Next Article in Journal
Sodium Alginate/β-Cyclodextrin Reinforced Carbon Nanotubes Hydrogel as Alternative Adsorbent for Nickel(II) Metal Ion Removal
Previous Article in Journal
New Chelate Resins Prepared with Direct Red 23 for Cd2+, Ni2+, Cu2+ and Pb2+ Removal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pineapple Agro-Industrial Biomass to Produce Biomedical Applications in a Circular Economy Context in Costa Rica
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Approach to Charcoal Fine Waste: Sustainable Use as Filling of Polymeric Matrices

by
Fabíola Martins Delatorre
1,
Gabriela Fontes Mayrinck Cupertino
1,*,
Michel Picanço Oliveira
1,
Felipe da Silva Gomes
1,
Luciene Paula Roberto Profeti
1,
Demetrius Profeti
1,
Mário Guimarães Júnior
2,
Márcia Giardinieri de Azevedo
3,
Daniel Saloni
4 and
Ananias Francisco Dias Júnior
1
1
Agricultural Sciences and Engineering Center, Federal University Espírito Santo, Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, Espiríto Santo, Brazil
2
Department of Eletromechanical, Federal Center of Technological Education of Minas Gerais, Araxá 38180-510, Minas Gerais, Brazil
3
Advanced Materials Laboratory, North Fluminense University State Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes 28013-602, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
4
Department of Forest Biomaterials, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(24), 5525; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245525
Submission received: 2 October 2022 / Revised: 29 November 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 16 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Sustainable Polymers from Biomass)

Abstract

:
Most composites produced come from fossil fuel sources. Renewable strategies are needed for the production of composites. Charcoal fines are considered waste and an alternative for the production of biocomposites. The charcoal fines resulting from the pyrolysis of any biomass are an efficient alternative for the production of green composites. Studies to understand how the pyrolysis parameters influence the properties of this material for the production of biocomposites are necessary. Charcoal has a high carbon content and surface area, depending on final production temperatures. This study aims to evaluate charcoal fines as potential reinforcing agents in biocomposites. This study investigated for the first time charcoal fines from three pyrolysis temperatures (400, 600, and 800 °C) to identify the most suitable charcoal for use as a raw material in the production of carbon biocomposites with 30% by weight incorporated into a polyester matrix composite. Apparent density, porosity, morphology, and immediate chemical composition and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of charcoal fines were evaluated. The charcoal fines produced at 800 °C showed interesting potential as polymeric matrix fillers due to their higher porosity (81.08%), fixed carbon content (96.77%), and hydrophobicity. The biocomposites were analyzed for flexural and tensile strength and scanning electron microscopy. The results revealed an improvement in resistance at elevated temperatures, especially at 800 °C, with higher breaking strength (84.11 MPa), modulus of elasticity (4064.70 MPa), and traction (23.53 MPa). Scanning electron microscopy revealed an improvement in morphology, with a decrease in roughness at 800 °C, which caused greater adhesion to the polyester matrix. These results revealed a promising new biocomposite compared to other natural lignocellulosic polymeric composites (NLFs) in engineering applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Studies have sought to develop new materials to meet current technological demands and industrial sectors with low environmental impact. Thus, science has proposed utilizing industrial waste as raw materials for other processes, promoting the use of resources and ensuring sustainability. Charcoal is a highly friable material, produced in copious quantities by the thermochemical conversion of plant biomass, resulting in enormous amounts of fines (>25% of the production) [1]. These residues usually lack adequate disposal, a problem for manufacturers in developing countries such as Brazil, especially for manufacturers. We propose using these residues to create new composite materials, such as reinforcing agents in polymeric, thermoplastic, and/or rigid biocomposites used in various industrial applications. We base this hypothesis on its high carbon constitution, porosity, surface area [2,3], and the fact that we can control the pyrolysis process to obtain these specific properties. We aimed to evaluate the most appropriate parameters to develop new polymeric biocomposites in a matrix with charcoal fines.
Pyrolysis occurs in controlled amounts of oxygen at temperatures above 300 °C, and factors such as permanence in reaction zones, final temperature, pressure, and heating rate influence it [1,4]. Thus, we need to investigate the relevant parameters originating charcoal, especially the absolute temperature, since it affects all crucial characteristics for producing carbon biocomposite [5,6].
Polymer production consists mainly of fossil fuels, severely impacting the environment due to these materials’ chemical, physical, and biological inertia [2]. Research aimed at producing new sustainable materials to circumvent this impact has intensified [7]. However, studies on synthesizing polymeric materials with charcoal fines additives are still emergent. This material is an alternative to polymeric products of purely fossil origin, which could add value to this abundant and renewable biomass.
Researchers proposed the first studies analyzing the potential of charcoal to produce polymeric biocomposites [2,3,8]. They analyzed charcoal-filled composites and their thermal, mechanical, and electrical properties to characterize their composition and behavior. These studies attest to the beneficial effects of adding charcoal to polymeric matrices to reinforce their properties. The abundant production of charcoal as an energy source and other applications may suit its potential use as an additive. Studies are needed to evaluate the use of charcoal fines as additives, as they are residues that need to be reinserted into the production chain to minimize their life cycle and add value to production. Charcoal depends on pyrolysis temperature, which alters its characteristics for use as fillers of polymeric matrices. Managing pyrolysis temperatures in order to use fines in biocomposite production requires an urgent resolution for developing new carbon products.
Charcoal fines resulting from the pyrolysis of any biomass are an efficient alternative for producing sustainable composites since their carbon, porous, and hydrophobic structure allows more significant interaction with polymer matrices [3]. This study evaluates the physical and chemical properties of charcoal fines produced at different pyrolysis temperatures and how these characteristics achieved the mechanical properties of the carbon biocomposites produced.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biomass Characterization and Charcoal Production

Chips from 10-year old Eucalyptus saligna trees were used as raw materials for charcoal fines (Appendix A, Figure A1). Basic density [9], chemical composition of extractives, lignin [10], hemicelluloses [11], ash content [12], and porosity [13] were measured.
Then, the material was pyrolyzed. Wood dried in a 103 ± 2 °C oven was charred in a reactor inside a muffle whose inert atmosphere was obtained by the continuous insertion of nitrogen gas (3 mL·min−1). Chips were pyrolyzed at 400, 600, and 800 °C, at a heating rate of 10 °C·min−1, beginning at 30 °C until they reached their final temperature, in which they remained for 120 min of conditioning. After each process, the charcoal mass was measured, and the pyroligneous liquid obtained by gas condensation was evaluated for its mass and volume. Thus, the gravimetric charcoal, pyroligneous liquid, and noncondensable gas yields were estimated in relation to the initial wood chip mass via Equations (1)–(3).
CY   = ( Cm Dm ) × 100
PLY   = ( PLm Dm ) × 100
NCGY   = 100 ( CY   +   PLY )
where: CY = charcoal yield (%); Cm = charcoal mass (g); Dm = dry wood mass (g); PLY = pyroligneous liquid yield (%); PLm = pyroligneous liquid mass (g); NCGY = noncondensable gas yield (%).

2.1.1. Charcoal Fine Characterization

Apparent density was estimated by dividing the sample mass by its volume (Apd = mass/volume, in g·cm−3), porosity [13] and the determination of immediate chemical analysis (volatile material, ash and fixed carbon) [14].

2.1.2. Visual Analysis of Charcoal Microstructures

This analysis was performed in two steps. The first step involved the aid of the Olympus LEXT Confocal Microscope—3D Measuring L. Microscope 4000 to assess degradation or maintenance of solid charcoal in chips prior to maceration. Images were obtained via an objective 50× magnification lens (0.95 numerical aperture; with a 0.26 mm × 0.26 mm field of view, and about 0.25 μm sampling distance) and an objective 100× magnification lens (0.95 numerical aperture, with a 0.13 mm × 0.13 mm working field of view, and a 0.13 μm sampling distance). 405 nm light beam wavelength. The OLS4000 2.1 software was used to treat the images. Then, charcoal fines were analyzed (250 mesh—0.056 mm). The fixation of the material on a metal support with carbon tape and metallized with gold in the Balzers Union SCD 030 system ensured the accurate scanning of secondary electrons during microscopy using a scanning electron microscope (Jeol, model JSM-IT200, Peabody, MA, USA) operating at 10 kV. SEM images were obtained using the proprietary JEOL software.

2.1.3. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

To characterize the aromatic structures (functional groups and chemical bonds) of charcoal fines, a spectroscopy analysis was performed in the Fourier-transform infrared region (FTIR).

2.1.4. Charcoal Fine X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

An X-ray excited photoelectron (XPS) spectrometer, model K-Alpha, from Thermo Scientific at the National Nanotechnology Laboratory (LNNano) at the National Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM, Brazil) was used for energy analysis of surface of charcoal fines. A monochromatic Al Kα (1486.6 eV) X-ray source of 300 W was used at a 30° take-off angle to the sample surface. Measurements were taken in a 9 × 9 mm2 area under a 5 × 10−10 mbar high vacuum at room temperature. Spectra were obtained in bond energies between 0 and 1150 eV via three scans with 160 eV passing energy and 1 eV resolution.

2.2. Production and Characterization of Biocomposites

The charcoal fines were ground in an MA-500 ball mill for three hours and then homogenized in a 250 mesh sieve (0.056 mm) (Appendix A, Figure A1) according to the conditions proposed in this study, thus simulating the fines obtained in industrial operations. The charcoal fines were dried in an oven with air circulation at 103 ± 2 °C for 24 h. The polymeric matrix used was polyester resin (UC 2120 AC PLUS), with molecular weight Mn = 9 × 103 g·mol−1, as well as the butanox catalyst, supplied by Redelease (São Paulo, Brazil). The biocomposites were developed using polyester resin to verify the feasibility of using charcoal fines as filler in the polymeric matrix. The biocomposites were produced in the proportion of 30% of charcoal fines at different final temperatures of charcoal pyrolysis (400, 600, and 800 °C). Catalyst was added to 2% resin by weight, as suggested by the manufacturer. Subsequently, the mixture of the fines and the polymeric matrix was carried out in a mechanical stirrer for three minutes for better homogenization of the samples. The mixture was poured into the silicone mold and placed in a compressed air reactor from the company MM (Lavras, Brazil). After 24 h of curing under the pressure of 90 bar, complete polymerization occurred.

2.2.1. Mechanical Tests

Mechanical tests were performed to verify the properties of this material. The bending and tensile tests were performed using a universal mechanical testing machine model EMIC, the bending strength (Appendix A, Figure A2a) was defined following the parameters of the ASTM D-7264 standard [15] and the tensile tests (Appendix A, Figure A2b) followed the prescriptions of the ASTM D-3039 standard [16]. Seven samples were tested for each trial to overcome experimental and instrumental errors.

2.2.2. Fractographic Analyses

Then, the charcoal fines were analyzed (250 mesh—0.056 mm). The fixation of the material on a metal support with carbon tape and metallized with gold in the Balzers Union SCD 030 system ensured the accurate scanning of secondary electrons during microscopy using a scanning electron microscope (Jeol, model JSM-IT200, Peabody, MA, USA), equipped with an energy disperser. The images were obtained using the proprietary Jeol software.

2.3. Data Analysis

Data were provided for normality (Shapiro–Wilk) and homoscedasticity (Bartlett) tests. Analysis of variance was performed following a completely randomized design, with three response variables related to the pyrolysis temperature (400, 600 and 800 °C), with seven replications using composites with 30% charcoal fines. After detecting significant differences, the regression model that best predicted the behavior of the data was adjusted. All analyses were performed at 95% probability. Standard error measures were provided to better understand the confidence interval obtained for each variable studied. The R core Team software was used for all statistical analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

E. saligna charcoal fines showed the following average values: basic density = 0.57 g·cm−3; extractives = 5.79%; lignin = 25.8%; ash = 0.15%, and porosity = 68.22%. These properties relate directly to pyrolysis products. Basic density and lignin content are relevant for charcoal production, increasing charcoal volumetric and gravimetric yields and favoring greater biocomposite manufacture [17,18]. Yield also depends on pyrolysis variables, such as reaction atmosphere, heating rate, and, especially, final temperature (Appendix A, Figure A3).
The results show that 400 °C pyrolysis obtained the highest yield, 37.15%, whereas 800 °C, the lowest, 27.42%, results inversely proportional to pyroligneous liquid yield. Figure A3 shows that non-condensable gas yields failed vary significantly vary with increasing temperatures (Appendix A): 25.7, 23.27, and 22.04% in 400, 600 and 800 °C, respectively. To optimize production, greater charcoal yields favor biocomposite filling due to larger volumes of the material of interest. However, its chemical and physical properties will effectively contribute to the synergy of the materials involved in producing carbon biocomposites [19].
A higher final pyrolysis temperature (600 to 800 °C) increased in 7% the apparent density of charcoal (Figure 1A). This behavior is due to intense hydrogen output, an element capable of strong molecular bonds absorbing significant energy in pyrolysis above 500 °C [20]. This relates to the rearrangement of the chemical structure of biomass under heat, producing a graphitic structure that benefits the mechanical resistance of the material [21,22]. By proposing charcoal as a reinforcing agent in polymeric matrices, we expect increased mechanical strength and developed density in the new material. We hope biocomposites filled with high-temperature charcoal will show higher strength, facilitating their use in structural applications.
Porosity is another relevant parameter for producing biocomposites. Charcoal is highly porous (up to 85% of its volume) and its pore sizes range from sub-nanometers to tens of micrometers, depending on raw materials and pyrolysis temperatures [23,24]. Figure 1b shows that higher temperatures result in a more porous charcoal—800 °C pyrolysis favored their formation. Studies state that the progressive removal of volatile materials from charcoal pores, increased connection of existing pores, and condensation of the remaining skeletal structure cause this behavior [23,24,25,26].
Their immediate chemical composition (Figure 2) shows that higher pyrolysis temperatures increase the percentage of fixed carbon and, proportionally, the reduction of volatile materials. Evaluating the immediate chemical composition of charcoal fines as a function of pyrolysis temperature is important for predicting biocomposite performance [27]. Studies discuss that materials with a higher carbon content provide greater mechanical strength, which can positively increase the resistance of the biocomposites produced [28,29]. We observe a decrease in the ash content of charcoal produced at 800 °C, which may enable a greater interaction between polymeric matrices and charcoal fines due to its high fixed carbon and lower ash contents. We expect these characteristics to provide biocomposites with greater interaction and mechanical resistance.
Confocal microscopy images show increased charcoal porosity at higher temperatures (Figure 3). Through the SEM images and the percentage of pores in Figure 1b, there was an increase of 2.37 and 3.58%, generally of a nonpolar nature [28,29] of pores compared to charcoal at 800 °C at temperatures 400 and 600 °C, respectively. These characteristics are relevant for using the material as reinforcing agents in biocomposites since they can promote greater adhesion to polymeric matrices, better wetting, and greater mechanical resistance by high impregnation and better spreadability. The literature indicates that a more porous structure allows polymeric resins to fuse and entangle with charcoal, creating a strong interfacial support between fillings and matrices, resulting in improved properties, especially mechanical resistance [28,30,31]. However, polymer penetration into charcoal pores will depend on the viscosity of the polymer resin and pore size [30].
We highlight that such aspects depend on particle dimensions of charcoal fines used as filler. Figure 4 shows the SEM images of charcoal fines produced at different final temperatures. Charcoal fines have a rough surface, due to pores collapsing and ash filling the porous system. Different temperatures did not produce significant morphological differences, which would require higher heating rates. Despite homogenization, we observe charcoal fines of varied sizes. Pyrolysis conditions influence surface morphology and the physical properties of charcoal fines.
Figure 5 shows the FTIR spectra of charcoal fines produced at three pyrolysis temperatures and changes to their chemical structure. The stretching vibration of the asymmetric OH group—referring to phenol, alcohol, carboxylic acid groups, and water—formed a 3663 cm−1 broad peak. The 1671 and 1728 cm−1 peaks refer to the vibration and elongation of the CO double bond, whereas the 1500 cm−1 peaks, to the vibration in the double bond between aromatic carbons with olefins and aromatic structures. On the other hand, 1180 to 1297 cm−1 peaks relate to elongating vibrations of the C-O connection. Figure 5 shows that higher temperatures affected functional groups, changing charcoal structures. The formation of hydroxyl groups at 800 °C favors the elevated polarity of the material, profoundly influencing charcoal and polymer matrix interaction in composites [32], essential for good mechanical properties [32,33,34]. Moreover, the free hydroxyl groups in charcoal produced at 800 °C allow greater interaction between materials, contributing to the generation of highly compatible composites [2,3].
We performed an XPS analysis to understand how the chemical changes to charcoal can contribute to resin interaction. Figure 6 shows the deconvolution of the XPS spectra of charcoal fine samples. Note the spectral region comprising the binding energies characteristic of C1s in the materials synthesized at 400 (Figure 6a), 600 (Figure 6b), and 800 °C (Figure 6c). Analysis of C1s spectra showed five peaks related to the different carbon species in charcoal fines. The most intense peak (EB = ~284.0 eV) corresponds to functional states of species with C=C or C−sp2 bonds in aromatic/allophatic carbons [34]. Due to the nature of the atoms surrounding these species, the binding energy in this peak may undergo small variations due to changes in pyrolysis temperature, since heating affected the chemical composition of the surface [35].
Higher pyrolysis temperatures changed the structure and chemical nature of charcoal; attested by the increased intensity of peaks of aromatic/allophatic groups in XPS spectra. As expected, heating develops more compact aromatic carbon structures and more intense spectral peaks. On the other hand, higher temperatures decrease the proportion of functional groups formed by carbon atoms and heteroatoms, especially oxygen, in the composition of charcoal fines [36]. Table 1 shows this aspect by comparing the mean relative percentages related to the contribution of each carbon species to the total composition of the material.
Analyzing XPS spectra shows the majority presence of aromatic or aliphatic carbon species, and C−/C−O−C/C−OH groups (ether, phenol, etc.), C−O (ketone), C=O (carbonyl) and O−C=O (carboxylic acid, ester), located at 284.70 eV, 286.15 eV, 287.75 eV, and 288.80 eV binding energies, respectively [35,36]. These functional carbon and oxygen groups comprise a smaller proportion of the composition, tending to decrease as temperatures rose from 400 to 600 °C. However, they remained stable from 600 °C upward since we observed no significant variations in percentage contributions as temperatures neared 800 °C.
Note in the XPS spectra (Figure 6) that the energy of the C−C/C−H group dominates the charcoal composition, intensifying as temperatures increased, whereas oxygen functional groups showed an inversely proportional trend. We can classify the functional groups on the surface of charcoal fines with carbon chains, such as the C−C/C−H group, as hydrophobic; and those containing oxygen, such as C−O/C−O−C/C−OH, C−O, C=O and O−C=O, as hydrophilic [36]. The hydrophobic surface of charcoal fines improved with higher temperatures, attested by the increased contribution of C−C/C−H species dominating the material composition.
Studies point out that greater hydrophobicity ensures greater polymer compatibility [34,37,38]. More hydrophobic materials result in better polymer filling and compatibility, evenly incorporating charcoal particles into polymer matrices and improving the tensile strength and flexion of biocomposites [39]. Thus, charcoal fines could reinforce polymer matrices due to their hydrophobicity, which can provide resistance to biocomposites.

3.1. Insights about the Use Charcoal in Polymerics Biocomposites

The effects of pyrolysis temperature on the properties of flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of biocomposites reinforced with charcoal fines are shown in Figure 7.
According to Figure 7, the pyrolysis temperature variation of the charcoal fines significantly affected the flexural properties and modulus of elasticity of the produced biocomposites. The resistance to reflection and the modulus of elasticity increase with increasing temperature (Figure 7). The flexural strength of the composites with charcoal fines °C was 51.6 MPa, a value lower than 84.1 MPa of the composites with charcoal at 800 °C. A higher flexural strength of a composite depends directly on the dispersion and filtration of the material particles in the resin used [6]. Higher pyrolysis temperatures result in charcoal fines with greater surface area, which favors greater resin fluidity in the charcoal pores, which causes physical/mechanical interlocking [5,6], which justifies the results of this study. Figure 8 illustrates the effect of pyrolysis temperature on the tensile strength of biocomposites produced with charcoal fines at different pyrolysis temperatures.
It can be observed that the tensile strength values of the produced biocomposites increased to the increase in the pyrolysis temperature of the charcoal fines (Figure 8). The tensile strength of the fines produced at 400, 600, and 800 °C was 15.8 MPa, 16 MPa, and 23.5 MPa, respectively. As already reported in this work, the higher the pyrolysis temperature, the greater the hydrophobicity of the charcoal fines. This behavior may favor a better affinity between nonpolar polymer chains and charcoal fines, thus resulting in greater tensile strength [40]. Figure 9 shows the microstructure of the fractured surfaces of the biocomposites produced with charcoal and the composite made only with polyester resin.
Adding charcoal fines favored the formation of a rougher surface (Figure 9a–c) compared to the resin-only composite (Figure 9d). The biocomposites produced with charcoal fines showed reasonably good surface adhesion. There was no significant difference in the microstructure of the biocomposites produced at temperatures of 400 and 800 °C (Figure 9a,c). The polyester resin irregularly enveloped the charcoal fines. Generating a rough appearance on the surface of the biocomposite can be explained by the low interaction between fines and resin [41]. The roughness tends to decrease at a temperature of 800 °C, which may cause more significant interactions between the raw materials (Figure 9c) and consequently more excellent resistance of the biocomposite. These observations corroborate the results obtained in the mechanical tests (Figure 7 and Figure 8).

3.2. Practical and Policy Implications and Future Perspectives

Composites are technologically strategic materials with many applications in biomedicine, engineering, architecture, and dentistry, among others. However, nonbiodegradable petroleum-derived materials comprise several of these biocomponents. Researchers have widely investigated biocomposite development to offer a sustainable appeal to production systems since they are strategic, efficient, economically viable, and environmentally correct products which add value to charcoal residues. Currently, this waste lacks an adequate disposal or use due to its substantial amounts and the absence of government and social awareness. We believe no technical or scientific study have examined the practical potential of charcoal fines as reinforcement in polymeric matrices. Using this residue in polymeric biocomposites can reduce costs, dependence on fossil sources (plastics and other petroleum products) and, consequently, mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.
Our results have practical and political implications, showing the potential benefits of reusing residual charcoal fines to produce biocomposites worldwide. The actions that can be developed based on our proposal favor the so-called industrial symbiosis, where waste from one sector becomes resources for the generation of products from another sector, contributing to resource efficiency and circular economy [42]. It is important to note that we present an innovative approach toward sustainability in this paper by including the concept of industrial symbiosis that is a part of the emerging field of industrial ecology, which demands resolute attention to the flow of materials and energy through local and regional economies. Industrial symbiosis engages traditionally separate industries in a collective approach to competitive advantage involving physical exchange of materials, energy, water, and/or byproducts [43]. The keys to industrial symbiosis are collaboration and the synergistic possibilities offered by geographic proximity. Moreover, industrial symbiosis [44] describes how a network of diverse organizations can foster eco-innovation and long-term culture change, create and share mutually profitable transactions, and improve business and technical processes. Thus, this perfectly complement the technical assessment of the biomass when processed under different conditions with the utilization of waste from one industry to be used by another industry to add value.
Our proposal contemplates two of the Sustainable Development Goals developed with the participation of world leaders and international non-governmental organizations. These are Goal 9, which aims to “Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation”, and Goal 12, which aims to “Ensure sustainable production and consumption patterns”. The Brazilian National Solid Waste Policy (Law 12305/2010) provides for this action, encouraging waste reuse and valorization [45,46]. Brazil still needs to develop sectoral plans to reduce such waste accumulation, but national development planning or regulation still ignore most of these policies and instruments. Moreover, we should mention this study may impact society since biocomposites manufactured with charcoal fine-filling will benefit small and medium producers of this raw material. This study assists public management and companies in planning future goals toward charcoal waste, which will generate and develop new materials for various industrial sectors, such as civil construction, automotive, and biomedical, among others.

4. Conclusions

Charcoal fines at 800 °C show good carbonic, porous, and hydrophobic results, making them a potential material for biocomposite production, which would allow a greater interaction and higher compatibilization with polymer matrices. The composites’ results show that the fines produced at 800 °C had better mechanical resistance. The search for innovations and use of polymeric biocomposites is increasing, and this study shows another possible use for these materials. We suggest future studies seeking optimizing the pyrolysis yields or their speed (flash pyrolysis) in order to obtain charcoal for polymeric matrices.

Author Contributions

F.M.D. and F.d.S.G. conducted the experiments; F.M.D., G.F.M.C. and A.F.D.J.; data analysis and writing of the original draft; A.F.D.J. acquisition of financing; M.P.O., L.P.R.P., D.P., M.G.J., M.G.d.A. and D.S. actively helped from the critical correlated areas of the research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo (FAPES, Edict Universal FAPES 03/2021) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Edict Universal 2021) for promoting research. They also thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for granting scholarships.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Laboratory of Nanotechnology (LNNano) of the National Center of Energy and Materials (CNPEM), the Laboratory of Advanced Materials at the Universidade Estadual Norte Fluminense (UENF) for assisting in material analyses, the Department of Forestry Biomaterials at North Carolina State University (NCSU) for research support, and Illus Scientia for elaborating the figures in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Demonstration of the charcoal fines produced.
Figure A1. Demonstration of the charcoal fines produced.
Polymers 14 05525 g0a1
Figure A2. (a) Flexural strength test (b) and tensile strength test of biocomposites.
Figure A2. (a) Flexural strength test (b) and tensile strength test of biocomposites.
Polymers 14 05525 g0a2
Figure A3. Yield of charcoal fines.
Figure A3. Yield of charcoal fines.
Polymers 14 05525 g0a3

References

  1. Delatorre, F.M.; Cupertino, G.F.M.; Junior, A.J.d.S.; Da Silva, Á.M.; Júnior, A.F.D.; Silveira, M.P.R. Insights Acerca Do Uso de Finos de Carvão Vegetal Para Geração de Bioenergia. Agropec. Cient. Semiárido 2020, 16, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Akaluzia, R.O.; Edoziuno, F.O.; Adediran, A.A.; Odoni, B.U.; Edibo, S.; Olayanju, T.M.A. Evaluation of the Effect of Reinforcement Particle Sizes on the Impact and Hardness Properties of Hardwood Charcoal Particulate-Polyester Resin Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 38, 570–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Polok-Rubiniec, M.; Włodarczyk-Fligier, A. Polypropylene Matrix Composite with Charcoal Filler. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 2020, 2, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dias Júnior, A.F.; Anuto, R.B.; Andrade, C.R.; De Souza, N.D.; Takeshita, S.; Brito, J.O.; Nolasco, A.M. Influence of Eucalyptus Wood Addition to Urban Wood Waste During Combustion. Cerne 2017, 23, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Aktar, S.; Hossain, M.A.; Rathnayake, N.; Patel, S.; Gasco, G.; Mendez, A.; de Figueiredo, C.; Surapaneni, A.; Shah, K.; Paz-Ferreiro, J. Effects of Temperature and Carrier Gas on Physico-Chemical Properties of Biochar Derived from Biosolids. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 164, 105542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Das, O.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Hui, D.; Lau, K.-T. Mechanical and Flammability Characterisations of Biochar/Polypropylene Biocomposites. Compos. B Eng. 2016, 106, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Holmes, M. Biocomposites Take Natural Step Forward. Reinf. Plast. 2019, 63, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kumar, S.; Das, J. Carbon Nanotubes, Nanochains and Quantum Dots Synthesized through the Chemical Treatment of Charcoal Powder. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1227, 129419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. NBR 11941; Brasileira de Normas Técnicas—Madeira: Determinação da Densidade Básica. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas: Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2003; 6p.
  10. TAPPI 222 05-74; Industry Lignin in Wood. Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry: Peachtree Corners, GA, USA, 1974; 12p.
  11. TAPPI T-12 05-75; Industry Preparation of Wood for Chemical Analysis (Including Procedures for Removal of Extractives an Determination of Moisture Content). Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry: Peachtree Corners, GA, USA, 1975; 21p.
  12. ASTM D1102-84; Standad Test Methods for Ash in Wood. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  13. NBR 9165; Carvão Vegetal: Determinação da Densidade Relativa Aparente, Relativa Verdadeira e Porosidade. ABNT NBR: Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1985.
  14. ASTM D1762-84; Standard Test Method for Chemical Analysis of Wood Charcoal. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  15. ASTM D7264M-21; Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  16. ASTM D 3039-17; Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  17. Ge, S.; Zuo, S.; Zhang, M.; Luo, Y.; Yang, R.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Xia, C. Utilization of Decayed Wood for Polyvinyl Chloride/Wood Flour Composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 12, 862–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ren, K.; Xia, Q.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, W.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yu, H. Wood/Polyimide Composite via a Rapid Substitution Compositing Method for Extreme Temperature Conditions. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 207, 108698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ho, M.P.; Lau, K.T.; Wang, H.; Hui, D. Improvement on the Properties of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Using Bamboo Charcoal Particles. Compos. B Eng. 2015, 81, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Somerville, M.; Jahanshahi, S. The Effect of Temperature and Compression during Pyrolysis on the Density of Charcoal Made from Australian Eucalypt Wood. Renew. Energy 2015, 80, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Assis, M.R.; Brancheriau, L.; Napoli, A.; Trugilho, P.F. Factors Affecting the Mechanics of Carbonized Wood: Literature Review. Wood Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 519–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weber, K.; Quicker, P. Properties of Biochar. Fuel 2018, 217, 240–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brewer, C.E.; Chuang, V.J.; Masiello, C.A.; Gonnermann, H.; Gao, X.; Dugan, B.; Driver, L.E.; Panzacchi, P.; Zygourakis, K.; Davies, C.A. New Approaches to Measuring Biochar Density and Porosity. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 66, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, X.; Driver, L.E.; Kasin, I.; Masiello, C.A.; Pyle, L.A.; Dugan, B.; Ohlson, M. Effect of Environmental Exposure on Charcoal Density and Porosity in a Boreal Forest. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 592, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, H.; Chen, X.; Qin, Y.; Wei, J.; Liu, H. Effect of Torrefaction on the Properties of Rice Straw High Temperature Pyrolysis Char: Pore Structure, Aromaticity and Gasification Activity. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 228, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Elyounssi, K.; Blin, J.; Halim, M. High-Yield Charcoal Production by Two-Step Pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2010, 87, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Das, S.C.; Ashek-E-Khoda, S.; Sayeed, M.A.; Suruzzaman; Paul, D.; Dhar, S.A.; Grammatikos, S.A. On the Use of Wood Charcoal Filler to Improve the Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 44, 926–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Das, O.; Sarmah, A.K.; Bhattacharyya, D. Biocomposites from Waste Derived Biochars: Mechanical, Thermal, Chemical, and Morphological Properties. Waste Manag. 2016, 49, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mullani, N.; Ali, I.; Dongale, T.D.; Kim, G.H.; Choi, B.J.; Basit, M.A.; Park, T.J. Improved Resistive Switching Behavior of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube/TiO2 Nanorods Composite Film by Increased Oxygen Vacancy Reservoir. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020, 108, 104907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Batista, E.M.C.C.; Shultz, J.; Matos, T.T.S.; Fornari, M.R.; Ferreira, T.M.; Szpoganicz, B.; de Freitas, R.A.; Mangrich, A.S. Effect of Surface and Porosity of Biochar on Water Holding Capacity Aiming Indirectly at Preservation of the Amazon Biome. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Paul, S.A.; Joseph, K.; Mathew, G.D.G.; Pothen, L.A.; Thomas, S. Influence of Polarity Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of Composites from Polypropylene Fiber and Short Banana Fiber. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 1380–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, J.; Dou, B.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H.; Xu, Y.; Wu, C. Pyrolysis Characteristics and Non-Isothermal Kinetics of Waste Wood Biomass. Energy 2021, 226, 120358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Z.; Qu, J.; Feng, Y.; Feng, W. Assembly of Graphene-Aligned Polymer Composites for Thermal Conductive Applications. Compos. Commun. 2018, 9, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zielke, U.; Hüttinger, K.J.; Hoffman, W.P. Surface-Oxidized Carbon Fibers: I. Surface Structure and Chemistry. Carbon 1996, 34, 983–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Azargohar, R.; Nanda, S.; Kozinski, J.A.; Dalai, A.K.; Sutarto, R. Effects of Temperature on the Physicochemical Characteristics of Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Chars Derived from Canadian Waste Biomass. Fuel 2014, 125, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wen, B.; Xia, W.; Niu, C. Comparison of Pyrolysis and Oxidation Actions on Chemical and Physical Property of Anthracite Coal Surface. Adv. Powder Technol. 2020, 31, 2447–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, Z.; Liu, G. Microencapsulation of Ammonium Polyphosphate with Melamine-Formaldehyde-Tris(2-Hydroxyethyl)Isocyanurate Resin and Its Flame Retardancy in Polypropylene. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 88445–88455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, W.; Lian, J.; Hu, Y. Influence of Ammonium Polyphosphate Microencapsulation on Flame Retardancy, Thermal Degradation and Crystal Structure of Polypropylene Composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 81, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Luo, L.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, M.; Bian, L.; Yuan, B.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, F.; Pan, X. A Novel Biotemplated Synthesis of TiO2/Wood Charcoal Composites for Synergistic Removal of Bisphenol A by Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 262, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, S.; Chen, T.; Xiong, Y.; Dong, Q. Effects of Wet Torrefaction on the Physicochemical Properties and Pyrolysis Product Properties of Rice Husk. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 141, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pappu, A.; Pickering, K.L.; Thakur, V.K. Manufacturing and Characterization of Sustainable Hybrid Composites Using Sisal and Hemp Fibres as Reinforcement of Poly (Lactic Acid) via Injection Moulding. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 137, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Demartini, M.; Tonelli, F.; Govindan, K. An Investigation into Modelling Approaches for Industrial Symbiosis: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Clean. Logist. Supply Chain. 2022, 3, 100020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chertow, M.R. Industrial Symbiosis: Literature and Taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 2000, 25, 313–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Lombardi, D.R.; Laybourn, P. Redefining Industrial Symbiosis. J. Ind. Ecol. 2012, 16, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Casa Civil. LEI N° 12.187, de 29 de Dezembro de 2009; Institui a Política Nacional Sobre Mudança do Clima—PNMC e dá Outras Providências: Brasília, Brazil, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  46. Casa Civil. Lei N° 12.305, de 2 de Agosto de 2009; Institui a Política Nacional Sobre Mudança do Clima—PNMC e dá Outras Providências: Brasília, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Apparent density and (b) porosity of charcoal fines produced at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Figure 1. (a) Apparent density and (b) porosity of charcoal fines produced at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Polymers 14 05525 g001
Figure 2. Immediate chemical composition of charcoal fines. Source: Where: FC = fixed carbon content; VM = volatile material content; AS = ash content.
Figure 2. Immediate chemical composition of charcoal fines. Source: Where: FC = fixed carbon content; VM = volatile material content; AS = ash content.
Polymers 14 05525 g002
Figure 3. Confocal microscopy of the anatomical transverse structure of charcoal produced at 400 °C (a,b), 600 °C (c), and 800 °C (d).
Figure 3. Confocal microscopy of the anatomical transverse structure of charcoal produced at 400 °C (a,b), 600 °C (c), and 800 °C (d).
Polymers 14 05525 g003
Figure 4. Micrographs obtained by scanning electron microscopy of charcoal fine samples synthesized at 400 (a), 600 (b), and 800 °C (c) in ×300 magnification.
Figure 4. Micrographs obtained by scanning electron microscopy of charcoal fine samples synthesized at 400 (a), 600 (b), and 800 °C (c) in ×300 magnification.
Polymers 14 05525 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of charcoal fines produced at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of charcoal fines produced at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Polymers 14 05525 g005
Figure 6. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of charcoals at temperatures of 400 (a), 600 (b), and 800 °C (c).
Figure 6. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of charcoals at temperatures of 400 (a), 600 (b), and 800 °C (c).
Polymers 14 05525 g006
Figure 7. (a) Flexural strength and (b) modulus of elasticity of biocomposite produced with charcoal fines produced at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Figure 7. (a) Flexural strength and (b) modulus of elasticity of biocomposite produced with charcoal fines produced at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Polymers 14 05525 g007
Figure 8. Tensile strength of biocomposites produced from charcoal fines obtained at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Figure 8. Tensile strength of biocomposites produced from charcoal fines obtained at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Polymers 14 05525 g008
Figure 9. Micrographs obtained by scanning electron microscopy of biocomposites produced with charcoal fine samples synthesized at 400 (a), 600 (b), 800 °C (c), and control (d) in ×300 magnification.
Figure 9. Micrographs obtained by scanning electron microscopy of biocomposites produced with charcoal fine samples synthesized at 400 (a), 600 (b), 800 °C (c), and control (d) in ×300 magnification.
Polymers 14 05525 g009
Table 1. Tables should average percentage of functional states in C1s XPS spectra.
Table 1. Tables should average percentage of functional states in C1s XPS spectra.
SampleC=C, C−C, C−H
(Aromatic, Aliphatic Carbon)
C−O, C−O−C, C−OH
(Hydroxyl, Ether, Phenol)
C−O
(Ketone)
C=O
(Carbonyl)
O−C=O
(Carboxylic Acid,
Ester)
CV 40062.1 ± 1.919.3 ± 0.910.8 ± 0.73.9 ± 0.33.95 ± 0.08
CV 60072.1 ± 1.712.7 ± 2.57.5 ± 0.53.4 ± 0.24.3 ± 0.1
CV 80070.4 ± 1.812.5 ± 1.57.7 ± 0.83.8 ± 0.25.7 ± 0.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Delatorre, F.M.; Cupertino, G.F.M.; Oliveira, M.P.; da Silva Gomes, F.; Profeti, L.P.R.; Profeti, D.; Júnior, M.G.; de Azevedo, M.G.; Saloni, D.; Júnior, A.F.D. A Novel Approach to Charcoal Fine Waste: Sustainable Use as Filling of Polymeric Matrices. Polymers 2022, 14, 5525. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245525

AMA Style

Delatorre FM, Cupertino GFM, Oliveira MP, da Silva Gomes F, Profeti LPR, Profeti D, Júnior MG, de Azevedo MG, Saloni D, Júnior AFD. A Novel Approach to Charcoal Fine Waste: Sustainable Use as Filling of Polymeric Matrices. Polymers. 2022; 14(24):5525. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245525

Chicago/Turabian Style

Delatorre, Fabíola Martins, Gabriela Fontes Mayrinck Cupertino, Michel Picanço Oliveira, Felipe da Silva Gomes, Luciene Paula Roberto Profeti, Demetrius Profeti, Mário Guimarães Júnior, Márcia Giardinieri de Azevedo, Daniel Saloni, and Ananias Francisco Dias Júnior. 2022. "A Novel Approach to Charcoal Fine Waste: Sustainable Use as Filling of Polymeric Matrices" Polymers 14, no. 24: 5525. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245525

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop