Next Article in Journal
The Influence of the Dispersion and Covalent Functionalization of CNTs on Electrical Conduction Under an Electric Field in LDPE/CNT Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Properties, Mechanical Behavior, and Food Protecting Ability of Chickpea Protein-Derived Biopolymer Films
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Silver Nanoparticles on pH-Indicative Color Response and Moisture Content in Intelligent Films Based on Peruvian Purple Potato and Polyvinyl Alcohol
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Irradiated Nanocellulose on Enhancing the Functionality of Polylactic Acid-Based Composite Films for Packaging Applications

1
Institute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials—CNR, P.le E. Fermi 1, 80055 Portici, Italy
2
Department of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy
3
Institut de Chimie Moléculaire de Reims, CNRS UMR 7312, Campus Moulin de la Housse, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, BP 1039, 51687 Reims, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2025, 17(14), 1939; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141939
Submission received: 19 May 2025 / Revised: 30 June 2025 / Accepted: 7 July 2025 / Published: 15 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Polymers for Value Added and Functional Packaging)

Abstract

This study investigates the combined use of electron beam irradiation (EBI) and nanotechnology to develop improved food packaging films. EBI, commonly applied for sterilization, can alter polymer microstructure, while irradiated cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) offer enhanced functionality when incorporated into biopolymer matrices. Here, CNCs were irradiated with doses up to 50 kGy, leading to the formation of carboxyl and aldehyde groups, confirmed by FTIR analysis, as a consequence of the initial formation of free radicals and peroxides that may subsist in that original form or be converted into various carbonyl groups. Flexible films were obtained by incorporating pristine and EB-irradiated CNCs in an internal mixer, using minute amounts of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) to facilitate the dispersion of the filler within the polymer matrix. The resulting PLA/PEO/CNC films were evaluated for their mechanical, thermal, barrier, and antioxidant properties. The results showed that structural modifications of CNCs led to significant enhancements in the performance of the composite films, including a 30% improvement in water barrier properties and a 50% increase in antioxidant activity. These findings underscore the potential of irradiated CNCs as effective additives in biopolymer-based active packaging, offering a sustainable approach to reduce dependence on synthetic preservatives and potentially extend the shelf life of food products.

1. Introduction

Active packaging materials interact positively with the packaged food by slowing down or inhibiting the chemical and physical mechanisms responsible for the phenomena that cause food degradation [1,2]. In recent years, both academic research and the food industry have shown a growing interest in developing flexible packaging films with specific features, such as antioxidant activity, to prevent oxidation during storage and reduce the need for chemical preservatives in direct contact with food [3].
The synergistic integration of radiation and nanotechnology represents a promising approach for developing innovative food packaging materials, aimed at enhancing food quality and safety on a global scale. This strategy focuses on understanding the relationship between process, structure, and properties to effectively tailor the final performance of the material [3,4,5,6,7].
Radiation processing is increasingly applied to manufactured products (containing or) constituted of polymers or composites. In the radiation sterilization of healthcare and food products, one of the major applications of radiation processing, the treatment is performed to reduce the level of pathogenic contaminants with a minimal impact on the structural properties of the plastic components present in the packaging and packaged items [8,9]. Conversely, in the second main domain of application, the chemical effects of irradiation are positively exploited to tailor the macromolecular structure of plastics and/or rubbers formulated in simple or complex blends. Radiation treatments are indeed known to induce competing cross-linking and scission of polymer chains, oxidation, and grafting between the components present in the blends [10]. Enhancing the thermal resistance of thermoplastics used in the pipe and cable industries is illustrative of the positive effects associated with radiation cross-linking [11].
Nowadays, an emerging and promising approach in materials science is the development of nanocomposites with improved properties obtained by irradiating the composite after blending or by applying the radiation treatment only to one of its components, matrix or filler, prior to the mixing operation. From the standpoint of mechanical performances, introducing radiation-treated organic nanofillers can improve the dispersibility of the self-aggregated particles by modifying their surface properties as a consequence of main chain scission, oxidation, and/or grafting [12].
On the other hand, this technique can offer the advantage of generating compounds with antioxidant properties, capable of scavenging free radicals and interrupting the chain reactions responsible for rancidity and food spoilage, thereby enhancing food preservation [13,14,15].
Polylactic acid (PLA) is widely recognized for its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability; however, its brittleness, limited thermal stability, and relatively high production costs constrain its broader application. To address these limitations, the incorporation of biodegradable and renewable fillers, such as cellulose and its derivatives, has been extensively explored as a strategy to enhance the mechanical and thermal properties of PLA while maintaining a favorable balance between performance and cost [16].
Among natural polymer-based particles, cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) stand out as highly promising candidates for composite development, owing to their unique physical and chemical properties, natural abundance, renewability, and environmental sustainability [17,18]. CNCs also offer high stiffness, low density, ease of processing, compatibility with conventional manufacturing techniques, and cost-effectiveness [19]. Consequently, modified CNCs are increasingly used as reinforcing agents in a variety of polymer matrices—including starch, polyvinyl alcohol, and PLA—not only due to their surface functionality but also their proven ability to enhance mechanical strength and barrier performance in packaging applications [13,18,20].
Radiation processing is also widely used in the pretreatment of cellulosic materials, offering rapid processing and eliminating the need for chemical reagents. It has been applied in the production of modified cellulose derived from sources such as cotton linters and softwood fibers for the extraction of CNCs [21]. Aqueous suspensions of CNCs have been introduced in radiation curable polyurethane acrylate emulsions with larger enhancement of the mechanical properties after electron beam (EB) treatment than for conventional UV curing [22]. Radiation-mediated grafting of synthetic polymers with lower critical solution temperature in water has been successfully achieved to impart CNCs with thermally switchable surface properties [23]. The physicochemical properties of both pristine and irradiated CNCs have been investigated, with particular focus on the formation of new functional groups, thermal stability, and hydrophilicity [24]. These studies have shown that increasing the dose promotes the development of new chemical functionalities, thereby enhancing the antioxidant capacity of CNCs [13]. In a related study, the same research group examined the synergistic effect of irradiation and gallic acid, demonstrating improved antiradical activity in antioxidant-enriched, gellan-based film packaging designed to extend the shelf life of pre-packaged foods [25].
In this context, our aim was to prepare and assess innovative packaging film material based on PLA and irradiated cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) with the dual objective of enhancing its overall performance and imparting antioxidant functionality. The degree of dispersion of the nanoparticle additive plays a key role in the beneficial results expected for the nanocomposites compared to the original matrix material. For the sake of simplicity in the practical implementation of this approach, we have decided to examine, at this stage, the properties of blends prepared by incorporating pristine and EB-irradiated CNCs, as obtained, in an internal mixer, using minute amounts of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) to facilitate the dispersion of the filler within the polymer matrix.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Materials and Chemicals

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs, Ref. NG01NC0101) were obtained from Nanografi (Jena, Germany), with a cross-section of 10–20 nm, and they exhibited a degree of crystallinity of 92% (X-ray diffractometry).
Polylactic acid polymer (Ingeo™ Biopolymer 4032D Mw = 180,000–260,000 g/mol, with specific gravity 1.24, MFR 7 g/10 min at 210 °C/2.16 kg, density 1.08 g/cm3 at 230 °C, melting point 155–170 °C) was supplied by NatureWorks™ (Minnetonka, MN, USA). Prior to further processing, the PLA pellets were dried at 90 °C for at least 12 h under a vacuum due to their tendency to hydrolyze.
Poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO) (Sigma-Aldrich®, Milan, Italy), average Mv of ~4,000,000 g/mol (nominal), containing <1000 ppm BHT as an inhibitor, viscosity of 1650–5500 cP, 1% in H2O (25 °C, Brookfield) (lit.), and density of 1.21 g/mL at 25 °C, was added as a plasticizer.

2.2. Irradiation Procedure

The solid samples equilibrated in air containing 55% relative humidity at 23 °C were placed into sealable plastic bags before irradiation. Electron beam (EB) irradiations were performed at Ionisos (Chaumesnil, France) using a 10 MeV, 33 kW Linac accelerator at a time-averaged dose rate of approximately 4 kGy s−1. Samples were treated to achieve the desired doses of 25 or 50 kGy, within the range suggested by [13], by applying one or two 25 kGy passes to limit undesirable effects due to the rise in temperature during irradiation. The obtained powders were coded as CNC25 and CNC50, respectively.

2.3. PLA-Based Film Preparation

PLA-based films containing two different amounts (1% and 2% wt/wt) of both pristine and EB-irradiated CNC were prepared by a two-step melt process involving melt mixing and hot compression. To improve the dispersion of CNC within the polymer matrix, PEO, used as a plasticizer, was added to the formulation in weight amount equal to that of the CNC [26,27]. The selected PLA grade provides a good balance between structural integrity and thermal stability, while the ultra-high-molecular-weight PEO enhances nanoparticle dispersion and serves as a compatibilizer. This combination has been shown to effectively balance mechanical performance and processability in CNC-reinforced systems [26,27], and it was therefore chosen to promote homogeneous filler distribution and ensure the functional performance of the resulting films.
In detail, different concentrations of PEO and CNC were mixed with PLA in an internal mixer (Rheomix® 600 Haake, Vreden, Germany) with a volume capacity of 50 cm3, at 180 °C and at 50 rpm, for 3 min. Composite films were prepared by hot pressing the obtained melt using a Collin P300P (COLLIN Lab & Pilot Solutions GmbH, Maitenbeth, Germany) press at the same previous temperature value (P = 50 bar for 3 min).
A schematic representation of the preparation process is provided in Figure 1.
Six different film composites were obtained with a thickness of approximately 100–130 μm, whose formulation and codes are reported in Table 1. For comparison, PLA/1PEO and PLA/2PEO films without CNC fillers were prepared under the same processing conditions.

2.4. Experimental Characterization of CNC Powder and PLA-Based Films

2.4.1. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)

To assess the dispersion of both pure and irradiated CNC powders within the polymer matrix, a morphological analysis was performed by using a scanning electron microscope (Quanta 200 FEG, FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Prior to analysis, dried specimens were mounted on aluminum stubs, using carbon adhesive discs, and coated with a thin layer (~10 nm) of an Au-Pd alloy, using a sputter-coating system (Emitech K575, Quorum Technologies LTD, Ashford, UK). A size distribution analysis of CNC aggregates was carried out using ImageJ software (version 1.53k). A total of 40 aggregate diameters were manually measured from SEM micrographs to construct the size distribution.

2.4.2. Wide-Angle X-Ray Scattering (WAXS)

The structural characterization of CNCs was studied by WAXS, using an Anton Paar SAXS camera (Graz, Austria) equipped with a 2D imaging plate detector. CuKa X-rays were generated by a Philips PW3830 (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK), with a wavelength of 1.5418 Å, sealed tube source (40 kV, 50 mA), and slit collimation. To obtain the diffractogram, the CNC powder was analyzed for 10 min. Using an empirical method, known as the Segal or peak height method [28,29], the crystallinity index (CI, %) was determined as follows:
C I = I 200 I a m I 200 × 100 %
where CI is the relative degree of crystallinity, I200 is the maximum intensity of the crystalline peak corresponding to 2θ ≈ 22.5° (in arbitrary units), and Iam is the diffraction intensity of the amorphous halo (in the same arbitrary units) at 2θ ≈ 18°.

2.4.3. FTIR Analysis

FTIR spectra of CNC powders and PLA-based films were collected at room temperature by using a Frontier FTIR/NIR spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Rodgau, Germany) in the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode from 650 to 4000 cm−1. Spectra were recorded at 4 cm−1 resolutions, and the reported results are the average of 64 scans. To better inspect the spectrum of the irradiated CNC powder and to evaluate the CNC changes before and after irradiation, the spectral region was deconvolved using Origin-Pro 8.0 and analyzed between 1500 and 1800 cm−1, using the Lorentzian function to fit the absorption peak identified by visual inspection of the spectra. The band positions, corresponding to specific vibrational mode assignments of the C = O stretching mode, were determined by the automatic peak-finding function [30,31].

2.4.4. Analysis Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The thermal stability of the film samples was determined by using a Q500 thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Each CNC powder sample was placed in platinum trays, and it was heated through the temperature range up to 800 °C, at a rate of 10 °C/min, under nitrogen atmosphere. Similarly, each film sample of approximately 8 mg weight and of 0.5 mm diameter was placed in platinum trays and heated up to 600 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min, under nitrogen atmosphere.

2.4.5. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

All tests were performed on a Q2000 Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC) (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) in a heat–cool–heat mode and processed with the TA Universal Analysis software (ver. 4.1 D). Each sample (3–5 mg) was placed in an aluminum DSC pan and heated from –80 °C to 250 °C. The acquired data were processed by the TA Universal Analysis software to calculate all the parameters, and the degree of crystallinity was calculated from the corresponding melting enthalpy values of the second scan according to the following relationship:
x c = H m   H c o l d     H m 100   ·   W f     · 100
where ΔHm, ΔHcold, and ΔHm100 are the enthalpies of melting, cold crystallization, and 100% crystalline PLA, respectively, taken as 93 J/g, while Wf is the weight percent of PLA for the specific sample [32].

2.4.6. Mechanical Properties Tests

Mechanical behavior was assessed in tensile configuration, using a Lonost T1 Universal Testing Machine (Lonos srl, Monda, Italy), equipped with a 250 N load cell and set at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min in accordance with ASTM D882 [33]. Data from 10 different tests were averaged for statistical purposes.

2.4.7. Barrier Properties Tests

Water vapor permeability was determined on 5 cm2 samples, using infrared sensor technology with a PermatranW3/31 (Mocon GmbH, Neuwied, Germany) at 25 °C. Permeation tests were performed with relative humidity set at 0% and up to 50% on the downstream and upstream sides of the film, respectively, under a nitrogen stream flow rate of 100 mL/min. Each test was performed in duplicate.

2.4.8. Surface Wettability: Contact Angle Measurements

All the measurements were carried out using the Dataphysics OCA 20-Optical (Filderstadt, Germany) contact angle instrument, dispensing a 1 mL drop of water to assess the wettability of the surface or of diiodomethane to assess the improvement in printability, i.e., ink adhesion on the surface. The solvent was dropped on at least 10 different sites of the tested samples, and the static contact angle was reported as the average value of each individual measurement.
The surface free energy ( γ s ) of the films was calculated using the Owens–Wendt method, which separates γ s into dispersive ( γ s d ) and polar ( γ s p ) components [34]. The method uses contact angle measurements (θ) with two standard liquids whose surface tension values ( γ L ) and components are known:
Water: γ L = 72.8 mN/m ( γ L d   = 21.8, γ L p   = 51.0).
Diiodomethane: γ L = 50.8 mN/m ( γ L d = 50.8, γ L p = 0.0).
The following equation was applied:
γ L ( 1 + c o s θ ) = 2 [ γ s d · γ L d + γ s p · γ L p ]
Solving the system for both liquids yielded the polar and dispersive components of γ s . The total surface energy was calculated as γ s = γ s d + γ s p .

2.4.9. Color Analysis Measurements

The color analysis of the films was carried out by using a colorimeter (Minolta Chroma Meter, CR 300, Osaka, Japan). Hunter parameters are L* (from 0 = black to 100 = white), a* (−a* = green to + a* = red), and b* (−b* = blue to + b* = yellow). For each film, three random measurements in different positions were taken and averaged. The results are expressed as the difference between the color parameters of the sample and the color parameters of a reference standard (L = 96.3, a = +0.5, b = +2.9) used as the background. The total color difference (ΔE) was then calculated using the following equation [35]:
E = ( L f i l m L s t a n d a r d ) 2 + ( a f i l m a s t a n d a r d ) 2 + ( b f i l m b s t a n d a r d ) 2

2.4.10. ABTS Radical Scavenging

The antiradical activity of PLA films with and without PEO and CNC was tested using the ABTS assay according to the procedure already reported in previous works [36,37]. In detail, aqueous solutions of ABTS (7 mM) and K2S2O8 (140 mM) were co-incubated for 16–18 h in the dark to obtain the ABTS•+ solution. Then, 227 µL of ABTS•+ solution (0.7 ± 0.02 OD at 734 nm) was placed in contact with 0.19 cm2 of PLA films in quadruplicate, using 96-well microtiter plates. After 6 min, the films were removed, and the absorbance at 734 nm was recorded. The radical scavenging percentage (RS%) was calculated using the following formula:
R S % = O D n e g a t i v e   c o n t r o l O D s a m p l e O D n e g a t i v e   c o n t r o l

3. Results

3.1. Powder Characterization

3.1.1. Morphological Powder Analyses

SEM analysis was carried out to investigate the effect of irradiation on the morphology of the three different powders. The results reveal that the pristine CNC (Figure 2b) has irregularly shaped aggregates, which become smaller and more irregular as the irradiation dose increases (Figure 2e,h). At 20,000X magnification, the aggregates appear with a smooth surface (Figure 2c), while both CNC25 and CNC50 (Figure 2f,i) exhibit small structures on the surface that increase in number at higher doses.
The histograms on the left in Figure 2a,d,g show the diameter distribution of the CNC aggregates in each sample. As the irradiation dose increases, a clear shift towards larger aggregate sizes is observed. The CNC sample shows a narrower size range, indicating greater homogeneity. Increasing the radiation dose results in a population of smaller diameters; however, gradually larger aggregates also appear.
At 100,000X magnification of the aggregate surface (Figure 3), it is evident that the population density of CNC chains rises with the increasing radiation dose, and they also arrange into a compact and continuous morphology at higher doses.
Irradiation induces the formation of macroradicals, which subsequently react with one another to create cross-links between polymer chains. This process reduces chain mobility and alters the submicroscopic capillarity of the cellulose fiber structure. Morphologically, these effects are evidenced by the formation of larger aggregates, visible at higher SEM magnifications, as well as by surface regions where individual layers of cellulose chains are no longer distinguishable. This indicates a more compact morphology [38].
WAXS analysis was performed to determine the crystallinity of CNCs (Figure 4). The diffractogram of the unirradiated CNCs exhibits a typical Form I cellulose pattern, with two main peaks at 2θ around 15.3°, corresponding to the overlap of reflection planes (101) and (101), and at 2θ equal to 22.1°, associated with the reflection plane (200) [28]. The diffraction patterns of the irradiated CNCs confirm that cellulose crystallinity remains in Form I when irradiation is performed on the solid and moisture-free materials. Cellulose can adopt several crystalline polymorphs—namely cellulose I, II, III, and IV—depending on its botanical origin and posttreatment. Form I, the native crystalline structure of plant-derived cellulose, consists of two allomorphs: Iα, predominantly found in algae and bacteria, and Iβ, which is prevalent in higher plants. This form is characterized by a parallel chain arrangement and distinct sharp diffraction peaks in WAXS patterns. It is typically retained in cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) obtained via acid hydrolysis [39].
As the irradiation dose increases, the degree of crystallinity rises from 77% in the unirradiated CNC to 80% in the CNC50. This is a general feature of natural and synthetic semicrystalline polymers in which chain scission induced by irradiation at low dose allows some segments of tie-chains to gain more mobility and to develop ordered interactions with the neighboring crystals. This common phenomenon increases the fraction of crystalline domains within the material [40,41].
Figure 5a,b provides a schematic representation of the molecular and structural phases of CNC. Pristine CNC is characterized by parallel chains linked by strong hydrogen bonds, forming microfibrils. Figure 5b illustrates the structure of cellulose microfibrils, which are locally ordered with both amorphous and crystalline regions, exhibiting different crystal structures [26,35].
From a chemical standpoint, irradiation of CNCs in the presence of air at doses of 25 and 50 kGy can be summarized as follows. High energy carried by the penetrating fast electrons is deposited in the irradiated matter without selectivity. The primary ionization and excitation processes take place within the core of crystalline domains, in the less ordered chains at the surface and in the remaining tie chains linking the nanocrystals. Since the results of XRD analyses establish that the crystalline structure is not degraded and the crystallinity degree is even slightly enhanced, the chemical transformations following primary stages would essentially take place in the less ordered domains surrounding the almost perfectly packed chains. If we neglect the indirect effects of water radiolysis that may generate oxidizing HO radicals in the slightly hydrated surface layer of CNCs, C-H bond dissociation is expected to yield C-centered free radicals at the C(1) or C(4) position of anhydroglucose units [43]. A simplified description of the other events taking place in the CNCs is illustrated in Figure 6.
In crystalline domains, radiolysis induces the formation of long-lived C-centered free radicals on anhydroglucose units of the cellulose chain together with H atoms that can recombine to form gaseous hydrogen. Scission reactions within the polysaccharide chains cannot be excluded but seem very limited even at 50 kGy, as a probable consequence of the high order and minimal mobility in the purified nanocrystals.
At the surface of CNCs, the C-centered free radicals (label b) can undergo main chain scission, but in the presence of air, the radicals would readily react with molecular oxygen to produce hydroperoxides (reaction c) or peroxides, some of which are further converted into carbonyl derivatives (reaction d). Alternatively, there is a cascade of reactions and rearrangements involving free radical species located on close or open anhydroglucose units [44]. The decomposition of peroxides is subject to thermal activation during storage, blending, or processing. This may gradually convert the less stable chemical entities or functions, in particular, free radicals and peroxides, while the aldehydes formed in situ would be sensitive to further oxidation into carboxylic derivatives [45]. It was one of the main motivations of this study to evaluate the beneficial consequences of the surface functionalization of CNCs on the mechanical and functional properties of the nanocomposite thermoplastic films containing irradiated CNCs. Moreover, the presence of reactive functions was expected to favor development at different stages, particularly in the subsequent blending and film production operated at elevated temperatures. In such conditions, the decomposition of peroxides and possible hopping process transferring the free radical species at the surface of CNCs would induce coupling reactions between the nanofiller and the thermoplastic matrix, with some enhancement of materials properties.

3.1.2. Structural Powder Analyses

The FTIR spectra of unirradiated and irradiated CNCs are shown in Figure 7, revealing structural changes in the irradiated CNCs. All spectra exhibit characteristic peaks associated with the CNC chemical structure. Specifically, the large band at 3340 cm−1 corresponds to the -OH stretching vibration, while the peaks at 2890 cm−1 and 1431 cm−1 are indicative of C-H stretching and -CH2 group bending, respectively. The peaks at 1160 cm−1 and 1070 cm−1 are attributed to the saccharide structure (Figure 7a) [19]. Notably, the intensity of the peak at 1733 cm−1, corresponding to the C=O stretching mode [46], increases with the irradiation dose, a trend that is most clearly observed in the deconvolved plots of Figure 7c,d. Along with the formation of carbonyl groups, the peak at 1642 cm−1 [47,48], related to the amount of adsorbed water, changes and increases with the applied doses from 25 to 50 kGy. This phenomenon is likely linked to the formation of new hydrophilic groups, such as carboxylic acid groups, due to the cleavage of glycosidic bond [13]. The cleavage of cellulose chains could affect the crystalline rearrangement, leading to a slight increase in the crystallinity (as indicated by the WAXS results) due to shorter and more easily crystallized chains.
The thermal decomposition behavior of both unirradiated and irradiated CNCs, as well as the weight loss as a function of temperature, is presented in Figure 8. The thermograms display four distinct regions: (1) water loss (below 100 °C), (2) depolymerization (around 250 °C), (3) thermal decomposition of cellulose (around 310 °C), and (4) residual char (above 400 °C). The weight loss starts at below 100 °C, and this is due to the evaporation of adsorbed bulk water [14]. Indeed, the TGA curves for CNC25 and CNC50 powders (represented by the blue and green curves, respectively) show a decrease in thermal stability as the radiation dose increases, as also reported in the literature [49]. This behavior is attributed to the formation of oxidized groups, such as carboxyl and aldehyde functionalities, as well as the breakdown of glycosidic bonds during electron beam irradiation. These structural changes lead to a reduction in molecular weight and an increased presence of thermally labile species, which promote an earlier onset of thermal degradation. Reduced thermal stability is observed after a weight loss of approximately 60% of the initial powder. The shift in weight loss to lower temperatures is typical of oxidized cellulose and occurs between 300 and 400 °C. Weight loss at 350 °C was 64.6%, 67.1%, and 68% for CNC, CNC25, and CNC50, respectively. The residual mass at 800 °C was 83.64%, 83.32%, and 84.19% for CNC, CNC25, and CNC50, respectively.

3.2. Film Characterization

3.2.1. Morphological Analyses of Films

Morphological analysis of pure PLA films and nanocomposites with varying percentages of CNC was conducted to evaluate changes in the film surface. Figure 9 presents SEM micrographs of different types of films loaded with unirradiated and irradiated CNC at two different doses. In the analysis of the PLA/PEO film (Figure 9a,e), it is observed that as the percentage of PEO in the matrix increases, the population density of the polymer chain structure also increases. Consequently, when pure CNC powder is added to the PLA/2PEO/2CNC film, the CNC chains are incorporated into the matrix structure. In contrast, in the PLA/1PEO/1CNC film, the CNC chains are more free and therefore more visible on the surface of the sample. CNC25, having a structure with more free radicals, interacts more with the polymer matrix when added, altering its structure. In the PLA/1PEO/1CNC25 film, small stretches of the CNC chain remain visible on the surface, whereas in the PLA/1PEO/1CNC50 film, they are completely absorbed by the matrix, creating a more uniform and smoother surface. In the PLA/2PEO/2CNC25 films, fibrils and agglomerates appear in some areas of the surface. In the PLA/2PEO/2CNC50 films, the surface is homogeneous, but with a denser structure compared to the PLA/1PEO/1CNC50 film.

3.2.2. Structural Analyses of Films

FTIR analysis was performed to investigate possible chemical interactions between the PLA backbone, PEO, and both pristine and irradiated CNCs. The dominant interaction mechanisms are not fully understood and likely depend on the specific surface chemistry of the CNCs; however, all PLA-based composites exhibit the characteristic infrared peaks of the PLA matrix, and no significant changes in vibrational shifts were observed. Specifically, the absorption peaks at 2997 and 2945 cm−1 correspond to the –CH2 asymmetric and symmetric vibrations, respectively. A strong absorption band at 1747 cm−1 was observed, which is attributed to the C=O stretching of PLA. The bending vibrations in the 1300–1500 cm−1 range are associated with the antisymmetric and symmetric bending of the –CH3 group. The bands at 1266 and 1209 cm−1 are attributed to the C–O–C antisymmetric and symmetric stretching in esters, while the peak at 1180 cm−1 is linked to the C–O–C stretching of PLA. The three peaks at 1125, 1080, and 1040 cm−1 may correspond to C–O stretching vibrations. The last two bands, detected at 868 and 755 cm−1 (in the far infrared region), can be assigned to the amorphous and crystalline phases of PLA. The values corresponding to these peaks are summarized in Table 2 [20].
The thermal stability, including degradation, crystallinity, and glass transition, of neat PLA and its corresponding composites, both with different amounts of PEO and unirradiated or irradiated CNC, was investigated using TGA and DSC. Figure 10 displays the thermogravimetric curves for PLA with 1% wt (a) and 2% wt (b) of both PEO and CNCs. All the curves exhibit the characteristic behavior of the PLA matrix, with a single degradation step occurring around 370 °C. The addition of PEO results in lower thermal stability for the resulting composites (i.e., PLA/1PEO and PLA/2PEO) compared to pristine PLA, due to the plasticizing effect of PEO. The incorporation of varying amounts of unirradiated and irradiated CNC helps minimize the effect of PEO, as CNC interacts with the bonds formed between PLA and PEO during crystallization, thus reducing chain mobility [50].
The DSC thermograms shown in Figure 11 were analyzed, and the main characteristic parameters related to the second heating are reported in Table 3. In the PLA/PEO blends, the Tg decreases for both PEO amounts compared to the pristine PLA value, confirming that PEO acts as a plasticizer. However, the degree of crystallinity increases. The presence of PEO can promote the crystallization of PLA and enhance the mobility of its molecular chains, thereby accelerating the crystallization rate, allowing PLA to crystallize more extensively during cooling and at higher temperatures [50,51]. The incorporation of both unirradiated and irradiated CNCs appears to reduce the plasticizing effect of PEO. Specifically, at higher PEO levels, the crystallinity degree of the films remains constant, possibly due to a balance between the enhanced chain mobility induced by PEO and the structural influence of CNC aggregates. In contrast, at lower PEO amounts, the observed decrease in crystallinity (Xc) with higher doses of CNC irradiation may be due to the generation of trapped free radicals and surface (hydro)peroxides, which induce coupling reactions during processing. This may reduce the time available for orderly crystallization of PLA chains, leading to a more amorphous morphology [13].

3.2.3. Mechanical Properties

Mechanical characterization was carried out to evaluate the effect of pristine and irradiated CNC on the behavior of nanocomposite films, in comparison to PLA/PEO films. Table 4 presents the mean values and corresponding standard deviations for Young’s modulus, stress, and elongation at break.
Incorporation of PEO serves two primary functions compared to PLA. First, it acts as a plasticizer, lowering the glass transition temperature and increasing chain mobility. While pure PLA has a crystallinity of around 9%, PLA/PEO blends exhibit significantly higher crystallinity due to better chain rearrangement during cooling, as supported by the literature [52]. Generally, higher crystallinity leads to increased stiffness and tensile strength, whereas lower crystallinity results in greater ductility and flexibility. Consequently, the mechanical behavior of PLA/PEO/CNC films is influenced by both CNC dispersion and changes in matrix crystallinity induced by the presence of PEO.
In the case of films containing 1% w/w of CNC, it is observed that the addition of pristine CNC increases Young’s Modulus by approximately 18%, acting as a reinforcement, without altering the fracture stress of the films compared to PLA/1PEO. However, the presence of CNC25 leads to a 33% reduction in mechanical performance, likely due to the fracture of long polymer chains. In contrast, the addition of CNC50 results in a 13% recovery of breaking strength and a 40% increase in film elongation, probably due to its improved homogeneity within the polymer matrix. For the PLA/1PEO/1CNC25 and PLA/1PEO/1CNC50 films, a decrease in Young’s modulus and slight elongation at break are observed, which can be attributed to chain breakage and the consequent formation of radicals [35,51].
Regarding the 2PEO:2CNC ratio, it is shown that the addition of CNC to the PLA/PEO films leads to an 8% reduction in maximum stress and modulus while maintaining the same elongation at break. This is likely due to the coarse dispersion of CNC and the non-homogeneous morphology, which induces the formation of agglomerates and voids that act as stress concentrators [19]. The improved dispersion of CNCs in PLA/PEO blends can be attributed to several complementary mechanisms. The flexible chains and low glass transition temperature (Tg) of PEO facilitate CNC mobility during the melt processing, while its hydrophilic character promotes hydrogen bonding with the hydroxyl-rich surfaces of CNCs. These interactions enhance compatibility and suppress aggregation. Additionally, PEO contributes to steric stabilization and may act as a molecular bridge between PLA and CNCs, thereby improving interfacial adhesion and facilitating more efficient stress transfer across the matrix [26,27].
In the case of PLA/PEO blends containing CNC25, both the maximum stress and elongation increase by approximately 28% and 42%, respectively, while the modulus remains constant. This improvement can be attributed to the better dispersion of the filler within the polymer matrix, which enhances the strength of the film without compromising its flexibility. On the other hand, the use of CNC50 results in a 19% loss in strength and a slight 5% reduction in modulus. In this case, further irradiation of the CNC leads to an excessive increase in surface density, which negatively affects the mechanical behavior despite the more homogeneous surface. Criado et al. [25] observed enhanced mechanical performance in gellan gum films when gallic acid was grafted using pre-irradiated CNCs at various concentrations, with the best results at 20 wt%. In contrast, the present study achieved similar mechanical improvements using only 2 wt% of pre-irradiated CNCs, suggesting a more efficient reinforcing effect at substantially lower filler content.
Moreover, when comparing samples with different CNC concentrations, the results indicate that the addition of CNC irradiated at different doses provides lower stiffness and therefore higher elongation at break in both 1:1 and 2:2 ratios. This makes the PLA/PEO/CNC films more processable and flexible.

3.2.4. Water Permeability and Surface Wettability

The influence of unirradiated and irradiated CNCs on the barrier properties of the films was evaluated by measuring water vapor permeability (Figure 12). It can be inferred that the increase in PEO has a negligible effect on water permeability values, as does the presence of pristine CNC, which leads to only a 10% increase in the water barrier. Conversely, the presence of irradiated CNC results in a more significant decrease in water permeability, with reductions of approximately 25% and 29% for PLA/PEO/CNC25 and PLA/PEO/CNC50, respectively. A reduction in water vapor permeability was also observed by Criado et al. [25], although significant improvements were only achieved at a CNC loading of 20 wt%. In contrast, the present study attained a comparable 29% reduction in WVP using just 2 wt% of irradiated CNCs, suggesting that radiation-induced surface modifications effectively enhance barrier properties of the developed PLA-based film even at low filler concentrations.
To evaluate the surface properties of the active films, contact angle measurements were performed using two different liquids (distilled water and diiodomethane). The data presented in Table 5 show that increasing the amount of PEO does not affect the wettability of the samples. On the contrary, the presence of CNC leads to an increase in surface hydrophobicity, which becomes even more pronounced with irradiated CNC, especially in films containing higher amounts of PEO and CNC. The positive effect on the wettability of PLA/PEO-based films with cellulose is mainly due to the presence of low-polarity sulphate groups on the surface that increase the hydrophobicity of the final material [47].
Contact angle measurements performed with diiodomethane (DII) reveal that films with lower PEO content exhibit lower contact angle values, regardless of the presence of CNC. Notably, films containing CNC25 (in both 1:1 and 2:2 ratios) show lower DII contact angle values compared to the corresponding films with and without CNC, indicating improved wettability and enhanced printability. The lower contact angle values confirm that these films offer better ink adhesion, making them more suitable for printing applications.
Moreover, the surface free energy (γs) of the PLA/PEO and PLA/PEO/CNC films was calculated, including its polar (γsp) and dispersive (γsd) components, using the Owens–Wendt method, based on contact angle measurements with water and diiodomethane. The obtained values are reported in Table 5 and indicate that surface energy is significantly influenced by both the irradiation dose of CNCs and the PEO content. For the PLA/1PEO system, the incorporation of CNCs led to slight variations in γs, with a general decrease in the polar component (γsp) as the irradiation dose increased. This trend suggests a reduction in the availability or surface exposure of polar –OH groups, likely due to the formation of compact aggregates or cross-linked domains that shield functional groups from the interface [53].
In the PLA/2PEO series, an initial increase in surface free energy and its components was observed for PLA/2PEO/2CNC and PLA/2PEO/2CNC25, likely due to improved interfacial compatibility and more uniform CNC distribution within the more hydrophilic matrix. However, at the highest irradiation dose (PLA/2PEO/2CNC50), both the dispersive (γsd) and total surface energy (γs) decreased, suggesting a possible loss of homogeneity and increased CNC aggregation.
These results highlight the complex interplay between CNC irradiation dose, PEO content, and the PLA matrix in determining surface morphology and interfacial properties [51,54]. While a higher PEO content initially enhances wettability and surface polarity, this stabilizing effect diminishes at higher irradiation doses due to structural changes in the CNC phase.
While FTIR analysis indicated an increased intensity in the –OH region—suggesting the formation of additional polar groups upon irradiation—the Owens–Wendt analysis revealed a slight decrease in the polar component of the surface energy. This apparent discrepancy can be attributed to the morphological evolution of CNC aggregates under irradiation: although more polar functionalities may be formed, their accessibility at the surface is likely reduced due to increased aggregate compaction or internal localization of these groups within the aggregates.

3.2.5. Color Analysis

Color is an important feature for consumer acceptance of packaging, as it reflects the light within the visible spectrum [35]. Table 6 presents all the color parameters of PLA/PEO and composite films containing unirradiated and irradiated CNCs. An increase in the b* value is observed in all the tested specimens, without significantly affecting the ΔE value of the composite films. In the presence of CNC25, the total color value increases for both 1% and 2% PEO. This change corresponds to an increase in the blue component (b*) and a decrease in the yellow component, resulting in a cooler tone compared to films with non-irradiated CNCs. Conversely, films containing CNC50 show a decrease in total color variation, suggesting that light diffraction is closer to a neutral state. It is important to note that, in all cases, the ΔE value remains within an acceptable range for packaging applications. Color perception studies suggest that a ΔE below 1 is generally imperceptible to the human eye, while a ΔE between 1 and 2 is only noticeable upon close inspection [55]. Values up to 3–4 are still considered acceptable, as they fall within the limits commonly used in the packaging sector [56].

3.3. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity

The films PLA/1PEO/1CNC and PLA/2PEO/2CNC, both in their pristine form and irradiated at different doses (25 and 50 kGy), were tested to evaluate their ability to scavenge ABTS•+ radicals. The results are presented in Figure 13.
It is evident that films containing CNC25 and CNC50 exhibit higher ABTS•+ radical scavenging percentages compared to non-irradiated samples. Interestingly, CNC irradiation proves to be an effective method to enhance the antiradical activity of these PLA-based active films. Specifically, the incorporation of CNC25 into PLA/1PEO/1CNC films results in an approximately 30% increase in scavenging activity, while exposure to 50 kGy leads to a 50% improvement. Figure 13 also highlights the crucial role of the irradiation dose in enhancing the antiradical properties of these materials. The highest ABTS•+ scavenging activity is observed in films containing CNC50. However, at a dose of 25 kGy, the improvement in antioxidant properties appears to be better balanced with the amount of CNC added, particularly in the 1:1 PLA/PEO formulation, ensuring effective radical scavenging activity, while maintaining suitable mechanical and structural properties. Criado et al. [25] reported a 49% enhancement in the antioxidant activity of gellan gum films incorporating 20 wt% CNC-g-GA. In comparison, the present study achieved a similar increase (~50%) using only 1–2 wt% of electron beam-irradiated CNCs, demonstrating a more efficient antioxidant effect at significantly lower filler concentrations in PLA-based film. The improved antioxidant behavior can be attributed to the formation of long-lived radicals and surface carbonyl groups (such as aldehydes) on the CNCs during irradiation. These species contribute to the stabilization of the polymer matrix and enhance its antioxidant activity by scavenging free radicals or interrupting oxidative chain reactions [22,23,25]. The significant reduction in color change observed in the irradiated CNC-based films (Figure 7) further supports this effect, indicating that CNCs help scavenge radicals and stabilize the polymer structure, thereby limiting the formation of chromophoric degradation products typically associated with oxidative processes [57].

4. Conclusions

The aim of this research was to develop an innovative active packaging film by incorporating electron beam (EB)-irradiated cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) into a thermoplastic polylactic acid (PLA) matrix, containing poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), acting as a compatibilizer, as a possible strategy to enhance the degree of CNC dispersion within the polymer.
The dual objectives were to enhance the final properties of the material and introduce new functionalities, such as antioxidant activity.
The study demonstrated the effect of different EB irradiation doses on the physical, chemical, mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of PLA films containing different concentrations of both pristine CNCs and CNCs irradiated at 25 kGy and 50 kGy. Among the investigated formulations, the PLA/1PEO/1CNC film containing CNC25 emerged as the most promising composition.
This film showed improved mechanical properties, improved water barrier properties (consistent with water contact angle measurements); enhanced printability, as confirmed by diiodomethane contact angle measurements; and good color stability. Moreover, the modification of CNCs through EB irradiation led to the formation of new chemical functionalities, such as carboxyl and aldehyde groups, and the generation of free radicals. This effect resulted in a significant increase in antioxidant activity, making these films particularly suitable for active packaging applications. These findings confirm that the use of irradiated CNCs in packaging films represents a promising and effective strategy to improve barrier and mechanical properties, control moisture, enhance printability and consumer appeal, and impart new functionalities. All of these aspects are essential for the development of sustainable and functional packaging materials, and they are potentially usable to extend the shelf life of packaged food.
As a future prospective, it will be necessary to develop effective strategies to preserve and stabilize the antioxidant properties over time. This may involve the chemical stabilization of active compounds, as well as the refinement of processing and storage conditions. Addressing these challenges will be crucial to fully harness the potential of PLA/CNC nanocomposites for high-performance and sustainable applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., X.C., G.G.B. and M.L.; methodology, I.I., F.T., X.C. and E.O.; software, I.I., M.S. and F.T.; validation, I.I., M.S., F.T. and E.O.; formal analysis, I.I. and M.S.; investigation, I.I., X.C., M.S., F.T. and E.O.; resources, G.G.B. and M.L.; data curation, I.I., M.S., F.T. and E.O.; writing—original draft preparation, I.I. and M.S.; writing—review and editing, I.I., M.S., X.C., F.T., E.O., G.G.B. and M.L.; visualization, I.I. and M.S.; supervision, G.G.B., X.C. and M.L.; project administration, G.G.B. and M.L.; funding acquisition, G.G.B. and M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed at the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The research activities were part of CRP F22070 “Enhancing the Beneficial Effects of Radiation Processing in Nanotechnology” (NANORADxPACK Project—from Italy, under contract N.23176); and “Radiation-induced elaboration of nanocomposites in dimensionally controlled structures” (project from France under contract N.23116), supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the ISIS@MACH ITALIA Research Infrastructure, the hub of ISIS Neutron and Muon Source (UK), [MUR official registry U. 0008642.28-05-2020–16 April 2020]. IM@IT is listed in the Italian Ministry of University and Research’s Piano Nazionale delle Infrastrutture di Ricerca (PNIR 2021–2027) “in the broader notion of ISIS”, and ISIS Facility and IM@IT are jointly listed in high priority RI’s (see Table 6 page 30, note 38, PNIR in 2021–2027). The research group of Torrieri (DIA–University of Naples Federico II) is kindly acknowledged for their support in the color analysis of the films.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Barbosa, C.H.; Andrade, M.A.; Vilarinho, F.; Fernando, A.L.; Silva, A.S. Active Edible Packaging. Encyclopedia 2021, 1, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Andrade, M.A.; Barbosa, C.H.; Mariño-Cortegoso, S.; Barbosa-Pereira, L.; Sendón, R.; Buonocore, G.G.; Stanzione, M.; Coelho, A.; Belo Correia, C.; Saraiva, M.; et al. LDPE and PLA Active Food Packaging Incorporated with Lemon by-Products Extract: Preparation, Characterization and Effectiveness to Delay Lipid Oxidation in Almonds and Beef Meat. Foods 2023, 12, 2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Barbosa-Pereira, L.; Aurrekoetxea, G.P.; Angulo, I.; Paseiro-Losada, P.; Cruz, J.M. Development of New Active Packaging Films Coated with Natural Phenolic Compounds to Improve the Oxidative Stability of Beef. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mittendorfer, J.; Bierbaumer, H.P.; Gratzl, F.; Kellauer, E. Decontamination of Food Packaging Using Electron Beam–Status and Prospects. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2002, 63, 833–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hamiruddin, N.A.; Othman, S.A. The Feasibility of Irradiated Bioplastics as Future Packaging Material. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8, 1422–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Y.; Huang, S.; Mishra, A.K.; Wang, X.H. Effects of Input Capacity Constraints on Food Quality and Regulation Mechanism Design for Food Safety Management. Ecol. Model. 2018, 385, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mariño-Cortegoso, S.; Stanzione, M.; Andrade, M.A.; Restuccia, C.; Rodríguez-Bernaldo de Quirós, A.; Buonocore, G.G.; Barbosa, C.H.; Vilarinho, F.; Silva, A.S.; Ramos, F.; et al. Development of Active Films Utilizing Antioxidant Compounds Obtained from Tomato and Lemon By-Products for Use in Food Packaging. Food Control 2022, 140, 109128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haji-Saeid, M.; Sampa, M.H.O.; Chmielewski, A.G. Radiation Treatment for Sterilization of Packaging Materials. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2007, 76, 1535–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. International Atomic Energy Agency. Trends in Radiation Sterilization of Health Care Products; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2008; ISBN 978-92-0-111007-7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferry, M.; Ngono-Ravache, Y.; Aymes-Chodur, C.; Clochard, M.C.; Coqueret, X.; Cortella, L.; Pellizzi, E.; Rouif, S.; Esnouf, S. Ionizing radiation effects in polymers. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering; Hashmi, S., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bryant, R. Irradiation of cables, wires and heat shrinkables. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2020, 174, 108895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ashfaq, A.; Clochard, M.C.; Coqueret, X.; Dispenza, C.; Driscoll, M.; Ulański, P.; Al-Sheikhly, M. Polymerization reactions and modifications of polymers by ionizing radiation. Polymers 2020, 12, 2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Criado, P.; Fraschini, C.; Jamshidian, M.; Salmieri, S.; Safrany, A.; Lacroix, M. Gamma-Irradiation of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs): Investigation of Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties. Cellulose 2017, 24, 2111–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, S.; Shukla, A.; Baul, P.P.; Mitra, A.; Halder, D. Biodegradable Hybrid Nanocomposites of Chitosan/Gelatin and Silver Nanoparticles for Active Food Packaging Applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 16, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, D.; Ou, B.; Prior, R.L. The Chemistry behind Antioxidant Capacity Assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1841–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Khoo, R.Z.; Ismail, H.; Chow, W.S. Thermal and Morphological Properties of Poly (Lactic Acid)/Nanocellulose Nanocomposites. Procedia Chem. 2016, 19, 788–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, M.; Heo, M.H.; Lee, H.; Lee, H.H.; Jeong, H.; Kim, Y.W.; Shin, J. Facile and Eco-Friendly Extraction of Cellulose Nanocrystals: Via Electron Beam Irradiation Followed by High-Pressure Homogenization. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 2596–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Davoudpour, Y.; Islam, M.N.; Mustapha, A.; Sudesh, K.; Dungani, R.; Jawaid, M. Production and Modification of Nanofibrillated Cellulose Using Various Mechanical Processes: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 99, 649–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vilarinho, F.; Stanzione, M.; Buonocore, G.G.; Barbosa-Pereira, L.; Sendón, R.; Vaz, M.F.; Sanches Silva, A. Green Tea Extract and Nanocellulose Embedded into Polylactic Acid Film: Properties and Efficiency on Retarding the Lipid Oxidation of a Model Fatty Food. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 27, 100609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lizundia, E.; Fortunati, E.; Dominici, F.; Vilas, J.L.; León, L.M.; Armentano, I.; Torre, L.; Kenny, J.M. PLLA-Grafted Cellulose Nanocrystals: Role of the CNC Content and Grafting on the PLA Bionanocomposite Film Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 142, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hai, L.V.; Seo, Y.B. Characterization of Cellulose Nanocrystal Obtained from Electron Beam Treated Cellulose Fiber. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2017, 32, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Furtak-Wrona, K.; Kozik-Ostrówka, P.; Jadwiszczak, K.; Maigret, J.E.; Aguié-Béghin, V.; Coqueret, X. Polyurethane acrylate networks including cellulose nanocrystals: A comparison between UV and EB- curing. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 14, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mohamad, S.F.; Aguié-Béghin, V.; Kurek, B.; Coqueret, X. Radiation-induced graft polymerization of N-isopropyl acrylamide onto microcrystalline cellulose: Assessing the efficiency of the peroxidation method. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2022, 194, 110038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gomri, C.; Cretin, M.; Semsarilar, M. Recent progress on chemical modification of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) and its application in nanocomposite films and membranes–A comprehensive review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 294, 119790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Criado, P.; Fraschini, C.; Salmieri, S.; Becher, D.; Safrany, A.; Lacroix, M. Free Radical Grafting of Gallic Acid (GA) on Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) and Evaluation of Antioxidant Reinforced Gellan Gum Films. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2016, 118, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chanda, S.; Bajwa, D.S.; Holt, G.A.; Stark, N.; Bajwa, S.G.; Quadir, M. Silane Compatibilzation to Improve the Dispersion, Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Cellulose Nanocrystals in Poly (Ethylene Oxide). Nanocomposites 2021, 7, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arias, A.; Heuzey, M.C.; Huneault, M.A.; Ausias, G.; Bendahou, A. Enhanced Dispersion of Cellulose Nanocrystals in Melt-Processed Polylactide-Based Nanocomposites. Cellulose 2015, 22, 483–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Segal, L.; Creely, J.J.; Martin, A.E.; Conrad, C.M. An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer. Text. Res. J. 1959, 29, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Coccia, F.; Gryshchuk, L.; Moimare, P.; Bossa, F.D.L.; Santillo, C.; Barak-Kulbak, E.; Verdolotti, L.; Boggioni, L.; Lama, G.C. Chemically Functionalized Cellulose Nanocrystals as Reactive Filler in Bio-Based Polyurethane Foams. Polymers 2021, 13, 2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Łojewski, T.; Miśkowiec, P.; Missori, M.; Lubańska, A.; Proniewicz, L.M.; Łojewska, J. FTIR and UV/Vis as Methods for Evaluation of Oxidative Degradation of Model Paper: DFT Approach for Carbonyl Vibrations. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Łojewski, T.; Zięba, K.; Knapik, A.; Bagniuk, J.; Lubańska, A.; Łojewska, J. Evaluating Paper Degradation Progress. Cross-Linking between Chromatographic, Spectroscopic and Chemical Results. Appl. Phys. A 2010, 100, 809–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zotti, A.; Zuppolini, S.; Tábi, T.; Grasso, M.; Ren, G.; Borriello, A.; Zarrelli, M. Effects of 1D and 2D Nanofillers in Basalt/Poly(Lactic Acid) Composites for Additive Manufacturing. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 153, 364–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. ASTM D882; Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.
  34. Luis Orellana, J.; Wichhart, D.; Kitchens, C.L. Mechanical and Optical Properties of Polylactic Acid Films Containing Surfactant-Modified Cellulose Nanocrystals. J. Nanomater. 2018, 2018, 7124260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Orlo, E.; Russo, C.; Nugnes, R.; Lavorgna, M.; Isidori, M. Natural Methoxyphenol Compounds: Antimicrobial Activity against Foodborne Pathogens and Food Spoilage Bacteria, and Role in Antioxidant Processes. Foods 2021, 10, 1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Orlo, E.; Nerín, C.; Lavorgna, M.; Wrona, M.; Russo, C.; Stanzione, M.; Nugnes, R.; Isidori, M. Antioxidant Activity of Coatings Containing Eugenol for Flexible Aluminium Foils to Preserve Food Shelf-Life. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 39, 101145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wan Ishak, W.H.; Ahmad, I.; Ramli, S.; Mohd Amin, M.C.I. Gamma Irradiation-Assisted Synthesis of Cellulose Nanocrystal-Reinforced Gelatin Hydrogels. Nanomater 2018, 8, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cieśla, K.; Abramowska, A. The Effect of the Addition of Crystalline Nanocellulose (CNC) and Radiation Treatment on the Properties of Edible Films Based on a Cornstarch–Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) System. Coatings 2025, 15, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moon, R.J.; Martini, A.; Nairn, J.; Simonsen, J.; Youngblood, J. Idealized Powder Diffraction Patterns for Cellulose Polymorphs. Cellulose 2011, 18, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, H.J.; Lee, W.J. The Influence of Cellulose Nanocrystal Characteristics on Regenerative Silk Composite Fiber Properties. Materials 2023, 16, 2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhang, R.; Liu, Y. High Energy Oxidation and Organosolv Solubilization for High Yield Isolation of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNC) from Eucalyptus Hardwood. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sabara, Z.; Mutmainnah, A.; Kalsum, U.; Afiah, I.N.; Husna, I.; Saregar, A.; Irzaman; Umam, R. Sugarcane Bagasse as the Source of Nanocrystalline Cellulose for Gelatin-Free Capsule Shell. Int. J. Biomater. 2022, 2022, 9889127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ponomarev, A.V.; Ershov, B.G. Radiation-Induced Formation of Peroxides in Cellulose. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 152, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Al-Assaf, S.; Coqueret, X.; Zaman, H.M.K.; Sen, M.; Ulanski, P. The Radiation Chemistry of Polysaccharides; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2016; ISBN 978–92–0–101516–7. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kubota, H.; Ogiwara, Y. Cellulose peroxides derived from carbonylated cellulose and hydrogen. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1980, 25, 683–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rodrigues, S.C.S.; de Mesquita, F.A.S.; de Carvalho, L.H.; Alves, T.S.; Folkersma, R.; dos R M Araújo, R.S.; Oliveira, A.D.; Barbosa, R. Preparation and Characterization of Polymeric Films Based on PLA, PBAT and Corn Starch and Babassu Mesocarp Starch by Flat Extrusion. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 35305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maréchal, Y.; Chanzy, H. The Hydrogen Bond Network in Iβ Cellulose as Observed by Infrared Spectrometry. J. Mol. Struct. 2000, 523, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hatakeyama, T.; Iijima, M.; Hatakeyama, H. Role of Bound Water on Structural Change of Water Insoluble Polysaccharides. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 53, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Varma, A.J.; Chavan, V.B. Thermal Properties of Oxidized Cellulose. Cellulose 1995, 2, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, J.; Gao, N.; Jiang, L.; Zhong, G.; Deng, C.; Gao, X. The Coupling Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystal and Strong Shear Field Achieved the Strength and Toughness Balance of Polylactide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 207, 927–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Eom, Y.; Choi, B.; Park, S.I. A Study on Mechanical and Thermal Properties of PLA/PEO Blends. J. Polym. Environ. 2019, 27, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arrieta, M.P.; Fortunati, E.; Dominici, F.; Rayón, E.; López, J.; Kenny, J.M. PLA-PHB/Cellulose Based Films: Mechanical, Barrier and Disintegration Properties. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 107, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kovalev, G.V.; Bugaenko, L.T. On the Crosslinking of Cellulose under Exposure to Radiation. Polymers 2003, 37, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, X.; Liu, F.; Jiang, L.; Zhu, J.Y.; Haagenson, D.; Wiesenborn, D.P. Cellulose Nanocrystals vs. Cellulose Nanofibrils: A Comparative Study on Their Microstructures and Effects as Polymer Reinforcing Agents. Polymers 2013, 5, 2999–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ripoll, G.; Panea, B.; Latorre, M.Á. A Machine Learning Approach Investigating Consumers’ Familiarity with and Involvement in the Just Noticeable Color Difference and Cured Color Characterization Scale. Foods 2023, 12, 4426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lee, M.; Rüegg, N.; Yildirim, S. Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Sodium Alginate Films Integrated with Cinnamon Essential Oil and Citric Acid on Sliced Cooked Ham. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2023, 36, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Panchal, P.; Mekonnen, T.H. Tailored Cellulose Nanocrystals as a Functional Ultraviolet Absorbing Nanofiller of Epoxy Polymers. Polymers 2019, 11, 2612–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the preparation process for PLA/PEO/CNC composite films.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the preparation process for PLA/PEO/CNC composite films.
Polymers 17 01939 g001
Figure 2. SEM analysis with magnification 2500X and 20,000X for (b,c) CNC pristine, (e,f) CNC25, and (h,i) CNC50; and size distribution of (a) CNC pristine, (d) CNC25, and (g) CNC50.
Figure 2. SEM analysis with magnification 2500X and 20,000X for (b,c) CNC pristine, (e,f) CNC25, and (h,i) CNC50; and size distribution of (a) CNC pristine, (d) CNC25, and (g) CNC50.
Polymers 17 01939 g002
Figure 3. SEM micrographs recorded at the same magnification for CNC aggregates: (a) pristine CNC, (b) CNC25, and (c) CNC50.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs recorded at the same magnification for CNC aggregates: (a) pristine CNC, (b) CNC25, and (c) CNC50.
Polymers 17 01939 g003
Figure 4. WAXS spectra of pristine CNC (red line) and CNC25 (blue line) and 50 kGy (green line).
Figure 4. WAXS spectra of pristine CNC (red line) and CNC25 (blue line) and 50 kGy (green line).
Polymers 17 01939 g004
Figure 5. (a) Chemical structure of the cellulose repeating unit within the polymer structure. (b) Simplified structure of cellulose microfibrils, showing the presence of amorphous and crystalline zones. Adapted from Sabara et al. [42], licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Figure 5. (a) Chemical structure of the cellulose repeating unit within the polymer structure. (b) Simplified structure of cellulose microfibrils, showing the presence of amorphous and crystalline zones. Adapted from Sabara et al. [42], licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Polymers 17 01939 g005
Figure 6. Sketch representing the main chemical events taking place in irradiated cellulose nanocrystals: radiolytic formation of C-centered long-lived free radicals in the core of nanocrystals (a), with only a few of them undergoing chain scission (a’); radiolytic formation of C-centered free radicals in chains at the surface of nanocrystals with more mobility and in contact with gaseous environment and moisture (b), further converted into peroxyl radicals and then peroxides by reaction with molecular oxygen (c), and finally leading to carbonyl derivatives (d), with some carbonyl derivatives being directly formed by multistep evolution of the initial radical formed on an anhydroglucose unit (e).
Figure 6. Sketch representing the main chemical events taking place in irradiated cellulose nanocrystals: radiolytic formation of C-centered long-lived free radicals in the core of nanocrystals (a), with only a few of them undergoing chain scission (a’); radiolytic formation of C-centered free radicals in chains at the surface of nanocrystals with more mobility and in contact with gaseous environment and moisture (b), further converted into peroxyl radicals and then peroxides by reaction with molecular oxygen (c), and finally leading to carbonyl derivatives (d), with some carbonyl derivatives being directly formed by multistep evolution of the initial radical formed on an anhydroglucose unit (e).
Polymers 17 01939 g006
Figure 7. FTIR (a) of untreated CNC (black line) and CNC25 (red line) and 50 kGy (blue line) and deconvoluted range of C–O–C vibration bands related to data of untreated CNC (b), and CNC25 (c) and CNC50 (d) (1500–1800 cm–1). Within the (ac) deconvoluted range, black dashed lines represent the acquired FTIR signals.
Figure 7. FTIR (a) of untreated CNC (black line) and CNC25 (red line) and 50 kGy (blue line) and deconvoluted range of C–O–C vibration bands related to data of untreated CNC (b), and CNC25 (c) and CNC50 (d) (1500–1800 cm–1). Within the (ac) deconvoluted range, black dashed lines represent the acquired FTIR signals.
Polymers 17 01939 g007
Figure 8. TGA data of CNC (red line), CNC25 (blue line), and CNC50 (green line). The arrow represents the thermal stability trend of unirradiated and irradiated CNCs.
Figure 8. TGA data of CNC (red line), CNC25 (blue line), and CNC50 (green line). The arrow represents the thermal stability trend of unirradiated and irradiated CNCs.
Polymers 17 01939 g008
Figure 9. SEM analysis of pristine (a) PLA/1PEO, (b) PLA/1PEO/1CNC (c) PLA/1PEO/1CNC25, (d) PLA/1PEO/1CNC50, (e) PLA/2PEO, (f) PLA/2PEO/2CNC, (g) PLA/2PEO/2CNC25, and (h) PLA/2PEO/2CNC50.
Figure 9. SEM analysis of pristine (a) PLA/1PEO, (b) PLA/1PEO/1CNC (c) PLA/1PEO/1CNC25, (d) PLA/1PEO/1CNC50, (e) PLA/2PEO, (f) PLA/2PEO/2CNC, (g) PLA/2PEO/2CNC25, and (h) PLA/2PEO/2CNC50.
Polymers 17 01939 g009
Figure 10. TGA data of PLA/PEO (a) and PLA/PEO/CNC composites (b).
Figure 10. TGA data of PLA/PEO (a) and PLA/PEO/CNC composites (b).
Polymers 17 01939 g010
Figure 11. DSC data (second heating cycle) of (a) neat PLA/1PEO and PLA/1PEO/1CNC and (b) neat PLA/2PEO and PLA/2PEO/2CNC films.
Figure 11. DSC data (second heating cycle) of (a) neat PLA/1PEO and PLA/1PEO/1CNC and (b) neat PLA/2PEO and PLA/2PEO/2CNC films.
Polymers 17 01939 g011
Figure 12. Water permeability data of PLA/PEO and of composite films containing pristine and irradiated CNC (blue bars: PLA/1PEO/1CNCs; light blue bars: PLA/2PEO/2CNCs).
Figure 12. Water permeability data of PLA/PEO and of composite films containing pristine and irradiated CNC (blue bars: PLA/1PEO/1CNCs; light blue bars: PLA/2PEO/2CNCs).
Polymers 17 01939 g012
Figure 13. ABTS radical scavenging (%) of unirradiated and irradiated PLA films containing 1% and 2% of both PEO and CNC.
Figure 13. ABTS radical scavenging (%) of unirradiated and irradiated PLA films containing 1% and 2% of both PEO and CNC.
Polymers 17 01939 g013
Table 1. PLA-based film formulations containing PEO, and pristine and irradiated CNC.
Table 1. PLA-based film formulations containing PEO, and pristine and irradiated CNC.
PLA-Based Sample% PEO% CNC% Irradiated CNC
PLA/1PEO1--
PLA/1PEO/1CNC11-
PLA/1PEO/1CNC2511(25 kGy)
PLA/1PEO/1CNC5011(50 kGy)
PLA/2PEO2--
PLA/2PEO/2CNC22-
PLA/2PEO/2CNC2522(25 kGy)
PLA/2PEO/2CNC5022(50 kGy)
Table 2. Assignments of the main IR bands of PLA-based composites.
Table 2. Assignments of the main IR bands of PLA-based composites.
BandsWavenumber (cm−1)
–CH2 antisymmetric and symmetric stretching2997–2945
–C=0 stretching1747
–CH3 antisymmetric and symmetric bending1300–1500
C–O–C stretching of esters1266–1209
C–O–C stretching of PLA1180
C–O stretching1125, 1080, 1040
Amorphous and crystalline phases of PLA868–755
Table 3. Measured parameters from DSC tests (second heating cycle) of neat PLA/PEO and PLA/PEO/CNC films.
Table 3. Measured parameters from DSC tests (second heating cycle) of neat PLA/PEO and PLA/PEO/CNC films.
Tg
(°C)
ΔHc
(J/(g·°C)
Tc Max
(°C)
ΔHm
(J/g)
Tm Max
(°C)
Xc
(%)
PLA6135.3011243.701679.03
PLA/1PEO5754.40101 82.6016630.62
PLA/1PEO/1CNC5729.6010449.9016722.27
PLA/1PEO/1CNC255731.1010451.1016621.94
PLA/1PEO/1CNC505734.4010849.9016717.01
PLA/2PEO5521.4011356.6018338.62
PLA/2PEO/2CNC5618.809756.4016742.11
PLA/2PEO/2CNC255321.009753.8016636.73
PLA/2PEO/2CNC505611.209843.7016636.40
Table 4. Measured parameters from mechanical tensile tests of neat PLA/PEO, and of composite films containing pristine and irradiated CNC.
Table 4. Measured parameters from mechanical tensile tests of neat PLA/PEO, and of composite films containing pristine and irradiated CNC.
Stress at Break
(MPa)
Elongation at Break
(%)
Young Modulus
(MPa)
PLA/1PEO21.6 ± 2.41.0 ± 0.04387.0 ± 430.9
PLA/1PEO/1CNC21.7 ± 1.61.3 ± 0.24994.4 ± 353.2
PLA/1PEO/1CNC2514.7 ± 2.31.3 ± 0.24125.0 ± 279.6
PLA/1PEO/1CNC5025.4 ± 2.52.2 ± 0.53769.6 ± 371.4
PLA/2PEO19.7 ± 2.41.1 ± 0.14700.4 ± 285.4
PLA/2PEO/2CNC17.7 ± 2.21.2 ± 0.14320.9 ± 257.6
PLA/2PEO/2CNC2524.0 ± 1.62.1 ± 0.44385.9 ± 184.9
PLA/2PEO/2CNC5020.0 ± 1.32.0 ± 0.54143.1 ± 260.2
Table 5. Water and diiodomethane contact angle data of PLA/PEO and of composite films containing pristine and irradiated CNC, as well as their surface free energy (γs) and its dispersive (γsd) and polar components (γsp).
Table 5. Water and diiodomethane contact angle data of PLA/PEO and of composite films containing pristine and irradiated CNC, as well as their surface free energy (γs) and its dispersive (γsd) and polar components (γsp).
Water
Contact Angle (°)
Diiodiomethane
Contact Angle (°)
γ s d (mN/m) γ s p (mN/m) γ s
PLA/1PEO87.4 ± 1.756.8 ± 1.730.422.9733.38
PLA/1PEO/1CNC88.8 ± 2.358.2 ± 1.829.612.7132.32
PLA/1PEO/1CNC2591.6 ± 1.352.7 ± 1.632.761.4734.23
PLA/1PEO/1CNC5089.9 ± 2.256.9 ± 1.430.362.2632.62
PLA/2PEO86.9 ± 3.261.6 ± 1.427.653.7431.4
PLA/2PEO/2CNC83.9 ± 1.055.7 ± 2.031.053.9835.03
PLA/2PEO/2CNC2590.9 ± 2.757.4 ± 1.430.072.0532.12
PLA/2PEO/2CNC5094.8 ± 2.861.4 ± 1.427.771.529.27
Table 6. Color analysis of PLA/PEO and of composite films containing pristine and irradiated CNCs.
Table 6. Color analysis of PLA/PEO and of composite films containing pristine and irradiated CNCs.
L*a*b*Total Color (ΔE)
Reference96.30 ± 0.090.50 ± 0.042.90 ± 0.140.00
PLA/1PEO94.70 ± 0.060.50 ± 0.003.20 ± 0.161.63
PLA/1PEO/1CNC95.30 ± 0.060.50 ± 0.062.90 ± 0.451.00
PLA/1PEO/1CNC2594.10 ± 0.160.50 ± 0.064.70 ± 0.262.84
PLA/1PEO/1CNC5094.5 ± 0.230.50 ± 0.063.7 ± 0.231.97
PLA/2PEO95.00 ± 0.150.50 ± 0.003.1 ± 0.061.32
PLA/2PEO/2CNC94.70 ± 0.060.40 ± 0.063.80 ± 0.261.84
PLA/2PEO/2CNC2593.60 ± 0.060.30 ± 0.004.50 ± 0.353.14
PLA/2PEO/2CNC5095.10 ± 0.210.50 ± 0.004.50 ± 0.672.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Improta, I.; Stanzione, M.; Orlo, E.; Tescione, F.; Lavorgna, M.; Coqueret, X.; Buonocore, G.G. Effect of Irradiated Nanocellulose on Enhancing the Functionality of Polylactic Acid-Based Composite Films for Packaging Applications. Polymers 2025, 17, 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141939

AMA Style

Improta I, Stanzione M, Orlo E, Tescione F, Lavorgna M, Coqueret X, Buonocore GG. Effect of Irradiated Nanocellulose on Enhancing the Functionality of Polylactic Acid-Based Composite Films for Packaging Applications. Polymers. 2025; 17(14):1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141939

Chicago/Turabian Style

Improta, Ilaria, Mariamelia Stanzione, Elena Orlo, Fabiana Tescione, Marino Lavorgna, Xavier Coqueret, and Giovanna G. Buonocore. 2025. "Effect of Irradiated Nanocellulose on Enhancing the Functionality of Polylactic Acid-Based Composite Films for Packaging Applications" Polymers 17, no. 14: 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141939

APA Style

Improta, I., Stanzione, M., Orlo, E., Tescione, F., Lavorgna, M., Coqueret, X., & Buonocore, G. G. (2025). Effect of Irradiated Nanocellulose on Enhancing the Functionality of Polylactic Acid-Based Composite Films for Packaging Applications. Polymers, 17(14), 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141939

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop