Next Article in Journal
Self-Supported Biopolymeric Films Based on Onion Bulb (Allium cepa L.): Gamma-Radiation Effects in Sterilizing Doses
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanical and Chemical Resistance of UV Coating Systems Prepared under Industrial Conditions Using LED Radiation
Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical Derivation of the Effect of Bonding Current on the Bonding Interface during Anodic Bonding of PEG-Based Encapsulation Materials and Aluminum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Mineral-Bonded Plywood with Magnesium Oxychloride as a Binder Using the Hot-Pressing Process
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Development of an Electrically Conductive MDF Panel—Evaluation of Carbon Content and Resin Type

Polymers 2023, 15(4), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040912
by Christof Tschannen 1,*, Ali Shalbafan 2 and Heiko Thoemen 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Polymers 2023, 15(4), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040912
Submission received: 17 January 2023 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 11 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wood-Based Composites: Materials, Manufacturing and Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper, highly conductive medium density fibreboard panels (MDF) were fabricated with wood and carbon fibres via two mixing processes (wet and dry), which can be applied in furniture and construction materials. The effect of resin type and carbon fiber content on the mechanical, physical and electrical properties of MDF were studied. The experiment was conducted professionally, and the discussion was adequate. Overall, this paper could be published in Polymers journal after all the comments are well addressed.

1. Section 3.1 of the manuscript elaborates that the CF applied in the experiment consists of a mixture of many different fibers and the conductivity is not known. It is suggested that the authors add this data.

2. It is suggested that the authors elaborate in the manuscript on how the values of solid content were determined for the two mixing processes (wet and dry).

3. The digital photo in Figure 8 does not show the difference between the fracture surfaces of the wet and dry blended samples. It is suggested to add a partial enlargement of the fracture pattern to better visualize the contrast.

4. In the last part of the manuscript, it is suggested that the authors describe how the MDF is connected to the power supply and LEDs?

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, thank you very much for your valuable comments and suggestions. Please find my detailed answers in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,
I found your manuscript as well prepared and of high potential to readers.
A few remarks mentioned below will help to make your manuscript better:
- line 120 - when you mixed the CF and WF in water, what was the fibres-to-water ratio?
- Figure 1 - In my opinion, you should add the additional box (step) for fibers blending with glue (probably between "dried fiber mixture" and "panel pressing process")
- line 153 - what was the maximum unit pressure during pressing the mats to get panels?
- line 260 (and other plots) - I suggest moving the information about the number of samples used to the Methodology part
Best regards!

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, thank you very much for your valuable comments and suggestions. Please find my detailed answers in the attached file. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept in present form

Back to TopTop