Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Gas Sensing Properties of PANI/SnO2 Hybrid Material
Next Article in Special Issue
Seismic Protection of RC Buildings by Polymeric Infill Wall-Frame Interface
Previous Article in Journal
Optical Encryption Based on Computer Generated Holograms in Photopolymer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deformable Polyurethane Joints and Fibre Grids for Resilient Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Orthoblock Brick Infills
 
 
Article

Novel Bending Test Method for Polymer Railway Sleeper Materials

1
Centre for Future Materials (CFM), Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
2
School of Engineering, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113, Australia
3
Austrak Pty Ltd., Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Theodoros Rousakis
Polymers 2021, 13(9), 1359; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091359
Received: 13 March 2021 / Revised: 13 April 2021 / Accepted: 14 April 2021 / Published: 21 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Reinforced Polymer Composites)
Alternative sleeper technologies have been developed to address the significant need for the replacement of deteriorating timber railway sleepers. The review of the literature indicates that the railway sleepers might fail while in service, despite passing the evaluation tests of the current composite sleeper standards which indicated that these tests do not represent in situ sleeper on ballast. In this research, a new five-point bending test is developed to evaluate the flexural behaviour of timber replacement sleeper technologies supported by ballast. Due to the simplicity, acceptance level of evaluation accuracy and the lack of in-service behaviour of alternative sleepers, this new testing method is justified with the bending behaviour according to the Beam on Elastic Foundation theory. Three timber replacement sleeper technologies—plastic, synthetic composites and low-profile prestressed concrete sleepers in addition to timber sleepers—were tested under service loading condition to evaluate the suitability of the new test method. To address the differences in the bending of the sleepers due to their different modulus of elasticities, the most appropriate material for the middle support was also determined. Analytical equations of the bending moments with and without middle support settlement were also developed. The results showed that the five-point static bending test could induce the positive and negative bending moments experienced by railway sleepers under a train wheel load. It was also found that with the proposed testing spans, steel-EPDM rubber is the most suitable configuration for low bending modulus sleepers such as plastic, steel-neoprene for medium modulus polymer sleepers and steel-steel for very high modulus sleepers such as concrete. Finally, the proposed bending moment equations can precisely predict the flexural behaviour of alternative sleepers under the five-point bending test. View Full-Text
Keywords: timber replacement sleeper; composite sleeper; five-point bending test; Beam on Elastic Foundation (BOEF); in-track sleeper behaviour timber replacement sleeper; composite sleeper; five-point bending test; Beam on Elastic Foundation (BOEF); in-track sleeper behaviour
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Salih, C.; Manalo, A.; Ferdous, W.; Abousnina, R.; Yu, P.; Heyer, T.; Schubel, P. Novel Bending Test Method for Polymer Railway Sleeper Materials. Polymers 2021, 13, 1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091359

AMA Style

Salih C, Manalo A, Ferdous W, Abousnina R, Yu P, Heyer T, Schubel P. Novel Bending Test Method for Polymer Railway Sleeper Materials. Polymers. 2021; 13(9):1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salih, Choman, Allan Manalo, Wahid Ferdous, Rajab Abousnina, Peng Yu, Tom Heyer, and Peter Schubel. 2021. "Novel Bending Test Method for Polymer Railway Sleeper Materials" Polymers 13, no. 9: 1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091359

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop