:PDBPyBT blend films. Materials 2022, 15, 8392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hajduk, B.; Bednarski, H.; Trzebicka, B. Temperature-dependent spectroscopic ellipsometry of thin polymer films. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 3229–3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hajduk, B.; Bednarski, H.; Jarząbek, B.; Nitschke, P.; Janeczek, H. Phase diagram of P3HT:PC70BM thin films based on variable-temperature spectroscopic ellipsometry. Polym. Test. 2020, 84, 106383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qi, K.; Liewehr, B.; Koci, T.; Pattanasiri, B.; Williams, M.J.; Bachmann, M. Influence of bonded interactions on structural phases of flexible polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 054904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Williams, M.J.; Bachmann, M. System-size dependence of helix-bundle formation for generic semiflexible polymers. Polymers 2016, 8, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Joshua, R.J.N.; Raj, S.A.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Łukaszewicz, A.; Józwik, J.; Oksiuta, Z.; Dziedzic, K.; Tofil, A.; Shahar, F.S. Powder bed fusion 3D printing in precision manufacturing for biomedical applications: A comprehensive review. Materials 2024, 17, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Szalai, S.; Herold, B.; Kurhan, D.; Németh, A.; Sysyn, M.; Fischer, S. Optimization of 3D printed rapid prototype deep drawing tools for automotive and railway sheet material testing. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Szalai, S.; Szívós, B.F.; Nemes, V.; Fischer, S. Sustainable 3D-printing filaments and their applications. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2024, 114, 967–972. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gilabert, F.A. An efficient anisotropization technique to transform isotropic nonlinear materials into unidirectional and bidirectional composites. Mater. Des. 2021, 206, 109772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Laheri, V.; Hao, P.; Gilabert, F.A. Direct embedment of RVE-based microscale into lab size coupons to research fracture process in unidirectional and bidirectional composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2023, 235, 109949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kuang, N.; Xiao, M.; Qi, H.; Zhao, W.; Wu, J. Optimization of resin composition for zirconia ceramic digital light processing additive manufacturing. Polymers 2025, 17, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sawangrat, C. Anti-Static and Anti-Flaming Improvement of Biodegradable Polymer Blends by Nanocoating via Plasma Technology and Sparking Process; Technical Report; Chiang Mai University: Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jantanasakulwong, K.; Thanakkasaranee, S.; Seesuriyachan, P.; Singjai, P.; Saenjaiban, A.; Photphroet, S.; Pratinthong, K.; Phimolsiripol, Y.; Leksawasdi, N.; Chaiyaso, T.; et al. Sparking nano-metals on a surface of polyethylene terephthalate and its application: Anti-coronavirus and anti-fogging properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grzejda, R. Modeling of Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites. Polymers 2025, 17, 1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141944

AMA Style

Grzejda R. Modeling of Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites. Polymers. 2025; 17(14):1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141944

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grzejda, Rafał. 2025. "Modeling of Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites" Polymers 17, no. 14: 1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141944

APA Style

Grzejda, R. (2025). Modeling of Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites. Polymers, 17(14), 1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141944

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop