Next Article in Journal
PEEK for Oral Applications: Recent Advances in Mechanical and Adhesive Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Stacking Sequence on Mechanical Properties of Basalt/Ramie Biodegradable Hybrid Polymer Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Amino Acids as Bio-Based Curing Agents for Epoxy Resin: Correlation of Network Structure and Mechanical Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Study on EMI Shielding Performance of Carbon Nanomaterials-Embedded CFRP or GFRP Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Structural, Optical Properties and Antibacterial Activity of PEO/CMC Doped TiO2 NPs for Food Packaging Applications

by
Ibrahim A. Alhagri
1,2,*,
Talal F. Qahtan
3,
Mohammed O. Farea
4,
Ahmed N. Al-Hakimi
1,2,
Sadeq M. Al-Hazmy
1,
Saeed El-Sayed Saeed
1 and
Abuzar EAE Albadri
1
1
Department of Chemistry, College of Sciences, Qassim University, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Ibb University, Ibb 70270, Yemen
3
Physics Department, College of Science and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
4
Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Ibb University, Ibb 70270, Yemen
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(2), 384; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020384
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 27 December 2022 / Accepted: 6 January 2023 / Published: 11 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymer-Based Composites)

Abstract

:
In this article, the synthesis, optical, and electrical properties of composites consisting of polyethylene oxide (PEO), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), and titanium dioxide nanoparticles are examined. Flexible nanocomposite samples comprising PEO, CMC, and TiO2 nanoparticles were produced swiftly via using the cast synthesis method. In addition, XRD and FT-IR analysis were performed in order to analyze the structures of the prepared samples. Our results demonstrate the PEO/CMC blend’s effectiveness in interacting with TiO2 nanoparticles. The optical properties of the PEO/CMC and nanocomposite samples, such as the energy band gap, were studied using the UV/Vis optical absorbance. It was found that as TiO2 NP weight fraction increases, the energy gap narrows. Moreover, TiO2 nanoparticles with an average size of 16 nm were formed in spherical and rod shapes, according to a TEM image. The SEM images demonstrate how the distribution of TiO2 NPs increased upon the surfaces of the prepared films. The antibacterial activity in the nanocomposites was shown to be enhanced by the TiO2 NP concentrations. Finally, we proposed that PEO/CMC-0.8 wt. % TiO2 nanocomposites with enhanced optical, electrical, and dielectric properties should be used in electrochemical devices.

1. Introduction

Polymer blending has developed into a significant and convenient method for the purposes of creating novel material with altered physical properties in comparison to pure polymer [1]. In addition to possessing high thermal stability, semicrystalline-linear polyethylene oxide (PEO) is useful for supporting mechanical properties and also possesses a low cost. Therefore, PEO are being considered in respect to using them in antibacterial coatings, as well as in the food packaging industry [2,3]. As an effective coating technique, the PEO polymer has been used to produce antimicrobial coatings on the surfaces of bio-medical devices. Although PEO coating alone can enhance the antimicrobial activity of materials, additions of nanofiller with good antibacterial activity into the PEO matrix can further double the antimicrobial activity [4,5]. Since carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) polymer is amorphous, it facilitates the movement of ions within the blend matrix by increasing the number of amorphous regions. Having said this, to the best of our knowledge, PEO/CMC has only been studied to small degree in the literature [6,7,8]. CMC is one of the more important cellulose derivatives due to the fact that it is an anionic water soluble polymer. Additionally, it provides certain valuable properties, including filming, suspension, emulsification, water maintenance, biodegradability, and nontoxicity. It has different uses—for example in food packaging, bathroom products, and paper manufacturing [9]. Indeed, the unique properties and endless potential of nanoparticles have fascinated those involved in materials science [10]. The large surface area of nanoparticles increases their reactivity [11]. Consequently, nanoparticles formed in an organic polymeric matrix have the potential to create a range of practical devices, such as optoelectronics, memory, solar cells, and energy storage systems [12]. Due to its controlled properties in a variety of applications—including integrated capacitors, intelligent structures, actuators, and acoustic emission sensors—nanoscale polymers containing electroactive ceramics have gained considerable interest [13]. The photocatalytic process uses of TiO2 nanoparticles are an easy and promising method to prevent bacterial infection. In the crystal structure of TiO2, each Ti4+ ion is surrounded by an octahedron of six O2− ions, while each oxygen atom is surrounded by three Ti atoms. TiO2 can also be used as the most photoactive phase and is a widely applicable semiconductor material for the purposes of environmental application. On the other hand, piezoelectric transducers and other uses rely on their ferroelectric properties [14,15]. Many scientists have looked into the effects of TiO2 incorporation in various polymeric matrices [16,17,18]. For example, L.H. Gaabour [16] investigated the impact of adding TiO2 NPs, which were created using the sol-gel method, to a blend of PS and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) polymers with a ratio of 50:50 wt. % by the casting process. He discovered that adding TiO2 to the (PEO)6: NaPO3 matrix at varying ratios improved its structural and electrical properties. Abutalib and Rajeh [18] synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles via the sol-gel method. In addition, the TEM micrograph showed that the size of the TiO2 nanoparticles was visible at the nanoscale. The TiO2 nanoparticles were added to the SA/PANi blend to obtain the nanocomposite samples. They observed that the filled samples showed excellent antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The highest antibacterial activity of the nanocomposite samples were found against S. aureus and E. coli bacteria. Additionally, Jayanthi et al. [19] examined the influence of nanoscale TiO2 on the morphological, electrical, and optical properties of PEO-PVC-LiClO4 electrolytes. We are aware of no prior studies on the creation of the PEO/CMC composite while incorporated with TiO2 NPs. The purpose of this research is to use X-ray diffraction, FT-IR, and UV/Vis. spectroscopy to investigate the effect of TiO2 packing on the structural, optical, and antibacterial activity of the PEO/CMC composite.

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemicals

ACROS Organic in Morris Plains, New Jersey provided the PEO polymer, which has an MW = 35,000 g·mol−1, while BDH Chemical Ltd. provided the CMC, which has an MW = 190,000 g·mol−1 (Poole, UK). The TiO2 was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (Schnelldorf, Germany) and had a purity of 99.997%. During the examination, the chemicals were dissolved in double distilled water (DDW) obtained from the Al-gomhoria company located in Mansoura, Egypt.

2.2. Creation of PEO/CMC-TiO2 Nanocomposite

In double distilled water, CMC and PEO were separately dissolved at the required concentrations. The solution became crystal clear and transparent after four hours. The prepared samples comprised around 30% PEO and 70% CMC. Various weight percentages of the polymer nanocomposites (i.e., 0.0, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, and 0.80 wt. %) were obtained after dispersing TiO2 for five hours in double-distilled water. Subsequently, a homogeneous viscous liquid was produced by combining all the solutions and vigorously agitating them. The prepared solutions were cast into a Petri dish. When the solvent gradually evaporated for two days, polymeric mixtures were modified into nanocomposites. The nanocomposites of PEO/CMC-TiO2 were then peeled from the Petri dish and used for further studies.

2.3. Characterization

A XRD diffraction study of obtained films with varying TiO2 concentrations was performed using DIANO XRD 800 diffractometers with a Ni filter Cu Kα radiation of λ = 1.54 nm. The functional groups in respect of the PEO/CMC-TiO2 nanocomposites were determined using FTIR spectroscopy (Nicolet iS10, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The UV-Vis spectra of polymer nanocomposite films were measured with an RT utilizing a JASCO UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Model V-630, Japan). The size and shape of the gold nanoparticles were investigated using a TEM (JEOL–JEM–1011, Tokyo, Japan). The produced samples’ surfaces were examined using scanning electron microscopy (JEOLJSM –6510 LV, Peabody, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Spectra

Figure 1a displays the XRD spectra for PEO, CMC, and the PEO/CMC composite. The PEO spectrum contains three major sharp peaks at 2θ = 18.85°, 22.82°, and 26.07, thereby demonstrating the semi-crystalline nature of PEO. These three peaks are connected by plane (112), (120), and (121) [PCPDF File. No, 49-2234 and 49-2200] [20]. The amorphous character of CMC is indicated by the presence of a broad peak in its spectral distribution at 2θ = 21.16°. An XRD pattern for the PEO/CMC composite and its nanocomposites containing TiO2 nanoparticles is shown in Figure 1b. The semicrystalline character of the composite can be seen in the XRD spectra, which feature two primary strong peaks at 19.04° and 23.06°, due to the presence of the semicrystalline polymer, PEO. The composite sample’s XRD spectrum has many low-intensity peaks at 2θ = 27.07°, 32.44°, 36.06°, and 39.57°. The two main diffraction peaks of the nanocomposite films show a reduction in intensity and an expansion in width. Furthermore, when filler concentrations increase, the intensity of the peaks at 2θ = 19.04°, 23.06°, and 26.07° increases. The distribution of TiO2 within the PEO/CMC chain becomes random as a result of these observations. Indeed, these are supported by FTIR measurements, which show a strong interaction between TiO2 and PEO/CMC [21]. Due to this interaction, the nanocomposite’s degree of crystallinity falls and its proportion of amorphous regions rises, thereby enhancing the conductivity of the PEO/CMC/TiO2 nanocomposite. The XRD patterns for the nanocomposite films do not show any new peaks. This demonstrates that the TiO2 NPs within the PEO/CMC matrix have completely dissolved.

3.2. FTIR Investigation

It is possible to study intermolecular interactions in self-polymers or between several polymers in a polymeric matrix by using FTIR spectroscopy. The interaction between TiO2 nanoparticles and the PEO/CMC composite was studied using FTIR spectroscopy in this article. Figure 2 displays illustrations of the FTIR analysis of CMC, PEO, and the PEO/CMC blend. Figure 3 displays illustrations of the FT-IR analysis of PEO/CMC, as well as the PEO/CMC filled with 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 wt. % concentrations of TiO2 NPs. The existence of titanium dioxide affects a broadening of the hydroxyl group, thereby stretching the vibration to 3454 cm−1. The peak of the CH2 asymmetric stretching of PEO is detected at 2884 cm−1; further, its broadness is somewhat changed. The stretching vibration of C=O of CMC was thought to be responsible for the peak at 1600 cm−1. After CMC was bended with PEO, there was a decrease in the transmittance of this band (1600 cm−1) as observed in Figure 2. The band at 1475 cm−1 corresponds to the scissoring of CH2 in respect of PEO. The asymmetric bending of CH2 is responsible for a transmittance band for PEO at 1334 cm−1. By increasing filler concentration, the small transmittance band at 1240 cm−1, caused by a symmetric CH2 twisting of PEO, remains unchanged. With increasing filler concentration, the transmittance band at 1090 cm−1 increases substantially, indicating a stretching of the C–O–C group within the PEO chain. There were two main transmittance bands at 958 and 817 cm−1. The CH bending mode and C–C stretching created these peaks; in addition, these bands were typical of PEO polymers. As a result of these findings, PEO, CMC, and the PEO/CMC blend with TiO2 have strong vibrational interactions between their vibrational groups. Table 1 lists the FTIR characterization band assignments for (a) PEO, (b) CMC, and (c) the PEO/CMC blend. When different concentrations of TiO2 NPs are added to the PEO/CMC samples, the interaction between organic and inorganic components affects the vibrational bands of the polymeric chain. The different transmittance values for the CH2, C=O, C–O–C, and OH groups serve as an example of this interaction. The transmittance in the vibrational groups C–O, C=O, and CH2 were dramatically altered, indicating a powerful interaction between the polymer matrix and TiO2 NPs. An X-ray diffractometry (XRD) examination that showed the breakdown of the polymer matrix’s crystal structure confirmed these results. This suggests that the PEO/CMC and TiO2 NP vibrational groups are intricate and interacting.

3.3. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

UV/Vis analysis is the process of determining how much a light beam attenuates after passing through a sample or after reflecting off of a sample surface. Figure 4 shows the ultraviolet and visible absorption spectra for the PEO/CMC blend and PEO/CMC-TiO2 NPs at different concentrations. The shoulder peak in the PEO/CMC spectrum at 196 nm is caused by an n→ π* transition. Another peak, belonging to π → π*, is located at 225 nm [22]. The 225 nm peak’s strength increases and is shifted to longer wavelengths when the concentration of TiO2 increases (redshift). As determined by XRD analysis, the shift of the TiO2 NPs could be due to changes in crystallinity, which suggest complexation/homogeneity, and differences in the energy gaps between polymeric matrices and TiO2 NPs [4,21,23,24]. The last two samples (at 0.4 and 0.8 wt. %) show a new peak at 414 nm, which could be due to titanium nanoparticle surface plasmon resonance (SPR). It appears that the PEO/CMC matrix contains titanium nanoparticles, as evidenced by the presence of an SPR peak. There is an increase in surface plasmon resonance intensity and a shift toward longer wavelengths (redshift from 414 to 444 nm). A combination of PEO/CMC and TiO2 nanoparticles was modified in order to confirm their interaction and complexation. The energy gap is calculated using the following equation (Eg) [15,25]:
( α h v ) = C ( h v E g ) r
where h v denotes the photon energy and C denotes constant. The r value varies depending on whether an electronic transition is indirect or direct. In addition, it has values of 2 and ½ in the k space, respectively. The Beer–Lambert formula can be utilized to determine an absorption coefficient α   [22].
α ( v ) = 2.303 (   A d   )
where A denotes the absorbance and d indicates the thickness of the investigated films. Figure 5 shows the relation between α ( v ) and for the PEO/CMC blend and the PEO/CMC/TiO2 NPs. Table 2 shows the absorption edge values, which have decreased from 2.43 eV to 2.13 eV. The absorption edge values decrease as filler concentration increases, due to the electron hole’s conduction and valence bands changing. Figure 6 and Figure 7 depict the plots of ( α h υ )1/2 and ( α )2 versus ; Table 2 contains a listing of the values that were obtained. As shown in Table 2, the energy gap value, Eg, decreases as filler concentrations rise from 5.46 eV–3.45 eV for direct transition and 4.81 eV–1.99 eV for indirect transition. This decrease may be caused by the coordination or interaction between the TiO2 NPs and PEO/CMC matrix, which may lead to localized states inside the band gap.

3.4. Analysis of HR-TEM Image

The particle size and crystallinity of samples were examined further using HR-TEM images. Figure 8a–c shows an HRTEM image together with the accompanying histograms for the diameter and length distributions of TiO2 nanopowder in the anatase phases. The grain size of the particles, which was less than 20 nm, indicates that they are nanoscale in size. The TiO2 nanopowder in the anatase phase consists of both spherical and rod particles with an average length of 17.5 nm, as revealed in histogram (c). Moreover, it may be deduced that the sample’s particles are nanoscale in size, with grain sizes ranging between 12 and 20 nm.

3.5. FE-SEM Images

The characteristic SEM micrographs of the prepared films that are under investigation, were received at a magnification of 5000 times and are shown in Figure 9. This micrograph represents a blend of PEO and CMC. The surface is smooth and has spherical pores distributed regularly, as seen in Figure 9a. This pore structure is partially filled by TiO2 when it is added to a polymer blend as shown in Figure 9b–e. When compared to the pure samples (PEO/CMC), the pores are smaller for the TiO2 content of 0.8%, and the surface is coarser for the 0.8% film due to the fact that most of the pores have been filled with nanoparticles. As a result, incorporating TiO2 into the PEO/CMC blend has significantly affected surface morphology, which can be described as the physical interaction between metal oxides and organic materials. It is interesting to observe that there was no evidence of phase separation in these micrographs. This gives a clear indication regarding how well the PEO/CMC mixture interacts with TiO2 nanoparticles, demonstrating that their complexation was acceptable.

3.6. Antibacterial Assay

Figure 10 exhibits the in vitro activity index assay of the obtained films versus three types of bacteria: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus as controls. An antibacterial test was recorded after 24 h of incubation under UV irradiation in order to record the inhibition zone diameters. The findings exhibited that as the amount of TiO2 NPs increased, antibacterial activity also steadily increases. In the examination, antimicrobial broad-spectrum actions are clearly discernible. The findings indicated that raising the concentration of TiO2 NPs increased activity against the studied bacterial species, but that Pseudomonas aeruginosa had the greatest impact on the antibacterial assay [23,24]. The species from the samples were found on the agar plates that had been sown with the test organisms. At 37 °C, dishes were incubated. Table 3 lists the inhibition area sizes (mm) for the microorganisms that were noticed after 24 h. These results showed how the pure PEO/CMC blend and its nanocomposites affected the inhibition area and activity index [26]. The diameter of the areas and the activity index are observed to rise in all films when the concentration of TiO2 NPs increases. The findings showed that the S. aureus bacteria had higher diameter zones and activity indices than the E. coli and P. aeruginosa bacteria. The operation of the Ti ions release mechanism—which results in variations in permeability, the creation of reactive oxygen species, metabolic disruption, and finally death as a result of the bacterial cells being destroyed—was what caused the inhibition of the examined region.
The growing of the antibacterial activity of TiO2 nanoparticles was due to their ability to activate free OH radicals and as per the H–O–O radicals by TiO2 nanoparticles. An important contribution to the biocidal process of TiO2 nanoparticles are found in cell membrane interaction due to their nanosize and penetrating ability. This is after which the TiO2 nanoparticles release reactive species through interaction with the inert environment of the cells. The produced radicals caused the destruction of bacterial cells due to their decomposition and complete degradation of microorganisms [27,28,29]. These findings demonstrated that PEO/CMC/TiO2 NPs films could serve as a viable substitute for their synthetic equivalents in the food packaging sector.

4. Conclusions

We swiftly formed flexible nanocomposite samples including TiO2 NPs as a nanofiller, CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose), and PEO (polyethylene oxide) via cast synthesis. In this article, the optical, electric properties, and antibacterial activity of composites made of polyethylene oxide were studied. In addition, the carboxymethyl cellulose was incorporated by the TiO2 nanoparticles. The disorder of the polymer chain was exacerbated after the TiO2 nanoparticles were embedded, according to X-ray diffraction data. The interaction between the bands corresponding to the OH, CH3, and CH2 vibrations modes, as well as to the TiO2 NPs were corroborated by the complexation between the PEO/CMC composite and the TiO2 NPs in the FTIR spectrum. The existence of a surface plasmon resonance peak at 414 nm for the titanium NPs is visible in the UV-visible analysis of PEO/CMC and TiO2 nanoparticles, which is the hallmark of titanium nanoparticles. An increase in TiO2 content results in the band gap decrease and antibacterial activities increase. The study of microstructure was performed in respect to HR-TEM and FE-SEM, in terms of proving the nanosized dimensions of inorganic particles and their homogeneous distribution in the bulk. Obtained materials exhibit synergetic properties in addition to the properties of interacting components. Increased antimicrobial efficacy was observed when the TiO2 NPs concentration was increased. As such, these results can be used in designing new materials for electronic devices.

Author Contributions

I.A.A.: methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing—review and editing. A.N.A.-H.: investigation, writing—review and editing. S.M.A.-H.: methodology, formal analysis, investigation. T.F.Q.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing. M.O.F.: investigation, writing—review and editing. S.E.-S.S.: investigation, writing—review and editing. A.E.A.: investigation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (QU-IF-4-5- 1-30615). The authors also would like to thank Qassim University for their technical support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Morsi, M.; Abdelaziz, M.; Oraby, A.; Mokhles, I. Structural, optical, thermal, and dielectric properties of polyethylene oxide/carboxymethyl cellulose blend filled with barium titanate. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 125, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fattah-alhosseini, A.; Molaei, M.; Attarzadeh, N.; Babaei, K.; Attarzadeh, F. On the enhanced antibacterial activity of plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coatings that incorporate particles: A Review. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 20587–20607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Farea, M.; Abdelghany, A.; Oraby, A. Optical and dielectric characteristics of polyethylene oxide/sodium alginate-modified gold nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 37621–37630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tarabiah, A.E.; Alhadlaq, H.A.; Alaizeri, Z.M.; Ahmed, A.A.; Asnag, G.M.; Ahamed, M. Enhanced structural, optical, electrical properties and antibacterial activity of PEO/CMC doped ZnO nanorods for energy storage and food packaging applications. J. Polym. Res. 2022, 29, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Farea, M.; Abdelghany, A.; Meikhail, M.; Oraby, A. Effect of cesium bromide on the structural, optical, thermal and electrical properties of polyvinyl alcohol and polyethylene oxide. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 1530–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gupta, B.; Agarwal, R.; Alam, M.S. Preparation and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene oxide-carboxymethyl cellulose blend membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 127, 1301–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gupta, B.; Agarwal, R.; Alam, M.S. Antimicrobial and release study of drug loaded PVA/PEO/CMC wound dressings. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2014, 25, 1613–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. El-Naggar, A.A.; Magida, M.; Ibrahim, S. Metal adsorption of gamma-irradiated carboxymethyl cellulose/polyethylene oxide blend films. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 2016, 171, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lopez, C.G.; Rogers, S.E.; Colby, R.H.; Graham, P.; Cabral, J.T. Structure of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose aqueous solutions: A SANS and rheology study. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2015, 53, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Abdelghany, A.; Abdelrazek, E.; Badr, S.; Abdel-Aziz, M.; Morsi, M. Effect of Gamma-irradiation on biosynthesized gold nanoparticles using Chenopodium murale leaf extract. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2017, 21, 528–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morsi, M.; Rajeh, A.; Al-Muntaser, A. Reinforcement of the optical, thermal and electrical properties of PEO based on MWCNTs/Au hybrid fillers: Nanodielectric materials for organoelectronic devices. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 173, 106957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Choudhary, S. Structural, optical, dielectric and electrical properties of (PEO–PVP)–ZnO nanocomposites. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2018, 121, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Srivastava, A.; Jana, K.K.; Maiti, P.; Kumar, D.; Parkash, O. Investigations on structural, mechanical, and dielectric properties of PVDF/ceramic composites. J. Eng. 2015, 2015, 205490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Yadav, H.M.; Kim, J.S.; Pawar, S.H. Developments in photocatalytic antibacterial activity of nano TiO2: A review. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 33, 1989–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abdelghany, A.M.; Farea, M.O.; Oraby, A.H. Structural, optical, and electrical reinforcement of gamma-irradiated PEO/SA/Au NPs nanocomposite. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 6538–6549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gaabour, L. Effect of addition of TiO2 nanoparticles on structural and dielectric properties of polystyrene/polyvinyl chloride polymer blend. AIP Adv. 2021, 11, 105120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Al-Bati, S.; Jumali, M.H.H.; Al-Asbahi, B.A.; Ibtehaj, K.; Yap, C.C.; Qaid, S.M.; Ghaithan, H.M.; Farooq, W. Improving photophysical properties of white emitting ternary conjugated polymer blend thin film via additions of TiO2 nanoparticles. Polymers 2020, 12, 2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abutalib, M.M.; Rajeh, A. Preparation and characterization of polyaniline/sodium alginate-doped TiO2 nanoparticles with promising mechanical and electrical properties and antimicrobial activity for food packaging applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 9430–9442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jayanthi, S.; Kulasekarapandian, K.; Arulsankar, A.; Sankaranarayanan, K.; Sundaresan, B. Influence of nano-sized TiO2 on the structural, electrical, and morphological properties of polymer-blend electrolytes PEO–PVC–LiClO4. J. Compos. Mater. 2015, 49, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Al-Shamari, A.; Abdelghany, A.M.; Alnattar, H.; Oraby, A.H. Structural and optical properties of PEO/CMC polymer blend modified with gold nanoparticles synthesized by laser ablation in water. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 12, 1597–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. El Fewaty, N.H.; El Sayed, A.; Hafez, R. Synthesis, structural and optical properties of tin oxide nanoparticles and its CMC/PEG–PVA nanocomposite films. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2016, 58, 1004–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. El Askary, A.; El-Sharnouby, M.; Awwad, N.S.; Ibrahium, H.A.; El-Morsy, M.; Farea, M.; Menazea, A. Optical, thermal, and electrical conductivity strength of ternary CMC/PVA/Er2O3 NPs nanocomposite fabricated via pulsed laser ablation. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2022, 637, 413910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abdelghany, A.; Abdelrazek, E.; Badr, S.; Morsi, M. Effect of gamma-irradiation on (PEO/PVP)/Au nanocomposite: Materials for electrochemical and optical applications. Mater. Des. 2016, 97, 532–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, K.K.; Ravi, M.; Pavani, Y.; Bhavani, S.; Sharma, A.; Rao, V.N. Investigations on the effect of complexation of NaF salt with polymer blend (PEO/PVP) electrolytes on ionic conductivity and optical energy band gaps. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2011, 406, 1706–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Davis, E.; Mott, N. Conduction in non-crystalline systems V. Conductivity, optical absorption and photoconductivity in amorphous semiconductors. Philos. Mag. 1970, 22, 0903–0922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ismail, K.A.; El Askary, A.; Farea, M.; Awwad, N.S.; Ibrahium, H.A.; Moustapha, M.E.; Menazea, A. Perspectives on composite films of chitosan-based natural products (Ginger, Curcumin, and Cinnamon) as biomaterials for wound dressing. Polym. Test. 2022, 15, 103716. [Google Scholar]
  27. Abutalib, M.; Rajeh, A.J.P.T. Enhanced structural, electrical, mechanical properties and antibacterial activity of Cs/PEO doped mixed nanoparticles (Ag/TiO2) for food packaging applications. Polym. Test. 2021, 93, 107013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sebak, M.A.; Qahtan, T.F.; Asnag, G.M.; Abdallah, E.M. The Role of TiO2 Nanoparticles in the Structural, Thermal and Electrical Properties and Antibacterial Activity of PEO/PVP Blend for Energy Storage and Antimicrobial Application. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2022, 32, 4715–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-hakimi, A.N.; Asnag, G.M.; Alminderej, F.; Alhagri, I.A.; Al-Hazmy, S.M.; Abdallah, E.M. Enhanced structural, optical, electrical properties and antibacterial activity of selenium nanoparticles loaded PVA/CMC blend for electrochemical batteries and food packaging applications. Polym. Test. 2022, 116, 107794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD scans of (a) pure PEO, pure CMC, and PEO/CMC composite. (b) PEO/CMC filled with different amounts of TiO2 NPs.
Figure 1. XRD scans of (a) pure PEO, pure CMC, and PEO/CMC composite. (b) PEO/CMC filled with different amounts of TiO2 NPs.
Polymers 15 00384 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of pure PEO, CMC, and the pure (PEO/CMC) blend.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of pure PEO, CMC, and the pure (PEO/CMC) blend.
Polymers 15 00384 g002
Figure 3. FT-IR transmittance spectra of PEO/CMC/TiO2 NP nanocomposite samples.
Figure 3. FT-IR transmittance spectra of PEO/CMC/TiO2 NP nanocomposite samples.
Polymers 15 00384 g003
Figure 4. UV/vis spectra of PEO/CMC/TiO2 NP nanocomposites.
Figure 4. UV/vis spectra of PEO/CMC/TiO2 NP nanocomposites.
Polymers 15 00384 g004
Figure 5. The relation between α ( v ) and h v for the PEO/CMC blend and PEO/CMC/TiO2 NPs at various concentrations.
Figure 5. The relation between α ( v ) and h v for the PEO/CMC blend and PEO/CMC/TiO2 NPs at various concentrations.
Polymers 15 00384 g005
Figure 6. Plots of (αhυ)1/2 vs. of PEO/CMC and PEO/CMC filled with various amounts of TiO2 NPs.
Figure 6. Plots of (αhυ)1/2 vs. of PEO/CMC and PEO/CMC filled with various amounts of TiO2 NPs.
Polymers 15 00384 g006
Figure 7. Plots of (α)2 vs. of the PEO/CMC blend and the PEO/CMC filled with various amounts of TiO2 NPs.
Figure 7. Plots of (α)2 vs. of the PEO/CMC blend and the PEO/CMC filled with various amounts of TiO2 NPs.
Polymers 15 00384 g007
Figure 8. (a) TEM image of TiO2 NPs (b) the corresponding histograms of diameter TiO2 NPs (c) the corresponding histograms of length distribution of TiO2 NPs.
Figure 8. (a) TEM image of TiO2 NPs (b) the corresponding histograms of diameter TiO2 NPs (c) the corresponding histograms of length distribution of TiO2 NPs.
Polymers 15 00384 g008aPolymers 15 00384 g008b
Figure 9. SEM images of (a) the pure PEO/CMC blend, (b) 0.10, (c) 0.20, (d) 0.40, and (e) 0.80 (wt. %) of TiO2 NPs at mag. of 5000 times.
Figure 9. SEM images of (a) the pure PEO/CMC blend, (b) 0.10, (c) 0.20, (d) 0.40, and (e) 0.80 (wt. %) of TiO2 NPs at mag. of 5000 times.
Polymers 15 00384 g009aPolymers 15 00384 g009b
Figure 10. Antibacterial inhibition zones of the PEO/CMC composite with a differing content of TiO2 NPs: (S1) PEO/CMC, (S2) 0.10, (S3) 0.20, (S4) 0.40, and (S5) 0.80 wt. % TiO2 NPs.
Figure 10. Antibacterial inhibition zones of the PEO/CMC composite with a differing content of TiO2 NPs: (S1) PEO/CMC, (S2) 0.10, (S3) 0.20, (S4) 0.40, and (S5) 0.80 wt. % TiO2 NPs.
Polymers 15 00384 g010
Table 1. The FTIR characterization peaks for PEO, CMC, and the PEO/CMC composite.
Table 1. The FTIR characterization peaks for PEO, CMC, and the PEO/CMC composite.
Wavenumber (cm−1) aVibrational Modes a
2884CH2 asymmetric stretching
1465CH2 scissoring
1348CH2 asymmetric bending
1278CH2 twisting
1236CH2 symmetric twisting
1110COC stretching
956CH bending mode
844CO stretching
Wavenumber (cm−1) bVibrational Modes b
3454OH stretching
2956CH2 asymmetric stretching
1600stretching vibration of C=O
1427bending vibration of C–H
1285stretching vibration of C–N
844C–C stretching
741Out—of—plane rings CH bending
650C—N bending
Wavenumber (cm−1) cVibrational Modes c
3454OH stretching
2884CH2 asymmetric stretching
1600stretching vibration of C=O
1445CH2 scissoring
1334CH2 asymmetric bending
1240stretching vibration of C–N
1090COC stretching
958CH bending mode
817C–C stretching
a: The FTIR characterization peaks for PEO, b: The FTIR characterization peaks for CMC, c: The FTIR characterization peaks for the PEO/CMC composite.
Table 2. Optical energy gaps (Egi and Egd) and the absorption edge values for PEO/CMC/TiO2 NPs samples.
Table 2. Optical energy gaps (Egi and Egd) and the absorption edge values for PEO/CMC/TiO2 NPs samples.
The Concentration of TiO2 NPs (wt. %)Abs. Edge. (eV)Eg (eV)
DirectIndirect
0.002.435.464.81
0.102.325.324.5
0.202.254.613.35
0.402.193.652.48
0.802.133.451.99
Table 3. Antibacterial activity of PEO/CMC filled with different content of TiO2 NPs.
Table 3. Antibacterial activity of PEO/CMC filled with different content of TiO2 NPs.
Content of TiO2 NPsP. aeruginosa
Diameter of Area
(mg/mL)
E. coli Diameter of Area (mg/mL)S. aureus Diameter of Area (mg/mL)
0.00 wt. %-ve-ve-ve
0.10 wt. %236
0.20 wt. %71018
0.40 wt. %111333
0.80 wt. %151843
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alhagri, I.A.; Qahtan, T.F.; Farea, M.O.; Al-Hakimi, A.N.; Al-Hazmy, S.M.; Saeed, S.E.-S.; Albadri, A.E. Enhanced Structural, Optical Properties and Antibacterial Activity of PEO/CMC Doped TiO2 NPs for Food Packaging Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020384

AMA Style

Alhagri IA, Qahtan TF, Farea MO, Al-Hakimi AN, Al-Hazmy SM, Saeed SE-S, Albadri AE. Enhanced Structural, Optical Properties and Antibacterial Activity of PEO/CMC Doped TiO2 NPs for Food Packaging Applications. Polymers. 2023; 15(2):384. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020384

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alhagri, Ibrahim A., Talal F. Qahtan, Mohammed O. Farea, Ahmed N. Al-Hakimi, Sadeq M. Al-Hazmy, Saeed El-Sayed Saeed, and Abuzar EAE Albadri. 2023. "Enhanced Structural, Optical Properties and Antibacterial Activity of PEO/CMC Doped TiO2 NPs for Food Packaging Applications" Polymers 15, no. 2: 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020384

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop